A major objective of economic development or growth is poverty reduction, and it is especially a high priority in developing, low-income economies such as Vietnam. Vietnam is an important transition open high-growth economy since Doi Moi in 1987 and with increasing global geopolitical influence in South East Asia but with concerning high poverty incidence. While poverty is recognised internationally as a multidimensional incidence with interdependent relationships among the country's many activities in the sense of Marshall or Haavelmo, rigorous studies with focus on these multidirectional causality issues for Vietnam are currently very limited. The paper addresses these issues by introducing an endogeneity or simultaneous multi-equation modelling approach with World Bank and other international data and system estimation to studying the growth-poverty relationship with Vietnam as a case study. The objective is to explore empirical evidence for this causal relationship with an economy-wide transmission mechanism and with common causality postulates for the improvement of sustainable growth and poverty reduction strategic policy analysis. The main findings show growth-poverty circular causality and the strong impact of growth on poverty reduction and of trade openness on growth. The approach advances the literature, and the findings are also a useful guide for aid consultants, economic researchers, policy makers, nongovernment organizations (NGOs), and official development assistance (ODA) donors in Vietnam in particular and in developing countries in general.
Citation: Van Hoa Tran, Quang Thao Pham. Growth and poverty reduction in Vietnam: A strategic policy modelling study[J]. National Accounting Review, 2024, 6(3): 449-464. doi: 10.3934/NAR.2024020
A major objective of economic development or growth is poverty reduction, and it is especially a high priority in developing, low-income economies such as Vietnam. Vietnam is an important transition open high-growth economy since Doi Moi in 1987 and with increasing global geopolitical influence in South East Asia but with concerning high poverty incidence. While poverty is recognised internationally as a multidimensional incidence with interdependent relationships among the country's many activities in the sense of Marshall or Haavelmo, rigorous studies with focus on these multidirectional causality issues for Vietnam are currently very limited. The paper addresses these issues by introducing an endogeneity or simultaneous multi-equation modelling approach with World Bank and other international data and system estimation to studying the growth-poverty relationship with Vietnam as a case study. The objective is to explore empirical evidence for this causal relationship with an economy-wide transmission mechanism and with common causality postulates for the improvement of sustainable growth and poverty reduction strategic policy analysis. The main findings show growth-poverty circular causality and the strong impact of growth on poverty reduction and of trade openness on growth. The approach advances the literature, and the findings are also a useful guide for aid consultants, economic researchers, policy makers, nongovernment organizations (NGOs), and official development assistance (ODA) donors in Vietnam in particular and in developing countries in general.
[1] | ADB (2003) Economic Growth and Poverty Reduction in Viet Nam, ERD Working Paper No. 42. Manila, June 2003. Available from: http://www.adb.org/economics. |
[2] | Anderson E (2020) The impact of trade liberalisation on poverty and inequality: Evidence from CGE models. J Policy Model 42:1208–1227. |
[3] | Balisacan AM, Pernia EM, Estrada GEB (2003) Economic Growth and Poverty Reduction in Viet Nam, In: Pernia, E.M., Deolalikar, A.B., Poverty, Growth and Institutions in Developing Asia, London: Palgrave Macmillan, 273–296. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403937797_9 |
[4] | CIE (2002) Vietnam Poverty Analysis, Centre for International Economics, 9 May 2002. Available from: https://www.dfat.gov.au/sites/default/files/vietnam_poverty_analysis.pdf. |
[5] | Dollar D, Kraay A (2002) Growth is Good for the Poor. J Econ Growth 7: 195–225. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020139631000 doi: 10.1023/A:1020139631000 |
[6] | Easterly W (2007) Was Development Assistance a Mistake? Am Econ Rev 97: 328–332. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.97.2.328 doi: 10.1257/aer.97.2.328 |
[7] | Engle RF, Granger CWJ (1987) Co-integration and Error Correction: Representation, Estimation and Testing. Econometrica 55: 251–276. |
[8] | ERS-USDA (2024) International Macroeconomic Data Set. Available from: https://www.ers.usda.gov/data-products/international-macroeconomic-data-set.aspx. |
[9] | Fernandez-Villaverdez J, Mineyama T, Song D (2024) Are We Fragmented Yet? Measuring Geopolitical Fragmentation and its Causal Effects. Available from: https://www.sas.upenn.edu/~jesusfv/Fragmentation.pdf. |
[10] | Frankel JA, Romer D (1999) Does Trade Cause Growth?. Am Econ Rev 89: 379–399. |
[11] | Friedman M (1953) Essays in Positive Economics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. |
[12] | Giroud A (2004) Regionalisation, Foreign Direct Investment and Poverty Reduction: The Case of ASEAN. University of Bradford, 2004. Available from: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/57a08d1eed915d3cfd00181c/R7625BRADFORD_FINAL_REPORT_DfID.pdf. |
[13] | Granger CWJ (1969) Investigating Causal Relations by Econometric Models and Cross-Spectral Methods. Econometrica 37: 424–438. |
[14] | Johansen L (1982) Econometric Models and Economic Planning and Policy: Some Trends and Problems, In: Hazewinkle, M., Kan, A.H.G.R. (eds.), Current Developments in the Interface: Economics, Econometrics, Mathematics, Boston: Reidel. 91–120. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-7933-8_12 |
[15] | Kydland FE (2006) Quantitative Aggregate Economics. Am Econ Rev 96: 13731383. |
[16] | Le TH, Koo S (2007) Recent Economic Performance and Poverty Reduction in Vietnam. J Int Area Stud 14: 17–35. |
[17] | Le MS, Nguyen T, Singh T (2014) Economic Growth and Poverty in Vietnam: Evidence from Elasticity Approach (Working paper), Griffith University. Available from: https://researchrepository.griffith.edu.au. |
[18] | MOLISA (Ministry of Labour, Invalids and Social Affairs) (2023) Available from: https://en.vietnamplus.vn/nationaltarget-programme-on-sustainable-povertyreductionreviewed/271430.vnp#: ~: text = The%20programme%20also%20aims%20to, by%20over%203%25%20per%20year. |
[19] | Paweenawat SW, McNown R (2014) The Determinants of Income Inequality in Thailand: A Synthetic Cohort Analysis. J Asian Econ 31–32: 10–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asieco.2014.02.001 doi: 10.1016/j.asieco.2014.02.001 |
[20] | Pham TH, Riedel J (2019) Impacts of the Sectoral Composition of Growth on Poverty Reduction in Vietnam. J Econ Dev 21: 213–222. https://doi.org/10.1108/JED-10-2019-0046 doi: 10.1108/JED-10-2019-0046 |
[21] | Pindyck RS, Rubinfeld DL (1998) Econometric Models and Economic Forecasts. Sydney: McGraw-Hill. |
[22] | Sala-I-Martin X (1991) Comment, In: Blanchard, O.J., Fischer, S. (eds.), NBER Macroeconomic Annual 1991, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 368–378. |
[23] | Siddiqui R, Kemal AR (2006) Poverty-reducing or Poverty-inducing? A CGE-based Analysis of Foreign Capital Inflows in Pakistan. MPRA Paper no. 2283. Available from: https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/2283/1/MPRA_paper_2283.pdf. |
[24] | Stone R (1988) Progress in Balancing the National Accounts, In: Ironmonger, D.S., Perkins, J.O.N., Tran, V.H. (eds.), National Income and Economic Progress: Essays in Honour of Colin Clark, London: Macmillan. |
[25] | Tran VH (1992) Modelling Output Growth: A New Approach. Econ Lett 38: 279–284. |
[26] | Tran VH (2005) Modelling the Impact of China's WTO Membership on Its Investment and Growth: A New Flexible Keynesian Approach (with Comment), In: Heiduk, G.S., Wong, K. (eds), WTO and World Trade, New York: Physica-Verlag, 251–265. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-7908-1630-2_22 |
[27] | Tran VH, Limskul K (2013) Economic Impact of CO2 Emissions on Thailand's Growth and Climate Change Mitigation Policy: A Modelling Analysis. Econ Model 33: 351–358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2013.04.019 doi: 10.1016/j.econmod.2013.04.019 |
[28] | Tran VH, Turner L, Vu J (2018) Economic Impact of Chinese Tourism on Australia: A New Approach. Tour Econ 24: 677–689. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354816618769077 doi: 10.1177/1354816618769077 |
[29] | Tran VH, Vu J (2020) Contribution of Chinese and Indian Tourism to Australia: A Comparative Econometric Study. Archives Bus Res 8: 107–120. https://doi.org/10.14738/abr.81.7498 doi: 10.14738/abr.81.7498 |
[30] | Tran VH, Vu J, Pham QT (2020) Vietnam's sustainable tourism and growth: a new approach to strategic policy modelling. Natl Account Rev 2: 324–336. https://doi.org/10.3934/NAR.2020019 doi: 10.3934/NAR.2020019 |
[31] | Tran VH, Vu J, Ho TT (2021) Vietnam's National Export Strategy: Evidence from an Economic Policy Modelling Study. Thammasat Rev Econ Soc Policy 7: 4–33. |
[32] | UNDP (2024) Unstacking Global Poverty: Data for High Impact Action: Briefing Note for Countries on the 2023 Multidimensional Poverty Index, Viet Nam, Available from: https://hdr.undp.org/sites/default/files/Country-Profiles/MPI/VNM.pdf. |
[33] | World Bank (2022) From the Last Mile to the Next Mile: 2022 Vietnam Poverty and Equity Assessment. Overview. Available from: https://thedocs.worldbank.org/en/doc/4849fcf95377cf1482bd9668c4cf05fb-0070012022/original/VN-PA-launch-PPT-ENG-FINAL.pdf. |
[34] | World Bank (2023) Harnessing the Potential of the Services Sector for Growth. Available from: https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/099544403132351453/pdf/IDU0343e48530e212043860bee605aae66cfb04a.pdf. |
[35] | World Bank (2024) Available from: https://databank.worldbank.org/source/world-development-indicators. |
[36] | WTO (2024) Regional Trade Agreements. Available from: https://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/region_e/region_e.htm. |
[37] | Zhu Y, Bashir S, Marie M (2022) Assessing the Relationship between Poverty and Economic Growth: Does Sustainable Development Goal Can be Achieved?. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29: 27613–27623. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-18240-5 |