Research article

Existence of solutions of Dirichlet problems for one dimensional fractional equations

  • Received: 07 September 2021 Revised: 13 December 2021 Accepted: 29 December 2021 Published: 17 January 2022
  • MSC : 34A08, 35A15, 26A33

  • We establish the existence of infinitely many solutions for some nonlinear fractional differential equations under suitable oscillating behaviour of the nonlinear term. These problems have a variational structure and we prove our main results by using a critical point theorem due to Ricceri.

    Citation: Armin Hadjian, Juan J. Nieto. Existence of solutions of Dirichlet problems for one dimensional fractional equations[J]. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(4): 6034-6049. doi: 10.3934/math.2022336

    Related Papers:

    [1] H. H. G. Hashem, Hessah O. Alrashidi . Qualitative analysis of nonlinear implicit neutral differential equation of fractional order. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(4): 3703-3719. doi: 10.3934/math.2021220
    [2] Yudhveer Singh, Devendra Kumar, Kanak Modi, Vinod Gill . A new approach to solve Cattaneo-Hristov diffusion model and fractional diffusion equations with Hilfer-Prabhakar derivative. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(2): 843-855. doi: 10.3934/math.2020057
    [3] Aslı Alkan, Halil Anaç . The novel numerical solutions for time-fractional Fornberg-Whitham equation by using fractional natural transform decomposition method. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(9): 25333-25359. doi: 10.3934/math.20241237
    [4] Humaira Yasmin, Aljawhara H. Almuqrin . Efficient solutions for time fractional Sawada-Kotera, Ito, and Kaup-Kupershmidt equations using an analytical technique. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(8): 20441-20466. doi: 10.3934/math.2024994
    [5] Jun Moon . The Pontryagin type maximum principle for Caputo fractional optimal control problems with terminal and running state constraints. AIMS Mathematics, 2025, 10(1): 884-920. doi: 10.3934/math.2025042
    [6] Khalid K. Ali, K. R. Raslan, Amira Abd-Elall Ibrahim, Mohamed S. Mohamed . On study the fractional Caputo-Fabrizio integro differential equation including the fractional q-integral of the Riemann-Liouville type. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(8): 18206-18222. doi: 10.3934/math.2023925
    [7] Zhilin Li, Guoping Chen, Weiwei Long, Xinyuan Pan . Variational approach to p-Laplacian fractional differential equations with instantaneous and non-instantaneous impulses. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(9): 16986-17000. doi: 10.3934/math.2022933
    [8] Jing Yang . Existence of infinitely many solutions for a nonlocal problem. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(6): 5743-5767. doi: 10.3934/math.2020369
    [9] Kangqun Zhang . Existence and uniqueness of positive solution of a nonlinear differential equation with higher order Erdélyi-Kober operators. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(1): 1358-1372. doi: 10.3934/math.2024067
    [10] Amjid Ali, Teruya Minamoto, Rasool Shah, Kamsing Nonlaopon . A novel numerical method for solution of fractional partial differential equations involving the $ \psi $-Caputo fractional derivative. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(1): 2137-2153. doi: 10.3934/math.2023110
  • We establish the existence of infinitely many solutions for some nonlinear fractional differential equations under suitable oscillating behaviour of the nonlinear term. These problems have a variational structure and we prove our main results by using a critical point theorem due to Ricceri.



    In this paper, we are eager to investigate the nonlinear fractional boundary value problem (BVP) of the form

    {ddt(0Dα1t(c0Dαtu(t))tDα1T(ctDαTu(t)))+λf(t,u(t))=0 a.e. t[0,T]u(0)=u(T)=0, (1.1)

    where λ>0 is a real parameter, α(1/2,1], c0Dαt and ctDαT are the left and right Caputo fractional derivatives of order α, respectively, 0Dα1t and tDα1T are the left and right Riemann-Liouville fractional integrals of order 1α, respectively, and f:[0,T]×RR is a continuous function.

    Fractional differential equations (i.e. α(1/2,1)) arise in real applications in many fields of sciences such as conservation laws, minimal surfaces, water waves and ultra-relativistic limits of quantum mechanics. Due to these applications, non-local fractional problems are extensively investigated. There has been remarkable progress in fractional differential equations; the interested reader may see the books [16,18,24,26,29].

    Critical point theory has been very effective in specifying the existence and multiplicity of solutions for integer order differential equations provided that the equation has a variational construction on some appropriate Sobolev spaces, e.g., we refer to [12,20,21,23,27,30] and the references therein for detailed discussions. But until now, there are little consequences on the existence of solutions to fractional BVPs which were proved by the variational methods, since it is frequently hard to establish a proper space and variational functional for fractional differential equations. For instance, in [1,2,3,4,5,13,14,17], variational methods are applied to study the existence and multiplicity of solutions for fractional BVPs.

    An attractive physical case is considered in [17] where Jiao and Zhou, by applying the critical point theory, proved the existence and multiplicity of solutions for the problem

    {ddt(120Dβt(u(t))+12tDβT(u(t)))+F(t,u(t))=0 a.e. t[0,T]u(0)=u(T)=0,

    where β[0,1), F:[0,T]×RNR (with N1) is a suitable given function and F(t,x) is the gradient of F at x (see Remark 2.9 below for the relation of this problem with problem (1.1)).

    Also, Bai in [5], applying a critical point result for differentiable functionals proved by Bonanno [7], discussed the existence of at least one non-zero solution for the problem

    {ddt(0Dα1t(c0Dαtu(t))tDα1T(ctDαTu(t)))+λf(u(t))=0 a.e. t[0,T]u(0)=u(T)=0. (1.2)

    The authors in [13] obtained, by using three critical point theorems, for the following BVP for fractional order differential equations

    {ddt(0Dα1t(c0Dαtu(t))tDα1T(ctDαTu(t)))+λf(t,u(t))+μg(t,u(t))=0 a.e. t[0,T]u(0)=u(T)=0,

    the existence of at least three solutions, where λ,μ>0 are two parameters.

    More recently, Galewski and Molica Bisci in [14] studied the problem (1.2), in the case λ=1. With an asymptotic behaviour of f at zero and using a critical point result [8], they proved the existence of one non-zero solution for the problem.

    In this paper, we will prove the existence of infinitely many solutions for problem (1.1) with rather various hypotheses on the function f. We need that the potential F of f assures an appropriate oscillatory behavior either at infinity or at the origin.

    Our results are based on the variational principle due to Ricceri [28]. We address the eager reader to the book [19] as a comprehensive reference on critical point theory adopted here.

    Finally, we note that an interesting and careful analysis of fractional BVPs was extended in the nice and recent works [6,9,10,11,15,22,25,32,33,34] and the references therein.

    This paper is organized as follows. In Section 2, we state some preliminary definitions and properties of the fractional calculus that will be required in the paper. In Section 3, our principal result, Theorem 3.1, and some significant conclusions (see Corollaries 3.3, 3.4 and 3.6) are presented. Then Example 3.8 is given as an application of Corollary 3.3.

    In the present section, first we present several needful definitions and properties of the fractional calculus which are required further in this paper. Let AC([a,b],R)=AC1([a,b],R) be the space of absolutely continuous functions on the interval [a,b], where a<b are real numbers (see [18]). Set ACn([a,b],R) the space of functions u:[a,b]R such that uCn1([a,b],R) and u(n1)AC([a,b],R). Here, Cn1([a,b],R) signifies the set of mappings that are (n1) times continuously differentiable on [a,b].

    Definition 2.1 ([18,26]). Let uL1([a,b],R). We denote by aDγtu(t) and tDγbu(t) the left and right Riemann-Liouville fractional integrals of order γ>0 for function u, respectively, that are defined by

    aDγtu(t)=1Γ(γ)ta(ts)γ1u(s)ds,

    and

    tDγbu(t)=1Γ(γ)bt(st)γ1u(s)ds,

    for every t[a,b], while the right-hand sides are pointwise defined on [a,b], where Γ>0 is the standard gamma function given by

    Γ(γ)=+0zγ1ezdz.

    We note that aDγt and tDγb are linear and bounded operators from L1([a,b],R) into L1([a,b],R); see also Lemma 2.6 below.

    Definition 2.2 ([18,26]). Let uACn([a,b],R). We denote by aDγtu(t) and tDγbu(t) the left and right Riemann-Liouville fractional derivatives of order γ (n1γ<n and nN) for function u, respectively, that are defined by

    aDγtu(t)=dndtnaDγntu(t)=1Γ(nγ)dndtn(ta(ts)nγ1u(s)ds),

    and

    tDγbu(t)=(1)ndndtntDγnbu(t)=1Γ(nγ)(1)ndndtn(bt(st)nγ1u(s)ds),

    where t[a,b]. Specially, if 0γ<1, then

    aDγtu(t)=ddtaDγ1tu(t)=1Γ(1γ)ddt(ta(ts)γu(s)ds),t[a,b],

    and

    tDγbu(t)=ddttDγ1bu(t)=1Γ(1γ)ddt(bt(st)γu(s)ds),t[a,b].

    Definition 2.3 ([18]). Suppose that γ0 and nN.

    (i) Let γ(n1,n) and uACn([a,b],R). We denote by caDγtu(t) and ctDγbu(t) the left and right Caputo fractional derivatives of order γ for function u, respectively. These derivatives exist almost everywhere on [a,b]. caDγtu(t) and ctDγbu(t) are illustrated by

    caDγtu(t)=aDγntu(n)(t)=1Γ(nγ)ta(ts)nγ1u(n)(s)ds,

    and

    ctDγbu(t)=(1)ntDγnbu(n)(t)=(1)nΓ(nγ)bt(st)nγ1u(n)(s)ds,

    for every t[a,b], respectively. Specially, if 0<γ<1, then

    caDγtu(t)=aDγ1tu(t)=1Γ(1γ)ta(ts)γu(s)ds,t[a,b],

    and

    ctDγbu(t)=tDγ1bu(t)=1Γ(1γ)bt(st)γu(s)ds,t[a,b].

    (ii) If γ=n1 and uACn1([a,b],R), then caDn1tu(t) and ctDn1bu(t) are illustrated by

    caDn1tu(t)=u(n1)(t),andctDn1bu(t)=(1)(n1)u(n1)(t),

    for every t[a,b]. Specially, caD0tu(t)=ctD0bu(t)=u(t),t[a,b].

    If uACn([a,b],R), then the relation between the Riemann-Liouville fractional derivative and the Caputo fractional derivative is expressed by the following

    aDγtu(t)=caDγtu(t)+n1j=0u(j)(a)Γ(jγ+1)(ta)jγ,t[a,b].

    Proposition 2.4 ([18]). The left and right Riemann-Liouville fractional integral operators have the feature of a semigroup, that is

    aDγ1t(aDγ2tu(t))=aDγ1γ2tu(t)andtDγ1b(tDγ2bu(t))=tDγ1γ2bu(t),γ1,γ2>0

    at every point t[a,b] for a continuous function u, and for a.e. point in [a,b] if uL1([a,b],R).

    Proposition 2.5 ([29]). We have

    ba[aDγtu(t)]v(t)dt=ba[tDγbv(t)]u(t)dt,γ>0,

    with the condition that uLp([a,b],R), vLq([a,b],R) and p1, q1 and 1/p+1/q1+γ, or p1, q1 and 1/p+1/q=1+γ.

    For any uL2([0,T],R) and for every fixed t[0,T], set

    uL2([0,t]):=(t0|u(ξ)|2dξ)1/2,uL2:=(T0|u(t)|2dt)1/2,u:=maxt[0,T]|u(t)|.

    Lemma 2.6 ([17,Lemma 3.1]). Let α(0,1]. For any uL2([0,T],R), we have

    0DαξuL2([0,t])tαΓ(α+1)uL2([0,t]),forξ[0,t],t[0,T].

    Let C0([0,T],R) be the collection of all functions gC([0,T],R) with compact support contained in (0,T). Then any function gC0([0,T],R) satisfies g(0)=g(T)=0.

    Definition 2.7. Suppose that 0<α1. We define the fractional derivative space Eα0 by the closure of C0([0,T],R) with respect to the norm

    u:=(T0|c0Dαtu(t)|2dt+T0|u(t)|2dt)1/2,

    for every uEα0.

    Remark 2.8. (i) For any uEα0, with the fact that u(0)=0, one has c0Dαtu(t)=0Dαtu(t),t[0,T] according to the equality (10) of [17].

    (ii) According to Lemma 2.6, for every uC0([0,T],R), one has uL2([0,T],R) and c0DαtuL2([0,T],R). Thus, it is obvious that Eα0 is the space of functions uL2([0,T],R) having an α-order Caputo fractional derivative c0DαtuL2([0,T],R) and u(0)=u(T)=0.

    Remark 2.9. In view of Definition 2.3, for every uAC([0,T],R), BVP (1.1) transforms to

    {ddt(0Dβ2t(0Dβ2tu(t))+tDβ2T(tDβ2Tu(t)))+λf(t,u(t))=0a.e.t[0,T]u(0)=u(T)=0, (2.1)

    where β:=2(1α)[0,1).

    Furthermore by Proposition 2.4, it is clear that uAC([0,T],R) is a solution of BVP (2.1) if and only if u is a solution of the problem

    {ddt(0Dβt(u(t))+tDβT(u(t)))+λf(t,u(t))=0a.e.t[0,T]u(0)=u(T)=0. (2.2)

    For completeness we recall that a function uAC([0,T],R) is named a solution of BVP (2.2) if:

    (j) The map

    t0Dβt(u(t))+tDβT(u(t)),

    is differentiable for a.e. t[0,T], and

    (jj) The function u assures (2.2).

    Proposition 2.10 ([31,Lemma 4.2]). Suppose that α(0,1]. The space Eα0 is a separable and reflexive Banach space.

    Lemma 2.11 ([17,Proposition 3.2]). Suppose that α(1/2,1]. For all uEα0, one has

    uL2TαΓ(α+1)c0DαtuL2,uTα1/2Γ(α)2α1c0DαtuL2.

    Hence, we can consider Eα0 equipped with the equivalent norm

    uα:=(T0|c0Dαtu(t)|2dt)1/2=c0DαtuL2,uEα0.

    Lemma 2.12 ([17,Proposition 4.1]). Suppose that α(1/2,1]. For every uEα0, one has

    |cos(πα)|u2αT0c0Dαtu(t)ctDαTu(t)dt1|cos(πα)|u2α.

    We refer our main results for α(1/2,1] rather than α(0,1/2], since by Lemmas 2.11 and 2.12, for α(1/2,1], the space Eα0 is compactly embedded in C([0,T],R) and the functional T0c0Dαtu(t)ctDαTu(t)dt is coercive.

    We formulate the following version of Ricceri's variational principle [28,Theorem 2.5], that is our principal tool for establishing the principal result of this paper.

    Theorem 2.13. Suppose that X is a reflexive real Banach space, and let Φ,Ψ:XR be two Gâteaux differentiable functionals such that Φ is sequentially weakly lower semicontinuous, strongly continuous and coercive, and Ψ is sequentially weakly upper semicontinuous. For any r>infXΦ, let

    φ(r):=infuΦ1((,r))(supvΦ1((,r))Ψ(v))Ψ(u)rΦ(u).

    Put

    γ:=lim infr+φ(r),andδ:=lim infr(infXΦ)+φ(r).

    Then, the following properties hold:

    (a) If γ<+, then for each λ(0,1/γ), the following alternative holds: Either

    (a1) Iλ possesses a global minimum, or

    (a2) there is a sequence {un} of critical points (local minima) of Iλ such that

    limn+Φ(un)=+.

    (b) If δ<+, then for each λ(0,1/δ), the following alternative holds: Either

    (b1) there is a global minimum of Φ which is a local minimum of Iλ, or

    (b2) there is a sequence {un} of pairwise distinct critical points (local minima) of Iλ that converges weakly to a global minimum of Φ, with limn+Φ(un)=infuXΦ(u).

    In the present section, we state and prove our principal result. Let

    κ:=Tα12Γ(α)2α1,
    C(T,α):=T/40t22αdt+3T/4T/4[t1α(tT4)1α]2dt+T3T/4[t1α(tT4)1α(t3T4)1α]2dt,

    and

    B:=lim supξ+3T/4T/4F(t,ξ)dtξ2,

    where F is the potential of f defined by

    F(t,ξ):=ξ0f(t,x)dx,(t,ξ)[0,T]×R.

    We suppose that the following condition holds:

    (f1) F(t,ξ)0 for any (t,ξ)([0,T4][3T4,T])×R.

    Our principal result reads as follows.

    Theorem 3.1. Suppose that f:[0,T]×RR is a continuous function whose potential satisfies (f1). Assume that there exist real sequences {an} and {bn} in (0,+), with limn+bn=+, such that:

    (h1) For some n0N we have an<T|cos(πα)|Γ(2α)4κC(T,α)bn for each nn0;

    (h2) A:=limn+T0max|ξ|bnF(t,ξ)dt3T/4T/4F(t,an)dtT2|cos(πα)|2Γ2(2α)b2n16κ2a2nC(T,α)<B16κ2C(T,α).

    Then, for each

    λ]16C(T,α)T2Γ2(2α)|cos(πα)|B,1κ2T2Γ2(2α)|cos(πα)|A[,

    problem (1.1) admits an unbounded sequence of solutions in Eα0.

    Proof. We want to apply Theorem 2.13 to problem (1.1). For this, we define the functionals Φ,Ψ:XR by

    Φ(u):=T0c0Dαtu(t)ctDαTu(t)dt,Ψ(u):=T0F(t,u(t))dt,

    and put

    Iλ(u):=Φ(u)λΨ(u),

    for every uX:=Eα0.

    Obviously, Φ and Ψ are Gâteaux differentiable functionals whose derivatives at uEα0 are

    Φ(u)(v)=T0(c0Dαtu(t)ctDαTv(t)+ctDαTu(t)c0Dαtv(t))dt,Ψ(u)(v)=T0f(t,u(t))v(t)dt=T0t0f(s,u(s))dsv(t)dt,

    for every vEα0. By Definition 2.3 and (2.1), we have

    Φ(u)(v)=T0(0Dα1t(c0Dαtu(t))tDα1T(ctDαTu(t)))v(t)dt.

    Hence, Iλ=ΦλΨC1(Eα0,R) and Φ and Ψ are sequentially weakly lower and upper semicontinuous, respectively.

    Also by applying Lemma 2.12, we deduce that the functional Φ is coercive. Indeed, we have

    Φ(u)|cos(πα)|u2α+,

    as uα+.

    Further, we prove that a critical point of Iλ is a solution of (1.1). For this, if uEα0 is a critical point of Iλ, then

    0=Iλ(u)(v)=T0(0Dα1t(c0Dαtu(t))tDα1T(ctDαTu(t))+λt0f(s,u(s))ds)v(t)dt, (3.1)

    for every vEα0. The Du Bois-Reymond Lemma and (3.1) imply

    0Dα1t(c0Dαtu(t))tDα1T(ctDαTu(t))+λt0f(s,u(s))ds=m (3.2)

    a.e. on [0,T] for some mR. By (3.2), it is obvious to prove that uEα0 is a solution of (1.1).

    By Lemma 2.11, when α>1/2, for each uEα0 one has

    uκ(T0|c0Dαtu(t)|2dt)1/2=κuα. (3.3)

    First we establish that λ<1/γ, for any fixed λ as in the conclusion. For this, put

    rn:=|cos(πα)|κ2b2n,nN. (3.4)

    Then, for all uEα0 with Φ(u)<rn, by applying Lemma 2.12, we see that

    |cos(πα)|u2αΦ(u)<rn,

    which implies

    u2α<rn|cos(πα)|. (3.5)

    Thus, by (3.3)–(3.5) we obtain

    ubn,(nN)

    for any uEα0 with the condition Φ(u)<rn. Then, for every nN, we get that

    φ(rn)infΦ(u)<rnT0max|ξ|bnF(t,ξ)dtT0F(t,u(t))dt|cos(πα)|κ2b2n+T0c0Dαtu(t)ctDαTu(t)dt.

    Let wn be defined by

    wn(t):={4anTtt[0,T/4)ant[T/4,3T/4]4anT(Tt)t(3T/4,T]

    for each nN.

    Clearly, we can investigate that wn(0)=wn(T)=0 and wnL2([0,T]). Moreover, wn is Lipschitz continuous on [0,T], and therefore wn is absolutely continuous on [0,T]. We have

    c0Dαtwn(t)={4anTΓ(2α)t1αt[0,T/4)4anTΓ(2α)[t1α(tT4)1α]t[T/4,3T/4]4anTΓ(2α)[t1α(tT4)1α(t3T4)1α]t(3T/4,T].

    Obviously, the function c0Dαtwn is continuous in [0,T], and

    T0|c0Dαtwn(t)|2dt=16a2nT2Γ2(2α){T/40t22αdt+3T/4T/4[t1α(tT4)1α]2dt+T3T/4[t1α(tT4)1α(t3T4)1α]2dt}=16a2nT2Γ2(2α)C(T,α).

    Therefore,

    Φ(wn)1|cos(πα)|wn2α=16a2nT2|cos(πα)|Γ2(2α)C(T,α).

    Hence, by (h1), one has Φ(wn)<rn for all nn0. Moreover, by (f1), we also have

    Ψ(wn)3T/4T/4F(t,an)dt,

    for each nN.

    Then, it follows that

    φ(rn)T0max|ξ|bnF(t,ξ)dt3T/4T/4F(t,an)dt|cos(πα)|κ2b2n16C(T,α)a2nT2|cos(πα)|Γ2(2α),

    for every nn0.

    Hence, by the hypothesis (h2), we get that

    0γlimn+φ(rn)κ2T2Γ2(2α)|cos(πα)|A<+.

    By the above relation, since

    λ<1κ2T2Γ2(2α)|cos(πα)|A,

    we also have λ<1/γ.

    Now, we claim that Iλ is unbounded from below. By the relation

    1λ<T2|cos(πα)|Γ2(2α)B16C(T,α),

    taking into account the definition of B, there exist a sequence {ηn} of positive numbers and τ>0 with the conditions limn+ηn=+ and

    1λ<τ<T2|cos(πα)|Γ2(2α)16C(T,α)3T/4T/4F(t,ηn)dtη2n,

    for every nN large enough.

    For every nN, suppose that snX is defined by

    sn(t):={4ηnTtt[0,T/4)ηnt[T/4,3T/4]4ηnT(Tt)t(3T/4,T].

    Thus, we obtain

    Iλ(sn)=Φ(sn)λΨ(sn)16C(T,α)T2|cos(πα)|Γ2(2α)η2nλ3T/4T/4F(t,ηn)dt<16C(T,α)T2|cos(πα)|Γ2(2α)η2n(1λτ),

    for all nN large enough. By the relation λτ>1 and limn+ηn=+, we have

    limn+Iλ(sn)=.

    Therefore, Iλ is unbounded from below, and so, we get that Iλ has no global minimum. Then, by applying Theorem 2.13, part (b), there exists a sequence {un} of critical points of Iλ with

    limn+Φ(un)=+.

    So by Lemma 2.12, we have

    limn+unα=+.

    The proof is complete.

    Put

    B0:=lim supξ0+3T/4T/4F(t,ξ)dtξ2.

    Discussing as in the proof of Theorem 3.1 and exploiting part (c) of Theorem 2.13, we arrive the following.

    Theorem 3.2. Suppose that f:[0,T]×RR is a continuous function whose potential satisfies (f1). Assume that there exist real sequences {cn} and {dn} in (0,+), with limn+dn=0, such that:

    (h3) For some n0N we have cn<T|cos(πα)|Γ(2α)4κC(T,α)dn for each nn0;

    (h4) A0:=limn+T0max|ξ|dnF(t,ξ)dt3T/4T/4F(t,cn)dtT2|cos(πα)|2Γ2(2α)d2n16κ2c2nC(T,α)<B016κ2C(T,α).

    Then, for each

    λ]16C(T,α)T2Γ2(2α)|cos(πα)|B0,1κ2T2Γ2(2α)|cos(πα)|A0[,

    problem (1.1) has a sequence of non-zero solutions which strongly converges to zero in Eα0.

    At the present, we state some remarkable consequences of Theorem 3.1. Let

    A:=lim infξ+T0max|x|ξF(t,x)dtξ2.

    Corollary 3.3. Suppose that f:[0,T]×RR is a continuous function whose potential satisfies (f1). Assume that

    (h5) A<T2|cos(πα)|2Γ2(2α)16κ2C(T,α)B.

    Then, for each

    λ]16C(T,α)T2Γ2(2α)|cos(πα)|B,|cos(πα)|κ2A[,

    problem (1.1) has an unbounded sequence of solutions in Eα0.

    Proof. Assume that {bn} be a sequence of positive numbers, with limn+bn=+, such that

    limn+T0max|ξ|bnF(t,ξ)dtb2n=A.

    Taking an=0 for all nn0, by applying Theorem 3.1, we have the outcome.

    A specific case of Corollary 3.3 is the following.

    Corollary 3.4. Assume that f:[0,T]×RR be a continuous function whose potential satisfies (f1). Assume that

    (h6) A<|cos(πα)|κ2 and B>16C(T,α)T2Γ2(2α)|cos(πα)|.

    Then, the problem

    {ddt(0Dα1t(c0Dαtu(t))tDα1T(ctDαTu(t)))+f(t,u(t))=0a.e.t[0,T]u(0)=u(T)=0,

    has an unbounded sequence of solutions in Eα0.

    Remark 3.5. We point out that when f is a nonnegative function, hypothesis (f1) preserves and assumption (h5) becomes

    (h5) A:=lim infξ+T0F(t,ξ)dtξ2<T2|cos(πα)|2Γ2(2α)16κ2C(T,α)B.

    In this occasion, (h5) ensures that for all

    λ]16C(T,α)T2Γ2(2α)|cos(πα)|B,|cos(πα)|κ2A[,

    problem (1.1) has an unbounded sequence of solutions in Eα0.

    Corollary 3.6. Assume that f:[0,T]×RR be a continuous function whose potential satisfies (f1). Assume that there exist real sequences {an} and {bn} in (0,+), with limn+bn=+, such that (h1) holds and

    (h7) 3T/4T/4F(t,an)dt=T0max|ξ|bnF(t,ξ)dt for all nN.

    If B>0, then, for all

    λ>16C(T,α)T2Γ2(2α)|cos(πα)|B,

    problem (1.1) has an unbounded sequence of solutions in Eα0.

    Proof. By (h7) we get A=0. Therefore, since B>0, condition (h2) of Theorem 3.1 holds and the result is obtained.

    Remark 3.7. By Theorem 3.2 we get the identical conclusions of Theorem 3.1. Namely, substituting ξ+ with ξ0+, assertions such as Corollaries 3.3, 3.4 and 3.6 can be established. We omit the details.

    To conclude, we give an example of application of the main results.

    Example 3.8. Consider the problem

    {ddt(0D0.3t(c0D0.7tu(t))tD0.31(ctD0.71u(t)))+λf(u(t))=0a.e.t[0,1]u(0)=u(1)=0, (3.6)

    where f:RR is the continuous function defined by

    f(x):={x(2cos(ln|x|)2sin(ln|x|))xR{0}0x=0.

    A direct calculation shows

    F(x)={x2(1sin(ln|x|))xR{0}0x=0.

    So, F satisfies (f1) and we have

    A=lim infξ+(1sin(ln|ξ|))=0,B=lim supξ+12(1sin(ln|ξ|))=1,
    |cos(0.7π)|0.58779,C(1,0.7)0.13429,Γ2(1.3)0.805454,
    160.134290.8054540.58779=4.5384.

    The above calculations are done using MAPLE. Hence, using Corollary 3.3, for each λ]4.5384,+[, problem (3.6) has an unbounded sequence of solutions in E0.70.

    Taking advantage of a critical point theorem obtained by Ricceri [28], the existence of infinitely many solutions for a nonlinear fractional BVP with a parameter is established. More precisely, a concrete interval of positive parameters, for which the treated problem admits infinitely many solutions, is determined without any symmetry or monotonicity assumptions on the nonlinear data. Our goal was achieved by requiring an appropriate oscillatory behavior of the nonlinear term either at infinity or at zero, without any additional conditions.

    The authors would like to thank the reviewers for their good comments and suggestions which helped them to improve the presentation of this paper.

    The work of the second author has been partially supported by the Agencia Estatal de Investigación (AEI) of Spain under Grants MTM2016-75140-P and PID2020-113275GB-I00, and by Xunta de Galicia, grant ED431C 2019/02.

    The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.



    [1] G. A. Afrouzi, A. Hadjian, A variational approach for boundary value problems for impulsive fractional differential equations, Fract. Calc. Appl. Anal., 21 (2018), 1565–1584. https://doi.org/10.1515/fca-2018-0082 doi: 10.1515/fca-2018-0082
    [2] G. A. Afrouzi, S. M. Kolagar, A. Hadjian, J. Xu, A variational approach for fractional boundary value systems depending on two parameters, Filomat, 32 (2018), 517–530. https://doi.org/10.2298/FIL1802517A doi: 10.2298/FIL1802517A
    [3] D. Averna, A. Sciammetta, E. Tornatore, Infinitely many solutions to boundary value problem for fractional differential equations, Fract. Calc. Appl. Anal., 21 (2018), 1585–1597. https://doi.org/10.1515/fca-2018-0083 doi: 10.1515/fca-2018-0083
    [4] D. Averna, S. Tersian, E. Tornatore, On the existence and multiplicity of solutions for Dirichlet's problem for fractional differential equations, Fract. Calc. Appl. Anal., 19 (2016), 253–266. https://doi.org/10.1515/fca-2016-0014 doi: 10.1515/fca-2016-0014
    [5] C. Bai, Existence of solutions for a nonlinear fractional boundary value problem via a local minimum theorem, Electron. J. Differ. Eq., 2012 (2012), 176.
    [6] A. S. Berdyshev, B. J. Kadirkulov, J. J. Nieto, Solvability of an elliptic partial differential equation with boundary condition involving fractional derivatives, Complex Var. Elliptic Equ., 59 (2014), 680–692. https://doi.org/10.1080/17476933.2013.777711 doi: 10.1080/17476933.2013.777711
    [7] G. Bonanno, A critical point theorem via the Ekeland variational principle, Nonlinear Anal., 75 (2012), 2992–3007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.na.2011.12.003 doi: 10.1016/j.na.2011.12.003
    [8] G. Bonanno, G. Molica Bisci, Infinitely many solutions for a Dirichlet problem involving the p-Laplacian, Proc. Roy. Soc. Edinburgh Sect. A, 140 (2010), 737–752. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0308210509000845 doi: 10.1017/S0308210509000845
    [9] J. F. Bonder, Z. Cheng, H. Mikayelyan, Optimal rearrangement problem and normalized obstacle problem in the fractional setting, Adv. Nonlinear Anal., 9 (2020), 1592–1606. https://doi.org/10.1515/anona-2020-0067 doi: 10.1515/anona-2020-0067
    [10] M. J. Ceballos-Lira, A. Pérez, Global solutions and blowing-up solutions for a nonautonomous and nonlocal in space reaction-diffusion system with Dirichlet boundary conditions, Fract. Calc. Appl. Anal., 23 (2020), 1025–1053. https://doi.org/10.1515/fca-2020-0054 doi: 10.1515/fca-2020-0054
    [11] P. Chen, Z. Cao, S. Chen, X. Tang, Ground states for a fractional reaction-diffusion system, J. Appl. Anal. Comput., 11 (2021), 556–567. https://doi.org/10.11948/20200349 doi: 10.11948/20200349
    [12] J. N. Corvellec, V. V. Motreanu, C. Saccon, Doubly resonant semilinear elliptic problems via nonsmooth critical point theory, J. Differ. Equations, 248 (2010), 2064–2091. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jde.2009.11.005 doi: 10.1016/j.jde.2009.11.005
    [13] M. Ferrara, A. Hadjian, Variational approach to fractional boundary value problems with two control parameters, Electron. J. Differ. Eq., 2015 (2015), 138.
    [14] M. Galewski, G. Molica Bisci, Existence results for one-dimensional fractional equations, Math. Methods Appl. Sci., 39 (2016), 1480–1492. https://doi.org/10.1002/mma.3582 doi: 10.1002/mma.3582
    [15] B. Ge, V. Rădulescu, J. C. Zhang, Infinitely many positive solutions of fractional boundary value problems, Topol. Methods Nonlinear Anal., 49 (2017), 647–664. https://doi.org/10.12775/TMNA.2017.001 doi: 10.12775/TMNA.2017.001
    [16] R. Hilfer, Applications of fractional calculus in physics, Singapore: World Scientific, 2000. https://doi.org/10.1142/3779
    [17] F. Jiao, Y. Zhou, Existence of solutions for a class of fractional boundary value problems via critical point theory, Comput. Math. Appl., 62 (2011), 1181–1199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.camwa.2011.03.086 doi: 10.1016/j.camwa.2011.03.086
    [18] A. A. Kilbas, H. M. Srivastava, J. J. Trujillo, Theory and applications of fractional differential equations, In: North-holland mathematics studies, Vol. 204, Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2006.
    [19] A. Kristály, V. D. Rădulescu, C. G. Varga, Variational principles in mathematical physics, geometry, and economics: Qualitative analysis of nonlinear equations and unilateral problems, Encyclopedia of Mathematics and its Applications, No. 136, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511760631
    [20] V. Lakshmikantham, A. S. Vatsala, Basic theory of fractional differential equations, Nonlinear Anal., 69 (2008), 2677–2682. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.na.2007.08.042 doi: 10.1016/j.na.2007.08.042
    [21] F. Li, Z. Liang, Q. Zhang, Existence of solutions to a class of nonlinear second order two-point boundary value problems, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 312 (2005), 357–373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmaa.2005.03.043 doi: 10.1016/j.jmaa.2005.03.043
    [22] J. Manimaran, L. Shangerganesh, A. Debbouche, Finite element error analysis of a time-fractional nonlocal diffusion equation with the Dirichlet energy, J. Comput. Appl. Math., 382 (2021), 113066. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cam.2020.113066 doi: 10.1016/j.cam.2020.113066
    [23] J. Mawhin, M. Willem, Critical point theorey and Hamiltonian systems, New York: Springer, 1989. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-2061-7
    [24] K. S. Miller, B. Ross, An introduction to the fractional calculus and fractional differential equations, New York: Wiley, 1993.
    [25] T. Mukherjee, K. Sreenadh, On Dirichlet problem for fractional p-Laplacian with singular non-linearity, Adv. Nonlinear Anal., 8 (2019), 52–72. https://doi.org/10.1515/anona-2016-0100 doi: 10.1515/anona-2016-0100
    [26] I. Podlubny, Fractional differential equations, In: Mathematics in science and engineering, Vol. 198, New York: Academic Press, 1999.
    [27] P. H. Rabinowitz, Minimax methods in critical point theory with applications to differential equations, Rhode Island: American Mathematical Society, 1986.
    [28] B. Ricceri, A general variational principle and some of its applications, J. Comput. Appl. Math., 113 (2000), 401–410. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-0427(99)00269-1 doi: 10.1016/S0377-0427(99)00269-1
    [29] S. G. Samko, A. A. Kilbas, O. I. Marichev, Fractional integrals and derivatives: Theory and applications, Switzerland: Gordon and Breach, 1993.
    [30] C. L. Tang, X. P. Wu, Some critical point theorems and their applications to periodic solution for second order Hamiltonian systems, J. Differ. Equations, 248 (2010), 660–692. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jde.2009.11.007 doi: 10.1016/j.jde.2009.11.007
    [31] Y. Tian, J. J. Nieto, The applications of critical-point theory to discontinuous fractional-order differential equations, Proc. Edinburgh Math. Soc., 60 (2017), 1021–1051. https://doi.org/10.1017/S001309151600050X doi: 10.1017/S001309151600050X
    [32] M. P. Tran, T. N. Nguyen, New gradient estimates for solutions to quasilinear divergence form elliptic equations with general Dirichlet boundary data, J. Differ. Equations, 268 (2020), 1427–1462. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jde.2019.08.052 doi: 10.1016/j.jde.2019.08.052
    [33] M. Xiang, B. Zhang, V. D. Rădulescu, Superlinear Schrödinger-Kirchhoff type problems involving the fractional p-Laplacian and critical exponent, Adv. Nonlinear Anal., 9 (2020), 690–709. https://doi.org/10.1515/anona-2020-0021 doi: 10.1515/anona-2020-0021
    [34] M. Zhen, B. Zhang, V. D. Rădulescu, Normalized solutions for nonlinear coupled fractional systems: Low and high perturbations in the attractive case, Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst., 41 (2021), 2653–2676. https://doi.org/10.3934/dcds.2020379 doi: 10.3934/dcds.2020379
  • This article has been cited by:

    1. Xiao-Li Ding, Juan J. Nieto, Xiaolong Wang, Analytical solutions for fractional partial delay differential-algebraic equations with Dirichlet boundary conditions defined on a finite domain, 2022, 25, 1311-0454, 408, 10.1007/s13540-022-00021-7
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2022 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(1896) PDF downloads(91) Cited by(1)

Other Articles By Authors

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog