Diagnostic Utility of Pleural Effusion and Serum Cholesterol, Lactic Dehydrogenase and Protein Ratios in the Differentiation between Transudates and Exudates

Muaz O. Fagere; Muaz O. Fagere

doi:10.3934/medsci.2016.1.32

AIMS Medical Science

2016, Volume 3, Issue 1: 32-40. doi: 10.3934/medsci.2016.1.32

Previous Article Next Article

Research article

Diagnostic Utility of Pleural Effusion and Serum Cholesterol, Lactic Dehydrogenase and Protein Ratios in the Differentiation between Transudates and Exudates

Muaz O. Fagere ^,

Department Laboratory Medicine, Faculty of Applied Medical Sciences, Albaha University

Received: 29 July 2015 Accepted: 10 December 2015 Published: 20 December 2015

This is a descriptive study carried out in Khartoum state hospitals during the period from May 2012 to April 2014. The study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic role of the pleural effusion/serum (CHOL, LDH, and protein) ratios in the differentiation between exudate and transudate pleural effusion. As a part of the investigation, 135 serum and pleural effusion samples were collected from patients with accumulated plural effusion. Prior to testing, 5 mL of venous blood and 20 mL of pleural effusion samples were prepared in accordance with specific testing requirements. Exudative pleural effusions were observed in 95 (70.4%) samples, of which 64 (67.4%) belonged to male patients and 31 (32.6%) to females. The calculated means for CHOL, LDH, and protein levels in pleural effusion and serum samples between exudate and transudate effusion showed statistically significant differences with the p-value = 0.000. In distinguishing between exudative and transudate pleural effusion, a high Pearson correlation was observed between CHOL ratio and clinical diagnosis (r = 0.971), as well as between CHOL level in effusion samples and LDH level in serum samples (r = 0.867). Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value analysis of the parameters in the differentiation between exudate and transudate samples revealed the following values: 97.7% and 100%, 100%, and 95%, respectively, for the CHOL ratio; 86%, 97.4%, 97.4%, and 97%, respectively, for the LDH ratio; and 81.4%, 81.6%, 89.7%, and 70.4%, respectively, for the protein ratio. On the basis of the study findings, it could be concluded that estimation of CHO, LDH, and protein ratios can assist in the differentiation between exudative and transudate pleural effusion and thus patient management. Hence, this approach should be included in routine laboratory analyses of pleural effusions. Nevertheless, additional techniques should be incorporated in the diagnosis of doubtful pleural effusions, as this will improve the diagnostic sensitivity and specificity in this setting.
- pleural effusion,
- transudates,
- exudates,
- cholesterol,
- protein,
- lactic dehydrogenase
Citation: Muaz O. Fagere. Diagnostic Utility of Pleural Effusion and Serum Cholesterol, Lactic Dehydrogenase and Protein Ratios in the Differentiation between Transudates and Exudates[J]. AIMS Medical Science, 2016, 3(1): 32-40. doi: 10.3934/medsci.2016.1.32

Related Papers:

Abstract

This is a descriptive study carried out in Khartoum state hospitals during the period from May 2012 to April 2014. The study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic role of the pleural effusion/serum (CHOL, LDH, and protein) ratios in the differentiation between exudate and transudate pleural effusion. As a part of the investigation, 135 serum and pleural effusion samples were collected from patients with accumulated plural effusion. Prior to testing, 5 mL of venous blood and 20 mL of pleural effusion samples were prepared in accordance with specific testing requirements. Exudative pleural effusions were observed in 95 (70.4%) samples, of which 64 (67.4%) belonged to male patients and 31 (32.6%) to females. The calculated means for CHOL, LDH, and protein levels in pleural effusion and serum samples between exudate and transudate effusion showed statistically significant differences with the p-value = 0.000. In distinguishing between exudative and transudate pleural effusion, a high Pearson correlation was observed between CHOL ratio and clinical diagnosis (r = 0.971), as well as between CHOL level in effusion samples and LDH level in serum samples (r = 0.867). Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value analysis of the parameters in the differentiation between exudate and transudate samples revealed the following values: 97.7% and 100%, 100%, and 95%, respectively, for the CHOL ratio; 86%, 97.4%, 97.4%, and 97%, respectively, for the LDH ratio; and 81.4%, 81.6%, 89.7%, and 70.4%, respectively, for the protein ratio. On the basis of the study findings, it could be concluded that estimation of CHO, LDH, and protein ratios can assist in the differentiation between exudative and transudate pleural effusion and thus patient management. Hence, this approach should be included in routine laboratory analyses of pleural effusions. Nevertheless, additional techniques should be incorporated in the diagnosis of doubtful pleural effusions, as this will improve the diagnostic sensitivity and specificity in this setting.

References

[1]	Black LF (1972) The pleural space and pleural fluid. Mayo Ciln Proc 47: 493-506.
[2]	Sahn SA (1988) State of art. The pleura. Am Rev Respir Dis 138: 184-234. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm/138.1.184
[3]	Light RW, MacGregor MI, Lushsinger PC, et al. (1972) Pleural effusion: the diagnostic separation of transudates and exudates. Ann Intern Med 77: 507-513. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-77-4-507
[4]	Hamm H, Brohan U, Bohmer R, et al. (1987) Cholesterol in pleural effusion: a diagnostic acid. Chest 92: 296-302. doi: 10.1378/chest.92.2.296
[5]	Tahaoglu K, Kizkin O, EI R (1994) Alkaline phosphatase: distinguishing between pleural exudates and transudates. Chest 105: 1912-1913. doi: 10.1378/chest.105.6.1911b
[6]	Rahman MS, Siddiqui MAM, Rabbani MG, et al. (2008) Diagnostic evaluation of pleural fluid: the role of total protein and lactic dehydrogenase. JAFMC 4: 2.
[7]	Mathie P, Leers G, Henne A (2007) Differentiating transudative from exudative pleural effusion: should we measure effusion cholesterol dehydrogenase? Clin Chem Lab Med 45: 1332-1338.
[8]	Liam CK, Kim-Hatt LIM, Wong CM (2000) Causes of pleural exudates in a region with a high incidence of tuberculosis. Respirology 5: 33-38. doi: 10.1046/j.1440-1843.2000.00223.x
[9]	Kalaajieh WK (2001) Etiology of exudative pleural effusions in adults in North Lebanon. Can Respir J 8: 93-97.
[10]	Wilcox ME, Chong CA, Stanbrook MB, et al. (2014) Does this patient have an exudative pleural effusion? The Rational Clinical Examination systematic review. JAMA 311: 2422-2431.
[11]	Sánchez Hernández I, Ussetti Gil P, Delgado Cirerol V, et al. (1994) Cholesterol in pleural fluid. Its usefulness in differentiating between exudates and transudates. Arch Bronconeumol 30: 240-244.
[12]	Hamal AB, Yogi KN, Bam N, et al. (2013) Pleural fluid cholesterol in differentiating exudative and transudative pleural effusion. Pulmon Med. Doi:10.1155/2013/135036.
[13]	Jiménez Castro D, Díaz Nuevo G, Pérez-Rodríguez E (2002) Comparative analysis of Light’s criteria and other biochemical parameters to distinguish exudates from transudates. Rev Clin Esp 202: 3-6. doi: 10.1016/S0014-2565(02)70970-3

Reader Comments

Your name:*

Email:*
© 2016 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)