Commentary Special Issues

Letter to editor: Human biological monitoring of mercury for exposure assessment

  • Citation: SMJ Mortazavi, Ghazal Mortazavi, Maryam Paknahad. Letter to editor: Human biological monitoring of mercury for exposure assessment[J]. AIMS Environmental Science, 2017, 4(3): 456-457. doi: 10.3934/environsci.2017.3.456

    Related Papers:

    [1] Romilda Z. Boerleider, Nel Roeleveld, Paul T.J. Scheepers . Human biological monitoring of mercury for exposure assessment. AIMS Environmental Science, 2017, 4(2): 251-276. doi: 10.3934/environsci.2017.2.251
    [2] Theresa Vertigan, Kriya Dunlap, Arleigh Reynolds, Lawrence Duffy . Effects of Methylmercury exposure in 3T3-L1 Adipocytes. AIMS Environmental Science, 2017, 4(1): 94-111. doi: 10.3934/environsci.2017.1.94
    [3] Kayla L. Penta, Diego Altomare, Devon L. Shirley, Jennifer F. Nyland . Female immune system is protected from effects of prenatal exposure to mercury. AIMS Environmental Science, 2015, 2(3): 448-463. doi: 10.3934/environsci.2015.3.448
    [4] Alma Sobrino-Figueroa, Sergio H. Álvarez Hernandez, Carlos Álvarez Silva C . Evaluation of the freshwater copepod Acanthocyclops americanus (Marsh, 1983) (Cyclopidae) response to Cd, Cr, Cu, Hg, Mn, Ni and Pb. AIMS Environmental Science, 2020, 7(6): 449-463. doi: 10.3934/environsci.2020029
    [5] Judy Choi, Thit Aarøe Mørck, Anke Joas, Lisbeth E. Knudsen . Major national human biomonitoring programs in chemical exposure assessment. AIMS Environmental Science, 2015, 2(3): 782-802. doi: 10.3934/environsci.2015.3.782
    [6] PA Stapleton . Toxicological considerations of nano-sized plastics. AIMS Environmental Science, 2019, 6(5): 367-378. doi: 10.3934/environsci.2019.5.367
    [7] Patricia Morcillo, Maria Angeles Esteban, Alberto Cuesta . Mercury and its toxic effects on fish. AIMS Environmental Science, 2017, 4(3): 386-402. doi: 10.3934/environsci.2017.3.386
    [8] Cyril A. Cabello, Nelfa D. Canini, Barbara C. Lluisma . Water quality assessment of Dodiongan Falls in Bonbonon, Iligan City, Philippines. AIMS Environmental Science, 2022, 9(4): 526-537. doi: 10.3934/environsci.2022031
    [9] Gytautas Ignatavičius, Murat H. Unsal, Peter E. Busher, Stanisław Wołkowicz, Jonas Satkūnas, Giedrė Šulijienė, Vaidotas Valskys . Geochemistry of mercury in soils and water sediments. AIMS Environmental Science, 2022, 9(3): 277-297. doi: 10.3934/environsci.2022019
    [10] Francesco Teodori . Health physics calculation framework for environmental impact assessment of radiological contamination. AIMS Environmental Science, 2021, 8(4): 403-420. doi: 10.3934/environsci.2021026


  • To the Editor,

    With great interest, we have read the article by Romilda et al. entitled "Human biological monitoring of mercury for exposure assessment" that is published in the journal of AIMS Environmental Science Volume 4, Issue 2, 251–276 [1]. In this article, the authors have reviewed the different human biological monitoring (HBM) approaches for short-and long-term exposure to different chemical forms of mercury. The paper authored by Romilda et al. is a well-structured article which can be considered a significant contribution in this field. However, this commentary addresses another aspect of Hg biomonitoring and human health. Today, growing advances in modern technologies such as telecommunication and the rapid rise in the use of wireless systems have drastically increased the human exposure to different sources of electromagnetic fields (EMFs). Over the past several years, we have shown that dental amalgam fillings exposed to EMFs produced by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or those generated by very common sources such as mobile phones and Wi-Fi routers, show higher levels of mercury release from dental amalgam restorations [2,3]. It is worth noting that our experiments were not limited to in-vitro studies (using extracted teeth) [4] and our in-vivo [2,3] studies showed the same findings. Furthermore, it cannot be claimed that in our studies the release of mercury from dental amalgam fillings was under the influence of electromagnetic fields which cannot be extrapolated to in-vivo data from human biomonitoring (blood, urine, hair). Due to great advances in telecommunication technology and wireless systems, people are now continuously exposed to inescapable manmade electromagnetic fields in in the home or workplace.

    Findings obtained by other researchers who later studied the microleakage of amalgam further confirmed the results of our early studies which indicated EMF-induced accelerated mercury release [5,6]. Furthermore, moving to the high energy ionizing portion of the wide spectrum of electromagnetic fields, it was shown that x-rays are also capable of increasing the mercury release from dental amalgam fillings [7]. It should be noted that the mercury levels which normally are released from amalgam fillings, even in the EMFs are present, are not high enough to cause toxicity. However, hypersensitive subpopulation, pregnant women and children may be affected by these low levels of mercury. Mortazavi and Mortazavi have recently reviewed these findings [8]. Considering the evidence provided above, the role of modern telecommunication technology and the substantial evidence which shows the role of exposure to EMFs on the release of mercury from dental amalgam restorations should be taken into account in future studies.


    Conflict of interest

    The authors declare there is no conflict of interest.


    [1] Romilda ZB, Nel R, Paul TJS (2017) Human biological monitoring of mercury for exposure assessment. AIMS Environmental Science 4: 251-276. doi: 10.3934/environsci.2017.2.251
    [2] Mortazavi SMJ, Neghab M, Anoosheh SMH, et al. (2014) High-field MRI and mercury release from dental amalgam fillings. Int J Occup Environ Med 5: 316-101-5.
    [3] Mortazavi SM, Daiee E, Yazdi A, et al. (2008) Mercury release from dental amalgam restorations after magnetic resonance imaging and following mobile phone use. Pak J Biol Sci 11: 1142-1146. doi: 10.3923/pjbs.2008.1142.1146
    [4] Paknahad M, Mortazavi SMJ, Shahidi S, et al. (2016) Effect of radiofrequency radiation from Wi-Fi devices on mercury release from amalgam restorations. J Environ Health 14: 12.
    [5] Yilmaz S, Misirlioglu M (2013) The effect of 3 T MRI on microleakage of amalgam restorations. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 42: 20130072. doi: 10.1259/dmfr.20130072
    [6] Shahidi SH, Bronoosh P, Alavi AA, et al. (2009) Effect of magnetic resonance imaging on microleakage of amalgam restorations: an in vitro study. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 38: 470-474. doi: 10.1259/dmfr/30077669
    [7] Kursun S, Öztas B, Atas H, et al. (2014) Effects of X-rays and magnetic resonance imaging on mercury release from dental amalgam into artificial saliva. Oral Radiol 30: 142-146. doi: 10.1007/s11282-013-0154-0
    [8] Mortazavi G, Mortazavi SMJ (2015) Increased Mercury Release from Dental Amalgam Restorations after Exposure to Electromagnetic Fields as a Potential Hazard for Hypersensitive People and Pregnant Women. Rev Environ Health 30: 287-292.
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2017 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(4452) PDF downloads(750) Cited by(0)

Article outline

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog