Spatially-implicit modelling of disease-behaviour interactions in the context of non-pharmaceutical interventions

  • Received: 20 October 2016 Accepted: 05 May 2017 Published: 01 April 2018
  • MSC : Mathematical biology (92Bxx)

  • Pair approximation models have been used to study the spread of infectious diseases in spatially distributed host populations, and to explore disease control strategies such as vaccination and case isolation. Here we introduce a pair approximation model of individual uptake of non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) for an acute self-limiting infection, where susceptible individuals can learn the NPIs either from other susceptible individuals who are already practicing NPIs ("social learning"), or their uptake of NPIs can be stimulated by being neighbours of an infectious person ("exposure learning"). NPIs include individual measures such as hand-washing and respiratory etiquette. Individuals can also drop the habit of using NPIs at a certain rate. We derive a spatially defined expression of the basic reproduction number $R_0$ and we also numerically simulate the model equations. We find that exposure learning is generally more efficient than social learning, since exposure learning generates NPI uptake in the individuals at immediate risk of infection. However, if social learning is pre-emptive, beginning a sufficient amount of time before the epidemic, then it can be more effective than exposure learning. Interestingly, varying the initial number of individuals practicing NPIs does not significantly impact the epidemic final size. Also, if initial source infections are surrounded by protective individuals, there are parameter regimes where increasing the initial number of source infections actually decreases the infection peak (instead of increasing it) and makes it occur sooner. The peak prevalence increases with the rate at which individuals drop the habit of using NPIs, but the response of peak prevalence to changes in the forgetting rate are qualitatively different for the two forms of learning. The pair approximation methodology developed here illustrates how analytical approaches for studying interactions between social processes and disease dynamics in a spatially structured population should be further pursued.

    Citation: Notice Ringa, Chris T. Bauch. Spatially-implicit modelling of disease-behaviour interactions in the context of non-pharmaceutical interventions[J]. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2018, 15(2): 461-483. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2018021

    Related Papers:

  • Pair approximation models have been used to study the spread of infectious diseases in spatially distributed host populations, and to explore disease control strategies such as vaccination and case isolation. Here we introduce a pair approximation model of individual uptake of non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) for an acute self-limiting infection, where susceptible individuals can learn the NPIs either from other susceptible individuals who are already practicing NPIs ("social learning"), or their uptake of NPIs can be stimulated by being neighbours of an infectious person ("exposure learning"). NPIs include individual measures such as hand-washing and respiratory etiquette. Individuals can also drop the habit of using NPIs at a certain rate. We derive a spatially defined expression of the basic reproduction number $R_0$ and we also numerically simulate the model equations. We find that exposure learning is generally more efficient than social learning, since exposure learning generates NPI uptake in the individuals at immediate risk of infection. However, if social learning is pre-emptive, beginning a sufficient amount of time before the epidemic, then it can be more effective than exposure learning. Interestingly, varying the initial number of individuals practicing NPIs does not significantly impact the epidemic final size. Also, if initial source infections are surrounded by protective individuals, there are parameter regimes where increasing the initial number of source infections actually decreases the infection peak (instead of increasing it) and makes it occur sooner. The peak prevalence increases with the rate at which individuals drop the habit of using NPIs, but the response of peak prevalence to changes in the forgetting rate are qualitatively different for the two forms of learning. The pair approximation methodology developed here illustrates how analytical approaches for studying interactions between social processes and disease dynamics in a spatially structured population should be further pursued.


    加载中
    [1] [ K. A. Alexander,J. W. McNutt, Human behavior influences infectious disease emergence at the human-animal interface, Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 8 (2010): 522-526.
    [2] [ M. C. Auld, Estimating behavioral response to the AIDS epidemic, Contributions to Economic Analysis and Policy 5 (2006), Art. 12.
    [3] [ N. Bacaer, Approximation of the basic reproduction number for vector-borne disease with periodic vector population, Bulleting of Mathematical Biology, 69 (2007): 1067-1091.
    [4] [ C. T. Bauch, A versatile ODE approximation to a network model for the spread of sexually transmitted diseases, Journal of Mathematical Biology, 45 (2002): 375-395.
    [5] [ C. T. Bauch, The spread of infectious diseases in spatially structured populations: An invasory pair approximation, Mathematical Biosciences, 198 (2005): 217-237.
    [6] [ C. T. Bauch,A. d'Onofrio,P. Manfredi, Behavioral epidemiology of infectious diseases: An overview, Modeling the interplay between human behavior and the spread of infectious diseases, Springer-Verlag, null (2013): 1-19.
    [7] [ C. T. Bauch,A. P. Galvani, Using network models to approximate spatial point-process models, Mathematical Biosciences, 184 (2003): 101-114.
    [8] [ C. T. Bauch,D. A. Rand, A moment closure model for sexually transmitted disease transmission through a concurrent partnership network, The Royal Society, 267 (2000): 2019-2027.
    [9] [ J. Benoit,A. Nunes,M. Telo da Gama, Pair approximation models for disease spread, The European Physical Journal B, 50 (2006): 177-181.
    [10] [ K. Dietz, The estimation of the basic reproduction number for infectious diseases, Statistical Methods in Medical Research, 2 (1993): 23-41.
    [11] [ S. P. Ellner, Pair approximation for lattice models with multiple interaction scales, Journal of Theoretical Biology, 210 (2001): 435-447.
    [12] [ E. P. Fenichel,C. Castillo-Chavez,M. G. Geddia,G. Chowell,P. A. Gonzalez Parra,G. J. Hickling,G. Holloway,R. Horan,B. Morin,C. Perrings,M. Springborn,L. Velazquez,C. Villalobos, Adaptive human behavior in epidemiological models, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108 (2011): 6306-6311.
    [13] [ N. M. Ferguson,C. A. Donnelly,R. M. Anderson, The foot and mouth epidemic in Great Britain: pattern of spread and impact of interventions, Science, 292 (2001): 1155-1160.
    [14] [ M. J. Ferrari,S. Bansal,L. A. Meyers,O. N. Bjϕrnstad, Network frailty and the geometry of head immunity, Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 273 (2006): 2743-2748.
    [15] [ S. Funk,E. Gilad,C. Watkins,V. A. A. Jansen, The spread of awareness and its impact on epidemic outbreaks, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106 (2009): 6872-6877.
    [16] [ R. J. Glass,L. M. Glass,W. E. Beyeler,H. J. Min, Targeted social distancing designs for pandemic influenza, Emerging Infectious Diseases, 12 (2016): 1671-1681.
    [17] [ D. Hiebeler, Moment equations and dynamics of a household SIS epidemiological model, Bulletin of Mathematical Biology, 68 (2006): 1315-1333.
    [18] [ M. J. Keeling, The effects of local spatial structure on epidemiological invasions, Proceedings of The Royal Society of London B, 266 (1999): 859-867.
    [19] [ M.J. Keeling,D. A. Rand,A. J. Morris, Correlation models for childhood epidemics, Proceedings of The Royal Society of London B, 264 (1997): 1149-1156.
    [20] [ J. Li,D. Blakeley,R. J. Smith, The failure of $\mathbb{R}_0$, Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine, 12 (2011): 1-17.
    [21] [ C. N. L. Macpherson, Human behavior and the epidemiology of parasitic zoonoses, International Journal for Parasitology, 35 (2005): 1319-1331.
    [22] [ S. Maharaj,A. Kleczkowski, Controlling epidemic spread by social distancing: Do it well or not at all, BMC Public Health, 12 (2012): p679.
    [23] [ L. Mao,Y. Yang, Coupling infectious diseases, human preventive behavior, and networks--a conceptual framework for epidemic modeling, Social Science Medicine, 74 (2012): 167-175.
    [24] [ J. P. McGowan,S. S. Shah,C. E. Ganea,S. Blum,J. A. Ernst,K. L. Irwin,N. Olivo,P. J. Weidle, Risk behavior for transmission of Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) among HIV-seropositive individuals in an urban setting, Clinical Infectious Diseases, 38 (2004): 122-127.
    [25] [ T. Modie-Moroka, Intimate partner violence and sexually risky behavior in Botswana: Implications for HIV prevention, Health Care for Women International, 30 (2009): 230-231.
    [26] [ S. S. Morse, Factors in the emergence of infectious diseases, Factors in the Emergence of Infectious Diseases, null (2001): 8-26.
    [27] [ S. Mushayabasa,C. P. Bhunu,M. Dhlamini, Impact of vaccination and culling on controlling foot and mouth disease: A mathematical modeling approach, World of Journal Vaccines, 1 (2011): 156-161.
    [28] [ S. O. Oyeyemi,E. Gabarron,R. Wynn, Ebola, Twitter, and misinformation: A dangerous combination?, British Medical Journal, 349 (2014): g6178.
    [29] [ P. E. Parham,N. M. Ferguson, Space and contact networks: Capturing of the locality of disease transmission, Journal of Royal Society, 3 (2005): 483-493.
    [30] [ P. E. Parham,B. K. Singh,N. M. Ferguson, Analytical approximation of spatial epidemic models of foot and mouth disease, Theoretical Population Biology, 72 (2008): 349-368.
    [31] [ F. M. Pillemer,R. J. Blendon,A. M. Zaslavsky,B. Y. Lee, Predicting support for non-pharmaceutical interventions during infectious outbreaks: A four region analysis, Disasters, 39 (2014): 125-145.
    [32] [ D. A. Rand, Correlation equations and pair approximations for spatial ecologies, CWI Quarterly, 12 (1999): 329-368.
    [33] [ C. T. Reluga, Game theory of social distancing in response to an epidemic Plos Computational Biology 6 (2010), e1000793, 9pp.
    [34] [ N. Ringa,C. T. Bauch, Dynamics and control of foot and mouth disease in endemic countries: A pair approximation model, Journal of Theoretical Biology, 357 (2014): 150-159.
    [35] [ A. Rizzo,M. Frasca,M. Porfiri, Effect of individual behavior on epidemic spreading in activity-driven networks, Physical Review E, 90 (2014): 042801.
    [36] [ M. Salathe,S. Bonhoeffer, The effect of opinion clustering on disease outbreaks, Journal of The Royal Society Interface, 5 (2008): 1505-1508.
    [37] [ L. B. Shaw,I. B. Schwartz, Fluctuating epidemics on adaptive networks, Physical Review E, 77 (2008): 066101, 10pp.
    [38] [ R. L. Stoneburner,D. Low-Beer, Population-level HIV decline and behavioral risk avoidance in Uganda, Science, 304 (2004): 714-718.
    [39] [ R. R. Swenson,W. S. Hadley,C. D. Houck,S. K. Dance,L. K. Brown, Who accepts a rapid HIV antibody test? The role of race/ethnicity and HIV risk behavior among community adolescents, Journal of Adolescent Health, 48 (2011): 527-529.
    [40] [ J. M. Tchuenche and C. T. Bauch, Dynamics of an infectious disease where media coverage influences transmission ISRN Biomathematics2012 (2012), Article ID 581274, 10pp.
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2018 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(3619) PDF downloads(705) Cited by(0)

Article outline

Figures and Tables

Figures(8)  /  Tables(1)

Other Articles By Authors

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog