Research article Special Issues

Supply-side perspective for carbon pricing

  • Received: 11 February 2019 Accepted: 14 March 2019 Published: 20 March 2019
  • JEL Codes: C51, G13, Q41, Q54

  • This paper theoretically and empirically revisits carbon pricing from the supply-side perspective for carbon assets to solve the recent low price issue which may delay the development of emission reduction technologies in the sense of marginal abatement costs. We propose a carbon pricing model linked to crude oil prices, which has historically been employed in supply-side driven pricing of long-term contracts for early-stage energy trading. Since the model is designed to hold carbon prices between certain lower and upper boundaries using S-shaped carbon price linkage to crude oil prices, it can be useful to overcome a recent low carbon price issue. In addition, it is shown that the model can alleviate the difficulties of carbon derivative pricing in selecting market price of risk. Empirical studies using EUA and Brent crude oil futures prices estimate the parameters of the Brent crude oil-linked EUA price model. The comparison of EUA prices simulated from the model with historical EUA prices suggests that simulated EUA prices be kept relatively higher than historical EUA prices. This is preferable for accelerating carbon emission reductions in that it can make emission reduction technologies with high marginal abatement costs affordable. It may imply that EUA must be priced using a crude oil-linked carbon price model in the early stage of EUA trading until EUA markets mature. This is a sharp contrast to current carbon markets employing premature market-based or supply and demand based pricing models. To show usefulness of crude oil-linked carbon pricing, we also give a numerical example of European carbon option pricing based on the Brent crude oillinked EUA price model by using the Crank-Nicolson finite di erence method. Finally we discuss the relation between crude oil-linked carbon pricing and emission reduction risk. These studies may suggest carbon policy makers should take account of crude oil-linked carbon pricing to tackle low price and low liquidity issues of carbon assets.

    Citation: Takashi Kanamura. Supply-side perspective for carbon pricing[J]. Quantitative Finance and Economics, 2019, 3(1): 109-123. doi: 10.3934/QFE.2019.1.109

    Related Papers:

  • This paper theoretically and empirically revisits carbon pricing from the supply-side perspective for carbon assets to solve the recent low price issue which may delay the development of emission reduction technologies in the sense of marginal abatement costs. We propose a carbon pricing model linked to crude oil prices, which has historically been employed in supply-side driven pricing of long-term contracts for early-stage energy trading. Since the model is designed to hold carbon prices between certain lower and upper boundaries using S-shaped carbon price linkage to crude oil prices, it can be useful to overcome a recent low carbon price issue. In addition, it is shown that the model can alleviate the difficulties of carbon derivative pricing in selecting market price of risk. Empirical studies using EUA and Brent crude oil futures prices estimate the parameters of the Brent crude oil-linked EUA price model. The comparison of EUA prices simulated from the model with historical EUA prices suggests that simulated EUA prices be kept relatively higher than historical EUA prices. This is preferable for accelerating carbon emission reductions in that it can make emission reduction technologies with high marginal abatement costs affordable. It may imply that EUA must be priced using a crude oil-linked carbon price model in the early stage of EUA trading until EUA markets mature. This is a sharp contrast to current carbon markets employing premature market-based or supply and demand based pricing models. To show usefulness of crude oil-linked carbon pricing, we also give a numerical example of European carbon option pricing based on the Brent crude oillinked EUA price model by using the Crank-Nicolson finite di erence method. Finally we discuss the relation between crude oil-linked carbon pricing and emission reduction risk. These studies may suggest carbon policy makers should take account of crude oil-linked carbon pricing to tackle low price and low liquidity issues of carbon assets.


    加载中


    [1] Aatola P, Ollikainen M, Toppinen A (2013) Price determination in the EU ETS market: Theory and econometric analysis with market fundamentals. Energy Econ 36: 380-395. doi: 10.1016/j.eneco.2012.09.009
    [2] Benz E, Trück S (2009) Modeling the price dynamics of CO2 emission allowances. Energy Econ 31: 4-15. doi: 10.1016/j.eneco.2008.07.003
    [3] Bredin D, Muckley C (2011) An emerging equilibrium in the EU emissions trading scheme. Energy Econ 33: 353-362. doi: 10.1016/j.eneco.2010.06.009
    [4] Chevallier J (2009) Carbon futures and macroeconomic risk factors: A view from the EU ETS. Energy Econ 31: 614-625. doi: 10.1016/j.eneco.2009.02.008
    [5] Chevallier J (2011a) Detecting instability in the volatility of carbon prices. Energy Econ 33: 99-110. doi: 10.1016/j.eneco.2010.09.006
    [6] Chevallier J (2011b) A model of carbon price interactions with macroeconomic and energy dynamics. Energy Econ 33: 1295-1312. doi: 10.1016/j.eneco.2011.07.012
    [7] Daskalakis G, Psychoyios D, Markellos RN (2009) Modeling CO2 emission allowance prices and derivatives: Evidence from the European trading scheme. J Bank Financ 33: 1230-1241. doi: 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2009.01.001
    [8] Dutta A (2018) Modeling and forecasting the volatility of carbon emission market: The role of outliers, time-varying jumps and oil price risk. J Clean Prod 172: 2773-2781. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.11.135
    [9] Dutta A, Bouri E, Noor MH (2018) Return and volatility linkages between CO2 emission and clean energy stock prices. Energy 164: 803-810. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2018.09.055
    [10] Ellerman AD, Joskow PL (2008) The European Union's Emissions Trading System in Perspective, Washington, DC: Pew Center on Global Climate Change.
    [11] Fehr M, Hinz J (2006) A quantitative approach to carbon price risk modeling. Working Paper, Institute of Operations Research, ETZ.
    [12] Fezzi C, Bunn DW (2009) Structural interactions of European carbon trading and energy prices. J Energy Mark 2: 53-69. doi: 10.21314/JEM.2009.034
    [13] Gil-Alana LA, Gupta R, de Gracia FP (2016) Modeling persistence of carbon emission allowance prices. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 55: 221-226. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2015.10.056
    [14] Gorenflo M (2013) Futures price dynamics of CO2 emission allowances. Empir Econ 45: 1025-1047. doi: 10.1007/s00181-012-0645-6
    [15] Gronwald M, Ketterer J, Trück S (2011) The relationship between carbon, commodity and financial markets: A copula analysis. Econ Rec 87: 105-124. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-4932.2011.00748.x
    [16] Hintermann B (2010) Allowance price drivers in the first phase of the EU ETS. J Environ Econ Manage 59: 43-56. doi: 10.1016/j.jeem.2009.07.002
    [17] Ji Q, Zhang D, Geng J (2018) Information linkage, dynamic spillovers in prices and volatility between the carbon and energy markets. J Clean Prod 198: 972-978. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.07.126
    [18] Kanamura T (2009a) A classification study of carbon assets into commodities. Working Paper, SSRN.
    [19] Kanamura T (2009b) A supply and demand based volatility model for energy prices. Energy Econ 31: 736-747. doi: 10.1016/j.eneco.2009.04.001
    [20] Kanamura T (2016) Role of carbon swap trading and energy prices in price correlations and volatilities between carbon markets. Energy Econ 54: 204-212. doi: 10.1016/j.eneco.2015.10.016
    [21] Koch N, Fuss S, Grosjean G, et al. (2014) Causes of the EU ETS price drop: Recession, CDM, renewable policies or a bit of everything? -New evidence. Energy Policy 73: 676-685. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2014.06.024
    [22] Paolella MS, Taschini L (2008) An econometric analysis of emission allowance prices. J Bank Financ 32: 2022-2032. doi: 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2007.09.024
    [23] Seifert J, Uhrig-Homburg M,Wagner M (2008) Dynamic behavior of CO2 spot prices. J Environ Econ Manage 56: 180-194. doi: 10.1016/j.jeem.2008.03.003
    [24] Stern JP (2007) Is there a rationale for the continuing link to oil product prices in continental European long-term gas contracts? Int J Energy Sect Manage 1: 221-239. doi: 10.1108/17506220710821116
    [25] Trück S, Härdle W, Weron R (2015) The relationship between spot and futures CO2 emission allowance prices in the EU ETS, In: Gronwald M, Hintermann B (eds) Emissions Trading as a Policy Instrument: Evaluation and Prospects, Cambridge MIT Press, 183-212.
    [26] Uhrig-Homburg M, Wagner M (2009) Futures price dynamics of CO2 emission allowances: An empirical analysis of the trial period. J Deriv 17: 73-88. doi: 10.3905/JOD.2009.17.2.073
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2019 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(4399) PDF downloads(765) Cited by(11)

Article outline

Figures and Tables

Figures(6)  /  Tables(3)

Other Articles By Authors

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog