Commentary

Artificial intelligence, human intelligence, and the future of public health

  • Received: 11 June 2022 Revised: 12 August 2022 Accepted: 07 September 2022 Published: 16 September 2022
  • In this paper, I have described the healthcare problem (maldistribution of doctors) in India. Later, I have introduced the concept of artificial intelligence (AI) and I have described AI technology with various examples, how it is rapidly changing the healthcare scenario across the world. I have also described the various advantages of artificial intelligence technology. At the end of the paper, I have raised some serious concerns regarding complete replacement of human based healthcare technology with artificial intelligence technology. I concluded that there is not the slightest question that AI will influence the future. People must be innovative, insightful, and context-aware for AI to work. This is because humans will continue to contribute value that cannot be reproduced by robots.

    Citation: Sudip Bhattacharya. Artificial intelligence, human intelligence, and the future of public health[J]. AIMS Public Health, 2022, 9(4): 644-650. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2022045

    Related Papers:

    [1] Eftychia Ferentinou, Ioannis Koutelekos, Evangelos Dousis, Eleni Evangelou, Despoina Pappa, Maria Theodoratou, Chrysoula Dafogianni . The relationship between childhood sleep, emotional intelligence and Body Mass Index in school aged children. AIMS Public Health, 2025, 12(1): 77-90. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2025006
    [2] Petros Galanis, Aglaia Katsiroumpa, Ioannis Moisoglou, Maria Kalogeropoulou, Parisis Gallos, Irene Vraka . Emotional intelligence protects nurses against quiet quitting, turnover intention, and job burnout. AIMS Public Health, 2024, 11(2): 601-613. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2024030
    [3] Giuseppe Palomba, Agostino Fernicola, Marcello Della Corte, Marianna Capuano, Giovanni Domenico De Palma, Giovanni Aprea . Artificial intelligence in screening and diagnosis of surgical diseases: A narrative review. AIMS Public Health, 2024, 11(2): 557-576. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2024028
    [4] Eleni Marki, Ioannis Moisoglou, Stamata Aggelidou, Maria Malliarou, Konstantinos Tsaras, Ioanna V. Papathanasiou . Body image, emotional intelligence and quality of life in peritoneal dialysis patients. AIMS Public Health, 2023, 10(3): 698-709. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2023048
    [5] Kate E. Thomason, Gisli Gudjonsson, Elaine German, Robin Morris, Susan Young . Sociomoral Reasoning in Adults with ADHD: A Pilot Study. AIMS Public Health, 2014, 1(3): 147-159. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2014.3.147
    [6] Ali S. Abed Al Sailawi, Mohammad Reza Kangavari . Utilizing AI for extracting insights on post WHO's COVID-19 vaccination declaration from X (Twitter) social network. AIMS Public Health, 2024, 11(2): 349-378. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2024018
    [7] Vasiliki Georgousopoulou, Panagiota Pervanidou, Pantelis Perdikaris, Efrosyni Vlachioti, Vaia Zagana, Georgios Kourtis, Ioanna Pavlopoulou, Vasiliki Matziou . Covid-19 pandemic? Mental health implications among nurses and Proposed interventions. AIMS Public Health, 2024, 11(1): 273-293. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2024014
    [8] Anichur Rahman, Tanoy Debnath, Dipanjali Kundu, Md. Saikat Islam Khan, Airin Afroj Aishi, Sadia Sazzad, Mohammad Sayduzzaman, Shahab S. Band . Machine learning and deep learning-based approach in smart healthcare: Recent advances, applications, challenges and opportunities. AIMS Public Health, 2024, 11(1): 58-109. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2024004
    [9] Jean-François Pelletier . The transcendent voice of recovery mentors in mental health: a philosophical reflection. AIMS Public Health, 2019, 6(2): 135-142. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2019.2.135
    [10] Otobo I. Ujah, Chukwuemeka E Ogbu, Russell S. Kirby . “Is a game really a reason for people to die?” Sentiment and thematic analysis of Twitter-based discourse on Indonesia soccer stampede. AIMS Public Health, 2023, 10(4): 739-754. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2023050
  • In this paper, I have described the healthcare problem (maldistribution of doctors) in India. Later, I have introduced the concept of artificial intelligence (AI) and I have described AI technology with various examples, how it is rapidly changing the healthcare scenario across the world. I have also described the various advantages of artificial intelligence technology. At the end of the paper, I have raised some serious concerns regarding complete replacement of human based healthcare technology with artificial intelligence technology. I concluded that there is not the slightest question that AI will influence the future. People must be innovative, insightful, and context-aware for AI to work. This is because humans will continue to contribute value that cannot be reproduced by robots.



    Whether healthcare is provided by the government, the private sector or both, the key to improving health outcomes in our nation is the availability of a sufficient number of physicians providing basic healthcare services in disadvantaged regions. In several countries, like India, the situation has changed. Now that there are enough doctors, the problem is incorrect distribution [1].

    The new National Health Policy and the National Health Assurance Mission are already in effect. It is time for a comprehensive analysis of the policymakers' viable options for resolving the current dilemma [1].

    Approximately 69% of India's population resides in rural areas, where only about 26% of the country's physicians are working, and even then, they are mostly in the private sector. This is too expensive and out of reach for most individuals. In India, almost 833 million people rely on 44,000 physicians [2].

    Due to the unequal distribution, an average of 19,000 patients are treated by each physician. This scenario is causing increased out-of-pocket medical expenses. Consequently, 3.3% of the population of India becoming poor on yearly basis [3]. This is solely related to the quantity. Likewise, the issue of care quality is of similar importance. A healthy and sustainable health staff must be accessible 24 hours a day, seven days a week, for best health results.

    A study emphasized that the inequitable distribution of doctors in the Indian public sector poses a threat to the health and economic well-being of the people [4].

    As in other industries, we should explore implementing technology to tackle this issue, such as information technology-enabled self-service kiosks to minimize the bankers' (manual) burden. Beneficially, the aviation and railroad sectors have adopted automation and technology [5].

    Now, we inhabit an era of artificial intelligence (AI). AI is, in the most fundamental sense, the natural intelligence of a computer system that is gained via consistent contact with end users (humans). This non-human intelligence can accomplish miracles with an accuracy and reliability of 90 to 96% [5].

    In the era of AI-based technology, life has become easier; for instance, Amazon Lab126's Alexa is a household-oriented virtual assistant. It can have features such as voice recognition, voice interaction, music playback, creating to-do lists, providing real-time weather and traffic information, etc. Alexa can also control numerous smart gadgets, like the TV and air conditioner. Alexa's powers can be increased by installing new skills (also known as applications) [6].

    Japan has already employed AI-based robotics to address geriatric care-related commercial challenges (personally programmed). These aid the elderly in doing daily duties, such as taking their prescriptions in the morning and adjusting the temperature of their air conditioner as they rest in bed [7].

    It is also useful for detecting glaucoma. Glaucoma, an optic nerve disorder, is considered as one of the primary causes of blindness. Glaucoma is a global public health concern. A steady rise in intraocular pressure leads to pressure atrophy or atrophy, resulting in unilateral or bilateral vision loss. Glaucoma can only be identified by comparing the texture of a normal retinal image to an image of glaucoma. This study employs Haralick characteristics to differentiate between photos of normal and damaged retinas. Glaucoma has been detected with 96% accuracy by utilizing AI (via image extraction and training of the back propagation neural network) features [8],[9].

    UE Lifesciences created the iBreastExam (iBE), which is a “portable, clinically proven, non-invasive, painless, and radiation-free instrument” that aids in the early diagnosis of breast lesions at the site of contact. It offers a “map” of breast tissue that detects irregularities that are afterward probed for the presence of carcinomas. Approximately 50,000 women were screened using the iBE over the course of one year; among them, 2251 were found to have breast lumps, 75 of which were malignant. Initially, just a few patients showed up for examinations. But the number climbed dramatically. The (USA) Food and Drug Administration-approved iBreastExam has been used on over 150,000 women in India and in six other countries: Botswana, Indonesia, Mexico, Myanmar, Nepal and Oman. This user-friendly breast cancer screening device can therefore assist underserved/difficult to reach populations and increase the 5-year breast cancer patient survival rates [10].

    Currently, robot-assisted surgery is gaining popularity. Surgical robots can perform advanced minimally invasive treatments with better vision, precision and dexterity than laparoscopy [11]. These are successful applications of AI in healthcare. According to the preceding discussion, complex machine learning algorithms, AI and robotics will affect the future of all scientific endeavors.

    The two categories of human capacity are cognitive and physical. In the past, humans dominated machines because of their cognitive superiority, while robots dominated mostly due to their better physical ability. Thus, most of the manual work in agriculture and industry was automated. As a result, vocations that formerly needed largely cognitive talents, such as learning, analyzing, communicating and understanding human emotions, have developed into “new” occupations [12].

    It is essential to understand that the AI revolution is not just about improved technology and supercomputers. Additionally, it is currently propelled by developments in the biological sciences.

    The better our understanding of the physiological principles underlying human emotions, desires and decisions, the more competent computers will be when analyzing and predicting human behavior, making them better able to replace human drivers, bankers, and lawyers [13].

    Scientists utilized data from neuroscience and behavioral economics to get a deeper grasp of human decision-making a few decades ago. All our choices/decisions/wants (from eating food to wearing clothes) are not the result of strange intuitions, but rather the probability estimated by billions of neurons in a fraction of a second, according to the research findings. Human intuition is nothing more than the recognition of patterns and happenings [14].

    Good physicians, surgeons and nurses do not possess supernatural abilities when diagnosing patients. It is like reassessing recurring patterns/events. Typically, they observe the pattern or occurrence learned in medical school and aim to avoid making any mistakes throughout the investigation, diagnosis, therapy or surgery. The study also indicated that the biochemical algorithms of the human brain are not faultless. According to specialists, the molecular algorithms of our neurons are deteriorated, short, outmoded and adaptable [14].

    Therefore, even competent surgeons and physicians sometimes make unintentional mistakes. The accompanying explanation demonstrates that AI-enabled doctors can also outperform human doctors in the cognitive domain.

    As mentioned above, a physician's ability to identify a problem does not depend on supernatural abilities or intuition. Instead, their brains find biological patterns by evaluating the signs and symptoms of patients. If AI is equipped with the proper sensors and software, it may be able to treat patients with greater precision and dependability than a human physician.

    Similarly, if the World Health Organization discovers a new disease or a laboratory creates a novel treatment, it is impractical to tell all traditional physicians about these developments. Compared to this, 10 billion AI-enabled physicians may share and update the same information in a fraction of a second. They may also exchange their thoughts on the new infections or treatments via non-neural networks [15].

    A patient in a remote community has access to hundreds of AI-enabled physicians whose relative performance is continuously compared when many algorithms are executed on the same network. The patient may simply seek a second opinion from a “traditional doctor” if he or she is unhappy with the AI-enabled physician's diagnosis [16].

    Significant future advantages for human civilization are envisaged. For billions of underprivileged individuals, AI-enabled doctors might provide far improved and more economical care. Due to machine learning and biometric sensors, it may be possible for a poor peasant to receive the same level of healthcare via a smartphone as the wealthiest individual in a modern metropolitan health facility [16]. A practical advantage of AI's non-human capabilities is the ease and speed with which they may be connected and upgraded [15].

    This information technology and biotechnology revolution has the potential to replace human physicians in areas with limited resources [15]. As an example, the present understanding of the basal ganglia, pons, cerebrum and cerebellum by psychiatrists and neurologists may one day allow computers to exceed human psychiatrists and neurologists.

    Some may argue that, if we switch to AI-enabled doctors, we may lose the advantages of individual clinical judgment and creativity [16].

    A doctor endowed with AI may not only be able to hack humans and outperform them in their uniquely human abilities, but they may also have a competitive advantage over their distinctively non-human skills.

    AI's potential is incomprehensible, yet it is also restricted. It seems likely that AI will dominate the professional world on a variety of levels, but the degree of its dominion is questionable.

    The ethical implications of AI-based healthcare decision-making raise several issues, such as whether there will be sociodemographic biases such racial prejudice and cultural inequalities. How will it impact careers in the healthcare and budgeting fields? Who will be held accountable for any unintended repercussions of AI-driven therapy algorithms or unexpected mistakes made during invasive medical procedures? What might automatic devices in the healthcare industry mean ethically? These inquiries are very important, and it can be difficult to provide ethical responses in the context of AI-enabled healthcare.

    Therefore, adopting an accountability framework approach is crucial for the design, development and deployment of AI-based medical technology to better comprehend and address the concerns. This strategy should be centered on promoting human welfare while combining moral standards and cultural ideals. This type of strategy is crucial since AI affects and worries us all. Instead of limiting our analysis to the person, we must consider AI-based medical systems in the context of the complex technological and medical realities and social dynamics.

    The following are the proposed strategies to uphold ethics when developing AI-based healthcare systems:

    1. When designing AI systems, theological and technological procedures that consider cultural factors should be known as “ethics in design”.

    2. Establishment of applied ethics, which focuses more on the behavioral ethics involved in creating and using AI systems in healthcare. Such ethical considerations may center on how humans use and develop AI systems in healthcare, which is likely to influence how AI systems behave digitally in the future.

    3. The establishment of ethics for various stakeholders, which might be defined as the norms and regulations that ensure the honesty of all participants as they create and implement AI systems. Understanding these ethical concepts may help us to better understand how sophisticated AI systems might contribute to the population's overall health, which depends on how individual and collective human intelligence behaves in various social circumstances [17],[18].

    We have already covered roles that may be eliminated owing to technical advances, but human labor parts cannot be replicated. Let us focus on something AI cannot achieve. There are certain duties that can only be performed by people.

    There are activities requiring creativity, conceptualization and complex strategic planning, as well as the ability to deal with unknown areas and feelings or emotional interactions, that AI is now incapable of performing. Let us now explore skills that are irreplaceable forever.

    1. Empathy: Some may argue that animals also exhibit empathy, but they are not replacing humans in the workforce. In contrast to software designed to produce a certain result, people can experience emotions. Personal affinity between a person and an organization is the cornerstone of a professional relationship, despite the seeming contradiction. Humans need a personal relationship that extends beyond the business realm to establish trust and human connection, something that bot technology utterly lacks.

    2. Emotional intelligence: Although the AI may be accurate, it lacks intuition and cultural sensitivity, which are human qualities. It will never be able to adapt to the algorithm of human intellect, no matter how exactly it is designed to do a task. For instance, reading a situation or the expression of another person. It lacks the emotional intelligence necessary for individuals to perceive and manage relationships involving emotional communication. A human connection that can read and grasp the issue is always favored over an automated technology that cannot operate or help beyond its programming while providing customer assistance.

    3. Creativity is an advantage of being human. AI may boost productivity and efficiency by reducing errors and repetition and replacing manual jobs with intelligent automated alternatives, but it cannot comprehend human psychology. In addition, as the world becomes more AI-enabled, individuals will be able to engage in increasingly innovative activities.

    4. Problem-solving outside of a code: Humans may deal with unforeseen uncertainty by studying the issue, e.g., by utilizing critical thinking in challenging situations and creative techniques. Contrary to humans, who can function in a variety of settings and environments, AI-powered devices are limited to their original role. In the distant future, this may be conceivable, but not soon.

    Finally, we cannot ignore technological advancement. To alleviate human suffering, we must embrace technology with caution. It will be intriguing to watch in the future how much AI-enabled doctors can aid (in diagnosis/treatment/decision-making) in tackling community health concerns and controlling the “maldistribution” of doctors in India. It is time to experiment with AI-enabled physicians in nations with limited resources. There is not the slightest question that AI will influence the future. People must be innovative, insightful and context-aware for AI to work. This is because humans will continue to contribute value that cannot be reproduced by robots. Additionally, it cannot be denied that, no matter how intelligent AI gets, it will never be able to imitate human awareness, thereby reinforcing humans' position at the top of the food chain.

    N.B. The opinion expressed in this article is that solely of the author and does not reflect the official position of any other affiliated institution or agency affiliated in the past or present.


    Acknowledgments



    We do acknowledge all previous researchers who have worked or are still working on this topic (AI). We do also acknowledge Prof. Yuval Noah Harari for inspiring us to write this article.

    [1] Deo MG (2013) Doctor population ratio for India-The reality. Indian J Med Res 137: 632-635.
    [2] Rao M, Rao KD, Kumar AKS, et al. (2011) Human resources for health in India. Lancet 377: 587-598. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61888-0
    [3] Artificial Intelligence and its Role in Near Future (2019). Available from: https://www.groundai.com/project/artificial-intelligence-and-its-role-in-near-future/
    [4] Amazon Alexa Wikipedia (2019). Available from: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Amazon_Alexa&oldid=883093523
    [5] Japanese Automakers Look to Robots to Aid the Elderly-Scientific American (2019). Available from: https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/japanese-automakers-look-to-robots-to-aid-the-elderly/
    [6] Samanta S, Ahmed SK, Salem MA-MM, et al. (2015) Haralick features based automated glaucoma classification using back propagation neural network. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Frontiers of Intelligent Computing: Theory and Applications (FICTA) 2014.Springer International Publishing 351-358. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11933-5_38
    [7] Mursch-Edlmayr AS, Ng WS, Diniz-Filho A, et al. (2020) Artificial Intelligence Algorithms to Diagnose Glaucoma and Detect Glaucoma Progression: Translation to Clinical Practice. Transl Vis Sci Technol 9: 55. https://doi.org/10.1167/tvst.9.2.55
    [8] Mango VL, Olasehinde O, Omisore AD, et al. (2022) The iBreastExam versus clinical breast examination for breast evaluation in high risk and symptomatic Nigerian women: a prospective study. Lancet Glob Health 10: e555-e563. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(22)00030-4
    [9] Adverse Events in Robotic Surgery: A Retrospective Study of 14 Years of FDA Data. Available from: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0151470
    [10] Woirol GR (1996) The Technological Unemployment and Structural Unemployment Debates.Greenwood Press.
    [11] Kahneman D (2013) Thinking, Fast and Slow. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux 499.
    [12] Where machines could replace humans-and where they can't (yet) | McKinsey (2019). Available from: https://www.mckinsey.com/business-functions/digital-mckinsey/our-insights/where-machinescould-replace-humans-and-where-they-cant-yet
    [13] Jiang F, Jiang Y, Zhi H, et al. (2017) Artificial intelligence in healthcare: Past, present, and future. Stroke Vasc Neurol 2: 230. https://doi.org/10.1136/svn-2017-000101
    [14] Harari YN 21 Lessons for the 21st Century 2018 London Jonathan Cape: 368.
    [15] Bhattacharya S, Pradhan KB, Bashar MA, et al. (2019) Artificial intelligence enabled healthcare: A hype, hope or harm. J Family Med Prim Care 8: 3461-3464. https://doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_155_19
    [16] Bhattacharya S, Sharma N, Singh A (2019) Designing culturally acceptable screening for breast cancer through artificial intelligence-two case studies. J Family Med Prim Care 8: 760-762. https://doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_391_18
    [17] Bhattacharya S, Hossain MM, Juyal R, et al. (2021) Role of Public Health Ethics for Responsible Use of Artificial Intelligence Technologies. Indian J Community Med 46: 178-181.
    [18] Bhattacharya S, Saleem SM, Hossain MM (2022) Implementing national digital health blueprint in India-The future opportunities and challenges. Int J Prev Med 13: 99. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijpvm.ijpvm_418_20
  • This article has been cited by:

    1. Sudip Bhattacharya, Saurabh Varshney, Shailesh Tripathi, Harnessing public health with “metaverse” technology, 2022, 10, 2296-2565, 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1030574
    2. Apurvakumar Pandya, Pragya Lodha, Ankita Gupta, 2024, 9780443236372, 37, 10.1016/B978-0-443-23637-2.00019-9
    3. Tatum Joy Sommer, 2024, chapter 2, 9798369339046, 33, 10.4018/979-8-3693-3904-6.ch002
    4. Durre Aden, Sufian Zaheer, Sabina Khan, Possible benefits, challenges, pitfalls, and future perspective of using ChatGPT in pathology, 2024, 57, 16998855, 198, 10.1016/j.patol.2024.04.003
    5. Alifiya Aamir, Yumna Jamil, Maham Bilal, Mufaddal Diwan, Abdulqadir J. Nashwan, Irfan Ullah, Artificial Intelligence in Enhancing Syncope Management - An Update, 2024, 49, 01462806, 102079, 10.1016/j.cpcardiol.2023.102079
    6. Pelin Uymaz, Ali Osman Uymaz, Yakup Akgül, Assessing the Behavioral Intention of Individuals to Use an AI Doctor at the Primary, Secondary, and Tertiary Care Levels, 2024, 40, 1044-7318, 5229, 10.1080/10447318.2023.2233126
    7. Meetali Kalani, Ashish Anjankar, Revolutionizing Neurology: The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Advancing Diagnosis and Treatment, 2024, 2168-8184, 10.7759/cureus.61706
    8. Tianze Wang, Dongqing Wang, 2024, Efficient Channel Attention Based Hybrid Networks for EEG Emotion Recognition, 979-8-3503-5076-0, 413, 10.1109/ICISCAE62304.2024.10761714
    9. Shambo Samrat Samajdar, Rupak Chatterjee, Shatavisa Mukherjee, Amit Dey, Bharat Saboo, Jyotirmoy Pal, Shashank Joshi, Nandini Chatterjee, Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare: Current Trends and Future Directions, 2025, 23, 0973-4651, 53, 10.4103/cmi.cmi_93_24
    10. Manuel A. Solis-Arrazola, Raul E. Sanchez-Yanez, Ana M. S. Gonzalez-Acosta, Carlos H. Garcia-Capulin, Horacio Rostro-Gonzalez, Eliciting Emotions: Investigating the Use of Generative AI and Facial Muscle Activation in Children’s Emotional Recognition, 2025, 9, 2504-2289, 15, 10.3390/bdcc9010015
    11. Jinyu Liu, Naidan Feng, Yongquan Liang, Frequency-Domain Hybrid Model for EEG-Based Emotion Recognition, 2025, 13, 2227-7390, 1072, 10.3390/math13071072
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2022 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(2726) PDF downloads(284) Cited by(11)

Other Articles By Authors

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog