Research article Special Issues

Stability analysis of COVID-19 outbreak using Caputo-Fabrizio fractional differential equation

  • The main aim of this paper is to construct a mathematical model for the spread of SARS-CoV-2 infection. We discuss the modified COVID-19 and change the model to fractional order form based on the Caputo-Fabrizio derivative. Also several definitions and theorems of fractional calculus, fuzzy theory and Laplace transform are illustrated. The existence and uniqueness of the solution of the model are proved based on the Banach's unique fixed point theory. Moreover Hyers-Ulam stability analysis is studied. The obtained results show the efficiency and accuracy of the model.

    Citation: Murugesan Sivashankar, Sriramulu Sabarinathan, Vediyappan Govindan, Unai Fernandez-Gamiz, Samad Noeiaghdam. Stability analysis of COVID-19 outbreak using Caputo-Fabrizio fractional differential equation[J]. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(2): 2720-2735. doi: 10.3934/math.2023143

    Related Papers:

    [1] Thanin Sitthiwirattham, Rozi Gul, Kamal Shah, Ibrahim Mahariq, Jarunee Soontharanon, Khursheed J. Ansari . Study of implicit-impulsive differential equations involving Caputo-Fabrizio fractional derivative. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(3): 4017-4037. doi: 10.3934/math.2022222
    [2] Shabir Ahmad, Aman Ullah, Ali Akgül, Manuel De la Sen . A study of fractional order Ambartsumian equation involving exponential decay kernel. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(9): 9981-9997. doi: 10.3934/math.2021580
    [3] Songkran Pleumpreedaporn, Chanidaporn Pleumpreedaporn, Weerawat Sudsutad, Jutarat Kongson, Chatthai Thaiprayoon, Jehad Alzabut . On a novel impulsive boundary value pantograph problem under Caputo proportional fractional derivative operator with respect to another function. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(5): 7817-7846. doi: 10.3934/math.2022438
    [4] Shayma A. Murad, Zanyar A. Ameen . Existence and Ulam stability for fractional differential equations of mixed Caputo-Riemann derivatives. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(4): 6404-6419. doi: 10.3934/math.2022357
    [5] Kamal Shah, Thabet Abdeljawad, Bahaaeldin Abdalla, Marwan S Abualrub . Utilizing fixed point approach to investigate piecewise equations with non-singular type derivative. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(8): 14614-14630. doi: 10.3934/math.2022804
    [6] Choukri Derbazi, Zidane Baitiche, Mohammed S. Abdo, Thabet Abdeljawad . Qualitative analysis of fractional relaxation equation and coupled system with Ψ-Caputo fractional derivative in Banach spaces. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(3): 2486-2509. doi: 10.3934/math.2021151
    [7] Kamal Shah, Muhammad Sher, Muhammad Sarwar, Thabet Abdeljawad . Analysis of a nonlinear problem involving discrete and proportional delay with application to Houseflies model. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(3): 7321-7339. doi: 10.3934/math.2024355
    [8] Qun Dai, Shidong Liu . Stability of the mixed Caputo fractional integro-differential equation by means of weighted space method. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(2): 2498-2511. doi: 10.3934/math.2022140
    [9] Ugyen Samdrup Tshering, Ekkarath Thailert, Sotiris K. Ntouyas . Existence and stability results for a coupled system of Hilfer-Hadamard sequential fractional differential equations with multi-point fractional integral boundary conditions. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(9): 25849-25878. doi: 10.3934/math.20241263
    [10] Weerawat Sudsutad, Chatthai Thaiprayoon, Sotiris K. Ntouyas . Existence and stability results for $ \psi $-Hilfer fractional integro-differential equation with mixed nonlocal boundary conditions. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(4): 4119-4141. doi: 10.3934/math.2021244
  • The main aim of this paper is to construct a mathematical model for the spread of SARS-CoV-2 infection. We discuss the modified COVID-19 and change the model to fractional order form based on the Caputo-Fabrizio derivative. Also several definitions and theorems of fractional calculus, fuzzy theory and Laplace transform are illustrated. The existence and uniqueness of the solution of the model are proved based on the Banach's unique fixed point theory. Moreover Hyers-Ulam stability analysis is studied. The obtained results show the efficiency and accuracy of the model.



    For the first time COVID-19 was diagnosed in Wuhan, China, in December 2019. The virus gene testing reveals that it is a beta coronavirus directly associated with SARS. A functional COVID-19 case is defined as a person who has exhibited clinical manifestations which are diagnostic of COVID-19 [1,2,3,4]. This infection is widespread and had an impact on the patients. Many researchers are investigating the effects of COVID-19 in a range of contexts. In the field, there are still some mathematical models that claim to represent the process of COVID-19 growth. COVID-19 is used by several studies as a feature extraction method (see [5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,30]).

    A significant method for controlling the pandemic among the population is infectious model research. Also studding mathematical models of fractional orders, solving the models and analysis of results are among challenging problems. Non-singular kernels such as Caputo-Fabrizio (Short Denote: CF) fractional derivatives had also been included in the fractional function formulation. A whole effect of memory is described by utilizing a non-singular kernel and other benefits achieved with the modern definition known as CF fractional derivative.

    Fractional calculus arose from a question posed to Leibnitz by L'Hospital concerning his generalization of the meaning of the notation dnydxn for the derivative of order n whn n=12. In his reply, dated September 30, 1695, Leibnitz wrote to L'Hospital, "This is an apparent paradox from which one-day useful consequences will be drawn".

    Recent researches have focused generally on fractional differential equations, and there has been significant progress in this field. This concept has existed for a long time and is nearly as old as differential equations. Fractional order differential equations have recently proven to be a useful problem in many fields of science and engineering [31,32,33]. Indeed, electromagnetic technology has a lot of applications in electrochemistry, regulation, etc. In recent years, a lot of researchers have contributed to fractional derivative operators for various differential equations (see [34,35,36,37,38,39]). In 2021, Khan et al. were concerned with the existence of results and stability analysis for a nabla discrete ABC fractional COVID-19 [14,15,16]. In the same year, Li et al. concerned a vigorous study of the fractional order COVID-19 model in ABC derivatives. In 2022, Khan et al. [43] studied a COVID-19 model in the fractal-fractional sense of operators for the existence of a solution in Ulam stability and related papers (see also [17,19,20,40,41,42,44]).

    The main objective of this study is to define the model variables that have the highest impact on early disease transmission when vaccination and medication are used. As far as we are aware, this paper offers the first comprehensive mathematical characterization of the qualitative dynamics of COVID-19 with an ineffective vaccine and treatment by the variable fractional derivative, which follows the CF fractional derivative. We also discussed and theoretically evaluate a mathematical model of the COVID-19 transmission mechanism, combining important dynamics of the illness with two important treatment measures: immunization of susceptible people and recovery/treatment of afflicted people. Along with more unique and original innovations for the intended COVID-19 system, applying Banach's fixed point idea, the existence and uniqueness of the solution are discussed to prove the Hyers-Ulam stability of the innovative COVID-19 model.

    Most of them have mentioned that "the main advantage of this kind of operator is that the singular power-law kernel is now replaced by a non-singular kernel, " which is easier to use in theoretical analysis, numerical calculations, and real-world applications. But we believe that the singular power-law kernel is very easy to use in the mentioned above calculations and applications.

    In this section, we present some basic definitions and lemmas in CF which used throughout the paper.

    Definition 2.1. A fuzzy number Υ is defined on a set of real numbers which satisfies the following properties,

    (i) Υ is convex, i.e., Υ[βa1+(1β)a2]min[Υ(a1),Υ(a2)], for all a1,a2R and β[0,1],

    (ii) Υ is normal i.e., there exists an aR such that Υ(a) = 1,

    (iii) Υ is piecewise continuous.

    Definition 2.2. Let x,yM and βR, then the α-cut set of fuzzy number is closed and bounded interval x=(x_(α),¯x(α)), y=(y_(α),¯y(α)) and β>0. Then the operation on fuzzy numbers,

    (i) Addition: xy=(x_(α)+y_(α),¯x(α)+¯y(α)).

    (ii) Subraction: xy=(x_(α)y_(α),¯x(α)¯y(α)).

    (iii) Scalar multiplication:

    k.v={(βx_,β¯x), λ0,(βx_,β¯x), λ<0, (2.1)

    if β=1 then βx=x.

    Definition 2.3. Consider mapping Γ:M×MR and Γ(x,y)=supζ[0,1]max{|x_(ζ)y_(ζ) |,|¯x(ζ)¯y(ζ) |}, be the Hausdorff distance between fuzzy number. where, [x]ζ=[x_(ζ),¯x(ζ)] and [y]ζ=[y_(ζ),¯y(ζ)].

    Then Γ is a metric in M and following criteria.

    (i) Γ(x+z,y+z)=Γ(x,y), for all x,y,zM,

    (ii) Γ(kx,ky)=|k|Γ(x,y), for all kR,x,y,zM,

    (iii) Γ(x+y,z+H)Γ(x,z)+Γ(y,H), for all x,y,z,HM.

    Then (Γ,M) is complete metric space.

    Definition 2.4. Let A and B be two fuzzy sets with CR and consider a two variable function M:A×BC. Let μA(a),μB(b) and μC(c) be their associate member function,

    (i) In addition: Let C=M(a,b)=a+b. Then C={c|c=a+b;aA,bB} and μC(c)=c=a+b={μA(a)μB(b)}.

    (ii) In α-cut notation:

    (C)α=M[(A)α,(B)α], then (c)α=(A)α+(B)α.

    For real numbers S1 and S2, S1S2=min{S1,S2} and S1S2=max{S1,S2}.

    Definition 2.5. The Laplace transform of fuzzy valued function f(t) is defined as

    F(S)=L[f(t)]=0estf(t)=limhh0estf(t)dt.

    Definition 2.6. The unit step function which is called Heavyside's unit function is defined as

    μ(t)={0ift<0,1ift0.

    Definition 2.7. The variable caputo derivative of function f(t)[0,1) is defined as

    CF0Dφ(t)tf(t)=1Γ(1φ(t))t01(tx)φ(t)f(x)dx. (2.2)

    Definition 2.8. For f(t)H1([0,T]), and φ(t)[0,1), the φ(t)th-order variable of CF derivative of f(t) in the Caputo sense is

    CF0Dφ(t)tf(t)=M(φ(t))1φ(t)t0e(φ(t)(ta)1φ(t))f(x)dx, (2.3)

    where H1([0,T]) is Hilbert space, the value M(φ(t)) is a normalising function in Eq (2.3), i.e., M(0)=M(1)=1, then

    CF0Dφ(t)tG=0, (2.4)

    which G is constant.

    Definition 2.9. The variable fractional integral of non-singular kernel type is stated as follows

    CF0Jφ(t)tf(t)=(1φ(t))M(φ(t))f(t)+φ(t)M(φ(t))t0f(x)dx, (2.5)

    where 0<φ(t)1.

    Definition 2.10. Suppose γR is a solution of equation with non-negative initial condition. For γ(0)=γ0 and there is Φ[t,γ(t)]NF([0,v]×R) for t[0,v] then we get

    Ψ[t,γ(t)]=(1Ξ(t))M(Ξ(t))Φ[t,γ(t)]Ξ(t)M(Ξ(t))t0Φ(,γ())d, (2.6)

    with

    γ(t)=γ0+CF0JΞ(t)t[Φ(t,γ(t))]. (2.7)

    Definition 2.11. Let Ξ=(S1S2)t[0,v]{Ξ(t),t[0,v]} and Ξ=(S1S2)t[0,v]{Ξ(t),t[0,v]} be the minimum and maximum values of the variable fractional order Ξ(t) on [0,v] then we get

    ||Φ(t,γ1(t))Φ(t,γ2(t))||ι||γ1γ2||.

    Definition 2.12. Let ϵ>0 and γR be the solution of the following inequality. Then the equation is Hyers-Ulam stable if

    CF0DΞ(t)tγ(t)Φ(t,γ(t))ϵ, (2.8)

    for t[0,v] and there is unique solution γ2(t) with as Jk>0 that it follows

    ||γ(t)γ2(t)||Jkϵ; t[0,v] (2.9)

    is said to be Hyers-Ulam-stable.

    Definition 2.13. Let ϵ>0 and γR be the solution of the following inequality. Then the equation is Hyers Ulam Rassias-stable.

    ||CF0DΞ(t)tγ(t)Φ(t,γ(t))||Ω(t)ϵ, (2.10)

    for t[0,v] and there is a unique solution γ2(t) with Jk>0 that it follows

    ||γ(t)γ2(t)||JkΩ(t)ϵ; t[0,v] (2.11)

    is said to be Hyers-Ulam-Rassias stable.

    Lemma 2.14. Suppose f(t)C([0,T]), then the fractional differential equation with variable CF is

    CF0Dφ(t)tf(t)=ϱ(t), t[0,T],  o<φ(t)1, (2.12)

    f(0)=f0,ϱ0R and then

    f(t)=ϱ0+(1φ(t))M(φ(t))ϱ(t)+φ(t)M(φ(t))t0ϱ(x)dx. (2.13)

    Theorem 2.15. (Arzela-Ascoli theorem [21]): Let X be a compact metric space. Let C(X,R) be given the sup norm metric. Then a set M(C,X) is compact iff M is bounded, closed and equicontinuous.

    In this paper, we cover the COVID-19 model which was chosen recently [22], as well as the parameters and covariants used in the model. Assume a demographic with homogeneous mixing, which signifies any living thing that has a fair probability of colliding with itself. But using a causal physically based proposed model to categorize effectively evaluation, the current population is segmented up into various infections and disease asserts related to individual overall health at any time t with S(t) is susceptible, V(t) is vaccinated, E(t) is exposed, I(t) is symptoms in patients highly infections people, A(t) is infected latent, H(t) is seriously injured, R(t) is regained.

    dS/dt=[1p]π+ηR(βS+μ+v)S,dV/dt=pπ+vS(βV+μ)V,dE/dt=βSS+βVV(σ+μ)E,dI/dt=σψE+λ(1ϕ)A(γ+μ+δ)I,dA/dt=σ(1ψ)E(λ+μ)A,dH/dt=γ(1k)I(τ+μ+δ)H,dR/dt=γkI+λϕA+τH(η+μ)R, (3.1)

    with initial conditions,

    S(t0)=S0, V(t0)=V0, E(t0)=E0,I(t0)=I0, A(t0)=A0, H(t0)=H0,R(t0)=R0. (3.2)

    Susceptible people are infected after having close contact with symptomatic, asymptomatic, and patient people. We assume that disease transmission from asymptomatic to immunocompromised patients is lower than from symptomatic and hospitalized people whereas for a brief significant period, the COVID-19 pandemic which began in December 2019, is still ongoing. Consider σ escape rate from the exposed class, where a minority of the individuals is infected while the other (1ψ) becomes asymptotic. The asymptomatic class has an abandonment rate of λ. Natural death at the rate of μ. Even these improving diagnoses and traveling to the undiagnosed class at the rate of (1ϕ) and the fraction ϕ struggling to recover normally from the pathogens and traveling to the obtained class R are all influences that limit the number of patients. Departure from the sick class γ with a percentage (1k) of one being detained and other healing spontaneous.

    People get attracted through into society at the pace of π with a portion of p being immunized and the rest (1p) exposed. A few are vaccines at a much higher rate than the other v. The infected persons can also become introduced to the illness b(1ϵ) if the antibiotic is imperfect. Just a remotely effective treatment has already begun to promote a pure product to the SARS-COV-2 virus. The variable reflects the new vaccine's success.

    Non-pharmacological use such as self-quarantine of positive samples, isolation, face shields, wash hands, and social distancing, but the most limiting lockdowns, closures, or restricted openings of shops and schools were depended on and proceeded to be broadly applied before the access of pharma initiatives such as diagnosis and immunization.

    This chapter discusses the COVID-19 model with variable CF fractional derivative and the fuzzy approach

    CF0DΞ(t)tS(t)=(1p)πηR+(βS+μ+v)S,CF0DΞ(t)tV(t)=pπ+vS(βV+μ)V,CF0DΞ(t)tE(t)=βSS+βVV(σ+μ)E,CF0DΞ(t)tI(t)=σψE+λ(1ϕ)A(γ+μ+δ)I,CF0DΞ(t)tA(t)=σ(1ψ)E(λ+μ)A,CF0DΞ(t)tH(t)=γ(1k)I(τ+μ+σ)H,CF0DΞ(t)tR(t)=γkI+λϕA+τH(η+μ)R. (4.1)

    Here Ξ (t) denotes indicates for the variable CF fractional order and the initial conditions accompanying,

    S(t0)=S00,V(t0)=V00,E(t0)=E00,I(t0)=I00,A(t0)=A00,H(t0)=H00,R(t0)=R00. (4.2)

    Take a look at the right side of the proposal model in Eq (4.1). Now let us continue with the form Φj[t,S(t),V(t),E(t),I(t),A(t),H(t),R(t)]=Φj(),j=1,2,...7.

    Φ1()=CF0DΞ(t)tS(t)=(1p)πηR+(βS+μ+v)S,Φ2()=CF0DΞ(t)tV(t)=pπ+vS(βV+μ)V,Φ3()=CF0DΞ(t)tE(t)=βSS+βVV(σ+μ)E,Φ4()=CF0DΞ(t)tI(t)=σψE+λ(1ϕ)A(γ+μ+δ)I,Φ5()=CF0DΞ(t)tA(t)=σ(1ψ)E(λ+μ)A,Φ6()=CF0DΞ(t)tH(t)=γ(1k)I(τ+μ+σ)H,Φ7()=CF0DΞ(t)tR(t)=γkI+λϕA+τH(η+μ)R. (4.3)

    Here Φj(),j=1,2...7 are fuzzy functions for Ξ(t)(0,1]. Then Eq (4.1) modified as,

    γ(t)=γ(0)+CF0JΞ(t)t[Φ(t,γ(t))], (4.4)

    Ξ(t)(0,1]. Here, by using initial condition CF0JΞ(t)t, we transform Eq (4.2) into integral equations used to solve the problem. We convert Eq (4.1) into the integral equations as shown below,

    CF0DΞ(t)t(S(t))=Φ1(),CF0DΞ(t)t(V(t))=Φ2(),CF0DΞ(t)t(E(t))=Φ3(),CF0DΞ(t)t(I(t))=Φ4(),CF0DΞ(t)t(A(t))=Φ5(),CF0DΞ(t)t(H(t))=Φ6(),CF0DΞ(t)t(R(t))=Φ7(). (4.5)
    S(t)=S0+CF0JΞ(t)t(Φ1()),V(t)=V0+CF0JΞ(t)t(Φ2()),E(t)=E0+CF0JΞ(t)t(Φ3()),I(t)=I0+CF0JΞ(t)t(Φ4()),A(t)=A0+CF0JΞ(t)t(Φ5()),H(t)=H0+CF0JΞ(t)t(Φ6()),R(t)=R0+CF0JΞ(t)t(Φ7()). (4.6)

    Again, we modify Eq (4.6) into,

    γ(t) γ(0) Φ(t,γ(t))
    S(t) S0 Φ1[t,S(t),V(t),E(t),I(t),A(t),H(t),R(t)]
    V(t) V0 Φ2[t,S(t),V(t),E(t),I(t),A(t),H(t),R(t)]
    E(t) E0 Φ3[t,S(t),V(t),E(t),I(t),A(t),H(t),R(t)]
    I(t) I0 Φ4[t,S(t),V(t),E(t),I(t),A(t),H(t),R(t)]
    A(t) A0 Φ5[t,S(t),V(t),E(t),I(t),A(t),H(t),R(t)]
    H(t) H0 Φ6[t,S(t),V(t),E(t),I(t),A(t),H(t),R(t)]
    R(t) R0 Φ7[t,S(t),V(t),E(t),I(t),A(t),H(t),R(t)]

    Theorem 4.1. If we assume that γR, then the Eq (4.6) of the solution is

    CF0DΞ(t)t[γ(t))]=Φ(,γ()),t[0,v],0<Ξ(t)1, (4.7)

    γ(0)=γ0,γ0R with,

    γ(t)=γ(0)+CF0JΞ(t)t[Φ(t,γ(t))]. (4.8)

    Proof. By using the initial conditions (4.2), Theorem 4.1 can be proved [17,18].

    Theorem 4.2. The operator (2.6) satisfies the Banach fixed point theory with the hypothesis if and only if

    ι[(1Ξ)M(Ξ)+ΞvM(Ξ)]<1. (4.9)

    Proof. Assume that γ1,γ2R

    ||Ψγ1Ψγ2||||Ψ1γ1Ψ1γ2||+||Ψ2γ1Ψ2γ2|||[(1Ξ(t))M(Ξ(t))Φ[t,γ1(t)]Ξ(t)M(Ξ(t))t0Φ(,γ1())d       1Ξ(t)M(Ξ(t))Φ[t,γ2(t)]Ξ(t)M(Ξ(t))Φ(,γ2())d]|,[(1Ξ)M(Ξ)ι+ΞM(Ξ)ιv](S1S2)t[0,v]|γ1γ2|ι[(1Ξ)M(Ξ)+ΞM(Ξ)v]||γ1γ2||.

    The operator Φ in Eq (2.6) satisfying the Banach fixed point theorem, depending on the inequality (4.9), and using Eqs (4.4) and (4.8) satisfies

    γq(t)=(1Ξ(t))M(Ξ(t))Φ[t,γq(t)]Ξ(t)M(Ξ(t))t0Φ(,γq())d. (4.10)

    Theorem 4.3. The following Eqs (4.2)–(4.6) with CF in fuzzy variable fractional integral equation (FVFIE) has unique solution

    ι[(1Ξ)M(Ξ)+ΞvM(Ξ)]<1. (4.11)

    Proof. Assume that there is another solution for the CF in FVFIE (4.2)–(4.6), which is solution of (γ1(t)).

    ||γ1(t)γ2(t)|||[(1Ξ(t))M(Ξ(t))Φ[t,γ1(t)]Ξ(t)M(Ξ(t))t0Φ(,γ1())d       1Ξ(t)M(Ξ(t))Φ[t,γ2(t)]Ξ(t)M(Ξ(t))Φ(,γ2())d]|,(1Ξ(t))M(Ξ(t))|Φ[t,γ1(t)Φ[t,γ2(t)]|Ξ(t)M(Ξ(t))|t0Φ[t,γ1(t)Φ[t,γ2(t)]|ι[(1Ξ)M(Ξ)+ΞvM(Ξ)]||γ1(t)γ2(t)||.

    Additionally, this indicates that

    ι[(1Ξ)M(Ξ)+ΞvM(Ξ)]||γ1(t)γ2(t)||0. (4.12)

    The Eqs (4.11) and (4.12) is relates ||γ1(t)γ2(t)||=0, then

    ||γ2(t),(1Ξ(t))M(Ξ(t))Φ[t,γ2(t)]Ξ(t)M(Ξ(t))t0Φ(,γ2())d||, (4.13)

    there exists γ(t) which satisfies,

    γ(t)=(1Ξ(t))M(Ξ(t))Φ[t,γ(t)]Ξ(t)M(Ξ(t))t0Φ(,γ())d, (4.14)

    i.e., γ1(t)=γ2(t). The CF in FVFIE (4.2)–(4.6) is a unique solution. As a result CF with fuzzy variable fractional differential equation COVID-19 model has a unique solution.

    Theorem 5.1. The solution of the Eqs (4.2)–(4.6) is Ulam-Hyers stable with CF with FVFIE, under the Theorem 4.3.

    ι[1ΞM(Ξ)+ΞvM(Ξ)]<1. (5.1)

    Proof. By CF with FVFIE (4.2)–(4.6) has a unique solution from Theorem 4.3 and relates with (4.14)

    |γ(t)γ2(t)||[(1Ξ(t))M(Ξ(t))Φ[t,γ(t)]Ξ(t)M(Ξ(t))t0Φ(,γ())d       1Ξ(t)M(Ξ(t))Φ[t,γ2(t)]Ξ(t)M(Ξ(t))Φ(,γ2())d]|(1Ξ(t))M(Ξ(t))|Φ(t,γ(t))Φ(t,γ2(t))|     Ξ(t)M(Ξ(t))[t0|Φ(t,γ(t))Φ(t,γ2(t))|]ι(1Ξ(t))M(Ξ(t))|γ(t)γ2(t)|ιΞ(t)M(Ξ(t))[t0|γ(t)γ2(t)|]ι[(1Ξ)M(Ξ)+ΞvM(Ξ)]||γ(t))γ2(t)|||γ(t)γ2(t)|Jkϵ. (5.2)

    Where ϵ=ι[(1Ξ)M(Ξ)+ΞvM(Ξ)] and Jk=||γ(t)γ2(t)||. From Eq (5.2) is said to be Hyers-Ulam stable with CF in FVFIE (4.2) – (4.6) in COVID-19 model and the CF with fuzzy variable fractional differential equation COVID-19 model has Hyers-Ulam stable.

    Numerical simulations are performed to demonstrate the theoretical findings. Table 1 shows the model input variables for the numerical simulations as well as their source and description. We examined the effect of the vaccine and treatment of COVID-19 spreading [30]. Due to natural and seasonal changes, potential measurement flaws, and the fact that mathematical models are representations of complex biological systems, some model parameter values are not always known with certainty. We determine the relative significance of model parameters to disease transmission and graphically display how sensitive the functional reproduction number is to model parameters to show how changes in model parameter values affect R. Timely rating of prevention strategies and other hyperparameters based on their impact may ideally potentially enable policy and outcome prioritize public health intervention measures to be implemented, focusing attention on the most effective interventions. Similarly, the treatment rate and the effective contact rate should be kept as low as possible to limit COVID-19 spread in the environment. Now we discuss the obtained numerical outcomes of the governing method. Let us assume that the initial condition is taken as S=50, V=20, E=30, I=100, A=45, H=200, R=300 with parameters given in Table 1.

    Table 1.  Parameter and bilogical interpretations.
    Parameter Descriptions Value Reference
    π People are getting hired at a quick speed into the population. 1000059×365 [23,24]
    p Average fraction of those that were inoculated from recruited. 0.0001 Assumed
    v Inoculation completion. 0.4 Assumed
    μ Risk of mortality due to the extreme weather event. 159×365 [23,24]
    δ Risk of morality illness. 0.018 [25,26]
    ϵ Vaccinated people got serious illness. 0.8 Assumed
    σ A vulnerable groups departure rate. 0.13 [27]
    γ Departure rate in the highly contagious group. 0.0833 [26]
    k A portion of patients that heal gradually. 0.05 [28]
    ψ Primary infection in a low minority those who are vaccinated. 0.7 [24]
    b Amount of secure connection. 1.12 [26]
    τ People who are discharged get a great recovery. 0.0701 [25]
    ϕ The fraction of undiagnosed patients who recovery. 0.14 [27]
    λ A present for all who exist of their sick grade. 0.13978 [24,26]
    η A ratio for which people have lost an antibodies. 0.011 [29]

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    Figure 1 shows the time series for the susceptibility, vaccination, exposure, and infectious categories in the mathematical model. Because vaccines may have limits in some situations. When vaccinations are easily obtainable the number of persons at risk gradually reduces as more people receive the vaccine (the number of vaccinations of class v grows at the start of implementation). Even though vaccine availability is high, vaccine efficiency is low, and is larger than unity, the disease may not be cured. The statistical conclusion is that high vaccine efficiency and immunization coverage significantly lower the number of community-acquired secondary infections Figure 2.

    Figure 1.  Dynamics of exposed E with control and V vaccinated class="some_class".
    Figure 2.  Dynamics of susceptible class S and infected with control I.

    Early identifications of stability and mechanics that have a higher impact on medical transmission are critical for informing policy decisions about which parameters to focus on for data gathering or disease mitigation. The time series of the model system is shown for the susceptible, immunized, exposed, and infected groups, because vaccinations may not be effective in all circumstances in Figure 3. When vaccinations are widely accessible, we observe that as increasing numbers of people receive the vaccine (the number of class V vaccine recipients grows at the start of implementation), the number of susceptible individuals rapidly drops. In our proposed model performance is well because the number of recovered people slightly increases after vaccination. Hence, the fractional derivative model proves to be a model easier to use for theoretical and numerical calculations and real word applications.

    Figure 3.  Profile of S, E, V and I with saturation.

    Corollary 5.2. The solution of the system Eqs (4.2)–(4.6) is Ulam-Hyers-Rassias stable with CF with FVFIE, under the Theorem 4.3.

    ι[(1(Ξ))M((Ξ))+(Ξ)vM((Ξ))]<1. (5.3)

    By this Eq (4.14) we can prove that Hyers-Ulam-Rassias stability.

    The mathematical modeling tends towards the stability analysis of COVID-19, we developed a deterministic model of the COVID-19 transmission dynamics using an inadequate vaccination. The model is theoretically examined for both its effective and intrinsic reproduction frequencies to be computed. The findings of the paper explain how the COVID-19 system was generalized with fuzzy variable differential equation and unit step function carried out under CF fractional derivative. Using Banach's fixed point theory, we analyzed new existence and unique conditions for the COVID-19 system model. The investigation to prove Hyers-Ulam stability for the COVID-19 system is carried out. Future studies will investigate how COVID-19 patterns are affected by different treatment methods and objectives.

    The authors wish to express their appreciation to the reviewers for their helpful suggestions which greatly improved the presentation of this paper. The work of U.F.-G. was supported by the government of the Basque Country for the ELKARTEK21/10 KK-2021/00014 and ELKARTEK22/85 research programs, respectively.

    All authors declare no conflicts of interest in this paper.



    [1] D. Baleanu, H. Mohammadi, S. A. Rezapour, A fractional differential equation model for the COVID-19 transmission by using the Caputo-Fabrizio derivative, Adv. Differ. Equ., 299 (2020), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13662-020-02762-2 doi: 10.1186/s13662-020-02762-2
    [2] Q. Li, X. Guan, Early transmission dynamics in Wuhan, China, of novel coronavirus-infected pneumonia, New Engl. J. Med., 382 (2020), 1199–1207.
    [3] R. M. Ganji, H. Jafari, A new approach for solving multi variable orders differential equations with Mittag-Leffler kernel, Chaos Soliton. Fract., 130 (2020), 109405. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2019.109405 doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2019.109405
    [4] F. Saldana, J. A. Camacho-Gutierrez, A. Korobeinikov, Impact of a cost functional on the optimal control and the cost-effectiveness: Control of a spreading infection as a case study, Math. Optim. Control, 2020. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2011.06648
    [5] M. Shera, K. Shaha, H. Khan, Khan, Z. Khan, A computational and theoretical modeling of the transmission dynamics of novel COVID-19 under Mittag-Leffler power law, Alex. Eng. J., 59 (2020), 3133–3147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2020.07.014 doi: 10.1016/j.aej.2020.07.014
    [6] S. M. Blower, H. Dowlatabadi, Sensitivity and uncertainty analysis of complex models of disease transmission: An HIV model, as an example, Int. Stat. Rev., 62 (1994), 229–243.
    [7] K. Hasib, J. Gomez-Aguilar, J. Abdeljawad, Existence results and stability criteria for ABC-fuzzy-volterra integrodiferential equation, Fractals, 28 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218348X20400484 doi: 10.1142/S0218348X20400484
    [8] D. Lu, M. Suleman, J. U. Rahman, S. Noeiaghdam, G. Murtaza, Numerical simulation of fractional zakharov-kuznetsov equation for description of temporal discontinuity using projected differential transform method, Complexity, 2021 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/9998610 doi: 10.1155/2021/9998610
    [9] M. Hedayati, R. Ezzati, S. Noeiaghdam, New procedures of a fractional order model of novel coronavirus (COVID-19) outbreak via wavelets method, Axioms, 10 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3390/axioms10020122 doi: 10.3390/axioms10020122
    [10] S. Noeiaghdam, A. Dreglea, H. Isik, M. Suleman, Comparative study between discrete stochastic arithmetic and floating-point arithmetic to validate the results of fractional order model of malaria infection, Mathematics, 9 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3390/math9121435 doi: 10.3390/math9121435
    [11] S. Noeiaghdam, S. Micula, J. J. Nieto, Novel technique to control the accuracy of a nonlinear fractional order model of COVID-19: Application of the cestac method and the cadna library, Mathematics, 9 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3390/math9121321 doi: 10.3390/math9121321
    [12] S. Noeiaghdam, D. Sidorov, Caputo-Fabrizio fractional derivative to solve the fractional model of energy supply-demand system, Math. Model. Eng. Probl., 7 (2020), 359–367. https://doi.org/10.18280/mmep.070305 doi: 10.18280/mmep.070305
    [13] R. S. Palais, A simple proof of the banach contraction principle, J. Fix. Point Theory A., 2 (2007), 221–223. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11784-007-0041-6 doi: 10.1007/s11784-007-0041-6
    [14] C. Ravichandran, K. Logeswari, New results on existence in the framework of atangana-baleanu derivative for fractional integro-differential equations, Chaos Solution. Fract., 125 (2019), 194–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2019.05.014 doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2019.05.014
    [15] A. Hussain, M. Adee, Existence of solution and stability for the fractional order novel coronavirus (nCoV-2019) model, Adv. Differ. Equ., 384 (2020), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13662-020-02845-0 doi: 10.1186/s13662-020-02845-0
    [16] S. Ahmad, A. Ullah, K. Shah, S. Salahshour, A. Ahmadian, T. Ciano, Fuzzy fractional-order model of the novel coronavirus, Adv. Differ. Equ., 472 (2020), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13662-020-02934-0 doi: 10.1186/s13662-020-02934-0
    [17] A. Khan, H. Khan, J. F. Gómez-Aguilar, T. Abdeljawad, Existence and Hyers-Ulam stability for a nonlinear singular fractional differential equations with Mittag-Leffler kernel, Chaos Soliton. Fract., 127 (2019), 422–427. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2019.07.026 doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2019.07.026
    [18] P. Verma, M. Kumar, Analysis of a novel coronavirus (2019-nCOV) system with variable Caputo-Fabrizio fractional order, Chaos Soliton. Fract., 142 (2021), 110451. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2020.110451 doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2020.110451
    [19] H. Khan, C. Tunc, Green function's properties and existence theorems for nonlinear singular delay-fractional differential equations, Discrete Cont. Dyn.-S, 13 (2020), 2475–2487. https://doi.org/10.3934/dcdss.2020139 doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2020139
    [20] J. Wang, S. Zhang, The existence of solutions for nonlinear fractional boundary value problem and its lyapunov-type inequality involving conformable variable-order derivative, J. Inequal. Appl., 86 (2020), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13660-020-02351-7 doi: 10.1186/s13660-020-02351-7
    [21] J. W. Green, F. A. Valentine, On the arzela-ascoli theorem, Math. Mag., 34 (1961), 199–202. https://doi.org/10.1080/0025570X.1961.11975217 doi: 10.1080/0025570X.1961.11975217
    [22] M. L. Diagne, H. Rwezaura, S. Y. Tchoumi, J. M. Tchuenche, A mathematical model of COVID-19 with vaccination and treatment, Comput. Math. Meth. Med., 2021 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/1250129 doi: 10.1155/2021/1250129
    [23] B. Buonomo, Analysis of a malaria model with mosquito host choice and bed-net control, Int. J. Biomath., 8 (2015), 1550077. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1793524515500771 doi: 10.1142/S1793524515500771
    [24] M. O. Adewole, A. Onifade, F. A. Abdullah, F. Kasali, A. I. M. Ismail, Modeling the dynamics of COVID-19 in Nigeria, Int. J. Appl. Comput. Math., 7 (2021), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40819-021-01014-5 doi: 10.1007/s40819-021-01014-5
    [25] S. M. Garba, J. M. Lubuma, B. Tsanou, Modeling the transmission dynamics of the COVID-19 pandemic in south africa, Math. Biosci., 328 (2020), 108441. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mbs.2020.108441 doi: 10.1016/j.mbs.2020.108441
    [26] A. Babaei, H. Jafari, S. Banihashemi, M. Ahmadi, Mathematical analysis of a stochastic model for spread of coronavirus, Chaos Soliton. Fract., 145 (2021), 110788. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2021.110788 doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2021.110788
    [27] B. Tang, X. Wang, Q. Li, N. L. Bragazzi, S. Tang, Y. Xiao, et al., Estimation of the transmission risk of the 2019-ncov and its implication for public health interventions, J. Clin. Med., 9 (2020), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9020462 doi: 10.3390/jcm9020462
    [28] C. T. Deressa, Y. O. Mussa, G. F. Duressa, Optimal control and sensitivity analysis for transmission dynamics of coronavirus, Results Phys., 19 (2020), 103642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rinp.2020.103642 doi: 10.1016/j.rinp.2020.103642
    [29] M. Q. Shakhany, K. Salimifard, Predicting the dynamical behavior of COVID-19 epidemic and the effect of control strategies, Chaos Soliton. Fract., 146 (2021), 110823. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2021.110823 doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2021.110823
    [30] R. K. Upadhyay, A. K. Pal, S. Kumari, R. Parimita, Dynamics of an seir epidemic model with nonlinear incidence and treatment rates, Nonlinear Dyn., 96 (2019), 2351–2368. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-019-04926-6 doi: 10.1007/s11071-019-04926-6
    [31] S. Deepa, A. Ganesh, V. Ibrahimov, S. S. Santra, V. Govindan, K. M. Khedher, et al., Fractional Fourier transform to stability analysis of fractional differential equations with Prabhakar derivatives, Azerbaijan J. Math., 12 (2022).
    [32] F. Ghomanjani, S. Noeiaghdam, Application of Said Ball curve for solving fractional differential algebraic equations, Mathematics, 9 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3390/math9161926 doi: 10.3390/math9161926
    [33] T. Allahviranloo, Z. Noeiaghdam, S. Noeiaghdam, Juan J. Nieto, A fuzzy method for solving fuzzy fractional differential equations based on the generalized fuzzy Taylor expansion, Mathematics, 8 (2020), 2166. https://doi.org/10.3390/math8122166 doi: 10.3390/math8122166
    [34] I. A. Mirza, D. Vieru, Fundamental solutions to advection-diffusion equation with time-fractional Caputo-Fabrizio derivative, Comput. Math. Appl., 73 (2017), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.camwa.2016.09.026 doi: 10.1016/j.camwa.2016.09.026
    [35] I. A. Mirza, M. S. Akram, N. A. Shah, W. Imtiaz, J. D. Chung, Analytical solutions to the advection-diffusion equation with Atangana-Baleanu time-fractional derivative and a concentrated loading, Alex. Eng. J., 60 (2021), 1199–1208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2020.10.043 doi: 10.1016/j.aej.2020.10.043
    [36] L. Wei, W. Li, Local discontinuous Galerkin approximations to variable-order time-fractional diffusion model based on the Caputo-Fabrizio fractional derivative, Math. Comput. Simul., 188 (2021), 280–290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matcom.2021.04.001 doi: 10.1016/j.matcom.2021.04.001
    [37] M. Alqhtani, K. M. Owolabi, K. M. Saad, E. Pindza, Efficient numerical techniques for computing the Riesz fractional-order reaction-diffusion models arising in biology, Chaos Soliton. Fract., 161 (2022), 112394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2022.112394 doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2022.112394
    [38] H. M. Srivastava, K. M. Saad, W. M. Hamanah, Certain new models of the Multi-space fractal-fractional Kuramoto-Sivashinsky and Korteweg-de vries equations, Mathematics, 10 (2022), 1089. https://doi.org/10.3390/math10071089 doi: 10.3390/math10071089
    [39] A. Selvam, S. Sabarinathan, S. Noeiaghdam, V. Govindan, Fractional Fourier transform and Ulam stability of fractional differentialnequation with fractional Caputo-type derivative, J.Funct. Space., 2022 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/3777566 doi: 10.1155/2022/3777566
    [40] A. Khan, H. M. Alshehri, T. Abdeljawad, Q. M. Al-Mdallal, H. Khan, Stability analysis of fractional nabla difference COVID-19 model, Results Phys., 22 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rinp.2021.103888 doi: 10.1016/j.rinp.2021.103888
    [41] I. Ahmed, I. A. Baba, A. Yusuf, P. Kumam, W. Kumam, Analysis of Caputo fractional-order model for COVID-19 with lockdown, Adv. Differ. Equ., 394 (2020), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13662-020-02853-0 doi: 10.1186/s13662-020-02853-0
    [42] M. Sher, K. Shah, Z. A. Khan, H. Khan, A. Khan, Computational and theoretical modeling of the transmission dynamics of novel COVID-19 under Mittag-Leffler power law, Alex. Eng. J., 59 (2020), 3133–3147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2020.07.014 doi: 10.1016/j.aej.2020.07.014
    [43] H. Khan, F. Ahmad, O. Tunç, M. Idrees, On fractal-fractional Covid-19 mathematical model, Chaos Soliton. Fract., 157 (2022), 111937. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2022.111937 doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2022.111937
    [44] X. P. Li, H. Al Bayatti, A. Din, A. Zeb, A vigorous study of fractional order COVID-19 model via ABC derivatives, Alex. Eng. J., 29 (2021), 104737. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rinp.2021.104737 doi: 10.1016/j.rinp.2021.104737
  • This article has been cited by:

    1. M. Sivashankar, S. Sabarinathan, Kottakkaran Sooppy Nisar, C. Ravichandran, B.V. Senthil Kumar, Some properties and stability of Helmholtz model involved with nonlinear fractional difference equations and its relevance with quadcopter, 2023, 168, 09600779, 113161, 10.1016/j.chaos.2023.113161
    2. M. Sivashankar, S. Sabarinathan, Kottakkaran Sooppy Nisar, C. Ravichandran, B.V. Senthil Kumar, Stability, numerical simulations, and applications of Helmholtz-Duffing fractional differential equations, 2024, 12, 25900544, 100106, 10.1016/j.csfx.2024.100106
    3. Haoqing Chen, Guangmei Wei, Yuxin Song, Yaqin Xie, Oceanic Shallow-Water Investigations on a Variable-Coefficient Davey–Stewartson System, 2024, 12, 2227-7390, 1732, 10.3390/math12111732
    4. A. Selvam, S. Sabarinathan, Sandra Pinelas, The Aboodh Transform Techniques to Ulam Type Stability of Linear Delay Differential Equation, 2023, 9, 2349-5103, 10.1007/s40819-023-01577-5
    5. Muhammed Rafeek K. V, G. Janardhana Reddy, Anjanna Matta, Hussain Basha, Linear and non-linear stability analysis of double-diffusive Hadley-Prats flow through horizontal porous layer with non-uniform thermal and solutal gradients, 2024, 1040-7782, 1, 10.1080/10407782.2024.2360645
    6. Arunachalam Selvam, Sriramulu Sabarinathan, Sandra Pinelas, Vaidhiyanathan Suvitha, Existence and Stability of Ulam–Hyers for Neutral Stochastic Functional Differential Equations, 2024, 50, 1017-060X, 10.1007/s41980-023-00827-y
    7. Muhammad Sarwar, Aiman Mukheimer, Syed Khayyam Shah, Arshad Khan, Existence of solutions of fractal fractional partial differential equations through different contractions, 2024, 9, 2473-6988, 12399, 10.3934/math.2024606
    8. Salem Mubarak Alzahrani, Statistical methods for the computation and parameter estimation of a fractional SIRC model with Salmonella infection, 2024, 10, 24058440, e30885, 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e30885
    9. Kottakkaran Sooppy Nisar, Ravichandran Chokkalingam, Sabarinathan Sriramulu, Selvam Arunachalam, Mathematical Study of Nabla Fractional Difference Tech Layoff Model, 2024, 2731-8095, 10.1007/s40995-024-01721-w
    10. Sandra Pinelas, Arunachalam Selvam, Sriramulu Sabarinathan, Ulam–Hyers Stability of Linear Differential Equation with General Transform, 2023, 15, 2073-8994, 2023, 10.3390/sym15112023
    11. Saba Jamil, Parvaiz Ahmad Naik, Muhammad Farman, Muhammad Umer Saleem, Abdul Hamid Ganie, Stability and complex dynamical analysis of COVID-19 epidemic model with non-singular kernel of Mittag-Leffler law, 2024, 70, 1598-5865, 3441, 10.1007/s12190-024-02105-4
    12. Anum Zehra, Parvaiz Ahmad Naik, Ali Hasan, Muhammad Farman, Kottakkaran Sooppy Nisar, Faryal Chaudhry, Zhengxin Huang, Physiological and chaos effect on dynamics of neurological disorder with memory effect of fractional operator: A mathematical study, 2024, 250, 01692607, 108190, 10.1016/j.cmpb.2024.108190
    13. Anip Kumar Paul, Neerob Basak, Md Abdul Kuddus, A mathematical model for simulating the transmission dynamics of COVID-19 using the Caputo–Fabrizio fractional-order derivative with nonsingular kernel, 2023, 43, 23529148, 101416, 10.1016/j.imu.2023.101416
    14. Arunachalam Selvam, Sriramulu Sabarinathan, Beri Venkatachalapathy Senthil Kumar, Haewon Byeon, Kamel Guedri, Sayed M. Eldin, Muhammad Ijaz Khan, Vediyappan Govindan, Ulam-Hyers stability of tuberculosis and COVID-19 co-infection model under Atangana-Baleanu fractal-fractional operator, 2023, 13, 2045-2322, 10.1038/s41598-023-35624-4
    15. Muhammad Umer Saleem, Muhammad Farman, Rabia Sarwar, Parvaiz Ahmad Naik, Perwasha Abbass, Evren Hincal, Zhengxin Huang, Modeling and analysis of a carbon capturing system in forest plantations engineering with Mittag–Leffler positive invariant and global Mittag–Leffler properties, 2025, 11, 2363-6203, 10.1007/s40808-024-02181-2
    16. S. Sepehr Tabatabaei, Mohammadreza Dehghan, Contagious Disease Outbreaks: Distinguishing Between Constant and Variable Order Using the SEIAR Model, 2025, 25901230, 104125, 10.1016/j.rineng.2025.104125
    17. Muhammad Farman, Rabia Sarwar, Kottakkaran Sooppy Nisar, Parvaiz Ahmad Naik, Sundus Shahzeen, Aceng Sambas, Global wave analysis of a fractional-order cholera disease model in society, 2025, 14, 2192-6670, 10.1007/s13721-025-00505-5
    18. Junseok Kim, A normalized Caputo–Fabrizio fractional diffusion equation, 2025, 10, 2473-6988, 6195, 10.3934/math.2025282
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2023 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(2227) PDF downloads(158) Cited by(18)

Figures and Tables

Figures(3)  /  Tables(1)

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog