Green supplier selection has been an important technique for environmental sustainability and reducing the harm of ecosystems. In the current climate, green supply chain management (GSCM) is imperative for maintaining environmental compliance and commercial growth. To handle the change related to environmental concern and how the company manages and operates, they are integrated the GSCM into traditional supplier selection process. The main aims of this study were to outline both traditional and environmental criteria for selecting suppliers, providing a comprehensive framework to assist decision-maker in prioritizing green supplier effectively. In order to address issue to simulate decision-making problems and manage inaccurate data. A useful technique of fuzzy set was proposed to handle uncertainty in various real-life problems, but all types of data could not be handled such as incomplete and indeterminate. However, several extensions of fuzzy set were considered, such as intuitionistic fuzzy set, Pythagorean fuzzy set, q-rung orthopair fuzzy set, and q-rung orthopair fuzzy soft set considering membership and nonmember ship grade to handle the uncertainty problem. However, there was a lack of information about the neutral degree and parameterization axioms lifted by existing approaches, so to fill this gap and overcome the difficulties Ali et al. proposed a generalized structure by combining the structure of picture fuzzy set and q-rung orthopair fuzzy soft set, known as q-rung orthopair picture fuzzy soft sets, characterized by positive, neutral and negative membership degree with parameterization tools and aggregation operator to solve the multi criteria group decision-making problem. Additionally, the TOPSIS method is a widely utilized to assist individuals and organizations in selecting the most appropriate option from a range of choices, taking into account various criteria. Finally, we demonstrate an illustrative example related to GSCM to enhance competitiveness, based on criteria both in general and with a focus on environmental consideration, accompanied by an algorithm and flow chart.
Citation: Sumbal Ali, Asad Ali, Ahmad Bin Azim, Abdul Samad Khan, Fuad A. Awwad, Emad A. A. Ismail. TOPSIS method based on q-rung orthopair picture fuzzy soft environment and its application in the context of green supply chain management[J]. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(6): 15149-15171. doi: 10.3934/math.2024735
Green supplier selection has been an important technique for environmental sustainability and reducing the harm of ecosystems. In the current climate, green supply chain management (GSCM) is imperative for maintaining environmental compliance and commercial growth. To handle the change related to environmental concern and how the company manages and operates, they are integrated the GSCM into traditional supplier selection process. The main aims of this study were to outline both traditional and environmental criteria for selecting suppliers, providing a comprehensive framework to assist decision-maker in prioritizing green supplier effectively. In order to address issue to simulate decision-making problems and manage inaccurate data. A useful technique of fuzzy set was proposed to handle uncertainty in various real-life problems, but all types of data could not be handled such as incomplete and indeterminate. However, several extensions of fuzzy set were considered, such as intuitionistic fuzzy set, Pythagorean fuzzy set, q-rung orthopair fuzzy set, and q-rung orthopair fuzzy soft set considering membership and nonmember ship grade to handle the uncertainty problem. However, there was a lack of information about the neutral degree and parameterization axioms lifted by existing approaches, so to fill this gap and overcome the difficulties Ali et al. proposed a generalized structure by combining the structure of picture fuzzy set and q-rung orthopair fuzzy soft set, known as q-rung orthopair picture fuzzy soft sets, characterized by positive, neutral and negative membership degree with parameterization tools and aggregation operator to solve the multi criteria group decision-making problem. Additionally, the TOPSIS method is a widely utilized to assist individuals and organizations in selecting the most appropriate option from a range of choices, taking into account various criteria. Finally, we demonstrate an illustrative example related to GSCM to enhance competitiveness, based on criteria both in general and with a focus on environmental consideration, accompanied by an algorithm and flow chart.
[1] | C. L. Hwang, K. Yoon, Methods for multiple attribute decision making, In: Lecture notes in economics and mathematical systems, Heidelberg: Springer, 186 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-48318-9_3 |
[2] | L. A. Zadeh, Fuzzy sets, Inf. Control, 8 (1965), 338–353. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90241-X |
[3] | K. T. Atanassov, Intuitionistic fuzzy sets, Fuzzy Set Syst., 20 (1986), 87–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-0114(86)80034-3. |
[4] | F. E. Boran, S. Genç, M. Kurt, D. Akay, A multi-criteria intuitionistic fuzzy group decision making for supplier selection with TOPSIS method, Expert Syst. Appl., 36 (2009), 11363–11368. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2009.03.039 doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2009.03.039 |
[5] | R. R. Yager, Pythagorean fuzzy subsets, In: 2013 Joint IFSA world congress and NAFIPS annual meeting (IFSA/NAFIPS), Canada, 2013, 57–61. https://doi.org/10.1109/IFSA-NAFIPS.2013.6608375 |
[6] | R. R. Yager, Generalized orthopair fuzzy sets, IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst., 25 (2017), 1222–1230. https://doi.org/10.1109/TFUZZ.2016.2604005 doi: 10.1109/TFUZZ.2016.2604005 |
[7] | D. Molodtsov, Soft set theory-First results, Comput. Math. Appl., 37 (1999), 19–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0898-1221(99)00056-5 doi: 10.1016/S0898-1221(99)00056-5 |
[8] | P. K. Maji, R. K. Biswas, A. Roy, Fuzzy soft sets, J. Fuzzy Math., 9 (2001), 589–602. |
[9] | P. K. Maji, More on intuitionistic fuzzy soft sets, In: Rough sets, fuzzy sets, data mining and granular computing, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin, 5908 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-10646-0_28 |
[10] | X. Peng, Y. Yang, J. Song, Y. Jiang, Pythagorean fuzzy soft set and its application, Comput. Eng., 41 (2015), 224–229. |
[11] | K. Naeem, M. Riaz, X. Peng, D. Afzal, Pythagorean fuzzy soft MCGDM methods based on TOPSIS, VIKOR and aggregation operators, J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst., 37 (2019), 6937–6957. https://doi.org/10.3233/JIFS-190905 doi: 10.3233/JIFS-190905 |
[12] | M. Riaz, K. Naeem, D. Afzal, Pythagorean m-polar fuzzy soft sets with TOPSIS method for MCGDM, Punjab Univ. J. Math., 52 (2020), 21–46. |
[13] | A. Hussain, M. I. Ali, T. Mahmood, M. Munir, q-Rung orthopair fuzzy soft average aggregation operators and their application in multicriteria decision-making, Int. J. Intell. Syst., 35 (2020), 571–599. https://doi.org/10.1002/int.22217 doi: 10.1002/int.22217 |
[14] | M. Riaz, M. T. Hamid, H. M. Athar Farid, D. Afzal, TOPSIS, VIKOR and aggregation operators based on q-rung orthopair fuzzy soft sets and their applications, J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst., 39 (2020), 6903–6917. https://doi.org/10.3233/JIFS-192175 |
[15] | R. Chinram, A. Hussain, M. I. Ali, T. Mahmood, Some geometric aggregation operators under q-rung orthopair fuzzy soft information with their applications in multi-criteria decision making, IEEE Access, 9 (2021), 31975–31993. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3059683 doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3059683 |
[16] | R. M. Zulqarnain, I. Siddique, A. Iampan, J. Awrejcewicz, M. Bednarek, R. Ali, et al., Novel multicriteria decision making approach for interactive aggregation operators of q-rung orthopair fuzzy soft set, IEEE Access, 10 (2022), 59640–59660. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3178595 |
[17] | B. C. Cường, Picture fuzzy sets, J. Comput. Sci. Cybernet., 30 (2014), 409–409. http://dx.doi.org/10.15625/1813-9663/30/4/5032 |
[18] | S. Ali, A. Ali, A. B. Azim, A. ALoqaily, N. Mlaiki, Averaging aggregation operators under the environment of q-rung orthopair picture fuzzy soft sets and their applications in MADM problems, AIMS Mathematics, 8 (2023), 9027–9053. https://doi.org/10.3934/math.2023452 doi: 10.3934/math.2023452 |
[19] | A. Puška, A Beganović, I. Stojanović, S. Murtič, Green supplier's selection using economic and environmental criteria in medical industry, Environ. Dev. Sustain., 2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-022-02544-8 |
[20] | X. Sheng, L. Chen, X. Yuan, Y. Tang, Q. Yuan, R. Chen, et al., Green supply chain management for a more sustainable manufacturing industry in China: a critical review, Environ. Dev. Sustain., 25 (2023), 1151–1183. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-022-02109-9 |
[21] | S. Ghosh, M. C. Mandal, A. Ray, A PDCA based approach to evaluate green supply chain management performance under fuzzy environment, Int. J. Manag. Sci. Eng. Manag., 18 (2023), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/17509653.2022.2027292 doi: 10.1080/17509653.2022.2027292 |
[22] | I. Badi, D. Pamucar, Supplier selection for steelmaking company by using combined Grey-MARCOS methods, Decis. Mak. Appl. Manag. Eng., 3 (2020), 37–48. https://doi.org/10.31181/dmame2003037b doi: 10.31181/dmame2003037b |
[23] | Ž. Erceg, F. Mularifović, Integrated MCDM model for processes optimization in the supply chain management in wood company, Oper. Res. Eng. Sci. Theory Appl., 2 (2019), 37–50. https://doi.org/10.31181/oresta1901015e doi: 10.31181/oresta1901015e |
[24] | D. Pamucar, Normalized weighted geometric Dombi Bonferroni mean operator with interval grey numbers: Application in multicriteria decision making, Rep. Mech. Eng., 1 (2020), 44–52. https://doi.org/10.31181/rme200101044p doi: 10.31181/rme200101044p |
[25] | G. Qu, Z. Zhang, W. Qu, Z. Xu, Green supplier selection based on green practices evaluated using fuzzy approaches of TOPSIS and ELECTRE with a case study in a Chinese internet company, Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 17 (2020), 3268. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17093268 doi: 10.3390/ijerph17093268 |
[26] | F. Zhou, T. Y. Chen, An integrated multicriteria group decision-making approach for green supplier selection under Pythagorean fuzzy scenarios, IEEE Access, 8 (2020), 165216–165231. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3022377 doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3022377 |
[27] | D. Sahoo, A. K. Tripathy, J. K. Pati, P. K. Parida, A selection of level of supplier in supply chain management using binary coded genetic algorithm with a case study towards Pareto optimality, J. Decision Anal. Intell. Comput., 3 (2023), 90–104. https://doi.org/10.31181/jdaic10015072023s doi: 10.31181/jdaic10015072023s |
[28] | K. Adegbola, A simulation study of single-vendor, single and multiple-manufacturers supply chain system, with stochastic demand and two distribution policies, J. Decision Anal. Intell. Comput., 3 (2023), 62–79. https://doi.org/10.31181/jdaic10010052023a |
[29] | Ł. Malys, The approach to supply chain cooperation in the implementation of sustainable development initiatives and company's economic performance, Equilibrium, 18 (2023), 255–286. |
[30] | B. M. Fathi, A. Ansari, A. Ansari, Green commercial aviation supply chain—A European path to environmental sustainability, Sustainability, 15 (2023), 6574. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15086574 doi: 10.3390/su15086574 |
[31] | A. Venkataraman, A. D. Rajkumar, Bibliometric survey of futuristic technologies for sustainable supply chain visibility, Multidiscip. Rev., 7 (2024), e2024042. https://doi.org/10.31893/multirev.2024042 |
[32] | H. Ogutu, Y. El Archi, L. D. Dávid, Current trends in sustainable organization management: A bibliometric analysis, Oecon. Copernic., 14 (2023), 11–45. |
[33] | V. G. Cannas, M. P. Ciano, M. Saltalamacchia, R. Secchi, Artificial intelligence in supply chain and operations management: a multiple case study research, Int. J. Prod. Res., 62 (2023), 3333–3360. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2023.2232050 doi: 10.1080/00207543.2023.2232050 |
[34] | J. Nascimento, S. M. C. Loureiro, Mapping the sustainability branding field: emerging trends and future directions, J. Product Brand Manag., 33 (2024), 234–257. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPBM-02-2023-4349 doi: 10.1108/JPBM-02-2023-4349 |
[35] | R. Jain, A. Kaur, P. Mittal, A co-occurrence network analysis of research work in supply chain finance and corporate sustainable strategy in industrial sector, Int. J. Exp. Res. Rev., 32 (2023), 378–386. |
[36] | R. Slabe-Erker, K. Primc, D. Zabavnik, New thematic relationships in the green recovery literature, Environ. Dev. Sustain., 2023. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-023-03789-7 doi: 10.1007/s10668-023-03789-7 |
[37] | R. M. Zulqarnain, X. L. Xin, I. Siddique, W. A. Khan, M. A. Yousif, TOPSIS method based on correlation coefficient under Pythagorean fuzzy soft environment and its application towards green supply chain management, Sustainability, 13 (2021), 1642. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13041642 doi: 10.3390/su13041642 |
[38] | W. Yang, Y. Pang, New q-rung orthopair hesitant fuzzy decision making based on linear programming and TOPSIS, IEEE Access, 8 (2020), 221299–221311. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3043255 doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3043255 |
[39] | J. Vimala, P. Mahalakshmi, A. Ur Rahman, M. Saeed, A customized TOPSIS method to rank the best airlines to fly during COVID-19 pandemic with q-rung orthopair multi-fuzzy soft information, Soft. Comput., 27 (2023), 14571–14584. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-023-08976-2 doi: 10.1007/s00500-023-08976-2 |