Research article Special Issues

Robust optimal reinsurance and investment with inflation risk: A game-theoretic approach and explicit solutions

  • Published: 20 March 2026
  • MSC : 91A15, 91G10, 93E20

  • This paper investigates robust optimal reinsurance and investment for an insurer facing both inflation risk and model ambiguity. The surplus is described by a diffusion approximation of the Cramér–Lundberg model, and purchasing-power risk is incorporated through a mean-reverting inflation factor. Specifically, the log-inflation index is modeled by an Ornstein–Uhlenbeck process, which yields a two-dimensional real-wealth system and captures state-dependent inflation effects absent under geometric Brownian inflation. Model ambiguity is represented by an adversarial probability distortion with an entropy penalty, allowing the adversary to distort the insurance, financial, and inflation channels in a unified framework. The decision problem is formulated as a zero-sum stochastic differential game. We establish a rigorous duality between the entropy-penalized robust formulation and a risk-sensitive control problem, and derive the associated Hamilton–Jacobi–Bellman–Isaacs (HJBI) equation. Our main theoretical contribution is a tractable characterization of the robust optimal strategies in a finite-horizon setting with non-zero interest rates. By an exponential-quadratic transformation, the nonlinear HJBI equation is reduced to a system of ordinary differential equations of Riccati type, which yields feedback-form optimal reinsurance and investment rules featuring an explicit inflation-hedging component and a novel mean-reversion hedging demand. We further show that the solution collapses to the geometric-Brownian-inflation benchmark as the mean-reversion speed tends to zero. Numerical experiments illustrate that ambiguity aversion amplifies effective risk aversion, strengthens reinsurance demand, and induces a pronounced flight-to-safety effect, with substantially different hedging behavior under mean-reverting versus non-mean-reverting inflation.

    Citation: QiongLin Li, XuJiang Tang. Robust optimal reinsurance and investment with inflation risk: A game-theoretic approach and explicit solutions[J]. AIMS Mathematics, 2026, 11(3): 7330-7352. doi: 10.3934/math.2026302

    Related Papers:

  • This paper investigates robust optimal reinsurance and investment for an insurer facing both inflation risk and model ambiguity. The surplus is described by a diffusion approximation of the Cramér–Lundberg model, and purchasing-power risk is incorporated through a mean-reverting inflation factor. Specifically, the log-inflation index is modeled by an Ornstein–Uhlenbeck process, which yields a two-dimensional real-wealth system and captures state-dependent inflation effects absent under geometric Brownian inflation. Model ambiguity is represented by an adversarial probability distortion with an entropy penalty, allowing the adversary to distort the insurance, financial, and inflation channels in a unified framework. The decision problem is formulated as a zero-sum stochastic differential game. We establish a rigorous duality between the entropy-penalized robust formulation and a risk-sensitive control problem, and derive the associated Hamilton–Jacobi–Bellman–Isaacs (HJBI) equation. Our main theoretical contribution is a tractable characterization of the robust optimal strategies in a finite-horizon setting with non-zero interest rates. By an exponential-quadratic transformation, the nonlinear HJBI equation is reduced to a system of ordinary differential equations of Riccati type, which yields feedback-form optimal reinsurance and investment rules featuring an explicit inflation-hedging component and a novel mean-reversion hedging demand. We further show that the solution collapses to the geometric-Brownian-inflation benchmark as the mean-reversion speed tends to zero. Numerical experiments illustrate that ambiguity aversion amplifies effective risk aversion, strengthens reinsurance demand, and induces a pronounced flight-to-safety effect, with substantially different hedging behavior under mean-reverting versus non-mean-reverting inflation.



    加载中


    [1] C. Guo, X. Zhuo, C. Constantinescu, O. M. Pamen, Optimal reinsurance-investment strategy under risks of interest rate, exchange rate and inflation, Methodol. Comput. Appl. Probab., 20 (2018), 1477–1502. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11009-018-9630-7 doi: 10.1007/s11009-018-9630-7
    [2] J. Ma, G. Wang, G. X. Yuan, Optimal reinsurance and investment problem in a defaultable market, Commun. Stat. Theory Methods, 47 (2018), 1597–1614. https://doi.org/10.1080/03610926.2017.1321772 doi: 10.1080/03610926.2017.1321772
    [3] H. Hata, L. H. Sun, Optimal investment and reinsurance of insurers with lognormal stochastic factor model, Math. Control Relat. Fields, 12 (2022), 531–566. https://doi.org/10.3934/mcrf.2021033 doi: 10.3934/mcrf.2021033
    [4] E. W. Anderson, L. P. Hansen, T. J. Sargent, A quartet of semigroups for model specification, robustness, prices of risk, and model detection, J. Eur. Econ. Assoc., 1 (2003), 68–123. https://doi.org/10.1162/154247603322256774 doi: 10.1162/154247603322256774
    [5] P. J. Maenhout, Robust portfolio rules and asset pricing, Rev. Financ. Stud., 17 (2004), 951–983.
    [6] X. Zhang, T. K. Siu, Optimal investment and reinsurance of an insurer with model uncertainty, Insurance Math. Econom., 45 (2009), 81–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.insmatheco.2009.04.001 doi: 10.1016/j.insmatheco.2009.04.001
    [7] B. Yi, Z. Li, F. G. Viens, Y. Zeng, Robust optimal control for an insurer with reinsurance and investment under Heston's stochastic volatility model, Insurance Math. Econom., 53 (2013), 601–614. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.insmatheco.2013.08.011 doi: 10.1016/j.insmatheco.2013.08.011
    [8] G. Guan, Z. Liang, Robust optimal reinsurance and investment strategies for an AAI with multiple risks, Insurance Math. Econom., 89 (2019), 63–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.insmatheco.2019.09.004 doi: 10.1016/j.insmatheco.2019.09.004
    [9] X. Peng, F. Chen, W. Wang, Robust optimal investment and reinsurance for an insurer with inside information, Insurance Math. Econom., 96 (2021), 15–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.insmatheco.2020.10.004 doi: 10.1016/j.insmatheco.2020.10.004
    [10] B. Liu, H. Meng, M. Zhou, Optimal investment and reinsurance policies for an insurer with ambiguity aversion, N. Am. J. Econ. Financ., 55 (2021), 101303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.najef.2020.101303 doi: 10.1016/j.najef.2020.101303
    [11] A. Gu, X. Zhang, S. Chen, L. Zhang, Robust optimal reinsurance-investment strategy with extrapolative bias premiums and ambiguity aversion, Stat. Theory Relat. Fields, 8 (2024), 274–294. https://doi.org/10.1080/24754269.2024.2393062 doi: 10.1080/24754269.2024.2393062
    [12] L. Li, Z. Qiu, Time-consistent robust investment–reinsurance strategy with common shock dependence under CEV model, PLoS One, 20 (2025), e0316649. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0316649 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0316649
    [13] P. Yang, Robust optimal reinsurance-investment problem for $n$ competitive and cooperative insurers under ambiguity aversion, AIMS Mathematics, 8 (2023), 25131–25163. https://doi.org/10.3934/math.20231283 doi: 10.3934/math.20231283
    [14] P. Yang, Robust optimal reinsurance strategy with correlated claims and competition, AIMS Mathematics, 8 (2023), 15689–15711. https://doi.org/10.3934/math.2023801 doi: 10.3934/math.2023801
    [15] Q. Zhang, G. Zhou, J. Fu, Reinsurance–investment game between two $\alpha$-maxmin mean–variance insurers, PLoS One, 20 (2025), e0326125. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0326125 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0326125
    [16] F. Peng, M. Yan, S. Zhang, Deep learning solution of optimal reinsurance–investment strategies with inside information and multiple risks, Math. Methods Appl. Sci., 48 (2025), 2859–2885. https://doi.org/10.1002/mma.10465 doi: 10.1002/mma.10465
    [17] L. Xu, M. Li, H. Wang, D. Yao, Constrained investment and reinsurance with ambiguous correlations, 2023. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4474737
    [18] P. Dupuis, R. S. Ellis, A weak convergence approach to the theory of large deviations, John Wiley & Sons, 1997. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118165904
    [19] M. Boué, P. Dupuis, A variational representation for certain functionals of Brownian motion, Ann. Probab., 26 (1998), 1641–1659. https://doi.org/10.1214/aop/1022855876 doi: 10.1214/aop/1022855876
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2026 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(210) PDF downloads(14) Cited by(0)

Article outline

Figures and Tables

Figures(6)  /  Tables(4)

Other Articles By Authors

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog