Research article

An MADM-based fuzzy parameterized framework for solar panels evaluation in a fuzzy hypersoft expert set environment

  • These authors contributed equally to this work and are co-first authors
  • Received: 26 August 2022 Revised: 25 September 2022 Accepted: 10 October 2022 Published: 21 November 2022
  • MSC : 03B52, 03E72, 03E75

  • The selection of parameters plays a vital role in the multi-attribute decision-making process. In some situations, it is observed that the nature of parameters is ambiguous and a multi-decisive opinion is necessary for managing such parametric uncertainty. In the literature, there is no suitable model that can cope with such situations. This study was purposed to develop a novel context called the fuzzy parameterized fuzzy hypersoft expert set (FPFHSE-set), which is capable of managing the uncertain nature of parameters and the multi-decisive opinion of experts collectively in one model. In this way, the proposed model may be described as the generalization of the existing model fuzzy parameterized fuzzy soft expert set (FPFSE-set). Theoretic, axiomatic and algorithmic approaches have been employed for the characterization of the basic notions of the FPFHSE-set. In order to handle multi-attribute decision-making, two algorithms are proposed and then validated by applying them to some real-world scenarios in the FPFHSE-set environment. The merits and superiority of the new algorithms are presented by comparing them with some existing fuzzy decision-making models. According to the proposed FPFHSE-set-based decision-making approaches, the experts have more freedom in specifying their preferences and thoughts according to their expertise, and they can process new types of data. Therefore, this paper presents a state-of-the-art improvement that provides a holistic view to understand and handle the multi-attribute decision-making issues focused on the objective of classifying alternatives according to multiple attributes by multiple experts.

    Citation: Muhammad Ihsan, Muhammad Saeed, Atiqe Ur Rahman, Hüseyin Kamacı, Nehad Ali Shah, Wajaree Weera. An MADM-based fuzzy parameterized framework for solar panels evaluation in a fuzzy hypersoft expert set environment[J]. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(2): 3403-3427. doi: 10.3934/math.2023175

    Related Papers:

  • The selection of parameters plays a vital role in the multi-attribute decision-making process. In some situations, it is observed that the nature of parameters is ambiguous and a multi-decisive opinion is necessary for managing such parametric uncertainty. In the literature, there is no suitable model that can cope with such situations. This study was purposed to develop a novel context called the fuzzy parameterized fuzzy hypersoft expert set (FPFHSE-set), which is capable of managing the uncertain nature of parameters and the multi-decisive opinion of experts collectively in one model. In this way, the proposed model may be described as the generalization of the existing model fuzzy parameterized fuzzy soft expert set (FPFSE-set). Theoretic, axiomatic and algorithmic approaches have been employed for the characterization of the basic notions of the FPFHSE-set. In order to handle multi-attribute decision-making, two algorithms are proposed and then validated by applying them to some real-world scenarios in the FPFHSE-set environment. The merits and superiority of the new algorithms are presented by comparing them with some existing fuzzy decision-making models. According to the proposed FPFHSE-set-based decision-making approaches, the experts have more freedom in specifying their preferences and thoughts according to their expertise, and they can process new types of data. Therefore, this paper presents a state-of-the-art improvement that provides a holistic view to understand and handle the multi-attribute decision-making issues focused on the objective of classifying alternatives according to multiple attributes by multiple experts.



    加载中


    [1] L. A. Zadeh, Fuzzy sets, Inf. Control, 8 (1965), 338–353. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90241-X
    [2] D. Molodtsov, Soft set theory-first results, Comput. Math. Appl., 37 (1999), 19–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0898-1221(99)00056-5 doi: 10.1016/S0898-1221(99)00056-5
    [3] E. Akçetin, H. Kamacı, Three-valued soft set and its multi-criteria group decision making via TOPSIS and ELECTRE, Sci. Iran., 28 (2021), 3719–3742. https://doi.org/10.24200/sci.2020.54715.3881 doi: 10.24200/sci.2020.54715.3881
    [4] M. Akram, G. Ali, J. C. R. Alcantud, F. Fatimah, Parameter reductions in N-soft sets and their applications in decision-makingm, Expert Syst., 38 (2020), e12601. https://doi.org/10.1111/exsy.12601 doi: 10.1111/exsy.12601
    [5] H. Kamacı, Introduction to N-soft algebraic structures, Turk. J. Math., 44 (2020), 2356–2379. https://doi.org/10.3906/mat-1907-99 doi: 10.3906/mat-1907-99
    [6] P. K. Maji, R. Biswas, A. R. Roy, Fuzzy soft sets, J. Fuzzy Math., 9 (2001), 589–602.
    [7] M. Akram, F. Wasim, F. Karaaslan, MCGDM with complex Pythagorean fuzzy N-soft model, Expert Syst., 38 (2021), e12783. https://doi.org/10.1111/exsy.12783 doi: 10.1111/exsy.12783
    [8] M. Riaz, H. Garg, M. T. Hamid, D. Afzal, Modelling uncertainties with TOPSIS and GRA based on q-rung orthopair m-polar fuzzy soft information in COVID-19, Expert Syst., 39 (2022), e12940. https://doi.org/10.1111/exsy.12940 doi: 10.1111/exsy.12940
    [9] S. Petchimuthu, H. Garg, H. Kamacı, A. O. Atagün, The mean operators and generalized products of fuzzy soft matrices and their applications in MCGDM, Comput. Appl. Math., 39 (2020), 68. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40314-020-1083-2 doi: 10.1007/s40314-020-1083-2
    [10] T. O. Sangodapo, B. O. Onasanya, S. Mayerova-Hoskova, Decision-making with fuzzy soft matrix using a revised method: a case of medical diagnosis of diseases, Mathematics, 9 (2021), 2327. https://doi.org/10.3390/math9182327 doi: 10.3390/math9182327
    [11] S. C. Warrier, T. J. Mathew, J. C. R. Alcantud, Fuzzy soft matrices on fuzzy soft multiset and its applications in optimization problems, J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst., 38 (2020), 2311–2322. https://doi.org/10.3233/JIFS-191177 doi: 10.3233/JIFS-191177
    [12] Z. Huang, J. Li, Y. Qian, Noise-tolerant fuzzy-$\beta$-covering based multigranulation rough sets and feature subset selection, IEEE T. Fuzzy Syst., 30 (2021), 2721–2735. https://doi.org/10.1109/TFUZZ.2021.3093202 doi: 10.1109/TFUZZ.2021.3093202
    [13] Z. Huang, J. Li, Discernibility measures for fuzzy $\beta$ covering and their application, IEEE T. Fuzzy Syst., 52 (2022), 9722–9735. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCYB.2021.3054742 doi: 10.1109/TCYB.2021.3054742
    [14] Z. Huang, J. Li, Noise-tolerant discrimination indexes for fuzzy $\gamma$ covering and feature subset selection, IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. Learn., 2022, 35622800. https://doi.org/10.1109/TNNLS.2022.3175922
    [15] S. Alkhazaleh, A. R. Salleh, Soft expert sets, Adv. Decis. Sci., 2011 (2011), 757868. https://doi.org/10.1155/2011/757868
    [16] M. Ihsan, M. Saeed, A. U. Rahman, A rudimentary approach to develop context for convexity cum concavity on soft expert set with some generalized results, Punjab Univ. J. Math., 53 (2021), 621–629. https://doi.org/10.52280/pujm.2021.530902 doi: 10.52280/pujm.2021.530902
    [17] S. Alkhazaleh, A. R. Salleh, Fuzzy soft expert set and its application, Appl. Math., 5 (2014), 1349–1368. https://doi.org/10.4236/am.2014.59127 doi: 10.4236/am.2014.59127
    [18] M. Ihsan, A. U. Rahman, M. Saeed, H. A. E. W. Khalifa, Convexity-cum-concavity on fuzzy soft expert set with certain properties, Int. J. Fuzzy Log. Inte., 21 (2021), 233–242. https://doi.org/10.5391/IJFIS.2021.21.3.233 doi: 10.5391/IJFIS.2021.21.3.233
    [19] F. Smarandache, Extension of soft set to hypersoft set, and then to plithogenic hypersoft set, Neutrosophic Sets Syst., 22 (2018), 168–170.
    [20] M. Saeed, A. U. Rahman, M. Ahsan, F. Smarandache, Theory of hypersoft sets: axiomatic properties, aggregation operations, relations, functions and matrices, Neutrosophic Sets Syst., 51 (2022), 744–765.
    [21] M. Ahsan, M. Saeed, A. U. Rahman, A theoretical and analytical approach for fundamental framework of composite mappings on fuzzy hypersoft classes, Neutrosophic Sets Syst., 45 (2021), 268–285.
    [22] S. Y. Musa, B. A. Asaad, Bipolar hypersoft sets, Mathematics, 9 (2021), 1826. https://doi.org/10.3390/math9151826
    [23] M. Saeed, M. K. Siddique, M. Ahsan, M. R. Ahmad, A. U. Rahman, A novel approach to the rudiments of hypersoft graphs, In: Theory and application of hypersoft set, Pons Publication House, 2021,203.
    [24] R. M. Zulqarnain, I. Siddique, R. Ali, D. Pamucar, D. Marinkovic, D. Bozanic, Robust aggregation operators for intuitionistic fuzzy hypersoft set with their application to solve MCDM problem, Entropy, 23 (2021), 688. https://doi.org/10.3390/e23060688 doi: 10.3390/e23060688
    [25] M. Saeed, M. Ahsan, A. U. Rahman, A novel approach to mappings on hypersoft classes with application, In: Theory and application of hypersoft set, Pons Publication House, 2021,175–191. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4743384
    [26] H. Ajay, J. J. Charisma, N. Boonsatit, P. Hammachukiattikul, G. Rajchakit, Neutrosophic semiopen hypersoft sets with an application to MAGDM under the COVID-19 scenario, J. Math., 2021 (2021), 5583218. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/5583218 doi: 10.1155/2021/5583218
    [27] M. Saeed, M. Ahsan, A. U. Rahman, M. H. Saeed, A. Mehmood, An application of neutrosophic hypersoft mapping to diagnose brain tumor and propose appropriate treatment, J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst., 41 (2021), 1677–1699. https://doi.org/10.3233/JIFS-210482 doi: 10.3233/JIFS-210482
    [28] A. U. Rahman, M. Saeed, M. Arshad, A. Dhital, A novel approach to neutrosophic hypersoft graphs with properties, Neutrosophic Sets Syst., 46 (2021), 336–355.
    [29] A. U. Rahman, M. Saeed, F. Smarandache, M. R. Ahmad, Development of hybrids of hypersoft set with complex fuzzy set, complex intuitionistic fuzzy set and complex neutrosophic set, Neutrosophic Sets Syst., 38 (2020), 335–354.
    [30] A. U. Rahman, M. Saeed, F. Smarandache, Convex and concave hypersoft sets with some properties, Neutrosophic Sets Syst., 38 (2020), 497–508.
    [31] H. Kamacı, On hybrid structures of hypersoft sets and rough sets, Int. J. Mod. Sci. Tech., 6 (2021), 69–82.
    [32] A. U. Rahman, A. Hafeez, M. Saeed, M. R. Ahmad, U. Farwa, Development of rough hypersoft set with application in decision making for the best choice of chemical material, In: Theory and application of hypersoft set, Pons Publication House, 192–202.
    [33] A. U. Rahman, M. Saeed, A. Khalid, M. R. Ahmad, S. Ayaz, Decision-making application based on aggregations of complex fuzzy hypersoft set and development of interval-valued complex fuzzy hypersoft set, Neutrosophic Sets Syst., 46 (2021), 300–317.
    [34] A. U. Rahman, M. Saeed, A. Hafeez, Theory of bijective hypersoft set with application in decision making, Punjab Univ. J. Math., 53 (2021), 511–526. https://doi.org/10.52280/pujm.2021.530705 doi: 10.52280/pujm.2021.530705
    [35] M. Ihsan, A. U. Rahman, M. Saeed, Hypersoft expert set with application in decision making for recruitment process, Neutrosophic Sets Syst., 42 (2021), 191–207.
    [36] M. Ihsan, M. Saeed, A. U. Rahman, Fuzzy hypersoft expert set with application in decision making for the best selection of product, Neutrosophic Sets Syst., 46 (2021), 318–335.
    [37] M. Ihsan, M. Saeed, A. U. Rahman, Single valued neutrosophic hypersoft expert set with application in decision making, Neutrosophic Sets Syst., 47 (2021), 451–471.
    [38] M. Ihsan, M. Saeed, A. U. Rahman, Multi-attribute decision support model based on bijective hypersoft expert set, Punjab Univ. J. Math., 54 (2022), 55–73. https://doi.org/10.52280/pujm.2021.540105 doi: 10.52280/pujm.2021.540105
    [39] H. Kamacı, M. Saqlain, $n$-ary fuzzy hypersoft expert sets, Neutrosophic Sets Syst., 43 (2021), 180–211.
    [40] N. Ça$\tilde{\mathrm{g}}$man, F. Çıtak, S. Engino$\tilde{\mathrm{g}}$lu, FP-soft set theory and its applications, Ann. Fuzzy Math. Inform., 2 (2011), 219–226.
    [41] Y. Tella, A. Peter, S. B. Hosea, Fuzzy parameterized fuzzy soft set for multiple criteria decision process under multiple expert assessments, Int. J. Eng. Sci. Mgmt., 5 (2015), 180–185.
    [42] K. Zhu, J. Zhan, Fuzzy parameterized fuzzy soft sets and decision making, Int. J. Mach. Learn. Cyb., 7 (2016), 1207–1212. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13042-015-0449-z doi: 10.1007/s13042-015-0449-z
    [43] M. Bashir, A. R. Salleh, Fuzzy parameterized soft expert set, Abstr. Appl. Anal., 2012 (2012), 258361. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/258361 doi: 10.1155/2012/258361
    [44] A. A. Hazaymeh, I. B. Abdullah, Z. Balkhi, R. Ibrahim, Fuzzy parameterized fuzzy soft expert set, Appl. Math. Sci., 6 (2012), 5547–5564.
    [45] A. U. Rahman, M. Saeed, S. Zahid, Application in decision making based on fuzzy parameterized hypersoft set theory, Asia Math., 5 (2021), 19–27.
    [46] A. U. Rahman, M. Saeed, S. S. Alodhaibi, H. A. E. W. Khalifa, Decision making algorithmic approaches based on parameterization of neutrosophic set under hypersoft set environment with fuzzy, intuitionistic fuzzy and neutrosophic settings, Comp. Model. Eng., 128 (2021), 743–777. https://doi.org/10.32604/cmes.2021.016736 doi: 10.32604/cmes.2021.016736
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2023 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(1488) PDF downloads(90) Cited by(3)

Article outline

Figures and Tables

Figures(6)  /  Tables(8)

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog