The mechanism of resistance-reducing/anti-adhesion and its application on biomimetic disc furrow opener

Jiyu Sun; Yueming Wang; Shujun Zhang; Yunhai Ma; Jin Tong; Zhijun Zhang; Jiyu Sun; Yueming Wang; Shujun Zhang; Yunhai Ma; Jin Tong; Zhijun Zhang

doi:10.3934/mbe.2020256

Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering

2020, Volume 17, Issue 5: 4657-4677. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2020256

Previous Article Next Article

Research article Special Issues

The mechanism of resistance-reducing/anti-adhesion and its application on biomimetic disc furrow opener

1.
Key Laboratory of Bionic Engineering (Ministry of Education), Jilin University, Changchun, 130022, P. R. China
2.
School of Computing and Technology, Gloucestershire University, Cheltenham GL50 2HR, UK
3.
Key Laboratory of CNC Equipment Reliability (Ministry of Education) and School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Jilin University, Changchun, 130022, P. R. China

Received: 26 May 2020 Accepted: 01 July 2020 Published: 07 July 2020

The black soil of Northeast China is sticky and agglomerates easily, which often adheres to the surface of a traditional furrow opener during the furrowing process. In this paper, biomimetic design principles in resistance-reducing, anti-adhesion and resistance-reducing mechanism of biomimetic disc furrow opener were studied. Nine kinds of singular convex hull, nine kinds of singular wedge and nine kinds of mixed convex hull and wedge structural biomimetic disc furrow opener were designed, and the furrowing process with the soil simulated by finite element method (FEM).Three types of biomimetic disc furrow opener with less resistance were manufactured by laser processing for comparative test in soil bin based on the simulation results. The test results showed that the resistance of the biomimetic disc furrow opener was less than that of the ordinary disc. The soil-disc stress, influence of biomimetic structures, moisture content and furrow speeds on resistance were discussed. The resistance-reducing rate of D-BC-3 reached the maximum value 15.36% at the furrow speed of 0.6 m/s and the soil moisture content of 20%. It is believed that the biomimetic design principles can provide the significant inspirations for the future design of disc furrow opener with drag reduction.
- biomimetic,
- disc furrow opener,
- resistance-reducing,
- optimal design
Citation: Jiyu Sun, Yueming Wang, Shujun Zhang, Yunhai Ma, Jin Tong, Zhijun Zhang. The mechanism of resistance-reducing/anti-adhesion and its application on biomimetic disc furrow opener[J]. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2020, 17(5): 4657-4677. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2020256

Related Papers:

Abstract

The black soil of Northeast China is sticky and agglomerates easily, which often adheres to the surface of a traditional furrow opener during the furrowing process. In this paper, biomimetic design principles in resistance-reducing, anti-adhesion and resistance-reducing mechanism of biomimetic disc furrow opener were studied. Nine kinds of singular convex hull, nine kinds of singular wedge and nine kinds of mixed convex hull and wedge structural biomimetic disc furrow opener were designed, and the furrowing process with the soil simulated by finite element method (FEM).Three types of biomimetic disc furrow opener with less resistance were manufactured by laser processing for comparative test in soil bin based on the simulation results. The test results showed that the resistance of the biomimetic disc furrow opener was less than that of the ordinary disc. The soil-disc stress, influence of biomimetic structures, moisture content and furrow speeds on resistance were discussed. The resistance-reducing rate of D-BC-3 reached the maximum value 15.36% at the furrow speed of 0.6 m/s and the soil moisture content of 20%. It is believed that the biomimetic design principles can provide the significant inspirations for the future design of disc furrow opener with drag reduction.

References

[1]	D. P. Darmora, K. P. Pandey, Evaluation of performance of furrow openers of combined seed and fertiliser drills, Soil Till. Res., 34 (1995), 127-139.
[2]	C. Sawant, A. Kumar, I. Mani, J. K. Singh, Soil bin studies on the selection of furrow opener for conservation agriculture, J. Soil Water Conserv., 15 (2016), 107-112.
[3]	P. Y. Guo, M. A. Choudhary, Preliminary studies of a modified slot opener for direct drilling seeds, New Zeal. J. Exp. Agric., 1 (1985), 85-95.
[4]	A. Bahri, R. K. Bansal, Evaluation of different combination of furrow openers and press wheels for no till seeding, Homme. Terre. Eaux., 22 (1992), 55-66.
[5]	A. Ozmerzi, Seed distribution performance of furrow openers used on drill machines, AMA-Agr. Mech. Asia AF., 17 (1986), 32-34.
[6]	F. Ahmad, D. Weimin, D. Qishuo, M. Hussain, K. Jabran, Forces and straw cutting performance of double disc furrow opener in no-till paddy soil, PLoS One, 10 (2015), e0119648.
[7]	T. Vamerali, M. Bertocco, L. Sartori, Effects of a new wide-sweep opener for no-till planter on seed zone properties and root establishment in maize (Zea mays, L.): A comparison with double-disk opener, Soil Till. Res., 89 (2006), 196-209.
[8]	A. A. Tagar, C. Ji, J. Adamowski, J. Malard, C. S. Qi, Q. S. Ding, N. A. Abbasi, Finite element simulation of soil failure patterns under soil bin and fieldtesting conditions, Soil Till. Res., 145 (2015), 157-170.
[9]	H. A. Nidal, C. R. Randall, A nonlinear 3D finite element analysis of the soil forces acting on a disk plow, Soil Till. Res., 74 (2003), 115-124.
[10]	H. Bentaher, A. Ibrahmi, E. Hamza, M. Hbaieb, G. Kantchev, A. Maalej, W. Arnold, Finite element simulation of moldboard-soil interaction, Soil Till. Res., 134 (2013), 11-16.
[11]	B. A. Collins, D. B. Fowler, Effect of soil characteristics, seeding depth, operating speed, and opener design on draft force during direct seeding, Soil Till. Res., 39 (1996), 199-211.
[12]	S. Q. Zhang, X. Ma, C. C. Zuo, C. L. Ma, H. W. Wang, Y. J. Sun, Forces acting on disk colter and computer simulation, Trans. CSAE., 11 (1995), 52-56.
[13]	S. Q. Zhang, C. C. Zuo, C. L. Ma, The study on the model of disc coulter force, Trans. CSAM, 29 (1998), 71-75.
[14]	J. L. Jiang, L. N. Gong, M. F. Wang, Study on the working performance of the no-tillage planter unit, Trans. CSAE, 16 (2000), 64-66.
[15]	E. M. Tice, J. G. Hendricks, Disc coulter forces: evaluation of mathematical models, Trans. ASAE, 34 (1991), 2291-2298.
[16]	J. Tong, B. Z. Moayad, Y. H. Ma, J. Y. Sun, D. H. Chen, H. L. Jia, L. Q. Ren, Effects of biomimetic surface designs on furrow opener performance, J. Bionic. Eng., 6 (2009), 280-289.
[17]	L.Q. Ren, Progress in the bionic study on anti-adhesion and resistance-reducing of terrain machines, Sci. China Ser. E., 52 (2009), 273-284.
[18]	L. Q. Ren, D. X. Chen, J. G. Hu, Preliminary analysis on the rules of decreasing viscosity and removing rabbits of soil animals, J. Agr. Eng., 6 (1993), 15-20.
[19]	B. C. Cheng, L. Q. Ren, X. B. Xu, Bionic study on soil adhesion (two) A preliminary study on the anti-viscosity and desorption of the body surface of typical soil animals, J. Agr. Eng., 6 (1990), 2-6.
[20]	L. Q. Ren, Experimental Design and Optimization, Science Press, (2009).
[21]	D. W. Bechert, M. Bruse, W. Hage, J. G. T. van der Hoeven, G. Hoppe, Experimentson drag reducing surfaces and their optimization with an adjustable geometry, J. Fluid Mech., 338 (1997), 59-87.
[22]	J. B. Zhang, J. Tong, Y. H. Ma, Abrasive wear characteristics of subsoiler tines with bionic rib structure surface, Jilin Daxue Xuebao (Gongxueban),45 (2015), 174-180.
[23]	Z. J. Zhang, H. L. Jia, J. Y. Sun, Abrasive wear characteristics of subsoiler tines with bionic rib structure surface, Adv. Mech. Eng., 7 (2015), 1-11.
[24]	V. Zorba, E. Stratakis, M. Barberoglou, E. Spanakis, C. Fotakis, Biomimetic artificial surfaces quantitatively reproduce the water repellency of a lotus leaf, Adv. Mater., 20 (2008), 4049-4054.
[25]	H. Lee, B. P. Lee, P. B. Messersmith, A reversible wet/dry adhesive inspired by mussels and geckos, Nature, 448(2007), 338-341.
[26]	X. Li, T. Chen, Enhancement and suppression effects of a nanopatterned surface on bacterial adhesion, Phys. Rev. E, 93(2016), 52419.
[27]	D. C. Zeng, Mechanical Soil Dynamics, Beijing Science and Technology Press, (1995).
[28]	L. D. Bevel, W. H. Gardner, W. R. Gardner, Soil Physics, John Wiley & Sons., (1956).
[29]	P. G. Huray, Maxwell's Equations, Wiley-IEEE Press, (2009).
[30]	D. H. Qian, J. X. Zhang, A summary of study of adhesion and friction between soil and metals, Trans. CSAM, 1 (1984), 71-80.
[31]	D. H. Qian, A summary of study of adhesion and friction between soil and metals, Trans. CSAM, 2 (1965), 47-52.
[32]	L. Q. Ren, Soil Adhesion Mechanics, China Machine Press, (2011).
[33]	R. E. Baier, E. G. Shafrin, W. A. Zisman, Adhesion: mechanisms that assist or impede it, Science, 162 (1968), 1360-1368.
[34]	R. A. Fisher, Further note on the capillary forces in an ideal soil, J. Agr. Sci., 18 (1928), 406-410.
[35]	M. L. Nichols, The sliding of metal over soil, Agric. Eng., 6 (1925), 80-84.
[36]	W. B. Haines, Studies in the physical properties of soils: I. Mechanical properties concerned in cultivation, J. Agr. Sci., 15 (1925), 178-200.
[37]	S. Q. Deng, L. Q. Ren, Y. Liu, Z. W. Han, Tangent resistance of soil on moldboard and the mechanism of resistance reduction of bionic moldboard, J. Bionic Eng., 2 (2005), 33-46.
[38]	L. Q. Ren, J. Tong, J. Q. Li, B. C. Chen, Soil adhesion and biomimetics of soil-engaging components: a review, J. Agr. Eng. Res., 79 (2001), 239-263.
[39]	W. R. Gill, C. E. Vandenberg, Soil Dynamics in Tillage and Traction, Chinese Agricultural Machinery Press, (1983).
[40]	B. A. Lewis, Manual for LS-DYNA Soil Material Model 147, Federal Highway Administration, (2004).
[41]	I. Ahmadi, Development and assessment of a draft force calculator for disk plow using the laws of classical mechanics, Soil Till. Res.,163 (2016), 32-40.
[42]	A. Armin, R. Fotouhin, W. Szyszkowski, On the FE modeling of soil-blade interaction in tillage operations, Finite Elem. Anal. Des., 92 (2014), 1-11.
[43]	N. Eu-Gene, D. K. Aspinwall, Modeling of hard part machining, J. Mater. Process. Tech., 127 (2002), 222-229.
[44]	J. M. Huang, J. T. Black, An evaluation of chip separation criteria for the fem simulation of machining, J. Manuf. Sci. Eng., 118 (1996), 461-469.
[45]	A. P. Markopoulos, Finite Element Method in Machining Process, Springer, (2013).
[46]	A. Z. Shmulevich, D. Rubinstein, Interaction between soil and a wide cutting blade using the discrete element method, Soil Till. Res., 97 (2007), 37-50.
[47]	D. L. Jing, S. K. Yi, Electroosmotic flow in tree-like branching microchannel network, Fractals, 27 (2019), 1950095.
[48]	D. L. Jing, J. Song, Y. Sui, Hydraulic and thermal performances of laminar flow in fractal treelike branching microchannel network with wall velocity slip, Fractals, 28 (2020), 2050022.
[49]	X. Jia, Unsmooth cuticles of soil animals and theoretical analysis of their hydrophobicity and anti-soil-adhesion mechanism, J. Colloid Inter. Sci., 295 (2006), 490-494.
[50]	E. R. Fountaine, Investigations into the mechanism of soil adhesion, J. Soil Sci., 5 (1954), 251-263.
[51]	F. M. Fowkes, Additivity of intermolecular forces at interfaces. I determination of the contribution to surface and interfacial tensions of dispersion forces in various liquids, J. Phys. C, 67 (1963), 2538-2541.
[52]	I. Lifshitz, The kinetics of precipitation from supersaturated solid solutions, J. Phys. Chem. Solid, 19 (1961), 35-50
[53]	J. Bachmann, A. Ellies, K.H. Hartgea, Development and application of a new sessile drop contact angle method to assess soil water repellency, J. Hydrol., 231-232 (2000), 66-75.

Reader Comments

Your name:*

Email:*
© 2020 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)