Recycling of plastic materials is a key sustainability topic. Hence, the scope of this study is to evaluate the potential of this purification step for achieving high-purity recyclates via mechanical recycling. In this study, the focus is set on the revalorization of poly(3-hydroxy butyrate) and poly(3-hydroxy butyrate-co-3-hydroxy valerate)—two biobased and biodegradable polymers that have properties similar to those of polyolefins and are therefore possible eco-friendly alternatives. Specifically, the washing process as an important part of polymer recycling processes is evaluated regarding different washing conditions on a laboratory scale. For this purpose, several virgin polymers were contaminated with volatile organic compounds that differed in functionality and molecular weight. Regarding contamination, concentration correlates with contamination time. Moreover, the contamination degree was found to be higher for polar contaminants since polar compounds show higher compatibility with the polymer. General beneficial effects of higher temperatures and longer washing times were observed. The choice of washing medium was relevant for different polarities of the contaminants. At higher process temperatures, material degradation occurred. Hence, recyclers have to pay attention to the difference in the interaction between impurities and the polymer and to the degradation of the polymer during recycling and the subsequent formation of degradation products. Since these biopolymers display comparable properties to polyolefins, great potential in packaging applications is apparent. Moreover, the method of analyzing the removal efficiency of volatile organic compounds via washing can be applied to all recyclable polymers.
Citation: Konstanze Kruta, Jörg Fischer, Peter Denifl, Christian Paulik. Effect of different washing conditions on the removal efficiency of selected compounds in biopolymers[J]. Clean Technologies and Recycling, 2023, 3(3): 134-147. doi: 10.3934/ctr.2023009
Recycling of plastic materials is a key sustainability topic. Hence, the scope of this study is to evaluate the potential of this purification step for achieving high-purity recyclates via mechanical recycling. In this study, the focus is set on the revalorization of poly(3-hydroxy butyrate) and poly(3-hydroxy butyrate-co-3-hydroxy valerate)—two biobased and biodegradable polymers that have properties similar to those of polyolefins and are therefore possible eco-friendly alternatives. Specifically, the washing process as an important part of polymer recycling processes is evaluated regarding different washing conditions on a laboratory scale. For this purpose, several virgin polymers were contaminated with volatile organic compounds that differed in functionality and molecular weight. Regarding contamination, concentration correlates with contamination time. Moreover, the contamination degree was found to be higher for polar contaminants since polar compounds show higher compatibility with the polymer. General beneficial effects of higher temperatures and longer washing times were observed. The choice of washing medium was relevant for different polarities of the contaminants. At higher process temperatures, material degradation occurred. Hence, recyclers have to pay attention to the difference in the interaction between impurities and the polymer and to the degradation of the polymer during recycling and the subsequent formation of degradation products. Since these biopolymers display comparable properties to polyolefins, great potential in packaging applications is apparent. Moreover, the method of analyzing the removal efficiency of volatile organic compounds via washing can be applied to all recyclable polymers.
| [1] | Plastics Europe, Plastics—the Facts 2022. Plastics Europe, 2022. Available from: https://plasticseurope.org/knowledge-hub/plastics-the-facts-2022/. |
| [2] |
Eze WU, Umunakwe R, Obasi HC, et al. (2021) Plastics waste management: A review of pyrolysis technology. Clean Technol Recy 1: 50–69. https://doi.org/10.3934/ctr.2021003 doi: 10.3934/ctr.2021003
|
| [3] |
Soto JM, Blázquez G, Calero M, et al. (2018) A real case study of mechanical recycling as an alternative for managing of polyethylene plastic film presented in mixed municipal solid waste. J Clean Prod 203: 777–787. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.08.302 doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.08.302
|
| [4] |
Soto JM, Martín-Lara MA, Blázquez G, et al. (2020) Novel pre-treatment of dirty post-consumer polyethylene film for its mechanical recycling. Process Saf Environ 139: 315–324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2020.04.044 doi: 10.1016/j.psep.2020.04.044
|
| [5] | Reclay StewardEdge, Analysis of flexible film plastics packaging diversion systems. Recsource Recycling Systems, and Moore Recycling Associates Inc., 2013. Available from: https://thecif.ca/projects/documents/714-Flexible_Film_Report.pdf. |
| [6] |
Xia D, Zhang FS (2018) A novel dry cleaning system for contaminated waste plastic purification in gas-solid media. J Clean Prod 171: 1472–1480. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.028 doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.028
|
| [7] |
Liu W, Zhang B, Li Y, et al. (2014) An environmentally friendly approach for contaminants removal using supercritical CO2 for remanufacturing industry. Appl Surf Sci 292: 142–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2013.11.102 doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2013.11.102
|
| [8] |
Niaounakis M (2019) Recycling of biopolymers—The patent perspective. Eur Polym J 114: 464–475. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2019.02.027 doi: 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2019.02.027
|
| [9] |
Cornell DD (2007) Biopolymers in the existing postconsumer plastics recycling stream. J Polym Environ 15: 295–299. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10924-007-0077-0 doi: 10.1007/s10924-007-0077-0
|
| [10] |
Fredi G, Dorigato A (2021) Recycling of bioplastic waste: A review. Adv Ind Eng Polym Res 4: 159–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aiepr.2021.06.006 doi: 10.1016/j.aiepr.2021.06.006
|
| [11] |
McAdam B, Fournet MB, McDonald P, et al. (2020) Production of polyhydroxybutyrate (PHB) and factors impacting its chemical and mechanical characteristics. Polymers 12: 2908. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym12122908 doi: 10.3390/polym12122908
|
| [12] |
Yu J, Plackett D, Chen LXL (2005) Kinetics and mechanism of the monomeric products from abiotic hydrolysis of poly[(R)-3-hydroxybutyrate] under acidic and alkaline conditions. Polym Degrad Stabil 89: 289–299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2004.12.026 doi: 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2004.12.026
|
| [13] |
Pospisilova A, Melcova V, Figalla S, et al. (2021) Techniques for increasing the thermal stability of poly[(R)-3-hydroxybutyrate] recovered by digestion methods. Polym Degrad Stabil 193: 109727. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2021.109727 doi: 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2021.109727
|
| [14] | Delva L, Van Kets K, Kuzmanovic M, et al., Mechanical recycling of polymers for dummies. Capture—Plastics To Resource, 2019. Available from: https://www.ugent.be/ea/match/cpmt/en/research/topics/circular-plastics/mechanicalrecyclingfordummiesv2.pdf. |
Figures(12) / Tables(2)
Konstanze Kruta, Jörg Fischer, Peter Denifl, Christian Paulik. Effect of different washing conditions on the removal efficiency of selected compounds in biopolymers[J]. Clean Technologies and Recycling, 2023, 3(3): 134-147. doi: 10.3934/ctr.2023009
DownLoad: