Figure 1.
The model of the proposed method.
Citation: Ekaterina Bereznyak, Natalia Gladkovskaya, Evgeniy Dukhopelnykov, Anastasiya Gerus, Anastasiya Lantushenko, Maxim Evstigneev. Thermal analysis of ligand-DNA interaction: determination of binding parameters[J]. AIMS Biophysics, 2015, 2(4): 423-440. doi: 10.3934/biophy.2015.4.423
| [1] | Ting-Huai Ma, Xin Yu, Huan Rong . A comprehensive transfer news headline generation method based on semantic prototype transduction. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2023, 20(1): 1195-1228. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2023055 |
| [2] | Wu Zeng, Zheng-ying Xiao . Few-shot learning based on deep learning: A survey. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2024, 21(1): 679-711. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2024029 |
| [3] | Hao Zhang, Lina Ge, Guifen Zhang, Jingwei Fan, Denghui Li, Chenyang Xu . A two-stage intrusion detection method based on light gradient boosting machine and autoencoder. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2023, 20(4): 6966-6992. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2023301 |
| [4] | Depei Wang, Lianglun Cheng, Tao Wang . Fairness-aware genetic-algorithm-based few-shot classification. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2023, 20(2): 3624-3637. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2023169 |
| [5] | Guoli Wang, Pingping Wang, Jinyu Cong, Benzheng Wei . MRChexNet: Multi-modal bridge and relational learning for thoracic disease recognition in chest X-rays. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2023, 20(12): 21292-21314. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2023942 |
| [6] | Yevgeniy Bodyanskiy, Olha Chala, Natalia Kasatkina, Iryna Pliss . Modified generalized neo-fuzzy system with combined online fast learning in medical diagnostic task for situations of information deficit. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2022, 19(8): 8003-8018. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2022374 |
| [7] | Jia Yu, Huiling Peng, Guoqiang Wang, Nianfeng Shi . A topical VAEGAN-IHMM approach for automatic story segmentation. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2024, 21(7): 6608-6630. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2024289 |
| [8] | Hanjiang Wu, Jie Huang, Kehan Wu, António M. Lopes, Liping Chen . Precise tracking control via iterative learning for one-sided Lipschitz Caputo fractional-order systems. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2024, 21(2): 3095-3109. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2024137 |
| [9] | Peng Wang, Shiyi Zou, Jiajun Liu, Wenjun Ke . Matching biomedical ontologies with GCN-based feature propagation. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2022, 19(8): 8479-8504. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2022394 |
| [10] | Shi Liu, Kaiyang Li, Yaoying Wang, Tianyou Zhu, Jiwei Li, Zhenyu Chen . Knowledge graph embedding by fusing multimodal content via cross-modal learning. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2023, 20(8): 14180-14200. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2023634 |
Deep learning has significantly succeeded in image recognition, image segmentation and target detection. However, deep learning models often require a large amount of labeled data to train, and labeling the data will take more time. Some scholars propose zero-shot learning. Zero-shot learning uses the model obtained from the seen classes to infer the unseen class of samples, which can largely reduce the labeling of samples [1,2]. Zero-shot learning mimics the process of human cognition of new things. For example, a person knows an animal, like a horse, through pictures and their linguistic descriptions; when knowing about the linguistic description of zebras, zebras look like horses and have black and white stripes on its body, then the person can still recognize zebras by this linguistic description when seeing zebras even though he or she has never seen a zebra [3]. In zero-shot learning, semantic features are needed in addition to using sample features. Semantic features are linguistic descriptions of the samples, such as the color, size and other characteristics. Word vectors extracted by Word2Vec [4] are usually used as semantic features. In zero-shot learning, the model is trained by the seen class samples with semantic features to find the relationship between semantic features and the seen class samples, and then transfers the model to unseen class samples to infer the categories of the unseen class samples.
There are two categories of zero-shot learning: generalized zero-shot learning and conventional zero-shot learning. The test set contains only the unseen class samples for conventional zero-shot learning. While for generalized zero-shot learning, the test set contains not only the unseen class samples but also the seen class samples. In zero-shot learning, there are many approaches devoted to finding the relationship between the training set samples and the training set semantic features, such as mapping the training set samples to the semantic feature space, mapping the semantic features to the sample space [5], mapping the semantic features and samples to the common space [6,7] and mapping the semantic features and samples to each other's space [8]. However, the training set contains only the seen class samples, and the classes in the training set are not the same as those in the unseen class, which can lead to the inaccurate classification of the unseen class samples when the classification models are used in the test set.
To address these problems, some scholars use generative models, such as Variational Autoencoder (VAE) [9] and Generative Adversarial Network (GAN) [10], to generate the unseen class pseudo samples, and input them to the classifier for training, which can alleviate the problem of inaccurate classification of samples in the unseen classes. It has been proposed in the literature [11,12] that the use of VAE and GAN leads to the problems of posterior collapse and training instability, and the use of Wasserstein Auto-Encoder (WAE) and Wasserstein Generative Adversarial Network (WGAN) to generate pseudo samples can alleviate this problem. However, the unseen class samples generated by these methods are easily biased to the features of the seen class samples, leading to inaccurate classification results when classifying the real unseen class samples. To address these problems, we propose the following methods:
1) Different from the above generation models, we use autoencoder to generate the unseen class samples. To make the sample features in the latent space more distinguishable and representative, a classifier is used for the sample features in the latent space.
2) In order to reduce the unseen class pseudo sample features that are biased to the seen class sample features, we propose new sample features and use them together with unseen class semantic features for cross-reconstruction loss function.
3) The proposed method is validated for three datasets, AWA1, AWA2 and aPY and have good results.
The structure of this paper is organized as follows. First, we thoroughly review the related works in Section 2. The proposed method is illustrated in Section 3. In Section 4, we discuss the experiments, and we conclude the paper in Section 5.
For zero-shot learning, embedding-based zero-shot learning is a common approach. However, embedding-based zero-shot learning can produce domain shift problems and misclassification in unseen class samples [13].
There are three solutions to alleviate the unseen class samples that are easily misclassified into the seen classes in zero-shot learning: calibrated stacking, generative models and detection of the unseen class samples. Calibrated stacking [14] added a calibrated term to the classifier so that the score of the seen class is reduced during classification, and the score of the unseen class samples can be increased. The calibrated stacking equation is as follows:
| $ \widehat{y} = \underset{c\in \mathcal{T}}{\mathrm{argmax}}{f}_{c}\left(x\right)-\gamma \mathbb{I}[c\in S] $ |
where $ \gamma $ is the calibrated factor and the indicator function. $ \mathbb{I}[\cdot ] $ indicates whether $ c $ belongs to a seen class, if $ c $ is a seen class, the value of the indicator function is 1, otherwise the value of the indicator function is 0. The classifier of APN [15] used class embedding and added calibrated stacking in the classifier to alleviate misclassification of the unseen class samples.
The method of generative models is to use generative models to generate pseudo samples substitute real unseen class samples [16]. The training set and pseudo samples are used in training the classifier, so that the unseen class samples can avoid bias to the seen classes. Multi-modal Feature Fusion algorithm (MFF) [17] used visual principal component features to compensate for the lack of descriptive information using only semantic features, and then combined GAN and VAE to generate high-quality pseudo-samples. Cross- and Distribution Aligned VAE (CADA-VAE) [18] was the VAE method. The latent space distributional alignment and cross-alignment were used to ensure the alignment between the two different modalities of sample features and semantic features. To make the generated samples close to the real samples, Over-Complete Distribution using Conditional Variational Autoencoder (OCD-CVAE) [19] used over-complete distribution to generate pseudo samples. Chen et al. [12] proposed to use WAE to generate pseudo samples and used an aggregated posterior distribution in the latent space to align the manifold structure of the sample features and the semantic features. f-CLSWGAN [20] used WGAN to generate pseudo samples and used a classifier to make the generated pseudo samples more discriminative. Based on f-CLSWGAN, Adaptive Bias-Aware GAN (ABA-GAN) [21] proposed adaptive adversarial loss and domain loss functions to make the generated pseudo samples more meaningful and to distinguish the seen classes from the unseen classes. Li et al. [11] used WGAN to generate pseudo samples and used multimodal cyclic loss function and bi-directional autoencoder. In response to the fact that GAN is not easy to train, and the pseudo samples generated by VAE are of low quality, Dual VAEGAN [22] used a combination of GAN and VAE.
Detection of samples of the unseen class. This method first distinguishes whether the samples belong to the seen classes or the unseen classes and then classifies the samples into specific class. GatingAE [3] first used the latent space and the cross-reconstruction space to detect samples belonging to the unseen class, and then used a linear classifier to classify the samples in the seen classes and a nearest neighbor classifier for the samples belonging to the unseen classes. Chen et al. [23] proposed determining whether a sample belongs to the seen class or the unseen class by calculating the cosine similarity between the latent space features of the samples and the mean value of each class. However, the models in these methods are obtained by training the samples from the seen classes; when migrating to the samples from the unseen classes, the classification results of the samples from the unseen classes are still biased to the seen classes.
Cao et al. [24] achieved recognition of zero shot traffic signs using autoencoder. Different from the literature [24], we use autoencoder to generate the unseen samples to alleviate the misclassification of the unseen class samples. To prevent the generated unseen class samples biased towards the features of seen class samples and improve the classification accuracy of the unseen class samples, we add the information of both unseen class semantic features and the proposed sample features.
In zero-shot learning, the training set can be denoted as $ S = \{{X}_{S}, {A}_{S}, {Y}_{S}\} $, and the unseen class can be denoted as $ U = \{{X}_{U}, {A}_{U}, {Y}_{U}\} $, where $ X $ denotes sample features, $ A $ denotes semantic features and $ Y $ denotes labels. For conventional zero-shot learning, the class of $ {X}_{U} $ is predicted by the classifier: $ {X}_{U}\to {Y}_{U} $; for generalized zero-shot learning, the class of $ X $ is predicted by the classifier: $ X\to {Y}_{S}\cup {Y}_{U} $.
In this study, we use autoencoder to generate the pseudo samples of unseen classes, and the model is shown in Figure 1. In the Figure 1, E1 and E2 represent the encoder, D1 and D2 represent the decoder. The sample features and semantic features are encoded to obtain the same dimensional latent space features.
According to the autoencoder, for the training set, the generated sample features $ \widetilde {{X}_{S}} $ and the semantic features of the seen classes $ \widetilde {{A}_{S}} $ need to approximate the input features $ {X}_{S} $ and $ {A}_{S} $.Assuming that there are $ m $ samples, the reconstruction loss function can be written as:
| $ {L}_{recon1} = \frac{1}{m}\sum _{i = 1}^{m}\left|{x}_{si}-\widetilde {{x}_{si}}\right|+\frac{1}{m}\sum _{i = 1}^{m}\left|{a}_{si}-\widetilde {{a}_{si}}\right| $ | (1) |
We use the lowercase $ {x}_{si} $, $ \widetilde {{x}_{si}} $, $ {a}_{si} $ and $ {a}_{si} $ to denote one sample feature in $ {X}_{S} $, one generate sample feature in $ \widetilde {{X}_{S}} $, one semantic feature in $ {A}_{S} $ and one generated semantic feature in $ \widetilde {{A}_{S}} $ respectively. We want these two modality features to be aligned in the latent space. We use $ {Z}_{S} $ to represent the sample features of the latent space and $ {Z}_{AS} $ to represent the seen class semantic features of the latent space.
| $ {L}_{latent-recon} = \frac{1}{m}\sum _{i = 1}^{m}\left|{z}_{Si}-{z}_{ASi}\right| $ | (2) |
In Eq (2), we use the lowercase $ {z}_{Si} $ to denote one sample feature in $ {Z}_{S} $, and use the $ {z}_{ASi} $ to denote one seen class semantic feature in $ {Z}_{AS} $. In addition to the reconstruction loss function shown in Eq (1), zero-shot learning contains two different modalities, sample features and semantic features. Aligning different modalities can reduce the domain shift problem [25]. Inspired by GatingAE [3], Chen et al. [12], CADA-VAE [18] and Discriminative Cross-Aligned Variational Autoencoder(DCA-VAE) [25], we use the cross-reconstruction loss function. The features $ \overline {{X}_{S}} $ and $ \overline {{A}_{S}} $ are obtained by passing the semantic features and sample features of the latent space through D2 and D1 decoders, respectively, the cross-reconstruction loss function is as follows:
| $ {L}_{cross-recon1} = \frac{1}{m}\sum _{i = 1}^{m}\left|{x}_{si}-\overline {{x}_{si}}\right|+\frac{1}{m}\sum _{i = 1}^{m}\left|{a}_{si}-\overline {{a}_{si}}\right| $ | (3) |
Here, $ \overline {{x}_{si}} $ denotes one feature in $ \overline {{X}_{S}} $, and $ \overline {{a}_{si}} $ denotes one feature in $ \overline {{A}_{S}} $. Although we can use Eqs (1), (2) and (3) to train the model and then to generate samples of the unseen classes, Eqs (1), (2) and (3) only contains samples of the seen classes and semantic features, which will lead to the pseudo samples being biased to the seen classes. To address this problem, we add the unseen class semantic features $ {A}_{US} $ to the model and propose new sample features $ \widehat{X} $.
The unseen class semantic features $ {A}_{US} $ can be obtained by the following method. The sample features of the training set are mapped to the semantic feature space using the following equation:
| $ \underset{W}{\mathrm{min}}{||{X}_{S}-{{W}^{T}A}_{S}||}_{F}^{2}+\alpha {||W||}_{F}^{2} $ | (4) |
$ {||\cdot ||}_{F} $ in Eq (4) denotes Frobenius norm. The mapping matrix $ W $ is obtained as follows:
| $ W = {X}_{S}^{T}{A}_{S}{\left({A}_{S}^{T}{A}_{S}+\alpha I\right)}^{-1} $ | (5) |
where $ I $ in Eq (5) represents the unit matrix and $ \alpha $ denotes an adjustable parameter. The sample features in the training set are then mapped to the semantic feature space through the mapping matrix $ W $ and find the nearest unseen class semantic features, which constitute $ {A}_{US} $.
After obtaining $ {A}_{US} $, we input $ {A}_{US} $ to the autoencoder to obtain the generated unseen class semantic features $ \widetilde {{A}_{US}} $, and the reconstruction loss between $ \widetilde {{A}_{US}} $ and $ {A}_{US} $ is:
| $ {L}_{recon2} = \frac{1}{m}\sum _{i = 1}^{m}\left|{a}_{usi}-\widetilde {{a}_{usi}}\right| $ | (6) |
Here, we use $ {a}_{usi} $ to denote one unseen class semantic feature in $ {A}_{US} $ and $ \widetilde {{a}_{usi}} $ to denote one generated unseen class semantic feature in $ \widetilde {{A}_{US}} $. Except the reconstruction loss for $ {A}_{US} $. We also want to align different modalities between the unseen class semantic features and sample features, but there is a lack of unseen class samples in the training set. In this paper, we take the following approach to get the cross-reconstruction loss function: Find the difference between the unseen class semantic features and the seen class sample features in the latent space, the difference represents the relationship between the unseen class semantic features and the seen class sample features in the latent space. Then, pass the difference through the decoder D1 to get $ \mathrm{\theta } $. We use $ {Z}_{S} $ and $ {Z}_{AU} $ to represent the latent features of the seen class sample features and the latent features of the unseen class semantic features. The formula is as follows:
| $ \mathrm{\theta } = D1({Z}_{S}-{Z}_{AU}) $ | (7) |
Then subtract $ \theta $ from the sample features of the training set to obtain the feature $ \widehat{X} $:
| $ \widehat{X} = {X}_{S}-\theta $ | (8) |
The cross-reconstruction loss function for unseen class semantic features can be written as:
| $ {L}_{cross-recon2} = \frac{1}{m}\sum _{i = 1}^{m}\left|\widehat{{x}_{i}}-\overline {{x}_{usi}}\right|+\beta \frac{1}{m}\sum _{i = 1}^{m}\left|{a}_{usi}-\overline {{a}_{si}}\right| $ | (9) |
$ \beta $ in the above equation is an adjustable parameter. $ \widehat{{x}_{i}} $ denotes one feature in $ \widehat{X} $, $ \overline {{x}_{usi}} $ denotes one feature obtained by passing one unseen class semantic feature through the decoder D1. The reason for using the feature $ \widehat{X} $ instead of $ {X}_{S} $ is that $ \widehat{X} $ can reduce the information of the seen class samples in the loss function, which can alleviate the similarity between the unseen class pseudo samples and the seen class samples.
To better find the relationship between the semantic features of unseen classes and the training set samples in Eq (7), and also make the sample features in the latent space distinguishable and representative, the sample features of the latent space are classified using the cross-entropy loss function:
| $ {L}_{classifier} = -\sum _{i = 1}^{m}{y}_{si}\mathrm{l}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{g}\widetilde {{y}_{si}} $ | (10) |
$ \widetilde {{y}_{si}} $ in Eq (10) is the predicted label and $ {y}_{si} $ is the true label of the sample features of the latent space.
Combining Eqs (1), (2), (3), (6), (9) and (10), the objective function is:
| $ L = {L}_{recon1}+{L}_{latent-recon}+{L}_{recon2}+{L}_{cross-recon1}+{L}_{cross-recon2}+{L}_{classifier} $ | (11) |
After the model is trained according to Eq (11), the samples are generated with the sample features $ {X}_{S} $ and semantic features $ {A}_{US} $. For generalized zero-shot classification, all the generated seen class samples and unseen class samples need to be input to the classifier for training. For conventional zero-shot classification, only the generated unseen class samples need to be input to the classifier for training.
Three datasets, AWA1, AWA2 and aPY, are used in our study.
1) AWA1 [26]: The seen class contains 40 categories, and the unseen class contains 10 categories. The number of samples in the seen class is 19832, the number of samples in the unseen class is 5685 and the dimension of the semantic features is 85.
2) AWA2 [27]: The seen class contains 40 categories, and the unseen class contains 10 categories. The number of samples in the seen class is 23527, the number of samples in the unseen class is 7913 and the dimension of the semantic features is 85.
3) aPY [28]: The seen class contains 20 categories, and the unseen class contains 12 categories. The number of samples in the seen class is 5932, the number of samples in the unseen class is 7924, and the dimension of the semantic features is 64.
The sample features and semantic features used in our study are taken from the literature [27]. Following the literature [12], the input dimension of encoder E1 is 2048 dimensions, the output of the first layer is 512 dimensions, and the dimension of the latent space is 128; the dimension of the output of the first layer of encoder E2 is 128.The dimension of the output of the first layer of decoder D1 is 256 and the dimension of output is 2048; the dimension of output of the first layer of decoder D2 is 256. We use the Adam algorithm for optimization, the learning rate is 0.001 and the batch size is 256.
We use the evaluation criteria proposed in the literature [27]. For the conventional zero-shot classification, only the accuracy of classification needs to be calculated:
| $ acc = \frac{1}{\left|C\right|}\sum _{i}^{\left|C\right|}\frac{\#correct\ predictions\ in\ i}{samples\ in\ i} $ |
For generalized zero-shot classification, not only the classification accuracy of the seen class and the unseen class should be calculated, but also the harmonic mean. Assuming that the classification accuracy of the samples of seen classes is denoted as $ {acc}_{tr} $ and the classification accuracy of the samples of unseen classes is denoted as $ {acc}_{ts} $, the harmonic mean can be written as:
| $ H = \frac{2\times {acc}_{tr}\times {acc}_{ts}}{{acc}_{tr}+{acc}_{ts}} $ |
The generalized zero-shot classification results and the conventional zero-shot classification results are shown in Tables 1 and 2, where the results of Semantic Autoencoder (SAE) [8], Direct Attribute Prediction (DAP) [26], Indirect Attribute Prediction (IAP) [26] and Structured Joint Embedding (SJE) [29] are from the literature [27]. In Table 1, "ts" represents the classification results of unseen classes and "tr" represents the classification results of the seen classes. From Table 1, the proposed method is 1% less than CADA-VAE [18] for the AWA1 dataset. For the AWA2 dataset, the proposed method is 0.5% better than Chen et al. [23]. For the aPY dataset, the proposed method is 3.1% higher than DAP [26], while it is 4.9% higher than the generative model Chen et al. [12]. The accuracy of the proposed method on unseen class is higher than other methods.
| AWA1 | AWA2 | aPY | |||||||
| ts | tr | H | ts | tr | H | ts | tr | H | |
| SAE [8] | 1.8 | 77.1 | 3.5 | 1.1 | 82.2 | 2.2 | 0.4 | 80.9 | 0.9 |
| DAP [26] | 46.5 | 68.5 | 55.4 | 43.7 | 70.2 | 53.3 | 27.6 | 55.8 | 37.0 |
| IAP [26] | 2.1 | 78.2 | 4.1 | 0.9 | 87.6 | 1.8 | 5.7 | 65.6 | 10.4 |
| SJE [29] | 11.3 | 74.6 | 19.6 | 8.0 | 73.9 | 14.4 | 3.7 | 55.7 | 6.9 |
| Preserving Semantic Relations (PSR) [30] | 20.7 | 73.8 | 32.3 | 13.5 | 51.4 | 21.4 | |||
| f-CLSWGAN [20] | 57.9 | 61.4 | 59.6 | ||||||
| Zhang et al. [31] | 20.7 | 67.9 | 38.6 | 16.1 | 66.9 | 25.9 | |||
| Li et al. [11] | 54.9 | 71.7 | 62.2 | ||||||
| CADA-VAE [18] | 57.3 | 72.8 | 64.1 | 55.8 | 75.0 | 63.9 | |||
| Chen et al. [23] | 54.7 | 72.7 | 62.4 | 55.6 | 76.9 | 64.2 | |||
| Chen et al. [12] | 54.5 | 72.8 | 62.3 | 55.2 | 73.5 | 63.0 | 26.7 | 51.5 | 35.2 |
| The proposed method | 62.4 | 63.9 | 63.1 | 60.6 | 69.5 | 64.7 | 31.5 | 55.3 | 40.1 |
DownLoad:
CSV
Table 2 shows the conventional zero-shot classification results. For the AWA1 dataset, the proposed method is slightly lower than f-CLSWGAN [20] and Li et al. [11], which used the GAN model. For the aPY dataset, the method in this paper is slightly lower than the method of Zhang et al. [31] and more accurate than the other methods. The accuracy of the method in this paper is higher than the other methods on the AWA2 dataset.
| AWA1 | AWA2 | aPY | |
| SAE [8] | 53.0 | 54.1 | 8.3 |
| DAP [26] | 44.1 | 46.1 | 33.8 |
| IAP [26] | 35.9 | 35.9 | 36.6 |
| SJE [29] | 65.6 | 61.9 | 32.9 |
| PSR [30] | 63.8 | 38.4 | |
| Cross-Class Sample Synthesis (CCSS) [32] | 56.3 | 63.7 | 35.5 |
| f-CLSWGAN [20] | 69.9 | ||
| Zhang et al. [31] | 68.8 | 41.3 | |
| Li et al. [11] | 69.9 | ||
| CADA-VAE [18] | 58.8 | 60.3 | |
| Chen et al. [12] | 65.2 | 65.5 | 32.7 |
| The proposed method | 67.1 | 66.1 | 39.8 |
DownLoad:
CSV
The parameters involved in the model are $ \alpha $, $ \beta $ and the dimensionality of the latent space, where we denote the dimensionality of the latent space as $ d $. The effects of taking different values of $ \alpha $, $ \beta $ and $ d $ on the generalized zero-shot classification and the conventional zero-shot classification are shown in Figures 2, 3 and 4.
Figure 2 shows the effects of the parameter $ \alpha $ on the zero-shot classification results. The parameter $ \alpha $ is used to prevent overfitting. Taking the values of $ \alpha $ as 0.1, 1, 10 and 100. It can be seen from Figure 2 that the classification results of the aPY dataset are decreasing and then increasing as $ \alpha $ keeps increasing. The results of the AWA2 dataset on the conventional zero-shot classification are increasing all the time, while the values of the generalized zero-shot classification are decreasing and then increasing. The results of AWA1 dataset on the conventional zero-shot classification is decreasing and then increasing, and the harmonic mean is always increasing.
The values of $ \beta $ are taken as 0.001, 0.01, 0.1 and 1. $ \beta $ is used to regulate the relationship between the training set samples and the generated unseen class semantic features, and the value of $ \beta $ is taken small because the training set samples are not the real unseen class samples. From Figure 3, the accuracy of conventional zero-shot classification on the aPY dataset is almost unaffected by the value of $ \beta $, but the value in the generalized zero-shot classification decreases with increasing of $ \beta $. The classification accuracy of AWA1 and AWA2 on conventional zero-shot classification is also almost unaffected by the value of $ \beta $, but the harmonic mean value increases and then decreases with increasing of $ \beta $.
Figure 4 shows the effects of dimension $ d $ on the zero-shot classification results, with $ d $ taking values of 64,128 and 256. For the aPY dataset, the accuracy of conventional zero-shot classification increases first and then decreases as $ d $ increases, the harmonic mean value keeps decreasing. For the AWA1 dataset, the results increase and then decrease with increasing $ d $, except for the classification results of the seen classes. For the AWA2 dataset, most of the zero-shot classification results show a trend of increasing and then decreasing with increasing $ d $.
Figure 5 shows the tSNE for generalized zero-shot classification of the aPY dataset, where (a) and (b) denote the training set samples and unseen class samples, respectively, and (c) and (d) are the generated training set samples and unseen class samples.
For the training set samples, the distribution between the generated samples and the original samples is almost the same, and the generated samples are more dispersed between different categories and more concentrated within classes than the original samples. For the unseen class samples, there are more samples presenting orange color in the original samples, while in the generated samples, since $ {A}_{US} $ is chosen for generating the unseen class samples in this paper, it will lead to the number of some classes will be more and the number of some other classes will be less in the generated samples. Except for the inconsistent number of samples, most of the generated samples are similar to the distribution of the real samples.
The ablation experiments are divided into the following cases: a. Only Eq (1) is retained as the loss function of the model. b. Add $ {L}_{latent-recon} $ to Eq(1). c. $ {L}_{cross-recon1}\ne 0 $ on the basis of b. d. $ {L}_{classifier}\ne 0 $ on the basis of c; e. Based on d, the second term in $ {L}_{cross-recon2} $ is not 0; f. Based on e, $ {L}_{recon2}\ne 0 $. The proposed method is to add the first term in $ {L}_{cross-recon2} $, on the basis of f. The harmonic mean H and the accuracy acc of the conventional zero-shot classification are shown in Table 3.
| AWA1 | AWA2 | aPY | ||||
| acc | H | acc | H | acc | H | |
| a | 45.1 | 30.0 | 45.1 | 17.9 | 30.7 | 22.0 |
| b | 52.6 | 32.3 | 59.4 | 38.4 | 38.8 | 25.0 |
| c | 56.5 | 33.3 | 57.6 | 23.4 | 35.2 | 26.3 |
| d | 59.7 | 48.3 | 59.7 | 40.2 | 36.8 | 34.4 |
| e | 61.1 | 51.4 | 60.2 | 43.8 | 36.9 | 35.1 |
| f | 61.1 | 49.8 | 61.0 | 45.7 | 37.0 | 36.4 |
| The proposed method | 67.1 | 63.1 | 66.1 | 63.1 | 39.8 | 40.1 |
DownLoad:
CSV
As can be seen in Table 3, most of the classification results are increased as the term increased in the loss function. However, for the AWA1 dataset when changing from e to f, the accuracy does not change for the conventional zero-shot classification, and the harmonic mean decreases slightly. The proposed method does not increase particularly much in the conventional zero-shot classification compared to other methods, especially in the aPY dataset, and for aPY dataset, the method b is larger than other methods except the proposed method. For AWA2 when changing from b to c, the results decreases, especially in harmonic mean. The seen class information increased when we add the $ {L}_{cross-recon1} $ and the accuracy of the unseen classes decreases. However, for generalized zero-shot classification, the proposed method can provide some information about the unseen classes when training the model, and reduce the similarity between the generated unseen class samples and the seen class samples.
By replacing $ \widehat{X} $ in the loss function $ {L}_{cross-recon2} $ with $ {X}_{S} $, the results are shown in Table 4 numbered as (1), and the results of the proposed model numbered as (2). From Table 4, when $ {X}_{S} $ is used instead of $ \widehat{X} $, the results of zero-shot classification are all decreased, especially for generalized zero-shot classification. This is because the loss function contains more information about the samples of the seen classes, making the results easily biased to the seen classes.
| AWA1 | AWA2 | aPY | ||||||||||
| acc | ts | tr | H | acc | ts | tr | H | acc | ts | tr | H | |
| (1) | 55.1 | 37.0 | 71.8 | 48.8 | 55.6 | 34.8 | 73.0 | 47.1 | 35.8 | 27.0 | 52.1 | 35.6 |
| (2) | 67.1 | 62.3 | 63.9 | 63.1 | 66.1 | 60.6 | 69.5 | 64.7 | 39.8 | 31.5 | 55.3 | 40.1 |
DownLoad:
CSV
In this study, an autoencoder approach is used for generating samples of unseen classes in zero-shot learning. For the problem that the generated unseen class sample features are always biased to the seen class features, we add the semantic features of the unseen class with the proposed new sample features to the cross-reconstruction loss function. This can reduce the information of the seen class samples and make the generated unseen class samples closer to the real unseen class samples, and improve the classification accuracy of the unseen class samples. The experimental results on three datasets verify that the proposed method can achieve good results.
The authors declare they have not used Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools in the creation of this article.
The authors declare there is no conflict of interest.
| [1] |
Finley A, Copeland RA (2014) Small molecule control of chromatin remodeling. Chem Biol 21: 1196–1210. doi: 10.1016/j.chembiol.2014.07.024
|
| [2] |
Prinjha R, Tarakhovsky A (2013) Chromatin targeting drugs in cancer and immunity. Genes Dev 27: 1731–1738. doi: 10.1101/gad.221895.113
|
| [3] |
Rabbani A, Finn RM, Ausio J (2005) The anthracycline antibiotics: antitumor drugs that alter chromatin structure. Bioessays 27: 50–56. doi: 10.1002/bies.20160
|
| [4] |
Majumder P, Pradhan SK, Devi PG, et al. (2007) Chromatin as a target for the DNA-binding anticancer drugs. Subcell Biochem 41: 145–189. doi: 10.1007/1-4020-5466-1_8
|
| [5] |
Banerjee A, Majumder P, Sanyal S, et al. (2014) The DNA intercalators ethidium bromide and propidium iodide also bind to core histones. FEBS Open Bio 4: 251–259. doi: 10.1016/j.fob.2014.02.006
|
| [6] |
Hajihassan Z, Rabbani-Chadegani A (2009) Studies on the binding affinity of anticancer drug mitoxantrone to chromatin, DNA and histone proteins. J Biomed Sci 16: 31. doi: 10.1186/1423-0127-16-31
|
| [7] |
Rabbani-Chadegani A, Chamani E, Hajihassan Z (2009) The effect of vinca alkaloid anticancer drug, vinorelbine, on chromatin and histone proteins in solution. Eur J Pharmacol 613: 34–38. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2009.04.040
|
| [8] |
Rabbani-Chadegani A, Keyvani-Ghamsari S, Zarkar N (2011) Spectroscopic studies of dactinomycin and vinorelbine binding to deoxyribonucleic acid and chromatin. Spectrochim Acta A Mol Biomol Spectrosc 84: 62–67. doi: 10.1016/j.saa.2011.08.064
|
| [9] |
Rabbani A, Iskandar M, Ausio J (1999) Daunomycin-induced unfolding and aggregation of chromatin. J Biol Chem 274: 18401–18406. doi: 10.1074/jbc.274.26.18401
|
| [10] |
Mir MA, Majee S, Das S, et al. (2003) Association of chromatin with anticancer antibiotics, mithramycin and chromomycin A3. Bioorg Med Chem 11: 2791–2801. doi: 10.1016/S0968-0896(03)00211-6
|
| [11] |
Mir MA, Dasgupta D (2001) Association of the anticancer antibiotic chromomycin A(3) with the nucleosome: role of core histone tail domains in the binding process. Biochemistry 40: 11578–11585. doi: 10.1021/bi010731r
|
| [12] |
Mir MA, Dasgupta D (2001) Interaction of antitumor drug, mithramycin, with chromatin. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 280: 68–74. doi: 10.1006/bbrc.2000.4075
|
| [13] |
Hagmar P, Pierrou S, Nielsen P, et al. (1992) Ionic strength dependence of the binding of methylene blue to chromatin and calf thymus DNA. J Biomol Struct Dyn 9: 667–679. doi: 10.1080/07391102.1992.10507947
|
| [14] |
Mir MA, Das S, Dasgupta D (2004) N-terminal tail domains of core histones in nucleosome block the access of anticancer drugs, mithramycin and daunomycin, to the nucleosomal DNA. Biophys Chem 109: 121–135. doi: 10.1016/j.bpc.2003.10.023
|
| [15] |
Hurley LH (2002) DNA and its associated processes as targets forcancer therapy. Nat Rev Cancer 2: 188–200. doi: 10.1038/nrc749
|
| [16] | Veselkov AN, Davies DB (2002) Anticancer drug design, Sevastopol: Sevntu press, 259. |
| [17] | Veselkov AN, Maleev VYa, Glibin EN, et al. (2003) Structure–activity relation for synthetic phenoxazone drugs.Evidence for a direct correlation between DNA binding and pro-apoptotic activity. Eur J Biochem 270: 4200–4207 |
| [18] |
Andersson J, Lincoln P (2011) Stereoselectivity for DNA threading intercalation of short binuclear ruthenium complexes. J Phys Chem B 115: 14768–14775. doi: 10.1021/jp2062767
|
| [19] | Chaurasiya KR, Paramanathan T, McCauley MJ, et al. (2010) Biophysical characterization of DNA binding from single molecule force measurements. Phys Life Rev 7: 299–341. |
| [20] |
Nordell P, Lincoln P (2005) Mechanism of DNA threading intercalation of binuclear Ru complexes: uni- or bimolecular pathways depending on ligand structure and binding density. J Am Chem Soc 127: 9670–9671. doi: 10.1021/ja0521674
|
| [21] | Andersson J, Li M, Lincoln P (2010) AT-specific DNA binding of binuclear ruthenium complexes at the border of threading intercalation. Chemistry 16: 11037–11046. |
| [22] | Wilhelmsson LM, Lincoln P, Nordґen B (2006) Slow DNA binding. In: Waring M, editor. Sequence-Specific DNA Binding Agents, The Royal Society of Chemistry, Cambridge, 69–95. |
| [23] |
Palchaudhuri R, Hergenrother PJ (2007) DNA as a target for anticancer compounds: methods to determine the mode of binding and the mechanism of action. Curr Opin Biotechnol 18: 497–503. doi: 10.1016/j.copbio.2007.09.006
|
| [24] | Barton TF, Cooney RP, Denny WA (1992) Surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopic study of amsacrine and amsacrine–DNA interactions. J Raman Spectrosc 23: 341–345. |
| [25] |
Rodger A, Blagbrough IS, Adlam G, et al. (1994) DNA binding of a spermine derivative: Spectroscopic study of anthracene-9-carbonyl-n1-spermine with poly[d(G-C)·(d(G-C))] and poly[d(A-T) · d(A-T)]. Biopolymers 34: 1583–1593. doi: 10.1002/bip.360341203
|
| [26] | Hackl EV, Galkin VL, Blagoi YP (2004) DNA interaction with biologically active divalent metal ions: binding constants calculation. Int J Biol Macromol 34: 303–308. |
| [27] |
Evstigneev MP, Mykhina YV, Davies DB (2005) Complexation of daunomycin with a DNA oligomer in the presence of an aromatic vitamin (B2) determined by NMR spectroscopy. Biophys Chem 118: 118–127. doi: 10.1016/j.bpc.2005.08.007
|
| [28] |
Hackl EV, Blagoi YP (2005) The effect of temperature on DNA structural transitions under the action of Cu2+ and Ca2+ ions in aqueous solutions. Biopolymers 77: 315–324. doi: 10.1002/bip.20225
|
| [29] | Kruglova EB, Gladkovskaia NA, Maleev V (2005) The use of the spectrophotometric analysis for the calculation of the thermodynamic parameters in actinocin derivative-DNA systems. Biofizika 50: 253–264. |
| [30] | Evstigneev MP, Baranovskii SF, Rybakova KA, et al. (2006) 1H NMR study of the complexation of the quinolone antibiotic norfloxacin with DNA. Mol Biol (Mosk) 40: 894–899. |
| [31] |
Evstigneev MP, Rybakova KA, Davies DB (2006) Complexation of norfloxacin with DNA in the presence of caffeine. Biophys Chem 121: 84–95. doi: 10.1016/j.bpc.2005.12.003
|
| [32] |
Williams AK, Dasilva SC, Bhatta A, et al. (2012) Determination of the drug-DNA binding modes using fluorescence-based assays. Anal Biochem 422: 66–73. doi: 10.1016/j.ab.2011.12.041
|
| [33] |
Anupama B, Sunita M, Shiva LD, et al. (2014) Synthesis, spectral characterization, DNA binding studies and antimicrobial activity of Co(II), Ni(II), Zn(II), Fe(III) and VO(IV) complexes with 4-aminoantipyrine Schiff base of ortho-vanillin. J Fluoresc 24: 1067–1076. doi: 10.1007/s10895-014-1386-z
|
| [34] | Zasedatelev AS, Gurskii GV, Vol'kenshtein MV (1971) Theory of one-dimensional adsorption. I. Adsorption of small molecules on a homopolymer. Molecular biology 5: 194–198. |
| [35] |
McGhee JD, von Hippel PH (1974) Theoretical aspects of DNA-protein interactions: co-operative and non-co-operative binding of large ligands to a one-dimensional homogeneous lattice. J Mol Biol 86: 469–489. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(74)90031-X
|
| [36] |
Schellman JA (1974) Cooperative Multisite Binding to DNA. Israel Journal of Chemistry 12: 219–238. doi: 10.1002/ijch.197400021
|
| [37] |
Nechipurenko YD, Gursky GV (1986) Cooperative effects on binding of proteins to DNA. Biophys Chem 24: 195–209. doi: 10.1016/0301-4622(86)85025-6
|
| [38] |
Lando DY, Teif VB (2000) Long-range interactions between ligands bound to a DNA molecule give rise to adsorption with the character of phase transition of the first kind. J Biomol Struct Dyn 17: 903–911. doi: 10.1080/07391102.2000.10506578
|
| [39] |
Teif VB, Rippe K (2010) Statistical-mechanical lattice models for protein-DNA binding in chromatin. J Phys Condens Matter 22: 414105. doi: 10.1088/0953-8984/22/41/414105
|
| [40] | Breslauer KJ, Freire E, Straume M (1992) Calorimetry: a tool for DNA and ligand-DNA studies. Methods Enzymol 211: 533–567. |
| [41] |
Doyle ML (1997) Characterization of binding interactions by isothermal titration calorimetry. Curr Opin Biotechnol 8: 31–35. doi: 10.1016/S0958-1669(97)80154-1
|
| [42] | Jelesarov I, Bosshard HR (1999) Isothermal titration calorimetry and differential scanning calorimetry as complementary tools to investigate the energetics of biomolecular recognition. J Mol Recognit 12: 3–18. |
| [43] | Haq I, Chowdhry BZ, Jenkins TC (2001)Calorimetric techniques in the study of high-order DNA-drug interactions. Methods Enzymol 340: 109–149. |
| [44] | Thomson JA, Ladbury JE (2004) Isothermal titration calorimetry: a tutorial. In Ladbury JE, Doyle ML, editors. Biocalorimetry 2. Applications of Calorimetry in the Biological Sciences, Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, 35–58. |
| [45] | Holdgate GA, Ward WH (2005) Measurements of binding thermodynamics in drug discovery. Drug Discov Today 10: 1543–1550. |
| [46] |
Freyer MW, Lewis EA (2008) Isothermal titration calorimetry: experimental design, data analysis, and probing macromolecule/ligand binding and kinetic interactions. Methods Cell Biol 84: 79–113. doi: 10.1016/S0091-679X(07)84004-0
|
| [47] |
Bhadra K, Maiti M, Kumar GS (2008) Berberine–DNA complexation: New insights into the cooperative binding and energetic aspects. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 1780: 1054–1061. doi: 10.1016/j.bbagen.2008.05.005
|
| [48] | Hossain M, Kumar GS (2009) DNA intercalation of methylene blue and quinacrine: new insights into base and sequence specificity from structural and thermodynamic studies with polynucleotides. Mol Biosyst 5: 1311–1322. |
| [49] |
Crane-Robinson C, Dragan AI, Read CM (2009) Defining the thermodynamics of protein/DNA complexes and their components using micro-calorimetry. Methods Mol Biol 543: 625–651. doi: 10.1007/978-1-60327-015-1_37
|
| [50] |
Kabir A, Kumar GS (2013) Binding of the biogenic polyamines to deoxyribonucleic acids of varying base composition: base specificity and the associated energetics of the interaction. PLoS One 8: e70510. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0070510
|
| [51] |
Kumar S, Spano MN, Arya DP (2014) Shape readout of AT-rich DNA by carbohydrates. Biopolymers 101: 720–732. doi: 10.1002/bip.22448
|
| [52] |
Basu A, Kumar GS (2015) Thermodynamic characterization of proflavine–DNA binding through microcalorimetric studies. J Chem Thermodyn 87: 1–7. doi: 10.1016/j.jct.2015.03.009
|
| [53] | Basu A, Kumar GS (2015) Studies on the interaction of the food colorant tartrazine with double stranded deoxyribonucleic acid. J Biomol Struct Dyn 10: 1–8. |
| [54] | Chaires JB (1997) Possible origin of differences between van't Hoff and calorimetric enthalpy estimates. Biophys Chem 64: 15–23. |
| [55] | Chaires JB (2008) Calorimetry and thermodynamics in drug design. Annu Rev Biophys 37: 135–151. |
| [56] |
Janjua NK, Siddiqa A, Yaqub A, et al. (2009) Spectrophotometric analysis of flavonoid-DNA binding interactions at physiological conditions. Spectrochim Acta A Mol Biomol Spectrosc 74: 1135–1137. doi: 10.1016/j.saa.2009.09.022
|
| [57] |
Temerk YM, Ibrahim MS, Kotb M (2009) Voltammetric and spectroscopic studies on binding of antitumor Morin, Morin-Cu complex and Morin-beta-cyclodextrin with DNA. Spectrochim Acta A Mol Biomol Spectrosc 71: 1830–1836. doi: 10.1016/j.saa.2008.07.001
|
| [58] |
Baranovskii SF, Chernyshev DN, Buchel’nikov AS, et al. (2011) Thermodynamic analysis of complex formation of ethidium bromide with DNA in water solutions. Biophysics 56: 214–219. doi: 10.1134/S0006350911020023
|
| [59] | Chaires JB (1997) Energetics of drug-DNA interactions. Biopolymers 44: 201–215. |
| [60] |
Ren J, Jenkins TC, Chaires JB (2000) Energetics of DNA intercalation reactions. Biochemistry 39: 8439–8447. doi: 10.1021/bi000474a
|
| [61] |
Davies DB, Veselkov AN (1996) Structural and thermodynamical analysis of molecular complexation by 1H NMR spectroscopy. Intercalation of ethidium bromide with the isomeric deoxytetranucleoside triphosphates 5’-d(GpCpGpC) and 5’-d(CpGpCpG) in aqueous solution. J Chem Soc Faraday Trans 92: 3545-3557. doi: 10.1039/ft9969203545
|
| [62] |
Kostjukov VV, Pahomov VI, Andrejuk DD, et al. (2007) Investigation of the complexation of the anti-cancer drug novantrone with the hairpin structure of the deoxyheptanucleotide 5′-d(GpCpGpApApGpC). J Mol Struct 843: 78–86. doi: 10.1016/j.molstruc.2006.12.036
|
| [63] |
Wartell RM, Benight AS (1985) Thermal denaturation of DNA molecules: A comparison of theory with experiment. Phys Rep 126: 67–107. doi: 10.1016/0370-1573(85)90060-2
|
| [64] |
Rice SA, Doty P (1957) The Thermal Denaturation of Desoxyribose Nucleic Acid. J Am Chem Soc 79: 3937–3947. doi: 10.1021/ja01572a001
|
| [65] |
Guedin A, Lacroix L, Mergny JL (2010) Thermal melting studies of ligand DNA interactions. Methods Mol Biol 613: 25–35. doi: 10.1007/978-1-60327-418-0_2
|
| [66] | Goldstein G, Stern KG (1950) Experiments on the sonic, thermal, and enzymic depolymerization of desoxyribosenucleic acid. J Struc Chem 5: 687–708. |
| [67] |
Thomas R (1954) Recherches sur la d'enaturation des acides desoxyribonucléiques. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 14: 231–240. doi: 10.1016/0006-3002(54)90163-8
|
| [68] | Frank-Kamenetskii M (1965) Theory of the helix–coil transition for deoxyribonucleic acids with additional connections between the chains. Vysokomolekulyarnye Soedineniya 7: 354–361. |
| [69] | Frank-Kamenetskii M (1968) Consideration of helix-coil transition in homopolymers by the most probable distribution method. Mol Biol 2: 408–419. |
| [70] |
Stewart CR (1968) Broadening by acridine orange of the thermal transition of DNA. Biopolymers 6: 1737–1743. doi: 10.1002/bip.1968.360061208
|
| [71] |
Lazurkin YS, Frank-Kamenetskii MD, Trifonov EN (1970) Melting of DNA: its study and application as a research method. Biopolymers 9: 1253–1306. doi: 10.1002/bip.1970.360091102
|
| [72] |
Barcelo F, Capo D, Portugal J (2002) Thermodynamic characterization of the multivalent binding of chartreusin to DNA. Nucleic Acids Res 30: 4567–4573. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkf558
|
| [73] |
Zhong W, Yu JS, Liang Y (2003) Chlorobenzylidine-herring sperm DNA interaction: binding mode and thermodynamic studies. Spectrochim Acta A Mol Biomol Spectrosc 59: 1281–1288. doi: 10.1016/S1386-1425(02)00301-3
|
| [74] |
Vardevanyan PO, Antonyan AP, Hambardzumyan LA, et al. (2013) Thermodynamic analysis of DNA complexes with methylene blue, ethidium bromide and Hoechst 33258. Biopolym. Cell 29: 515–520. doi: 10.7124/bc.000843
|
| [75] | Hajian R, Guan Huat T (2013) Spectrophotometric Studies on the Thermodynamics of the ds-DNA Interaction with Irinotecan for a Better Understanding of Anticancer Drug-DNA Interactions. J Spectrosc 2013: 1–8. |
| [76] | Cooper A, Johnson CM (1994) Introduction to microcalorimetry and biomolecular energetics. Methods Mol Biol 22: 109–24. |
| [77] | Rosgen J, Hinz HJ (1999) Theory and practice of DSC mesuarements on proteins. In: Kemp RB, editor. Handbook of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry, Vol.4, From Macromolecules to Man, Amsterdam: Elsevier, 63–108. |
| [78] |
Bruylants G, Wouters J, Michaux C (2005) Differential scanning calorimetry in life science: thermodynamics, stability, molecular recognition and application in drug design. Curr Med Chem 12: 2011–2020. doi: 10.2174/0929867054546564
|
| [79] |
Spink CH (2008) Differential scanning calorimetry. Methods Cell Biol 84: 115–141. doi: 10.1016/S0091-679X(07)84005-2
|
| [80] |
Bereznyak EG, Gladkovskaya NA, Khrebtova AS, et al. (2009) Peculiarities of DNA-proflavine binding under different concentration ratios. Biophysics 54: 574–580. doi: 10.1134/S0006350909050030
|
| [81] | Garbett N (2011) The Use of Calorimetry to Study Ligand–DNA Interactions. In: Aldrich-Wright J, editor. Metallointercalators, Vienna: Springer, 299–324. |
| [82] |
Ising E (1925) Beitrag zur Theorie des Ferromagnetismus. Zeitschrift für Physik 31: 253–258. doi: 10.1007/BF02980577
|
| [83] | Poland DC, Scheraga HA (1970) The theory of helix coil transition, New York: Academic Press. |
| [84] |
Peyrard M, Bishop AR (1989) Statistical mechanics of a nonlinear model for DNA denaturation. Phys Rev Lett 62: 2755–2758. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.62.2755
|
| [85] |
Dauxois T, Peyrard M, Bishop AR (1993) Entropy-driven DNA denaturation. Physical Review E 47: R44–R47. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.47.R44
|
| [86] | Dauxois T, Peyrard M, Bishop AR (1993) Dynamics and thermodynamics of a nonlinear model for DNA denaturation. Phys Rev E Stat Phys Plasmas Fluids Relat Interdiscip Topics 47: 684–695. |
| [87] | Grosberg AIU, Khokhlov AR (1994) Statistical physics of macromolecules, New York: AIP Press. |
| [88] |
Frank-Kamenetskii MD, Prakash S (2014) Fluctuations in the DNA double helix: A critical review. Phys Life Rev 11: 153–170. doi: 10.1016/j.plrev.2014.01.005
|
| [89] | Cantor CR, Schimmel PR (1980) Biophysical chemistry. 3. The behavior of biological macromolecules, San Francisco, Freeman. |
| [90] |
Zimm BH, Bragg JK (1959) Theory of the Phase Transition between Helix and Random Coil in Polypeptide Chains. J Chem Phys 31: 526–535. doi: 10.1063/1.1730390
|
| [91] |
Crothers DM (1971) Statistical thermodynamics of nucleic acid melting transitions with coupled binding equilibria. Biopolymers 10: 2147–2160. doi: 10.1002/bip.360101110
|
| [92] |
McGhee JD (1976) Theoretical calculations of the helix-coil transition of DNA in the presence of large, cooperatively binding ligands. Biopolymers 15: 1345–1375. doi: 10.1002/bip.1976.360150710
|
| [93] |
Akhrem AA, Fridman AS, Lando D (1985) Theory of helix-coil transition of the heterogeneous DNA-heteroqeneous ligands complexes. Biopolym Cell 1: 171–179. doi: 10.7124/bc.00017E
|
| [94] |
Lando D (1994) A theoretical consideration of the influence of selective binding of small ligands on DNA helix-coil transition. J Biomol Struct Dyn 12: 343–354. doi: 10.1080/07391102.1994.10508744
|
| [95] | Akhrem AA, Lando D (1979) Influence of ligands characteristic of selective binding to a certain type of base pairs on DNA helix-coil transition I. Model. Theory. Mol Biol (Mosk) 13: 1098–1109. |
| [96] | Akhrem AA, Lando D, Shpakovskii AG, et al. (1990) The effect of long-range interactions between adsorbed ligands on the DNA helix-coil transition. Mol Biol (Mosk) 24: 649–656. |
| [97] | Lando D, Ivanova MA, Akhrem AA (1980) Effect of changes in the stoichiometry of DNA-ligand complexes during heat denaturation of DNA on helix-coil transition parameters. Mol Biol (Mosk) 14: 1281–1288. |
| [98] |
Karapetian AT, Mehrabian NM, Terzikian GA, et al. (1996) Theoretical treatment of melting of complexes of DNA with ligands having several types of binding sites on helical and single-stranded DNA. J Biomol Struct Dyn 14: 275–283. doi: 10.1080/07391102.1996.10508118
|
| [99] |
Plum GE, Bloomfield VA (1990) Structural and electrostatic effects on binding of trivalent cations to double-stranded and single-stranded poly[d (AT)]. Biopolymers 29: 13–27. doi: 10.1002/bip.360290105
|
| [100] |
Spink CH, Chaires JB (1997) Thermodynamics of the Binding of a Cationic Lipid to DNA. J Am Chem Soc 119: 10920–10928. doi: 10.1021/ja964324s
|
| [101] |
Leng F, Chaires JB, Waring MJ (2003) Energetics of echinomycin binding to DNA. Nucleic Acids Res 31: 6191–6197. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkg826
|
| [102] |
Pasic L, Sepcic K, Turk T, et al. (2001) Characterization of parazoanthoxanthin A binding to a series of natural and synthetic host DNA duplexes. Arch Biochem Biophys 393: 132–142. doi: 10.1006/abbi.2001.2469
|
| [103] |
Portugal J, Cashman DJ, Trent JO, et al. (2005) A new bisintercalating anthracycline with picomolar DNA binding affinity. J Med Chem 48: 8209–8219. doi: 10.1021/jm050902g
|
| [104] |
Liu Y-J, Wei X, Mei W-J, et al. (2007) Synthesis, characterization and DNA binding studies of ruthenium(II) complexes: [Ru(bpy)2(dtmi)]2+ and [Ru(bpy)2(dtni)]2+. Transit Metal Chem 32: 762–768. doi: 10.1007/s11243-007-0246-y
|
| [105] |
Peng B, Chen X, Du KJ, et al. (2009) Synthesis, characterization and DNA-binding studies of ruthenium(II) mixed-ligand complexes containing dipyrido[1,2,5]oxadiazolo[3,4-b]quinoxaline. Spectrochim Acta A Mol Biomol Spectrosc 74: 896–901. doi: 10.1016/j.saa.2009.08.031
|
| [106] | Barcelo F, Portugal J (2004) Elsamicin A binding to DNA. A comparative thermodynamic characterization. FEBS Lett 576: 68–72. |
| [107] |
Barcelo F, Scotta C, Ortiz-Lombardia M, et al. (2007) Entropically-driven binding of mithramycin in the minor groove of C/G-rich DNA sequences. Nucleic Acids Res 35: 2215–2226. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkm037
|
| [108] | Marky LA, Blumenfeld KS, Breslauer KJ (1983) Calorimetric and spectroscopic investigation of drug-DNA interactions. I. The binding of netropsin to poly d(AT). Nucleic Acids Res 11: 2857–2870. |
| [109] |
Remeta DP, Mudd CP, Berger RL, et al (1993) Thermodynamic characterization of daunomycin-DNA interactions: comparison of complete binding profiles for a series of DNA host duplexes. Biochemistry 32: 5064–5073. doi: 10.1021/bi00070a014
|
| [110] | Brandts JF, Lin LN (1990) Study of strong to ultratight protein interactions using differential scanning calorimetry. Biochemistry 29: 6927–6940. |
| [111] | Barone G, Catanzano F, Del Vecchio P, et al. (1995) Differential scanning calorimetry as a tool to study protein-ligand interactions. Pure Appl Chem 67: 1867–1872. |
| [112] |
Dassie SA, Celej MS, Fidelio GD (2005) Protein Unfolding Coupled to Ligand Binding: Differential Scanning Calorimetry Simulation Approach. J Chem Educ 82: 85. doi: 10.1021/ed082p85
|
| [113] |
Celej MS, Dassie SA, Gonzalez M, et al. (2006) Differential scanning calorimetry as a tool to estimate binding parameters in multiligand binding proteins. Anal Biochem 350: 277–284. doi: 10.1016/j.ab.2005.12.029
|
| [114] |
Esposito D, Del Vecchio P, Barone G (2001) A thermodynamic study of herring protamine-DNA complex by differential scanning calorimetry. Phys Chem Chem Phys 3: 5320–5325. doi: 10.1039/b107218h
|
| [115] |
Dukhopelnikov EV, Bereznyak EG, Khrebtova AS, et al. (2013) Determination of ligand to DNA binding parameters from two-dimensional DSC curves. J Therm Anal Calorim 111: 1817–1827. doi: 10.1007/s10973-012-2561-6
|
| [116] |
Straume M, Freire E (1992) Two-dimensional differential scanning calorimetry: Simultaneous resolution of intrinsic protein structural energetics and ligand binding interactions by global linkage analysis. Anal Biochem 203: 259–268. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(92)90311-T
|
| [117] |
Freire E (1994) Statistical thermodynamic analysis of differential scanning calorimetry data: structural deconvolution of heat capacity function of proteins. Methods Enzymol 240: 502–530. doi: 10.1016/S0076-6879(94)40062-8
|
| [118] | Freire E (1995) Differential scanning calorimetry. Methods Mol Biol 40: 191–218. |
| [119] |
Marky LA, Breslauer KJ (1987) Calculating thermodynamic data for transitions of any molecularity from equilibrium melting curves. Biopolymers 26: 1601–1620. doi: 10.1002/bip.360260911
|
| [120] |
Sturtevant JM (1987) Biochemical Applications of Differential Scanning Calorimetry. Annu Rev Phys Chem 38: 463–488. doi: 10.1146/annurev.pc.38.100187.002335
|
| [121] |
Kawai Y (1999) Thermal transition profiles of bacteriophage T4 and its DNA. J Gen Appl Microbiol 45: 135–138. doi: 10.2323/jgam.45.135
|
| [122] |
Tostesen E, Sandve GK, Liu F, et al. (2009) Segmentation of DNA sequences into twostate regions and melting fork regions. J Phys Condens Matter 21: 034109. doi: 10.1088/0953-8984/21/3/034109
|
| [123] | Duguid JG, Bloomfield VA, Benevides JM, et al. (1996) DNA melting investigated by differential scanning calorimetry and Raman spectroscopy. Biophys J 71: 3350–3360. |
| [124] |
Movileanu L, Benevides JM, Thomas GJ (2002) Determination of base and backbone contributions to the thermodynamics of premelting and melting transitions in B DNA. Nucleic Acids Res 30: 3767–3777. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkf471
|
| [125] | Dukhopelnikov EV (2014) Modeling of heat absorption curves for ligand-competitor-DNA triple system. Biophysical Bulletin 31: 49–58. |
| [126] |
1. Finley A, Copeland RA (2014) Small molecule control of chromatin remodeling. Chem Biol 21: 1196-1210. doi: 10.1016/j.chembiol.2014.07.024
|
| [127] |
2. Prinjha R, Tarakhovsky A (2013) Chromatin targeting drugs in cancer and immunity. Genes Dev 27: 1731-1738. doi: 10.1101/gad.221895.113
|
| [128] |
3. Rabbani A, Finn RM, Ausio J (2005) The anthracycline antibiotics: antitumor drugs that alter chromatin structure. Bioessays 27: 50-56. doi: 10.1002/bies.20160
|
| [129] |
4. Majumder P, Pradhan SK, Devi PG, et al. (2007) Chromatin as a target for the DNA-binding anticancer drugs. Subcell Biochem 41: 145-189. doi: 10.1007/1-4020-5466-1_8
|
| [130] |
5. Banerjee A, Majumder P, Sanyal S, et al. (2014) The DNA intercalators ethidium bromide and propidium iodide also bind to core histones. FEBS Open Bio 4: 251-259. doi: 10.1016/j.fob.2014.02.006
|
| [131] |
6. Hajihassan Z, Rabbani-Chadegani A (2009) Studies on the binding affinity of anticancer drug mitoxantrone to chromatin, DNA and histone proteins. J Biomed Sci 16: 31. doi: 10.1186/1423-0127-16-31
|
| [132] |
7. Rabbani-Chadegani A, Chamani E, Hajihassan Z (2009) The effect of vinca alkaloid anticancer drug, vinorelbine, on chromatin and histone proteins in solution. Eur J Pharmacol 613: 34-38. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2009.04.040
|
| [133] |
8. Rabbani-Chadegani A, Keyvani-Ghamsari S, Zarkar N (2011) Spectroscopic studies of dactinomycin and vinorelbine binding to deoxyribonucleic acid and chromatin. Spectrochim Acta A Mol Biomol Spectrosc 84: 62-67. doi: 10.1016/j.saa.2011.08.064
|
| [134] |
9. Rabbani A, Iskandar M, Ausio J (1999) Daunomycin-induced unfolding and aggregation of chromatin. J Biol Chem 274: 18401-18406. doi: 10.1074/jbc.274.26.18401
|
| [135] |
10. Mir MA, Majee S, Das S, et al. (2003) Association of chromatin with anticancer antibiotics, mithramycin and chromomycin A3. Bioorg Med Chem 11: 2791-2801. doi: 10.1016/S0968-0896(03)00211-6
|
| [136] |
11. Mir MA, Dasgupta D (2001) Association of the anticancer antibiotic chromomycin A(3) with the nucleosome: role of core histone tail domains in the binding process. Biochemistry 40: 11578-11585. doi: 10.1021/bi010731r
|
| [137] |
12. Mir MA, Dasgupta D (2001) Interaction of antitumor drug, mithramycin, with chromatin. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 280: 68-74. doi: 10.1006/bbrc.2000.4075
|
| [138] |
13. Hagmar P, Pierrou S, Nielsen P, et al. (1992) Ionic strength dependence of the binding of methylene blue to chromatin and calf thymus DNA. J Biomol Struct Dyn 9: 667-679. doi: 10.1080/07391102.1992.10507947
|
| [139] |
14. Mir MA, Das S, Dasgupta D (2004) N-terminal tail domains of core histones in nucleosome block the access of anticancer drugs, mithramycin and daunomycin, to the nucleosomal DNA. Biophys Chem 109: 121-135. doi: 10.1016/j.bpc.2003.10.023
|
| [140] |
15. Hurley LH (2002) DNA and its associated processes as targets forcancer therapy. Nat Rev Cancer 2: 188-200. doi: 10.1038/nrc749
|
| [141] | 17. Veselkov AN, Maleev VYa, Glibin EN, et al. (2003) Structure-activity relation for synthetic phenoxazone drugs.Evidence for a direct correlation between DNA binding and pro-apoptotic activity. Eur J Biochem 270: 4200-4207 |
| [142] |
18. Andersson J, Lincoln P (2011) Stereoselectivity for DNA threading intercalation of short binuclear ruthenium complexes. J Phys Chem B 115: 14768-14775. doi: 10.1021/jp2062767
|
| [143] | 19. Chaurasiya KR, Paramanathan T, McCauley MJ, et al. (2010) Biophysical characterization of DNA binding from single molecule force measurements. Phys Life Rev 7: 299-341. |
| [144] |
20. Nordell P, Lincoln P (2005) Mechanism of DNA threading intercalation of binuclear Ru complexes: uni- or bimolecular pathways depending on ligand structure and binding density. J Am Chem Soc 127: 9670-9671. doi: 10.1021/ja0521674
|
| [145] | 21. Andersson J, Li M, Lincoln P (2010) AT-specific DNA binding of binuclear ruthenium complexes at the border of threading intercalation. Chemistry 16: 11037-11046. |
| [146] | 22. Wilhelmsson LM, Lincoln P, Nordґen B (2006) Slow DNA binding. In: Waring M, editor. Sequence-Specific DNA Binding Agents, The Royal Society of Chemistry, Cambridge, 69-95. |
| [147] |
23. Palchaudhuri R, Hergenrother PJ (2007) DNA as a target for anticancer compounds: methods to determine the mode of binding and the mechanism of action. Curr Opin Biotechnol 18: 497-503. doi: 10.1016/j.copbio.2007.09.006
|
| [148] | 24. Barton TF, Cooney RP, Denny WA (1992) Surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopic study of amsacrine and amsacrine-DNA interactions. J Raman Spectrosc 23: 341-345. |
| [149] |
25. Rodger A, Blagbrough IS, Adlam G, et al. (1994) DNA binding of a spermine derivative: Spectroscopic study of anthracene-9-carbonyl-n1-spermine with poly[d(G-C)·(d(G-C))] and poly[d(A-T) · d(A-T)]. Biopolymers 34: 1583-1593. doi: 10.1002/bip.360341203
|
| [150] | 26. Hackl EV, Galkin VL, Blagoi YP (2004) DNA interaction with biologically active divalent metal ions: binding constants calculation. Int J Biol Macromol 34: 303-308. |
| [151] |
27. Evstigneev MP, Mykhina YV, Davies DB (2005) Complexation of daunomycin with a DNA oligomer in the presence of an aromatic vitamin (B2) determined by NMR spectroscopy. Biophys Chem 118: 118-127. doi: 10.1016/j.bpc.2005.08.007
|
| [152] |
28. Hackl EV, Blagoi YP (2005) The effect of temperature on DNA structural transitions under the action of Cu2+ and Ca2+ ions in aqueous solutions. Biopolymers 77: 315-324. doi: 10.1002/bip.20225
|
| [153] | 29. Kruglova EB, Gladkovskaia NA, Maleev V (2005) The use of the spectrophotometric analysis for the calculation of the thermodynamic parameters in actinocin derivative-DNA systems. Biofizika 50: 253-264. |
| [154] | 30. Evstigneev MP, Baranovskii SF, Rybakova KA, et al. (2006) 1H NMR study of the complexation of the quinolone antibiotic norfloxacin with DNA. Mol Biol (Mosk) 40: 894-899. |
| [155] |
31. Evstigneev MP, Rybakova KA, Davies DB (2006) Complexation of norfloxacin with DNA in the presence of caffeine. Biophys Chem 121: 84-95. doi: 10.1016/j.bpc.2005.12.003
|
| [156] |
32. Williams AK, Dasilva SC, Bhatta A, et al. (2012) Determination of the drug-DNA binding modes using fluorescence-based assays. Anal Biochem 422: 66-73. doi: 10.1016/j.ab.2011.12.041
|
| [157] |
33. Anupama B, Sunita M, Shiva LD, et al. (2014) Synthesis, spectral characterization, DNA binding studies and antimicrobial activity of Co(II), Ni(II), Zn(II), Fe(III) and VO(IV) complexes with 4-aminoantipyrine Schiff base of ortho-vanillin. J Fluoresc 24: 1067-1076. doi: 10.1007/s10895-014-1386-z
|
| [158] | 34. Zasedatelev AS, Gurskii GV, Vol'kenshtein MV (1971) Theory of one-dimensional adsorption. I. Adsorption of small molecules on a homopolymer. Molecular biology 5: 194-198. |
| [159] |
35. McGhee JD, von Hippel PH (1974) Theoretical aspects of DNA-protein interactions: co-operative and non-co-operative binding of large ligands to a one-dimensional homogeneous lattice. J Mol Biol 86: 469-489. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(74)90031-X
|
| [160] |
36. Schellman JA (1974) Cooperative Multisite Binding to DNA. Israel Journal of Chemistry 12: 219-238. doi: 10.1002/ijch.197400021
|
| [161] |
37. Nechipurenko YD, Gursky GV (1986) Cooperative effects on binding of proteins to DNA. Biophys Chem 24: 195-209. doi: 10.1016/0301-4622(86)85025-6
|
| [162] |
38. Lando DY, Teif VB (2000) Long-range interactions between ligands bound to a DNA molecule give rise to adsorption with the character of phase transition of the first kind. J Biomol Struct Dyn 17: 903-911. doi: 10.1080/07391102.2000.10506578
|
| [163] |
39. Teif VB, Rippe K (2010) Statistical-mechanical lattice models for protein-DNA binding in chromatin. J Phys Condens Matter 22: 414105. doi: 10.1088/0953-8984/22/41/414105
|
| [164] | 40. Breslauer KJ, Freire E, Straume M (1992) Calorimetry: a tool for DNA and ligand-DNA studies. Methods Enzymol 211: 533-567. |
| [165] |
41. Doyle ML (1997) Characterization of binding interactions by isothermal titration calorimetry. Curr Opin Biotechnol 8: 31-35. doi: 10.1016/S0958-1669(97)80154-1
|
| [166] |
42. Jelesarov I, Bosshard HR (1999) Isothermal titration calorimetry and differential scanning calorimetry as complementary tools to investigate the energetics of biomolecular recognition. J Mol Recognit 12: 3-18. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1352(199901/02)12:1<3::AID-JMR441>3.0.CO;2-6
|
| [167] | 43. Haq I, Chowdhry BZ, Jenkins TC (2001)Calorimetric techniques in the study of high-order DNA-drug interactions. Methods Enzymol 340: 109-149. |
| [168] | 44. Thomson JA, Ladbury JE (2004) Isothermal titration calorimetry: a tutorial. In Ladbury JE, Doyle ML, editors. Biocalorimetry 2. Applications of Calorimetry in the Biological Sciences, Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, 35-58. |
| [169] | 45. Holdgate GA, Ward WH (2005) Measurements of binding thermodynamics in drug discovery. Drug Discov Today 10: 1543-1550. |
| [170] |
46. Freyer MW, Lewis EA (2008) Isothermal titration calorimetry: experimental design, data analysis, and probing macromolecule/ligand binding and kinetic interactions. Methods Cell Biol 84: 79-113. doi: 10.1016/S0091-679X(07)84004-0
|
| [171] |
47. Bhadra K, Maiti M, Kumar GS (2008) Berberine-DNA complexation: New insights into the cooperative binding and energetic aspects. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 1780: 1054-1061. doi: 10.1016/j.bbagen.2008.05.005
|
| [172] | 48. Hossain M, Kumar GS (2009) DNA intercalation of methylene blue and quinacrine: new insights into base and sequence specificity from structural and thermodynamic studies with polynucleotides. Mol Biosyst 5: 1311-1322. |
| [173] |
49. Crane-Robinson C, Dragan AI, Read CM (2009) Defining the thermodynamics of protein/DNA complexes and their components using micro-calorimetry. Methods Mol Biol 543: 625-651. doi: 10.1007/978-1-60327-015-1_37
|
| [174] |
50. Kabir A, Kumar GS (2013) Binding of the biogenic polyamines to deoxyribonucleic acids of varying base composition: base specificity and the associated energetics of the interaction. PLoS One 8: e70510. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0070510
|
| [175] |
51. Kumar S, Spano MN, Arya DP (2014) Shape readout of AT-rich DNA by carbohydrates. Biopolymers 101: 720-732. doi: 10.1002/bip.22448
|
| [176] |
52. Basu A, Kumar GS (2015) Thermodynamic characterization of proflavine-DNA binding through microcalorimetric studies. J Chem Thermodyn 87: 1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jct.2015.03.009
|
| [177] | 53. Basu A, Kumar GS (2015) Studies on the interaction of the food colorant tartrazine with double stranded deoxyribonucleic acid. J Biomol Struct Dyn 10: 1-8. |
| [178] | 54. Chaires JB (1997) Possible origin of differences between van't Hoff and calorimetric enthalpy estimates. Biophys Chem 64: 15-23. |
| [179] | 55. Chaires JB (2008) Calorimetry and thermodynamics in drug design. Annu Rev Biophys 37: 135-151. |
| [180] |
56. Janjua NK, Siddiqa A, Yaqub A, et al. (2009) Spectrophotometric analysis of flavonoid-DNA binding interactions at physiological conditions. Spectrochim Acta A Mol Biomol Spectrosc 74: 1135-1137. doi: 10.1016/j.saa.2009.09.022
|
| [181] |
57. Temerk YM, Ibrahim MS, Kotb M (2009) Voltammetric and spectroscopic studies on binding of antitumor Morin, Morin-Cu complex and Morin-beta-cyclodextrin with DNA. Spectrochim Acta A Mol Biomol Spectrosc 71: 1830-1836. doi: 10.1016/j.saa.2008.07.001
|
| [182] |
58. Baranovskii SF, Chernyshev DN, Buchel’nikov AS, et al. (2011) Thermodynamic analysis of complex formation of ethidium bromide with DNA in water solutions. Biophysics 56: 214-219. doi: 10.1134/S0006350911020023
|
| [183] | 59. Chaires JB (1997) Energetics of drug-DNA interactions. Biopolymers 44: 201-215. |
| [184] | 60. Ren J, Jenkins TC, Chaires JB (2000) Energetics of DNA intercalation reactions. Biochemistry 39: 8439-8447. |
| [185] | 61. Davies DB, Veselkov AN (1996) Structural and thermodynamical analysis of molecular complexation by 1H NMR spectroscopy. Intercalation of ethidium bromide with the isomeric deoxytetranucleoside triphosphates 5’-d(GpCpGpC) and 5’-d(CpGpCpG) in aqueous solution. J Chem Soc Faraday Trans 92: 3545-3557. |
| [186] |
62. Kostjukov VV, Pahomov VI, Andrejuk DD, et al. (2007) Investigation of the complexation of the anti-cancer drug novantrone with the hairpin structure of the deoxyheptanucleotide 5′-d(GpCpGpApApGpC). J Mol Struct 843: 78-86. doi: 10.1016/j.molstruc.2006.12.036
|
| [187] |
63. Wartell RM, Benight AS (1985) Thermal denaturation of DNA molecules: A comparison of theory with experiment. Phys Rep 126: 67-107. doi: 10.1016/0370-1573(85)90060-2
|
| [188] |
64. Rice SA, Doty P (1957) The Thermal Denaturation of Desoxyribose Nucleic Acid. J Am Chem Soc 79: 3937-3947. doi: 10.1021/ja01572a001
|
| [189] |
65. Guedin A, Lacroix L, Mergny JL (2010) Thermal melting studies of ligand DNA interactions. Methods Mol Biol 613: 25-35. doi: 10.1007/978-1-60327-418-0_2
|
| [190] | 66. Goldstein G, Stern KG (1950) Experiments on the sonic, thermal, and enzymic depolymerization of desoxyribosenucleic acid. J Struc Chem 5: 687-708. |
| [191] |
67. Thomas R (1954) Recherches sur la d'enaturation des acides desoxyribonucléiques. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 14: 231-240. doi: 10.1016/0006-3002(54)90163-8
|
| [192] | 68. Frank-Kamenetskii M (1965) Theory of the helix-coil transition for deoxyribonucleic acids with additional connections between the chains. Vysokomolekulyarnye Soedineniya 7: 354-361. |
| [193] | 69. Frank-Kamenetskii M (1968) Consideration of helix-coil transition in homopolymers by the most probable distribution method. Mol Biol 2: 408-419. |
| [194] |
70. Stewart CR (1968) Broadening by acridine orange of the thermal transition of DNA. Biopolymers 6: 1737-1743. doi: 10.1002/bip.1968.360061208
|
| [195] |
71. Lazurkin YS, Frank-Kamenetskii MD, Trifonov EN (1970) Melting of DNA: its study and application as a research method. Biopolymers 9: 1253-1306. doi: 10.1002/bip.1970.360091102
|
| [196] |
72. Barcelo F, Capo D, Portugal J (2002) Thermodynamic characterization of the multivalent binding of chartreusin to DNA. Nucleic Acids Res 30: 4567-4573. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkf558
|
| [197] |
73. Zhong W, Yu JS, Liang Y (2003) Chlorobenzylidine-herring sperm DNA interaction: binding mode and thermodynamic studies. Spectrochim Acta A Mol Biomol Spectrosc 59: 1281-1288. doi: 10.1016/S1386-1425(02)00301-3
|
| [198] | 74. Vardevanyan PO, Antonyan AP, Hambardzumyan LA, et al. (2013) Thermodynamic analysis of DNA complexes with methylene blue, ethidium bromide and Hoechst 33258. Biopolym. Cell 29: 515-520. |
| [199] | 75. Hajian R, Guan Huat T (2013) Spectrophotometric Studies on the Thermodynamics of the ds-DNA Interaction with Irinotecan for a Better Understanding of Anticancer Drug-DNA Interactions. J Spectrosc 2013: 1-8. |
| [200] | 76. Cooper A, Johnson CM (1994) Introduction to microcalorimetry and biomolecular energetics. Methods Mol Biol 22: 109-24. |
| [201] | 77. Rosgen J, Hinz HJ (1999) Theory and practice of DSC mesuarements on proteins. In: Kemp RB, editor. Handbook of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry, Vol.4, From Macromolecules to Man, Amsterdam: Elsevier, 63-108. |
| [202] |
78. Bruylants G, Wouters J, Michaux C (2005) Differential scanning calorimetry in life science: thermodynamics, stability, molecular recognition and application in drug design. Curr Med Chem 12: 2011-. doi: 10.2174/0929867054546564
|
| [203] |
79. Spink CH (2008) Differential scanning calorimetry. Methods Cell Biol 84: 115-141. doi: 10.1016/S0091-679X(07)84005-2
|
| [204] |
80. Bereznyak EG, Gladkovskaya NA, Khrebtova AS, et al. (2009) Peculiarities of DNA-proflavine binding under different concentration ratios. Biophysics 54: 574-580. doi: 10.1134/S0006350909050030
|
| [205] | 81. Garbett N (2011) The Use of Calorimetry to Study Ligand-DNA Interactions. In: Aldrich-Wright J, editor. Metallointercalators, Vienna: Springer, 299-324. |
| [206] |
82. Ising E (1925) Beitrag zur Theorie des Ferromagnetismus. Zeitschrift für Physik 31: 253-258. doi: 10.1007/BF02980577
|
| [207] | 83. Poland DC, Scheraga HA (1970) The theory of helix coil transition, New York: Academic Press. |
| [208] | 84. Peyrard M, Bishop AR (1989) Statistical mechanics of a nonlinear model for DNA denaturation. Phys Rev Lett 62: 2755-2758. |
| [209] | 85. Dauxois T, Peyrard M, Bishop AR (1993) Entropy-driven DNA denaturation. Physical Review E 47: R44-R47. |
| [210] | 86. Dauxois T, Peyrard M, Bishop AR (1993) Dynamics and thermodynamics of a nonlinear model for DNA denaturation. Phys Rev E Stat Phys Plasmas Fluids Relat Interdiscip Topics 47: 684-695. |
| [211] | 87. Grosberg AIU, Khokhlov AR (1994) Statistical physics of macromolecules, New York: AIP Press. |
| [212] | 88. Frank-Kamenetskii MD, Prakash S (2014) Fluctuations in the DNA double helix: A critical review. Phys Life Rev 11: 153-170. |
| [213] | 89. Cantor CR, Schimmel PR (1980) Biophysical chemistry. 3. The behavior of biological macromolecules, San Francisco, Freeman. |
| [214] | 90. Zimm BH, Bragg JK (1959) Theory of the Phase Transition between Helix and Random Coil in Polypeptide Chains. J Chem Phys 31: 526-535. |
| [215] | 91. Crothers DM (1971) Statistical thermodynamics of nucleic acid melting transitions with coupled binding equilibria. Biopolymers 10: 2147-2160. |
| [216] | 92. McGhee JD (1976) Theoretical calculations of the helix-coil transition of DNA in the presence of large, cooperatively binding ligands. Biopolymers 15: 1345-1375. |
| [217] | 93. Akhrem AA, Fridman AS, Lando D (1985) Theory of helix-coil transition of the heterogeneous DNA-heteroqeneous ligands complexes. Biopolym Cell 1: 171-179. |
| [218] |
94. Lando D (1994) A theoretical consideration of the influence of selective binding of small ligands on DNA helix-coil transition. J Biomol Struct Dyn 12: 343-354. doi: 10.1080/07391102.1994.10508744
|
| [219] | 95. Akhrem AA, Lando D (1979) Influence of ligands characteristic of selective binding to a certain type of base pairs on DNA helix-coil transition I. Model. Theory. Mol Biol (Mosk) 13: 1098-1109. |
| [220] | 96. Akhrem AA, Lando D, Shpakovskii AG, et al. (1990) The effect of long-range interactions between adsorbed ligands on the DNA helix-coil transition. Mol Biol (Mosk) 24: 649-656. |
| [221] | 97. Lando D, Ivanova MA, Akhrem AA (1980) Effect of changes in the stoichiometry of DNA-ligand complexes during heat denaturation of DNA on helix-coil transition parameters. Mol Biol (Mosk) 14: 1281-1288. |
| [222] |
98. Karapetian AT, Mehrabian NM, Terzikian GA, et al. (1996) Theoretical treatment of melting of complexes of DNA with ligands having several types of binding sites on helical and single-stranded DNA. J Biomol Struct Dyn 14: 275-283. doi: 10.1080/07391102.1996.10508118
|
| [223] |
99. Plum GE, Bloomfield VA (1990) Structural and electrostatic effects on binding of trivalent cations to double-stranded and single-stranded poly[d (AT)]. Biopolymers 29: 13-27. doi: 10.1002/bip.360290105
|
| [224] |
100. Spink CH, Chaires JB (1997) Thermodynamics of the Binding of a Cationic Lipid to DNA. J Am Chem Soc 119: 10920-10928. doi: 10.1021/ja964324s
|
| [225] |
101. Leng F, Chaires JB, Waring MJ (2003) Energetics of echinomycin binding to DNA. Nucleic Acids Res 31: 6191-6197. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkg826
|
| [226] |
102. Pasic L, Sepcic K, Turk T, et al. (2001) Characterization of parazoanthoxanthin A binding to a series of natural and synthetic host DNA duplexes. Arch Biochem Biophys 393: 132-142. doi: 10.1006/abbi.2001.2469
|
| [227] |
103. Portugal J, Cashman DJ, Trent JO, et al. (2005) A new bisintercalating anthracycline with picomolar DNA binding affinity. J Med Chem 48: 8209-8219. doi: 10.1021/jm050902g
|
| [228] |
104. Liu Y-J, Wei X, Mei W-J, et al. (2007) Synthesis, characterization and DNA binding studies of ruthenium(II) complexes: [Ru(bpy)2(dtmi)]2+ and [Ru(bpy)2(dtni)]2+. Transit Metal Chem 32: 762-768. doi: 10.1007/s11243-007-0246-y
|
| [229] |
105. Peng B, Chen X, Du KJ, et al. (2009) Synthesis, characterization and DNA-binding studies of ruthenium(II) mixed-ligand complexes containing dipyrido[1,2,5]oxadiazolo[3,4-b]quinoxaline. Spectrochim Acta A Mol Biomol Spectrosc 74: 896-901. doi: 10.1016/j.saa.2009.08.031
|
| [230] | 106. Barcelo F, Portugal J (2004) Elsamicin A binding to DNA. A comparative thermodynamic characterization. FEBS Lett 576: 68-72. |
| [231] |
107. Barcelo F, Scotta C, Ortiz-Lombardia M, et al. (2007) Entropically-driven binding of mithramycin in the minor groove of C/G-rich DNA sequences. Nucleic Acids Res 35: 2215-2226. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkm037
|
| [232] | 108. Marky LA, Blumenfeld KS, Breslauer KJ (1983) Calorimetric and spectroscopic investigation of drug-DNA interactions. I. The binding of netropsin to poly d(AT). Nucleic Acids Res 11: 2857-2870. |
| [233] |
109. Remeta DP, Mudd CP, Berger RL, et al (1993) Thermodynamic characterization of daunomycin-DNA interactions: comparison of complete binding profiles for a series of DNA host duplexes. Biochemistry 32: 5064-5073. doi: 10.1021/bi00070a014
|
| [234] | 110. Brandts JF, Lin LN (1990) Study of strong to ultratight protein interactions using differential scanning calorimetry. Biochemistry 29: 6927-6940. |
| [235] | 111. Barone G, Catanzano F, Del Vecchio P, et al. (1995) Differential scanning calorimetry as a tool to study protein-ligand interactions. Pure Appl Chem 67: 1867-1872. |
| [236] |
112. Dassie SA, Celej MS, Fidelio GD (2005) Protein Unfolding Coupled to Ligand Binding: Differential Scanning Calorimetry Simulation Approach. J Chem Educ 82: 85. doi: 10.1021/ed082p85
|
| [237] |
113. Celej MS, Dassie SA, Gonzalez M, et al. (2006) Differential scanning calorimetry as a tool to estimate binding parameters in multiligand binding proteins. Anal Biochem 350: 277-284. doi: 10.1016/j.ab.2005.12.029
|
| [238] |
114. Esposito D, Del Vecchio P, Barone G (2001) A thermodynamic study of herring protamine-DNA complex by differential scanning calorimetry. Phys Chem Chem Phys 3: 5320-5325. doi: 10.1039/b107218h
|
| [239] |
115. Dukhopelnikov EV, Bereznyak EG, Khrebtova AS, et al. (2013) Determination of ligand to DNA binding parameters from two-dimensional DSC curves. J Therm Anal Calorim 111: 1817-1827. doi: 10.1007/s10973-012-2561-6
|
| [240] |
116. Straume M, Freire E (1992) Two-dimensional differential scanning calorimetry: Simultaneous resolution of intrinsic protein structural energetics and ligand binding interactions by global linkage analysis. Anal Biochem 203: 259-268. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(92)90311-T
|
| [241] |
117. Freire E (1994) Statistical thermodynamic analysis of differential scanning calorimetry data: structural deconvolution of heat capacity function of proteins. Methods Enzymol 240: 502-530. doi: 10.1016/S0076-6879(94)40062-8
|
| [242] | 118. Freire E (1995) Differential scanning calorimetry. Methods Mol Biol 40: 191-218. |
| [243] |
119. Marky LA, Breslauer KJ (1987) Calculating thermodynamic data for transitions of any molecularity from equilibrium melting curves. Biopolymers 26: 1601-1620. doi: 10.1002/bip.360260911
|
| [244] |
120. Sturtevant JM (1987) Biochemical Applications of Differential Scanning Calorimetry. Annu Rev Phys Chem 38: 463-488. doi: 10.1146/annurev.pc.38.100187.002335
|
| [245] |
121. Kawai Y (1999) Thermal transition profiles of bacteriophage T4 and its DNA. J Gen Appl Microbiol 45: 135-138. doi: 10.2323/jgam.45.135
|
| [246] |
122. Tostesen E, Sandve GK, Liu F, et al. (2009) Segmentation of DNA sequences into twostate regions and melting fork regions. J Phys Condens Matter 21: 034109. doi: 10.1088/0953-8984/21/3/034109
|
| [247] | 123. Duguid JG, Bloomfield VA, Benevides JM, et al. (1996) DNA melting investigated by differential scanning calorimetry and Raman spectroscopy. Biophys J 71: 3350-3360. |
| [248] |
124. Movileanu L, Benevides JM, Thomas GJ (2002) Determination of base and backbone contributions to the thermodynamics of premelting and melting transitions in B DNA. Nucleic Acids Res 30: 3767-3777. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkf471
|
| [249] | 125. Dukhopelnikov EV (2014) Modeling of heat absorption curves for ligand-competitor-DNA triple system. Biophysical Bulletin 31: 49-58. |
| 1. | Tianshu Wei, Jinjie Huang, A Dual Discriminator Method for Generalized Zero-Shot Learning, 2024, 79, 1546-2226, 1599, 10.32604/cmc.2024.048098 |
Figures(1)
Ekaterina Bereznyak, Natalia Gladkovskaya, Evgeniy Dukhopelnykov, Anastasiya Gerus, Anastasiya Lantushenko, Maxim Evstigneev. Thermal analysis of ligand-DNA interaction: determination of binding parameters[J]. AIMS Biophysics, 2015, 2(4): 423-440. doi: 10.3934/biophy.2015.4.423
| AWA1 | AWA2 | aPY | |||||||
| ts | tr | H | ts | tr | H | ts | tr | H | |
| SAE [8] | 1.8 | 77.1 | 3.5 | 1.1 | 82.2 | 2.2 | 0.4 | 80.9 | 0.9 |
| DAP [26] | 46.5 | 68.5 | 55.4 | 43.7 | 70.2 | 53.3 | 27.6 | 55.8 | 37.0 |
| IAP [26] | 2.1 | 78.2 | 4.1 | 0.9 | 87.6 | 1.8 | 5.7 | 65.6 | 10.4 |
| SJE [29] | 11.3 | 74.6 | 19.6 | 8.0 | 73.9 | 14.4 | 3.7 | 55.7 | 6.9 |
| Preserving Semantic Relations (PSR) [30] | 20.7 | 73.8 | 32.3 | 13.5 | 51.4 | 21.4 | |||
| f-CLSWGAN [20] | 57.9 | 61.4 | 59.6 | ||||||
| Zhang et al. [31] | 20.7 | 67.9 | 38.6 | 16.1 | 66.9 | 25.9 | |||
| Li et al. [11] | 54.9 | 71.7 | 62.2 | ||||||
| CADA-VAE [18] | 57.3 | 72.8 | 64.1 | 55.8 | 75.0 | 63.9 | |||
| Chen et al. [23] | 54.7 | 72.7 | 62.4 | 55.6 | 76.9 | 64.2 | |||
| Chen et al. [12] | 54.5 | 72.8 | 62.3 | 55.2 | 73.5 | 63.0 | 26.7 | 51.5 | 35.2 |
| The proposed method | 62.4 | 63.9 | 63.1 | 60.6 | 69.5 | 64.7 | 31.5 | 55.3 | 40.1 |
DownLoad:
CSV
| AWA1 | AWA2 | aPY | |
| SAE [8] | 53.0 | 54.1 | 8.3 |
| DAP [26] | 44.1 | 46.1 | 33.8 |
| IAP [26] | 35.9 | 35.9 | 36.6 |
| SJE [29] | 65.6 | 61.9 | 32.9 |
| PSR [30] | 63.8 | 38.4 | |
| Cross-Class Sample Synthesis (CCSS) [32] | 56.3 | 63.7 | 35.5 |
| f-CLSWGAN [20] | 69.9 | ||
| Zhang et al. [31] | 68.8 | 41.3 | |
| Li et al. [11] | 69.9 | ||
| CADA-VAE [18] | 58.8 | 60.3 | |
| Chen et al. [12] | 65.2 | 65.5 | 32.7 |
| The proposed method | 67.1 | 66.1 | 39.8 |
DownLoad:
CSV
| AWA1 | AWA2 | aPY | ||||
| acc | H | acc | H | acc | H | |
| a | 45.1 | 30.0 | 45.1 | 17.9 | 30.7 | 22.0 |
| b | 52.6 | 32.3 | 59.4 | 38.4 | 38.8 | 25.0 |
| c | 56.5 | 33.3 | 57.6 | 23.4 | 35.2 | 26.3 |
| d | 59.7 | 48.3 | 59.7 | 40.2 | 36.8 | 34.4 |
| e | 61.1 | 51.4 | 60.2 | 43.8 | 36.9 | 35.1 |
| f | 61.1 | 49.8 | 61.0 | 45.7 | 37.0 | 36.4 |
| The proposed method | 67.1 | 63.1 | 66.1 | 63.1 | 39.8 | 40.1 |
DownLoad:
CSV
| AWA1 | AWA2 | aPY | ||||||||||
| acc | ts | tr | H | acc | ts | tr | H | acc | ts | tr | H | |
| (1) | 55.1 | 37.0 | 71.8 | 48.8 | 55.6 | 34.8 | 73.0 | 47.1 | 35.8 | 27.0 | 52.1 | 35.6 |
| (2) | 67.1 | 62.3 | 63.9 | 63.1 | 66.1 | 60.6 | 69.5 | 64.7 | 39.8 | 31.5 | 55.3 | 40.1 |
DownLoad:
CSV
| AWA1 | AWA2 | aPY | |||||||
| ts | tr | H | ts | tr | H | ts | tr | H | |
| SAE [8] | 1.8 | 77.1 | 3.5 | 1.1 | 82.2 | 2.2 | 0.4 | 80.9 | 0.9 |
| DAP [26] | 46.5 | 68.5 | 55.4 | 43.7 | 70.2 | 53.3 | 27.6 | 55.8 | 37.0 |
| IAP [26] | 2.1 | 78.2 | 4.1 | 0.9 | 87.6 | 1.8 | 5.7 | 65.6 | 10.4 |
| SJE [29] | 11.3 | 74.6 | 19.6 | 8.0 | 73.9 | 14.4 | 3.7 | 55.7 | 6.9 |
| Preserving Semantic Relations (PSR) [30] | 20.7 | 73.8 | 32.3 | 13.5 | 51.4 | 21.4 | |||
| f-CLSWGAN [20] | 57.9 | 61.4 | 59.6 | ||||||
| Zhang et al. [31] | 20.7 | 67.9 | 38.6 | 16.1 | 66.9 | 25.9 | |||
| Li et al. [11] | 54.9 | 71.7 | 62.2 | ||||||
| CADA-VAE [18] | 57.3 | 72.8 | 64.1 | 55.8 | 75.0 | 63.9 | |||
| Chen et al. [23] | 54.7 | 72.7 | 62.4 | 55.6 | 76.9 | 64.2 | |||
| Chen et al. [12] | 54.5 | 72.8 | 62.3 | 55.2 | 73.5 | 63.0 | 26.7 | 51.5 | 35.2 |
| The proposed method | 62.4 | 63.9 | 63.1 | 60.6 | 69.5 | 64.7 | 31.5 | 55.3 | 40.1 |
| AWA1 | AWA2 | aPY | |
| SAE [8] | 53.0 | 54.1 | 8.3 |
| DAP [26] | 44.1 | 46.1 | 33.8 |
| IAP [26] | 35.9 | 35.9 | 36.6 |
| SJE [29] | 65.6 | 61.9 | 32.9 |
| PSR [30] | 63.8 | 38.4 | |
| Cross-Class Sample Synthesis (CCSS) [32] | 56.3 | 63.7 | 35.5 |
| f-CLSWGAN [20] | 69.9 | ||
| Zhang et al. [31] | 68.8 | 41.3 | |
| Li et al. [11] | 69.9 | ||
| CADA-VAE [18] | 58.8 | 60.3 | |
| Chen et al. [12] | 65.2 | 65.5 | 32.7 |
| The proposed method | 67.1 | 66.1 | 39.8 |
| AWA1 | AWA2 | aPY | ||||
| acc | H | acc | H | acc | H | |
| a | 45.1 | 30.0 | 45.1 | 17.9 | 30.7 | 22.0 |
| b | 52.6 | 32.3 | 59.4 | 38.4 | 38.8 | 25.0 |
| c | 56.5 | 33.3 | 57.6 | 23.4 | 35.2 | 26.3 |
| d | 59.7 | 48.3 | 59.7 | 40.2 | 36.8 | 34.4 |
| e | 61.1 | 51.4 | 60.2 | 43.8 | 36.9 | 35.1 |
| f | 61.1 | 49.8 | 61.0 | 45.7 | 37.0 | 36.4 |
| The proposed method | 67.1 | 63.1 | 66.1 | 63.1 | 39.8 | 40.1 |
| AWA1 | AWA2 | aPY | ||||||||||
| acc | ts | tr | H | acc | ts | tr | H | acc | ts | tr | H | |
| (1) | 55.1 | 37.0 | 71.8 | 48.8 | 55.6 | 34.8 | 73.0 | 47.1 | 35.8 | 27.0 | 52.1 | 35.6 |
| (2) | 67.1 | 62.3 | 63.9 | 63.1 | 66.1 | 60.6 | 69.5 | 64.7 | 39.8 | 31.5 | 55.3 | 40.1 |
