Research article

Evaluation of the freshwater copepod Acanthocyclops americanus (Marsh, 1983) (Cyclopidae) response to Cd, Cr, Cu, Hg, Mn, Ni and Pb

  • Received: 19 August 2020 Accepted: 10 November 2020 Published: 11 November 2020
  • The toxic effect of cadmium, chromium, copper, mercury, manganese, nickel and lead on adult Acanthocyclops americanuscopepods was evaluated to determine the sensitivity of this species to these metals. Toxicity tests were carried out to determine the LC50, after which bioassays were carried out with environmentally relevant sublethal concentrations in order to measure oxidative damage to cell membranes as well as neurotoxic effects. Cadmium was the most toxic metal and manganese was the least harmful. Copper had the greatest oxidative effect (lipid peroxidation) and nickel had the least effect. A 3% to 79% drop was observed in acetylcholinesterase (AchE) activity, with copper causing the greatest inhibitory effect. A. americanus sensitivity to cadmium, manganese and lead was similar to that recorded for Daphnia magna neonates, but the copepods were less sensitive to chromium, copper, mercury and nickel. The response of A. americanus to exposure to metals makes it possible to propose it as a test organism to evaluate the presence and effect of these elements, particularly cadmium, manganese and lead, in toxicity studies, and possibly for monitoring purposes.

    Citation: Alma Sobrino-Figueroa, Sergio H. Álvarez Hernandez, Carlos Álvarez Silva C. Evaluation of the freshwater copepod Acanthocyclops americanus (Marsh, 1983) (Cyclopidae) response to Cd, Cr, Cu, Hg, Mn, Ni and Pb[J]. AIMS Environmental Science, 2020, 7(6): 449-463. doi: 10.3934/environsci.2020029

    Related Papers:

    [1] Hamdy E. Nour, Fatma Ramadan, Nouf El Shammari, Mohamed Tawfik . Status and contamination assessment of heavy metals pollution in coastal sediments, southern Kuwait. AIMS Environmental Science, 2022, 9(4): 538-552. doi: 10.3934/environsci.2022032
    [2] Md. Saiful Islam, Md. Habibullah-Al-Mamun . Accumulation of trace elements in sediment and fish species of Paira River, Bangladesh. AIMS Environmental Science, 2017, 4(2): 310-322. doi: 10.3934/environsci.2017.2.310
    [3] Jerry R. Miller . Potential ecological impacts of trace metals on aquatic biota within the Upper Little Tennessee River Basin, North Carolina. AIMS Environmental Science, 2016, 3(3): 305-325. doi: 10.3934/environsci.2016.3.305
    [4] Hedi Januar, Dwiyitno, Izhamil Hidayah, Irma Hermana . Seasonal heavy metals accumulation in the soft tissue of Anadara granosa mollusc form Tanjung Balai, Indonesia. AIMS Environmental Science, 2019, 6(5): 356-366. doi: 10.3934/environsci.2019.5.356
    [5] Joseph A. Kazery, Dayakar P. Nittala, H. Anwar Ahmad . Meteorological effects on trace element solubility in Mississippi coastal wetlands. AIMS Environmental Science, 2019, 6(1): 1-13. doi: 10.3934/environsci.2019.1.1
    [6] Sandrine Chifflet, Marc Tedetti, Hana Zouch, Rania Fourati, Hatem Zaghden, Boubaker Elleuch, Marianne Quéméneur, Fatma Karray, Sami Sayadi . Dynamics of trace metals in a shallow coastal ecosystem: insights from the Gulf of Gabès (southern Mediterranean Sea). AIMS Environmental Science, 2019, 6(4): 277-297. doi: 10.3934/environsci.2019.4.277
    [7] Joje Mar P. Sanchez, Marchee T. Picardal, Marnan T. Libres, Hedeliza A. Pineda, Ma. Lourdes B. Paloma, Judelynn M. Librinca, Reginald Raymund A. Caturza, Sherry P. Ramayla, Ruby L. Armada, Jay P. Picardal . Characterization of a river at risk: the case of Sapangdaku River in Toledo City, Cebu, Philippines. AIMS Environmental Science, 2020, 7(6): 559-574. doi: 10.3934/environsci.2020035
    [8] Ioannis Panagopoulos, Athanassios Karayannis, Georgios Gouvalias, Nikolaos Karayannis, Pavlos Kassomenos . Chromium and nickel in the soils of industrial areas at Asopos river basin. AIMS Environmental Science, 2016, 3(3): 420-438. doi: 10.3934/environsci.2016.3.420
    [9] Jerry R. Miller, John P. Gannon, Kyle Corcoran . Concentrations, mobility, and potential ecological risks of selected metals within compost amended, reclaimed coal mine soils, tropical South Sumatra, Indonesia. AIMS Environmental Science, 2019, 6(4): 298-325. doi: 10.3934/environsci.2019.4.298
    [10] Maryem EL FAHEM, Abdellah BENZAOUAK, Habiba ZOUITEN, Amal SERGHINI, Mohamed FEKHAOUI . Hydrogeochemical assessment of mine water discharges from mining activity. Case of the Haut Beht mine (central Morocco). AIMS Environmental Science, 2021, 8(1): 60-85. doi: 10.3934/environsci.2021005
  • The toxic effect of cadmium, chromium, copper, mercury, manganese, nickel and lead on adult Acanthocyclops americanuscopepods was evaluated to determine the sensitivity of this species to these metals. Toxicity tests were carried out to determine the LC50, after which bioassays were carried out with environmentally relevant sublethal concentrations in order to measure oxidative damage to cell membranes as well as neurotoxic effects. Cadmium was the most toxic metal and manganese was the least harmful. Copper had the greatest oxidative effect (lipid peroxidation) and nickel had the least effect. A 3% to 79% drop was observed in acetylcholinesterase (AchE) activity, with copper causing the greatest inhibitory effect. A. americanus sensitivity to cadmium, manganese and lead was similar to that recorded for Daphnia magna neonates, but the copepods were less sensitive to chromium, copper, mercury and nickel. The response of A. americanus to exposure to metals makes it possible to propose it as a test organism to evaluate the presence and effect of these elements, particularly cadmium, manganese and lead, in toxicity studies, and possibly for monitoring purposes.


    The lacustrine catchment area of the Valley of Mexico presents high indices of disruption caused by various issues among which are the expansion of the urban area, the excessive exploitation of the water table, the desiccation of springs, the modification of riverbeds and the influx of untreated wastewater from industrial, domestic and agricultural activities [1,2]. All this has brought about drastic changes in the environmental conditions of rivers, creeks, ponds, dams and lakes, changes that affect the organisms that live there, decreasing their distribution and causing some species to be threatened and others to have disappeared [1,3].

    High concentrations of contaminants, primarily metals and pesticides, have been found in the water systems of this region [4,5,6,7,8,9]. Metals are considered to be contaminants that cause serious problems to the environment since they cannot be removed efficiently through natural processes. Their removal requires physicochemical processes that are expensive, while they are highly persistent, accumulate and are biomagnified (e.g., As and Hg) in food chains. They are also toxic to aquatic organisms depending on their concentration [5,10,11].

    High levels of Cd, Cr, Cu, Hg, Mn, Ni and Pb are found in the water of aquatic systems in the Valley of Mexico, including the catchment areas of the Lerma River where Cd, Cr, Cu, Hg, Ni and Pb concentrations vary from11.3 to 980 μg L−1 (Table 1) [4,5,7,12].

    Table 1.  Metal concentrations found in waters of aquatic systems in the Valley of Mexico.
    Metals Lerma River(μg/L) Xochimilco (μg/L) Sublethal bioassays Concentrations (μg /L)
    Cd 11.3 ± 7.8 0.5 to 24.5 4.1
    Cr 17.2 ± 8.0 54.1 to 331.5 331
    Cu 119 ± 76 351.3 to 2198 90
    Hg 118.5± 103.5 0.071 to 7.61 26
    Mn 980 ± 440 1857 to 9946.6 35170.0
    Ni 90 ± 12 89.4 to 8136.8 1660.0
    Pb 116 ± 77 5.6 to 431.2 230
    Reference 4, 5, 7, 12 6, 9, 13 This study

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    In the case of Xochimilco, the concentration of metals detected in the canals varies from0.071 to 9946.6 μg L−1 [6,9,13]. Average levels of Cr (1.93 mg L−1), Ni (4.11 mg L−1) and Pb (0.418 mg L−1) detected in thenavigationcanals [9,13] are above those indicated by the NOM-001-SEMARNAT for the Protection of Aquatic Life (Cr = 0.5–1.0 mg L−1, Ni = 2.0–4.0 mg L−1and Pb = 0.2–0.4 mg L−1) [14].

    Metals may cause adverse effects in aquatic organisms depending on the concentration and the exposure time. In elevated concentrations, they cause the death of sensitive organisms. In sublethal exposures, they bring about changes in enzymatic activities at the biochemical level [15]. They cause changes in physiological rates (feeding rate, excretion rate and growth rate), and upheavals in the behaviour, reproduction and survival of neonates and juveniles [11,15]. They also lead to the generation of Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS) that cause oxidative stress in aquatic organisms such as fish, molluscs and crustaceans [16,17]. ROS act on cellular macromolecules such as lipids, proteins and DNA. Enzymatic activity and the structural lipids of cell membranes are the main targets of metals [18]. Prolonged oxidative stress leads to aging, diseases and even cellular death due to necrosis and/or apoptosis [19].

    Moreover, acetylcholinesterases (AChE) are enzymes in the esterases group whose function is the hydrolysis of the acetylcholine neurotransmitter (ACh). These enzymes are essential in controlling the transmission of nerve impulses that run from nerve fibers to muscle cells, autonomous ganglia and the central nervous system. Prior studies have demonstrated that metals may be neurotoxic to aquatic species because they affect AChE activity, causing changes in mobility and behaviour that compromise the survival of organisms [20,21].

    Acanthocyclops americanusis a copepod species of the order Cyclopoida. These organisms are 0.44 to 1.12 mm in length and are part of the zooplankton community in freshwater aquatic systems [22,23]. They are important from the ecological point of view because they are food for fish, crustaceans and other predatory specimens like axolotls [23].

    Apart from Mexico, A. americanus is found in Spain, the United States and France. In Mexico, the presence of populations of this species has been reported for the lacustrine catchment area of the Valley of Mexico [23], while Enríquez and assistants (2011) recently found them in the lake at Huetzalin, Xochimilco [22].

    Studies on the effect of contaminants on native organisms are very few and its harmful effects are unknown in many of the species present in subtropical and tropical climates [24]. Since no studies have been carried out on A. americanussensitivity to diverse xenobiotics, an evaluation of the toxicity, oxidative damage and neurotoxic effect of cadmium, chrome, copper, mercury, manganese, nickel and lead on adultA. americanuscopepods was carried out in this study to determine the response of the species to each metal, and whether A. americanus is more sensitive to these elements compared with other copepod species and neonates of Daphnia magna, a species that is used in Mexico as a test organism to evaluate the toxicity of effluents that are discharged into natural systems [25].

    Acanthocyclops americanusadults (985 ± 30 μm) were obtained from water samples collected from semi-permanent pools located at the CIBAC (Cuemanco Biological and Fish Farm Research Center). The organisms were grown in the laboratory, in two-litre glass jars (pyrex) with reconstituted water [26], for four months, under the following conditions: temperature 22 ± 2 ℃, pH 7.1, total hardness 165 ± 5 mg L−1 and dissolved oxygen > 7 mg L−1. The copepods were fed every third day a mixture of microalgae (Monraphidium sp. 1 x 106 cel/mL), pulverised fish feed (Tetramin 0.1 g/L) and rotifers (Brachionus sp. 160 ± 20 organisms/mL) [22].

    The metals were prepared as standard solutions [27,28] with deionized water and the following salts: CdCl2, (Baker, 99% purity), K2Cr2O7 (Merk, 99.5%), CuSO4 (Baker, 99.9%), HgCl2 (Merk, 99.98%), MnCl24´H2O (Baker, 99.99%), NiCl2 (Merk, 99.5%) and Pb(NO3)2 (Baker, 99%). The standard solutions and the tests were prepared the day the bioassays began.

    The adult copepods (917 ± 74 μm) obtained from the laboratory cultures were exposed to five nominal concentrations of each metal (for the tests with Cd, Cr, Cu and Hg: 0.1, 0.5, 1.0, 5.0 and 10 mg L−1, and for the bioassays with Mn, Ni and Pb: 1, 10, 25, 50 and 100 mg L−1). One control was left with no toxic substance. Twenty organisms were placed in crystal glasses (pyrex) with 50 mL of each test solution (in triplicate). The conditions during the bioassays were as follows: temperature 22 ± 2 ℃, pH 7.1, total hardness 160 ± 5 mg L−1, photoperiod 12 hrs light/12 hr darkness and dissolved oxygen > 7 mg L−1. The copepods were not fed during the test trials. Each bioassay was repeated a minimum of three times.The number of immobile organisms in each test was recorded after 24 and 48 hours of exposure [28,29]. The LC50 (Lethal Concentration 50) was determined with the data obtained following the Probit method via the EPA Probit software. The calculation to compare the LC50 and its confidence intervals was carried out using the statistics described in APHA (1994) [28] to evaluate the statistical significance of the differences recorded among the different treatments:

    where:

    SD = Standard deviation

    LC50 = Lethal concentration 50

    f = Confidence limit factor

    f1 = Upper endpoint of the 95% confidence interval

    f2 = Lower endpoint of the 95% confidence interval

    A sublethal assay was then carried out for 8 days, with a change in the test solutions every 48 hours. The organisms were exposed to the LC1 of each metal (table 1). Fifty copepods were exposed to the metals (in triplicate). At days 2, 4 and 8 of exposure, a random sample of 15 organisms was taken from each replica and put together to create a composite sample (n = 45) (in triplicate). These samples were used to determine the degree of lipid peroxidation and acetylcholinesterase (AchE) activity in copepod tissues to evaluate the oxidative and neurotoxic effect of these metals.

    The degree of lipid peroxidation was determined in a thiobarbituric reactive species (TBARS) assay. This method is based on the reaction of thiobarbituric acid (TBA) and the subproducts formed by the effect of free radicals (ROS) on cell membranes [30].

    The composite samples were homogenised in a 3 mL phosphate buffer (0.02 M, pH 7.2) using a stainless steel homogeniser in an ice bath at 4 ℃.

    One mL of each homogenate was incubated at 90 ºC in a mixture of thiobarbituric acid (0.5%), trichloroacetic acid (15%) and hydrochloric acid (0.25 M) for 20 minutes. Three replicates per treatment were prepared. The samples were then centrifuged and analysed in a spectrophotometer (Genesis) at 535 nm. The concentration of TBARS was calculated with an extinction coefficient of 1.56 x 105 M/cm, and the results were expressed as nmol TBARS/mg protein.

    AChE enzyme activity was measured following the Ellman et al. (1961) method, modified for microplates. One mL of each homogenate was centrifuged at 5000 g and 4 ℃ for 10 minutes, and the supernatant was collected to determine AChE activity.

    A volume of 0.05 mL of supernatant and 0.25 mL of reaction mixture (DTNB 10 mM, phosphate buffer pH 7.2 and acetylcholine 0.075 M) was placed in a multi-well plate (96 wells).

    Activities were measured at 405 nm in an ELISA reader (Multiskan Spectrum). The reaction was monitored for 20 minutes. AchE activity was expressed as the amount of enzyme that catalysed the hydrolysis of 1 nmol of acetylcholine per minute per milligram of protein (nmol/min/mg protein) [31,32].

    The concentration of protein in the samples was evaluated following the Bradford method, with 100 μL of each homogenate and 1 mL of the Bradford reactive. The samples were read in a spectrophotometer (Genesis) at 535 nm. A calibration curve was used with bovine serum albumin as a standard [33].

    The Tbars level and AchE activity data obtained in the bioassays with the metals were analysed with a Kolmogorov-Smirnov test to determine normality. Later, the data were analysed with a two-way ANOVA test considering the type of metal and the exposure time as factors. A multiple comparison was then carried out with a Bonferroni test to determine the statistical importance of the differences observed between the control and the different treatments with metals and exposure times. A significance level of < 0.05 was considered for the analyses. All statistical analyses were run with the NCSS v 97 software for Windows [34].

    The data obtained from the lethality bioassays indicated that the most toxic metal for A. americanus adults was cadmium and the least harmful was manganese (Figure 1). Cadmium was 77 times more toxic than chromium, 49 times more toxic than copper, 17 times more toxic than mercury, 1725 times more toxic than manganese, 513 times more toxic than nickel, and 1546 times more toxic than lead.

    Figure 1.  Median lethal concentration (LC50, 48 h) values and confidence limits (P < 0.05) for Acanthocyclops americanus copepods exposed to Cd, Cr, Cu, Hg, Mn Ni and Pb. (Different letters indicate significant differences among different metal treatments (P < 0.05).).

    LC50 values (48 hours) indicated that the toxicity of the metals was, from the most toxic to the least: Cd > Hg > Cu > Cr > Ni > Pb > Mn.

    The analysis of the LC50 dataand its confidence intervals indicated no significant differences in Mn and Pb toxicity (P < 0.05). However, significant differences were observed in the responses to Cd, Cr, Cu, Hg and Ni (P < 0.05) (Figure 1).

    The mortality rate in the sublethal bioassaysvaried from 0 to 4%, values that lie within acceptable limits for toxicity tests [26,27,28].

    It is important to mention that the Cd, Cr, Cu, Hg, Ni and Pb concentrations used in the sublethal bioassays are environmentally relevant. This is because they fall within the concentration intervals that are reported for water in the aquatic systems of the Valley of Mexico (Table 1).

    The average data on the degree of lipid peroxidation recorded in the metal assays ranged from 2.07 ± 0.34 nM Tbars mg−1 to 22.23 ± 5.47 nM Tbars mg−1 (Figure 2). The metal that caused the greatest oxidative effect on the copepods was Cu and the metal with the least effect was Ni. In the case of the tests carried out with Cu, Cr, Hg, Mn and Pb, a direct relationship was observed between the concentration of Tbars and the exposure time, as the degree of lipid peroxidation increased with exposure time (P < 0.05) (Figure 2). In most cases, significant differences were observed in relation to the control group, however, no significant differences were observed at days 2, 4 and 8 of exposure in the bioassays with Ni (P < 0.05). Similarly, no significant differences were recorded in relation to the control group after 2 days of exposure in the tests with Cd and Mn (P < 0.05) (Figure 2).

    Figure 2.  Levels of lipid peroxidation measured as Tbars (nM mg−1) (mean ± standard deviation) in tissues of the copepod Acanthocyclops americanus exposed to Cd, Cr, Cu, Hg, Mn, Ni and Pb. (*Significant differences (P < 0.05) among the exposed organisms and the control group (Bonferroni test).).

    Regarding AchE activity, significant differences were observed in relation to the control group in thetests with Cd, Cr, Cu, Hg and Pb, for all evaluation times (P < 0.05) (Figure 3). The AchE activity values recorded in these tests were lower than those recorded for the control group, indicating thatthese metals may inhibit AchE activity. This varied from 15% to 79%. The metal that caused the greatest inhibitory effect was Cu (Figure 3). In the case of the tests with the copepods exposed to Mn, AchE activity was observed to be similar to that recorded for the control group 2 days after beginning the bioassay. However, a 36% and 34% decrease in the activity of this enzyme was observed after 4 and 8 days of exposure to this metal, respectively. Ni caused no inhibitory effect on AchE activity (Figure 3).

    Figure 3.  Changes in AchE enzyme activity (nM min−1 mg−1) (mean ± standard deviation) in Acanthocyclops americanus exposed to Cd, Cr, Cu, Hg, Mn, Ni and Pb. (*Significant differences (P < 0.05) among the exposed organisms and the control group (Bonferroni test).

    Most of the studies that have evaluated the toxic effect of different contaminants on copepods have involved species that live in marine systems. The species that are most frequently used in toxicological evaluations are Acartia tonsa and Tigriopus japonicus [35,36,37]. Very few studies have taken place with freshwater species, however, this research proves that freshwater copepods are quite sensitive to metals [38,39,40].

    When we compared the response ofA. Americanus adults to the different metals, as has been done for other species of freshwater copepods like Cyclops abyssorum and Eudiaptomus padanus that live in oligotrophic environments [41], we observed that they are more sensitive to Cd, Cr, Cu and Hg (Table 2) and less sensitive to Ni and Pb (Table 2). Also, A. americanus is less sensitive to Cr, Cu and Ni compared with Mesocyclops pehpeiensis, whereas Tripocyclops prasinus mexicanus and Cyclops sp. are less sensitive to Cd, Cr and Cu than A. americanus [42,43,44](Table 2). In addition, the LC50 values obtained in the tests with Cd and Cr indicated that A. americanus is more sensitive to these metals than species of marine copepods like Acartia tonsa, Tisbe holothuriae, Tigriopus japonicas, Tigriopus fulvus, Tisbe battagliai and Tigriopus brevicornis [45,46,47,48,49,50,51]

    Table 2.  Median Lethal 50 values determined for other copepods species in similar test conditions.
    SPECIES Cd Cr Cu Hg Mn Ni Pb Reference
    LC50 48 hours ppm
    Cyclops abyssorum 3.8 ±2.5 10±2.1 2.5±0.5 2.2±1.1 nd 15±10.5 5.5±2.2 41
    Eudiaptomus padanus 0.55±0.22 10.1±1.8 0.5±0.15 0.85±0.17 . 3.6 ±1.1 4.0±2.4 41
    Mesocyclops pehpeiensis - 0.51±0.15 0.075±0.046 - 1.191±0.47 - 42
    Cyclops sp. - 10.47 - 0.60 - - - 44
    Tripocyclops prasinus mexicanus 2.23±1.7 - 2.11±0.79 0.199±0.156 - - - 43
    Daphnia magna 0.054±0.015 0.77±0.25 0.086±0.03 0.0186±0.0098 61.2±9.8 5.1±4.5 57.1±15.5 45, 52
    Marine copepods
    Acartia tonsa 0.337±0.12 11.9±2.7 0.064±0.01 0.019±0.008 - 5.0±1.9 - 45
    Tisbe holothuriae 0.97 8.14 0.08 - - - - 46
    Tigriopus japonicus 25.2±7.39 3.9±1.97 - - - - 47
    Tigriopus japonicus 12.1±3.1 - - - - 17.7±5.1 - 48
    Tigriopus fulvus 12.36±4.3 128.16±14.9 - 0.52±0.15 - - - 49
    Tisbe battagliai 0.340 - 0.088 - - - - 50
    Tigriopus brevicornis 0.048±0.021 - 0.150±0.085 - - - - 51
    Acanthocyclops americanus 0.041±0.03 3.16±2.05 2.004±1.5 0.712±0.49 70.74±19.05 21.04±12.4 63.40±13.005 This study

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    Moreover, our results indicate that A. americanus is sensitive to Cd, Mn and Pb, as are Daphnia magna neonates. When comparing the sensitivity of A. americanus adults with that of D. magna neonates [45,52,53], a species that is used worldwide to evaluate toxicity in samples of water, elutriation and leaching, it is evident that A. americanus adults are less sensitive to Cr, Cu, Hg and Ni (Table 2). The LC50 recorded for A. americanus exposed to Cd was 0.041 ± 0.03 mg L−1, a value that is close to that which is tolerated by D. magna neonates (0.054 mg L−1 (0.039 to 0.069 mg L−1) [52,53]. Likewise, A. americanus presented a similar sensitivity to that of D. magna neonates to manganese and lead [45] (Table 2).

    Species of the genus Acanthocyclops have been proposed as water quality indicators in cases of contamination by metals. The species A. balcanicus and A. venustusthat inhabit the Aries River in Romania have been proposed as indicator organisms for water with high concentrations of aluminum, copper and zinc associated with particulate and suspended solids. However, these metals, in dissolved form, are very toxic to these species [54]. Acanthocyclops trajani, a species that inhabits the Nile River, has been proposed as a species that is sensitive to water contaminated with metals [55,56]. Krupa (2007) proposedA. rubustus, along with other species of Cyclopoida, as an indicator of mesotrophy [57]. In addition, this researcher found a highincidence of deformed A. rubustusmales in sites where elevated concentrations of metals were recorded in the Shardarinskoe Lake, Kazakhstan. Finally, Gagneten and Paggi (2009) recorded Cyclopoida, including A. robustus, as more sensitive to metals than rotifers in the Salado River, Argentina [58].

    The toxicity of metals recorded for A. americanus, according to the Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labelling of Chemicals (GHS), was as follows: Cd and Hg were highly toxic, Cr and Cu were toxic, and Mn, Ni and Pb were harmful to this species (i. highly toxic: EC50 ≤ 1 mg L−1; ii. toxic: EC50:1 mg L−1 ≤ 10 mg L−1; iii. harmful to aquatic organisms: EC50 10 mg L−1 ≤ 100 mg L−1; iv. non-toxic: EC50 > 100 mg L−1) [59].

    The use of biochemical indices to identify sublethal effects produced by xenobiotics has currently increased. These indices are called biomarkers [60,61]. The degree of lipid peroxidation and AchE activity have been proposed as biomarkers that are effective in identifying damage that may be either reversible or permanent, depending on the concentration and the exposure time to metals and other xenobiotics [61,62]. Publications on biomarker evaluations in copepods are scarce, and most have been carried out on marine species.

    The results obtained in this study indicate that Cd, Cr, Cu, Hg, Mn and Pb significantly increased lipid peroxidation in copepod tissues after 8 days of exposure. This shows that these metals caused oxidative stress, as the degree of lipid peroxidation indicated that the generation of ROS overcame the antioxidant defenses, causing cellular membranes to be altered [63].

    The lipid peroxidation levels recorded in this study demonstrated that the most deleterious metal was Cu (22.23 ± 5.56 nM Tbars mg−1; control = 2.4 ± 0.65 nM Tbarsmg−1). Prior studies carried out by Bo-Mi et al. (2014) on the copepod Tigriopus japonicus also recorded Cu with a highly oxidative effect at concentrations of 0.01 and 0.1 mg L−1 [37]. Likewise, we observed that Cd induces lipid peroxidation. This was previously reported by Wang and Wang (2009) who tested concentrations of 80.01 to 0.1 mg L−1 and reported that the degree of lipid peroxidation was positively correlated with Cd concentration in assays with T. japonicus [64]. Likewise, Bo-Mi et al. (2014) observed that Cd induced the generation of ROS in T. japonicus tissues [37].

    Our results indicate that Ni did not cause any rise in lipid peroxidation levels in A. americanus. This agrees with previous reports by Wang and Wang (2010) on tests with T. japonicus [64].

    Another biochemical response evaluated in this study was the activity of the AchE enzyme. The tests with A. americanus showed that Cd, Cr, Cu, Hg, Mn and Pb had an inhibitory effect on the activity of this enzyme, with average inhibition percentages of 38%, 54%, 60%, 36%, 26% and 41% respectively, making it possible to consider these metals as neurotoxic agents.

    Studies on aquatic organisms have shown that a 20% decrease in AchE activity affects important physiological functions such as feeding and swimming [66]. When inhibitions greater than 25% occur, the life expectancy of the affected organisms is reduced [67,68].

    Nickel did not decrease AchE activity after 8 days of exposure in the tests with A. americanus, as Wang and Wang (2010) recorded for the marine copepod Tigriopus japonicuswhen exposed to Ni [65].

    Finally, according to the results obtained in this study, the Cd, Cu and Hg concentrations recorded for the Lerma River basin, and those of Cd, Cr, Cu and Ni recorded for the Xochimilco canals, constitute a risk to A. americanus, since they are greater than the concentrations tested inthe sublethal bioassays with A. americanus that had an oxidative and neurotoxic effect on these organisms.

    It should also be mentioned that the LC50 values for Cd and Cu recorded in this study (LC50 Cd = 0.041 ± 0.03 mg L−1; Cu = 2.004 ± 1.5 mg L−1) are lower than the values established as Maximum Permissible Limits in the NOM-001-SEMARNAT for the Protection of Aquatic Life (Cd = 0.1 to 0.2 mg L−1; Cu = 4 to 6 mg L−1) [14]. This may be considered a possible risk to organisms that come in contact with discharges that contain these metals. Thus, it is important to continue carrying out studies to evaluate the degree of the effects on the A. americanus populations in the short and long terms.

    A. americanus is an organism with greater sensitivity to Cd and Cr metals compared to other freshwater and marine copepods species. A.americanus may be proposed as a test organism to evaluate the presence and effect of metals, especially Cd, Mn and Pb, in toxicity studies, as well as for monitoring purposes. However, more studies need to be done to propose this species as an indicator organism.

    This research was supported by UAM Research Funds allocated by the CBS Division of UAM-Iztapalapa. It is a contribution to the project “Physiological, Biochemical and Molecular Responses of Aquatic Organisms Under Stress” (Respuestas Fisiológicas, Bioquímicas y Moleculares de Organismos Acuáticos Sometidos a Estrés).

    All authors declare no conflicts of interest in this paper.



    [1] De La Vega-Salazar Y (2003) Situación de los peces dulceacuícolas en México. Revista Ciencias UNAM 72: 20-30.
    [2] SEMARNAT (2016) Informe de la situación del medio ambiente en México. Compendio de estadísticas ambientales, indicadores clave de desempeñ o ambiental y crecimiento verde. Mexico: Semarnat.
    [3] Naranjo EJ, Dirzo R (2009) Impacto de los factores antropogénicos de afectación directa a las poblaciones silvestres de flora y fauna. In: CONABIO, Capital natural de México, Vol. II: Estado de conservación y tendencias de cambio. México: CONABIO 247-276.
    [4] Paulín-Vaca R, Hernández-Silva G, Lugo de la Fuente J (1997) Extracción secuencial de Cd, Co, Cu, Mn, Ni, Pb y Zn en sedimentos de la cuenca alta del Río Lerma. Actas INAGEQ 4: 85-96.
    [5] Avila-Perez P, Zarazua G, Tejeda S, et al. (2007) Evaluation of distribution and bioavailability of Cr, Mn, Fe, Cu, Zn and Pb in the waters of the upper course of the Lerma River. X-Ray Spectrom 36: 361-368.
    [6] Carrion C, Ponce-de Leon C, Cram S, et al. (2012) Potential use of water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes) in Xochimilco for metal phytoremediation. Agrociencia 46: 609-620.
    [7] Zarazúa G, Avila-Pérez P, Tejeda S, et al. (2013) Evaluación de los metales pesados Cr, Mn, Fe, Cu, Zn y Pb en sombrerillo de agua (Hydrocotyle ranunculoides) del curso alto del río Lerma, México. Rev Int Contam Ambie 29: 17-24.
    [8] Mercado-Borrayo BM, Heydrich SC, Rosas PI, et al. (2015) Organophosphorus and organochlorine pesticides bioaccumulation by Eichhornia crassipes in irrigation canals in an urban agricultural system. Int J Phytorem 17: 701-708.
    [9] Aldana G, Hernández M, Cramb S, et al. (2018) Trace metal speciation in a wastewater wetland and its bioaccumulation in tilapia Oreochromis niloticus. Chem Speciat Bioavailab 30: 23-32.
    [10] Tchounwou PB, Yedjou CG, Patlolla AK, et al. (2012) Heavy metals toxicity and the environment. EXS 101: 133-164.
    [11] Wu X, Cobbina SJ, Guanghua M, et al. (2016)A review of toxicity and mechanisms of individual and mixtures of heavy metals in the environment. Environ Sci Pollut Res 23:8244-8259.
    [12] Brito EMS, De la Cruz M, Barróna C, et al. (2015) Impact of hydrocarbons, PCBs and heavy metals on bacterial communities in Lerma River, Salamanca, Mexico: Investigation of hydrocarbon degradation potential. Sci Total Environ 521: 1-10.
    [13] Bojórquez L. Esquivel-Herrera A (2017) Contaminación química de la zona lacustre de Xochimilco. In: Bojórquez L. Contaminación química y biológica de la zona lacustre de Xochimilco.Mexico: UAM, 85-169.
    [14] Norma Oficial Mexicana NOM-001-Semarnat. Que establece los Límites Máximos Permitidos de contaminantes en las descargas de aguas residuales en aguas y bienes nacionales. Publicada en el Diario Oficial de la Federación el 6 de enero de 1997, México.
    [15] Golovanova IL (2008) Effects of heavy metals on the physiological and biochemical status of fishes and aquatic invertebrates. Inland Water Biol 1: 93-101.
    [16] Barata C, Varo I, Navarro JC, et al. (2005) Antioxidant enzyme activities and lipid peroxidation in the freshwater cladoceran Daphnia magna exposed to redox cycling compounds. Comp Biochem Physiol C 140: 175-186.
    [17] Lushchak VI (2011) Environmentally induced oxidative stress in aquatic animals. Aquat Toxicol 101: 13-30.
    [18] Chang LW, Suzuki T (1996) Toxicology of Metals. Lewis Publishers, 432-567.
    [19] Pulido MD, Parrish AR (2003) Metal-induced apoptosis: mechanisms. Mutat Res 533: 227-241.
    [20] Forget J, Pavillon JF, Beliaeff B, et al. (1999) Joint action of pollutant combinations (pesticides and metals) on survival (LC50 values) and acetylcholinesterase activity of Tigriopus brevicornis (copepoda, harpacticoida). Environ Toxicol Chem 18: 912-918
    [21] Tsangaris C, Papathanasiou E, Cotou E (2007) Assessment of the impact of heavy metal pollution from a ferro-nickel smelting plant using biomarkers. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 66: 232-43.
    [22] Enríquez-García C, Nandini S, Sarma SSS (2011) Demographic characteristics of the copepod Acanthocyclops americanus (Sars, 1863), (Copepoda:Cyclopoida) fed mixed algal (Scenedesmus acutus) rotifer (Brachionus havanensis) diet. Hydrobiologia 666: 59-69.
    [23] Elías-Gutiérrez M, Suárez Morales E, Silva Briano M, et al. (2008) Cladocera y Copepoda de las aguas continentales de México. Guía ilustrada. México: UNAM, ECOSUR, SEMARNAT-CONACYT, CONABIO. 57: 67-92.
    [24] Azad M, Agard JBR (2006) Comparative sensitivity of three tropical Cladoceran species (Diaphanosoma brachyurum, Ceriodaphnia rigaudii and Moinodaphnia macleayi) to six chemicals. J Environ Sci Health 41: 2713-2720.
    [25] NMX-AA-087-SCFI-2010 Análisis de agua - Evaluación de toxicidad aguda con Daphnia magna, Straus (Crustacea -Cladocera) - Método de prueba, México, 1-44.
    [26] USEPA (US Environmental Protection Agency) (2002) Methods for Measuring the Acute Toxicity of Effluents and Receiving Waters to Freshwater and Marine Organisms. Washington DC: U.S: Environmental Protection Agency, EPA-821-R-02-012.
    [27] FAO (1986) Manual of methods in aquatic environment research. Part 10. Short-term static bioassays. FAO Fisheries Technical Paper. 247: 1-62.
    [28] APHA, AWWA y WPFC (1994) Métodos estándar para el examen de aguas y aguas de desecho, 64º México: Ed. Interamericana, 124-278.
    [29] Diz FR, Araújo CV, Moreno-Garrido I, et al. (2009) Short-term toxicity tests on the harpacticoid copepod Tisbe battagliai: lethal and reproductive endpoints. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 72: 1881-1886.
    [30] Buege JA, Aust SD (1978) Microsomal lipid peroxidation. Meth Enzym51: 302.
    [31] Ellman L, Courtey KD, Andreas VJr, et al. (1961) A new rapid calorimetric determination of cholinesterase activity. Biochem Pharmacol 7: 88-98
    [32] Guilhermino L, Lopes MC, Carvalho AP, et al. (1996) Inhibition of acetylcholinesterase activity as effect criterion in acute tests with juvenile Daphnia magna. Chemosphere 32: 727-738.
    [33] Bradford M (1976) A rapid and sensitive method for the quantification of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Annals Biochem 72: 248-254.
    [34] Hintze JL (1997) NCSS 97: Statistical System for Windows. NCSS. Kaysville, UT.
    [35] Raisuddin S, Kwok KWH, Leung KMY, et al. (2007) The copepod Tigriopus: A promising marine model organism for ecotoxicology and environmental genomics. Aquatic Toxicol 83: 161-173.
    [36] Kulkarni D, Gergs A, Hommen U, et al. (2013) A plea for the use of copepods in freshwater ecotoxicology. Environ Sci Pollut Res 20: 75-85.
    [37] Bo-Mi K, Jae-Sung R, Chang-Bum J, et al. (2014) Heavy metals induce oxidative stress and trigger oxidative stress-mediated heat shock protein (hsp) modulation in the intertidal copepod Tigriopus japonicus. Comp Biochem Physiol Part C 166: 65-74.
    [38] Brown RJ, Rundle SD, Hutchinson TH, et al. (2005) A microplate freshwater copepod bioassay for evaluating acute and chronic effects of chemical. Environ Toxicol Chem 24: 1528-1531.
    [39] Soto E, Oyarce G, Inzunza B, et al. (2003) Acute toxicity of organic and inorganic compounds on the freshwater cyclopoid copepod Eucyclops neumani neumani (Pesta, 1927). Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 70: 1017-1021.
    [40] Devdutt K, Gergs A, Hommen U, et al. (2013) A plea for the use of copepods in freshwater ecotoxicology. Environ Sci Pollut Res 20: 75-85.
    [41] Baudouin MF, Scoppa P (1974) Acute toxicity of various metals of freshwater zooplankton. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 12: 741-751.
    [42] WongCK, Pak AP (2004) Acute and Subchronic Toxicity of the Heavy Metals Copper, Chromium, Nickel, and Zinc, Individually and in Mixture, to the Freshwater Copepod Mesocyclops pehpeiensis. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 73: 190-196.
    [43] Lalande M, Pinel-Alloul B (1986) Acute toxicity of cadmium, copper, mercury and zinc to tropocyclops prasinus mexicanus (cyclopoida, copepoda) from three quebec lakes. Environ Toxicol Chem 5: 95-102.
    [44] Abbasi SA, Nipaney PC, Soni R (1988) Studies on environmental management of mercury (II), Chromium (VI) and zinc (II) with respect to the impact on some arthropods and protozoans. Inter J Environmental Studies 32: 181-187.
    [45] Ecotox Database. EPA Available at https://cfpub.epa.gov/ecotox/
    [46] Moraitou-Apostolopoulou M, Verriopoulos G (1982) Individual and combined toxicity of three heavy metals, Cu, Cd and Cr for marine copepod Tisbe holothuriae. Hydrobiologia 87: 83-87
    [47] Lee KW, Raisuddin S, Hwang DS, et al. (2007) Acute Toxicities of Trace Metals and Common Xenobiotics to the Marine Copepod Tigriopus japonicus: Evaluation of Its Use as a Benchmark Species for Routine Ecotoxicity Tests in Western Pacific Coastal Regions. Environ Toxicol 22: 532-538
    [48] Emadeldeen HM (2017) Acute Toxicity of Cadmium and Nickel to Three Marine Copepods. Sci J King Faisal Univer 18: 9-16.
    [49] Pane L, Mariottini GL, Lodi A, et al. (2008) Effects of heavy metals on laboratory reared Tigriopus fulvus Fischer (Copepoda: Harpacticoida). In: Brown SE, Welton WC Heavy Metal Pollution. Nova Science Publishers, Inc, 158-165.
    [50] Hutchinson TH, Williams TD, Eales GJ (994) Toxicity of cadmium, hexavalent chromium and copper to marine fish larvae (Cyprinodon variegatus) and copepods (Tisbe battagliai). Mar Environ Res. 38: 275-290.
    [51] Barka S, Pavillon JF, Amiard JC (2001) Influence of different essential and nonessentialmetals on MTLP levels in the copepod Tigriopus brevicornis. Comp Biochem Physiol C 128: 479-493.
    [52] Mance G(1987) Pollution threat of heavy metals in aquatic environments. London: Elsevier Aplied Science, 45-123.
    [53] Traudt EM, Ranville JF, Meye JS (2017) Effect of age on acute toxicity of cadmium, copper, nickel, and zinc in individual-metal exposures to Daphnia magna neonates. Environ Toxicol Chem 36: 113-119.
    [54] Moldovan OT, Melega IN, Leveib E, et al. (2013) A simple method for assessing biotic indicators and predicting biodiversity in the hyporheic zone of a river polluted with metals. Ecol Indic 24: 123-136.
    [55] El-Shabrawy GM, Elowa SE, Rizk ST, et al. (2005) Impact of industrial pollution on zooplankton community structure in Rosetta Nile Branch at Kafr El-Zayat area Egypt. Afr J Biol Sci 1: 1-14.
    [56] Abdel-Halim AS, Waheed ME, El-ShabrawyGM, Fawzia MF (2013)Sewage pollution and zooplankton assemblages along the Rosetta Nile branch at El Rahawy area, Egypt. Int J Environ Sci Engin 4: 29-45.
    [57] Krupa EG (2007) Structural characteristics of zooplankton of the Shardarinskoe reservoir and their use in water quality assessment. Water Resour 34: 712-717.
    [58] Gagneten AM, Paggi JC (2009) Effects of heavy metal contamination (Cr, Cu, Pb, Cd) and eutrophication on zooplankton in the lower basin of the Salado River (Argentina). Water Air Soil Pollut 198: 317-334.
    [59] United Nations (2009) The globally harmonized system of classification and labelling of chemicals. ST/SG/AC.10/30/Rev.3. Available from: https://www.unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/trans/danger/publi/ghs/ghs_rev04/English/ST-SG-AC10-30-Rev4e.pdf
    [60] Vasseur P, Cossu-Leguille C (2006) Linking molecular interactions to consequent effects of persistent organic pollutants (POPs) upon populations. Chemosphere 62: 1033-42.
    [61] Hagger J, Malcolm JB, Lowe D, et al. (2008) Application of biomarkers for improving risk assessments of chemicals under the Water Framework Directive: A case study. Mar Poll Bull 56: 1111-1118.
    [62] Broeg K, Westernhagen H, Zander S, et al. (2005) The bioeffect assessment index (BAI) a concept for the quantification of effects of marine pollution by an integrated biomarker approach. Mar Poll Bull 50: 495-503.
    [63] Volodymyr I L (2011) Environmentally induced oxidative stress in aquatic animals. Aquatic Toxicol 101: 13-30.
    [64] Wang MH, Wang GZ (2009) Biochemical response of the copepod Tigriopus japonicusMori experimentally exposed to cadmium. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 57: 707-717
    [65] Wang MH, Wang GZ (2010) Oxidative damage effects in the copepod Tigriopus japonicusMori experimentally exposed to nickel. Ecotoxicol 19: 273-284.
    [66] USEPA (1998). SCE policy issues related to the food quality protection act. Office of pesticide programs science policy on the use of cholinesterase inhibition for risk assessment of organophosphate and carbamate pesticides. Office of Pesticide Programs. Washington DC: US Environmental Protection Agency 20460.
    [67] Dailianis S, Domouhtsidou GP, Raftopoulou E, et al. (2003). Evaluation of neutral red retention assay, micronucleus test, acetylcholinesterase activity and a signal transduction molecule (cAMP) in tissues of Mytilus galloprovincialis (L.), in pollution monitoring. Mar Environ Res 56: 443-470.
    [68] Stefano B, Ilaria C, Silvano F (2008). Cholinesterase activities in the scallop Pecten jacobaeus: Characterization and effects of exposure to aquatic contaminants. Sci Total Environ 392: 99-109.
  • This article has been cited by:

    1. Joseane A. Marques, Simone R. Costa, Anieli C. Maraschi, Carlos E.D. Vieira, Patricia G. Costa, Camila de Martinez Gaspar Martins, Henrique Fragoso Santos, Marta M. Souza, Juliana Z. Sandrini, Adalto Bianchini, Biochemical response and metals bioaccumulation in planktonic communities from marine areas impacted by the Fundão mine dam rupture (southeast Brazil), 2022, 806, 00489697, 150727, 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.150727
    2. José Luis Uc-Castillo, Adrián Cervantes-Martínez, Martha Angélica Gutiérrez-Aguirre, Evaluation of arsenic effects on Paracyclops novenarius Reid, 1987: a cyclopoid copepod in central-north of Mexico, 2022, 29, 0944-1344, 61674, 10.1007/s11356-022-18959-9
    3. Yannick Colin, Caroline Arcanjo, Claire Da Costa, Anne-Laure Vivant, Gauthier Trémolet, Nathalie Giusti-Petrucciani, Aurélie Duflot, Joëlle Forget-Leray, Thierry Berthe, Céline Boulangé-Lecomte, Decoupled responses of the copepod Eurytemora affinis transcriptome and its microbiota to dissolved copper exposure, 2023, 259, 0166445X, 106546, 10.1016/j.aquatox.2023.106546
    4. Bruna Horvath Vieira, Suzelei Rodgher, Renata Natsumi Haneda, Ana Teresa Lombardi, Maria da Graça Gama Melão, Michiel Adriaan Daam, Evaldo Luiz Gaeta Espíndola, Importance of different exposure routes on the toxicity of chromium to planktonic organisms, 2024, 58, 1386-2588, 175, 10.1007/s10452-023-10054-6
    5. Laís Fernanda de Palma Lopes, Giseli Swerts Rocha, Jéssyca Ferreira de Medeiros, Cassiana Carolina Montagner, Evaldo Luiz Gaeta Espíndola, The acute effects of fipronil and 2,4-D, individually and in mixture: a threat to the freshwater Calanoida copepod Notodiaptomus iheringi, 2023, 30, 1614-7499, 80335, 10.1007/s11356-023-28066-y
    6. María Pilar González, Andrea Cordero-de-Castro, David Salvatierra, Rajaa Kholssi, Marisa Narciso Fernandes, Julián Blasco, Cristiano V.M. Araújo, Camilo Dias Seabra Pereira, Multi-level biological responses of Daphnia magna exposed to settleable atmospheric particulate matter from metallurgical industries, 2023, 263, 0166445X, 106692, 10.1016/j.aquatox.2023.106692
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2020 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(3474) PDF downloads(169) Cited by(6)

Figures and Tables

Figures(3)  /  Tables(2)

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog