
In recent years, machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) have been the leading approaches to solving various challenges, such as disease predictions, drug discovery, medical image analysis, etc., in intelligent healthcare applications. Further, given the current progress in the fields of ML and DL, there exists the promising potential for both to provide support in the realm of healthcare. This study offered an exhaustive survey on ML and DL for the healthcare system, concentrating on vital state of the art features, integration benefits, applications, prospects and future guidelines. To conduct the research, we found the most prominent journal and conference databases using distinct keywords to discover scholarly consequences. First, we furnished the most current along with cutting-edge progress in ML-DL-based analysis in smart healthcare in a compendious manner. Next, we integrated the advancement of various services for ML and DL, including ML-healthcare, DL-healthcare, and ML-DL-healthcare. We then offered ML and DL-based applications in the healthcare industry. Eventually, we emphasized the research disputes and recommendations for further studies based on our observations.
Citation: Anichur Rahman, Tanoy Debnath, Dipanjali Kundu, Md. Saikat Islam Khan, Airin Afroj Aishi, Sadia Sazzad, Mohammad Sayduzzaman, Shahab S. Band. Machine learning and deep learning-based approach in smart healthcare: Recent advances, applications, challenges and opportunities[J]. AIMS Public Health, 2024, 11(1): 58-109. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2024004
[1] | Thi Thuy Le, Trung Kien Nguyen, Nu Minh Nguyet Ton, Thi Thu Tra Tran, Van Viet Man Le . Quality of cookies supplemented with various levels of turmeric by-product powder. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2024, 9(1): 209-219. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2024012 |
[2] | Teti Estiasih, Jatmiko Eko Witoyo, Khofifah Putri Wulandari, Fadhillah Dwi Juniati, Widiastuti Setyaningsih, Hanifah Nuryani Lioe, Miguel Palma, Kgs Ahmadi, Hamidie Ronald Daniel Ray, Elya Mufidah . Stability comparison of conventional and foam-mat red and purple dried roselle calyces powder as a function of pH. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2025, 10(1): 177-198. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2025010 |
[3] | Marlin Marlin, Marulak Simarmata, Umi Salamah, Waras Nurcholis . Effect of nitrogen and potassium application on growth, total phenolic, flavonoid contents, and antioxidant activity of Eleutherine palmifolia. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2022, 7(3): 580-593. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2022036 |
[4] | Birabrata Nayak, Bibhu Prasad Panda . Modelling and optimization of texture profile of fermented soybean using response surface methodology. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2016, 1(4): 409-418. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2016.4.409 |
[5] | Albert Nugraha, Asadin Briliantama, M Umar Harun, Li Sing-Chung, Chin Xuan Tan, Vuanghao Lim, Amir Husni, Widiastuti Setyaningsih . Ultrasound-assisted extraction of phenolic compounds from ear mushrooms (Auricularia auricula-judae): Assessing composition and antioxidant activity during fruiting body development. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2024, 9(4): 1134-1150. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2024059 |
[6] | Chiao Ying Huang, Gerald L. Riskowski, Jennifer Chang, Ching Hsuan Lin, Jinn Tsyy Lai, Audrey Chingzu Chang . Pecan shell by-products—phenolic compound contents and antimicrobial properties. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2020, 5(2): 218-232. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2020.2.218 |
[7] | Nicolas Nagahama, Bruno Gastaldi, Michael N. Clifford, María M. Manifesto, Renée H. Fortunato . The influence of environmental variations on the phenolic compound profiles and antioxidant activity of two medicinal Patagonian valerians (Valeriana carnosa Sm. and V. clarionifolia Phil.). AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2021, 6(1): 106-124. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2021007 |
[8] | Namfon Samsalee, Rungsinee Sothornvit . Physicochemical, functional properties and antioxidant activity of protein extract from spent coffee grounds using ultrasonic-assisted extraction. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2021, 6(3): 864-878. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2021052 |
[9] | Pham Thi Thu Ha, Nguyen Thi Bao Tran, Nguyen Thi Ngoc Tram, Vo Hoang Kha . Total phenolic, total flavonoid contents and antioxidant potential of Common Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) in Vietnam. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2020, 5(4): 635-648. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2020.4.635 |
[10] | Evi Mintowati Kuntorini, Laurentius Hartanto Nugroho, Maryani, Tri Rini Nuringtyas . Maturity effect on the antioxidant activity of leaves and fruits of Rhodomyrtus tomentosa (Aiton.) Hassk.. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2022, 7(2): 282-296. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2022018 |
In recent years, machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) have been the leading approaches to solving various challenges, such as disease predictions, drug discovery, medical image analysis, etc., in intelligent healthcare applications. Further, given the current progress in the fields of ML and DL, there exists the promising potential for both to provide support in the realm of healthcare. This study offered an exhaustive survey on ML and DL for the healthcare system, concentrating on vital state of the art features, integration benefits, applications, prospects and future guidelines. To conduct the research, we found the most prominent journal and conference databases using distinct keywords to discover scholarly consequences. First, we furnished the most current along with cutting-edge progress in ML-DL-based analysis in smart healthcare in a compendious manner. Next, we integrated the advancement of various services for ML and DL, including ML-healthcare, DL-healthcare, and ML-DL-healthcare. We then offered ML and DL-based applications in the healthcare industry. Eventually, we emphasized the research disputes and recommendations for further studies based on our observations.
Nowadays, markets offer more and more products coming from different countries because of the strong development of global trade. However, the valorisation of traditional food products on a global dimension encounters several difficulties in terms of legal protection of product specificities on the international market and product acceptance by foreign consumers with different cultural perceptions, values and needs [1]. For example, "Made in Italy" products are well known and valued around the world [2].
Every year, more than one billion people purchase Italian food products, with most of them being loyal consumers. In 2014, Italian export reached 34.3 billion Euros with a growth rate of +2.7% compared to the previous year. However, "Made in Italy" is a country brand that suffers large losses due to imitations and counterfeit because of the strong popularity of Italian food products and their perceived (high) quality.
To reduce the losses for the Italian economy related to fake Italian food products, several initiatives have been adopted by Italian food companies. At the regulatory level, traditional products may be protected through the adoption of the EU quality logos which attest the specific tradition and quality of food products, such as the Protected Designation of Origin (PDO) and the Protected Geographical Indication (PGI) logos. At the national level, it is also possible to adopt collective quality certifications aimed at protecting the quality specificities of local food production. For example, in Italy it is possible to find labels such as "Qualità Alto Adige" or "Sapore di Campania", which signal to consumers the specific cultural and geographical characteristics of the products belonging to such regional food systems.
At the firm level, brand strategies can be adopted to stress the unique quality characteristics of the firm's traditional food products. For example, several private brand strategies have been developed in order to differentiate products that are produced using traditional ingredients, and/or traditional production or processing methods. Identity preservation and traceability is one of the strategies adopted by some food chains. Indeed, such strategies follow the food product through all stages of production, transformation until the retail-shelf allowing to make sure that the products actually have the features that are claimed [3,4,5,6]. At the retailer level an example of differentiation strategy is provided by Eataly, a company that uses the Italian origin of food and Italian culture as a key factor for the internationalization process of traditional food products. Eataly is the largest Italian food hall in the world and it includes in all its stores: A market, a variety of restaurants and corners dedicated to different food and beverage products, and a cooking school. Eataly has 13 stores in 10 foreign countries. The strategic goal of Eataly is to distribute Italian traditional products through an effective communication strategy based on the production methods and on the history of the people and companies that supply the traditional Italian products.
Consumer-related literature has mostly explored the drivers and barriers affecting consumer preferences towards traditional and typical products in order to evaluate the effectiveness of existing quality policies [7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18]. To this date, only few studies have explored the effectiveness of firm level strategies for such products from a consumer perspective. To fill this gap, the present research aims at identifying the factors affecting the preferences of international food consumers towards Italian food products, taking into consideration two sets of consumers: Those who shop at speciality retails, in this case Eataly, and those who shop at generalist retail stores. More precisely, the analysis concentrates on the possible barriers which can limit the acceptability of the products sold by this retailer on the international market.
More specifically, we aim at studying the levels of ethnocentrism and of product knowledge among international food consumer preferences, focusing on Munich in Germany where the German Eataly store is based. Germany is the biggest importer of Italian food and Italy represents one of the main suppliers of food products in the German market. In 2015, Italian exports increased by 6.3% and remained stable during 2016 with a growth rate of 5.3%.
In detail, we evaluate how ethnocentrism and product knowledge are affected by the socio-demographic characteristics of the respondents and if the effect is different among Eataly and non-Eataly customers. Moreover, we evaluate if ethnocentrism, product knowledge and socio-demographics have an effect on the purchase of authentic Italian products.
Food consumer purchase intensions are based on different parameters. Many scholars have focused on different variables like, for example, attitudes, subjective norms, habits, concern, trust and other individual characteristics [14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21]. More specifically, to understand the behaviour of consumers with regards to foreign products, many authors investigated its links with product knowledge, country of origin, and consumer ethnocentrism [22]. Chryssochoidis et al. [23] found that the product's country of origin stimulates different ethnocentric views and that consumer knowledge might have a role in affecting the evaluation of food product characteristics. Cilingir and Basfirinci [24] and Insch and Jackson [25] found that such variables affect consumer food choices. The focus of this work is to study the relevance of such variables on foreign-food purchasing-decisions (Figure 1). We also investigate the association between purchasing behaviour and socio-demographic variables, such as age and gender [26], education level [27] and income [28] as these have been shown to significantly affect consumer purchase of Italian food products.
Product knowledge is defined as "the amount of accurate information held in memory as well as self-perceptions of product knowledge" [29]. Consumers take purchasing decisions based on, among other things, their own knowledge about the product. The more they know about the product, the better are the chances that the consumer will purchase the product [30]. Nowadays, the market offers a huge variety of different food products and consumers depend more and more on their knowledge in evaluating and purchasing them. Such knowledge is generally acquired when a consumer purchases and consumes the product. As highlighted by Brucks [22], product knowledge is related to the consumer's food literacy and on his/her own memories. Lin and Zhen [31] found an association with customer awareness and understanding of the food product characteristics. Product knowledge is a multidirectional concept: Consumers derive different types of product knowledge from different types of product experiences [32]. It is also influenced by the frequency of purchase as it enhances the consumer usage experience [33]. Furthermore, different people have different levels of knowledge and this affects their information search [34] and their perception about product authenticity [35]. Product knowledge tend to lead to familiarity with the product [36].
Product knowledge has been classified in objective and subjective knowledge [32,37]. Objective knowledge is the knowledge that the individual actually holds, while the subjective one is what the consumer thinks he/she has.
Country of origin is an extrinsic attribute of food products, together with price, brand, packaging, and many others [38]. Consumers who have not had direct experiences with a product—and thus are unaware of its intrinsic characteristics—evaluate it through its extrinsic attributes. Literature highlights that country of origin is relevant to consumers that perceive it as a quality attribute [39]. This association influences the value perceived by consumers and the risks related to product purchase [40]. Country of origin is also strongly related to consumer trust [41,42,43], that has been shown to be an important factor affecting consumer food purchasing intentions [44]. Country of origin indications are not only used as a signal for the cognitive system, but also relate to symbols and emotions that consumers associate with a country [49,45,46]. For this reason, the buying decision process is strongly influenced by the origin of the product. In addition, given the increasing importance of country of origin attributes for consumers and given the continuous effort of food firms in trying to differentiate their products, a positive country image becomes a key factor for the success on the international market. Previous studies show that the concept of "Made in Italy" has become more than a country of origin indication: It seems to have reached the characteristics of a brand with a defined identity and to be considered as a synonym of quality and reliability [47,48,49,50]. Thus, selling products with the "Made in Italy" trademark means obtaining an important competitive advantage, thanks to the benefits that derive from such a strong image. However, "Made in Italy" has recently been suffering from a complex competitive environment with the emergence of "Italian sounding" products coming from abroad. Such products are not "Made in Italy" but try to benefit from the positive attitudes towards Italian food products. Forgery accounts globally for 60 billion euros and has increased in the last ten years; in the USA, only one product out of eight, among the ones sold as Italian, actually comes from Italy [51]. The most forged product is cheese, in particular Parmigiano Reggiano, that is evoked in the names of foreign cheeses named "Parmesan", "Reggianito", and "Parmesello".
Current literature has shown that consumers tend to prefer domestic and local products, or products imported from countries with similar culture or traditions, underlining ethnocentric tendencies [52]. Ethnocentrism was defined in 1906 by William Graham Sumner as the general inclination of an individual to base its assessments of an external phenomena on the standards of the group he/she belongs to [53]. Afterwards, in 1987, Shimp and Sharma [54] adapted the concept to marketing. They defined consumer ethnocentrism (CET) as a personality trait, founded in generally stable values, that dictates what is considered to be right or moral in the context of foreign product purchase [53]. The background assumption is that food characterizes people, cultures and societies. For this reason, food can be considered as a cultural element. Despite the fact that human beings are omnivores, they do not eat the same food across different cultures. In fact, the preference for some foods and the refusal for others have a cultural origin [55]. Every culture has a foodstuff code that approves of some products and forbids others. This code is determined by geographical, environmental, economic, historical and nutritional elements that characterize the culture itself. Often particular foods are associated with specific cultures. The development of global trade leads to the introduction in the market of new products coming from countries that differ for cultural, political, or economic orientation. As a consequence, the buying decision process is becoming more and more complex and consumers have to choose between local or foreign products [56]. Consumers are often faced with the option of buying international and multinational brands or products from the local market. Approaching different cultures, the desire to stay anchored to one's own personal identity and eating habits could lead to nationalist purchase behaviours [57]. Ethnocentrism is a global attitude, but differences in the strength with which it affects consumer behaviour exist among countries [39,58]. For this reason, ethnocentrism is considered as an important factor to foresee consumer attitudes and perceptions towards imported and foreign food products [39]. According to Shimp and Sharma [54] and Lindquist et al. [59], the reasons for which it may be unsuitable to buy foreign products are related to four factors: Damage to the domestic economy, job loss, unpatriotic behaviour, and product availability. Previous studies highlight the usefulness of studying consumer choices looking at ethnocentrism [23,60,61]. In these studies, ethnocentrism was considered as one of the antecedents of the purchasing behaviour [62,63].
Given all of the above considerations, our research focuses on purchases of food products of Italian origin in a large German city such as Munich. Figure 1 represents the framework of our analysis.
More precisely, the present analysis addresses the following research questions:
RQ1. Which is the level of ethnocentrism tendencies and product knowledge related to Italian food products on the international market? Are there differences between customers of speciality stores and generalist food stores?
RQ2. Which is the relation of ethnocentrism tendencies and product knowledge to socio-demographic characteristics? Are there differences in the association between variables for customers of speciality stores and generalist food stores?
RQ3. Which is the effect of ethnocentrism tendencies, product knowledge and socio-demographic variables on the frequency of purchase of authentic Italian products on the international market? Do these relations differ for customers of speciality stores and generalist food stores?
Data on the variables included in the conceptual framework were collected via a survey questionnaire developed to investigate consumer behaviour, consumer ethnocentrism, knowledge of Italian food products, and sociodemographic characteristics. The questionnaire was structured in closed-answered questions to make it easier for respondents to answer and for researchers to compare and analyse the results.
Data was collected face to face in Munich (Germany) during May 2017. We chose a German city because Germany is the biggest importer of Italian food productions and Italy represents the first suppliers of food products in German market (Istat, 2018). Moreover, we chose Munich because of the presence of the Eataly store.
The choice of using a survey is related to the aim of reducing the interviewing time, given that consumers were food shopping. The risk of low-understanding or confusion about the questions, of skipping questions, or of satisfying were limited by the fact the survey was administered in person. However, this reduced the level of anonymity of the survey. The survey was developed in English and then translated and conducted in German.
Data was collected in the centre on Munich, focusing both on Eataly and non-Eataly customers. Eataly customers were interviewed in front of the shop, whereas non-Eataly customers were interviewed in front of other food shops. Relatively close to the store, i.e., at the REWE store, Penny store and at the Viktualien Markt. Data was collected during different time slots (8–12 am; 12–15 pm; 15–18 pm; 18–21 pm) by an experienced researcher who received specific training before data collection. Before starting the interviews, a screening question was applied to the potential respondents. The interviewer asked if the person was in charge of family food shopping. In case of a positive answer, the respondents were invited to take the questionnaire.
The questionnaire was administered to 203 subjects: 94 customers of Eataly Munich and 109 respondents who do not shop at the store. The general characteristics of the two sub-samples are reported in Table 1. We considered people who lived in Munich or have a German citizenship; however, we took notice of the country of origin of their families since it could be an interesting variable for our study. The possibility to specify the country of origin allowed us to define better the macro areas EU and extra EU. Among the 16 observations from European Union, 8 respondents come from Austria, 2 from Greece, 2 from Romania, 1 respondent from Albania, 1 from Croatia, 1 from UK and 1 from France. Indeed, in Bavaria, the most present ethnic groups are from Turkey, ex Jugoslav countries, Austria, and Italy. Moreover, the 13 observations with family origin from countries outside of the EU were distributed in the following way: 3 from Switzerland, 2 from USA, 2 from Brazil, 1 from Singapore, 1 from Syria, 1 from Iran, 1 from Macedonia, and 1 from Bosnia. 36.9% of the total sample had visited Italy between 2 and 4 times in the last ten years, 31% of it visits Italy every year, 25.6% had done so only once, and 6.4% had never been to Italy.
Variable | Eataly customers (%) | Non-Eataly customers (%) |
Age | ||
18–30 | 23.4 | 25.7 |
31–40 | 16.0 | 19.3 |
41–50 | 22.7 | 22.9 |
more than 50 | 38.3 | 32.1 |
Gender | ||
Male | 53.2 | 48.6 |
Female | 46.8 | 51.4 |
Educational level* | ||
Hauptschule | 3.2 | 4.6 |
Realschule | 21.3 | 24.8 |
Abitur | 13.8 | 27.5 |
Hochschulabschluss | 61.7 | 43.1 |
Income | ||
Less than 20,000 € | 16.0 | 11.9 |
20,000–40,000 € | 13.8 | 15.6 |
40,000–60,000 € | 23.4 | 17.4 |
More than 60,000 € | 12.8 | 17.4 |
Refuse to answer | 34.0 | 37.7 |
*For accuracy, we present the educational level of the German scholastic system: Hauptschule = Secondary school, from grade 5 to 9; Realschule = Secondary school, from grade 5 to 10; Abitur = Final degree of Gymnasium, secondary school from 5 to 13; Hochschulabschluss = Final degree of the University. |
In order to understand the attitudes and purchasing habits of a set of German consumers, we collected data on four main types of variables: Consumer ethnocentrism, knowledge about Italian food products, frequency of purchase of authentic Italian products, and socio-demographic characteristics.
The level of ethnocentrism is measured through the Consumer Ethnocentric Tendencies (CET) scale, in the version developed and tested by Klein et al. [64]. The original version was developed in 1987 by Shimp and Sharma [54] that proposed a psychometric scale to measure the ethnocentric vision of a nation or a group with respect to foreign products or products coming from outside the group. The scale was subsequently shortened and translated in many languages to be used in different countries. It has indeed been adopted by researchers focusing on a wide variety of products and services. All items are scored using a seven-point scale (where "1" means "strongly disagree" and "7" means "strongly agree"). More details are provided in Table 2.
Variable name | Scale | Description |
Ethnocentrism variable (CET scale) | ||
CET1 | scale (1–7)* | Only those products that are unavailable in Germany should be imported |
CET2 | scale (1–7)* | German products, first, last and foremost |
CET3 | scale (1–7)* | A real German should always buy German-made products' |
CET4 | scale (1–7)* | Germans should not buy foreign products, because this hurts German business and causes unemployment |
CET5 | scale (1–7)* | It may cost me in the long-run but I prefer to support German products' |
CET6 | scale (1–7)* | German consumers who purchase products made in other countries are responsible for putting their fellow Germans out of work |
Product knowledge | ||
SubKnow1 | scale (1–7)* | I know pretty much about fresh pasta |
SubKnow2 | scale (1–7)* | I know how to judge the quality of fresh pasta |
ObjKnow1 | dummy (0–1) | Wrong/correct answer to closed-answer questions about traditional Italian food products (long cut pasta) |
ObjKnow2 | dummy (0–1) | Wrong/correct answer to closed-answer to questions about traditional Italian food products (stuffed pasta) |
ObjKnow3 | dummy (0–1) | Wrong/correct answer to closed-answer to questions about traditional Italian food products (typical Italian dish) |
ObjKnow4 | dummy (0–1) | Wrong/correct answer to closed-answer questions about traditional Italian food products (typical dish form Southern Italy) |
Food purchasing habits | ||
Eataly | dummy (0–1) | Dummy variable on purchases at Eataly (0 = no; 1 = yes) |
Italian products | scale (1–5) | Frequency of purchase of authentic Italian food products (never, yearly, monthly, weekly) |
*Level of agreement: 1 = strongly disagree; 7 = strongly agree. |
Literature highlights that the level of ethnocentrism may be influenced by some antecedents [65]. Indeed, demographic variables have been shown to affect consumption behaviour directly and indirectly, that is via consumer personal values and other characteristics of their decision-making processes [66]. We focus on four demographic antecedents: Gender, age, education, and income.
The relation between ethnocentrism and gender is not clear in the literature. Some empirical studies showed that women tend to be more ethnocentric than men [67]; while others find evidence supporting the opposite [68,69]. Moreover, other authors did not find any significant gender differences [70,71].
For what concerns age, some authors found a positive association with age: With younger consumers showing lower levels of ethnocentric tendencies compared to older ones [72,73]. However, other studies highlight an opposite association [68,74] or no association between age and ethnocentrism [75].
Considering education, most studies found a negative association with educational levels [67,72,73,76]. Moreover, literature suggests that higher educated people tend to be less conservative and to show lower racial preconceptions [77].
Focusing on income, previous studies do not agree on a single hypothesis about the link between these variables. Indeed, many authors highlight a negative relationship between income levels and consumer ethnocentrism [54,74,75,76], while others find a positive one [78] or no association [79].
The analysis also focuses on product knowledge. Indeed, consumer purchasing decisions are influenced by many variables, among others their knowledge about the product [80,81]. The more consumers know about the product, the better are the chances that they will purchase the product [30]. According to some authors, consumer knowledge is positively correlated with product information [32,82] and purchase intensions [30]. Thanks to globalization, products with different attributes and features are available on the market and consumers have more knowledge about them.
Knowledge about Italian food products is measured using both objective and subjective knowledge measures [22]. Literature indeed indicates that often consumers tend to overestimate their knowledge, believing to know more than what they actually know. Objective knowledge is the "current, accurate information stored by individuals in their long-term memory" [83]; while subjective knowledge is based on self-assumptions about one's own knowledge of a topic [84,85]. More specifically, objective knowledge was assessed by means of multiple-choice questions related to knowledge and familiarity with Italian food; while subjective knowledge was measured through a one to seven scale.
Variables concerning socio-demographic characteristics and food purchasing habits by respondents were also considered. More in detail, we collected data about gender, age, education, and income. Respondents were also asked about their purchases in Eataly Munich, allowing us to divide the sample in Eataly customers and non-customers. Finally, we investigated the purchase frequency of authentic Italian products with a direct question evaluated on a four-level scale.
Collected data was firstly analysed by means of descriptive statistics and factor analysis. More specifically, before analysing the variables that influence ethnocentrism and product knowledge (RQ2) and the role of the latter constructs on purchasing decisions (RQ3), we performed a factor analysis on all of the variables related to ethnocentrism and knowledge of Italian food products. Factor analysis is a useful tool to study complex concepts, such as ethnocentrism or product knowledge, that are collected via a set of questions that relate to a latent unobservable factor. Likelihood-ratio tests for the number of factors where performed to check if the number of factors was sufficient.
After having reduced the dimensionality of the data into factors, we investigated the distribution of the factors across different consumer characteristics and in particular focusing on consumers who shop or do not shop at Eataly.
We then applied an ordinary least square model to the data to analyse the multivariate associations among variables. More specifically, we used as dependent variables the factors related to ethnocentrism and knowledge of Italian products, and as independent variables the socio-demographic characteristics of respondents.
Furthermore, we performed four ordered logistic regressions, via cumulative link models, to evaluate the relation between the purchasing behaviour related to authentic Italian products and the other variables of our conceptual framework (Figure 1).
As a first analysis of the data, we report some descriptive statistic useful to provide insights on our first research question, i.e., on the level of consumer ethnocentrism tendencies and product knowledge. For what concerns ethnocentrism, Table 3 reports as a mean of comparison, even if the data are ordinal, the mean value and the standard deviation for each of the six items of the CET scale.
Eataly customers | Non-Eataly customers | |||
Variable | Mean | Std. Deviation | Mean | Std. Deviation |
ETN1 | 3.42 | 1.97 | 3.27 | 2.06 |
ETN2 | 1.58 | 1.09 | 1.98 | 1.45 |
ETN3 | 2.09 | 1.48 | 2.28 | 1.51 |
ETN4 | 1.46 | 0.96 | 1.80 | 1.12 |
ETN5 | 1.90 | 1.29 | 2.40 | 1.65 |
ETN6 | 1.22 | 0.64 | 1.47 | 1.16 |
According to our study, the CET scale mean score in Munich is 2.08. The results underline low ethnocentric tendencies and a general disagreement with the sentences of the scale, especially among Eataly consumers (except for the first item). It is interesting to underline how the mean scores of the scale reveal a general trend of respondents to prefer local products. More precisely, the respondents disagree strongly with item 6 ("German consumers who purchase products made in other countries are responsible for putting their fellow Germans out of work") and item 4 ("Germans should not buy foreign products, because this hurts German business and causes unemployment"). On the other hand, item 1 ("only those products that are unavailable in Germany should be imported") reaches higher mean values. This result is reinforced by the general trend to prefer local products: 76% of German people consider very important the fact that food products come from their region [86]. In this direction, German consumers may prefer to import food that they do not produce, but do not avoid purchasing ethnic food or imported products. In particular, they do not seem to associate the unemployment in Germany with the import of food products.
Table 4 reports the mean value and the standard deviation for each of the items aimed at measuring knowledge about Italian food products. Even if mean values for Eataly customers are always higher than for non-Eataly customers, as you might expect, values in the two subsamples do not vary much.
Eataly customers | Non-Eataly customers | |||
Variable | Mean | Std. Deviation | Mean | Std. Deviation |
SUB1 | 5.54 | 1.58 | 5.38 | 1.60 |
SUB2 | 4.46 | 1.71 | 4.22 | 1.87 |
OBJ_easy | 1.91 | 0.35 | 1.86 | 0.42 |
OBJ_advanced | 0.68 | 0.71 | 0.61 | 0.64 |
We also report the frequency of purchase of authentic Italian products as a background information to our third research question about the role of the above variables, together with socio-demographics, in influencing the purchase of authentic Italian products on the international market.
Results related to the frequency of purchase indicate that authentic Italian food is bought every week by 52.7% of the sample (more in detail, by 59.6% of Eataly customers and 46.8% of non-Eataly customers), once per month by 39.9% of the respondents (38.3% of Eataly customers and 41.3% of non-Eataly customers), and a few times during the year by 6.4% of the sample (2.1% of Eataly customers and 10.1% of non-Eataly customers). Only 2 respondents out of 203 do not purchase Italian products (1.0%) and these are non-Eataly customers.
To assess the relationship among the cultural variables included in our survey, we performed an explorative factor analysis. The choice of using a dimension-reduction tool is functional to responding to the second and third research questions, to see if we can treat the items of the same scale as being measures of one unique (or more) latent variable. Being able to group different items in a factor makes the interpretation of the (following) regression analysis more straightforward.
The factor analysis grouped the variables into two factors (Table 5). The first factor groups together all the six variables included in the CET scale. The second factor instead groups all the variables related to knowledge.
Variable | Factor 1 | Factor 2 |
ETN1 | 0.408 | 0.039 |
ETN2 | 0.579 | −0.119 |
ETN3 | 0.701 | −0.109 |
ETN4 | 0.769 | −0.240 |
ETN5 | 0.583 | −0.246 |
ETN6 | 0.431 | −0.162 |
SUB1 | 0.142 | 0.907 |
SUB2 | 0.238 | 0.670 |
OBJ_easy | 0.033 | 0.308 |
OBJ_advanced | 0.001 | 0.275 |
The output of the factor analysis does not seem to distinguish between the variables aimed at measuring objective and subjective knowledge as it groups them all in one unique factor, even if with quite diverse factor loadings. Factor loadings are reported in Table 4. Likelihood-ratio tests for the number of factors support the existence of only two significant latent factors.
To evaluate if there are differences between Eataly and non-Eataly customers related to ethnocentrism (factor 1) and product knowledge (factor 2) (RQ1), we report the boxplots of the scores of the factor analysis. What emerges is that non-Eataly customers (X = 0) seem to be less homogenous in terms of ethnocentrism that Eataly customers (X = 1). In particular they show a heavy right tail, that highlights a group of very ethnocentric individuals among such consumers. For what concerns knowledge of Italian food products, the two distributions of scores for Eataly and non-Eataly customers do not show major differences. The boxplots unveil left-skewed distributions, suggesting the existence of a non-negligible group of subjects that have low levels of knowledge about Italian products in both types of consumers. T-tests confirm that mean values do not differ in a statistically significant way for factor 2 on product knowledge, but they do differ for factor 1 on ethnocentrism, meaning that non-Eataly customers have higher scores for factor 1, thus, they are statistically more ethnocentric than Eataly consumers.
Having reduced ethnocentrism and knowledge of Italian food products to two single factors, we are able to evaluate if there are significant associations between the levels of ethnocentrism and knowledge of Italian products and the socio-demographic characteristics of the respondents [65] i.e., to provide insights on the second research question. We perform two models for each variable, fitting responses from Eataly and non-Eataly customers to evaluate if there are differences in the association among variables in these two sub-samples.
Tables 6 and 7 summarize the output of two linear regression models where the dependent variable is the ethnocentrism factor performed on non-Eataly customers (Table 6) and Eataly customers (Table 7). What emerges is that, among non-Eataly customers, higher levels of ethnocentrism seem to be associated, ceteris paribus, with females and with people with lower levels of education. Income was not included in such models due to high levels of correlation with education levels and the lower response rate that would affect sample size. The corresponding models with income instead of education were also analysed, but these show lower levels of significance.
Ethnocentrism, non-Eataly customers | |||||
Estimate | Std. Error | t-value | Pr(>|t|) | significance | |
(Intercept) | 0.18715 | 0.21112 | 0.886 | 0.377 | |
GENDER (male) | −0.59296 | 0.18608 | −3.187 | 0.002 | ** |
AGE 31–40 | 0.16497 | 0.28310 | 0.583 | 0.561 | |
AGE 41–50 | 0.06292 | 0.26927 | 0.234 | 0.816 | |
AGE morethan 50 | −0.24322 | 0.25059 | −0.971 | 0.334 | |
EDUCATION abitur | 0.28370 | 0.22869 | 1.241 | 0.218 | |
EDUCATION realschule | 0.53660 | 0.24286 | 2.210 | 0.029 | * |
EDUCATION hauptschule | 0.92672 | 0.45003 | 2.059 | 0.042 | * |
R-squared | 0.186 | ||||
Adjusted R-squared | 0.130 | ||||
DF | 101 | ||||
p-value | 0.003 | ||||
Notes: Signif. codes: 0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1. |
Ethnocentrism, Eataly customers | |||||
Estimate | Std. Error | t-value | Pr(>|t|) | significance | |
(Intercept) | −0.04584 | 0.17213 | −0.266 | 0.791 | |
GENDER (male) | −0.34965 | 0.15331 | −2,281 | 0.025 | * |
AGE 31–40 | 0.38836 | 0.24241 | 1,602 | 0.113 | |
AGE 41–50 | 0.07972 | 0.23002 | 0.347 | 0.730 | |
AGE morethan 50 | −0.05034 | 0.20627 | −0.244 | 0.808 | |
EDUCATION reordabitur | 0.21740 | 0.22807 | 0.953 | 0.343 | |
EDUCATION reordrealschule | −0.12147 | 0.19426 | −0.625 | 0.533 | |
EDUCATION reordhauptschule | 0.15983 | 0.43385 | 0.368 | 0.713 | |
R-squared | 0.112 | ||||
Adjusted R-squared | 0.041 | ||||
DF | 86 | ||||
p-value | 0.1592 | ||||
Notes: Signif. codes: 0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1. |
Results reported in Table 7 suggest that there is no evidence to infer the existence of an association between socio-demographic variables and the level of ethnocentrism among Eataly customers.
A similar analysis was performed also for what concerns the knowledge for Italian products. Results are reported in Tables 8 and 9. The levels of knowledge of Italian food products among non-Eataly customers seem to be related to gender, with males having lower levels of knowledge, and age, with older consumers being more knowledgeable about Italian products. Instead, knowledge for Italian food products among Eataly customers does not seem to be associated with different socio-demographic characteristics.
Italian products knowledge, non-Eataly customers | |||||
Estimate | Std. Error | t-value | Pr(>|t|) | significance | |
(Intercept) | −0.29309 | 0.19796 | −1.481 | 0.142 | |
GENDER (male) | −0.43917 | 0.17449 | −2.517 | 0.013 | * |
AGE 31–40 | 0.62188 | 0.26546 | 2.343 | 0.021 | * |
AGE 41–50 | 0.61096 | 0.25249 | 2.420 | 0.017 | * |
AGE morethan 50 | 0.81631 | 0.23498 | 3.474 | 0.001 | *** |
EDUCATION abitur | 0.00433 | 0.21444 | 0.020 | 0.984 | |
EDUCATION realschule | −0.36016 | 0.22773 | −1.582 | 0.117 | |
EDUCATION hauptschule | −0.18559 | 0.42199 | −0.440 | 0.661 | |
R-squared | 0.158 | ||||
Adjusted R-squared | 0.100 | ||||
DF | 101 | ||||
p-value | 0.013 | ||||
Notes: Signif. codes: 0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1. |
Italian products knowledge, Eataly customers | |||||
Estimate | Std. Error | t-value | Pr(>|t|) | significance | |
(Intercept) | 0.03076 | 0.21661 | 0.142 | 0.887 | |
GENDER (male) | −0.13972 | 0.19292 | −0.724 | 0.471 | |
AGE 31–40 | 0.18703 | 0.30504 | 0.613 | 0.541 | |
AGE 41–50 | 0.52842 | 0.28945 | 1.826 | 0.071 | |
AGE morethan 50 | 0.30250 | 0.25957 | 1.165 | 0.247 | |
EDUCATION abitur | −0.61764 | 0.28700 | −2.152 | 0.034 | * |
EDUCATION realschule | −0.15604 | 0.24446 | −0.638 | 0.525 | |
EDUCATION hauptschule | −0.51515 | 0.54594 | −0.944 | 0.348 | |
R-squared | 0.112 | ||||
Adjusted R-squared | 0.039 | ||||
DF | 86 | ||||
p-value | 0.1613 | ||||
Notes: Signif. codes: 0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1. |
Given the above results, we also tested the relation of the two factors regarding the two cultural variables in our framework with the purchase at the Eataly store in Munich. We performed a logistic regression with two regressors (the two factors) considering as dependent variable a dummy variable where 0 indicates a non-Eataly customer and 1 a person who shops at Eataly. Results confirm a negative and significant association between purchasing at Eataly and the ethnocentrism factor (p-value = 0.038) and no evidence for an association with the knowledge of Italian food products.
After having analysed the role of socio-demographic characteristics on the cultural variables included in our conceptual framework, we have investigated their role on the frequency of purchase of Italian food products, to try to answer to our third research question. Hence, we run a set of ordinal regression models where the dependent variable is the purchase frequency of authentic Italian food products. As before, we run two separate models for the two subsets of consumers: Eataly and non-Eataly customers, to verify if there are changes in the associations with the independent variables (RQ3). Given the relatively weak relations between socio-demographics and the cultural variables factors discussed above, especially in the case of Eataly customers, and the fact that previous literature highlights both direct and indirect effects of socio-demographic variables on consumption behaviour, we run two models for each subset of the sample: One with only the two factors related to the cultural variables and one with also socio-demographic variables. Significant variables are identified in in Tables 10 and 11.
Non eataly customers | ||||||||||
Model 1 | Model 2 | |||||||||
Estimate | Std. Error | t-value | Pr(>|t|) | significance | Estimate | Std. Error | t-value | Pr(>|t|) | significance | |
(Intercepts) | ||||||||||
never|year | −4,138,112 | 0.721297 | −57,370 | 9.6E-06 | *** | −384,180 | 0.82328 | −46,664 | 3.07E-03 | *** |
year|month | −2,129,359 | 0.308493 | −69,024 | 5.1E-09 | *** | −179,588 | 0.49726 | −36,116 | 0.0003043 | *** |
month|week | 0.080418 | 0.196692 | 0.4089 | 0.6826 | 0.56813 | 0.45026 | 12,618 | 0.2070221 | ||
(Explanatory variables) | ||||||||||
GENDER (male) | 0.24283 | 0.42665 | 0.5692 | 0.5692489 | ||||||
AGE 31–40 | −0.48598 | 0.58290 | −0.8337 | 0.4044353 | ||||||
AGE 41–50 | 0.76475 | 0.58939 | 12,975 | 0.1944476 | ||||||
AGE morethan 50 | 0.90878 | 0.55132 | 16,484 | 0.0992744 | ||||||
EDUCATION abitur | −0.13429 | 0.48279 | −0.2782 | 0.7808877 | ||||||
EDUCATION realschule | 0.12468 | 0.53617 | 0.2325 | 0.8161165 | ||||||
EDUCATION hauptschule | −0.42209 | 0.86700 | −0.4868 | 0.6263756 | ||||||
Factor 1 | −0.288937 | 0.184715 | −15,642 | 0.1178 | −0.22096 | 0.20746 | −10,651 | 0.2868503 | ||
Factor 2 | 0.326450 | 0.200457 | 16,285 | 0.1034 | 0.30237 | 0.22712 | 13,313 | 0.1830912 | ||
N. of observations | 109 | 109 | ||||||||
Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) | 228.54 | 145.57 | ||||||||
Notes: Signif. codes: 0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1. |
Eataly customers | ||||||||||
Model 1 | Model 2 | |||||||||
Estimate | Std. Error | t-value | Pr(>|t|) | significance | Estimate | Std. Error | t-value | Pr(>|t|) | significance | |
never|year | −1045854 | 2644408 | −0.3955 | 0.69248 | −11261026 | 28092799 | −0.4009 | 0.68853 | ||
year|month | −396228 | 0.72498 | −54654 | 4.6E-05 | *** | −3595964 | 0.885406 | −40614 | 0.04879 | *** |
month|week | −0.37777 | 0.22206 | −17012 | 0.08890 | . | 0.387025 | 0.513935 | 0.7531 | 0.45141 | |
(Explanatory variables) | ||||||||||
GENDER (male) | −0.238943 | 0.502088 | −0.4759 | 0.63415 | ||||||
AGE 31–40 | 0.959550 | 0.740327 | 12961 | 0.19494 | ||||||
AGE 41–50 | 1864401 | 0.763756 | 24411 | 0.01464 | * | |||||
AGE morethan 50 | 1590115 | 0.646868 | 24582 | 0.01396 | * | |||||
EDUCATION abitur | 1111720 | 0.793847 | 14004 | 0.16139 | ||||||
EDUCATION realschule | −1461593 | 0.591462 | −24712 | 0.01347 | * | |||||
EDUCATION hauptschule | −2921894 | 1489000 | −19623 | 0.04973 | * | |||||
Factor 1 | 0.12715 | 0.29616 | 0.4293 | 0.66768 | 0.055926 | 0.334351 | 0.1673 | 0.86716 | ||
Factor 2 | 0.59636 | 0.23479 | 25400 | 0.01109 | * | 0.620954 | 0.265170 | 23417 | 0.01920 | * |
N. of observations | 94 | 94 | ||||||||
Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) | 232.70 | 143.69 | ||||||||
Notes: Signif. codes: 0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1. |
Results indicate that the frequency of purchase of authentic Italian products among Eataly customers is not associated so much to ethnocentrism—that in this subsample is lower than among non-Eataly customers—but to personal knowledge about Italian food products. This suggests that the more you know about traditional products the more you are prone to purchase them. This has marketing implications both at the store and country level if "Made in Italy" products are to be promoted. If we look at Model 2 for this subset of consumers—whose cultural factors were not explained by socio-demographic variables—we find that, ceteris paribus, older people seem to have higher frequency of purchase of such products and people with lower levels of education purchase authentic Italian products less frequently. For non-Eataly customers we find that socio-demographic characteristics, ethnocentrism and product knowledge do not seem to affect the purchase of Italian food. This could instead depend on other factors not included in our analysis.
Results from the descriptive analysis, aimed at answering to RQ1, indicate higher levels of ethnocentrism among consumers who do not shop at Eataly compared to Eataly customers; while no significant differences seem to emerge for what concerns the knowledge of Italian food products. Such results highlight an interesting contrast that suggests that the choice of purchasing at Eataly seems to be conscious and in line with personal inclinations. Indeed, it does not seem to depend on knowledge of Italian products, instead it is more related (negatively) to the level of ethnocentrism, i.e., the willingness to protect German products and economy.
For what concerns RQ2, among non-Eataly customers, it appears that men are less ethnocentric with respect to women, confirming the main empirical studies [67,75]. This could indicate that women tend to be more conservative for what concerns food choices. Considering the educational level, results indicate that people with lower educational level (Hauptschule, Realschule and Abitur) are more ethnocentric than the ones with a university degree. Previous studies agree with our finding, showing a negative relation between the two variables. Indeed, more educated people tend to have fewer ethnic preconceptions and to be less conservative [87]. Among Eataly customers, where ethnocentrism levels were lower, we dot find evidence of a significant role of socio-demographics on the level of ethnocentrism. Moving to product knowledge, among non-Eataly customers, females and, ceteris paribus, older people seem to be more knowledgeable on Italian food products. Again, no significant relation is highlighted among Eataly customers.
Finally, for what concerns our third research question (RQ3), we find that the regular purchase of authentic Italian food does not characterise only Eataly customers. Indeed, 52.7% of the sample purchase Italian food every week, 39.9% every month, with percentages that do not differ substantially between the two subsamples. What seems to emerge from our analyses is that the level of ethnocentrism tendencies influences the choice of shopping at Eataly or not, but not so much the level of purchase of Italian food products. Indeed, the frequency of purchase of Italian food products, among Eataly customers, is instead related to product knowledge, age and education.
The paper aimed at investigating the role of cultural variables such as ethnocentrism and product knowledge on the choice of international food products, focusing on "Made in Italy" food products in Germany.
To do so, data on ethnocentrism tendencies, knowledge about Italian food products, and food shopping behaviour were collected among consumers living in Munich (Germany). The choice of Munich was related to the presence of an Eataly store, that is the largest Italian food hall in the world and whose focus is selling traditional Italian food products. The results of our analysis highlight that ethnocentrism tendencies and lack of product knowledge can constitute potential barriers to the success of Italian food products in foreign markets.
This provides some interesting implications for firms marketing Italian food products and also for policy makers interested in building the "Made in Italy" brand. What emerges is that while increasing the customer base of Eataly or retailers selling only Italian food products might be long and quite cumbersome, given the difficulty and the time involved in changing personal cultural values, there is still space for Italian food firms to sell their products via more generalist retailers. Speciality retailers should try to differentiate their communication strategies, not focusing only on the fact that products are authentic Italian but trying to attract new customers by increasing awareness about the taste, quality and other features that their products—being authentic traditional Italian products—have.
Moreover, all stakeholders interested in increasing sales or promoting authentic Italian food products should target product knowledge. Building knowledge about Italian products and culinary traditions could increase the frequency of purchase by the less ethnocentric foreign consumers. This could, for example, be done by communications campaigns in the city, through local newspapers, cooking magazines or local events and festivals. Product knowledge should be built also in the store itself among customers for example using billboards (a tool that already differentiates Eataly stores from those of other retailers), providing recipes and organising seminars and classes. Indeed, the current educational engagement of Eataly on traditional production processes and producers can help customers understand that even if prices are not low, the quality of the products makes the difference. This type of communication could be also extended out of the store. Increasing product knowledge and making people more conscious about the quality differences between authentic and non-authentic products could also gradually reduce the market erosion for authentic Italian food products by imitation ones, supporting the "Made in Italy" brand.
However, results suffer from a set of limitations that need to be considered. First of all, the variables are measured on the basis of stated preference data. This has well-known problems related to the risk of over-statement of socially desirable practices or values. Moreover, the analysis is based on a sample limited in size and in geographical scope and this limits the reliability of the findings. Moreover, the results of our regressive models show low levels of R-squared indicating low levels of association (in some cases significant and in other not) among some of the variables of our conceptual framework and, possibly, suggesting the presence of other additional variables in explaining the purchasing behaviour. Future work should also consider a wider range of behaviour determinants and try to confirm results with a larger sample. However, this is one of the few studies looking at the role of ethnocentrism and product knowledge on the preferences for food products sold by retailers with a strong national identity on the international market. Future work should focus on collecting data also in other countries so that results may be more extendable. Further work could be done also developing ad hoc ethnocentrism scales, given that this variable might depend on the product and on the context. Moreover, future research could also explore more deeply the motivations affecting the choice of the retailer channel and analyse the possible relations with ethnocentrism and product knowledge. Finally, from a prospective point of view, researchers should also investigate the relations among the different latent constructs that affect consumer choices by using more integrated regression models, e.g., structural equation models.
The authors would like to thank the anonymous reviewers for providing insightful suggestions and comments.
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
[1] |
Hampel H, O'Bryant S, Durrleman S, et al. (2017) Others A precision medicine initiative for Alzheimer's disease: the road ahead to biomarker-guided integrative disease modeling. Climacteric 20: 107-118. https://doi.org/10.1080/13697137.2017.1287866 ![]() |
[2] | Hossain M, Wadud M, Rahman A A Secured Patient's Online Data Monitoring through Blockchain: An Intelligent way to Store Lifetime Medical Records. 2021 International Conference On Science Contemporary Technologies (ICSCT); c2021 : p. 1-6. |
[3] | Bhatia K, Syal R Predictive analysis using hybrid clustering in diabetes diagnosis. 2017 Recent Developments In Control, Automation & Power Engineering (RDCAPE); c2017 : p. 447-452. |
[4] | Nienhold D, Dornberger R, Korkut S Pattern recognition for automated healthcare assessment using non-invasive, ambient sensors. 2017 IEEE International Conference On Healthcare Informatics (ICHI); c2017 : p. 189-197. |
[5] | Bhardwaj R, Nambiar A, Dutta D A study of machine learning in healthcare. 2017 IEEE 41st Annual Computer Software And Applications Conference (COMPSAC); c2017 : p. 236-241. |
[6] | Li Y, Wu F, Ngom A (2018) A review on machine learning principles for multi-view biological data integration. Brief Bioinform 19: 325-340. https://doi.org/10.1093/bib/bbw113 |
[7] |
Rahman A, Islam M, Rahman Z, et al. (2020) Distb-condo: Distributed blockchain-based iot-sdn model for smart condominium. IEEE Access 8: 209594-209609. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3039113 ![]() |
[8] |
Finger M, Razaghi M (2017) Conceptualizing smart cities. Inform-Spektrum 40: 6-13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00287-016-1002-5 ![]() |
[9] |
Rahman A, Islam J, Kundu D, et al. (2023) Impacts of blockchain in software-defined Internet of Things ecosystem with Network Function Virtualization for smart applications: Present perspectives and future directions. Int J Commun Syst : e5429. https://doi.org/10.1002/dac.5429 ![]() |
[10] |
Baig M, Gholamhosseini H (2013) Smart health monitoring systems: an overview of design and modeling. J Med Syst 37: 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-012-9898-z ![]() |
[11] | Poslad S Ubiquitous computing: smart devices, environments and interactions. (John Wiley & Sons,2011) (2011). |
[12] |
Kamath U, Liu J, Whitaker J (2019) Deep learning for NLP and speech recognition.Springer 39. ![]() |
[13] |
Bali J, Garg R, Bali R (2019) Artificial intelligence (AI) in healthcare and biomedical research: Why a strong computational/AI bioethics framework is required?. Indian J Ophthalmol 67: 3. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijo.IJO_1292_18 ![]() |
[14] |
Hsu J (2016) For sale: deep learning [News]. IEEE Spectrum 53: 12-13. https://doi.org/10.1109/MSPEC.2016.7524158 ![]() |
[15] |
Rahman A, Islam M, Montieri A, et al. (2021) SmartBlock-SDN: An Optimized Blockchain-SDN Framework for Resource Management in IoT. IEEE Access 9: 28361-28376. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3058244 ![]() |
[16] | Islam S, Sara U, Kawsar A, et al. (2021) SGBBA: An Efficient Method for Prediction System in Machine Learning using Imbalance Dataset. IJACSA 12: 2021. https://doi.org/10.14569/IJACSA.2021.0120351 |
[17] |
Bengio Y, Courville A, Vincent P (2013) Representation learning: A review and new perspectives. IEEE T Pattern Anal 35: 1798-1828. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPAMI.2013.50 ![]() |
[18] |
Schmidhuber J (2015) Deep learning in neural networks: An overview. Neural Networks 61: 85-117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neunet.2014.09.003 ![]() |
[19] |
LeCun Y, Bengio Y, Hinton G (2015) Deep learning. Nat 521: 436-444. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14539 ![]() |
[20] |
Sarker I (2021) Machine learning: Algorithms, real-world applications and research directions. SN Comput Sci 2: 160. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202103.0216.v1 ![]() |
[21] |
Karim F, Armin M, Ahmedt-Aristizabal D, et al. (2023) A review of hydrodynamic and machine learning approaches for flood inundation modeling. Water 15: 566. https://doi.org/10.3390/w15030566 ![]() |
[22] |
Mukerji S, Petersen K, Pohl K, et al. (2023) Machine learning approaches to understand cognitive phenotypes in people with HIV. J Infect Dis 227: S48-S57. https://doi.org/10.1093/infdis/jiac293 ![]() |
[23] |
Chan J, Leow S, Bea K, et al. (2022) Mitigating the multicollinearity problem and its machine learning approach: A review. Math 10: 1283. https://doi.org/10.3390/math10081283 ![]() |
[24] |
Halbouni A, Gunawan T, Habaebi M, et al. (2022) Machine learning and deep learning approaches for cybersecuriy: A review. IEEE Access 10: 19572-19585. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3151248 ![]() |
[25] | Luan H, Tsai C (2021) A review of using machine learning approaches for precision education. Educ Technol Soc 24: 250-266. |
[26] |
Carracedo-Reboredo P, Liñares-Blanco J, Rodríguez-Fernández N, et al. (2021) A review on machine learning approaches and trends in drug discovery. Comput Struct Biotec J 19: 4538-4558. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csbj.2021.08.011 ![]() |
[27] |
Verbraeken J, Wolting M, Katzy J, et al. (2020) A survey on distributed machine learning. Acm Comput Surv (csur) 53: 1-33. https://doi.org/10.1145/3377454 ![]() |
[28] |
Alanazi S, Kamruzzaman M, Alruwaili M, et al. (2020) Measuring and preventing COVID-19 using the SIR model and machine learning in smart health care. J Healthc Eng 2020: 8857346. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/8857346 ![]() |
[29] |
Djenouri D, Laidi R, Djenouri Y, et al. (2019) Machine learning for smart building applications: Review and taxonomy. ACM Comput Surv 52: 1-36. https://doi.org/10.1145/3311950 ![]() |
[30] | Narayan V, Awasthi S, Fatima N Deep Learning Approaches for Human Gait Recognition: A Review. 2023 International Conference On Artificial Intelligence And Smart Communication (AISC); c2023 : p. 763-768. |
[31] |
Abdusalomov A, Islam B, Nasimov R, et al. (2023) An improved forest fire detection method based on the detectron2 model and a deep learning approach. Sensors 23: 1512. https://doi.org/10.3390/s23031512 ![]() |
[32] |
Ibrahim N, Gabr D, Rahman A, et al. (2022) A deep learning approach to intelligent fruit identification and family classification. Multimed Tools Appl 81: 27783-27798. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-022-12942-9 ![]() |
[33] |
Aqeel S, Shahid Khan A, Ahmad Z, et al. (2022) A comprehensive study on DNA based Security scheme Using Deep Learning in Healthcare. EDPACS 66: 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1080/07366981.2021.1958742 ![]() |
[34] | Ahmed I, Jeon G, Piccialli F (2021) A deep-learning-based smart healthcare system for patient's discomfort detection at the edge of Internet of things. IEEE Int Things 8: 10318-10326. https://doi.org/10.1109/JIOT.2021.3052067 |
[35] |
Zhang S, Yao L, Sun A, et al. (2019) Deep learning based recommender system: A survey and new perspectives. ACM Comput Surv (CSUR) 52: 1-38. https://doi.org/10.1145/3285029 ![]() |
[36] |
Altaheri H, Muhammad G, Alsulaiman M, et al. (2021) Deep learning techniques for classification of electroencephalogram (EEG) motor imagery (MI) signals: A review. Neural Comput Appl 35: 14681-14722. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-021-06352-5 ![]() |
[37] |
Asraf A, Islam M, Haque M, et al. (2020) Deep learning applications to combat novel coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic. SN Comput Sci 1: 363. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42979-020-00383-w ![]() |
[38] |
Rahman M, Hossain M, Alrajeh N, et al. (2020) B5G and explainable deep learning assisted healthcare vertical at the edge: COVID-I9 perspective. IEEE Netw 34: 98-105. https://doi.org/10.1109/MNET.011.2000353 ![]() |
[39] |
Kumar P, Kumar R, Gupta G, et al. (2023) A blockchain-orchestrated deep learning approach for secure data transmission in IoT-enabled healthcare system. J Parallel Distr Com 172: 69-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpdc.2022.10.002 ![]() |
[40] | Gnanasankaran N, Subashini B, Sundaravadivazhagan B (2023) Amalgamation of Deep Learning in Healthcare Systems. Deep Learning For Healthcare Decision Making. USA: River Publishers 23. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003373261-1 |
[41] |
Azadi M, Yousefi S, Saen R, et al. (2023) Forecasting sustainability of healthcare supply chains using deep learning and network data envelopment analysis. J Bus Res 154: 113357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.113357 ![]() |
[42] | Bhat R, Mannarswamy S, NC S DL4HC: Deep Learning for Healthcare. Proceedings Of The 6th Joint International Conference On Data Science & Management Of Data (10th ACM IKDD CODS And 28th COMAD); c2023 : p. 327-329. |
[43] | Javaid M, Haleem A, Singh R, et al. (2022) Significance of machine learning in healthcare: Features, pillars and applications. Int J Intell Netw 3: 58-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijin.2022.05.002 |
[44] |
Abdullah A, Hassan M, Mustafa Y (2022) A review on bayesian deep learning in healthcare: Applications and challenges. IEEE Access 10: 36538-36562. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3163384 ![]() |
[45] |
Futoma J, Simons M, Panch T, et al. (2020) The myth of generalisability in clinical research and machine learning in health care. Lancet Dig Health 2: e489-e492. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2589-7500(20)30186-2 ![]() |
[46] |
Wiens J, Saria S, Sendak M, et al. (2019) Others Do no harm: a roadmap for responsible machine learning for health care. Nat Med 25: 1337-1340. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-019-0609-x ![]() |
[47] | Periyasamy G, Rangaswamy E, Srinivasan U (2023) A study on impact of ageing population on Singapore healthcare systems using machine learning algorithms. World Rev Entrep Manag Sustain Dev 19: 47-70. https://doi.org/10.1504/WREMSD.2023.127243 |
[48] | Patil R, Shah K (2023) Machine Learning in Healthcare: Applications, Current Status, and Future Prospects. Handbook Res Mach Le. USA: Apple Academic Press 163-186. |
[49] |
McCoy L, Brenna C, Chen S, et al. (2022) Believing in black boxes: machine learning for healthcare does not need explainability to be evidence-based. J Clin Epidemiol 142: 252-257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.11.001 ![]() |
[50] |
Sabry F, Eltaras T, Labda W, et al. (2022) Machine learning for healthcare wearable devices: the big picture. J Healthc Eng 2022: 4653923. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/4653923 ![]() |
[51] |
Zhang A, Xing L, Zou J, et al. (2022) Shifting machine learning for healthcare from development to deployment and from models to data. Nat Biomed Eng 6: 1330-1345. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41551-022-00898-y ![]() |
[52] |
Siddique S, Chow J (2021) Machine learning in healthcare communication. Encyclopedia 1: 220-239. https://doi.org/10.3390/encyclopedia1010021 ![]() |
[53] |
Chen I, Pierson E, Rose S, et al. (2021) Ethical machine learning in healthcare. Annu Rev Biomed Da S 4: 123-144. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-biodatasci-092820-114757 ![]() |
[54] |
Souri A, Ghafour M, Ahmed A, et al. (2020) A new machine learning-based healthcare monitoring model for student's condition diagnosis in Internet of Things environment. Soft Comput 24: 17111-17121. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-020-05003-6 ![]() |
[55] |
Mageshkumar N, Lakshmanan L (2023) Intelligent data deduplication with deep transfer learning enabled classification model for cloud-based healthcare system. Expert Syst Appl 215: 119257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2022.119257 ![]() |
[56] |
Dhar T, Dey N, Borra S, et al. (2023) Challenges of deep learning in medical image analysis-improving explainability and trust. IEEE T Technol Soc 4: 68-75. https://doi.org/10.1109/TTS.2023.3234203 ![]() |
[57] |
Narayan V, Mall P, Alkhayyat A, et al. (2023) Others enhance-net: an approach to boost the performance of deep learning model based on real-time medical images. J Sensors 2023: 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/8276738 ![]() |
[58] |
Jujjavarapu C, Suri P, Pejaver V, et al. (2023) Predicting decompression surgery by applying multimodal deep learning to patients' structured and unstructured health data. BMC Med Inform Decis 23: 2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-022-02096-x ![]() |
[59] | Buddenkotte T, Rundo L, Woitek R, et al. (2023) Others deep learning-based segmentation of multi-site disease in ovarian cancer. MedRxiv : 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.01.10.22279679 |
[60] |
Rajan Jeyaraj P, Nadar E (2019) Smart-monitor: Patient monitoring system for IoT-based healthcare system using deep learning. IETE J Res 68: 1435-1442. https://doi.org/10.1080/03772063.2019.1649215 ![]() |
[61] |
Jin D, Sergeeva E, Weng W, et al. (2022) Explainable deep learning in healthcare: A methodological survey from an attribution view. WIREs Mech Dise 14: e1548. https://doi.org/10.1002/wsbm.1548 ![]() |
[62] |
Vinod D, Prabaharan S (2023) COVID-19-The Role of Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning, and Deep Learning: A Newfangled. Arch Comput Methods E 30: 2667-2682. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11831-023-09882-4 ![]() |
[63] | Zohuri B, Rahmani F (2023) Artificial intelligence driven resiliency with machine learning and deep learning components. Transcranial Magnetic and Electrical Brain Stimulation for Neurological Disorders.Academic Press 317-334. |
[64] |
Hassan A, Rajesh A, Asaad M, et al. (2023) Artificial intelligence and machine learning in prediction of surgical complications: Current state, applications, and Iimplications. Am Surgeon 89: 25-30. ![]() |
[65] |
Jenkins T (2022) Others wearable medical sensor devices, machine and deep learning algorithms, and internet of things-based healthcare systems in COVID-19 patient screening, diagnosis, monitoring, and treatment. Am J Med Res 9: 49-64. ![]() |
[66] |
Saravi B, Hassel F, Ülkümen S, et al. (2022) Artificial intelligence-driven prediction modeling and decision making in spine surgery using hybrid machine learning models. J Pers Med 12: 509. https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm12040509 ![]() |
[67] | Bahrami M, Forouzanfar M (2022) Sleep apnea detection from single-lead ECG: A comprehensive analysis of machine learning and deep learning algorithms. IEEE T Instrum Meas 71: 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIM.2022.3151947 |
[68] |
Stone D, Michalkova L, Machova V (2022) Machine and deep learning techniques, body sensor networks, and Internet of Things-based smart healthcare systems in COVID-19 remote patient monitoring. Am J Med Res 9: 97-112. ![]() |
[69] |
Afshar P, Heidarian S, Enshaei N, et al. (2021) COVID-CT-MD, COVID-19 computed tomography scan dataset applicable in machine learning and deep learning. Scientific Data 8: 121. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-021-00900-3 ![]() |
[70] | Hasan M, Rahman A, Karim M Normalized Approach to Find Optimal Number of Topics in Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA). Proceedings Of International Conference On Trends In Computational And Cognitive Engineering; c2021 : p. 341-354. |
[71] |
Ikotun A, Ezugwu A, Abualigah L, et al. (2022) K-means Clustering Algorithms: A Comprehensive Review, Variants Analysis, and Advances in the Era of Big Data. Inform Sci 622: 178-210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2022.11.139 ![]() |
[72] |
Rahmani A, Ali S, Yousefpoor M, et al. (2021) An area coverage scheme based on fuzzy logic and shuffled frog-leaping algorithm (sfla) in heterogeneous wireless sensor networks. Math 9: 2251. https://doi.org/10.3390/math9182251 ![]() |
[73] |
Alizadehsani R, Roshanzamir M, Abdar M, et al. (2019) A database for using machine learning and data mining techniques for coronary artery disease diagnosis. Sci Data 6: 227. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-019-0206-3 ![]() |
[74] |
Ben-Israel D, Jacobs W, Casha S, et al. (2020) The impact of machine learning on patient care: a systematic review. Artif Intell Med 103: 101785. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artmed.2019.101785 ![]() |
[75] |
Rahman A, Islam M, Band S, et al. (2023) Towards a blockchain-SDN-based secure architecture for cloud computing in smart industrial IoT. Digit Commun Netw 9: 411-421. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcan.2022.11.003 ![]() |
[76] |
Dhal P, Azad C (2022) A comprehensive survey on feature selection in the various fields of machine learning. Appl Intell 52: 4543-4587. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-021-02550-9 ![]() |
[77] | Tiwari S, Rana K Feature selection in big data: Trends and challenges. Data Science And Intelligent Applications: Proceedings Of ICDSIA 2020; c2021 : p. 83-98. |
[78] | Hussen Wadud M, Rahman A, Islam M A Decentralized Secure Blockchain-based Privacy-Preserving Healthcare Clouds and Applications. 2023 International Conference On Electrical, Computer And Communication Engineering (ECCE); c2023 : p. 1-6. |
[79] | Feldman K, Faust L, Wu X Beyond volume: The impact of complex healthcare data on the machine learning pipeline. Towards Integrative Machine Learning And Knowledge Extraction: BIRS Workshop, Banff, AB, Canada, July 24–26, 2015, Revised Selected Papers; c2017 : p. 150-169. |
[80] |
Zhang J, Harman M, Ma L, et al. (2020) Machine learning testing: Survey, landscapes and horizons. IEEE T Software Eng 48: 1-36. ![]() |
[81] |
Javaheri D, Hosseinzadeh M, Rahmani A (2018) Detection and elimination of spyware and ransomware by intercepting kernel-level system routines. IEEE Access 6: 78321-78332. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2884964 ![]() |
[82] |
Islam M, Rahman A, Kabir S, et al. (2022) Blockchain-SDN-based energy-aware and distributed secure architecture for IoT in smart cities. IEEE Internet Things 9: 3850-3864. https://doi.org/10.1109/JIOT.2021.3100797 ![]() |
[83] | Khan S, Shahrior A, Karim R, et al. (2022) MultiNet: A deep neural network approach for detecting breast cancer through multi-scale feature fusion. J King Saud Univ-Com 34: 6217-6228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksuci.2021.08.004 |
[84] |
Brophy E, Wang Z, She Q, et al. (2023) Generative adversarial networks in time series: A systematic literature review. ACM Comput Surv 55: 1-31. https://doi.org/10.1145/3559540 ![]() |
[85] |
Alhussein M, Muhammad G, Hossain M (2019) EEG pathology detection based on deep learning. IEEE Access 7: 27781-27788. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2901672 ![]() |
[86] |
Yang S, Deng B, Wang J, et al. (2018) Design of hidden-property-based variable universe fuzzy control for movement disorders and its efficient reconfigurable implementation. IEEE T Fuzzy Syst 27: 304-318. https://doi.org/10.1109/TFUZZ.2018.2856182 ![]() |
[87] |
Fadlullah Z, Tang F, Mao B, et al. (2018) On intelligent traffic control for large-scale heterogeneous networks: A value matrix-based deep learning approach. IEEE Commun Lett 22: 2479-2482. ![]() |
[88] |
Hossain M (2015) Cloud-supported cyber–physical localization framework for patients monitoring. IEEE Syst J 11: 118-127. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11030384 ![]() |
[89] |
Luo P, Tian L, Ruan J, et al. (2017) Disease gene prediction by integrating ppi networks, clinical rna-seq data and omim data. IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform 16: 222-232. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCBB.2017.2770120 ![]() |
[90] |
Wang D, Zhang M, Li Z, et al. (2017) Modulation format recognition and OSNR estimation using CNN-based deep learning. IEEE Photonic Tech L 29: 1667-1670. https://doi.org/10.1109/LPT.2017.2742553 ![]() |
[91] |
Li M, Wang Y, Zheng R, et al. (2019) DeepDSC: a deep learning method to predict drug sensitivity of cancer cell lines. IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform 18: 575-582. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCBB.2019.2919581 ![]() |
[92] |
Rahman A, Montieri A, Kundu D, et al. (2022) Others On the Integration of Blockchain and SDN: Overview, Applications, and Future Perspectives. J Netw Syst Manag 30: 1-44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10922-022-09682-4 ![]() |
[93] |
Debnath T, Reza M, Rahman A, et al. (2022) Four-layer ConvNet to facial emotion recognition with minimal epochs and the significance of data diversity. Sci Rep 12: 6991. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-511221/v1 ![]() |
[94] | Nix-UnitedUnited artificial intelligence vs. machine learning vs. deep learning: Explaining the difference (2021). Available from: https://nix-united.com/blog/artificial-intelligence-vsmachine-learning-vsdeep-learning-explaining-the-difference. |
[95] | Tkachenko N Machine learning in healthcare: 12 Real-world use cases to know (2021). Available from: https://nix-united.com/blog/machine-learning-in-healthcare-12-real-world-use-cases-to-know/. |
[96] | Flam D Benefits of Machine Learning in Healthcare (2022). Available from: https://www.foreseemed.com/blog/machine-learning-in-healthcare. |
[97] | Bresnick J What Is Deep Learning and How Will It Change Healthcare? (2022). Available from: https://healthitanalytics.com/features/what-is-deep-learning-and-how-will-it-change-healthcare |
[98] |
Khan M, Rahman A, Debnath T, et al. (2022) Accurate brain tumor detection using deep convolutional neural network. Comput Struct Biotec 20: 4733-4745. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICISET54810.2022.9775817 ![]() |
[99] |
Vyas S, Bhargava D (2021) Smart health systems: Emerging trends. UK: Springer Nature. ![]() |
[100] |
Huang X, Jagota V, Espinoza-Muñoz E, et al. (2021) Tourist hot spots prediction model based on optimized neural network algorithm. Int J Syst Assur Eng 13: 63-71. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13198-021-01226-4 ![]() |
[101] |
Rahman A, Chakraborty C, Anwar A, et al. (2022) Others SDN–IoT empowered intelligent framework for industry 4.0 applications during COVID-19 pandemic. Cluster Comput 25: 2351-2368. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10586-021-03367-4 ![]() |
[102] | Rahman A, Sara U, Kundu D, et al. (2020) DistB-SDoIndustry: Enhancing Security in Industry 4.0 Services based on Distributed Blockchain through Software Defined Networking-IoT Enabled Architecture. Int J Adv Comput Sc 11: 2020. https://doi.org/10.14569/IJACSA.2020.0110980 |
[103] |
Wang N, Zhao X, Zhao P, et al. (2019) Automatic damage detection of historic masonry buildings based on mobile deep learning. Automat Constr 103: 53-66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2019.03.003 ![]() |
[104] | Chen X, Xie H, Li Z, et al. (2023) Information fusion and artificial intelligence for smart healthcare: a bibliometric study. Inform Process Manag 60: 103-113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2022.103113 |
[105] |
Chatzinikolaou T, Vogiatzi E, Kousis A, et al. (2022) Smart Healthcare Support Using Data Mining and Machine Learning. IoT And WSN Based Smart Cities: A Machine Learning Perspective. Cham: Springer 27-48. ![]() |
[106] |
Balakrishnan S, Suresh Kumar K, Ramanathan L, et al. (2022) IoT for health monitoring system based on machine learning algorithm. Wireless Pers Commun 124: 189-205. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-021-09335-w ![]() |
[107] |
Awotunde J, Folorunso S, Ajagbe S, et al. (2022) AiIoMT: IoMT-based system-enabled artificial intelligence for enhanced smart healthcare systems. Machine Learning For Critical Internet Of Medical Things: Applications And Use Cases. Cham: Springer 229-254. ![]() |
[108] |
Bahalul Haque A, Bhushan B, Nawar A, et al. (2022) Attacks and countermeasures in IoT based smart healthcare applications. Recent Advances In Internet Of Things And Machine Learning: Real-World Applications.Springer 67-90. ![]() |
[109] |
Singh S, Rathore S, Alfarraj O, et al. (2022) A framework for privacy-preservation of IoT healthcare data using Federated Learning and blockchain technology. Future Gener Comp Sy 129: 380-388. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2021.11.028 ![]() |
[110] | Ahmed M, Zubair S (2022) Explainable artificial intelligence in sustainable smart healthcare. Explainable Artificial Intelligence For Cyber Security: Next Generation Artificial Intelligence. Cham: Springer 265-280. |
[111] |
Verma R (2022) Smart city healthcare cyber physical system: Characteristics, technologies and challenges. Wireless Pers Commun 122: 1413-1433. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-021-08955-6 ![]() |
[112] |
Rahman A, Hossain M, Muhammad G, et al. (2022) Federated learning-based AI approaches in smart healthcare: Concepts, taxonomies, challenges and open issues. Cluster Comput 26: 2271-2311. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10586-022-03658-4 ![]() |
[113] |
Dwivedi R, Mehrotra D, Chandra S (2022) Potential of Internet of Medical Things (IoMT) applications in building a smart healthcare system: A systematic review. J Oral Biol Craniofac Res 12: 302-318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobcr.2021.11.010 ![]() |
[114] |
Ghosh A, Umer S, Khan M, et al. (2023) Smart sentiment analysis system for pain detection using cutting edge techniques in a smart healthcare framework. Cluster Comput 29: 119-135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10586-022-03552-z ![]() |
[115] |
Kondaka L, Thenmozhi M, Vijayakumar K, et al. (2022) An intensive healthcare monitoring paradigm by using IoT based machine learning strategies. Multimed Tools Appl 81: 36891-36905. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-021-11111-8 ![]() |
[116] |
Unal D, Bennbaia S, Catak F (2022) Machine learning for the security of healthcare systems based on Internet of Things and edge computing. Cybersecurity And Cognitive Science. USA: Academic Press 299-320. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-90570-1.00007-3 ![]() |
[117] |
Verma V, Verma S (2022) Machine learning applications in healthcare sector: An overview. Materials Today: Proc 57: 2144-2147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2021.12.101 ![]() |
[118] |
Kumari S, Muthulakshmi P, Agarwal D (2022) Deployment of Machine Learning Based Internet of Things Networks for Tele-Medical and Remote Healthcare. Evolutionary Computing And Mobile Sustainable Networks: Proceedings Of ICECMSN 2021. Singapore: Springer 305-317. ![]() |
[119] |
Rehman A, Abbas S, Khan M, et al. (2022) A secure healthcare 5.0 system based on blockchain technology entangled with federated learning technique. Comput Biol Med 150: 106019. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/gvkqc ![]() |
[120] | Kute S, Tyagi A, Aswathy S (2022) Security, privacy and trust issues in internet of things and machine learning based e-healthcare. Intelligent Interactive Multimedia Systems For E-Healthcare Applications. Singapore: Springer 291-317. |
[121] |
Talaat F (2022) Effective prediction and resource allocation method (EPRAM) in fog computing environment for smart healthcare system. Multimed Tools Appl 81: 8235-8258. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-022-12223-5 ![]() |
[122] |
Swain S, Bhushan B, Dhiman G, et al. (2022) Appositeness of optimized and reliable machine learning for healthcare: A survey. Arch Comput Methods Eng 29: 3981-4003. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11831-022-09733-8 ![]() |
[123] |
Shafiq S, Ahmed S, Kaiser M S, et al. (2022) Comprehensive Analysis of Nature-Inspired Algorithms for Parkinson's Disease Diagnosis. IEEE Access 11: 1629-1653. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3232292 ![]() |
[124] |
Mohanty A, Parida S, Nayak S, et al. (2022) Study and impact analysis of machine learning approaches for smart healthcare in predicting mellitus diabetes on clinical data. Smart Healthcare Analytics: State Of The Art. Singapore: Springer 75-101. ![]() |
[125] |
Gupta P, Chouhan A, Wajeed M, et al. (2023) Prediction of health monitoring with deep learning using edge computing. Meas: Sensors 25: 100604. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measen.2022.100604 ![]() |
[126] |
Ahmed I, Jeon G, Chehri A (2022) An IoT-enabled smart health care system for screening of COVID-19 with multi layers features fusion and selection. Computing 105: 743-760. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00607-021-00992-0 ![]() |
[127] |
Ravi V, Alazab M, Selvaganapathy S, et al. (2022) A Multi-View attention-based deep learning framework for malware detection in smart healthcare systems. Comput Commun 195: 73-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comcom.2022.08.015 ![]() |
[128] |
Jiao Y, Qi H, Wu J (2022) Capsule network assisted electrocardiogram classification model for smart healthcare. Biocybern Biomed Eng 42: 543-555. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbe.2022.03.006 ![]() |
[129] |
Ahmed I, Camacho D, Jeon G, et al. (2022) Internet of health things driven deep learning-based system for non-invasive patient discomfort detection using time frame rules and pairwise keypoints distance feature. Sustain Cities Soc 79: 103672. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2022.103672 ![]() |
[130] |
Parida P, Dora L, Swain M, et al. (2022) Data science methodologies in smart healthcare: A review. Health Tech 12: 329-344. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12553-022-00648-9 ![]() |
[131] |
Hammad M, Abd El-Latif A, Hussain A, et al. (2022) Deep learning models for arrhythmia detection in IoT healthcare applications. Comput Electr Eng 100: 108011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compeleceng.2022.108011 ![]() |
[132] |
Sujith A, Sajja G, Mahalakshmi V, et al. (2022) Systematic review of smart health monitoring using deep learning and Artificial intelligence. Neurosci Inform 2: 100028. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuri.2021.100028 ![]() |
[133] |
Refaee E, Shamsudheen S (2022) A computing system that integrates deep learning and the internet of things for effective disease diagnosis in smart health care systems. J Super comput 78: 9285-9306. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11227-021-04263-9 ![]() |
[134] |
Moqurrab S, Tariq N, Anjum A, et al. (2022) A deep learning-based privacy-preserving model for smart healthcare in Internet of medical things using fog computing. Wireless Pers Commun 126: 2379-2401. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-021-09323-0 ![]() |
[135] | Awotunde J, Abiodun K, Adeniyi E A deep learning-based intrusion detection technique for a secured IoMT system. Informatics And Intelligent Applications: First International Conference, ICIIA 2021, Ota, Nigeria, November 25–27, 2021, Revised Selected Papers; c2022 : p. 50-62. |
[136] |
Sahu A, Sharma S, Raja R (2022) Deep learning-based continuous authentication for an IoT-enabled healthcare service. Comput Electr Eng 99: 107817. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compeleceng.2022.107817 ![]() |
[137] |
Munnangi A, UdhayaKumar S, Ravi V, et al. (2023) Survival study on deep learning techniques for IoT enabled smart healthcare system. Health Technol 13: 215-228. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12553-023-00736-4 ![]() |
[138] | CourseraWhat is machine learning in health care? Applications and opportunities (2022). Available from: https://www.coursera.org/articles/machine-learning-in-health-care |
[139] | ONPASSIVEApplication of deep learning in healthcare (2022). Available from: https://onpassive.com/blog/application-of-deep-learning-in-healthcare/::text=Imaging%20In%20Medicine,the%20best%20treatment%20to%20patients |
[140] |
Xu Z, Sun J (2018) Model-driven deep-learning. National Sci Rev 5: 22-24. https://doi.org/10.1093/nsr/nwx099 ![]() |
[141] |
Shah A, Yan X, Shah S, et al. (2020) Mining patient opinion to evaluate the service quality in healthcare: a deep-learning approach. J Amb Intel Hum Comp 11: 2925-2942. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-019-01434-8 ![]() |
[142] |
Tuli S, Basumatary N, Gill S, et al. (2020) HealthFog: An ensemble deep learning based Smart Healthcare System for Automatic Diagnosis of Heart Diseases in integrated IoT and fog computing environments. Future Gener Comp Sy 104: 187-200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2019.10.043 ![]() |
[143] |
Shamshirband S, Fathi M, Dehzangi A, et al. A review on deep learning approaches in healthcare systems: Taxonomies, challenges, and open issues. J Biomed Inform 113: 103627. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2020.103627 ![]() |
[144] |
Rana M, Bhushan M (2022) Machine learning and deep learning approach for medical image analysis: diagnosis to detection. Multimed Tools Appl 82: 26731-26769. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-022-14305-w ![]() |
[145] |
Almutairi M, Gabralla L, Abubakar S, et al. (2022) Detecting elderly behaviors based on deep learning for healthcare: Recent advances, methods, real-world applications and challenges. IEEE Access 10: 69802-69821. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3186701 ![]() |
[146] | Harrou F, Dairi A, Kadri F, et al. (2022) Effective forecasting of key features in hospital emergency department: Hybrid deep learning-driven methods. Mach Le Appl 7: 100200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mlwa.2021.100200 |
[147] |
Chopra P, Junath N, Singh S, et al. (2022) Cyclic GAN model to classify breast cancer data for pathological healthcare task. Biomed Res Int 2022: 6336700. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/6336700 ![]() |
[148] |
Heidari A, Navimipour N, Unal M, et al. (2022) The COVID-19 epidemic analysis and diagnosis using deep learning: A systematic literature review and future directions. Comput Biol Med 141: 105141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2021.105141 ![]() |
[149] |
Heidari A, Jafari Navimipour N, Unal M, et al. (2022) Machine learning applications for COVID-19 outbreak management. Neural Comput Appl 34: 15313-15348. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-022-07424-w ![]() |
[150] | Raja G (2022) Deep learning algorithms for real-time healthcare monitoring systems. Convergence of deep learning and artificial intelligence in internet of things. USA: CRC Press 1-18. |
[151] | Sserubombwe R (2022) Automatic bone fracture detection in x-ray images using deep learning [dissertation]. [Uganda]: Makerere University 73p. |
[152] |
Hulsen T (2022) Literature analysis of artificial intelligence in biomedicine. Ann Transl Med 10: 1284. https://doi.org/10.21037/atm-2022-50 ![]() |
[153] |
Kumar S, Ramachandran P (2022) Review on compressive sensing algorithms for ECG signal for IoT based deep learning framework. Appl Sci 12: 8368. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12168368 ![]() |
[154] | Nath S, Das Gupta S, Saha S (2023) Deep learning-based common skin disease image classification. J Intell Fuzzy Syst : 1-17. |
[155] |
Zeng N, Qiu H, Wang Z, et al. (2018) A new switching-delayed-PSO-based optimized SVM algorithm for diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease. Neurocomputing 320: 195-202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2018.09.001 ![]() |
[156] | Shahab S, Hessam S, Vahdat S, et al. (2019) Parkinson's disease detection using biogeography-based optimization. Tech Science Press 61: 11-26. https://doi.org/10.32604/cmc.2019.06472 |
[157] |
Kruthika K, Maheshappa H, Initiative A (2019) Others Multistage classifier-based approach for Alzheimer's disease prediction and retrieval. Inform Med Unlocked 14: 34-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.imu.2018.12.003 ![]() |
[158] | Rajalaxmi R, Kaavya S Feature selection for identifying Parkinson's disease using binary Grey Wolf Optimization. Proceedings Of The International Conference On Intelligent Computing Systems; ICICS 2017–Dec 15th–16th 2017; Organized By Sona College Of Technology, Salem, Tamilnadu, India. c2017 : p11. |
[159] | Chen X, Yao X, Tang C Detecting Parkinson's disease using gait analysis with particle swarm optimization. Human Aspects Of IT For The Aged Population; Applications In Health, Assistance, And Entertainment: 4th International Conference, ITAP 2018, Held As Part Of HCI International 2018, Las Vegas, NV, USA, July 15–20, 2018, Proceedings, Part II 4; c2018 : p. 263-275. |
[160] |
El-Rashidy N, El-Sappagh S, Islam S, et al. (2020) End-to-end deep learning framework for coronavirus (COVID-19) detection and monitoring. Electronics 9: 1439. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics9091439 ![]() |
[161] | Qaraqe M, Erraguntla M, Dave D (2021) AI and machine learning in diabetes management: opportunity, status, and challenges. Multiple Perspectives On Artificial Intelligence In Healthcare: Opportunities And Challenges. Cham: Springer 129-141. |
[162] |
Suarez-Ibarrola R, Hein S, Reis G, et al. (2020) Current and future applications of machine and deep learning in urology: a review of the literature on urolithiasis, renal cell carcinoma, and bladder and prostate cancer. World J Urol 38: 2329-2347. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-019-03000-5 ![]() |
[163] |
Alzubaidi L, Zhang J, Humaidi A, et al. (2021) Review of deep learning: Concepts, CNN architectures, challenges, applications, future directions. J Big Data 8: 1-74. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40537-021-00444-8 ![]() |
[164] |
Fernando T, Gammulle H, Denman S, et al. (2021) Deep learning for medical anomaly detection–a survey. ACM Comput Surv (CSUR) 54: 1-37. https://doi.org/10.1145/3464423 ![]() |
[165] |
Altaheri H, Muhammad G, Alsulaiman M, et al. (2023) Deep learning techniques for classification of electroencephalogram (EEG) motor imagery (MI) signals: A review. Neural Comput Appl 35: 14681-14722. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-021-06352-5 ![]() |
[166] |
Rasheed K, Qayyum A, Ghaly M, et al. (2022) Explainable, trustworthy, and ethical machine learning for healthcare: A survey. Comput Biol Med 149: 106043. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2022.106043 ![]() |
[167] |
Goel K, Sindhgatta R, Kalra S, et al. (2022) The effect of machine learning explanations on user trust for automated diagnosis of COVID-19. Comput Biol Med 146: 105587. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2022.105587 ![]() |
[168] |
Velden B, Kuijf H, Gilhuijs K, et al. (2022) Explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) in deep learning-based medical image analysis. Med Image Anal 79: 102470. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.media.2022.102470 ![]() |
[169] |
Chieregato M, Frangiamore F, Morassi M, et al. (2022) A hybrid machine learning/deep learning COVID-19 severity predictive model from CT images and clinical data. Sci Rep 12: 4629. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-07890-1 ![]() |
[170] |
Messina P, Pino P, Parra D, et al. (2022) A survey on deep learning and explainability for automatic report generation from medical images. ACM Comput Surv (CSUR) 54: 1-40. https://doi.org/10.1145/3522747 ![]() |
[171] |
Castiglioni I, Rundo L, Codari M, et al. (2021) AI applications to medical images: From machine learning to deep learning. Phys Med 83: 9-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmp.2021.02.006 ![]() |
[172] |
Li W, Chai Y, Khan F, et al. (2021) A comprehensive survey on machine learning-based big data analytics for IoT-enabled smart healthcare system. Mobile Netw Appl 26: 234-252. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11036-020-01700-6 ![]() |
[173] |
Saheed Y, Arowolo M (2021) Efficient cyber attack detection on the internet of medical things-smart environment based on deep recurrent neural network and machine learning algorithms. IEEE Access 9: 161546-161554. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3128837 ![]() |
[174] |
Chen I, Joshi S, Ghassemi M, et al. (2021) Probabilistic machine learning for healthcare. Annu Rev Biomed Data Sci 4: 393-415. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-biodatasci-092820-033938 ![]() |
[175] |
Muhammad K, Khan S, Del Ser J, et al. (2020) Deep learning for multigrade brain tumor classification in smart healthcare systems: A prospective survey. IIEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst 32: 507-522. https://doi.org/10.1109/TNNLS.2020.2995800 ![]() |
[176] |
Qayyum A, Qadir J, Bilal M, et al. (2020) Secure and robust machine learning for healthcare: A survey. IEEE Rev Biomed Eng 14: 156-180. https://doi.org/10.1109/RBME.2020.3013489 ![]() |
[177] | Parihar A, Sharma S Application of Machine Learning and Deep Learning in for diagnosis in Medical learning. (2020) (2020). |
[178] |
Nakaura T, Higaki T, Awai K, et al. (2020) A primer for understanding radiology articles about machine learning and deep learning. Diagn Interv Imag 101: 765-770. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diii.2020.10.001 ![]() |
[179] |
Ali F, El-Sappagh S, Islam S, et al. (2020) A smart healthcare monitoring system for heart disease prediction based on ensemble deep learning and feature fusion. Inform Fusion 63: 208-222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inffus.2020.06.008 ![]() |
[180] |
Rasheed K, Qayyum A, Qadir J, et al. (2020) Machine learning for predicting epileptic seizures using EEG signals: A review. IEEE Rev Biomed Eng 14: 139-155. https://doi.org/10.1109/RBME.2020.3008792 ![]() |
[181] |
Esteva A, Robicquet A, Ramsundar B, et al. (2019) A guide to deep learning in healthcare. Nat Med 25: 24-29. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-018-0316-z ![]() |
[182] |
Retson T, Besser A, Sall S, et al. (2019) Machine learning and deep neural networks in thoracic and cardiovascular imaging. J Thorac Imag 34: 192. https://doi.org/10.1097/RTI.0000000000000385 ![]() |
[183] | Dhillon A, Singh A (2019) Machine learning in healthcare data analysis: A survey. J Biol Today's World 8: 1-10. |
[184] |
Saba L, Biswas M, Kuppili V, et al. (2019) Others The present and future of deep learning in radiology. Eur J Radiol 114: 14-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2019.02.038 ![]() |
[185] |
Huang H, Hsiao Y, Mukundan A, et al. (2023) Classification of Skin Cancer Using Novel Hyperspectral Imaging Engineering via YOLOv5. J Clin Med 12: 1134. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12031134 ![]() |
[186] | Hu Q, Xia H, Zhang T (2023) Chatbot Combined with Deep Convolutional Neural Network for Skin Cancer Detection. Methods 2: 35. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-94-6463-040-4_7 |
[187] | Soni V, Yadav H, Semwal V A Novel Smartphone-Based Human Activity Recognition Using Deep Learning in Health care. Machine Learning, Image Processing, Network Security And Data Sciences: Select Proceedings Of 3rd International Conference On MIND 2021; c2023 : p. 493-503. |
[188] |
Kanagala P (2023) Effective cyber security system to secure optical data based on deep learning approach for healthcare application. Optik 272: 170315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijleo.2022.170315 ![]() |
[189] |
Khan M, Khan A, Alhaisoni M, et al. (2023) Multimodal brain tumor detection and classification using deep saliency map and improved dragonfly optimization algorithm. Int J Imag Syst Tech 33: 572-587. https://doi.org/10.1002/ima.22831 ![]() |
[190] | Dua N, Singh S, Challa S A Survey on Human Activity Recognition Using Deep Learning Techniques and Wearable Sensor Data. Machine Learning, Image Processing, Network Security And Data Sciences: 4th International Conference, MIND 2022, Virtual Event, January 19–20, 2023, Proceedings, Part I; c2023 : p. 52-71. |
[191] |
Wang W, Li X, Qiu X, et al. (2023) A privacy preserving framework for federated learning in smart healthcare systems. Inform Process Manag 60: 103167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2022.103167 ![]() |
[192] | Baji F, Abdullah S, Abdulsattar F (2023) K-mean clustering and local binary pattern techniques for automatic brain tumor detection. Bull Electr Eng Inf 12: 1586-1594. https://doi.org/10.11591/eei.v12i3.4404 |
[193] |
Hassan D, Hussein H, Hassan M (2023) Heart disease prediction based on pre-trained deep neural networks combined with principal component analysis. Biomed Signal Proces 79: 104019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bspc.2022.104019 ![]() |
[194] | Doshi R, Hiran K, Prakash B, et al. (2023) Deep belief network-based image processing for local directional segmentation in brain tumor detection. J Electr Imag 32: 062502. https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JEI.32.6.062502 |
[195] |
Hu X, Zhang P, Ban Y (2023) Large-scale burn severity mapping in multispectral imagery using deep semantic segmentation models. ISPRS J Photogramm 196: 228-240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2022.12.026 ![]() |
[196] |
Ogundepo E, Yahya W (2023) Performance analysis of supervised classification models on heart disease prediction. Innov Syst Softw Eng 19: 129-144. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11334-022-00524-9 ![]() |
[197] | Minda A, Ganesan V (2023) A Review on Optimal Deep Learning Based Prediction Model for Multi Disease Prediction. Smart Technologies In Data Science And Communication: Proceedings Of SMART-DSC 2022 Singapore-Springer. |
[198] |
Raheja N, Manocha A (2023) An IoT enabled secured clinical health care framework for diagnosis of heart diseases. Biomed Signal Proces 80: 104368. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bspc.2022.104368 ![]() |
[199] |
Sengar N, Joshi R, Dutta M, et al. (2023) EyeDeep-Net: a multi-class diagnosis of retinal diseases using deep neural network. Neural Comput Appl 35: 10551-10571. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-023-08249-x ![]() |
[200] |
Uzun Ozsahin D, Mustapha M, Uzun B, et al. (2023) Computer-Aided Detection and Classification of Monkeypox and Chickenpox Lesion in Human Subjects Using Deep Learning Framework. Diagnostics 13: 292. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13020292 ![]() |
[201] | Jagadeesha N, Trisal A, Tiwar V Skin Tone Assessment Using Hyperspectral Reconstruction from RGB Image. 2023 15th International Conference On COMmunication Systems & NETworkS (COMSNETS); c2023 : p. 125-128. |
[202] |
Balaha H, Hassan A (2023) Skin cancer diagnosis based on deep transfer learning and sparrow search algorithm. Neural Comput Appl 35: 815-853. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-022-07762-9 ![]() |
[203] | Bordoloi D, Singh V, Kaliyaperumal K, et al. (2023) Classification and detection of skin disease based on machine learning and image processing evolutionary models. Comput Assist Methods Eng Sci 30: 247-256. |
[204] |
Dileep P, Rao K, Bodapati P, et al. (2023) An automatic heart disease prediction using cluster-based bi-directional LSTM (C-BiLSTM) algorithm. Neural Comput Appl 35: 7253-7266. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-022-07064-0 ![]() |
[205] | Suha S, Sanam T A Machine Learning Approach for Predicting Patient's Length of Hospital Stay with Random Forest Regression. 2022 IEEE Region 10 Symposium (TENSYMP); c2022 : p. 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1109/TENSYMP54529.2022.9864447 |
[206] | Kundu D, Siddiqi U, Rahman M Vision transformer based deep learning model for monkeypox detection. 2022 25th International Conference On Computer And Information Technology (ICCIT); c2022 : p. 1021-1026. |
[207] | Rahman M, Kundu D, Suha S, et al. (2022) Hospital patients' length of stay prediction: A federated learning approach. J King Saud Univ-Com 34: 7874-7884. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksuci.2022.07.006 |
[208] | Suha S, Sanam T (2022) A deep convolutional neural network-based approach for detecting burn severity from skin burn images. Mach Learn Appl 9: 100371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mlwa.2022.100371 |
[209] |
Solanki R, Rajawat A, Gadekar A, et al. (2023) Building a Conversational Chatbot Using Machine Learning: Towards a More Intelligent Healthcare Application. Handbook Of Research On Instructional Technologies In Health Education And Allied Disciplines. USA: IGI Global 285-309. ![]() |
[210] |
Chen P, Wu T, Wang P, et al. (2023) Pancreatic cancer detection on CT scans with deep learning: a nationwide population-based study. Radiology 306: 172-182. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.220152 ![]() |
[211] | Siar M, Teshnehlab M Brain tumor detection using deep neural network and machine learning algorithm. 2019 9th International Conference On Computer And Knowledge Engineering (ICCKE); c2019 : p. 363-368. |
[212] |
Awotunde J, Panigrahi R, Khandelwal B, et al. (2023) Breast cancer diagnosis based on hybrid rule-based feature selection with deep learning algorithm. Res Biomed Eng 39: 115-127. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42600-022-00255-7 ![]() |
[213] | Özdil A, Yilmaz B (2023) Medical infrared thermal image based fatty liver classification using machine and deep learning. Quant Infr Therm J : 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1080/17686733.2022.2158678 |
[214] |
Qadri S, Lin H, Shen L, et al. (2023) Others CT-Based Automatic Spine Segmentation Using Patch-Based Deep Learning. Int J Intell Syst 2023: 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/2345835 ![]() |
[215] | Parihar A, Sharma S Application of Machine Learning and Deep Learning in for diagnosis in Medical learning. (2022,2) (2022). |
[216] |
Bhardwaj A, Singh S, Joshi D (2023) Explainable Deep Convolutional Neural Network for Valvular Heart Diseases Classification using PCG signals. IEEE T Instrum Meas 72: 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIM.2023.3274174 ![]() |
[217] |
Tasin I, Nabil T, Islam S, et al. (2023) Diabetes prediction using machine learning and explainable AI techniques. Healthcare Tech Lett 10: 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1049/htl2.12039 ![]() |
[218] |
Tasnim N, Al Mamun S, Shahidul Islam M, et al. (2023) Explainable Mortality Prediction Model for Congestive Heart Failure with Nature-Based Feature Selection Method. Appl Sci 13: 6138. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13106138 ![]() |
[219] |
Nancy A, Ravindran D, Raj Vincent P, et al. (2022) Iot-cloud-based smart healthcare monitoring system for heart disease prediction via deep learning. Electron 11: 2292. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics11152292 ![]() |
[220] |
Rieke N, Hancox J, Li W, et al. (2020) Others The future of digital health with federated learning. NPJ Digit Med 3: 119. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-020-00323-1 ![]() |
[221] |
Rahman A, Hasan K, Kundu D, et al. (2023) On the ICN-IoT with federated learning integration of communication: Concepts, security-privacy issues, applications, and future perspectives. Future Gener Comp Sy 138: 61-88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2022.08.004 ![]() |
[222] |
Rahman A, Nasir M, Rahman Z, et al. (2020) DistBlockBuilding: A Distributed Blockchain-Based SDN-IoT Network for Smart Building Management. IEEE Access 8: 140008-140018. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3012435 ![]() |
[223] |
Villarreal E, Garcıa-Alonso J, Moguel E, et al. (2023) Blockchain for healthcare management systems: a survey on interoperability and security. IEEE Access 11: 5629-5652. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3236505 ![]() |
[224] | Rahman A, Islam M, Karim M, Kundu D An Intelligent Vaccine Distribution Process in COVID-19 Pandemic through Blockchain-SDN Framework from Bangladesh Perspective. 2021 International Conference On Electronics, Communications And Information Technology (ICECIT); c2021 : p. 1-4. |
[225] | Imam R, Huzaifa M, Azz M (2023) On enhancing the robustness of Vision Transformers: Defensive Diffusion. ArXiv Preprint ArXiv:2305.08031 . |
[226] | Faisal M, Siddiqua H, Islam M An SDN-based Secure Model for IoT Network in Smart Building. 2022 4th International Conference On Sustainable Technologies For Industry 4.0 (STI); c2022 : p. 1-6. |
[227] | Tang C, Vishwakarma S, Li W Augmenting experimental data with simulations to improve activity classification in healthcare monitoring. 2021 IEEE Radar Conference (RadarConf21); c2021 : p. 1-6. |
[228] |
Rahman A, Rahman M, Kundu D, et al. (2021) Study on IoT for SARS-CoV-2 with healthcare:present and future perspective. Math Biosci Eng 18: 9697-9726. https://doi.org/10.3934/mbe.2021475 ![]() |
[229] |
Yang Z, Li Y, Zhou G (2023) TS-GAN: Time-series GAN for Sensor-based Health Data Augmentation. ACM Trans Comput Healthcare 4: 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1145/3583593 ![]() |
[230] | Rahman A, Hasan K, Jeong S An Enhanced Security Architecture for Industry 4.0 Applications based on Software-Defined Networking. 2022 13th International Conference On Information And Communication Technology Convergence (ICTC); c2022 : p. 2127-2130. |
1. | Thi Quynh Ngoc Nguyen, Thi Ho Thanh Dong, Hoai Nhi Vo, Effects of cantaloupe rind powder fortification on yogurt properties: Comparison between raw and enzyme-treated powder, 2024, 210, 00236438, 116828, 10.1016/j.lwt.2024.116828 | |
2. | Thi Quynh Ngoc Nguyen, Thanh Nhan Pham, Thi Thu Tra Tran, Nu Minh Nguyet Ton, Dang Khoa Cao, Van Viet Man Le, Antioxidant- and dietary fiber-enriched crackers using cashew nut skin powder, 2024, 2193-4126, 10.1007/s11694-024-03033-4 |
Variable | Eataly customers (%) | Non-Eataly customers (%) |
Age | ||
18–30 | 23.4 | 25.7 |
31–40 | 16.0 | 19.3 |
41–50 | 22.7 | 22.9 |
more than 50 | 38.3 | 32.1 |
Gender | ||
Male | 53.2 | 48.6 |
Female | 46.8 | 51.4 |
Educational level* | ||
Hauptschule | 3.2 | 4.6 |
Realschule | 21.3 | 24.8 |
Abitur | 13.8 | 27.5 |
Hochschulabschluss | 61.7 | 43.1 |
Income | ||
Less than 20,000 € | 16.0 | 11.9 |
20,000–40,000 € | 13.8 | 15.6 |
40,000–60,000 € | 23.4 | 17.4 |
More than 60,000 € | 12.8 | 17.4 |
Refuse to answer | 34.0 | 37.7 |
*For accuracy, we present the educational level of the German scholastic system: Hauptschule = Secondary school, from grade 5 to 9; Realschule = Secondary school, from grade 5 to 10; Abitur = Final degree of Gymnasium, secondary school from 5 to 13; Hochschulabschluss = Final degree of the University. |
Variable name | Scale | Description |
Ethnocentrism variable (CET scale) | ||
CET1 | scale (1–7)* | Only those products that are unavailable in Germany should be imported |
CET2 | scale (1–7)* | German products, first, last and foremost |
CET3 | scale (1–7)* | A real German should always buy German-made products' |
CET4 | scale (1–7)* | Germans should not buy foreign products, because this hurts German business and causes unemployment |
CET5 | scale (1–7)* | It may cost me in the long-run but I prefer to support German products' |
CET6 | scale (1–7)* | German consumers who purchase products made in other countries are responsible for putting their fellow Germans out of work |
Product knowledge | ||
SubKnow1 | scale (1–7)* | I know pretty much about fresh pasta |
SubKnow2 | scale (1–7)* | I know how to judge the quality of fresh pasta |
ObjKnow1 | dummy (0–1) | Wrong/correct answer to closed-answer questions about traditional Italian food products (long cut pasta) |
ObjKnow2 | dummy (0–1) | Wrong/correct answer to closed-answer to questions about traditional Italian food products (stuffed pasta) |
ObjKnow3 | dummy (0–1) | Wrong/correct answer to closed-answer to questions about traditional Italian food products (typical Italian dish) |
ObjKnow4 | dummy (0–1) | Wrong/correct answer to closed-answer questions about traditional Italian food products (typical dish form Southern Italy) |
Food purchasing habits | ||
Eataly | dummy (0–1) | Dummy variable on purchases at Eataly (0 = no; 1 = yes) |
Italian products | scale (1–5) | Frequency of purchase of authentic Italian food products (never, yearly, monthly, weekly) |
*Level of agreement: 1 = strongly disagree; 7 = strongly agree. |
Eataly customers | Non-Eataly customers | |||
Variable | Mean | Std. Deviation | Mean | Std. Deviation |
ETN1 | 3.42 | 1.97 | 3.27 | 2.06 |
ETN2 | 1.58 | 1.09 | 1.98 | 1.45 |
ETN3 | 2.09 | 1.48 | 2.28 | 1.51 |
ETN4 | 1.46 | 0.96 | 1.80 | 1.12 |
ETN5 | 1.90 | 1.29 | 2.40 | 1.65 |
ETN6 | 1.22 | 0.64 | 1.47 | 1.16 |
Eataly customers | Non-Eataly customers | |||
Variable | Mean | Std. Deviation | Mean | Std. Deviation |
SUB1 | 5.54 | 1.58 | 5.38 | 1.60 |
SUB2 | 4.46 | 1.71 | 4.22 | 1.87 |
OBJ_easy | 1.91 | 0.35 | 1.86 | 0.42 |
OBJ_advanced | 0.68 | 0.71 | 0.61 | 0.64 |
Variable | Factor 1 | Factor 2 |
ETN1 | 0.408 | 0.039 |
ETN2 | 0.579 | −0.119 |
ETN3 | 0.701 | −0.109 |
ETN4 | 0.769 | −0.240 |
ETN5 | 0.583 | −0.246 |
ETN6 | 0.431 | −0.162 |
SUB1 | 0.142 | 0.907 |
SUB2 | 0.238 | 0.670 |
OBJ_easy | 0.033 | 0.308 |
OBJ_advanced | 0.001 | 0.275 |
Ethnocentrism, non-Eataly customers | |||||
Estimate | Std. Error | t-value | Pr(>|t|) | significance | |
(Intercept) | 0.18715 | 0.21112 | 0.886 | 0.377 | |
GENDER (male) | −0.59296 | 0.18608 | −3.187 | 0.002 | ** |
AGE 31–40 | 0.16497 | 0.28310 | 0.583 | 0.561 | |
AGE 41–50 | 0.06292 | 0.26927 | 0.234 | 0.816 | |
AGE morethan 50 | −0.24322 | 0.25059 | −0.971 | 0.334 | |
EDUCATION abitur | 0.28370 | 0.22869 | 1.241 | 0.218 | |
EDUCATION realschule | 0.53660 | 0.24286 | 2.210 | 0.029 | * |
EDUCATION hauptschule | 0.92672 | 0.45003 | 2.059 | 0.042 | * |
R-squared | 0.186 | ||||
Adjusted R-squared | 0.130 | ||||
DF | 101 | ||||
p-value | 0.003 | ||||
Notes: Signif. codes: 0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1. |
Ethnocentrism, Eataly customers | |||||
Estimate | Std. Error | t-value | Pr(>|t|) | significance | |
(Intercept) | −0.04584 | 0.17213 | −0.266 | 0.791 | |
GENDER (male) | −0.34965 | 0.15331 | −2,281 | 0.025 | * |
AGE 31–40 | 0.38836 | 0.24241 | 1,602 | 0.113 | |
AGE 41–50 | 0.07972 | 0.23002 | 0.347 | 0.730 | |
AGE morethan 50 | −0.05034 | 0.20627 | −0.244 | 0.808 | |
EDUCATION reordabitur | 0.21740 | 0.22807 | 0.953 | 0.343 | |
EDUCATION reordrealschule | −0.12147 | 0.19426 | −0.625 | 0.533 | |
EDUCATION reordhauptschule | 0.15983 | 0.43385 | 0.368 | 0.713 | |
R-squared | 0.112 | ||||
Adjusted R-squared | 0.041 | ||||
DF | 86 | ||||
p-value | 0.1592 | ||||
Notes: Signif. codes: 0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1. |
Italian products knowledge, non-Eataly customers | |||||
Estimate | Std. Error | t-value | Pr(>|t|) | significance | |
(Intercept) | −0.29309 | 0.19796 | −1.481 | 0.142 | |
GENDER (male) | −0.43917 | 0.17449 | −2.517 | 0.013 | * |
AGE 31–40 | 0.62188 | 0.26546 | 2.343 | 0.021 | * |
AGE 41–50 | 0.61096 | 0.25249 | 2.420 | 0.017 | * |
AGE morethan 50 | 0.81631 | 0.23498 | 3.474 | 0.001 | *** |
EDUCATION abitur | 0.00433 | 0.21444 | 0.020 | 0.984 | |
EDUCATION realschule | −0.36016 | 0.22773 | −1.582 | 0.117 | |
EDUCATION hauptschule | −0.18559 | 0.42199 | −0.440 | 0.661 | |
R-squared | 0.158 | ||||
Adjusted R-squared | 0.100 | ||||
DF | 101 | ||||
p-value | 0.013 | ||||
Notes: Signif. codes: 0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1. |
Italian products knowledge, Eataly customers | |||||
Estimate | Std. Error | t-value | Pr(>|t|) | significance | |
(Intercept) | 0.03076 | 0.21661 | 0.142 | 0.887 | |
GENDER (male) | −0.13972 | 0.19292 | −0.724 | 0.471 | |
AGE 31–40 | 0.18703 | 0.30504 | 0.613 | 0.541 | |
AGE 41–50 | 0.52842 | 0.28945 | 1.826 | 0.071 | |
AGE morethan 50 | 0.30250 | 0.25957 | 1.165 | 0.247 | |
EDUCATION abitur | −0.61764 | 0.28700 | −2.152 | 0.034 | * |
EDUCATION realschule | −0.15604 | 0.24446 | −0.638 | 0.525 | |
EDUCATION hauptschule | −0.51515 | 0.54594 | −0.944 | 0.348 | |
R-squared | 0.112 | ||||
Adjusted R-squared | 0.039 | ||||
DF | 86 | ||||
p-value | 0.1613 | ||||
Notes: Signif. codes: 0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1. |
Non eataly customers | ||||||||||
Model 1 | Model 2 | |||||||||
Estimate | Std. Error | t-value | Pr(>|t|) | significance | Estimate | Std. Error | t-value | Pr(>|t|) | significance | |
(Intercepts) | ||||||||||
never|year | −4,138,112 | 0.721297 | −57,370 | 9.6E-06 | *** | −384,180 | 0.82328 | −46,664 | 3.07E-03 | *** |
year|month | −2,129,359 | 0.308493 | −69,024 | 5.1E-09 | *** | −179,588 | 0.49726 | −36,116 | 0.0003043 | *** |
month|week | 0.080418 | 0.196692 | 0.4089 | 0.6826 | 0.56813 | 0.45026 | 12,618 | 0.2070221 | ||
(Explanatory variables) | ||||||||||
GENDER (male) | 0.24283 | 0.42665 | 0.5692 | 0.5692489 | ||||||
AGE 31–40 | −0.48598 | 0.58290 | −0.8337 | 0.4044353 | ||||||
AGE 41–50 | 0.76475 | 0.58939 | 12,975 | 0.1944476 | ||||||
AGE morethan 50 | 0.90878 | 0.55132 | 16,484 | 0.0992744 | ||||||
EDUCATION abitur | −0.13429 | 0.48279 | −0.2782 | 0.7808877 | ||||||
EDUCATION realschule | 0.12468 | 0.53617 | 0.2325 | 0.8161165 | ||||||
EDUCATION hauptschule | −0.42209 | 0.86700 | −0.4868 | 0.6263756 | ||||||
Factor 1 | −0.288937 | 0.184715 | −15,642 | 0.1178 | −0.22096 | 0.20746 | −10,651 | 0.2868503 | ||
Factor 2 | 0.326450 | 0.200457 | 16,285 | 0.1034 | 0.30237 | 0.22712 | 13,313 | 0.1830912 | ||
N. of observations | 109 | 109 | ||||||||
Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) | 228.54 | 145.57 | ||||||||
Notes: Signif. codes: 0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1. |
Eataly customers | ||||||||||
Model 1 | Model 2 | |||||||||
Estimate | Std. Error | t-value | Pr(>|t|) | significance | Estimate | Std. Error | t-value | Pr(>|t|) | significance | |
never|year | −1045854 | 2644408 | −0.3955 | 0.69248 | −11261026 | 28092799 | −0.4009 | 0.68853 | ||
year|month | −396228 | 0.72498 | −54654 | 4.6E-05 | *** | −3595964 | 0.885406 | −40614 | 0.04879 | *** |
month|week | −0.37777 | 0.22206 | −17012 | 0.08890 | . | 0.387025 | 0.513935 | 0.7531 | 0.45141 | |
(Explanatory variables) | ||||||||||
GENDER (male) | −0.238943 | 0.502088 | −0.4759 | 0.63415 | ||||||
AGE 31–40 | 0.959550 | 0.740327 | 12961 | 0.19494 | ||||||
AGE 41–50 | 1864401 | 0.763756 | 24411 | 0.01464 | * | |||||
AGE morethan 50 | 1590115 | 0.646868 | 24582 | 0.01396 | * | |||||
EDUCATION abitur | 1111720 | 0.793847 | 14004 | 0.16139 | ||||||
EDUCATION realschule | −1461593 | 0.591462 | −24712 | 0.01347 | * | |||||
EDUCATION hauptschule | −2921894 | 1489000 | −19623 | 0.04973 | * | |||||
Factor 1 | 0.12715 | 0.29616 | 0.4293 | 0.66768 | 0.055926 | 0.334351 | 0.1673 | 0.86716 | ||
Factor 2 | 0.59636 | 0.23479 | 25400 | 0.01109 | * | 0.620954 | 0.265170 | 23417 | 0.01920 | * |
N. of observations | 94 | 94 | ||||||||
Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) | 232.70 | 143.69 | ||||||||
Notes: Signif. codes: 0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1. |
Variable | Eataly customers (%) | Non-Eataly customers (%) |
Age | ||
18–30 | 23.4 | 25.7 |
31–40 | 16.0 | 19.3 |
41–50 | 22.7 | 22.9 |
more than 50 | 38.3 | 32.1 |
Gender | ||
Male | 53.2 | 48.6 |
Female | 46.8 | 51.4 |
Educational level* | ||
Hauptschule | 3.2 | 4.6 |
Realschule | 21.3 | 24.8 |
Abitur | 13.8 | 27.5 |
Hochschulabschluss | 61.7 | 43.1 |
Income | ||
Less than 20,000 € | 16.0 | 11.9 |
20,000–40,000 € | 13.8 | 15.6 |
40,000–60,000 € | 23.4 | 17.4 |
More than 60,000 € | 12.8 | 17.4 |
Refuse to answer | 34.0 | 37.7 |
*For accuracy, we present the educational level of the German scholastic system: Hauptschule = Secondary school, from grade 5 to 9; Realschule = Secondary school, from grade 5 to 10; Abitur = Final degree of Gymnasium, secondary school from 5 to 13; Hochschulabschluss = Final degree of the University. |
Variable name | Scale | Description |
Ethnocentrism variable (CET scale) | ||
CET1 | scale (1–7)* | Only those products that are unavailable in Germany should be imported |
CET2 | scale (1–7)* | German products, first, last and foremost |
CET3 | scale (1–7)* | A real German should always buy German-made products' |
CET4 | scale (1–7)* | Germans should not buy foreign products, because this hurts German business and causes unemployment |
CET5 | scale (1–7)* | It may cost me in the long-run but I prefer to support German products' |
CET6 | scale (1–7)* | German consumers who purchase products made in other countries are responsible for putting their fellow Germans out of work |
Product knowledge | ||
SubKnow1 | scale (1–7)* | I know pretty much about fresh pasta |
SubKnow2 | scale (1–7)* | I know how to judge the quality of fresh pasta |
ObjKnow1 | dummy (0–1) | Wrong/correct answer to closed-answer questions about traditional Italian food products (long cut pasta) |
ObjKnow2 | dummy (0–1) | Wrong/correct answer to closed-answer to questions about traditional Italian food products (stuffed pasta) |
ObjKnow3 | dummy (0–1) | Wrong/correct answer to closed-answer to questions about traditional Italian food products (typical Italian dish) |
ObjKnow4 | dummy (0–1) | Wrong/correct answer to closed-answer questions about traditional Italian food products (typical dish form Southern Italy) |
Food purchasing habits | ||
Eataly | dummy (0–1) | Dummy variable on purchases at Eataly (0 = no; 1 = yes) |
Italian products | scale (1–5) | Frequency of purchase of authentic Italian food products (never, yearly, monthly, weekly) |
*Level of agreement: 1 = strongly disagree; 7 = strongly agree. |
Eataly customers | Non-Eataly customers | |||
Variable | Mean | Std. Deviation | Mean | Std. Deviation |
ETN1 | 3.42 | 1.97 | 3.27 | 2.06 |
ETN2 | 1.58 | 1.09 | 1.98 | 1.45 |
ETN3 | 2.09 | 1.48 | 2.28 | 1.51 |
ETN4 | 1.46 | 0.96 | 1.80 | 1.12 |
ETN5 | 1.90 | 1.29 | 2.40 | 1.65 |
ETN6 | 1.22 | 0.64 | 1.47 | 1.16 |
Eataly customers | Non-Eataly customers | |||
Variable | Mean | Std. Deviation | Mean | Std. Deviation |
SUB1 | 5.54 | 1.58 | 5.38 | 1.60 |
SUB2 | 4.46 | 1.71 | 4.22 | 1.87 |
OBJ_easy | 1.91 | 0.35 | 1.86 | 0.42 |
OBJ_advanced | 0.68 | 0.71 | 0.61 | 0.64 |
Variable | Factor 1 | Factor 2 |
ETN1 | 0.408 | 0.039 |
ETN2 | 0.579 | −0.119 |
ETN3 | 0.701 | −0.109 |
ETN4 | 0.769 | −0.240 |
ETN5 | 0.583 | −0.246 |
ETN6 | 0.431 | −0.162 |
SUB1 | 0.142 | 0.907 |
SUB2 | 0.238 | 0.670 |
OBJ_easy | 0.033 | 0.308 |
OBJ_advanced | 0.001 | 0.275 |
Ethnocentrism, non-Eataly customers | |||||
Estimate | Std. Error | t-value | Pr(>|t|) | significance | |
(Intercept) | 0.18715 | 0.21112 | 0.886 | 0.377 | |
GENDER (male) | −0.59296 | 0.18608 | −3.187 | 0.002 | ** |
AGE 31–40 | 0.16497 | 0.28310 | 0.583 | 0.561 | |
AGE 41–50 | 0.06292 | 0.26927 | 0.234 | 0.816 | |
AGE morethan 50 | −0.24322 | 0.25059 | −0.971 | 0.334 | |
EDUCATION abitur | 0.28370 | 0.22869 | 1.241 | 0.218 | |
EDUCATION realschule | 0.53660 | 0.24286 | 2.210 | 0.029 | * |
EDUCATION hauptschule | 0.92672 | 0.45003 | 2.059 | 0.042 | * |
R-squared | 0.186 | ||||
Adjusted R-squared | 0.130 | ||||
DF | 101 | ||||
p-value | 0.003 | ||||
Notes: Signif. codes: 0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1. |
Ethnocentrism, Eataly customers | |||||
Estimate | Std. Error | t-value | Pr(>|t|) | significance | |
(Intercept) | −0.04584 | 0.17213 | −0.266 | 0.791 | |
GENDER (male) | −0.34965 | 0.15331 | −2,281 | 0.025 | * |
AGE 31–40 | 0.38836 | 0.24241 | 1,602 | 0.113 | |
AGE 41–50 | 0.07972 | 0.23002 | 0.347 | 0.730 | |
AGE morethan 50 | −0.05034 | 0.20627 | −0.244 | 0.808 | |
EDUCATION reordabitur | 0.21740 | 0.22807 | 0.953 | 0.343 | |
EDUCATION reordrealschule | −0.12147 | 0.19426 | −0.625 | 0.533 | |
EDUCATION reordhauptschule | 0.15983 | 0.43385 | 0.368 | 0.713 | |
R-squared | 0.112 | ||||
Adjusted R-squared | 0.041 | ||||
DF | 86 | ||||
p-value | 0.1592 | ||||
Notes: Signif. codes: 0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1. |
Italian products knowledge, non-Eataly customers | |||||
Estimate | Std. Error | t-value | Pr(>|t|) | significance | |
(Intercept) | −0.29309 | 0.19796 | −1.481 | 0.142 | |
GENDER (male) | −0.43917 | 0.17449 | −2.517 | 0.013 | * |
AGE 31–40 | 0.62188 | 0.26546 | 2.343 | 0.021 | * |
AGE 41–50 | 0.61096 | 0.25249 | 2.420 | 0.017 | * |
AGE morethan 50 | 0.81631 | 0.23498 | 3.474 | 0.001 | *** |
EDUCATION abitur | 0.00433 | 0.21444 | 0.020 | 0.984 | |
EDUCATION realschule | −0.36016 | 0.22773 | −1.582 | 0.117 | |
EDUCATION hauptschule | −0.18559 | 0.42199 | −0.440 | 0.661 | |
R-squared | 0.158 | ||||
Adjusted R-squared | 0.100 | ||||
DF | 101 | ||||
p-value | 0.013 | ||||
Notes: Signif. codes: 0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1. |
Italian products knowledge, Eataly customers | |||||
Estimate | Std. Error | t-value | Pr(>|t|) | significance | |
(Intercept) | 0.03076 | 0.21661 | 0.142 | 0.887 | |
GENDER (male) | −0.13972 | 0.19292 | −0.724 | 0.471 | |
AGE 31–40 | 0.18703 | 0.30504 | 0.613 | 0.541 | |
AGE 41–50 | 0.52842 | 0.28945 | 1.826 | 0.071 | |
AGE morethan 50 | 0.30250 | 0.25957 | 1.165 | 0.247 | |
EDUCATION abitur | −0.61764 | 0.28700 | −2.152 | 0.034 | * |
EDUCATION realschule | −0.15604 | 0.24446 | −0.638 | 0.525 | |
EDUCATION hauptschule | −0.51515 | 0.54594 | −0.944 | 0.348 | |
R-squared | 0.112 | ||||
Adjusted R-squared | 0.039 | ||||
DF | 86 | ||||
p-value | 0.1613 | ||||
Notes: Signif. codes: 0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1. |
Non eataly customers | ||||||||||
Model 1 | Model 2 | |||||||||
Estimate | Std. Error | t-value | Pr(>|t|) | significance | Estimate | Std. Error | t-value | Pr(>|t|) | significance | |
(Intercepts) | ||||||||||
never|year | −4,138,112 | 0.721297 | −57,370 | 9.6E-06 | *** | −384,180 | 0.82328 | −46,664 | 3.07E-03 | *** |
year|month | −2,129,359 | 0.308493 | −69,024 | 5.1E-09 | *** | −179,588 | 0.49726 | −36,116 | 0.0003043 | *** |
month|week | 0.080418 | 0.196692 | 0.4089 | 0.6826 | 0.56813 | 0.45026 | 12,618 | 0.2070221 | ||
(Explanatory variables) | ||||||||||
GENDER (male) | 0.24283 | 0.42665 | 0.5692 | 0.5692489 | ||||||
AGE 31–40 | −0.48598 | 0.58290 | −0.8337 | 0.4044353 | ||||||
AGE 41–50 | 0.76475 | 0.58939 | 12,975 | 0.1944476 | ||||||
AGE morethan 50 | 0.90878 | 0.55132 | 16,484 | 0.0992744 | ||||||
EDUCATION abitur | −0.13429 | 0.48279 | −0.2782 | 0.7808877 | ||||||
EDUCATION realschule | 0.12468 | 0.53617 | 0.2325 | 0.8161165 | ||||||
EDUCATION hauptschule | −0.42209 | 0.86700 | −0.4868 | 0.6263756 | ||||||
Factor 1 | −0.288937 | 0.184715 | −15,642 | 0.1178 | −0.22096 | 0.20746 | −10,651 | 0.2868503 | ||
Factor 2 | 0.326450 | 0.200457 | 16,285 | 0.1034 | 0.30237 | 0.22712 | 13,313 | 0.1830912 | ||
N. of observations | 109 | 109 | ||||||||
Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) | 228.54 | 145.57 | ||||||||
Notes: Signif. codes: 0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1. |
Eataly customers | ||||||||||
Model 1 | Model 2 | |||||||||
Estimate | Std. Error | t-value | Pr(>|t|) | significance | Estimate | Std. Error | t-value | Pr(>|t|) | significance | |
never|year | −1045854 | 2644408 | −0.3955 | 0.69248 | −11261026 | 28092799 | −0.4009 | 0.68853 | ||
year|month | −396228 | 0.72498 | −54654 | 4.6E-05 | *** | −3595964 | 0.885406 | −40614 | 0.04879 | *** |
month|week | −0.37777 | 0.22206 | −17012 | 0.08890 | . | 0.387025 | 0.513935 | 0.7531 | 0.45141 | |
(Explanatory variables) | ||||||||||
GENDER (male) | −0.238943 | 0.502088 | −0.4759 | 0.63415 | ||||||
AGE 31–40 | 0.959550 | 0.740327 | 12961 | 0.19494 | ||||||
AGE 41–50 | 1864401 | 0.763756 | 24411 | 0.01464 | * | |||||
AGE morethan 50 | 1590115 | 0.646868 | 24582 | 0.01396 | * | |||||
EDUCATION abitur | 1111720 | 0.793847 | 14004 | 0.16139 | ||||||
EDUCATION realschule | −1461593 | 0.591462 | −24712 | 0.01347 | * | |||||
EDUCATION hauptschule | −2921894 | 1489000 | −19623 | 0.04973 | * | |||||
Factor 1 | 0.12715 | 0.29616 | 0.4293 | 0.66768 | 0.055926 | 0.334351 | 0.1673 | 0.86716 | ||
Factor 2 | 0.59636 | 0.23479 | 25400 | 0.01109 | * | 0.620954 | 0.265170 | 23417 | 0.01920 | * |
N. of observations | 94 | 94 | ||||||||
Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) | 232.70 | 143.69 | ||||||||
Notes: Signif. codes: 0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1. |