The main goal of this paper is to define the concept of metallic deformation through a relation between the metallic structure and paracontact structure on an almost paracontact para-Norden manifold. A Riemannian connection is obtained on a metallically deformed para-Sasaki-like para-Norden manifold. A φ-connection is obtained via the Riemannian connection on a metallically deformed para-Sasaki-like para-Norden manifold. The curvature tensors, Ricci tensors, scalar curvatures, and ∗-scalar curvatures are investigated with respect to the Riemannian connection and the φ-connection. Finally, an example is given of a metallically deformed 3-dimensional para-Sasaki-like para-Norden manifold.
Citation: Rabia Cakan Akpınar, Esen Kemer Kansu. Metallic deformation on para-Sasaki-like para-Norden manifold[J]. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(7): 19125-19136. doi: 10.3934/math.2024932
[1] | Rabia Cakan Akpınar, Esen Kemer Kansu . Correction: Metallic deformation on para-Sasaki-like para-Norden manifold. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(10): 26825-26825. doi: 10.3934/math.20241304 |
[2] | Fatemah Mofarreh, S. K. Srivastava, Anuj Kumar, Akram Ali . Geometric inequalities of PR-warped product submanifold in para-Kenmotsu manifold. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(10): 19481-19509. doi: 10.3934/math.20221069 |
[3] | Mohammad Nazrul Islam Khan, Uday Chand De . Liftings of metallic structures to tangent bundles of order r. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(5): 7888-7897. doi: 10.3934/math.2022441 |
[4] | Mehmet Solgun . On constructing almost complex Norden metric structures. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(10): 17942-17953. doi: 10.3934/math.2022988 |
[5] | Mehmet Atçeken, Tuğba Mert . Characterizations for totally geodesic submanifolds of a K-paracontact manifold. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(7): 7320-7332. doi: 10.3934/math.2021430 |
[6] | Yan Wang, Xintian Dong, Fanghui Liao . Weak Hardy spaces associated with para-accretive functions and their applications. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(11): 30572-30596. doi: 10.3934/math.20241476 |
[7] | Rajab Ali Borzooei, Hee Sik Kim, Young Bae Jun, Sun Shin Ahn . MBJ-neutrosophic subalgebras and filters in BE-algebras. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(4): 6016-6033. doi: 10.3934/math.2022335 |
[8] | Yaning Wang, Hui Wu . Invariant vector fields on contact metric manifolds under D-homothetic deformation. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(6): 7711-7718. doi: 10.3934/math.2020493 |
[9] | Sudhakar Kumar Chaubey, Meraj Ali Khan, Amna Salim Rashid Al Kaabi . N(κ)-paracontact metric manifolds admitting the Fischer-Marsden conjecture. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(1): 2232-2243. doi: 10.3934/math.2024111 |
[10] | Biswabismita Bag, Meraj Ali Khan, Tanumoy Pal, Shyamal Kumar Hui . Geometric analysis on warped product semi-slant submanifolds of a locally metallic Riemannian space form. AIMS Mathematics, 2025, 10(4): 8131-8143. doi: 10.3934/math.2025373 |
The main goal of this paper is to define the concept of metallic deformation through a relation between the metallic structure and paracontact structure on an almost paracontact para-Norden manifold. A Riemannian connection is obtained on a metallically deformed para-Sasaki-like para-Norden manifold. A φ-connection is obtained via the Riemannian connection on a metallically deformed para-Sasaki-like para-Norden manifold. The curvature tensors, Ricci tensors, scalar curvatures, and ∗-scalar curvatures are investigated with respect to the Riemannian connection and the φ-connection. Finally, an example is given of a metallically deformed 3-dimensional para-Sasaki-like para-Norden manifold.
The notion of almost paracontact paracomplex Riemannian manifold was introduced in the studies by Manev and collaborators, specifically in [1,2]. Various topics have been addressed on almost paracontact paracomplex Riemannian manifolds, commonly abbreviated as apcpcR manifolds [3,4,5,6].
Spinadel pioneered the notion of the metallic means family [7,8]. The quadratic equation x2−px−q=0 has two eigenvalues σp,q and σ∗p,q. Within this family, all members are characterized by positive quadratic irrational numbers σp,q. Building upon the inspiration drawn from the metallic means family, Crasmareanu and Hretcanu introduced a metallic structure on the manifold M [9]. This structure is defined by a (1,1)-tensor field Ψ on manifold M, with the crucial property that Ψ2=pΨ+qI, where p and q belong to the set of positive integers. In accordance with certain values taken by p and q, special cases of metallic structures emerge. These special cases of metallic structures are golden structure, silver structure, bronze structure, copper structure, nickel structure. Investigating metallic structures and their special cases on Riemannian manifolds is one of the current topics in differential geometry. Gezer and Karaman [10] studied an integrability condition and curvature properties for metallic Riemannian structures. Turanli et al. [11] constructed metallic Kähler and nearly metallic Kähler structures on Riemannian manifolds. Cayir [12] applied the Tachibana and Vishnevskii operators to vertical and horizontal lifts with respect to the metallic Riemannian structure on (1,1)-tensor bundle. Hretcanu and Blaga [13] described the warped product bi-slant, warped product semi-slant and warped product hemi-slant submanifolds in locally metallic Riemannian manifolds. Khan and De [14] showed that the r-lift of the metallic structure in the tangent bundle of order r is a metallic structure. Ahmad et al. [15] investigated some interesting results on bi-slant lightlike submanifolds of golden semi-Riemannian manifolds. Şahin et al. [16] reached some results on Norden golden manifold having a constant sectional curvature. Özkan et al. [17] investigated integrability and parallelism of silver structure in tangent bundle. Akpınar [18] studied an integrability condition and curvature properties for bronze Riemannian structures. For details on finding several classical eigenvalues and remarkable eigenproblems, we refer reader to [19,20].
Some studies have been conducted on para-Sasakian manifolds and Lorentzian para-Sasakian manifolds based on the relation between metallic structure and paracontact structure [21,22]. The notion of metallic deformation has been addressed through the relation between the metallic structure and the almost contact structure in [23].
The main goal of this study is to define the notion of metallic deformation through the relation between the metallic structure and paracontact structure on almost paracontact para-Norden manifolds (referred to as almost paracontact paracomplex Riemannian manifolds in [2,3,4,5,6]). The progress of the study has been structured as follows: In Section 2, some fundamental information for almost paracontact para-Norden manifolds is given. In Section 3, the metallic deformation is defined through a relation between the metallic structure and paracontact structure on an almost paracontact para-Norden manifold. In Section 4, the curvature tensors, Ricci tensors, scalar curvatures, and ∗-scalar curvatures are computed with respect to the Riemannian connection and the φ-connection on metallically deformed para-Sasaki-like para-Norden manifolds. In Section 5, an example is given of a metallically deformed 3-dimensional para-Sasaki-like para-Norden manifold.
A (2n+1)-dimensional differentiable manifold (M,φ,ξ,η) is referred to as an almost paracontact paracomplex manifold if it is endowed with an almost paracontact structure (φ,ξ,η), comprising a (1,1)-tensor field φ, a Reeb vector field ξ, and its dual 1-form η. The almost paracontact structure (φ,ξ,η) satisfies the following conditions:
φ2=I−η⊗ξ,φξ=0,η(ξ)=1,η∘φ=0,trφ=0, | (2.1) |
where I is the identity transformation on the tangent bundle TM. The manifold (M,φ,ξ,η,g) is called an almost paracontact para-Norden manifold equipped with a para-Norden metric g relative to (φ,ξ,η) determined by
g(φx,w)=g(x,φw), | (2.2) |
or equivalently
g(φx,φw)=g(x,w)−η(x)η(w), | (2.3) |
for any smooth vector fields x, w on M, i.e. x,w∈χ(M) [2,24]. The almost paracontact para-Norden manifold is briefly called the apcpN manifold. As a result, the following equations are obtained:
g(x,ξ)=η(x),g(ξ,ξ)=1,η(∇xξ)=0, | (2.4) |
where ∇ denotes the Riemannian connection of g. From here onwards, x,w,z are arbitrary vector fields from χ(M) or vectors in TM at a fixed point of M. The basis {e0=ξ,e1,...,en,en+1=φe1,e2n=φen} is an orthonormal basis on the structure (φ,ξ,η,g) with
g(ei,ej)=δij, i,j=0,1,...,2n. | (2.5) |
The metric ˆg is an associated metric of g and defined on (M,φ,ξ,η,g) by
ˆg(x,w)=g(x,φw)+η(x)η(w). | (2.6) |
The associated metric ˆg is an indefinite metric with signature (n+1,n) and compatible with (M,φ,ξ,η,g) in a manner analogous to that of g [2]. The apcpN manifolds are classified in [1]. This classification comprises eleven fundamental classes denoted as F1,F2,...,F11. The eleven fundamental classes are based on the (0,3)-tensor field F determined by
F(x,w,z)=g((∇xφ)w,z), | (2.7) |
and has the properties
F(x,w,z)=F(x,z,w)=−F(x,φw,φz)+η(w)F(x,ξ,z)+η(z)F(x,w,ξ), | (2.8) |
(∇xη)(w)=g(∇xξ,w)=−F(x,φw,ξ). |
Let (M,φ,ξ,η,g) be an almost paracontact para-Norden manifold (apcpN manifold). We construct a metallic structure on an apcpN manifold M.
Proposition 3.1. The (1,1)-tensor field Ψ defined by
Ψ=p2I−(p−2σ2)(φ+η⊗ξ), | (3.1) |
is a metallic structure on an apcpN manifold, where p and q are positive integers.
Proof. (3.1) is written for x∈χ(M) as
Ψx=p2x−(p−2σ2)(φx+η(x)ξ). |
In order for Ψ to be a metallic structure on apcpN manifold, it must satisfy the equation Ψ2x=pΨx+qx [9]. By utilizing (2.1) and (3.1), the equation
Ψ2x=p2Ψx−(p−2σ2)(Ψ(φx)+η(x)Ψξ) |
is written. Considering the equation σ2=σp+q for the eigenvalue σ, Ψ2x=pΨx+qx is obtained for every x∈χ(M). Hence, the proof is concluded.
Proposition 3.2. Let (M,φ,ξ,η,g) be an apcpN manifold, and Ψ is given as (3.1). In this way, the following equality is satisfied:
g(Ψx,Ψw)=σ2∗+σ22g(x,w)−σ2∗−σ22ˆg(x,w). | (3.2) |
Proof. By utilizing (2.1), (2.2), and (3.1), the equality
g(Ψx,Ψw)=((p−σ)2+σ2)2g(x,w)−p(p−2σ)2g(φx,w)−p(p−2σ)2η(x)η(w), |
is written. Using (2.6) and (3.1), the above equality is rearranged as
g(Ψx,Ψw)=((p−σ)2+σ2)2g(x,w)−p(p−2σ)2ˆg(x,w). |
Considering σ+σ∗=p, (3.2) is obtained.
Considering Propositions 3.1 and 3.2, a change in the structure tensors can be generated in
˜φ=φ, ˜ξ=1σξ, ˜η=ση, | (3.3) |
˜g(x,w)=g(Ψx,Ψw)=σ2∗+σ22g(x,w)−σ2∗−σ22ˆg(x,w)=σ2∗+σ22g(x,w)−σ2∗−σ22g(φx,w)−σ2∗−σ22η(x)η(w). |
This is called a metallic deformation on the apcpN manifold. Thus, (M,˜φ,˜ξ,˜η,˜g) is also an apcpN manifold.
Definition 4.1 An apcpN manifold (M,φ,ξ,η,g) is called a para-Sasaki-like para-Norden manifold if the structure tensors (φ,ξ,η,g) satisfy the following conditions for x,w,z∈H=ker(η):
F(x,w,z)=F(ξ,w,z)=F(ξ,ξ,z)=0,F(x,w,ξ)=−g(x,w). | (4.1) |
The class of para-Sasaki-like para-Norden manifolds is defined and examined in [3]. This particular subclass of the examined manifolds is determined by:
(∇xφ)w=−g(x,w)ξ−η(w)x+2η(x)η(w)ξ=−g(φx,φw)ξ−η(w)φ2x. | (4.2) |
In this section, we focus on the para-Sasaki-like para-Norden manifolds. These manifolds have also been called para-Sasaki-like Riemannian manifolds and para-Sasaki-like Riemannian Π-manifolds in [3,4,5]. In [3], the following identities are proved:
∇xξ=φx,(∇xη)w=g(x,φw),R(x,w)ξ=−η(w)x+η(x)w,R(ξ,w)ξ=φ2w,Ric(x,ξ)=−2nη(x),Ric(ξ,ξ)=−2n, | (4.3) |
where R and Ric denote the curvature tensor and the Ricci tensor, respectively.
The distribution H=ker(η) is a 2n-dimensional paracontact distribution of a para-Sasaki-like para-Norden manifold equipped with an almost paracomplex structure P=φ∣H and a metric h=g∣H, are the restrictions of φ and g on paracontact distribution H, respectively [3]. The metric h is pure according to P, as follow:
h(Px,w)=h(x,Pw), | (4.4) |
or equivalently
h(Px,Pw)=h(x,w). | (4.5) |
Such a metric is known as the almost product Riemannian metric [25,26], the real part of the paracomplex Riemannian metric [27], the para-B-metric, or the para-Norden metric [28,29]. Remember that an almost paracomplex manifold of dimension 2n, equipped with a para-Norden metric h satisfying (4.4), is called an almost para-Norden manifold. On a para-Sasaki-like para-Norden manifold, (4.2) is written in form F(x,y,z) as
F(x,w,z)=g((∇xφ)w,z)=−g(x,w)η(z)−η(w)g(x,z)+2η(x)η(w)η(z). |
The (0,3)-tensor field F becomes zero on the paracontact distribution H=ker(η) of a para-Sasaki-like para-Norden manifold. So, h∇xφ∣H=0 for every x,w,z∈H. When the almost paracomplex structure is parallel with respect to the Riemannian connection of the metric h, an almost para-Norden manifold is known as a para-Kahler-Norden manifold [27,29].
Theorem 4.1. If (M,˜φ,˜ξ,˜η,˜g) is a metallically deformed para-Sasaki-like para-Norden manifold, then the relation between the Riemannian connections ˜∇ of the metrics ˜g and ∇ of the metric g is given by
˜∇xw=∇xw+σ2∗−σ22σ2g(φx,φw)ξ−σ2∗−σ22σ2g(φx,w)ξ. | (4.6) |
Proof. Utilizing the general Kozsul formula, the equation
2˜g(˜∇xw,z)=x˜g(w,z)+w˜g(z,x)−z˜g(x,w)+˜g([x,w],z)+˜g([z,x],w)+˜g([z,w],x) |
is written on a metallically deformed para-Sasaki-like para-Norden manifold. Considering (2.2), (2.4), (3.3) and (4.3), the relation between ˜∇ and ∇ is reached.
Proposition 4.1. Let (M,˜φ,˜ξ,˜η,˜g) be a metallically deformed para-Sasaki-like para-Norden manifold. The following equalities hold:
˜∇x˜ξ=1σφx,(˜∇x˜η)w=σ2∗+σ22σg(φx,w)−σ2∗−σ22σg(φx,φw),(˜∇x˜φ)w=(∇xφ)w+σ2∗−σ22σ2g(φx,w)ξ−σ2∗−σ22σ2g(φx,φw)ξ. | (4.7) |
Proof. Using (3.3) and (4.3), the assertions in (4.7) is directly obtain.
Taking into account (4.6), the (0,3)-tensor field ˜F has the following form:
˜F(x,w,z)=σ2∗+σ22F(x,w,z)+σ2∗−σ22g(φx,z)η(w)+σ2∗−σ22g(φx,w)η(z). | (4.8) |
It is seen that the Riemannian connections ˜∇ and ∇ coincide for x,w∈H. Moreover, ˜F(x,w,z)=σ2∗+σ22F(x,w,z) holds for x,w∈H. Considering Definition 4.1 and Eq (4.8), a metallically deformed para-Sasaki-like para-Norden manifold is a para-Sasaki-like para-Norden manifold.
The curvature tensor ˜R of ˜∇ is defined as follows:
˜R(x,w)z=˜∇x˜∇wz−˜∇w˜∇xz−˜∇[x,w]z. |
Taking into account (4.3) and (4.6), the following relation between the corresponding curvature tensors ˜R and R of the Riemannian connections ˜∇ and ∇, respectively, is obtained:
˜R(x,w)z=R(x,w)z+σ2∗−σ22σ2{g(φx,φz)η(w)ξ+g(w,φz)η(x)ξ+g(φw,φz)φx+g(φx,z)φw}−σ2∗−σ22σ2{g(φw,φz)η(x)ξ+g(x,φz)η(w)ξ+g(φx,φz)φw+g(φw,z)φx}. | (4.9) |
On the apcpN manifold, the Ricci tensor Ric, the scalar curvature scal, and the ∗-scalar curvature scal∗ are defined as usual traces of the (0,4)-type curvature tensor R(x,w,z,y)=g(R(x,w)z,y),
Ric(x,w)=2n∑i=0R(ei,x,w,ei),scal=2n∑i=0Ric(ei,ei),scal∗=2n∑i=0Ric(ei,φei), |
with respect to an arbitrary orthonormal basis {e0,...,e2n} of its tangent space [3]. On account of (4.9), the Ricci tensor ~Ric, the scalar curvature tensor ~scal, and ∗-scalar curvature tensor ~scal∗ are obtained on a metallically deformed para-Sasaki-like para-Norden manifold as
~Ric(x,w)=Ric(x,w), | (4.10) |
~scal=σ2+σ2∗2σ2σ2∗scal−σ2−σ2∗2σ2σ2∗(scal∗−2n), | (4.11) |
~scal∗=σ2+σ2∗2σ2σ2∗scal∗−σ2−σ2∗2σ2σ2∗(scal+2n). | (4.12) |
Let us consider the almost paracontact structure (˜φ,˜ξ,˜η) defined by (3.3) and the Riemannian connection ˜∇ of ˜g given in Theorem 4.1. On a metallically deformed para-Sasaki-like para-Norden manifold (M,˜φ,˜ξ,˜η,˜g), a (1,2)-tensor field can be defined as
˜S(x,w)=12{(˜∇φwφ)x+φ((˜∇wφ)x)−φ((˜∇xφ)w)}, | (4.13) |
for all x,w∈χ(M). Then, the linear connection
¯∇xw=˜∇xw−˜S(x,w) | (4.14) |
is an almost paracontact connection on (M,˜φ,˜ξ,˜η,˜g). We will refer to the connection ¯∇ as the φ-connection on a metallically deformed para-Sasaki-like para-Norden manifold. An almost product connection has been obtained through a similar method on almost product manifolds [30].
Theorem 4.2. Let (M,˜φ,˜ξ,˜η,˜g) be a metallically deformed para-Sasaki-like para-Norden manifold. Then the φ-connection ¯∇ constructed by the Riemannian connection ˜∇ and the almost paracontact structure (˜φ,˜ξ,˜η) is as follows:
¯∇xw=∇xw+σ2∗−σ24σ2g(φx,φw)ξ−σ2∗−3σ24σ2g(φx,w)ξ+η(x)φw−12η(w)φx. | (4.15) |
Proof. Considering (4.7)
(˜∇φwφ)x=(∇φwφ)x+σ2∗−σ22σ2g(φx,φw)ξ−σ2∗−σ22σ2g(φx,w)ξ | (4.16) |
is written. Using (2.2), (3.3), (4.7), and (4.16),
˜S(x,w)=σ2∗−σ24σ2g(φx,φw)ξ−σ2∗+σ24σ2g(φx,w)ξ−η(x)φw+12η(w)φw | (4.17) |
is obtained. Considering Theorem 4.1 and Proposition 4.1, we directly obtain (4.15) from (4.14).
The torsion tensor ¯T of ¯∇ is defined as follows:
¯T(x,w)=¯∇xw−¯∇wx−[x,w]=−32{η(w)φx−η(x)φw}. |
Golab [31] defined and studied quarter-symmetric linear connections in a differentiable manifold. A linear connection ∇ is called a quarter-symmetric connection if its torsion tensor T satisfies
T(x,w)=η(w)φx−η(x)φw. | (4.18) |
When we obtain the torsion tensor ¯T of ¯∇, we observe that the connection ¯∇ is a quarter-symmetric connection on a metallically deformed para-Sasaki-like para-Norden manifold. Taking into account (4.3) and (4.15), the following relation between the corresponding curvature tensors ¯R and R of the Riemannian connections ¯∇ and ∇, respectively, is obtained:
¯R(x,w)z=R(x,w)z+σ2∗−σ28σ2{g(φw,φz)φx−g(φx,φz)φw}+σ2∗−7σ28σ2{g(φx,z)φw−g(φw,z)φx}+η(x)g(w,z)ξ−η(w)g(x,z)ξ. | (4.19) |
The Ricci tensor ¯Ric, the scalar curvature ¯scal, and the ∗-scalar curvature ¯scal∗ are obtained on a metallically deformed para-Sasaki-like para-Norden manifold as
¯Ric(x,w)=Ric(x,w)+σ2∗+σ28σ2g(φx,φw)−σ2∗−σ28σ2g(x,φw), | (4.20) |
¯scal=σ2∗+σ22σ2∗σ2scal−σ2−σ2∗2σ2∗σ2scal∗+2σ2−σ2∗4σ2∗σ22n, | (4.21) |
¯scal∗=σ2∗+σ22σ2∗σ2scal∗−σ2−σ2∗2σ2∗σ2{scal+2n}. | (4.22) |
Consider a 3-dimensional real connected Lie group denoted by L. Then, the Lie group L has a basis of left-invariant vector fields {e0,e1,e2} with associated Lie algebra determined as follows:
[e0,e1]=−e2,[e0,e2]=−e1,[e1,e2]=0. | (5.1) |
The Lie group L is endowed with an almost paracontact para-Norden structure (φ,ξ,η,g) as follows:
ξ=e0, φe0=0, φe1=e2, φe2=e1,g(e0,e0)=g(e1,e1)=g(e2,e2)=1, g(ei,ej)=0,i,j∈{0,1,2},i≠j. | (5.2) |
In [6], it is proved that the solvable Lie group corresponding to the Lie algebra defined by (5.1) and equipped with the almost paracontact para-Norden structure (φ,ξ,η,g) from (5.2) is a para-Sasaki-like para-Norden manifold. Moreover, the basic components of ∇ and R are obtained. The components of the Riemannian connection ∇ are determined via the Kozsul formula as follows:
∇e0e1=∇e0e2=0,∇e1e2=∇e2e1=−e0,∇e1e0=e2,∇e2e0=e1,∇e0e0=∇e1e1=∇e2e2=0. |
On a para-Sasaki-like para-Norden manifold, the non-zero components of the fundamental tensor F are obtained in the following way:
F101=F110=F202=F220=−1. |
On a para-Sasaki-like para-Norden manifold, the components of the curvature tensor R corresponding to the Riemannian connection ∇ are expressed by:
R(e0,e0)e0=0, R(e0,e2)e1=0,R(e0,e1)e0=e1, R(e0,e2)e2=−e0,R(e0,e1)e1=−e0,R(e1,e2)e0=0,R(e0,e1)e2=0,R(e1,e2)e1=−e2,R(e0,e2)e0=e2,R(e1,e2)e2=e1. |
The non-zero component of Ricci tensor Ric, the scalar curvature scal, and the ∗-scalar tensor scal∗ are expressed by:
Ric(e0,e0)=−2,scal=−2,scal∗=0. |
On a metallically deformed para-Sasaki-like para-Norden manifold, the components of the Riemannian connection ˜∇ are obtained in the following way:
˜∇e0e0=0,˜∇e0e1=0,˜∇e0e2=0,˜∇e1e0=e2,˜∇e1e1=σ2∗−σ22σ2e0,˜∇e1e2=−σ2∗+σ22σ2e0,˜∇e2e0=e1,˜∇e2e1=−σ2∗+σ22σ2e0,˜∇e2e2=σ2∗−σ22σ2e0. |
On a metallically deformed para-Sasaki-like para-Norden manifold, the non-zero components of the fundamental tensor ˜F are obtained in the following way:
˜F101=˜F110=˜F202=˜F220=−σ2∗+σ22,˜F102=˜F201=˜F210=˜F120=σ2∗−σ22. |
The manifold (L,φ,ξ,η,g) is the para-Sasaki-like para-Norden manifold since it satisfies (4.1). Hence, the manifold (L,˜φ,˜ξ,˜η,˜g) is also a para-Sasaki-like para-Norden manifold. If x=a0e0+a1e1+a2e2, y=b0e0+b1e1+b2e2, then the metric ˜g is given by
˜g(x,y)=σ2a0b0+σ2∗+σ22(a1b1+a2b2)−σ2∗−σ22(a1b2+a2b1). |
On a metallically deformed para-Sasaki-like para-Norden manifold, the components of the curvature tensor ˜R corresponding to the Riemannian connection ˜∇ are obtained in the following way:
˜R(e0,e0)e0=0, ˜R(e0,e2)e1=σ2∗−σ22σ2e0,˜R(e0,e1)e0=e1, ˜R(e0,e2)e2=−σ2∗+σ22σ2e0,˜R(e0,e1)e1=−σ2∗+σ22σ2e0,˜R(e1,e2)e0=0,˜R(e0,e1)e2=σ2∗−σ22σ2e0,˜R(e1,e2)e1=−σ2∗−σ22σ2e1−σ2∗+σ22σ2e2,˜R(e0,e2)e0=e2,˜R(e1,e2)e2=σ2∗+σ22σ2e1+σ2∗−σ22σ2e2. |
On a metallically deformed para-Sasaki-like para-Norden manifold, the non-zero component of the Ricci tensor ~Ric is obtained in the following way:
~Ric(e0,e0)=−2. |
On a metallically deformed para-Sasaki-like para-Norden manifold, the scalar tensor ~scal and ∗-scalar tensor ~scal∗ are obtained in the following way
~scal=−2σ2,~scal∗=0. |
On a metallically deformed para-Sasaki-like para-Norden manifold, the components of φ−connection ¯∇ are obtained in the following way:
¯∇e0e0=0,¯∇e1e0=12e2,¯∇e2e0=12e1,¯∇e0e1=e2,¯∇e1e1=σ2∗−σ24σ2e0,¯∇e2e1=−σ2∗+σ24σ2e0,¯∇e0e2=e1,¯∇e1e2=−σ2∗+σ24σ2e0,¯∇e2e2=σ2∗−σ24σ2e0. |
The non-zero components of the curvature tensor ¯R corresponding to the φ-connection ¯∇ are obtained in the following way:
¯R(e0,e1)e0=e1,¯R(e1,e2)e1=−σ2∗−σ28σ2e1−σ2∗+σ28σ2e2, ¯R(e0,e2)e0=e2,¯R(e1,e2)e2=σ2∗+σ28σ2e1+σ2∗−σ28σ2e2. |
The non-zero components of the Ricci tensor ¯Ric are obtained in the following way:
¯Ric(e0,e0)=−2, ¯Ric(e1,e1)=σ2∗+σ28σ2, ¯Ric(e2,e1)=−σ2∗−σ28σ2, ¯Ric(e1,e2)=−σ2∗−σ28σ2, ¯Ric(e2,e2) =σ2∗+σ28σ2. |
The scalar curvature ¯scal and ∗-scalar curvature ¯scal∗are obtained in the following way:
¯scal=−32σ2,¯scal∗=0. |
The non-zero components of the torsion tensor ¯T corresponding to the φ−connection ¯∇ are expressed by:
¯T(e0,e1)=32e2,¯T(e0,e2)=32e1. |
In this paper, we define a metallic deformation on almost paracontact para-Norden manifolds by establishing the relationship between the metallic structure and the paracontact structure. We obtain the Riemannian connection on metallically deformed para-Sasaki-like para-Norden manifolds and compute the curvature tensor, Ricci tensor, scalar curvature, ∗-scalar curvature, and φ-connection based on this Riemannian connection. Finally, we give an example based on the results of the paper.
Rabia Cakan Akpınar and Esen Kemer Kansu: Writing, review, editing of this paper. All authors of this article have been contributed equally. All authors have read and approved the final version of the manuscript for publication.
The authors declare they have not used Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools in the creation of this article.
The authors declare no conflicts of interest in this paper.
[1] |
M. Manev, M. Staikova, On almost paracontact Riemannian manifolds of type (n, n), J. Geom., 72 (2001), 108–114. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00022-001-8572-2 doi: 10.1007/s00022-001-8572-2
![]() |
[2] | M. Manev, V. Tavkova, On almost paracontact almost paracomplex Riemannian manifolds, arXiv: 1805.11120, 2018. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1805.11120 |
[3] |
S. Ivanov, H. Manev, M. Manev, Para-Sasaki-like Riemannian manifolds and new Einstein metrics, RACSAM Rev. R. Acad. Cienc. Exactas Fıs. Nat. Ser. A Mat., 115 (2021), 112. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13398-021-01053-z doi: 10.1007/s13398-021-01053-z
![]() |
[4] |
H. Manev, M. Manev, Para-Ricci-like solitons on Riemannian manifolds with almost paracontact structure and almost paracomplex structure, Mathematics, 9 (2021), 1704. https://doi.org/10.3390/math9141704 doi: 10.3390/math9141704
![]() |
[5] |
H. Manev, Para-Ricci-like solitons with vertical potential on para-Sasaki-like Riemannian ∏−manifolds, Symmetry, 13 (2021), 2267. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym13122267 doi: 10.3390/sym13122267
![]() |
[6] |
M. Manev, V. Tavkova, Lie groups as 3-dimensional almost paracontact almost paracomplex Riemannian manifolds, J. Geom., 110 (2019), 43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00022-019-0499-6 doi: 10.1007/s00022-019-0499-6
![]() |
[7] |
V. W. Spinadel, The metallic means family and multifractal spectra, Nonlinear Anal., 36 (1999), 721–745. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0362-546X(98)00123-0 doi: 10.1016/S0362-546X(98)00123-0
![]() |
[8] | V. W. Spinadel, The metallic means family and forbidden symmetries, Int. Math. J., 2 (2002), 279–288. |
[9] | C. Hretcanu, M. Crasmareanu, Metallic structures on Riemannian manifolds, Rev. Un. Mat. Argentina, 54 (2013), 15–27. |
[10] |
A. Gezer, C. Karaman, On metallic Riemannian structures, Turk. J. Math., 39 (2015), 954–962. https://doi.org/10.3906/mat-1504-50 doi: 10.3906/mat-1504-50
![]() |
[11] |
S. Turanli, A. Gezer, H. Cakicioglu, Metallic Kähler and nearly metallic Kähler manifolds, Int. J. Geom. Methods Mod. Phys., 18 (2021), 2150146. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219887821501462 doi: 10.1142/S0219887821501462
![]() |
[12] |
H. Cayir, Operators on metallic Riemannian structures, Honam Math. J., 42 (2020), 63–74. https://doi.org/10.5831/HMJ.2020.42.1.63 doi: 10.5831/HMJ.2020.42.1.63
![]() |
[13] |
C. E. Hretcanu, A. M. Blaga, Types of submanifolds in metallic Riemannian manifolds: A short survey, Mathematics, 9 (2021), 2467. https://doi.org/10.3390/math9192467 doi: 10.3390/math9192467
![]() |
[14] |
M. N. I. Khan, U. C. De, Liftings of metallic structures to tangent bundles of order r, AIMS Mathematics, 7 (2022), 7888–7897. https://doi.org/10.3934/math.2022441 doi: 10.3934/math.2022441
![]() |
[15] |
M. Ahmad, M. Ahmad, F. Moferreh, Bi-slant lightlike submanifolds of golden semi-Riemannian manifolds, AIMS Mathematics, 8 (2023), 19526–19545. https://doi.org/10.3934/math.2023996 doi: 10.3934/math.2023996
![]() |
[16] |
F. Şahin, B. Şahin, F. E. Erdoğan, Norden golden manifolds with constant sectional curvature and their submanifolds, Mathematics, 11 (2023), 3301. https://doi.org/10.3390/math11153301 doi: 10.3390/math11153301
![]() |
[17] |
M. Özkan, E. Taylan, A. A. Çitlak, On lifts of silver structure, J. Sci. Arts, 17 (2017), 223–234. doi: 10.3390/math11153301
![]() |
[18] |
R. C. Akpınar, On bronze Riemannian structures, Tbilisi Math. J., 13 (2020), 161–169. https://doi.org/10.32513/tbilisi/1601344906 doi: 10.32513/tbilisi/1601344906
![]() |
[19] |
L. Jäntschi, Eigenproblem basics and algorithms, Symmetry, 15 (2023), 2046. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym15112046 doi: 10.3390/sym15112046
![]() |
[20] |
L. Jäntschi, The eigenproblem translated for alignment of molecules, Symmetry, 11 (2019), 1027. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym11081027 doi: 10.3390/sym11081027
![]() |
[21] |
M. Altunbaş, Ç. Şengül, Metallic structures on tangent bundles of Lorentzian para-Sasakian manifolds, J. Mahani Math. Res., 12 (2023), 137–149. https://doi.org/10.22103/JMMR.2022.19411.1247 doi: 10.22103/JMMR.2022.19411.1247
![]() |
[22] | S. Azami, Metallic structures on the tangent bundle of a P-Sasakian manifold, arXiv: 1904.12637, 2019. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1904.12637 |
[23] | G. Beldjilali, Almost contact metric and metallic Riemannian structures, Commun. Fac. Sci. Univ. Ank. Ser. A1 Math. Stat., 69 (2020), 19–30. |
[24] | I. Sato, On a structure similar to the almost contact structure, Tensor, 30 (1976), 219–224. |
[25] | A. Naveira, Classification of Riemannian almost-product manifolds, Rend. Di Mat. Di Roma, 3 (1983), 577–592. |
[26] | M. Staikova, K. Gribachev, Canonical connections and their conformal invariants on Riemannian P-manifolds, Serdica Math. J., 18 (1992), 150–161. |
[27] |
C. Ida, A. Ionescu, A. Manea, A note on para-holomorphic Riemannian-Einstein manifolds, Int. J. Geom. Methods Mod. Phys., 13 (2016), 1650107. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219887816501073 doi: 10.1142/S0219887816501073
![]() |
[28] | C. Ida, A. Manea, On para-Norden metric connections, Balkan J. Geom. Appl., 21 (2016), 45–54. |
[29] |
A. A. Salimov, M. Iscan, K. Akbulut, Notes on para-Norden-Walker 4-manifolds, Int. J. Geom. Methods Mod. Phys., 7 (2010), 1331–1347. https://doi.org/10.1142/S021988781000483X doi: 10.1142/S021988781000483X
![]() |
[30] | M. De León, P. R. Rodrigues, Methods of differential geometry in analytical mechanics, Elsevier, 1989. |
[31] | S. Golab, On semi-symmetric and quarter-symmetric linear connections, Tensor, 29 (1975), 249–254. |
1. | Rabia Cakan Akpınar, Esen Kemer Kansu, Correction: Metallic deformation on para-Sasaki-like para-Norden manifold, 2024, 9, 2473-6988, 26825, 10.3934/math.20241304 |