
Concomitant with the expeditious growth of the construction industry, the challenge of building energy consumption has become increasingly pronounced. A multitude of factors influence the energy consumption of building operations, thereby underscoring the paramount importance of monitoring and predicting such consumption. The advent of big data has engendered a diversification in the methodologies employed to predict building energy consumption. Against the backdrop of factors influencing building operation energy consumption, we reviewed the advancements in research pertaining to the supervision and prediction of building energy consumption, deliberated on more energy-efficient and low-carbon strategies for buildings within the dual-carbon context, and synthesized the relevant research progress across four dimensions: The contemporary state of building energy consumption supervision, the determinants of building operation energy consumption, and the prediction and optimization of building energy consumption. Building upon the investigation of supervision and determinants of building energy consumption, three predictive methodologies were examined: (ⅰ) Physical methods, (ⅱ) data-driven methods, and (ⅲ) mixed methods. An analysis of the accuracy of these three predictive methodologies revealed that the mixed methods exhibited superior precision in the actual prediction of building energy consumption. Furthermore, predicated on this foundation and the identified determinants, we also explored research on the optimization of energy consumption prediction. Through an in-depth examination of building energy consumption prediction, we distilled the methodologies pertinent to the accurate forecasting of building energy consumption, thereby offering insights and guidance for the pursuit of building energy conservation and emission reduction.
Citation: Zhongjiao Ma, Zichun Yan, Mingfei He, Haikuan Zhao, Jialin Song. A review of the influencing factors of building energy consumption and the prediction and optimization of energy consumption[J]. AIMS Energy, 2025, 13(1): 35-85. doi: 10.3934/energy.2025003
[1] | Lamya Lairgi, Rachid Lagtayi, Yassir Lairgi, Abdelmajid Daya, Rabie Elotmani, Ahmed Khouya, Mohammed Touzani . Optimization of tertiary building passive parameters by forecasting energy consumption based on artificial intelligence models and using ANOVA variance analysis method. AIMS Energy, 2023, 11(5): 795-809. doi: 10.3934/energy.2023039 |
[2] | Bilal Akbar, Khuram Pervez Amber, Anila Kousar, Muhammad Waqar Aslam, Muhammad Anser Bashir, Muhammad Sajid Khan . Data-driven predictive models for daily electricity consumption of academic buildings. AIMS Energy, 2020, 8(5): 783-801. doi: 10.3934/energy.2020.5.783 |
[3] | Hamza El Hafdaoui, Ahmed Khallaayoun, Kamar Ouazzani . Activity and efficiency of the building sector in Morocco: A review of status and measures in Ifrane. AIMS Energy, 2023, 11(3): 454-485. doi: 10.3934/energy.2023024 |
[4] | Afamia Elnakat, Juan D. Gomez, Martha Wright . A measure to manage approach to characterizing the energy impact of residential building stocks. AIMS Energy, 2016, 4(4): 574-588. doi: 10.3934/energy.2016.4.574 |
[5] | Sumera I. Chaudhry, Manohar Das . Design of optimum reference temperature profiles for energy saving control of indoor temperature in a building. AIMS Energy, 2016, 4(6): 906-920. doi: 10.3934/energy.2016.6.906 |
[6] | Fiona Bénard-Sora, Jean-Philippe Praene, Yatina Calixte . Assess the local electricity consumption: the case of Reunion island through a GIS based method. AIMS Energy, 2018, 6(3): 436-452. doi: 10.3934/energy.2018.3.436 |
[7] | Akram Jahanshahi, Dina Jahanianfard, Amid Mostafaie, Mohammadreza Kamali . An Auto Regressive Integrated Moving Average (ARIMA) Model for prediction of energy consumption by household sector in Euro area. AIMS Energy, 2019, 7(2): 151-164. doi: 10.3934/energy.2019.2.151 |
[8] | Mohamed Elweddad, Muhammet Güneşer, Ziyodulla Yusupov . Designing an energy management system for household consumptions with an off-grid hybrid power system. AIMS Energy, 2022, 10(4): 801-830. doi: 10.3934/energy.2022036 |
[9] | Anbazhagan Geetha, S. Usha, J. Santhakumar, Surender Reddy Salkuti . Forecasting of energy consumption rate and battery stress under real-world traffic conditions using ANN model with different learning algorithms. AIMS Energy, 2025, 13(1): 125-146. doi: 10.3934/energy.2025005 |
[10] | Hossam A. Gabbar, Ahmed Eldessouky, Jason Runge . Evaluation of renewable energy deployment scenarios for building energy management. AIMS Energy, 2016, 4(5): 742-761. doi: 10.3934/energy.2016.5.742 |
Concomitant with the expeditious growth of the construction industry, the challenge of building energy consumption has become increasingly pronounced. A multitude of factors influence the energy consumption of building operations, thereby underscoring the paramount importance of monitoring and predicting such consumption. The advent of big data has engendered a diversification in the methodologies employed to predict building energy consumption. Against the backdrop of factors influencing building operation energy consumption, we reviewed the advancements in research pertaining to the supervision and prediction of building energy consumption, deliberated on more energy-efficient and low-carbon strategies for buildings within the dual-carbon context, and synthesized the relevant research progress across four dimensions: The contemporary state of building energy consumption supervision, the determinants of building operation energy consumption, and the prediction and optimization of building energy consumption. Building upon the investigation of supervision and determinants of building energy consumption, three predictive methodologies were examined: (ⅰ) Physical methods, (ⅱ) data-driven methods, and (ⅲ) mixed methods. An analysis of the accuracy of these three predictive methodologies revealed that the mixed methods exhibited superior precision in the actual prediction of building energy consumption. Furthermore, predicated on this foundation and the identified determinants, we also explored research on the optimization of energy consumption prediction. Through an in-depth examination of building energy consumption prediction, we distilled the methodologies pertinent to the accurate forecasting of building energy consumption, thereby offering insights and guidance for the pursuit of building energy conservation and emission reduction.
With the rapid development of the global economy and the continuous growth of the population, the proportion of building energy consumption in global energy consumption has increased yearly, becoming an important part of it. Building energy consumption refers to the energy used in the construction and operation of buildings, including the energy consumed in the production of building materials, construction processes, building operation, and maintenance. According to the International Energy Agency (IEA) [1], the share of building energy consumption in global energy consumption has risen from about 30% in the 1970s to approximately 40% today, and it is expected that buildings will account for more than half of global energy consumption by 2050. In China, as of 2021, building operation energy consumption accounted for 21% of the country's total energy consumption, with CO2 emissions constituting 19% of China's total CO2 emissions [2], as shown in Figure 1. In response to the increasing energy consumption of buildings, many scholars are studying the supervision and prediction of building energy consumption.
In an effort to address the issue of building energy consumption, numerous country leaders have advocated for the monitoring and management of building energy usage, alongside the implementation of pertinent regulations and standards aimed at reducing energy consumption, enhancing building energy efficiency, mitigating environmental pollution, and fostering sustainable development. Through the scrutiny of building energy consumption data, patterns and anomalies in energy use are identified, thereby providing a foundation for effective building energy management and facilitating the optimization of energy utilization and efficiency. Concurrently, researchers have embarked on the prediction of building energy consumption, with the aspiration of refining energy management through the anticipation of future energy consumption data, thereby contributing to energy conservation and emission reduction. Data-driven technologies are employed to conduct a comprehensive analysis of various factors, including the building environment, energy consumption, and geographical location, thereby offering data support for green building design and optimizing building design schemes.
To attain precision in building energy consumption prediction, researchers have proposed methodologies categorized as white-box, black-box, and gray-box approaches. Leveraging the granularity of IoT-enabled smart meter data, Natarajan et al. [3] utilized deep learning models to achieve accurate predictions of energy consumption in residential and commercial spaces. Ahmad et al. [4] introduced four machine-learning models to ensure the robustness and high accuracy of energy consumption predictions. Given the often complex and nonlinear nature of energy time series, a single model is typically insufficient for achieving satisfactory prediction results. Consequently, in recent years, an increasing number of scholars have endeavored to develop hybrid models to address this challenge. Xiao et al. [5] proposed constructing a hybrid prediction model based on the point selection ensemble group method, while Neo et al. [6] suggested the integration of XGboost into hybrid prediction methodologies. Building upon the research of these scholars, building energy consumption is effectively analyzed through data-driven and other methodologies, thereby enhancing building energy efficiency and reducing energy consumption. Furthermore, data-driven technologies can elucidate the relationship between various determinants of building energy consumption and actual energy usage, thereby enabling more targeted and precise energy consumption predictions.
In the literature, most researchers looking at building energy consumption prediction have focused on data-driven models, such as Ahmad et al. [7], who reviewed data-driven and large-scale building energy consumption, and Mohamad et al. [8], who researched machine learning, deep learning, and statistical analysis models for building energy consumption prediction. Mathieu et al. [9] directed their attention towards the attributes of input data and the methodologies employed in data preprocessing, subsequently conducting a comprehensive review of the advancements in novel data-driven models tailored for building-scale applications. Yin et al. [10] conducted a comprehensive review of the application of Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs) in predicting building energy consumption, with a particular emphasis on the evolution of ANNs for this purpose. Kadir et al. [11] focused on the scope of energy consumption prediction, the attributes of data employed, the methodologies of data preprocessing, and the machine learning algorithms utilized for predictive tasks. Most of these review articles introduce the application of data-driven approaches in building energy consumption prediction, allocating substantial consideration to aspects such as data-driven methodologies, algorithmic accuracy, and data preprocessing. Nevertheless, in practical scenarios, both intra-building and extra-building factors exert significant influence on the energy consumption of buildings. Consequently, we adopt a holistic approach, integrating the insights from prior research, to synthesize establishment and optimization strategies for building energy consumption prediction models, taking into account the multifaceted influences of building energy consumption factors, as informed by advancements in the field. Our purpose of this paper is to review the research progress of building energy consumption supervision and prediction and to discuss the practical significance of the research on building energy consumption supervision and prediction to green development.
To attain building energy efficiency and develop a more precise prediction methodology for building energy consumption, this study is primarily segmented into three phases: Delineating the scope of the literature review; establishing the criteria for literature selection; and categorizing and discussing the content of the selected literature.
This paper primarily encompasses an examination of the regulatory landscape governing building energy consumption, an analysis of the factors influencing building energy consumption, and an exploration of prediction methodologies for building energy consumption. Various factors influence the energy consumption of buildings, originating from the building's inherent characteristics such as design, structure, and materials, all of which impart a significant impact. Moreover, external factors, including climate, building equipment, and usage habits, also contribute to varying degrees of influence on the building, thereby correspondingly affecting energy consumption. The energy consumption values attributed to these diverse influencing factors are monitored by an energy consumption supervision system, which analyzes the data collected to facilitate short-term or long-term predictions of building energy consumption, thereby informing the formulation of targeted building energy conservation strategies. Accordingly, we focus on the selection of literature pertaining to the factors influencing building energy consumption, the supervision of building energy consumption, and the prediction of energy consumption.
During the initial phase of literature collection, a total of 232 articles were identified and screened from relevant websites and journals based on specific keywords. The primary keywords included: Building energy consumption prediction, building energy consumption supervision, and data-driven approaches. Owing to the substantial volume of retrieved literature, the selection of articles was guided by the following criteria: (ⅰ) Publication within the past decade to ensure the incorporation of the most up-to-date research content; (ⅱ) a focus on the forecasting of building energy consumption and load demand; and (ⅲ) research pertaining to energy consumption prediction and optimization grounded in building influencing factors. Furthermore, relevant laws and regulations enacted by various countries to manage building energy consumption were also reviewed. These studies encompass the research contributions of scholars from diverse countries in the field of building energy, and they collectively reflect a comprehensive consideration of the latest research developments in energy consumption forecasting.
Given the extensive volume of literature, these documents were categorized into distinct thematic areas at the outset of the screening process. The primary categories are as follows:
(ⅰ) The Current Status of Building Energy Consumption Supervision
We synthesize the regulatory frameworks of various countries, providing exemplars of pertinent regulatory provisions from representative nations. Accordingly, we introduce scholarly research on building energy consumption monitoring systems, discuss the developmental status of these systems with respect to architectural framework and system integration applications, and summarize the structural configuration of contemporary building energy consumption monitoring systems, thereby establishing a foundation for building energy consumption prediction.
(ⅱ) Categorization of Influencing Factors of Building Energy Consumption
A multitude of factors influence building operation energy consumption, including architectural design, construction materials, building equipment energy management, usage patterns, and environmental factors. While architectural design and construction materials are extensively discussed within the domains of civil engineering and architecture, building equipment energy management is intrinsically linked to occupant behavior. Consequently, we identify climatic conditions, occupant behavior, and urban morphology as emblematic factors influencing building operation energy consumption.
(ⅲ) Inquiry into Building Energy Consumption Forecasting
Research methodologies in the realm of building energy consumption prediction are predominantly classified into three categories: White-box methods (physical methods), black-box methods (data-driven methods), and gray-box methods (hybrid methods). We elaborate on the predictive processes of these three methodologies based on operational energy consumption factors, juxtaposing their respective advantages and disadvantages. Furthermore, given the diversity of methods within these three categories and the inherent limitations of relying on a single method for accurate building energy consumption prediction, we also explore optimization research in energy consumption prediction. By analyzing the procedural steps of building energy consumption prediction, two focal areas for optimization are selected for discussion: Algorithmic optimization and model optimization.
Through the synthesis, analysis, and summarization of the extant literature, a more precise methodology for forecasting building energy consumption is ascertained. As a proactive approach, building energy consumption prediction elucidates the intrinsic correlations between energy consumption determinants and actual energy usage via data-driven techniques, thereby furnishing a scientific foundation for formulating precise energy conservation strategies. In the realm of optimization research, investigations into algorithmic and model optimization reveal substantial potential for energy savings, facilitate the development of more refined building energy consumption optimization strategies, and enable the implementation of personalized and differentiated energy management practices.
With global energy consumption on the rise, building energy consumption, as a major contributor to overall energy use, has garnered significant attention. Many countries have implemented various measures to regulate and reduce building energy consumption. To address the increasing energy demands of buildings, governments worldwide have introduced a range of policy measures, including building energy efficiency standards, promoting renewable energy use, and green building evaluation systems. These policies are aimed at enhancing the energy efficiency of buildings, reducing energy consumption, and fostering sustainable development. Additionally, to decrease building energy consumption and improve energy efficiency, developing a building energy consumption monitoring system has been the subject of increasing research and attention. Researchers utilizing information technology are investigating various aspects of the monitoring system's general design framework, including IoT-based data collection modes, data transmission technologies, and database deployment strategies, with the goal of establishing a comprehensive and scientific energy consumption monitoring system for public buildings.
In China, the regulatory status of energy consumption in building operations has garnered widespread attention. The Chinese government has implemented various measures to control energy use in building operations, including setting standards, conducting energy efficiency assessments, providing financial support, and promoting green building practices. These actions are aimed at steering the development of the building industry towards greater energy conservation and environmental protection. To achieve this, the Chinese government has enacted several laws, regulations, and policies to enhance energy efficiency and promote sustainable development in the building sector.
China has developed a series of building energy efficiency standards, including the Design Standards for Building Energy Efficiency [12,13] and the Implementation Rules for Building Energy Efficiency Projects. These standards establish energy use limits and energy-efficient design requirements for buildings, aimed at ensuring that buildings operate with the lowest possible energy consumption. Additionally, China has implemented a mandatory energy efficiency rating system for building energy consumption. This system requires building owners to conduct energy efficiency assessments and ratings for new buildings and large-scale renovation projects, to ensure compliance with national energy efficiency standards. The Chinese government also encourages the construction industry to adopt advanced energy-saving technologies and equipment and has provided a range of fiscal and tax incentives to motivate building entities to implement energy management and energy-saving renovation measures [14]. Concurrently, China has established a special fund for building energy efficiency, which supports building energy management and technological innovation. China is actively promoting green building certification systems, such as the China Green Building Evaluation Standard (GB/T 50378) and the Green Building Evaluation Mark (three-star, four-star, and five-star), to encourage the adoption of sustainable design and construction practices in the construction industry. As shown in Table 1, from 2007 to the present, the Chinese government has issued a series of standards and policies for building energy management and energy-saving renovation measures.
Time/year | Name of policy, standard | Supervisor/Publishing department |
2007 | Implementation opinions on strengthening the energy conservation management of office buildings and large public buildings of state organs | Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development |
2007 | Guidelines for energy audit of office buildings and large public buildings of state agencies | Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development |
2008 | Regulations on energy conservation in civil buildings | State Council |
2008 | Technical guidelines related to the construction of energy consumption monitoring systems for office buildings of state organs and large public buildings | Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development |
2014 | Technical specification for remote monitoring system of energy consumption in public buildings JGJ/T285-2014 | Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development |
2016 | Guidelines for energy audits of public buildings | Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development |
2017 | The 13th five-year plan for building energy conservation and green development | Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development |
2019 | Green building evaluation CriteriaGB/T 50378-2019 | Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development |
In Europe and the United States, a range of regulations and standards for building energy efficiency have been established to promote the development of the building industry towards greater sustainability and energy efficiency. For instance, Europe's Building Energy Performance Directive (EPBD) mandates that EU member states develop and implement building energy performance requirements and encourage the use of renewable energy. Member states are required to ensure that new buildings meet certain energy efficiency standards and to conduct energy audits of buildings. Additionally, the U.S. Energy Policy Act (EPACT) sets energy efficiency requirements for buildings owned by the U.S. federal government and requires states to develop building energy codes. Each state in the United States has its own energy efficiency standards that apply to both commercial and residential buildings. These regulations and standards are part of the framework for regulating building energy consumption in Europe and the United States, promoting the adoption of energy-saving measures in the building industry to reduce energy use and carbon emissions by establishing energy efficiency standards, certification systems, and policy incentives. For examples, Table 2 lists the policies and standards for building energy efficiency and energy management issued by Japan, Germany, and the United States.
Country | Time/year | Name of policy, standard |
Japan | 1979 | Energy Conservation Act and Design standards for energy efficiency in public buildings |
1980 | Design standards for energy efficiency in residential buildings and Guidelines for Energy Efficient Design and Construction of Residential Buildings | |
1992 | Guidelines for Energy Efficient Design and Construction of Residential Buildings revised | |
1993 | Design standards for energy efficiency in residential buildings revised | |
2009 | Design standards for energy efficiency in public buildings Design standards for energy efficiency in residential buildings and Guidelines for Energy Efficient Design and Construction of Residential Buildings revised | |
2013 | Merger into Building Energy Efficiency Standard 2013 | |
Germany | 1952 | DN 4108 Insulation of high-rise buildings |
1976 | Building Energy Efficiency Act ENEG1976 | |
1977 | Building Insulation Regulations 1.0 | |
1982 | Building Insulation Regulations 2.0 | |
1994 | Building Insulation Regulations 3.0 | |
2002 | Building Energy Efficiency Regulation EnEV2002 | |
2005 | Building Energy Efficiency Regulation EnEG2005 | |
2007 | Building Energy Efficiency Regulation EnEV2007 | |
2014 | Building Energy Efficiency Regulation EnEV2014 | |
2020 | Building Energy Law (2020GEG) | |
United States | 1973 | Energy Policy and Conservation Law |
2005 | Energy Policy Act 2005 | |
2013 | Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) standard revision V4 | |
2022 | Federal Building Performance Standard |
In summary, a growing number of policies and legal provisions have been established for the supervision of building energy consumption both domestically and internationally. These initiatives collectively aim to contribute to the reduction of building energy consumption and to the global energy consumption reduction effort. Furthermore, it is evident that the awareness of building energy efficiency in European and American countries is ahead of China. Nevertheless, China's building energy efficiency policy has seen rapid development in recent years, keeping pace with the construction industry's growth. The Chinese government has revised its policies in line with current events, making a meaningful contribution to reducing global building energy consumption. These measures related to building energy efficiency provide a data foundation for the building energy consumption monitoring system and offer a reference range for further enhancing the accuracy of building energy consumption predictions.
In addition to the regulations for the supervision of building energy consumption both domestically and internationally, an in-depth study of building energy consumption supervision systems is warranted. Such studies can provide new measures for reducing building energy consumption when using cooling and heating equipment in buildings. Among the various building energy consumption monitoring systems, researchers primarily focus on the integration and application of system architecture, functional design, and system capabilities.
Starting from the overall design framework of the monitoring system, scholars have investigated the design method, data transmission technology, and database deployment method for the data collector in the Internet of Things (IoT), with the aim of constructing a scientific and comprehensive energy consumption monitoring system for public buildings, as depicted in Figure 2. Boris et al. [15] introduced a conceptual architecture for an integrated performance monitoring system that can facilitate planning, execution, inspection, and action modes. Zhao et al. [16] devised a comprehensive system tailored for the surveillance of energy consumption in large public edifices, meticulously engineered from six strategic dimensions: The strategic selection of building monitoring points, the sophisticated design of data collection protocols, the implementation of measures to preclude data loss, and the development of both top-level database architectures and application software. The creation of application software is tantamount to the visualization of data and the administration of the system, thereby necessitating a multi-faceted examination in the design of an integrated building energy monitoring system.
The current building energy consumption monitoring system can be roughly divided into five sections (Figure 2). The first section involves defining the objectives and requirements of the monitoring system based on the building's energy usage, designing the system, and selecting suitable sensors and data collectors. The second section entails installing sensors and data acquisition equipment at critical locations within the building, such as electricity meters, water meters, and temperature sensors. The third section involves collecting real-time building energy consumption data through sensors, including electricity, water, gas, and heat consumption, and then transmitting the collected data wirelessly to the processor. The fourth section utilizes computers for data clarification, storage, and analysis and calculates building energy consumption indicators, such as total energy consumption, sub-item energy consumption, and energy efficiency ratios. The fifth section involves displaying the generated energy consumption report on a device such as a mobile phone. Furthermore, in response to the inherent instability of the data, Ma et al. [17] introduced a methodology to ascertain latent erroneous energy consumption data utilizing the building energy consumption monitoring platform. They categorized energy utilization patterns, employed cluster analysis to detect anomalous data, and conducted a comparative analysis between real-time and historical energy consumption data to validate the precision of the methodology and enhance the overall data quality.
In addition, with the rapid development of emerging technologies such as the Internet of Things, the design of building energy consumption detection systems can also be based on this. For example, Malkawi et al. [18] designed a building energy management system based on data collection based on the Internet of Things architecture. Arun et al. [19] combined the Internet of Things technology to propose a safe and energy-saving intelligent building system architecture, which can effectively reduce building energy consumption through simulation analysis. Garín et al. [20] described an approach to a building environment monitoring system based on an open-source platform and the Internet of Things, which first collects data based on sensors and then analyzes and evaluates the collected data. In addition, the design of building energy consumption systems is carried out in combination with BIM tools, and Gökc et al. [21] have developed a system for building energy monitoring and management through sensor facilities, BIM tools, etc.
The architecture and design of building monitoring systems have garnered increasing attention with the rise of big data. By integrating big data with the supervision system, the energy consumption of building operations can be accurately tracked. Subsequently, based on the energy consumption values obtained from the building energy consumption monitoring system, researchers can make more precise predictions of building energy consumption equipment, enhancing the accuracy of their predictions and thereby reducing building energy consumption.
In the design of building energy monitoring systems, they will also be integrated with other systems or technologies. In this paragraph, the combination of building automation systems and energy management systems and building energy consumption monitoring systems is reviewed to obtain higher-quality building energy consumption monitoring data.
The Building Automation System (BAS) is an important part of the intelligent building, which automates the management of various mechanical and electrical equipment and systems in the building through centralized monitoring and remote control. Its core goal is to provide an efficient, safe, comfortable and economical living and working environment. Vandenbogaerde et al. [22] analyzed the building automation and control system for building energy consumption, such as heating, cooling, and ventilation of buildings, combined with the European standard EN 52120-1, and reflected the limitations of EN 52120-1 and the key parameters that need to be considered in the practical application of building automation and control systems. Morshed et al. [23] investigated a data mining method based on using K-means clustering analysis on building management systems to identify sources of waste in buildings.
An Energy Management System (EMS) is a systematic solution for monitoring, controlling, and optimizing energy consumption. By collecting and analyzing energy usage data, the system helps businesses or organizations manage energy consumption more effectively, thereby reducing costs, reducing environmental impact, and improving energy efficiency. Muhammad et al. [24] developed a method for optimizing building energy management systems that uses multi-criteria decision-making techniques to balance the demand and consumption of buildings.
In addition to the integrated application of the above two systems, there are also the applications of artificial intelligence technology, sensor network monitoring systems, etc. Rajalakshmi et al. [25] proposed the application of artificial intelligence technology in the monitoring of energy management in intelligent buildings to monitor energy consumption and utilization. Wang et al. [26] used a sensor network-based monitoring system to analyze the performance of building energy-saving parameters.
In summary, the research progress related to the design of building energy consumption monitoring systems has achieved certain results. The design of building energy consumption monitoring systems can mainly provide a new management scheme for building energy conservation, so as to achieve energy conservation and emission reduction from the demand side. However, there are some challenges in the design of building energy consumption monitoring systems, such as efficient operation and maintenance of the system, data security, and privacy protection. Future research can continue to focus on these issues and seek more efficient and reliable design methods to provide technical support for building energy efficiency and green building development.
As research into building energy consumption supervision systems progresses, the understanding of the factors influencing building energy consumption has similarly evolved. Building energy consumption primarily encompasses expenditures in heating, cooling, lighting, and electrical appliances. The principal determinants of such consumption include architectural design, construction materials, equipment usage patterns, environmental conditions, and occupant behaviors. Within individual buildings or complexes, the specific factors influencing energy consumption vary with the architectural style. Consequently, architectural design must be considered within the broader context of urban morphology for a holistic evaluation. For isolated structures, indoor and outdoor meteorological conditions, as well as occupant behavior, are critical variables contributing to energy consumption fluctuations. In the context of urban clusters, the morphology shaped by urban planning and design, along with the urban green belt coverage ratio, influences urban heat emissions, thereby impacting building energy consumption. Thus, the primary factors examined in this discourse are climatic conditions, occupant behavior, and urban morphology.
Climatic conditions are an important external factor influencing a building's energy consumption. For example, Thomas et al. [27] analyzed the impact of urban microclimate on building energy consumption based on the monthly urban energy consumption data of New York in the past three years, and Chen [28] AutoBPS was used to establish 22 different urban buildings, and the total energy use intensity of these 22 types of urban buildings in 2050 and 2080 under the scenario of low emissions in the future was compared, and the energy intensity of buildings increased by climate change was obtained. Luo et al. [29] proposed a model predictive control (MPC) system that relies on weather forecasting. This system is used to select the mode of renewable energy generation and building energy consumption. Furthermore, Nowak et al. [30] conducted a systematic review of the impact of microclimate on energy consumption, albeit with a focus on delineating Eco-feedback technology as a mechanism for energy conservation aimed at enhancing household awareness regarding energy usage.
Climatic conditions that typically affect a building's energy consumption include temperature, wind direction and speed, sunlight, and climate zones, as shown in Figure 3. However, depending on the region, the climatic conditions that affect the energy consumption of buildings are also different. For example, heating in cold areas accounts for a large proportion of energy consumption, while cooling energy consumption in hot areas accounts for a large proportion. Therefore, according to the local climatic conditions, the energy consumption of buildings can be reduced by adopting appropriate energy-saving technologies and measures.
Temperature is one of the most direct factors affecting a building's energy consumption. In cold regions, buildings require a lot of heating energy to maintain indoor temperatures, while in hot areas, air conditioning energy consumption is relatively high. In areas with large temperature differences, the energy consumption of buildings will also increase accordingly. Verichev et al. [31] studied the changes in heating energy consumption of residential buildings in three regions of southern Chile under two scenarios of increased temperatures and found that the increase in temperature led to a decrease in the heating energy consumption of residential buildings. Li et al. [32] studied the variation of cooling energy consumption of office buildings in different climatic zones in China and concluded that the annual cooling load is mainly affected by dry-bulb temperature in severely cold regions, while wet-bulb temperature is affected in other regions.
Wind direction and velocity significantly influence the natural ventilation of a building. During the architectural design phase, it is imperative to consider the local wind direction and velocity to optimize the building's layout and morphology, thereby mitigating the energy consumption associated with ventilation and air conditioning systems. A favorable wind direction can facilitate the exchange of air between the interior and exterior, thereby diminishing the reliance on air conditioning and mechanical ventilation systems and subsequently lowering energy consumption. The velocity of the wind enhances the convective heat transfer effect, which in turn impacts the heat exchange on the building's external surfaces. Du et al. [33] conducted an analysis of the coupling relationship between the rugged topography of coastal cities, urban heat islands, land-sea breezes, and related local wind patterns, as well as their collective impact on the energy consumption of urban buildings. Mikulik [34] investigated the correlation between various meteorological parameters—including wind speed, irradiation, humidity, and air temperature—and observed energy consumption, revealing a correlation coefficient of no more than 0.25 between energy demand and wind speed. Liu et al. [35] identified that the wind velocity at the building's corner significantly influenced the energy consumption of high-rise buildings during renovations in severe cold regions. The renovation notably mitigated the strong wind zones in winter and the calm wind areas in summer. In summary, wind direction and velocity are pivotal factors affecting building energy consumption, and through judicious design and strategic interventions, it is possible to effectively reduce building energy consumption and enhance energy efficiency.
Sunlight conditions have a direct impact on a building's energy consumption for lighting and heating. Adequate sunlight can reduce the energy consumption of lighting, while in areas with insufficient sunlight, the energy consumption of buildings will increase accordingly. In addition, sunlight can also provide free heating energy for the building, reducing heating energy consumption. Mitja et al. [36] studied that slender buildings are more effective at harvesting solar energy than compact buildings in Central European climates, saving the need for heating energy.
The energy consumption characteristics of buildings in different climate zones are different. For example, the energy consumption of buildings in tropical regions is mainly used for air conditioning and lighting, while the energy consumption of buildings in temperate regions is mainly used for heating and air conditioning. Duan et al. [37] studied the influence of climatic conditions on building energy consumption under the conditions of five thermal climate distributions in China and concluded that the influence of climatic conditions on building energy consumption is greater due to the greater energy consumption of building operations in severe cold areas and hot summer and cold winter areas. Ayoub et al. [38] selected six typical cities in Morocco to compare building energy consumption, and found that buildings in the Mediterranean climate have the largest energy demand, while those in the desert climate have the least energy demand. Wang et al. [39] analyzed measures to reduce hospital energy consumption in areas with hot summers and warm winters and proposed two measures to save energy and reduce emissions: Photovoltaic power generation and green roofs.
In summary, climatic conditions are an important factor affecting the energy consumption of buildings, but the climatic conditions listed in this paragraph are far less than the impact of actual climatic conditions on building energy consumption, and specific analysis is required in combination with the actual building. For example, Kim et al. [40] used experimental reference years to study the impact of climate parameters on the energy demand of buildings in 18 regions of South Korea and concluded that temperature has a greater impact on building energy consumption in winter and solar irradiance has a greater impact on building energy consumption in summer. Therefore, in the analysis of the energy consumption of the actual building, it is often necessary to consider the influence of multiple climatic conditions on it to ensure the accuracy of the building energy consumption prediction.
The impact of occupant behavior on building energy consumption is often multifaceted, and the mode of energy consumption, the amount of energy consumed, and the distribution of consumption time all affect the prediction of building energy consumption. The use behavior of the occupant directly determines the switching status and running time of the internal equipment of the building, including lighting, air conditioning, heating, refrigeration, and electrical appliances. For example, excessive lighting use will increase electricity consumption, and inappropriate air conditioning and heating use will increase fossil energy consumption, which will directly affect the energy consumption of buildings. Generally, the influence of occupant behavior on building energy consumption can be primarily categorized into three aspects: Occupancy, interaction, and behavioral efficiency. A high occupancy rate tends to elevate the frequency of interaction between individuals and building systems, thereby affording greater opportunities to optimize energy consumption through these interactions. Moreover, well-designed interaction mechanisms, such as intuitive control systems and real-time energy consumption feedback, have the potential to enhance the behavioral efficiency of occupants, thereby incentivizing more energy-efficient practices. Additionally, at a constant occupancy rate, a higher level of behavioral efficiency is likely to result in reduced energy consumption. Conversely, lower behavioral efficiency may exacerbate the energy consumption issues associated with high occupancy levels. as shown in Figure 4 [41].
Occupancy mainly refers to the occupancy rate of occupants in the building, and factors such as the number of people in the building, the time distribution of activities, and the nature of activities (e.g., different energy consumption needs of offices and gyms) will affect the total amount of energy consumption. For example, the peak energy consumption of domestic buildings usually occurs from the evening to night, while the peak energy consumption of commercial buildings may occur during the day on weekdays. Hu et al. [42] analyzed the composition and floor area of 4964 households in China based on a questionnaire survey, and concluded that the larger the unit size of the household, the greater the energy consumption of the building. Osman et al. [43] studied the energy use intensity of six types of households: Single working individuals, single retired individuals, working couples, retired couples, nuclear families, and single-parent families and found that regions with more retirees had higher energy intensity at noon and larger households. Luo et al. [44] studied the impact of hotel occupancy rate on the efficiency of building photovoltaic cell energy consumption and proposed a new scheme for hotel energy cost savings.
Interaction refers to the behavior and habits of the occupants in the use of the building, such as: The interaction of the occupants with lighting, the interaction with the air conditioning system, the interaction with the heating system, the interaction with electrical appliances, etc. Moreover, regulating indoor temperatures, using lighting and appliances wisely, and avoiding wasting energy can reduce building energy consumption. Duan et al. [45] divided the energy consumption of households living in high-rise buildings into five categories, namely, households with high energy consumption for heating and cooling, households with low energy consumption for heating and cooling, households with high cooling energy consumption and low heating energy consumption, households with low cooling energy consumption, households with high heating energy consumption, and households with medium energy consumption for heating and cooling. For university buildings, Deng et al. [46] calculated the electricity consumption of university dormitory buildings in China's hot summer and cold winter areas for two consecutive years, and concluded that the frequency of computer use by men and women is different, and the height and orientation of the floors lead to different electricity consumption in the dormitories. Zhang et al. [47] proposed an improved building energy consumption prediction system, which uses the duration of occupant behavior as an input parameter to more accurately reflect the relationship between building users and building energy consumption.
Behavioral efficiency refers to consciously improving the awareness and awareness of building users on energy conservation and emission reduction through publicity, which is also one of the effective ways to reduce building energy consumption. Rational usage mode can reduce ineffective energy waste and improve energy efficiency by optimizing the operating state of the equipment. For example, the intelligent control system can effectively reduce energy waste by adjusting the temperature of the air conditioner according to the temperature difference between indoor and outdoor and the needs of personnel. Zhou et al. [48] established a model of residents' behavior in government office buildings, analyzed the specific causes of residents' energy consumption behavior, and reduced the energy intensity of buildings as a basis for improving building energy efficiency. Yoon et al. [49] designed a new building energy consumption model based on the energy consumption of individual rooms, offices, and retail tenants in commercial buildings, focusing on the different energy consumption caused by different tenants to achieve energy conservation and emission reduction.
According to the above research and analysis results on occupant behavior, it was found that the use behavior of occupants greatly affects the consumption of building energy, and different family structures will lead to different consumption of building energy. Therefore, in the prediction of building energy consumption, the behavior habits of occupants need to be considered. In addition, in order to better save energy and reduce emissions, it is advisable to consider taking into account the behavior and habits of occupants in the future building design and functional layout, so that occupants can use reasonable equipment, reduce the consumption of ineffective energy, and reduce energy intensity to improve the prediction accuracy in the prediction of building energy consumption.
The impact of urban form on a building's energy consumption is multifaceted. The urban form mostly includes the density, type, and spatial layout of the buildings, as shown in Figure 5. Different urban forms will have an impact on solar radiation, wind direction, and speed, which impact the energy consumption of buildings.
First, the density and height of buildings in cities are often higher, which leads to the heat island effect between buildings, where temperatures are higher in urban areas than in surrounding rural areas. This heat island effect increases the cooling demand of the building, which in turn increases energy consumption. Du [50] categorized the urban morphological parameters into three distinct groups—urban structure, vegetation coverage, and impervious surface thermal characteristics—under mesoscale climatic conditions, and subsequently investigated the impact of these three urban forms on building energy consumption.
Furthermore, buildings in cities tend to be more concentrated, which can lead to poor heat exchange and ventilation between buildings, further increasing energy consumption. Rostami et al. [51] studied the energy consumption and solar energy utilization in urban canyons and neighborhoods in three different regions under semi-arid climate conditions, and the results showed that different urban morphologies had an impact on both solar energy utilization and energy consumption in cities. Liu et al. [52] proposed a framework for multi-objective urban form design optimization to combine urban form with building energy consumption and solar energy potential, and summarized the optimal energy-saving building form in Jianhu City. The concentration of urban form signifies a concentration of population residences, where the flow of people is substantial, leading to increased demand for building energy consumption.
The existence of an urban green environment also affects the generation of building energy consumption. Wang et al. [53] analyzed the correlation between the layout of different building environments around urban parks and building energy consumption, and concluded that water bodies and roads have a positive effect on compact high-rise buildings and a negative effect on sparse high-rise buildings. Zhu et al. [54] analyzed the relationship between urban vegetation morphology and urban building energy consumption, and concluded that urban vegetation morphology can significantly reduce the energy consumption of urban buildings. Shareef et al. [55] aimed to explore urban forms suitable for the local climate in the UAE region to reduce the indoor energy consumption of buildings, and concluded that building orientation is the main factor affecting the energy consumption of urban blocks.
A well-designed spatial layout can enhance the accessibility and connectivity of a building or area. Similarly, a well-designed public space can offer a venue for leisure and social interaction, which can encourage residents' engagement, promote outdoor activities, enhance resident satisfaction and lead to increased occupancy. Xie et al. [56] analyzed the impact of different urban forms on the energy consumption and solar power generation potential of university dormitory buildings, and the results showed that different block patterns would lead to different energy use intensities. Ge et al. [57] analyzed the impact of vertical meteorological models on the energy consumption of different urban blocks, and obtained a regression equation for the relationship between building energy consumption and urban block morphology. Nasrollahi et al. [58] studied the influence of urban morphological parameters on building energy consumption in the Ilang region, and concluded that building height had the greatest impact on building energy consumption. High-density cities can offer a wider array of housing options to cater to the diverse needs of various income levels and lifestyles. A rich housing supply can help draw in diverse groups of people. However, it is important to recognize that excessive urban density can have a detrimental effect on environmental quality. Yu et al. [59] studied the inter-building effect (EBI) of energy consumption of high-rise office buildings in high-density cities, and in order to ensure the accuracy of the data, the impact of shutters on EBI was considered, and the results showed that the impact of EBI on the total energy consumption of buildings was as high as 13.1%.
In summary, urban forms increase the energy consumption of buildings and provide more opportunities to save energy and reduce emissions. In the early stage of urban construction, the urban form should be taken into account to fundamentally reduce the energy consumption of urban buildings and improve the accuracy of building energy consumption prediction.
In the prediction of building energy consumption, the above factors do not completely summarize the fluctuation of building energy consumption, but whether it is climatic conditions, building use behavior, or urban form, as shown in Table 3 and Figure 6, they are important factors affecting building operation energy consumption, which provide prerequisites for predicting building energy consumption. For the energy use of specific buildings, it is necessary to conduct multi-party investigation and research, this paragraph only provides a relevant analysis for predicting building energy consumption, and on the basis of these influencing factors, researchers can more accurately study new energy consumption prediction models and improve the accuracy of building energy consumption prediction.
Classification of factors | Keywords in the literature | Summary |
Climatic conditions | Temperature [60,61,62], Solar irradiance [63], Shading of buildings [64], Typical meteorological year [65,66], Micrometeorology [67], Urban heat islands [68], Climate scenarios [29], Meteorological parameters [69] | Different climatic conditions call for different strategies for building energy consumption, and climate parameters must be considered in various aspects when predicting building energy consumption. |
Occupant use behavior | Occupant behavior [70,71,72,73,74], Windowing behavior [75,76,77,78], Air conditioning usage behavior [79], Family mode [80], Space occupancy [81] | Occupant use behavior mainly refers to people's activity patterns, equipment usage habits, and requirements for indoor environmental comfort in the building, which affect the energy consumption of buildings to varying degrees. |
Urban form | Urban density [82], Residential type space [83], Architectural features [84], Layout of residential complexes [85], Green coverage [86], High-rise buildings [87], Community building layout parameters [88], Urban morphological factors [89,90,91], Type of dwelling cluster [92], Block form [93], City profile [94], City geometry parameters [95], Architectural layout [96], Behavior of school building use [97] | Building density, orientation, street width, and direction can influence a building's natural ventilation and daylight availability, leading to varying cooling and heating requirements. The height and high floor area ratio of a building determine the ratio of its external surface area to volume, which in turn affects heat exchange and energy loss. |
Accurate building energy forecasting can help building managers understand future energy needs, so they can develop more effective energy conservation measures and energy use strategies. In the prediction of building energy consumption, it can be seen from the previous paragraph that there are many influencing factors, such as building type, building heating mode, internal personnel behavior, and urban form, which can affect the prediction of building energy consumption. Therefore, the establishment and optimization of prediction models for building energy consumption is an important research topic. Constructing an accurate building energy consumption prediction model is an effective measure for building energy conservation, which can help managers control operating costs and optimize energy scheduling by predicting building energy consumption. When there is an anomaly in the building energy system, the building energy consumption forecast can also help to carry out maintenance and repair in a timely manner. Therefore, it is crucial for research content to do a good job in the prediction and optimization of building energy consumption.
In the past few decades, many scholars have conducted a lot of research on the prediction of building energy consumption, aiming at the prediction algorithms, models, and characteristics of building energy, etc., and now the research methods of building energy consumption prediction are mainly divided into three categories: physical model (white box method), data-driven method (black box method), and hybrid method (gray box method) [98].
Physical models, also known as white box methods, typically evaluate a building's energy consumption based on comprehensive data, including the building's construction details, HVAC system specifications, physical characteristics of equipment, and occupant behavior patterns. The physical modeling approach necessitates the establishment of a detailed building physics model, which encompasses the geometric structure, material properties, thermal characteristics, and internal equipment systems of the building. Additionally, it is imperative to account for the heat exchange between the building and the external environment, thereby maintaining energy balance. Utilizing the developed physical model, in conjunction with input meteorological parameters and other relevant data, the predicted energy consumption of the building is calculated through simulation. Consequently, physical models generally rely on computer simulation tools and software, such as EnergyPlus, eQUEST, DOE-2, Trnsys, and Matlab, to forecast energy consumption by simulating the building's thermal environment and air conditioning load.
EnergyPlus is a building energy consumption simulation engine jointly developed by the U.S. Department of Energy and Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, which is a detailed software that can simulate building energy consumption, suitable for simulation and evaluation of building heating, cooling, lighting, ventilation and other energy consumption. Wang et al. [99] used a dynamic coupling of the physical model (VCWG) with EnergyPlus, which provides the prediction conditions of the urban microclimate to EnergyPlus, and EnergyPlus predicts the heat dissipation and exterior surface temperature of the building. Bilous et al. [100] established a dynamic simulation model of the room in EnergyPlus to analyze the influence of these factors on the thermal state of the building. Based on meteorological data, Wang et al. [101] established the EnergyPlus simulation model under two climatic conditions to analyze and predict the overall energy consumption, heating energy consumption, and cooling energy consumption of office buildings.
Design Builder is a comprehensive user interface simulation software developed based on EnergyPlus, which can perform simulation calculations and analyses for building heating, carbon emissions, building incremental costs, light simulation, indoor and outdoor CFD simulations, and LEED scores. Wang et al. [102] used Design Builder to simulate the annual dynamic energy consumption of three models: The target single building, the target building and the building group within 50 m, and the target building and the building group within 200 m, and analyzed the energy consumption difference of the target building under three different conditions.
Trnsys is an instantaneous system simulation program that simulates and evaluates building energy consumption by entering a building model to simulate the built environment. Hu et al. [103] used Trnsys to simulate and predict the energy consumption of rural residential buildings and analyzed the carbon emissions and their economics under three different heating methods: Natural gas, biomass and standard plum, and biomass and air conditioning. In addition, Trnsys can also analyze the hourly energy consumption of buildings throughout the year, simulate and calculate solar heat pump systems or ground source heat pump systems, etc., and can establish links with other software such as EnergyPlus and Matlab to provide strong support for building energy consumption data prediction. Cao et al. [104] proposed a method combining WRF and Trnsys, which uses the data provided by WRF to make corrections in Trnsys and then predict the cooling and heating loads of commercial buildings. Alibabaei et al. [105] studied the development of a joint Matlab and Trnsys simulator for more advanced and accurate predictive control and verified the effectiveness of the simulator on the energy saving of actual residential HVAC systems under three different types of prediction strategies: load shifting, intelligent dual-fuel switching system, and load shifting and intelligent dual-fuel switching system.
eQUEST is a DOE-2 engine-based building energy simulation tool, which can be applied to building energy simulation and economic analysis of various building types. The software can output graphical results intuitively, which is convenient for users to analyze the results of building energy consumption. Zhao et al. [106] proposed a building energy consumption prediction method based on monitoring data and Bayesian theory, and used eQUEST software to establish a campus building energy consumption model and output the results, which verified the applicability of the method. Xing et al. [107] used eQUEST software to conduct energy simulation analysis of hotel buildings, studied the major factors affecting the energy consumption of hotel buildings, and proposed energy-saving renovation measures.
The white box method uses the laws of physics (e.g., thermodynamics, heat transfer, etc.) to simulate and predict building energy consumption through detailed building information, including the building's structure, material properties, equipment performance, and operating mechanisms. The white box method is based on physical processes so that the model can be adapted and optimized to suit the energy consumption characteristics of different buildings in the face of different building types, designs, and operating modes. In addition, the white box method not only simulates the energy consumption under known conditions but also predict the energy consumption response of the building under changing environmental and operation strategies, providing a scientific basis for the energy management and energy-saving measures of the building. However, since the white box method is mostly based on physical processes for prediction, researchers need to have professional knowledge of physics, which is difficult for people who lack physical knowledge. In recent years, due to the rise of big data, data-driven applications in building energy consumption prediction have become more and more extensive.
The data-driven method, also known as the black box method, is a simplified approach commonly used in building energy simulations. This method does not delve into the detailed physical processes of a building's energy consumption, but instead treats the building as a "black box", focusing only on the relationship between inputs (time series characteristics, meteorological conditions, building physical parameters, etc.) and outputs (building heating and cooling loads, electricity consumption, etc.). When using the black box method to simulate the energy consumption of a building, it is not necessary to have an in-depth understanding of the details of the building's internal structure, material properties, equipment performance, etc., but only to focus on the overall energy consumption characteristics of the building. The black box method can improve the efficiency of the simulation, lower the technical threshold, and provide scientific and practical analysis results for building energy efficiency in the simulation of building energy consumption.
According to Sun et al. [108], the classification of data-driven models for building energy forecasting can be divided into two categories: statistical models and machine learning models, as shown in Figure 7.
Statistical analysis is a method of collecting, analyzing, interpreting, and presenting data using mathematical and statistical methods. In the field of data science, statistical analysis is the basis for building machine learning models and conducting data exploration, providing theoretical support and data processing methods for machine learning algorithms. The purpose of this method is to establish a statistical relationship between energy consumption and influencing parameters by analyzing historical energy consumption data to make energy consumption predictions. Such methods mostly include linear regression models and time series models.
Linear regression models are common in the field of machine learning and are mainly used to predict the linear relationship between a continuous target variable and one or more independent variables. The linear regression model mainly combines the historical eigenvalues and model parameters of building energy consumption to predict building energy consumption. Linear regression models are typically noted as:
y=w1x1+w2x2+⋯+wnxn+b=[w0w1w2…wn][x0x1…xn]+b |
thereinto:
● y is the prediction function;
● w is the model parameter;
● x is the feature input;
● b is the paranoid quantity.
R2 (coefficient of determination), MAE (mean absolute error), MSE (mean square error), RMSE (root mean square error), MAPE (mean absolute percentage error), and so on are used as metrics to evaluate the predicted performance of the linear regression model. In the linear regression model, when the coefficient of determination is high, and the mean square error and root mean square error values are low, it is indicative that the method can be effectively utilized as a prediction model for building energy consumption. As a typical example, Ciulla et al. [109] developed an alternative white-box method, a reliable multiple linear regression method, to predict building energy. This method selects several suitable variables for sensitivity analysis and then develops simple linear relationships to determine the cooling and heating load requirements of buildings. Bilous et al. [100] established a multiple nonlinear regression model, which used the modified coefficient of determination as the prediction criterion and the indoor air temperature as the eigenvalue. This model was verified to have high applicability and accuracy and can be used for other performance parameters of indoor and outdoor buildings.
Time series models are primarily suited for processing time series data and predicting energy consumption trends. Similarly, the prediction criteria for time series models are derived from metrics such as MAE (mean absolute error), MSE (mean square error), RMSE (root mean square error), and MAPE (mean absolute percentage error). Li et al. [110] developed a time series energy consumption prediction model for five campus buildings in northern China. They proposed an energy consumption evaluation method based on sub-projection and overall forecasting and conducted a comprehensive comparison of MAE (mean absolute error), RMSE (root mean square error), and CV-RMSE (coefficient of variation of root mean square error). They concluded that the accuracy of building energy consumption sub-prediction was higher than that of the overall prediction. In time series analysis, there are also autoregressive moving average models (ARMA) and differential autoregressive moving average models (ARIMA). Alexander et al. [111] proposed a genetic algorithm to optimize the regression wavelet neural network to predict the daily gas consumption of buildings, which uses the multiple nonlinear autoregressive model modeling of the s-shaped neural network and performs wavelet decomposition on the time series of outdoor average temperature regression, which effectively reduces the prediction error compared with the traditional autoregressive moving average error model. Jahanshahi et al. [112] employed an autoregressive composite moving average model to predict energy consumption in residential buildings across the EU, revealing an improvement in energy efficiency. Transformer models have great advantages in analysis and time series forecasting models because of their powerful sequence modeling capabilities and ability to capture long-distance dependencies in time series. Li et al. [113] proposed the Transformer model to establish a building load prediction model based on the dependence between time series information in building load data, and compared with the latest methods of the XGBoost model, deep learning model (LSTM model), and hybrid model (CLM model), the TRN model has higher prediction accuracy.
The linear regression model is well-suited for capturing the linear relationship between building energy consumption and static factors such as floor area, number of floors, geographical location, etc. Moreover, the time series model predicts that building energy consumption is influenced by various dynamic factors, including seasonality, calendar effects, weather changes, etc., and can effectively capture the patterns of these changes. In the evaluation of the predictions from these two models, the coefficient of determination (R2), adjusted R2, mean square error (MSE), root mean square error (RMSE), and mean absolute error (MAE) are used as metrics for assessing prediction errors. The linear regression model is typically used for long-term forecasting, while the time series model is more suitable for short-term forecasting. In practical building energy consumption forecasting, it may be beneficial to combine time series models and linear regression models to leverage the strengths of both. For instance, a time series model could be used for short-term forecasting, followed by a linear regression model for long-term forecasting. Alternatively, a linear regression model could be used to extract static features, which could then be combined with a time series model to capture dynamic changes.
In summary, the building energy consumption prediction model based on statistical analysis primarily performs linear analysis on characteristic parameters, which can intuitively depict the variability of building energy consumption. However, due to the prevalence of many nonlinear relationships in building energy consumption data, statistical analysis methods are not fully applicable for building energy consumption prediction. Consequently, prediction accuracy may be compromised. As a result, machine learning methods have become increasingly prevalent in recent years.
Machine learning is a branch of artificial intelligence that enables computers to learn from data to improve performance without the need for explicit programming. Machine learning models predict the output of unknown data by learning patterns from data. These models can be statistically based, such as linear regression, logistic regression, or complex algorithms, including decision trees and support vector machines. The goal of machine learning is to build models that can learn from historical data and make predictions or decisions. Researchers use machine learning models to analyze building energy consumption data, including deep learning (DL), artificial neural networks (ANN), random forests (RF), and support vector machines (SVMs). Similar to the statistical analysis model, the machine learning approach to building energy consumption prediction also relies on metrics such as the coefficient of determination (R2), adjusted R2, mean square error (MSE), root mean square error (RMSE), and mean absolute error (MAE).
Deep learning (DL) is a subfield of machine learning (ML) that focuses on learning complex patterns and features of data using neural networks with multi-layered structures. These neural networks mimic how the human brain works, passing and processing information layer by layer, extracting useful features from raw data. Common deep learning architectures encompass Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs), Recurrent Neural Networks (RNNs), Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) frameworks, and Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs). These architectures are individually examined as representative methodologies within the domain of deep learning, while the respective advantages and disadvantages of the latter three deep learning methodologies are delineated in Table 4.
Deep learning category | Examples of individual documents | Similar literature | Advantage | Disadvantage |
Convolutional Neural Network (CNN)![]() |
Maryam et al. [114] proposed a method for predicting the energy consumption of mosques, using a convolutional neural network deep learning model that can operate in different operating scenarios. | CNN [115,116,117,118,119,120,121,122], Spatiotemporal Graph Convolutional Network (STGCN) [123,124], Temporal Convolutional Neural Network (TCN) [125,126] | Automatically extract data features, process multi-dimensional data, local perception, and parameter sharing | The data demand is large, the training time is long, and the interpretation is poor |
Recurrent Neural Networks (RNNs)![]() |
Rahman et al. [127] developed a new deep recurrent neural network model for hourly power consumption prediction for commercial and residential buildings. | RNN [128,129,130,131,132,133,134,135,136] | It has time series data processing ability and memory ability and can carry out parameter sharing and dynamic input processing | Easy gradient vanishing and gradient explosion, difficult to capture long-term dependencies, poor explanatory properties |
Long Short-Term Memory Architecture (LSTM)![]() |
Jang et al. [137] created three LSTM models for analysis and comparison of the impact of the operation of non-residential buildings on the prediction of building heating energy consumption. | LSTM [138,139,140,141,142,143,144,145,146,147], FRS-LSTM [148], BiLSTM [149] | It can capture long-term dependencies, alleviate the problem of gradient vanishing, and have strong time series data processing capabilities | The computational cost is high, the training efficiency is slow, the risk of overfitting is prone to occur, and the interpretation is poor |
A combination of more than two types of deep learning![]() |
Somu et al. [150] proposed a deep learning framework called kCNN-LSTM, which collates and processes the energy consumption data of each stage recorded in advance to accurately predict the energy consumption of buildings. | ResNet-LSTM [151], CNN-LSTM [152,153,154,155,156], CNN-RNN [157], LSTM-AEs and CNNs [158], CNN and BiLSTM [159], Mixed DL and LSTM [160] | Automatic identification of features, ability to process irregular energy consumption data, ability to process correlations between time and historical energy consumption, etc. | The computational cost is high, the interpretability is poor, and the training difficulty is increased. |
An artificial neural network (ANN) comprises numerous interconnected neurons, each possessing a specific input-output relationship. These neurons are typically organized into three layers: The input layer, the hidden layer, and the output layer (Figure 8). The input layer receives external data, the hidden layer processes and transforms the data, and the output layer delivers the final result. Despite the nonlinear nature of most building energy consumption data, ANNs possess adaptive learning capabilities, enabling them to automatically extract features from input data without the need for complex feature engineering. They are adept at handling complex and nonlinear data, capturing intricate relationships among various factors, and thereby predicting building energy consumption with greater accuracy. Moreover, ANNs are robust and can tolerate a certain level of data noise and outliers. Afzal et al. [161] employed three extended ANN frameworks and a regression model to predict cooling and heating loads, comprehensively analyzed the correlation coefficients of the cooling and heating loads, and optimized the data to develop an optimal hybrid model. Talib et al. [162] employed artificial neural network (ANN) models to accomplish multi-step forecasting of building thermodynamics utilizing historical and contemporary data. To mitigate the overfitting phenomenon inherent in ANN models, the dataset underwent cross-validation, thereby facilitating effective generalization of the dataset. Consequently, the root mean square error (RMSE) of the ANN model was determined, demonstrating commendable performance.
ANNs typically demand a significant number of computational resources, particularly when dealing with large datasets. Moreover, due to the multitude of ANN parameters, if the training data is insufficient, the risk of overfitting increases, which can diminish the model's generalization ability and lead to a reduction in prediction accuracy. Lu et al. [163] employed a geographically weighted regression model to analyze the influencing factors of energy consumption in commercial buildings in Singapore. They utilized K-means clustering and an artificial neural network to predict energy consumption, significantly enhancing the fitting effect. However, the analysis lacked comprehensive data, and the number of datasets for each cluster was not equal, resulting in inaccuracies in cross-sectional data comparison.
Artificial neural networks (ANNs) generally possess robust capabilities for predicting building energy consumption. Their multi-layer architecture is adept at processing nonlinear data, and their capacity for automatic feature extraction mitigates reliance on intricate feature engineering, while exhibiting a certain degree of robustness. Nevertheless, ANNs are not without the common shortcomings inherent to neural network models, including substantial computational resource demands, a propensity for overfitting owing to many parameters, and limited interpretability. Consequently, despite their potential in forecasting building energy consumption, ANNs necessitate further optimization to holistically account for their strengths and weaknesses, thereby enhancing the accuracy and practicality of predictions.
Random Forest (RF) is an ensemble learning method that is based on decision trees (Figure 9), it holds significant application value in building energy consumption prediction. Random Forest randomly selects a subset of the original feature set and constructs multiple decision trees based on that subset. Each decision tree is independently trained on the training set, which enhances the training and prediction speed of the model and results in the optimal segmentation scheme. Finally, the prediction results of the multiple decision trees are aggregated by voting or averaging to derive the final prediction results. Throughout this process, Random Forest can handle high-dimensional data with numerous features and can manage noise and outliers to enhance the robustness of the model. Lei et al. [164] proposed combining the entropy weight K-means and the Random Forest method to establish a prediction model for building energy consumption and to facilitate the classification and selection of influencing factors. Ahmad et al. [98] utilized three methods—Nonlinear autoregressive model (NARM), stepwise regression linear model (LMSR), and Random Forest (LSBoost)—To analyze the power consumption and climate data of the target building on a monthly, quarterly, and annual basis. However, Random Forest requires the construction of multiple decision trees, each of which is built independently. Additionally, there are numerous feature selections and parameter quantity selections, which lead to a significant computational burden in the Random Forest and increase the training and prediction cost of the model.
The Support Vector Regression (SVR) model is a powerful machine learning algorithm. It first requires the selection of features related to energy consumption, such as indoor and outdoor temperature, humidity, light intensity, and human activity, which will be used as inputs for the SVR model in the prediction of building energy consumption. Second, the SVR algorithm is employed to conduct regression analysis on the training data, and the optimal model is determined by adjusting the model parameters (such as the penalty parameter C and the kernel function type) during the training process. The performance of the model is then evaluated using cross-validation methods, such as mean square error (MSE), coefficient of determination (R2), and other metrics. Finally, the model is optimized and adjusted based on the evaluation results. SVR identifies the optimal hyperplane by optimizing the objective function, enabling it to capture complex relationships in the data and provide high prediction accuracy when dealing with nonlinear data. Hamed et al. [165] selected the SVR method and the combination of a meta-heuristic algorithm to predict the heating energy consumption of residential buildings. They comprehensively compared the coefficients of determination of the training dataset and the test data of the model and concluded that the model exhibits high prediction accuracy. The SVR has relatively few parameters and supports various kernel functions, making it suitable for different data types and prediction tasks. Li et al. [166] proposed a hybrid prediction model based on Multivariate Empirical Mode Decomposition (MEMD) and SVR. This model decomposes the eigenvalues and building heat load into several components using MEMD and maintains these components constant, then uses SVR to predict the building heat load. The model compares metrics such as MAPE, NMBE, CVRMSE, and R2 to enhance the accuracy of the heat load prediction. Jain et al. [167] d developed a sensor-based prediction model using SVR to forecast building energy consumption. However, the SVR training process is time-consuming, especially in the absence of high-performance computing resources, and the scale of data collection cannot be effectively utilized.
All four machine learning models can process nonlinear data and capturing complex relationships in building energy forecasting. This implies that they can handle seasonality, weather changes, and other factors in building energy consumption data, and can automatically extract features from these factors. By employing data-driven techniques, they address the uncertainty in building energy consumption forecasting and enhance prediction accuracy. In addition, both random forests and support vector regression are ensemble learning methods that build multiple models to improve prediction accuracy. This also enables them to enhance the robustness of predictions and deal with noise and outliers. However, the process of extracting data features often necessitates a large number of datasets, especially when working with large-scale datasets. Different parameter adjustments can lead to errors in building energy consumption predictions. Deep learning models, in particular, have high requirements for data preprocessing, demand a substantial amount of labeled data, and their parameter adjustment is more complex. If the training data is insufficient, it is prone to overfitting.
Whether it is a statistical model based on the linear relationship of building energy consumption data or a machine learning model based on the nonlinear relationship of building energy consumption data, it focuses only on the input of historical building energy data or eigenvalues and then makes relevant predictions. Both black box methods focus more on the end result of a building's energy consumption, i.e., the relationship between input energy and output energy, and are more helpful in identifying key issues in building energy consumption without considering the intricate details of the building's interior. In general, the application of the black box method in building energy consumption simulation can improve the efficiency of simulation, reduce the technical threshold, and provide scientific and practical analysis results for building energy efficiency. However, the black box method also has limitations, and the premise of using the black box method is that there is a sufficient data set and a wide range of types, so the black box method cannot accurately predict the influencing parameters of the building's energy consumption behavior.
The mixed methods (also known as the gray box method, Figure 10) is a method commonly used in the simulation and analysis of building energy consumption, which combines detailed simulations based on physical models (white box method) and simplified simulations based on statistical or empirical models (black box method). The gray box method approximates the prediction of building energy consumption by abstracting and simplifying complex processes in the physical model, using fewer input data and a simplified simulation process.
Mao et al. [168] proposed an Elman neural network prediction model based on the improved Harry Eagle algorithm, which mostly uses the entropy weight method and the grey correlation method to select the eigenvalues, and then uses the improved Elman neural network model to predict the cooling load of the building. Talib et al. [162] used a resistor-capacitance thermal network to predict the thermal dynamics of buildings and compared it with the artificial neural network model prediction; the gray box model was more accurate. Fan et al. [169] developed a new hybrid model for short-term prediction of power load, which predicts energy consumption based on several models such as gray mutation, random forest, and support vector regression, and optimizes the prediction results of the model using genetic algorithms, and the conclusion proves that the model has high prediction accuracy.
To sum up, the gray box method combines the white box method and the black box method and combines the advantages of the two methods to process a large amount of data, find the relationship between the input variables and the output variables, and predict the building energy consumption more accurately. In addition, a new hybrid method combining a white box method and a black box method can be found to adjust model parameters, etc., and to reduce the building's energy consumption by comparing it with a single method. The gray box method is more widely used in the application of actual building energy consumption, which can effectively reduce building energy consumption, improve the energy efficiency of buildings, and contribute to energy conservation and emission reduction.
From the perspective of actual building energy consumption prediction, the gray box model generally exhibits superior prediction accuracy compared to both the black box and white box models. Nevertheless, irrespective of the method employed, it is imperative to investigate the role of influencing factors on building energy consumption. The white box method, grounded in the physical model of the building, necessitates consideration of the building's physical characteristics. Conversely, the black box method is highly dependent on the accuracy and completeness of historical data, with the selection of appropriate characteristic parameters—Such as temperature, humidity, and lighting—Being crucial to the model's accuracy. The gray box method, however, integrates both the physical characteristics of the white box method and the characteristic parameters of the black box method. Consequently, it is essential to consider the influencing factors of building operation energy consumption in the prediction process to enhance the accuracy of building energy consumption forecasts, thereby creating pivotal conditions for building energy conservation and optimization of energy management. Building managers, armed with this enhanced accuracy, can more precisely control building energy consumption, contributing to reductions in energy use and furthering efforts to save energy and reduce emissions. To this end, optimizing these three methods remains a focal point for researchers, as refining building energy consumption prediction enables a deeper understanding of energy flow, fundamentally mitigates energy waste, and facilitates the achievement of energy conservation and emission reduction in buildings.
Building energy consumption prediction constitutes a critical facet of building energy conservation strategies, wherein precise predictions can facilitate enhancements in energy efficiency and the attainment of energy conservation and emission reduction objectives. Within the extant body of research, aside from the prediction of building energy consumption, there are researchers who focus on the optimization of such predictions. The optimization of building energy consumption prediction not only has the potential to transform the predictive modalities of current research and propose novel model-based inquiries but also to further elevate the accuracy of building energy consumption demand forecasts, thereby enabling more precise energy conservation and emission reduction outcomes. The optimization of building energy consumption forecasting is an iterative process, encompassing multiple stages aimed at enhancing the accuracy, stability, and utility of the predictive model. Moreover, the prediction and optimization phases are intricately linked to the influencing factors of building operational energy consumption, with both algorithmic and model optimization necessitating the consideration of input characteristic parameters, which typically derive from historical climate data, equipment usage data, and historical energy consumption data, among other sources. Consequently, the optimization process must also place emphasis on these influencing factors.
The optimization procedures for building energy consumption are inherently complex (Figure 11), initially requiring the determination of the temporal scope, type of energy consumption, and the granularity of the prediction. Subsequently, data collection and preprocessing are undertaken to gather building energy consumption data, meteorological data, and building usage data, followed by the standardization of data through the cleanup and conversion of missing values, outliers, and duplicate data. The selection of an appropriate prediction model involves the construction of model architecture and the specification of network layers, neuron counts, and activation functions. The model is then trained using historical data, and the resulting structure is validated and refined. The analysis of the discrepancy between predicted results and actual energy consumption is conducted using appropriate evaluation metrics, such as Mean Square Error (MSE), Root Mean Square Error (RMSE), and Mean Absolute Error (MAE). The optimization strategy—Whether feature optimization, model optimization, or otherwise—Is determined by analyzing these results. Conclusions are drawn based on the optimization strategy employed. From the optimization workflow, it is evident that the process involves data processing and adjustment, followed by algorithmic optimization, and culminates in optimizing the prediction model. An examination of the optimization process reveals that building energy consumption data, meteorological data, and building use data are integral to the entire workflow of building energy consumption prediction and optimization, necessitating the consideration of data anomalies. Consequently, the influencing factors of building energy consumption are inherently linked to the optimization process. To enhance the accuracy of building energy consumption prediction, the focus of optimization efforts can be directed toward two fundamental components: The algorithm and the model.
Algorithm optimization of building energy consumption prediction refers to improving the accuracy, efficiency, and reliability of energy consumption prediction by improving the design of the algorithm, adjusting the parameters, or combining multiple algorithms. The energy consumption optimization based on optimization algorithm mainly optimizes the energy consumption of buildings through optimization algorithms such as genetic algorithm, particle swarm optimization algorithm, and simulated annealing algorithm. The optimization process for this category of algorithms predominantly follows a similar sequence of steps. Initially, data preprocessing is undertaken, which entails data cleaning and the elimination of aberrant elements. Subsequently, an appropriate algorithm is selected based on the intrinsic characteristics of the data, followed by the optimization of its parameters. The dataset is then utilized to train the model, thereby accomplishing the objective of optimization. Consequently, data serves as the foundational element for algorithmic optimization, with high-quality data significantly contributing to the enhancement of predictive accuracy. During the collection and collation of energy consumption data, it is imperative to ensure the veracity, completeness, and precision of the data. Ju et al. [170] used the AHU data collected from the operating buildings to evaluate the performance of the locally calibrated building heat source energy consumption prediction model, and compared with the uncalibrated building heat source energy consumption prediction model, the calibrated prediction model has a coefficient of determination (R2) of 0.95, which is more suitable for model predictive control. Abbass et al. [171] proposed a comprehensive framework based on artificial neural networks, which optimizes the scenario parameters of building energy consumption, evaluates them completely, and finally selects appropriate artificial neural networks for prediction.
Zheng et al. [172] proposed an interpretable system for predicting building energy consumption based on energy consumption pattern recognition and time fusion transformers, which experimentally proved that the system had a lower average absolute percentage error than other traditional prediction models. Zhang et al. [173] proposed an ensemble model using the Exponentially Weighted Moving Average (EWMA) algorithm for energy consumption prediction optimization for the energy consumption prediction of building heating systems, and selected four basic machine learning to compare with it, and the ensemble model effectively improved the accuracy of heating energy consumption prediction. Cao et al. [174] proposed an improved particle swarm optimization overlay ensemble model (PStIE) and a preferred feature selection method to solve the problem that it is difficult to determine the optimal combination of parameters of the ensemble algorithm when using the ensemble model to predict building energy consumption, and the root mean square error of the model is 1.71 lower than that of the ordinary machine learning method.
Selecting the right features is also an important step in optimizing the algorithm. Through the analysis of the influencing factors of building energy consumption, the characteristics closely related to energy consumption are selected, such as outdoor meteorological parameters, building parameters, and equipment performance. After selecting the appropriate features, they are combined with the optimized algorithm to improve the accuracy of building energy consumption prediction. Zhang et al. [47] proposed an improvement of the building energy consumption prediction system, which includes the modification of the input system and the modification of the operation algorithm. The behavioral relationship between sockets, lighting, air conditioners, and people is proposed as input parameters, and the swarm intelligence algorithm with circle mapping is used to predict energy consumption. The method is used to predict building energy consumption with a determination coefficient of 0.9588–0.9901 and an average absolute percentage error of 4.44%~11.60%, and the performance of the building energy consumption prediction model is optimized. In addition, Table 5 lists some scholars' research on algorithm optimization. It can be observed that the essence of algorithm optimization lies in the processing of energy consumption data. Effective data processing can lead to accurate predictions of building energy consumption, which aligns with the above-mentioned demonstration of building energy consumption prediction and optimization steps.
Author | Literature summary |
Xiao Chen [175] | A new meta-heuristic optimization algorithm, CSBOA, is adopted, and indoor temperature and occupancy are taken as input parameters. |
Majid Emami Javanmard [176] | In Iran, the PSO algorithm and the gray wolf optimization algorithm were used to forecast the energy demand of seven industries, and compared with the six machine learning algorithms, the PSO algorithm and the gray wolf optimization algorithm were more accurate. |
Chengyu Zhang [177] | In this paper, Bi-LSTM is used as the basic algorithm to replace LSTM, and the improved WO algorithm is used for optimization. |
Yiran Yang [178] | The shuffle frog jumping algorithm (SFLA) was used to optimize and predict the cooling and heating load of the building. |
Mohd Herwan Sulaiman [179] | The Evolutionary Mating Algorithm (EMA) is proposed to optimize the use of energy to ensure indoor comfort. |
Guohui Feng [180] | The optimized support vector machine regression algorithm is used to train and predict the load data |
Most of the algorithm optimization for building energy consumption prediction is data-driven. The optimized algorithm can more accurately predict the energy demand of the building, which helps managers allocate energy rationally and reduce waste. With accurate energy forecasting, building operators can make more economical purchasing decisions and reduce operating costs when energy prices fluctuate. However, advanced energy consumption prediction algorithms may require complex data analysis and model building, which requires a high level of expertise and skills. Moreover, optimization algorithms often rely on large amounts of historical data, and the quality and availability of data may affect the accuracy of predictions. Therefore, the optimization algorithm is not fully applicable to all buildings, and it is necessary to conduct practical research based on the building.
Building energy consumption prediction model optimization refers to improving the prediction accuracy, stability, and generalization ability of the model on energy consumption data by improving the structure, parameters, or training process of the prediction model. Choosing the right predictive model is also the key to improving the accuracy of the forecast. In numerous studies, it has been found that scholars have improved the performance of predictive models through machine learning, the use of artificial intelligence, and algorithm selection.
With machine learning algorithms, complex nonlinear relationships can be processed, and patterns and features in the data can be automatically learned. Vasanthkumar et al. [181] proposed an improved Mustang optimization deep learning method model for the prediction of energy consumption of residential buildings, and according to the experimental results, the method is better than the prediction of other deep learning methods. Alymani et al. [182] introduced an improved Moth Flame Optimized Weighted Voting Ensemble Learning (IMFO-WVEL) model based on machine learning methods.
Khan et al. [183] proposed an AI-based efficient hybrid framework to accurately predict building electricity consumption and power generation in response to the mismatch between building supply and demand, and experimentally reduced the hourly mean square error of the method by 0.012 and 0.045 compared with the latest technology (SOTA). Zhang et al. [184] developed an interpretable artificial intelligence model that integrates building features, building geometry, and urban morphology to accurately predict building energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions, and experiments have proved that this method is feasible. Based on machine learning and artificial neural networks, Aruta et al. [185] proposed a model framework that can predict energy demand in advance and plan the optimal set value of building energy consumption based on meteorological data.
While establishing the building energy consumption prediction model, the feature selection algorithm is optimized or selected. In order to improve the efficiency of building energy consumption prediction, Afzal et al. [186] combined multi-layer perceptron with eight meta-heuristic algorithms to obtain that the MLP-PSOGWO hybrid model has the best performance and the highest accuracy in building energy consumption prediction. Sun et al. [187] proposed a Thermal Comfort Control Strategy for Buildings (PTCN-ICHOA) that combines temporal convolutional neural networks with chimpanzee optimization algorithms, which predicts the energy consumption of buildings in both winter and summer with the smallest error. Liu et al. [188] proposed a Data-Driven Evidence Regression (EVREG) model based on feature selection and model parameter learning, which can predict the point and interval prediction of building energy consumption, which can better describe the fluctuation of building energy consumption and achieve better prediction than the traditional EVEG model.
For the company or system that provides energy, the building energy consumption prediction model is designed to achieve energy saving. Wang et al. [189] proposed a GRU-GTO model for HVAC energy consumption prediction, which uses different communication protocols to reduce transmission efficiency and improve the accuracy of building energy consumption prediction. Irankhah et al. [190] designed a model based on bidirectional gated recurrent units (BiGRUs) and particle swarm optimization (PSO) methods for energy consumption prediction of power companies, which can effectively improve the accuracy of energy consumption prediction. Cai et al. [191] used the support vector regression model combined with six meta-heuristic algorithms to select the optimal model SVR-AEO to predict the cooling and heating load of buildings.
Table 6 lists the research on using deep learning for model optimization in building energy consumption prediction over the past decade. From this table, it is evident that model prediction optimization has garnered increasing attention from many scholars in recent years, which is conducive to a comprehensive understanding of building energy consumption. The optimization of the model can help building managers gain a better understanding of energy consumption patterns, enabling them to optimize energy management, reduce waste, cut costs, and promote sustainable development. Compared to algorithms, the model can more accurately control indoor environmental factors such as temperature and humidity, thereby enhancing the comfort of the living or working environment. To build accurate prediction models, a substantial amount of high-quality historical energy consumption data and related variable data, such as weather and usage patterns, is often necessary, and the combination of simulation software and computer simulations is required. During this process, researchers must collect a large amount of high-quality historical data and relevant variable parameters to prevent data anomalies and ensure accurate model predictions.
Categorization | Model classification | Literature citations |
Optimization based on statistical models | Linear regression models | 2014/Barbato [192], 2016/Shiel [193], 2018/Ahmad [194], 2018/Roy [195], 2019/Ahmad [196], 2020/Alam [197], 2021/Pandey [198], 2022/Pachauri [199], 2022/Yang [200], 2024/Araújo [201], 2024/Ravichandran [202], 2024/ Lairgi [203] |
Time series models | 2017/Sadaei [204], 2021/Chou [205], 2022/Ngo [206], 2024/Liu [207] | |
Optimization based on machine learning models | Deep learning | 2020/Bouktif [208], 2020/Kim [209], 2022/Godahewa [210], 2022/Vasanthkumar [211], 2023/Alymani [182], 2023/Jiang [212], 2023/Kaur [213], 2023/Sekhar [159], 2023/So [126], 2023/Uwiragiye [214], 2023/Wang [189], 2024/Da [215], 2024/Irankhah [190], 2024/Somu [216] |
Artificial neural networks | 2018/Wang [217], 2019/Kaur [218], 2020/Georgiou [219], 2020/Hafeez [220], 2020/Luo [221], 2020/Luo [222], 2021/Ishaq [223], 2022/D'Amico [224], 2022/Yang [225], 2023/Abbass [171], 2024/ Arowoiya [226] | |
Support vector regression | 2015/Jung [227], 2016/Zhang [228], 2020/Gao [229], 2022/Cheng [230], 2022/Ngo [231], 2023/Khajavi [165], 2023/Ma [232] |
Through the optimization of building energy consumption forecasting, energy use can be adjusted with greater precision, facilitating the rational allocation and utilization of energy, thereby enhancing energy use efficiency. The optimization of algorithms in building energy consumption prediction leverages the flexibility and stability of mathematical algorithms, taking into account various building-related influencing factors. This process involves the optimization and adjustment of diverse building feature data and the extraction and processing of effective data, thereby mitigating the impact of random errors and enhancing the stability of predictions. By selecting influencing factors and readily interpretable features that are highly correlated with operational energy consumption as the basis for algorithm optimization, the comprehensibility of the model is augmented, thereby improving the accuracy of the prediction model and reducing prediction errors. Research indicates that both the optimization of mathematical algorithms and model optimization necessitate the collection of a substantial volume of high-quality historical data and relevant characteristic parameters, which are derived from factors influencing building operational energy consumption. To enhance the accuracy of building energy consumption prediction, this approach provides a more precise direction for energy-saving transformations in building energy consumption.
We primarily address the significance of building energy consumption supervision and prediction and explore methods for optimizing building energy consumption prediction models through mathematical algorithms and data feature selection. The supervision and prediction of building energy consumption are pivotal in achieving energy conservation and emission reduction, reducing operating costs, and enhancing living comfort. By identifying the influencing factors of building energy consumption and subsequently employing suitable mathematical algorithms and model selection techniques, the accuracy of building energy consumption prediction can be enhanced, thereby providing robust support for building energy management.
Global Emphasis and Systematic Design in Building Energy Regulation: Numerous nations persistently concentrate on the formulation of regulations and standards pertaining to building energy regulation. Regarding the design of building energy consumption supervision systems, the optimization and integration of system architecture have facilitated the precise extraction of data and the comprehensive analysis of building energy-saving parameters. This has intuitively delineated the trends in energy consumption and their underlying factors, thereby providing robust data support for the prediction of building energy consumption. Nevertheless, there remains a deficiency in reliable research methodologies within the domains of system maintenance and data security, necessitating urgent further exploration.
Multivariate Analysis of Building Energy Consumption Influencing Factors: We systematically synthesize the intricate effects of climatic conditions, occupant behavior, and urban morphology on building energy consumption. Divergent climatic conditions exert varying influences on energy consumption within buildings, while the air conditioning habits and window opening behaviors of occupants engender substantial discrepancies in household energy usage. Furthermore, urban morphology, block scale, and the density of surrounding buildings also exert a range of impacts on building energy consumption. These aforementioned factors delineate the trajectory for research on building energy consumption prediction and robustly facilitate the profound advancement of energy conservation and emission reduction initiatives.
Three-Dimensional Analysis of Building Energy Consumption Prediction Methodologies: Building energy consumption prediction methodologies are primarily categorized into three classes: Physical methods, data-driven methods, and mixed methods. Although the physical method is predicated on computer technology and simulation software, it necessitates a high level of physical knowledge on the part of the researchers. The black-box method, a subset of data-driven methods, can process vast datasets, extracting pertinent information, and enhancing prediction accuracy through data-driven and algorithmic leveraging; however, it requires the support of extensive and diverse datasets, presenting challenges in the training phase. The mixed method is extensively employed in the prediction of building energy consumption, integrating physical models with data-driven techniques, and has been shown to significantly augment prediction accuracy in comparison to single-method approaches.
Dual-Track Examination of Building Energy Consumption Prediction and Optimization: To further enhance the precision of building energy consumption forecasting, we conduct a succinct analysis of prediction process optimization methodologies. The optimization trajectory primarily concentrates on refining mathematical algorithms and predictive models. The optimization of data algorithms can augment data quality, albeit necessitating extensive data collection and profound analysis, thereby imposing stringent requirements on researchers' mathematical proficiency. While model optimization can be realized through feature selection, it also mandates substantial data support. Consequently, both algorithmic optimization and model optimization are inherently linked to data analysis and collation, warranting researchers' meticulous attention.
In the analysis of the aforementioned literature, it is evident that factors related to building operation energy consumption form the foundation of energy consumption prediction. Data-driven approaches are a crucial element in achieving accurate predictions of building energy consumption. Looking ahead, for the prediction and optimization of building energy consumption, a new model could be developed by integrating the influencing factors of building operation energy consumption with a prediction model based on mathematical algorithms. This integration would enable a more precise estimation of building energy use intensity and contribute to further research on energy conservation and emission reduction.
The authors declare they have not used Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools in the creation of this article.
The authors would like to acknowledge the financial support from the Natural Science Foundation of Liaoning Province of China (Grant No. 2024-BSLH-251).
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
The authors confirm contribution to the paper as follows: study conception and design: Zhongjiao Ma, Zichun Yan; data survey collection: Zhongjiao Ma, Zichun Yan, Mingfei He, Haikuan Zhao; analysis and interpretation of results: Zhongjiao Ma, Zichun Yan; fund support: Zhongjiao Ma; draft manuscript preparation: Jialin Song, Zichun Yan. All authors reviewed the results and approved the final version of the manuscript.
[1] | IEA. World Energy Outlook 2023, 2023. Available from: https://www.iea.org/. |
[2] | Building Energy Conservation Research Center of Tsinghua University (2023) China building energy conservation annual development research report 2023 (Special Topic of Urban Energy System), (in Chinese). Beijing: China Construction Industry Press, 2023. |
[3] |
Natarajan Y, Preethaa KRS, Wadhwa G, et al. (2024) Enhancing building energy efficiency with iot-driven hybrid deep learning models for accurate energy consumption prediction. Sustainability 16: 1925. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16051925 doi: 10.3390/su16051925
![]() |
[4] |
Ahmad T, Chen HX, Zhang DD, et al. (2020) Smart energy forecasting strategy with four machine learning models for climate-sensitive and non-climate sensitive conditions. Energy 198: 117283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2020.117283 doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2020.117283
![]() |
[5] |
Xiao J, Li YX, Xie L, et al. (2018) A hybrid model based on selective ensemble for energy consumption forecasting in China. Energy 159: 534–546. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2018.06.161 doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2018.06.161
![]() |
[6] |
Neo HYR, Wong NH, Ignatius M, et al. (2024) A hybrid machine learning approach for forecasting residential electricity consumption: A case study in Singapore. Energy Environ 35: 3923–3939. https://doi.org/10.1177/0958305x231174000 doi: 10.1177/0958305x231174000
![]() |
[7] |
Ahmad T, Chen H, Guo Y, et al. (2018) A comprehensive overview on the data driven and large scale based approaches for forecasting of building energy demand: A review. Energy Build 165: 301–320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2018.01.017 doi: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2018.01.017
![]() |
[8] |
Khalil M, McGough AS, Pourmirza Z, et al. (2022) Machine learning, deep learning and statistical analysis for forecasting building energy consumption—A systematic review. Eng Appl Artif Intell 115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2022.105287 doi: 10.1016/j.engappai.2022.105287
![]() |
[9] |
Bourdeau M, Zhai XQ, Nefzaoui E, et al. (2019) Modeling and forecasting building energy consumption: A review of data-driven techniques. Sustainable Cities Soc 48: 101533. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2019.101533 doi: 10.1016/j.scs.2019.101533
![]() |
[10] |
Yin Q, Han C, Li A, et al. (2024) A review of research on building energy consumption prediction models based on Artificial Neural Networks. Sustainability 16: 7805. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16177805 doi: 10.3390/su16177805
![]() |
[11] |
Amasyali K, El-Gohary NM (2018) A review of data-driven building energy consumption prediction studies. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev 81: 1192–1205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.04.095 doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2017.04.095
![]() |
[12] | Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region Department of Housing and Urban-Rural Development. (2022) Design standard for energy efficiency of residential buildings (DBJ/T45-095-2022), (in Chinese). Guilin: Office of the Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region Department of Housing and Urban-Rural Development, 2022. |
[13] | Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region Department of Housing and Urban-Rural Development. Design Standard for Energy Efficiency of Public Buildings (DBJ/T45-096-2022), (in Chinese). Guilin: Office of the Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region Department of Housing and Urban-Rural Development, 2022. |
[14] | Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of the People's Republic of China. Assessment Standard for Green Building (GB/T 50378-2019), (in Chinese). Beijing: China Architecture and Building Press, 2022 |
[15] |
Sučić B, Anđelković AS, Tomšić Ž (2015) The concept of an integrated performance monitoring system for promotion of energy awareness in buildings. Energy Build 98: 82–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2014.09.065 doi: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2014.09.065
![]() |
[16] |
Zhao L, Zhang J-l, Liang R-b (2013) Development of an energy monitoring system for large public buildings. Energy Build 66: 41–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2013.07.007 doi: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2013.07.007
![]() |
[17] |
Ma L, Xu Y, Qin Y, et al. (2019) Identifying abnormal energy consumption data of lighting and socket based on energy consumption characteristics. International Conference on Smart City and Intelligent Building 890: 59–72. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-6733-5_6 doi: 10.1007/978-981-13-6733-5_6
![]() |
[18] |
Malkawi A, Ervin S, Han X, et al. (2023) Design and applications of an IoT architecture for data-driven smart building operations and experimentation. Energy Build 295: 113291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2023.113291 doi: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2023.113291
![]() |
[19] |
Kumar A, Sharma S, Goyal N, et al. (2021) Secure and energy-efficient smart building architecture with emerging technology IoT. Comput Commun 176: 207–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comcom.2021.06.003 doi: 10.1016/j.comcom.2021.06.003
![]() |
[20] |
Martín-Garín A, Millán-García JA, Baïri A, et al. (2018) Environmental monitoring system based on an open source platform and the internet of things for a building energy retrofit. Autom Constr 87: 201–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2017.12.017 doi: 10.1016/j.autcon.2017.12.017
![]() |
[21] |
Gökçe HU, Gökçe KU (2014) Multi dimensional energy monitoring, analysis and optimization system for energy efficient building operations. Sustainable Cities Soc 10: 161–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2013.08.004 doi: 10.1016/j.scs.2013.08.004
![]() |
[22] |
Vandenbogaerde L, Verbeke S, Audenaert A (2023) Optimizing building energy consumption in office buildings: A review of building automation and control systems and factors influencing energy savings. J Build Eng 76: 107233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2023.107233 doi: 10.1016/j.jobe.2023.107233
![]() |
[23] |
Alam M, Devjani MR (2021) Analyzing energy consumption patterns of an educational building through data mining. J Build Eng 44: 103385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2021.103385 doi: 10.1016/j.jobe.2021.103385
![]() |
[24] |
Uzair M, Ali Abbas Kazmi S (2023) A multi-criteria decision model to support sustainable building energy management system with intelligent automation. Energy Build 301: 113687. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2023.113687 doi: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2023.113687
![]() |
[25] |
Selvaraj R, Kuthadi VM, Baskar S (2023) Smart building energy management and monitoring system based on artificial intelligence in smart city. Sustainable Energy Technol Assess 56: 103090. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seta.2023.103090 doi: 10.1016/j.seta.2023.103090
![]() |
[26] |
Wang Y, Kuckelkorn JM, Zhao F-Y, et al. (2016) Evaluation on energy performance in a low-energy building using new energy conservation index based on monitoring measurement system with sensor network. Energy Build 123: 79–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2016.04.056 doi: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2016.04.056
![]() |
[27] |
Thomas RD, Rishee KJ (2023) Invisible walls: Exploration of microclimate effects on building energy consumption in New York City. Sustainable Cities Soc 90: 104364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2022.104364 doi: 10.1016/j.scs.2022.104364
![]() |
[28] |
Chen Y, Ren Z, Peng Z, et al. (2023) Impacts of climate change and building energy efficiency improvement on city-scale building energy consumption. J Build Eng 78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2023.107646 doi: 10.1016/j.jobe.2023.107646
![]() |
[29] |
Luo J, Yuan Y, Joybari MM, et al. (2024) Development of a prediction-based scheduling control strategy with V2B mode for PV-building-EV integrated systems. Renewable Energy 224: 120237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2024.120237 doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2024.120237
![]() |
[30] |
Nowak AM, Snow S, Horrocks N, et al. (2022) Micro-climatic variations and their impact on domestic energy consumption—Systematic literature review. Energy Build 277: 112476. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2022.112476 doi: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2022.112476
![]() |
[31] |
Verichev K, Zamorano M, Carpio M (2020) Effects of climate change on variations in climatic zones and heating energy consumption of residential buildings in the southern Chile. Energy Build 215: 109874. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2020.109874 doi: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2020.109874
![]() |
[32] |
Li M, Cao J, Xiong M, et al. (2018) Different responses of cooling energy consumption in office buildings to climatic change in major climate zones of China. Energy Build 173: 38–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2018.05.037 doi: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2018.05.037
![]() |
[33] |
Du R, Liu C-H, Li X, et al. (2024) Interaction among local flows, UHI, coastal winds, and complex terrain: Effect on urban-scale temperature and building energy consumption during heatwaves. Energy Build 303: 113763. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2023.113763 doi: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2023.113763
![]() |
[34] |
Mikulik J (2018) Energy demand patterns in an office building: A case study in Kraków (Southern Poland). Sustainability 10: 10082901. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10082901 doi: 10.3390/su10082901
![]() |
[35] |
Liu Y, Chen D, Wang J, et al. (2023) Energy-saving and ecological renovation of existing urban buildings in severe cold areas: A case study. Sustainability 15: 12985. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151712985 doi: 10.3390/su151712985
![]() |
[36] |
Košir M, Gostiša T, Kristl Ž (2018) Influence of architectural building envelope characteristics on energy performance in Central European climatic conditions. J Build Eng 15: 278–288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2017.11.023 doi: 10.1016/j.jobe.2017.11.023
![]() |
[37] |
Duan H, Chen S, Song J (2022) Characterizing regional building energy consumption under joint climatic and socioeconomic impacts. Energy 245: 123290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2022.123290 doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2022.123290
![]() |
[38] |
Gounni A, Ouhaibi S, Belouaggadia N, et al. (2022) Impact of COVID-19 restrictions on building energy consumption using Phase Change Materials (PCM) and insulation: A case study in six climatic zones of Morocco. J Energy Storage 55: 105374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2022.105374 doi: 10.1016/j.est.2022.105374
![]() |
[39] |
Wang J, Yang W, Zhang Y, et al. (2024) Research on energy consumption evaluation and energy saving and carbon reduction measures for typical general hospitals in hot summer and warm winter regions. Energy Sustainable Dev 79: 101381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esd.2024.101381 doi: 10.1016/j.esd.2024.101381
![]() |
[40] |
Kim S, Zirkelbach D, Künzel HM, et al. (2017) Development of test reference year using ISO 15927-4 and the influence of climatic parameters on building energy performance. Build Environ 114: 374–386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2016.12.037 doi: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2016.12.037
![]() |
[41] |
Chen S, Zhang GM, Xia XB, et al. (2021) The impacts of occupant behavior on building energy consumption: A review. Sustainable Energy Technol Assess 45: 101212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seta.2021.101212 doi: 10.1016/j.seta.2021.101212
![]() |
[42] |
Hu S, Yan D, Guo S, et al. (2017) A survey on energy consumption and energy usage behavior of households and residential building in urban China. Energy Build 148: 366–378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2017.03.064 doi: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2017.03.064
![]() |
[43] |
Osman M, Saad MM, Ouf M, et al. (2024) From buildings to cities: How household demographics shape demand response and energy consumption. Appl Energy 356: 122359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2023.122359 doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2023.122359
![]() |
[44] |
Luo J, Joybari MM, Ma Y, et al. (2024). Assessment of renewable power generation applied in homestay hotels: Energy and cost-benefit considering dynamic occupancy rates and reservation prices. J Build Eng 87: 109074. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2024.109074 doi: 10.1016/j.jobe.2024.109074
![]() |
[45] |
Duan J, Li N, Peng J, et al. (2023) Clustering and prediction of space cooling and heating energy consumption in high-rise residential buildings with the influence of occupant behaviour: Evidence from a survey in Changsha, China. J Build Eng 76: 107418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2023.107418 doi: 10.1016/j.jobe.2023.107418
![]() |
[46] |
Deng Y, Gou Z, Gui X, et al. (2021) Energy consumption characteristics and influential use behaviors in university dormitory buildings in China's hot summer-cold winter climate region. J Build Eng 33: 101870. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2020.101870 doi: 10.1016/j.jobe.2020.101870
![]() |
[47] |
Zhang C, Ma L, Han X, et al. (2023) Improving building energy consumption prediction using occupant-building interaction inputs and improved swarm intelligent algorithms. J Build Eng 73: 106671. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2023.106671 doi: 10.1016/j.jobe.2023.106671
![]() |
[48] |
Zhou X, Mei Y, Liang L, et al. (2022) Modeling of occupant energy consumption behavior based on human dynamics theory: A case study of a government office building. J Build Eng 58: 104983. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2022.104983 doi: 10.1016/j.jobe.2022.104983
![]() |
[49] |
Yoon YR, Moon HJ (2018) Energy consumption model with energy use factors of tenants in commercial buildings using Gaussian process regression. Energy Build 168: 215–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2018.03.042 doi: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2018.03.042
![]() |
[50] |
Du RQ, Liu CH, Li XX (2024) A new method for detecting urban morphology effects on urban-scale air temperature and building energy consumption under mesoscale meteorological conditions. Urban Clim 53: 101775. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.uclim.2023.101775 doi: 10.1016/j.uclim.2023.101775
![]() |
[51] |
Rostami E, Nasrollahi N, Khodakarami J (2024) A comprehensive study of how urban morphological parameters impact the solar potential, energy consumption and daylight autonomy in canyons and buildings. Energy Build 305: 113904. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2024.113904 doi: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2024.113904
![]() |
[52] |
Liu K, Xu X, Zhang R, et al. (2023) Impact of urban form on building energy consumption and solar energy potential: A case study of residential blocks in Jianhu, China. Energy Build 280: 112727. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2022.112727 doi: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2022.112727
![]() |
[53] |
Wang P, Yang Y, Ji C, et al. (2023) Positivity and difference of influence of built environment around urban park on building energy consumption. Sustainable Cities Soc 89: 104321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2022.104321 doi: 10.1016/j.scs.2022.104321
![]() |
[54] |
Zhu S, Li Y, Wei S, et al. (2022) The impact of urban vegetation morphology on urban building energy consumption during summer and winter seasons in Nanjing, China. Landsc Urban Plan 228: 104576. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2022.104576 doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2022.104576
![]() |
[55] |
Shareef S (2021) The impact of urban morphology and building's height diversity on energy consumption at urban scale. The case study of Dubai. Build Environ 194: 107675. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.107675 doi: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.107675
![]() |
[56] |
Xie M, Wang M, Zhong H, et al. (2023) The impact of urban morphology on the building energy consumption and solar energy generation potential of university dormitory blocks. Sustainable Cities Soc 96: 104644. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2023.104644 doi: 10.1016/j.scs.2023.104644
![]() |
[57] |
Ge J, Wang Y, Zhou D, et al. (2023) Building energy demand of urban blocks in Xi'an, China: Impacts of high-rises and vertical meteorological pattern. Build Environ 244: 110749. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2023.110749 doi: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2023.110749
![]() |
[58] |
Nasrollahi N, Rostami E (2023) The impacts of urban canyons morphology on daylight availability and energy consumption of buildings in a hot-summer Mediterranean climate. Sol Energy 266: 112181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2023.112181 doi: 10.1016/j.solener.2023.112181
![]() |
[59] |
Yu C, Pan W (2023) Inter-building effect on building energy consumption in high-density city contexts. Energy Build 278: 112632. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2022.112632 doi: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2022.112632
![]() |
[60] |
Adilkhanova I, Santamouris M, Yun GY (2023) Coupling urban climate modeling and city-scale building energy simulations with the statistical analysis: Climate and energy implications of high albedo materials in Seoul. Energy Build 290: 113092. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2023.113092 doi: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2023.113092
![]() |
[61] |
Tsala S, Koronaki IP, Orfanos G (2024) Utilizing weather forecast meteorological models for building energy simulations: A case study of a multi-unit residential complex. Energy Build 305: 113848. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2023.113848 doi: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2023.113848
![]() |
[62] |
Abu R, Amakor J, Kazeem R, et al. (2024) Modeling influence of weather variables on energy consumption in an agricultural research institute in Ibadan, Nigeria. AIMS Energy 12: 256–270. https://doi.org/10.3934/energy.2024012 doi: 10.3934/energy.2024012
![]() |
[63] |
Barea G, Mercado MV, Filippin C, et al. (2022) New paradigms in bioclimatic design toward climatic change in arid environments. Energy Build 266: 112100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2022.112100 doi: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2022.112100
![]() |
[64] |
Deng YQ, Zhou YA, Wang H, et al. (2023) Simulation-based sensitivity analysis of energy performance applied to an old Beijing residential neighbourhood for retrofit strategy optimisation with climate change prediction. Energy Build 294: 113284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2023.113284 doi: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2023.113284
![]() |
[65] |
Dias JB, da Graça GC, Soares PMM (2020) Comparison of methodologies for generation of future weather data for building thermal energy simulation. Energy Build 206: 109556. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2019.109556 doi: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2019.109556
![]() |
[66] |
Ma YCX, Yu C (2020) Impact of meteorological factors on high-rise office building energy consumption in Hong Kong: From a spatiotemporal perspective. Energy Build 228: 110468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2020.110468 doi: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2020.110468
![]() |
[67] |
Kotharkar R, Ghosh A, Kapoor S, et al. (2022) Approach to local climate zone based energy consumption assessment in an Indian city. Energy Build 259: 111835. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2022.111835 doi: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2022.111835
![]() |
[68] |
Singh M, Sharston R (2022) Quantifying the dualistic nature of urban heat Island effect (UHI) on building energy consumption. Energy Build 255: 111649. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2021.111649 doi: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2021.111649
![]() |
[69] |
Zou YK, Xiang K, Zhan QS, et al. (2021) A simulation-based method to predict the life cycle energy performance of residential buildings in different climate zones of China. Build Environ 193: 107663. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.107663 doi: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.107663
![]() |
[70] |
Chen S, Zhang GM, Xia XB, et al. (2020) A review of internal and external influencing factors on energy efficiency design of buildings. Energy Build 216: 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2020.109944 doi: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2020.109944
![]() |
[71] |
Grassi C, Chvatal KMS, Schweiker M (2022) Stochastic models for window opening and air-conditioning usage in mixed-mode offices for a humid subtropical climate in Brazil. Build Environ 225: 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2022.109579 doi: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2022.109579
![]() |
[72] |
Qiao QY, Yunusa-Kaltungo A (2023) A hybrid agent-based machine learning method for human-centred energy consumption prediction. Energy Build 283: 112797. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2023.112797 doi: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2023.112797
![]() |
[73] |
Xu Q, Lu YJ, Hwang BG, et al. (2021) Reducing residential energy consumption through a marketized behavioral intervention: The approach of Household Energy Saving Option (HESO). Energy Build 232: 110621. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2020.110621 doi: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2020.110621
![]() |
[74] |
Zaidan ES, Abulibdeh A, Alban A, et al. (2022) Motivation, preference, socioeconomic, and building features: New paradigm of analyzing electricity consumption in residential buildings. Build Environ 219: 109177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2022.109177 doi: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2022.109177
![]() |
[75] |
Gu YX, Cui T, Liu K, et al. (2021) Study on influencing factors for occupant window-opening behavior: Case study of an office building in Xi'an during the transition season. Build Environ 200: 107977. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.107977 doi: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.107977
![]() |
[76] |
Hawila AA, Diallo TMO, Collignan B (2023) Occupants' window opening behavior in office buildings: A review of influencing factors, modeling approaches and model verification. Build Environ 242: 110525. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2023.110525 doi: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2023.110525
![]() |
[77] |
Liu YQ, Chong WT, Cao YJ, et al. (2022) Characteristics analysis and modeling of occupants' window operation behavior in hot summer and cold winter region, China. Build Environ 216: 108998. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2022.108998 doi: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2022.108998
![]() |
[78] |
Shi SS, Li HJ, Ding X, et al. (2020) Effects of household features on residential window opening behaviors: A multilevel logistic regression study. Build Environ 170: 106610. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2019.106610 doi: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2019.106610
![]() |
[79] |
Liu M, Liang MS, Huang BJ, et al. (2022) The effect of normative-based feedback messaging on room air conditioner usage in university dormitory rooms in winter season. Energy Build 277: 112587. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2022.112587 doi: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2022.112587
![]() |
[80] |
Peng HW, He MN, Li MX, et al. (2020) Investigation on spatial distributions and occupant schedules of typical residential districts in South China's Pearl River Delta. Energy Build 209: 109710. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2019.109710 doi: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2019.109710
![]() |
[81] |
Yuan Y, Gao LY, Zeng KJ, et al. (2023) Space-Level air conditioner electricity consumption and occupant behavior analysis on a university campus. Energy Build 300: 113646. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2023.113646 doi: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2023.113646
![]() |
[82] |
Ahmadian E, Sodagar B, Bingham C, et al. (2021) Effect of urban built form and density on building energy performance in temperate climates. Energy Build 236: 110762. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2021.110762 doi: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2021.110762
![]() |
[83] |
Amiri SS, Mueller M, Hoque S (2023) Investigating the application of a commercial and residential energy consumption prediction model for urban Planning scenarios with Machine Learning and Shapley Additive explanation methods. Energy Build 287: 112965. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2023.112965 doi: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2023.112965
![]() |
[84] |
Bansal P, Quan SJ (2022) Relationships between building characteristics, urban form and building energy use in different local climate zone contexts: An empirical study in Seoul. Energy Build 272: 112335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2022.112335 doi: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2022.112335
![]() |
[85] |
Deng QT, Wang GB, Wang YT, et al. (2021) A quantitative analysis of the impact of residential cluster layout on building heating energy consumption in cold ⅡB regions of China. Energy Build 253: 111515. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2021.111515 doi: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2021.111515
![]() |
[86] |
Dong Q, Xu XY, Zhen M (2023) Assessing the cooling and buildings' energy-saving potential of urban trees in severe cold region of China during summer. Build Environ 244: 110818. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2023.110818 doi: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2023.110818
![]() |
[87] |
Ge JJ, Wang YP, Zhou D, et al. (2023) Building energy demand of urban blocks in Xi'an, China: Impacts of high-rises and vertical meteorological pattern. Build Environ 244: 110749. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2023.110749 doi: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2023.110749
![]() |
[88] |
He P, Xue J, Shen GQ, et al. (2023) The impact of neighborhood layout heterogeneity on carbon emissions in high-density urban areas: A case study of new development areas in Hong Kong. Energy Build 287: 113002. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2023.113002 doi: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2023.113002
![]() |
[89] |
Leng H, Chen X, Ma YH, et al. (2020) Urban morphology and building heating energy consumption: Evidence from Harbin, a severe cold region city. Energy Build 224: 110143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2020.110143 doi: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2020.110143
![]() |
[90] |
Liu HJ, Pan YQ, Yang YK, et al. (2021) Evaluating the impact of shading from surrounding buildings on heating/cooling energy demands of different community forms. Build Environ 206: 108322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.108322 doi: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.108322
![]() |
[91] |
Xu S, Sang MC, Xie MJ, et al. (2023) Influence of urban morphological factors on building energy consumption combined with photovoltaic potential: A case study of residential blocks in central China. Build Simul 16: 1777–1792. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12273-023-1014-4 doi: 10.1007/s12273-023-1014-4
![]() |
[92] |
Li XF, Ying Y, Xu XD, et al. (2020) Identifying key determinants for building energy analysis from urban building datasets. Build Environ 181: 107114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2020.107114 doi: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2020.107114
![]() |
[93] |
Liu K, Xu XD, Huang WX, et al. (2023) A multi-objective optimization framework for designing urban block forms considering daylight, energy consumption, and photovoltaic energy potential. Build Environ 242: 110585. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2023.110585 doi: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2023.110585
![]() |
[94] |
Liu K, Xu XD, Zhang R, et al. (2023) Impact of urban form on building energy consumption and solar energy potential: A case study of residential blocks in Jianhu, China. Energy Build 280: 112727. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2022.112727 doi: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2022.112727
![]() |
[95] |
Oh M, Jang KM, Kim Y (2021) Empirical analysis of building energy consumption and urban form in a large city: A case of Seoul, South Korea. Energy Build 245: 111046. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2021.111046 doi: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2021.111046
![]() |
[96] |
Wang JJ, Liu WX, Sha C, et al. (2023) Evaluation of the impact of urban morphology on commercial building carbon emissions at the block scale-A study of commercial buildings in Beijing. J Clean Prod 408: 137191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137191 doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137191
![]() |
[97] | Feng GH, Qiang X, Tian C, et al. (2019) Research on calculation method of thermal load at university buildings in severe cold region, (in Chinese). J Shenyang Jianzhu Univ Nat Sci 35: 339–346. Available from: https://qikan.cqvip.com/Qikan/Article/Detail?id = 83897490504849574850484957. |
[98] |
Ahmad T, Chen H, Guo Y, et al. (2018) A comprehensive overview on the data driven and large scale based approaches for forecasting of building energy demand: A review. Energy Build 165: 301–320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2018.01.017 doi: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2018.01.017
![]() |
[99] |
Wang L, Wu L, Norford LK, et al. (2024) The interactive indoor-outdoor building energy modeling for enhancing the predictions of urban microclimates and building energy demands. Build Environ 248: 111059. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2023.111059 doi: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2023.111059
![]() |
[100] |
Bilous I, Deshko V, Sukhodub I (2018) Parametric analysis of external and internal factors influence on building energy performance using non-linear multivariate regression models. J Build Eng 20: 327–336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2018.07.021 doi: 10.1016/j.jobe.2018.07.021
![]() |
[101] |
Wang L, Liu X, Brown H (2017) Prediction of the impacts of climate change on energy consumption for a medium-size office building with two climate models. Energy Build 157: 218–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2017.01.007 doi: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2017.01.007
![]() |
[102] | Wang Q, Fu X (2022) Influence of surrounding buildings on target building in energy consumption simulation, (in Chinese). J Build Energy Effic 50: 101–104. Available from: https://qikan.cqvip.com/Qikan/Article/Detail?id = 7108231763. |
[103] | Hu K, Liu F, Wu X, et al. (2023) Carbon-economy analysis on energy supply methods for rural, (in Chinese). Integrated Intell Energy 45: 64–71. Available from: https://qikan.cqvip.com/Qikan/Article/Detail?id = 7110284087. |
[104] |
Cao J, Liu J, Man X (2017) A united WRF/TRNSYS method for estimating the heating/cooling load for the thousand-meter scale megatall buildings. Appl Therm Eng 114: 196–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2016.11.195 doi: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2016.11.195
![]() |
[105] |
Alibabaei N, Fung AS, Raahemifar K (2016) Development of Matlab-TRNSYS co-simulator for applying predictive strategy planning models on residential house HVAC system. Energy Build 128: 81–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2016.05.084 doi: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2016.05.084
![]() |
[106] |
Zhao T, Xu J, Zhang C, et al. (2021) A monitoring data based bottom-up modeling method and its application for energy consumption prediction of campus building. J Build Eng 35: 101962. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2020.101962 doi: 10.1016/j.jobe.2020.101962
![]() |
[107] |
Xing J, Ren P, Ling J (2015) Analysis of energy efficiency retrofit scheme for hotel buildings using eQuest software: A case study from Tianjin, China. Energy Build 87: 14–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2014.10.045 doi: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2014.10.045
![]() |
[108] |
Sun Y, Haghighat F, Fung BCM (2020) A review of the-state-of-the-art in data-driven approaches for building energy prediction. Energy Build 221: 110022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2020.110022 doi: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2020.110022
![]() |
[109] |
Ciulla G, D'Amico A (2019) Building energy performance forecasting: A multiple linear regression approach. Appl Energy 253: 113500. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.113500 doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.113500
![]() |
[110] |
Li X, Yu J, Zhao A, et al. (2023) Time series prediction method based on sub-metering in building energy performance evaluation. J Build Eng 72: 106638. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2023.106638 doi: 10.1016/j.jobe.2023.106638
![]() |
[111] |
Hošovský A, Piteľ J, Adámek M, et al. (2021) Comparative study of week-ahead forecasting of daily gas consumption in buildings using regression ARMA/SARMA and genetic-algorithm-optimized regression wavelet neural network models. J Build Eng 34: 101955. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2020.101955 doi: 10.1016/j.jobe.2020.101955
![]() |
[112] |
Jahanshahi A, Jahanianfard D, Mostafaie A, et al. (2019) An Auto Regressive Integrated Moving Average (ARIMA) Model for prediction of energy consumption by household sector in Euro area. AIMS Energy 7: 151–164. https://doi.org/10.3934/energy.2019.2.151 doi: 10.3934/energy.2019.2.151
![]() |
[113] |
Li L, Su X, Bi X, et al. (2023) A novel Transformer-based network forecasting method for building cooling loads. Energy Build 296: 113409. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2023.113409 doi: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2023.113409
![]() |
[114] |
El-Maraghy M, Metawie M, Safaan M, et al. (2024) Predicting energy consumption of mosque buildings during the operation stage using deep learning approach. Energy Build 303: 113829. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2023.113829 doi: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2023.113829
![]() |
[115] | Amarasinghe K, Marino DL, Manic M, et al. (2017) Deep neural networks for energy load forecasting. 2017 IEEE 26th International Symposium on Industrial Electronics (ISIE) 2017: 1483–1488. https://doi.org/110.1109/ISIE.2017.8001465 |
[116] |
Barzola-Monteses J, Guerrero M, Parrales-Bravo F, et al. (2021) Forecasting energy consumption in residential department using convolutional neural networks. Inf Commun Technol 1456: 18–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-89941-7_2 doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-89941-7_2
![]() |
[117] | Elshaboury N, Abdelkader EM, Al-Sakkaf A, et al. (2023) A deep convolutional neural network for predicting electricity consumption at Grey Nuns building in Canada. Constr Innov, ahead-of-print. https://doi.org/10.1108/ci-01-2023-0005 |
[118] |
Gao Y, Ruan YJ, Fang CK, et al. (2020) Deep learning and transfer learning models of energy consumption forecasting for a building with poor information data. Energy Build 223: 110156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2020.110156 doi: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2020.110156
![]() |
[119] |
Guo J, Lin PH, Zhang LM, et al. (2023) Dynamic adaptive encoder-decoder deep learning networks for multivariate time series forecasting of building energy consumption. Appl Energy 350: 121803. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2023.121803 doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2023.121803
![]() |
[120] |
Kaligambe A, Fujita G (2020) Short-term load forecasting for commercial buildings using 1D convolutional neural networks. 2020 IEEE PES/IAS PowerAfrica 2020: 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1109/PowerAfrica49420.2020.9219934 doi: 10.1109/PowerAfrica49420.2020.9219934
![]() |
[121] |
Khan ZA, Ullah A, Ul Haq I, et al. (2022) Efficient short-term electricity load forecasting for effective energy management. Sustainable Energy Technol Assess 53: 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seta.2022.102337 doi: 10.1016/j.seta.2022.102337
![]() |
[122] |
Kizilcec V, Spataru C, Lipani A, et al. (2022) Forecasting solar home system customers' electricity usage with a 3d convolutional neural network to improve energy access. Energies 15: 1–25. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15030857 doi: 10.3390/en15030857
![]() |
[123] |
Cheng XY, Hu YQ, Huang JX, et al. (2021) Urban building energy modeling: A time-series building energy consumption use simulation prediction tool based on graph neural network. J Comput Civ Eng 2021: 188–195. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784483893.024 doi: 10.1061/9780784483893.024
![]() |
[124] |
Hu Y, Cheng X, Wang S, et al. (2022) Times series forecasting for urban building energy consumption based on graph convolutional network. Appl Energy, 307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.118231 doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.118231
![]() |
[125] |
Lum KL, Mun HK, Phang SK, et al. (2021) Industrial electrical energy consumption forecasting by using temporal convolutional neural networks. MATEC Web Conferences 335: 02003. https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/202133502003 doi: 10.1051/matecconf/202133502003
![]() |
[126] |
So D, Oh J, Jeon I, et al. (2023) BiGTA-Net: A hybrid deep learning-based electrical energy forecasting model for building energy management systems. Systems 11: 456. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems11090456 doi: 10.3390/systems11090456
![]() |
[127] |
Rahman A, Srikumar V, Smith AD (2018) Predicting electricity consumption for commercial and residential buildings using deep recurrent neural networks. Appl Energy 212: 372–385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.12.051 doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.12.051
![]() |
[128] |
Akbarzadeh O, Hamzehei S, Attar H, et al. (2024) Heating-cooling monitoring and power consumption forecasting using LSTM for energy-efficient smart management of buildings: A Computational intelligence solution for smart homes. Tsinghua Sci Technol 29: 143–157. https://doi.org/10.26599/tst.2023.9010008 doi: 10.26599/tst.2023.9010008
![]() |
[129] |
Damrongsak D, Wongsapai W, Lekgamheng N, et al. (2023) Forecasting of electricity consumption using neural networks in public hospital buildings with installed smart meters in Thailand. 2023 7th International Conference on Green Energy and Applications (ICGEA) 2023: 199–203. https://doi.org/10.1109/icgea57077.2023.10125911 doi: 10.1109/icgea57077.2023.10125911
![]() |
[130] |
Fang L, He B (2023) A deep learning framework using multi-feature fusion recurrent neural networks for energy consumption forecasting. Appl Energy 348: 121563. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2023.121563 doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2023.121563
![]() |
[131] |
Gugulothu N, Subramanian E (2019) Load forecasting in energy markets: An approach using sparse neural networks. Proceedings of the Tenth ACM International Conference on Future Energy Systems, 403–405. https://doi.org/10.1145/3307772.3330167 doi: 10.1145/3307772.3330167
![]() |
[132] |
Hribar R, Potocnik P, Silc J, et al. (2019) A comparison of models for forecasting the residential natural gas demand of an urban area. Energy 167: 511–522. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2018.10.175 doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2018.10.175
![]() |
[133] |
Lee DH, Kim J, Kim S, et al. (2023) Comparison analysis for electricity consumption prediction of multiple campus buildings using deep recurrent neural networks. Energies 16: 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16248038 doi: 10.3390/en16248038
![]() |
[134] |
Fan C, Wang J, Gang W, et al. (2019) Assessment of deep recurrent neural network-based strategies for short-term building energy predictions. Appl Energy 236: 700–710. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.12.004 doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.12.004
![]() |
[135] |
Mawson VJ, Hughes B (2020) Deep learning techniques for energy forecasting and condition monitoring in the manufacturing sector. Energy Build, 217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2020.109966 doi: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2020.109966
![]() |
[136] |
Nichiforov C, Arghira N, Stamatescu G, et al. (2022) Efficient load forecasting model assessment for embedded building energy management systems. 2022 IEEE International Conference on Automation, Quality and Testing, Robotics (AQTR), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/aqtr55203.2022.9801969 doi: 10.1109/aqtr55203.2022.9801969
![]() |
[137] |
Jang J, Han J, Leigh SB (2022) Prediction of heating energy consumption with operation pattern variables for non-residential buildings using LSTM networks. Energy Build 255: 111647. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2021.111647 doi: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2021.111647
![]() |
[138] |
Fan GF, Zheng Y, Gao WJ, et al. (2023) Forecasting residential electricity consumption using the novel hybrid model. Energy Build 290: 113085. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2023.113085 doi: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2023.113085
![]() |
[139] |
Li GN, Zhao XW, Fan C, et al. (2021) Assessment of long short-term memory and its modifications for enhanced short-term building energy predictions. J Build Eng 43: 103182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2021.103182 doi: 10.1016/j.jobe.2021.103182
![]() |
[140] |
Lin XY, Yu H, Wang M, et al. (2021) Electricity consumption forecast of high-rise office buildings based on the long short-term memory method. Energies 14: 1–21. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14164785 doi: 10.3390/en14164785
![]() |
[141] |
Sendra-Arranz R, Gutiérrez A (2020) A long short-term memory artificial neural network to predict daily HVAC consumption in buildings. Energy Build 216: 109952. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2020.109952 doi: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2020.109952
![]() |
[142] |
Somu N, Raman MRG, Ramamritham K (2020) A hybrid model for building energy consumption forecasting using long short term memory networks. Appl Energy 261: 114131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.114131 doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.114131
![]() |
[143] |
Tang D, Li C, Ji X, et al. (2019) Power load forecasting using a refined LSTM. Proceedings of the 2019 11th International Conference on Machine Learning and Computing, 104–108. https://doi.org/10.1145/3318299.3318353 doi: 10.1145/3318299.3318353
![]() |
[144] |
Wang X, Fang F, Zhang XN, et al. (2019) LSTM-based short-term load forecasting for building electricity consumption. Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium on Industrial Electronics. 2019 IEEE 28th International Symposium on Industrial Electronics (ISIE), 1418–1423. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISIE.2019.8781349 doi: 10.1109/ISIE.2019.8781349
![]() |
[145] |
Wang Z, Hong TZ, Piette MA (2020) Building thermal load prediction through shallow machine learning and deep learning. Appl Energy 263: 114683. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.114683 doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.114683
![]() |
[146] |
Xu L, Hu MM, Fan C (2022) Probabilistic electrical load forecasting for buildings using Bayesian deep neural networks. J Build Eng 46: 103853. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2021.103853 doi: 10.1016/j.jobe.2021.103853
![]() |
[147] |
Zhou CG, Fang ZS, Xu XN, et al. (2020) Using long short-term memory networks to predict energy consumption of air-conditioning systems. Sustainable Cities Soc 55: 102000. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2019.102000 doi: 10.1016/j.scs.2019.102000
![]() |
[148] |
Sun HC, Wang YD, Niu LQ, et al. (2021) A novel fuzzy rough set based long short-term memory integration model for energy consumption prediction of public buildings. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 40: 5715–5729. https://doi.org/10.3233/jifs-201857 doi: 10.3233/jifs-201857
![]() |
[149] |
Ul Haq I, Ullah A, Khan SU, et al. (2021) Sequential learning-based energy consumption prediction model for residential and commercial sectors. Mathematics 9: 1–17. https://doi.org/10.3390/math9060605 doi: 10.3390/math9060605
![]() |
[150] |
Somu N, Raman MRG, Ramamritham K (2021) A deep learning framework for building energy consumption forecast. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev 137: 110591. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2020.110591 doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2020.110591
![]() |
[151] |
Albelwi S (2022) A robust energy consumption forecasting model using ResNet-LSTM with huber loss. Int J Comput Sci Net 22: 301–307. https://doi.org/10.22937/ijcsns.2022.22.7.36 doi: 10.22937/ijcsns.2022.22.7.36
![]() |
[152] |
Faiz MF, Sajid M, Ali S, et al. (2023) Energy modeling and predictive control of environmental quality for building energy management using machine learning. Energy Sustainable Dev 74: 381–395. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esd.2023.04.017 doi: 10.1016/j.esd.2023.04.017
![]() |
[153] |
Kim TY, Cho SB (2019) Predicting residential energy consumption using CNN-LSTM neural networks. Energy 182: 72–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2019.05.230 doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2019.05.230
![]() |
[154] |
Shahid ZK, Saguna S, Åhlund C, et al. (2023) Forecasting electricity and district heating consumption: a case study in schools in Sweden. 2023 IEEE Green Technologies Conference (GreenTech), 169–175. https://doi.org/10.1109/GreenTech56823.2023.10173792 doi: 10.1109/GreenTech56823.2023.10173792
![]() |
[155] |
Shao X, Pu C, Zhang YX, et al. (2020) Domain fusion CNN-LSTM for short-term power consumption forecasting. IEEE Access 8: 188352–188362. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2020.3031958 doi: 10.1109/access.2020.3031958
![]() |
[156] |
Xie JJ, Zhong YJ, Xiao T, et al. (2022) A multi-information fusion model for short term load forecasting of an architectural complex considering spatio-temporal characteristics. Energy Build 277: 112566. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2022.112566 doi: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2022.112566
![]() |
[157] |
Jayashankara M, Shah PY, Sharma A, et al. (2023) A novel approach for short-term energy forecasting in smart buildings. IEEE Sens J 23: 5307–5314. https://doi.org/10.1109/jsen.2023.3237876 doi: 10.1109/jsen.2023.3237876
![]() |
[158] |
Khan ZA, Hussain T, Ullah A, et al. (2020) Towards efficient electricity forecasting in residential and commercial buildings: A novel hybrid CNN with a LSTM-AE based framework. Sensors 20: 1–16. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20051399 doi: 10.3390/s20051399
![]() |
[159] |
Sekhar C, Dahiya R (2023) Robust framework based on hybrid deep learning approach for short term load forecasting of building electricity demand. Energy 268: 126660. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2023.126660 doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2023.126660
![]() |
[160] |
Syed D, Abu-Rub H, Ghrayeb A, et al. (2021) Household-level energy forecasting in smart buildings using a novel hybrid deep learning model. IEEE Access 9: 33498–33511. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2021.3061370 doi: 10.1109/access.2021.3061370
![]() |
[161] |
Afzal S, Shokri A, Ziapour BM, et al. (2024) Building energy consumption prediction and optimization using different neural network-assisted models; comparison of different networks and optimization algorithms. Eng Appl Artif Intell 127: 107356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2023.107356 doi: 10.1016/j.engappai.2023.107356
![]() |
[162] |
Talib A, Park S, Im P, et al. (2023) Grey-box and ANN-based building models for multistep-ahead prediction of indoor temperature to implement model predictive control. Eng Appl Artif Intell 126: 107115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2023.107115 doi: 10.1016/j.engappai.2023.107115
![]() |
[163] |
Lu Y, Chen Q, Yu M, et al. (2023) Exploring spatial and environmental heterogeneity affecting energy consumption in commercial buildings using machine learning. Sustainable Cities Soc 95: 104586. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2023.104586 doi: 10.1016/j.scs.2023.104586
![]() |
[164] |
Lei L, Shao S, Liang L (2024) An evolutionary deep learning model based on EWKM, random forest algorithm, SSA and BiLSTM for building energy consumption prediction. Energy 288: 129795. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2023.129795 doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2023.129795
![]() |
[165] |
Khajavi H, Rastgoo A (2023) Improving the prediction of heating energy consumed at residential buildings using a combination of support vector regression and meta-heuristic algorithms. Energy 272: 127069. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2023.127069 doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2023.127069
![]() |
[166] |
Li Y, Zhu N, Hou Y (2023) A novel hybrid model for building heat load forecasting based on multivariate Empirical modal decomposition. Build Environ 237: 110317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2023.110317 doi: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2023.110317
![]() |
[167] |
Jain RK, Smith KM, Culligan PJ, et al. (2014) Forecasting energy consumption of multi-family residential buildings using support vector regression: Investigating the impact of temporal and spatial monitoring granularity on performance accuracy. Appl Energy 123: 168–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.02.057 doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.02.057
![]() |
[168] |
Mao Y, Yu J, Zhang N, et al. (2023) A hybrid model of commercial building cooling load prediction based on the improved NCHHO-FENN algorithm. J Build Eng 78: 107660. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2023.107660 doi: 10.1016/j.jobe.2023.107660
![]() |
[169] |
Fan G-F, Yu M, Dong S-Q, et al. (2021) Forecasting short-term electricity load using hybrid support vector regression with grey catastrophe and random forest modeling. Util Policy 73: 101294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jup.2021.101294 doi: 10.1016/j.jup.2021.101294
![]() |
[170] |
Oh JH, Park SH, Kim EJ (2023) Component model calibration using typical AHU data for improved prediction of daily heat source energy consumption. J Build Eng 76: 107376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2023.107376 doi: 10.1016/j.jobe.2023.107376
![]() |
[171] |
Abbass MAB (2023) A comprehensive framework based on Bayesian optimization and skip connections artificial neural networks to predict buildings energy performance. J Build Eng 77: 107523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2023.107523 doi: 10.1016/j.jobe.2023.107523
![]() |
[172] |
Zheng P, Zhou H, Liu J, et al. (2023) Interpretable building energy consumption forecasting using spectral clustering algorithm and temporal fusion transformers architecture. Appl Energy 349: 121607. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2023.121607 doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2023.121607
![]() |
[173] |
Zhang J, Huang Y, Cheng H, et al. (2023) Ensemble learning-based approach for residential building heating energy prediction and optimization. J Build Eng 67: 106051. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2023.106051 doi: 10.1016/j.jobe.2023.106051
![]() |
[174] |
Cao Y, Liu G, Sun J, et al. (2023) PSO-Stacking improved ensemble model for campus building energy consumption forecasting based on priority feature selection. J Build Eng 72: 106589. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2023.106589 doi: 10.1016/j.jobe.2023.106589
![]() |
[175] |
Chen X, Cao B, Pouramini S (2023) Energy cost and consumption reduction of an office building by Chaotic Satin Bowerbird Optimization Algorithm with model predictive control and artificial neural network: A case study. Energy 270: 126874. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2023.126874 doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2023.126874
![]() |
[176] |
Emami Javanmard M, Ghaderi SF (2023) Energy demand forecasting in seven sectors by an optimization model based on machine learning algorithms. Sustainable Cities Soc 95: 104623. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2023.104623 doi: 10.1016/j.scs.2023.104623
![]() |
[177] |
Zhang C, Ma L, Luo Z, et al. (2024) Forecasting building plug load electricity consumption employing occupant-building interaction input features and bidirectional LSTM with improved swarm intelligent algorithms. Energy 288: 129651. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2023.129651 doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2023.129651
![]() |
[178] |
Yang Y, Li G, Luo T, et al. (2023) The innovative optimization techniques for forecasting the energy consumption of buildings using the shuffled frog leaping algorithm and different neural networks. Energy 268: 126548. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2022.126548 doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2022.126548
![]() |
[179] |
Sulaiman MH, Mustaffa Z (2023) Using the evolutionary mating algorithm for optimizing the user comfort and energy consumption in smart building. J Build Eng 76: 107139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2023.107139 doi: 10.1016/j.jobe.2023.107139
![]() |
[180] | Feng G, Li Q, Wang G, et al. (2022) Hourly load forecast of nZEB in severe cold area based on DeST Simulation and GS-SVR Algorithm, (in Chinese). J Shenyang Jianzhu Univ Nat Sci 38: 149–155. Available from: https://qikan.cqvip.com/Qikan/Article/Detail?id=7107048915. |
[181] |
Vasanthkumar P, Senthilkumar N, Rao KS, et al. (2022) Improving energy consumption prediction for residential buildings using modified wild horse optimization with deep learning model. Chemosphere 308: 136277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.136277 doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.136277
![]() |
[182] |
Alymani M, Mengash HA, Aljebreen M, et al. (2023) Sustainable residential building energy consumption forecasting for smart cities using optimal weighted voting ensemble learning. Sustainable Energy Technol Assess 57: 103271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seta.2023.103271 doi: 10.1016/j.seta.2023.103271
![]() |
[183] |
Khan SU, Khan N, Ullah FUM, et al. (2023) Towards intelligent building energy management: AI-based framework for power consumption and generation forecasting. Energy Build 279: 112705. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2022.112705 doi: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2022.112705
![]() |
[184] |
Zhang Y, Teoh BK, Wu M, et al. (2023) Data-driven estimation of building energy consumption and GHG emissions using explainable artificial intelligence. Energy 262: 125468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2022.125468 doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2022.125468
![]() |
[185] |
Aruta G, Ascione F, Bianco N, et al. (2023) Optimizing heating operation via GA- and ANN-based model predictive control: Concept for a real nearly-zero energy building. Energy Build 292: 113139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2023.113139 doi: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2023.113139
![]() |
[186] |
Afzal S, Ziapour BM, Shokri A, et al. (2023) Building energy consumption prediction using multilayer perceptron neural network-assisted models; comparison of different optimization algorithms. Energy 282: 128446. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2023.128446 doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2023.128446
![]() |
[187] |
Sun H, Niu Y, Li C, et al. (2022) Energy consumption optimization of building air conditioning system via combining the parallel temporal convolutional neural network and adaptive opposition-learning chimp algorithm. Energy 259: 125029. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2022.125029 doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2022.125029
![]() |
[188] |
Liu C, Su ZG, Zhang X (2023) A data-driven evidential regression model for building hourly energy consumption prediction with feature selection and parameters learning. J Build Eng 80: 107956. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2023.107956 doi: 10.1016/j.jobe.2023.107956
![]() |
[189] |
Wang B, Wang X, Wang N, et al. (2023) Machine learning optimization model for reducing the electricity loads in residential energy forecasting. Sustainable Comput Inf Syst 38: 100876. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.suscom.2023.100876 doi: 10.1016/j.suscom.2023.100876
![]() |
[190] |
Irankhah A, Yaghmaee MH, Ershadi-Nasab S (2024) Optimized short-term load forecasting in residential buildings based on deep learning methods for different time horizons. J Build Eng 84: 108505. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2024.108505 doi: 10.1016/j.jobe.2024.108505
![]() |
[191] |
Cai W, Wen X, Li C, et al. (2023) Predicting the energy consumption in buildings using the optimized support vector regression model. Energy 273: 127188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2023.127188 doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2023.127188
![]() |
[192] |
Barbato A, Capone A, Carello G, et al. (2014) A framework for home energy management and its experimental validation. Energy Effic 7: 1013–1052. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12053-014-9269-3 doi: 10.1007/s12053-014-9269-3
![]() |
[193] |
Shiel P, West R (2016) Effects of building energy optimisation on the predictive accuracy of external temperature in forecasting models. J Build Eng 7: 281–291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2016.07.001 doi: 10.1016/j.jobe.2016.07.001
![]() |
[194] |
Ahmad T, Chen HX (2018) Short and medium-term forecasting of cooling and heating load demand in building environment with data-mining based approaches. Energy Build 166: 460–476. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2018.01.066 doi: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2018.01.066
![]() |
[195] |
Roy SS, Roy R, Balas VE (2018) Estimating heating load in buildings using multivariate adaptive regression splines, extreme learning machine, a hybrid model of MARS and ELM. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev 82: 4256–4268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.05.249 doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2017.05.249
![]() |
[196] |
Ahmad T, Chen HX, Shair J, et al. (2019) Deployment of data-mining short and medium-term horizon cooling load forecasting models for building energy optimization and management. Int J Refrig 98: 399–409. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrefrig.2018.10.017 doi: 10.1016/j.ijrefrig.2018.10.017
![]() |
[197] |
Alam SMM, Ali MH (2020) Equation based new methods for residential load forecasting. Energies 13: 6378. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13236378 doi: 10.3390/en13236378
![]() |
[198] |
Pandey K, Basu B, Karmakar S (2021) An efficient decision-making approach for short term indoor room temperature forecasting in smart environment: Evidence from India. Int J Inf Technol Decis Mak 20: 733–774. https://doi.org/10.1142/s0219622021500164 doi: 10.1142/s0219622021500164
![]() |
[199] |
Pachauri N, Ahn CW (2022) Weighted aggregated ensemble model for energy demand management of buildings. Energy 263: 125853. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2022.125853 doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2022.125853
![]() |
[200] |
Yang H, Ran MY, Zhuang CQ (2022) Prediction of building electricity consumption based on joinpoint-multiple linear regression. Energies 15: 1–19. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15228543 doi: 10.3390/en15228543
![]() |
[201] |
Araújo GR, Gomes R, Ferrão P, et al. (2024) Optimizing building retrofit through data analytics: A study of multi-objective optimization and surrogate models derived from energy performance certificates. Energy Built Environ 5: 889–899. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbenv.2023.07.002 doi: 10.1016/j.enbenv.2023.07.002
![]() |
[202] |
Ravichandran C, Gopalakrishnan P (2024) Estimating cooling loads of Indian residences using building geometry data and multiple linear regression. Energy Built Environ 5: 741–771. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbenv.2023.06.003 doi: 10.1016/j.enbenv.2023.06.003
![]() |
[203] |
Lairgi L, Lagtayi R, Lairgi Y, et al. (2023) Optimization of tertiary building passive parameters by forecasting energy consumption based on artificial intelligence models and using ANOVA variance analysis method. AIMS Energy 11: 795–809. https://doi.org/10.3934/energy.2023039 doi: 10.3934/energy.2023039
![]() |
[204] |
Sadaei HJ, Guimaraes FG, da Silva CJ, et al. (2017) Short-term load forecasting method based on fuzzy time series, seasonality and long memory process. Int J Approx Reason 83: 196–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijar.2017.01.006 doi: 10.1016/j.ijar.2017.01.006
![]() |
[205] |
Chou JS, Truong DN (2021) Multistep energy consumption forecasting by metaheuristic optimization of time-series analysis and machine learning. Int J Energy Res 45: 4581–4612. https://doi.org/10.1002/er.6125 doi: 10.1002/er.6125
![]() |
[206] |
Ngo NT, Pham AD, Truong TTH, et al. (2022) Developing a hybrid time-series artificial intelligence model to forecast energy use in buildings. Sci Rep 12: 15775. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-19935-6 doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-19935-6
![]() |
[207] |
Liu D, Wang H (2024) Time series analysis model for forecasting unsteady electric load in buildings. Energy Built Environ 5: 900–910. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbenv.2023.07.003 doi: 10.1016/j.enbenv.2023.07.003
![]() |
[208] |
Bouktif S, Fiaz A, Ouni A, et al. (2020) Multi-Sequence LSTM-RNN deep learning and metaheuristics for electric load forecasting. Energies 13: 1–21. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13020391 doi: 10.3390/en13020391
![]() |
[209] |
Kim W, Han Y, Kim KJ, et al. (2020) Electricity load forecasting using advanced feature selection and optimal deep learning model for the variable refrigerant flow systems. Energy Rep 6: 2604–2618. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2020.09.019 doi: 10.1016/j.egyr.2020.09.019
![]() |
[210] |
Godahewa R, Deng C, Prouzeau A, et al. (2022) A generative deep learning framework across time series to optimize the energy consumption of air conditioning systems. IEEE Access 10: 6842–6855. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2022.3142174 doi: 10.1109/access.2022.3142174
![]() |
[211] |
Vasanthkumar P, Senthilkumar N, Rao KS, et al. (2022) Improving energy consumption prediction for residential buildings using modified wild horse optimization with deep learning model. Chemosphere 308: 136277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.136277 doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.136277
![]() |
[212] |
Jiang HC, Li MH, Fathi G (2023) Optimal load demand forecasting in air conditioning using deep belief networks optimized by an improved version of snake optimization algorithm. IET Renewable Power Gener 17: 3011–3024. https://doi.org/10.1049/rpg2.12819 doi: 10.1049/rpg2.12819
![]() |
[213] |
Kaur S, Bala A, Parashar A (2023) GA-BiLSTM: An intelligent energy prediction and optimization approach for individual home appliances. Evol Syst 15: 413–427. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12530-023-09529-6 doi: 10.1007/s12530-023-09529-6
![]() |
[214] |
Uwiragiye B, Duhirwe PN, Seo H, et al. (2023) Sequential attention deep learning architecture with unsupervised pre-training for interpretable and accurate building energy prediction with limited data. J Asian Archit Build Eng 23: 2012–2028. https://doi.org/10.1080/13467581.2023.2278460 doi: 10.1080/13467581.2023.2278460
![]() |
[215] |
Da TN, Cho MY, Thanh PN (2024) Hourly load prediction based feature selection scheme and hybrid CNN-LSTM method for building's smart solar microgrid. Expert Syst 41: 13539. https://doi.org/10.1111/exsy.13539 doi: 10.1111/exsy.13539
![]() |
[216] |
Somu N, Kowli A (2024) Evaluation of building energy demand forecast models using multi-attribute decision making approach. Energy Built Environ 5: 480–491. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbenv.2023.03.002 doi: 10.1016/j.enbenv.2023.03.002
![]() |
[217] |
Wang L, Lee EWM, Yuen RKK (2018) Novel dynamic forecasting model for building cooling loads combining an artificial neural network and an ensemble approach. Appl Energy 228: 1740–1753. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.07.085 doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.07.085
![]() |
[218] |
Kaur J, Bala A (2019) A hybrid energy management approach for home appliances using climatic forecasting. Build Simul 12: 1033–1045. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12273-019-0552-2 doi: 10.1007/s12273-019-0552-2
![]() |
[219] |
Georgiou GS, Nikolaidis P, Kalogirou SA, et al. (2020) A hybrid optimization approach for autonomy enhancement of nearly-zero-energy buildings based on battery performance and artificial neural networks. Energies 13: 1–23. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13143680 doi: 10.3390/en13143680
![]() |
[220] |
Hafeez G, Alimgeer KS, Wadud Z, et al. (2020) An innovative optimization strategy for efficient energy management with day-ahead demand response signal and energy consumption forecasting in smart grid using artificial neural network. IEEE Access 8: 84415–84433. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2020.2989316 doi: 10.1109/access.2020.2989316
![]() |
[221] |
Luo XJ (2020) A novel clustering-enhanced adaptive artificial neural network model for predicting day-ahead building cooling demand. J Build Eng 32: 101504. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2020.101504 doi: 10.1016/j.jobe.2020.101504
![]() |
[222] |
Luo XJ, Oyedele LO, Ajayi AO, et al. (2020) Feature extraction and genetic algorithm enhanced adaptive deep neural network for energy consumption prediction in buildings. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev 131: 109980. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2020.109980 doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2020.109980
![]() |
[223] |
Ishaq M, Kwon S (2021) Short-term energy forecasting framework using an ensemble deep learning approach. IEEE Access 9: 94262–94271. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2021.3093053 doi: 10.1109/access.2021.3093053
![]() |
[224] |
D'Amico A, Ciulla G (2022) An intelligent way to predict the building thermal needs: ANNs and optimization. Expert Syst Appl 191: 116293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2021.116293 doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2021.116293
![]() |
[225] |
Yang Y, Liu XC, Tian CX (2022) Optimization method for energy saving of rural architectures in hot summer and cold winter areas based on artificial neural network. Comput Intel Neurosc 2022: 2232425. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/2232425 doi: 10.1155/2022/2232425
![]() |
[226] |
Arowoiya VA, Moehler RC, Fang Y (2024) Digital twin technology for thermal comfort and energy efficiency in buildings: A state-of-the-art and future directions. Energy Built Environ 5: 641–656. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbenv.2023.05.004 doi: 10.1016/j.enbenv.2023.05.004
![]() |
[227] |
Jung HC, Kim JS, Heo H (2015) Prediction of building energy consumption using an improved real coded genetic algorithm based least squares support vector machine approach. Energy Build 90: 76–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2014.12.029 doi: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2014.12.029
![]() |
[228] |
Zhang F, Deb C, Lee SE, et al. (2016) Time series forecasting for building energy consumption using weighted Support Vector Regression with differential evolution optimization technique. Energy Build 126: 94–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2016.05.028 doi: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2016.05.028
![]() |
[229] |
Gao XY, Qi CY, Xue GX, et al. (2020) Forecasting the heat load of residential buildings with heat metering based on CEEMDAN-SVR. Energies 13: 1–19. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13226079 doi: 10.3390/en13226079
![]() |
[230] |
Cheng RY, Yu JQ, Zhang M, et al. (2022) Short-term hybrid forecasting model of ice storage air-conditioning based on improved SVR. J Build Eng 50: 557–589. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2022.104194 doi: 10.1016/j.jobe.2022.104194
![]() |
[231] |
Ngo NT, Truong TTH, Truong NS, et al. (2022) Proposing a hybrid metaheuristic optimization algorithm and machine learning model for energy use forecast in non-residential buildings. Sci Rep 12: 1065. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-04923-7 doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-04923-7
![]() |
[232] |
Ma X, Deng YQ, Yuan H (2023) Forecasting the natural gas supply and consumption in China using a novel grey wavelet support vector regressor. Systems 11: 428. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems11080428 doi: 10.3390/systems11080428
![]() |
Time/year | Name of policy, standard | Supervisor/Publishing department |
2007 | Implementation opinions on strengthening the energy conservation management of office buildings and large public buildings of state organs | Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development |
2007 | Guidelines for energy audit of office buildings and large public buildings of state agencies | Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development |
2008 | Regulations on energy conservation in civil buildings | State Council |
2008 | Technical guidelines related to the construction of energy consumption monitoring systems for office buildings of state organs and large public buildings | Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development |
2014 | Technical specification for remote monitoring system of energy consumption in public buildings JGJ/T285-2014 | Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development |
2016 | Guidelines for energy audits of public buildings | Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development |
2017 | The 13th five-year plan for building energy conservation and green development | Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development |
2019 | Green building evaluation CriteriaGB/T 50378-2019 | Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development |
Country | Time/year | Name of policy, standard |
Japan | 1979 | Energy Conservation Act and Design standards for energy efficiency in public buildings |
1980 | Design standards for energy efficiency in residential buildings and Guidelines for Energy Efficient Design and Construction of Residential Buildings | |
1992 | Guidelines for Energy Efficient Design and Construction of Residential Buildings revised | |
1993 | Design standards for energy efficiency in residential buildings revised | |
2009 | Design standards for energy efficiency in public buildings Design standards for energy efficiency in residential buildings and Guidelines for Energy Efficient Design and Construction of Residential Buildings revised | |
2013 | Merger into Building Energy Efficiency Standard 2013 | |
Germany | 1952 | DN 4108 Insulation of high-rise buildings |
1976 | Building Energy Efficiency Act ENEG1976 | |
1977 | Building Insulation Regulations 1.0 | |
1982 | Building Insulation Regulations 2.0 | |
1994 | Building Insulation Regulations 3.0 | |
2002 | Building Energy Efficiency Regulation EnEV2002 | |
2005 | Building Energy Efficiency Regulation EnEG2005 | |
2007 | Building Energy Efficiency Regulation EnEV2007 | |
2014 | Building Energy Efficiency Regulation EnEV2014 | |
2020 | Building Energy Law (2020GEG) | |
United States | 1973 | Energy Policy and Conservation Law |
2005 | Energy Policy Act 2005 | |
2013 | Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) standard revision V4 | |
2022 | Federal Building Performance Standard |
Classification of factors | Keywords in the literature | Summary |
Climatic conditions | Temperature [60,61,62], Solar irradiance [63], Shading of buildings [64], Typical meteorological year [65,66], Micrometeorology [67], Urban heat islands [68], Climate scenarios [29], Meteorological parameters [69] | Different climatic conditions call for different strategies for building energy consumption, and climate parameters must be considered in various aspects when predicting building energy consumption. |
Occupant use behavior | Occupant behavior [70,71,72,73,74], Windowing behavior [75,76,77,78], Air conditioning usage behavior [79], Family mode [80], Space occupancy [81] | Occupant use behavior mainly refers to people's activity patterns, equipment usage habits, and requirements for indoor environmental comfort in the building, which affect the energy consumption of buildings to varying degrees. |
Urban form | Urban density [82], Residential type space [83], Architectural features [84], Layout of residential complexes [85], Green coverage [86], High-rise buildings [87], Community building layout parameters [88], Urban morphological factors [89,90,91], Type of dwelling cluster [92], Block form [93], City profile [94], City geometry parameters [95], Architectural layout [96], Behavior of school building use [97] | Building density, orientation, street width, and direction can influence a building's natural ventilation and daylight availability, leading to varying cooling and heating requirements. The height and high floor area ratio of a building determine the ratio of its external surface area to volume, which in turn affects heat exchange and energy loss. |
Deep learning category | Examples of individual documents | Similar literature | Advantage | Disadvantage |
Convolutional Neural Network (CNN)![]() |
Maryam et al. [114] proposed a method for predicting the energy consumption of mosques, using a convolutional neural network deep learning model that can operate in different operating scenarios. | CNN [115,116,117,118,119,120,121,122], Spatiotemporal Graph Convolutional Network (STGCN) [123,124], Temporal Convolutional Neural Network (TCN) [125,126] | Automatically extract data features, process multi-dimensional data, local perception, and parameter sharing | The data demand is large, the training time is long, and the interpretation is poor |
Recurrent Neural Networks (RNNs)![]() |
Rahman et al. [127] developed a new deep recurrent neural network model for hourly power consumption prediction for commercial and residential buildings. | RNN [128,129,130,131,132,133,134,135,136] | It has time series data processing ability and memory ability and can carry out parameter sharing and dynamic input processing | Easy gradient vanishing and gradient explosion, difficult to capture long-term dependencies, poor explanatory properties |
Long Short-Term Memory Architecture (LSTM)![]() |
Jang et al. [137] created three LSTM models for analysis and comparison of the impact of the operation of non-residential buildings on the prediction of building heating energy consumption. | LSTM [138,139,140,141,142,143,144,145,146,147], FRS-LSTM [148], BiLSTM [149] | It can capture long-term dependencies, alleviate the problem of gradient vanishing, and have strong time series data processing capabilities | The computational cost is high, the training efficiency is slow, the risk of overfitting is prone to occur, and the interpretation is poor |
A combination of more than two types of deep learning![]() |
Somu et al. [150] proposed a deep learning framework called kCNN-LSTM, which collates and processes the energy consumption data of each stage recorded in advance to accurately predict the energy consumption of buildings. | ResNet-LSTM [151], CNN-LSTM [152,153,154,155,156], CNN-RNN [157], LSTM-AEs and CNNs [158], CNN and BiLSTM [159], Mixed DL and LSTM [160] | Automatic identification of features, ability to process irregular energy consumption data, ability to process correlations between time and historical energy consumption, etc. | The computational cost is high, the interpretability is poor, and the training difficulty is increased. |
Author | Literature summary |
Xiao Chen [175] | A new meta-heuristic optimization algorithm, CSBOA, is adopted, and indoor temperature and occupancy are taken as input parameters. |
Majid Emami Javanmard [176] | In Iran, the PSO algorithm and the gray wolf optimization algorithm were used to forecast the energy demand of seven industries, and compared with the six machine learning algorithms, the PSO algorithm and the gray wolf optimization algorithm were more accurate. |
Chengyu Zhang [177] | In this paper, Bi-LSTM is used as the basic algorithm to replace LSTM, and the improved WO algorithm is used for optimization. |
Yiran Yang [178] | The shuffle frog jumping algorithm (SFLA) was used to optimize and predict the cooling and heating load of the building. |
Mohd Herwan Sulaiman [179] | The Evolutionary Mating Algorithm (EMA) is proposed to optimize the use of energy to ensure indoor comfort. |
Guohui Feng [180] | The optimized support vector machine regression algorithm is used to train and predict the load data |
Categorization | Model classification | Literature citations |
Optimization based on statistical models | Linear regression models | 2014/Barbato [192], 2016/Shiel [193], 2018/Ahmad [194], 2018/Roy [195], 2019/Ahmad [196], 2020/Alam [197], 2021/Pandey [198], 2022/Pachauri [199], 2022/Yang [200], 2024/Araújo [201], 2024/Ravichandran [202], 2024/ Lairgi [203] |
Time series models | 2017/Sadaei [204], 2021/Chou [205], 2022/Ngo [206], 2024/Liu [207] | |
Optimization based on machine learning models | Deep learning | 2020/Bouktif [208], 2020/Kim [209], 2022/Godahewa [210], 2022/Vasanthkumar [211], 2023/Alymani [182], 2023/Jiang [212], 2023/Kaur [213], 2023/Sekhar [159], 2023/So [126], 2023/Uwiragiye [214], 2023/Wang [189], 2024/Da [215], 2024/Irankhah [190], 2024/Somu [216] |
Artificial neural networks | 2018/Wang [217], 2019/Kaur [218], 2020/Georgiou [219], 2020/Hafeez [220], 2020/Luo [221], 2020/Luo [222], 2021/Ishaq [223], 2022/D'Amico [224], 2022/Yang [225], 2023/Abbass [171], 2024/ Arowoiya [226] | |
Support vector regression | 2015/Jung [227], 2016/Zhang [228], 2020/Gao [229], 2022/Cheng [230], 2022/Ngo [231], 2023/Khajavi [165], 2023/Ma [232] |
Time/year | Name of policy, standard | Supervisor/Publishing department |
2007 | Implementation opinions on strengthening the energy conservation management of office buildings and large public buildings of state organs | Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development |
2007 | Guidelines for energy audit of office buildings and large public buildings of state agencies | Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development |
2008 | Regulations on energy conservation in civil buildings | State Council |
2008 | Technical guidelines related to the construction of energy consumption monitoring systems for office buildings of state organs and large public buildings | Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development |
2014 | Technical specification for remote monitoring system of energy consumption in public buildings JGJ/T285-2014 | Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development |
2016 | Guidelines for energy audits of public buildings | Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development |
2017 | The 13th five-year plan for building energy conservation and green development | Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development |
2019 | Green building evaluation CriteriaGB/T 50378-2019 | Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development |
Country | Time/year | Name of policy, standard |
Japan | 1979 | Energy Conservation Act and Design standards for energy efficiency in public buildings |
1980 | Design standards for energy efficiency in residential buildings and Guidelines for Energy Efficient Design and Construction of Residential Buildings | |
1992 | Guidelines for Energy Efficient Design and Construction of Residential Buildings revised | |
1993 | Design standards for energy efficiency in residential buildings revised | |
2009 | Design standards for energy efficiency in public buildings Design standards for energy efficiency in residential buildings and Guidelines for Energy Efficient Design and Construction of Residential Buildings revised | |
2013 | Merger into Building Energy Efficiency Standard 2013 | |
Germany | 1952 | DN 4108 Insulation of high-rise buildings |
1976 | Building Energy Efficiency Act ENEG1976 | |
1977 | Building Insulation Regulations 1.0 | |
1982 | Building Insulation Regulations 2.0 | |
1994 | Building Insulation Regulations 3.0 | |
2002 | Building Energy Efficiency Regulation EnEV2002 | |
2005 | Building Energy Efficiency Regulation EnEG2005 | |
2007 | Building Energy Efficiency Regulation EnEV2007 | |
2014 | Building Energy Efficiency Regulation EnEV2014 | |
2020 | Building Energy Law (2020GEG) | |
United States | 1973 | Energy Policy and Conservation Law |
2005 | Energy Policy Act 2005 | |
2013 | Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) standard revision V4 | |
2022 | Federal Building Performance Standard |
Classification of factors | Keywords in the literature | Summary |
Climatic conditions | Temperature [60,61,62], Solar irradiance [63], Shading of buildings [64], Typical meteorological year [65,66], Micrometeorology [67], Urban heat islands [68], Climate scenarios [29], Meteorological parameters [69] | Different climatic conditions call for different strategies for building energy consumption, and climate parameters must be considered in various aspects when predicting building energy consumption. |
Occupant use behavior | Occupant behavior [70,71,72,73,74], Windowing behavior [75,76,77,78], Air conditioning usage behavior [79], Family mode [80], Space occupancy [81] | Occupant use behavior mainly refers to people's activity patterns, equipment usage habits, and requirements for indoor environmental comfort in the building, which affect the energy consumption of buildings to varying degrees. |
Urban form | Urban density [82], Residential type space [83], Architectural features [84], Layout of residential complexes [85], Green coverage [86], High-rise buildings [87], Community building layout parameters [88], Urban morphological factors [89,90,91], Type of dwelling cluster [92], Block form [93], City profile [94], City geometry parameters [95], Architectural layout [96], Behavior of school building use [97] | Building density, orientation, street width, and direction can influence a building's natural ventilation and daylight availability, leading to varying cooling and heating requirements. The height and high floor area ratio of a building determine the ratio of its external surface area to volume, which in turn affects heat exchange and energy loss. |
Deep learning category | Examples of individual documents | Similar literature | Advantage | Disadvantage |
Convolutional Neural Network (CNN)![]() |
Maryam et al. [114] proposed a method for predicting the energy consumption of mosques, using a convolutional neural network deep learning model that can operate in different operating scenarios. | CNN [115,116,117,118,119,120,121,122], Spatiotemporal Graph Convolutional Network (STGCN) [123,124], Temporal Convolutional Neural Network (TCN) [125,126] | Automatically extract data features, process multi-dimensional data, local perception, and parameter sharing | The data demand is large, the training time is long, and the interpretation is poor |
Recurrent Neural Networks (RNNs)![]() |
Rahman et al. [127] developed a new deep recurrent neural network model for hourly power consumption prediction for commercial and residential buildings. | RNN [128,129,130,131,132,133,134,135,136] | It has time series data processing ability and memory ability and can carry out parameter sharing and dynamic input processing | Easy gradient vanishing and gradient explosion, difficult to capture long-term dependencies, poor explanatory properties |
Long Short-Term Memory Architecture (LSTM)![]() |
Jang et al. [137] created three LSTM models for analysis and comparison of the impact of the operation of non-residential buildings on the prediction of building heating energy consumption. | LSTM [138,139,140,141,142,143,144,145,146,147], FRS-LSTM [148], BiLSTM [149] | It can capture long-term dependencies, alleviate the problem of gradient vanishing, and have strong time series data processing capabilities | The computational cost is high, the training efficiency is slow, the risk of overfitting is prone to occur, and the interpretation is poor |
A combination of more than two types of deep learning![]() |
Somu et al. [150] proposed a deep learning framework called kCNN-LSTM, which collates and processes the energy consumption data of each stage recorded in advance to accurately predict the energy consumption of buildings. | ResNet-LSTM [151], CNN-LSTM [152,153,154,155,156], CNN-RNN [157], LSTM-AEs and CNNs [158], CNN and BiLSTM [159], Mixed DL and LSTM [160] | Automatic identification of features, ability to process irregular energy consumption data, ability to process correlations between time and historical energy consumption, etc. | The computational cost is high, the interpretability is poor, and the training difficulty is increased. |
Author | Literature summary |
Xiao Chen [175] | A new meta-heuristic optimization algorithm, CSBOA, is adopted, and indoor temperature and occupancy are taken as input parameters. |
Majid Emami Javanmard [176] | In Iran, the PSO algorithm and the gray wolf optimization algorithm were used to forecast the energy demand of seven industries, and compared with the six machine learning algorithms, the PSO algorithm and the gray wolf optimization algorithm were more accurate. |
Chengyu Zhang [177] | In this paper, Bi-LSTM is used as the basic algorithm to replace LSTM, and the improved WO algorithm is used for optimization. |
Yiran Yang [178] | The shuffle frog jumping algorithm (SFLA) was used to optimize and predict the cooling and heating load of the building. |
Mohd Herwan Sulaiman [179] | The Evolutionary Mating Algorithm (EMA) is proposed to optimize the use of energy to ensure indoor comfort. |
Guohui Feng [180] | The optimized support vector machine regression algorithm is used to train and predict the load data |
Categorization | Model classification | Literature citations |
Optimization based on statistical models | Linear regression models | 2014/Barbato [192], 2016/Shiel [193], 2018/Ahmad [194], 2018/Roy [195], 2019/Ahmad [196], 2020/Alam [197], 2021/Pandey [198], 2022/Pachauri [199], 2022/Yang [200], 2024/Araújo [201], 2024/Ravichandran [202], 2024/ Lairgi [203] |
Time series models | 2017/Sadaei [204], 2021/Chou [205], 2022/Ngo [206], 2024/Liu [207] | |
Optimization based on machine learning models | Deep learning | 2020/Bouktif [208], 2020/Kim [209], 2022/Godahewa [210], 2022/Vasanthkumar [211], 2023/Alymani [182], 2023/Jiang [212], 2023/Kaur [213], 2023/Sekhar [159], 2023/So [126], 2023/Uwiragiye [214], 2023/Wang [189], 2024/Da [215], 2024/Irankhah [190], 2024/Somu [216] |
Artificial neural networks | 2018/Wang [217], 2019/Kaur [218], 2020/Georgiou [219], 2020/Hafeez [220], 2020/Luo [221], 2020/Luo [222], 2021/Ishaq [223], 2022/D'Amico [224], 2022/Yang [225], 2023/Abbass [171], 2024/ Arowoiya [226] | |
Support vector regression | 2015/Jung [227], 2016/Zhang [228], 2020/Gao [229], 2022/Cheng [230], 2022/Ngo [231], 2023/Khajavi [165], 2023/Ma [232] |