Research article

Phenotypic and molecular characterization of Staphylococcus aureus from mobile phones in Nigeria

  • Received: 11 January 2023 Revised: 03 March 2023 Accepted: 07 March 2023 Published: 23 April 2023
  • The presence of Staphylococcus aureus, a normal human flora on cellphones of different professionals in Ile-Ife was investigated with a view to determining their antibiotic susceptibility profile and nature of resistance and virulence genes. One hundred swab samples were collected aseptically from mobile phones of various users based on their profession. Surfaces of the mobile phones were swabbed and the streak plate method was used to isolate colonies showing characteristic golden yellow on mannitol salt agar plates. These isolates were further identified using standard microbiological methods. The antibiotic susceptibility of the isolates was determined using Kirby-Bauer's disk diffusion technique. Molecular detection of nuc, mecA and pvl genes in some isolates was carried out by polymerase chain reaction technique. All the 36 isolates obtained in this study were 100% resistant to amoxicillin and augmentin; the isolates also displayed 55.6%, 44.4% and 41.7% resistance to ceftriazone, erythromycin and chloramphenicol, respectively. Based on resistance to oxacillin, prevalence of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) was 11.1%. Only one S. aureus was positive for plasmid analysis. MecA gene was genetically confirmed in four (4) out of the 16 suspected phenotypic MRSA strains, nuc gene was confirmed in all 28 isolates investigated, while there was no pvl gene in the strains investigated. Mobile phones harbor multiple antibiotics resistant S. aureus, which are responsible for important diseases in humans and could be difficult to manage with antibiotics thereby posing serious health risks.

    Citation: Anthonia O. Oluduro, Yetunde M. Adesiyan, Olumide O. Omoboye, Adebowale T. Odeyemi. Phenotypic and molecular characterization of Staphylococcus aureus from mobile phones in Nigeria[J]. AIMS Microbiology, 2023, 9(3): 402-418. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2023021

    Related Papers:

    [1] Ogueri Nwaiwu, Chiugo Claret Aduba . An in silico analysis of acquired antimicrobial resistance genes in Aeromonas plasmids. AIMS Microbiology, 2020, 6(1): 75-91. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2020005
    [2] Afia Anjum, Jarin Tabassum, Sohidul Islam, A. K. M. Imrul Hassan, Ishrat Jabeen, Sabbir R. Shuvo . Deciphering the genomic character of the multidrug-resistant Staphylococcus aureus from Dhaka, Bangladesh. AIMS Microbiology, 2024, 10(4): 833-858. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2024036
    [3] Oluwafolajimi Adesanya, Tolulope Oduselu, Oluwawapelumi Akin-Ajani, Olubusuyi M. Adewumi, Olusegun G. Ademowo . An exegesis of bacteriophage therapy: An emerging player in the fight against anti-microbial resistance. AIMS Microbiology, 2020, 6(3): 204-230. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2020014
    [4] McKenna J. Cruikshank, Justine M. Pitzer, Kimia Ameri, Caleb V. Rother, Kathryn Cooper, Austin S. Nuxoll . Characterization of Staphylococcus lugdunensis biofilms through ethyl methanesulfonate mutagenesis. AIMS Microbiology, 2024, 10(4): 880-893. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2024038
    [5] Alexis M. Hobbs, Kennedy E. Kluthe, Kimberly A. Carlson, Austin S. Nuxoll . Interruption of the tricarboxylic acid cycle in Staphylococcus aureus leads to increased tolerance to innate immunity. AIMS Microbiology, 2021, 7(4): 513-527. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2021031
    [6] Babak Elyasi Far, Mehran Ragheb, Reza Rahbar, Ladan Mafakher, Neda Yousefi Nojookambari, Spyridon Achinas, Sajjad Yazdansetad . Cloning and expression of Staphylococcus simulans lysostaphin enzyme gene in Bacillus subtilis WB600. AIMS Microbiology, 2021, 7(3): 271-283. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2021017
    [7] Amira ElBaradei, Dalia Ali Maharem, Ola Kader, Mustafa Kareem Ghareeb, Iman S. Naga . Fecal carriage of ESBL-producing Escherichia coli in Egyptian patients admitted to the Medical Research Institute hospital, Alexandria University. AIMS Microbiology, 2020, 6(4): 422-433. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2020025
    [8] Rochelle Keet, Diane Rip . Listeria monocytogenes isolates from Western Cape, South Africa exhibit resistance to multiple antibiotics and contradicts certain global resistance patterns. AIMS Microbiology, 2021, 7(1): 40-58. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2021004
    [9] Yuya Uehara, Yuko Shimamura, Chika Takemura, Shiori Suzuki, Shuichi Masuda . Effects of cosmetic ingredients on growth and virulence factor expression in Staphylococcus aureus: a comparison between culture medium and in vitro skin model medium. AIMS Microbiology, 2025, 11(1): 22-39. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2025002
    [10] Tomokazu Shoji, Ryusei Muto, Ryoko Sakai, Hiroki Matsumura, Takashi Uchida, Fumihiko Kitta, Osamu Inoue, Keishi Kawata, Manabu Akazawa . Estimated medical costs of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection classified by polymerase chain reaction-based open reading frame typing in Japan. AIMS Microbiology, 2022, 8(4): 528-543. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2022034
  • The presence of Staphylococcus aureus, a normal human flora on cellphones of different professionals in Ile-Ife was investigated with a view to determining their antibiotic susceptibility profile and nature of resistance and virulence genes. One hundred swab samples were collected aseptically from mobile phones of various users based on their profession. Surfaces of the mobile phones were swabbed and the streak plate method was used to isolate colonies showing characteristic golden yellow on mannitol salt agar plates. These isolates were further identified using standard microbiological methods. The antibiotic susceptibility of the isolates was determined using Kirby-Bauer's disk diffusion technique. Molecular detection of nuc, mecA and pvl genes in some isolates was carried out by polymerase chain reaction technique. All the 36 isolates obtained in this study were 100% resistant to amoxicillin and augmentin; the isolates also displayed 55.6%, 44.4% and 41.7% resistance to ceftriazone, erythromycin and chloramphenicol, respectively. Based on resistance to oxacillin, prevalence of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) was 11.1%. Only one S. aureus was positive for plasmid analysis. MecA gene was genetically confirmed in four (4) out of the 16 suspected phenotypic MRSA strains, nuc gene was confirmed in all 28 isolates investigated, while there was no pvl gene in the strains investigated. Mobile phones harbor multiple antibiotics resistant S. aureus, which are responsible for important diseases in humans and could be difficult to manage with antibiotics thereby posing serious health risks.



    In Nigeria, there has been an increase in the use of mobile phones among the general population from more than forty million [1] to more than one hundred and eighty-four million in December 2019 [2].

    They are handled frequently, and held to the face [3],[4] and this constant handling of the mobile phones by users makes it a breeding place for transmission of microorganisms as well as hospital-associated infections [4],[5]. The normal microbiota of the skin include among others Staphylococci which are also found regularly on clothes, bed linen and other human environments [6]. They can produce disease condition if introduced into foreign locations or compromised host [7]. It has been reported that Coagulase Negative Staphylococcus (CoNS), which constitute part of the normal flora of the skin is among the commonly isolated bacteria on cell phone and automated teller machine [8][11]. Also, potentially pathogenic bacteria commonly reported include methicillin sensitive S. aureus (MSSA), coliforms, methicillin resistant S. aureus (MRSA), Corynebacterium spp., Enterococcus faecalis, Clostridium perfringens, Klebsiella spp., Enterobacter spp., Pseudomonas spp., Aeromonas spp., Acinetobacter spp., Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, Escherichia coli, Klebsiella spp. And Bacillus spp. [8],[9],[12]. S. aureus possess a number of virulent factors including cell surface factors, such as capsular polysaccharide; secreted factors for example, Panton-Valentine leucocidin (PVL), a typical cytolytic toxin, and various exoenzymes such as nucleases, proteases; among several others [13]. MRSA produce a transformed penicillin-binding protein (PBP), which is mediated by an acquired gene mecA and confers decreased affinity for most semisynthetic penicillins on the producing strains [14][17]. MecA is borne on a mobile genetic element (MGE) called staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec (SCCmec) [18],[19]. MRSA strains results from the horizontal transfer of the MGE by a competent strain(s), coupled with acquisition and insertion into the chromosomes of susceptible strains [20]. It has been reported that the acquisition of antimicrobial resistance poses a daunting task to the health sector with respect to the treatment and control of staphylococcal infections [20]. A study has shown that MRSA could account for up to 50% cases of S. aureus infections in hospitals [21]. MRSA infections are characterized with high morbidity and death rate which has been attributed to their resistance to all available penicillin and most of the other beta-lactam antibiotics, with the exception of ceftaroline and ceftobiprole [20]. Considering the health implications of mobile phones contaminated with methicillin resistant S. aureus viz a viz its economic cost, careful handling and observance of stringent hygiene is highly canvassed.

    The research was conducted at the Obafemi Awolowo University's Department of Microbiology Laboratory in Ile-Ife, Osun State, Nigeria. At Ile-Ife, Osun State, Nigeria, samples were taken from the mobile phones of different users based on their profession, including cleaners, abattoir employees, lecturers and students, nurses, food vendors and marketers.

    All glassware used in this study was sterilized in the hot air oven at 160 °C for one hour. All the media used namely Mannitol Salt Agar (MSA), nutrient agar, nutrient broth and Mueller Hinton agar (MHA) were prepared according to the manufacturers' specifications. The reagents used were of analytical grade and were obtained from either Sigma Chemical Company or BDH.

    The samples (n = 100) were collected aseptically by swabbing the surfaces of the keypad, mouthpiece and earpiece of the mobile phones using sterile cotton swab sticks moistened with sterile saline. The cotton swabs were then transported immediately to the laboratory for bacteriological analysis. The swabs were streaked onto Mannitol salt agar (MSA) plates and incubated aerobically at 37 °C for 24 to 48 hours. Colonies showing a characteristic golden yellow on MSA plates were picked and streaked on fresh MSA plates and incubated at 37 °C for 24 hours to obtain pure colonies, which were presumptively identified as Staphylococcus aureus. Preliminary characterization of isolates was carried out using Gram's staining and phenotypic characters, such as catalase, tube coagulase, nitrate reduction and DNase tests [22],[23].

    Antibiotic susceptibility of isolates was determined on Mueller-Hinton agar plate by antibiotic disk diffusion method [24]. The antibiotics of known concentrations (Oxoid, USA); (amoxicillin (25 µg), ofloxacin (5 µg), streptomycin (30 µg), chloramphenicol (30 µg), ceftriaxone (30 µg), gentamicin (10 µg), pefloxacin (30 µg) cotrimoxazole (25 µg), ciprofloxacin (10 µg), erythromycin (5 µg), Augmentin (30 µg) and oxacillin (1 µg) was used. Standardized (0.05 MacFarland standard –108 CFU/mL) S. aureus culture was seeded on cooled molten Mueller Hinton agar plate. The antibiotic disk was carefully placed on the seeded plate using sterile forceps, and incubated at 37 °C for 24 h. The diameter of zone of growth inhibition was measured in millimeter and recorded as resistant, susceptible or intermediate.

    Twenty-eight multiple antibiotic resistant isolates were randomly selected and profiled for plasmid analysis. The plasmid DNA of the S. aureus isolates were extracted using the modified alkaline lysis (TENS) method of Kraft et al. [25]. An overnight broth culture of the isolate grown in Luria-Bertani broth medium was spin in a 1.5 mL micro-centrifuge tube for 1 min to pellet the cells. The supernatant was gently decanted leaving 50–100 µL of the broth inside the tube. The tube was then vortexed at high speed to re-suspend the cells completely. After which 300 µL of TENS (Tris 25 Mm, EDTA 10 Mm, NaOH 0.1 N, and SDS 0.5%) was added to the tube and mixed by inverting the tubes 3–5 times until the mixture became sticky (caution was taken during this stage as stickiness ensure that lysis has taken place). After this, 150 mL of 3.0 M sodium acetate of pH 5.2 was added to the tube and vortexed to mix completely. After vortexing, the tube was spun in the micro-centrifuge for 5 min to pellet cell debris and chromosomal DNA. The supernatant was transferred into new tubes and mixed with 900 µL of ice-cold 100% ethanol. The tube was then centrifuged at 14,000 rpm for 10 min to pelletize the plasmid DNA. The supernatant was discarded leaving the whitish pellet in the tube. The whitish pellet was rinsed twice with 1 mL of 70% ethanol. The pellets were allowed to dry and were re-suspended in 20–40 µL of TE (Tris Ethylene diamine tetraacetate) buffer or distilled water for further use.

    Purified plasmid DNA were then electrophoresed on 0.8% agarose gel stained with 1% ethidium bromide and ran at 80 V for 90 minutes for size estimation and pattern comparison with the marker (100 bp DNA ladder). The plasmid DNA bands were visualized by ultraviolet-trans-illuminator, photographed and documented using a gel electrophoresis documentation system. The molecular sizes of the unknown plasmid DNA were then estimated by comparing the distance travelled with that of the molecular weight of the standards.

    The DNA extraction was achieved through the microwave lysis method [26]. Twenty-eight (28) isolates were cultured in nutrient broth for 24 h at 37 °C with agitation at 100 rpm. The cell culture was centrifuged at 4,500 rpm for 5 min at 4 °C, the supernatant was poured off while the pellet obtained was washed with 1 mL of TE (10 mM Tris, pH 8, 10 mM EDTA) and was re-suspended in 100 µL of TE. Fifty microliters (50 µL) of 10% SDS was added to the mixture and incubated for 30 min at 65 °C. The lysate was centrifuged and supernatants removed. The micro-tubes were then placed in a microwave oven (with specification; LG grill, model No. MG-604AZ, input 220v–50/bHz, microwave 1350 W, RF output 900 W, 2450 MH) and heated twice for 1 min at 900 W or three times for 1 min at 750 W. Each pellet was dissolved in 200 µL of TE and were extracted with an equal volume of phenol/chloroform/isoamyl alcohol (25:24:1) for 15 min. The aqueous phase was recovered by centrifugation for 20 min and precipitated with ethanol and kept in the refrigerator at 4 °C until needed for polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification.

    Twenty eight (28) multiple antibiotic resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates were selected based on their resistance profile and screened for the presence of thermonuclease (nuc) and mecA genes. Primers which amplified a 279 bp segment of the nuc gene and a 147 bp segment of the mecA gene were used for this study (Table 1). All PCR reactions were carried out separately in a final volume of 25 µL of a PCR reaction mixture containing 1 µL MgCl2, 5 µL of the master mix consisting of dNTPs and Taq polymerase, 1 µL of each primer (both reverse and forward), and 7 µL of the template DNA with 10 µL of nuclease-free water. The thermocycler was programmed with the following parameters for the amplification of nuc gene: an initial denaturation at 95 °C for 2 minutes, 40 cycles of denaturation at 95 °C for 30 seconds, annealing temperature of 54 °C for 30 seconds, elongation at 72 °C for 45 seconds and final extension at 72 °C for 5 minutes [27].

    For the amplification of mecA gene, the thermocycler was programmed with the following parameters: an initial denaturation at 95 °C for 3 minutes, 30 cycles denaturation at 95 °C for 30 seconds, annealing temperature of 60 °C for 30 seconds, elongation at 72 °C for 30 seconds and final extension at 72 °C for 10 minutes [28]. The PCR products were analyzed by gel electrophoresis using 1% agarose using IxTBE buffer (0.089 M boric acid, 0.002 M EDTA disodium buffer, pH 8.3) for 1 hour at 100 V. The gel was visualized under ultraviolet light and analyzed by comparing the corresponding band for the specific gene with the positive control and DNA ladder.

    A 25 µL of the PCR reaction mixture contains 1 µL MgCl2 4 µL of PCR buffer, 3 µL of each dNTP, 0.2 µL of Taq polymerase, 1 µL of each primer (reverse and forward), 9.8 µL nuclease-free water and 5 µL of the DNA sample. The thermo cycler (Eppendorf Mastercycler, USA) was programmed for optimum conditions. The PCR mixture was poured into PCR tubes and vortexed for proper mixing before loading them into the thermocycler. The PCR amplification condition of the thermocycler was set as follows: an initial denaturation at 95 °C for 5 min, 35 cycles of denaturation at 95 °C for 1 minutes, annealing temperature of 65 °C for 1 min, elongation at 72 °C for 1 min and final extension at 72 °C for 10 min [29]. Gel electrophoresis was used to detect the amplified DNA products. A volume of 10 µL of the amplified PCR products was subjected to electrophoresis at 100 volts for about 2 hours. The marker used was a 100 bp ladder, which was added to one of the wells in the gel to serve as reference. The amplified product was viewed using an Ultraviolet transilluminator. The Primers used for the molecular detection of pvl gene is presented in Table 1.

    Table 1.  Primers used for the molecular detection of nuc, mecA and pvl genes.
    Gene Primers References
    Thermonuclease (nuc gene) 279 bp Forward nuc1 5′GCGATTGATGGTGATACGGTT3′ Brakstad et al., 1992
    Reverse nuc2 5′AGCCAAGCCTTGACGAACTAAAGC3′
    Methicillin resistant mecA gene (147 bp) Forward mec1 5′GTGAAGATATACCAAGTGATT3′ Zhang et al., 2005
    Reverse mec2 5′ATGCGCTATAGATTGAAAGGAT3′
    Panton Valentine Leucocidine pvl gene (433 bp) Forward pvl1 5′ATCATTAGGTAAAATGTCTGGACATGATCCA3′ Lina et al., 1999
    Reverse pvl2 5′GCATCAAGTGTATTGGATAGCAAAAGC3′

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    A total of 100 (32 male and 68 female) persons from 5 different professional backgrounds (nurses, students/lecturers, abattoir workers, food vendors/market women and cleaners) in Ile-Ife (OAU Campus, OAUTHC, Opa area and Odo-Ogbe Market) participated in this study. Their ages ranged between 17 and 58 years and their mean (±SE) age was 35.99 (±0.89) years with majority (46%) in the age range of 27–36 years. They've had phones for no less than three months or more than 144 months. Most of them (54.6%) have been mobile phone users for between one and five years. Table 2 lists participant responses to questions on cell phone usage. The majority of participants use the same mobile phones at work and at home, share them with coworkers and don't frequently clean them.

    Table 2.  Socio-demographic characteristics (sex) of mobile phone users in relation to hygienic habits during usage.
    Users attributes/characteristics No of Samples (N = 100) Phone usage at workplace Phone usage at home Usage of same phone at home and at workplace Answering of phone calls while working Wearing of glove/ protective covering while answering phone calls phone cleaning in the past Regular phone cleaning Regular hand washing after phone use Receiving/making of phone calls/ texting while toileting Knowledge of transfer of pathogenic bacteria via phone usage
    Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No
    Sex Male 32 28 4 32 0 30 2 27 5 6 26 2 30 1 31 0 32 23 9 3 29
    Female 68 62 6 68 0 64 4 52 16 24 44 7 61 3 65 0 68 52 16 12 56
    X2 0.05* 75.92 0.144* 0.82 2.84 0.081* 0.058* 75.92 0.245 0.609
    P 0.831* 0 0.704 0.365 0.092 0.776* 0.810* 0 0.621 0.435
    Age 17–26 13 13 0 13 0 13 0 12 1 2 11 0 13 0 13 0 13 9 4 1 12
    27–36 46 43 3 46 0 43 3 39 7 13 33 3 43 2 44 0 46 40 6 10 36
    37–46 26 23 3 26 0 23 2 21 5 4 22 2 24 1 14 0 26 23 3 3 23
    47–56 15 13 4 15 0 14 1 7 8 5 10 4 11 1 14 0 15 3 12 1 14
    X2 5.684 104.88 1.82 11.816 2.761 7.401 0.836 104.88 30.451 3.244
    P 0.128 0 0.611 0.008 0.42996 0.06016 0.84084 0 0.0000011 0.3555
    Occupation Student/Lecturer 20 19 1 20 0 18 2 16 4 3 17 1 19 1 19 0 20 14 6 4 16
    Nurses 20 17 3 20 0 16 4 12 8 6 14 4 16 3 17 0 20 16 4 10 10
    Food Vendors/Market Women 20 19 1 20 0 20 0 19 1 4 16 1 19 0 20 0 20 15 5 0 20
    Abattoir Workers/Butchers 20 17 3 20 0 20 0 16 4 3 17 1 19 0 20 0 20 15 5 0 20
    Occupation Cleaners 20 18 2 20 0 20 0 16 4 8 12 2 18 0 20 0 20 15 5 1 19
    X2 2.222 50 4.756 7.478 5.154 4.151 4.232 50 0.533 22.451
    P 0.695 1.10E-07 0.313 0.113 0.272 0.386 0.376 1.10E-07 0.97 0.000163

    *Yates correction for continuity (Preacher, 2001) was employed to improve the accuracy of the null-condition sampling distribution of chi-square.

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV
    Table 3.  Distribution of S. aureus, MRSA and MSSA isolates from mobile phones from mobile phones of the investigated users.
    Categories of users No of S. aureus (%) Number of MRSA (%) Number of MSSA (%)
    Students/Lecturers 13 (36.1) 2 (12.5) 11 (55)
    Nurses 1 (2.8) 0 1 (5)
    Abattoir workers/Butchers 4 (11.1) 8 (50) 6 (30)
    Food Vendors/Market Women 14 (38.9) 3 (18.8) 1 (5)
    Cleaners 4 (11.1) 3 (18.8) 1 (5)
    Total 36 (100) 16 20

    T-test of MRSA and MSSA isolates from investigated users' mobile phone at p < 0.05. tα0.05 -0.334, P = 0.747.

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    Virtually all the respondents irrespective of their gender, age and occupation neither wash their hands after using mobile phones nor before attending to customers/patients nor shake other people's hands. The majority of the respondents answer/receive phone calls, text/send short message service (sms) and/or other purposes (e.g., lighting, browsing and so on) while in the toilet. Meanwhile 50% of the nurses and 20% of students/lecturers believe that mobile phones can serve as a medium of transferring bacteria from person to person (Table 2). All responses, when statistically tested for independence using Chi-square at p < 0.005, were independent of the respondents' gender, age and profession except ‘answering of phone calls while working’ and ‘receiving/making of phone calls/texting while in the rest room which are age-dependent; and ‘knowledge of transfer of pathogenic bacteria via phone usage’ which is profession-dependent. In other words, most of the respondents' answers relating to hygienic use of mobile phones are not affected or determined by their (respondents) socio-demographic statistics.

    The result presented in Table 3, also revealed that all the mobile phones of the investigated categories of users were contaminated with Staphylococcus aureus. The mobile phones of food vendors/market women (38.89%) and students/lecturers (36.11%) had the highest level of S. aureus contamination, followed by that of the abattoir workers/butchers (11.11%) and cleaners (11.11%), while that of Nurses were the least contaminated (2.78%).

    Isolates were considered methicillin resistant or sensitive based on its resistance or sensitivity to oxacillin. Out of the 36 isolated S. aureus from mobile phones of investigated users, 16 (44.44%) were discovered to be methicillin resistant S. aureus (MRSA) and the other 20 (55.56%) were methicilin sensitive S. aureus (MSSA) (Table 3). Out of the sixteen MRSA detected, 8 (50%) were recovered from food vendors/market women mobile phones, Abattoir workers/Butcher 3 (18.75%), Cleaner 3 (18.75), Students/lecturers 2 (12.50%). The number of MRSA is not significant different from MSSA (Table 3).

    A total of 115 Staphylococcus sp. were recovered from 100 mobile phones of various users out of which 36 Staphylococcus aureus were identified based on their cultural, morphological and biochemical characteristics. Based on Gram's staining, the isolates were found to be Gram positive cocci. The result of the cultural characteristics of the isolates showed that their colonies were golden yellow when cultured on mannitol salt agar (MSA). The results of the morphological characteristics showed that they were Gram positive, and clustered cocci. The isolates were positive for tube coagulase test, catalase, DNAse and nitrate reduction test.

    All the 36 S. aureus isolates recovered from the cellphones of the investigated users were resistant to amoxicillin and augmentin. Also, 55.6%, 44.4% and 41.7% of the strains were resistant to cefriazone, erythromycin and chloramphenicol, respectively (Table 4). In addition, 12 (33.33%) of the 36 Staphylococcus aureus isolates displayed multiple antibiotic resistance patterns to the antibiotics (three to six different classes) assessed in this study as shown in Table 5. There was diversity in multiple antibiotic resistance (MAR) patterns; 5 (13.9%) isolates displayed MAR to 3 and 4 classes of antibiotics, respectively, while 1 (2.8%) isolate was resistant to 5 and 6 classes of antibiotics, respectively. The predominant MAR phenotype was “AMX, STR, CHL, ERY” which was observed in 5 (13.9%) of the isolates.

    Table 4.  Frequency of antibiotic resistance and susceptibility of S. aureus isolates from mobile phones.
    Antibiotics Frequency (%)
    Resistance Intermediate Susceptible
    Amoxicillin (25 µg) 36 (100) 0 0
    Ofloxacin (10 µg) 0 1 (2.8) 35 (97.2)
    Streptomycin (30 µg) 8 (22.2) 0 28 (77.8)
    Chloramphenicol (30 µg) 15 (41.7) 1 (2.8) 20 (55.6)
    Ceftriazone (30 µg) 20 (55.6) 9 (25) 7 (19.4)
    Gentamycin (10 µg) 6 (16.7) 1 (2.8) 29 (80.6)
    Pefloxacin (30 µg) 0 1 (2.8) 35 (97.2)
    Cotrimoxazole (25 µg) 4 (11.1) 0 32 (88.9)
    Ciprofloxacin (10 µg) 1 (2.8) 7 (19.4) 28 (77.8)
    Erythromycin (5 µg) 16 (44.4) 11 (30.6) 9 (25)
    Augmentin (30 µg) 36 (100) 0 0
    Oxacillin (1 µg) 15 (41.7) 3 (8.3) 18 (50)

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV
    Table 5.  Multiple antibiotic resistance patterns of the S. aureus isolates from mobile phones.
    Number of classes of antibiotics Multiple antibiotic resistance pattern Number of isolates Total (%)
    3 AMX, CHL, ERY 3 5 (13.9)
    AMX, STR, CHL 1
    AMX, COT, ERY 1
    4 AMX, STR, CHL, ERY 5 5(13.9)
    5 AMX, STR, CHL, COT, ERY 1 1 (2.8)
    6 AMX, STR, CHL, COT, CIP, ERY 1 1 (2.8)
    Sum total 12 12 (33.33)

    *Total number of isolate: 36, AMX: Amoxicillin, STR: Streptomycin, CHL: Chloramphenicol, COT: Cotrimoxazole, ERY: Erythromycin, CIP: Ciprofloxacin

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    Twenty-eight S. aureus isolates were selected for plasmid analysis. Only one isolate possessed plasmid DNA of molecular weight of 2440 bp. Figure 1 shows the result of the agarose gel electrophoresis of plasmids in the multiple antibiotic resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates.

    Twenty eight multiple antibiotic resistant S. aureus isolates were selected based on the results of the antibiotic susceptibility profiles. Nuc (279 bp) gene was detected in all the twenty-eight isolates (Figure 2), while mecA (147 bp) gene was detected in four out of the sixteen isolates recovered from the food vendors that were phenotypically resistant to methicillin as depicted by lanes 1, 2, 9 and 10 in Figure 3. Pvl gene was not detected in all the S. aureus isolates from mobile phones as shown in Figure 4. The NanoDrop-1000 spectrophotometer was used to determine the subject's DNA's purity, and the appropriate yields of 1.13 (the lowest) to 149 ng/L (the highest) were achieved at 260 and 280 nm. The absorbance ratio was compared. As a result, highly pure DNA products were obtained, and PCR results revealed that each one had the correct gene that codes for the appropriate drug-metabolizing enzyme. Both the quantity and purity of the DNA in the samples may be measured with the help of the NanoDrop-1000 method and PCR analysis.

    Figure 1.  Agarose gel electrophoresis of plasmids in multiple antibiotic resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates. Lane M=DNA marker (HIND III digest), Lanes 1–14, 15–16, 18–28 have no plasmids while Lane 17 is positive for plasmid (2440 bp). Lane N = Negative control, Lanes 1–7 = Students/Lecturers, Lanes 8–10 = Cleaners, Lanes 11–12 = Abattoir workers/ butchers, Lanes 13–28 = Food vendors/market women. *L17: S. aureus isolate from food vendor mobile phone.
    Figure 2.  PCR amplification of nuc gene (270 bp) in Staphylococcus aureus isolates. Lane M = 100 bp marker, Lane N = Negative control, Lanes 1–7: Students/lecturers, Lanes 8–10: Cleaners, Lanes 11–12: Abattoir workers/butchers, Lanes 13–28: Food vendors/market women.
    Figure 3.  PCR amplification of mecA (147 bp) gene in Staphylococcus aureus isolates. M=100 bp marker, Lane N = Negative control, Lanes 1, 2, 9, 10, 12–16 = Food vendors/market women, Lanes 3–5 = Students/lecturers, Lanes 6–8 = Cleaners, Lane 11 = Abattoir workers/butchers.
    Figure 4.  PCR amplification showing the absence of pvl gene in the Staphylococcus aureus isolates. Lane M=100 bp marker, Lane N = Negative control, Lanes 1–7 = Students/lecturers, Lanes 8–10 = Cleaners, Lanes 11–12 = Abattoir workers/butchers, Lanes 13–28 = Food vendors/market women.

    Mobile phones are reservoirs for pathogenic bacteria owing to its unhygienic handling [30], could serves as vehicle the transmission of hospital acquired pathogens including MRSA [31]. In this study, we investigated the multiple antibiotic resistance and profiled virulence genes associated with S. aureus isolated from mobile phones of different professionals in Ile-Ife, Osun State, Nigeria.

    The isolation of S. aureus from mobile phones of the investigated users is in agreement with the reports of several researchers who had reported the occurrence of S. aureus on mobile phones [7],[32][35]. Although S. aureus is a normal flora of the skin, it can cause serious health challenges and complications if it has access into the body such as wounds and the blood stream. High percentage of S. aureus isolated from mobile phones of food vendors/market women and students in this study could be attributed to the dynamic nature of these two sets of people. Vendors/market women interact with a lot of people in the course of transaction with involves the exchange of materials for money, while students interact with one in the lecture rooms, halls of residents, university campus and community at large; another through handshakes, hugging, sharing of phones, writing materials and clothing. These activities could promote the transmission of S. aureus. Isolation of S. aureus from mobile phones and various computer interphase devices in communities worldwide have been reported by previous researchers [11],[34],[36][39]. Ilusanya et al. [37] reported that S. aureus accounted for 50% of the isolates obtained from the mobile phones of food vendors, while Roy et al. [38] showed that S. aureus was 12% of bacteria obtained from mobile phones of students. In addition, Adhikari et al. [40] reported 56% incidence of S. aureus on the phones of staff and students of Birendra Multiple Campus, Bharatpur in Nepal; while Ulger et al. [41], Elmanama et al. [42] and Gashaw et al. [43] reported 52%, 27% and 21%, in Turkey, Palestine and Ethiopia, respectively. Interestingly, the least percentage of S. aureus isolated from the mobile phones of nurses in this study is similar to the findings of Famurewa and David [36] who reported low occurrence of the bacteria in their study. The low incidence of the bacteria on the mobile phones of nurses may be because they are aware that inanimate objects and surfaces at the hospitals could easily transmit S. aureus. This could have contributed to possible precautionary measures taken in the course of their job, such as wearing of gloves and other protective clothing, washing of hands, hygienic handling of materials and surfaces at the hospital settings and disinfection of their hands before handling their mobile phones and other portable computers.

    The presence of MRSA on mobile phones of student/lecturer, abattoir workers, cleaners and most especially, those of the food vendors/market women is worrisome. This can predispose the respondents and other individuals in the community to increasing exposure to community-acquired MRSA infections, which is fast evolving resistance to commonly used antibiotics [44]. It is known that MRSA synthesize an altered penicillin-binding protein (PBP) encoded by mecA which is responsible for the decreased affinity for majority of semisynthetic penicillins (as reviewed by Lakhundi and Zhang [20].

    Wangai et al. [45] reported that the detection of S. aureus-specific gene markers like nuc [46] could be used to delineate MRSA from coagulase negative S. aureus which also harbour mecA gene. Interestingly, all the S. aureus in this study harbored nuc gene confirming them as S. aureus while 25% of the 16 phenotypic MRSA was confirmed genetically by the presence of mecA gene. We observed 33.3% MAR S. aureus and 44.4% MRSA in this study. However, Adhirikai et al. [40] reported 21.4% MAR S. aureus and 26.8% MRSA. MRSA was initially described solely as nosocomial infection-causing bacteria, but it has been reported that the bacteria could cause community-acquired infections [20]. It has been reported that infections due to MRSA is responsible for high death rate, prolonged hospital stay and higher health care costs in comparison to infections caused by MSSA [47][50]. Isolation of high percentage of MAR S. aureus and MRSA from the mobile phones of several professionals at Ile-Ife, Nigeria is a cause for concern because it could trigger a disease outbreak if this observation is not properly handled. It was observed in this study that only one representative of the multiple antibiotic resistant (MAR) S. aureus was found to harbor class1 plasmid which indicates the range of 1–5 kb. The absence of plasmid in most of the MAR isolates could be that their antibiotic resistance is not plasmids-borne but chromosomal. The chromosomal-borne antibiotic resistance observed in this study could minimize the dissemination of antibiotic resistance gene among bacteria associated with the microflora of the respondents, in contrast to plasmids-borne antibiotic resistance gene that can be rapidly spread through horizontal gene transfer. PCR and the NanoDrop-1000 spectrophotometer are two extremely precise techniques for measuring genomic DNA. DNA quality has a direct impact on the effectiveness of Polymerase Chain Reaction amplification. The amount of genes present that code for drug-metabolizing enzymes increases with purity, amplification efficiency and gene quantity [51].

    Hygienic use of mobile phones is independent of sex, age and occupation/profession. However, the observation that many health workers in line of duty are inseparable from their mobile phones while attending to patients is worrisome. The isolation of multiple antibiotic resistant S. aureus and MRSA from the mobile phones of several professionals in Ile-Ife is an insight to possible disease outbreak form this pathogen which requires proper surveillance and awareness to keep the community safe. Antibiotic-resistant bacteria might be transmitted using cell phones and portable computers. In order to reduce the local and global transmission of bacterial resistant strains, frequent hand washing and surface disinfection of mobile phones and portable computers are advised everywhere. Aggressive awareness on the need for hygienic handling of mobile phones and handy computer devices by all and sundry, especially health workers is highly recommended.


    Acknowledgments



    The authors appreciate the Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Science, Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife, Nigeria for providing an enabling environment for this study.

    Conflicts of interest



    The authors declared that there are no conflicts of interest.

    Author's contribution



    Anthonia Oluduro: Conceptualization, Supervision and Project Administration; Anthonia Oluduro and Yetunde Adesiyan: Methodology, resources and Funding Acquisition; Anthonia Oluduro, Odeyemi Adebowale, Yetunde Adesiyan and Olumide Omoboye: Validation, Formal Analysis, Data curation and Visualization, Investigation; Yetunde Adesiyan and Olumide Omoboye: Writing Original Draft; Anthonia Oluduro, Odeyemi Adebowale and Olumide Omoboye: Writing Review and Editing.

    [1] Nwadike I GSM made easy: solution to every GSM problem (2007).
    [2] Nigerian Communications Commission, Subscriber Data, 2020. Available from: https://www.ncc.gov.ng/statistics-reports/industry-overview
    [3] Yusha'u M, Hassan A, Kawo AH (2008) Public health implications of the bacterial load of stethoscopes of some clinicians in Kano, Nigeria. Biol Environ Sci J Trop 5: 196-199.
    [4] Yusha'u M, Bello M, Sule H (2010) Isolation of bacteria and fungi from personal and public cell phones: a case study of Bayero University, Kano (old campus). Int J Biomed Health Sci 6: 97-102.
    [5] Glodblatt JG, Krief I, Haller TD (2007) Use of cellular telephones and transmission of pathogens by medical staff in New York and Israel. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 28: 500-503.
    [6] Brooks GF, Butel JS, Morse SA (2004) Jawetz, Melnick, & Adelberg's Medical Microbiology. New York: McGraw-Hill.
    [7] Ekrakene T, Igeleke CL (2007) Micro-organisms associated with public mobile phones along Benin-sapele Express Way, Benin City, Edo State of Nigeria. J Appl Sci Res 3: 2009-2012.
    [8] Tunc K, Olgun U (2006) Microbiology of public telephones. J Infect Dis 53: 140-143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinf.2005.10.022
    [9] Shahaby AF, Awad NS, El-Tarras AE, et al. (2012) Mobile phone as potential reservoirs of bacterial pathogens. Afr J Biotechnol 11: 15896-15904. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJB12.1836
    [10] David OM, Oluwole OA, Owolabi A (2016) Epidemiology of oxacillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus from cell phones of health-care workers in Ekiti State. Int J Scien World 4: 15-18. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijsw.v4i1.5903
    [11] Odeyemi AT, Sulaimon AM, Odunmbaku E, et al. (2018) Bacteriological contamination of user interface of automated teller machines (ATM) of banks in Ekiti State University, Ado-Ekiti. Int J Res Stu Microbiol Biotechnol 1: 10-17.
    [12] Trivedi HR, Desai KJ, Trivedi LP, et al. (2011) Role of mobile phone in spreading hospital acquired infection: a study in different group of health care workers. Nat J Integ Res Med 2: 61-66.
    [13] Costa AR, Batistão DW, Ribas RM, et al. (2013) Staphylococcus aureus virulence factors and disease. Microbial Pathogens and Strategies for Combating Them: Science, Technology and Education. Badajoz: Formatex 702-710.
    [14] Hartman BJ, Tomasz A (1984) Low-affinity penicillin-binding protein associated with beta-lactam resistance in Staphylococcus aureus. J Bacteriol 158: 513-516. https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.158.2.513-516.1984
    [15] Reynolds PE, Brown DF (1985) Penicillin-binding proteins of β-lactam-resistant strains of Staphylococcus aureus: effect of growth conditions. FEBS Lett 192: 28-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/0014-5793(85)80036-3
    [16] Utsui Y, Yokota T (1985) Role of an altered penicillin-binding protein in methicillin- and cephem-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 28: 397-403. https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.28.3.397
    [17] Matsuhashi M, Song MD, Ishino F, et al. (1986) Molecular cloning of the gene of a penicillin-binding protein supposed to cause high resistance to beta-lactam antibiotics in Staphylococcus aureus. J Bacteriol 167: 975-980. https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.167.3.975-980.1986
    [18] Katayama Y, Ito T, Hiramatsu K (2000) A new class of genetic element, staphylococcus cassette chromosome mec, encodes methicillin-resistance in Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 44: 1549-1555. https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.44.6.1549-1555.2000
    [19] Hiramatsu K, Asada K, Suzuki E, et al. (1992) Molecular cloning and nucleotide sequence determination of the regulator region of mecA gene in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). FEBS Lett 298: 133-136. https://doi.org/10.1016/0014-5793(92)80039-J
    [20] Lakhundi S, Zhang K (2018) Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: molecular characterization, evolution, and epidemiology. Clin Microbiol Rev 31. https://doi.org/10.1128/CMR.00020-18
    [21] Diekema DJ, Pfaller MA, Schmitz FJ, et al. (2001) Survey of infections due to Staphylococcus species: frequency of occurrence and antimicrobial susceptibility of isolates collected in the United States, Canada, Latin America, Europe, and the Western Pacific region for the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program, 1997–1999. Clin Infect Dis 32: S114-S132. https://doi.org/10.1086/320184
    [22] Olutiola PO, Famurewa O, Sonntag HG (2018) An introduction to microbiology, a pratical approach. Heidelberg: Heidelberger Verlagsanstalt und Druckerei GmbH 157-177.
    [23] Adesoji TO, Egyir B, Shittu AO (2020) Antibiotic-resistant staphylococci from the wastewater treatment plant and grey-water samples in Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife, Nigeria. J Water Health 18: 890-898. https://doi.org/10.2166/wh.2020.019
    [24] (2018) Clinical and Laboratory Standards InstituteMethods for dilution antimicrobial susceptibility tests for bacteria that grow aerobically. Wayne, PA: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute.
    [25] Kraft R, Tardiff J, Krauter KS, et al. (1988) Using mini-prep plasmid DNA for sequencing double stranded template with sequenase. Biotechniques 6: 544-549.
    [26] Bollet C, Gevaudan MJ, de Lamballerie X, et al. (1991) Common protocols such as phenol-chloroform extraction and microwave lysis. J Amer Oil Chem Soc 68: 509-514.
    [27] Brakstad O, Aasbakk GK, Maeland JA (1992) Detection of Staphylococcus aureus by polymerase chain reaction amplification of the nuc gene. J Clin Microbiol 30: 1654-1660. https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.30.7.1654-1660.1992
    [28] Zhang K, McClure JA, Elsayed S, et al. (2005) Novel multiplex PCR assay for characterization and concomitant subtyping of staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec Types I to V in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. J Clin Microbiol 43: 5026-5033. https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.43.10.5026-5033.2005
    [29] Lina G, Piémont Y, Godail-Gamot F, et al. (1999) Involvement of Panton-Valentine leukocidin-producing Staphylococcus aureus in primary skin infections and pneumonia. Clin Infect Dis 29: 1128-1132. https://doi.org/10.1086/313461
    [30] Singh A, Walker M, Rousseau J, et al. (2013) Methicillin-resistant staphylococcal contamination of clothing worn by personnel in a veterinary teaching hospital. Vet Surg 42: 643-648. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-950X.2013.12024.x
    [31] Selim HS, Abaza AF (2015) Microbial contamination of mobile phones in a health care setting in Alexandria, Egypt. GMS Hyg Infect Contr 10. https://doi.org/10.3205/dgkh000246
    [32] Khivsara A, Sushma T, Dhanshree B (2006) Typing of Staphylococcus aureus from mobile phones and clinical samples. Curr Sci 90: 910-912.
    [33] Tambekar DH, Dhanorkar DV, Gulhane SR, et al. (2006) Prevalence and antimicrobial susceptibility pattern of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus from health care and community associated sources. Afr J Infect Dis 1: 52-56. https://doi.org/10.4314/ajid.v1i1.42086
    [34] Akinyemi KO, Audu DA, Olabisi OA, et al. (2009) The potential role of mobile phones in the spread of bacterial infections. J Infect Dis 3: 628-632. https://doi.org/10.3855/jidc.556
    [35] Nikhil NT, Chitra PA (2012) Study of microbial flora and MRSA harbored by mobile phones of health care personnel. Internat J Recent Trends Sci Technol 4: 14-18.
    [36] Famurewa O, David OM (2009) Cell phones: a medium of transmission of bacterial pathogens. World Rur Obser 1: 69-72.
    [37] Ilusanya OAF, Adesanya OO, Adesemowo A, et al. (2012) Personal hygiene and microbial contamination of mobile phones of food vendors in Ago-Iwoye Town, Ogun State, Nigeria. Pakist J Nutri 11: 276-278.
    [38] Roy SS, Siddhartha SM, Malik MW (2013) Isolation and identification of bacteria of public health importance from mobile phones of fish and animal handlers of Kashmir, India. Afr J Microbiol Res 7: 2601-2607.
    [39] Mushabati NA, Samutela MT, Yamba K, et al. (2021) Bacterial contamination of mobile phones of healthcare workers at the University Teaching Hospital, Lusaka, Zambia. Infect Prev Pract 3: 100126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infpip.2021.100126
    [40] Adhikari S, Khadka S, Sapkota S, et al. (2018) Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus associated with mobile phones. SOJ Microbiol Infect Dis 6: 1-6.
    [41] Ulger F, Esen S, Dilek A, et al. (2009) Are we aware how contaminated our mobile phones with nosocomial pathogens?. Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob 8. https://doi.org/10.1186/1476-0711-8-7
    [42] Elmanama A, Hassona I, Marouf A, et al. (2015) Microbial load of touch screen mobile phones used by university students and healthcare staff. J Arab Am Univ 1: 1-21.
    [43] Gashaw M, Abtew D, Addis Z (2014) Prevalence and antimicrobial susceptibility pattern of bacteria isolated from mobile phones of health care professionals working in gondar town health centers. ISRN Public Health . https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/205074
    [44] Holmes JW, Williams MD (2010) Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus screening and eradication in the surgical intensive care unit: is it worth it?. Amer J Surg 200: 827-831.
    [45] Wangai FK, Masika MM, Maritim MC, et al. (2019) Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in East Africa: red alert or red herring?. BMC Infect Dis 19: 596. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-019-4245-3
    [46] Becker K, Pagnier I, Schuhen B, et al. (2006) Does nasal cocolonization by methicillin-resistant coagulase-negative staphylococci and methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus strains occur frequently enough to represent a risk of false-positive methicillin-resistant S. aureus determinations by molecular methods?. J Clin Microbiol 44: 229-231. https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.44.1.229-231.2006
    [47] Wolk DM, Struelens MJ, Pancholi P, et al. (2009) Rapid detection of Staphylococcus aureus and methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) in wound specimens and blood cultures: multicenter preclinical evaluation of the Cepheid Xpert MRSA/SA skin and soft tissue and blood culture assays. J Clin Microbiol 47: 823-826. https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.01884-08
    [48] Whitby M, McLaws ML, Berry G (2001) Risk of death from methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia: a meta-analysis. Med J Aust 175: 264-267.
    [49] Fortuin-de Smidt MC, Singh-Moodley A, Badat R, et al. (2015) Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia in Gauteng academic hospitals, South Africa. Int J Infect Dis 30: 41-48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2014.10.011
    [50] Thampi N, Showler A, Burry L, et al. (2015) Multicenter study of health care cost of patients admitted to hospital with Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia: impact of length of stay and intensity of care. Am J Infect Contr 43: 739-744. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2015.01.031
    [51] Bunu SJ, Otele D, Alade T, et al. (2020) Determination of serum DNA purity among patients undergoing antiretroviral therapy using NanoDrop-1000 spectrophotometer and polymerase chain reaction. Biomed Biotechnol Res J 4: 214-219.
  • This article has been cited by:

    1. Aswin Rafif Khairullah, Shendy Canadya Kurniawan, Sri Agus Sudjarwo, Mustofa Helmi Effendi, Agus Widodo, Ikechukwu Benjamin Moses, Abdullah Hasib, Reichan Lisa Az Zahra, Maria Aega Gelolodo, Dyah Ayu Kurniawati, Katty Hendriana Priscilia Riwu, Otto Sahat Martua Silaen, Daniah Ashri Afnani, Sancaka Cashyer Ramandinianto, Kinship analysis of mecA gene of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolated from milk and risk factors from the farmers in Blitar, Indonesia, 2024, 22310916, 216, 10.14202/vetworld.2024.216-225
    2. O. M. Aladejana, A. O. Ogunlade, O. A. Thonda, G. Obi, Plasmid Profile and Curing of Multiple Antibiotic Resistant Escherichia coli Isolated from Straw Colored Fruit Bats (Eidolon helvum ), 2024, 2756-4045, 5038, 10.48198/NJPAS/24.A10
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2023 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(2168) PDF downloads(234) Cited by(2)

Figures and Tables

Figures(4)  /  Tables(5)

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog