A satellite launcher requires accurate and reliable navigation to reach orbit safely. This challenging application includes vertical launch, flying through diverse layers of the atmosphere, discontinuous acceleration and stages separation, high terminal velocities and hostile temperature and vibration ranges. The Inertial Navigation System (INS) is typically coupled with a Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) receiver to achieve the desired solution quality along the complete ascent trajectory. Here, several INS/GNSS integrated navigation strategies are described and evaluated through numerical simulations. In particular, we evaluate different INS/GNSS integration using: loose coupling, tight coupling and an intermediate Kalman filter on the receiver to enhance the loosely coupled navigation solution. The main contributions are: a compensation model of tropospheric delays on the GNSS observables, a compensation of processing/communication delays on GNSS receiver outputs, covariance adaptations to consider vehicle's high dynamics, and an specific way to integrate the filtered solution and its covariance provided by the GNSS receiver. The tightly coupled integrated navigation proved to be the best choice to handle possible GNSS receiver positioning solution outages, to exploit more degrees of freedom for the compensation of GNSS observables and the possibility to make a cross validation of individual GNSS observables with INS-based information. This is specially important during the periods with a low number of satellites in view when the GNSS positioning solution can not be validated or even computed by the GNSS receiver alone. Finally, a test with hardware in the loop is provided to validate the numerical result for the selected tightly coupled INS/GNSS.
Citation: Victor Cánepa, Pablo Servidia. Design and evaluation of INS/GNSS loose and tight coupling applied to launch vehicle integrated navigation[J]. Metascience in Aerospace, 2024, 1(1): 66-109. doi: 10.3934/mina.2024004
[1] | Yuhua Zhu . A local sensitivity and regularity analysis for the Vlasov-Poisson-Fokker-Planck system with multi-dimensional uncertainty and the spectral convergence of the stochastic Galerkin method. Networks and Heterogeneous Media, 2019, 14(4): 677-707. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2019027 |
[2] | Diandian Huang, Xin Huang, Tingting Qin, Yongtao Zhou . A transformed $ L1 $ Legendre-Galerkin spectral method for time fractional Fokker-Planck equations. Networks and Heterogeneous Media, 2023, 18(2): 799-812. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2023034 |
[3] | L.L. Sun, M.L. Chang . Galerkin spectral method for a multi-term time-fractional diffusion equation and an application to inverse source problem. Networks and Heterogeneous Media, 2023, 18(1): 212-243. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2023008 |
[4] | Karoline Disser, Matthias Liero . On gradient structures for Markov chains and the passage to Wasserstein gradient flows. Networks and Heterogeneous Media, 2015, 10(2): 233-253. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2015.10.233 |
[5] | Ioannis Markou . Hydrodynamic limit for a Fokker-Planck equation with coefficients in Sobolev spaces. Networks and Heterogeneous Media, 2017, 12(4): 683-705. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2017028 |
[6] | Yves Achdou, Victor Perez . Iterative strategies for solving linearized discrete mean field games systems. Networks and Heterogeneous Media, 2012, 7(2): 197-217. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2012.7.197 |
[7] | Michael Herty, Lorenzo Pareschi, Sonja Steffensen . Mean--field control and Riccati equations. Networks and Heterogeneous Media, 2015, 10(3): 699-715. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2015.10.699 |
[8] | Martin Heida, Benedikt Jahnel, Anh Duc Vu . Regularized homogenization on irregularly perforated domains. Networks and Heterogeneous Media, 2025, 20(1): 165-212. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2025010 |
[9] | Fei Cao, Nicholas F. Marshall . From the binomial reshuffling model to Poisson distribution of money. Networks and Heterogeneous Media, 2024, 19(1): 24-43. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2024002 |
[10] | Hirotada Honda . On Kuramoto-Sakaguchi-type Fokker-Planck equation with delay. Networks and Heterogeneous Media, 2024, 19(1): 1-23. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2024001 |
A satellite launcher requires accurate and reliable navigation to reach orbit safely. This challenging application includes vertical launch, flying through diverse layers of the atmosphere, discontinuous acceleration and stages separation, high terminal velocities and hostile temperature and vibration ranges. The Inertial Navigation System (INS) is typically coupled with a Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) receiver to achieve the desired solution quality along the complete ascent trajectory. Here, several INS/GNSS integrated navigation strategies are described and evaluated through numerical simulations. In particular, we evaluate different INS/GNSS integration using: loose coupling, tight coupling and an intermediate Kalman filter on the receiver to enhance the loosely coupled navigation solution. The main contributions are: a compensation model of tropospheric delays on the GNSS observables, a compensation of processing/communication delays on GNSS receiver outputs, covariance adaptations to consider vehicle's high dynamics, and an specific way to integrate the filtered solution and its covariance provided by the GNSS receiver. The tightly coupled integrated navigation proved to be the best choice to handle possible GNSS receiver positioning solution outages, to exploit more degrees of freedom for the compensation of GNSS observables and the possibility to make a cross validation of individual GNSS observables with INS-based information. This is specially important during the periods with a low number of satellites in view when the GNSS positioning solution can not be validated or even computed by the GNSS receiver alone. Finally, a test with hardware in the loop is provided to validate the numerical result for the selected tightly coupled INS/GNSS.
In this article, we study the oscillatory behavior of the fourth-order neutral nonlinear differential equation of the form
{(r(t)Φp1[w′′′(t)])′+q(t)Φp2(u(ϑ(t)))=0,r(t)>0, r′(t)≥0, t≥t0>0, | (1.1) |
where w(t):=u(t)+a(t)u(τ(t)) and the first term means the p-Laplace type operator (1<p<∞). The main results are obtained under the following conditions:
L1: Φpi[s]=|s|pi−2s, i=1,2,
L2: r∈C[t0,∞) and under the condition
∫∞t01r1/(p1−1)(s)ds=∞. | (1.2) |
L3: a,q∈C[t0,∞), q(t)>0, 0≤a(t)<a0<∞, τ,ϑ∈C[t0,∞), τ(t)≤t, limt→∞τ(t)=limt→∞ϑ(t)=∞
By a solution of (1.1) we mean a function u ∈C3[tu,∞), tu≥t0, which has the property r(t)(w′′′(t))p1−1∈C1[tu,∞), and satisfies (1.1) on [tu,∞). We assume that (1.1) possesses such a solution. A solution of (1.1) is called oscillatory if it has arbitrarily large zeros on [tu,∞), and otherwise it is called to be nonoscillatory. (1.1) is said to be oscillatory if all its solutions are oscillatory.
We point out that delay differential equations have applications in dynamical systems, optimization, and in the mathematical modeling of engineering problems, such as electrical power systems, control systems, networks, materials, see [1]. The p-Laplace equations have some significant applications in elasticity theory and continuum mechanics.
During the past few years, there has been constant interest to study the asymptotic properties for oscillation of differential equations with p-Laplacian like operator in the canonical case and the noncanonical case, see [2,3,4,11] and the numerical solution of the neutral delay differential equations, see [5,6,7]. The oscillatory properties of differential equations are fairly well studied by authors in [16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27]. We collect some relevant facts and auxiliary results from the existing literature.
Liu et al. [4] studied the oscillation of even-order half-linear functional differential equations with damping of the form
{(r(t)Φ(y(n−1)(t)))′+a(t)Φ(y(n−1)(t))+q(t)Φ(y(g(t)))=0,Φ=|s|p−2s, t≥t0>0, |
where n is even. This time, the authors used comparison method with second order equations.
The authors in [9,10] have established sufficient conditions for the oscillation of the solutions of
{(r(t)|y(n−1)(t)|p−2y(n−1)(t))′+∑ji=1qi(t)g(y(ϑi(t)))=0,j≥1, t≥t0>0, |
where n is even and p>1 is a real number, in the case where ϑi(t)≥υ (with r∈C1((0,∞),R), qi∈C([0,∞),R), i=1,2,..,j).
We point out that Li et al. [3] using the Riccati transformation together with integral averaging technique, focuses on the oscillation of equation
{(r(t)|w′′′(t)|p−2w′′′(t))′+∑ji=1qi(t)|y(δi(t))|p−2y(δi(t))=0,1<p<∞, , t≥t0>0. |
Park et al. [8] have obtained sufficient conditions for oscillation of solutions of
{(r(t)|y(n−1)(t)|p−2y(n−1)(t))′+q(t)g(y(δ(t)))=0,1<p<∞, , t≥t0>0. |
As we already mentioned in the Introduction, our aim here is complement results in [8,9,10]. For this purpose we discussed briefly these results.
In this paper, we obtain some new oscillation criteria for (1.1). The paper is organized as follows. In the next sections, we will mention some auxiliary lemmas, also, we will use the generalized Riccati transformation technique to give some sufficient conditions for the oscillation of (1.1), and we will give some examples to illustrate the main results.
For convenience, we denote
A(t)=q(t)(1−a0)p2−1Mp1−p2(ϑ(t)), B(t)=(p1−1)εϑ2(t)ζϑ′(t)r1/(p1−1)(t), ϕ1(t)=∫∞tA(s)ds,R1(t):=(p1−1)μt22r1/(p1−1)(t),ξ(t):=q(t)(1−a0)p2−1Mp2−p11ε1(ϑ(t)t)3(p2−1),η(t):=(1−a0)p2/p1Mp2/(p1−2)2∫∞t(1r(δ)∫∞δq(s)ϑp2−1(s)sp2−1ds)1/(p1−1)dδ,ξ∗(t)=∫∞tξ(s)ds, η∗(t)=∫∞tη(s)ds, |
for some μ∈(0,1) and every M1,M2 are positive constants.
Definition 1. A sequence of functions {δn(t)}∞n=0 and {σn(t)}∞n=0 as
δ0(t)=ξ∗(t), and σ0(t)=η∗(t),δn(t)=δ0(t)+∫∞tR1(t)δp1/(p1−1)n−1(s)ds, n>1σn(t)=σ0(t)+∫∞tσp1/(p1−1)n−1(s)ds, n>1. | (2.1) |
We see by induction that δn(t)≤δn+1(t) and σn(t)≤σn+1(t) for t≥t0, n>1.
In order to discuss our main results, we need the following lemmas:
Lemma 2.1. [12] If the function w satisfies w(i)(ν)>0, i=0,1,...,n, and w(n+1)(ν)<0 eventually. Then, for every ε1∈(0,1), w(ν)/w′(ν)≥ε1ν/n eventually.
Lemma 2.2. [13] Let u(t) be a positive and n-times differentiable function on an interval [T,∞) with its nth derivative u(n)(t) non-positive on [T,∞) and not identically zero on any interval of the form [T′,∞), T′≥T and u(n−1)(t)u(n)(t)≤0, t≥tu then there exist constants θ, 0<θ<1 and ε>0 such that
u′(θt)≥εtn−2u(n−1)(t), |
for all sufficient large t.
Lemma 2.3 [14] Let u∈Cn([t0,∞),(0,∞)). Assume that u(n)(t) is of fixed sign and not identically zero on [t0,∞) and that there exists a t1≥t0 such that u(n−1)(t)u(n)(t)≤0 for all t≥t1. If limt→∞u(t)≠0, then for every μ∈(0,1) there exists tμ≥t1 such that
u(t)≥μ(n−1)!tn−1|u(n−1)(t)| for t≥tμ. |
Lemma 2.4. [15] Assume that (1.2) holds and u is an eventually positive solution of (1.1). Then, (r(t)(w′′′(t))p1−1)′<0 and there are the following two possible cases eventually:
(G1) w(k)(t)>0, k=1,2,3,(G2) w(k)(t)>0, k=1,3, and w′′(t)<0. |
Theorem 2.1. Assume that
liminft→∞1ϕ1(t)∫∞tB(s)ϕp1(p1−1)1(s)ds>p1−1pp1(p1−1)1. | (2.2) |
Then (1.1) is oscillatory.
proof. Assume that u be an eventually positive solution of (1.1). Then, there exists a t1≥t0 such that u(t)>0, u(τ(t))>0 and u(ϑ(t))>0 for t≥t1. Since r′(t)>0, we have
w(t)>0, w′(t)>0, w′′′(t)>0, w(4)(t)<0 and (r(t)(w′′′(t))p1−1)′≤0, | (2.3) |
for t≥t1. From definition of w, we get
u(t)≥w(t)−a0u(τ(t))≥w(t)−a0w(τ(t))≥(1−a0)w(t), |
which with (1.1) gives
(r(t)(w′′′(t))p1−1)′≤−q(t)(1−a0)p2−1wp2−1(ϑ(t)). | (2.4) |
Define
ϖ(t):=r(t)(w′′′(t))p1−1wp1−1(ζϑ(t)). | (2.5) |
for some a constant ζ∈(0,1). By differentiating and using (2.4), we obtain
ϖ′(t)≤−q(t)(1−a0)p2−1wp2−1(ϑ(t)).wp1−1(ζϑ(t))−(p1−1)r(t)(w′′′(t))p1−1w′(ζϑ(t))ζϑ′(t)wp1(ζϑ(t)). |
From Lemma 2.2, there exist constant ε>0, we have
ϖ′(t)≤−q(t)(1−a0)p2−1wp2−p1(ϑ(t))−(p1−1)r(t)(w′′′(t))p1−1εϑ2(t)w′′′(ϑ(t))ζϑ′(t)wp1(ζϑ(t)). |
Which is
ϖ′(t)≤−q(t)(1−a0)p2−1wp2−p1(ϑ(t))−(p1−1)εr(t)ϑ2(t)ζϑ′(t)(w′′′(t))p1wp1(ζϑ(t)), |
by using (2.5) we have
ϖ′(t)≤−q(t)(1−a0)p2−1wp2−p1(ϑ(t))−(p1−1)εϑ2(t)ζϑ′(t)r1/(p1−1)(t)ϖp1/(p1−1)(t). | (2.6) |
Since w′(t)>0, there exist a t2≥t1 and a constant M>0 such that
w(t)>M. |
Then, (2.6), turns to
ϖ′(t)≤−q(t)(1−a0)p2−1Mp2−p1(ϑ(t))−(p1−1)εϑ2(t)ζϑ′(t)r1/(p1−1)(t)ϖp1/(p1−1)(t), |
that is
ϖ′(t)+A(t)+B(t)ϖp1/(p1−1)(t)≤0. |
Integrating the above inequality from t to l, we get
ϖ(l)−ϖ(t)+∫ltA(s)ds+∫ltB(s)ϖp1/(p1−1)(s)ds≤0. |
Letting l→∞ and using ϖ>0 and ϖ′<0, we have
ϖ(t)≥ϕ1(t)+∫∞tB(s)ϖp1/(p1−1)(s)ds. |
This implies
ϖ(t)ϕ1(t)≥1+1ϕ1(t)∫∞tB(s)ϕp1/(p1−1)1(s)(ϖ(s)ϕ1(s))p1/(p1−1)ds. | (2.7) |
Let λ=inft≥Tϖ(t)/ϕ1(t) then obviously λ≥1. Thus, from (2.2) and (2.7) we see that
λ≥1+(p1−1)(λp1)p1/(p1−1) |
or
λp1≥1p1+(p1−1)p1(λp1)p1/(p1−1), |
which contradicts the admissible value of λ≥1 and (p1−1)>0.
Therefore, the proof is complete.
Theorem 2.2. Assume that
liminft→∞1ξ∗(t)∫∞tR1(s)ξp1/(p1−1)∗(s)ds>(p1−1)pp1/(p1−1)1 | (2.8) |
and
liminft→∞1η∗(t)∫∞t0η2∗(s)ds>14. | (2.9) |
Then (1.1) is oscillatory.
proof. Assume to the contrary that (1.1) has a nonoscillatory solution in [t0,∞). Without loss of generality, we let u be an eventually positive solution of (1.1). Then, there exists a t1≥t0 such that u(t)>0, u(τ(t))>0 and u(ϑ(t))>0 for t≥t1. From Lemma 2.4 there is two cases (G1) and (G2).
For case (G1). Define
ω(t):=r(t)(w′′′(t))p1−1wp1−1(t). |
By differentiating ω and using (2.4), we obtain
ω′(t)≤−q(t)(1−a0)p2−1wp2−1(ϑ(t))wp1−1(t)−(p1−1)r(t)(w′′′(t))p1−1wp1(t)w′(t). | (2.10) |
From Lemma 2.1, we get
w′(t)w(t)≤3ε1t. |
Integrating again from t to ϑ(t), we find
w(ϑ(t))w(t)≥ε1ϑ3(t)t3. | (2.11) |
It follows from Lemma 2.3 that
w′(t)≥μ12t2w′′′(t), | (2.12) |
for all μ1∈(0,1) and every sufficiently large t. Since w′(t)>0, there exist a t2≥t1 and a constant M>0 such that
w(t)>M, | (2.13) |
for t≥t2. Thus, by (2.10), (2.11), (2.12) and (2.13), we get
ω′(t)+q(t)(1−a0)p2−1Mp2−p11ε1(ϑ(t)t)3(p2−1)+(p1−1)μt22r1/(p1−1)(t)ωp1/(p1−1)(t)≤0, |
that is
ω′(t)+ξ(t)+R1(t)ωp1/(p1−1)(t)≤0. | (2.14) |
Integrating (2.14) from t to l, we get
ω(l)−ω(t)+∫ltξ(s)ds+∫ltR1(s)ωp1/(p1−1)(s)ds≤0. |
Letting l→∞ and using ω>0 and ω′<0, we have
ω(t)≥ξ∗(t)+∫∞tR1(s)ωp1/(p1−1)(s)ds. | (2.15) |
This implies
ω(t)ξ∗(t)≥1+1ξ∗(t)∫∞tR1(s)ξp1/(p1−1)∗(s)(ω(s)ξ∗(s))p1/(p1−1)ds. | (2.16) |
Let λ=inft≥Tω(t)/ξ∗(t) then obviously λ≥1. Thus, from (2.8) and (2.16) we see that
λ≥1+(p1−1)(λp1)p1/(p1−1) |
or
λp1≥1p1+(p1−1)p1(λp1)p1/(p1−1), |
which contradicts the admissible value of λ≥1 and (p1−1)>0.
For case (G2). Integrating (2.4) from t to m, we obtain
r(m)(w′′′(m))p1−1−r(t)(w′′′(t))p1−1≤−∫mtq(s)(1−a0)p2−1wp2−1(ϑ(s))ds. | (2.17) |
From Lemma 2.1, we get that
w(t)≥ε1tw′(t) and hence w(ϑ(t))≥ε1ϑ(t)tw(t). | (2.18) |
For (2.17), letting m→∞and using (2.18), we see that
r(t)(w′′′(t))p1−1≥ε1(1−a0)p2−1wp2−1(t)∫∞tq(s)ϑp2−1(s)sp2−1ds. |
Integrating this inequality again from t to ∞, we get
w′′(t)≤−ε1(1−a0)p2/p1wp2/p1(t)∫∞t(1r(δ)∫∞δq(s)ϑp2−1(s)sp2−1ds)1/(p1−1)dδ, | (2.19) |
for all ε1∈(0,1). Define
y(t)=w′(t)w(t). |
By differentiating y and using (2.13) and (2.19), we find
y′(t)=w′′(t)w(t)−(w′(t)w(t))2≤−y2(t)−(1−a0)p2/p1M(p2/p1)−1∫∞t(1r(δ)∫∞δq(s)ϑp2−1(s)sp2−1ds)1/(p1−1)dδ, | (2.20) |
hence
y′(t)+η(t)+y2(t)≤0. | (2.21) |
The proof of the case where (G2) holds is the same as that of case (G1). Therefore, the proof is complete.
Theorem 2.3. Let δn(t) and σn(t) be defined as in (2.1). If
limsupt→∞(μ1t36r1/(p1−1)(t))p1−1δn(t)>1 | (2.22) |
and
limsupt→∞λtσn(t)>1, | (2.23) |
for some n, then (1.1)is oscillatory.
proof. Assume to the contrary that (1.1) has a nonoscillatory solution in [t0,∞). Without loss of generality, we let u be an eventually positive solution of (1.1). Then, there exists a t1≥t0 such that u(t)>0, u(τ(t))>0 and u(ϑ(t))>0 for t≥t1. From Lemma 2.4 there is two cases.
In the case (G1), proceeding as in the proof of Theorem 2.2, we get that (2.12) holds. It follows from Lemma 2.3 that
w(t)≥μ16t3w′′′(t). | (2.24) |
From definition of ω(t) and (2.24), we have
1ω(t)=1r(t)(w(t)w′′′(t))p1−1≥1r(t)(μ16t3)p1−1. |
Thus,
ω(t)(μ1t36r1/(p1−1)(t))p1−1≤1. |
Therefore,
limsupt→∞ω(t)(μ1t36r1/(p1−1)(t))p1−1≤1, |
which contradicts (2.22).
The proof of the case where (G2) holds is the same as that of case (G1). Therefore, the proof is complete.
Corollary 2.1. Let δn(t) and σn(t) be defined as in (2.1). If
∫∞t0ξ(t)exp(∫tt0R1(s)δ1/(p1−1)n(s)ds)dt=∞ | (2.25) |
and
∫∞t0η(t)exp(∫tt0σ1/(p1−1)n(s)ds)dt=∞, | (2.26) |
for some n, then (1.1) is oscillatory.
proof. Assume to the contrary that (1.1) has a nonoscillatory solution in [t0,∞). Without loss of generality, we let u be an eventually positive solution of (1.1). Then, there exists a t1≥t0 such that u(t)>0, u(τ(t))>0 and u(ϑ(t))>0 for t≥t1. From Lemma 2.4 there is two cases (G1) and (G2).
In the case (G1), proceeding as in the proof of Theorem 2, we get that (2.15) holds. It follows from (2.15) that ω(t)≥δ0(t). Moreover, by induction we can also see that ω(t)≥δn(t) for t≥t0, n>1. Since the sequence {δn(t)}∞n=0 monotone increasing and bounded above, it converges to δ(t). Thus, by using Lebesgue's monotone convergence theorem, we see that
δ(t)=limn→∞δn(t)=∫∞tR1(t)δp1/(p1−1)(s)ds+δ0(t) |
and
δ′(t)=−R1(t)δp1/(p1−1)(t)−ξ(t). | (2.27) |
Since δn(t)≤δ(t), it follows from (2.27) that
δ′(t)≤−R1(t)δ1/(p1−1)n(t)δ(t)−ξ(t). |
Hence, we get
δ(t)≤exp(−∫tTR1(s)δ1/(p1−1)n(s)ds)(δ(T)−∫tTξ(s)exp(∫sTR1(δ)δ1/(p1−1)n(δ)dδ)ds). |
This implies
∫tTξ(s)exp(∫sTR1(δ)δ1/(p1−1)n(δ)dδ)ds≤δ(T)<∞, |
which contradicts (2.25). The proof of the case where (G2) holds is the same as that of case (G1). Therefore, the proof is complete.
Example 2.1. Consider the differential equation
(u(t)+12u(t2))(4)+q0t4u(t3)=0, | (2.28) |
where q0>0 is a constant. Let p1=p2=2, r(t)=1, a(t)=1/2, τ(t)=t/2, ϑ(t)=t/3 and q(t)=q0/t4. Hence, it is easy to see that
A(t)=q(t)(1−a0)(p2−1)Mp2−p1(ϑ(t))=q02t4, B(t)=(p1−1)εϑ2(t)ζϑ′(t)r1/(p1−1)(t)=εt227 |
and
ϕ1(t)=q06t3, |
also, for some ε>0, we find
liminft→∞1ϕ1(t)∫∞tB(s)ϕp1/(p1−1)1(s)ds>(p1−1)pp1/(p1−1)1.liminft→∞6εq0t3972∫∞tdss4>14q0>121.5ε. |
Hence, by Theorem 2.1, every solution of Eq (2.28) is oscillatory if q0>121.5ε.
Example 2.2. Consider a differential equation
(u(t)+a0u(τ0t))(n)+q0tnu(ϑ0t)=0, | (2.29) |
where q0>0 is a constant. Note that p=2, t0=1, r(t)=1, a(t)=a0, τ(t)=τ0t, ϑ(t)=ϑ0t and q(t)=q0/tn.
Easily, we see that condition (2.8) holds and condition (2.9) satisfied.
Hence, by Theorem 2.2, every solution of Eq (2.29) is oscillatory.
Remark 2.1. Finally, we point out that continuing this line of work, we can have oscillatory results for a fourth order equation of the type:
{(r(t)|y′′′(t)|p1−2y′′′(t))′+a(t)f(y′′′(t))+∑ji=1qi(t)|y(σi(t))|p2−2y(σi(t))=0,t≥t0, σi(t)≤t, j≥1,, 1<p2≤p1<∞. |
The paper is devoted to the study of oscillation of fourth-order differential equations with p-Laplacian like operators. New oscillation criteria are established by using a Riccati transformations, and they essentially improves the related contributions to the subject.
Further, in the future work we get some Hille and Nehari type and Philos type oscillation criteria of (1.1) under the condition ∫∞υ01r1/(p1−1)(s)ds<∞.
The authors express their debt of gratitude to the editors and the anonymous referee for accurate reading of the manuscript and beneficial comments.
The author declares that there is no competing interest.
[1] |
Savage PG (1998) Strapdown Inertial Navigation Integration Algorithm Design Part 1: Attitude Algorithms. J Guid Control Dynam 21: 19–28. https://doi.org/10.2514/2.4228 doi: 10.2514/2.4228
![]() |
[2] |
Savage P (1998) Strapdown Inertial Navigation Integration Algorithm Design Part 2: Velocity and Position Algorithms. J Guid Control Dynam 21: 208–221. https://doi.org/10.2514/2.4242 doi: 10.2514/2.4242
![]() |
[3] | Moreno A, Cánepa V, Giribet J, et al. (2021) Simulador GNSS para la Evaluación de Algoritmos de Navegación Integrada en Vehículos Aeroespaciales. XI Congreso Argentino de Tecnología Espacial. |
[4] | Tewari A (2011) Advanced Control of Aircraft, Spacecraft and Rockets, Wiley. |
[5] | Suresh BN, Sivan K (2015) Integrated Design for Space Transportation Systems, Springer. |
[6] | Range Command Council, US Army White Sands Missile Range (2011) 324 Global Positioning and Inertial Measurements Range Safety Tracking Systems Commonality Standard. |
[7] |
Hu G, Gao B, Zhong Y, et al. (2019) Robust Unscented Kalman Filtering With Measurement Error Detection for Tightly Coupled INS/GNSS Integration in Hypersonic Vehicle Navigation. IEEE Access 7: 151409–151421. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2948317 doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2948317
![]() |
[8] |
Hu G, Wang W, Zhong Y, et al. (2018) A New Direct Filtering Approach to INS/GNSS Integration. Aerosp Sci Technol 77: 755–764. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2018.03.040 doi: 10.1016/j.ast.2018.03.040
![]() |
[9] |
Meng Y, Gao S, Zhong Y, et al. (2016) Covariance Matching Based Adaptive Unscented Kalman Filter for Direct Filtering in INS/GNSS Integration. Acta Astronaut 120: 171–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2015.12.014 doi: 10.1016/j.actaastro.2015.12.014
![]() |
[10] |
Hu G, Gao S, Zhong Y (2015) A Derivative UKF for Tightly Coupled INS/GPS Integrated Navigation. ISA T 56: 135–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isatra.2014.10.006 doi: 10.1016/j.isatra.2014.10.006
![]() |
[11] | Bernadi P (2013) Sistema de Navegación INS/GPS para un Cohete Suborbital Controlado, Engineering Thesis, Universidad de Buenos Aires. |
[12] |
Hu G, Gao B, Zhong Y, et al. (2020) Unscented Kalman Filter with Process Noise Covariance Estimation for Vehicular INS/GPS Integration System. Inform Fusion 64: 194–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inffus.2020.08.005 doi: 10.1016/j.inffus.2020.08.005
![]() |
[13] |
Gao Z, Gu C, Yang J, et al. (2020) Random Weighting-Based Nonlinear Gaussian Filtering. IEEE Access 8: 19590–19605. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2968363 doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2968363
![]() |
[14] |
Gao B, Gao S, Hu G, et al. (2018) Maximum Likelihood Principle and Moving Horizon Estimation Based Adaptive Unscented Kalman Filter. Aerosp Sci Technol 73: 184–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2017.12.007 doi: 10.1016/j.ast.2017.12.007
![]() |
[15] |
Gao S, Hu G, Zhong Y (2015) Windowing and Random Weighting Based Adaptive Unscented Kalman Filter. Int J Adapt Control 29: 201–223. https://doi.org/10.1002/acs.2467 doi: 10.1002/acs.2467
![]() |
[16] |
Cánepa V, Servidia P, Giribet J (2022) Adaptive Extended Kalman Filter for Integrated Navigation in a Satellite Launch Vehicle. VI Congreso Bienal de la Sección Argentina del IEEE (ARGENCON), San Juan, Argentina. 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1109/ARGENCON55245.2022.9939949 doi: 10.1109/ARGENCON55245.2022.9939949
![]() |
[17] | Bancroft S (1985) An Algebraic Solution of the GPS Equations, in IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems. 1: 56–59. doi: 10.1109/TAES.1985.310538. |
[18] | Cánepa V (2022) Navegación Integrada Fuertemente Acoplada para Vehículos Lanzadores de Satélites, Engineering Thesis, Universidad de Buenos Aires. |
[19] |
Gao B, Hu G, Gao S, et al. (2018) Multi-sensor Optimal Data Fusion for INS/GNSS/CNS Integration Based on Unscented Kalman Filter. Int J Control Autom Syst 16: 129–140. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12555-016-0801-4. doi: 10.1007/s12555-016-0801-4
![]() |
[20] |
Hu G, Gao S, Zhong Y, Gao B, Subic A, (2016) Matrix Weighted Multisensor Data Fusion for INS/GNSS/CNS Integration, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part G. J Aerospace Eng 230: 1011–1026. https://doi.org/10.1177/0954410015602723 doi: 10.1177/0954410015602723
![]() |
[21] |
Hu G, Gao S, Zhong Y, et al. (2016) Modified Federated Kalman Filter for INS/GNSS/CNS Integration, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part G. J Aerospace Eng 230: 30–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/0954410015586860. doi: 10.1177/0954410015586860
![]() |
[22] | Parkinson B, Spilker J (1996) Global Positioning System: Theory and Applications. AIAA, Washington DC. |
[23] |
Kaniewski P, Gil R, Konatowski S (2016) Algorithms of Position and Velocity Estimation in GPS Receivers. Annu Navigation 23. https://doi.org/10.1515/aon-2016-0004 doi: 10.1515/aon-2016-0004
![]() |
[24] | Sarunic P (2016) Development of GPS Receiver Kalman Filter Algorithms for Stationary, Low-Dynamics, and High-Dynamics Applications. Defense, Science and Technology Group, Australia, Technical Report DST-Group-TR-3260. |
[25] | Gómez D, Langston C, Smalley R (2015) A Closed-form Solution for Earthquake Location in a Homogeneous Half-space Based on the Bancroft GPS Location Algorithm. |
[26] | Cánepa V, Servidia P, Giribet J (2023) Aspectos Prácticos en la Navegación Integrada de Vehículos Lanzadores. XII Congreso Argentino de Tecnología Espacial. |
[27] | España M (2019) Sistemas de Navegación Integrada con Aplicaciones, 2nd ed. Comisión Nacional de Actividades Espaciales. Available from: www.argentina.gob.ar/ciencia/conae/publicaciones. |
[28] | Jazwinski A (1970) Stochastic Processes and Filtering Theory. Math Sci Eng 64. |
[29] | Reif K, Günther S, Yaz E (1999) Stochastic Stability of the Discrete-time Extended Kalman Filter. IEEE 44. |
[30] | Ford J, Coulter A (2001) Filtering for Precision Guidance: The Extended Kalman Filter. Aeronautical and Maritime Research Laboratory. |
[31] |
Rodríguez S, García J, Scillone G, et al. (2020) Dual-Antenna Dual-Band High Performance Cubesat-Compatible GPS Receiver. IEEE Lat Am T 18: 265–272. https://doi.org/10.1109/TLA.2020.9085279 doi: 10.1109/TLA.2020.9085279
![]() |
[32] | López La Valle R, Rodriguez S, Garcia J (2018) Documento de Control de Interfaces (ICD) M3GR-EMB. SENYT-UNLP. |
[33] | Klobuchar J (1987) Ionospheric Time-Delay Algorithms for Single-Frequency GPS Users. IEEE T Aero Elec Syst 3: 325–331. |
[34] |
Servidia P, Sánchez Peña R (2002) Thruster Design for Position/Attitude Control of Spacecraft. IEEE T Aero Elec Sys 38: 1172–1180. https://doi.org/10.1109/TAES.2002.1145741 doi: 10.1109/TAES.2002.1145741
![]() |
[35] |
Servidia P (2010) Control Allocation for Gimbaled/Fixed Thrusters. Acta Astronaut 66: 587–594. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2009.07.023 doi: 10.1016/j.actaastro.2009.07.023
![]() |
[36] |
Servidia P, Sánchez Peña R, (2005) Spacecraft Thruster Control Allocation Problems. IEEE T Automat Contr 50: 245–249. https://doi.org/10.1109/TAC.2004.841923 doi: 10.1109/TAC.2004.841923
![]() |
[37] |
Servidia P, Sánchez Peña R (2005) Practical Stabilization in Attitude Thruster Control. IEEE T Aerosp Elec Sys 41: 584–598. https://doi.org/10.1109/TAES.2005.1468750 doi: 10.1109/TAES.2005.1468750
![]() |
[38] |
Beaudoin Y, Desbiens A, Gagnon E, et al. (2018) Observability of Satellite Launcher Navigation with INS, GPS, Attitude Sensors and Reference Trajectory. Acta Astronaut 142: 277–288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2017.10.038 doi: 10.1016/j.actaastro.2017.10.038
![]() |
[39] | Van Dierendonk A, McGraw J, Grover Brown R (1984) Relationship Between Allan Variances and Kalman Filter Parameters. NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Proc. of the 16th Ann. Precise Time and Time Interval (PTTI) Appl. and Planning Meeting 273–293. |
[40] | Kaplan E, Hegarty C (2006) Understanding GPS: Principles and Applications, Artech House. |
[41] | Grover Brown R, Hwang P (2012) Introduction to Random Signals and Applied Kalman Filtering. 4th ed. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. |
[42] | KHV 1750 Inertial Measurement Unit Technical Manual (2013) KVH Industries. |
[43] | Gomez E, Servidia P, España M (2019) Fast and Reliable Computation of Mean Orbit Elements for Autonomous Orbit Control, IAA-LA2-03-03, Proceedings of the 2nd IAA Latin American Symposium on Small Satellites, 69–76. |
[44] |
España M, Carrizo J, Giribet J (2019) Sensability and Excitability Metrics Applied to Navigation Systems Assessment. J Navigation 72: 1481–1495. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0373463319000328 doi: 10.1017/S0373463319000328
![]() |
1. | José M. Mazón, The Cheeger cut and Cheeger problem in metric graphs, 2022, 12, 1664-2368, 10.1007/s13324-022-00729-y | |
2. | Salvador Moll, Vicent Pallardó-Julià, Marcos Solera, Segmentation in Measure Spaces, 2024, 89, 0095-4616, 10.1007/s00245-024-10134-5 | |
3. | Luís N. Baptista, James B. Kennedy, Delio Mugnolo, Mean Distance on Metric Graphs, 2024, 34, 1050-6926, 10.1007/s12220-024-01574-0 |