Research article

The correlation between severe complications and blood group types in COVID-19 patients; with possible role of T polyagglutination in promoting thrombotic tendencies

  • Received: 03 September 2022 Revised: 21 November 2022 Accepted: 22 December 2022 Published: 16 January 2023
  • Introduction 

    Coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19), caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), is still posing detrimental effects on people. An association between contracting COVID-19 and the ABO blood group type has been determined. However, factors that determine the severity of COVID-19 are not yet fully understood. Thus, the current study aimed to investigate whether the ABO blood group type has a role in the severity of complications due to COVID-19.

    Materials and methods 

    Eighty-Six ICU-admitted COVID-19 patients and 80 matched-healthy controls were recruited in the study from Baish general hospital, Saudi Arabia. ABO blood grouping, complete blood count (CBC), CBC-derived inflammatory markers, coagulation profile, D-Dimer and anti-T antigen were reported.

    Results 

    Our data showed that patients with blood groups O and B are more protective against severe complications from COVID-19, as compared to patients with blood groups A and AB. This could be partially attributed to the presence of anti-T in blood group A individuals, compared to non-blood group A.

    Conclusion 

    The current study reports an association between the ABO blood group and the susceptibility to severe complications from COVID-19, with a possible role of anti-T in driving the mechanism of the thrombotic tendency, as it was also correlated with an elevation in D-dimer levels.

    Citation: Gasim Dobie, Sarah Abutalib, Wafa Sadifi, Mada Jahfali, Bayan Alghamdi, Asmaa Khormi, Taibah Alharbi, Munyah Zaqan, Zahra M Baalous, Abdulrahim R Hakami, Mohammed H Nahari, Abdullah A Mobarki, Muhammad Saboor, Mohammad S Akhter, Abdullah Hamadi, Denise E Jackson, Hassan A Hamali. The correlation between severe complications and blood group types in COVID-19 patients; with possible role of T polyagglutination in promoting thrombotic tendencies[J]. AIMS Medical Science, 2023, 10(1): 1-13. doi: 10.3934/medsci.2023001

    Related Papers:

    [1] Marcus Martin, Reinand Thompson, Nikhil Tirupathi . Does vitamin D level have effect on COVID-19 outcomes?. AIMS Medical Science, 2023, 10(2): 141-150. doi: 10.3934/medsci.2023012
    [2] Annamaria Petrungaro, Eugenia Quartarone, Luciana Rigoli, Paolo Sciarrone . Prothrombotic role of antiphospholipid antibodies in a patient with sickle cell disease. AIMS Medical Science, 2022, 9(3): 362-366. doi: 10.3934/medsci.2022017
    [3] Melissa R. Bowman Foster, Ali Atef Hijazi, Raymond C. Sullivan Jr, Rebecca Opoku . Hydroxyurea and pyridostigmine repurposed for treating Covid-19 multi-systems dysfunctions. AIMS Medical Science, 2023, 10(2): 118-129. doi: 10.3934/medsci.2023010
    [4] Chien Chinh Vien, Tuan Van Le, Van Tuyet Thi Nguyen, Thang Nghia Hoang, Phila Nay . Viral load dynamics of SARS-CoV-2 in the moderately symptomatic COVID-19 patients in Dak Lak, Viet Nam, 2021. AIMS Medical Science, 2025, 12(1): 1-12. doi: 10.3934/medsci.2025001
    [5] Abdulah Saeed, Alhanouf AlQahtani, Abdullah AlShafea, Abdrahman Bin Saeed, Meteb Albraik . The impact of telemedicine on cardiac patient outcomes: A study in Saudi Arabian hospitals. AIMS Medical Science, 2024, 11(4): 439-451. doi: 10.3934/medsci.2024030
    [6] Hossein Sheibani, Elham Azmoodeh, Amirhessam Kheirieh, Khadijeh Aerab Sheibani . COVID-19 and papular manifestations pattern in 3 patients: a retrospective case series. AIMS Medical Science, 2021, 8(1): 36-41. doi: 10.3934/medsci.2021004
    [7] Masoud Nazemiyeh, Mehrzad Hajalilou, Mohsen Rajabnia, Akbar Sharifi, Sabah Hasani . Diagnostic value of Endothelin 1 as a marker for diagnosis of pulmonary parenchyma involvement in patients with systemic sclerosis. AIMS Medical Science, 2020, 7(3): 234-242. doi: 10.3934/medsci.2020014
    [8] Jonathan Kissi, Daniel Kwame Kwansah Quansah, Jonathan Aseye Nutakor, Alex Boadi Dankyi, Yvette Adu-Gyamfi . Telehealth during COVID-19 pandemic era: a systematic review. AIMS Medical Science, 2022, 9(1): 81-97. doi: 10.3934/medsci.2022008
    [9] Ayema Haque, Areeba Minhaj, Areeba Ahmed, Owais Khan, Palvisha Qasim, Hasan Fareed, Fatima Nazir, Ayesha Asghar, Kashif Ali, Sobia Mansoor . A meta-analysis to estimate the incidence of thromboembolism in hospitalized COVID-19 patients. AIMS Medical Science, 2020, 7(4): 301-310. doi: 10.3934/medsci.2020020
    [10] Osmond C. Ekwebelem, Helen Onyeaka, Ismaeel Yunusa, Taghi Miri, Yahwedalu M. Onwuneme, Ayeni T. Eunice, Amara Anyogu, Bright Obi, Ngwogu Ada Carol . Do we trust the government? Attributes of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy and acceptance in Nigeria. AIMS Medical Science, 2022, 9(2): 268-282. doi: 10.3934/medsci.2022010
  • Introduction 

    Coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19), caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), is still posing detrimental effects on people. An association between contracting COVID-19 and the ABO blood group type has been determined. However, factors that determine the severity of COVID-19 are not yet fully understood. Thus, the current study aimed to investigate whether the ABO blood group type has a role in the severity of complications due to COVID-19.

    Materials and methods 

    Eighty-Six ICU-admitted COVID-19 patients and 80 matched-healthy controls were recruited in the study from Baish general hospital, Saudi Arabia. ABO blood grouping, complete blood count (CBC), CBC-derived inflammatory markers, coagulation profile, D-Dimer and anti-T antigen were reported.

    Results 

    Our data showed that patients with blood groups O and B are more protective against severe complications from COVID-19, as compared to patients with blood groups A and AB. This could be partially attributed to the presence of anti-T in blood group A individuals, compared to non-blood group A.

    Conclusion 

    The current study reports an association between the ABO blood group and the susceptibility to severe complications from COVID-19, with a possible role of anti-T in driving the mechanism of the thrombotic tendency, as it was also correlated with an elevation in D-dimer levels.



    The rapid spread of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2), at the end of 2019, still exhibits a huge burden and challenges on healthcare systems and economies including testing resources and patients' management. The novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) might lead to severe acute respiratory syndrome and has shown association with increased morbidity and mortality especially among elderly patients and patients with commodities such as diabetes, hypertension, obesity, and cardiovascular diseases [1][3]. In addition, COVID-19 has several non-respiratory complications such as systematic complications including thrombosis, septic shock, and disseminated intravascular coagulopathy (DIC) [4].

    Studies have suggested that ABO blood group system is not only a potential risk factor for the susceptibility and severity of COVID-19 [5],[6], but also for (i) viral infections such as Hepatitis B virus, Middle Eastern respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS) and severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS) [6],[7] and (ii) other non-viral diseases such as myocardial infarction, cancer, acute renal injury, and venous thromboembolism [7],[8].

    The current study aimed to (i) determine and correlate the ABO blood group type with D-dimer levels among intensive care unit (ICU)-admitted COVID-19 patients, and (ii) correlate the ABO blood group type with the T polyagglutination in Jazan city, Saudi Arabia.

    The current study was a case-control study, which involved a total of 86 ICU-admitted COVID-19 patients (42 males and 44 females) and 92 healthy individuals (47 males and 45 females). The patients and controls were recruited from Baish General Hospital, Jazan region, Saudi Arabia. All COVID-19 patients were confirmed positive for SARS-COV-2 using RT-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). The ICU admission of the patients was based on the Saudi Arabia ICU-admission criteria [9].

    Venous blood samples were collected from patients and control in ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) and sodium citrate anticoagulated tubes. The EDTA tube was used for determining complete blood count (CBC) and ABO blood typing. The sodium citrate tube was used for coagulation profile and D-dimer analysis.

    The CBC was obtained by analyzing the EDTA tube using Sysmex XN–1000 Hematology Analyzer (Kobe, Japan).

    The CBC-derived inflammatory markers, including neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet/lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and platelet/neutrophil ratio (PNR), were calculated as previously described [10],[11].

    Coagulation profile (prothrombin time [PT], activated partial thromboplastin [aPTT]) and D-dimer levels were measured using the Stago compact analyzer (Diagnostica Stago, Asnieres sur Seine, France).

    Red cell suspension prepared from samples collected from COVID-19 patients were reacted with antisera A & B and were observed for agglutination indicating the presence or absence of corresponding antigen. ABO blood group antisera were obtained from Crescent Diagnostics (Jeddah, KSA).

    The anti-T test was performed by mixing one drop of anti-T (Arachis hypogaea lectin) with one drop of 3–5% suspension of the patient's RBCs. After 15 minutes of incubation at room temperature and centrifugation at 1000 rpm for one minute, agglutination was observed macroscopically indicating positive results.

    The study was approved by the Jazan Health Ethics Committee “Jazan IRB”, Ministry of Health (project no. 2053) and carried out according to the Declaration of Helsinki.

    GraphPad Prism version 9 (San Diego, USA) was used for the statistical analysis. A chi-squared test was performed to test non-parametric data, and student's unpaired t-test was applied for group comparison of parametric data. The CBC data were presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD). P-value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

    Eighty-six ICU-admitted COVID-19 patients (42 males and 44 females; patient group) and ninety-two healthy controls (47 males and 45 females; control group) were recruited. The male to female ratio was almost 1:1 in both groups. The demographic data of the patients and control groups are shown in Table 1. There were no significant differences between the two groups in number, gender and age (P > 0.05).

    Table 1.  Complete blood count and CBC-derived inflammatory markers in the study cohort. Data are presented as mean ± SD. Unpaired student t-test was used to assess the significant differences between the patients and control groups.
    Parameters Patients
    Controls
    P value
    Mean ± SD Mean ± SD
    Number (male/female) 86(42/44) 92(47/45) >0.05
    Age (years) 59.6 ± 18.5 55.1 ± 25.3 >0.05
    WBCs (×109/L) 12.8 ± 10.3 6.6 ± 1.8 <0.0001
    Neutrophils (×109/L) 9.9 ± 20.2 2.9 ± 1.3 0.0002
    Lymphocytes (×109/L) 1.6 ± 1.4 2.7 ± 0.8 <0.0001
    Monocytes (×109/L) 0.6 ± 0.9 0.6 ± 0.2 >0.05
    Eosinophils (×109/L) 0.1 ± 0.1 0.3 ± 0.2 <0.0001
    Basophils (×109/L) 0.05 ± 0.07 0.04 ± 0.02 >0.05
    RBCs (×1012/L) 3.9 ± 0.8 5.1 ± 0.5 <0.0001
    Hemoglobin (g/dL) 10.6 ± 2.0 13.7 ± 1.9 <0.0001
    Hematocrit (%) 33.5 ± 6.4 42.1 ± 5.8 <0.0001
    MCV (fL) 84.9 ± 9.0 82.3 ± 6.6 0.0176
    MCH (pg) 26.9 ± 3.3 26.9 ± 2.6 >0.05
    MCHC (g/dL) 31.7 ± 1.8 32.6 ± 0.9 <0.0001
    RDW (%) 15.2 ± 2.9 16.8 ± 1.9 <0.0001
    Platelets (×109/L) 215 ± 115 286 ± 67 <0.0001
    NLR 6.2 ± 5.5 1.1 ± 1.5 <0.0001
    PLR 134 ± 215 104 ± 79 >0.05
    PNR 21.7 ± 19 98 ± 51 >0.05

    Note: WBCs: White blood cells; RBCs: Red blood cells; MCV: Mean cell volume; MCH: Mean cell hemoglobin; MCHC: Mean cell hemoglobin concentration; RDW: Red cell distribution width; NLR: Neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio; PLR: Platelet/lymphocyte ratio; PNR: Platelet/neutrophil ratio.

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    The overall CBC parameters showed an abnormal pattern in the patient group (Table 1). Patients had higher WBC, neutrophils (P < 0.05) and basophils (P > 0.05) counts as compared to the control group. The lymophcytes, eosinophils, (P < 0.05) and monocytes (P > 0.05) were low in patient group as compared to the control group. Furthermore, the RBCs, hemoglobin, hematocrit, red cell distribution width (RDW) and mean cell hemoglobin concentration (MCHC) were significantly low in the patient group as compared to control group (P < 0.0001; Table 1). On the other hand, the mean cell volume (MCV) was significantly high in patients as compared to control (Table 1).

    The inflammatory markers i.e., NLR (P < 0.0001) and PLR (P > 0.05) were high in patients compared to controls (Table 1). PNR values were less in patient group compared to control group (P > 0.05; Table 1).

    The coagulation profile tests (PT and aPTT) were markedly prolonged in the patient group as compared to the control group (P < 0.0001; Table 2). The D-dimer levels were elevated in patients (Table 2).

    Table 2.  Coagulation profile and D-dimer in the study cohort. Data are presented as mean ± SD. Unpaired student t-test was used to assess the significant differences between the patients and control groups.
    Parameters Patients
    Controls
    P value
    Mean ± SD Mean ± SD
    Prothrombin time (seconds) 18.1 ± 7.7 12.5 ± 1.9 <0.0001
    Activated partial thromboplastin time (seconds) 42.6 ± 12.8 31.7 ± 5.2 <0.0001
    D-Dimer (ng/mL) 4.1 ± 6.5 NA

    Note: NA: Not available.

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    The ABO group typing analysis revealed the following sequence A > O > B > AB in the patient group (Table 3). Out of 86 patients, 34 (39.5%) had blood group A, 22 (25.6%) blood group O, 17 (19.8%) blood group AB, and 13 (15.1%) patients had blood group B. On the other hand, in the control group the blood group is in 55 out of 92 representing 59.8%, followed by blood group A (28.3%), blood group B (10.9%) and blood group AB (1.1%).

    Table 3.  Distribution of ABO group systems in the study cohorts.
    Blood group Patients number (%) Controls number (%)
    O 22 (25.6) 55 (59.8)
    A 34 (39.5) 26 (28.3)
    B 13 (15.1) 10 (10.9)
    AB 17 (19.8) 1 (1.1)
    Total number 86 (100) 92 (100)

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    The anti-T analysis was positive in 28 out the 86 patients and negative in 58 patients as well as healthy controls (Table 4).

    Table 4.  Anti-T in the studied population.
    Anti-T Patients (n = 86) Controls
    Positive 28 0
    Negative 58 92

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    Twelve patients out of the 34 with blood group A were anti-T positive, followed by 9 out of 22 patients with blood group O (Figure 1).

    The D-dimer levels were found to be more elevated in patients with blood group A. This elevation was twice the D-dimer levels found in blood O, B, and AB (Figure 1).

    Figure 1.  Distribution of ABO blood types, positive anti T antibodies and D-dimers levels in patients with COVID-19.

    The current study investigated the prevalence of ABO blood group system in ICU-admitted COVID-19 patients and correlated each ABO blood group system with other biochemical parameters including D-dimer, anti-T polyaggulintation.

    The current study reported abnormalities in the CBC parameters, including increased WBC (leukocytosis), which is a feature of COVID-19 infection. These finding are in agreement with previous reports [10][12]. The WBC count have been reported to be high in COVID-19 patients. In addition, several studies also reported high WBC count in severely, ICU, infected COVID-19 patients as compared with mild infected COVID-19 patients [12]. Our data showed high neutrophil count (neutrophilia), low count of lymphocytes, RBC count, and low hemoglobin concentration in the ICU-admitted COVID-19 patients as compared to the matched healthy controls. Indeed, neutrophilia and lymphopenia have been suggested to be associated with severity and mortality in COVID-19 patients [10],[13],[14]. Similarly, the inflammatory markers, NLR and PLR were found to be elevated and lower PNR in the patients cohort, similar to other reported studies [10],[11]. The inflammatory response is a hallmark of COVID-19 infection and have been associated with the cytokine storm [15].

    The current study showed that majority of the patients who were shifted to ICU due to COVID-19 were patients with blood group A (39.5%) followed by O (25.6%) as compared to those with other ABO blood group types (Figure 1). It is worth mentioning that O and A blood group types are most common blood group system among the Saudi population with frequencies of ~59% O and ~29% A in Jazan area respectively [16][18]. The above data are consistent with the previous studies suggesting a link between the susceptibility to SARS-CoV-2 infection and ABO blood group types [19][21]. A recent study by Muñoz-Diaz et al. (2021) reported a strong association between susceptibility to COVID-19 and the ABO blood group types [5]. Individuals with blood group A had higher risk of acquiring COVID-19 while those with blood group O had lower susceptibility [21]. Similarly, SARS has also been found to be more frequent in individuals with blood group A [22].

    Furthermore, it has also been reported that the severity of COVID-19 and mortality risk, as well as the risk of hospitalization, are higher in patients with blood group A as compared to those with non-blood group A [5]. Importantly, ICU admitted patients with blood group O were reported to be less susceptible to severe complications/manifestations of COVID-19, as indicated by current data and others [23]. Similar findings have also been observed among females with COVID-19 [24]. It was suggested that anti-A antibody, found in persons with blood group O or B, appears to antagonize the link between SARS-CoV-1 and the receptor for angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2), which is expressed by the target cells of the host [25]. This could explain the reason behind the correlation between the ABO blood type and COVID-19 severity as shown in the current study.

    It is reasonable to consider and address that ABO blood types may also be possible determinants of susceptibility to SARS-CoV-2 infection and its severity, as the virus, SARS-CoV-2, also binds to ACE2 [26],[27]. Moreover, it has also been found that critically ill COVID-19 patients with blood group type A or AB are linked with an increased risk of requiring mechanical ventilation, continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT), and prolonged stay in ICU, as compared to patients with blood group B or O [28]. However, further studies are required to identify the biological mechanisms underpinning these findings. Kibler et al. (2020) declared that patients with A blood group were especially prone to develop the disease and showed unfavorable outcomes [29]; which is consistent with the findings of our study. Furthermore, Zhao et al. (2020) found that the incidence, severity, and mortality of COVID-19 were more common in non-blood group O, while individuals with blood group O were protected from contracting COVID-19 [19].

    Several studies have been linked between blood group types and susceptibility and severity to bacterial, parasitic and viral infection including severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS-CoV-1) [22],[30],[31]. The susceptibility to SARS-CoV-1 infection (which is up to 70% similar to SARS-CoV-2 [32], has been linked to ABO polymorphism [22]. Other investigators have found the presence of anti-A antibodies could be a protective against SARS-CoV-1 [25],[33]. This is mainly driven by anti-A antibody inhibiting the binding of angiotensin converting enzyme-2 to angiotensin converting enzyme-2—expressing on the cells [22].

    Although, the exact mechanism of the interaction of ABO blood group and SARS-Cov2 is not fully understood and needs to be elucidated, several studies have postulated different mechanism for the influence of ABO blood groups on modulating COVID-19 infection and SARS-CoV-2 binding to the cells [34]. Silva-Filho et al. (2020) have linked the influence of ABO blood group on COVID-19 infection mainly blood group A through the modification of sialic acid containing receptors mainly modulation of the carbohydrate-carbohydrate interactions with host cells allowing potentially more binding of the virus (SARS-CoV-2) with host cell [34].

    Other studies have suggested that receptor binding domain SARS-CoV-2, which is main part responsible for the COVID-19 infection [35] could bind to blood group A [36]. Moreover, a possible mechanism in reducing the susceptibility and severity of COVID-19 infection is attributed to the anti-A and anti-B antibodies in non-blood group A, non-blood group B and non-blood group AB, which can inhibit the interaction between the spike protein of SARD-CoV-2 and the receptor on the target cells [25], or could be due to their ability to opsonize the virus [37]. Furthermore, the levels of anti-A and anti-B play a key role in the COVID-19 infection, as those will high levels of anti-A and anti-B antibodies lower COVID-19 infection [38][40]. COVID-19 infection could be also modulated by the host transmembrane protease serine subtype 2 [41],[42].

    The current study also showed elevated D-dimer levels in COVID-19 patients with prolonged PT and aPTT; consistent with the findings of previous studies [11],[43]. Elevated D-dimer levels have been linked to severity and mortality in COVID-19 patients [44]. As D-dimers are produced through fibrinolysis by degrading the fibrin clots, hence its elevated levels indicates thrombotic tendency in COVID-19 patients [11]. Elevated D-dimer levels are suggested to be associated with disease complications, including COVID-19 severity. Elevated D-dimer levels have been proposed to be a surrogate and reliable prognostic marker of increased mortality among COVID-19 in hospitals and aiding in early intervention regimes among COVID-19 patients [45],[46]. In the current study elevated D-dimer levels were more pronounced in blood group A as compared to non-blood group A.

    The role of coagulation system in thrombotic tendency and manifestations of COVID-19 is not fully understood and needs to be elucidated. Furthermore, hypercoagulability is multifactorial, and RBC hemolysis is a known risk factor. RBC hemolysis contributes to hypercoagulability and the subsequent prothrombotic tendency in COVID-19. Our findings show the presence of anti-T antibody in patients with blood group A. Anti-T is a naturally occurring antibody against T-antigen on the RBC's membrane, renal endothelium and platelets [47]. In normal individuals with a normal physiological mechanism, the T-antigen has hidden receptors (crypt antigens) on the RBC's membrane. In several clinical conditions such as severe infections, malignancies, and due to some idiopathic reasons [19], the T-antigen on the RBC membrane is unmasked and exposed. RBC hemolysis externalizes the inner negatively charged membrane phospholipids to the outer surface, mainly phosphatidylserine (PS) [48]. RBCs with exposed PS have the ability to adhere to endothelial cells [49]. Furthermore, they enhance and support thrombin generation and tissue factor expression in many disorders including beta-thalassemia and sickle cell disease [50],[51]. Thrombin is known to be a key player not only in haemostasis and thrombosis but also in driving inflammation, vascular endothelium regulation, and blood cells activation [52].

    All of these conditions, we hypothesized, set a platform for thrombin to orchestrate fibrin formation. Once fibrin clot formation is initiated, the counterpart mechanism in human body; fibrinolysis, dissociates and breaks down the fibrin clot into fibrin degradation products (FDPs), where the D-dimer is part of these FDPs derived from cross linked fibrin.

    The current study is a preliminary study that investigated the possible role of anti-T in driving the thrombotic tendency in COVID-19 and its link to ABO blood group types. However, similar to other studies, the study has some limitations to it, such as small sample size and lack of details related with co-morbidities.

    Our data suggest that patients with blood group A are more susceptible to serious complications due to COVID-19, whereas patients with blood group O or B are less likely to suffer from severe complications due to COVID-19 as per their admissions in ICU. It is worthwhile to conduct this study on a large number of patients and look at affected markers and possible correlations with the ABO blood group type.


    Acknowledgments



    The authors extend their appreciation to the Deputyship for Research and Innovation, Ministry of Education in Saudi Arabia for funding this research work through the project number ISP22-1.

    Conflict of interest



    All authors have no conflict of interest in this manuscript.

    [1] Garg S, Kim L, Whitaker M, et al. (2020) Hospitalization rates and characteristics of patients hospitalized with laboratory-confirmed Coronavirus Disease 2019—COVID-NET, 14 States, March 1–30, 2020. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 69: 458-464. https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm6915e3
    [2] Nguyen NT, Chinn J, De Ferrante M, et al. (2021) Male gender is a predictor of higher mortality in hospitalized adults with COVID-19. PLoS One 16: e0254066. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0254066
    [3] Jin JM, Bai P, He W, et al. (2020) Gender differences in patients with COVID-19: focus on severity and mortality. Front Public Health 8: 152. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2020.00152
    [4] Wiersinga WJ, Rhodes A, Cheng AC, et al. (2020) Pathophysiology, transmission, diagnosis, and treatment of Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): A review. JAMA 324: 782-793. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2020.12839
    [5] Muñiz-Diaz E, Llopis J, Parra R, et al. (2021) Relationship between the ABO blood group and COVID-19 susceptibility, severity and mortality in two cohorts of patients. Blood Transfus 19: 54-63. https://doi.org/10.2450/2020.0256-20
    [6] Wu BB, Gu DZ, Yu JN, et al. (2020) Association between ABO blood groups and COVID-19 infection, severity and demise: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Infect Genet Evol 84: 104485. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meegid.2020.104485
    [7] Dentali F, Sironi AP, Ageno W, et al. (2012) Non-O blood type is the commonest genetic risk factor for VTE: results from a meta-analysis of the literature. Semin Thromb Hemost 38: 535-548. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0032-1315758
    [8] Sun W, Wen CP, Lin J, et al. (2015) ABO blood types and cancer risk—a cohort study of 339,432 subjects in Taiwan. Cancer Epidemiol 39: 150-156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.canep.2014.12.006
    [9] Weqaya Saudi Center for Disease Prevention and Control, Minsitry of HealthCOVID-19 Cornoavirus disease guidelines (2020). Available from: https://www.moh.gov.sa/Ministry/MediaCenter/Publications/Documents/Coronavirus-Disease-2019-Guidelines-v1.2.pdf
    [10] Mobarki AA, Dobie G, Saboor M, et al. (2021) MPR and NLR as prognostic markers in ICU-admitted patients with COVID-19 in Jazan, Saudi Arabia. Infect Drug Resist 14: 4859-4864. https://doi.org/10.2147/IDR.S342259
    [11] Hamali HA, Saboor M, Dobie G, et al. (2022) Procoagulant microvesicles in COVID-19 patients: possible modulators of inflammation and prothrombotic tendency. Infect Drug Resist 15: 2359-2368. https://doi.org/10.2147/IDR.S355395
    [12] Liu J, Li S, Liu J, et al. (2020) Longitudinal characteristics of lymphocyte responses and cytokine profiles in the peripheral blood of SARS-CoV-2 infected patients. EbioMedicine 55: 102763. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ebiom.2020.102763
    [13] Nurlu N, Ozturk OO, Cat A, et al. (2021) Could some laboratory parameters predict mortality in COVID-19?. Clin Lab 67. https://doi.org/10.7754/Clin.Lab.2021.201231
    [14] Huang G, Kovalic AJ, Graber CJ (2020) Prognostic value of leukocytosis and lymphopenia for Coronavirus disease severity. Emerg Infect Dis 26: 1839-1841. https://doi.org/10.3201/eid2608.201160
    [15] Sinha P, Matthay MA, Calfee CS (2020) Is a “Cytokine Storm” relevant to COVID-19?. JAMA Intern Med 180: 1152-1154. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.3313
    [16] Zaghloul A, Aljoaid AM, Balkhi DS, et al. (2019) Frequency of ABO blood groups in the Makkah city and their association with diseases. IAJPS 6: 551-557. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.2532774
    [17] Alabdulmonem W, Shariq A, Alqossayir F, et al. (2020) Sero-prevalence ABO and Rh blood groups and their associated transfusion-transmissible infections among blood donors in the central region of Saudi Arabia. J Infect Public Health 13: 299-305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiph.2019.12.004
    [18] Saboor M, Zehra A, Hamali HA, et al. (2020) Prevalence of A2 and A2B subgroups and anti-A1 antibody in blood donors in Jazan, Saudi Arabia. Int J Gen Med 13: 787-790. https://doi.org/10.2147/IJGM.S272698
    [19] Zhao J, Yang Y, Huang H, et al. (2021) Relationship between the ABO blood group and the Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) susceptibility. Clin Infect Dis 73: 328-331. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciaa1150
    [20] Zietz M, Zucker J, Tatonetti NP (2020) Associations between blood type and COVID-19 infection, intubation, and death. Nat Commun 11: 5761. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-19623-x
    [21] Li J, Wang X, Chen J, et al. (2020) Association between ABO blood groups and risk of SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia. Br J Haematol 190: 24-27. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjh.16797
    [22] Cheng Y, Cheng G, Chui CH, et al. (2005) ABO blood group and susceptibility to severe acute respiratory syndrome. JAMA 293: 1450-1451. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.293.12.1450-c
    [23] Samra S, Habeb M, Nafae R (2021) ABO groups can play a role in susceptibility and severity of COVID-19. Egypt J Bronchol 15: 9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43168-020-00051-w
    [24] Fan Q, Zhang W, Li B, et al. (2020) Association between ABO blood group system and COVID-19 susceptibility in Wuhan. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 10: 404. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2020.00404
    [25] Guillon P, Clément M, Sébille V, et al. (2008) Inhibition of the interaction between the SARS-CoV spike protein and its cellular receptor by anti-histo-blood group antibodies. Glycobiology 18: 1085-1093. https://doi.org/10.1093/glycob/cwn093
    [26] Lu R, Zhao X, Li J, et al. (2020) Genomic characterisation and epidemiology of 2019 novel coronavirus: implications for virus origins and receptor binding. Lancet 395: 565-574. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30251-8
    [27] Zhou P, Yang XL, Wang XG, et al. (2020) A pneumonia outbreak associated with a new coronavirus of probable bat origin. Nature 579: 270-273. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2012-7
    [28] Hoiland RL, Fergusson NA, Mitra AR, et al. (2020) The association of ABO blood group with indices of disease severity and multiorgan dysfunction in COVID-19. Blood Adv 4: 4981-4989. https://doi.org/10.1182/bloodadvances.2020002623
    [29] Kibler M, Dietrich L, Kanso M, et al. (2020) Risk and severity of COVID-19 and ABO blood group in transcatheter aortic valve patients. J Clin Med 9: 3769. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9113769
    [30] Wang DS, Chen DL, Ren C, et al. (2012) ABO blood group, hepatitis B viral infection and risk of pancreatic cancer. Int J Cancer 131: 461-468. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.26376
    [31] Rowe JA, Handel IG, Thera MA, et al. (2007) Blood group O protects against severe plasmodium falciparum malaria through the mechanism of reduced rosetting. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104: 17471-17476. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0705390104
    [32] Coronaviridae Study Group of the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses.The species severe acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirus: classifying 2019-nCoV and naming it SARS-CoV-2. Nat Microbiol (2020) 5: 536-544. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41564-020-0695-z
    [33] Ritchie G, Harvey DJ, Feldmann F, et al. (2010) Identification of N-linked carbohydrates from severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) spike glycoprotein. Virology 399: 257-269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.virol.2009.12.020
    [34] Silva-Filho JC, de Melo CGF, de Oliveira JL (2020) The influence of ABO blood groups on COVID-19 susceptibility and severity: A molecular hypothesis based on carbohydrate-carbohydrate interactions. Med Hypotheses 144: 110155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mehy.2020.110155
    [35] Law JLM, Logan M, Joyce MA, et al. (2021) SARS-COV-2 recombinant Receptor-Binding-Domain (RBD) induces neutralizing antibodies against variant strains of SARS-CoV-2 and SARS-CoV-1. Vaccine 39: 5769-5779. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.08.081
    [36] Wu SC, Arthur CM, Wang J, et al. (2021) The SARS-CoV-2 receptor-binding domain preferentially recognizes blood group A. Blood Adv 5: 1305-1309. https://doi.org/10.1182/bloodadvances.2020003259
    [37] Boukhari R, Breiman A, Jazat J, et al. (2022) ABO blood group incompatibility protects against SARS-CoV-2 transmission. Front Microbiol 12: 799519. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2021.799519
    [38] Deleers M, Breiman A, Daubie V, et al. (2021) Covid-19 and blood groups: ABO antibody levels may also matter. Int J Infect Dis 104: 242-249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2020.12.025
    [39] Breiman A, Ruvën-Clouet N, Le Pendu J (2020) Harnessing the natural anti-glycan immune response to limit the transmission of enveloped viruses such as SARS-CoV-2. PLoS Pathog 16: e1008556. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1008556
    [40] Matzhold EM, Berghold A, Bemelmans MKB, et al. (2021) Lewis and ABO histo-blood types and the secretor status of patients hospitalized with COVID-19 implicate a role for ABO antibodies in susceptibility to infection with SARS-CoV-2. Transfusion 61: 2736-2745. https://doi.org/10.1111/trf.16567
    [41] Arend P (2021) Why blood group A individuals are at risk whereas blood group O individuals are protected from SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) infection: A hypothesis regarding how the virus invades the human body via ABO(H) blood group-determining carbohydrates. Immunobiology 226: 152027. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.imbio.2020.152027
    [42] Hoffmann M, Kleine-Weber H, Schroeder S, et al. (2020) SARS-CoV-2 cell entry depends on ACE2 and TMPRSS2 and is blocked by a clinically proven protease inhibitor. Cell 181: 271-280.e8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2020.02.052
    [43] Tang N, Li D, Wang X, Sun Z (2020) Abnormal coagulation parameters are associated with poor prognosis in patients with novel coronavirus pneumonia. J Thromb Haemost 18: 844-847. https://doi.org/10.1111/jth.14768
    [44] Araya S, Mamo MA, Tsegay YG, et al. (2021) Blood coagulation parameter abnormalities in hospitalized patients with confirmed COVID-19 in Ethiopia. PLoS One 16: e0252939. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0252939
    [45] Yao Y, Cao J, Wang Q, et al. (2020) D-dimer as a biomarker for disease severity and mortality in COVID-19 patients: A case control study. J Intensive Care 8: 49. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40560-020-00466-z
    [46] Yu HH, Qin C, Chen M, et al. (2020) D-dimer level is associated with the severity of COVID-19. Thromb Res 195: 219-225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.thromres.2020.07.047
    [47] Roseff SD (2017) Cryptantigens: time to uncover the real significance of T-activation. Transfusion 57: 2553-2557. https://doi.org/10.1111/trf.14366
    [48] Boas FE, Forman L, Beutler E (1998) Phosphatidylserine exposure and red cell viability in red cell aging and in hemolytic anemia. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 95: 3077-3081. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.95.6.3077
    [49] Yang Y, Koo S, Lin CS, et al. (2010) Specific binding of red blood cells to endothelial cells is regulated by nonadsorbing macromolecules. J Biol Chem 285: 40489-40495. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M110.116608
    [50] Whelihan MF, Mooberry MJ, Zachary V, et al. (2013) The contribution of red blood cells to thrombin generation in sickle cell disease: meizothrombin generation on sickled red blood cells. J Thromb Haemost 11: 2187-2189. https://doi.org/10.1111/jth.12423
    [51] Mackman N (2018) The red blood cell death receptor and thrombosis. J Clin Invest 128: 3747-3749. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI122881
    [52] Danckwardt S, Hentze MW, Kulozik AE (2013) Pathologies at the nexus of blood coagulation and inflammation: thrombin in hemostasis, cancer, and beyond. J Mol Med 91: 1257-1271. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00109-013-1074-5
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2023 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(2673) PDF downloads(341) Cited by(0)

Figures and Tables

Figures(1)  /  Tables(4)

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog