Processing math: 100%
Research article

Stochastic dynamic analysis of a chemostat model of intestinal microbes with migratory effect

  • Received: 28 October 2022 Revised: 16 December 2022 Accepted: 20 December 2022 Published: 03 January 2023
  • MSC : 37A50, 37H05, 37N25, 60G10

  • This paper proposes a stochastic intestinal chemostat model considering microbial migration, intraspecific competition and stochastic perturbation. First, the extinction and persistence in mean of the intestinal microbe of the chemostat model are investigated by constructing the appropriate Lyapunov functions. Second, we explore and obtain sufficient conditions for the existence and uniqueness of an ergodic stationary distribution of the model by using ergodic theory. The results show stochastic interference has a critical impact on the extinction and sustainable survival of the intestinal microbe. Eventually, numerical simulations are carried out to verify the theoretical results.

    Citation: Yue Dong, Xinzhu Meng. Stochastic dynamic analysis of a chemostat model of intestinal microbes with migratory effect[J]. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(3): 6356-6374. doi: 10.3934/math.2023321

    Related Papers:

    [1] Xiaodong Wang, Kai Wang, Zhidong Teng . Global dynamics and density function in a class of stochastic SVI epidemic models with Lévy jumps and nonlinear incidence. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(2): 2829-2855. doi: 10.3934/math.2023148
    [2] Xiaoxia Guo, Dehao Ruan . Long-time analysis of a stochastic chemostat model with instantaneous nutrient recycling. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(4): 9331-9351. doi: 10.3934/math.2023469
    [3] Jingen Yang, Zhong Zhao, Xinyu Song . Statistical property analysis for a stochastic chemostat model with degenerate diffusion. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(1): 1757-1769. doi: 10.3934/math.2023090
    [4] Yue Wu, Shenglong Chen, Ge Zhang, Zhiming Li . Dynamic analysis of a stochastic vector-borne model with direct transmission and media coverage. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(4): 9128-9151. doi: 10.3934/math.2024444
    [5] Hong Qiu, Yanzhang Huo, Tianhui Ma . Dynamical analysis of a stochastic hybrid predator-prey model with Beddington-DeAngelis functional response and Lévy jumps. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(8): 14492-14512. doi: 10.3934/math.2022799
    [6] Yuanfu Shao . Dynamics and optimal harvesting of a stochastic predator-prey system with regime switching, S-type distributed time delays and Lévy jumps. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(3): 4068-4093. doi: 10.3934/math.2022225
    [7] Ruoyun Lang, Yuanshun Tan, Yu Mu . Stationary distribution and extinction of a stochastic Alzheimer's disease model. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(10): 23313-23335. doi: 10.3934/math.20231185
    [8] Ying He, Bo Bi . Conditions for extinction and ergodicity of a stochastic Mycobacterium tuberculosis model with Markov switching. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(11): 30686-30709. doi: 10.3934/math.20241482
    [9] Tahir Khan, Fathalla A. Rihan, Muhammad Bilal Riaz, Mohamed Altanji, Abdullah A. Zaagan, Hijaz Ahmad . Stochastic epidemic model for the dynamics of novel coronavirus transmission. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(5): 12433-12457. doi: 10.3934/math.2024608
    [10] Yassine Sabbar, Aeshah A. Raezah . Threshold analysis of an algae-zooplankton model incorporating general interaction rates and nonlinear independent stochastic components. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(7): 18211-18235. doi: 10.3934/math.2024889
  • This paper proposes a stochastic intestinal chemostat model considering microbial migration, intraspecific competition and stochastic perturbation. First, the extinction and persistence in mean of the intestinal microbe of the chemostat model are investigated by constructing the appropriate Lyapunov functions. Second, we explore and obtain sufficient conditions for the existence and uniqueness of an ergodic stationary distribution of the model by using ergodic theory. The results show stochastic interference has a critical impact on the extinction and sustainable survival of the intestinal microbe. Eventually, numerical simulations are carried out to verify the theoretical results.



    We are not individuals but a collection of living things [1]. Up to 10 million microbes inhabit every square centimeter of skin [2]. Surface-dwelling microbes even play a crucial role in maintaining the homeostasis of the host microbial community [3]. At the same time, our teeth, throat, and esophagus are even more infested with microbes, which accumulate thousands of times more than the surface of the skin. The human body has a large number of microorganisms living in the gut, and the vast majority of them are beneficial to us. A correct view of their value and continuous research and discovery is the proper attitude of human beings towards the microbes in the body. Researchers have long applied various methods to study the role of the microbiome in living organisms and achieved significant results. In addition to the application of biological methods [4], the application of mathematical methods is undoubtedly a great help for this research direction [5,6].

    The flow characteristics of chemostat model are very suitable for simulating the flow ecological environment. And the culture of microorganisms in the chemostat can be regulated by controlling the concentration of nutrients. Combined with the features of intestinal circulation, the chemostat model can be used to further investigate the microbial system in the intestinal tract. Presently, research on chemostat models has been further improved [9,10,11], and researchers have studied ecosystems with different types of functional responses through chemostat models, such as Monod-Haldane [12,13,23], Lotka-Volterra [14], Holling II [16], etc. In spite of this, few papers have applied the chemostat model to specific ecological environment. This paper proposes that, it is an innovation to apply the chemostat model to the characterization of intestinal microorganisms. In addition, based on the study of reaction function in the above literature and the characteristics of intestinal microorganisms, we adopted Holling II functional response function. In the gut, microbes circulate with material and may attach to the folds in the intestinal wall as they flow, or they may fall off the wall. It is an innovative point of this paper to consider and study the impact of the migration between the flowing microorganisms and the microorganisms on the intestinal wall as the microorganisms on the two plates. This phenomenon can be described by adding a migration term to the model. In [7], the authors considered the variable flow rate, microbial decomposition, and other factors to construct a detailed intestinal chemostat model.

    Inevitably, microbial survival in the gut is affected by uncertainties such as body temperature, water supply and pH-value.

    In stochastic biological models, scholars use Brownian motion to describe the perturbation of the system caused by uncertain factors and have made important achievements [8,17,18,21,22]. On the basis of deterministic models, many authors consider the linear disturbance of mortality, which further enrich the content of the models [15,25,27,29]. In addition, bilinear perturbation and nonlinear perturbation have been considered in [24,28], respectively. In [26], stochastic models perturbed by Lévy noise are concerned. From what has been discussed above, we assume that uncertain factors can cause an impact on microbial growth, that is, environmental disturbance, mainly interferes with the consumption function. Then the following chemostat model with nonlinear perturbation, intraspecific competition and migration is established.

    {dS(t)=[D(S0S(t))aS(t)m+S(t)(x1(t)+x2(t))]dtσaS(t)m+S(t)(x1(t)+x2(t))dB(t),dx1(t)=[x1(t)(bS(t)m+S(t)αx1(t)βx2(t))vx1(t)Dx1(t)+r2x2(t)r1x1(t)]dt+σbS(t)x1(t)m+S(t)dB(t),dx2(t)=[x2(t)(bS(t)m+S(t)αx1(t)βx2(t))vx2(t)r2x2(t)+r1x1(t)]dt+σbS(t)x2(t)m+S(t)dB(t). (1.1)

    Let (Ω,F,P) be a complete probability space with a filtration {Ft}t0 satisfying the usual conditions (i.e., it is increasing and right continuous while F0 contains all P-null sets). At the same time, there are the corrective coefficients of Wong-Zakai in the model, and the same calculation results can be obtained by using Itô integral and Stratonovich integral [30]. The function B(t) is independent standard Brownian motion defined on this complete probability space with B(0)=0 and σ>0 represents for the intensity of the white noise. And other parameters are defined in the Table 1.

    Table 1.  Parameter definition.
    Parameters Paraphrase
    S(t)0 the concentration of nutrients in the intestine at time t
    x1(t)0 the amount of bacteria in the gut at time t
    x2(t)0 the amount of bacteria on the wall at time t
    D0 input and output flow rate
    S00 the initial concentration of nutrients
    a0 the maximum rate of nutrient uptake by microorganisms
    b0 the effective rate of nutrient uptake by microorganisms
    m0 the half-saturation constant
    r10 the rate at which microbe attaches to the wall
    r20 the rate at which microbe detaches from wall
    α0 intra-specific competition rate of the gut population of microbe
    β0 intra-specific competition rate of wall population of microbe
    v0 the mortality of the microbial

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    The characteristics of the proposed model are the application of the chemostat model to simulate the intestinal environment, and the introduction of microbial migration, interspecific competition and nonlinear disturbance on the basis of the classical chemostat model. Compared with [7], we consider the effect of environmental disturbance on the microbial response function based on the corresponding autonomous model.

    The organizational structure of the paper is as follows. In Section 2, we provide the lemmas and partial proofs used in the argument of this paper. In Section 3, we verify the existence and uniqueness of global positive solution and the boundedness of solution of the system (1.1). Section 4 presents all the research results for the proposed system. In the first subsection, sufficient conditions for microbial extinction are proved. Then, the condition of persistence in mean of the system is given. Next, the existence of ergodic stationary distribution is established. Finally, the behavior of system (1.1) is simulated numerically in Section 5, and the conclusions are given.

    We let R+={xR:x>0}. If f(t) is an intergrable function on [0,+), let f(t)=1tt0f(θ)dθ. Here we give the common lemmas of stochastic differential equations which will be used in the proof below.

    Lemma 2.1 (Stationary distribution [20]). Let X(t) be a homogenous Markov process in El (El denotes l-dimensional Euclidean space), and it is described by the following stochastic differential equation

    dX(t)=b(X)dt+kr=1gr(X)dBr(t).

    The diffusion matrix is defined as follows

    A(x)=(aij(x)),aij(x)=kr=1gir(x)gjr(x).

    If there is a bounded open set URn with regular that satisfies the following conditions.

    (i) For any xU,εRn, there is a constant ς>0, satisfying that:

    ni,j=1aij(x)εiεjς|ε|2.

    (ii) For any xRnU, there is a C1,2 function V, such that LV<0.

    Then, the Markov process X(t) exists a stationary distribution ψ().

    Lemma 2.2 (Existence and uniqueness of global positive solutions). For any initial value (S(0),x1(0),x2(0))R3+, there is a unique positive solution (S(t),x1(t),x2(t)) of system (1.1) on t0 and the solution will remain in R3+ with probability one.

    Proof. Since the coefficients of the system (1.1) satisfy the local Lipschitz conditions, then for any given initial value (S(0),x1(0),x2(0))R3+, there exists a unique local solution (S(t),x1(t),x2(t)) on t[0,τe), where τe is the explosion time. Now we just need to prove τe= a.s..

    Let k0>0 be so sufficiently large that any initial value S(0), x1(0) and x2(0) lying within the interval [1k0,k0]. For any integer k satisfying kk0, define the stopping time as follows:

    τk=inf{t[0,τe):min{S(t),x1(t),x2(t)}1kormax{S(t),x1(t),x2(t)}k},

    with inf= (where denotes the empty set). It is easy to get that τk is increasing as k. Let τ=limkτk, hence ττk a.s.. Next, we only need to verify τ= a.s.. If this statement is false, then there exist two constants T>0 and ϵ(0,1) such that

    P{τT}>ϵ.

    Thus there is an integer k1k0 such that

    P{τkT}ϵ,kk1.

    Define a C2-function I: R3+R+ as follows,

    I(S(t),x1(t),x2(t))=(S1lnS)+(x11lnx1)+(x21lnx2)+x212+x222. (2.1)

    Clearly,

    I>0.

    Applying Itô's formula yields

    LI=(11S)[DS0DSaSm+S(x1+x2)]+σ2a22(m+S)2(x1+x2)2+(11x1+x1)[bSx1m+S(v+D)x1αx21βx1x2+r2x2r1x1]+σ2b2S2(1+x21)2(m+S)2+(11x2+x2)[bSx2m+Svx2αx1x2βx22r2x2+r1x1]+σ2b2S2(1+x22)2(m+S)2=DS0DSaSm+S(x1+x2)DS0S+D+am+S(x1+x2)+σ2a22(m+S)2(x1+x2)2+bSx1m+S(v+D)x1αx21βx1x2+r2x2r1x1bSm+S+(v+D+r1)+αx1+βx2r2x2x1+bSx21m+S(v+D)x21αx31βx21x2+r2x1x2r1x21+bSx2m+Svx2αx1x2βx22r2x2+r1x1bSm+S+(v+r2)+αx1+βx2r1x1x2+bSx22m+Svx22αx1x22βx32r2x22+r1x1x2+σ2a22(m+S)2(x1+x2)2+σ2b2S22(m+S)2(2+x21+x22)DS0+2D+2v+r1+r2+(am+b+2α)x1+(am+2β+b)x2+(r1+r2)x1x2+bx21+bx22αx31βx32(v+D+r1)x21βx21x2(v+r2)x22αx1x22+σ2a22m2(x1+x2)2+σ2b22(2+x21+x22)DS0+2v+2D+r1+r2+σ2b2+h1:=κ,

    where

    h1=max{(am+b+2α)x1+(am+b+2β)x2+(r1+r2)x1x2+bx21+bx22αx31βx32(v+D+r1)x21(v+r2)x22βx21x2αx1x22+σ2a22m2(x1+x2)2+σ2b22(x21+x22)},

    then

    LIDS0+2v+2D+r1+r2+σ2b2+h1:=κ, (2.2)

    where κ is a positive constant.

    The proof is completed.

    Lemma 2.3 (Boundedness). For any initial value (S(0),x1(0),x2(0))R3+, the solution (S(t),x1(t),x2(t)) of the stochastic system (1.1) is bounded. And it satisfies

    lim supt[S(t)+abx1(t)+abx2(t)]ω,a.s., (2.3)

    where ω=max{DS0μ,S(0)+abx1(0)+abx2(0)}.

    Proof. Denote

    Y(t)=S(t)+abx1(t)+abx2(t),

    then from the system (1.1), we obtain

    dY(t)=[DS0DSabvx1abDx1abαx21abβx1x2abvx2abαx1x2abβx22]dt[DS0DSabvx1abDx1abvx2]dt[DS0μ(S+abx1+abx2)]dt, (2.4)

    where μ=min{D,v}, Y(t) is the solution of (2.4). And it has the following form

    Y(t)ω.

    Furthermore,

    lim supt+x1(t)bωa,lim supt+x2(t)bωa.

    The proof is completed.

    In this subsection, we establish threshold condition for intestinal microbial extinction.

    Define a parameter

    R1=bS0m+S0σ2b2S204(m+S0)2v,R2=1σ2v.

    Theorem 3.1. (1) If bS0m+S0<2σ2 and R1<0, then microbials tend to extinction almost surely.

    (2) If bS0m+S02σ2 and R2<0, then microbials tend to extinction almost surely.

    Proof. Through the system, we can get,

    d(x1+x2)=[vx1Dx1+x1(bSm+Sαx1βx2)vx2+x2(bSm+Sαx1βx2)]dt+σbSm+S(x1+x2)dB(t).

    Applying Itô's formula gives

    dln(x1(t)+x2(t))={1x1+x2[v(x1+x2)Dx1+(x1+x2)(bSm+Sαx1βx2)]σ2b2S22(x1+x2)2(m+S)2(x21+x22)}dt+σbSm+SdB(t)[vDx1x1+x2+(bSm+Sαx1βx2)σ2b2S24(m+S)2]dt+σbSm+SdB(t)[v+bSm+Sσ2b2S24(m+S)2]dt+σbSm+SdB(t). (3.1)

    Consider the function

    g(S)=bSm+Sσ2b2S24(m+S)2.

    Obviously, when bSm+S=2σ2, g(S) gets the maximum. Otherwise, SS0. Therefore, the maximum value of g(S) is discussed in the following two cases.

    Case 1. If bS0m+S0<2σ2,

    g(S)bS0m+S0σ2b2S204(m+S0)2.

    Combining (3.1), we get

    dln(x1(t)+x2(t))[bS0m+S0σ2b2S204(m+S0)2v]dt+σbSm+SdB(t). (3.2)

    Integrating from 0 to t and dividing by t on both sides of (3.2) give

    ln(x1(t)+x2(t))tbS0m+S0σ2b2S204(m+S0)2v+1tt0σbS(τ)m+S(τ)dB(τ)+ln(x1(0)+x2(0))t.

    According to the strong law of large numbers [19], we obtain

    limt1tt0σbS(τ)m+S(τ)dB(τ)=0.

    So we can get

    lim suptln(x1(t)+x2(t))tbS0m+S0σ2b2S204(m+S0)2v<0,

    which means

    limt(x1(t)+x2(t))=0.

    Case 2. If bS0m+S02σ2,

    g(S)1σ2.

    Combining (3.1), we get

    dln(x1(t)+x2(t))[1σ2v]dt+σbSm+SdB(t). (3.3)

    Similar to Case 1, we can obtain

    lim suptln(x1(t)+x2(t))t1σ2v<0,

    which means

    limt(x1(t)+x2(t))=0.

    In this subsection, we examine the conditions sufficient for microbes to persist over time.

    Define

    R=2bS0m+S02vDr1r2σ2b24b2ω2(α+β)(m+S0)Da.

    Theorem 3.2. If R>0, then for any initial value (S(t),x1(t),x2(t))R3+, the system (1.1) is persistent in mean.

    Proof. Integrating the equations of the system (1.1) from 0 to t and dividing t on both sides yield

    ε(t)b(S(t)S(0))at+x1(t)x1(0)t+x2(t)x2(0)tbDS0a2b2ω2(α+β)a2bDaS(t)(v+D)x1(t)vx2(t).

    Then we can get

    S(t)S02bω2(α+β)Daa(v+D)Dbx1(t)avDbx2(t)aDbε(t). (3.4)

    Applying Itô's formula gives

    d(lnx1+lnx2)=[vD+bSm+Sαx1βx2+r2x2x1r1σ2b2S22(m+S)2v+bSm+Sαx1βx2r2+r1x1x2σ2b2S22(m+S)2]dt+2σbSm+SdB(t)[2vDr1r22αx12βx2+2bSm+Sσ2b2S2(m+S)2]dt+2σbSm+SdB(t)[2vDr1r22αx12βx2+2bSm+S0σ2b2]dt+2σbSm+SdB(t),

    from which we can obtain

    lnx1(t)lnx1(0)t+lnx2(t)lnx2(0)t2vDr1r22αx12βx2+2bm+S0Sσ2b2+1tt02σbS(τ)m+S(τ)dB(τ)2vDr1r2σ2b22αx12βx2+1tt02σbS(τ)m+S(τ)dB(τ)+2bS0m+S04b2ω2(α+β)(m+S0)Da2a(v+D)D(m+S0)x12avD(m+S0)x22a(m+S0)Dε(t)2bS0m+S02vDr1r2σ2b2(2α+2a(v+D)D(m+S0))x1(2β+2avD(m+S0))x24b2ω2(α+β)(m+S0)Da+1tt02σbS(τ)m+S(τ)dB(τ)2a(m+S0)Dε(t).

    From the strong law of large number of martingales, we have

    limt1tt02σbS(τ)m+S(τ)dB(τ)=0.

    Since

    limtlnx1(t)+lnx2(t)t=0,limtε(t)=0.

    When R>0 we can get

    lim inft(x1+x2)1Q[2bS0m+S02vDr1r2σ2b24b2ω2(α+β)(m+S0)Da]>0,

    where

    Q=max{2α+2a(v+D)D(m+S0),2β+2avD(m+S0)}.

    This completes the proof.

    In this subsection, we explore sufficient conditions for the existence of a unique stationary ergodic distribution.

    Define

    R=DbS02(m+S0)(D+v+r1+σ2b22)(D+v+r2+σ2b22).

    Theorem 3.3. Assume R>1, then system (1.1) exists a unique ergodic stationary distribution.

    Proof. In order to prove this theorem, it is necessary to prove that system (1.1) satisfies the conditions in Lemma 2.1. Define

    V1(S,x1,x2)=M[c1lnSc2lnx1c3lnx2]+x212+x222=MV2+V3.

    V1(S,x1,x2) is a continuous function, so it exists a minimum V1min. We can get a C2-function V:R3+R+:

    V(S,x1,x2)=V1(S,x1,x2)V1min.

    Applying Itô's formula gives

    LV2=c1S[DS0DSaSm+S(x1+x2)]+c1σ2a22(m+S)2(x1+x2)2c2x1[vx1Dx1+x1(bSm+Sαx1βx2)+r2x2r1x1]+c2σ2b2S22(m+S)2c3x2[vx2r2x2+x2(bSm+Sαx1βx2)+r1x1]+c3σ2b2S22(m+S)2=c1DS0S+c1D+c1am+S(x1+x2)+c1σ2a22(m+S)2(x1+x2)2+c2v+c2Dc2bSm+S+c2αx1+c2βx2c2r2x2x1+c2r1+c2σ2b2S22(m+S)2+c3vc3bSm+S+c3αx1+c3βx2+c3r2c3r1x1x2+c3σ2b2S22(m+S)2c1DS02Sc2bSm+S0c3D+c1D+c2(D+v+r1+σ2b22)+c3(D+v+r2+σ2b22)+c1σ2a22m2(x1+x2)2+(c1am+c2α+c3α)x1+(c1am+c2β+c3β)x2c3bSm+S0c1DS02S33c1c2c3D2bS02(m+S0)+c1D+c2(D+v+r1+σ2b22)+c3(D+v+r2+σ2b22)+c1σ2a22m2(x1+x2)2+(c1am+c2α+c3α)x1+(c1am+c2β+c3β)x2c3bSm+S0c1DS02S=3DS0(3R1)+(c1am+c2α+c3α)x1+(c1am+c2β+c3β)x2c3bSm+S0c1DS02S+c1σ2a22m2(x1+x2)2,

    where c1=S0, c2=DS0D+v+r1+σ2b22 and c3=DS0D+v+r2+σ2b22, so that

    c1D=c2(D+v+r1+σ2b22)=c3(D+v+r2+σ2b22)=DS0.

    In the same way, we can get

    LV3=bSx21m+Sαx31βx2x21vx21Dx21+r2x1x2r1x21+σ2b2S2x212(m+S)2+bSx22m+Sαx1x22βx32vx22r2x22+r1x1x2+σ2b2S2x222(m+S)2bx21αx31βx2x21+r2x1x2+σ2b22(x21+x22)+bx22αx1x22βx32+r1x1x2.

    Then,

    LV=MLV2+LV33MDS0(3R1)+(c1am+c2α+c3α)Mx1+(c1am+c2β+c3β)Mx2Mc3bSm+S0Mc1DS02S+Mc1σ2a22m2(x1+x2)2+(b+σ2b22)x21+(b+σ2b22)x22+(r1+r2)x1x2αx31βx32αx1x22βx21x2,

    where M is a sufficiently large constant such that

    3MDS0(3R1)+max{A,B,C,E,F}2, (3.5)

    where A,B,C,E,F are defined in the following.

    Define a compact bounded subset U,

    U={(S,x1,x2)R3+:ϵS1ϵ,ϵx11ϵ,ϵx21ϵ},

    and in the set R3+U, choosing ϵ small enough such that

    3MDS0(3R1)c1MDS02ϵ+A1, (3.6)
    3MDS0(3R1)+(c1am+c2α+c3α)Mϵ+(b+σ2b22)ϵ2+B1, (3.7)
    3MDS0(3R1)+(c1am+c2β+c3β)Mϵ+(b+σ2b22)ϵ2+C1, (3.8)
    3MDS0(3R1)c3Mb(m+S0)ϵ+A1, (3.9)
    3MDS0(3R1)α2ϵ3+E1, (3.10)
    3MDS0(3R1)β2ϵ3+F1. (3.11)

    Next, six domains are given in the following,

    U1={(S,x1,x2)R3+:0<S<ϵ},U2={(S,x1,x2)R3+:0<x1<ϵ},
    U3={(S,x1,x2)R3+:0<x2<ϵ},U4={(S,x1,x2)R3+:S>1ϵ},
    U5={(S,x1,x2)R3+:x1>1ϵ},U6={(S,x1,x2)R3+:x2>1ϵ}.

    Case 1. If (S,x1,x2)U1,

    LV3MDS0(3R1)+(c1am+c2α+c3α)Mx1+(c1am+c2β+c3β)Mx2Mc1DS02S+Mc1σ2a22m2(x1+x2)2+(b+σ2b22)x21+(b+σ2b22)x22+(r1+r2)x1x2αx31βx32αx1x22βx21x23MDS0(3R1)c1MDS02ϵ+A,

    where

    (3.12)

    Together with (3.5) and (3.6), we get LV1.

    Case 2. If (S,x1,x2)U2,

    LV3MDS0(3R1)+(c1am+c2α+c3α)Mx1+(c1am+c2β+c3β)Mx2βx32+Mc1σ2a22m2(x1+x2)2+(b+σ2b22)x21+(b+σ2b22)x22+(r1+r2)x1x2αx31αx1x22βx21x23MDS0(3R1)+(c1am+c2α+c3α)Mϵ+(b+σ2b22)ϵ2+B,

    where

    B=sup(S,x1,x2)R3+{(c1am+c2β+c3β)Mx2+Mc1σ2a22m2(x1+x2)2+(b+σ2b22)x22+(r1+r2)x1x2αx31αx1x22βx21x2βx32}. (3.13)

    On account of (3.5) and (3.7), we get LV1.

    Case 3. If (S,x1,x2)U3,

    LV3MDS0(3R1)+(c1am+c2α+c3α)Mx1+(c1am+c2β+c3β)Mx2βx32+Mc1σ2a22m2(x1+x2)2+(b+σ2b22)x21+(b+σ2b22)x22+(r1+r2)x1x2αx31αx1x22βx21x23MDS0(3R1)+(c1am+c2β+c3β)Mϵ+(b+σ2b22)ϵ2+C,

    where

    C=sup(S,x1,x2)R3+{(c1am+c2α+c3α)Mx1+Mc1σ2a22m2(x1+x2)2+(b+σ2b22)x21+(r1+r2)x1x2αx31αx1x22βx21x2βx32}. (3.14)

    In view of (3.5) and (3.8), we get LV1.

    Case 4. If (S,x1,x2)U4,

    LV3MDS0(3R1)+(c1am+c2α+c3α)Mx1+(c1am+c2β+c3β)Mx2Mc3bSm+S0+Mc1σ2a22m2(x1+x2)2+(b+σ2b22)x21+(b+σ2b22)x22+(r1+r2)x1x2αx31βx32αx1x22βx21x23MDS0(3R1)c3Mb(m+S0)ϵ+A.

    Considering (3.5) and (3.9), we get LV1.

    Case 5. If (S,x1,x2)U5,

    LV3MDS0(3R1)+(c1am+c2α+c3α)Mx1+(c1am+c2β+c3β)Mx2+Mc1σ2a22m2(x1+x2)2+(b+σ2b22)x21+(b+σ2b22)x22+(r1+r2)x1x2αx31βx32αx1x22βx21x23MDS0(3R1)α2ϵ3+E,

    where

    E=sup(S,x1,x2)R3+{(c1am+c2α+c3α)Mx1+(c1am+c2β+c3β)Mx2+Mc1σ2a22m2(x1+x2)2+(b+σ2b22)x21+(b+σ2b22)x22+(r1+r2)x1x2α2x31βx32αx1x22βx21x2}. (3.15)

    Combining with (3.5) and (3.10), we get LV1.

    Case 6. If (S,x1,x2)U6,

    LV3MDS0(3R1)+(c1am+c2α+c3α)Mx1+(c1am+c2β+c3β)Mx2+Mc1σ2a22m2(x1+x2)2+(b+σ2b22)x21+(b+σ2b22)x22+(r1+r2)x1x2αx31βx32αx1x22βx21x23MDS0(3R1)β2ϵ3+F,

    where

    F=sup(S,x1,x2)R3+{(c1am+c2α+c3α)Mx1+(c1am+c2β+c3β)Mx2+Mc1σ2a22m2(x1+x2)2+(b+σ2b22)x21+(b+σ2b22)x22+(r1+r2)x1x2β2x32αx31αx1x22βx21x2}. (3.16)

    Together with (3.5) and (3.11), we get LV1.

    Evidently, there exists a sufficiently small ε such that LV1, for any (S,x1,x2)R3+U.

    In addition, the diffusion matrix of the system (1.1) is

    (σ2a2S2(m+S)2(x1+x2)2000σ2b2S2x21(m+S)2000σ2b2S2x22(m+S)2).

    Then there exists a positive N=min(S,x1,x2)Uε{σ2a2S2(m+S)2(x1+x2)2,σ2b2S2x21(m+S)2,σ2b2S2x22(m+S)2} such that

    3i,j=1ai,jξiξj=σ2a2S2(m+S)2(x1+x2)2ξ21+σ2b2S2x21(m+S)2ξ22+σ2b2S2x22(m+S)2ξ23N|ξ|2,

    where (S,x1,x2)U, ξ=(ξ1,ξ2,ξ3)R3+. Obviously this satisfies the conditions in the Lemma 2.1.

    Hence, the system (1.1) exists a unique stationary distribution.

    For the theoretical results obtained above, we will conduct further verification through numerical simulation.

    Example 1. We use numerical simulations to verify the conditions under which microbes would go extinct. For details about parameter values, see Tables 2 and 3.

    Table 2.  Parameter settings for Figure 1(a).
    Parameters S(0) x1(0) x2(0) S0 D a b m v α β r1 r2 σ
    value 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 1 2 4 1 0.5 0.1 0.2 0.5 0.8 1.4

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV
    Table 3.  Parameter settings for Figure 1(b).
    Parameters S(0) x1(0) x2(0) S0 D a b m v α β r1 r2 σ
    value 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 1 2 4 1 0.5 0.1 0.2 0.5 0.8 2

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    And the results are as follows.

    The changes in the density of microorganisms and nutrient are shown in Figure 1, the red and green tracks gradually approach zero. Under those parameter settings, R1=0.0511<0 and R2=0.25<0, the threshold conditions of microbial extinction are met. Therefore, the theoretical results are consistent with the numerical simulation results.

    Figure 1.  The trajectories of the solution of the stochastic model.

    From the point of view of extinction threshold, it is easy to analyze that large noise leads to microbial extinction. Next, we further analyze the effect of noise on the survival of gut microbes. In Example 2, we demonstrate that the enteric microorganism could still survive for a long time under the influence of certain noise.

    Example 2. The parameters of composite number are selected to meet the conditions of microbial persistence, that is, R>0. The correctness of the conclusion is verified by the following numerical simulation. Parameter settings are shown in Table 4, at this point, R=0.1096>0, and simulation results are shown in Figure 2.

    Table 4.  Parameter Settings for Example 2.
    Parameters S(0) x1(0) x2(0) S0 D a b m v α β r1 r2 σ
    value 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.4 0.03 2 0.4 0.25 0.03 0.05 0.05 0.01 0.02 0.03

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV
    Figure 2.  The trajectories of the solutions of the stochastic model and the deterministic model.

    In addition to the trajectories indicated by the legend in Figure 2, the black dashed line, the black solid line and the purple solid line represent the trajectories of S, x1 and x2 of the deterministic model, respectively.

    As we can see from the figure, when it is not affected by noise, that is, σ=0, the microorganism will survive for a long time. When affected by a certain noise, the trajectories fluctuate near the trajectories of the corresponding deterministic model, and all of them are above the X-axis. In other words, microbes are still persistent.

    Example 3. On the basis of Example 2, with other parameters unchanged and σ=0.7, the numerical simulation results are shown in Figure 3.

    Figure 3.  The trajectories of x1, x2 of the stochastic model and the deterministic model.

    Under the influence of high noise, the originally persistent microorganisms tend to become extinct. Therefore, it can be concluded that the strong noise has adverse effects on the survival of microorganisms. This conclusion is reflected in the threshold values of microbial persistence and extinction.

    Example 4. Finally, we verify the existence of stationary ergodic distribution through numerical simulation. The density distributions of microorganisms and nutrient are shown in Figure 4. Set the parameters as Table 5.

    Figure 4.  The probability densities of S(t), x1(t) and x2(t).
    Table 5.  Parameter Settings for Example 4.
    Parameters S(0) x1(0) x2(0) S0 D a b m v α β r1 r2 σ
    value 0.2 0.2 0.2 10 0.3 3 3 0.3 0.05 0.5 0.9 0.1 0.1 0.05

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    In this case, R=2.0535>1, and the theoretical results are consistent with the numerical simulation.

    This paper proposes a stochastic chemostat model for intestinal microorganisms that considers migration and intraspecific competition. The dynamic behavior of the model is analyzed by ordinary differential theory. By constructing the Lyapunov functions, the threshold conditions of intestinal microbial extinction and persistence in mean are obtained, and the condition for the existence of stationary ergodic distribution is analyzed. Analysis shows that high noise increases the risk of extinction of gut microbes. At the same time, too fast intestinal velocity will also affect the survival of microorganisms. Now, we sum up the main results as follows.

    (1) Microorganisms tend to become extinct when the following conditions are met.

    (i) If bS0m+S0<2σ2 and R1<0, then microbials tend to extinction almost surely.

    (ii) If bS0m+S02σ2 and R2<0, then microbials tend to extinction almost surely.

    (2) If R>0, then the microorganism is persistent in mean. In addtion, we get

    lim inft(x1+x2)RQ>0.

    (3) Assume R>1, then system (1.1) exists a unique ergodic stationary distribution.

    By overcoming the difficulties in Lyapunov function construction and inequality reduction, the sufficient conditions for microbial extinction, persistence and stationary ergodic distribution were obtained. The threshold of microbial persistence or extinction is influenced by environmental disturbance (noise intensity). The results of numerical simulation also show that a large degree of noise will interfere with the survival of microorganisms, so that the microorganisms that can live for a long time tend to become extinct.

    This work is supported by the Shandong Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China (No.ZR2019MA003), the Research Fund for the Taishan Scholar Project of Shandong Province of China and the SDUST Innovation Fund for Graduate Students (No.YC20210291).

    The authors declare no conflicts of interest.



    [1] J. A. Gilbert, R. A. Quinn, J. Debelius, Z. Z. Xu, J. Morton, N. Garg, et al., Microbiome-wide association studies link dynamic microbial consortia to disease, Nature, 535 (2016), 94–103. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature18850 doi: 10.1038/nature18850
    [2] G. W. Tannock, Normal microflora: an introduction to microbes inhabiting the human body, Springer Science Business Media, 1995.
    [3] L. V. Hooper, D. R. Littman, A. J. Macpherson, Interactions between the microbiota and the immune system, Science, 336 (2012), 1268–1273. https://science.org/doi/abs/10.1126/science.1223490
    [4] J. Halfvarson, C. J. Brislawn, R. Lamendella, Y. Vázquez-Baeza, W. A. Walters, L. M. Bramer, et al., Dynamics of the human gut microbiome in inflammatory bowel disease, Nat. Microbiol., 2 (2017), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmicrobiol.2017.4 doi: 10.1038/nmicrobiol.2017.4
    [5] B. Tang, Mathematical investigations of growth of microorganisms in the gradostat, J. Math. Biol., 23 (1986), 319–339. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00275252 doi: 10.1007/BF00275252
    [6] A. Mitchell, Y. Pilpel, A mathematical model for adaptive prediction of environmental changes by microorganisms, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A, 108 (2011), 7271–7276. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1019754108 doi: 10.1073/pnas.1019754108
    [7] B. Hall, X. Han, P. E. Kloeden, H. W. Van Wyk, A nonautonomous chemostat model for the growth of gut microbiome with varying nutrient, Discrete Cont. Dyn. Syst., 15 (2022), 2889–2908. https://doi.org/10.3934/dcdss.2022075 doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2022075
    [8] H. Qi, X. Leng, X. Meng, T. Zhang, Periodic solution and ergodic stationary distribution of SEIS dynamical systems with active and latent patients, Qual. Theory Dyn. Syst., 18 (2019), 347–369. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12346-018-0289-9 doi: 10.1007/s12346-018-0289-9
    [9] C. Fritsch, J. Harmand, F. Campillo, A modeling approach of the chemostat, Ecol. Modell., 299 (2015), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2014.11.021 doi: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2014.11.021
    [10] J. Monod, Technique, theory and applications of continuous culture, Ann. Inst. Pasteur, 79 (1950), 390–410.
    [11] A. Novick, L. Szilard, Description of the chemostat, Science, 112 (1950), 715–716. https:/10.1126/science.112.2920.715 doi: 10.1126/science.112.2920.715
    [12] Z. Liu, R. Tan, Impulsive harvesting and stocking in a Monod-Haldane functional response predator-prey system, Chaos Solitons Fract., 34 (2007), 454–464. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2006.03.054 doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2006.03.054
    [13] X. Zhang, R. Yuan, A stochastic chemostat model with mean-reverting Ornstein-Uhlenbeck process and Monod-Haldane response function, Appl. Math. Comput., 394 (2021), 125833. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2020.125833 doi: 10.1016/j.amc.2020.125833
    [14] M. Gao, D. Jiang, Stationary distribution of a chemostat model with distributed delay and stochastic perturbations, Appl. Math. Lett., 123 (2020), 107585. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aml.2021.107585 doi: 10.1016/j.aml.2021.107585
    [15] Y. Cai, Y. Kang, W. Wang, A stochastic SIRS epidemic model with nonlinear incidence rate, Appl. Math. Comput., 305 (2017), 221–240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2017.02.003 doi: 10.1016/j.amc.2017.02.003
    [16] R. Liu, W. Ma, Noise-induced stochastic transition: a stochastic chemostat model with two complementary nutrients and flocculation effect, Chaos Solitons Fract., 147 (2021), 110951. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2021.110951 doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2021.110951
    [17] G. Liu, H. Qi, Z. Chang, X. Meng, Asymptotic stability of a stochastic may mutualism system, Comput. Math. Appl., 79 (2020), 735–745. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.camwa.2019.07.022 doi: 10.1016/j.camwa.2019.07.022
    [18] F. Li, S. Zhang, X. Meng, Dynamics analysis and numerical simulations of a delayed stochastic epidemic model subject to a general response function, Comput. Appl. Math., 38 (2019), 95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40314-019-0857-x doi: 10.1007/s40314-019-0857-x
    [19] R. S. Liptser, A strong law of large numbers for local martingales, Stochastics, 3 (1980), 217–228. https://doi.org/10.1080/17442508008833146 doi: 10.1080/17442508008833146
    [20] R. Khasminskii, Stochastic stability of differential equations, Springer Science and Business Media, 2011.
    [21] H. Qi, X. Meng, T. Hayat, A. Hobiny, Stationary distribution of a stochastic predator-prey model with hunting cooperation, Appl. Math. Lett., 124 (2022), 107662. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aml.2021.107662 doi: 10.1016/j.aml.2021.107662
    [22] H. Qi, X. Meng, Mathematical modeling, analysis and numerical simulation of HIV: the influence of stochastic environmental fluctuations on dynamics, Math. Comput. Simulat., 187 (2021), 700–719. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matcom.2021.03.027 doi: 10.1016/j.matcom.2021.03.027
    [23] C. Zeng, B. Liao, J. Huang, Dynamics of the stochastic chemostat model with Monod-Haldane response function, J. Nonlinear. Mod. Anal., 1 (2019), 335–354. https://doi.org/10.12150/jnma.2019.335 doi: 10.12150/jnma.2019.335
    [24] B. Cao, M. Shan, Q. Zhang, W. Wang, A stochastic SIS epidemic model with vaccination, Phys. A, 486 (2017), 127–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2017.05.083 doi: 10.1016/j.physa.2017.05.083
    [25] Q. Liu, D. Jiang, T. Hayat, A. Alsaedi, Stationary distribution of a stochastic delayed SVEIR epidemic model with vaccination and saturation incidence, Phys. A, 512 (2018), 849–863. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2018.08.054 doi: 10.1016/j.physa.2018.08.054
    [26] M. Liu, K. Wang, Stochastic Lotka-Volterra systems with Lévy noise, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 410 (2014), 750–763. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmaa.2013.07.078 doi: 10.1016/j.jmaa.2013.07.078
    [27] S. Zhang, S. Yuan, T. Zhang, A predator-prey model with different response functions to juvenile and adult prey in deterministic and stochastic environments, Appl. Math. Comput., 413 (2022), 126598. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2021.126598 doi: 10.1016/j.amc.2021.126598
    [28] T. Feng, X. Meng, T. Zhang, Z. Qiu, Analysis of the predator-prey interactions: a stochastic model incorporating disease invasion, Qual. Theory Dyn. Syst., 19 (2020), 55. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12346-020-00391-4 doi: 10.1007/s12346-020-00391-4
    [29] Y. Zhou, W. Zhang, S. Yuan, Survival and stationary distribution of a SIR epidemic model with stochastic perturbations, Appl. Math. Comput., 244 (2014), 118–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2014.06.100 doi: 10.1016/j.amc.2014.06.100
    [30] G. Falsone, Stochastic differential calculus for Gaussian and non-Gaussian noises: a critical review, Commun. Nonlinear Sci., 56 (2018), 198–216. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cnsns.2017.08.001 doi: 10.1016/j.cnsns.2017.08.001
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2023 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(1404) PDF downloads(65) Cited by(0)

Figures and Tables

Figures(4)  /  Tables(5)

Other Articles By Authors

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog