
Citation: Tuan Syaripah Najihah, Mohd Hafiz Ibrahim, Nurul Amalina Mohd Zain, Rosimah Nulit, Puteri Edaroyati Megat Wahab. Activity of the oil palm seedlings exposed to a different rate of potassium fertilizer under water stress condition[J]. AIMS Environmental Science, 2020, 7(1): 46-68. doi: 10.3934/environsci.2020004
[1] | Sergey V. Belim . Study of ordering in 2D ferromagnetic nanoparticles arrays: Computer simulation. AIMS Materials Science, 2023, 10(6): 948-964. doi: 10.3934/matersci.2023051 |
[2] | Yu Shiratsuchi, Yoshinori Kotani, Saori Yoshida, Yasunori Yoshikawa, Kentaro Toyoki, Atsushi Kobane, Ryoichi Nakatani, Tetsuya Nakamura . Direct observations of ferromagnetic and antiferromagnetic domains in Pt/Co/Cr2O3/Pt perpendicular exchange biased film. AIMS Materials Science, 2015, 2(4): 484-496. doi: 10.3934/matersci.2015.4.484 |
[3] | Yustina M Pusparizkita, Vivi A. Fardilah, Christian Aslan, J. Jamari, Athanasius P Bayuseno . Understanding of low-carbon steel marine corrosion through simulation in artificial seawater. AIMS Materials Science, 2023, 10(3): 499-516. doi: 10.3934/matersci.2023028 |
[4] | Tetsuji Saito, Daisuke Nishio-Hamane . Magnetic properties of Sm5Fe17 melt-spun ribbons and their borides. AIMS Materials Science, 2015, 2(4): 392-400. doi: 10.3934/matersci.2015.4.392 |
[5] | Anna Godymchuk, Alexey Ilyashenko, Yury Konyukhov, Peter Ogbuna Offor, Galiya Baisalova . Agglomeration and dissolution of iron oxide nanoparticles in simplest biological media. AIMS Materials Science, 2022, 9(4): 642-652. doi: 10.3934/matersci.2022039 |
[6] | Narayan Poudyal, Kinjal Gandha, Kevin Elkins, J. Ping Liu . Anisotropic SmCo5/FeCo core/shell nanocomposite chips prepared via electroless coating. AIMS Materials Science, 2015, 2(3): 294-302. doi: 10.3934/matersci.2015.3.294 |
[7] | Ayu Azera Izad, Rosimah Nulit, Che Azurahanim Che Abdullah, A'fifah Abdul Razak, Teh Huey Fang, Mohd Hafiz Ibrahim . Growth, leaf gas exchange and biochemical changes of oil palm (Elaeis guineensis Jacq.) seedlings as affected by iron oxide nanoparticles. AIMS Materials Science, 2019, 6(6): 960-984. doi: 10.3934/matersci.2019.6.960 |
[8] | Tomas Melus, Roman Kolenak, Jaromir Drapala, Mikulas Sloboda, Peter Gogola, Matej Pasak . Research of joining the SiC and Cu combination by use of SnTi solder filled with SiC nanoparticles and with active ultrasound assistance. AIMS Materials Science, 2024, 11(5): 1013-1034. doi: 10.3934/matersci.2024048 |
[9] | Omar Hassan Mahmood, Mustafa Sh. Aljanabi, Farouk M. Mahdi . Effect of Cu nanoparticles on microhardness and physical properties of aluminum matrix composite prepared by PM. AIMS Materials Science, 2025, 12(2): 245-257. doi: 10.3934/matersci.2025013 |
[10] | Andrea Ehrmann, Tomasz Blachowicz . Interaction between magnetic nanoparticles in clusters. AIMS Materials Science, 2017, 4(2): 383-390. doi: 10.3934/matersci.2017.2.383 |
In recent years, the nanoparticles have attracted the researcher's interest and have been extensively studied due to their diverse applications in biotechnology, environment protection, data storage, magnetic sensor, and drug delivery [1,2,3,4,5]. The nanoparticles' properties depend on the size, shape, morphology, crystallinity, surface effects, and inter-particle interactions of the materials [6,7]. Hence, understanding the fundamental properties of the nanomaterials is the prerequisite for their widespread applications. Iron oxide nanoparticles have drawn remarkable attention in biomedical applications such as MRI (as contrast agents) and magnetic hyperthermia [8,9]. Iron oxide exists mainly in the form of maghemite, magnetite and hematite. Maghemite and magnetite forms a spinel cubic structure, where Fe spins are distributed in tetrahedral and octahedral sites, which are magnetically coupled through double exchange. Both phases are ferrimagnetic in nature due to the opposite spins of A (tetrahedral) and B (octahedral) sites [10]. The magnetic properties of these particles are highly size dependent where below certain critical sizes the nanoparticles of both maghemite and magnetite possess superparamagnetic nature at room temperature. This property enables them to use in biomedical applications as they respond to external magnetic field and aggregation is avoided upon removal of external magnetic field [11].
The hematite is the most stable oxide of iron, which is commonly found in rocks and soil naturally. Because of its stability and low cost of mining hematite is most studied natural material for catalytic, gas sensor, electrochemical, inorganic pigments, and water purification applications [12,13]. Hematite is synthesised by various chemical and physical methods. Liu et al. was able to synthesize quasi, irregular cubic, parallel hexahedron sphere, nanosheet and hexagon shaped α-Fe2O3 structures using anions surfactants like OH–, Cl–, SO42–, NO3– and CH3COOH. They have shown that the magnetic and optical properties of α-Fe2O3 nanoparticles have a significant dependency on the shape of the nanoparticles [14]. The physical method of synthesis like ball mill results in a more active surface spin configuration of nanoparticles, which are evident through their magnetic properties [15].
Hematite (α-Fe2O3) exhibits antiferromagnetism and weak ferromagnetism behaviors below and the above the Morin temperature, respectively. Its crystal structure consists of hexagonal close-packed oxygen-sheets with two-third of octahedral interstices between the sheets filled with Fe3+. In antiferromagnetic crystalline (rhombohedral) hematite (α-Fe2O3), a spin-reorientation phenomenon (magnetic phase transition called the Morin transition) occurs at TM ≈ 263 K [16]. The Morin transition occurs due to the competition between the two different anisotropies with a comparable magnitude but with opposite signs. Below TM, the orientation of the two magnetic sublattices are directed toward the rhombohedral axis [111] and exactly antiparallel, and the material is an antiferromagnet. Above TM, due to the super-exchange interaction, the moments are in the basal plane (111) with slight canting from the antiferromagnetic axis [17]. This causes a small net magnetization, and thus the material becomes weakly ferromagnetic. The Morin transition temperature decreases with decreasing the particle size and tends to zero for the particles with size 10–20 nm or less [18,19,20,21]. Surface effects have a significant role in determining the TM value. α-Fe2O3 nanoparticles show superparamagnetic, weak-ferromagnetic, and antiferromagnetic behavior at different stages, and so, α-Fe2O3 nanoparticles are exciting materials for the fundamental research [20].
We have reported Morin transition for the α-Fe2O3 nanoparticles with respect to various cooling fields in temperature dependent magnetisation experiments. It was found that the Morin transition temperature is slightly field dependent, and it occurred around 250 K [22]. The extent of the transition was broad, and it was attributed to the wide distribution of sizes. The particles also possessed non-zero magnetisation in the antiferromagnetic state and significant magnetisation at room temperature. Attaining considerable ferromagnetic nature for hematite nanoparticles at room temperature is of paramount importance for the potential applications. The exchange bias is obtained by measuring the shift in the M-H (magnetisation versus applied magnetic field) hysteresis loop along the horizontal and vertical direction. Exchange bias is important property of the magnetic nanoparticles, which is required to be investigated, specifically to understand the origin of magnetism due to surface spins and interaction between the magnetic core and surface spins [23]. The hysteresis loop shift causes change in the HC (coercive field) when the ferromagnetic and antiferromagnetic systems are cooled in a magnetic field. Though the exchange bias effect were reported long back where various systems of magnetic interfaces were subjected to intense studies, the EB phenomena is not completely understood. The origin of EB is attributed to the exchange coupling between FM and AFM moments at the interfaces, which depends on the anisotropy energy. Here we report the temperature and field dependent EB of hematite nanoparticles with small maghemite phase fraction. It is observed that there is significant exchange bias on horizontal direction whereas the exchange bias on vertical direction is negligible.
The magnetisation vs applied magnetic field (M-H) plots were obtained at several temperatures in the field range of −5 to 5 T. The particles were cooled to the required temperatures in zero field and under field values of 1, 2, 3, and 4 T. The shift in the M-H hysteresis loop was used to obtain the exchange bias field. We have investigated the EB dependency on the temperature and applied cooling field in the hematite nanoparticles. The results presented in this study will help in understanding the origin of the exchange bias and in enhancing the room temperature magnetic properties of hematite nanoparticles. We have indicated ferrimagnetic (Maghemite) phase as ferromagnetic because of the similar response to the magnetic field.
Materials used in the synthesis are iron (III) nitrate nonahydrate at a rate of 98%, titanium (IV) n-butoxide (97%), 2-porpanol (99.7%), and propylene oxide (99%). All chemicals were obtained from Sigma Aldrich and were used as received. Hematite (α-Fe2O3) nanoparticles were synthesized by dissolving Fe(NO3)3‧9H2O salt in 2-propanol solvent and propylene oxide promotor which acts as condensing agent. In the synthesis method 10.7 g of iron salt was dissolved in 100 mL of 2-propanol and 25 mL propylene oxide mixture under constant stirring for 4 h. Upon continues stirring the solution turns into reddish-brown colloidal and it is further aged for 24 h followed by evaporation of the solvent at 80 ℃ in water bath. The brown precipitate is further washed with water and dried for 1 h at 120 ℃. Finally, the solid obtained is calcined at 350 and 500 ℃ for 1 and 4 h respectively.
The structure and morphology of the nanoparticles was determined by X-ray diffraction (XRD) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images. XRD characterization was carried out using a Shimadzu-6100 powder XRD diffractometer with Cu–Ka radiation with wavelength 1.542 Å. Diffraction data was obtained in an angle range of 20–80 deg with 1 deg/min scan rate. TEM images were obtained using the Philips electron microscope of CM10. The average crystalline size is calculated using Scherrer formula from the full width half maximum (FWHM) of highest intensity peak (110).
The dc magnetic measurements were carried out using a VSM in Physical Properties Measurement System (PPMS) from Quantum Design. The magnetization versus applied magnetic field (M-H) hysteresis loops were obtained both in the zero-field-cooled (ZFC) and field-cooled (FC) states. For the FC measurements, magnetic field values (HFC) of 1, 2, 3, 4 T field were applied while cooling the particles to the required temperature. All FC M-H loops were recorded in the field range of −5 to 5 T. The particles were cooled down from room temperature to 2, 30, 50, 70,100,150,200, and 300 K before obtaining each M-H plot at that particular temperature. From the M-H plots, we obtained the effect of temperature and HFC values on the horizontal and vertical shifts in the hysteresis loop. The shift in the field values is obtained with the uncertainty of ±1 Oe whereas the error associated with the magnetisation value obtained from the MH plot is ±0.0001 emu/g.
The XRD profile obtained from the sol-gel-synthesized hematite nanoparticles is shown in Figure 1. The diffraction pattern consists of peaks corresponding to α-Fe2O3 and small fraction of maghemite phase. Though it indicates the formation of mixed phase, the fraction of maghemite is low, which is evident from the intensity ratio of maghemite and hematite peaks. Using POWDER-CELL, the unit cell parameters were determined. The lattice dimensions are a = 5.0339 Å and c = 13.7866 Å with a cell volume of 302.5545 (Å)3. The XRD pattern obtained is in agreement with the expected XRD profile of α-Fe2O3 phase. By using FWHM of the highest intensity peak (110) corresponding to the α-Fe2O3 phase, the average crystallite size of the nanoparticles was obtained. From the XRD profile and using Scherrer formula, the mean diameter of the nanoparticles was calculated to be about 20 nm. The nanoparticles bright field TEM image is shown in Figure 2. The nanoparticles have a twisted spherical appearance and are broadly distributed in size. The size distribution histogram is obtained by measuring the individual nanoparticles sizes using sigma scan software and histogram is shown in Figure 2a, the average sizes of the nanoparticles is 17 nm and the size distribution is broad with significant number of particles having sizes of 11–13 nm.
Figure 3 displays the M-H hysteresis loops for hematite nanoparticles obtained at difference temperatures in the ZFC state and in the FC state at HFC = 1 T. Other M-H plots at various temperatures were obtained at HFC = 2, 3, and 4 T. For each hysteresis loop, the magnetization was measured by varying the magnetic field from −5 to 5 T.
For each hysteresis loop, the temperature was brought to 300 K and then cooled down to the particular temperature in zero applied magnetic field of under a specific HFC value. The hysteresis curve obtained at 300 K shows a loop indicating the ferromagnetic nature of the hematite nanoparticles, which is expected above the Morin transition temperature 250 K. The M-H loops obtained in the temperature range of 2 to 200 K display negligible hysteresis. Although below Morin transition temperature the hematite nanoparticles are expected to have zero magnetization, the observed negligible hysteresis behaviour is attributed to the small fraction of the maghemite phase. Similar paramagnetic behaviour of the hysteresis loops was observed at other cooling fields at temperatures below 200 K. The M-H plots were used to determine the horizontal and vertical exchange bias.
In the previous work [22], at several applied fields these hematite nanoparticles were conducted on zero-field-cooled (ZFC) and field-cooled (FC) temperature dependent magnetisation (M-T) measurements. Morin transition temperature was determined by calculating the first order derivative of magnetisation with respect to temperature (dM/dT). The Morin transition was found to occur at around 250 K. Morin transition showed a slight dependency on the applied magnetic field.
To determine the exchange bias, the shift in the M-H hysteresis loop from the origin was obtained. The enlarged M-H plots at the origin of the hysteresis loops are shown in Figure 4. As evident from the Figure 4, the shift in the hysteresis loops depend on both the field-cooling value and the temperature. The coercivity and exchange bias fields were calculated from the M-H hysteresis loops. The coercivity (or coercivity field, HC) is defined as the magnetic field value at which the magnetization becomes zero during M-H measurements. It is calculated using the Eq 1:
HC=|HC1−HC2|2 | (1) |
The exchange bias field (HEB) is obtained by the horizontal shift in the hysteresis loops, HEB. The exchange bias field, HEB was calculated using the following formula:
HEB=|HC1+HC2|2 | (2) |
The coercivity of the hematite nanoparticles was calculated by Eq 1. And the temperature-dependent coercivity plots are shown in Figure 5a where it can be seen that all curves display a similar behaviour. In both the ZFC state and FC state at all HFC values, the coercivity remains constant until 150 K and then increases slightly at 200 K followed by a sharp increase with the increase of temperature. As seen in Figure 5b, large coercivity values are obtained at room temperature (300 K), because of the ferromagnetic nature of the particles, which is induced by the relaxation of basal plane spins along the c-axis. Except at 200 K (where the coercivity is similar for all temperatures and HFC values), the coercivity in the ZFC state is always smaller than that in the FC state.
It can be seen in Figure 5b that there is a peak in coercivity at HFC = 3 T at nearly all temperatures. The peak is more pronounced at 300 K with HC value of 3352 Oe.
Figure 6 displays the exchange bias field (HEB) as function of temperature in the ZFC state and in the FC state at 1, 2, 3, 4 T field-cooling (HFC) values. From the temperature-dependent plots, it can be seen that HEB is negative in both the ZFC and the FC states at all HFC values up to 200 K and is positive at room temperature (300 K). HEB shows a non-monotonic behavior with the temperature under all HFC condition. HEB increases from 2–30 K and drops until 100 K.
It increases slightly above 100 K and increases sharply after 150 K, eventually becomes positive at 300 K. HEB has values of −1365 Oe at 2 K and 90 Oe at 300 K in the ZFC state. HEB remains constant up to 200 K with a value of −102 Oe and is positive at 300 K. At all temperatures, the HEB in the ZFC state is higher than that in the FC state.
The hematite nanoparticles possess significant ferromagnetism at room temperature, which is evident from the observed M-H loops. However, the significant M-H loop opening above the Morin transition temperature could be attributed to the exchange coupling of the (AFM) hematite and the (FM) maghemite phases with the spin-glass (SG) regions at the particle surfaces. The paramagnetic nature of the M-H plots (Figure 3) below 200 K can be attributed to the existence of a small fraction of maghemite phase, and a very slight (about 5%) nonmagnetic phase, which were confirmed by the XRD measurements.
The temperature dependence of the exchange bias in our sample is similar to those reported in iron oxide core-shell nanoparticles and in layered structures which include spin-glass phase [24,25]. Broken bonds and lattice distortions at the surface affect the coordination of surface cations leading to changes in their spin-orbit energy, and thus producing changes in the local magneto crystalline anisotropy [26,27]. Surface spin canting was suggested to occur due to the significant contribution to local magnetism caused by the low symmetry near the surface of the nanoparticles [28]. Hence, we suggest that surface spin freeze in random orientations and form spin glass (SG) clusters at the surface of the nanoparticles. The observed nonmonotonic temperature and field-cooling dependence exchange bias in our sample could be attributed to the exchange coupling between the AFM hematite and the FM maghemite nanoparticles mediated by a SG like phase. The surface SG phase prevents the direct exchange coupling between the nanoparticles. This SG phase is suggested to be composed of canted spins at the surfaces of both types of nanoparticles. These canted surface spins are oriented randomly with variable pinning strengths resulting in a nonmonotonic temperature and field behavior of the exchange bias.
It is very important to clarify two main points here. First, it was reported that exchange bias occurred in various combinations between ferromagnetic (FM), antiferromagnetic (AFM), canted AFM, ferrimagnetic (FIM), and spin glass (SG) magnetic phases [23,29,30,31,32]. It is very important to realize that we do not talk about direct FM/AFM exchange bias in our sample. We clearly emphasized that the nonmonotonic temperature and field dependent exchange bias is an indication of magnetic/Spin glass (SG) exchange coupling. In magnetic/SG systems, the exchange bias occurs when cooling through the transition temperature of the magnetic phase (TC, TN) or when cooling through the spin glass freezing temperature (TSG) [33,34]. In our system, we have seen direct signs of such spin glass signature in the ZFC/FC magnetization versus temperature measurements reported recently [22] where TSG is below 200 K. Hence, cooling down from 300 K is sufficient for the exchange bias to take place in our samples.
Second, it is correct that the magnetization hysteresis loops were not saturated (minor loops). We have conducted additional hysteresis measurement at room temperature where the field was swapped between ±9 T under zero field and several field-cooling values (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 T) and magnetization did not attain saturation as shown in Figure 7 (for the zero-field cooled and the 2 T-field-cooled state). The loops displayed small loop shifts of similar magnitudes to those obtained with the swapped field between ±5 T.
It is very important to point out that our calculations of HEB, MY and HC were based on the minor hysteresis loops. It is known that hysteresis loop shifts might occur due to the unsaturated magnetization loops (minor loops) and could lead to misinterpretation of the observation to be due to exchange bias effect [35,36]. However, this is a matter of controversy [37,38]. Nevertheless, it is very important to realize that obtaining hysteresis loop shifts from minor loops does not mean that exchange bias coupling is absent. In some cases, both effects (minor loops and magnetic exchange coupling) coexist and contribute to the loop shifts. In such cases, it is very difficult to isolate the contribution of either one. However, there are some signatures of the exchange coupling that are difficult to understand by considering only the effect of minor loop. As it is known, the magnitude of the minor loop shift depends on the maximum applied field (but smaller than the anisotropy field) reached in the hysteresis measurements. Changing the maximum field will result in different magnitude of loop shift. In some magnetic materials, it will not require large magnetic field to reach saturation magnetization. In antiferromagnetic materials were spin-flopping takes place reaching saturation magnetization requires the application of very large magnetic fields which are usually not available in normal laboratories. However, we believe that the loop shifts appeared in our magnetic measurements are not solely due to the minor hysteresis loops but also due to the magnetic exchange coupling [17]. We also believe that the behavior of the loop shifts as function of temperature and FC values is attributed only to the exchange bias coupling. In all our magnetic hysteresis measurements, the maximum field used was the same on the ascending and descending branches (−5 and 5 T) at all FC values and for all temperatures. In addition, the experiments were conducted under the same initial conditions. It is seen in Figure 6 that the magnitudes of the HEB in the ZFC state are clearly distinct from those in the FC state at all temperatures below TM. We believe that this effect is an indication of exchange bias coupling in these samples. On the other hand, the nonmonotonic dependence of HEB on the FC values and on temperature is attributed only to the exchange coupling. These nonmonotonic loop shifts with temperature and FC values indicate that the exchange coupling is due to magnetic exchange interaction across the FM (AFM)/SG interface and between the (FM) maghemite and (AFM) hematite nanoparticles mediated by disordered SG structures. These SG regions, have variable internal spin coupling (with multi-valley energies), and thus will display different response to temperature and to the field cooling leading to the nonmonotonic temperature and field dependence. Additionally, we have separated the FM magnetization component from the total magnetization (by subtracting the high field linear AFM contribution), we have obtained saturated ferromagnetic hysteresis loops that displayed horizontal and vertical loop shifts as shown in Figure 8 (for the zero-field-cooled state at 200,300 K). Hence, we believe that exchange bias contributed significantly towards the shifted FM loops. Of course, there could be another contribution due to the minor loops of the AFM loops. However, in this work, we focus on the behavior and trend of the exchange bias with temperature and field cooling which is due to real exchange coupling at the FM/SG interface (which resulted in the FM loop shifts).
The sol-gel method synthesized hematite nanoparticles were characterised by XRD and TEM. A small fraction of maghemite was observed in the XRD spectrum. The M-H plots were obtained by applying a magnetic field in the range of −5 to 5 T. The exchange bias in the ZFC state and in the FC state at various field-cooling values was calculated by measuring the shift in the M-H hysteresis loop from the origin. Significant HC, HEB values were observed at room temperature reflecting the significant exchange coupling interaction between the different magnetic phases mediated by SG regions that occur due to canted surface spins. The exchange bias and coercivity in our sample were attributed to the indirect magnetic exchange interaction between the AFM and FM nanoparticles mediated by SG regions.
The authors wish to thank University of Sharjah and Sharjah Research Academy for the Collaborative Research Grant #2101050262. The authors also thank the Research Institute of Medical and Health Sciences (RIMHS) at University of Sharjah.
All authors declare no conflicts of interest in this paper.
[1] |
Carr MKV (2011) The water relations and irrigation requirements of oil palm (Elaeis guineensis): A review. Exp Agric 47: 629-652. doi: 10.1017/S0014479711000494
![]() |
[2] | Kushairi A, Loh SK, Azman I, et al. (2018) Oil palm economic performance in Malaysia and r&d progress in 2017. J Oil Palm Res 30: 163-195. |
[3] |
Paterson RRM, Lima N (2018) Climate change affecting oil palm agronomy, and oil palm cultivation increasing climate change, require amelioration. Eco Evolut 8: 452-461. doi: 10.1002/ece3.3610
![]() |
[4] | Paterson RRM, Kumar L, Taylor S, et al. (2015) Future climate effects on suitability for growth of oil palms in Malaysia and Indonesia. Sci R 5: 1-11. |
[5] | Rosenani AB, Rovica R, Cheah PM, et al. (2016) Growth Performance and Nutrient Uptake of Oil Palm Seedling in Prenursery Stage as Influenced by Oil Palm Waste Compost in Growing Media. Int J Agron. |
[6] |
Awalludin MF, Sulaiman O, Hashim R, et al. (2015) An overview of the oil palm industry in Malaysia and its waste utilization through thermochemical conversion, specifically via liquefaction. Renew Sustain Energ Rev 50: 1469-1484. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2015.05.085
![]() |
[7] | Suresh K (2013) Adaptation and Mitigation Strategies for Climate-Resilient Oil Palm. India. Springer India 199-211. |
[8] |
Culman M, de Farias CM, Bayona C, et al. (2019) Using agrometeorological data to assist irrigation management in oil palm crops: A decision support method and results from crop model simulation. Agri Water Manage 213: 1047-1062. doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2018.09.052
![]() |
[9] | Noor MRM, Harun MH (2004) Importance of water use efficiency (WUE) in oil palm productivity. Oil Palm Bull 2004: 24-30. |
[10] |
Azzeme AM, Abdullah SNA, Aziz MA, et al. (2016) Oil palm leaves and roots differ in physiological response, antioxidant enzyme activities and expression of stress-responsive genes upon exposure to drought stress. Acta Physiol Plantarum 38: 52. doi: 10.1007/s11738-016-2073-2
![]() |
[11] |
Silva PA, Oliveira IV, Rodrigues KCB, et al. (2016) Leaf gas exchange and multiple enzymatic and non-enzymatic antioxidant strategies related to drought tolerance in two oil palm hybrids. Trees 30: 203-214. doi: 10.1007/s00468-015-1289-x
![]() |
[12] | Suresh K, Nagamani C, Ramachandrudu K, et al. (2010) Gas-exchange characteristics, leaf water potential and chlorophyll a fluorescence in oil palm (Elaeis guineensis Jacq.) seedlings under water stress and recovery. Photosynthetica 48: 430-436. |
[13] | Bahrami-Rad S, Hajiboland R (2017) Effect of potassium application in drought-stressed tobacco (Nicotiana rustica L.) plants: Comparison of root with foliar application. Ann Agric Sci 62: 121-130. |
[14] |
Martineau E, Domec JC, Bosc A, et al. (2017) The effects of potassium nutrition on water use in field-grown maize (Zea mays L.). Environ Exp Botany 134: 62-71. doi: 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2016.11.004
![]() |
[15] |
Mohd Zain NA, Ismail MR (2016) Effects of potassium rates and types on growth, leaf gas exchange and biochemical changes in rice (Oryza sativa) planted under cyclic water stress. Agric Water Manage 164: 83-90. doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2015.09.022
![]() |
[16] |
Zahoor R, Dong H, Abid M, et al. (2017) Potassium fertilizer improves drought stress alleviation potential in cotton by enhancing photosynthesis and carbohydrate metabolism. Environ Exp Botany 137: 73-83. doi: 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2017.02.002
![]() |
[17] |
Daliparthy J, Barker AV, Mondal SS (1994) Potassium fractions with other nutrients in crops: A review focusing on the tropics. J Plant Nutri 17: 1859-1886. doi: 10.1080/01904169409364852
![]() |
[18] | Hu W, Yang J, Meng Y, et al. (2015) Potassium application affects carbohydrate metabolism in the leaf subtending the cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) boll and its relationship with boll biomass. Field Crops Res 179: 120-131. |
[19] |
Hafeez A, Ali S, Ma X, et al. (2018) Potassium to nitrogen ratio favors photosynthesis in late-planted cotton at high planting density. Ind Crops Prod 124: 369-381. doi: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2018.08.006
![]() |
[20] | Mengel K (2016). Potassium. In Handbook of plant nutrition. CRC Press 107-136. |
[21] |
Peoples TR, Koch DW (1979) Role of Potassium in Carbon Dioxide Assimilation in Medicago sativa L. Plant Physiol 63: 878-881. doi: 10.1104/pp.63.5.878
![]() |
[22] |
Sangakkara UR, Frehner M, Nösberger J (2000) Effect of soil moisture and potassium fertilizer on shoot water potential, photosynthesis and partitioning of carbon in mungbean and cowpea. J Agron Crop Sci 185: 201-207. doi: 10.1046/j.1439-037x.2000.00422.x
![]() |
[23] |
Ibrahim HM, Jaafar ZEH, Karimi E, et al. (2012) Primary, Secondary Metabolites, Photosynthetic Capacity and Antioxidant Activity of the Malaysian Herb Kacip Fatimah (Labisia Pumila Benth) Exposed to Potassium Fertilization under Greenhouse Conditions. Int J Mol Sci 13: 15321-15342. doi: 10.3390/ijms131115321
![]() |
[24] | Bocianowski J, Szulc P, Tratwal A, et al. (2016) The influence of potassium to mineral fertilizers on the maize health. J Int Agric15: 1286-1292. |
[25] | Baque MA, Karim MA. Hamid A, et al. (2006) Effects of fertilizer potassium on growth, yield and nutrient uptake of wheat (Triticum aestivum) under water stress conditions. S Pacif Stud 27: 25-35. |
[26] | Aboelill AA, Mehanna HM, Kassab OM, et al. (2012) The response of peanut crop to foliar spraying with potassium under water stress conditions. Aus J Basic Appl Sci 6: 626-634. |
[27] | Vijiandran JR, Husni MHA. Teh CBS, et al. (2017) Nutrient losses through runoff from several types of fertilisers under mature oil palm. Malays J Soil Sci 21: 113-121. |
[28] | Wahid MB, Simeh MA (2009) Issues related to production cost of palm oil in Malaysia. Oil Palm Indus Econ J 9: 1-12. |
[29] | MPOB (2013) Oil Palm Biology: Facts & Figures. Kuala Lumpur: Malays Palm Oil Board 40-41. |
[30] | Klapwijk D, Lint PJAL (1974) Fresh weight and flowering of tomato plants as influecend by container type and watering conditions. Acta Hortic 23: 237-248. |
[31] | MPOB (2017) Oil palm Vegetative Measurements Manual. Kuala Lumpur. Malays Palm Oil Board 50-65. |
[32] |
Weatherly P (1950) Studies in the water relations of the cotton plant. New Phytol 49: 81-97. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.1950.tb05146.x
![]() |
[33] |
Jaafar HZE, Ibrahim MH, Fakri NFM (2012) Impact of soil field water capacity on secondary metabolites, phenylalanine ammonia-lyase (PAL), maliondialdehyde (MDA) and photosynthetic responses of Malaysian Kacip Fatimah (Labisia pumila Benth). Molecules 17: 7305-7322. doi: 10.3390/molecules17067305
![]() |
[34] | Zainuren NF, Ibrahim MH, Abdullah CAC, et al. (2019) Growth, Carbon Assimilation and Quality of Kesum (Persicaria minor) as Exposed to Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles. Annual Res Rev Biol 2019: 1-15. |
[35] |
Bates LS, Waldren RP, Teare ID (1973) Rapid determination of free proline for water-stress studies. Plant and Soil 39: 205-207. doi: 10.1007/BF00018060
![]() |
[36] | Ibrahim MH, Jaafar HZE, Rahmat A, et al. (2012) Involvement of Nitrogen on Flavonoids, Glutathione, Anthocyanin, Ascorbic Acid and Antioxidant Activities of Malaysian Medicinal Plant Labisia pumila Blume (Kacip Fatimah). Int J Mol Sci 13: 393-408. |
[37] | Ibrahim MH, Jaafar HZE, Rahmat A, et al. (2011) The relationship between phenolics and flavonoids production with total non structural carbohydrate and photosynthetic rate in Labisia pumila Benth. under high CO2 and nitrogen fertilization. Molecules 16: 162-174. |
[38] |
Boutraa T, Akhkha A, Al-Shoaibi AA, et al. (2010) Effect of water stress on growth and water use efficiency (WUE) of some wheat cultivars (Triticum durum) grown in Saudi Arabia. J Taibah Univ Sci 3: 39-48. doi: 10.1016/S1658-3655(12)60019-3
![]() |
[39] |
Litvin AG, Van Iersel MW, Malladi A (2016) Drought stress reduces stem elongation and alters gibberellin-related gene expression during vegetative growth of tomato. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 141: 591-597. doi: 10.21273/JASHS03913-16
![]() |
[40] | Riaz A, Younis A, Taj AR, et al. (2013) Effect of drought stress on growth and flowering of marigold (Tagetes erecta L.). Pak J Bot 45: 123-131. |
[41] |
Hussain M, Farooq S, Hasan W, et al. (2018) Drought stress in sunflower: Physiological effects and its management through breeding and agronomic alternatives. Agri Water Manage 201: 152-166. doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2018.01.028
![]() |
[42] | Anjum S, Xie X, Wang L, et al. (2011) Morphological, physiological and biochemical responses of plants to drought stress. Afr J Agr Res 6: 2026-2032. |
[43] | Rivera-Mendes YD, Cuenca JC, Romero HM (2016) Physiological responses of oil palm (Elaeis guineensis Jacq.) seedlings under different water soil conditions. Agrono Colombiana 34: 163. |
[44] | Chartzoulakis K, Noitsakis B, Therios I (1993) Photosynthesis, plant growth and dry matter distribution in kiwifruit as influenced by water deficits. Irrigat Sci 14: 1-5. |
[45] | Hailemichael G, Catalina A, González M, et al. (2016) Relationships between water status, leaf chlorophyll content and photosynthetic performance in Tempranillo vineyards. S Afr J Enol Vitic 37: 149-156. |
[46] | Malika LY, Deshabandu KSHT, De Costa WAJM, et al. (2019) Physiological traits determining tolerance to intermittent drought in the Capsicum annuum complex. Sci Hortic246: 21-33. |
[47] | Zhang S, Xu X, Sun Y, et al. (2018) Influence of drought hardening on the resistance physiology of potato seedlings under drought stress. J Int Agric17: 336-347. |
[48] |
Oddo E, Inzerillo S, Grisafi F, et al. (2014) Does short-term potassium fertilization improve recovery from drought stress in laurel? Tree Physiol 34: 906-913. doi: 10.1093/treephys/tpt120
![]() |
[49] |
De Sá AFL, Valeri SV, Da Cruz MCP, et al. (2014) Effects of potassium application and soil moisture on the growth of Corymbia citriodora plants. Cerne 20: 645-651. doi: 10.1590/01047760201420041422
![]() |
[50] |
Fauzi WR, Putra ETS (2019) Dampak Pemberian Kalium Dan Cekaman Kekeringan Terhadap Serapan Hara Dan Produksi Biomassa Bibit Kelapa Sawit (Elaeis Gueenensis Jacq.). J Penelitian Kelapa Sawit 27: 41-56. doi: 10.22302/iopri.jur.jpks.v27i1.74
![]() |
[51] | Jordan-Meille L, Martineau E, Bornot Y, et al. (2018) How Does Water-Stressed Corn Respond to Potassium Nutrition? A Shoot-Root Scale Approach Study under Controlled Conditions. Agriculture 8: 180. |
[52] | Huda AI, El-Behairy UA, El-Desuki M, et al. (2010) Response of green bean to fertilization with potassium and magnesium. Res J Agric Biol Sci 6: 834-839. |
[53] | Nazli F, Bushra, Iqbal MM, et al. (2018) Modeling the potassium requirements of potato crop for yield and quality optimization. Asian J Agric Biol 6: 169-180. |
[54] |
Ortas I (2018) Influence of potassium and magnesium fertilizer application on the yield and nutrient accumulation of maize genotypes under field conditions. J Plant Nutri 41: 330-339. doi: 10.1080/01904167.2017.1385800
![]() |
[55] |
Chen H, Wang P, Li J, et al. (2012) Canopy Spectral Reflectance Feature and Leaf Water Potential of Sugarcane Inversion. Physics Procedia 25: 595-600. doi: 10.1016/j.phpro.2012.03.131
![]() |
[56] |
El-Hendawy SE, Al-Suhaibani NA, Elsayed S, et al. (2019) Potential of the existing and novel spectral reflectance indices for estimating the leaf water status and grain yield of spring wheat exposed to different irrigation rates. Agri Water Manage 217: 356-373. doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2019.03.006
![]() |
[57] |
Ma X, He Q, Zhou G (2018) Sequence of Changes in Maize Responding to Soil Water Deficit and Related Critical Thresholds. Fron Plant Sci 9: 511. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2018.00511
![]() |
[58] |
Hsiao TC (1973) Plant responses to water stress. Ann Rev Plant Physio 24: 519-570. doi: 10.1146/annurev.pp.24.060173.002511
![]() |
[59] | Reddy PS (2019) "Breeding for Abiotic Stress Resistance in Sorghum." Breeding Sorghum for Diverse End Uses. Woodh Publ 2019: 325-340. |
[60] | Ju Y, Yue X, Zhao X, et al. (2018) Physiological, micro-morphological and metabolomic analysis of grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.) leaf of plants under water stress. Plant Physiol Bioch 130: 501-510. |
[61] | Jamaludin D, Abd Aziz S, Ahmad D, et al. (2015) Impedance analysis of Labisia pumila plant water status. Infor Process Agric 2: 161-168. |
[62] |
Gautam A, Agrawal D, SaiPrasad SV, et al. (2014) A quick method to screen high and low yielding wheat cultivars exposed to high temperature. Physiol Mol Biol Plant 20: 533-537. doi: 10.1007/s12298-014-0252-4
![]() |
[63] |
Kalaji HM, Carpentier R, Allakhverdiev SI, et al. (2012) Fluorescence parameters as early indicators of light stress in barley. J Photoch Photobio 112: 1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2012.03.009
![]() |
[64] |
Maxwell K, Johnson GN (2000) Chlorophyll fluorescence-a practical guide. J Exp Bot 51: 659-668. doi: 10.1093/jexbot/51.345.659
![]() |
[65] |
Živčák M, Brestič M, Olšovská K, et al. (2008) Performance index as a sensitive indicator of water stress in Triticum aestivum L. Plant Soil Environ 54: 133-139. doi: 10.17221/392-PSE
![]() |
[66] |
Liu B, Liang J, Tang G, et al. (2019) Drought stress affects on growth, water use efficiency, gas exchange and chlorophyll fluorescence of Juglans rootstocks. Sci Hortic 250: 230-235. doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2019.02.056
![]() |
[67] |
Naidoo G, Naidoo KK (2018) Drought stress effects on gas exchange and water relations of the invasive weed Chromolaena odorata. Flora 248: 1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.flora.2018.08.008
![]() |
[68] |
Zain NAM, Ismail MR, Mahmood M, et al. (2014) Alleviation of water stress effects on mr220 rice by application of periodical water stress and potassium fertilization. Molecules 19: 1795-1819. doi: 10.3390/molecules19021795
![]() |
[69] |
Mohammadian R, Rahimian H, Moghaddam M, et al. (2003) The effect of early season drought on chlorophyll a fluorescence in sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.). Pakistan J Biol Sci 6: 1763-1769. doi: 10.3923/pjbs.2003.1763.1769
![]() |
[70] |
Zlatev Z (2009) Drought-induced changes in chlorophyll fluorescence of young wheat plants. Biotech Biotec Equip 23: 438-441. doi: 10.1080/13102818.2009.10818458
![]() |
[71] |
Meng L, Song JF, Wen J, et al. (2016) Effects of drought stress on fluorescence characteristics of photosystem II in leaves of Plectranthus scutellarioides. Photosynthetica 54: 414-421. doi: 10.1007/s11099-016-0191-0
![]() |
[72] |
Wang XM, Wang XK, Su YB, et al. (2019) Land pavement depresses photosynthesis in urban trees especially under drought stress. Sci Total Environ 653: 120-130. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.10.281
![]() |
[73] |
Li Y, Song H, Zhou L, et al. (2019) Tracking chlorophyll fluorescence as an indicator of drought and rewatering across the entire leaf lifespan in a maize field. Agri Water Manage 211: 190-201. doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2018.09.050
![]() |
[74] |
Ma P, Bai T, Ma F (2015) Effects of progressive drought on photosynthesis and partitioning of absorbed light in apple trees. J Int Agric 14: 681-690. doi: 10.1016/S2095-3119(14)60871-6
![]() |
[75] | Gómez-del-Campo M, Ruiz C, Lissarrague JR (2002) Effect of water stress on leaf area development, photosynthesis, and productivity in Chardonnay and Airén grapevines. Am J Enol Viticult 53: 138-143. |
[76] |
Zargar SM, Gupta N, Nazir M, et al. (2017) Impact of drought on photosynthesis: Molecular perspective. Plant Gene 11: 154-159. doi: 10.1016/j.plgene.2017.04.003
![]() |
[77] | Oosterhuis DM, Loka DA, Kawakam EM, et al. (2014) "The physiology of potassium in crop production." Advances in agronomy. Academic Press 126: 203-233. |
[78] | Armstrong DL, Griffin KP (1998) Better crops with plant food. Int Pl Nutri Institute 3. |
[79] | Vyas SP, Garg BK, Kathju S, et al. (2001) Influence of potassium on water relations, photosynthesis, nitrogen metabolism and yield of clusterbean under soil moisture stress. Indian J Plant Physiol 6: 30-37. |
[80] | Farooq M, Hussain M, Wahid A, et al. (2012) Drought Stress in Plants: An Overview BT - Plant Responses to Drought Stress: From Morphological to Molecular Features. Berlin, Heidelberg. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 1-33. |
[81] | Osakabe Y, Osakabe K, Shinozaki K, et al. (2014) Response of plants to water stress. Front Pl Sci 5: 86. |
[82] |
Miyashita K, Tanakamaru S, Maitani T, et al. (2005) Recovery responses of photosynthesis, transpiration, and stomatal conductance in kidney bean following drought stress. Environ Exp Botany 53: 205-214. doi: 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2004.03.015
![]() |
[83] | Matthews LR (1986) The effect of water stress on the leaf area of Cucumis melo (Master thesis).Texas Tech University. Lubbock. United states. |
[84] | Klamkowski K, Treder W (2008) Response to drought stress of three strawberry cultivars grown under greenhouse conditions. J Fruit Ornam Pl Res 16: 179-188. |
[85] | Bolat I, Dikilitas M, Ercisli S, et al. (2014) The effect of water stress on some morphological, physiological, and biochemical characteristics and bud success on apple and quince rootstocks. The Sci World J 2014: 769732. |
[86] |
Tominaga J, Shimada H, Kawamitsu Y (2018) Direct measurement of intercellular CO2 concentration in a gas-exchange system resolves overestimation using the standard method. J Exp Bot 69: 1981-1991. doi: 10.1093/jxb/ery044
![]() |
[87] |
Kelly JWG, Duursma RA, Atwell BJ, et al. (2016) Drought×CO2 interactions in trees: a test of the low-intercellular CO2 concentration (Ci) mechanism. New Phytol 209: 1600-1612. doi: 10.1111/nph.13715
![]() |
[88] |
Warren CR, Livingston NJ, Turpin DH (2004) Water stress decreases the transfer conductance of Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) seedlings. Tree Physiol 24: 971-979. doi: 10.1093/treephys/24.9.971
![]() |
[89] |
Guo YY, Yu HY, Yang MM, et al. (2018) Effect of Drought Stress on Lipid Peroxidation, Osmotic Adjustment and Antioxidant Enzyme Activity of Leaves and Roots of Lycium ruthenicum Murr. Seedling. Russ J Plant Physiol 65: 244-250. doi: 10.1134/S1021443718020127
![]() |
[90] | Toscano S, Farieri E, Ferrante A, et al. (2016) Physiological and Biochemical Responses in Two Ornamental Shrubs to Drought Stress. Front Plant Sci 7: 645. |
[91] | Chrysargyris A, Drouza C, Tzortzakis N (2017) Optimization of potassium fertilization/nutrition for growth, physiological development, essential oil composition and antioxidant activity of Lavandula angustifolia Mill. J Soil Sci Plant Nutri 17: 291-306. |
[92] | Siddiqui MH, Al-Whaibi MH, Sakran AM, et al. (2012) Effect of calcium and potassium on antioxidant system of Vicia faba L. Under cadmium stress. Int J Mol Sci 13: 6604-6619. |
[93] | Su D, Chen N, Gao T, et al. (2012) Effects of Si+, K+, and Ca2+ on antioxidant enzyme activities and osmolytes in Halocnemum strobilaceum under salt stress. Adv Mat Res 56: 2542-2550. |
[94] | Hasanuzzaman M, Bhuyan MHMB, Nahar K, et al. (2018) Potassium: A vital regulator of plant responses and tolerance to abiotic stresses. Agron 8. |
[95] |
Ma L, Shi Y (2011) Effects of potassium fertilizer on physiological and biochemical index of Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni. Energ Procedia 5: 581-586. doi: 10.1016/j.egypro.2011.03.102
![]() |
[96] | El-Mogy MM, Salama AM, Mohamed HFY, et al. (2019) Responding of long green pepper plants to different sources of foliar potassium fertiliser. Agriculture 65: 59-76. |
[97] |
Nguyen PM, Kwee EM, Niemeyer ED (2010) Potassium rate alters the antioxidant capacity and phenolic concentration of basil (Ocimum basilicum L.) leaves. Food Chem 123: 1235-1241. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2010.05.092
![]() |
[98] | Zhang W, Zhang X, Wang Y, et al. (2018) Potassium fertilization arrests malate accumulation and alters soluble sugar metabolism in apple fruit. Biol Open 7. |
[99] |
Klunklin W, Savage G (2017) Effect on Quality Characteristics of Tomatoes Grown Under Well-Watered and Drought Stress Conditions. Foods 6: 56. doi: 10.3390/foods6080056
![]() |
[100] |
Mathesius U (2018) Flavonoid Functions in Plants and Their Interactions with Other Organisms. Plants 7: 30. doi: 10.3390/plants7020030
![]() |
[101] | Yuan Y, Liu Y, Wu C, et al. (2012) Water Deficit Affected Flavonoid Accumulation by Regulating Hormone Metabolism in Scutellaria baicalensis Georgi Roots. Plos One 7. |
[102] |
Munene R, Changamu E, Korir N, et al. (2017) Effects of different nitrogen forms on growth, phenolics, flavonoids and antioxidant activity in amaranth species. Trop Plant Res 4: 81-89. doi: 10.22271/tpr.2017.v4.i1.012
![]() |
[103] |
Salas-Pérez L, Fornari-Reale T, Preciado-Rangel P, et al. (2018) Cultivar Variety and Added Potassium Influence the Nutraceutical and Antioxidant Content in Hydroponically Grown Basil (Ocimum basilicum L.). Agron 8: 13. doi: 10.3390/agronomy8020013
![]() |
1. | Hur Abbas, K Nadeem, J Hester, M F Pervez, S Yick, M Kostylev, Ilse Letofsky-Papst, B Ali, C Ulrich, H Krenn, Competing magnetic states and M–H loop splitting in core–shell NiO nanoparticles, 2022, 33, 0957-4484, 345711, 10.1088/1361-6528/ac6dc3 | |
2. | R.N. Bhowmik, G. Kishor, Divya Sherin, Amit Kumar, P.D. Babu, S.M. Yusuf, Effects of intrinsic and extrinsic multi-phased lattice structure and chemical heterogeneity on the control of ferrimagnetic properties in Co rich spinel ferrite, 2023, 588, 03048853, 171412, 10.1016/j.jmmm.2023.171412 |