Motivated by a work of Li, we study nonlocal vertex algebras and their smash products over fields of positive characteristic. Through smash products, modular vertex algebras associated with positive definite even lattices are reconstructed. This gives a different construction of the modular vertex algebras obtained from integral forms introduced by Dong and Griess in lattice vertex operator algebras over a field of characteristic zero.
Citation: Qiang Mu. Smash product construction of modular lattice vertex algebras[J]. Electronic Research Archive, 2022, 30(1): 204-220. doi: 10.3934/era.2022011
[1] | Hongyan Guo . Automorphism group and twisted modules of the twisted Heisenberg-Virasoro vertex operator algebra. Electronic Research Archive, 2021, 29(4): 2673-2685. doi: 10.3934/era.2021008 |
[2] | Agustín Moreno Cañadas, Robinson-Julian Serna, Isaías David Marín Gaviria . Zavadskij modules over cluster-tilted algebras of type $ \mathbb{A} $. Electronic Research Archive, 2022, 30(9): 3435-3451. doi: 10.3934/era.2022175 |
[3] | Youming Chen, Weiguo Lyu, Song Yang . A note on the differential calculus of Hochschild theory for $ A_{\infty} $-algebras. Electronic Research Archive, 2022, 30(9): 3211-3237. doi: 10.3934/era.2022163 |
[4] | Xue Yu . Orientable vertex imprimitive complete maps. Electronic Research Archive, 2024, 32(4): 2466-2477. doi: 10.3934/era.2024113 |
[5] | Yizheng Li, Dingguo Wang . Lie algebras with differential operators of any weights. Electronic Research Archive, 2023, 31(3): 1195-1211. doi: 10.3934/era.2023061 |
[6] | Ming Ding, Zhiqi Chen, Jifu Li . The properties on F-manifold color algebras and pre-F-manifold color algebras. Electronic Research Archive, 2025, 33(1): 87-101. doi: 10.3934/era.2025005 |
[7] | Liqian Bai, Xueqing Chen, Ming Ding, Fan Xu . A generalized quantum cluster algebra of Kronecker type. Electronic Research Archive, 2024, 32(1): 670-685. doi: 10.3934/era.2024032 |
[8] | Xiuhai Fei, Haifang Zhang . Additivity of nonlinear higher anti-derivable mappings on generalized matrix algebras. Electronic Research Archive, 2023, 31(11): 6898-6912. doi: 10.3934/era.2023349 |
[9] | Doston Jumaniyozov, Ivan Kaygorodov, Abror Khudoyberdiyev . The algebraic classification of nilpotent commutative algebras. Electronic Research Archive, 2021, 29(6): 3909-3993. doi: 10.3934/era.2021068 |
[10] | Quanguo Chen, Yong Deng . Hopf algebra structures on generalized quaternion algebras. Electronic Research Archive, 2024, 32(5): 3334-3362. doi: 10.3934/era.2024154 |
Motivated by a work of Li, we study nonlocal vertex algebras and their smash products over fields of positive characteristic. Through smash products, modular vertex algebras associated with positive definite even lattices are reconstructed. This gives a different construction of the modular vertex algebras obtained from integral forms introduced by Dong and Griess in lattice vertex operator algebras over a field of characteristic zero.
It is well known that there are three important classes of rational vertex operator algebras over the field of complex numbers; namely, affine vertex operator algebras, Virasoro vertex operator algebras and lattice vertex operator algebras (see [1]). It is natural to study the corresponding vertex algebra structures over fields of prime characteristic first.
There have already been some works on modular vertex algebras and their representations. For example, modular A(V) theory and An(V) theory were studied in [2,3], modular Virasoro vertex operator algebras were studied in [4], and framed vertex operator algebras were studied in [5]. Modular vertex algebras obtained from integral forms in some vertex operator algebras over the field of complex numbers were used to study modular moonshine in [6,7,8].
Dong and Griess introduced an integral form of the vertex algebras associated with positive definite even lattices over a field of characteristic zero in [9], and the related modular vertex algebras were studied in [10].
In a series of papers (see [11,12,13]), Li studied nonlocal vertex algebras over a field of characteristic zero. In particular, in [13] Li introduced a smash product construction of nonlocal vertex algebras and used smash product to give a different construction of lattice vertex algebras and their modules (cf. [1,14]). Motivated by [13], in this paper we study nonlocal vertex algebras and the smash product construction over fields of prime characteristic. As an application, modular vertex algebras associated with positive definite even lattices are reconstructed by using smash products. This gives another construction of the modular vertex algebras obtained from integral forms introduced by Dong and Griess of lattice vertex operator algebras over a field of characteristic zero.
This paper is organized as follows: In Section 2, we present some basic results on modular nonlocal vertex algebras and give the smash product construction of nonlocal vertex algebras. In Section 3, we use the smash product to construct the vertex algebras associated with positive definite even lattices.
In this section, we first present some basic results on modular nonlocal vertex algebras. Then we give the smash product construction of modular nonlocal vertex algebras. The proofs for most of the results in this section are the same as those for characteristic zero (see [11,12,13]).
Let F be an algebraically closed field of an odd prime characteristic p, which is fixed throughout this paper. All vector spaces, including algebras, are considered to be over F. We use Z for the integers, Z+ for the positive integers, and N for the nonnegative integers.
Note that for any m∈Z, k∈N,
(mk)=m(m−1)⋯(m+1−k)k!∈Z. |
Then we shall also view (mk) as an element of F. Furthermore, for m∈Z we have
(x±z)m=∑k∈N(mk)(±1)kxm−kzk∈F[x,x−1][[z]]. |
The following definition is the same as in characteristic zero (see [11,12,13]).
Definition 2.1. A nonlocal vertex algebra is a vector space V endowed with a distinguished vector 1, called the vacuum vector, and endowed with a linear map
Y(⋅,x):V→(EndV)[[x,x−1]]v↦Y(v,x)=∑n∈Zvnx−n−1 | (2.1) |
such that for u,v∈V,
unv=0for n sufficiently large, | (2.2) |
Y(1,x)=1, | (2.3) |
Y(v,x)1∈V[[x]]andlimx→0Y(v,x)1=vfor v∈V | (2.4) |
and for u,v,w∈V, there exists a nonnegative integer l such that
(x0+x2)lY(u,x0+x2)Y(v,x2)w=(x0+x2)lY(Y(u,x0)v,x2)w. | (2.5) |
As in [15], define B to be the bialgebra with a basis {D(r)∣r∈N}, where
D(m)⋅D(n)=(m+nn)D(m+n),D(0)=1,Δ(D(n))=n∑i=0D(n−i)⊗D(i),ε(D(n))=δn,0 |
for m,n∈N. Set
exD=∑n∈NxnD(n)∈B[[x]]. | (2.6) |
The bialgebra structure of B can be described in terms of the generating functions as
exDezD=e(x+z)D,Δ(exD)=exD⊗exD,ε(exD)=1, | (2.7) |
in particular, we have exDe−xD=1.
Remark 2.2. Let U be any vector space. Then U[[x,x−1]] is a B-module with D(n) for n∈N acting as the n-th Hasse differential operator ∂(n)x with respect to x, which is defined by
∂(n)xxm=(mn)xm−nfor m∈Z. | (2.8) |
Set ez∂x=∑n∈Nzn∂(n)x. Then
f(x+z)=ez∂xf(x)for f(x)∈U[[x,x−1]]. | (2.9) |
As in the case of characteristic zero, we have (cf. [13]):
Lemma 2.3. Let V be a nonlocal vertex algebra.Then V is naturally a B-module with
D(n)u=u−n−11 | (2.10) |
for u∈V and n∈N.Furthermore,
ex0DY(u,x2)e−x0D=Y(ex0Du,x2)=Y(u,x2+x0)=ex0∂x2Y(u,x2). | (2.11) |
Proof. Let u∈V. By (2.4) and (2.10), we have
exDu=Y(u,x)1, | (2.12) |
and in particular, D(0)=1 on V.
Let l∈N be such that
(x0+x2)lY(Y(u,x0)1,x2)1=(x0+x2)lY(u,x0+x2)Y(1,x2)1. |
As Y(1,x)=1 and Y(u,x)1 only involves nonnegative powers of x, we have
(x0+x2)lY(Y(u,x0)1,x2)1=(x0+x2)lY(u,x0+x2)1=(x0+x2)lY(u,x2+x0)1. |
Multiplying both sides by (x2+x0)−l we obtain
Y(Y(u,x0)1,x2)1=Y(u,x2+x0)1. |
Using (2.12) and the equation above, we have
ex2D(ex0Du)=Y(ex0Du,x2)1=Y(Y(u,x0)1,x2)1=Y(u,x2+x0)1=e(x2+x0)Du. |
Therefore V is a B-module.
Let u,v∈V. Then there is l∈N such that
(x0+x2)lY(Y(u,x0)1,x2)v=(x0+x2)lY(u,x0+x2)Y(1,x2)v=(x0+x2)lY(u,x0+x2)v. |
We may assume that xlY(u,x)v∈V[[x]] by replacing l with a bigger integer if necessary, so that
(x0+x2)lY(u,x0+x2)v=(x0+x2)lY(u,x2+x0)v. |
Then
(x2+x0)lY(Y(u,x0)1,x2)v=(x2+x0)lY(u,x2+x0)v. |
Multiplying both sides by (x2+x0)−l we have
Y(ex0Du,x2)v=Y(Y(u,x0)1,x2)v=Y(u,x2+x0)v=ex0∂x2Y(u,x2)v. |
Let u,v∈V and let l∈N be such that
(x0+x2)lY(Y(u,x0)v,x2)1=(x0+x2)lY(u,x0+x2)Y(v,x2)1. |
Since Y(Y(u,x0)v,x2)1 involves only nonnegative powers of x2, we can multiply both sides by (x0+x2)−l to get
Y(Y(u,x0)v,x2)1=Y(u,x0+x2)Y(v,x2)1. |
Then
ex2DY(u,x0)v=Y(Y(u,x0)v,x2)1=Y(u,x0+x2)Y(v,x2)1=Y(u,x0+x2)ex2Dv, |
that is,
ex2DY(u,x0)=Y(u,x0+x2)ex2D |
on V. Applying e−x2D from left, as ex2De−x2D=1, we have
ex2DY(u,x0)e−x2D=Y(u,x0+x2). |
Thus (2.11) holds.
The following two results of [11] are valid here with the same proof.
Lemma 2.4. For any subset S of a nonlocal vertex algebra V, the subalgebra ⟨S⟩ generated by S is linearly spanned by vectors
v(1)n1v(2)n2⋯v(r)nr1 |
for r∈N, v(i)∈S, ni∈Z.
Let V be a nonlocal vertex algebra. For u,v∈V, we say u,v are mutually local if there exists k∈N such that
(x1−x2)kY(u,x1)Y(v,x2)=(x1−x2)kY(v,x2)Y(u,x1). | (2.13) |
A subset S of V is said to be local if every pair of elements of S are mutually local.
Lemma 2.5. Let V be a nonlocal vertex algebra and let S be a local subset of V.Then the subalgebra ⟨S⟩ of V generated by S is a vertex algebra.
Definition 2.6. Let V be a nonlocal vertex algebra. A V-module is a vector space W endowed with a linear map
YW(⋅,x):V→(EndW)[[x,x−1]]v↦YW(v,x)=∑n∈Zvnx−n−1 | (2.14) |
such that for v∈V and w∈W,
vnw=0for n sufficiently large, | (2.15) |
YW(1,x)=1, | (2.16) |
and for u,v∈V and w∈W, there exists a nonnegative integer l such that
(x0+x2)lYW(u,x0+x2)YW(v,x2)w=(x0+x2)lYW(Y(u,x0)v,x2)w. | (2.17) |
A unital associative algebra A is called a B-module algebra if A is a B-module such that
h⋅(ab)=∑(h(1)⋅a)(h(2)⋅b),h⋅1=ε(h)1 | (2.18) |
for h∈B and a,b∈A, where Δ(h)=∑h(1)⊗h(2) is in the Sweedler notation.
Example 2.7. Let A be a B-module algebra. Then A has a nonlocal vertex algebra structure with 1 as the vacuum vector and
Y(a,x)b=(exDa)bfor a,b∈A. |
Furthermore, on any module W for A as an associative algebra, there exists a module structure YW for A with YW(a,x)w=(exDa)w for a∈A, w∈W.
Remark 2.8. Let A and B be B-module algebras. Then A⊗B is a B-module algebra with exD=exDA⊗exDB.
Let V and U be nonlocal vertex algebras. A linear map f from V to U is a homomorphism of nonlocal vertex algebras if
f(1)=1,fY(u,x)v=Y(f(u),x)f(v)for u,v∈V. |
It is straightforward to show that fexDV=exDUf if f is a homomorphism from V to U. A homomorphism of nonlocal vertex algebras from V to V is called an endomorphism of V.
Remark 2.9. Let A and B be B-module algebras. Then a linear map f from A to B is a homomorphism of nonlocal vertex algebras from A to B if and only if f is a homomorphism of algebras and of B-modules, that is, fexDA=exDBf.
As in the case of characteristic zero, we have:
Lemma 2.10. Let V and U be nonlocal vertex algebras and let f be a linear map from V to U.If
f(1)=1,fY(u,x)v=Y(f(u),x)f(v)for u∈T,v∈V, |
where T is a generating subset of V, then f is a homomorphism of nonlocal vertex algebras.
Proof. Set
S={u∈V|f(Y(u,x)w)=Y(f(u),x)f(w) for w∈V}. |
We must show that V=S. Since T⊂S and T generates V, it suffices to show that S is a nonlocal vertex subalgebra of V. As 1∈S, it remains to show that for u,v∈S and n∈Z we have unv∈S, that is,
f(Y(Y(u,x0)v,x2)w)=Y(f(Y(u,x0)v),x2)f(w) | (2.19) |
for w∈V. Let l∈N be such that
(x0+x2)lY(u,x0+x2)Y(v,x2)w=(x0+x2)lY(Y(u,x0)v,x2)w,(x0+x2)lY(f(u),x0+x2)Y(f(v),x2)f(w)=(x0+x2)lY(Y(f(u),x0)f(v),x2)f(w). |
Since u,v∈S, we have
(x0+x2)lfY(Y(u,x0)v,x2)w=(x0+x2)lfY(u,x0+x2)Y(v,x2)w=(x0+x2)lY(f(u),x0+x2)fY(v,x2)w=(x0+x2)lY(f(u),x0+x2)Y(f(v)v,x2)f(w)=(x0+x2)lY(Y(f(u),x0)f(v),x2)f(w)=(x0+x2)lY(f(Y(u,x0)v),x2)f(w). |
Multiplying both sides by (x2+x0)−l, we obtain (2.19).
Let V be a nonlocal vertex algebra and let A be a B-module algebra. Following [13], we consider V as a subalgebra of V⊗A by the natural embedding, and consider V⊗A as an A-module with A acting on the second factor. Then
HomF(V,V⊗A)=EndA(V⊗A) |
as A-modules and as spaces. We also consider any linear map from V to V⊗A or from V to V as an A-linear endomorphism of V⊗A. Then we consider the vertex operator map Y of V as an A-linear map from V⊗A to (End(V⊗A))[[x,x−1]], that is,
Y(v⊗a,x)=Y(v,x)⊗afor v∈V, a∈A. |
We denote by Yten the vertex operator map of V⊗A.
Lemma 2.11. Let V be a nonlocal vertex algebra, let A be a B-module algebra, and let f be a linear map from V to V⊗A.Then f is a homomorphism of nonlocal vertex algebras if and only if
f(1)=1,fY(v,x)=Y((1⊗exD)f(v),x)ffor v∈V. |
Proof. For any u∈V and a∈A, we see that
Yten(u⊗a,x)=Y(u,x)⊗Y(a,x)=Y(u,x)⊗(exDa)=Y((1⊗exD)(u⊗a),x). |
It follows that
Yten(f(v),x)=Y((1⊗exD)f(v),x)for v∈V. |
Then for v∈V, we see fY(v,x)=Yten(f(v),x)f is equivalent to
fY(v,x)=Y((1⊗exD)f(v),x)f. |
Thus our assertion follows.
We denote by F((x))− the B-module algebra F((x)) with D(n) acting as (−1)n∂(n)x for n∈N. Now we consider the special case with A=F((x))−.
Definition 2.12. Let V be a nonlocal vertex algebra. We define PEnd(V) to be the subspace of HomF(V,V⊗F((x))−) consisting of the elements f(x) such that
f(x)1=1,f(x1)Y(u,x2)=Y(f(x1−x2)u,x2)f(x1)for u∈V. |
Lemma 2.13. Let V be a nonlocal vertex algebra and let f(x)∈HomF(V,V⊗F((x))−).Then f(x)∈PEnd(V) if and only if f(x) is a homomorphism of nonlocal vertex algebrasfrom V to V⊗F((x))−.Furthermore,
ezDVf(x)e−zDV=f(x+z)for f(x)∈PEnd(V). | (2.20) |
Proof. Since e−x2∂xg(x)=g(x−x2) for g(x)∈F((x))−, we have
f(x−x2)u=(1⊗e−x2∂x)f(x)ufor u∈V. |
Thus the first assertion follows from Lemma 2.11.
For f(x)∈PEnd(V), since f(x) is a homomorphism of nonlocal vertex algebras, we have
f(x)e−zDV=(e−zDV⊗ez∂x)f(x)=e−zDVf(x+z). |
Then (2.20) holds.
Let V be a nonlocal vertex algebra. We say a subset U of Hom(V,V⊗F((x))−) is Δ-closed if for every a(x)∈U, there exist elements a(1i)(x),a(2i)(x)∈U, i=1,2,…,r, such that
a(x1)Y(u,x2)=r∑i=1Y(a(1i)(x1−x2)u,x2)a(2i)(x1)for u∈V. | (2.21) |
We denote by B(V) the sum of all the Δ-closed subspaces U of Hom(V,V⊗F((x))−) such that
a(x)1∈F1for a(x)∈U. |
Using the same arguments in [13, Proposition 3.4] we have:
Lemma 2.14. Let V be a nonlocal vertex algebra.Then B(V) is Δ-closed and B(V) is a B-module algebra with D(n) acting as ∂(n)x for n∈N.Furthermore, V is a module for B(V) as a nonlocal vertex algebra with YV(a(x),x0)=a(x0) for a(x)∈B(V).
The following notion is the modular counterpart of the notion of differential bialgebra in [13].
Definition 2.15. A B-module bialgebra is a bialgebra (B,Δ,ε) endowed with a B-module structure such that εexD=ε and ΔexD=(exD⊗exD)Δ.
We shall need the following notion (see [13]).
Definition 2.16. A nonlocal vertex algebra V endowed with a coalgebra structure (V,Δ,ε) is called a vertex bialgebra if Δ and ε are homomorphisms of nonlocal vertex algebras.
Let (B,Δ,ε) be a B-module bialgebra. Then B is a B-module algebra, and we have a nonlocal vertex algebra B by Example 2.7. From definition we have Δ(1)=1⊗1 and ε(1)=1. Furthermore,
ε(Y(a,x)b)=ε((exDa)b)=ε(exDa)ε(b)=ε(a)ε(b)=Y(ε(a),x)ε(b),Δ(Y(a,x)b)=Δ((exDa)b)=Δ(exDa)Δ(b)=((exD⊗exD)Δ(a))Δ(b)=Y(Δ(a),x)Δ(b) |
for a,b∈B. Then Δ and ε are nonlocal vertex algebra homomorphisms. Thus B is a vertex bialgebra.
Definition 2.17. Let H be a vertex bialgebra. A nonlocal vertex H-module-algebra is a nonlocal vertex algebra V endowed with an H-module structure on V such that
Y(h,x)u∈V⊗F((x)),Y(h,x)1V=ε(h)1V,Y(h,x1)Y(v,x2)u=∑Y(Y(h(1),x1−x2)v,x2)Y(h(2),x1)u |
for h∈H, u,v∈V.
The following results of [13] hold with the same arguments.
Lemma 2.18. Let H be a vertex bialgebra, let T be a generating subset of H as a nonlocal vertex algebra, let V be a nonlocal vertex algebra, and let (V,YHV) be an H-module.Suppose that
YHV(h,x)∈Hom(V,V⊗F((x))−),YHV(h,x)1=ε(h)1,YHV(h,x1)Y(v,x2)u=∑Y(YHV(h(1),x1−x2)v,x2)YHV(h(2),x1)u |
for h∈T and u,v∈V.Then V is a nonlocal vertex H-module-algebra.
Theorem 2.19. Let H be a vertex bialgebra, and let V be a nonlocal vertex H-module-algebra.We define V♯H=V⊗H as a vector space and define
Y♯(u⊗h,x)(v⊗k)=∑Y(u,x)Y(h(1),x)v⊗Y(h(2),x)k. |
for u,v∈V and h,k∈H.Then (V♯H,Y♯) is a nonlocal vertex algebra.Furthermore,
Y♯(h,x1)Y♯(v,x2)=∑Y♯(Y(h(1),x1−x2)v,x2)Y♯(h(2),x1) |
for h∈H and v∈V.
In [9], Dong and Griess introduced an integral form of vertex operator algebras associated to even lattices over the complex field, from which one can define modular lattice vertex algebras. In this section, we construct the modular lattice vertex algebras through smash product.
Let L be a positive definite even lattice with a basis {γ1,…,γd} and let L∘ be the dual lattice of L. Let AL denote the d×d matrix (⟨γi,γj⟩)1≤i,j≤d. Note that det(AL) is independent of the choice of a basis for L. Let ϵ:L×L→F× be a map such that
ϵ(α,0)=ϵ(0,α)=1,ϵ(α,β+γ)ϵ(β,γ)=ϵ(α+β,γ)ϵ(α,β) |
for α,β,γ∈L. Denote by Fϵ[L] the ϵ-twisted group algebra of L with F-basis {eα∣α∈L} and multiplication
eαeβ=ϵ(α,β)eα+βfor α,β∈L. |
Next, recall from [9] the ring M(1)Z. Denote by M(1) the polynomial algebra generated by sα,n for α∈{γ1,…,γd} and n∈Z+. Set sα,0=1 for α∈{γ1,…,γd}. For α∈{γ1,…,γd}, we set
E−(−α,x)=∑n∈Nsα,nxn∈M(1)[[x]]. |
Note that E−(−α,x) is an invertible element of M(1)[[x]] as sα,0=1. For a general element α=k1γ1+k2γ2+⋯+kdγd∈L, where k1,…,kd∈Z, we define
E−(−α,x)=d∏i=1E−(−γi,x)ki∈M(1)[[x]]. |
Then for α,β∈L,
E−(α,x)E−(β,x)=E−(α+β,x),E−(0,x)=1. |
As M(1) is isomorphic to the universal enveloping algebra of the abelian Lie algebra with basis {sα,n∣α∈{γ1,…,γd},n∈Z+}, we see M(1) is naturally a bialgebra with
ε(E−(−α,x))=1, | (3.1) |
Δ(E−(−α,x))=E−(−α,x)⊗E−(−α,x) | (3.2) |
for α∈L.
Define a B-action on M(1) by ezD1=1 and
ezDr∏i=1E−(−αi,xi)=r∏i=1E−(−αi,xi+z)E−(αi,z) | (3.3) |
for r∈Z+, αi∈{γ1,…,γd}. Then (3.3) holds for r∈Z+, αi∈L. It is straightforward to check
e(z+z0)D=ezDez0Don M(1),ezD(ab)=(ezDa)(ezDb)for a,b∈M(1). |
Then M(1) is a B-module algebra. Furthermore, for r∈Z+, αi∈L, we have
εezDr∏i=1E−(−αi,xi)=εr∏i=1E−(−αi,xi+z)E−(αi,z)=1=εr∏i=1E−(−αi,xi), |
and
ΔezDr∏i=1E−(−αi,xi)=Δr∏i=1E−(−αi,xi+z)E−(αi,z)=(r∏i=1E−(−αi,xi+z)E−(αi,z))⊗(r∏i=1E−(−αi,xi+z)E−(αi,z))=(ezDr∏i=1E−(−αi,xi))⊗(ezDr∏i=1E−(−αi,xi))=(ezD⊗ezD)Δr∏i=1E−(−αi,xi). |
Therefore, (M(1),Δ,ε) is a B-module bialgebra.
For α∈{γ1,γ2,…,γd}, we inductively define linear operators rα,n for n∈N on M(1) by
rα,n1=δn,01, | (3.4) |
rα,nr∏i=1sβi,mi=∑j1,…,jr∈N(r∏i=1(−1)ji(⟨α,βi⟩ji)sβi,mi−ji)rα,n−j1−⋯−jr1 | (3.5) |
for βi∈{γ1,γ2,…,γd}, mi∈N, where rα,m is understood to be zero if m<0. From (3.5), we see
rα,nsβ,m=∑i∈N(−1)i(⟨α,β⟩i)sβ,m−irα,n−ion M(1) | (3.6) |
for β∈{γ1,γ2,…,γd} and m∈N. For α∈{γ1,γ2,…,γd}, we set
E+(−α,x)=∑n∈Nrα,nx−n∈(EndM(1))[[x−1]]. |
Furthermore, for α=k1γ1+k2γ2+⋯+kdγd∈L, where k1,…,kd∈Z, we define
E+(−α,x)=d∏i=1E+(−γi,x)ki∈(EndM(1))[[x−1]]. |
Then for α,β∈L,
E+(α,x)E+(β,x)=E−(α+β,x),E+(0,x)=1, |
and furthermore,
E+(−α,x1)E−(−β,x2)=(1−x2x1)⟨α,β⟩E−(−β,x2)E+(−α,x1). | (3.7) |
Lemma 3.1. In the B-module algebra M(1), we have
Δ(E−(−α,x)E+(−α,x)u)=(E−(−α,x)E+(−α,x)⊗E−(−α,x))Δu | (3.8) |
for α∈L and u∈M(1).
Proof. We use induction on m to show (3.8) holds for u=sα1,n1sα2,n2…sαm,nm with m∈N, αi∈L, ni∈N. For u=1, we have
ΔE−(−α,x)E+(−α,x)1=ΔE−(−α,x)=E−(−α,x)⊗E−(−α,x)=(E−(−α,x)E+(−α,x)⊗E−(−α,x))(1⊗1)=(E−(−α,x)E+(−α,x)⊗E−(−α,x))Δ1. |
The induction step is given by
ΔE−(−α,x)E+(−α,x)E−(−β,z)u=(1−zx)⟨α,β⟩ΔE−(−β,z)E−(−α,x)E+(−α,x)u=(1−zx)⟨α,β⟩(ΔE−(−β,z))(ΔE−(−α,x)E+(−α,x)u)=(1−zx)⟨α,β⟩(E−(−β,z)⊗E−(−β,z))(E−(−α,x)E+(−α,x)⊗E−(−α,x))Δu=(1−zx)⟨α,β⟩(E−(−β,z)E−(−α,x)E+(−α,x)⊗E−(−β,z)E−(−α,x))Δu=(E−(−α,x)E+(−α,x)E−(−β,z)⊗E−(−α,x)E−(−β,z))Δu=(E−(−α,x)E+(−α,x)⊗E−(−α,x))ΔE−(−β,z)u. |
This completes the induction. As M(1) is spanned by elements of the form
sα1,n1sα2,n2…sαm,nm, |
our assertion follows.
Set
BL,ϵ=Fϵ[L]⊗M(1), | (3.9) |
an associative algebra.
Lemma 3.2. For α∈L and u∈M(1), define
exD(eα⊗u)=eα⊗E−(−α,x)exDu. |
Then BL,ϵ is a B-module algebra.
Proof. For eα⊗u,eβ⊗v∈BL,ϵ, we have
exD((eα⊗u)(eβ⊗v))=ϵ(α,β)exD(eα+β⊗uv)=ϵ(α,β)eα+β⊗E−(−α−β,x)exD(uv)=eαeβ⊗E−(−α,x)E−(−β,x)(exDu)(exDv)=(eα⊗E−(−α,x)(exDu))(eβ⊗E−(−β,x)(exDv))=(exDeα⊗u)(exDeβ⊗v). |
Thus BL,ϵ is a B-module algebra.
Set
BL=F[L]⊗M(1), | (3.10) |
a unital commutatively associative algebra. As in the case of characteristic zero (see [13]), we have the following universal property of BL:
Lemma 3.3. Let A be a B-module algebra and let f:F[L]→A be a homomorphism of algebras.Then f can be extended uniquely to a homomorphism of B-module algebras from BL to A.
Proof. For α∈{γ1,γ2,…,γd}, define
fE−(−α,x)=(fe−α)exDfeα. | (3.11) |
Since M(1) is freely generated by sα,n for α∈{γ1,γ2,…,γd} and n∈Z+, it follows that f can be extended to a homomorphism of algebras.
Now, we show that in fact (3.11) holds for all α∈L. Let P be the subset of L consisting of α such that (3.11) holds for all n∈N. From definition, we have γi∈P for 1≤i≤d. Assume α,β∈P. Then we get
fE−(−α−β,x)=f(E−(−α,x)E−(−β,x))=(fe−α)(exDfeα)(fe−β)(exDfeβ)=(fe−α)(fe−β)(exDfeα)(exDfeβ)=(fe−α−β)exD((feα)(feβ))=(fe−α−β)exD(feα+β), |
proving α+β∈P.
Now, assume α∈P. As E−(α,x)E−(−α,x)=1 and (exDfeα)(exDfe−α)=exD1=1, we have
fE−(α,x)=(fE−(−α,x))−1=((fe−α)exDfeα)−1=(feα)exDfe−α, |
proving −α∈P. Thus P=L, that is, (3.11) holds for all α∈L.
Next we show that f is a homomorphism of B-modules. For α∈L, we have
fexD(eα)=f(eα⊗E−(−α,x))=(feα)(fe−α)exD(feα)=exD(feα). |
Using the equation above and (3.3), we have
exDfE−(−α,z)=exD((fe−α)ezDfeα)=(exDfe−α)(exDezDfeα)=(feα)(exDfe−α)(fe−α)(e(z+x)Dfeα)=f(E−(α,x))f(E−(−α,z+x))=f(E−(α,x)E−(−α,z+x))=fexDE−(−α,z). |
Since BL as an algebra is generated by sα,n and eα for α∈L and n∈N, it follows that fexD=exDf. Thus f is a B-module homomorphism.
For α∈L, we define xα∈(EndVL)[x,x−1] by
xα(eβ⊗u)=x⟨α,β⟩(eβ⊗u) | (3.12) |
for β∈L∘ and u∈M(1).
Lemma 3.4. For α∈L, we have
E+(−α,x)xα∈PEnd(BL,ϵ). |
Proof. For β∈L, we have
(ex2DE+(−α,x1−x2)(x1−x2)αeβ)E+(−α,x1)xα1=(x1−x2)⟨α,β⟩(ex2Deβ)E+(−α,x1)xα1=(x1−x2)⟨α,β⟩E−(−β,x2)eβE+(−α,x1)xα1=(x1−x2)⟨α,β⟩E−(−β,x2)E+(−α,x1)eβxα1=(x1−x2)⟨α,β⟩(1−x2x1)−⟨α,β⟩E+(−α,x1)E−(−β,x2)eβxα1=x−⟨α,β⟩1(x1−x2)⟨α,β⟩(1−x2x1)−⟨α,β⟩E+(−α,x1)E−(−β,x2)xα1eβ=E+(−α,x1)E−(−β,x2)xα1eβ=E+(−α,x1)xα1ex2Deβ. |
Since L generates VL,ϵ as a nonlocal vertex algebra, it follows from Lemma 2.10 that E+(−α,x)xα is a homomorphism of nonlocal vertex algebras. By Lemma 2.13, we see that E+(−α,x)xα∈PEnd(BL,ϵ).
Lemma 3.5. There exists a unique BL-module structure YM on BL,ϵ such that
YM(eα,x)=E+(−α,x)xαfor α∈L, |
and (BL,ϵ,YM) is a nonlocal vertex BL-module-algebra.
Proof. Denote Φα(x)=E+(−α,x)xα for α∈L. By Lemma 3.4, we have Φα(x)∈PEnd(BL,ϵ). Clearly Φ0(x)=1 and
Φα(x)Φβ(x)=Φα+β(x)for α,β∈L. |
Let A be the subalgebra of B(BL,ϵ) generated by ∂(n)xΦα(x) for n∈N, α∈L. Clearly A is a commutative B-module algebra. By Lemma 3.3, there exists a homomorphism f of B-module algebras from BL to A such that f(eα)=Φα(x) for all α∈L. Then by Lemma 2.18 we see that BL,ϵ is a nonlocal vertex BL-module-algebra.
As BL,ϵ is a nonlocal vertex BL-module-algebra by Lemma 3.5, we have the nonlocal vertex algebra BL,ϵ♯BL by Theorem 2.19.
Theorem 3.6. Denote
U=∐α∈LF(eα⊗eα)⊗Δ(M(1)), |
a subspace of BL,ϵ♯BL.Then U is a vertex subalgebra of the nonlocal vertex algebra BL,ϵ♯BL, and the linear map
π:VL→U,eα⊗u↦(eα⊗eα)⊗Δ(u) |
for α∈L and u∈M(1) is a vertex algebra homomorphism.Furthermore, if det(AL)≢0(modp), the map π is an isomorphism.
Proof. This is a slight modification of the proof in [13]. As Δ is a homomorphism from M(1) to M(1)⊗M(1), we see that π is a linear homomorphism. We then show that π is a vertex algebra homomorphism. Let α,β∈L and u∈M(1). Then we have
YVL(eα,x)(eβ⊗u)=x⟨α,β⟩ϵ(α,β)(eα+β⊗E−(−α,x)E+(−α,x)u). |
By Lemma 3.1, we have
π(YVL(eα,x)(eβ⊗u))=x⟨α,β⟩ϵ(α,β)(eα+β⊗eα+β)Δ(E−(−α,x)E+(−α,x)u)=x⟨α,β⟩ϵ(α,β)(eα+β⊗eα+β)(E−(−α,x)E+(−α,x)⊗E−(−α,x))Δ(u). |
Since Δ(eα)=eα⊗eα, by Lemma 3.2 we have
Y♯(eα⊗eα,x)=YBL,ϵ(eα,x)YM(eα,x)⊗YBL(eα,x)=E−(−α,x)eαE+(−α,x)xα⊗E−(−α,x)eα. |
Then
Y♯(eα⊗eα,x)π(eβ⊗u)=E−(−α,x)eαE+(−α,x)xα⊗E−(−α,x)eα(eβ⊗eβ)Δ(u)=x⟨α,β⟩ϵ(α,β)(eα+β⊗eα+β)(E−(−α,x)E+(−α,x)⊗E−(−α,x))Δ(u). |
Therefore
π(YVL(eα,x)(eβ⊗u))=Y♯(eα⊗eα,x)π(eβ⊗u) |
for α,β∈L and u∈M(1). Since L generates VL as a vertex algebra by [10, Theorem 1], it follows from Lemma 2.10 that π is a nonlocal vertex algebra homomorphism. As VL is a vertex algebra, we see that π is a vertex algebra homomorphism. If det(AL)≢0(modp), it follows from [10, Theorem 13] that VL is a simple vertex algebra, then π is an isomorphism.
Extend ϵ to a map from L×L∘ to F× such that
ϵ(α,β)ϵ(α+β,γ)=ϵ(α,β+γ)ϵ(β,γ) |
for α,β∈L and γ∈L∘ (see [14]). Define an Fϵ[L]-module structure on F[L∘] by
eα⋅eγ=ϵ(α,γ)eα+γfor α∈L,γ∈L∘. |
Set
VL∘=F[L∘]⊗M(1). |
By the same proof of [13, Proposition 5.8], we have:
Proposition 3.7. There exists a unique VL-module structure on VL∘ such that
Y(eα,x)=E−(−α,x)E+(−α,x)eαxα |
for α∈L.
The author was supported by the China NSF (grant 11571391) and the Heilongjiang Provincial NSF (grant JQ2020A002).
The authors declare there is no conflicts of interest.
[1] | I. Frenkel, J. Lepowsky, A. Meurman, Vertex Operator Algebras and the Monster, Pure Appl. Math., 134. Academic Press, Inc., Boston, MA, 1988. https://doi.org/10.1142/9789812798411_0010 |
[2] |
C. Dong, L. Ren, Representations of vertex operator algebras over an arbitrary field, J. Algebra, 403 (2014), 497–516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jalgebra.2014.01.007 doi: 10.1016/j.jalgebra.2014.01.007
![]() |
[3] | L. Ren, Modular An(V) theory, J. Algebra, 485 (2017), 254–268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jalgebra.2017.04.027 |
[4] |
C. Dong, L. Ren, Vertex operator algebras associated to the Virasoro algebra over an arbitrary field, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 368 (2016), 5177–5196. https://doi.org/10.1090/tran/6529 doi: 10.1090/tran/6529
![]() |
[5] | C. Dong, C. H. Lam, L. Ren, Modular framed vertex operator algebras, preprint, arXiv: 1709.04167 |
[6] | R. E. Borcherds, Modular moonshine III, Duke Math. J., 93 (1998), 129–154. https://doi.org/10.1215/S0012-7094-98-09305-X |
[7] | R. E. Borcherds, A. Ryba, Modular moonshine II, Duke Math. J., 83 (1996), 435–459. https://doi.org/10.1215/S0012-7094-96-08315-5 |
[8] | R. L. Griess Jr, C. H. Lam, Groups of Lie type, vertex algebras, and modular moonshine, Int. Math. Res. Not. IMRN, 2015 (2015), 10716–10755. https://doi.org/10.1093/imrn/rnv003 |
[9] |
C. Dong, R. L. Griess Jr, Integral forms in vertex operator algebras which are invariant under finite groups, J. Algebra, 365 (2012), 184–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jalgebra.2012.05.006 doi: 10.1016/j.jalgebra.2012.05.006
![]() |
[10] |
Q. Mu, Lattice vertex algebras over fields of prime characteristic, J. Algebra, 417 (2014), 39–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jalgebra.2014.06.027 doi: 10.1016/j.jalgebra.2014.06.027
![]() |
[11] |
H.-S. Li, Axiomatic G1-vertex algebras, Commun. Contemp. Math., 5 (2003), 281–327. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219199703000987 doi: 10.1142/S0219199703000987
![]() |
[12] |
H.-S. Li, Nonlocal vertex algebras generated by formal vertex operators, Selecta Math. (N.S.), 11 (2005), 349–397. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00029-006-0017-1 doi: 10.1007/s00029-006-0017-1
![]() |
[13] |
H.-S. Li, A smash product construction of nonlocal vertex algebras, Commun. Contemp. Math., 9 (2007), 605–637. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219199707002605 doi: 10.1142/S0219199707002605
![]() |
[14] | J. Lepowsky, H.-S. Li, Introduction to Vertex Operator Algebras and Their Representations, Progr. Math., 227. Birkhäuser Boston, Inc., Boston, MA, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-8176-8186-9 |
[15] |
H.-S. Li, Q. Mu, Heisenberg VOAs over fields of prime characteristic and their representations, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 370 (2018), 1159–1184. https://doi.org/10.1090/tran/7094 doi: 10.1090/tran/7094
![]() |
1. | Yukun Xiao, Jianzhi Han, Cocommutative connected vertex (operator) bialgebras, 2025, 212, 03930440, 105461, 10.1016/j.geomphys.2025.105461 |