Research article

Evaluation of water and soil qualities for giant freshwater prawn farming site suitability by using the AHP and GIS approaches in Jelebu, Negeri Sembilan, Malaysia

  • Received: 29 May 2021 Accepted: 07 September 2021 Published: 13 September 2021
  • Water and soil qualities play significant roles in the farming of giant freshwater prawn. The study evaluated water and soil qualities for giant freshwater prawn farming site suitability by using Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Geographic Information System (GIS) in Jelebu, Malaysia. The water quality parameters measured were biochemical oxygen demand, chemical oxygen demand, ammonia nitrogen, pH, dissolved oxygen, water temperature, total suspended solids, nitrite concentration and phosphate concentration, meanwhile soil qualities investigated were land use, slope, pH, texture, organic carbon and organic matter. Site suitability analysis can assist to identify the best location for prawn production. Specialist's opinions were used to rank the level of preference and significance of each of the parameter while the pairwise comparison matrix was applied to calculate the weight of each parameter for prawn farming. There are about 45.41% of the land was most suitable, 28.89% was moderately suitable while 25.69% was found unsuitable for prawn farming. The combination of AHP and GIS could give a better database and guide map for planners and decision-makers to take more rewarding decisions when apportioning the land for prawn farming, for better productivity.

    Citation: Rosazlin Abdullah, Firuza Begham Mustafa, Subha Bhassu, Nur Aziaty Amirah Azhar, Benjamin Ezekiel Bwadi, Nur Syabeera Begum Nasir Ahmad, Aaronn Avit Ajeng. Evaluation of water and soil qualities for giant freshwater prawn farming site suitability by using the AHP and GIS approaches in Jelebu, Negeri Sembilan, Malaysia[J]. AIMS Geosciences, 2021, 7(3): 507-528. doi: 10.3934/geosci.2021029

    Related Papers:

    [1] Jorge Rebaza . On a model of COVID-19 dynamics. Electronic Research Archive, 2021, 29(2): 2129-2140. doi: 10.3934/era.2020108
    [2] Khongorzul Dashdondov, Mi-Hye Kim, Mi-Hwa Song . Deep autoencoders and multivariate analysis for enhanced hypertension detection during the COVID-19 era. Electronic Research Archive, 2024, 32(5): 3202-3229. doi: 10.3934/era.2024147
    [3] Yazao Yang, Haodong Tang, Tangzheng Weng . Changes in public travel willingness in the post-COVID-19 era: Evidence from social network data. Electronic Research Archive, 2023, 31(7): 3688-3703. doi: 10.3934/era.2023187
    [4] Zimeng Lv, Jiahong Zeng, Yuting Ding, Xinyu Liu . Stability analysis of time-delayed SAIR model for duration of vaccine in the context of temporary immunity for COVID-19 situation. Electronic Research Archive, 2023, 31(2): 1004-1030. doi: 10.3934/era.2023050
    [5] Hao Nong, Yitan Guan, Yuanying Jiang . Identifying the volatility spillover risks between crude oil prices and China's clean energy market. Electronic Research Archive, 2022, 30(12): 4593-4618. doi: 10.3934/era.2022233
    [6] Chengtian Ouyang, Huichuang Wu, Jiaying Shen, Yangyang Zheng, Rui Li, Yilin Yao, Lin Zhang . IEDO-net: Optimized Resnet50 for the classification of COVID-19. Electronic Research Archive, 2023, 31(12): 7578-7601. doi: 10.3934/era.2023383
    [7] Gaohui Fan, Ning Li . Application and analysis of a model with environmental transmission in a periodic environment. Electronic Research Archive, 2023, 31(9): 5815-5844. doi: 10.3934/era.2023296
    [8] Liling Huang, Yong Tan, Jinzhu Ye, Xu Guan . Coordinated location-allocation of cruise ship emergency supplies under public health emergencies. Electronic Research Archive, 2023, 31(4): 1804-1821. doi: 10.3934/era.2023093
    [9] Zhiliang Li, Lijun Pei, Guangcai Duan, Shuaiyin Chen . A non-autonomous time-delayed SIR model for COVID-19 epidemics prediction in China during the transmission of Omicron variant. Electronic Research Archive, 2024, 32(3): 2203-2228. doi: 10.3934/era.2024100
    [10] Cong Cao, Chengxiang Chu, Jinjing Yang . "If you don't buy it, it's gone!": The effect of perceived scarcity on panic buying. Electronic Research Archive, 2023, 31(9): 5485-5508. doi: 10.3934/era.2023279
  • Water and soil qualities play significant roles in the farming of giant freshwater prawn. The study evaluated water and soil qualities for giant freshwater prawn farming site suitability by using Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Geographic Information System (GIS) in Jelebu, Malaysia. The water quality parameters measured were biochemical oxygen demand, chemical oxygen demand, ammonia nitrogen, pH, dissolved oxygen, water temperature, total suspended solids, nitrite concentration and phosphate concentration, meanwhile soil qualities investigated were land use, slope, pH, texture, organic carbon and organic matter. Site suitability analysis can assist to identify the best location for prawn production. Specialist's opinions were used to rank the level of preference and significance of each of the parameter while the pairwise comparison matrix was applied to calculate the weight of each parameter for prawn farming. There are about 45.41% of the land was most suitable, 28.89% was moderately suitable while 25.69% was found unsuitable for prawn farming. The combination of AHP and GIS could give a better database and guide map for planners and decision-makers to take more rewarding decisions when apportioning the land for prawn farming, for better productivity.



    The class of normalized analytic functions in the open unit disc Δ={zC:|z|<1} denoted by Ω consists of the functions f of the form

    f(z)=z+n=2anzn, (1.1)

    where f(0)1=f(0)=0. Let (z)Ω defined by

    (z)=z+n=2bnzn. (1.2)

    Then the Hadamard product, also known as the convolution of two function f(z) and (z) denoted by f is defined as

    (f)(z)=f(z)(z)=z+n=2anbnzn,zΔ.

    Moreover, f(z)(z), if there exist a Schwartz function χ(z) in A, satisfying the conditions χ(0)=0 and |χ(z)|<1, such that f(z)=(χ(z)). The symbol is used to denote subordination.

    Let S denote the subclass of Ω of univalent functions in Δ. Let P,C,S and K represent the subclasses of S known as the classes of Caratheodory functions, convex funtions, starlike functions, and close-to-convex functions, respectively.

    The concept of bounded rotations was introduced by Brannan in [7]. A lot of quality work on the generalization of this concept has already been done. Working in the same manner, we have defined the following new classes.

    Definition 1.1. Let

    ν(z)=1+n=1pnzn (1.3)

    be analytic in Δ such that ν(0)=1. Then for m2, ν(z)Pm((z)), if and only if

    ν(z)=(m4+12)ν1(z)(m412)ν2(z), (1.4)

    where (z) is a convex univalent function in Δ and νi(z)(z) for i=1,2.

    Particularly, for m=2, we get the class P((z)).

    Definition 1.2. Let f(z) and (z) be two analytic functions as defined in (1.1) and (1.2) such that (f)(z)0. Let (z) be a convex univalent function. Then for m2, fVm[(z);(z)] if and only if

    (z(f))(f)Pm((z)),zΔ. (1.5)

    Particularly, for m=2, we will get the class C[(z);(z)]. So, a function fC[(z);(z)] if and only if

    (z(f))(f)(z),zΔ.

    Definition 1.3. Let f(z) and (z) be the functions defined in (1.1) and (1.2), then f(z)Rm[(z);(z)] if and only if

    z(f)(f)Pm((z)),zΔ. (1.6)

    Particularly, for m=2, we get the class SΛ[(z);(z)], i.e., fSΛ[(z);(z)] if and only if

    z(f)(f)(z),zΔ.

    From (1.5) and (1.6) it can be easily noted that fVm[(z);(z)] if and only if zf(z)Rm[(z);(z)]. For m=2, this relation will hold for the classes C[(z);(z)] and SΛ[(z);(z)].

    Definition 1.4. Let f(z) and (z) be analytic function as defined in (1.1) and (1.2) and m2. Let (z) be the convex univalent function. Then, fTm[(z);(z)] if and only if there exists a function ψ(z)SΛ[(z);(z)] such that

    z(f)ψPm((z)),zΔ. (1.7)

    It is interesting to note that the particular cases of our newly defined classes will give us some well-known classes already discussed in the literature. Some of these special cases have been elaborated below.

    Special Cases: Let (z) be the identity function defined as z1z denoted by I i.e., f=fI=f. Then

    (1) For (z)=1+z1z we have Pm((z))=Pm,Rm[(z);(z)]=Rm introduced by Pinchuk [23] and the class Vm[(z);(z)]=Vm defined by Paatero [21]. For m=2, we will get the well-known classes of convex functions C and the starlike functions SΛ.

    (2) Taking (z)=1+(12δ)z1z, we get the classes Pm(δ),Rm(δ) and Vm(δ) presented in [22]. For m=2, we will get the classes C(δ) and SΛ(δ).

    (3) Letting (z)=1+Az1+Bz, with 1B<A1 introduced by Janowski in [12], the classes Pm[A,B],Rm[A,B] and Vm[A,B] defined by Noor [16,17] can be obtained. Moreover, the classes C[A,B] and SΛ[A,B] introduced by [12] can be derived by choosing m=2.

    A significant work has already been done by considering (z) to be different linear operators and (z) to be any convex univalent function. For the details see ([4,9,18,19,24]).

    The importance of Mittag-Leffler functions have tremendously been increased in the last four decades due to its vast applications in the field of science and technology. A number of geometric properties of Mittag-Leffler function have been discussed by many researchers working in the field of Geometric function theory. For some recent and detailed study on the Geometric properties of Mittag-Leffler functions see ([2,3,31]).

    Special function theory has a vital role in both pure and applied mathematics. Mittag-Leffler functions have massive contribution in the theory of special functions, they are used to investigate certain generalization problems. For details see [11,26]

    There are numerous applications of Mittag-Leffler functions in the analysis of the fractional generalization of the kinetic equation, fluid flow problems, electric networks, probability, and statistical distribution theory. The use of Mittag-Leffler functions in the fractional order integral equations and differential equations attracted many researchers. Due to its connection and applications in fractional calculus, the significance of Mittag-Leffler functions has been amplified. To get a look into the applications of Mittag-Leffler functions in the field of fractional calculus, (see [5,27,28,29,30]).

    Here, in this article we will use the operator Hγ,κλ,η:ΩΩ, introduced by Attiya [1], defined as

    Hγ,κλ,η(f)=μγ,κλ,ηf(z),zΔ, (1.8)

    where η,γC, (λ)>max{0,(k)1} and (k)>0. Also, (λ)=0 when (k)=1;η0. Here, μγ,κλ,η is the generalized Mittag-Leffler function, defined in [25]. The generalized Mittag-Leffler function has the following representation.

    μγ,κλ,η=z+n=2Γ(γ+nκ)Γ(λ+η)Γ(γ+κ)Γ(η+λn)n!zn.

    So, the operator defined in (1.8) can be rewritten as:

    Hγ,κλ,η(f)(z)=z+n=2Γ(γ+nκ)Γ(λ+η)Γ(γ+κ)Γ(η+λn)n!anzn,zΔ. (1.9)

    Attiya [1] presented the properties of the aforesaid operator as follows:

    z(Hγ,κλ,η(f(z)))=(γ+κκ)(Hγ+1,κλ,η(f(z)))(γκ)(Hγ,κλ,η(f(z))), (1.10)

    and

    z(Hγ,κλ,η+1(f(z)))=(λ+ηλ)(Hγ,κλ,η(f(z)))(ηλ)(Hγ,κλ,η+1(f(z))). (1.11)

    However, as essential as real-world phenomena are, discovering a solution for the commensurate scheme and acquiring fundamentals with reverence to design variables is challenging and time-consuming. Among the most pragmatically computed classes, we considered the new and novel class which is very useful for efficiently handling complex subordination problems. Here, we propose a suitably modified scheme in order to compute the Janowski type function of the form (z)=(1+Az1+Bz)β, where 0<β1 and 1B<A1, which is known as the strongly Janowski type function. Moreover, for (z), we will use the function defined in (1.9). So, the classes defined in Definition 1.1–1.4 will give us the following novel classes.

    Definition 1.5. A function ν(z) as defined in Eq (1.3) is said to be in the class P(m,β)[A,B] if and only if for m2 there exist two analytic functions ν1(z) and ν2(z) in Δ, such that

    ν(z)=(m4+12)ν1(z)(m412)ν2(z),

    where νi(z)(1+Az1+Bz)β for i=1,2. For m=2, we get the class of strongly Janowki type functions Pβ[A,B].

    Moreover,

    V(m,β)[A,B;γ,η]={fΩ:(z(Hγ,κλ,ηf(z)))(Hγ,κλ,ηf(z))P(m,β)[A,B]},
    R(m,β)[A,B;γ,η]={fΩ:z(Hγ,κλ,ηf(z))Hγ,κλ,ηf(z)P(m,β)[A,B]},
    Cβ[A,B,γ,η]={fΩ:(z(Hγ,κλ,ηf(z)))(Hγ,κλ,ηf(z))Pβ[A,B]},
    SΛβ[A,B,γ,η]={fΩ:z(Hγ,κλ,ηf(z))Hγ,κλ,ηf(z)Pβ[A,B]},
    T(m,β)[A,B;γ,η]={fΩ:z(Hγ,κλ,ηf(z))Hγ,κλ,ηψ(z)P(m,β)[A,B],whereψ(z)SΛβ[A,B,γ,η]},

    where η,γC, (λ)>max{0,(k)1} and (k)>0. Also, (λ)=0 when (k)=1;η0. It can easily be noted that there exists Alexander relation between the classes V(m,β)[A,B;γ,η] and R(m,β)[A,B;γ,η], i.e.,

    fV(m,β)[A,B;γ,η]zfR(m,β)[A,B;γ,η]. (1.12)

    Throughout this investigation, 1B<A1, m2 and 0<β1 unless otherwise stated.

    Lemma 2.1. ([13]) Let ν(z) as defined in (1.3) be in P(m,β)[A,B]. Then ν(z)Pm(ϱ), where 0ϱ=(1A1B)β<1.

    Lemma 2.2. ([8]) Let (z) be convex univalent in Δ with h(0)=1 and (ζ(z)+α)>0(ζC). Let p(z) be analytic in Δ with p(0)=1, which satisfy the following subordination relation

    p(z)+zp(z)ζp(z)+α(z),

    then

    p(z)(z).

    Lemma 2.3. ([10]) Let (z)P. Then for |z|<r, 1r1+r((z)) |(z)|1+r1r, and |h(z)|2r(z)1r2.

    Theorem 3.1. Let ϱ=(1A1B)β. Then for (γκ)>ϱ,

    R(m,β)[A,B,γ+1,η]R(m,β)[A,B,γ,η].

    Proof. Let f(z)R(m,β)[A,B,γ+1,η]. Set

    φ(z)=z(Hγ+1,κλ,ηf(z))Hγ+1,κλ,ηf(z), (3.1)

    then φ(z)P(m,β)[A,B]. Now, Assume that

    ψ(z)=z(Hγ,κλ,ηf(z))Hγ,κλ,ηf(z). (3.2)

    Plugging (1.10) in (3.2), we get

    ψ(z)=(γ+κκ)(Hγ+1,κλ,ηf(z))(γκ)(Hγ,κλ,ηf(z))Hγ,κλ,ηf(z).

    It follows that

    Hγ,κλ,ηf(z)(κγ+κ)(ψ(z)+γκ)=Hγ+1,κλ,ηf(z).

    After performing logarithmic differentiation and simple computation, we get

    ψ(z)+zψ(z)ψ(z)+γκ=φ(z). (3.3)

    Now, for m2, consider

    ψ(z)=(m4+12)ψ1(z)(m412)ψ2(z). (3.4)

    Combining (3.3) and (3.4) with the similar technique as used in Theorem 3.1 of [20], we get

    φ(z)=(m4+12)φ1(z)(m412)φ2(z),

    where

    φi(z)=ψi(z)+zψi(z)ψi(z)+γκ,

    for i=1,2. Since φ(z)P(m,β)[A,B], therefore

    φi(z)=ψi(z)+zψi(z)ψi(z)+γκ(1+Az1+Bz)β,

    for i=1,2. By using Lemma 2.1 and the condition (γκ)>ϱ, we have

    (γκ+(1+Az1+Bz)β)>0,

    where ϱ=(1A1B)β. Hence, in view of Lemma 2.2, we have

    ψi(z)(1+Az1+Bz)β,

    for i = 1, 2. This implies ψ(z)P(m,β)[A,B], so

    f(z)R(m,β)[A,B,γ,η],

    which is required to prove.

    Theorem 3.2. If (λη)>ϱ, where ϱ=(1A1B)β, then

    R(m,β)[A,B,γ,η]R(m,β)[A,B,γ,η+1].

    Proof. Let f(z)R(m,β)[A,B,γ,η]. Taking

    φ(z)=z(Hγ,κλ,ηf(z))Hγ,κλ,ηf(z), (3.5)

    we have φ(z)P(m,β)[A,B]. Now, suppose that

    ψ(z)=z(Hγ,κλ,η+1f(z))Hγ,κλ,η+1f(z). (3.6)

    Applying the relation (1.11) in the Eq (3.6), we have

    ψ(z)=(λ+ηλ)(Hγ,κλ,ηf(z))(ηλ)(Hγ,κλ,η+1f(z))Hγ,κλ,η+1f(z).

    arrives at

    Hγ,κλ,η+1f(z)(λη+λ)(ψ(z)+ηλ)=Hγ,κλ,ηf(z).

    So by the logarithmic differentiation and simple computation we get,

    ψ(z)+zψ(z)ψ(z)+ηλ=φ(z). (3.7)

    Therefore, for m2, take

    ψ(z)=(m4+12)ψ1(z)(m412)ψ2(z). (3.8)

    Combining Eqs (3.6) and (3.7) using the similar technique as in Theorem 3.1 of [20], we get

    φ(z)=(m4+12)φ1(z)(m412)φ2(z),

    where

    φi(z)=ψi(z)+zψi(z)ψi(z)+ηλ,

    for i=1,2. Since φ(z)P(m,β)[A,B], therefore

    φi(z)=ψi(z)+zψi(z)ψi(z)+ηλ(1+Az1+Bz)β,

    for i=1,2. Applying Lemma 2.1 and the condition (ηλ)>ϱ, we get

    (ηλ+(1+Az1+Bz)β)>0,

    where ϱ=(1A1B)β. Hence, by Lemma 2.2, we have

    ψi(z)(1+Az1+Bz)β,

    for i = 1, 2. This implies ψ(z)P(m,β)[A,B], so

    f(z)R(m,β)[A,B,γ,η+1],

    which completes the proof.

    Corollary 3.1. For m=2, if (γκ)>ϱ, where ϱ=(1A1B)β. Then

    SΛβ[A,B,γ+1,η]SΛβ[A,B,γ,η].

    Moreover, if (λη)>ϱ, then

    SΛβ[A,B,γ,η]SΛβ[A,B,γ,η+1].

    Theorem 3.3. Let ϱ=(1A1B)β. Then for (γκ)>ϱ,

    V(m,β)[A,B,γ+1,η]V(m,β)[A,B,γ,η].

    Proof. By means of theorem 3.1 and Alexander relation defined in (1.12), we get

    fV(m,β)[A,B,γ+1,η]zfR(m,β)[A,B,γ+1,η]zfR(m,β)[A,B,γ,η]fV(m,β)[A,B,γ,η].

    Hence the result.

    Analogously, we can prove the following theorem.

    Theorem 3.4. If (λη)>ϱ, where ϱ=(1A1B)β, then

    V(m,β)[A,B,γ,η]V(m,β)[A,B,γ,η+1].

    Corollary 3.2. For m=2, if (γκ)>ϱ, where ϱ=(1A1B)β. Then

    Cβ[A,B,γ+1,η]Cβ[A,B,γ,η].

    Moreover, if (λη)>ϱ, then

    Cβ[A,B,γ,η]Cβ[A,B,γ,η+1].

    Theorem 3.5. Let ϱ=(1A1B)β, and (γκ)>ϱ. Then

    T(m,β)[A,B;γ+1,η]T(m,β)[A,B;γ,η].

    Proof. Let f(z)T(m,β)[A,B,γ+1,η]. Then there exist ψ(z)SΛβ[A,B,γ+1,η] such that

    φ(z)=z(Hγ+1,κλ,ηf(z))Hγ+1,κλ,ηψ(z)P(m,β)[A,B]. (3.9)

    Now consider

    ϕ(z)=z(Hγ,κλ,ηf(z))Hγ,κλ,ηψ(z). (3.10)

    Since ψ(z)SΛβ[A,B,γ+1,η] and (γκ)>ϱ, therefore by Corollary 3.3, ψ(z)SΛβ[A,B,γ,η]. So

    q(z)=z(Hγ,κλ,ηψ(z))Hγ,κλ,ηψ(z)Pβ[A,B]. (3.11)

    By doing some simple calculations on (3.11), we get

    (κq(z)+γ)Hγ,κλ,ηψ(z)=(γ+κ)Hγ+1,κλ,ηψ(z). (3.12)

    Now applying the relation (1.10) on (3.10), we get

    ϕ(z)Hγ,κλ,ηψ(z)=γ+κκHγ+1,κλ,ηf(z)γκHγ,κλ,ηf(z). (3.13)

    Differentiating both sides of (3.13), we have

    ϕ(z)(Hγ,κλ,ηψ(z))+ϕ(z)Hγ,κλ,ηψ(z)=γ+κκ(Hγ+1,κλ,ηf(z))γκ(Hγ,κλ,ηf(z)).

    By using (3.12) and with some simple computations, we get

    ϕ(z)+zϕ(z)q(z)+γκ=φ(z)P(m,β)[A,B], (3.14)

    with (q(z)+γκ)>0, since q(z)Pβ[A,B], so by Lemma 2.1, (q(z)>ϱ and (γκ)>ϱ. Now consider

    ϕ(z)=(m4+12)ϕ1(z)(m412)ϕ2(z). (3.15)

    Combining (3.14) and (3.15) with the similar technique as used in Theorem 3.1 of [20], we get

    φ(z)=(m4+12)φ1(z)(m412)φ2(z), (3.16)

    where

    φi(z)=ϕ(z)+zϕzq(z)+γκ,

    for i=1,2. Since φ(z)P(m,β)[A,B], therefore

    φi(z)(1+Az1+Bz)β,i=1,2.

    Using the fact of Lemma 2.2, we can say that

    ϕi(z)(1+Az1+Bz)β,i=1,2.

    So, ϕ(z)P(m,β)[A,B]. Hence we get the required result.

    Theorem 3.6. If (λη)>ϱ, where ϱ=(1A1B)β, then

    T(m,β)[A,B,γ,η]T(m,β)[A,B,γ,η+1].

    Let f(z)T(m,β)[A,B,γ,η]. Then there exist ψ(z)SΛβ[A,B,γ,η] such that

    φ(z)=z(Hγ,κλ,ηf(z))Hγ,κλ,ηψ(z)P(m,β)[A,B]. (3.17)

    Taking

    ϕ(z)=z(Hγ,κλ,η+1f(z))Hγ,κλ,η+1ψ(z). (3.18)

    As we know that, ψ(z)SΛβ[A,B,γ,η] and (ηλ)>ϱ, therefore by Corollary 3.3, ψ(z)SΛβ[A,B,γ,η+1]. So

    q(z)=z(Hγ,κλ,η+1ψ(z))Hγ,κλ,η+1ψ(z)Pβ[A,B]. (3.19)

    By doing some simple calculations on (3.19) with the help of (1.11), we get

    (λq(z)+η)Hγ,κλ,η+1ψ(z)=(η+λ)Hγ,κλ,ηψ(z). (3.20)

    Now, applying the relation (1.11) on (3.18), we get

    ϕ(z)Hγ,κλ,η+1ψ(z)=η+λλHγ,κλ,ηf(z)ηλHγ,κλ,η+1f(z). (3.21)

    Differentiating both sides of Eq (3.21), we have

    ϕ(z)(Hγ,κλ,η+1ψ(z))+ϕ(z)Hγ,κλ,η+1ψ(z)=η+λλ(Hγ,κλ,ηf(z))ηλ(Hγ,κλ,η+1f(z)),

    some simple calculations along with using (3.20) give us

    ϕ(z)+zϕ(z)q(z)+ηλ=φ(z)P(m,β)[A,B], (3.22)

    with (q(z)+ηλ)>0. Since q(z)Pβ[A,B], so applying Lemma 2.1, we have (q(z)>ϱ and (ηλ)>ϱ.

    Assume that

    ϕ(z)=(m4+12)ϕ1(z)(m412)ϕ2(z). (3.23)

    Combining (3.22) and (3.23), along with using the similar technique as in Theorem 3.1 of [20], we get

    φ(z)=(m4+12)φ1(z)(m412)φ2(z), (3.24)

    where

    φi(z)=ϕ(z)+zϕzq(z)+ηλ,

    for i=1,2. Since φ(z)P(m,β)[A,B], therefore

    φi(z)(1+Az1+Bz)β,i=1,2.

    Applying the fact of Lemma 2.2, we have

    ϕi(z)(1+Az1+Bz)β,i=1,2.

    So ϕ(z)P(m,β)[A,B]. Which gives us the required result.

    Corollary 3.3. If ϱ>min{(γκ),(λη)}, where ϱ=(1A1B)β, then we have the following inclusion relations:

    (i) R(m,β)[A,B,γ+1,η]R(m,β)[A,B,γ,η]R(m,β)[A,B,γ,η+1].

    (ii)V(m,β)[A,B,γ+1,η]V(m,β)[A,B,γ,η]V(m,β)[A,B,γ,η+1].

    (iii)T(m,β)[A,B,γ+1,η]T(m,β)[A,B,γ,η]T(m,β)[A,B,γ,η+1].

    Now, we will discuss some radius results for our defined classes.

    Theorem 3.7. Let ϱ=(1A1B)β, and (γκ)>ϱ. Then

    R(m,β)[A,B,γ,η]R(m,β)[ϱ,γ+1,η]

    whenever

    |z|<ro=1ϱ2ϱ+32ϱ,where0ϱ<1.

    Proof. Let f(z)R(m,β)[A,B,γ,η]. Then

    ψ(z)=z(Hγ,κλ,ηf(z))Hγ,κλ,ηf(z)P(m,β)[A,B]. (3.25)

    In view of Lemma 2.1 P(m,β)[A,B]Pm(ϱ), for ϱ=(1A1B)β, therefore ψ(z)Pm(ϱ). So by the Definition of Pm(ϱ) given in [22], there exist two functions ψ1(z),ψ2(z)P(ϱ) such that

    ψ(z)=(m4+12)ψ1(z)(m412)ψ2(z), (3.26)

    with m2 and (ψi(z))>ϱ,i=1,2. We can write

    ψi(z)=(1ϱ)hi(z)+ϱ, (3.27)

    where hi(z)P and (hi(z)>0, for i=1,2. Now, let

    ϕ(z)=z(Hγ+1,κλ,ηf(z))Hγ+1,κλ,ηf(z). (3.28)

    We have to check when ϕ(z)Pm(ϱ). Using relation (1.10) in (3.25), we get

    ψ(z)Hγ+1,κλ,ηf(z)=(γ+κκ)(Hγ+1,κλ,η(f(z)))(γκ)(Hγ,κλ,η(f(z))).

    So, by simple calculation and logarithmic differentiation, we get

    ψ(z)+zψzψ(z)+γκ=ϕ(z). (3.29)

    Now, consider

    ϕ(z)=(m4+12)ϕ1(z)(m412)ϕ2(z),

    where

    ϕi(z)=ψi(z)+zψizψi(z)+γκ,i=1,2.

    To derive the condition for ϕi(z) to be in P(ϱ), consider

    (ϕi(z)ϱ)=(ψi(z)+zψizψi(z)+γκϱ).

    In view of (3.27), we have

    (ϕi(z)ϱ)=((1ϱ)hi(z)+ϱ+z(1ϱ)hi(z)γκ+ϱ+(1ϱ)hi(z)ϱ)(1ϱ)(hi(z))(1ϱ)|zhi(z)|(γκ+ϱ)+(1ϱ)(hi(z)). (3.30)

    We have, (γκ+ϱ)>0 since (γκ)>ϱ. Since hi(z)P, hence by using Lemma 2.3 in inequality (3.30), we have

    (ϕi(z)ϱ)(1ϱ)(hi(z))1ϱ2r1r2(hi(z))(1ϱ)(1r1+r)=(1ϱ)(hi(z))[(1r)2(1ϱ)2r(1r)2(1ϱ)](1ϱ)(1r1+r)[(1r)2(1ϱ)2r(1r)2(1ϱ)]=r2(1ϱ)2r(2ϱ)+(1ϱ)1r2. (3.31)

    Since 1r2>0, letting T(r)=r2(1ϱ)2r(2ϱ)+(1ϱ). It is easy to note that T(0)>0 and T(1)<0. Hence, there is a root of T(r) between 0 and 1. Let ro be the root then by simple calculations, we get

    ro=1ϱ2ϱ+32ϱ.

    Hence ϕ(z)Pm(ϱ) for |z|<ro. Thus for this radius ro the function f(z) belongs to the class R(m,β)[ϱ,γ+1,η], which is required to prove.

    Theorem 3.8. Let ϱ=(1A1B)β, and (λη)>ϱ. Then

    R(m,β)[A,B,γ,η+1]R(m,β)[ϱ,γ,η],

    whenever

    |z|<ro=1ϱ2ϱ+32ϱ,where0ϱ<1.

    Proof. Let f(z)R(m,β)[A,B,γ,η+1]. Then

    ψ(z)=z(Hγ,κλ,η+1f(z))Hγ,κλ,η+1f(z)P(m,β)[A,B]. (3.32)

    By applying of Lemma 2.1, we get P(m,β)[A,B]Pm(ϱ), for ϱ=(1A1B)β, therefore ψ(z)Pm(ϱ). Hence, the Definition of Pm(ϱ) given in [22], there exist two functions ψ1(z),ψ2(z)P(ϱ) such that

    ψ(z)=(m4+12)ψ1(z)(m412)ψ2(z), (3.33)

    with m2 and (ψi(z))>ϱ,i=1,2. We can say that

    ψi(z)=(1ϱ)hi(z)+ϱ, (3.34)

    where hi(z)P and (hi(z)>0, for i=1,2. Now, assume

    ϕ(z)=z(Hγ,κλ,ηf(z))Hγ,κλ,ηf(z). (3.35)

    Here, We have to obtain the condition for which ϕ(z)Pm(ϱ). Using relation (1.11) in (3.51), we get

    ψ(z)Hγ,κλ,ηf(z)=(η+λλ)(Hγ,κλ,η(f(z)))(ηλ)(Hγ,κλ,η+1(f(z))).

    Thus, by simple calculation and logarithmic differentiation, we have

    ψ(z)+zψzψ(z)+ηλ=ϕ(z). (3.36)

    Now, consider

    ϕ(z)=(m4+12)ϕ1(z)(m412)ϕ2(z),

    where

    ϕi(z)=ψi(z)+zψizψi(z)+ηλ,i=1,2.

    To derive the condition for ϕi(z) to be in P(ϱ), consider

    (ϕi(z)ϱ)=(ψi(z)+zψizψi(z)+ηλϱ).

    In view of (3.34), we have

    (ϕi(z)ϱ)=((1ϱ)hi(z)+ϱ+z(1ϱ)hi(z)ηλ+ϱ+(1ϱ)hi(z)ϱ)(1ϱ)(hi(z))(1ϱ)|zhi(z)|(ηλ+ϱ)+(1ϱ)(hi(z)). (3.37)

    Here, (ηλ+ϱ)>0 since (ηλ)>ϱ. We know that hi(z)P, therefore by using Lemma 2.3 in inequality (3.37), we have

    (ϕi(z)ϱ)(1ϱ)(hi(z))1ϱ2r1r2(hi(z))(1ϱ)(1r1+r)=(1ϱ)(hi(z))[(1r)2(1ϱ)2r(1r)2(1ϱ)](1ϱ)(1r1+r)[(1r)2(1ϱ)2r(1r)2(1ϱ)]=r2(1ϱ)2r(2ϱ)+(1ϱ)1r2. (3.38)

    Since 1r2>0, letting T(r)=r2(1ϱ)2r(2ϱ)+(1ϱ). It can easily be seen that T(0)>0 and T(1)<0. Hence, there is a root of T(r) between 0 and 1. Let ro be the root then by simple calculations, we get

    ro=1ϱ2ϱ+32ϱ.

    Hence ϕ(z)Pm(ϱ) for |z|<ro. Thus for this radius ro the function f(z) belongs to the class R(m,β)[ϱ,γ,η], which is required to prove.

    Corollary 3.4. Let ϱ=(1A1B)β. Then, for m=2, and |z|<ro=1ϱ2ϱ+32ϱ,

    (i) If (γκ)>ϱ, then SΛβ[A,B,γ,η]SΛβ[ϱ,γ+1,η].

    (ii) If(λη)>ϱ, then SΛβ[A,B,γ,η+1]SΛβ[ϱ,γ,η].

    Theorem 3.9. Let ϱ=(1A1B)β. Then for |z|<ro=1ϱ2ϱ+32ϱ, we have

    (1)V(m,β)[A,B,γ,η]V(m,β)[ϱ,γ+1,η], if (γκ)>ϱ.

    (2)V(m,β)[A,B,γ,η+1]V(m,β)[ϱ,γ,η], if (λη)>ϱ.

    Proof. The above results can easily be proved by using Theorem 3.10, Theorem 3.11 and the Alexander relation defined in (1.12).

    Theorem 3.10. Let ϱ=(1A1B)β, and (γκ)>ϱ. Then

    T(m,β)[A,B,γ,η]T(m,β)[ϱ,γ+1,η],

    whenever

    |z|<ro=1ϱ2ϱ+32ϱ,where0ϱ<1.

    Proof. Let fT(m,β)[A,B,γ,η], then there exist ψ(z)SΛβ[A,B,γ,η] such that

    φ(z)=z(Hγ,κλ,ηf(z))Hγ,κλ,ηψ(z)P(m,β)[A,B]. (3.39)

    Since by Lemma 2.1 we know that P(m,β)[A,B]Pm(ϱ), where ϱ=(1A1B)β, therefore φ(z)Pm(ϱ). So by using the Definition of Pm(ϱ) defined in [22], there exist two functions φ1(z) and φ2(z) such that

    φ(z)=(m4+12)φ1(z)(m412)φ2(z), (3.40)

    where φi(z)P(ϱ),i=1,2. We can write

    φi(z)=ϱ+(1ϱ)hi(z), (3.41)

    where hi(z)P. Now, let

    ϕ(z)=z(Hγ+1,κλ,ηf(z))Hγ+1,κλ,ηψ(z).

    Since ψ(z)SΛβ[A,B,γ,η], therefore

    q(z)=z(Hγ,κλ,ηψ(z))Hγ,κλ,ηψ(z)Pβ[A,B], (3.42)

    then by using relation (1.10) and doing some simple computation on Eq (3.42), we have

    (κq(z)+γ)Hγ,κλ,ηψ(z)=(γ+κ)Hγ+1,κλ,ηψ(z). (3.43)

    Now, using relation (1.10) in (3.39), we get

    φ(z)=(γ+κκ)(Hγ+1,κλ,ηf(z))(γκ)(Hγ,κλ,ηf(z))Hγ,κλ,ηψ(z). (3.44)

    By some simple calculations along with differentiation of both sides of (3.44) and then applying (3.43) we get the following relation

    φ(z)+zφ(z)q(z)+(γκ)=ϕ(z).

    Let us consider

    ϕ(z)=(m4+12)ϕ1(z)(m412)ϕ2(z),

    where

    ϕi(z)=φi(z)+zφi(z)q(z)+(γκ),

    i=1,2. Since q(z)Pβ[A,B]P(ϱ). Therefore, we can write

    q(z)=ϱ+(1ϱ)qo(z), (3.45)

    where qo(z)P. We have to check when ϕi(z)Pm(ϱ). For this consider

    (ϕi(z)ϱ)=(φi(z)+zφi(z)q(z)+(γκ)ϱ).

    Using (3.41) and (3.45), we have

    (ϕi(z)ϱ)=(ϱ+(1ϱ)hi(z)+(1ϱ)zhi(z)ϱ+(1ϱ)qo(z)+(γκ)ϱ),

    where hi(z),qo(z)P.

    (ϕi(z)ϱ)=(1ϱ)(hi(z))(1ϱ)|zhi(z)|(ϱ+γκ)+(1ϱ)qo(z).

    Since (γκ)>ϱ, so (ϱ+γκ)>0. Now by using the distortion results of Lemma 2.3, we have

    (ϕi(z)ϱ)=((1ϱ)hi(z)+ϱ+z(1ϱ)hi(z)γκ+ϱ+(1ϱ)hi(z)ϱ)(1ϱ)(hi(z))(1ϱ)|zhi(z)|(γκ+ϱ)+(1ϱ)(hi(z)). (3.46)

    Since hi(z)P, so (hi(z))>0 and (γκ+ϱ)>0 for (γκ)>ϱ. Hence, by using Lemma 2.3 in inequality (3.46), we have

    (ϕi(z)ϱ)(1ϱ)(hi(z))1ϱ2r1r2(hi(z))(1ϱ)(1r1+r)r2(1ϱ)2r(2ϱ)+(1ϱ)1r2.

    Since 1r2>0, taking T(r)=r2(1ϱ)2r(2ϱ)+(1ϱ). Let ro be the root then by simple calculations, we get

    ro=1ϱ2ϱ+32ϱ.

    Hence ϕ(z)Pm(ϱ) for |z|<ro. Thus for this radius ro the function f(z) belongs to the class T(m,β)[ϱ,γ+1,η], which is required to prove.

    Using the analogous approach used in Theorem 3.14, one can easily prove the following theorem.

    Theorem 3.11. Let ϱ=(1A1B)β, and (ηλ)>ϱ. Then

    T(m,β)[A,B,γ,η+1]T(m,β)[ϱ,γ,η]

    whenever

    |z|<ro=1ϱ2ϱ+32ϱ,where0ϱ<1.

    Integral Preserving Property: Here, we will discuss some integral preserving properties of our aforementioned classes. The generalized Libera integral operator Iσ introduced and discussed in [6,14] is defined by:

    Iσ(f)(z)=σ+1zσz0tσ1f(t)dt, (3.47)

    where f(z)A and σ>1.

    Theorem 3.12. Let σ>ϱ, where ϱ=(1A1B)β. If fR(m,β)[A,B,γ,η] then Iσ(f)R(m,β)[A,B,γ,η].

    Proof. Let fR(m,β)[A,B,γ,η], and set

    ψ(z)=z(Hγ,κλ,ηIσ(f)(z))Hγ,κλ,ηIσ(f)(z), (3.48)

    where ψ(z) is analytic and ψ(0)=1. From definition of Hγ,κλ,η(f) given by [1] and using Eq (3.47), we have

    z(Hγ,κλ,ηIσ(f)(z))=(σ+1)Hγ,κλ,ηf(z)σHγ,κλ,ηIσ(f)(z). (3.49)

    Then by using Eqs (3.48) and (3.49), we have

    (σ+1)Hγ,κλ,ηf(z)Hγ,κλ,ηIσ(f)(z)=ψ(z)+σ.

    Logarithmic differentiation and simple computation results in

    ϕ(z)=ψ(z)+zψ(z)ψ(z)+σ=z(Hγ,κλ,ηf(z))Hγ,κλ,ηf(z)P(m,β)[A,B], (3.50)

    with (ψ(z)+σ)>0, since (σ)>ϱ. Now, consider

    ψ(z)=(m4+12)ψ1(z)(m412)ψ2(z). (3.51)

    Combining (3.50) and (3.51), we get

    ϕ(z)=(m4+12)ϕ1(z)(m412)ϕ2(z),

    where ϕi(z)=ψi(z)+zψi(z)ψi(z)+σ, i=1,2. Since ϕ(z)P(m,β)[A,B], therefore

    ϕi(z)(1+Az1+Bz)β,

    which implies

    ψi(z)+zψi(z)ψi(z)+σ(1+Az1+Bz)βi=1,2.

    Therefore, using Lemma 2.2 we get

    ψi(z)(1+Az1+Bz)β,

    or ψ(z)P(m,β)[A,B]. Hence the result.

    Corollary 3.5. Let σ>ϱ. Then for m=2, if fSΛβ[A,B,γ,η] then Iσ(f)SΛβ[A,B,γ,η], where ϱ=(1A1B)β.

    Theorem 3.13. Let σ>ϱ, where ϱ=(1A1B)β. If fV(m,β)[A,B,γ,η] then Iσ(f)V(m,β)[A,B,γ,η].

    Proof. Let fV(m,β)[A,B,γ,η]. Then by using relation (1.12), we have

    zf(z)R(m,β)[A,B,γ,η],

    so by using Theorem 3.16, we can say that

    Iσ(zf(z))R(m,β)[A,B,γ,η],

    equivalently

    z(Iσ(f(z)))R(m,β)[A,B,γ,η],

    so again by using the relation (1.12), we get

    Iσ(f)V(m,β)[A,B,γ,η].

    Theorem 3.14. Let σ>ϱ, where ϱ=(1A1B)β. If fT(m,β)[A,B,γ,η] then Iσ(f)T(m,β)[A,B,γ,η].

    Proof. Let fT(m,β)[A,B,γ,η]. Then there exists ψ(z)SΛβ[A,B,γ,η], such that

    φ(z)=z(Hγ,κλ,ηf(z))(Hγ,κλ,ηψ(z)P(m,β)[A,B]. (3.52)

    Consider

    ϕ(z)=z(Hγ,κλ,ηIσ(f)(z))Hγ,κλ,ηIσ(ψ)(z). (3.53)

    Since ψ(z)SΛβ[A,B,γ,η], then by Corollary 3.17, Iσ(ψ)(z)SΛβ[A,B,γ,η]. Therefore

    q(z)=z(Hγ,κλ,ηIσ(ψ)(z))Hγ,κλ,ηIσ(ψ)(z)Pβ[A,B]. (3.54)

    By using (3.47) and Definition of Hγ,κλ,η, we get

    q(z)Hγ,κλ,ηIσ(ψ)(z)=(σ+1)Hγ,κλ,η(ψ)(z)σHγ,κλ,ηIσ(ψ)(z),

    or we can write it as

    Hγ,κλ,ηIσ(ψ)(z)=σ+1q(z)+σHγ,κλ,η(ψ)(z). (3.55)

    Now using the relation (3.47) and the Definition of Hγ,κλ,η, in (3.53), we have

    ϕ(z)Hγ,κλ,ηIσ(ψ)(z)=(σ+1)Hγ,κλ,η(f)(z)σHγ,κλ,ηIσ(f)(z). (3.56)

    Differentiating both sides of (3.56), we have

    ϕ(z)Hγ,κλ,ηIσ(ψ)(z)+ϕ(z)(Hγ,κλ,ηIσ(ψ)(z))=(σ+1)(Hγ,κλ,η(f)(z))σ(Hγ,κλ,ηIσ(f)(z)),

    then by simple computations and using (3.53)–(3.55), we get

    ϕ(z)+zϕ(z)q(z)+σ=φ(z), (3.57)

    with (σ)>ϱ, so (q(z)+σ)>0, since q(z)Pβ[A,B]P(ϱ). Consider

    ϕ(z)=(m4+12)ϕ1(z)(m412)ϕ2(z), (3.58)

    Combining Eqs (3.57) and (3.58), we have

    φ(z)=(m4+12)φ1(z)(m412)φ2(z), (3.59)

    where φi(z)=ϕi(z)+zϕi(z)q(z)+σ, i=1,2.

    Since φ(z)P(m,β)[A,B], thus we have

    φi(z)(1+Az1+Bz)β,

    then

    ϕi(z)+zϕi(z)q(z)+σ(1+Az1+Bz)β,i=1,2.

    Since (q(z)+σ)>0, therefore using Lemma 2.2 we get

    ϕi(z)(1+Az1+Bz)β,i=1,2,

    thus ϕ(z)P(m,β)[A,B]. Hence the result.

    Due to their vast applications, Mittag-Leffler functions have captured the interest of a number of researchers working in different fields of science. The present investigation may help researchers comprehend some stimulating consequences of the special functions. In the present article, we have used generalized Mittag-Leffler functions to define some novel classes related to bounded boundary and bounded radius rotations. Several inclusion relations and radius results for these classes have been discussed. Moreover, it has been proved that these classes are preserved under the generalized Libera integral operator. Finally, we can see that the projected solution procedure is highly efficient in solving inclusion problems describing the harmonic analysis. It is hoped that our investigation and discussion will be helpful in cultivating new ideas and applications in different fields of science, particularly in mathematics.

    Δ Open Unit Disc.

    Ω Class of normalized analytic functions.

    Real part of complex number.

    Γ Gamma function.

    χ(z) Schwartz function.

    The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

    The authors would like to thank the Rector of COMSATS Univeristy Islamabad, Pakistan for providing excellent research oriented environment. The author Thabet Abdeljawad would like to thank Prince Sultan University for the support through TAS research Lab.



    [1] Hossain MS, Das NG (2010) GIS-based multi-criteria evaluation to land suitability modelling for giant prawn (Macrobrachium rosenbergii) farming in Companigonj Upazila of Noakhali, Bangladesh. Comput Electron Agric 70: 172-186. doi: 10.1016/j.compag.2009.10.003
    [2] Ezekiel BB, Firuza B, Mohammad L, et al. (2018) Analysis of Factors for Determining Suitable Site for Giant Freshwater Prawn (Macrobrachium rosenbergii) Farming Through the Local Knowledge in Negeri Sembilan of Peninsular Malaysia. Pertanika J Soc Sci Humanit 26: 2867-2882.
    [3] Zafar M, Haque M, Aziz M, et al. (2015) Study on water and soil quality parameters of shrimp and prawn farming in the southwest region of Bangladesh. J Bangladesh Agric Univ 13: 153-160. doi: 10.3329/jbau.v13i1.28732
    [4] Food and Agriculture Organization, Aquaculture, 2020. Available from: http://www.fao.org/fishery/en.
    [5] Banu R, Christianus A (2016) Giant freshwater prawn Macrobrachium rosenbergii farming: A review on its current status and prospective in Malaysia. J Aquacul Res Dev 7: 1-5. doi: 10.4172/2155-9546.1000423
    [6] New MB, Valenti WC, Tidwell JH, et al. (2009) Freshwater prawns: biology and farming. John Wiley & Sons.
    [7] Islam MM, Ahmed MK, Shahid MA, et al. (2009) Determination of land cover changes and suitable shrimp farming area using remote sensing and GIS in Southwestern Bangladesh. Int J Ecol Dev 12: 28-41.
    [8] Mustafa FB, Bwadi BE (2018) Determination of Optimal Freshwater Prawn Farming Site Locations using GIS and Multicriteria Evaluation. J Coastal Res 82: 41-54. doi: 10.2112/SI82-006.1
    [9] Joerin F, Thériault M, Musy A (2001) Using GIS and outranking multicriteria analysis for land-use suitability assessment. Int J Geogr Inf Sci 15: 153-174. doi: 10.1080/13658810051030487
    [10] Sanchez-Jerez P, Karakassis I, Massa F, et al. (2016) Aquaculture's struggle for space: the need for coastal spatial planning and the potential benefits of Allocated Zones for Aquaculture (AZAs) to avoid conflict and promote sustainability. Aquacult Environ Interact 8: 41-54. doi: 10.3354/aei00161
    [11] Höhn J, Lehtonen E, Rasi S, et al. (2014) A Geographical Information System (GIS) based methodology for determination of potential biomasses and sites for biogas plants in southern Finland. Appl Energy 113: 1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.07.005
    [12] Sánchez-Moreno JF, Farshad A, Pilesjö P (2013) Farmer or expert; a comparison between three land suitability assessments for upland Rice and rubber in Phonexay District, Lao Pdr. Ecopersia 1: 235-260.
    [13] Baja S, Chapman DM, Dragovich D (2007) Spatial based compromise programming for multiple criteria decision making in land use planning. Environ Model Assess 12: 171-184. doi: 10.1007/s10666-006-9059-1
    [14] Singha C, Swain KC (2016) Land suitability evaluation criteria for agricultural crop selection: A review. Agric Rev 37.
    [15] Akıncı H, Özalp AY, Turgut B (2013) Agricultural land use suitability analysis using GIS and AHP technique. Comput Electron Agric 97: 71-82. doi: 10.1016/j.compag.2013.07.006
    [16] Farkan M, Setiyanto D, Widjaja R (2017) Assessment area development of sustainable shrimp culture ponds (case ctudy the gulf coast Banten). IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci 54: 012077. doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/54/1/012077
    [17] Setiawan Y, Pertiwi DGBCS (2014) Evaluation of Land Suitability for Brackishwatershrimp Farming using GIS in Mahakam Delta, Indonesia. Evaluation 4.
    [18] Ullah KM, Mansourian A (2016) Evaluation of Land Suitability for Urban Land—Use Planning: Case Study D haka City. Trans GIS 20: 20-37. doi: 10.1111/tgis.12137
    [19] Zarkesh MK, Ghoddusi J, Zaredar N, et al. (2010) Application of spatial analytical hierarchy process model in land use planning. J Food Agric Environ 8: 970-975.
    [20] Kumar V, Jain K (2017) Site suitability evaluation for urban development using remote sensing, GIS and analytic hierarchy process (AHP), Proceedings of International Conference on Computer Vision and Image Processing, Springer, 377-388.
    [21] Salui CL, Hazra PB (2017) Geospatial Analysis for Industrial Site Suitability Using AHP Modeling: A Case Study, Environment and Earth Observation, Springer, 3-21.
    [22] Hossain MS, Chowdhury SR, Das NG, et al. (2009) Integration of GIS and multicriteria decision analysis for urban aquaculture development in Bangladesh. Landscape Urban Plann 90: 119-133. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2008.10.020
    [23] Morckel VC (2017) Using suitability analysis to prioritize demolitions in a legacy city. Urban Geogr 38: 90-111. doi: 10.1080/02723638.2016.1147756
    [24] Chandio IA, Matori A, Yusof K, et al. (2014) GIS-basedland suitability analysis of sustainable hillside development. Procedia Eng 77: 87-94. doi: 10.1016/j.proeng.2014.07.009
    [25] Trinh T, Wu D, Huang J, et al. (2016) Application of the analytical hierarchy process (AHP) for landslide susceptibility mapping: A case study in Yen Bai province, Viet Nam, CRC Press, 275.
    [26] Rahmat ZG, Niri MV, Alavi N, et al. (2017) Landfill site selection using GIS and AHP: a case study: Behbahan, Iran. KSCE J Civ Eng 21: 111-118. doi: 10.1007/s12205-016-0296-9
    [27] Şener Ş, Şener E, Nas B, et al. (2010) Combining AHP with GIS for landfill site selection: a case study in the Lake Beyşehir catchment area (Konya, Turkey). Waste Manage 30: 2037-2046. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2010.05.024
    [28] Malczewski J, Rinner C (2015) GIScience, Spatial Analysis, and Decision Support, Multicriteria Decision Analysis in Geographic Information Science, Springer, 3-21.
    [29] Goodridge W, Bernard M, Jordan R, et al. (2017) Intelligent diagnosis of diseases in plants using a hybrid Multi-Criteria decision making technique. Comput Electron Agric 133: 80-87. doi: 10.1016/j.compag.2016.12.003
    [30] Abu-Taha R (2011) Multi-criteria applications in renewable energy analysis: A literature review, IEEE, 1-8.
    [31] Mendoza GA (2000) GIS-based multicriteria approaches to land use suitability assessment and allocation. United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service General Technical Report NC, 89-94.
    [32] Dehe B, Bamford D (2015) Development, test and comparison of two Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) models: A case of healthcare infrastructure location. Expert Syst Appl 42: 6717-6727. doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2015.04.059
    [33] Dhami I, Deng J, Strager M, et al. (2017) Suitability-sensitivity analysis of nature-based tourism using geographic information systems and analytic hierarchy process. J Ecotourism 16: 41-68. doi: 10.1080/14724049.2016.1193186
    [34] Bwadi BE, Mustafa FB, Ali ML, et al. (2019) Spatial analysis of water quality and its suitability in farming giant freshwater prawn (Macrobrachium rosenbergii) in Negeri Sembilan region, Peninsular Malaysia. Singapore J Trop Geogr 40: 71-91. doi: 10.1111/sjtg.12250
    [35] Department of Fisheries Laporan Tahunan Dan Penyata Kewangan LKIM Tahun 2014. Available from: https://www.lkim.gov.my/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/1.-FINAL-LAPORAN-TAHUNAN-2014.pdf
    [36] Naubi I, Zardari NH, Shirazi SM, et al. (2016) Effectiveness of Water Quality Index for Monitoring Malaysian River Water Quality. Pol J Environ Stud 25: 231-239. doi: 10.15244/pjoes/60109
    [37] National Water Quality Standards For Malaysia. Available from: https://www.doe.gov.my/portalv1/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/Standard-Kualiti-Air-Kebangsaan.pdf.
    [38] Wastewater Sampling Method, 2013. Available from: http://www.aquaculture.asia/files/PMNQ%20WQ%20standard%202.pdf.
    [39] Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater 23rd edition (APHA, AWWA, WEF), 2017. Available from: https://www.wef.org/resources/publications/books/StandardMethods/.
    [40] Thunjai T, Boyd CE, Dube K (2001) Poind soil pH measurement. J World Aquacul Soc 32: 141-152. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-7345.2001.tb00365.x
    [41] Chaikaew P, Chavanich S (2017) Spatial variability and relationship of mangrove soil organic matter to organic carbon. Appl Environ Soil Sci 2017.
    [42] Saia S, Salvucci T, Zhang W (2018) Ion Chromatography Procedure. Available from: http://soilandwater.bee.cornell.edu/tools/equipment/IC_Protocol.pdf.
    [43] Water Quality Criteria and Standards for Freshwater and Marine Aquaculture. Available from: http://aquaculture.asia/files/PMNQ%20WQ%20standard%202.pdf.
    [44] Hadipour A, Vafaie F, Hadipour V (2015) Land suitability evaluation for brackish water aquaculture development in coastal area of Hormozgan, Iran. Aquacult Int 23: 329-343. doi: 10.1007/s10499-014-9818-y
    [45] New MB, Nair CM (2012) Global scale of freshwater prawn farming. Aquacult Res 43: 960-969. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2109.2011.03008.x
    [46] Food and Agriculture Organization, Farming freshwater prawns—A manual for the culture of the giant river prawn (Macrobrachium rosenbergii). 2020. Available from: http://www.fao.org/3/y4100e/y4100e00.htm.
    [47] Mallasen M, Valenti WC (2005) Larval development of the giant river prawn Macrobrachium rosenbergii at different ammonia concentrations and pH values. J World Aquacul Soc 36: 32-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-7345.2005.tb00128.x
    [48] Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, A framework for land evaluation. 1976. Available from: https://edepot.wur.nl/149437.
    [49] Rossiter DG (1996) A theoretical framework for land evaluation. Geoderma 72: 165-190. doi: 10.1016/0016-7061(96)00031-6
    [50] New MB, Kutty MN (2010) Commercial freshwater prawn farming and enhancement around the world. Freshwater Prawns; Biology and Farming, 346-399.
    [51] Nguyen TT, Verdoodt A, Van Y T, et al. (2015) Design of a GIS and multi-criteria based land evaluation procedure for sustainable land-use planning at the regional level. Agric Ecosyst Environ 200: 1-11. doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2014.10.015
    [52] Capraz O, Meran C, Wörner W, et al. (2015) Using AHP and TOPSIS to evaluate welding processes for manufacturing plain carbon stainless steel storage tank. Arch Mater Sci 76: 157-162.
    [53] García JL, Alvarado A, Blanco J, et al. (2014) Multi-attribute evaluation and selection of sites for agricultural product warehouses based on an analytic hierarchy process. Comput Electron Agric 100: 60-69. doi: 10.1016/j.compag.2013.10.009
    [54] Saaty TL (2004) Decision making—the analytic hierarchy and network processes (AHP/ANP). J Syst Sci Syst Eng 13: 1-35. doi: 10.1007/s11518-006-0151-5
    [55] Pramanik MK (2016) Site suitability analysis for agricultural land use of Darjeeling district using AHP and GIS techniques. Model Earth Sys Environ 2: 56. doi: 10.1007/s40808-016-0116-8
    [56] Park S, Jeon S, Kim S, et al. (2011) Prediction and comparison of urban growth by land suitability index mapping using GIS and RS in South Korea. Landscape Urban Plann 99: 104-114. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2010.09.001
    [57] Öztürk D, Batuk F (2010) Konumsal karar problemlerinde analitik hiyerarşi yönteminin kullanılması. Sigma Mühendislik ve Fen Bilimleri Derg 28: 124-137.
    [58] Apak S, Orbak I, Tombus A, et al. (2015) Analyzing logistics firms business performance. Sci Bull Mircea Cel Batran Naval Acad 18: 180.
    [59] Malczewski J (1999) GIS and multicriteria decision analysis, John Wiley & Sons.
    [60] Huang YF, Ang SY, Lee KM, et al. (2015) Quality of water resources in Malaysia. Res Pract Water Qual 3: 65-94.
    [61] Ferreira N, Bonetti C, Seiffert W (2011) Hydrological and water quality indices as management tools in marine shrimp culture. Aquaculture 318: 425-433. doi: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2011.05.045
    [62] Cheng W, Chen JC (2000) Effects of pH, temperature and salinity on immune parameters of the freshwater prawn Macrobrachium rosenbergii. Fish Shellfish Immunol 10: 387-391. doi: 10.1006/fsim.2000.0264
    [63] Boyd CE (2017) General relationship between water quality and aquaculture performance in ponds, Fish Dis 147-166.
    [64] Hai NT, Lili Y, Qigen L, et al. (2015) Assessment of water quality of giant freshwater prawn (Macrobrachium rosenbergii) in culture ponds in Zhejiang of China. Int J Fish Aquat Stud 2: 45-55.
    [65] Osmi SAC, Ishak WFW, Azman MA, et al. (2018) Recent assessment of physico-chemical water quality in Malacca River using water quality index and statistical analysis, IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci 169: 012071.
    [66] Khoda Bakhsh H, Chopin T (2011) Water quality and nutrient aspects in recirculating aquaponic production of the freshwater prawn, Macrobrachium rosenbergii and the lettuce, Lactuca sativa. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/10919/90643.
    [67] Alam T (2015) Estimation of Chemical Oxygen Demand in WasteWater using UV-VIS Spectroscopy. Available from: https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/56379601.pdf.
    [68] Boyd CE, Wood C, Thunjai T (2002) Aquaculture pond bottom soil quality management, Pond Dynamics/Aquaculture Collaborative Research Support Program. Oregon.
    [69] Gardi C, Visioli G, Conti FD, et al. (2016) High nature value farmland: assessment of soil organic carbon in Europe. Front Environ Sci 4: 47. doi: 10.3389/fenvs.2016.00047
  • This article has been cited by:

    1. Georgia Irina Oros, Gheorghe Oros, Shigeyoshi Owa, Subordination Properties of Certain Operators Concerning Fractional Integral and Libera Integral Operator, 2022, 7, 2504-3110, 42, 10.3390/fractalfract7010042
    2. Bushra Kanwal, Saqib Hussain, Afis Saliu, Fuzzy differential subordination related to strongly Janowski functions, 2023, 31, 2769-0911, 10.1080/27690911.2023.2170371
    3. Bushra Kanwal, Kashmala Sarfaraz, Munnaza Naz, Afis Saliu, Fuzzy differential subordination associated with generalized Mittag-Leffler type Poisson distribution, 2024, 31, 2576-5299, 206, 10.1080/25765299.2024.2319366
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2021 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(4220) PDF downloads(182) Cited by(4)

Figures and Tables

Figures(7)  /  Tables(9)

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog