We establish the existence of infinitely many solutions for some nonlinear fractional differential equations under suitable oscillating behaviour of the nonlinear term. These problems have a variational structure and we prove our main results by using a critical point theorem due to Ricceri.
Citation: Armin Hadjian, Juan J. Nieto. Existence of solutions of Dirichlet problems for one dimensional fractional equations[J]. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(4): 6034-6049. doi: 10.3934/math.2022336
[1] | H. H. G. Hashem, Hessah O. Alrashidi . Qualitative analysis of nonlinear implicit neutral differential equation of fractional order. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(4): 3703-3719. doi: 10.3934/math.2021220 |
[2] | Yudhveer Singh, Devendra Kumar, Kanak Modi, Vinod Gill . A new approach to solve Cattaneo-Hristov diffusion model and fractional diffusion equations with Hilfer-Prabhakar derivative. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(2): 843-855. doi: 10.3934/math.2020057 |
[3] | Aslı Alkan, Halil Anaç . The novel numerical solutions for time-fractional Fornberg-Whitham equation by using fractional natural transform decomposition method. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(9): 25333-25359. doi: 10.3934/math.20241237 |
[4] | Humaira Yasmin, Aljawhara H. Almuqrin . Efficient solutions for time fractional Sawada-Kotera, Ito, and Kaup-Kupershmidt equations using an analytical technique. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(8): 20441-20466. doi: 10.3934/math.2024994 |
[5] | Jun Moon . The Pontryagin type maximum principle for Caputo fractional optimal control problems with terminal and running state constraints. AIMS Mathematics, 2025, 10(1): 884-920. doi: 10.3934/math.2025042 |
[6] | Khalid K. Ali, K. R. Raslan, Amira Abd-Elall Ibrahim, Mohamed S. Mohamed . On study the fractional Caputo-Fabrizio integro differential equation including the fractional q-integral of the Riemann-Liouville type. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(8): 18206-18222. doi: 10.3934/math.2023925 |
[7] | Zhilin Li, Guoping Chen, Weiwei Long, Xinyuan Pan . Variational approach to p-Laplacian fractional differential equations with instantaneous and non-instantaneous impulses. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(9): 16986-17000. doi: 10.3934/math.2022933 |
[8] | Jing Yang . Existence of infinitely many solutions for a nonlocal problem. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(6): 5743-5767. doi: 10.3934/math.2020369 |
[9] | Kangqun Zhang . Existence and uniqueness of positive solution of a nonlinear differential equation with higher order Erdélyi-Kober operators. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(1): 1358-1372. doi: 10.3934/math.2024067 |
[10] | Amjid Ali, Teruya Minamoto, Rasool Shah, Kamsing Nonlaopon . A novel numerical method for solution of fractional partial differential equations involving the $ \psi $-Caputo fractional derivative. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(1): 2137-2153. doi: 10.3934/math.2023110 |
We establish the existence of infinitely many solutions for some nonlinear fractional differential equations under suitable oscillating behaviour of the nonlinear term. These problems have a variational structure and we prove our main results by using a critical point theorem due to Ricceri.
In this paper, we are eager to investigate the nonlinear fractional boundary value problem (BVP) of the form
{ddt(0Dα−1t(c0Dαtu(t))−tDα−1T(ctDαTu(t)))+λf(t,u(t))=0 a.e. t∈[0,T]u(0)=u(T)=0, | (1.1) |
where λ>0 is a real parameter, α∈(1/2,1], c0Dαt and ctDαT are the left and right Caputo fractional derivatives of order α, respectively, 0Dα−1t and tDα−1T are the left and right Riemann-Liouville fractional integrals of order 1−α, respectively, and f:[0,T]×R→R is a continuous function.
Fractional differential equations (i.e. α∈(1/2,1)) arise in real applications in many fields of sciences such as conservation laws, minimal surfaces, water waves and ultra-relativistic limits of quantum mechanics. Due to these applications, non-local fractional problems are extensively investigated. There has been remarkable progress in fractional differential equations; the interested reader may see the books [16,18,24,26,29].
Critical point theory has been very effective in specifying the existence and multiplicity of solutions for integer order differential equations provided that the equation has a variational construction on some appropriate Sobolev spaces, e.g., we refer to [12,20,21,23,27,30] and the references therein for detailed discussions. But until now, there are little consequences on the existence of solutions to fractional BVPs which were proved by the variational methods, since it is frequently hard to establish a proper space and variational functional for fractional differential equations. For instance, in [1,2,3,4,5,13,14,17], variational methods are applied to study the existence and multiplicity of solutions for fractional BVPs.
An attractive physical case is considered in [17] where Jiao and Zhou, by applying the critical point theory, proved the existence and multiplicity of solutions for the problem
{ddt(120D−βt(u′(t))+12tD−βT(u′(t)))+∇F(t,u(t))=0 a.e. t∈[0,T]u(0)=u(T)=0, |
where β∈[0,1), F:[0,T]×RN→R (with N≥1) is a suitable given function and ∇F(t,x) is the gradient of F at x (see Remark 2.9 below for the relation of this problem with problem (1.1)).
Also, Bai in [5], applying a critical point result for differentiable functionals proved by Bonanno [7], discussed the existence of at least one non-zero solution for the problem
{ddt(0Dα−1t(c0Dαtu(t))−tDα−1T(ctDαTu(t)))+λf(u(t))=0 a.e. t∈[0,T]u(0)=u(T)=0. | (1.2) |
The authors in [13] obtained, by using three critical point theorems, for the following BVP for fractional order differential equations
{ddt(0Dα−1t(c0Dαtu(t))−tDα−1T(ctDαTu(t)))+λf(t,u(t))+μg(t,u(t))=0 a.e. t∈[0,T]u(0)=u(T)=0, |
the existence of at least three solutions, where λ,μ>0 are two parameters.
More recently, Galewski and Molica Bisci in [14] studied the problem (1.2), in the case λ=1. With an asymptotic behaviour of f at zero and using a critical point result [8], they proved the existence of one non-zero solution for the problem.
In this paper, we will prove the existence of infinitely many solutions for problem (1.1) with rather various hypotheses on the function f. We need that the potential F of f assures an appropriate oscillatory behavior either at infinity or at the origin.
Our results are based on the variational principle due to Ricceri [28]. We address the eager reader to the book [19] as a comprehensive reference on critical point theory adopted here.
Finally, we note that an interesting and careful analysis of fractional BVPs was extended in the nice and recent works [6,9,10,11,15,22,25,32,33,34] and the references therein.
This paper is organized as follows. In Section 2, we state some preliminary definitions and properties of the fractional calculus that will be required in the paper. In Section 3, our principal result, Theorem 3.1, and some significant conclusions (see Corollaries 3.3, 3.4 and 3.6) are presented. Then Example 3.8 is given as an application of Corollary 3.3.
In the present section, first we present several needful definitions and properties of the fractional calculus which are required further in this paper. Let AC([a,b],R)=AC1([a,b],R) be the space of absolutely continuous functions on the interval [a,b], where a<b are real numbers (see [18]). Set ACn([a,b],R) the space of functions u:[a,b]→R such that u∈Cn−1([a,b],R) and u(n−1)∈AC([a,b],R). Here, Cn−1([a,b],R) signifies the set of mappings that are (n−1) times continuously differentiable on [a,b].
Definition 2.1 ([18,26]). Let u∈L1([a,b],R). We denote by aD−γtu(t) and tD−γbu(t) the left and right Riemann-Liouville fractional integrals of order γ>0 for function u, respectively, that are defined by
aD−γtu(t)=1Γ(γ)∫ta(t−s)γ−1u(s)ds, |
and
tD−γbu(t)=1Γ(γ)∫bt(s−t)γ−1u(s)ds, |
for every t∈[a,b], while the right-hand sides are pointwise defined on [a,b], where Γ>0 is the standard gamma function given by
Γ(γ)=∫+∞0zγ−1e−zdz. |
We note that aD−γt and tD−γb are linear and bounded operators from L1([a,b],R) into L1([a,b],R); see also Lemma 2.6 below.
Definition 2.2 ([18,26]). Let u∈ACn([a,b],R). We denote by aDγtu(t) and tDγbu(t) the left and right Riemann-Liouville fractional derivatives of order γ (n−1≤γ<n and n∈N) for function u, respectively, that are defined by
aDγtu(t)=dndtnaDγ−ntu(t)=1Γ(n−γ)dndtn(∫ta(t−s)n−γ−1u(s)ds), |
and
tDγbu(t)=(−1)ndndtntDγ−nbu(t)=1Γ(n−γ)(−1)ndndtn(∫bt(s−t)n−γ−1u(s)ds), |
where t∈[a,b]. Specially, if 0≤γ<1, then
aDγtu(t)=ddtaDγ−1tu(t)=1Γ(1−γ)ddt(∫ta(t−s)−γu(s)ds),t∈[a,b], |
and
tDγbu(t)=−ddttDγ−1bu(t)=−1Γ(1−γ)ddt(∫bt(s−t)−γu(s)ds),t∈[a,b]. |
Definition 2.3 ([18]). Suppose that γ≥0 and n∈N.
(i) Let γ∈(n−1,n) and u∈ACn([a,b],R). We denote by caDγtu(t) and ctDγbu(t) the left and right Caputo fractional derivatives of order γ for function u, respectively. These derivatives exist almost everywhere on [a,b]. caDγtu(t) and ctDγbu(t) are illustrated by
caDγtu(t)=aDγ−ntu(n)(t)=1Γ(n−γ)∫ta(t−s)n−γ−1u(n)(s)ds, |
and
ctDγbu(t)=(−1)ntDγ−nbu(n)(t)=(−1)nΓ(n−γ)∫bt(s−t)n−γ−1u(n)(s)ds, |
for every t∈[a,b], respectively. Specially, if 0<γ<1, then
caDγtu(t)=aDγ−1tu′(t)=1Γ(1−γ)∫ta(t−s)−γu′(s)ds,t∈[a,b], |
and
ctDγbu(t)=−tDγ−1bu′(t)=−1Γ(1−γ)∫bt(s−t)−γu′(s)ds,t∈[a,b]. |
(ii) If γ=n−1 and u∈ACn−1([a,b],R), then caDn−1tu(t) and ctDn−1bu(t) are illustrated by
caDn−1tu(t)=u(n−1)(t),andctDn−1bu(t)=(−1)(n−1)u(n−1)(t), |
for every t∈[a,b]. Specially, caD0tu(t)=ctD0bu(t)=u(t),t∈[a,b].
If u∈ACn([a,b],R), then the relation between the Riemann-Liouville fractional derivative and the Caputo fractional derivative is expressed by the following
aDγtu(t)=caDγtu(t)+n−1∑j=0u(j)(a)Γ(j−γ+1)(t−a)j−γ,t∈[a,b]. |
Proposition 2.4 ([18]). The left and right Riemann-Liouville fractional integral operators have the feature of a semigroup, that is
aD−γ1t(aD−γ2tu(t))=aD−γ1−γ2tu(t)andtD−γ1b(tD−γ2bu(t))=tD−γ1−γ2bu(t),∀γ1,γ2>0 |
at every point t∈[a,b] for a continuous function u, and for a.e. point in [a,b] if u∈L1([a,b],R).
Proposition 2.5 ([29]). We have
∫ba[aD−γtu(t)]v(t)dt=∫ba[tD−γbv(t)]u(t)dt,γ>0, |
with the condition that u∈Lp([a,b],R), v∈Lq([a,b],R) and p≥1, q≥1 and 1/p+1/q≤1+γ, or p≠1, q≠1 and 1/p+1/q=1+γ.
For any u∈L2([0,T],R) and for every fixed t∈[0,T], set
‖u‖L2([0,t]):=(∫t0|u(ξ)|2dξ)1/2,‖u‖L2:=(∫T0|u(t)|2dt)1/2,‖u‖∞:=maxt∈[0,T]|u(t)|. |
Lemma 2.6 ([17,Lemma 3.1]). Let α∈(0,1]. For any u∈L2([0,T],R), we have
‖0D−αξu‖L2([0,t])≤tαΓ(α+1)‖u‖L2([0,t]),forξ∈[0,t],t∈[0,T]. |
Let C∞0([0,T],R) be the collection of all functions g∈C∞([0,T],R) with compact support contained in (0,T). Then any function g∈C∞0([0,T],R) satisfies g(0)=g(T)=0.
Definition 2.7. Suppose that 0<α≤1. We define the fractional derivative space Eα0 by the closure of C∞0([0,T],R) with respect to the norm
‖u‖:=(∫T0|c0Dαtu(t)|2dt+∫T0|u(t)|2dt)1/2, |
for every u∈Eα0.
Remark 2.8. (i) For any u∈Eα0, with the fact that u(0)=0, one has c0Dαtu(t)=0Dαtu(t),t∈[0,T] according to the equality (10) of [17].
(ii) According to Lemma 2.6, for every u∈C∞0([0,T],R), one has u∈L2([0,T],R) and c0Dαtu∈L2([0,T],R). Thus, it is obvious that Eα0 is the space of functions u∈L2([0,T],R) having an α-order Caputo fractional derivative c0Dαtu∈L2([0,T],R) and u(0)=u(T)=0.
Remark 2.9. In view of Definition 2.3, for every u∈AC([0,T],R), BVP (1.1) transforms to
{ddt(0D−β2t(0D−β2tu′(t))+tD−β2T(tD−β2Tu′(t)))+λf(t,u(t))=0a.e.t∈[0,T]u(0)=u(T)=0, | (2.1) |
where β:=2(1−α)∈[0,1).
Furthermore by Proposition 2.4, it is clear that u∈AC([0,T],R) is a solution of BVP (2.1) if and only if u is a solution of the problem
{ddt(0D−βt(u′(t))+tD−βT(u′(t)))+λf(t,u(t))=0a.e.t∈[0,T]u(0)=u(T)=0. | (2.2) |
For completeness we recall that a function u∈AC([0,T],R) is named a solution of BVP (2.2) if:
(j) The map
t↦0D−βt(u′(t))+tD−βT(u′(t)), |
is differentiable for a.e. t∈[0,T], and
(jj) The function u assures (2.2).
Proposition 2.10 ([31,Lemma 4.2]). Suppose that α∈(0,1]. The space Eα0 is a separable and reflexive Banach space.
Lemma 2.11 ([17,Proposition 3.2]). Suppose that α∈(1/2,1]. For all u∈Eα0, one has
‖u‖L2≤TαΓ(α+1)‖c0Dαtu‖L2,‖u‖∞≤Tα−1/2Γ(α)√2α−1‖c0Dαtu‖L2. |
Hence, we can consider Eα0 equipped with the equivalent norm
‖u‖α:=(∫T0|c0Dαtu(t)|2dt)1/2=‖c0Dαtu‖L2,∀u∈Eα0. |
Lemma 2.12 ([17,Proposition 4.1]). Suppose that α∈(1/2,1]. For every u∈Eα0, one has
|cos(πα)|‖u‖2α≤−∫T0c0Dαtu(t)⋅ctDαTu(t)dt≤1|cos(πα)|‖u‖2α. |
We refer our main results for α∈(1/2,1] rather than α∈(0,1/2], since by Lemmas 2.11 and 2.12, for α∈(1/2,1], the space Eα0 is compactly embedded in C([0,T],R) and the functional −∫T0c0Dαtu(t)⋅ctDαTu(t)dt is coercive.
We formulate the following version of Ricceri's variational principle [28,Theorem 2.5], that is our principal tool for establishing the principal result of this paper.
Theorem 2.13. Suppose that X is a reflexive real Banach space, and let Φ,Ψ:X→R be two Gâteaux differentiable functionals such that Φ is sequentially weakly lower semicontinuous, strongly continuous and coercive, and Ψ is sequentially weakly upper semicontinuous. For any r>infXΦ, let
φ(r):=infu∈Φ−1((−∞,r))(supv∈Φ−1((−∞,r))Ψ(v))−Ψ(u)r−Φ(u). |
Put
γ:=lim infr→+∞φ(r),andδ:=lim infr→(infXΦ)+φ(r). |
Then, the following properties hold:
(a) If γ<+∞, then for each λ∈(0,1/γ), the following alternative holds: Either
(a1) Iλ possesses a global minimum, or
(a2) there is a sequence {un} of critical points (local minima) of Iλ such that
limn→+∞Φ(un)=+∞. |
(b) If δ<+∞, then for each λ∈(0,1/δ), the following alternative holds: Either
(b1) there is a global minimum of Φ which is a local minimum of Iλ, or
(b2) there is a sequence {un} of pairwise distinct critical points (local minima) of Iλ that converges weakly to a global minimum of Φ, with limn→+∞Φ(un)=infu∈XΦ(u).
In the present section, we state and prove our principal result. Let
κ:=Tα−12Γ(α)√2α−1, |
C(T,α):=∫T/40t2−2αdt+∫3T/4T/4[t1−α−(t−T4)1−α]2dt+∫T3T/4[t1−α−(t−T4)1−α−(t−3T4)1−α]2dt, |
and
B∞:=lim supξ→+∞∫3T/4T/4F(t,ξ)dtξ2, |
where F is the potential of f defined by
F(t,ξ):=∫ξ0f(t,x)dx,(t,ξ)∈[0,T]×R. |
We suppose that the following condition holds:
(f1) F(t,ξ)≥0 for any (t,ξ)∈([0,T4]∪[3T4,T])×R.
Our principal result reads as follows.
Theorem 3.1. Suppose that f:[0,T]×R→R is a continuous function whose potential satisfies (f1). Assume that there exist real sequences {an} and {bn} in (0,+∞), with limn→+∞bn=+∞, such that:
(h1) For some n0∈N we have an<T|cos(πα)|Γ(2−α)4κ√C(T,α)bn for each n≥n0;
(h2) A∞:=limn→+∞∫T0max|ξ|≤bnF(t,ξ)dt−∫3T/4T/4F(t,an)dtT2|cos(πα)|2Γ2(2−α)b2n−16κ2a2nC(T,α)<B∞16κ2C(T,α).
Then, for each
λ∈]16C(T,α)T2Γ2(2−α)|cos(πα)|B∞,1κ2T2Γ2(2−α)|cos(πα)|A∞[, |
problem (1.1) admits an unbounded sequence of solutions in Eα0.
Proof. We want to apply Theorem 2.13 to problem (1.1). For this, we define the functionals Φ,Ψ:X→R by
Φ(u):=−∫T0c0Dαtu(t)⋅ctDαTu(t)dt,Ψ(u):=∫T0F(t,u(t))dt, |
and put
Iλ(u):=Φ(u)−λΨ(u), |
for every u∈X:=Eα0.
Obviously, Φ and Ψ are Gâteaux differentiable functionals whose derivatives at u∈Eα0 are
Φ′(u)(v)=−∫T0(c0Dαtu(t)⋅ctDαTv(t)+ctDαTu(t)⋅c0Dαtv(t))dt,Ψ′(u)(v)=∫T0f(t,u(t))v(t)dt=−∫T0∫t0f(s,u(s))ds⋅v′(t)dt, |
for every v∈Eα0. By Definition 2.3 and (2.1), we have
Φ′(u)(v)=∫T0(0Dα−1t(c0Dαtu(t))−tDα−1T(ctDαTu(t)))⋅v′(t)dt. |
Hence, Iλ=Φ−λΨ∈C1(Eα0,R) and Φ and Ψ are sequentially weakly lower and upper semicontinuous, respectively.
Also by applying Lemma 2.12, we deduce that the functional Φ is coercive. Indeed, we have
Φ(u)≥|cos(πα)|‖u‖2α→+∞, |
as ‖u‖α→+∞.
Further, we prove that a critical point of Iλ is a solution of (1.1). For this, if u∗∈Eα0 is a critical point of Iλ, then
0=I′λ(u∗)(v)=∫T0(0Dα−1t(c0Dαtu∗(t))−tDα−1T(ctDαTu∗(t))+λ∫t0f(s,u∗(s))ds)⋅v′(t)dt, | (3.1) |
for every v∈Eα0. The Du Bois-Reymond Lemma and (3.1) imply
0Dα−1t(c0Dαtu∗(t))−tDα−1T(ctDαTu∗(t))+λ∫t0f(s,u∗(s))ds=m | (3.2) |
a.e. on [0,T] for some m∈R. By (3.2), it is obvious to prove that u∗∈Eα0 is a solution of (1.1).
By Lemma 2.11, when α>1/2, for each u∈Eα0 one has
‖u‖∞≤κ(∫T0|c0Dαtu(t)|2dt)1/2=κ‖u‖α. | (3.3) |
First we establish that λ<1/γ, for any fixed λ as in the conclusion. For this, put
rn:=|cos(πα)|κ2b2n,∀n∈N. | (3.4) |
Then, for all u∈Eα0 with Φ(u)<rn, by applying Lemma 2.12, we see that
|cos(πα)|‖u‖2α≤Φ(u)<rn, |
which implies
‖u‖2α<rn|cos(πα)|. | (3.5) |
Thus, by (3.3)–(3.5) we obtain
‖u‖∞≤bn,(∀n∈N) |
for any u∈Eα0 with the condition Φ(u)<rn. Then, for every n∈N, we get that
φ(rn)≤infΦ(u)<rn∫T0max|ξ|≤bnF(t,ξ)dt−∫T0F(t,u(t))dt|cos(πα)|κ2b2n+∫T0c0Dαtu(t)⋅ctDαTu(t)dt. |
Let wn be defined by
wn(t):={4anTtt∈[0,T/4)ant∈[T/4,3T/4]4anT(T−t)t∈(3T/4,T] |
for each n∈N.
Clearly, we can investigate that wn(0)=wn(T)=0 and wn∈L2([0,T]). Moreover, wn is Lipschitz continuous on [0,T], and therefore wn is absolutely continuous on [0,T]. We have
c0Dαtwn(t)={4anTΓ(2−α)t1−αt∈[0,T/4)4anTΓ(2−α)[t1−α−(t−T4)1−α]t∈[T/4,3T/4]4anTΓ(2−α)[t1−α−(t−T4)1−α−(t−3T4)1−α]t∈(3T/4,T]. |
Obviously, the function c0Dαtwn is continuous in [0,T], and
∫T0|c0Dαtwn(t)|2dt=16a2nT2Γ2(2−α){∫T/40t2−2αdt+∫3T/4T/4[t1−α−(t−T4)1−α]2dt+∫T3T/4[t1−α−(t−T4)1−α−(t−3T4)1−α]2dt}=16a2nT2Γ2(2−α)C(T,α). |
Therefore,
Φ(wn)≤1|cos(πα)|‖wn‖2α=16a2nT2|cos(πα)|Γ2(2−α)C(T,α). |
Hence, by (h1), one has Φ(wn)<rn for all n≥n0. Moreover, by (f1), we also have
Ψ(wn)≥∫3T/4T/4F(t,an)dt, |
for each n∈N.
Then, it follows that
φ(rn)≤∫T0max|ξ|≤bnF(t,ξ)dt−∫3T/4T/4F(t,an)dt|cos(πα)|κ2b2n−16C(T,α)a2nT2|cos(πα)|Γ2(2−α), |
for every n≥n0.
Hence, by the hypothesis (h2), we get that
0≤γ≤limn→+∞φ(rn)≤κ2T2Γ2(2−α)|cos(πα)|A∞<+∞. |
By the above relation, since
λ<1κ2T2Γ2(2−α)|cos(πα)|A∞, |
we also have λ<1/γ.
Now, we claim that Iλ is unbounded from below. By the relation
1λ<T2|cos(πα)|Γ2(2−α)B∞16C(T,α), |
taking into account the definition of B∞, there exist a sequence {ηn} of positive numbers and τ>0 with the conditions limn→+∞ηn=+∞ and
1λ<τ<T2|cos(πα)|Γ2(2−α)16C(T,α)∫3T/4T/4F(t,ηn)dtη2n, |
for every n∈N large enough.
For every n∈N, suppose that sn∈X is defined by
sn(t):={4ηnTtt∈[0,T/4)ηnt∈[T/4,3T/4]4ηnT(T−t)t∈(3T/4,T]. |
Thus, we obtain
Iλ(sn)=Φ(sn)−λΨ(sn)≤16C(T,α)T2|cos(πα)|Γ2(2−α)η2n−λ∫3T/4T/4F(t,ηn)dt<16C(T,α)T2|cos(πα)|Γ2(2−α)η2n(1−λτ), |
for all n∈N large enough. By the relation λτ>1 and limn→+∞ηn=+∞, we have
limn→+∞Iλ(sn)=−∞. |
Therefore, Iλ is unbounded from below, and so, we get that Iλ has no global minimum. Then, by applying Theorem 2.13, part (b), there exists a sequence {un} of critical points of Iλ with
limn→+∞Φ(un)=+∞. |
So by Lemma 2.12, we have
limn→+∞‖un‖α=+∞. |
The proof is complete.
Put
B0:=lim supξ→0+∫3T/4T/4F(t,ξ)dtξ2. |
Discussing as in the proof of Theorem 3.1 and exploiting part (c) of Theorem 2.13, we arrive the following.
Theorem 3.2. Suppose that f:[0,T]×R→R is a continuous function whose potential satisfies (f1). Assume that there exist real sequences {cn} and {dn} in (0,+∞), with limn→+∞dn=0, such that:
(h3) For some n0∈N we have cn<T|cos(πα)|Γ(2−α)4κ√C(T,α)dn for each n≥n0;
(h4) A0:=limn→+∞∫T0max|ξ|≤dnF(t,ξ)dt−∫3T/4T/4F(t,cn)dtT2|cos(πα)|2Γ2(2−α)d2n−16κ2c2nC(T,α)<B016κ2C(T,α).
Then, for each
λ∈]16C(T,α)T2Γ2(2−α)|cos(πα)|B0,1κ2T2Γ2(2−α)|cos(πα)|A0[, |
problem (1.1) has a sequence of non-zero solutions which strongly converges to zero in Eα0.
At the present, we state some remarkable consequences of Theorem 3.1. Let
A∞:=lim infξ→+∞∫T0max|x|≤ξF(t,x)dtξ2. |
Corollary 3.3. Suppose that f:[0,T]×R→R is a continuous function whose potential satisfies (f1). Assume that
(h5) A∞<T2|cos(πα)|2Γ2(2−α)16κ2C(T,α)B∞.
Then, for each
λ∈]16C(T,α)T2Γ2(2−α)|cos(πα)|B∞,|cos(πα)|κ2A∞[, |
problem (1.1) has an unbounded sequence of solutions in Eα0.
Proof. Assume that {bn} be a sequence of positive numbers, with limn→+∞bn=+∞, such that
limn→+∞∫T0max|ξ|≤bnF(t,ξ)dtb2n=A∞. |
Taking an=0 for all n≥n0, by applying Theorem 3.1, we have the outcome.
A specific case of Corollary 3.3 is the following.
Corollary 3.4. Assume that f:[0,T]×R→R be a continuous function whose potential satisfies (f1). Assume that
(h6) A∞<|cos(πα)|κ2 and B∞>16C(T,α)T2Γ2(2−α)|cos(πα)|.
Then, the problem
{ddt(0Dα−1t(c0Dαtu(t))−tDα−1T(ctDαTu(t)))+f(t,u(t))=0a.e.t∈[0,T]u(0)=u(T)=0, |
has an unbounded sequence of solutions in Eα0.
Remark 3.5. We point out that when f is a nonnegative function, hypothesis (f1) preserves and assumption (h5) becomes
(h′5) A′∞:=lim infξ→+∞∫T0F(t,ξ)dtξ2<T2|cos(πα)|2Γ2(2−α)16κ2C(T,α)B∞.
In this occasion, (h′5) ensures that for all
λ∈]16C(T,α)T2Γ2(2−α)|cos(πα)|B∞,|cos(πα)|κ2A′∞[, |
problem (1.1) has an unbounded sequence of solutions in Eα0.
Corollary 3.6. Assume that f:[0,T]×R→R be a continuous function whose potential satisfies (f1). Assume that there exist real sequences {an} and {bn} in (0,+∞), with limn→+∞bn=+∞, such that (h1) holds and
(h7) ∫3T/4T/4F(t,an)dt=∫T0max|ξ|≤bnF(t,ξ)dt for all n∈N.
If B∞>0, then, for all
λ>16C(T,α)T2Γ2(2−α)|cos(πα)|B∞, |
problem (1.1) has an unbounded sequence of solutions in Eα0.
Proof. By (h7) we get A∞=0. Therefore, since B∞>0, condition (h2) of Theorem 3.1 holds and the result is obtained.
Remark 3.7. By Theorem 3.2 we get the identical conclusions of Theorem 3.1. Namely, substituting ξ→+∞ with ξ→0+, assertions such as Corollaries 3.3, 3.4 and 3.6 can be established. We omit the details.
To conclude, we give an example of application of the main results.
Example 3.8. Consider the problem
{ddt(0D−0.3t(c0D0.7tu(t))−tD−0.31(ctD0.71u(t)))+λf(u(t))=0a.e.t∈[0,1]u(0)=u(1)=0, | (3.6) |
where f:R→R is the continuous function defined by
f(x):={x(2−cos(ln|x|)−2sin(ln|x|))x∈R∖{0}0x=0. |
A direct calculation shows
F(x)={x2(1−sin(ln|x|))x∈R∖{0}0x=0. |
So, F satisfies (f1) and we have
A∞=lim infξ→+∞(1−sin(ln|ξ|))=0,B∞=lim supξ→+∞12(1−sin(ln|ξ|))=1, |
|cos(0.7π)|≈0.58779,C(1,0.7)≈0.13429,Γ2(1.3)≈0.805454, |
16∗0.134290.805454∗0.58779=4.5384. |
The above calculations are done using MAPLE. Hence, using Corollary 3.3, for each λ∈]4.5384,+∞[, problem (3.6) has an unbounded sequence of solutions in E0.70.
Taking advantage of a critical point theorem obtained by Ricceri [28], the existence of infinitely many solutions for a nonlinear fractional BVP with a parameter is established. More precisely, a concrete interval of positive parameters, for which the treated problem admits infinitely many solutions, is determined without any symmetry or monotonicity assumptions on the nonlinear data. Our goal was achieved by requiring an appropriate oscillatory behavior of the nonlinear term either at infinity or at zero, without any additional conditions.
The authors would like to thank the reviewers for their good comments and suggestions which helped them to improve the presentation of this paper.
The work of the second author has been partially supported by the Agencia Estatal de Investigación (AEI) of Spain under Grants MTM2016-75140-P and PID2020-113275GB-I00, and by Xunta de Galicia, grant ED431C 2019/02.
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.
[1] |
G. A. Afrouzi, A. Hadjian, A variational approach for boundary value problems for impulsive fractional differential equations, Fract. Calc. Appl. Anal., 21 (2018), 1565–1584. https://doi.org/10.1515/fca-2018-0082 doi: 10.1515/fca-2018-0082
![]() |
[2] |
G. A. Afrouzi, S. M. Kolagar, A. Hadjian, J. Xu, A variational approach for fractional boundary value systems depending on two parameters, Filomat, 32 (2018), 517–530. https://doi.org/10.2298/FIL1802517A doi: 10.2298/FIL1802517A
![]() |
[3] |
D. Averna, A. Sciammetta, E. Tornatore, Infinitely many solutions to boundary value problem for fractional differential equations, Fract. Calc. Appl. Anal., 21 (2018), 1585–1597. https://doi.org/10.1515/fca-2018-0083 doi: 10.1515/fca-2018-0083
![]() |
[4] |
D. Averna, S. Tersian, E. Tornatore, On the existence and multiplicity of solutions for Dirichlet's problem for fractional differential equations, Fract. Calc. Appl. Anal., 19 (2016), 253–266. https://doi.org/10.1515/fca-2016-0014 doi: 10.1515/fca-2016-0014
![]() |
[5] | C. Bai, Existence of solutions for a nonlinear fractional boundary value problem via a local minimum theorem, Electron. J. Differ. Eq., 2012 (2012), 176. |
[6] |
A. S. Berdyshev, B. J. Kadirkulov, J. J. Nieto, Solvability of an elliptic partial differential equation with boundary condition involving fractional derivatives, Complex Var. Elliptic Equ., 59 (2014), 680–692. https://doi.org/10.1080/17476933.2013.777711 doi: 10.1080/17476933.2013.777711
![]() |
[7] |
G. Bonanno, A critical point theorem via the Ekeland variational principle, Nonlinear Anal., 75 (2012), 2992–3007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.na.2011.12.003 doi: 10.1016/j.na.2011.12.003
![]() |
[8] |
G. Bonanno, G. Molica Bisci, Infinitely many solutions for a Dirichlet problem involving the p-Laplacian, Proc. Roy. Soc. Edinburgh Sect. A, 140 (2010), 737–752. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0308210509000845 doi: 10.1017/S0308210509000845
![]() |
[9] |
J. F. Bonder, Z. Cheng, H. Mikayelyan, Optimal rearrangement problem and normalized obstacle problem in the fractional setting, Adv. Nonlinear Anal., 9 (2020), 1592–1606. https://doi.org/10.1515/anona-2020-0067 doi: 10.1515/anona-2020-0067
![]() |
[10] |
M. J. Ceballos-Lira, A. Pérez, Global solutions and blowing-up solutions for a nonautonomous and nonlocal in space reaction-diffusion system with Dirichlet boundary conditions, Fract. Calc. Appl. Anal., 23 (2020), 1025–1053. https://doi.org/10.1515/fca-2020-0054 doi: 10.1515/fca-2020-0054
![]() |
[11] |
P. Chen, Z. Cao, S. Chen, X. Tang, Ground states for a fractional reaction-diffusion system, J. Appl. Anal. Comput., 11 (2021), 556–567. https://doi.org/10.11948/20200349 doi: 10.11948/20200349
![]() |
[12] |
J. N. Corvellec, V. V. Motreanu, C. Saccon, Doubly resonant semilinear elliptic problems via nonsmooth critical point theory, J. Differ. Equations, 248 (2010), 2064–2091. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jde.2009.11.005 doi: 10.1016/j.jde.2009.11.005
![]() |
[13] | M. Ferrara, A. Hadjian, Variational approach to fractional boundary value problems with two control parameters, Electron. J. Differ. Eq., 2015 (2015), 138. |
[14] |
M. Galewski, G. Molica Bisci, Existence results for one-dimensional fractional equations, Math. Methods Appl. Sci., 39 (2016), 1480–1492. https://doi.org/10.1002/mma.3582 doi: 10.1002/mma.3582
![]() |
[15] |
B. Ge, V. Rădulescu, J. C. Zhang, Infinitely many positive solutions of fractional boundary value problems, Topol. Methods Nonlinear Anal., 49 (2017), 647–664. https://doi.org/10.12775/TMNA.2017.001 doi: 10.12775/TMNA.2017.001
![]() |
[16] | R. Hilfer, Applications of fractional calculus in physics, Singapore: World Scientific, 2000. https://doi.org/10.1142/3779 |
[17] |
F. Jiao, Y. Zhou, Existence of solutions for a class of fractional boundary value problems via critical point theory, Comput. Math. Appl., 62 (2011), 1181–1199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.camwa.2011.03.086 doi: 10.1016/j.camwa.2011.03.086
![]() |
[18] | A. A. Kilbas, H. M. Srivastava, J. J. Trujillo, Theory and applications of fractional differential equations, In: North-holland mathematics studies, Vol. 204, Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2006. |
[19] | A. Kristály, V. D. Rădulescu, C. G. Varga, Variational principles in mathematical physics, geometry, and economics: Qualitative analysis of nonlinear equations and unilateral problems, Encyclopedia of Mathematics and its Applications, No. 136, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511760631 |
[20] |
V. Lakshmikantham, A. S. Vatsala, Basic theory of fractional differential equations, Nonlinear Anal., 69 (2008), 2677–2682. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.na.2007.08.042 doi: 10.1016/j.na.2007.08.042
![]() |
[21] |
F. Li, Z. Liang, Q. Zhang, Existence of solutions to a class of nonlinear second order two-point boundary value problems, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 312 (2005), 357–373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmaa.2005.03.043 doi: 10.1016/j.jmaa.2005.03.043
![]() |
[22] |
J. Manimaran, L. Shangerganesh, A. Debbouche, Finite element error analysis of a time-fractional nonlocal diffusion equation with the Dirichlet energy, J. Comput. Appl. Math., 382 (2021), 113066. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cam.2020.113066 doi: 10.1016/j.cam.2020.113066
![]() |
[23] | J. Mawhin, M. Willem, Critical point theorey and Hamiltonian systems, New York: Springer, 1989. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-2061-7 |
[24] | K. S. Miller, B. Ross, An introduction to the fractional calculus and fractional differential equations, New York: Wiley, 1993. |
[25] |
T. Mukherjee, K. Sreenadh, On Dirichlet problem for fractional p-Laplacian with singular non-linearity, Adv. Nonlinear Anal., 8 (2019), 52–72. https://doi.org/10.1515/anona-2016-0100 doi: 10.1515/anona-2016-0100
![]() |
[26] | I. Podlubny, Fractional differential equations, In: Mathematics in science and engineering, Vol. 198, New York: Academic Press, 1999. |
[27] | P. H. Rabinowitz, Minimax methods in critical point theory with applications to differential equations, Rhode Island: American Mathematical Society, 1986. |
[28] |
B. Ricceri, A general variational principle and some of its applications, J. Comput. Appl. Math., 113 (2000), 401–410. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-0427(99)00269-1 doi: 10.1016/S0377-0427(99)00269-1
![]() |
[29] | S. G. Samko, A. A. Kilbas, O. I. Marichev, Fractional integrals and derivatives: Theory and applications, Switzerland: Gordon and Breach, 1993. |
[30] |
C. L. Tang, X. P. Wu, Some critical point theorems and their applications to periodic solution for second order Hamiltonian systems, J. Differ. Equations, 248 (2010), 660–692. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jde.2009.11.007 doi: 10.1016/j.jde.2009.11.007
![]() |
[31] |
Y. Tian, J. J. Nieto, The applications of critical-point theory to discontinuous fractional-order differential equations, Proc. Edinburgh Math. Soc., 60 (2017), 1021–1051. https://doi.org/10.1017/S001309151600050X doi: 10.1017/S001309151600050X
![]() |
[32] |
M. P. Tran, T. N. Nguyen, New gradient estimates for solutions to quasilinear divergence form elliptic equations with general Dirichlet boundary data, J. Differ. Equations, 268 (2020), 1427–1462. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jde.2019.08.052 doi: 10.1016/j.jde.2019.08.052
![]() |
[33] |
M. Xiang, B. Zhang, V. D. Rădulescu, Superlinear Schrödinger-Kirchhoff type problems involving the fractional p-Laplacian and critical exponent, Adv. Nonlinear Anal., 9 (2020), 690–709. https://doi.org/10.1515/anona-2020-0021 doi: 10.1515/anona-2020-0021
![]() |
[34] |
M. Zhen, B. Zhang, V. D. Rădulescu, Normalized solutions for nonlinear coupled fractional systems: Low and high perturbations in the attractive case, Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst., 41 (2021), 2653–2676. https://doi.org/10.3934/dcds.2020379 doi: 10.3934/dcds.2020379
![]() |
1. | Xiao-Li Ding, Juan J. Nieto, Xiaolong Wang, Analytical solutions for fractional partial delay differential-algebraic equations with Dirichlet boundary conditions defined on a finite domain, 2022, 25, 1311-0454, 408, 10.1007/s13540-022-00021-7 |