Loading [MathJax]/jax/output/SVG/jax.js
Research article Special Issues

Properties and applications of generalized 1-parameter 3-variable Hermite-based Appell polynomials

  • We present a novel framework for introducing generalized 3-variable 1-parameter Hermite-based Appell polynomials. These polynomials are characterized by generating function, series definition, and determinant definition, elucidating their fundamental properties. Moreover, utilizing a factorization method, we established recurrence relations, shift operators, and various differential equations, including differential, integrodifferential, and partial differential equations. Special attention is given to exploring the specific cases of 3-variable 1-parameter generalized Hermite-based Bernoulli, Euler, and Genocchi polynomials, offering insights into their unique features and applications.

    Citation: Mohra Zayed, Shahid Ahmad Wani. Properties and applications of generalized 1-parameter 3-variable Hermite-based Appell polynomials[J]. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(9): 25145-25165. doi: 10.3934/math.20241226

    Related Papers:

    [1] Mohra Zayed, Shahid Ahmad Wani, William Ramírez, Clemente Cesarano . Advancements in $ q $-Hermite-Appell polynomials: a three-dimensional exploration. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(10): 26799-26824. doi: 10.3934/math.20241303
    [2] Nusrat Raza, Mohammed Fadel, Kottakkaran Sooppy Nisar, M. Zakarya . On 2-variable $ q $-Hermite polynomials. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(8): 8705-8727. doi: 10.3934/math.2021506
    [3] Tabinda Nahid, Mohd Saif, Serkan Araci . A new class of Appell-type Changhee-Euler polynomials and related properties. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(12): 13566-13579. doi: 10.3934/math.2021788
    [4] Awatif Muflih Alqahtani, Shahid Ahmad Wani, William Ramírez . Exploring differential equations and fundamental properties of Generalized Hermite-Frobenius-Genocchi polynomials. AIMS Mathematics, 2025, 10(2): 2668-2683. doi: 10.3934/math.2025125
    [5] Waleed Mohamed Abd-Elhameed, Omar Mazen Alqubori . On generalized Hermite polynomials. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(11): 32463-32490. doi: 10.3934/math.20241556
    [6] Gonca Kizilaslan . The altered Hermite matrix: implications and ramifications. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(9): 25360-25375. doi: 10.3934/math.20241238
    [7] Gyung Won Hwang, Cheon Seoung Ryoo, Jung Yoog Kang . Some properties for 2-variable modified partially degenerate Hermite (MPDH) polynomials derived from differential equations and their zeros distributions. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(12): 30591-30609. doi: 10.3934/math.20231564
    [8] Mdi Begum Jeelani . On employing linear algebra approach to hybrid Sheffer polynomials. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(1): 1871-1888. doi: 10.3934/math.2023096
    [9] Letelier Castilla, William Ramírez, Clemente Cesarano, Shahid Ahmad Wani, Maria-Fernanda Heredia-Moyano . A new class of generalized Apostol–type Frobenius–Euler polynomials. AIMS Mathematics, 2025, 10(2): 3623-3641. doi: 10.3934/math.2025167
    [10] Mohra Zayed, Shahid Ahmad Wani, Georgia Irina Oros, William Ramírez . Unraveling multivariable Hermite-Apostol-type Frobenius-Genocchi polynomials via fractional operators. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(7): 17291-17304. doi: 10.3934/math.2024840
  • We present a novel framework for introducing generalized 3-variable 1-parameter Hermite-based Appell polynomials. These polynomials are characterized by generating function, series definition, and determinant definition, elucidating their fundamental properties. Moreover, utilizing a factorization method, we established recurrence relations, shift operators, and various differential equations, including differential, integrodifferential, and partial differential equations. Special attention is given to exploring the specific cases of 3-variable 1-parameter generalized Hermite-based Bernoulli, Euler, and Genocchi polynomials, offering insights into their unique features and applications.



    In recent years, notable progress has been in developing various generalizations of special functions within mathematical physics. These advancements provide a robust analytical framework for solving a wide array of mathematical physics problems and have extensive practical applications across diverse domains. Particularly, the significance of generalized Hermite polynomials has been underscored, as noted in previous studies [1,2]. These polynomials find utility in addressing challenges in quantum mechanics, optical beam transport, and a spectrum of problems spanning partial differential equations to abstract group theory.

    The "2-variable Hermite Kampé de Feriet polynomials (2VHKdFP)", denoted as Dn(ν1,ν2) [3], are expressed through the following generating function:

    eν1ξ+ν2ξ2=n=0Dn(ν1,ν2)ξnn!. (1.1)

    Similarly, the "2-variable 1-parameter Hermite polynomials (2V1PHP)", represented as Dn(ν1,ν2,C), are defined using the subsequent generating function [4]:

    Cν1ξ+ν2ξ2=n=0Dn(ν1,ν2,C)ξnn!,C>1. (1.2)

    The "3-variable Hermite polynomials (3VHP)", denoted as Dn(ν1,ν2,ν3) [5], are characterized by the following generating function:

    eν1ξ+ν2ξ2+ν3ξ3=n=0Dn(ν1,ν2,ν3)ξnn!. (1.3)

    Further motivated by expressions (1.2) and (1.3), we give following representation to the "generalized 3-variable 1-parameter Hermite polynomials (g1P3VHP)", represented as Dn(ν1,ν2,ν3,C) defined by:

    Cν1ξ+ν2ξ2+ν3ξ3=n=0Dn(ν1,ν2,ν3,C)ξnn!,C>1. (1.4)

    The first few values of \(\mathcal{D}_n(\nu_1, \nu_2, \nu_3, \mathcal{C})\) are:

    D0(ν1,ν2,ν3,C)=1,
    D1(ν1,ν2,ν3,C)=ν1lnC,
    D2(ν1,ν2,ν3,C)=(ν1lnC)22+ν2lnC,
    D3(ν1,ν2,ν3,C)=(ν1lnC)36+(ν1lnC)(ν2lnC)2+ν3lnC.

    In their 3-variable formulation, these polynomials find widespread application across numerous fields in both pure and applied mathematics and physics. They serve as fundamental tools in addressing problems ranging from Laplace's equation in parabolic coordinates to various quantum mechanics and probability theory scenarios. Notably, for any integral value of n, these polynomials represent specific solutions to the heat or generalized heat problem facilitated by the corresponding existence of Gauss-Weierstrass transforms.

    Appell polynomials, named after the French mathematician Paul Appell [6], constitute a significant class of special functions in mathematical analysis. They are typically defined as solutions to certain differential equations, often arising in studying various physical and mathematical phenomena. Appell polynomials possess distinctive properties, including recurrence relations, generating function, and explicit formulas, which render them invaluable in diverse areas such as probability theory, mathematical physics, and combinatorics. These polynomials exhibit remarkable versatility as fundamental tools for formulating and solving differential equations, integral transforms, and other mathematical problems. Their rich structure and wide-ranging applications make Appell polynomials an indispensable subject of study in modern mathematics. The generating relation gives the Appell polynomials:

    R(ξ)eν1ξ=r=0Rr(ν1)ξrr!, (1.5)

    where,

    R(ξ)=r=0Rrξrr!;R00. (1.6)

    Within the context of contemporary classical umbral calculus pioneered by Roman [7], the intrinsic characteristics of Appell sequences are seamlessly managed. Notably, the entire collection of Appell sequences exhibits closure properties when subjected to the operation of the umbral composition of polynomial sequences. This phenomenon extends to form an abelian group, accentuating the structural coherence and algebraic integrity inherent within Appell sequences. Further, Non-separable polynomials like multivariate Appell polynomials have several potential application benefits. In many real-world problems, variables are interdependent rather than independent. Non-separable polynomials can naturally capture these interactions without forcing an artificial separation of variables, (see for instance [8,9]). This can be particularly useful in fields like physics, economics, and machine learning, where interactions between variables are critical. Non-separable polynomials provide a richer set of functional forms, allowing for more flexible modeling of complex relationships. This can lead to better fitting models in regression analysis and more accurate representations of multidimensional phenomena. These polynomials can naturally represent higher-order interactions between variables, which can be difficult to capture with separable polynomials. This feature is valuable in scenarios where the combined effect of multiple variables is non-trivial.

    Consider {Ψn(ν1)}n=0, which signifies a series of polynomials, we can observe that

    deg(Ψn(ν1))=n,(nN0:={0,1,2,}.

    The differential operators Zn and Z+n meeting the criteria

    Zn{Ψn(ν1)}=Ψn1(ν1), (1.7)
    Z+n{Ψn(ν1)}=Ψn+1(ν1) (1.8)

    are referred to as multiplicative and derivative operators. {Ψn(ν1)}n=0 is a series of polynomials that is considered quasi-monomial if and only if Eqs (1.7) and (1.8) hold, [10,11,12,13,14]. A differential equation like this can be found by finding the derivative and multiplicative operators for a given polynomial family as

    (Zn+1Z+n){Ψn(ν1)}=nΨn(ν1). (1.9)

    The factorization technique is the name given to this process. Determining the multiplicative operator Z+n and the derivative operator Zn forms the basis of the factorization approach [15,16,17,18]. The monomiality principle is another way to think about this method. When the factorization approach is applied to the domain of multivariable special functions, new analytical techniques are presented to solve a wide variety of partial differential equations frequently encountered in practical situations.

    Differential equations cover a wide range of topics in "physics, engineering, and pure and applied mathematics". Problems from various scientific and technical fields typically take the form of differential equations, solved using specialized functions. Differential equation theory has attracted renewed attention in the last thirty years due to developments in nonlinear analysis, dynamical systems, and their useful applications in science and engineering.

    Several studies employing different generating function approaches and analytical procedures have been conducted to present and analyze hybrid families of special polynomials methodically [19,20,21]. The "recurrence relations, explicit relations, functional and differential equations, summation formulae, symmetric and convolution identities, and determinant techniques" are just a few of the fundamental characteristics of multi-variable hybrid special polynomials that make them important. "Number theory, combinatorics, classical and numerical analysis, theoretical physics, approximation theory, and other fields of pure and practical mathematics" are just a few of the fields in which these polynomials can be useful to researchers. Various scientific areas can use the qualities of hybrid special polynomials to address new problems.

    The article is organized as follows: In Section 2, we provide an overview for the 3-variable 1-parameter generalized Hermite-based Appell polynomials using the determinant formulation, series definition, and generating function. We also describe how to derive the related differential, integrodifferential, and partial differential equations. In order to demonstrate the usefulness of the major conclusions, we examine instances from this polynomial family in Section 3. In Section 4, we investigate specific cases of the 1-parameter, 3-variable, generalized Hermite-based Appell polynomials. Finally, the last part contains closing thoughts.

    In this section, we introduce a hybrid family known as the generalized 3-variable 1-parameter Hermite-based Appell polynomials (g3V1PHAP). Additionally, various properties of these polynomials are established. To obtain the generating function for the g3V1PHAP, a key result is demonstrated as follows:

    Theorem 2.1. For the generalized 3-variable 1-parameter Hermite-based Appell polynomials DRn(ν1,ν2,ν3;C), the succeeding generating relation is demonstrated:

    R(ξ)Cν1ξ+ν2ξ2+ν3ξ3=n=0DRn(ν1,ν2,ν3;C)ξnn!,C>1,|ξ|<1, (2.1)

    or, equivalently

    R(ξ)elnC(ν1ξ+ν2ξ2+ν3ξ3)=n=0DRn(ν1,ν2,ν3;C)ξnn!,C>1. (2.2)

    Proof. Substituting the exponents of ξ, i.e., ν01,ν11,ν21,,νn1 in the expansion of eν1ξ by the polynomials DR0(ν1,ν2,ν3;C),DR2(ν1,ν2,ν3;C), ,DRn(ν1,ν2,ν3;C) in the left-hand part and ν1 by DR1(ν1,ν2,ν3;C) in right-hand part of the expression (1.5), further adding up the expressions in left-hand part of the resultant expression, we have

    R(ξ)n=0Dn(ν1,ν2,ν3;C)ξnn!=n=0Rn(D1(ν1,ν2,ν3;C))ξnn!, (2.3)

    which indicates the resulting g3V1PHAP in the r.h.s. by applying Eq (1.3) in the l.h.s. DRn(ν1,ν2,ν3;C) that is

    DRn(ν1,ν2,ν3;C):=Rn{D1(ν1,ν2,ν3;C)},

    leading to (2.1). The generating function (2.2) is obtained by simplifying the l.h.s. of Eq (2.1).

    The following theorem gives the series definition for the g3V1PHAP DRn(ν1,ν2,ν3;C):

    Theorem 2.2. For the g3V1PHAP DRn(ν1,ν2,ν3;C), the succeding series representation is demonstrated

    DRn(ν1,ν2,ν3;C)=n![n/3]k=0DRn3k(ν1,ν2)νk3(n3k)!k!(lnC)n2k, (2.4)

    where

    R(ξ)Cν1ξ+ν2ξ2=n=0DRn(ν1,ν2)lnCξnn!.

    Proof. Inserting the expressions (1.2) and expansion of elnC(ν3ξ3) in left hand part of the expression (2.1) or (2.2), it follows that

    n=0DRn(ν1,ν2,ν3;C)ξnn!=n=0DRn(ν1,ν2)(lnCξ)nn!k=0νk3(lnCξ3)kk!, (2.5)

    thus, operating the Cauchy-product rule yields the expression:

    n=0DRn(ν1,ν2,ν3;C)ξnn!=n=0[n/3]k=0n!DRn3k(ν1,ν2)νk3(n3k)!k!(lnC)n2kξnn!. (2.6)

    Assertion (2.4) is obtained by comparing the coefficients of the identical powers of ξ on both sides of the above expression.

    In order to give the determinant definition for the g3V1PHAP DRn(ν1,ν2,ν3;C), we demonstrate the succeeding result.

    Theorem 2.3. The g3V1PHAP DRn(ν1,ν2,ν3;C) of degree n give rise to the succeeding determinant representation:

    DR0(ν1,ν2,ν3;C)=1δ0,DRn(ν1,ν2,ν3;C)=(1)n(δ0)n+1|1D1(ν1,ν2,ν3;C)D2(ν1,ν2,ν3;C)Dn1(ν1,ν2,ν3;C)Dn(ν1,ν2,ν3;C)δ0δ1δ2δn1δn0δ0(21)δ1(n11)δn2(n1)δn100δ0(n12)δn3(n2)δn2..........000δ0(nn1)δ1|, (2.7)

    where n=1,2,; δ0,δ1,,δnR; δ00 and

    δ0=1R0,δn=1R0(nk=1(nk)γkδnk),n=1,2,, (2.8)

    and Dn(ν1,ν2,ν3;C) is defined in (1.4) and R(ξ) in (1.6).

    Proof. Consider γn and δn two numerical sequences with

    R(ξ)=γ0+ξ1!γ1+ξ22!γ2++ξnn!γn+,n=0,1,;γ00, (2.9)
    ˆR(ξ)=δ0+ξ1!δ1+ξ22!δ2++ξnn!δn+,n=0,1,;δ00, (2.10)

    satisfying

    R(ξ)ˆR(ξ)=1. (2.11)

    Consideration of the Cauchy-product rule yields:

    R(ξ)ˆR(ξ)=n=0nk=0(nk)γkδnkξnn!, (2.12)

    thus producing

    nk=0(nk)γkδnk={1forn=0,0forn>0. (2.13)

    Therefore

    {δ0=1γ0,δn=1γ0(nk=1(nk)γkδnk),n=1,2,. (2.14)

    By multiplying expression (2.1) by ˆR(ξ) on both sides, it follows that

    R(ξ)ˆR(ξ)Cν1ξ+ν2ξ2+ν3ξ3=ˆR(ξ)n=0DRn(ν1,ν2,ν3;C)ξnn!. (2.15)

    Thus, in consideration of the expressions (1.4), (2.10) and (2.11), it follows that

    n=0H(m)n(ν1,ν2,ν3,C)ξnn!=n=0DRn(ν1,ν2,ν3,C)ξnn!k=0δkξkk!. (2.16)

    Applying the Cauchy-product approach to the series on the r.h.s. of Eq (2.16), the preceding equality yields the following system of infinite equations in the unknowns DRn(ν1,ν2,ν3,C),n=0,1,:

    {DR0(ν1,ν2,ν3,C)δ0=1,DR0(ν1,ν2,ν3,C)δ1+DR1(ν1,ν2,ν3,C)δ0=D1(ν1,ν2,ν3,C),DR0(ν1,ν2,ν3,C)δ2+(21)DR1(ν1,ν2,ν3,C)δ1+DR2(ν1,ν2,ν3,C)δ0=D2(ν1,ν2,ν3,C),DR0(ν1,ν2,ν3,C)δn+(n1)DR1(ν1,ν2,ν3,C)δn1++DRn(ν1,ν2,ν3,C)δ0=Dn(ν1,ν2,ν3,C), (2.17)

    From the initial equation in system (2.17), we derive the first segment of assertion (2.7). Furthermore, the particular configuration of system (2.17) (lower triangular form) allows us to ascertain the unknowns DRn(ν1,ν2,ν3,C). Using Cramer's rule to solve the first n+1 expressions, we arrive at:

    DRn(ν1,ν2,ν3,C)=1δn+10|δ00001δ1δ000D1(ν1,ν2,ν3,C)δ2(21)δ1δ00D2(ν1,ν2,ν3,C).....δn1(n11)δn2(n12)δn3δ0Dn1(ν1,ν2,ν3,C)δn(n1)δn1(n2)δn2(nn1)δ1Dn(ν1,ν2,ν3,C)|. (2.18)

    We now acquire the second part of statement (2.7) by transferring the (n+1)-th column to the first position by n adjacent column transpositions and realising that the determinant of a square matrix equals that of its transpose.

    Theorem 3.1. The g3V1PHAP DRn(ν1,ν2,ν3,C) adhere to the succeeding recurrence relation:

    DRn+1(ν1,ν2,ν3,C)=(ν1lnC+γ0)DRn(ν1,ν2,ν3,C)+nk=1(nk)γkDRnk(ν1,ν2,ν3,C)+2nν2lnCDRn1(ν1,ν2,ν3,C)+3n(n1)ν3lnCDRn2(ν1,ν2,ν3,C), (3.1)

    where

    DRk(ν1,ν2,ν3,C):=0,k=1,2, (3.2)

    and the following expansion yields the coefficients {γk}kN0:

    R(ξ)R(ξ)=n=0γnξnn!. (3.3)

    Proof. After taking ξ into account and differentiating both sides of the generating function (2.1), we arrive at:

    ξ{R(ξ)Cν1ξ+ν2ξ2+ν3ξ3}=ξ{n=0DRn(ν1,ν2,ν3;C)ξnn!} (3.4)

    which can be simplified as

    {R(ξ)R(ξ)+ν1ln(C)+2ν2ln(C)ξ+3ν3ln(C)ξ2}n=0DRn+1(ν1,ν2,ν3;C)ξnn!=n=0nDRn(ν1,ν2,ν3;C)ξn1n!.

    Further, the preceding expression in consideration of the Cauchy-Product formula can be expressed as

    n=0[nk=0(nk)γkDRnk(ν1,ν2,ν3;C)+ν1ln(C)DRn(ν1,ν2,ν3;C)+2nν2ln(C)DRn1(ν1,ν2,ν3;C)+3n(n1)ν3ln(C)DRn2(ν1,ν2,ν3;C)]DRn(ν1,ν2,ν3;C)ξnn!=n=0DRn+1(ν1,ν2,ν3;C)ξnn!. (3.5)

    Assertion (3.1) is obtained by comparing the coefficients of the identical powers of ξ on both sides of the preceding statement.

    Theorem 3.2. The g3V1PHAP DRn(ν1,ν2,ν3,C) adhere to the succeeding shift operators:

    ν1Ln:=1n(lnC)Dν1, (3.6)
    ν2Ln:=1n(lnC)D1ν1Dν2, (3.7)
    ν3Ln:=1n(lnC)D2ν1Dν3, (3.8)
    ν1L+n:=(ν1lnC+γ0)+nk=1γkk!(lnC)kDkν1+2ν2Dν1+3ν3(lnC)1D2ν1, (3.9)
    ν2L+n:=(ν1lnC+γ0)+nk=1γkk!(lnC)kDkν1Dkν2+2ν2D1ν1Dν2+3ν3(lnC)1D2ν1D2ν2, (3.10)

    and

    ν3L+n:=(ν1lnC+γ0)+nk=1γkk!(lnC)kDkν1Dkν3+2ν2D1ν1Dν3+3ν3(lnC)1D4ν1D2ν3 (3.11)

    respectively, where

    Dν1:=ν1,Dν2:=ν2;Dν3:=ν3D1ν1:=ν10g(ξ)dξ. (3.12)

    Proof. After rearranging the powers and differentiating both sides of Eq (2.1) concerning ν1, we equate the coefficients of the identical powers of ξ in both sides of the resulting equation as follows:

    Dν1{DRn(ν1,ν2,ν3,C)}=n(lnC)DRn1(ν1,ν2,ν3,C), (3.13)

    as a result, the operator provided by Eq (3.6) satisfies equation

    ν1Ln{DRn(ν1,ν2,ν3,C)}=DRn1(ν1,ν2,ν3,C). (3.14)

    Subsequently, we differentiate both sides of Eq (2.1) concerning ν2, rearrange the powers, and then calculate the coefficients of the identical powers of ξ on both sides of the resulting equation gives:

    Dν2{DRn(ν1,ν2,ν3,C)}=(lnC)n(n1)DRn2(ν1,ν2,ν3,C), (3.15)

    which further can be stated as

    Dν2{DRn(ν1,ν2,ν3,C)}=n(lnC)Dν1DRn1(ν1,ν2,ν3,C), (3.16)

    thus, it follows that

    1n(lnC)Dν2D1ν1{DRn(ν1,ν2,ν3,C)}=DRn1(ν1,ν2,ν3,C). (3.17)

    Thus, the above equation is satisfied by the operator provided by Eq (3.7).

    Again differentiating both sides of Eq (2.1) with respect to ν3, we have

    Dν3{DRn(ν1,ν2,ν3,C)}=(lnC)n(n1)(n2)DRn3(ν1,ν2,ν3,C) (3.18)

    and further stated as

    Dν3{DRn(ν1,ν2,ν3,C)}=n(lnC)D2ν1DRn1(ν1,ν2,ν3,C), (3.19)

    thus, it follows that

    1n(lnC)Dν3D2ν1{DRn(ν1,ν2,ν3,C)}=DRn1(ν1,ν2,ν3,C). (3.20)

    Thus, the above equation is satisfied by the operator provided by Eq (3.8).

    The raising operator (3.9) may be found using the following relation:

    DRnk(ν1,ν2,ν3,C)=(ν1Lnk+1ν1Lnk+2ν1Ln1ν1Ln){DRn(ν1,ν2,ν3,C)}. (3.21)

    Using Eq (3.6) in conjunction with Eq (3.21), we obtain

    DRnk(ν1,ν2,ν3,C)=(1(nk+1)(lnC)Dν11(n1)(lnC)Dν11n(lnC)Dν1){DRn(ν1,ν2,ν3,C)} (3.22)

    and further casted as

    DRnk(ν1,ν2,ν3,C)=(nk)!n!(lnC)kDkν1{DRn(ν1,ν2,ν3,C)}. (3.23)

    Further, we have

    DRn1(ν1,ν2,ν3,C)=1n(lnC)1Dν1{DRn(ν1,ν2,ν3,C)}. (3.24)

    Thus inserting expressions (3.21) and (3.23) in Eq (3.1), we find

    DRn+1(ν1,ν2,ν3,C)=((ν1lnC+γ0)+nk=1γkk!(lnC)kDkν1Dkν2+2ν2D1ν1Dν2+3ν3(lnC)1D2ν1D2ν2)×{DRn(ν1,ν2,ν3,C)}, (3.25)

    thus yielding the expression (3.9) of the raising operator ν1L+n.

    We employ the relation below to determine the raising operator (3.10):

    DRnk(ν1,ν2,ν3,C)=(ν2Lnk+1ν2Lnk+2ν2Ln1ν2Ln){DRn(ν1,ν2,ν3,C)}. (3.26)

    Using Eq (3.7) in Eq (3.26) and simplifying, we find

    DRnk(ν1,ν2,ν3,C)=(nk)!n!(lnC)kDkν1Dkν2{DRn(ν1,ν2,ν3,C)}. (3.27)

    Also, we have

    DRn1(ν1,ν2,ν3,C)=1n(lnC)1D1ν1Dν2{DRn(ν1,ν2,ν3,C)}. (3.28)

    Using Eqs (3.27) and (3.28) in Eq (3.1), we find

    DRn+1(ν1,ν2,ν3,C)=((ν1lnC+γ0)+nk=1γkk!(lnC)kDkν1Dkν2+2ν2D1ν1Dν2+3ν3(lnC)1D2ν1D2ν2)×DRn(ν1,ν2,ν3,C), (3.29)

    thus yielding the expression (3.10) of the raising operator ν2L+n.

    Last, we employ the relation below to determine the raising operator (3.11):

    DRnk(ν1,ν2,ν3,C)=(ν3Lnk+1ν3Lnk+2ν3Ln1ν3Ln){DRn(ν1,ν2,ν3,C)} (3.30)

    Using Eq (3.8) in Eq (3.30) and simplifying, we find

    DRnk(ν1,ν2,ν3,C)=(nk)!n!(lnC)kD2kν1Dkν2{DRn(ν1,ν2,ν3,C)}. (3.31)

    Also, we have

    DRn1(ν1,ν2,ν3,C)=1n(lnC)1D2ν1Dν3{DRn(ν1,ν2,ν3,C)}. (3.32)

    Using Eqs (3.31) and (3.32) in Eq (3.1), we find

    DRn+1(ν1,ν2,ν3,C)=((ν1lnC+γ0)+nk=1γkk!(lnC)kDkν1Dkν3+2ν2D1ν1Dν3+3ν3(lnC)1D4ν1D2ν3)×DRn(ν1,ν2,ν3,C), (3.33)

    thus yielding the expression (3.11) of the raising operator ν3L+n.

    Next, we find the "differential, integrodifferential and partial differential equation" for the 3V1PGHbAP DRn(ν1,ν2,ν3,C). For this, we consider the following results:

    Theorem 3.3. The generalized 3-variable 1-parameter Hermite-based Appell polynomials DRn(ν1,ν2,ν3,C) satisfy the following differential equation:

    ((ν1+γ0lnC)Dν1+nk=1γkk!(lnC)k1Dk+1ν1+2ν2(lnC)1D2ν1+3ν3(lnC)2D3ν1(n+1))×DRn(ν1,ν2,ν3,C)=0. (3.34)

    Proof. Making use of expressions (3.6) and (3.8) of the shift operators ν1Ln and ν1L+n in the factorization equation

    ν1Ln+1ν1L+n{DRn(ν1,ν2,ν3,C)}=DRn(ν1,ν2,ν3,C),

    we adhere to the expression (3.34).

    Theorem 3.4. The generalized 3-variable 1-parameter Hermite-based Appell polynomials DRn(ν1,ν2,ν3,C) satisfy the following integrodifferential equations:

    ((ν1+γ0lnC)Dν2+nk=1γkk!(lnC)k1Dkν1Dk+1ν2+2ν2(lnC)1D1ν1D2ν2+3ν3(lnC)2D2ν1D3ν2(n+1)Dν1)×DRn(ν1,ν2,ν3,C)=0, (3.35)
    ((ν1+γ0lnC)Dν3+nk=1γkk!(lnC)k1Dkν1Dk+1ν3+2ν2(lnC)1D1ν1D2ν3+3ν3(lnC)2D4ν1D3ν3(n+1)D2ν1)×DRn(ν1,ν2,ν3,C)=0, (3.36)
    ((ν1+γ0lnC)Dν3+nk=1γkk!(lnC)k1Dkν1Dkν2Dν3+2ν2(lnC)1D1ν1D2ν2Dν3+3ν3(lnC)2D2ν1D3ν2Dν3(n+1)D2ν1)DRn(ν1,ν2,ν3,C)=0, (3.37)
    ((ν1+γ0lnC)Dν2+nk=1γkk!(lnC)k1Dkν1Dν2Dkν3+2ν2(lnC)1D1ν1Dν2Dν3+3ν3(lnC)2D4ν1Dν2D2ν3(n+1)Dν1)DRn(ν1,ν2,ν3,C)=0. (3.38)

    Proof. Making use of expressions (3.7), (3.10) and (3.8), (3.11) of the shift operators Ln and L+n in the factorization equation

    Ln+1L+n{DRn(ν1,ν2,ν3,C)}=DRn(ν1,ν2,ν3,C),

    we adhere to the expression (3.35) and (3.36).

    Further, making use of expressions (3.7), (3.11) and (3.8), (3.10) of the shift operators Ln and L+n in above factorization relation, we adhere to the expression (3.37) and (3.38).

    Theorem 3.5. The generalized 3-variable 1-parameter Hermite-based Appell polynomials DRn(ν1,ν2,ν3,C) satisfy the following partial differential equations:

    ((ν1+γ0lnC)Dnν1Dν2+nDn1ν1Dν2+nk=1γkk!(lnC)k1Dnkν1Dk+1ν2+2ν2(lnC)1Dn1ν1D2ν2+3ν3(lnC)2Dn2ν1D3ν2(n+1)Dn+1ν1)DRn(ν1,ν2,ν3,C)=0. (3.39)
    ((ν1+γ0lnC)D2nν1Dν3+2nD2n1ν1Dν3+nk=1γkk!(lnC)k1D2n2kν1Dk+1ν3+2ν2(lnC)1D2n1ν1D2ν3+3ν3(lnC)2×D2n4ν1D3ν3(n+1)D2n+2ν1)DRn(ν1,ν2,ν3,C)=0. (3.40)
    ((ν1+γ0lnC)Dnν1Dν3+nDn1ν1Dν3+nk=1γkk!(lnC)k1Dnkν1Dkν2Dν3+2ν2(lnC)1Dn1ν1D2ν2Dν3+3ν3(lnC)2Dn2ν1D3ν2Dν3(n+1)Dn+2ν1)DRn(ν1,ν2,ν3,C)=0. (3.41)
    ((ν1+γ0lnC)D2nν1Dν2+2nD2n1ν1Dν2+nk=1γkk!(lnC)k1D2nkν1Dν2Dkν3+2ν2(lnC)1×D2n1ν1Dν2Dν3+3ν3(lnC)2D2n4ν1Dν2D2ν3(n+1)D2n+1ν1)DRn(ν1,ν2,ν3,C)=0. (3.42)

    Proof. Differentiating the expressions (3.35) and (3.37) w.r.t. Dν1 n times, we get the partial differential equations (3.39) and (3.41). Similarly, upon differentiating the expressions (3.36) and (3.38) w.r.t. Dν1 2n times, we get the partial differential equations (3.40) and (3.42).

    A few instances of how the above-derived results are applied are given in the next section.

    By carefully choosing the function R(ξ), various distinct members within the extensive family of Appell polynomials can be derived. This flexibility allows for the customization of polynomial solutions tailored to specific mathematical or practical requirements, catering to diverse applications across numerous domains. This is because of its versatility, enabling researchers and practitioners to access a rich spectrum of polynomial functions, each suited to address different mathematical problems or modeling scenarios. The Bernoulli, Euler, and Genocchi polynomials are pivotal in numerous expansions and approximation formulas, serving as valuable assets in the analytical theory of numbers and classical and numerical analysis. Their significance extends to addressing a myriad of challenges in engineering and physics. These polynomials and numbers provide essential tools for mathematical research and problem-solving. The Appell polynomial family, combined with the data shown in Table 1, makes up a useful and strong instrument in the toolbox of scientists and mathematicians. They provide a modifiable problem-solving method by offering specialized answers to particular mathematical difficulties in various academic fields.

    Table 1.  Several members of the Appell polynomial family.
    S. Name of the R(ξ) Generating expression Series representation
    No. polynomials and
    related numbers
    I. Bernoulli (ξeξ1) (ξeξ1)eν1ξ=k=0Bk(ν1)ξkk! Bk(ν1)=km=0(km)Bmξkm
    polynomials (ξeξ1)=k=0Bkξkk!
    and numbers [22] Bk:=Bk(0)
    II. Euler (2eξ+1) (2eξ+1)eν1ξ=k=0Ek(ν1)ξkk! Ek(ν1)=km=0(km)Em2m(ξ12)km
    polynomials 2ξe2ξ+1=k=0Ekξkk!
    and numbers [22] Ek:=2kEk(12)
    III. Genocchi (2ξeξ+1) (2ξeξ+1)eν1ξ=k=0Gk(ν1)ξkk! Gk(ν1)=km=0(km)Gmξkm
    polynomials 2ξeξ+1=k=0Gkξkk!
    and numbers [23] Gk:=Gk(0)

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    The "generating function, series definition, recurrence relation, shift operators, as well as the differential, integrodifferential, and partial differential equations" for certain members of the 3-variable, 1-parameter generalized Hermite-based Appell polynomials DRn(ν1,ν2,ν3,C) is derived by examining the following examples:

    Example 4.1. Consider

    (ξeξ1)=R(ξ)

    in generating function (2.1), the 3V1PGHbAP DRn(ν1,ν2,ν3,C) reduces to the 3-variable 1-parameter generalized Hermite-based Bernoulli polynomials (3V1PGHbBP) DBn(ν1,ν2,ν3,C) defined by the following generating function:

    (ξeξ1)Cν1ξ+ν2ξ2+ν3ξ3=n=0DBn(ν1,ν2,ν3;C)ξnn!,C>1,|ξ|<2π, (4.1)

    or, equivalently

    (ξeξ1)elnC(ν1ξ+ν2ξ2+ν3ξ3)=n=0DBn(ν1,ν2,ν3;C)ξnn!,C>1,|ξ|<2π. (4.2)

    Further, the remaining corresponding results for the 3-variable 1-parameter generalized Hermite-based Bernoulli polynomials (3V1PGHbBP) DBn(ν1,ν2,ν3,C) are established by setting similar substitutions in the following manner:

    The 3-variable 1-parameter generalized Hermite-based Bernoulli polynomials DBn(ν1,ν2,ν3;C) are defined by the following series definition:

    DBn(ν1,ν2,ν3;C)=n![n/3]k=0DBn3k(ν1,ν2)νk3(n3k)!k!(lnC)n2k, (4.3)

    where

    (ξeξ1)Cν1ξ+ν2ξ2=n=0DBn(ν1,ν2)lnCξnn!.

    Next, setting δ0=1 and δi=1i+1(i=1,2,,n) in expression (2.7), the 3-variable 1-parameter generalized Hermite-based Bernoulli polynomials DBn(ν1,ν2,ν3;C) of degree n are defined by the following determinant definition:

    DB0(ν1,ν2,ν3;C)=1δ0,DBn(ν1,ν2,ν3;C)=(1)n(δ0)n+1|1D1(ν1,ν2,ν3;C)D2(ν1,ν2,ν3;C)Dn1(ν1,ν2,ν3;C)Dn(ν1,ν2,ν3;C)112131n1n+101(21)12(n11)1n1(n1)1n001(n12)1n2(n2)1n10001(nn1)12|. (4.4)

    Also, the 3-variable, 1-parameter generalized Hermite-based Bernoulli polynomials DBn(ν1,ν2,ν3,C) adhere to the following recurrence relation and shift operators:

    DBn+1(ν1,ν2,ν3,C)=(ν1lnC12)DRn(ν1,ν2,ν3,C)nk=1(nk)Bk+1(1)k+1DBnk(ν1,ν2,ν3,C)+2nν2lnCDBn2(ν1,ν2,ν3,C)+3n(n1)ν3lnCDBn2(ν1,ν2,ν3,C), (4.5)

    where

    R(ξ)R(ξ)=n=0Bn+1(1)n+1ξnn!,

    thus using (3.3), we find

    n=0γnξnn!=n=0Bn+1(1)n+1ξnn!,

    which impliesγn=Bn+1(1)n+1;γ0=12.

    ν1Ln:=1n(lnC)Dν1, (4.6)
    ν2Ln:=1n(lnC)D1ν1Dν2, (4.7)
    ν3Ln:=1n(lnC)D2ν1Dν3, (4.8)
    ν1L+n:=(ν1lnC12)nk=1(nk)Bk+1(1)k+1(lnC)kDkν1+2ν2Dν1+3ν3(lnC)1D2ν1, (4.9)
    ν2L+n:=(ν1lnC12)nk=1(nk)Bk+1(1)k+1(lnC)kDkν1Dkν2+2ν2D1ν1Dν2+3ν3(lnC)1D2ν1D2ν2, (4.10)

    and

    ν3L+n:=(ν1lnC12)nk=1(nk)Bk+1(1)k+1(lnC)kDkν1Dkν3+2ν2D1ν1Dν3+3ν3(lnC)1D4ν1D2ν3. (4.11)

    Finally, the 3-variable 1-parameter generalized Hermite-based Bernoulli polynomials DBn(ν1,ν2,ν3,C) satisfy the following differential, integrodifferential and partial differential equations:

    ((ν112lnC)Dν1nk=1(nk)Bk+1(1)k+1(lnC)k1Dk+1ν1+2ν2(lnC)1D2ν1+3ν3(lnC)2D3ν1(n+1))DRn(ν1,ν2,ν3,C)=0,((ν112lnC)Dν2nk=1(nk)Bk+1(1)k+1(lnC)k1Dkν1Dk+1ν2+2ν2(lnC)1D1ν1D2ν2+3ν3(lnC)2D2ν1D3ν2(n+1)Dν1)DBn(ν1,ν2,ν3,C)=0,((ν112lnC)Dν3nk=1(nk)Bk+1(1)k+1(lnC)k1Dkν1Dk+1ν3+2ν2(lnC)1D1ν1D2ν3+3ν3(lnC)2D4ν1D3ν3(n+1)D2ν1)DBn(ν1,ν2,ν3,C)=0,((ν112lnC)Dν3nk=1(nk)Bk+1(1)k+1(lnC)k1Dkν1Dkν2Dν3+2ν2(lnC)1D1ν1D2ν2Dν3+3ν3(lnC)2D2ν1D3ν2Dν3(n+1)D2ν1)DBn(ν1,ν2,ν3,C)=0,((ν112lnC)Dν2nk=1(nk)Bk+1(1)k+1(lnC)k1Dkν1Dν2Dkν3+2ν2(lnC)1D1ν1Dν2Dν3+3ν3(lnC)2D4ν1Dν2D2ν3(n+1)Dν1)DBn(ν1,ν2,ν3,C)=0,((ν112lnC)Dnν1Dν2+nDn1ν1Dν2nk=1(nk)Bk+1(1)k+1(lnC)k1Dnkν1Dk+1ν2+2ν2(lnC)1Dn1ν1D2ν2+3ν3(lnC)2Dn2ν1D3ν2(n+1)Dn+1ν1)DBn(ν1,ν2,ν3,C)=0,((ν112lnC)D2nν1Dν3+2nD2n1ν1Dν3nk=1(nk)Bk+1(1)k+1(lnC)k1D2n2kν1Dk+1ν3+2ν2(lnC)1D2n1ν1D2ν3+3ν3(lnC)2D2n4ν1D3ν3(n+1)D2n+2ν1)DBn(ν1,ν2,ν3,C)=0,((ν112lnC)Dnν1Dν3+nDn1ν1Dν3nk=1(nk)Bk+1(1)k+1(lnC)k1Dnkν1Dkν2Dν3+2ν2(lnC)1Dn1ν1D2ν2Dν3+3ν3(lnC)2Dn2ν1D3ν2Dν3(n+1)Dn+2ν1)DBn(ν1,ν2,ν3,C)=0,((ν112lnC)D2nν1Dν2+2nD2n1ν1Dν2nk=1(nk)Bk+1(1)k+1(lnC)k1D2nkν1Dν2Dkν3+2ν2(lnC)1D2n1ν1Dν2Dν3+3ν3(lnC)2D2n4ν1Dν2D2ν3(n+1)D2n+1ν1)DBn(ν1,ν2,ν3,C)=0.

    Example 4.2. Consider (2eξ+1)=R(ξ) in generating function (2.1), the 3V1PGHbAP DRn(ν1,ν2,ν3,C) reduces to the 3-variable 1-parameter generalized Hermite-based Euler polynomials (3V1PGHbEP) DEn(ν1,ν2,ν3,C) defined by the following generating function:

    (2eξ+1)Cν1ξ+ν2ξ2+ν3ξ3=n=0DEn(ν1,ν2,ν3;C)ξnn!,C>1,|ξ|<π, (4.12)

    or, equivalently

    (2eξ+1)elnC(ν1ξ+ν2ξ2+ν3ξ3)=n=0DEn(ν1,ν2,ν3;C)ξnn!,C>1,|ξ|<π. (4.13)

    Further, the remaining corressponding results for the 3-variable 1-parameter generalized Hermite-based Euler polynomials (3V1PGHbEP) DEn(ν1,ν2,ν3,C) are established by setting similar substitutions in the following manner:

    The 3-variable 1-parameter generalized Hermite-based Euler polynomials DEn(ν1,ν2,ν3;C) are defined by the following series definition:

    DEn(ν1,ν2,ν3;C)=n![n/3]k=0DEn3k(ν1,ν2)νk3(n3k)!k!(lnC)n2k, (4.14)

    where

    (2eξ+1)Cν1ξ+ν2ξ2=n=0DEn(ν1,ν2)lnCξnn!.

    Next, setting δ0=1 and δi=12(i=1,2,,n) in expression (2.7), the 3-variable 1-parameter generalized Hermite-based Euler polynomials DEn(ν1,ν2,ν3;C) of degree n are defined by the following determinant definition:

    DE0(ν1,ν2,ν3;C)=1δ0,DEn(ν1,ν2,ν3;C)=(1)n(δ0)n+1|1D1(ν1,ν2,ν3;C)D2(ν1,ν2,ν3;C)Dn1(ν1,ν2,ν3;C)Dn(ν1,ν2,ν3;C)112131n1n+11121212120112(21)12(n11)12(n1)00112(n12)12(n2)000112(nn1)|. (4.15)

    Also, the 3-variable, 1-parameter generalized Hermite-based Euler polynomials DEn(ν1,ν2,ν3,C) adhere to the following recurrence relation and shift operators:

    DEn+1(ν1,ν2,ν3,C)=(ν1lnC12)DRn(ν1,ν2,ν3,C)nk=1(nk)EkDEnk(ν1,ν2,ν3,C)+2nν2lnCDEn2(ν1,ν2,ν3,C)+3n(n1)ν3lnCDEn2(ν1,ν2,ν3,C), (4.16)
    ν1Ln:=1n(lnC)Dν1, (4.17)
    ν2Ln:=1n(lnC)D1ν1Dν2, (4.18)
    ν3Ln:=1n(lnC)D2ν1Dν3, (4.19)
    ν1L+n:=(ν1lnC12)+nk=1(nk)Ek(lnC)kDkν1+2ν2Dν1+3ν3(lnC)1D2ν1, (4.20)
    ν2L+n:=(ν1lnC12)+nk=1(nk)Ek(lnC)kDkν1Dkν2+2ν2D1ν1Dν2+3ν3(lnC)1D2ν1D2ν2, (4.21)

    and

    ν3L+n:=(ν1lnC12)+nk=1(nk)Ek(lnC)kDkν1Dkν3+2ν2D1ν1Dν3+3ν3(lnC)1D4ν1D2ν3. (4.22)

    Finally, the 3-variable 1-parameter generalized Hermite-based Euler polynomials DEn(ν1,ν2,ν3,C) satisfy the following differential, integrodifferential and partial differential equations:

    ((ν112lnC)Dν1+nk=1(nk)Ek(lnC)k1Dk+1ν1+2ν2(lnC)1D2ν1+3ν3(lnC)2D3ν1(n+1))DEn(ν1,ν2,ν3,C)=0,((ν112lnC)Dν2+nk=1(nk)Ek(lnC)k1Dkν1Dk+1ν2+2ν2(lnC)1D1ν1D2ν2+3ν3(lnC)2D2ν1D3ν2(n+1)Dν1)DEn(ν1,ν2,ν3,C)=0,((ν112lnC)Dν3+nk=1(nk)Ek(lnC)k1Dkν1Dk+1ν3+2ν2(lnC)1D1ν1D2ν3+3ν3(lnC)2D4ν1D3ν3(n+1)D2ν1)DEn(ν1,ν2,ν3,C)=0,((ν112lnC)Dν3+nk=1(nk)Ek(lnC)k1Dkν1Dkν2Dν3+2ν2(lnC)1D1ν1D2ν2Dν3+3ν3(lnC)2D2ν1D3ν2Dν3(n+1)D2ν1)DEn(ν1,ν2,ν3,C)=0,((ν112lnC)Dν2+nk=1(nk)Ek(lnC)k1Dkν1Dν2Dkν3+2ν2(lnC)1D1ν1Dν2Dν3+3ν3(lnC)2D4ν1Dν2D2ν3(n+1)Dν1)DEn(ν1,ν2,ν3,C)=0,((ν112lnC)Dnν1Dν2+nDn1ν1Dν2+nk=1(nk)Ek(lnC)k1Dnkν1Dk+1ν2+2ν2(lnC)1Dn1ν1D2ν2+3ν3(lnC)2Dn2ν1D3ν2(n+1)Dn+1ν1)DEn(ν1,ν2,ν3,C)=0,((ν112lnC)D2nν1Dν3+2nD2n1ν1Dν3+nk=1(nk)Ek(lnC)k1D2n2kν1Dk+1ν3+2ν2(lnC)1D2n1ν1D2ν3+3ν3(lnC)2D2n4ν1D3ν3(n+1)D2n+2ν1)DEn(ν1,ν2,ν3,C)=0,((ν112lnC)Dnν1Dν3+nDn1ν1Dν3+nk=1(nk)Ek(lnC)k1Dnkν1Dkν2Dν3+2ν2(lnC)1Dn1ν1D2ν2Dν3+3ν3(lnC)2Dn2ν1D3ν2Dν3(n+1)Dn+2ν1)DEn(ν1,ν2,ν3,C)=0,((ν112lnC)D2nν1Dν2+2nD2n1ν1Dν2+nk=1(nk)Ek(lnC)k1D2nkν1Dν2Dkν3+2ν2(lnC)1D2n1ν1Dν2Dν3+3ν3(lnC)2D2n4ν1Dν2D2ν3(n+1)D2n+1ν1)DEn(ν1,ν2,ν3,C)=0.

    Similar results can be obtained for 3-variable 1-parameter generalized Hermite-based Genocchi polynomials DGn(ν1,ν2,ν3,C).

    We present a novel framework for introducing generalized 3-variable 1-parameter Hermite-based Appell polynomials. The essential characteristics of these polynomials are explained through generating functions, series definitions, and determinant definitions. This research uses a factorization technique to build recurrence relations, shift operators, and several differential equations, such as integrodifferential, partial, and differential. We focus on examining the special situations of 3-variable 1-parameter generalized Hermite-based Bernoulli, Euler, and Genocchi polynomials, providing an understanding of their special characteristics and use.

    Future research could focus on extending the current framework to include more than three variables, exploring the associated complexities and new properties. Further examination of additional analytical properties, such as orthogonality, asymptotic behaviour, and zeros, is also warranted. Developing efficient computational algorithms to facilitate the practical application of these polynomials in various fields, such as numerical analysis, physics, and engineering, will be beneficial. Additionally, investigating their application in solving higher-order and more complex differential equations, particularly in modeling real-world phenomena, could yield significant insights. Interdisciplinary applications in finance, biology, and data science and enhanced graphical and numerical analyses could provide deeper insights and lead to new theoretical advancements.

    The authors contribute equally to this article. Both authors have read and approved the final version of the manuscript for publication.

    The authors declare they have not used Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools in creating this article.

    The authors extend their appreciation to the Deanship of Research and Graduate Studies at King Khalid University for funding this work through Large Research Project under grant number RGP2/161/45.

    The authors declare no conflicts of interest in this article.



    [1] G. Dattoli, C. Chiccoli, S. Lorenzutta, G. Maino, A. Torre, Generalized Bessel functions and generalized Hermite polynomials, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 178 (1993), 509–516. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmaa.1993.1321 doi: 10.1006/jmaa.1993.1321
    [2] G. Dattoli, S. Lorenzutta, G. Maino, A. Torre, C. Cesarano, Generalized Hermite polynomials and super-Gaussian forms, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 203 (1996), 597–609. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmaa.1996.0399 doi: 10.1006/jmaa.1996.0399
    [3] P. Appell, J. K. de Fˊeriet, Fonctions hypergˊeomˊetriques et hypersphˊeriques: polynˆomes d' Hermite, Gauthier-Villars, Paris, 1926.
    [4] B. Yılmaz, M. A. Özarslan, Differential equations for the extended 2D Bernoulli and Euler polynomials, Adv. Differ. Equ., 2013 (2013), 107. https://doi.org/10.1186/1687-1847-2013-107 doi: 10.1186/1687-1847-2013-107
    [5] S. Khan, G. Yasmin, R. Khan, N. A. M. Hassan, Hermite-based Appell polynomials: properties and applications, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 351 (2009), 756–764. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmaa.2008.11.002 doi: 10.1016/j.jmaa.2008.11.002
    [6] P. Appell, Sur une classe de polynômes, Ann. Sci. ˊEcole. Norm. Sup., 9 (1880), 119–144. https://doi.org/10.24033/asens.186
    [7] S. Roman, The umbral calculus, New York: Academic Press, 1984.
    [8] L. Bedratyuk, J. Flusser, T. Suk, J. Kostkova, J. Kautsky, Non-separable rotation moment invariants, Pattern Recogn., 127 (2022), 108607. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patcog.2022.108607 doi: 10.1016/j.patcog.2022.108607
    [9] J. Flusser, T. Suk, L. Bedratyuk, T. Karella, 3D non-separable moment invariants, In: N. Tsapatsoulis, Computer analysis of images and patterns, CAIP 2023, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Springer, 14184 (2023), 295–305. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-44237-7_28
    [10] M. X. He, P. E. Ricci, Differential equation of Appell polynomials via the factorization method, J. Comput. Appl. Math., 139 (2002), 231–237. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-0427(01)00423-X doi: 10.1016/S0377-0427(01)00423-X
    [11] L. Infeld, T. E. Hull, The factorization method, Rev. Mod. Phys., 23 (1951), 21–68. https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.23.21 doi: 10.1103/RevModPhys.23.21
    [12] S. A. Wani, S. Khan, Certain properties and applications of the 2D Sheffer and related polynomials, Bol. Soc. Mat. Mex., 26 (2020), 947–971. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40590-020-00280-5 doi: 10.1007/s40590-020-00280-5
    [13] S. A. Wani, S. Khan, Properties and applications of the Gould-Hopper-Frobenius-Euler polynomials, Tbilisi Math. J., 12 (2019), 93–104 https://doi.org/10.32513/tbilisi/1553565629 doi: 10.32513/tbilisi/1553565629
    [14] S. Araci, M. Riyasat, S. A. Wani, S. Khan, Differential and integral equations for the 3-variable Hermite-Frobenius-Euler and Frobenius-Genocchi polynomials, Appl. Math. Inf. Sci., 11 (2017), 1335–1346. https://doi.org/10.18576/amis/110510 doi: 10.18576/amis/110510
    [15] B. S. T. Alkahtani, I. Alazman, S. A. Wani, Some families of differential equations associated with multivariate Hermite polynomials, Fractal Fract., 7 (2023), 390. https://doi.org/10.3390/fractalfract7050390 doi: 10.3390/fractalfract7050390
    [16] Z. Ozat, M. A. Ozarslan, B. Cekim, On Bell based Appell polynomials, Turk. J. Math., 47 (2023), 5. https://doi.org/10.55730/1300-0098.3415 doi: 10.55730/1300-0098.3415
    [17] G. Baran, Z. Ozat, B. Cekim, M. A. Ozarslan, Some properties of degenerate Hermite Appell polynomials in three variables, Filomat, 37 (2023), 6537–6567. https://doi.org/10.2298/FIL2319537B doi: 10.2298/FIL2319537B
    [18] N. Biricik, B. Çekim, M. A. Özarslan, Sequences of twice-iterated Δw-Gould–Hopper Appell polynomials, J. Taibah Univ. Sci., 18 (2023), 2286714. https://doi.org/10.1080/16583655.2023.2286714 doi: 10.1080/16583655.2023.2286714
    [19] S. Khan, N. Raza, General-Appell polynomials within the context of monomiality principle, Int. J. Anal., 2013 (2013), 328032. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/328032 doi: 10.1155/2013/328032
    [20] S. Khan, G. Yasmin, R. Khan, N. A. M. Hassan, Hermite-based Appell polynomials: properties and applications, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 351 (2009), 756–764. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmaa.2008.11.002 doi: 10.1016/j.jmaa.2008.11.002
    [21] H. M. Srivastava, M. A. Özarslan, B. Yılmaz, Some families of differential equations associated with the Hermite-based Appell polynomials and other classes of Hermite-based polynomials, Filomat, 28 (2014), 695–708. https://doi.org/10.2298/FIL1404695S doi: 10.2298/FIL1404695S
    [22] H. Bateman, A. Erdélyi, Higher transcendental functions, McGraw-Hill Book Company, 1953.
    [23] J. Sándor, B. Crstici, Handbook of number theory II, Springer Science & Business Media, 2004.
  • This article has been cited by:

    1. William Ramírez, Can Kızılateş, Daniel Bedoya, Clemente Cesarano, Cheon Seoung Ryoo, On certain properties of three parametric kinds of Apostol-type unified Bernoulli-Euler polynomials, 2025, 10, 2473-6988, 137, 10.3934/math.2025008
    2. Nusrat Raza, Mohammed Fadel, Subuhi Khan, On monomiality property of q -Gould-Hopper-Appell polynomials , 2025, 32, 2576-5299, 21, 10.1080/25765299.2025.2457206
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2024 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(786) PDF downloads(33) Cited by(2)

Figures and Tables

Tables(1)

Other Articles By Authors

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog