Our paper reviews the current understanding of mercury in the environment of soil and sediment, including sampling, mobilization phases and analyzing methods. As a dangerous trace element, mercury has been shown to have several harmful effects on the environment. Mercury is released into the environment in a variety of chemical forms by both geogenic and human activities, with the majority of it coming from anthropogenic sources. It is affected by environmental conditions such as pH, redox potential, light and temperature-all of which determine its final chemical form-reactivity and toxicity. Methylmercury is considered one of the most poisonous forms found in nature. Considering the methodologies of the studies carried out we have found that the best technique for preserving methylmercury in soil and sediment samples is to freeze it immediately after collection. Organically rich soils are related to higher total mercury levels. Plants, such as Solanum nigrum (BR3) and Cynodon dactylon (BR2), can play an important role in mercury transport and accumulation. Solid-phase selenium causes faster demethylation and slower methylation of mercury. Methylmercury can increase by climate change and thawing; arctic permafrost is a potential source of Hg. Chemical vapor generation inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry was used to develop a simple and quick method for measuring methylmercury; ultrasonic agitation and HNO3 were used for the process, the last of which proved to be the most efficient for selective extraction of methylmercury.
Citation: Gytautas Ignatavičius, Murat H. Unsal, Peter E. Busher, Stanisław Wołkowicz, Jonas Satkūnas, Giedrė Šulijienė, Vaidotas Valskys. Geochemistry of mercury in soils and water sediments[J]. AIMS Environmental Science, 2022, 9(3): 277-297. doi: 10.3934/environsci.2022019
Our paper reviews the current understanding of mercury in the environment of soil and sediment, including sampling, mobilization phases and analyzing methods. As a dangerous trace element, mercury has been shown to have several harmful effects on the environment. Mercury is released into the environment in a variety of chemical forms by both geogenic and human activities, with the majority of it coming from anthropogenic sources. It is affected by environmental conditions such as pH, redox potential, light and temperature-all of which determine its final chemical form-reactivity and toxicity. Methylmercury is considered one of the most poisonous forms found in nature. Considering the methodologies of the studies carried out we have found that the best technique for preserving methylmercury in soil and sediment samples is to freeze it immediately after collection. Organically rich soils are related to higher total mercury levels. Plants, such as Solanum nigrum (BR3) and Cynodon dactylon (BR2), can play an important role in mercury transport and accumulation. Solid-phase selenium causes faster demethylation and slower methylation of mercury. Methylmercury can increase by climate change and thawing; arctic permafrost is a potential source of Hg. Chemical vapor generation inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry was used to develop a simple and quick method for measuring methylmercury; ultrasonic agitation and HNO3 were used for the process, the last of which proved to be the most efficient for selective extraction of methylmercury.
| [1] | Skrobonja A (2019) Formation, uptake, and bioaccumulation of methylmercury in coastal seas - a Baltic Sea case study. Doctoral Dissertation, Umea University. http://umu.diva-portal.org/ |
| [2] |
Kwasigroch U, Bełdowska M, Jędruch A, et al. (2021) Distribution and bioavailability of mercury in the surface sediments of the Baltic Sea. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28: 35690-35708. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-13023-4 doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-13023-4
|
| [3] |
Siedlewicz G, Korejwo E, Szubska M, et al. (2020) Presence of mercury and methylmercury in Baltic Sea sediments, collected in ammunition dumpsites, Marine Environmental Research 162: 105158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marenvres.2020.105158 doi: 10.1016/j.marenvres.2020.105158
|
| [4] | Manzetti S (2020) Heavy metal pollution in the Baltic Sea, from the North European coast to the Baltic states, Finland and the Swedish coastline to Norway, Doctoral Dissertation. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.11144.85769/1 |
| [5] |
Bełdowska M, Saniewska D, Falkowska, L (2014) Factors influencing variability of mercury input to the Southern Baltic Sea. Mar Pollut Bull 86: 283-290. http://doi:10.1016/j.marpolbul.2014.07.004 doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2014.07.004
|
| [6] | Kocman D, Horvat M, Pirrone N, et al. (2013) Contribution of contaminated sites to the global mercury budget. Environ. Res. 125: 160-170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2012.12.011 |
| [7] |
Panagos P, Jiskra M, Borrelli P, et al. (2021) Mercury in European topsoils: Anthropogenic sources, stocks and fluxes. Environmental Research 201: 111556. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2021.111556 doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2021.111556
|
| [8] | SedNet, Objectives of Sediment and its management, 2021. Available From: https://sednet.org/about/objectives/. |
| [9] |
Li C, Quan Q, Gan Y, et al. (2020) Effects of heavy metals on microbial communities in sediments and establishment of bioindicators based on microbial taxa and function for environmental monitoring and management. Science of The Total Environment 749: 141555. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141555 doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141555
|
| [10] |
Szymczycha B, Miotk M, Pempkowiak J (2013) Submarine Groundwater Discharge as a Source of Mercury in the Bay of Puck, the Southern Baltic Sea. Water Air Soils Pollut 224: 1542. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-013-1542-0 doi: 10.1007/s11270-013-1542-0
|
| [11] |
Leipe T, Moros M, Kotilainen A, et al. (2013) Mercury in Baltic Sea sediments-Natural background and anthropogenic impact, Geochemistry 73: 249-259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemer.2013.06.005 doi: 10.1016/j.chemer.2013.06.005
|
| [12] | Helcom (2018) State of the Baltic Sea - Second HELCOM holistic assessment 2011-2016. Baltic Sea Environment Proceedings 155: 1-155. |
| [13] |
Bełdowska M, Jędruch A, Łęczyński L, et al. (2016) Coastal erosion as a source of mercury into the marine environment along the Polish Baltic shore. Environ Sci Pollut Res 23: 16372-16382. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-016-6753-7 doi: 10.1007/s11356-016-6753-7
|
| [14] |
Careghini A, Mastorgio A, Saponaro S, et al. (2015) Bisphenol A, nonylphenols, benzophenones, and benzotriazoles in soils, groundwater, surface water, sediments, and food: a review. Environ Sci Pollut Res 22: 5711-5741. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-014-3974-5 doi: 10.1007/s11356-014-3974-5
|
| [15] |
Peng W, Li X, Xiao S, et al. (2018) Review of remediation technologies for sediments contaminated by heavy metals. J Soils Sediments 18: 1701-1719. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-018-1921-7 doi: 10.1007/s11368-018-1921-7
|
| [16] | Boszke L, Kowalski A (2006) Spatial Distribution of Mercury in Bottom Sediments and Soils from Poznan, Poland. Pol J Environ Stud 15: 211-218. |
| [17] |
Wada SI (2002) Effect of clay mineralogy on the feasibility of electrokinetic soil decontamination technology. Applied Clay Science 20: 283-293. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-1317(01)00080-1 doi: 10.1016/S0169-1317(01)00080-1
|
| [18] |
Shahidi D, Roy R, Azzouz A (2015) Advances in catalytic oxidation of organic pollutants - Prospects for thorough mineralization by natural clay catalysts. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental 174: 277-292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2015.02.042 doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2015.02.042
|
| [19] |
Kern K, Loffelsend T (2004) Sustainable development in the Baltic Sea region. Governance beyond the nation state. Local Environment 9: 451-467. https://doi.org/10.1080/1354983042000255351 doi: 10.1080/1354983042000255351
|
| [20] |
Ullrich S, Tanton T, Abdrashitova S (2001) Mercury in the Aquatic Environment: A Review of Factors Affecting Methylation. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology 31: 241-293. https://doi.org/10.1080/20016491089226 doi: 10.1080/20016491089226
|
| [21] | EEA (European Environment Agency) (2000) Down to Earth: soils degradation and sustainable development in Europe. Environmental issues series 16: 32. |
| [22] | EEA (European Environment Agency) (2001) Proposal for a European soils monitoring and assessment framework. Environmental issues series 61: 58. |
| [23] |
Ramos-Miras JJ, Gil C, Rodriguez Martin JA, et al. (2020) Ecological risk assessment of mercury and chromium in greenhouse soils. Environ Geochem Health 42: 313-324. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10653-019-00354-y doi: 10.1007/s10653-019-00354-y
|
| [24] |
Lado L, Hengl Y, Reuter H (2008) Heavy metals in European soils: A geostatistical analysis of the FOREGS Geochemical database. Geoderma 148: 189-199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2008.09.020 doi: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2008.09.020
|
| [25] | Long Q, Wang JY, Da LJ (2013) Assessing the spatial‐temporal variations of heavy metals in farmland soil of Shanghai, China. Fresenius Environmental Bulletin 22: 928-938. |
| [26] |
Ballabio C, Jiskra M, Osterwalder S, et al. (2021) A spatial assessment of mercury content in the European Union topsoil. Science of The Total Environment 769: 144755. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.144755. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.144755
|
| [27] | Medyńska-Juraszek A, Kabala C (2010) Lead, mercury, and cadmium in forest soils impacted by copper smelting in south-west Poland. 15th International Conference on Heavy Metals in the Environment 2010: 19-23. |
| [28] |
Martin JAR, Gutierrez C, Escuer M, et al. (2021) Trends in soil mercury stock associated with pollution sources on a Mediterranean island (Majorca, Spain). Environmental Pollution 283: 117397. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2021.117397. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2021.117397
|
| [29] | Horvart M, Kotnik J (2019) Technical information report on mercury monitoring in soils. UN Environment. Chemicals and Health Branch Switzerland 2019: 54. |
| [30] | Robles, I, Lakatos, J, Scharek, P (2014) Remediation of Soils and Sediments Polluted with Mercury: Occurence, Transformations, Environmental Consideration and San Joaquin's Sierra Gorda Case, InTech, 35-75. |
| [31] |
O'Connor D, Hou D, Ok Y, et al. (2019) Mercury speciation, transformation, and transportation in soils, atmospheric flux, and implications for risk management: A critical review. Environment International 126: 747-761. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2019.03.019 doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2019.03.019
|
| [32] |
Jędruch A, Falkowska L, Saniewska D, et al. (2021) Status and trends of mercury pollution of the atmosphere and terrestrial ecosystems in Poland. Ambio 50: 1698-1717. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-021-01505-1 doi: 10.1007/s13280-021-01505-1
|
| [33] |
Sas-Nowosielska A, Galimska-Stypa R, Kucharski R, et al. (2008) Remediation aspect of microbial changes of plant rhizosphere in mercury contaminated soils. Environ Monit Assess 137: 101-109. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-007-9732-0 doi: 10.1007/s10661-007-9732-0
|
| [34] | Boszke L, Kowalski A, Glosinska G. et al. (2003) Environmental factors affecting speciation of mercury in the bottom sediments; an overview. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies 12: 5-13. |
| [35] |
Pacyna E, Pacyna J, Pirrone N (2001) European emissions of atmospheric mercury from anthropogenic sources in 1995. Atmospheric Environment 35: 2987-2996. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(01)00102-9 doi: 10.1016/S1352-2310(01)00102-9
|
| [36] |
Glodek A, Panasiuk D, Pacyna J (2010) Mercury Emission from Anthropogenic Sources in Poland and Their Scenarios to the Year 2020. Water Air Soil Pollut 213: 227-236. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-010-0380-6 doi: 10.1007/s11270-010-0380-6
|
| [37] | Bartnicki J, Gusev A, Aas W, et al. Atmospheric Supply of Nitrogen, Lead, Cadmium, Mercury and Dioxins/Furans to the Baltic Sea in 2005. EMEP, 2007. Available from: https://emep.int/publ/helcom/2007. |
| [38] | Ministry of Environment of the Republic of Lithuania National environmental protection strategy, 2016. Available from: https://am.lrv.lt/uploads/am/documents/files/National%20Environmental%20Protection%20Strategy.pdf. |
| [39] |
Šakalys J, Kvietkus K, Garbarienė I, et al. (2019) Long-term study of atmospheric mercury deposition at monitoring stations in Lithuania. Lithuanian Journal of Physics 59: 1. https://doi/10.3952/physics.v59i1.3940 doi: 10.3952/physics.v59i1.3940
|
| [40] | Science for Environment Policy (2017) Tackling mercury pollution in the EU and worldwide. In-depth Report 15 produced for the European Commission. DG Environment by the Science Communication Unit. |
| [41] |
EEA (European Environment Agency) (2018) Mercury in Europe's environment A priority for European and global action. Environmental issues series 11: 72. https://doi/10.2800/558803 doi: 10.2800/558803
|
| [42] |
Schuster P, Schaefer K, Aiken G, et al. (2018) Permafrost stores a globally significant amount of mercury. Geophysical Research Letters 45: 1463-1471. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GL075571 doi: 10.1002/2017GL075571
|
| [43] |
Artiola J, Brusseau M. (2019) 10 - The Role of Environmental Monitoring in Pollution Science, Environmental and Pollution Science (Third Edition), Academic Press 2019: 149-162. https://doi.org/10.1016/C2017-0-00480-9 doi: 10.1016/C2017-0-00480-9
|
| [44] |
Artiola J, Pepper I, Brusseau M (2004) 1 - Environmental Monitoring and Characterization. Environmental Monitoring and Characterization. Elsevier Academic Press 2004: 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-064477-3.X5000-0 doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-064477-3.X5000-0
|
| [45] |
Loveland P, Bellamy P (2005) Environmental Monitoring. Encyclopedia of Soils in the Environment. Elsevier 2005: 441-448. https://doi.org/10.1016/B0-12-348530-4/00092-8 doi: 10.1016/B0-12-348530-4/00092-8
|
| [46] |
Morvan X, Saby NPA, Arrouays D, et al. (2008) Soil monitoring in Europe: A review of existing systems and requirements for harmonisation. Science of The Total Environment 391: 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2007.10.046 doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2007.10.046
|
| [47] |
Van Leeuwen E, Saby N, Jones A, et al. (2017) Gap assessment in current soils monitoring networks across Europe for measuring soils functions. Environ Res Lett 12: 124007. https://10.1088/1748-9326/aa9c5c doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/aa9c5c
|
| [48] | Brils J (2008) Sediments monitoring and the European Water Framework Directive. Annali dell'Istituto superiore di sanita 44: 218-223. |
| [49] | Reuther R (2009) Lake and river sediments monitoring. Environmental Monitoring. Encyclopedia of Life Support Systems Ⅱ 2009: 9. |
| [50] | SedNet Sediments Management-an essential element of River Basin Management Plans 28 pages, 2006. Available From: https://sednet.org/download/061122_Report_SedNet_Round_Table_Discussion.pdf. |
| [51] |
Ramsey C (2015) Considerations for Sampling Contaminants in Agricultural Soils. Journal of AOAC International 98: 309-315. https://doi.org/10.5740/jaoacint.14-268 doi: 10.5740/jaoacint.14-268
|
| [52] | International atomic energy agency (IAEA) (2004) Soils Sampling for Environmental Contaminants, IAEA-TECDOC-1415. Technical Reports Series, Vienna. |
| [53] | International atomic energy agency (IAEA) (2019) Guidelines on Soils and Vegetation Sampling for Radiological Monitoring. Technical Reports Series 486, IAEA, Vienna. |
| [54] |
Amde M, Yin Y, Zhang D. et al. (2016) Methods and recent advances in speciation analysis of mercury chemical species in environmental samples: a review. Chemical Speciation & Bioavailability 28: 51-65. https://doi.org/10.1080/09542299.2016.1164019 doi: 10.1080/09542299.2016.1164019
|
| [55] |
Yu L, Yan X (2003) Factors affecting the stability of inorganic and methylmercury during sample storage. TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry 22: 245-253. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-9936(03)00407-2 doi: 10.1016/S0165-9936(03)00407-2
|
| [56] | Diederick J (2013) Literature review on mercury speciation soils systems under oxidizing conditions. Snowman Network, Project No. SN-03/08. |
| [57] |
Gilli R, Claudine K, Mischa W, et al. (2018) Speciation and Mobility of Mercury in Soils Contaminated by Legacy Emissions from a Chemical Factory in the Rhô ne Valley in Canton of Valais. Switzerland Soils Syst 2: 44. https://doi.org/10.3390/soilsystems2030044 doi: 10.3390/soilsystems2030044
|
| [58] |
Kodamatani H, Balogh S, Nollet Y, et al. (2016) An inter-laboratory comparison of different analytical methods for the determination of monomethylmercury in various soils and sediments samples: A platform for method improvement. Chemosphere 169: 32-39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.10.129 doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.10.129
|
| [59] |
Leermakers M, Baeyens W, Quevauviller P, et al. (2005) Mercury in environmental samples: Speciation, artifacts and validation. TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry 24: 383-393. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trac.2004.01.001 doi: 10.1016/j.trac.2004.01.001
|
| [60] |
Kowalski A, Frankowski M (2016) Seasonal variability of mercury concentration in soils, buds and leaves of Acer platanoides and Tilia platyphyllos in central Poland. Environ Sci Pollut Res 23: 9614-9624. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-016-6179-2 doi: 10.1007/s11356-016-6179-2
|
| [61] |
Lepane V, Varvas M, Viitak A, et al. (2007) Sedimentary record of heavy metals in Lake Rõ uge Liinjärv, southern Estonia. Estonian Journal of Earth Sciences 56: 221-232. https://doi.org/10.3176/earth.2007.03 doi: 10.3176/earth.2007.03
|
| [62] |
Koniarz T, Tarnawski M, Baran A, et al. (2015) Mercury contamination of bottom sediments in water reservoirs of southern Poland. Biblioteka Glowna 41: 169-175. https://doi.org/10.7494/geol.2015.41.2.169 doi: 10.7494/geol.2015.41.2.169
|
| [63] | Dradrach A, Karczewska A (2013) Mercury in soils of municipal lawns in Wroclaw, Połand. Fresenius Environmental Bulletin 22: 968-972. |
| [64] |
Gruba P, Socha J, Pietrzykowski M, et al. (2019) Tree species affects the concentration of total mercury (Hg) in forest soils: Evidence from a forest soil inventory in Poland. Science of The Total Environment 647: 141-148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.07.452 doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.07.452
|
| [65] |
Kodamatani H, Maeda C, Balogh S, et al. (2017) The influence of sample drying and storage conditions on methylmercury determination in soils and sediments. Chemosphere 173: 380-386 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.01.053 doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.01.053
|
| [66] |
Arbestain M, Lado L, Bao M, et al. (2009) Assessment of Mercury-Polluted Soils Adjacent to an Old Mercury-Fulminate Production Plant. Applied and Environmental Soils Science 2009: 8. https://doi.org/10.1155/2009/387419 doi: 10.1155/2009/387419
|
| [67] |
Leopold K, Foulkes M, Worsfold P (2010) Methods for the determination and speciation of mercury in natural waters- a review. Analytica Chimica Acta 663: 127-138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2010.01.048 doi: 10.1016/j.aca.2010.01.048
|
| [68] |
Schuster E (1991) The behavior of mercury in the soils with special emphasis on complexation and adsorption processes - A review of the literature. Water, Air, and Soils Pollution 56: 667-680. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00342308 doi: 10.1007/BF00342308
|
| [69] |
Saponaro S, Sezenna E, Bonomo L (2005) Remediation Actions by a Risk Assessment Approach: A Case Study of Mercury Contamination. Water Air Soils Pollut 168: 187-212. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-005-1248-z doi: 10.1007/s11270-005-1248-z
|
| [70] |
Gabriel M, Williamson D (2004) Principal Biogeochemical Factors Affecting the Speciation and Transport of Mercury through the terrestrial environment. Environmental Geochemistry and Health 26: 421-434. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10653-004-1308-0 doi: 10.1007/s10653-004-1308-0
|
| [71] |
Saiz-Lopez A, Travnikov O, Sonke J, et al. (2020) Photochemistry of oxidized Hg(I) and Hg(Ⅱ) species suggests missing mercury oxidation in the troposphere. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 117: 30949-30956. http://10.1073/pnas.1922486117 doi: 10.1073/pnas.1922486117
|
| [72] | Segade S, Teresa D, Elsa R (2011) Mercury methylation versus demethylation: Main processes involved. Methylmercury: Formation, Sources and Health Effects. Nova Science Publishers 7: 123-166. http://hdl.handle.net/10198/6750 |
| [73] |
Higueras P, Fernández-Martínez R, Esbrí J, et al. (2015) Mercury Soil Pollution in Spain: A Review. Environment, Energy and Climate Change I 32: 135-158. https://doi.org/10.1007/698_2014_280 doi: 10.1007/698_2014_280
|
| [74] |
Devasena M, Nambi I (2010) Migration and entrapment of mercury in porous media. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology 117: 60-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconhyd.2010.06.005 doi: 10.1016/j.jconhyd.2010.06.005
|
| [75] |
Bengtsson G, Picado F (2008) Mercury sorption to sediments: Dependence on grain size, dissolved organic carbon, and suspended bacteria. Chemosphere 73: 526-531. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2008.06.017 doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2008.06.017
|
| [76] |
Zhang L, Wu S, Zhao L, et al. (2019) Mercury Sorption and Desorption on Organo-Mineral Particulates as a Source for Microbial Methylation. Environmental Science & Technology 53: 2426-2433. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.8b06020 doi: 10.1021/acs.est.8b06020
|
| [77] |
Tangahu B, Abdullah S, Basri H, et al. (2011) A Review on Heavy Metals (As, Pb, and Hg) Uptake by Plants through Phytoremediation. International Journal of Chemical Engineering 2011. https://doi.org/10.1155/2011/939161 doi: 10.1155/2011/939161
|
| [78] |
Li Q, Tang L, Qiu Q, et al. (2020) Total mercury and methylmercury in the soil and vegetation of a riparian zone along a mercury-impacted reservoir. Science of The Total Environment 738: 139794. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139794 doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139794
|
| [79] |
Gworek B, Dmuchowski W, Baczewska-Dąbrowska H (2020) Mercury in the terrestrial environment: a review. Environmental Sciences Europe 32: 128. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12302-020-00401-x doi: 10.1186/s12302-020-00401-x
|
| [80] |
Seo DC, Yu K, DeLaune RD (2008) Comparison of monometal and multimetal adsorption in Mississippi River alluvial wetland sediment: batch and column experiments. Chemosphere 73: 1757-1764. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2008.09.003 doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2008.09.003
|
| [81] |
Schluter K (2000) Review: Evaporation of mercury from soils. An integration and synthesis of current knowledge. Environmental Geology 39: 249-271. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002540050005 doi: 10.1007/s002540050005
|
| [82] |
Sondreal E.A, Benson S.A, Pavlish J.H, et al. (2004) An overview of air quality Ⅲ. Mercury, trace element and particulate matter. Fuel Processing Technology 85: 425-440. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2004.02.002 doi: 10.1016/j.fuproc.2004.02.002
|
| [83] |
Zhao S, Pudasainee D, Duan Y, et al. (2019) A review on mercury in coal combustion process: Content and occurrence forms in coal, transformation, sampling methods, emission and control technologies. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science 73: 26-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecs.2019.02.001 doi: 10.1016/j.pecs.2019.02.001
|
| [84] |
Pogrzeba M, Ciszek D, Galimska-Stypa R, et al. (2016) Ecological strategy for soil contaminated with mercury. Plant and Soil 409: 371-387. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-016-2936-8 doi: 10.1007/s11104-016-2936-8
|
| [85] |
Caldwell C, Canavan C, Bloom N (2000) Potential effects of forest fire and storm flow on total mercury and methylmercury in sediments of an arid-lands reservoir. Science of The Total Environment 260: 125-133. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-9697(00)00554-4 doi: 10.1016/S0048-9697(00)00554-4
|
| [86] |
Bigham G, Murray K, Masue-Slowey, et al. (2016) Biogeochemical controls on methylmercury in soils and sediments: Implications for site management: Geochemical Controls on Mercury Methylation. Integrated Environ. Assessment and Management 13: 249-263. https://doi.org/10.1002/ieam.1822 doi: 10.1002/ieam.1822
|
| [87] |
Xu J, Buck M, Eklöf K (2019) Mercury methylating microbial communities of boreal forest soils. Sci Rep 9: 518. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-37383-z doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-37383-z
|
| [88] | Tjerngren I, Karlsson T, Björn E, et al. (2012) Potential Hg methylation and MeHg demethylation rates related to the nutrient status of different boreal wetlands. Biogeochemistry 108: 335-350. http://www.jstor.org/stable/41410599 |
| [89] |
Kodamatani H, Tomiyasu T (2013) Selective determination method for measurement of methylmercury and ethylmercury in soils/sediments samples using high-performance liquid chromatography-chemiluminescence detection coupled with simple extraction technique. Journal of Chromatography A 1288: 155-159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2013.02.004 doi: 10.1016/j.chroma.2013.02.004
|
| [90] |
Strickman R, Mitchell C (2017) Methylmercury production and accumulation in urban stormwater ponds and habitat wetlands. Environmental Pollution 221: 326-334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2016.11.082 doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2016.11.082
|
| [91] |
Yang Z, W Fang, X Lu, et al. (2016) Warming increases methylmercury production in an Arctic soil. Environmental Pollution 214: 504-509. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2016.04.069 doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2016.04.069
|
| [92] | Dijkstra J, Buckman K, Ward D, et al. (2013) Experimental and Natural Warming Elevates Mercury Concentrations in Estuarine Fish. PLoS ONE 8: e58401. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0058401 |
| [93] |
Dang F, Li Z, Zhong H (2019) Methylmercury and selenium interactions: Mechanisms and implications for soil remediation. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology 49: 1737-1768. https://doi.org/10.1080/10643389.2019.1583051 doi: 10.1080/10643389.2019.1583051
|
| [94] |
Li Y, Cai Y (2013) Progress in the study of mercury methylation and demethylation in aquatic environments. Chin Sci Bull 58: 177-185. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11434-012-5416-4 doi: 10.1007/s11434-012-5416-4
|
| [95] |
Perez P, Hintelman H, Quiroz W, et al. (2017) Critical evaluation of distillation procedure for the determination of methylmercury in soils samples. Chemosphere 186: 570-575. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.08.034 doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.08.034
|
| [96] |
Lund W (1990) Speciation analysis—why and how? Fresenius' Journal of Analytical Chemistry 337: 557-564. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00322862 doi: 10.1007/BF00322862
|
| [97] |
Bernalte E, Salmanighabeshi S, Rueda-Holgado F (2015) Mercury pollution assessment in soil affected by industrial emissions using miniaturized ultrasonic probe extraction and ICP-MS. Int J Environ Sci Technol 12: 817-826. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-013-0461-3 doi: 10.1007/s13762-013-0461-3
|
| [98] |
Denmark I. S, Begu E, Arslan Z, et al. (2018) Removal of inorganic mercury by selective extraction and coprecipitation for determination of methylmercury in mercury-contaminated soils by chemical vapor generation inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (CVG-ICP-MS). Analytica chimica acta 1041: 68-77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2018.08.049 doi: 10.1016/j.aca.2018.08.049
|
| [99] |
Saniewska D, Bełdowska M (2017) Mercury fractionation in soil and sediment samples using thermo-desorption method. Talanta 168: 152-161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2017.03.026 doi: 10.1016/j.talanta.2017.03.026
|
Figures(1)
Gytautas Ignatavičius, Murat H. Unsal, Peter E. Busher, Stanisław Wołkowicz, Jonas Satkūnas, Giedrė Šulijienė, Vaidotas Valskys. Geochemistry of mercury in soils and water sediments[J]. AIMS Environmental Science, 2022, 9(3): 277-297. doi: 10.3934/environsci.2022019
DownLoad: