Research article Special Issues

Nonlocal coupled hybrid fractional system of mixed fractional derivatives via an extension of Darbo's theorem

  • In this work a new existence result is established for a coupled fractional system consisting of one Caputo and one Riemann-Liouville fractional derivatives and nonlocal hybrid boundary conditions. A new generalization of Darbo's theorem associated with measures of noncompactness is the main tool in our approach. An example is constructed to justify the theoretical result.

    Citation: Ayub Samadi, Sotiris K. Ntouyas, Jessada Tariboon. Nonlocal coupled hybrid fractional system of mixed fractional derivatives via an extension of Darbo's theorem[J]. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(4): 3915-3926. doi: 10.3934/math.2021232

    Related Papers:

    [1] M. Latha Maheswari, K. S. Keerthana Shri, Mohammad Sajid . Analysis on existence of system of coupled multifractional nonlinear hybrid differential equations with coupled boundary conditions. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(6): 13642-13658. doi: 10.3934/math.2024666
    [2] Kishor D. Kucche, Sagar T. Sutar, Kottakkaran Sooppy Nisar . Analysis of nonlinear implicit fractional differential equations with the Atangana-Baleanu derivative via measure of non-compactness. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(10): 27058-27079. doi: 10.3934/math.20241316
    [3] Choukri Derbazi, Zidane Baitiche, Mohammed S. Abdo, Thabet Abdeljawad . Qualitative analysis of fractional relaxation equation and coupled system with Ψ-Caputo fractional derivative in Banach spaces. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(3): 2486-2509. doi: 10.3934/math.2021151
    [4] Rahul, Nihar Kumar Mahato, Sumati Kumari Panda, Manar A. Alqudah, Thabet Abdeljawad . An existence result involving both the generalized proportional Riemann-Liouville and Hadamard fractional integral equations through generalized Darbo's fixed point theorem. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(8): 15484-15496. doi: 10.3934/math.2022848
    [5] Mouffak Benchohra, Zohra Bouteffal, Johnny Henderson, Sara Litimein . Measure of noncompactness and fractional integro-differential equations with state-dependent nonlocal conditions in Fréchet spaces. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(1): 15-25. doi: 10.3934/math.2020002
    [6] Ahmed Alsaedi, Bashir Ahmad, Afrah Assolami, Sotiris K. Ntouyas . On a nonlinear coupled system of differential equations involving Hilfer fractional derivative and Riemann-Liouville mixed operators with nonlocal integro-multi-point boundary conditions. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(7): 12718-12741. doi: 10.3934/math.2022704
    [7] Muhammed Jamil, Rahmat Ali Khan, Kamal Shah, Bahaaeldin Abdalla, Thabet Abdeljawad . Application of a tripled fixed point theorem to investigate a nonlinear system of fractional order hybrid sequential integro-differential equations. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(10): 18708-18728. doi: 10.3934/math.20221029
    [8] Salma Noor, Aman Ullah, Anwar Ali, Saud Fahad Aldosary . Analysis of a hybrid fractional coupled system of differential equations in $ n $-dimensional space with linear perturbation and nonlinear boundary conditions. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(6): 16234-16249. doi: 10.3934/math.2024785
    [9] Ymnah Alruwaily, Lamya Almaghamsi, Kulandhaivel Karthikeyan, El-sayed El-hady . Existence and uniqueness for a coupled system of fractional equations involving Riemann-Liouville and Caputo derivatives with coupled Riemann-Stieltjes integro-multipoint boundary conditions. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(5): 10067-10094. doi: 10.3934/math.2023510
    [10] Sunisa Theswan, Sotiris K. Ntouyas, Jessada Tariboon . Coupled systems of $ \psi $-Hilfer generalized proportional fractional nonlocal mixed boundary value problems. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(9): 22009-22036. doi: 10.3934/math.20231122
  • In this work a new existence result is established for a coupled fractional system consisting of one Caputo and one Riemann-Liouville fractional derivatives and nonlocal hybrid boundary conditions. A new generalization of Darbo's theorem associated with measures of noncompactness is the main tool in our approach. An example is constructed to justify the theoretical result.



    In the past years, fractional differential equations and coupled systems of those equations have attracted a lot of regard from many researches as they have played a key role in many basic sciences such as chemistry, control theory, biology and other arenas [1,2,3]. In addition, boundary conditions of differential models are strongest tools to extend applications of those equations. In fact, differential equations of fractional models can be extended by creating different types of boundary conditions. Newly, many authors have studied various types of boundary conditions to obtain new results of differential models. The following hybrid differential equation was studied by Dhage and Lakshmikantham [4]:

    {ddt[x(t)h(t,x(t))]=ω(t,x(t)),a.etJ,x(t0)=x0R,

    in which h and ω are continuous functions from J×R into R{0} and R, respectively. Based on the above work, the Caputo hybrid boundary value problem of the form:

    {CDp0+[x(t)h(t,x(t))]=ω(t,x(t)),a.etJ:=[0,L],a1x(0)h(0,x(0))+a2x(L)h(L,x(L))=d,

    was studied by Hilal and Kajouni [5] in which 0<p<1, h and ω are continuous functions from J×R into R{0} and R, respectively and a1,a2,d are real constants with a1+a20. For some more results on hybrid boundary value problems see [6,7,8,9] and references therein.

    The fractional hybrid modeling is of great significance in different engineering fields, and it can be a unique idea for the future combined research between various applied sciences, for example see [10] in which a fractional hybrid modeling of a thermostat is simulated. For some recent results on hybrid fractional differential equations we refer to [11,12,13].

    As in modern mathematics coupled fractional system have been applied to develop differential models of high complexity system, Ntouyas and Al-Sulami [14] have considered the following coupled system:

    {CDα1u(t)=f1(t,u(t),v(t)),t[0,L],0<α11,RLDα2v(t)=f2(t,u(t),v(t))t[0,L]1<α22,u(0)=λCDpv(η),0<p<1,v(0)=0,v(L)=γIqu(ξ),

    where CDα1 and RLDα2 indicate Caputo and Riemann-Liouville fractional derivitves of orders α1 and α2 respectively, f1,f2:[0,L]×R×RR are continuous functions, Iq is the Riemann-Liouville fractional integral, λ,γR and η,ξ(0,L). They have applied Banach's fixed point theorem and Leray-Schauder alternative to obtain main results. Nonlocal boundary value problems involving mixed fractional derivatives have been considered in [15] and references cited therein.

    Here, we combine mixed fractional derivatives and hybrid fractional differential equations. More precisely, in this paper the existence of solutions for the coupled hybrid system

    {CDα1u(t)f1(t,u(t),v(t))=f2(t,u(t),v(t)),tJ:=[0,L],0<α11,RLDα2v(t)g1(t,v(t),u(t))=g2(t,u(t),v(t))tJ:=[0,L]1<α22, (1.1)

    is investigated supplemented with boundary conditions:

    {u(0)f1(0,u(0),v(0))=θCDpv(η)g1(η,u(η),v(η)),0<p<1,v(0)g1(0,u(0),v(0))=0,v(L)g1(L,u(L),v(L))=γIqu(ξ)f1(ξ,u(ξ),v(ξ)). (1.2)

    where CDα1, RLDα2 are the Caputo and Riemann-Liouville fractional derivatives of orders α1(0,1] and α2(1,2] respectively, Iq is the Riemann-Liouville fractional integral, f2,g2C(J×R×R,R), f1,g1C(J×R×R,R{0}), θ,γR and η,ξ(0,L). An existence result is obtained via a new extension of Darbo's theorem associated to measures of noncompactness.

    Here we emphasize that the proposed coupled hybrid system includes:

    different orders of fractional derivatives (α1(0,1] and α2(1,2]);

    two different kinds of fractional derivatives (Caputo and Riemann-Liouville);

    nonlocal type boundary conditions which contain both fractional derivatives and integrals.

    We have organized the structure of the paper as follows. Section 2 presents some main concepts which will be applied in the future. In the next section, we prove an existence result for the problem (1.1) and (1.2). Finally, we construct an example to illustrate the obtained result.

    Now some basic notations are recalled from [2].

    Definition 2.1. The Riemann-Liouville fractional integral of order α>0 of a continuous function ξ:(0,)R, is defined as

    Iαξ(t)=1Γ(α)t0ξ(s)(ts)1αds,

    where Γ(α) is the Euler Gamma function.

    Definition 2.2. For a continuous function ξ:(0,)R, the Reimann-Liouville fractional derivative of order α>0, n1<α<n, nN is defined as:

    RLDα0+ξ(t)=1Γ(nσ)(ddt)nt0(ts)nσ1ξ(s)ds.

    Definition 2.3. Given a continuous function ξ:[0,)R, the Caputo derivative of order α>0 is defined as

    CDα0+ξ(t)=RLDα0+(ξ(t)n1k=0tkkiξ(k)(0)),t>0,n1<α<n.

    Now we present some basic facts about the notion measure of noncompactness.

    Assume that Z is the real Banach space with the norm and zero element θ. For a nonempty subset X of Z, the closure and the closed convex hull of X will be denoted by ¯X and Conv(X), respectively. Also, MZ and NZ denote the family of all nonempty and bounded subsets of Z and its subfamily consisting of all relatively compact sets, respectively.

    Definition 2.4. [16,19] We say that a mapping h:MZ[0,) is a measure of noncompactness, if the following conditions hold true:

    (1) The family Kerh={XMZ:h(X)=0} is nonempty and Ker hNZ.

    (2) X1Y1h(X1)h(Y1).

    (3) h(¯X)=h(X).

    (4) h(Conv(X))=h(X).

    (5) h(αX+(1α)Y)αh(X)+(1α)h(Y) for α[0,1].

    (6) For the sequence {Xn} of closed sets from MZ in which Xn+1Xn for n=1,2, and limnh(Xn)=0, we have n=1Xn.

    In [17], some generalizations of Darbo's theorem have been proved by Samadi and Ghaemi. Also, in [18], Darbo's theorem was extended and the following result was presented which is basic for our main result.

    Theorem 2.1. Let T be a continuous self-mapping on the set D where D denotes a nonempty bounded, closed and convex subset of a Banach space Z. Assume that for all nonempty subset X of D we have

    θ1((h(X))+θ2(h(T(X)))θ2(h(X)) (2.1)

    where h is an arbitrary measure of noncompactness defined in Z and (θ1,θ2)U. Then T has a fixed point in D.

    In Theorem 2.1, let U indicate the set of all pairs (θ1,θ2) where the following conditions hold true:

    (U1) θ1(tn)0 for each strictly increasing sequence {tn};

    (U2) θ2 is strictly increasing function;

    (U3) If {αn} is a sequence of positive numbers, then limnαn=0 limnθ2(αn)=.

    (U4) Let {ln} be a decreasing sequence in which ln0 and θ1(ln)<θ2(ln)θ2(ln+1), then we have n=1ln<.

    Next, the definition of a measure of noncompactness in the space C([0,1]) is recalled which will be applied later. Fix YMC[0,1] and for ε>0 and yY we define

    φ(y,ϵ)=sup{|y(t)y(s)|:t,s[0,1],|ts|ϵ},φ(Y,ϵ)=sup{φ(y,ϵ):yY},φ0(Y)=limϵ0φ(Y,ϵ). (2.2)

    Banas and Goebel [16] proved that φ0(Y) is a measure of noncompactness in the space C([0,1]).

    Now the coupled system (1.1) and (1.2) is investigated in the space C([0,1]).

    First following Lemma 2.5 of [14], the following lemma is presented which will be applied later.

    Lemma 3.1. Assume that the functions ϕ and h are continuous real-valued functions on [0,L]. Then, the functions u and v satisfy the system

    {CDα1u(t)f1(t,u(t),v(t))=ϕ(t),t[0,L],1<α12,RLDα2v(t)g1(t,u(t),v(t))=h(t),t[0,L],1<α22,u(0)f1(0,u(0),v(0))=θCDpv(η)g1(η,u(η),v(η)),v(0)g1(0,u(0),v(0))=0,v(L)g1(L,u(L),v(L))=γIqu(ξ)f1(ξ,u(ξ),v(ξ)), (3.1)

    if and only if u and v satisfy the system

    u(t)=f1(t,u(t),v(t))[Iα1ϕ(t)+θΔ{Tα21Iα2ph(η)+Γ(α2)Γ(α2p)ηα2p1(γIq+α1ϕ(ξ)Iα2h(L)}],v(t)=g1(t,u(t),v(t))[Iα1h(t)+tα21Δ{Iα2h(L)γIq+α1ϕ(ξ)θγξqΓ(1+q)Iα2ph(η)}], (3.2)

    where Δ=Lα21+θγΓ(α2)ξpηα2p1Γ(1+q)Γ(α2p). For convenience we set the notations:

    M1=Lα1Γ(1+α1)+1|Δ||θ||γ|Γ(α2)Γ(α2p)ηα2p1ξq+α1Γ(q+α1+1), (3.3)
    M2=Tα21ηα2p1|θ||Δ|[LΓ(α2)Γ(α2p)Γ(α2+1)+ηΓ(1+α2)], (3.4)
    M3=Lα21|γ|ξq+α1|Δ|Γ(q+α1+1), (3.5)
    M4=Lα2Γ(1+α2)(1+Lα21|Δ|)+Lα21|Δ||θ||γ|ξqηα2pΓ(1+q)Γ(α2p+1). (3.6)

    Now we present the main result of this section as follows:

    Theorem 3.1. Suppose that we have the following assumptions:

    (D1) The functions f2,g2:I×R×RR are continuous provided that

    |f2(t,u,v)|l1,|g2(t,u,v)|l2,|f2(t,u1,v1)f2(t,u2,v2)|k1|u1u2|+k2|v1v2|,|g2(t,u1,v1)g2(t,u2,v2)|γ1|u1u2|+γ2|v1v2|,

    where l1,l2,k1,k2,γ1,γ20, tI and u,v,u1,u2,v1,v2R.

    (D2) The continuous functions f1,g1 have been defined from I×R×R into R{0} provided that

    |f1(t,u1,v1)f1(t,u2,v2)|16ed(|u1u2|+|v1v2|),|g1(t,u1,v1)g1(t,u2,v2)|16ed(|u1u2|+|v1v2|),|f1(t2,u,v)f1(t1,u,v)||t2t1|,|g1(t2,u,v)g1(t1,u,v)||t2t1|.

    where d>0, t,t1,t2[0,L] and u,v,u1,u2,v1,v2R. Moreover, assume that ¯M=sup{|f1(t,0,0)|:t[0,L]} and ¯N=sup{|g1(t,0,0)|: t[0,L]}.

    (D3) There exists a positive solution r0 of the following inequality:

    ed2r0(M1l1+M2l2+M3l1+M4l2)+¯M(M1l1+M2l2)+¯N(M3l1+M4l2)r0.

    exists. Moreover, assume that

    ¯M(k1+k2)<16edand2r0(k1+k2)+M1l1+M2l2+M3l1+M4l2<1.

    Then the coupled hybrid fractional system (1.1) and (1.2) has a solution on [0,L].

    Proof. Define G:C([0,L],R)×C([0,L],R)C([0,L],R)×C([0,L],R) by

    G(u,v)(t)=(G1(u,v)(t),G2(u,v)(t)),

    where

    G1(u,v)(t)=f1(t,u(t),v(t))[Iα1¯f(t)+θΔ{Lα21Iα2p¯g(η)+Γ(α2)Γ(α2p)ηα2p1(γIq+α1¯f(ξ)Iα2¯g(L)}],G2(u,v)(t)=g1(t,u(t),v(t))[Iα1¯g(t)+tα21Δ{Iα2¯g(L)γIq+α1¯f(ξ)θγξqΓ(1+q)Iα2p¯g(η)}],

    with ¯f(t)=f2(t,u(t),v(t)) and ¯g(t)=g2(t,u(t),v(t)). Assume that the space C([0,L],R) ×C([0,L],R) has been equipped with the norm (u,v)=u+v, where u=sup{|u(t)|:t[0,L]}. Define Dr0={uC([0,L],R):ur0}. First we show that G(Dr0×Dr0)Dr0×Dr0. Given t[0,L] and u,vDr0, we earn

    |G1(u,v)(t)||f1(t,u(t),v(t))|(M1l1+M2l2)|f1(t,u(t),v(t))f1(t,0,0)|(M1l1+M2l2)+|f1(t,0,0)|(M1l1+M2l2)ed(|u(t)|+|v(t)|)(M1l1+M2l2)+¯M(M1l1+M2l2)ed2r0(M1l1+M2l2)+¯M(M1l1+M2l2).

    The above estimate yields that

    G1(u,v)ed2r0(M1l1+M2l2)+¯M(M1l1+M2l2). (3.7)

    Similarly we can prove that

    G2(u,v)ed2r0(M3l1+M4l2)+¯N(M3l1+M4l2). (3.8)

    Consequently, we have

    G(u,v)ed2r0(M1l1+M2l2+M3l1+M4l2)+¯N(M3l1+M4l2)+¯M(M1l1+M2l2). (3.9)

    Due to (3.9) and (D3) we derive that G(Dr0×Dr0)Dr0×Dr0. Now we verify the continuity property of G on Dr0×Dr0. Let (x1,y1),(u1,v1)Dr0×Dr0 and ε>0 be arbitrarily such that (x1,y1)(u1,v1)<ε2. Given t[0,L] we get

    |G1(x1,y1)(t)G1(u1,v1)(t)||f1(t,x1(t),y1(t))f1(t,u1(t),v1(t))|[Iα1|f2(t,x1(t),y1(t))|+|θ||Δ|{Lα21Iα2p|g2(η,x1(η),y1(η))|+Γ(α2)Γ(α2p)ηα2p1(|γ|Iq+α1|f2(ξ,x1(ξ),y1(ξ))|+Iα2|g2(L,x1(L),y1(L))|}]+|f1(t,u1(t),v1(t))|[Iα1|f2(t,x1(t),y1(t))f2(t,u1(t),v1(t))|+|θ||Δ|{Lα21Iα2p|g2(η,x1(η),y1(η))g2(η,u1(η),v1(η))|+Γ(α2)Γ(α2p)ηα2p1(|γ|Iq+α1|f2(ξ,x1(ξ),y1(ξ))f2(ξ,u1(ξ),v1(ξ))|+Iα2|g2(L,x1(L),y1(L))g2(L,u1(L),v1(L))|}]ed(x1u1+y1v1)(M1l1+M2l2)+|f1(t,x1(t),y1(t))|[(k1x1u1+k2y1v1)Iα1(1)+|θ|Δ|{Lα21(γ1x1u1+γ2y1v1)Iα2p(1)+Γ(α2)Γ(α2p)ηα2p1(|γ|k1x1u1+k2y1v1)Iq+α1(1)+(γ1x1u1+γ2y1v1)Iα2(1)}]edε(M1l1+M2l2)+|f1(t,x1(t),y1(t))|[(k1ε+k2ε)Iα1(1)+|θ||Δ|{Lα21(γ1ε+γ2ε)Iα2p(1)+Γ(α2)Γ(α2p)ηα2p1(|γ|k1ε+k2ε)Iq+α1(1)+(γ1ε+γ2ε)Iα2(1)}].

    Due to the above estimate we conclude that

    G1(x1,y1)G1(u1,v1)edε(M1l1+M2l2)+(edr0+¯M)[(k1ε+k2ε)Iα1(1)+|θ|Δ{Lα21(γ1ε+γ2εIα2p(1)+Γ(α2)Γ(α2p)ηα2p1(|γ|k1ε+k2ε)Iq+α1(1)(γ1ε+γ2ε)Iα2(1)}]. (3.10)

    Similarly, for (x1,y1),(u1,v1)Dr0×Dr0 and t[0,L] we conclude that

    |G2(x1,y1)(t)G2(u1,v1)(t)||g1(t,x1(t),y1(t))g1(t,u1(t),v1(t))|[Iα1|g2(t,x1(t),y1(t))|+Lα21|Δ|{Iα2|g2(L,x1(L),y1(L))|+|γ|Iq+α1|f2(ξ,x1(ξ),y1(ξ))|+θγξqΓ(1+q)Iα2p|g2(η,x1(η),y1(η))|}]+|g1(t,u1(t),v1(t))|[Iα1|g2(t,x1(t),y1(t))g2(t,u1(t),v1(t))|+Lα21|Δ|{Iα2|g2(L,x1(L),y1(L))g2(L,u1(L),v1(L))|+|γ|Iq+α1|f2(ξ,x1(ξ),y1(ξ))f2(ξ,u1(ξ),v1(ξ))|+|θ||γ|ξqΓ(1+q)Iα2p|g2(η,x1(η),y1(η))g2(η,u1(η),v1(η))|}].

    Consequently, we get

    G2(x1,y1)G2(u1,v1)edε(M31+M42)+(edr0+¯N)[(γ1ε+γ2ε)Iα1(1)+Lα21|Δ|{(γ1ε+γ2ε)Iα2(1)+|γ|(k1ε+k2ε)Iq+α1(1)+|θ||γ|ξqΓ(1+q)(γ1ε+γ2ε)Iα2p(1)}]. (3.11)

    In view of (3.10) and (3.11) we earn

    G(x1,y1)G(u1,v1)E1(ε)+E2(ε), (3.12)

    where E1(ε),E2(ε)0. Hence G is continuous on Dr0×Dr0.

    Next we show that the condition (2.1) of Theorem 2.1 is fulfilled. Let X1,X2Dr0 and ¯φ(X)=φ0(X1)+φ0(X2) where Xi,i=1,2 indicate the natural projection of X into C(I).

    For convenience we put

    H1(x,y)(t)=Iα1¯f(t)+θΔ{Lα21Iα2p¯g(η)+Γ(α2)Γ(α2p)ηα2p1(γIq+α1¯f(ξ)Iα2¯g(L)},H2(x,y)(t)=Iα1¯g(t)+tα21Δ{Iα2¯g(L)γIq+α1¯f(ξ)θγξqΓ(1+q)Iα2p¯g(η)}.

    Let t1,t2[0,L] and ε>0 be arbitrarily such that |t2t1|ε. Thus for (x1,y1)X1×X2 we get

    |G1(x1,y1)(t2)G1(x1,y1)(t1)|=|f1(t2,x1(t2),y1(t2))H1(x1,y1)(t2)f1(t1,x1(t1),y1(t1))H1(x1,y1)(t1)||f1(t2,x1(t2),y1(t2))H1(x1,y1)(t2)f1(t2,x1(t1),y1(t1))H1(x1,y1)(t2)|+|f1(t2,x1(t1),y1(t1))H1(x1,y1)(t2)f1(t1,x1(t1),y1(t1))H1(x1,y1)(t2)|+|f1(t1,x1(t1),y1(t1))||H1(x1,y1)(t2)H1(x1,y1)(t1)|ed16(|x1(t2)x1(t1)|+|y1(t2)y1(t1)|)(M1l1+M2l2)+|t2t1|(M1l1+M2l2)+[16ed(|x1(t1)|+|y1(t1)|)+¯M](k1|x1(t2)x1(t1)|+k2|y1(t2)y1(t1)|)16ed(φ(X1,ϵ)+φ(X2,ε))(M1l1+M2l2)+ε(M1l1+M2l2)+[16ed2r0+¯M](k1φ(X1,ε)+k2φ(X2,ε)).

    Consequently, from assumption (D3) and the above estimate we conclude that

    φ(G1(X1×X2),ε)16ed(φ(X1,ε)+φ(X2,ε))(M1l1+M2l2)+ε(M1l1+M2l2)+[16ed2r0+¯M](k1φ(X1,ε)+k2φ(X2,ε)).

    Hence we have

    φ0(G1(X1×X2))ed12(φ0(X1)+φ0(X2)). (3.13)

    Similarly, we prove that

    φ0(G2(X1×X2))12ed(φ0(X1)+φ0(X2)). (3.14)

    Combining (3.13) and (3.14) we conclude that

    ¯φ(G(X)¯φ(G(X1×X2))×G(X2×X1))=φ0(G(X1×X2))+φ0(G(X2×X1))12ed((φ0(X1)+φ0(X2))+12ed(φ0(X2)+φ0(X1)). (3.15)

    By taking logarithms, we earn

    d+ln(¯φ(G(X1×X2)))ln(¯φ(X)). (3.16)

    Hence we obtain all conditions of Theorem 2.1 with θ1(t)=d and θ2(t)=ln(t). Consequently, from Theorem 2.1 a fixed point of the mapping G is obtained which implies that the coupled system (1.1) and (1.2) has a solution on [0,L] and the proof is completed.

    Now an example is presented to show the applicability of the obtained result.

    Example 3.1. We consider the following hybrid nonlocal system of mixed fractional derivatives:

    {CD12u(t)ed(|u(t)|+|v(t)|+1)6(1+t8)=etd100cos(u(t)+v(t)100),t[0,1],RLD32v(t)ed6(|u(t)|+|v(t)|+1)(1+t)=et100sin(u(t)+v(t)50),t[0,1].u(0)f1(0,u(0),v(0))=3CD12v(13)g1(13,u(13),v(13)),v(0)g1(0,u(0),v(0))=0,v(1)g1(1,u(1),v(1))=2I12u(12)f1(12,u(12),v(12)). (3.17)

    Here, we have

    α1=12,θ=3,p=12,η=13,α2=32,γ=2,q=12,ξ=12,da positive real number,f2(t,u(t),v(t))=etd100cos(u(t)+v(t)100),g2(t,u(t),v(t))=et100sin(u(t)+v(t)50),f1(t,u(t),v(t))=ed(|u(t)|+|v(t)|+1)6(1+t8),g1(t,u(t),v(t))=ed6(|u(t)|+|v(t)|+1)(1+t).

    The above system is a special case of the system (1.1) and (1.2). Now we show that the conditions of Theorem 3.1 are satisfied. Due to the definitions of f2 and g2, given t[0,1] and u,v,u1,u2,v1,v2R we have

    |f2(t,u,v)|1100,|g2(t,u,v)|1100,|f2(t,u1,v1)f2(t,u2,v2)|110000|u1u2|+110000|v1v2|,|g2(t,u1,v1)g2(t,u2,v2)|110000|u1u2|+110000|v1v2|.

    Consequently, f2 and g2 satisfy condition (D1) with l1=l2=1100 and k1=k2=γ1=γ2=110000. Besides, obviously the functions f1 and g1 satisfy the condition (D2). Furthermore, ¯M=ed6 and ¯N=ed6. To verify condition (D3), given that M11.52, M20.58, M30.25 and M41.26, so the existent inequality in (D3) has the form

    ed2r0(1.52×1100+0.58×1100+0.25×1100+1.26×1100)+ed6(1.52×1100+0.58×1100)+ed6(0.25×1100+1.26×1100)r0.

    Obviously, the above inequality has a positive solution r0, for example r0=ed. Moreover, we have

    ¯M(k1+k2)=ed6(210000)ed6,2r0(k1+k2)+M1l1+M2l2+M3l1+M4l2=2ed(210000)+1.52×1100+0.58×1100+0.25×1100+1.26×1100<1.

    Therefore all conditions of Theorem 3.1 are satisfied. Hence, by Theorem 3.1 the system (3.17) has a solution on [0,1].

    We have studied a nonlocal coupled hybrid fractional system consisting from one Caputo and one Riemann-Liouville fractional derivatives and nonlocal hybrid boundary conditions. An existence result is established via a new generalization of Darbo's fixed point theorem associated with measures of noncompactness. The obtained result is well illustrated by a numerical example. The result obtained in this paper is new and significantly contributes to the existing literature on the topic.

    This research was funded by King Mongkut's University of Technology North Bangkok. Contract no. KMUTNB-61-KNOW-021.

    The authors declare that they have no competing interests.



    [1] I. Podlubny, Fractional differential equations, Academic Press, San Diego, 1999.
    [2] A. A. Kilbas, H. M. Srivastava, J. J. Trujillo, Theory and applications of fractional differential equations, North-Holland Mathematics Studies, Elsevier, Amesterdam, 2006.
    [3] B. Ahmad, A. Alsaedi, S. K. Ntouyas, J. Tariboon, Hadamard-type fractional differential equations, inclusions and inequalities, Springer, Cham, Switzerland, 2017.
    [4] B. C. Dhage, V. Lakshmikantham, Basic results on hybrid differential equations, Nonlinear Anal. Hybrid Syst., 4 (2010), 414–424. doi: 10.1016/j.nahs.2009.10.005
    [5] K. Hilal, A. Kajouni, Boundary value problems for hybrid differential equations with fractional order, Adv. Differ. Equ., 2015 (2015), 1–19. doi: 10.1186/s13662-014-0331-4
    [6] E. T. Karimov, B. Lopez, K. Sadarngani, About the existence of solutions for a hybrid nonlinear generalized pantograph equation, Fract. Differ. Calc., 6 (2016), 95–110.
    [7] N. Mahmudov, M. Matar, Existence of mild solutions for hybrid differential equations with arbitrary fractional order, TWMS J. Pure Appl. Math., 8 (2017), 160–169.
    [8] S. Sitho, S. K. Ntouyas, J. Tariboon, Existence results for hybrid fractional integro-differential equations, Bound. Value Probl., 2015 (2015), 1–13. doi: 10.1186/s13661-014-0259-3
    [9] S. Sun, Y. Zhao, Z. Han, Y. Li, The existence of solutions for boundary value problem of fractional hybrid differential equations, Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul., 17 (2012), 4961–4967. doi: 10.1016/j.cnsns.2012.06.001
    [10] D. Baleanu, S. Etemad, S. Rezapour, A hybrid Caputo fractional modeling for thermostat with hybrid boundary value conditions, Bound. Value Probl., 2020 (2020), 1–16. doi: 10.1186/s13661-019-01311-5
    [11] D. Baleanu, S. Etemad, S. Rezapour, On a fractional hybrid integro-differential equation with mixed hybrid integral boundary value conditions by using three operators, Alexandria Eng. J., 59 (2020), 3019–3027. doi: 10.1016/j.aej.2020.04.053
    [12] B. C. Dhage, Existence and attractivity theorems for nonlinear hybrid fractional integrodifferential equations with anticipation and retardation, CUBO, 22 (2020), 325–350. doi: 10.4067/S0719-06462020000300325
    [13] D. Ji, W. Ge, A nonlocal boundary value problems for hybrid ϕ-Caputo fractional integro-differential equations, AIMS Math., 5 (2020), 7175–7190. doi: 10.3934/math.2020459
    [14] S. K. Ntouyas, H. H. Al-Sulami, A study of coupled systems of mixed order fractional differential equations and inclusions with coupled integral fractional boundary conditions, Adv. Differ. Equ., 2020 (2020), 1–21. doi: 10.1186/s13662-019-2438-0
    [15] B. Ahmad, S. K. Ntouyas, A. Alsaedi, Existence theory for nonlocal boundary value problems involving mixed fractional derivatives, Nonlinear Anal. Model. Control, 24 (2019), 1–21.
    [16] J. Banas, K. Goebel, Measure of noncompactness in Banach spaces, Lecture notes in Pure and Appl. Math, New York: Dekker, 1980.
    [17] A. Samadi, M. B. Ghaemi, An extension of Darbo fixed point theorem and its applications to coupled fixed point and integral equations, Filomat, 28 (2014), 879–886. doi: 10.2298/FIL1404879S
    [18] A. Samadi, Applications of measure of noncompactness to coupled fixed points and systems of integral equations, Miskolc Math. Notes, 19 (2018), 537–553. doi: 10.18514/MMN.2018.2532
    [19] A. Samadi, S. K. Ntouyas, Solvability for infinite systems of fractional differential equations in Banach sequence spaces p and c0, Filomat, 34 (2020), 3943–3955.
  • This article has been cited by:

    1. Muath Awadalla, Kinda Abuasbeh, Muthaiah Subramanian, Murugesan Manigandan, On a System of ψ-Caputo Hybrid Fractional Differential Equations with Dirichlet Boundary Conditions, 2022, 10, 2227-7390, 1681, 10.3390/math10101681
    2. Muath Awadalla, Nazim I. Mahmudov, Hüseyin Işık, On System of Mixed Fractional Hybrid Differential Equations, 2022, 2022, 2314-8888, 1, 10.1155/2022/1258823
    3. Liyuan Zhao, Yirong Jiang, Guotao Wang, Existence and Stability for a Coupled Hybrid System of Fractional Differential Equations with Atangana–Baleanu–Caputo Derivative, 2022, 2022, 2314-4785, 1, 10.1155/2022/4741224
    4. Jehad Alzabut, Mohamed Houas, Mohamed I. Abbas, Application of fractional quantum calculus on coupled hybrid differential systems within the sequential Caputo fractional q-derivatives, 2023, 56, 2391-4661, 10.1515/dema-2022-0205
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2021 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(2366) PDF downloads(160) Cited by(4)

Other Articles By Authors

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog