Agroforestry systems, particularly the coffee agroforestry system (CAS), represent a promising approach to achieving sustainable development and promoting a green economy in Indonesia. Our research aims to explore the potential of CAS to provide ecosystem services and socio-economic benefits and address environmental risks in Indonesia. To critically analyze the current state of CAS in Indonesia, its potential for sustainable development, and the challenges that should be addressed to increase its uptake, we conducted a systematic review of published academic literature. Our findings suggest that CAS has the potential to turn a profit in the future thanks to rising global and domestic market demand as well as environmental benefits like reducing carbon emissions and improving resource efficiency. However, several challenges should be addressed to improve coffee quality and sustain green economy activities, including product certification, collaboration with NGOs and business entities, and coordination of government policies at the site level. Overall, this study highlights the importance of CAS as a green economy approach in Indonesia and suggests policy recommendations to support its promotion and adoption. By addressing the challenges and promoting the potential of CAS, sustainable development and green economic growth can be achieved in Indonesia.
Citation: Nur Arifatul Ulya, Alfonsus Hasudungan Harianja, Apri Laila Sayekti, Astrina Yulianti, Deden Djaenudin, Edwin Martin, Hariyadi Hariyadi, Julian Witjaksono, Leo Rio Ependi Malau, Muhammad Rifqi Tirta Mudhofir, Satria Astana. Coffee agroforestry as an alternative to the implementation of green economy practices in Indonesia: A systematic review[J]. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2023, 8(3): 762-788. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2023041
Agroforestry systems, particularly the coffee agroforestry system (CAS), represent a promising approach to achieving sustainable development and promoting a green economy in Indonesia. Our research aims to explore the potential of CAS to provide ecosystem services and socio-economic benefits and address environmental risks in Indonesia. To critically analyze the current state of CAS in Indonesia, its potential for sustainable development, and the challenges that should be addressed to increase its uptake, we conducted a systematic review of published academic literature. Our findings suggest that CAS has the potential to turn a profit in the future thanks to rising global and domestic market demand as well as environmental benefits like reducing carbon emissions and improving resource efficiency. However, several challenges should be addressed to improve coffee quality and sustain green economy activities, including product certification, collaboration with NGOs and business entities, and coordination of government policies at the site level. Overall, this study highlights the importance of CAS as a green economy approach in Indonesia and suggests policy recommendations to support its promotion and adoption. By addressing the challenges and promoting the potential of CAS, sustainable development and green economic growth can be achieved in Indonesia.
| [1] |
Barbier EB (2012) The green economy post Rio+20. Science 338: 887–888. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1227360 doi: 10.1126/science.1227360
|
| [2] |
Loiseau E, Saikku L, Antikainen R, et al. (2016) Green economy and related concepts: An overview. J Cleaner Prod 139: 361–371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.08.024 doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.08.024
|
| [3] | United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) (2011) Towards a Green Economy Pathways to Sustainable Development and Poverty Eradication. |
| [4] |
Pearce D (1992) Green economics. Environ Values 1: 3–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/096327199200100114 doi: 10.1177/096327199200100114
|
| [5] | Ocampo JA (2012) The transition to a green economy: Benefits, challenges and risks from a sustainable development perspective. |
| [6] |
Amato DD, Korhonen J (2021) Integrating the green economy, circular economy and bioeconomy in a strategic sustainability framework. Ecol Econ 188: 107143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2021.107143 doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2021.107143
|
| [7] |
Merino-Saum A, Baldi MG, Gunderson I, et al. (2018) Articulating natural resources and sustainable development goals through green economy indicators: A systematic analysis. Resour, Conserv Recycl 139: 90–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.07.007 doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.07.007
|
| [8] | Gibbs D (2019) Green Economy. In: Kobayashi A (Ed.), International Encyclopedia of Human Geography (Second Edition), Elsevier, 267–274. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-102295-5.10792-9 |
| [9] |
Ollikainen M (2014) Forestry in bioeconomy—smart green growth for the humankind. Scand J For Res 29: 360–366. https://doi.org/10.1080/02827581.2014.926392 doi: 10.1080/02827581.2014.926392
|
| [10] |
Dandabathula G, Chintala SR, Ghosh S, et al. (2021) Exploring the nexus between Indian forestry and the Sustainable Development Goals. Reg Sustainability 2: 308–323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.regsus.2022.01.002 doi: 10.1016/j.regsus.2022.01.002
|
| [11] |
Endale BJ, Zerihun K, Ermias M (2020) Analysis of socio-economic contribution of agroforestry systems to smallholder farmers around Jimma town, Southwestern Ethiopia. Int J Biodiversity Conserv 12: 48–58. https://doi.org/10.5897/IJBC2018.1237 doi: 10.5897/IJBC2018.1237
|
| [12] |
Jaza Folefack AJ, Darr D (2021) Promoting cocoa agroforestry under conditions of separated ownership of land and trees: Strengthening customary tenure institutions in Cameroon. Land Use Policy 108: 105524. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105524 doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105524
|
| [13] |
Phondani PC, Maikhuri RK, Rawat LS, et al. (2020) Assessing farmers' perception on criteria and indicators for sustainable management of indigenous agroforestry systems in Uttarakhand, India. Environ Sustainability Indic 5: 100018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indic.2019.100018 doi: 10.1016/j.indic.2019.100018
|
| [14] |
Hernandez-Aguilera JN, Conrad JM, Gómez MI, et al. (2019) The Economics and ecology of shade-grown coffee: A model to incentivize shade and bird conservation. Ecol Econ 159: 110–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.01.015 doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.01.015
|
| [15] |
De Leijster V, Santos MJ, Wassen MW, et al. (2021) Ecosystem services trajectories in coffee agroforestry in Colombia over 40 years. Ecosyst Serv 48: 101246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2021.101246 doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2021.101246
|
| [16] |
Costanza R, D'Arge R, Groot Rd, et al. (1997) The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 387: 253–260. https://doi.org/10.1038/387253a0 doi: 10.1038/387253a0
|
| [17] |
Ulya NA, Nurlia A, Kunarso A, et al. (2019) Valuation of goods and services derived from plantation forest in peat swamp forest area: The case of South Sumatra Province. IOP Conf Ser: Earth Environ Sci 308: 012047. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/308/1/012047 doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/308/1/012047
|
| [18] |
Rakatama A, Pandit R (2020) Reviewing social forestry schemes in Indonesia: Opportunities and challenges. For Policy Econ 111: 102052. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2019.102052 doi: 10.1016/j.forpol.2019.102052
|
| [19] | Buttoud G (2013) Advancing agroforestry on the policy agenda—A guide for decision-makers. |
| [20] | Butarbutar T (2011) Agroforestri untuk adaptasi dan mitigasi perubahan iklim. Jurnal Analisis Kebijakan Kehutanan 9: 1–10. |
| [21] | Newaj R, Chaturvedi OP, Handa AK (2016) Recent development in agroforestry research and its role in climate change adaptation and mitigation. Indian J Agrofor 18: 1–9. |
| [22] |
Stavi I, Lal R (2013) Agroforestry and biochar to offset climate change: a review. Agron Sustainable Develop 33: 81–96. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-012-0081-1 doi: 10.1007/s13593-012-0081-1
|
| [23] |
Hidayat A, Dharmawan AH, Pramudita D (2017) Kelayakan usaha budidaya kopi cibulao dalam program pengelolaan hutan bersama masyarakat. Risalah Kebijakan Pertanian dan Lingkungan 4: 85–95. https://doi.org/10.29244/jkebijakan.v4i2.22028 doi: 10.29244/jkebijakan.v4i2.22028
|
| [24] |
Sunderlin WD, Angelsen A, Belcher B, et al. (2005) Livelihoods, forests, and conservation in developing countries : An overview. World Develop 33: 1383–1402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2004.10.004 doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2004.10.004
|
| [25] | International Coffee Organization (ICO) (2022) Historical data on the global coffee trade. |
| [26] | Badan Pusat Statistik (BPS) (2022) Statistik kopi Indonesia 2021. Jakarta: Badan Pusat Statistik. |
| [27] |
Martin E, Herdiana N, Nurlia A, et al. (2020) Kebun-Ghepang: Ecological and institutional reference for social forestry at highlands of Sumatra. IOP Conf Ser: Earth and Environ Sci 533: 012023. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/533/1/012023 doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/533/1/012023
|
| [28] |
Iskandar BS, Iskandar J, Partasasmita R, et al. (2018) Planting coffee and take care of forest: A case study on coffee cultivation in the forest carried out among people of Palintang, highland of Bandung, west Java, Indonesia. Biodiversitas 19: 2183–2195. https://doi.org/10.13057/biodiv/d190626 doi: 10.13057/biodiv/d190626
|
| [29] | Prasmatiwi Erry FISA (2010) Analisis keberlanjutan usahatani kopi di kawasan hutan kabupaten Lampung Barat dengan pendekatan nilai ekonomi lingkungan. Pelita Perkebunan 26: 57–69. |
| [30] |
Octavia D, Suharti S, Murniati M, et al. (2022) Mainstreaming smart agroforestry for social forestry implementation to support Sustainable Development Goals in Indonesia: A Review. Sustainability (Switzerland) 14: 9313. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14159313 doi: 10.3390/su14159313
|
| [31] | Sanudin S, Widiyanto A, Palmolina M, et al. (2021) Kelembagaan petani kopi di desa Sukamanah, Sindangkasih, kabupaten Ciamis. J Agrofor Indones 4: 81–90. |
| [32] |
Nelson RH (2013) Multiple-use forest management versus ecosystem forest management: A religious question? For Policy Econ 35: 9–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2013.06.003 doi: 10.1016/j.forpol.2013.06.003
|
| [33] |
Mahmud MS, Zahid A, Das AK, et al. (2021) A systematic literature review on deep learning applications for precision cattle farming. Comput Electron Agric 187: 106313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2021.106313 doi: 10.1016/j.compag.2021.106313
|
| [34] |
Siddaway AP, Wood AM, Hedges LV (2018) How to do a systematic review: A best practice guide for conducting and reporting narrative reviews, meta-analyses, and meta-syntheses. Ann Rev Psychol 70: 747–770. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010418-102803 doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-010418-102803
|
| [35] | Kitchenham B, Charters S (2017) Guidelines for Systematic Literature Reviews in Software Engineering. Keele University and Durham University Joint Report, 1–44. |
| [36] |
Georgeson L, Maslin M, Poessinouw M (2017) The global green economy: A review of concepts, definitions, measurement methodologies and their interactions. Geo Environ 4: e00036. https://doi.org/10.1002/geo2.36 doi: 10.1002/geo2.36
|
| [37] |
Bina O (2013) The green economy and sustainable development: An uneasy balance? Environ Plann C: Gov Policy 31: 1023–1047. https://doi.org/10.1068/c1310j doi: 10.1068/c1310j
|
| [38] | United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) (2014) Trade and green economy: A Handbook. |
| [39] |
Kaztelan A (2017) Green growth, green economy and sustainable development: Terminological and relational discourse. Prague Econ Pap 26: 487–499. https://doi.org/10.18267/j.pep.626 doi: 10.18267/j.pep.626
|
| [40] |
Adamowicz M (2022) Green deal, green growth and green economy as a means of support for attaining the Sustainable Development Goals. Sustainability (Switzerland) 14: 5901. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14105901 doi: 10.3390/su14105901
|
| [41] | Platform for Accelerating the Circular Economy (2021) Capital Equipment. Platform for Accelerating the Circular Economy (PACE). |
| [42] | United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) (2022) For people and planet The United Nations Environment Programme strategy for tackling climate change, biodiversity and nature loss, and pollution and waste from 2022—2025. |
| [43] |
Nair PKR (2005) Agroforestry. Appropriate Technol: 2005: 35–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/B0-12-348530-4/00244-7 doi: 10.1016/B0-12-348530-4/00244-7
|
| [44] |
Torquebiau EF (2000) A renewed perspective on agroforestry concepts. C R de l'Académie des Sci-Ser Ⅲ-Sci de la Vie 323: 1009–1017. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0764-4469(00)01239-7 doi: 10.1016/S0764-4469(00)01239-7
|
| [45] |
Kay S, Graves A, Palma JHN, et al. (2019) Agroforestry is paying off—Economic evaluation of ecosystem services in European landscapes with and without agroforestry systems. Ecosyst Serv 36: 100896. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2019.100896 doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2019.100896
|
| [46] |
Ovando P, Campos P, Oviedo JL, et al. (2016) Ecosystem accounting for measuring total income in private and public agroforestry farms. For Policy Econ 71: 43–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2016.06.031 doi: 10.1016/j.forpol.2016.06.031
|
| [47] |
Brand U (2012) Green Economy—the Next Oxymoron? GAIA-Ecol Perspect Sci Soc 21: 28–32. https://doi.org/10.14512/gaia.21.1.9 doi: 10.14512/gaia.21.1.9
|
| [48] |
Borel-Saladin JM, Turok IN (2013) The green economy: Incremental change or transformation? Environ Policy Governance 23: 209–220. https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.1614 doi: 10.1002/eet.1614
|
| [49] |
Dianjaya AR, Epira P (2020) Indonesia green economy implementation readiness of greenhouse gas emissions reduction. J Contemp Governance Public Policy 1: 27–40. https://doi.org/10.46507/jcgpp.v1i1.5 doi: 10.46507/jcgpp.v1i1.5
|
| [50] |
Akter R, Kamrul M, Kabir KH, et al. (2022) Agroforestry systems and their impact on livelihood improvement of tribal farmers in a tropical moist deciduous forest in Bangladesh. Trees, For People 9: 100315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tfp.2022.100315 doi: 10.1016/j.tfp.2022.100315
|
| [51] |
Aryal K, Maraseni T, Apan A (2023) Transforming agroforestry in contested landscapes : A win-win solution to trade-offs in ecosystem services in Nepal. Sci Total Environ 857: 159301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.159301 doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.159301
|
| [52] |
Wilson MH, Lovell ST (2016) Agroforestry—The next step in sustainable and resilient agriculture. Sustainability (Switzerland) 8: 574. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.159301 doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.159301
|
| [53] |
Paudel S, Baral H, Rojario A, et al. (2022) Agroforestry : Opportunities and challenges in Timor-Leste. Forests 13: 41. https://doi.org/10.3390/f13010041 doi: 10.3390/f13010041
|
| [54] |
Fitch A, Rowe RL, McNamara NP, et al. (2022) The coffee compromise: Is agricultural expansion into tree plantations a sustainable option? Sustainability (Switzerland) 14: 3019. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14053019 doi: 10.3390/su14053019
|
| [55] |
Liu W, Yao S, Wang J, et al. (2019) Trends and features of agroforestry research based on bibliometric analysis. Sustainability (Switzerland) 11: 3473. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11123473 doi: 10.3390/su11123473
|
| [56] |
Susanti A, Marhaento H, Permadi DB, et al. (2020) Smallholder farmers' perception on oil palm agroforestry. IOP Conf Ser: Earth Environ Sci 449: 012056. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/449/1/012056 doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/449/1/012056
|
| [57] |
Vazquez-Delfin P, Casas A, Vallejo M (2022) Adaptation and biocultural conservation of traditional agroforestry systems in the Tehuac an Valley: Access to resources and livelihoods strategies. Heliyon 8: e09805. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09805 doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09805
|
| [58] |
Zada M, Zada S, Ali M, et al. (2022) Contribution of small-scale agroforestry to local economic development and livelihood resilience: Evidence from Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Province (KPK), Pakistan. Land 11: 71. https://doi.org/10.3390/land11010071 doi: 10.3390/land11010071
|
| [59] |
Parodi A, Villamonte-Cuneo G, Loboguerrero AM, et al. (2022) Embedding circularity into the transition towards sustainable agroforestry systems in Peru. Sci Total Environ 838: 156376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.156376 doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.156376
|
| [60] |
Insusanty E, Ikhwan M, Ervayenri E, et al. (2020) Mitigation climate change: Strengthening agroforestry at the District XⅢ Koto Kampar, Riau. Indonesia. IOP Conf Ser: Earth Environ Sci 469: 012015. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/469/1/012015 doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/469/1/012015
|
| [61] |
Suyanto S, Pandu Permana R, Khususiyah N, et al. (2005) Land tenure, agroforestry adoption, and reduction of fire hazard in a forest zone: A case study from Lampung, Sumatra, Indonesia. Agrofor Syst 65: 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-004-1413-1 doi: 10.1007/s10457-004-1413-1
|
| [62] |
Apriandana F, Safe'i R, Febryano IG, et al. (2021) Pengelolaan hutan desa di KPH wilayah VⅢ Semendo dari perspektif kinerja kelembagaan. J Penelitian Sosial dan Ekon Kehutanan 18: 185–204. https://doi.org/10.20886/jpsek.2021.18.3.185-204 doi: 10.20886/jpsek.2021.18.3.185-204
|
| [63] |
Verbist B, Putra AED, Budidarsono S (2005) Factors driving land use change: Effects on watershed functions in a coffee agroforestry system in Lampung, Sumatra. Agric Syst 85: 254–270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2005.06.010 doi: 10.1016/j.agsy.2005.06.010
|
| [64] |
Supriadi H, Pranowo D (2015) Some statistical aspects of partitioning genotype-environmental components of variability. Perspektif 14: 135–150. https://doi.org/10.21082/p.v14n2.2015.135-150 doi: 10.21082/p.v14n2.2015.135-150
|
| [65] | United Nations Office for REDD Coordination in Indonesia (UNORCID) (2015) Forest Ecosystem Valuation Study: Indonesia. |
| [66] |
Amaruzaman S, Leimona B, van Noordwijk M, et al. (2017) Discourses on the performance gap of agriculture in a green economy: A Q-methodology study in Indonesia. Int J Biodiversity Sci, Ecosyst Serv Manag 13: 233–247. https://doi.org/10.1080/21513732.2017.1331264 doi: 10.1080/21513732.2017.1331264
|
| [67] |
Swainson L, Mahanty S (2018) Green economy meets political economy: Lessons from the "Aceh Green" initiative, Indonesia. Global Environ Change 53: 286–295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2018.10.009 doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2018.10.009
|
| [68] |
Anderson ZR, Kusters K, McCarthy J, et al. (2016) Green growth rhetoric versus reality: Insights from Indonesia. Global Environ Change 38: 30–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.02.008 doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.02.008
|
| [69] |
Endriana L, Hartono D, Irawan T (2016) Green economy priority sectors in Indonesia: A SAM approach. Environ Econ Policy Stud 18: 115–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10018-015-0114-5 doi: 10.1007/s10018-015-0114-5
|
| [70] |
David W, Ardiansyah A (2016) Organic agriculture in Indonesia: Challenges and opportunities. Org Agric 7: 329–338. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13165-016-0160-8 doi: 10.1007/s13165-016-0160-8
|
| [71] |
Machmuddin N, Kusnadi N, Syaukat Y (2017) Analisis efisiensi ekonomi usahatani padi organik dan konvensional di kabupaten Tasikmalaya. Forum Agribisnis 6: 145–160. https://doi.org/10.29244/fagb.6.2.145-160 doi: 10.29244/fagb.6.2.145-160
|
| [72] |
Mayrowani H (2012) Pengembangan pertanian organik di Indonesia. Forum Penelitian Agro Ekonomi 30: 91–108. https://doi.org/10.21082/fae.v30n2.2012.91-108 doi: 10.21082/fae.v30n2.2012.91-108
|
| [73] |
Ginting YA, Malau LRE (2021) Analisis pendapatan dan faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi penerapan System Rice of Intensification (SRI) di desa Trasan, kecamatan Bandongan, kabupaten Magelang. J Manajemen Agribisnis (Journal of Agribusiness Management) 9: 303–314. https://doi.org/10.24843/JMA.2021.v09.i01.p07 doi: 10.24843/JMA.2021.v09.i01.p07
|
| [74] |
Gultom L, Winandi R, Jahroh S (2014) Analisis efisiensi teknis usahatani padi semi organik di kecamatan Cigombong, Bogor. Inf Pertanian 23: 7–18. https://doi.org/10.21082/ip.v23n1.2014.p7-18 doi: 10.21082/ip.v23n1.2014.p7-18
|
| [75] |
Murniati K, Mulyo JH, Irham I, et al. (2017) Efisiensi teknis usaha tani padi organik lahan sawah tadah hujan di kabupaten Tanggamus provinsi Lampung. J Penelitian Pertanian Ter 14: 31–38. https://doi.org/10.25181/jppt.v14i1.139 doi: 10.25181/jppt.v14i1.139
|
| [76] |
Permatasari P, Anantanyu S, Dewi WS (2018) Pengaruh tingkat adopsi budidaya padi organik terhadap keberlanjutan budidaya padi organik di kabupaten Boyolali. Carakatani: J Sustainable Agric 33: 153–168. https://doi.org/10.20961/carakatani.v33i2.22296 doi: 10.20961/carakatani.v33i2.22296
|
| [77] |
Arsanti IW, Böhme MH (2018) Organic vegetable production in java—Challenge for the chili growers. IOP Conf Ser: Earth Environ Sci 215: 012035. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/215/1/012035 doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/215/1/012035
|
| [78] |
Leksono AS, Mustafa I, Gama ZP, et al. (2021) Organic farming system of cocoa plantations in South Malang, Indonesia. IOP Conf Ser: Earth Environ Sci 743: 012030. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/743/1/012030 doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/743/1/012030
|
| [79] |
Utami TW, Irham I, Abdurofi I (2022) The sustainability level of semi organic shallot farming based on farmers perception: A case study in Bantul district, Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta, Indonesia. IOP Conf Ser: Earth Environ Sci 1005: 012029. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1005/1/012029 doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/1005/1/012029
|
| [80] |
Saroja RA-Z, Karyani T (2021) Komparasi pendapatan petani kopi organik dan Konvensional (Suatu kasus di desa Margamulya, kecamatan Pangalengan, kabupaten Bandung, Jawa Barat). Mimbar Agribisnis: J Pemikiran Masyarakat Ilmiah Berwawasan Agribisnis 7: 25–25. https://doi.org/10.25157/ma.v7i1.3822 doi: 10.25157/ma.v7i1.3822
|
| [81] |
Marindra G, Arifin B, Indriani Y (2018) Analisis keberlanjutan usahatani kopi sertifikasi Common Code For The Coffee Community (4C) di Kabupaten Tanggamus Provinsi Lampung. J Ilmu-Ilmu Agribisnis 6: 367–383. https://doi.org/10.23960/jiia.v6i4.376-383 doi: 10.23960/jiia.v6i4.376-383
|
| [82] |
Santoso AB (2017) Analisis pendapatan terhadap karakteristik usahtani integrasi tanaman perkebunan-sapi: Kasus di Desa Mesa, kabupaten Maluku Tengah. J Ilmu Pertanian Indonesia 22: 108–114. https://doi.org/10.18343/jipi.22.2.108 doi: 10.18343/jipi.22.2.108
|
| [83] |
Bamualim AM, Madarisa F, Pendra Y, et al. (2015) Kajian inovasi integrasi tanaman-ternak melalui pemanfaatan hasil ikutan tanaman sawit untuk meningkatkan produksi sapi lokal Sumatera Barat. J Peternakan Indonesia (Indonesian Journal of Animal Science) 17: 83–93. https://doi.org/10.25077/jpi.17.2.83-93.2015 doi: 10.25077/jpi.17.2.83-93.2015
|
| [84] |
Sari M, Silalahi FRL (2022) Analisis usahatani integrasi sapi-sawit di kabupaten Deli Serdang, provinsi Sumatera Utara, Indonesia. Agro Bali: Agric J 5: 144–155. https://doi.org/10.37637/ab.v5i1.879 doi: 10.37637/ab.v5i1.879
|
| [85] |
Ermiati E, Pribadi ER, Wahyudi A (2015) Pengkajian usahatani integrasi seraiwangi-ternak sapi. Buletin Penelitian Tanaman Rempah dan Obat 26: 133–142. https://doi.org/10.21082/bullittro.v26n2.2015.133-142 doi: 10.21082/bullittro.v26n2.2015.133-142
|
| [86] |
Parulian L, Munthe KPSM, Haloho RD (2019) Pengaruh integrasi tanaman dan ternak sapi terhadap peningkatan pendapatan dan produktivitas petani (Studi kasus: petani kentang di kecamatan Harian, kabupaten Samosir). Agrimor: J Agribisnis Lahan Kering 4: 22–25. https://doi.org/10.32938/ag.v4i2.694 doi: 10.32938/ag.v4i2.694
|
| [87] |
Suwarto S, Aryanto AT, Efendi I (2015) Perancangan model pertanian terpadu tanaman-ternak dan tanaman-ikan di perkampungan teknologi Telo, Riau. J Agron 43: 168–177. https://doi.org/10.24831/jai.v43i2.10424 doi: 10.24831/jai.v43i2.10424
|
| [88] |
Rahmat M, Premono BT, Ulya NA, et al. (2019) Management of swamp buffalo farms in forest areas to preserve forest ecosystem and sustainability of community livelihoods. IOP Conf Ser: Earth Environ Sci 298: 012038. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/298/1/012038 doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/298/1/012038
|
| [89] | Tata HL (2019) Mixed farming systems on peatlands in Jambi and Central Kalimantan provinces, Indonesia: Should they be describe as paludiculture? Mires Peat 25: 1–17. |
| [90] | Tata HL, Susmianto A (2016) Prospek Ekosistem Gambut Indonesia. Bogor: FORDA Press. |
| [91] |
Yuwati TW, Rachmanadi D, Qirom MA, et al. (2021) The performance of paludiculture commodities at different peat depths in Central Kalimantan. IOP Conf Ser: Earth Environ Sci 914: 012047. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/914/1/012047 doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/914/1/012047
|
| [92] |
Budiman I, Bastoni B, Sari ENN, et al. (2020) Progress of paludiculture projects in supporting peatland ecosystem restoration in Indonesia. Global Ecol Conserv 23: e01084. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2020.e01084 doi: 10.1016/j.gecco.2020.e01084
|
| [93] |
Achmad B, Siarudin M, Widiyanto A, et al. (2022) Traditional subsistence farming of smallholder agroforestry systems in Indonesia: A Review. Sustainability (Switzerland) 14: 8631. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14148631 doi: 10.3390/su14148631
|
| [94] |
Purnomo D, Budiastuti MTS, Setyaningrum D (2022) The role of soybean agroforestry in mitigating climate change in Indonesia. IOP Conf Ser: Earth Environ Sci 1016: 012024. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1016/1/012024 doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/1016/1/012024
|
| [95] | Rachman LM, Hidayat Y, Tarigan SD, et al. (2020) The effect of agroforestry system on reducing soil erosion in upstream Ciliwung watershed. IOP Conf Ser: Earth Environ Sci 556: 012010. |
| [96] |
Rahmani TA, Nurrochmat DR, Hero Y, et al. (2021) Evaluating the feasibility of oil palm agroforestry in harapan rainforest, Jambi, Indonesia. For Soc 5: 458–477. https://doi.org/10.24259/fs.v5i2.10375 doi: 10.24259/fs.v5i2.10375
|
| [97] | Hidayat NK, Offermans A, Glasbergen P (2016) On the profitability of sustainability certification. J Econ Sustainable Develop 7: 45–62. |
| [98] |
Hutabarat S, Slingerland M, Rietberg P, et al. (2018) Costs and benefits of certification of independent oil palm smallholders in Indonesia. Int Food Agribusiness Manag Rev 21: 681–700. https://doi.org/10.22434/IFAMR2016.0162 doi: 10.22434/IFAMR2016.0162
|
| [99] |
Ibnu M (2019) Determinan Partisipasi Petani Kopi dalam Standar dan Sertifikasi Berkelanjutan Common Code for Coffee Community (4C). J Tanaman Industri dan Penyegar 6: 135–144. https://doi.org/10.21082/jtidp.v6n3.2019.p135-144 doi: 10.21082/jtidp.v6n3.2019.p135-144
|
| [100] | Oktami N, Prasmatiwi FE, Rosanti N (2014) Manfaat sertifikasi Rainforest Alliance (RA) dalam mengembangkan usahatani kopi yang berkelanjutan di kecamatan Pulau Panggung, kabupaten Tanggamus. Jurnal Ilmu Ilmu Agribisnis 2: 337–347. |
| [101] |
Sinaga SV, Harianto H, Suharno S (2019) Analisis propensity score matching dampak ekonomi sertifikasi C.A.F.E Practises pada usahatani kopi lintong Sumatera Utara. J AGRISEP: Kajian Masalah Sosial Ekonomi Pertanian dan Agribisnis 18: 139–152. https://doi.org/10.31186/jagrisep.18.1.139-152 doi: 10.31186/jagrisep.18.1.139-152
|
| [102] | Sudirman H, Nurmalina R, Suprehatin S (2021) Dampak standar keberlanjutan terhadap pendapatan usahatani kopi: Kasus program CAFE Practises di Kabupaten Enrekang. J Agro Ekon 39: 131–153. |
| [103] |
Cahyono ED, Fairuzzana S, Willianto D, et al. (2020) Agroforestry innovation through planned farmer behavior: Trimming in pine-coffee systems. Land 9: 363. https://doi.org/10.3390/land9100363 doi: 10.3390/land9100363
|
| [104] |
Fitriani, Arifin B, Zakaria WA, et al. (2018) Coffee agroforestry for sustainability of Upper Sekampung Watershed management. IOP Conf Ser: Earth Environ Sci 141: 012006. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/141/1/012006 doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/141/1/012006
|
| [105] |
Hayyun DA, Megantara EN, Parikesit P (2018) Kajian layanan ekosistem pada sistem agroforestri berbasis kopi di Desa Cisero, Garut. J Pengelolaan Lingkungan Berkelanjutan (Journal of Environmental Sustainability Management) 2: 200–219. https://doi.org/10.36813/jplb.2.3.200-219 doi: 10.36813/jplb.2.3.200-219
|
| [106] |
Nandini R (2018) Analisis keuntungan usaha Tani agroforestry kemiri, coklat, kopi dan pisang di Hutan Kemasyarakatan Sesaot, Lombok Barat. J Penelitian Kehutanan Faloak 2: 1–12. https://doi.org/10.20886/jpkf.2018.2.1.1-12 doi: 10.20886/jpkf.2018.2.1.1-12
|
| [107] |
Pratiwi AM, Kaskoyo H, Herwanti S (2019) Efisiensi pemasaran agroforestri berbasis kopi berdasarkan keragaan pasar : Studi kasus di Pekon Air Kubang, Tanggamus. J Sylva Lestari 7: 299–308. https://doi.org/10.23960/jsl37299-308 doi: 10.23960/jsl37299-308
|
| [108] | Agustiningsih R, Suhartoyo H, Suharto E (2022) Pengaruh naungan terhadap kualitas bubuk kopi pada lahan agroforestri. J of Global For Environ Sci 2: 56–60. |
| [109] |
Kissinger K, Pitri RMN (2017) Bioekologi agroforestry kopi: Tutupan vegetasi dan pola tumbuhan penyusun agroforestry kopi (coffea sp.) di kecamatan Pengaron, kabupaten Banjar, Kalimantan Selatan. EnviroScienteae 13: 150–156. https://doi.org/10.20527/es.v13i2.3917 doi: 10.20527/es.v13i2.3917
|
| [110] |
Martin E, Suharjito D, Darusman D, et al. (2016) Etika subsistensi petani kopi: Memahami dinamika pengembangan agroforestri di Dataran Tinggi Sumatera Selatan. Sodality: J Sosiologi Pedesaan 4: 155–166. https://doi.org/10.22500/sodality.v4i1.14410 doi: 10.22500/sodality.v4i1.14410
|
| [111] |
Rimbawan R, Hafizianor H, Pujawati ED (2021) Pengelolaan agroforestri pinus-kopi dan kontribusinya bagi masyarakat desa Babadan pada kawasan hutan pinus perutani KPH Malang Jawa Timur. J Sylva Scienteae 4: 591–598. https://doi.org/10.20527/jss.v4i4.3933 doi: 10.20527/jss.v4i4.3933
|
| [112] |
Godoy R, Bennett C (1989) Diversification among coffee smallholders in the highlands of South Sumatra, Indonesia. Hum Ecol 16: 397–420. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00891650 doi: 10.1007/BF00891650
|
| [113] | Kerr J, Pender J, Suyanto (2006) Property rights and environmental services in Lampung Province, Indonesia. Survival of the Commons: Mounting Challenges and New Realities The Eleventh Conference of the International Association for the Study of Common Property, 1–30. |
| [114] |
Levang P, Sitorus S, Gaveau D, et al. (2012) Landless farmers, sly opportunists, and manipulated voters: The squatters of the Bukit Barisan Selatan National Park (Indonesia). Conserv Soc 10: 243–255. https://doi.org/10.4103/0972-4923.101838 doi: 10.4103/0972-4923.101838
|
| [115] |
Putraditama A, Kim Y-s, Baral H (2021) Where to put community-based forestry?: Reconciling conservation and livelihood in Lampung, Indonesia. Trees, For People 4: 100062. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tfp.2021.100062 doi: 10.1016/j.tfp.2021.100062
|
| [116] |
Octavia D, Rachmat HH (2020) Promoting agroforestry model in increasing land cover to sustain community livelihood in Paru Village Forest. IOP Conf Ser: Earth Environ Sci 449: 012011. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/449/1/012011 doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/449/1/012011
|
| [117] |
Wahyu A, Suharjito D, Darusman D, et al. (2020) The development of community-based forest management in Indonesia and its contribution to community welfare and forest condition. IOP Conf Ser: Earth Environ Sci 528: 012037. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/528/1/012037 doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/528/1/012037
|
| [118] | Capaian Perhutanan Sosial Sampai Dengan 1 Oktober 2022. http://pskl.menlhk.go.id/berita/437-capaian-perhutanan-sosial-sampai-dengan-1-oktober-2022.html?showall = 1 & limitstart = |
| [119] |
Fisher MR, Moeliono M, Mulyana A, et al. (2018) Assessing the new social forestry project in Indonesia: Recognition, livelihood and conservation? Int For Rev 20: 346–361. https://doi.org/10.1505/146554818824063014 doi: 10.1505/146554818824063014
|
| [120] |
Kaskoyo H, Mohammed AJ, Inoue M (2017) Impact of community forest program in protection forest on livelihood outcomes: A case study of Lampung Province, Indonesia. J Sustainable For 36: 250–263. https://doi.org/10.1080/10549811.2017.1296774 doi: 10.1080/10549811.2017.1296774
|
| [121] |
Rowe RL, Prayogo C, Oakley S, et al. (2022) Improved coffee management by farmers in state forest plantations in Indonesia: An experimental platform. Land 11: 671. https://doi.org/10.3390/land11050671 doi: 10.3390/land11050671
|
| [122] | Djajanti D (2006) Managing forest with community (PHBM) in Central Java: Promoting equity in access to NTFPs. In: Mahanty S, Fox J, Nurse M, et al. (Eds.), East-West Center and RECOFTC, 63–82. |
| [123] |
Maryudi A (2012) Restoring state control over forest resources through administrative procedures: Evidence from a community forestry programme in Central Java, Indonesia. Indonesia ASEAS-Austrian J South-East Asian Stud 5: 229–242. https://doi.org/10.5539/jsd.v5n2p43 doi: 10.5539/jsd.v5n2p43
|
| [124] |
Veriasa TO, Rustiadi E, Kinseng RA (2020) The impact of joint community forest management (PHBM) on local community income in upstream of Ciliwung watershed, Bogor Regency-Indonesia. IOP Conf Ser: Earth Environ Sci 556: 012009. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/556/1/012009 doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/556/1/012009
|
| [125] |
Yokota Y, Harada K, Rohman, et al. (2014) Contributions of company-community forestry partnerships (PHBM) to the livelihoods of participants in Java, Indonesia: A case study in Madiun, East Java. Jpn Agric Res Q: JARQ 48: 363–377. https://doi.org/10.6090/jarq.48.363 doi: 10.6090/jarq.48.363
|
| [126] |
Iskandar BS, Iskandar J, Irawan B, et al. (2019) The development of coffee cultivation in the traditional agroforestry of mixed-garden (Dukuh lembur) to provide social-economic benefit for the outer baduy community, South Banten, Indonesia. Biodiversitas 20: 2958–2969. https://doi.org/10.13057/biodiv/d201026 doi: 10.13057/biodiv/d201026
|
| [127] |
Sodik M, Pudyatmoko S, Yuwono PSH, et al. (2020) Forest conflict mitigation through coffee-based agroforestry provide secure habitat for Javan Slow Lorise in a lowland fragmented forest in Central Java, Indonesia. IOP Conf Ser: Earth Environ Sci 449: 012050. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/449/1/012050 doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/449/1/012050
|
| [128] |
Zahro M, Subekti S, Widjayanthi L (2017) Perubahan sosial ekonomi petani agroforestri berbasis kopi di kabupaten Jember, Jawa Timur. J Kebijakan dan Manajemen Publik 5: 159–168. https://doi.org/10.21070/jkmp.v5i2.1313 doi: 10.21070/jkmp.v5i2.1313
|
| [129] |
Winarni S, Budi Yuwono S, Herwanti S (2016) Struktur pendapatan, tingkat kesejahteraan dan faktor produksi agroforestri kopi pada Kesatuan Pengelolaan Hutan Lindung Batutegi (Studi di Gabungan Kelompok Tani Karya Tani Mandiri). J Sylva Lestari 4: 1–10. https://doi.org/10.23960/jsl141-10 doi: 10.23960/jsl141-10
|
| [130] |
Fitriani, Arifin B, Zakaria WA, et al. (2018) Kinerja usahatani kopi di hulu DAS Sekampung, Tanggamus, Lampung. J Penelitian Pertanian Terapan 18: 165–174. https://doi.org/10.25181/jppt.v18i3.1503 doi: 10.25181/jppt.v18i3.1503
|
| [131] |
Wulandari C, Kurniasih H (2019) Community preferences for social forestry facilitation programming in lampung, Indonesia. For Soc 3: 114–132. https://doi.org/10.24259/fs.v3i1.6026 doi: 10.24259/fs.v3i1.6026
|
| [132] |
Ahenkan A, Osei J, Owusu EH (2018) Mainstreaming green economy: An assessment of private sector led initiatives in climate change adaptation in Ghana. J Sustainable Develop 11: 77–87. https://doi.org/10.5539/jsd.v11n2p77 doi: 10.5539/jsd.v11n2p77
|
| [133] | Rawanda R, Mutama R, Surya MH, et al. (2021) Pengaruh pengelolaan kopi robusta terhadap kondisi sosial ekonomi masyarakat di HKM Binawana Register 45B Desa Tri Budisukur, Kecamatan Kebun Tebu, Lampung Barat, Lampung. J People, For Environ 1: 1–10. |
| [134] |
Suyanto S, Khususiyah N, Leimona B (2007) Poverty and environmental services case study in way Besai Watershed, Lampung Province, Indonesia. Ecol Soc 12: 13. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-02070-120213 doi: 10.5751/ES-02070-120213
|
| [135] |
Ismono H, Arifin B, Tanaka K, et al. (2022) Impacts of coffee agroforestry and sustainability certification on farmers' livelihood in Sumatra-Indonesia. Sustainability Sci Resour 2: 77–95. https://doi.org/10.55168/ssr2809-6029.2022.2005 doi: 10.55168/ssr2809-6029.2022.2005
|
| [136] | Harianja AH (2013) Analisis Ekonomi Pengelolaan Hutan Rakyat di Sub DAS Arun. |
| [137] |
Dassir M, Sadapotto A, Arsyad U, et al. (2019) Adaptive agroforestry model to improve livelihood and to support the management of Minraleng Watershed in Maros Regency. IOP Conf Ser: Earth Environ Sci 270: 012011. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/270/1/012011 doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/270/1/012011
|
| [138] |
Hakim L (2021) Coffee: Ethnobotany, tourism and biodiversity conservation in East Java. IOP Conf Ser: Earth Environ Sci 743: 012063. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/743/1/012063 doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/743/1/012063
|
| [139] |
Jafaruddin N, Noor TI, Karyani T (2020) Variables influencing the potency of community based coffee agro-tourism in Mount Galunggung, Tasikmalaya, Indonesia. Pelita Perkebunan 36: 267–276. https://doi.org/10.22302/iccri.jur.pelitaperkebunan.v36i3.454 doi: 10.22302/iccri.jur.pelitaperkebunan.v36i3.454
|
| [140] |
Imron MA, Campera M, Bihad DA, et al. (2022) Bird assemblages in coffee agroforestry systems and other human modified habitats in Indonesia. Biology 11: 310. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology11020310 doi: 10.3390/biology11020310
|
| [141] |
Arifin MZ, Khoir M, Purwanto BE (2020) Community attitudes towards biogas as an alternative energy and environmental quality improvement. J Phys: Conf Ser 1517: 012043. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1517/1/012043 doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1517/1/012043
|
| [142] |
Anhar A, Rasyid UHA, Muslih AM, et al. (2020) Sustainable arabica coffee development strategies in Aceh, Indonesia. IOP Conf Ser: Earth Environ Sci 667: 012106. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/667/1/012106 doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/667/1/012106
|
| [143] |
Gomes LC, Bianchi FJJA, Cardoso IM, et al. (2020) Agroforestry systems can mitigate the impacts of climate change on coffee production: A spatially explicit assessment in Brazil. Agric, Ecosystems Environ 294: 106858. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2020.106858 doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2020.106858
|
| [144] |
Moreira SLS, Pires CV, Marcatti GE, et al. (2018) Intercropping of coffee with the palm tree, macauba, can mitigate climate change effects. Agric For Meteorol 256-257: 379–390. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2018.03.026 doi: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2018.03.026
|
| [145] |
Rachman I, Umar S, Malik A, et al. (2021) Community readiness on managing agroforestry of candlenut and coffee. IOP Conf Ser: Earth Environ Sci 807: 032008. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/807/3/032008 doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/807/3/032008
|
| [146] |
Lelamo LL (2021) A review on the indigenous multipurpose agroforestry tree species in Ethiopia: management, their productive and service roles and constraints. Heliyon 7: e07874. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07874 doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07874
|
| [147] |
Rosiana N (2020) Dinamika pola pemasaran kopi pada wilayah sentra produksi utama di Indonesia. J Agrosains dan Teknologi 5: 1-10. https://doi.org/10.24853/jat.5.1.1-10 doi: 10.24853/jat.5.1.1-10
|
Figures(5) / Tables(1)
Nur Arifatul Ulya, Alfonsus Hasudungan Harianja, Apri Laila Sayekti, Astrina Yulianti, Deden Djaenudin, Edwin Martin, Hariyadi Hariyadi, Julian Witjaksono, Leo Rio Ependi Malau, Muhammad Rifqi Tirta Mudhofir, Satria Astana. Coffee agroforestry as an alternative to the implementation of green economy practices in Indonesia: A systematic review[J]. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2023, 8(3): 762-788. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2023041
DownLoad: