Processing math: 100%
Research article Special Issues

On the fractional-order mathematical model of COVID-19 with the effects of multiple non-pharmaceutical interventions

  • In this article, the Caputo fractional derivative operator of different orders 0<α1 is applied to formulate the fractional-order model of the COVID-19 pandemic. The existence and boundedness of the solutions of the model are investigated by using the Gronwall-Bellman inequality. Further, the uniqueness of the model solutions is established by using the fixed-point theory. The Laplace Adomian decomposition method is used to obtain an approximate solution of the nonlinear system of fractional-order differential equations of the model with a different fractional-order α for every compartment in the model. Finally, graphical presentations are presented to show the effects of other fractional parameters α on the obtained approximate solutions.

    Citation: Ihtisham Ul Haq, Nigar Ali, Hijaz Ahmad, Taher A. Nofal. On the fractional-order mathematical model of COVID-19 with the effects of multiple non-pharmaceutical interventions[J]. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(9): 16017-16036. doi: 10.3934/math.2022877

    Related Papers:

    [1] Mohammad Sajid, Biplab Dhar, Ahmed S. Almohaimeed . Differential order analysis and sensitivity analysis of a CoVID-19 infection system with memory effect. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(12): 20594-20614. doi: 10.3934/math.20221129
    [2] Murugesan Sivashankar, Sriramulu Sabarinathan, Vediyappan Govindan, Unai Fernandez-Gamiz, Samad Noeiaghdam . Stability analysis of COVID-19 outbreak using Caputo-Fabrizio fractional differential equation. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(2): 2720-2735. doi: 10.3934/math.2023143
    [3] Muhammad Farman, Ali Akgül, Kottakkaran Sooppy Nisar, Dilshad Ahmad, Aqeel Ahmad, Sarfaraz Kamangar, C Ahamed Saleel . Epidemiological analysis of fractional order COVID-19 model with Mittag-Leffler kernel. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(1): 756-783. doi: 10.3934/math.2022046
    [4] Sadam Hussain, Muhammad Sarwar, Kottakkaran Sooppy Nisar, Kamal Shah . Controllability of fractional differential evolution equation of order γ(1,2) with nonlocal conditions. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(6): 14188-14206. doi: 10.3934/math.2023726
    [5] Sivaranjani Ramasamy, Thangavelu Senthilprabu, Kulandhaivel Karthikeyan, Palanisamy Geetha, Saowaluck Chasreechai, Thanin Sitthiwirattham . Existence, uniqueness and controllability results of nonlinear neutral implicit ABC fractional integro-differential equations with delay and impulses. AIMS Mathematics, 2025, 10(2): 4326-4354. doi: 10.3934/math.2025200
    [6] Yujun Cui, Chunyu Liang, Yumei Zou . Existence and uniqueness of solutions for a class of fractional differential equation with lower-order derivative dependence. AIMS Mathematics, 2025, 10(2): 3797-3818. doi: 10.3934/math.2025176
    [7] Shao-Wen Yao, Muhammad Farman, Maryam Amin, Mustafa Inc, Ali Akgül, Aqeel Ahmad . Fractional order COVID-19 model with transmission rout infected through environment. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(4): 5156-5174. doi: 10.3934/math.2022288
    [8] Hawsar HamaRashid, Hari Mohan Srivastava, Mudhafar Hama, Pshtiwan Othman Mohammed, Musawa Yahya Almusawa, Dumitru Baleanu . Novel algorithms to approximate the solution of nonlinear integro-differential equations of Volterra-Fredholm integro type. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(6): 14572-14591. doi: 10.3934/math.2023745
    [9] Sara Salem Alzaid, Badr Saad T. Alkahtani . Real-world validation of fractional-order model for COVID-19 vaccination impact. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(2): 3685-3706. doi: 10.3934/math.2024181
    [10] Isra Al-Shbeil, Abdelkader Benali, Houari Bouzid, Najla Aloraini . Existence of solutions for multi-point nonlinear differential system equations of fractional orders with integral boundary conditions. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(10): 18142-18157. doi: 10.3934/math.2022998
  • In this article, the Caputo fractional derivative operator of different orders 0<α1 is applied to formulate the fractional-order model of the COVID-19 pandemic. The existence and boundedness of the solutions of the model are investigated by using the Gronwall-Bellman inequality. Further, the uniqueness of the model solutions is established by using the fixed-point theory. The Laplace Adomian decomposition method is used to obtain an approximate solution of the nonlinear system of fractional-order differential equations of the model with a different fractional-order α for every compartment in the model. Finally, graphical presentations are presented to show the effects of other fractional parameters α on the obtained approximate solutions.



    The outbreak of the coronavirus started in December 2019 in China [1]. It has been categorized as a pandemic by the World Health Organization. This new virus causes a severe acute respiratory illness, which can lead to death, that has been spread worldwide. This badly affects the general health system and the economic growth of the developing and underdeveloped countries. Because of the beginning of the first outbreaks, it is assessed that the worldwide disease burden due to COVID-19 amounts to over 91.2 million people infected globally and 1.9 million deaths worldwide [1,2]. From the coronavirus across 215 countries has brought the whole word the series threat [3]. It has been confirmed that large number of huge reported COVID-19 cases tend to be observed as mild to moderate respiratory disorders with symptoms, like coughing, fever, and breathing difficulty. This virus transmits mostly through beads from the nose or mouth when an infected individual sneezes or coughs. When the uninfected one breathes the droplets from the air, they will be presented with the risk of getting the infection. As a result, the best technique to control the spread of the coronavirus is to keep it away from people. Thus, there have been research works to interpret the mechanism to prevent the spread of the coronavirus and examine the impacts of different drugs and non-drug mediation. Mathematical modeling is an importing technique for investigating the underlying dynamics of a virus disperse and developing a control technique when enough data about the infection is scant. Models have also been utilized to predict the infection elements and estimate the efficiency of the intervention strategies disease spreading [4,5,6,7]. In this way different models have been developed that focus on minimizing the spread of coronavirus [8,9,10], such as the isolation of victims, maintaining social distancing, face maskes, washing hands with soap, all official and unofficial gatherings like sports club, games matches, schools, colleges and universities. Mumbu et al. [10] and Verma et al. [11] proposed a model with seven compartments, which include the susceptible population, exposed population, infected population, asymptotic population and recovered population. This model shows the coronavirus infection India and South Korea countries.

    Fractional order epidemic models are more helpful and realistic as a tool to evaluate the dynamics of a contagious disease than classical integer order models [12,13]. Because classical mathematical models do not provide a high degree of accuracy for modeling these diseases, fractional differential equations were developed to handle such problems, which have many applications in applied fields related to optimization problems, production problems, artificial intelligence, robotics, cosmology, medical diagnoses, and many more [14,15]. The fractional differential equation has been employed in the mathematical modelling of biological phenomena for many decades. Because mathematical models are effective tools for studying infectious diseases, recently, a lot of scientists have been investing mathematical models of the COVID-19 pandemic with fractional order derivatives; they have produced excellent results [16,17].

    Recently, Srivastav et al. [18] developed another compartmental model of the COVID-19 pandemic, particularly for the effects of face masks, hospitalization, and quarantine as follows:

    {.S=δβ(1εmem)SIsβ(1εmem)SIaλS.E=β1(1εmem)SIa+β(1εmem)SIaσEλE.Is=(1a)σE+ρaIa(λs+λ)IsϕsIs.Ia=aσEτaIaρaIaλIa.H=ϕsIs(τh+λh+λ)H.Qh=τaIaρhQhλQ.R=ρhQh+τhHλR. (1.1)

    The transmission dynamics of Model (1.1) are represented in the Figure 1 flowchart.

    Figure 1.  Flow diagram of the COVID-19 model (1.1).

    In this model, they have divided the whole population N(t) into seven epidemiological groups: S(t) (susceptible population), E(t) (exposed population), Is(t) (symptomatic population), Ia(t) (asymptomatic population), H(t) (hospitalized population), Qh(t) (quarantined population) and R(t) (recovered population). They categorized the infectious peoples into two subgroups Ia and Is. They assumed that as quickly as symptoms appear, an Ia individual would join the Is class. The biological interpretations of parameters are given in Table 1.

    Table 1.  Biological interpretations of the parameters of Model (1.1).
    Parameters Biological Interpretations
    δ Recruitment rate for the susceptible population
    β Rate of infection of S among Ia population
    β Rate of infection of S among Is population
    ϵm Effectiveness of face masks
    em Masks compliance
    λ Human mortality rate due to natural causes
    σ Rate of incubation
    a Fraction of those exposed who do not exhibit clinical symptoms
    ρa Rate of progression from Ia to Is class
    ρh Recovery rate for H individuals
    λs Disease induced mortality rate for Is class
    τa Q rate for Ia class
    τh Recovery rate for R class
    λh Disease induced mortality rate for H class
    ϕs Rate of H for Is individuals

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    Their model focused on the effects of face masks, hospitalization of the Ia population and quarantine of Is individuals on the spread of the coronavirus. Recently many researchers have proposed models of the COVID-19 pandemic based on the Caputo fractional derivative; they obtained some good results; for details see [19,20]. Consequently, inspired by the previously mentioned work, here we study Model (1.1) under the conditions of using fractional-order derivatives. For α(0,1],

    {c0Dαt[S(t)]=δβ(1εmem)SIsβ(1εmem)SIaλSc0Dαt[E(t)]=β(1εmem)SIa+β(1εmem)SIaσEλEc0Dαt[Is(t)]=(1a)σE+ρaIa(λs+λ)IsϕsIsc0Dαt[Ia(t)]=aσEτaIaρaIaλIc0Dαt[H(t)]=ϕsIs(τh+λh+λ)Hc0Dαt[Qh(t)]=τaIaρhQhλQc0Dαt[R(t)]=ρhQh+τhHλR. (1.2)

    We apply the following initial conditions:

    S(0)=S0=K1,E(0)=E0=K2,Is(0)=Is0=K3,Ia(0)=Ia0=K4,H(0)=H0=K5,Qh(0)=Qh0=K6,R(0)=R0=K7.

    We believe that a good mathematical model will assist health authorities in taking preventative steps against the spread of the new coronavirus disease. Therefore, we first introduce a Caputo fractional-order model and then derive the existence and non-negativity of the Caputo fractional order model solutions by applying the fractional Gronwall-Bellman inequality using the Laplace transform method(LTM). The uniqueness of the solutions of the model is founded on the use of fixed-point theory. Then, we expand the Laplace Adomian decomposition method (LADM) for numerical simulations. The coupling of the Adomian decomposition method and LTM leads to a powerful technique known as Laplace Adomian decomposition. With the application of LTM, we transform a CFDE into algebraic equations. The nonlinear terms in the first two equations are decomposed in terms of Adonmain polynomials. We see that this iterative method works efficiently for a stochastic system as well as deterministic differential equation. More explicitly, we can also use it for a system of linear and nonlinear ordinary differential equations and partial differential equations of an integer and fractional order. In the above process, no perturbation is required. It is to be proved that the LADM is a better technique than the standard ADM method [21,22,23,24].

    The rest of the paper is organized as follows: Section 1 is the introduction. Section 2 includes the basic definitions. The existence and non-negativity of the solution are discussed in Section 3. Section 4 is devoted to the uniqueness of the solution. The LAD method is applied to the soolution of the model in Section 5, and the numerical discussion is considered in Section 6. The last section is the conclusion of our work.

    Definition 2.1. [25] The CFD of order γ(K1,K] of U(t) is defined as

    c0Dγt{U(t)}=1Γ(Kγ)t0(tη)Kγ1U(K)(η)dη,

    where K=[γ]+1 and [γ] represents the integral parts of γ.

    Definition 2.2. Magin [26] The Riemann-Liouville fractional integration of order 0<γ1 of the continuous function U is defined as

    Iγ(U(t))=1Γ(γ)t0(tη)γ1U(η)dη,0<η<.

    Definition 2.3. [27] The Laplace transform of G(t), as denoted by G(S) is defined as

    G(S)=0eStG(t)dt.

    Definition 2.4. Mittag-Leffler function (MLF) is defined as

    Eα,β(U)=K=0UKΓ(αK+β),

    and

    Eα,1(U)=K=0UKΓ(αK+1),

    where α and β are greater than zero and the convergence of the MLF is described in [28,29].

    Lemma 2.1. [30] The Laplace transform of the Caputo FDO is

    L{c0Dγt(U(t))}=SKL{U(t)}N1K=0SγK1U(K)(t0),

    where K1<γ<K, K=[γ]+1 and [γ] shows theinteger part of γ.

    Lemma 2.2. [31] The following result holds for Caputo FDO

    Iγ[c0DγtU](t)=U(t)+N1K=0UK(0)ΓK+1UK

    for any γ>0,KN, where K=[γ]+1 and [γ]shows the integer part of γ.

    This section is dedicated to proving the positivity and boundedness of the solution of System (1.2). The size of each class of the population varies over time, and the whole population N(t) is given by

    N=S+E+Is+Ia+H+Qh+R.

    Applying Caputo fractional order derivatives and using the linearity property of the Caputo operator, we get

    c0Dαt{N(t)}=c0Dαt[S(t)]+c0Dαt[E(t)]+c0Dαt[Is(t)]+c0Dαt[Ia(t)]+c0Dαt[H(t)]+c0Dαt[Qh(t)]+c0Dαt[R(t)]=δλN(t)λsIsλhH,
    c0Dαt[N(t)]λN(t)δ. (3.1)

    Applying the LTM to solve the FGB inequality given by Eq (3.1) with initial conditions N(t0)0, we obtain

    L{c0DαtN(t)λN(t)}L{δ},
    L{N(t)}δS(λ+Sα)+P1K=0SαK1NK(t0)(Sα+λ). (3.2)

    Splitting Eq (3.2) into partial fractions, we get

    L{N(t)}δ(1S1S(1+λSα))+P1K=0NK(t0)SK+1(1+λSα). (3.3)

    By using binomial series expansion, we get

    1(1+λSα)=K=0(λSα)K.

    Therefore, Eq (3.3) becomes

    L{N(t)}δ(1SK=0(λ)KSKα+1)+K1P=0K=0(λ)KNK(t0)SαK+P+1. (3.4)

    Applying the inverse Laplace transform to Eq (3.4) gives

    N(t)δ(1K=0(λ)KtKαΓ(Kα+1))+K1P=0K=0(μλ)NP(t0)tKα+PΓ(Kα+P+1)δ(1K=0(λtα)KΓ(Kα+1))+K1P=0K=0(λtα)KNP(t0)tPΓ(Kα+P+1).

    Now, we apply the definition of MLF

    N(t)δ(1K=0(λtα)K)Γ(Kα+1))+Eα,P+1(λtα)tPNP(t0), (3.5)

    where Eq (3.5), Eα,1(λtα) and Eα,K+1(λtα) represent the series of entire function. Hence the solutions of Model (1.2) are bounded.

    Thus,

    {(S(t),E(t),Is(t),Ia(t),H(t),Qh(t),R(t))R7+,0N(t)δ(1Eα,1(λtα)+Eα,P+1(λtα)tPNP(t0)}.

    Using the fixed point theory, we will discuss the uniqueness of the solutions of the Caputo fractional-order Model (1.2). For this need, we will follow the following procedure.

    Applying the initial conditions and the fractional integral to System (1.2), we obtain

    S(t)=K1+1Γ(α)t0(tη)α1[δβ(1ϵmcm)SIsβ(1ϵmcm)SIaλS]dη,E(t)=K2+1Γ(α)t0(tη)α1[β(1ϵmcm)SIs+β(1ϵmcm)SIaσEλE]dη,Is(t)=K3+1Γ(α)t0(tη)α1[(1a)σE+ρaIa(λs+λ)ϕsIs]dη,Ia(t)=K4+1Γ(α)t0(tη)α1[aσEτaIaρaIaλI]dη,H(t)=K5+1Γ(α)t0(tη)α1[ϕsIs(τh+λh+λ)H]dη,Qh(t)=K6+1Γ(α)t0(tη)α1[τaIaρhQhλQ]dη,R(t)=K7+1Γ(α)t0(tη)α1[ρhQh+τhHhλR]dη. (4.1)

    It is assumed that

    U(t)={SEIaIsHQhR, (4.2)
    K={K1K2K3K4K5K6K7. (4.3)

    We define the functions under the integral signs in Eq (4.1) as

    G(t,U(t))={F1(S,E,Is,Ia,H,Qh,R)=δβ(1ϵmcm)SIsβ(1ϵmcm)SIaλSF2(S,E,Is,Ia,H,Qh,R)=β(1ϵmcm)SIs+β(1ϵmcm)SIaσEλEF3(S,E,Is,Ia,H,Qh,R)=(1a)σE+ρaIa(λs+λ)ϕsIsF4(S,E,Is,Ia,H,Qh,R)=aσEτaIaρaIaλIF5(S,E,Is,Ia,H,Qh,R)=ϕsIs(τh+λh+λ)HF6(S,E,Is,Ia,H,Qh,R)=τaIaρhQhλQF7(S,E,Is,Ia,H,Qh,R)=ρhQh+τhHhλR. (4.4)

    Substituting Eq (4.4) into Eq (4.1), we get

    S(t)=K1+1Γ(α)t0(tη)α1F1(S,E,Is,Ia,H,Qh,R)dη,E(t)=K2+1Γ(α)t0(tη)α1F2(S,E,Is,Ia,H,Qh,R)dη,Is(t)=K3+1Γ(α)t0(tη)α1F3(S,E,Is,Ia,H,Qh,R)dη,Ia(t)=K4+1Γ(α)t0(tη)α1F4(S,E,Is,Ia,H,Qh,R)dη,H(t)=K5+1Γ(α)t0(tη)α1F5(S,E,Is,Ia,H,Qh,R)dη,Qh(t)=K6+1Γ(α)t0(tη)α1F6(S,E,Is,Ia,H,Qh,R)dη,R(t)=K7+1Γ(α)t0(tη)α1F7(S,E,Is,Ia,H,Qh,R)dη. (4.5)

    So, System (4.5) becomes

    U(t)=K+1Γ(α)t0(tη)α1G(η,U(η))dη. (4.6)

    Consider a Banach space Θ=C[0,T]xC[0,T], with a norm

    S,E,Is,Ia,H,Qh,R=maxt[0,T]|S+E+Is+Ia+H+Qh+R|.

    Let Ψ:ΘΘ be a mapping defined as

    Ψ[U(t)]=K+1Γ(α)t0(tη)α1G(η,U(η))dη. (4.7)

    Theorem 4.1. System (4.4) has at least one solution if there existconstants MC>0, and NC>0, such that

    |G(t,U(t))|MC|U(t)|+NC. (4.8)

    Proof. To show that the operator Ψ is bounded on Ω:{UΩ|ΛU}, where

    Λmaxt[0,T]K+(MCTα/Γ(α+1))K(NCTα/Γ(α+1)), (4.9)

    is a closed and convex subset of Θ. Now, take

    Ψ(U)=maxt[0,T]|K+1Γ(α)t0(tη)α1G(η,U(η))dη||K|+1Γ(α)t0(tη)α1|G(η,U(η))|dη|K|+1Γ(α)t0(tη)α1|MC|U(t)|+NC|dη|K|+|MC|U(t)|+NC|TαΓ(α+1)Λ. (4.10)

    It means that UΘΨ(Ω)Ω, which shows that d is bounded. Next, to show that Ψ is completely continuous, let t1<t2[0,T] and take

    Ψ(U)(t2)Ψ(U)(t1)=|1Γ(α)t20(t2η)α1G(η,U(η))dη1Γ(α)t10(t1η)α1G(η,U(η))dη|[tα1tα2]|MC|U(t)|+NC|Γ(α+1). (4.11)

    This shows that Ψ(U)(t2)Ψ(U)(t1)0,as t2t1. Hence, the operator Ψ is completely continuous according to the Arzelá-Ascoli theorem. Therefore, the given system, System (4.4) has at least one solution according to Schauder's fixed-point theorem.

    Next, the fixed-point theorem of Banach was used to demonstrate that System (4.4) has a unique solution.

    Theorem 4.2. System (4.4) has a unique solution if there exists a constantCC>0, such that for each U1(t),U2(t)Θ,such that

    |G(t,U1(t))G(t,U2(t))|CC|U1(t)U2(t)|. (4.12)

    Proof. Let U1(t),U2(t)Θ. Take

    |Ψ(U1)Ψ(U2)|=maxt[0,T]|1Γ(α)t0(tη)α1G(η,U1(η))dη1Γ(α)t0(tη)α1G(η,U2(η))dη|TαΓ(α+1)CC|U1U2|.

    Hence, Ψ is the contraction. System (4.4) has a unique solution based on the Banach contraction theorem.

    Here, we discuss the use of the Laplace Adomian algorithm for the nonlinear and linear fractional differential equations. The nonlinear terms in this model are SIs and SIa. Further, δ,β,β,εm,em,σ,a,ρa,ϕs,τa,τh,ρh,λ,λs, and λh are known constants.

    Applying the Laplace transform to Model (1.2), we get

    L{c0Dαt[S(t)]}=L{δβ(1εmem)SIsβ(1εmem)SIaλS},L{c0Dαt[E(t)]}=L{β(1εmem)SIa+β(1εmem)SIaσEλE},L{c0Dαt[Is(t)]}=L{(1a)σE+ρaIa(λs+λ)IsϕsIs},L{c0Dαt[Ia(t)]}=L{aσEτaIaρaIaλIa},L{c0Dαt[H(t)]}=L{ϕsIs(τh+λh+λ)H},L{c0Dαt[Qh(t)]}=L{τaIaρhQhλQh},L{c0Dαt[R(t)]}=L{ρhQh+τhHλR}. (5.1)

    Using the differentiation property of the LT and given initial conditions given in Eq (5.1), we get

    {SαL{S(t)}Sα1S(0)=L{δβ(1εmem)SIsβ(1εmem)SIaλS}SαL{E(t)}Sα1E(0)=L{β(1εmem)SIa+β(1εmem)SIaσEλE}SαL{Is(t)}Sα1Is(0)=L{(1a)σE+ρaIa(λs+λ)IsϕsIs}SαL{Ia(t)}Sα1Ia(0)=L{aσEτaIaρaIaλIa}SαL{H(t)}Sα1H(0)=L{ϕsIs(τh+λh+λ)H}SαL{Q(t)}Sα1Qh(0)=L{τaIaρhQhλQh}SαL{R(t)}Sα1R(0)=L{ρhQh+τhHλR}. (5.2)

    Now, applying the inverse Laplace transform to System (5.2) and the initial conditions, we get

    {S(t)=K1+L1[1Sα1L{δβ(1εmem)SIsβ(1εmem)SIaλS}]E(t)=K2+L1[1Sα1L{β(1εmem)SIa+β(1εmem)SIaσEλE}]Is(t)=K3+L1[1Sα1L{(1a)σE+ρaIa(λs+λ)IsϕsIs}]Ia(t)=K4+L1[1Sα1L{aσEτaIaρaIaλIa}]H(t)=K5+L1[1Sα1L{ϕsIs(τh+λh+λ)H}]Q(t)=K6+L1[1Sα1L{τaIaρhQhλQh}]R(t)=K7+L1[1Sα1L{ρhQh+τhHλR}]. (5.3)

    Now, we assume that the solution of S(t),E(t),Is(t),Ia(t),H(t),Qh(t) and R(t) in the form of infinite series is defined as

    {S(t)=P=0SP(t)E(t)=P=0EP(t)Is(t)=P=0Is,P(t)Ia(t)=P=0Ia,P(t)H(t)=P=0HP(t)Qh(t)=P=0Qh,PR(t)=P=0RP(t). (5.4)

    The nonlinear terms of the fractional order model are SIs and SIa. The nonlinear terms are decomposed by using an Adomian polynomial, as follow:

    S(t)Is(t)=P=0CP,SIa(t)=P=0BP, (5.5)

    where CP and BP are called Adomian polynomials, and they depend upon S0Is0,S1Is1,...SmIsm and S0Ia0,S1Ia1,...SmIam, respectively. We can calculate the polynomials by using the following formula:

    CP=1Γ(P+1)dPdtP[PK=0λKSKPK=0λKIs,K]λ=0,BP=1Γ(P+1)dPdtP[PK=0λKSKPK=0λKIa,K]λ=0.

    Substituting Eqs (5.4) and (5.5) into Eq (5.3), we get

    {L{S1(t)}=k1S+1Sα1L{δβ(1εmem)C0β(1εmem)B0λS}L{E1(t)}=k2S+1Sα1L{β(1εmem)C0+β(1εmem)B0σEλE0}L{Is1(t)}=k3S+1Sα1L{(1a)σE0+ρaIa0(λs+λ)IsϕsIs0}L{Ia1(t)}=k4S+1Sα1L{aσE0τaIa0ρaIa0λIa0}L{H1(t)}=k5S+1Sα1L{ϕsIs0(τh+λh+λ)H0}L{Qh1(t)}=k6S+1Sα1L{τaIa0ρhQh0λQh0}L{R1(t)}=k7S+1Sα1L{ρhQh0+τhH0λR0}. (5.6)

    The subsequent terms are

    {L{S2(t)}=K1S+1Sα1L{δβ(1εmem)C1β(1εmem)B1λS1}L{E2(t)}=K2S+1Sα1L{β(1εmem)C1+β(1εmem)B1σE1λE1}L{Is2(t)}=K3S+1Sα1L{(1a)σE1+ρaIa1(λs+λ)Is1ϕsIs1}L{Ia2(t)}=K4S+1Sα1L{aσE1τaIa1ρaIa1λIa1}L{H2(t)}=K5S+1Sα1L{ϕsIs1(τh+λh+λ)H1}L{Qh2(t)}=K6S+1Sα1L{τaIa1αhQh1λQh1}L{R2(t)}=K7S+1Sα1L{ρhQh1+τhH1λR1}. (5.7)
    {L{Sn+1(t)}=K1S+1Sα1L{δβ(1εmem)Cnβ(1εmem)BnλSn}L{En+1(t)}=K2S+1Sα1L{β(1εmem)Cn+β(1εmem)BnσEnλEn}L{Is,n+1(t)}=K3S+1Sα1L{(1a)σEn+ρaIan(λs+λ)Is,nϕsIsn}L{Ia,n+1(t)}=K4S+1Sα1L{aσEnτaIanρaIanλIan}L{Hn+1(t)}=K5S+1Sα1L{ϕsIsn(τh+λh+λ)Hn}L{Qh,n+1(t)}=K6S+1Sα1L{τaIanρhQhnλQhn}L{Rn+1(t)}=K7S+1Sα1L{ρhQhn+τhHnλR}. (5.8)

    By applying the initial conditions, we obtained C0=S0Is0=K1K3, B0=S0Iao=K1K4.

    Then, applying the inverse Laplace transform to Eq (5.8), we obtain the values for Eq (5.8) recursively.

    S1(t)=K1+{δβ(1εmem)K1K3β(1εmem)K1K4λK1}tαΓ(α+1),E1(t)=K2+{β(1εmem)K1K3+β(1εmem)K1K4σK2λK2}tαΓ(α+1),Is,1(t)=K3+{(1a)σK2+ρaK4(λs+λ)K3ϕsK4}tαΓ(α+1),Ia,1(t)=K4+{aσK2τaK4ρaK4λK4}tαΓ(α+1),H1(t)=K5+{ϕsK3(τh+λh+λ)K5}tαΓ(α+1),Qh,1(t)=K6+{τaK4ρhK6λK6}tαΓ(α+1),R1(t)=K7+{ρhK5+τhK5λK7}tαΓ(α+1). (5.9)

    Similarly, we get the following series

    (5.10)

    We noted that the result obtained via LADM is the same as the ADM [32,33].

    Now, we considered a graphical representation of the obtained approximate solutions given by Eq (5.10). Here, we calculated only three terms for the required approximate solutions of System (1.2). The values of the parameters have either been taken from suitable sources or were assumed. The importance of these parameters is given in Table 2.

    Table 2.  Parameters and their values.
    Name Parameters values References
    δ 0.23 Assumed
    β 0.000516 Assumed
    λs 0.0062 Assumed
    ϕs 0.06 [34]
    ρa 0.07 [34]
    εm 0.5 [35]
    em 0.2 [36]
    σ 0.28 [37]
    a 0.66 [37]
    λh 0.0045 Assumed
    λ 0.000428 Demographic
    τh 1/14 [38,39]

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    In Figures 28, we present the approximate solutions of the Caputo fractional-order model given by Model (1.2) by using the LADM corresponding to different fractional-order values of α(0,1]. Figure 2 demonstrates that the susceptible population rapidly decreases when the value of α decreases. The graph in Figure 3 shows the exposed class when the value of α goes down, the rate of increase slowly reduces. The graph in Figure 5 shows that the number of asymptomatic populations decreases for different values of α. Therefore, it can be seen in Figure 8 that the people are recover very quickly with different fractional values of α. We also notice that the combined effects of face masks and the hospitalization of asymptomatic individuals on the asymptomatic populations which consequently decreases very rapidly Figure (5). The plot shows that the asymptomatic population disappears completely in a shorter time if the face masks are used together with the hospitalization of confirmed infected people.

    Figure 2.  Graphical representation of the approximate solutions for the susceptible class for four different fractional orders.
    Figure 3.  Graphical representation of the approximate solutions for the exposed class for four different fractional orders.
    Figure 4.  Graphical representation of the approximate solutions for the symptomatic class for four different fractional orders.
    Figure 5.  Graphical representation of the approximate solutions for the symptomatic class for four different fractional orders.
    Figure 6.  Graphical representation of the approximate solutions for the hospitalized class for four different fractional orders.
    Figure 7.  Graphical representation of the approximate solutions for the quarantine class for four different fractional orders.
    Figure 8.  Graphical representation of the approximate solutions for the recovered class for four different fractional orders.

    Figure 9 shows all the seven compartments of Model (1.2) when the integer order α=1, and considering the data from Table 2. As compered to traditional derivatives of integer order, fractional order derivatives give more accuracy.

    Figure 9.  Plot showing the compartments of the fractional model given by Model (1.2) for a integer order of α=1 for the first four terms of the iterative series.

    This study investigated the caputo fractional-order model of the COVID-19 pandemic, wherein we modeled the effects of quarantine, hospitalization, and face mask use on the COVID-19 pandemic. The existence and non-negativity of the solutions of Model (1.2) have been demonstrated by solving the FGB inequality using the LTM. We proved the uniqueness of the solution of the Caputo fractional order model. We found that the LADM is a powerful technique capable of heading linear and nonlinear Caputo fractional differential equations. This method produces the same solution as the ADM with the correct choice of initial approximation. From these examples, we can see that this method is considered effective for solving many Caputo fractional-order models. Finally, we derived the graphical results of the obtained approximate solutions presented in Eq (5.10) with different values of the fractional-order α(0,1].

    The authors received financial support from Taif University Researchers Supporting Project (TURSP-2020/031)at Taif University, Taif, Saudi Arabia.

    The authors declare that they have no competing interests.



    [1] M. Garcia, N. Lipskiy, J. Tyson, R. Watkins, E. Stein, T. Kinley, Centers for disease control and prevention 2019 novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) information management: Addressing national health-care and public health needs for standardized data definitions and codified vocabulary for data exchange, J. Am. Med. Inf. Assoc., 27 (2020), 1476–1487. https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocaa141 doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocaa141
    [2] Report 9–Impact of non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) to reduce COVID-19 mortality and healthcare demand, MRC Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis COVID-19, 2020. Available from: https://www.imperial.ac.uk/mrc-global-infectious-disease-analysis/covid-19/report-9-impact-of-npis-on-covid-19/.
    [3] P. Roy, K. R. Upadhyay, J. Caur, Modeling Zika transmission dynamics: Prevention and control, J. Biol. Syst., 28 (2020), 719–749. https://doi.org/10.1142/S021833902050014X doi: 10.1142/S021833902050014X
    [4] S. Dilshad, N. Singh, M. Atif, A. Hanif, N. Yaqub, W. A. Farooq, et al., Automated image classification of chest X-rays of COVID-19 using deep transfer learning, Results Phys., 28 (2021), 104529. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rinp.2021.104529 doi: 10.1016/j.rinp.2021.104529
    [5] M. Nicola, Z. Alsafi, C. Sohrabi, A. Kerwan, A. Al-Jabir, C. Iosifidis, et al., The socio-economic implications of the coronavirus pandemic (COVID-19): A review, Int. J. Surg., 78 (2020), 185–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.04.018 doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.04.018
    [6] I. A. Bashir, B. A. Nasidi, Fractional order model for the role of mild cases in the transmission of COVID-19, Chaos Solition. Fract., 142 (2021), 110374–110383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2020.110374 doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2020.110374
    [7] S. Ahmada, A. Ullaha, Q. Mdallal, H. Khan, K. Shaha, A. Khan, Fractional order mathematical modeling of COVID-19 transmission, Chaos Solition. Fract., 139 (2020), 110256–110263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2020.110256 doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2020.110256
    [8] T. Chen, J. Rui, Q. Wang, Z. Zhao, J. Cui, L. Yin, A mathematical model for simulating the phase-based transmissibility of a novel coronavirus, Infect. Dis. Poverty, 9 (2020), 24. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40249-020-00640-3 doi: 10.1186/s40249-020-00640-3
    [9] K. Nisar, S. Ahmad, A. Ullah, K. Shah, H. Alrabaiahc, M. Arfana, Mathematical analysis of SIRD model of COVID-19 with Caputo fractional derivative based on real data, Results Phys., 21 (2021), 103772–103780. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rinp.2020.103772 doi: 10.1016/j.rinp.2020.103772
    [10] A. J. Mumbu, A. K. Hugo, Mathematical modelling on COVID-19 transmission impacts with preventive measures: A case study of Tanzania, Adv. Differ. Equ., 14 (2020), 748–766. https://doi.org/10.1080/17513758.2020.1823494 doi: 10.1080/17513758.2020.1823494
    [11] R. Verma, S. P. Tiwari, R. Upadhyay, Transmission dynamics of epidemic spread and outbreak of Ebola in West Africa: Fuzzy modeling and simulation, J. Biol. Dyn., 60 (2019), 637–671. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12190-018-01231-0 doi: 10.1007/s12190-018-01231-0
    [12] M. A. Khan, S. Ullah, K. O. Okosun, K. Shah, A fractional order pine wilt disease model with Caputo-Fabrizio derivative, Adv. Differ. Equ., 2018 (2018), 410. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13662-018-1868-4 doi: 10.1186/s13662-018-1868-4
    [13] I. Area, H. Batarfi, J. Losada, J. J. Nieto, W. Shammakh, Á. Torres, On a fractional order Ebola epidemic model, Adv. Differ. Equ., 2015 (2015), 278. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13662-015-0613-5 doi: 10.1186/s13662-015-0613-5
    [14] M. Dulǎu, A. Gligor, T. M. Dulău, Fractional order controllers versus integer order controllers, Procedia Eng., 181 (2017), 538–545. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.02.431 doi: 10.1016/j.proeng.2017.02.431
    [15] D. Sain, B. M. Mohan, A simple approach to mathematical modelling of integer order and fractional order fuzzy PID controllers using one-dimensional input space and their experimental realization, J. Franklin Inst., 358 (2021), 3726–3756. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfranklin.2021.03.010 doi: 10.1016/j.jfranklin.2021.03.010
    [16] M. Higazy, Novel fractional order SIDARTHE mathematical model of COVID-19 pandemic, Chaos Solition. Fract., 138 (2020), 110007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2020.110007 doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2020.110007
    [17] N. H. Tuan, H. Mohammadi, S. Rezapour, A mathematical model for COVID-19 transmission by using the Caputo fractional derivative, Chaos Solition. Fract., 140 (2020), 110107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2020.110107 doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2020.110107
    [18] A. Srivastav, P. Tiwari, P. Srivastava, M. Ghosh, Y. Kang, A mathematical model for the impacts of face mask, hospitalization and quarantine on the dynamics of COVID-19 in India: Deterministic vs. stochastic, Math. Biosci. Eng., 18 (2021), 182–213. https://doi.org/10.3934/mbe.2021010 doi: 10.3934/mbe.2021010
    [19] K. Shah, T. A. jawad, I. Mahariq, F. Jarad, Qualitative analysis of a mathematical model in the time of COVID-19, BioMed Res. Int., 2020 (2020), 5098598. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/5098598 doi: 10.1155/2020/5098598
    [20] Z. Zhang, A. Zeb, O. F. Egbelowo, V. S. Erturk, Dynamics of a fractional order mathematical model for COVID-19 epidemic, Adv. Differ. Equ., 2020 (2020), 420. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13662-020-02873-w doi: 10.1186/s13662-020-02873-w
    [21] H. Jafari, C. M. Khalique, M. Nazari, Application of the Laplace decomposition method for solving linear and nonlinear fractional diffusion–wave equations, Appl. Math. Lett., 24 (2011), 1799–1805. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aml.2011.04.037 doi: 10.1016/j.aml.2011.04.037
    [22] F. Haq, K. Shah, G. Rahman, M. Shahzada, Numerical solution of fractional order smoking model via Laplace Adomian decomposition method, Alex. Eng. J., 57 (2018), 1061–1069. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2017.02.015 doi: 10.1016/j.aej.2017.02.015
    [23] M. Z. Mohamed, T. M. Elzaki, Comparison between the Laplace decomposition method and Adomian decomposition in time-space fractional nonlinear fractional differential equations, Appl. Math., 9 (2018), 84309. https://doi.org/10.4236/am.2018.94032 doi: 10.4236/am.2018.94032
    [24] M. De la Sen, Positivity and stability of the solutions of Caputo fractional linear time-invariant systems of any order with internal point delays, Abstr. Appl. Anal., 2011 (2011), 161246. https://doi.org/10.1155/2011/161246 doi: 10.1155/2011/161246
    [25] S. Bushnaq, T. Saeed, D. F. M. Torres, A. Zeb, Control of COVID-19 dynamics through a fractional-order model, Alex. Eng. J., 60 (2021), 3587–3592. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2021.02.022 doi: 10.1016/j.aej.2021.02.022
    [26] R. Magin, Fractional calculus in bioengineering, Crit. Rev. Biomed. Eng., 32 (2006), 1–104. https://doi.org/10.1615/critrevbiomedeng.v32.i1.10 doi: 10.1615/critrevbiomedeng.v32.i1.10
    [27] Introduction to Differential Equations, The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, 2003. Available from: https://hostnezt.com/cssfiles/appliedmaths/Introduction20to20Differential20Equations20By20Jeffrey20R.0Chasnov.pdf.
    [28] I. Podlubny, A. Chechkin, T. Skovranek, Y. Q. Chen, M. V. Jara, Matrix approach to discrete fractional calculus Ⅱ: Partial fractional differential equations, J. Comput. Phys., 228 (1019), 3137–3153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2009.01.014 doi: 10.1016/j.jcp.2009.01.014
    [29] J. Sabatier, O. P. Agrawal, J. A. Tenreiro Machado, Advances in fractional calculus, Theoretical Developments and Applications in Physics and Engineering, 4 Eds., Berlin: Springer, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6042-7
    [30] M. S. Abdo, K. Shah, H. A. Wahash, S. K. Panchal, On a comprehensive model of the novel coronavirus (COVID-19) under Mittag-Leffler derivative, Chaos Solition. Fract., 135 (2020), 109867. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2020.109867 doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2020.109867
    [31] S. Kumar, A. Yildirim, Y. Khan, L. Wei, A fractional model of the diffusion equation and its analytical solution using Laplace transform, Sci. Iran., 19 (2012), 1117–1123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scient.2012.06.016 doi: 10.1016/j.scient.2012.06.016
    [32] H. Khan, R. Shah, P. Kumam, D. Baleanu, M. Arif, A two-step Laplace decomposition method for solving nonlinear partial differential equations, Int. J. Phys. Sci., 6 (2011), 4102–4109. https://doi.org/10.5897/IJPS11.146 doi: 10.5897/IJPS11.146
    [33] J. H. He, Variational iteration method–a kind of non-linear analytical technique: Some examples, Int. J. Non-Linear Mech., 34 (1999), 699–708. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7462(98)00048-1 doi: 10.1016/S0020-7462(98)00048-1
    [34] D. Aldila, M. Z. Ndii, B. M. Samiadji, Optimal control on COVID-19 eradication program in Indonesia under the effect of community awareness, Math. Biosci. Eng., 17 (2020), 6355–6389. http://dx.doi.org/10.3934/mbe.2020335 doi: 10.3934/mbe.2020335
    [35] A. Davies, K. Thompson, K. Giri, G. Kafatos, J. Walker, A. Bennett, Testing the efficacy of homemade masks: Would they protect in an influenza pandemic, Disaster Med. Public Health Prep., 7 (2013), 413–418. https://doi.org/10.1017/dmp.2013.43 doi: 10.1017/dmp.2013.43
    [36] C. J. Noakes, P. Sleigh, Mathematical models for assessing the role of airflow on the risk of airborne infection in hospital wards, J. R. Soc. Interface, 6 (2009), S791–S800. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2009.0305.focus doi: 10.1098/rsif.2009.0305.focus
    [37] M. A. Khan, A. Atangana, Modeling the dynamics of novel coronavirus (2019-nCov) with fractional derivative, Alex. Eng. J., 59 (2020), 2379–2389. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2020.02.033 doi: 10.1016/j.aej.2020.02.033
    [38] F. Zhou, T. Yu, R. Du, G. Fan, Y. Liu, Z. Liu, et al., Clinical course and risk factors for mortality of adult inpatients with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China: A retrospective cohort study, Lancet, 395 (2020), 1054–1062. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30566-3 doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30566-3
    [39] B. Tang, X. Wang, Q. Li, N. L. Bragazzi, S. Tang, Y. Xiao, et al., Estimation of the transmission risk of the 2019-nCoV and its implication for public health interventions, J. Clin. Med., 9 (2020), 462. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9020462 doi: 10.3390/jcm9020462
  • This article has been cited by:

    1. Victoria May P. Mendoza, Renier Mendoza, Youngsuk Ko, Jongmin Lee, Eunok Jung, Managing bed capacity and timing of interventions: a COVID-19 model considering behavior and underreporting, 2022, 8, 2473-6988, 2201, 10.3934/math.2023114
    2. V. Rexma Sherine, P. Chellamani, Rashad Ismail, N. Avinash, G. Britto Antony Xavier, Estimating the Spread of Generalized Compartmental Model of Monkeypox Virus Using a Fuzzy Fractional Laplace Transform Method, 2022, 14, 2073-8994, 2545, 10.3390/sym14122545
    3. Aaqid Mohi-Ud Din Bhat, Younis Ahmad Bhat, A Multi-compartment Mathematical Model for HIV–AIDS Transmission and Dynamics, 2023, 2731-8095, 10.1007/s40995-022-01397-0
    4. Ihtisham Ul Haq, Numan Ullah, Nigar Ali, Kottakkaran Sooppy Nisar, A New Mathematical Model of COVID-19 with Quarantine and Vaccination, 2022, 11, 2227-7390, 142, 10.3390/math11010142
    5. Victoria May P. Mendoza, Renier Mendoza, Jongmin Lee, Eunok Jung, Adjusting non-pharmaceutical interventions based on hospital bed capacity using a multi-operator differential evolution, 2022, 7, 2473-6988, 19922, 10.3934/math.20221091
    6. Ihtisham Ul Haq, Nigar Ali, Hijaz Ahmad, Analysis of a chaotic system using fractal-fractional derivatives with exponential decay type kernels, 2022, 2, 2767-8946, 185, 10.3934/mmc.2022019
    7. Islam M Elbaz, MA Sohaly, H El-Metwally, On the extinction of stochastic Susceptible-Infected-Susceptible epidemic with distributed delays, 2023, 42, 1461-3484, 1866, 10.1177/14613484231181956
    8. Vivek MİSHRA, Sarit MAİTRA, Mihir DASH, Saurabh Kumar AGRAWAL, Praveen AGARWAL, Chaos and Control of COVID-19 Dynamical System, 2023, 5, 2687-4539, 233, 10.51537/chaos.1320492
    9. Ibad Ullah, Nigar Ali, Ihtisham Ul Haq, Imtiaz Ahmad, Mohammed Daher Albalwi, Md. Haider Ali Biswas, Kareem T. Elgindy, Analysis of COVID-19 Disease Model: Backward Bifurcation and Impact of Pharmaceutical and Nonpharmaceutical Interventions, 2024, 2024, 1687-0425, 1, 10.1155/2024/6069996
    10. Asma Rashid Butt, Aitzaz Ahmad Saqib, Abu Bakar, Dilber Uzun Ozsahin, Hijaz Ahmad, Bandar Almohsen, Investigating the fractional dynamics and sensitivity of an epidemic model with nonlinear convex rate, 2023, 54, 22113797, 107089, 10.1016/j.rinp.2023.107089
    11. Ibad ullah, Nigar Ali, Ihtisham Ul Haq, Mohammed Daher Albalwi, Shah Muhammad, Mohammad Shuaib, Comprehensive analysis of COVID-19 transmission dynamics: mathematical modeling, stability analysis, and optimal control strategies, 2024, 99, 0031-8949, 075035, 10.1088/1402-4896/ad562c
    12. A. Venkatesh, M. Manivel, K. Arunkumar, M. Prakash Raj, S. D. Purohit, A fractional mathematical model for vaccinated humans with the impairment of Monkeypox transmission, 2024, 1951-6355, 10.1140/epjs/s11734-024-01211-5
    13. Samuel Okyere, Joseph Ackora-Prah, Ebenezer Bonyah, Bennedict Barnes, Maxwell Akwasi Boateng, Ishmael Takyi, Samuel Akwasi Adarkwa, Hypertension and COVID-19 fractional derivative model with double dose vaccination, 2023, 12, 2046-1402, 495, 10.12688/f1000research.133768.1
    14. Shashikant Waghule, Dinkar Patil, Amjad Shaikh, Kottakkaran Sooppy Nisar, Application of the Atangana–Baleanu operator in Caputo sense for numerical solutions of the time-fractional Burgers–Fisher equation using finite difference approaches, 2024, 12, 26668181, 100998, 10.1016/j.padiff.2024.100998
    15. Ihtisham ul Haq, Nigar Ali, Hijaz Ahmad, Ramadan Sabra, M. Daher Albalwi, Imtiaz Ahmad, Mathematical analysis of a coronavirus model with Caputo, Caputo–Fabrizio–Caputo fractional and Atangana–Baleanu–Caputo differential operators, 2025, 18, 1793-5245, 10.1142/S1793524523500857
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2022 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(2118) PDF downloads(143) Cited by(15)

Figures and Tables

Figures(9)  /  Tables(2)

Other Articles By Authors

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog