Loading [MathJax]/jax/output/SVG/jax.js
Research article Special Issues

Anxiety and depression in healthcare workers are associated with work stress and poor work ability

  • Background 

    Symptoms of anxiety and depression are very common among healthcare workers (HCWs) and could impact the quality of care.

    Objective 

    This study aimed to evaluate the prevalence of these disorders in a public health company and their association with work ability and work-related stress.

    Methods 

    A cross-sectional study involved 80 HCWs being treated for mental disorders (MD), 55 HCWs who said they suffered from MD but were not being treated, and 824 healthy colleagues. All workers completed the Work Ability Index (WAI), the Siegrist's Effort/Reward Imbalance questionnaire (ERI), the Goldberg's scales of anxiety and depression (GADS), and the Warr's scale of job satisfaction.

    Results 

    Three-quarters of workers with MD suffered from anxiety and/or depression. Workers who declared at the periodic medical examination in the workplace that they were being treated for MD had significantly lower levels of work ability than those of their colleagues who declared good mental health. They also reported greater work stress (high effort, low rewards, high overcommitment) and lower job satisfaction than their healthy colleagues. Symptomatic but untreated workers reported significantly lower work ability, lower satisfaction, and greater occupational stress than their healthy colleagues. In the entire sample, there were many workers with symptoms of anxiety or depression who did not declare these disorders during the examination. Overall, there were 328 suspected cases of anxiety (34.2%) and 334 cases of depression (34.8%). Anxious workers [OR = 8.11, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 3.74–17.58] and depressed workers (OR = 4.49, 95% CI = 2.22–9.10) had an increased risk of being classified as having “poor work ability”.

    Conclusion 

    The negative association between psychological symptoms and work ability even in undiagnosed/untreated workers demonstrates the usefulness of screening for these symptoms in work environments.

    Citation: Nicola Magnavita, Igor Meraglia, Matteo Riccò. Anxiety and depression in healthcare workers are associated with work stress and poor work ability[J]. AIMS Public Health, 2024, 11(4): 1223-1246. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2024063

    Related Papers:

    [1] Alma Mašić, Hermann J. Eberl . On optimization of substrate removal in a bioreactor with wall attached and suspended bacteria. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2014, 11(5): 1139-1166. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2014.11.1139
    [2] Maryam Basiri, Frithjof Lutscher, Abbas Moameni . Traveling waves in a free boundary problem for the spread of ecosystem engineers. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2025, 22(1): 152-184. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2025008
    [3] Fadoua El Moustaid, Amina Eladdadi, Lafras Uys . Modeling bacterial attachment to surfaces as an early stage of biofilm development. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2013, 10(3): 821-842. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2013.10.821
    [4] Ana I. Muñoz, José Ignacio Tello . Mathematical analysis and numerical simulation of a model of morphogenesis. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2011, 8(4): 1035-1059. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2011.8.1035
    [5] Fabiana Russo, Alberto Tenore, Maria Rosaria Mattei, Luigi Frunzo . Multiscale modelling of the start-up process of anammox-based granular reactors. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2022, 19(10): 10374-10406. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2022486
    [6] Peter W. Bates, Jianing Chen, Mingji Zhang . Dynamics of ionic flows via Poisson-Nernst-Planck systems with local hard-sphere potentials: Competition between cations. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2020, 17(4): 3736-3766. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2020210
    [7] Chiu-Yen Kao, Yuan Lou, Eiji Yanagida . Principal eigenvalue for an elliptic problem with indefinite weight on cylindrical domains. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2008, 5(2): 315-335. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2008.5.315
    [8] Nikodem J. Poplawski, Abbas Shirinifard, Maciej Swat, James A. Glazier . Simulation of single-species bacterial-biofilm growth using the Glazier-Graner-Hogeweg model and the CompuCell3D modeling environment. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2008, 5(2): 355-388. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2008.5.355
    [9] Min Zhu, Xiaofei Guo, Zhigui Lin . The risk index for an SIR epidemic model and spatial spreading of the infectious disease. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2017, 14(5&6): 1565-1583. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2017081
    [10] Blaise Faugeras, Olivier Maury . An advection-diffusion-reaction size-structured fish population dynamics model combined with a statistical parameter estimation procedure: Application to the Indian Ocean skipjack tuna fishery. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2005, 2(4): 719-741. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2005.2.719
  • Background 

    Symptoms of anxiety and depression are very common among healthcare workers (HCWs) and could impact the quality of care.

    Objective 

    This study aimed to evaluate the prevalence of these disorders in a public health company and their association with work ability and work-related stress.

    Methods 

    A cross-sectional study involved 80 HCWs being treated for mental disorders (MD), 55 HCWs who said they suffered from MD but were not being treated, and 824 healthy colleagues. All workers completed the Work Ability Index (WAI), the Siegrist's Effort/Reward Imbalance questionnaire (ERI), the Goldberg's scales of anxiety and depression (GADS), and the Warr's scale of job satisfaction.

    Results 

    Three-quarters of workers with MD suffered from anxiety and/or depression. Workers who declared at the periodic medical examination in the workplace that they were being treated for MD had significantly lower levels of work ability than those of their colleagues who declared good mental health. They also reported greater work stress (high effort, low rewards, high overcommitment) and lower job satisfaction than their healthy colleagues. Symptomatic but untreated workers reported significantly lower work ability, lower satisfaction, and greater occupational stress than their healthy colleagues. In the entire sample, there were many workers with symptoms of anxiety or depression who did not declare these disorders during the examination. Overall, there were 328 suspected cases of anxiety (34.2%) and 334 cases of depression (34.8%). Anxious workers [OR = 8.11, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 3.74–17.58] and depressed workers (OR = 4.49, 95% CI = 2.22–9.10) had an increased risk of being classified as having “poor work ability”.

    Conclusion 

    The negative association between psychological symptoms and work ability even in undiagnosed/untreated workers demonstrates the usefulness of screening for these symptoms in work environments.



    The electronic medical records (EMRs), sometimes called electronic health records (EHRs) or electronic patient records (EPRs), is one of the most important types of clinical data and often contains valuable and detailed patient information for many clinical applications. This paper studies the technology of structuring EMRs and medical information extraction, which are key foundations for health-related various applications.

    As a kind of medical information extraction technology, the medical assertion classification (MAC) in EMRs, which is formally defined for the 2010 i2b2/VA Challenge, aims to recognize the relationship between medical entities (Disease and Symptom) and patients. Given a medical problem or entity mentioned in a clinical text, an assertion classifier must look at the context and choose the status of how the medical problem pertains to the patient by assigning one of seven labels: present, absent, conditional, possible, family, occasional, or history. The assertion is reflected in two aspects: whether the entity occurs to the patient, and how the entity occurs to the patient. As the basis of medical information processing, assertion classification in EMRs is of great importance to many EMRs mining tasks. When there are many researches about MAC for English EMRs, few studies have been done on Chinese texts.

    Based on the above, we study the MAC methods for Chinese EMRs in this paper. According to the corresponding task of the 2010 i2b2/VA Challenge, we divide the assertion categories of medical entity into seven categories: present (当前的), possible (可能的), conditional (有条件的), family (非患者的), occasional (偶有的), absent (否认的) and history (既往的). The definitions and Chinese sentence examples of different kind of assertion category are shown in the Table 1.

    Table 1.  Definition of assertion categories.
    Category Definition Example sentence
    Present Symptoms or illness that must be present in the patient 患者意识昏迷8小时(The patient was unconscious for 8 hours.)
    Absent A denial of illness or symptoms 患者无眩晕头痛(No vertigo, no headache)
    Conditional A condition or illness that occurs only under certain conditions 饮酒后易休克(Shock after drinking)
    Possible Possible disease or symptom 术后可能有红肿现象(Postoperative redness may occur)
    肿瘤待查(Tumor waiting for investigation)
    Family A condition or condition that is not the patient's own 直系亲属患有癫痫病史(History of epilepsy in immediate relatives)
    Occasional An illness or symptom that does not currently occur frequently 偶有头晕症状(Occasionally dizziness)
    History Past illnesses or symptoms 2年前因痛风入我院治疗(Gout was admitted to our hospital two years ago for treatment)

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    Although there have been lot of methods proposed for recognizing entity assertion category from EMRs, most of them used traditional machine methods such as Support Vector Machine (SVM) and Conditional Random Field (CRF), which are mainly based on feature engineering. However, feature engineering is relatively time-consuming and costly, and resulting feature sets are both domain and model-specific. While deep neural network approaches on various medical information extraction tasks have achieved better performance compared to traditional machine learning models, research on entity assertion classification of EMRs using deep neural network model is still few.

    Therefore, this paper proposes a novel model for MAC of Chinese EMRs. We build a deep network (called GRU-Softmax) as baseline, which combines Gated Recurrent Unit (GRU) neural network (a type of Recurrent Neural Networks, RNNs) and softmax, to classify named entity assertion from Chinese EMR. Compared with RNN, the advantage of GRU-Softmax lie in that GRU neural networks have strong expressive ability to capture long context without time-intensive feature engineering.

    Furthermore, in order to obtain character level characteristics in EMRs text, we train Chinese character-level embedding representation using Convolutional Neural Network (CNN), and combine them with word-level embedding vector acquired from large-scale background training corpus. Then the combined vectors are sent to GRU architecture to train entity assertion classification model. In addition, to enhance the representation and distinguish ability of characters and their contexts, we integrate the medical knowledge attention (MKA) learned from entity names and their definition or descriptions in medical dictionary bases (MDBs) in the model.

    On the whole, the contributions of this work can be summarized as follow: (1) we introduce a deep neural network that combines GRU neural networks and Sfotmax to classify medical assertion at first time; (2) We compared the influence of character-level representation extracted by CNN on the model; (3) we use medical knowledge attention (MKA) to integrate entity representation from external knowledge (medical dictionary bases, MDBs).

    The remainder of this paper is composed as follows. In section 2 we summarize the related work about MAC. In section 3 we present our attention-based CNN-GRU-Softmax network model for MAC in Chinese EMRs. In section 4 we show the experimental results and give some analysis. Finally, we summarize our work and outline some ideas for future research.

    Research of entity assertion classification is to study the relation classification between entity and patient on the basis of entity known. Chapman et al. [1] proposed a classification model named as NegEx based on regular expression rules, which classifies disease entity as "existing" or "nonexistent", and can obtain 85.3% of F value on more than 1000 disease entities. Based on NegEx method and combining regular expression rules and trigger words, Harkema et al. [2] proposed the ConText method to classify the disease entities into one of six categories. On six different types of medical records, 76% to 93% of F values could be obtained, indicating that the distribution of modified disease entities varied greatly in different styles of texts.

    Based on the evaluation data of the 2010 i2b2 Challenge, researchers proposed many classification methods based on rules, SVM, CRF, etc. The most effective concept extraction systems used support vector machines (SVMs) [3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11], either with contextual information and dictionaries that indicate negation, uncertainty, and family history [6,10], or with the output of rule-based systems [3,6,8]. Roberts et al. [4] and Chang et al. [11] utilized both medical dictionary and rules. Chang et al. complemented SVM with logistic regression, multi-logistic regression, and boosting, which they combined using voting mechanism. The highest classification effect in the evaluation was obtained by the Bi-level classifier proposed by de Bruijn et al. [5], who used the cTAKES knowledge base created an ensemble whose final output was determined by a multi-class SVM, and the evaluation result F could reach 93.6%. Clark et al. [12] used a CRF model to determine negation and uncertainty with their scope, and added sets of rules to separate documents into different zones, to identify and scope cue phrases, and determine phrase status. They combined the results from the found cues and the phrase status module with a maximum entropy classifier that also used concept and contextual features.

    In this paper, we propose a neural network architecture combining GRU-CNN-Softmax network with Medical Knowledge Attention that will learn the shared semantics between medical record texts and the mentioned entities in the medical dictionary bases (MDBs). The architecture of our proposed model is shown in Figure 1. After querying pretrained character embedding tables, the input sentence will be transformed respectively to the corresponding sequences of pretrained character embeddings and random generated character embedding matrixes for every character. Then a CNN is used to form the character level representation and a GRU is used to encode the sentence representation after concatenating the pretrained character embeddings and character-level representation of the sentence. Afterwards, we treat the entity information from MKBs as a query guidance and integrate them with the original sentence representation using a multi-modal fusion gate and a filtering gate. At last, a Softmax layer is used to classify.

    Figure 1.  The framework of our model. The right part is the GMF and Filtering Gate.

    As described in Figure 2, we firstly train Chinese character embeddings from a large unlabeled Chinese EMR corpus, then CNN is used to generate sentence character-level representation from the character embedding matrix sequence to alleviate rare character problems and capture helpful morphological information like special characters in EMRs. Since the length of sentences is not consistent, a placeholder (padding) is added to the left and right side of character embeddings matrix to make the length of every sentence character-level representation vector matrix sequence equal.

    Figure 2.  Character-level representation of a sentence by CNN.

    The Gate Recurrent Unit (GRU) is a branch of the Recurrent Neural Network (RNN). Like LSTM, it is proposed to solve such problems as the gradient in long-term memory and reverse propagation. We choose to use GRU [13] in our model since it performs similarly to LSTM [14] but is computationally cheaper.

    The GRU model is defined by the following equations:

    zt=σ(Wzxt+Uzht1+bz) (1)
    rt=σ(Wrxt+Urht1+br) (2)
    ˜ht%=tanh(Whxt+Uh(ht1rt)+bh) (3)
    ˜ht%=tanh(Whxt+Uh(ht1rt)+bh) (4)

    In particular, zt and rt are vectors corresponding to the update and reset gates respectively, where * denotes elementwise multiplication. The activations of both gates are elementwise logistic sigmoid functions σ(), constraining the values of zt and rt ranging from 0 to 1. ht represents the output state vector for the current time framet, while ˜ht% is the candidate state obtained with a hyperbolic tangent. The network is fed by the current input vectorxt(sentence representation of previous layer), and the parameters of the model are Wz, Wr, Wh (the feed-forward connections), Uz, Ur, Uh(the recurrent weights), and the bias vectors bz, br, bh. The Gate Recurrent Unit (GRU) is shown in Figure 3.

    Figure 3.  The architecture of gate recurrent unit (GRU).

    Concerning rich entity mention and definition information containing in MDBs, the medical knowledge attention is applied to integrate entity representations learned from external knowledge bases as query vector for encoding. We use a medical dictionary to encode entity information (entity mention and definition) into attention scores as entity embeddings.

    at=f(eWAht) (5)

    Where e is the embedding for entity, and WA is a bi-linear parameter matrix. We simply choose the quadratic function f(x) = x2, which is positive definite and easily differentiate.

    Based on the output of GRU and attention scoring, we design a gated multimodal fusion (GMF) method to fuse the features from output of hidden layerhtand attention scoringat. When predicting the entity tag of a character, the GMF trades off how much new information of the network is considering from the query vector with the EMR text containing the character. The GMF is defined as:

    hat=tanh(Watat+bat) (6)
    hht=tanh(Whtht+bht) (7)
    gt=σ(Wgt(hathht)) (8)
    mt=gthat+(1gt)hht (9)

    where Wat, Wht, Wgt are parameters, hht and hat are the new sentence vector and new query vector respectively, after transformation by single layer perceptron. is the concatenating operation, σ is the logistic sigmoid activation, gt is the gate applied to the new query vector hht, and mt is the multi-modal fused feature from the new medical knowledge feature and the new textual feature.

    When decoding the combination of the multimodal fusion feature mt at position t, the impact and necessity of the external medical knowledge feature for different assertion is different. Because the multimodal fusion feature contains external knowledge feature more or less and it may introduce some noise. We therefore use a filtering gate to combine different features from different signal that better represent the useful information. The filtering gate is a scalar in the range of [0, 1] and its value depends on how much the multimodal fusion feature is helpful to label the tag of the assertion. stand the input feature to the decoder ˆmt are defined as follows:

    st=σ(Wst,htht(Wmt,stmt+bmt,st)) (10)
    ut=st(tanh(Wmtmt+bmt)) (11)
    ˆmt=Wˆmt(htut) (12)

    where Wmt,st, Wst,ht, Wmt, Wˆmt are parameters, ht is the hidden state of bidirectional LSTM at time t, ut is the reserved multimodal features after the filtering gate filter out noise, andis the concatenating operation. The architecture of gated multimodal fusion and filtering gate are shown in Figure 1.

    After we get the representation ˆmt of sentence, we use softmax function to normalize and output entity assertion probability.

    In this section, we evaluate our method on a manually annotated dataset. Following Nadeau et al., we use Precision, Recall, and F1 to evaluate the performance of the models [18].

    We use our own manually annotated corpus as evaluation dataset, which consists of 800 de-identified EMR texts from different clinical departments of a grade-A hospital of second class in Gansu Province. The annotated entity number of every entity assertion category in the dataset is shown in the Table 2.

    Table 2.  Number statistics of different entity assertion categories in the evaluation dataset.
    Category Training Test Total
    Present (当前的) 2025 1013 3038
    Absent (否认的) 1877 921 2799
    Conditional (有条件的) 204 102 306
    Possible (可能的) 844 420 1264
    Family (非患者本人的) 235 117 352
    Occasional (偶有的) 249 147 396
    History (既往的) 342 171 513
    Total 5778 2889 8667

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    We use Google's Word2Vec to train Chinese character embeddings on our 30 thousand unlabeled Chinese EMR texts which is from a grade-A hospital of second class in Gansu Province. Random generated character embeddings are initialized with uniform samples from[3dim,3dim], where we set dim = 30.

    Table 3 gives the chosen hyper-parameters for all experiments. We tune the hyper-parameters on the development set by random search. We try to share as many hyper-parameters as possible in experiments.

    Table 3.  Parameter Setting.
    Parameter Value
    Character-level representation size 50
    Pretrained character Embedding Size 100
    Learning Size 0.014
    Decay Rate 0.05
    Dropout 0.5
    Batch Size 10
    CNN Window Size 3
    CNN Number of filters 50

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    In this part, we describe all of models in the following experimental comparison.

    GRU+Softmax: We combine gated recurrent unit (GRU) neural network and Sfotmaxto classify assertion of clinical named entity. In this model, the GRU neural network is used to help encoding character embedding vector and then the Softmax layer is used to decode and classify. To compare the impact of different methods on experimental performance, we will use this model as the baseline.

    CNN+GRU+Softmax: This model is similar to the CNN-LSTM-CRF which was proposed by Ma and Hovy (2016)[15] and is a truly end-to-end system.

    CGAtS(CNN+GRU+Attention+Softmax): This model is the CNN-GRU-Softmax architecture enhanced by medical knowledge attention (MKA). In this model the output of hidden layer h and the attention score a are used to encode text representation as follows:

    c=Li=1aihi (13)

    where L is the window size of text characters.

    CGAtFuFiS(CNN+GRU+Softmax+All): This is our model. Unlike the previous one, we employed a gated multi-modal fusion (GMF) mechanism and a filtration gate.

    The performance on each of seven categories obtained by all models are shown in Figure 4, and their overall performance on the evaluation dataset is shown in Table 4.

    Figure 4.  Experimental results of different assertion categories.
    Table 4.  Performance of different models on the total evaluation dataset.
    Model Precision (%) Recall (%) F1 (%)
    Softmax 89.13 88.31 88.72
    GRU+Softmax(Baseline) 90.21 90.77 90.49
    CNN-GRU-Softmax 92.95 89.65 91.27
    CGAtS 90.76 93.34 92.03
    CGAtFuFiS 92.19 93.48 92.84

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    We compare our model with the baseline. Table 4 shows the overall assertion classification performance obtained by our method and others, from which we can see that our model CGAtFuFiS obtains the best F1-score of 92.84%.

    The experimental results of different models on our manually annotated datasets are shown in Table 4 and 5. Compared with the baseline model, all other models have improved performance and the updated neural network model is better than the traditional machine learning methods on the MAC task.

    The convolution layer in convolution neural network can well describe the local features of characters, and the most representative part of the local features can be further extracted through the pooling layer. Therefore, our experimental results show that CNN-GRU-Softmax model is superior to GRU-CRF model.The performance of the CGAtS model is better than CNN-GRU-Softmax. This result shows that, the rich information of entities and their corresponding semantic definition from MDBs is surely useful for MAC. CGAtFuFiS model is slightly better than CGAtS model and indicates that for the clinical NER task in Chinese EMRs it is helpful to fuse the features from EMR text context with the external knowledge dictionary utilizing gated multimodal fusion (GMF). Since supplement of external information in MKBs sometimes causes noise to the model, we therefore use a filtering gate to combine and weight different features. As shown by the experimental results, the filtering gate is helpful to improve the overall performance of our model.

    Due to the sublanguage characteristic of Chinese EMRs, the expression of clinical named entity is very different from those in general text. Using the entity information contained in the MABs as the classification query vector can lead the decoder to focus on the entity itself. We combine text itself and MABs features together with a multi-modal fusion gate as the query vector, then set up a filtering gate to filter out useless feature information. The experimental results show that our model CGAtFuFiS, which integrates CNN, GRU, medical knowledge attention, gated multimodal fusion, filtering gate, and Softmax, achieves the best F1 score on the evaluation corpus.

    In this work, we proposed a medical knowledge-attention enhanced neural clinical entity assertion classification model, which makes use of the external MABs in the way of attention mechanism. A gated multi-modal fusion module is introduced to decide how much MABs information is fused into the query vector at each time step. We further introduced a filtering gate module to adaptively adjust how much multi-modal information can be considered at each time step. The experimental results on the manually annotated Chinese EMR evaluation dataset show that our proposed approach improved the performance of MAC task obviously compared to other baseline models.

    In the future, we will explore a fine-grained clinical entity classification model for Chinese EMRs and method to extract entity semantic relation in Chinese EMRs.

    We would like to thank the anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments. The research work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NO. 61762081, No.61662067, No. 61662068) and the Key Research and Development Project of Gansu Province (No. 17YF1GA016).

    All authors declare no conflicts of interest in this paper.


    Acknowledgments



    We thank Ms. EA Wright who revised the English language.

    Authors' contribution



    Conceptualization, Nicola Magnavita; methodology, Nicola Magnavita; investigation, Nicola Magnavita and Igor Meraglia; data curation, Nicola Magnavita; writing-original draft preparation, Nicola Magnavita; writing-review and editing, Nicola Magnavita, Igor Meraglia and Matteo Riccò. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

    Conflict of interest



    The authors declare there are no conflicts of interest.

    Funding



    This research received no external funding.

    [1] Pappa S, Ntella V, Giannakas T, et al. (2020) Prevalence of depression, anxiety, and insomnia among healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Brain Behav Immun 88: 901-907. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbi.2020.05.026
    [2] Marvaldi M, Mallet J, Dubertret C, et al. (2019) Anxiety, depression, trauma-related, and sleep disorders among healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 126: 252-264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2021.03.024
    [3] Li Y, Scherer N, Felix L, et al. (2021) Prevalence of depression, anxiety and post-traumatic stress disorder in health care workers during the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One 16: e0246454. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0246454
    [4] Hill JE, Harris C, Danielle LC, et al. (2022) The prevalence of mental health conditions in healthcare workers during and after a pandemic: Systematic review and meta-analysis. J Adv Nurs 78: 1551-1573. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.15175
    [5] Takada H, Ae R, Ogawa M, et al. (2022) Depression prevention in healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic. Occup Med (Lond) 72: 207-214. https://doi.org/10.1093/occmed/kqab192
    [6] Turan O, Demirci NY, Güntülü AK, et al. (2022) Anxiety and depression levels of healthcare workers during Covid-19 pandemic. Afr Health Sci 22: 532-540. https://doi.org/10.4314/ahs.v22i1.62
    [7] Weibelzahl S, Reiter J, Duden G (2021) Depression and anxiety in healthcare professionals during the COVID-19 pandemic. Epidemiol Infect 149: e46. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0950268821000303
    [8] Shamsan A, Alhajji M, Alabbasi Y, et al. (2022) Level of anxiety and depression among healthcare workers in Saudi Arabia during the COVID-19 pandemic. Peer J 10: e14246. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.14246
    [9] Smirnova D, Syunyakov T, Pavlichenko A, et al. (2022) Anxiety, depression and suicidality in healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic: The Russian study sample of the COMET-G project. Psychiatr Danub 34: 246-255.
    [10] Danet Danet A (2021) Psychological impact of COVID-19 pandemic in western frontline healthcare professionals. A systematic review. Med Clin (Barc) 156: 449-458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medcli.2020.11.009
    [11] Abdulla EK, Velladath SU, Varghese A, et al. (2021) Depression and anxiety associated with COVID-19 pandemic among healthcare professionals in India- A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Epidemiol Glob Health 12: 100888. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cegh.2021.100888
    [12] Saragih ID, Tonapa SI, Saragih IS, et al. (2021) Global prevalence of mental health problems among healthcare workers during the Covid-19 pandemic: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Nurs Stud 121: 104002. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2021.104002
    [13] Aymerich C, Pedruzo B, Pérez JL, et al. (2022) COVID-19 pandemic effects on health worker's mental health: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Psychiatry 65: e10. https://doi.org/10.1192/j.eurpsy.2022.1
    [14] Fernandez R, Sikhosana N, Green H, et al. (2021) Anxiety and depression among healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic umbrella review of the global evidence. BMJ Open 11: e054528. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054528
    [15] Vindegaard N, Benros ME (2020) COVID-19 pandemic and mental health consequences: Systematic review of the current evidence. Brain Behav Immun 89: 531-542. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbi.2020.05.048
    [16] Chen Y, Wang J, Geng Y, et al. (2022) Meta-analysis of the prevalence of anxiety and depression among frontline healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic. Front Public Health 10: 984630. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.984630
    [17] Wu T, Jia X, Shi H, et al. (2021) Prevalence of mental health problems during the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Affect Disord 281: 91-98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2020.11.117
    [18] Salari N, Khazaie H, Hosseinian-Far A, et al. (2020) The prevalence of stress, anxiety and depression within front-line healthcare workers caring for COVID-19 patients: A systematic review and meta-regression. Hum Resour Health 18: 100. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12960-020-00544-1
    [19] Tian H, Qiao T, Teng J, et al. (2023) Factors associated with depression among healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychol Med 15: 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291723002271
    [20] Andhavarapu S, Yardi I, Bzhilyanskaya V, et al. (2022) Post-traumatic stress in healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychiatry Res 317: 114890. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2022.114890
    [21] Magnavita N, Chirico F, Garbarino S, et al. (2021) SARS/MERS/SARS-CoV-2 outbreaks and burnout syndrome among healthcare workers. An umbrella systematic review. Int J Environ Res Public Health 18: 4361. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18084361
    [22] Serrano-Ripoll MJ, Meneses-Echavez JF, Ricci-Cabello I, et al. (2020) Impact of viral epidemic outbreaks on mental health of healthcare workers: A rapid systematic review and meta-analysis. J Affect Disord 277: 347-357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2020.08.034
    [23] Norhayati MN, Che Yusof R, Azman MY (2021) Prevalence of psychological impacts on healthcare providers during COVID-19 pandemic in Asia. Int J Environ Res Public Health 18: 9157. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18179157
    [24] Arora T, Grey I, Östlundh L, et al. (2022) The prevalence of psychological consequences of COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. J Health Psychol 27: 805-824. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359105320966639
    [25] Lee BEC, Ling M, Boyd L, et al. (2023) The prevalence of probable mental health disorders among hospital healthcare workers during COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Affect Disord 330: 329-345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2023.03.012
    [26] Ghahramani S, Kasraei H, Hayati R, et al. (2023) Health care workers' mental health in the face of COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Psychiatry Clin Pract 27: 208-217. https://doi.org/10.1080/13651501.2022.2101927
    [27] Chirico F, Nucera G, Magnavita N (2020) COVID-19: Protecting healthcare workers is a priority. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 41: 1117. https://doi.org/10.1017/ice.2020.148
    [28] Chirico F, Nucera G, Magnavita N (2020) Protecting the mental health of healthcare workers during the COVID-19 emergency. Brit J Psych Int 18: E1. https://doi.org/10.1192/bji.2020.39
    [29] Cohen C, Pignata S, Bezak E, et al. (2023) Workplace interventions to improve well-being and reduce burnout for nurses, physicians and allied healthcare professionals: A systematic review. BMJ Open 13: e071203. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-071203
    [30] Muller AE, Hafstad EV, Himmels JPW, et al. (2020) The mental health impact of the covid-19 pandemic on healthcare workers, and interventions to help them: A rapid systematic review. Psychiatry Res 293: 113441. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2020.113441
    [31] Pollock A, Campbell P, Cheyne J, et al. (2020) Interventions to support the resilience and mental health of frontline health and social care professionals during and after a disease outbreak, epidemic or pandemic: A mixed methods systematic review. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 11: CD013779. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD013779
    [32] Yang JM, Ye H, Long Y, et al. (2023) Effects of web-based mindfulness-based interventions on anxiety, depression, and stress among frontline health care workers during the COVID-19 pandemic: Systematic review and meta-analysis. J Med Internet Res 25: e44000. https://doi.org/10.2196/44000
    [33] Del Campo MT, Romo PE, de la Hoz RE, et al. (2017) Anxiety and depression predict musculoskeletal disorders in health care workers. Arch Environ Occup Health 72: 39-44. https://doi.org/10.1080/19338244.2016.1154002
    [34] Shi L, Li G, Hao J, et al. (2020) Psychological depletion in physicians and nurses exposed to workplace violence: A cross-sectional study using propensity score analysis. Int J Nurs Stud 103: 103493. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2019.103493
    [35] Magnavita N, Heponiemi T (2011) Workplace violence against nursing students and nurses. An Italian experience. J Nurs Scholarsh 43: 203-210. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1547-5069.2011.01392.x
    [36] Magnavita N, Fileni A (2012) Violence against radiologists. II: psychosocial factors. Radiol Med 117: 1034-1043.
    [37] Li Y, Wang Y, Lv X, et al. (2022) Effects of factors related to shift work on depression and anxiety in nurses. Front Public Health 10: 926988. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.926988
    [38] Hoying J, Melnyk BM, Hutson E, et al. (2020) Prevalence and correlates of depression, anxiety, stress, healthy beliefs, and lifestyle behaviors in first-year graduate health sciences students. Worldviews Evid Based Nurs 17: 49-59. https://doi.org/10.1111/wvn.12415
    [39] Cirrincione L, Plescia F, Malta G, et al. (2023) Evaluation of correlation between sleep and psychiatric disorders in a population of night shift workers: A pilot study. Int J Environ Res Public Health 20: 3756. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20043756
    [40] Weaver MD, Vetter C, Rajaratnam SMW, et al. (2018) Sleep disorders, depression and anxiety are associated with adverse safety outcomes in healthcare workers: A prospective cohort study. J Sleep Res 27: e12722. https://doi.org/10.1111/jsr.12722
    [41] Sabanciogullari S, Yilmaz FT, Karabey G (2021) The effect of the clinical nurses' compassion levels on tendency to make medical error: A cross-sectional study. Contemp Nurse 57: 65-79. https://doi.org/10.1080/10376178.2021.1927772
    [42] Cocker F, Joss N (2016) Compassion fatigue among healthcare, emergency and community service workers: A systematic review. Int J Environ Res Public Health 13: 618. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph13060618
    [43] Bailey BC, Cox S, Terris L, et al. (2023) Rural health care worker wellness during COVID-19: Compassion fatigue, compassion satisfaction & utilization of wellness resources. PLoS One 18: e0295020. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0295020
    [44] Abbaszadeh R, Ahmadi F, Khoobi M, et al. (2024) Contributors to fatigue among nurses working in critical care units: A qualitative study. Nurs Crit Care 2024 . https://doi.org/10.1111/nicc.13091
    [45] de Boer J, Lok A, Van't Verlaat E, et al. (2011) Work-related critical incidents in hospital-based health care providers and the risk of post-traumatic stress symptoms, anxiety, and depression: a meta-analysis. Soc Sci Med 73: 316-326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.05.009
    [46] Magnavita N, Magnavita G, Fileni A, et al. (2009) Ethical problems in radiology. Medical error and disclosure. Radiol Med 114: 1345-1355. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-009-0445-z
    [47] Fileni A, Magnavita N, Mammi F, et al. (2007) Malpractice stress syndrome in radiologists and radiotherapists. Perceived causes and consequences. Radiol Med 112: 1069-1084. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-007-0206-9
    [48] Lindwall M, Gerber M, Jonsdottir IH, et al. (2014) The relationships of change in physical activity with change in depression, anxiety, and burnout: A longitudinal study of Swedish healthcare workers. Health Psychol 33: 1309-1318. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034402
    [49] Magnavita N, Fileni A (2014) Association of work-related stress with depression and anxiety in radiologists. Radiol Med 119: 359-366. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-013-0355-y
    [50] Ramírez-Elvira S, Romero-Béjar JL, Suleiman-Martos N, et al. (2021) Prevalence, risk factors and burnout levels in intensive care unit nurses: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Environ Res Public Health 18: 11432. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182111432
    [51] Ulfa M, Azuma M, Steiner A (2022) Burnout status of healthcare workers in the world during the peak period of the COVID-19 pandemic. Front Psychol 13: 952783. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.952783
    [52] Jun J, Ojemeni MM, Kalamani R, et al. (2021) Relationship between nurse burnout, patient and organizational outcomes: Systematic review. Int J Nurs Stud 119: 103933. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2021.103933
    [53] Melnyk BM, Kelly SA, Stephens J, et al. (2020) Interventions to improve mental health, well-being, physical health, and lifestyle behaviors in physicians and nurses: A systematic review. Am J Health Promot 34: 929-941. https://doi.org/10.1177/0890117120920451
    [54] Zhang XJ, Song Y, Jiang T, et al. (2020) Interventions to reduce burnout of physicians and nurses: An overview of systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Medicine (Baltimore) 99: e20992. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000020992
    [55] West CP, Dyrbye LN, Erwin PJ, et al. (2016) Interventions to prevent and reduce physician burnout: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet 388: 2272-2281. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31279-X
    [56] Ghawadra SF, Abdullah KL, Choo WY, et al. (2019) Mindfulness-based stress reduction for psychological distress among nurses: A systematic review. J Clin Nurs 28: 3747-3758. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.14987
    [57] Gilmartin H, Goyal A, Hamati MC, et al. (2017) Brief mindfulness practices for healthcare providers-A systematic literature review. Am J Med 130: 1219.e1-1219.e17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2017.05.041
    [58] Guillaumie L, Boiral O, Champagne J (2017) A mixed-methods systematic review of the effects of mindfulness on nurses. J Adv Nurs 73: 1017-1034. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.13176
    [59] Tamminga SJ, Emal LM, Boschman JS, et al. (2023) Individual-level interventions for reducing occupational stress in healthcare workers. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 5: CD002892. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD002892.pub6
    [60] Di Nota PM, Bahji A, Groll D, et al. (2021) Proactive psychological programs designed to mitigate posttraumatic stress injuries among at-risk workers: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Syst Rev 10: 126. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-021-01677-7
    [61] Ward EJ, Fragala MS, Birse CE, et al. (2023) Assessing the impact of a comprehensive mental health program on frontline health service workers. PLoS One 18: e0294414. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0294414
    [62] Magnavita N, Cicerone M, Cirese V, et al. (2006) Critical aspects of the management of “hazardous” health care workers. Consensus document. Med Lav 97: 715-725.
    [63] Magnavita N (2006) Management of impaired physicians in Europe. Med Lav 97: 762-773.
    [64] Magnavita N (2007) The unhealthy physician. J Med Ethics 33: 210-214. https://doi.org/10.1136/jme.2006.017533
    [65] Magnavita N, Magnavita G, Bergamaschi A (2010) The impaired radiologist. Radiol Med 115: 826-838. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-010-0539-7
    [66] Sturesson M, Edlund C, Fjellman-Wiklund A, et al. (2013) Work ability as obscure, complex and unique: Views of Swedish occupational therapists and physicians. Work 45: 117-128. https://doi.org/10.3233/WOR-2012-1416
    [67] Ebener M, Hasselhorn HM (2019) Validation of short measures of work ability for research and employee surveys. Int J Environ Res Public Health 16: 3386. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16183386
    [68] Tengland PA (2011) The concept of work ability. J Occup Rehabil 21: 275-285. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-010-9269-x
    [69] Abbasi M, Zakerian A, Kolahdouzi M, et al. (2016) Relationship between Work Ability Index and cognitive failure among nurses. Electron Physician 8: 2136-2143. https://doi.org/10.19082/2136
    [70] Gracino ME, Dos Santos Tortajada J, de-Castro-Alves MB, et al. (2020) Analysis of physicians work ability, in the city of Maringá, Brazil. Rev Bras Med Trab 16: 417-428. https://doi.org/10.5327/Z1679443520180296
    [71] Magnavita N (2023) Workplace health promotion embedded in medical surveillance: The Italian way to total worker health program. Int J Environ Res Public Health 20: 3659. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20043659
    [72] Magnavita N (2007) Anxiety and depression at work. the A/D Goldberg Questionnaire. G Ital Med Lav Ergon 29: 670-671.
    [73] Goldberg D, Bridges K, Duncan-Jones P, et al. (1988) Detecting anxiety and depression in general medical settings. BMJ 297: 897-899. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.297.6653.897
    [74] Magnavita N (2007) Two tools for health surveillance of job stress: The Karasek job content questionnaire and the Siegrist effort reward imbalance questionnaire. G Ital Med Lav Ergon 29: 667-670.
    [75] Magnavita N, Garbarino S, Siegrist J (2012) The use of parsimonious questionnaires in occupational health surveillance: Psychometric properties of the short Italian version of the effort/reward imbalance questionnaire. Scientific World J 372852. https://doi.org/10.1100/2012/372852
    [76] Siegrist J (1996) Adverse health effects of high-effort/low-reward conditions. J Occup Health Psychol 1: 27-41. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8998.1.1.27
    [77] Siegrist J, Wege N, Pühlhofer F, et al. (2009) A short generic measure of work stress in the era of globalization: Effort-reward imbalance. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 82: 1005-1013. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00420-008-0384-3
    [78] Avanzi L, Perinelli E, Vignoli M, et al. (2020) Unravelling work drive: A comparison between workaholism and overcommitment. Int J Environ Res Public Health 17: 5755. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17165755
    [79] Siegrist J, Li J (2016) Associations of extrinsic and intrinsic components of work stress with health: A systematic review of evidence on the effort-reward imbalance model. Int J Environ Res Public Health 13: 432. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph13040432
    [80] Magnavita N, Fileni A, Magnavita L, et al. (2007) Job satisfaction. Use of the Job Satisfaction Scale (JSS). G Ital Med Lav Ergon 29: 655-657.
    [81] Warr P, Cook J, Wall T (1979) Scales for the measurement of some work attitudes and aspects of psychological well-being. J Occup Psychol 52: 129-148. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8325.1979.tb00448.x
    [82] Converso D, Sottimano I, Garzaro G, et al. (2022) Contribution to validation of the Italian version of work ability personal radar. Med Lav 113: e2022051. https://doi.org/10.23749/mdl.v113i6.13470
    [83] Tuomi K, Ilmarinen J, Jahkola A, et al. (1998) Work Ability Index, 2 Eds. revised Edn. Helsinki: Finnish Institute of Occupational Health.
    [84] Ilmarinen J (2007) The Work Ability Index (WAI). Occup Med 57: 160. https://doi.org/10.1093/occmed/kqm008
    [85] Radkiewicz P, Widerszal-Bazyl M (2005) Psychometric properties of Work Ability Index in the light of comparative survey study. Int Congr Ser 1280: 304-309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. ics.2005.02.089. 23
    [86] Abdolalizadeh M, Arastoo AA, Ghsemzadeh R, et al. (2012) The psychometric properties of an Iranian translation of the Work Ability Index (WAI) questionnaire. J Occup Rehabil 22: 401-408. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-012-9355-3
    [87] Bethge M, Radoschewski FM, Gutenbrunner C (2012) The Work Ability Index as a screening tool to identify the need for rehabilitation: Longitudinal findings from the Second German Sociomedical Panel of Employees. J Rehabil Med 44: 980-987. https://doi.org/10.2340/16501977-1063
    [88] Martinez MC, Latorre Mdo R, Fischer FM (2009) Validity and reliability of the Brazilian version of the Work Ability Index questionnaire. Rev Saude Publica 43: 525-532. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-89102009005000017
    [89] Martus P, Jakob O, Rose U, et al. (2010) A comparative analysis of the Work Ability Index. Occup Med 60: 517-524. https://doi.org/10.1093/occmed/kqq093
    [90] Peralta N, Godoi Vasconcelos AG, Härter Griep R, et al. (2012) Validity and reliability of the Work Ability Index in primary care workers in Argentina. Salud Colectiva 8: 163-173. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1851-82652012000200005
    [91] Al Maqbali M, Alsayed A, Hughes C, et al. (2024) Stress, anxiety, depression and sleep disturbance among healthcare professional during the COVID-19 pandemic: An umbrella review of 72 meta-analyses. PLoS One 19: e0302597. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0302597
    [92] Nowrouzi-Kia B, Sithamparanathan G, Nadesar N, et al. (2022) Factors associated with work performance and mental health of healthcare workers during pandemics: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Public Health (Oxf) 44: 731-739. https://doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdab173
    [93] Magnavita N, Tripepi G, Di Prinzio RR (2020) Symptoms in health care workers during the COVID-19 epidemic. A cross-sectional survey. Int J Environ Res Public Health 17: 5218. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17145218
    [94] Magnavita N, Soave PM, Ricciardi W, et al. (2020) Occupational stress and mental health of anaesthetists during the COVID-19 pandemic. Int J Environ Res Public Health 17: 8245. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17218245
    [95] Magnavita N, Soave PM, Antonelli M (2021) Prolonged stress causes depression in frontline workers facing the COVID-19 pandemic-a repeated cross-sectional study in a COVID-19 hub-hospital in central Italy. Int J Environ Res Public Health 18: 7316. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18147316
    [96] Magnavita N, Soave PM, Antonelli M (2021) A one-year prospective study of work-related mental health in the intensivists of a COVID-19 hub hospital. Int J Environ Res Public Health 18: 9888. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18189888
    [97] Magnavita N, Soave PM, Antonelli M (2022) Treating anti-vax patients, a new occupational stressor—data from the 4th wave of the Prospective Study of Intensivists and COVID-19 (PSIC). Int J Environ Res Public Health 19: 5889. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19105889
    [98] Magnavita N, Soave PM, Antonelli M (2022) Teaching safety-resident anaesthetists at the forefront of COVID-19. Ind Health 60: 75-78. https://doi.org/10.2486/indhealth.2021-0054
    [99] Petrie K, Milligan-Saville J, Gayed A, et al. (2018) Prevalence of PTSD and common mental disorders amongst ambulance personnel: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 53: 897-909. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-018-1539-5
    [100] Tung YJ, Lo KKH, Ho RCM, et al. (2018) Prevalence of depression among nursing students: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Nurse Educ Today 63: 119-129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2018.01.009
    [101] Pacheco JP, Giacomin HT, Tam WW, et al. (2017) Mental health problems among medical students in Brazil: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Braz J Psychiatry 39: 369-378. https://doi.org/10.1590/1516-4446-2017-2223
    [102] Wieclaw J, Agerbo E, Mortensen PB, et al. (2006) Risk of affective and stress related disorders among employees in human service professions. Occup Environ Med 63: 314-319. https://doi.org/10.1136/oem.2004.019398
    [103] Maharaj S, Lees T, Lal S (2018) Prevalence and risk factors of depression, anxiety, and stress in a cohort of Australian nurses. Int J Environ Res Public Health 16: 61. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16010061
    [104] Al Mawaali Z, Abdelrahman H, Al Qadire M, et al. (2024) Prevalence of anxiety, depression, and sleep disturbance among emergency nurses in Oman. J Emerg Nurs 13: S0099–1767(24)00050–3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jen.2024.02.004
    [105] Opoku Agyemang S, Ninnoni JP, Enyan NIE (2022) Prevalence and determinants of depression, anxiety and stress among psychiatric nurses in Ghana: A cross-sectional study. BMC Nurs 21: 179. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-022-00964-5
    [106] Huang CL, Weng SF, Wang JJ, et al. (2015) Risks of treated insomnia, anxiety, and depression in health care-seeking physicians: A nationwide population-based study. Medicine (Baltimore) 94: e1323. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000001323
    [107] Chirico F, Afolabi AA, Ilesanmi OS, et al. (2021) Prevalence, risk factors and prevention of burnout syndrome among healthcare workers before the COVID-19 pandemic: An umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses. J Health Soc Sci 6: 465-491. HTTPS://DOI.ORG/10.19204/2021/prvl3
    [108] Prga Borojević I, Kincaid IA, Bago M, et al. (2024) The mediating role of depressive, anxiety, and physical symptoms on Work Ability Index in employed women with breast cancer: A prospective study from Croatia. Croat Med J 65: 101-110. https://doi.org/10.3325/cmj.2024.65.101
    [109] Magnavita N, Di Prinzio RR, Meraglia I, et al. (2023) Supporting return to work after breast cancer: A mixed method study. Healthcare (Basel) 11: 2343. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11162343
    [110] Cordeiro RA, Fischer FM, Shinjo SK (2023) Work situation, work ability and expectation of returning to work in patients with systemic autoimmune myopathies. Rheumatology (Oxford) 62: 785-793. https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/keac389
    [111] Knekt P, Lindfors O, Laaksonen MA, et al. (2008) Helsinki psychotherapy study group. Effectiveness of short-term and long-term psychotherapy on work ability and functional capacity--a randomized clinical trial on depressive and anxiety disorders. J Affect Disord 107: 95-106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2007.08.005
    [112] Riedl D, Labek K, Gstrein I, et al. (2023) Large improvement of mental health during in outpatient short-term group psychotherapy treatment-a naturalistic pre-/post-observational study. Neuropsychiatr 37: 57-64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40211-022-00449-6
    [113] Guidi S, Bagnara S, Fichera GP (2012) The HSE indicator tool, psychological distress and work ability. Occup Med (Lond) 62: 203-209. https://doi.org/10.1093/occmed/kqs021
    [114] Walker EJ, Jackson CA, Egan HH, et al. (2015) Workability and mental wellbeing among therapeutic prison officers. Occup Med (Lond) 65: 549-551. https://doi.org/10.1093/occmed/kqv084
    [115] Westermann C, Nienhaus A, Treszl A (2019) Quality of life and work ability among healthcare personnel with chronic viral hepatitis. Evaluation of the inpatient rehabilitation program of the Wartenberg clinic. Int J Environ Res Public Health 16: 3874. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16203874
    [116] Lerner D, Adler DA, Chang H, et al. (2004) The clinical and occupational correlates of work productivity loss among employed patients with depression. J Occup Environ Med 46: S46-S55. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.jom.0000126684.82825.0a
    [117] Lerner D, Henke RM (2008) What does research tell us about depression, job performance, and work productivity?. J Occup Environ Med 50: 401-410. https://doi.org/10.1097/JOM.0b013e31816bae50
    [118] McKnight PE, Kashdan TB (2009) The importance of functional impairment to mental health outcomes: A case for reassessing our goals in depression treatment research. Clin Psychol Rev 29: 243-259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2009.01.005
    [119] Gartner FR, Nieuwenhuijsen K, van Dijk FJ, et al. (2010) The impact of common mental disorders on the work functioning of nurses and allied health professionals: A systematic review. Int J Nurs Stud 47: 1047-1061. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2010.03.013
    [120] Noben C, Smit F, Nieuwenhuijsen K, et al. (2014) Comparative cost-effectiveness of two interventions to promote work functioning by targeting mental health complaints among nurses: Pragmatic cluster randomised trial. Int J Nurs Stud 51: 1321-1331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2014.01.017
    [121] Noben C, Evers S, Nieuwenhuijsen K, et al. (2015) Protecting and promoting mental health of nurses in the hospital setting: Is it cost-effective from an employer's perspective?. Int J Occup Med Environ Health 28: 891-900. https://doi.org/10.13075/ijomeh.1896.00465
    [122] Magnavita N, Meraglia I, Viti G, et al. (2024) The Work Ability Index (WAI) in the healthcare sector: A cross-sectional/retrospective assessment of the questionnaire. Int J Environ Res Public Health 21: 349. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph21030349
    [123] Magnavita N, Meraglia I, Chiorri C (2024) Emotional and work-related factors in the self-assessment of work ability among italian healthcare workers. Healthcare 12: 1731. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare12171731
    [124] Kaewboonchoo O, Ratanasiripong P (2015) Psychometric properties of the Thai version of the work ability index (Thai WAI). J Occup Health 57: 371-377. https://doi.org/10.1539/joh.14-0173-OA
    [125] Smrekar M, Franko A, Petrak O, et al. (2020) Validation of the croatian version of Work Ability Index (WAI) in population of nurses on transformed item-specific scores. Zdr Varst 59: 57-64. https://doi.org/10.2478/sjph-2020-0008
    [126] González-Domínguez ME, Fernández-García E, Paloma-Castro O, et al. (2024) Work Ability Index: Psychometric testing in aeronautical industry workers. Saf Health Work 15: 80-86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shaw.2023.12.001
  • This article has been cited by:

    1. Babita Pandey, Devendra Kumar Pandey, Brijendra Pratap Mishra, Wasiur Rhmann, A comprehensive survey of deep learning in the field of medical imaging and medical natural language processing: Challenges and research directions, 2021, 13191578, 10.1016/j.jksuci.2021.01.007
    2. Lizong Deng, Luming Chen, Tao Yang, Mi Liu, Shicheng Li, Taijiao Jiang, Constructing High-Fidelity Phenotype Knowledge Graphs for Infectious Diseases With a Fine-Grained Semantic Information Model: Development and Usability Study, 2021, 23, 1438-8871, e26892, 10.2196/26892
    3. Marta B. Fernandes, Navid Valizadeh, Haitham S. Alabsi, Syed A. Quadri, Ryan A. Tesh, Abigail A. Bucklin, Haoqi Sun, Aayushee Jain, Laura N. Brenner, Elissa Ye, Wendong Ge, Sarah I. Collens, Stacie Lin, Sudeshna Das, Gregory K. Robbins, Sahar F. Zafar, Shibani S. Mukerji, M. Brandon Westover, Classification of neurologic outcomes from medical notes using natural language processing, 2023, 214, 09574174, 119171, 10.1016/j.eswa.2022.119171
    4. Jin-ah Sim, Xiaolei Huang, Madeline R. Horan, Christopher M. Stewart, Leslie L. Robison, Melissa M. Hudson, Justin N. Baker, I-Chan Huang, Natural language processing with machine learning methods to analyze unstructured patient-reported outcomes derived from electronic health records: A systematic review, 2023, 146, 09333657, 102701, 10.1016/j.artmed.2023.102701
    5. Yu Zhang, Rui Xie, Iman Beheshti, Xia Liu, Guowei Zheng, Yin Wang, Zhenwen Zhang, Weihao Zheng, Zhijun Yao, Bin Hu, Improving brain age prediction with anatomical feature attention-enhanced 3D-CNN, 2024, 169, 00104825, 107873, 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2023.107873
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2024 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(756) PDF downloads(57) Cited by(1)

Figures and Tables

Tables(6)

Other Articles By Authors

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog