This investigative study explored the field of electrical discharge machining (EDM), with a particular focus on the machining of Ti6Al4V, a titanium alloy that finds widespread application in aerospace, airframes, engine components, and non-aerospace applications such as power generation and marine and offshore environments. Ti6Al4V presents difficulties for conventional metal cutting techniques because of high cutting forces, poor surface integrity, and tool wear. This has led to the adoption of unconventional techniques like EDM. However, problems like high electrode wear rates, low material removal rates, long machining times, and less-than-ideal surface finishes still exist, especially in large-scale applications. By addressing the particular difficulties associated with large-scale electrical discharge machining and by putting forth a multi-objective optimization strategy, this research makes a substantial contribution to the field. With an emphasis on the optimization of input parameters like pulse on time (Ton), pulse off time (Toff), voltage (HV), and current (LV), which are critical in large-scale industrial applications, the study attempts to evaluate the optimal parameter states that simultaneously accomplish multiple goals during the machining process. This work is the first to simultaneously optimize all relevant output responses, such as material removal rate (MRR), electrode wear rate (EWR), machining time (Tm), surface roughness (Ra), and base radius. Previous studies have concentrated on one or two output responses. To optimize MRR, EWR, Tm, Ra, and base radius, the experiments were carefully planned using design of experiment (DOE) and response Surface methodology (RSM). Regression analysis and ANOVA are two statistical techniques that were used with Minitab 15 to help interpret experimental data and build a solid regression model specifically for Ti6Al4V. Throughout the experiment, a variety of input factor settings were employed, and the responses to those were noted. The following parameters were used to obtain the experimental data: current (LV) at 30 and 50 A, voltage (HV) at 0.3 and 0.7 V, pulse on time (Ton) at 4 and 6.5 µs, and pulse off time (Toff) at 5.5 and 6.5 µs. Ton and current are the most significant variables that influence most of the output responses. By addressing the simultaneous optimization of multiple output responses, this investigative study not only sets a new standard in the field but also identifies current bottlenecks and offers solutions.
Citation: Muhammad Mansoor Uz Zaman Siddiqui, Syed Amir Iqbal, Ali Zulqarnain, Adeel Tabassum. An investigative study on the parameters optimization of the electric discharge machining of Ti6Al4V[J]. Clean Technologies and Recycling, 2024, 4(1): 43-60. doi: 10.3934/ctr.2024003
This investigative study explored the field of electrical discharge machining (EDM), with a particular focus on the machining of Ti6Al4V, a titanium alloy that finds widespread application in aerospace, airframes, engine components, and non-aerospace applications such as power generation and marine and offshore environments. Ti6Al4V presents difficulties for conventional metal cutting techniques because of high cutting forces, poor surface integrity, and tool wear. This has led to the adoption of unconventional techniques like EDM. However, problems like high electrode wear rates, low material removal rates, long machining times, and less-than-ideal surface finishes still exist, especially in large-scale applications. By addressing the particular difficulties associated with large-scale electrical discharge machining and by putting forth a multi-objective optimization strategy, this research makes a substantial contribution to the field. With an emphasis on the optimization of input parameters like pulse on time (Ton), pulse off time (Toff), voltage (HV), and current (LV), which are critical in large-scale industrial applications, the study attempts to evaluate the optimal parameter states that simultaneously accomplish multiple goals during the machining process. This work is the first to simultaneously optimize all relevant output responses, such as material removal rate (MRR), electrode wear rate (EWR), machining time (Tm), surface roughness (Ra), and base radius. Previous studies have concentrated on one or two output responses. To optimize MRR, EWR, Tm, Ra, and base radius, the experiments were carefully planned using design of experiment (DOE) and response Surface methodology (RSM). Regression analysis and ANOVA are two statistical techniques that were used with Minitab 15 to help interpret experimental data and build a solid regression model specifically for Ti6Al4V. Throughout the experiment, a variety of input factor settings were employed, and the responses to those were noted. The following parameters were used to obtain the experimental data: current (LV) at 30 and 50 A, voltage (HV) at 0.3 and 0.7 V, pulse on time (Ton) at 4 and 6.5 µs, and pulse off time (Toff) at 5.5 and 6.5 µs. Ton and current are the most significant variables that influence most of the output responses. By addressing the simultaneous optimization of multiple output responses, this investigative study not only sets a new standard in the field but also identifies current bottlenecks and offers solutions.
[1] | Okokpujie IP, Bolu CA, Ohunakin OS, et al. (2019) A review of recent application of machining techniques, based on the phenomena of CNC machining operations. Procedia Manuf 35: 1054–1060. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2019.06.056 doi: 10.1016/j.promfg.2019.06.056 |
[2] | Natsu W, He J, Iwanaga Y (2020) Experimental study on electrochemical machining with electrolyte confined by absorption material. Procedia CIRP 87: 263–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2020.02.106 doi: 10.1016/j.procir.2020.02.106 |
[3] | Farooq MU, Anwar S, Bhatti HA, et al. (2023) Electric discharge machining of Ti6Al4V ELI in biomedical industry: Parametric analysis of surface functionalization and tribological characterization. Materials 16: 4458. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16124458 doi: 10.3390/ma16124458 |
[4] | Happonen A, Stepanov A, Piili H, et al. (2015) Innovation study for laser cutting of complex geometries with paper materials. Phys Procedia 78: 128–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phpro.2015.11.025 doi: 10.1016/j.phpro.2015.11.025 |
[5] | Gilmore R (1991) Ultrasonic machining: A case study. J Mater Process Tech 28: 139–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/0924-0136(91)90213-X doi: 10.1016/0924-0136(91)90213-X |
[6] | Samsudeensadham S, Mohan A, Krishnaraj V (2021) A research on machining parameters during dry machining of Ti-6Al-4V alloy. Mater Today: Proc 46: 9354–9360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.02.821 doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.02.821 |
[7] | Prasad AVSR, Ramji K, Datta GL (2014) An experimental study of wire EDM on Ti-6Al-4V alloy. Procedia Mater Sci 5: 2567–2576. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mspro.2014.07.517 doi: 10.1016/j.mspro.2014.07.517 |
[8] | Rathod R, Kamble D, Ambhore N (2022) Performance evaluation of electric discharge machining of titanium alloy—A review. J Eng Appl Sci 69: 64. https://doi.org/10.1186/s44147-022-00118-z doi: 10.1186/s44147-022-00118-z |
[9] | Nagadeepan A, Jayaprakash G, Senthilkumar V (2023) Advanced optimization of surface characteristics and material removal rate for biocompatible Ti6Al4V using WEDM process with BBD and NSGA Ⅱ. Materials 16: 4915. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16144915 doi: 10.3390/ma16144915 |
[10] | Dewangan S, Kumar SD, Jha SK, et al. (2020) Optimization of micro-EDM drilling parameters of Ti-6Al-4V alloy. Mater Today: Proc 33: 5481–5485. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.03.307 doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.03.307 |
[11] | Garba E, Abdul-Rani AM, Yunus NA, et al. (2023) A review of electrode manufacturing methods for electrical discharge machining: Current status and future perspectives for surface alloying. Machines 11: 906. https://doi.org/10.3390/machines11090906 doi: 10.3390/machines11090906 |
[12] | Banu A, Ali MY (2016) Electrical discharge machining (EDM): A review. Int J Eng Mater Manuf 1: 3–10. https://doi.org/10.26776/ijemm.01.01.2016.02 doi: 10.26776/ijemm.01.01.2016.02 |
[13] | Galati M, Antonioni P, Calignano F, et al. (2023) Experimental investigation on the cutting of additively manufactured Ti6Al4V with wire-EDM and the analytical modelling of cutting speed and surface roughness. J Manuf Mater Process 7: 69. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmmp7020069 doi: 10.3390/jmmp7020069 |
[14] | Kamenskikh AA, Muratov KR, Shlykov ES, et al. (2023) Recent trends and developments in the electrical discharge machining industry: A review. J Manuf Mater Process 7: 204. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmmp7060204 doi: 10.3390/jmmp7060204 |
[15] | Ram JS, Jeavudeen S, Mouda PA, et al. (2023) The role of various dielectrics used in EDM process and their environmental, health, and safety issues. Mater Today: Proc. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2023.05.137 doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2023.05.137 |
[16] | Nadda R, Nirala CK, Singh PK, et al. (2024) An overview of techniques for monitoring and compensating tool wear in micro-electrical discharge machining. Heliyon 10: e26784. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e26784 doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e26784 |
[17] | Nguyen VQ, Duong TH, Kim HC (2015) Precision micro EDM based on real-time monitoring and electrode wear compensation. Int J Adv Manuf Tech 79: 1829–1838. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-015-6964-y doi: 10.1007/s00170-015-6964-y |
[18] | Di Campli R, Maradia U, Boccadoro M, et al. (2020) Real-time wire EDM tool simulation enabled by discharge location tracker. Procedia CIRP 95: 308–312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2020.01.176 doi: 10.1016/j.procir.2020.01.176 |
[19] | Mhatre MS, Sapkal SU, Pawade RS (2014) Electro discharge machining characteristics of Ti-6Al-4V alloy: A grey relational optimization. Procedia Mater Sci 5: 2014–2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mspro.2014.07.534 doi: 10.1016/j.mspro.2014.07.534 |
[20] | Gu L, Li L, Zhao W, et al. (2012) Electrical discharge machining of Ti6Al4V with a bundled electrode. Int J Mach Tool Manu 53: 100–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2011.10.002 doi: 10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2011.10.002 |
[21] | Świercz R, Oniszczuk-Świercz D, Chmielewski T (2019) Multi-response optimization of electrical discharge machining using the desirability function. Micromachines 10: 72. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi10010072 doi: 10.3390/mi10010072 |
[22] | Maniyar KG, Ingole DS (2018) Multi response optimization of EDM process parameters for aluminium hybrid composites by GRA. Mater Today: Proc 5: 19836–19843. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2018.06.347 doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2018.06.347 |
[23] | Agarwal N, Irshad M, Singh M R, et al. (2022) Optimization of material removal rate of Ti-6Al-4V using Rao-1 algorithm. Mater Today: Proc 62: 6722–6726. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2022.04.760 doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2022.04.760 |
[24] | Klocke F, Schwade M, Klink A, et al. (2013) Analysis of material removal rate and electrode wear in sinking EDM roughing strategies using different graphite grades. Procedia CIRP 6: 163–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2013.03.079 doi: 10.1016/j.procir.2013.03.079 |
[25] | Kumar R, Roy S, Gunjan P, et al. (2018) Analysis of MRR and surface roughness in machining Ti-6Al-4V ELI titanium alloy using EDM process. Procedia Manuf 20: 358–364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2018.02.052 doi: 10.1016/j.promfg.2018.02.052 |
[26] | Shao F, Liu Z, Wan Y, et al. (2010) Finite element simulation of machining of Ti-6Al-4V alloy with thermodynamical constitutive equation. Int J Adv Manuf Tech 49: 431–439. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-009-2423-y doi: 10.1007/s00170-009-2423-y |
[27] | Caballero B, Finglas P, Toldrá F (2016) Encyclopedia of Food and Health, New York: Academic Press, 321–326. |
[28] | Iqbal A, Khan AA (2010) Modeling and analysis of MRR, EWR and surface roughness in EDM milling through response surface methodology. Am J Eng Appl Sci 3: 611–619. https://doi.org/10.3923/jeasci.2010.154.162 doi: 10.3923/jeasci.2010.154.162 |
[29] | Liu Y, Fearn T, Strlič M (2021) Factorial experimentation on photodegradation of historical paper by polychromatic visible radiation. Herit Sci 9: 130. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40494-021-00602-4 doi: 10.1186/s40494-021-00602-4 |
[30] | Sultan T, Kumar A, Gupta RD (2014) Material removal rate, electrode wear rate, and surface roughness evaluation in die sinking EDM with hollow tool through response surface methodology. Int J Manuf Eng 2014: 259129. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/259129 doi: 10.1155/2014/259129 |
[31] | Seshaiah S, Sampathkumar D, Mariappan M, et al. (2022) Optimization on material removal rate and surface roughness of stainless steel 304 wire cut EDM by response surface methodology. Adv Mater Sci Eng 2022: 6022550. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/6022550 doi: 10.1155/2022/6022550 |
[32] | Jin HT, Wang F, Zhang W, et al. (2023) Linear regression analysis of sleep quality in people with insomnia in Wuhan city during the COVID-19 pandemic. Int J Clin Pract 2023: 6746045. https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/6746045 doi: 10.1155/2023/6746045 |
[33] | Sarstedt M, Mooi E (2014) A Concise Guide to Market Research, 2 Eds., Berlin: Springer, 193–233. |
[34] | Harane PP, Wojciechowski S, Unune DR (2022) Investigating the effect of different tool electrodes in electric discharge drilling of Waspaloy on process responses. J Mater Res Technol 20: 2542–2557. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2022.08.015 doi: 10.1016/j.jmrt.2022.08.015 |
[35] | Devarajaiah D, Muthumari C (2018) Evaluation of power consumption and MRR in WEDM of Ti-6Al-4V alloy and its simultaneous optimization for sustainable production. J Braz Soc Mech Sci 40: 400. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-018-1318-y doi: 10.1007/s40430-018-1318-y |
[36] | Tang L, Du YT (2014) Experimental study on green electrical discharge machining in tap water of Ti-6Al-4V and parameters optimization. Int J Adv Manuf Tech 70: 469–475. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-013-5274-5 doi: 10.1007/s00170-013-5274-5 |
ctr-04-01-003-Supplementary.pdf |