Investors and other financial actors are attracted by the role of socially responsible (SR) mutual funds in the transition to a low-carbon economy. In response to the demand for more information, Morningstar reported the level of carbon risk of funds by using the following indicators: Carbon Risk, Carbon Management, Carbon Operations risk and Carbon Exposure. Dealing with a sample of 3370 equity SR mutual funds worldwide from 2017 to 2021, this study analyzes the relationships between these indicators and the expense ratio and performance of the funds. In general, the results point to funds with lower carbon scores that have lower fees and perform better than those with higher scores. Considering the effects of the COVID-19 crisis, this evidence holds true for most of the sample period analyzed. With a spatial analysis, although the evidence generally holds, regional differences are found. Thus, funds that invest in the USA and Canada are on average cheaper and show lower carbon scores, while funds that are oriented to other areas, such as emerging markets, are more expensive and show higher scores. In summary, there is good news for the utility function of the investor and the planet: Green investing is cheaper and better.
Citation: Juan Carlos Matallín-Sáez, Amparo Soler-Domínguez. Cost and performance of carbon risk in socially responsible mutual funds[J]. Quantitative Finance and Economics, 2023, 7(1): 50-73. doi: 10.3934/QFE.2023003
Investors and other financial actors are attracted by the role of socially responsible (SR) mutual funds in the transition to a low-carbon economy. In response to the demand for more information, Morningstar reported the level of carbon risk of funds by using the following indicators: Carbon Risk, Carbon Management, Carbon Operations risk and Carbon Exposure. Dealing with a sample of 3370 equity SR mutual funds worldwide from 2017 to 2021, this study analyzes the relationships between these indicators and the expense ratio and performance of the funds. In general, the results point to funds with lower carbon scores that have lower fees and perform better than those with higher scores. Considering the effects of the COVID-19 crisis, this evidence holds true for most of the sample period analyzed. With a spatial analysis, although the evidence generally holds, regional differences are found. Thus, funds that invest in the USA and Canada are on average cheaper and show lower carbon scores, while funds that are oriented to other areas, such as emerging markets, are more expensive and show higher scores. In summary, there is good news for the utility function of the investor and the planet: Green investing is cheaper and better.
| [1] |
Barauskaite G, Streimikiene D (2021) Corporate social responsibility and financial performance of companies: The puzzle of concepts, definitions and assessment methods. Corp Soc Resp Env Ma 28: 278–287. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2048 doi: 10.1002/csr.2048
|
| [2] |
Bolton P, Kacperczyk M (2021) Do investors care about carbon risk? J Financ Econ 142: 517–549. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2021.05.008 doi: 10.1016/j.jfineco.2021.05.008
|
| [3] |
Carhart MM (1997) On persistence in mutual fund performance. J Financ 52: 57–82. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1997.tb03808.x doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1997.tb03808.x
|
| [4] |
Chang CE, Krueger TM, Witte HD (2019) Saving green while going green: The role of expenses in socially responsible equity mutual fund selection. Manag Financ 45: 21–35. https://doi.org/10.1108/MF-03-2018-0095 doi: 10.1108/MF-03-2018-0095
|
| [5] |
Climent F, Soriano P (2011) Green and good? The investment performance of US environmental mutual funds. J Bus Ethics 103: 275–287. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-0865-2 doi: 10.1007/s10551-011-0865-2
|
| [6] |
Durán-Santomil P, Otero-González L, Correia-Domingues RH, et al. (2019) Does sustainability score impact mutual fund performance? Sustainability 11: 2972. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11102972 doi: 10.3390/su11102972
|
| [7] |
Elton EJ, Gruber, MJ, Blake CR (1996) Survivor bias and mutual fund performance. Rev Financ Stud 9: 1097–1120. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/9.4.1097 doi: 10.1093/rfs/9.4.1097
|
| [8] |
Elton EJ, Gruber MJ, Das S, et al. (1993) Efficiency with costly information: A reinterpretation of evidence from managed portfolios. Rev Financ Stud 6: 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/6.1.1 doi: 10.1093/rfs/6.1.1
|
| [9] |
Fama EF, French KR (2015) A five-factor asset pricing model. J Financ Econ 116: 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2014.10.010 doi: 10.1016/j.jfineco.2014.10.010
|
| [10] |
Fourati YM, Dammak M (2021) Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: International evidence of the mediating role of reputation. Corp Soc Resp Env Ma 28: 1749–1759. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2143 doi: 10.1002/csr.2143
|
| [11] |
Gil-Bazo J, Ruiz-Verdú P (2008) When cheaper is better: Fee determination in the market for equity mutual funds. J Econ Behav Organ 67: 871–885. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2007.04.003 doi: 10.1016/j.jebo.2007.04.003
|
| [12] |
Gil-Bazo J, Ruiz-Verdú P, Santos AA (2010) The performance of socially responsible mutual funds: The role of fees and management companies. J Bus Ethics 94: 243–263. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0260-4 doi: 10.1007/s10551-009-0260-4
|
| [13] |
Gruber MJ (1996) Another puzzle: The growth in actively managed mutual funds. J Financ 51: 783–810. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1996.tb02707.x doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1996.tb02707.x
|
| [14] | Global Sustainable Investment Alliance (2020) Global Sustainable Investment Review. Biennial Report. Available from: https://www.gsi-alliance.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/GSIR-20201.pdf. |
| [15] |
Hejase H, Farha C, Haddad Z, et al. (2012) Exploring the multiple benefits of CSR on organizational performance: Case of Lebanon. J Soc Sci 1: 1–23. https://doi.org/10.25255/jss.2012.1.1.1.23 doi: 10.25255/jss.2012.1.1.1.23
|
| [16] |
Kacperczyk M, Sialm C, Zheng L (2005) On the industry concentration of actively managed equity mutual funds. J Financ 60: 1983–2011. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2005.00785.x doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.2005.00785.x
|
| [17] |
Kleimeier S, Viehs M (2021) Pricing carbon risk: Investor preferences or risk mitigation? Econ Lett 205: 109936. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2021.109936 doi: 10.1016/j.econlet.2021.109936
|
| [18] |
Leite C, Cortez MC, Silva F, et al. (2018) The performance of socially responsible equity mutual funds: Evidence from Sweden. Bus Ethics 27: 108–126. https://doi.org/10.1111/beer.12174 doi: 10.1111/beer.12174
|
| [19] |
Lu J, Liang M, Zhang C, et al. (2021) Assessment of corporate social responsibility by addressing sustainable development goals. Corp Soc Resp Env Ma 28: 686–703. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2081 doi: 10.1002/csr.2081
|
| [20] | Mallett J, Michelson S (2010) Green investing: Is it different from socially responsible investing? Intl J Bus 15: 395–410. |
| [21] |
Matallín-Sáez JC (2006) Seasonality, market timing and performance amongst bench- marks and mutual fund evaluation. J Bus Financ Account 33: 1484–1507. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5957.2006.00636.x doi: 10.1111/j.1468-5957.2006.00636.x
|
| [22] |
Matallín-Sáez JC, Soler-Domínguez A, de Mingo-López DV (2021) On management risk and price in the mutual fund industry: style and performance distribution analysis. Risk Manag 23: 150–171. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41283-021-00072-9 doi: 10.1057/s41283-021-00072-9
|
| [23] |
Matallín‐Sáez JC, Soler‐Domínguez A, de Mingo‐López DV, et al. (2019) Does socially responsible mutual fund performance vary over the business cycle? New insights on the effect of idiosyncratic SR features. Bus Ethics 28: 71–98. https://doi.org/10.1111/beer.12196 doi: 10.1111/beer.12196
|
| [24] | Morningstar (2018a) Morningstar portfolio carbon metrics frequently asked questions. Hale, J and Koska, J, Morningstar Research. |
| [25] | Morningstar (2018b) Measuring transition risk in fund portfolios. The Morningstar portfolio carbon risk score. Hale, J, Morningstar Research. |
| [26] | Nofsinger JR, Varma A (2022) Keeping Promises? Mutual Funds' Investment Objectives and Impact of Carbon Risk Disclosures. J Bus Ethics, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-022-05264-1 |
| [27] |
Otero-González L, Durán-Santomil P (2021) Is quantitative and qualitative information relevant for choosing mutual funds? J Bus Res 123: 476–488. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.10.015 doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.10.015
|
| [28] |
Pástor L, Stambaugh R (2002) Mutual fund performance and seemingly unrelated assets. J Financ Econ 63: 315–349. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-405X(02)00064-8 doi: 10.1016/S0304-405X(02)00064-8
|
| [29] |
Pástor L, Vorsatz MB (2020) Mutual fund performance and flows during the COVID-19 crisis. Rev Asset Pricing Stud 10: 791–833. https://doi.org/10.1093/rapstu/raaa015 doi: 10.1093/rapstu/raaa015
|
| [30] |
Reboredo JC, Otero LA (2021) Are investors aware of climate-related transition risks? Evidence from mutual fund flows. Ecol Econ 189: 107148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2021.107148 doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2021.107148
|
| [31] |
Reboredo JC, Otero LA (2022) Low carbon transition risk in mutual fund portfolios: Managerial involvement and performance effects. Bus Strateg Environ 31: 950–968. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2928 doi: 10.1002/bse.2928
|
| [32] |
Renneboog L, Horst JT, Zhang C (2008) The price of ethics and stakeholder governance of socially responsible funds. J Corp Financ 14: 302–322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2008.03.009 doi: 10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2008.03.009
|
| [33] |
Zerbib OD (2019) The effect of pro-environmental preferences on bond prices: Evidence from green bonds. J Bank Financ 98: 39–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2018.10.012 doi: 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2018.10.012
|
Juan Carlos Matallín-Sáez, Amparo Soler-Domínguez. Cost and performance of carbon risk in socially responsible mutual funds[J]. Quantitative Finance and Economics, 2023, 7(1): 50-73. doi: 10.3934/QFE.2023003
DownLoad: