In this article, we introduce a new extension to J−metric spaces, called CJ−metric spaces, where θ is the controlled function in the triangle inequality. We prove some fixed point results in this new type of metric space. In addition, we present some applications to systems of linear equations to illustrate our results.
Citation: Suhad Subhi Aiadi, Wan Ainun Mior Othman, Kok Bin Wong, Nabil Mlaiki. Fixed point theorems in controlled J−metric spaces[J]. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(2): 4753-4763. doi: 10.3934/math.2023235
[1] | Qing Yang, Chuanzhi Bai . Fixed point theorem for orthogonal contraction of Hardy-Rogers-type mapping on $O$-complete metric spaces. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(6): 5734-5742. doi: 10.3934/math.2020368 |
[2] | Chen Lang, Hongyan Guan . Common fixed point and coincidence point results for generalized $ \alpha $-$ \varphi_{E} $-Geraghty contraction mappings in $ b $-metric spaces. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(8): 14513-14531. doi: 10.3934/math.2022800 |
[3] | Yao Yu, Chaobo Li, Dong Ji . Fixed point theorems for enriched Kannan-type mappings and application. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(8): 21580-21595. doi: 10.3934/math.20241048 |
[4] | Afrah Ahmad Noman Abdou . Common fixed point theorems for multi-valued mappings in bicomplex valued metric spaces with application. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(9): 20154-20168. doi: 10.3934/math.20231027 |
[5] | Mi Zhou, Naeem Saleem, Xiao-lan Liu, Nihal Özgür . On two new contractions and discontinuity on fixed points. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(2): 1628-1663. doi: 10.3934/math.2022095 |
[6] | Xun Ge, Songlin Yang . Some fixed point results on generalized metric spaces. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(2): 1769-1780. doi: 10.3934/math.2021106 |
[7] | Budi Nurwahyu, Naimah Aris, Firman . Some results in function weighted b-metric spaces. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(4): 8274-8293. doi: 10.3934/math.2023417 |
[8] | Ahmed Alamer, Faizan Ahmad Khan . Boyd-Wong type functional contractions under locally transitive binary relation with applications to boundary value problems. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(3): 6266-6280. doi: 10.3934/math.2024305 |
[9] | Erdal Karapınar, Marija Cvetković . An inevitable note on bipolar metric spaces. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(2): 3320-3331. doi: 10.3934/math.2024162 |
[10] | Yan Han, Shaoyuan Xu, Jin Chen, Huijuan Yang . Fixed point theorems for $ b $-generalized contractive mappings with weak continuity conditions. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(6): 15024-15039. doi: 10.3934/math.2024728 |
In this article, we introduce a new extension to J−metric spaces, called CJ−metric spaces, where θ is the controlled function in the triangle inequality. We prove some fixed point results in this new type of metric space. In addition, we present some applications to systems of linear equations to illustrate our results.
The fixed point theory is a new, essential theory, and its application is utilized in many fields, including Mathematics, Economics, and many others. For example, the impact of the fixed point theory in the fractional differential equations appear clearly to all the observers, see[3,4]. The fixed point theory and the proof of the uniqueness were introduced by Banach [2], which was encouraging to all subsequent researchers to start working on this theory; see [5,8]. These days, the fixed point is an active area wildly generalizing Banach, see {[6,7,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18].
Generalization of the fixed point theory can be made in two ways, either a generalization of the Banach contraction to another linear or nonlinear contraction. The other way of extension is to generalize the metric spaces by either changing the triangle inequality, omitting the symmetry condition, or assuming that the self-distance is not necessarily zero.
Those generalizations are important due to the fact that more general spaces or contractions impact a greater number of applications that can be adapted to that results.
In this work, we generalize a J−metric spaces, which Souayah recently introduced [1], where it defined a metric space in three dimensions with a triangle inequality that includes a constant b>0. We extend the notion of J−metric spaces to CJ metric spaces that include a control function θ in three dimensions instead of the constant b.
In the main result section, we prove the existence and the uniqueness of a fixed point for self-mappings on CJ−metric spaces, in Theorems 3.10 and 3.11, we consider self-mappings that satisfy linear contractions where in Theorem 3.12, we consider mappings that satisfy nonlinear contractions. Our finding generalizes many results in the literature. Moreover, in the last section, we present an application of our impact on the system of linear equations.
We begin our preliminaries by recalling the definitions of J−metric spaces.
Definition 2.1. [1] Consider a nonempty set δ, and a function J:δ3→[0,∞). Let us define the set,
S(J,δ,ϕ)={{ϕn}⊂δ:limn→∞J(ϕ,ϕ,ϕn)=0} |
for all ϕ∈δ.
Definition 2.2. [1] Let δ be a set with at least one element and, J:δ3→[0,∞) that satisfies the mentioned below conditions:
(ⅰ) J(α,β,γ)=0 implies α=β=γ for any α,β,γ∈δ.
(ⅱ) There are some b>0, where for each (α,β,γ)∈δ3 and {νn}∈S(J,δ,ν)
J(α,β,γ)≤blimsupn→∞(J(α,α,νn)+J(β,β,νn)+J(γ,γ,νn)). |
Then, (δ,J) is defined as a J−metric space. In addition, if J(α,α,β)=J(β,β,α) for each α,β∈δ, the pair (δ,J) is defined as a symmetric J−metric space.
In this part, we will define CJ−metric spaces and prove the existence and the uniqueness of the fixed point of self-mapping.
Definition 3.1. Let δ is a non empty set and a function CJ:δ3→[0,∞). Then the set is defined as follows
S(CJ,δ,α)={{αn}⊂δ:limn→∞CJ(α,α,αn)=0} |
for each α∈δ
Definition 3.2. Let δ be a set with at least one element and CJ:δ3→[0,∞)fulfill the following conditions:
(ⅰ) CJ(α,β,γ)=0 implies α=β=γ for all α,β,γ∈δ.
(ⅱ) There exist a function θ:δ3→[0,∞), where θ is a continuous function and
limn→∞θ(α,α,αn)} |
is a finite and exist where,
CJ(α,β,γ)≤θ(α,β,γ)limsupn→∞(CJ(α,α,ϕn)+CJ(β,β,ϕn)+CJ(γ,γ,ϕn)). |
Then (δ,CJ) is defined as CJ−metric space. In addition, if
CJ(α,α,β)=CJ(β,β,α) |
for each α,β∈δ, then (δ,CJ) is defined as symmetric CJ−metric space.
Remark 3.3. Notice that, this symmetry hypothesis does not necessarily mean that
CJ(α,β,γ)=CJ(β,α,γ)=CJ(γ,β,α)=⋯. |
We will start by presenting some properties in the topology of CJ−metric spaces.
Definition 3.4. (1) Let (δ,CJ) is a CJ−metric space. A sequence {αn}⊂δ is convergent to an element α∈δ if limn→∞αn=α , for {αn}∈S(CJ,δ,α).
(2) Let (δ,CJ) is a CJ−metric space.A sequence {αn}⊂δ is called Cauchy iff
limn,m→∞CJ(αn,αn,αm)=0. |
(3) A CJ−metric space is called complete if each Cauchy sequence in δ is convergent.
(4) In a CJ−metric space (α,CJ), if ψ is a continuous map at a0∈δ then for each αn∈S(CJ,α,a0) gives {ψαn}∈S(CJ,α,ψa0).
Proposition 3.5. In a CJ−metric space (δ,CJ), if {αn} converges, then it is convergent to one exact element in δ.
Proof. Let us start with {αn} converges to α1 and α2. so by using the triangle inequality condition that is mentioned in the definition of the CJ metric space,
CJ(α1,α1,α2)≤θ(α1,α1,α2)limsupn→∞(CJ(α1,α1,αn)+CJ(α1,α1,αn)+CJ(α2,α2,αn))=θ(α1,α,α2)limsupn→∞(2CJ(α1,α1,αn)+CJ(α2,α2,αn))=0. |
Thus,
CJ(α1,α1,α2)=0⇒α1=α2. |
Definition 3.6. Let (δ,CJ1) and (Γ,CJ1) are two CJ−metric spaces and ψ:δ→Γ is a map. Then ψ is said to be a continuous at a0∈δ if, for each ε>0, there is ξ>0 where, for each α∈δ, CJ2(ψa0,ψa0,ψα)<ε whenever CJ1(a0,a0,α)<ξ.
Example 3.7. Let δ=R and, CJ:δ3→[0,∞) defined by
CJ(α,β,γ)=|α−β|+|β−γ|, |
for all α,β,γ∈R.
Let α∈R, and the sequence αn such that, αn=α+1n. It is not hard to observe that limn→∞CJ(α,α+1n,α+1n)=0. For that reason and for each α∈R there is a sequence αn=α+1n where S(CJ,δ,α)≠∅.
Now, we present an example of CJ−metric space.
Example 3.8. Let δ=R, and CJ(α,β,γ)=|α|+|β|+2|γ|, for all α,β,γ∈δ. And let θ:δ3→[0,∞), where θ(α,β,γ)=max(2,|α|,|β|,|γ|). We have CJ(α,β,γ)=0 ⇒ |α|+|β|+2|γ|=0, which gives |α|=|β|=|γ|=0.
Then, the hypotheses (2.2) are fulfilled, and the symmetry of CJ is satisfied too.
CJ(α,α,γ)=2|α|+2|γ|=CJ(γ,γ,α). |
In the end, let's check the triangle inequality.
Let α,β,γ∈δ and ϕn a convergent sequence in δ such that, limn→∞CJ(ϕ,ϕ,ϕn)=0, we have
CJ(α,β,γ)=|α|+|β|+2|γ|≤4|α|+4|β|+4|γ|+12|ϕn|=2(2|α|+2|ϕn|+2|β|+2|ϕn|+2|γ|+2|ϕn|)=2(CJ(α,β,ϕn)+CJ(β,β,ϕn)+J(γ,γ,ϕn))≤max(2,|α|,|β|,|γ)limsupn→∞(CJ(α,β,ϕn)+CJ(α,β,ϕn)+CJ(γ,γ,ϕn))=θ(α,β,γ)limsupn→∞(CJ(α,β,ϕn)+CJ(α,β,ϕn)+CJ(γ,γ,ϕn)). |
So, this is an example of CJ metric space.
Next, we present an example of CJ−metric space that is not a J−metric spaces.
Example 3.9. Choose δ={1,2,⋯}. Take CJ:δ3→[0,∞) such that
CJ(α,β,γ)={0,⟺α=β=γ1α+β,ifα,βareevenandγ=2n+11γ,ifα,βareoddandγ=2n1,otherwise. |
Consider θ:δ3→(0,∞) as
θ(α,β,γ)={α+β,ifα,βareevenandγ=2n+1γ,ifα,βareoddandγ=2n1,otherwise. |
Note that, it is not difficult to see that (δ,CJ) is a CJ−metric space.
However, (δ,CJ) is not a J−metric space.
Theorem 3.10. Let (δ,CJ) is a CJ−complete symmetric metric space, and g:δ→δ is a continuous map satisfies
CJ(gα,gβ,gγ)≤P(CJ(α,β,γ))forallα,β,γ∈δ. | (3.1) |
Where, P:[0,+∞)→[0,+∞) is a function and for all t∈[0,+∞),
t≻x,P(t)≻P(x). |
And,
limn→∞Pn(t)=0 foreachfixed t>0. | (3.2) |
Then, g has a unique fixed point in δ.
Proof. Let's start with α0 is an element in δ, and {αn}n≥0⊂δ where,
α1=gα0,α2=gα1...αn=gnα0,n=1,2,⋯. | (3.3) |
First, we have to start proving {αn} is a Cauchy in δ. Let n,m∈N.
CJ(αn,αn,αm)=CJ(gαn−1,gαn−1,gαm−1)≤P(CJ(αn−1,αn−1,αm−1))=P(CJ(gαn−2,gαn−2,gαm−2))≤⋮≤Pn(CJ(α0,α0,αm−n)). |
After applying (3.1) n times and with assuming that m=n+q for some constant q∈N to get
CJ(αn,αn,αm)≤Pn(CJ(α0,α0,αq)). | (3.4) |
By applying the limit in (3.4) as n⟶∞ we get
limn→∞CJ(αn,αn,αm)=0. | (3.5) |
Accordingly, {αn} is a Cauchy sequence in δ and because of the completeness, there is α∈δ such that αk→α as k→∞.
Moreover, α=limk→∞αk=limk→∞αk+1=limk→∞gαk=gα. Thus, g has α as a fixed point.
Assume that α1 and α2 are two fixed points of g.
CJ(α1,α1,α2)=CJ(gα1,gα1,gα2)≤P(CJ(α1,α1,α2))≤P2(CJ(α1,α1,α2))⋮≤Pn(CJ(α1,α1,α2)). |
By taking the limit for the above inequalities as n⟶∞ we get CJ(α1,α1,α2)=0 and α1=α2.
Thus, g has a unique fixed point in δ as desired.
Theorem 3.11. Let (δ,CJ) is a CJ−complete symmetric metric space and g:δ→δ be a mapping that satisfies,
CJ(gα,gβ,gγ)≤ϕ(α,β,γ)CJ(α,β,γ),∀α,β,γ∈δ, | (3.6) |
where ϕ∈A, \text{and} ϕ:δ3→(0,1), such that
ϕ(g(α,β,γ))≤ϕ(α,β,γ)and{g:δ→δ} |
g is a given mapping. Then g has a unique fixed point in δ.
Proof. Let α0 be an arbitrary element in δ. We establish the sequence {αn\}as follows {αn=gnα0}.
Let's start by proving that {αn} is a Cauchy sequence. For all natural numbers n,m, we assume that that n<m and assume that there is q∈N where m=n+q. By applying (3.6) we get :
CJ(αn,αn,αm)=CJ(gαn−1,gαn−1,gαm−1)≤ϕ(αn−1,αn−1,αm−1)CJ(αn−1,αn−1,αm−1)⋮≤ϕn(α0,α0,αq)CJ(α0,α0,αq). |
By applying the limit as n→∞, and taking ϕ into consideration, we get limn,m→∞CJ(αn,αn,αm)=0, so{αn} is a Cauchy sequence.
Then, by the completeness definition of δ, there is a α∈δ such that
α=limn→∞αn=limn→∞αn−1. | (3.7) |
We will show that α is a fixed point of g. From (3.7), we conclude that αn∈S(CJ,δ,α) and
limn→∞CJ(α,α,αn)=0 | (3.8) |
and
limn→∞CJ(α,α,αn−1)=0. | (3.9) |
By using the triangle inequality we get
CJ(gα,gα,α)≤θ(gα,gα,α)limn→∞sup[2CJ(gα,gα,αn)+CJ(α,α,αn)]=2θ(gα,gα,α)limn→∞CJ(gα,gα,gαn−1)≤2θ(gα,gα,α)limn→∞ϕ(α,α,αn−1)CJ(α,α,αn−1). | (3.10) |
By applying (3.9) in (3.10) we obtain that CJ(gα,gα,α)=0, that is gα=α. Therefore α is a fixed point of g.
To prove the uniqueness let, β1,β2∈δ are two fixed points of g such that β1≠β2, gβ1=β1 and gβ2=β2.
CJ(β1,β1,β2)=CJ(Gβ1,gβ1,gβ2)≤ϕ(β1,β1,β2)CJ(β1,β1,β2)<CJ(β1,β1,β2). |
Where ϕ(β1,β1,β2)<1, then CJ(β1,β1,β2)=0 which implies that β1=β2.
Theorem 3.12. Let (δ,CJ) is a complete symmetric CJ−metric spaces, g:δ→δ is a continuous map where
CJ(gα,gβ,gγ)≤aCJ(α,β,γ)+bCJ(α,gα,gα)+cCJ(β,gβ,gβ)+dCJ(γ,gγ,gγ) | (3.11) |
for each α,β,γ∈δ where
0<a+b<1−c−d, | (3.12) |
0<a<1. | (3.13) |
Then, there is a unique fixed point of g.
Proof. Let α0∈δ be an arbitrary point of δ and {αn=gnα0} be a sequence in δ to get.
CJ(αn,αn+1,αn+1)=CJ(gαn−1,gαn,gαn)≤aCJ(αn−1,αn,αn)+bCJ(αn−1,αn,αn)+cCJ(αn,αn+1,αn+1)+dCJ(αn,αn+1,αn+1)≤(a+b)CJ(αn−1,αn,αn)+(c+d)CJ(αn,αn+1,αn+1). |
Then
CJ(αn,αn+1,αn+1)≤a+b1−c−dCJ(αn−1,αn,αn). |
By taking k=a+b1−c−d, then by using (3.12) we will have 0<k<1.
CJ(αn,αn+1,αn+1)≤knCJ(α0,α1,α1). |
Which gives
limn→∞CJ(αn,αn+1,αn+1)=0. | (3.14) |
We denote CJn=CJ(αn,αn+1,αn+1). For each n,m∈N,n<m, and suppose that there is a fixed q∈N such that m=n+q. we have
CJ(αn,αn,αm)=CJ(αn,αn,αn+q)=CJ(gαn−1,gαn−1,gαn+q−1)≤aCJ(αn−1,αn−1,αn+p−1)+bCJ(αn−1,αn,αn)+cCJ(αn−1,αn,αn)+dCJ(αn+q−1,αn+q,αn+q)=aCJ(αn−1,αn−1,αn+q−1)+(b+c)CJn−1+dCJn+q−1≤a[aCJ(αn−2,αn−2,αn+p−2)+(c+d)CJn−2+αJn+q−2]+(b+c)CJn−1+dCJn+q−1=a2CJ(αn−2,αn−2,αn+q−2)+a(c+d)CJn−2+aαCJn+q−2+(b+c)CJn−1+dCJn+q−1⋮≤anCJ(α0,α0,αq)+(b+c)n∑k=1ak−1CJ(n−k)+dn∑k=1ak−1CJ(n+q−k). | (3.15) |
By applying the limit in (3.15) as n→∞ and using (3.13) and (3.14), we get
limn,m→∞CJ(αn,αn,αm)=0. |
Then, {αn} is a Cauchy sequence in δ. By the completeness definition, there is α∈δ where αn→α as n→∞ and
limn→∞CJ(αn,αn,α)=limn,m→∞CJ(αn,αm,α)=0. | (3.16) |
In addition, u=limk→∞αk=limk→∞αk+1=limk→∞gαk=gα. Therefore, g has u as a fixed point.
Let γ1,γ2∈δ are two fixed point of g, γ1≠γ2, where, gγ1=γ1, gγ2=γ2.
CJ(γ1,γ1,γ2)=CJ(gγ1,gγ1,gγ2)≤aCJ(γ1,γ1,γ2)+(b+c)CJ(γ1,gγ1,gγ1)+dCJ(γ2,gγ2,gγ2)=aCJ(γ1,γ1,γ2)+(b+c)CJ(γ1,γ1,γ1)+dCJ(γ2,γ2,γ2). |
Then, (1−a)CJ(γ1,γ1,γ2)≤0. Using (3.13) so this gives CJ(γ1,γ1,γ2)=0 that is γ1=γ2, which means that g has a unique a fixed point.
Throughout this section, we represent an example of (3.10), where we have a linear system of equations in R, θ is a continuous function, and we prove that this system has a unique solution by applying the fixed point theory.
Let δ=Rn, and let the symmetric CJ−metric space (δ,CJ) introduced by
CJ(d,ξ,ν)=max1≤i≤n|di−ξi|+|di−νi|, |
for all d=(d1,...,dn),ξ=(ξ1,...,ξn),ν=(ν1,...,νn)∈δ. such that
θ(d,ξ,ν)=max1≤i≤n(2,|di|,|ξi|,|νi|). |
Theorem 4.1. Consider the following system
{ϖ11d1+ϖ12d2+ϖ13d3+ϖ1ndn=r1ϖ21d1+ϖ22d2+ϖ23d3+ϖ2ndn=r2⋮ϖn1d1+ϖn2d2+ϖn3d3+ϖnndn=rn, |
if
Υ=max1≤i≤n(n∑j=1,j≠i|ϖij|+|1+ϖii|)<1, |
then the raised system of linear equations has a solution that is unique.
Proof. Let the map σ:δ→δ introduced as σd=(B+In)d−r where
B=(ϖ11ϖ12⋯ϖ1nϖ21ϖ22⋯ϖ2n⋮⋮⋱⋮ϖn1ϖn2⋯ϖnn), |
d=(d1,d2,⋯,dn);ξ=(ξ1,ξ2,⋯,ξn) and ν=(ν1,ν2,⋯,νn)∈Rn, In is the identity matrix for n×n matrices and r=(r1,r2,⋯,rn)∈Cn. Let us show that CJ(σd,σξ,σν)≤ΥCJ(d,ξ,ν), ∀d,ξ,ν∈Rn.
We define
˜B=B+In=(˜bij), i,j=1,...,n, |
with ˜bij={ϖij,j≠i1+ϖii,j=i. Hence,
max1≤i≤nn∑j=1|˜bij|=max1≤i≤n(n∑j=1,j≠i|ϖij|+|1+ϖii|)=Υ<1. |
For all i=1,…,n, we have
(σd)i−(σξ)i=n∑j=1˜bij(dj−ξj), | (4.1) |
(σd)i−(σν)i=n∑j=1˜bij(dj−νj). | (4.2) |
Accordingly, using (4.1) and (4.2) we get
CJ(σd,σξ,σν)=max1≤i≤n(|(σd)i−(σξ)i|+|(σd)i−(σν)i|)≤max1≤i≤n(n∑j=1|˜bij||dj−ξj|+n∑j=1|˜bij||dj−νj|)≤max1≤i≤nn∑j=1|˜bij|max1≤k≤n(|dk−ξk|+|dk−νk|)=ΥCJ(d,ξ,ν)=Φ(CJ(d,ξ,ν)), |
where, Φ(t)=Υt, ∀t≥0. Notice that, all the conditions of Theorem 3.10 are fulfilled. Consequently, σ has a unique fixed point. Accordingly, the raised linear system has a unique solution.
We have introduced a new metric-type spaces, where we have proved fixed point theorems for self-mapping on such spaces. Our results generalize many well-known theorems in the field of fixed point theory. Also, we presented an application of our results to systems of linear equations. As a future work, our results can be used in fractional differential equations see[19,20,21], which include the most recent fractional definitions "Abu-Shady-Kaabar" fractional derivative. In closing, we would like to bring to the reader's attention the following open questions. Note that in Theorems 3.10 and 3.11, we assumed that the map is continuous. Can we replace the hypothesis of continuity with a weaker condition? How could CJ−metric space help in the "Abu-Shady-Kaabar" operators?
The authors S. Subhi and N. Mlaiki would like to thank Prince Sultan University for paying the publication fees for this work through TAS LAB.
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
[1] |
N. Souayah, N. Mlaiki, A new type of three-dimensional metric spaces with applications to fractional differential equations, AIMS Math., 7 (2022), 17802–17814. https://doi.org/10.3934/math.2022980 doi: 10.3934/math.2022980
![]() |
[2] |
S. Banach, Sur les opérations dans les ensembles abstraits et leur applications aux équations intégrales, Fund. Math., 3 (1922), 133–181. https://doi.org/10.4064/fm-3-1-133-181 doi: 10.4064/fm-3-1-133-181
![]() |
[3] | P. Debnath, N. Konwar, S. Radenović, Metric fixed point theory, Applications in Science, Engineering and Behavioural Sciences, Springer, Singapore, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-4896-0 |
[4] | P. Debnath, H. M. Srivastava, P. Kumam, B. Hazarika, Fixed point theory and fractional calculus, Recent Advances and Applications, Springer Singapore, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-0668-8 |
[5] |
T. Kamran, M. Samreen, Q. UL Ain, A generalization of b−metric space and some fixed point theorems, Mathematics, 5 (2017), 19. https://doi.org/10.3390/math5020019 doi: 10.3390/math5020019
![]() |
[6] | S. Sedghi, N. Shobe, A. Aliouche, A generalization of fixed point theorems in S−metric spaces, Mat. Vesnik, 64 (2012), 258–266. |
[7] | N. Mlaiki, α−ψ−contractive mapping on S−metric space, Math. Sc. Lett., 4 (2015), 9–12. |
[8] | N. Mlaiki, Common fixed points in complex S−metric space, Adv. Fixed Point Theory, 4 (2014), 509–524. |
[9] |
N. Souayah, N. Mlaiki, A fixed point in Sb−metric spaces, J. Math. Comput. Sci., 16 (2016), 131–139. http://dx.doi.org/10.22436/jmcs.016.02.01 doi: 10.22436/jmcs.016.02.01
![]() |
[10] |
N. Souayah, A fixed point in partial Sb−metric spaces, An. Şt. Univ. Ovidius Constanţa, 24 (2016), 351–362. https://doi.org/10.1515/auom-2016-0062 doi: 10.1515/auom-2016-0062
![]() |
[11] |
N. Souayah, N. Mlaiki, A coincident point principle for two weakly compatible mappings in partial S-metric spaces, J. Nonlinear Sci. Appl., 9 (2016), 2217–2223. https://doi.org/10.22436/jnsa.009.05.25 doi: 10.22436/jnsa.009.05.25
![]() |
[12] |
H. Aydi, W. Shatanawi, C. Vetro, On generalized weakly G−contraction mapping in G−metric spaces, Comput. Math. Appl., 62 (2011), 4222–4229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.camwa.2011.10.007 doi: 10.1016/j.camwa.2011.10.007
![]() |
[13] |
F. Gu, W. Shatanawi, Some new results on common coupled fixed points of two hybrid pairs of mappings in partial metric spaces, J. Nonlinear Funct. Anal., 2019 (2019), 13. https://doi.org/10.23952/jnfa.2019.13 doi: 10.23952/jnfa.2019.13
![]() |
[14] |
S. Romaguera, P. Tirado, A characterization of quasi-metric completeness in terms of α–Ψ−contractive mappings having fixed points, Mathematics, 8 (2020), 16. https://doi.org/10.3390/math8010016 doi: 10.3390/math8010016
![]() |
[15] |
W. Shatanawi, V. C. Rajić, S. Radenović, A. Al-Rawashhdeh, Mizoguchi-Takahashi-type theorems in tvs-cone metric spaces, Fixed Point Theory Appl., 2012 (2012), 106. https://doi.org/10.1186/1687-1812-2012-106 doi: 10.1186/1687-1812-2012-106
![]() |
[16] |
W. Shatanawi, On w−compatible mappings and common coupled coincidence point in cone metric spaces, Appl. Math. Lett., 25 (2012), 925–931. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aml.2011.10.037 doi: 10.1016/j.aml.2011.10.037
![]() |
[17] |
H. Huang, V. Todorcevic, S. Radenovic, Remarks on recent results for generalized F−contractions, Mathematics, 10 (2022), 768. https://doi.org/10.3390/math10050768 doi: 10.3390/math10050768
![]() |
[18] | I. Beg, K. Roy, M. Saha, SJS−metric and topological spaces, J. Math. Ext., 15 (2021), 1–16. |
[19] |
S. Etemad, M. Souid, B. Telli, M. Kabbar, S. Rezapour, Investigation of the neutral fractional differential inclusions of Katugampola-type involving both retarded and advanced arguments via Kuratowski MNC technique, Adv. Differ. Equ., 2021 (2021), 214. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13662-021-03377-x doi: 10.1186/s13662-021-03377-x
![]() |
[20] |
F. Martínez, M. K. A. Kaabar, A noval theoretical investigation of the Abu-Shady-Kabbar fractional derivative as a modeling tool science and engeineering, Comput. Math. Methods Med., 2022 (2022), 4119082. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/4119082 doi: 10.1155/2022/4119082
![]() |
[21] |
F. Martíneza, I. Martíneza, M. K. A. Kaabarb, S. Paredesa, Solving systems of conformable linear differential equations via the conformable exponential matrix, Ain Shams Eng. J., 12 (2021), 4075–4080. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2021.02.035 doi: 10.1016/j.asej.2021.02.035
![]() |
1. | Wasfi Shatanawi, Taqi A. M. Shatnawi, Some fixed point results based on contractions of new types for extended b-metric spaces, 2023, 8, 2473-6988, 10929, 10.3934/math.2023554 | |
2. | Wasfi Shatanawi, Taqi A. M. Shatnawi, New fixed point results in controlled metric type spaces based on new contractive conditions, 2023, 8, 2473-6988, 9314, 10.3934/math.2023468 | |
3. | Hasanen A. Hammad, Kamaleldin Abodayeh, Wasfi Shatanawi, Applying an Extended β-ϕ-Geraghty Contraction for Solving Coupled Ordinary Differential Equations, 2023, 15, 2073-8994, 723, 10.3390/sym15030723 | |
4. | Said Atallaoui, Fady Hasan, Wasfi Shatanawi, Zead Mustafa, Abdalla Tallafha, On some fixed point results using CG simulation functions via w-distance with applications, 2024, 10, 24058440, e29345, 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e29345 | |
5. | Suhad Subhi Aiadi, Wan Ainun Mior Othman, Kok Bin Wong, Nabil Mlaiki, A New Extension of CJ Metric Spaces—Partially Controlled J Metric Spaces, 2023, 11, 2227-7390, 2973, 10.3390/math11132973 | |
6. | Tahair Rasham, Arjumand Mustafa, Aiman Mukheimer, Muhammad Nazam, Wasfi Shatanawi, Novel results for two families of multivalued dominated mappings satisfying generalized nonlinear contractive inequalities and applications, 2024, 57, 2391-4661, 10.1515/dema-2023-0161 | |
7. | Tahair Rasham, Sumati Kumari Panda, Ghada Ali Basendwah, Aftab Hussain, Multivalued nonlinear dominated mappings on a closed ball and associated numerical illustrations with applications to nonlinear integral and fractional operators, 2024, 10, 24058440, e34078, 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e34078 |