Processing math: 100%
Review Topical Sections

V2O5 thin films for energy storage and conversion

  • V2O5 is one of the best material for many applications. Progress is currently made to improve its performance for use as a sensor, or an electrode, or smart window, electrochromic device, supercapacitor, photovoltaic applications among others. In this work, we review the progress that has been done these recent years, in relation to the mode of preparation of the V2O5 films. The results outline the complex relationship between the synthesis and the properties, which should serve as a guide for further research on the dependence of the best synthesis process on the type of application that is targeted.

    Citation: Alain Mauger, Christian M. Julien. V2O5 thin films for energy storage and conversion[J]. AIMS Materials Science, 2018, 5(3): 349-401. doi: 10.3934/matersci.2018.3.349

    Related Papers:

    [1] Lei Chen, Ruyun Qu, Xintong Liu . Improved multi-label classifiers for predicting protein subcellular localization. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2024, 21(1): 214-236. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2024010
    [2] Hangle Hu, Chunlei Cheng, Qing Ye, Lin Peng, Youzhi Shen . Enhancing traditional Chinese medicine diagnostics: Integrating ontological knowledge for multi-label symptom entity classification. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2024, 21(1): 369-391. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2024017
    [3] Jiyun Shen, Yiyi Xia, Yiming Lu, Weizhong Lu, Meiling Qian, Hongjie Wu, Qiming Fu, Jing Chen . Identification of membrane protein types via deep residual hypergraph neural network. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2023, 20(11): 20188-20212. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2023894
    [4] Yanping Xie, Zhaohui Dong, Junhua Du, Xiaoliang Zang, Huihui Guo, Min Liu, Shengwen Shao . The relationship between mouse lung adenocarcinoma at different stages and the expression level of exosomes in serum. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2020, 17(2): 1548-1557. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2020080
    [5] Cicely K. Macnamara, Mark A. J. Chaplain . Spatio-temporal models of synthetic genetic oscillators. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2017, 14(1): 249-262. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2017016
    [6] Hacı İsmail Aslan, Hoon Ko, Chang Choi . Classification of vertices on social networks by multiple approaches. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2022, 19(12): 12146-12159. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2022565
    [7] Yongyin Han, Maolin Liu, Zhixiao Wang . Key protein identification by integrating protein complex information and multi-biological features. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2023, 20(10): 18191-18206. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2023808
    [8] Wenjun Xu, Zihao Zhao, Hongwei Zhang, Minglei Hu, Ning Yang, Hui Wang, Chao Wang, Jun Jiao, Lichuan Gu . Deep neural learning based protein function prediction. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2022, 19(3): 2471-2488. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2022114
    [9] Feng Wang, Xiaochen Feng, Ren Kong, Shan Chang . Generating new protein sequences by using dense network and attention mechanism. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2023, 20(2): 4178-4197. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2023195
    [10] Kunli Zhang, Shuai Zhang, Yu Song, Linkun Cai, Bin Hu . Double decoupled network for imbalanced obstetric intelligent diagnosis. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2022, 19(10): 10006-10021. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2022467
  • V2O5 is one of the best material for many applications. Progress is currently made to improve its performance for use as a sensor, or an electrode, or smart window, electrochromic device, supercapacitor, photovoltaic applications among others. In this work, we review the progress that has been done these recent years, in relation to the mode of preparation of the V2O5 films. The results outline the complex relationship between the synthesis and the properties, which should serve as a guide for further research on the dependence of the best synthesis process on the type of application that is targeted.


    Protein is a major component for almost all living creatures. It is highly related to the maintenance of normal physical functions in cells [1]. Several complicated and essential biological processes need proteins to participate in, such as cell proliferation [2], DNA replication [3], enzyme-mediated metabolic processes [4], etc. Furthermore, protein provides important contributions to construct basic cellular structure, maintain cellular microenvironment and form complex macrostructures. Thus, the research of protein-related problems is quite hot in recent years. Determination of the functions of proteins is one of the essential problems. Experimental determination is a solid method. However, it also has some evident shortcomings, such as high cost and low efficiency. Thus, it is of great urgency to design novel methods with low cost and high efficiency.

    In recent years, several computational methods have been designed to identify protein functions. Most of them are data-driven methods. Based on lots of proteins with annotated functions, which can be obtained from some public databases, models were set up by using some existing or newly designed computer algorithms. The basic computational method to identify protein functions is based on protein sequence similarity measured by BLAST [5]. Other methods, such as sequence motif based methods (PROSITE) [6], profile-based methods (PFAM) [7], structure-based methods (FATCAT and ProCAT) [8], were also proposed to identify protein functions. In recent years, network-based methods become more and more popular to tackle some protein-related problems. Two previous studies employed protein network information to design hybrid approaches for the identification of protein functions. The method that adopted protein network information is an important step to identify protein functions [9,10]. Other steps used methods based on protein sequence similarity or biochemical and physicochemical description of proteins. Most established methods always focused on proteins, analyzing their sequences, properties, etc. Few studies considered function labels. As inspired by some studies on drug-related problems [11,12], which considered label information and improved the performance of classifiers, the associations of function labels may also be important information for protein function identification.

    In this study, we constructed a multi-label classifier with a label space partition to identify protein functions. To conduct this investigation, we selected proteins of mouse, one of the most extensively studied organisms, as the research object. Proteins and their function annotations were retrieved from MfunGD [13]. 24 functional types were reported in such database. A label space partition method, incorporating Louvain method [14], was applied to analyze the associations of 24 functional types, resulting in some subsets of types. To prove such partition can improve the performance of classifiers, we set up several classifiers with RAndom k-labELsets (RAKEL) [15], with support vector machine (SVM) [16] or random forest (RF) [17] as the base classifier. On each type subset, a multi-label classifier was set up and they were integrated in the proposed classifiers. The results indicated that classifiers with a label space partition were always superior to those without considering the partition of functional types. Furthermore, these classifiers also provided better performance than those with a random partition of functional types.

    We sourced the mouse proteins and their functional types from one previous study [9]. This information was retrieved from MfunGD (http://mips.gsf.de/genre/proj/mfungd/) [13], a public database collecting annotated mouse proteins and their occurrence in protein networks. In such database, mouse proteins were classified into 24 types, which are illustrated in Figure 1. The types of each mouse protein were determined by manually checking its annotation in the literature and GO annotation [18,19]. Because we encoded mouse proteins according to their functional domain or interaction information, those without these two types of information were excluded. Finally, a dataset consisting of 9655 mouse proteins were constructed. These proteins were also classified into above mentioned 24 functional types. The number of proteins in each functional type is also shown in Figure 1. It was easy to obtain that the sum of protein numbers in all 24 types were 29850, which was much larger than the number of different mouse proteins (9655). This fact implied that several proteins belonged to two or more functional types. Determination of functional types of mouse proteins was evidently a multi-label classification problem if functional types were deemed as labels.

    Figure 1.  Pie chart to show the number of mouse proteins in each functional type.

    As mentioned above, mouse proteins in MfunGD were classified into 24 functional types and assigning these types to given proteins was a multi-label classification problem, where types were termed as labels. Due to the number of labels, it was difficult to directly build powerful multi-label classifiers. The partition of label set may be helpful to optimize classifiers as inspired by some studies on drug-related problems [11,12]. Thus, this section proposed a label space partition method to divide labels into some label subsets.

    To implement this method, a label network was constructed first. Given a training dataset D with h labels (h = 24 in this study), denoted by l1,l2,,lh, the label set for one sample s was defined as L(s). For each label li(1ih), samples having such label constituted a sample subset, denoted as SL(li), that is

    SL(li)={s:sD and liL(s)} (1)

    The label network defined labels as nodes and two nodes were connected by an edge if and only if their corresponding labels, say li and lj, had common samples, that is SL(li)SL(lj). Furthermore, a weight was assigned to each edge for indicating the different association strength of labels. For an edge e, its weight was defined by

    w(e)=|SL(li)SL(lj)| (2)

    where li and lj were the endpoints of edge e. For an easy description, let us denoted such label network by NL.

    The Louvain method [14], a community detection algorithm, was performed on the label network NL to classify labels into some subsets. Such method adopts a greedy aggregation scheme to detect communities such that nodes in each detected community have strong associations. Initially, each node in the network constitutes a community. A loop procedure is executed. In each round, two communities are selected and merged when such merging can provide highest contribution to modularity. For a node n and community C, the gain in modularity, denoted by ΔQ, by merging n and C is defined as

    ΔQ=[Σin+kn,in2m(Σtot+kn2m)2][Σin2m(Σtot2m)2(kn2m)2] (3)

    where Σin stands for the overall weights of edges inside C, Σtot stands for the overall weights of edges adjacent to nodes in C, kn,in represents the overall weights of edges connecting n and nodes in C, kn denotes the overall weights of edges adjacent to n, m is the overall weights of edges in the network. For each node n, the gain in modularity by merging it and each of its neighbor is computed. The merging producing the highest gain in modularity is selected and a new network is constructed. In details, if such merging involves node n and community C, the new network combines n and community C, producing a new node n. The weight of an edge connecting n and another node n in the network is updated as the overall weights of edges connecting n (C) and n. In the next round, above procedure is executed on the new network. The loop stops until the gain in modularity cannot be positive. The remaining communities in the network indicate a label partition.

    In this study, the Louvain method was performed on the label network NL. By refining its outcome, we can access a label partition. Let us denote the label partition as L1,L2,,Lt.

    Efficient classifiers always adopt informative features of samples, which contain essential properties of samples as much as possible. This study employed two schemes to encode each mouse protein. The first scheme extracted features derived from functional domain information of proteins through a natural language processing approach, whereas the second one generated features from several protein-protein interaction (PPI) networks. Their descriptions were as below.

    Functional domain information is deemed to be useful to investigate various protein-related problems [20,21,22,23,24]. Here, we also adopted such information to encode each mouse protein.

    We retrieved the functional domain information of all mouse proteins from InterPro database (http://www.ebi.ac.uk/interpro/, accessed in October 2020) [25]. This information contained 48739 mouse proteins, covering 16797 domains. Each domain was termed as words, whereas mouse proteins, annotated by domains, were deemed as sentences. Then, such above information was fed into the well-known natural language processing approach, word2vec [26,27], to learn embedding features of domains. As a result, each domain was encoded by a 256-D feature vector. Here, the word2vec program retrieved from https://github.com/RaRe-Technologies/gensim was adopted. It was executed with its default parameters.

    The feature vectors of domains were further refined to represent each mouse protein. For each mouse protein, it was encoded by a vector, which was defined as the average of vectors of domains that were annotated on such protein. Thus, each protein was also represented by 256 features. For convenience, such obtained features were called domain embedding features.

    Network has been deemed to be a popular research form because it can organize objects at a system level. However, a gap exists between network and traditional machine learning algorithms. This gap promotes the process of network embedding algorithms, which can abstract linkage in one or more networks and learn features for each node in the network(s). In recent years, several network embedding algorithms, such as DeepWalk [28], Node2vec [29], and Mashup [30], etc. have been proposed. Some of them have been applied to tackle different protein-related problems [30,31,32,33,34]. Features obtained by network embedding algorithms are quite different from those extracted from inherent properties of samples and can reflect different aspects of samples. Here, we adopted Mashup to extract features of mouse proteins from several PPI networks.

    We used the mouse PPI information collected in STRING (https://www.string-db.org/, Version 10.0) [35], a public database containing interaction of 9, 643, 763 proteins from 2031 organisms. Interactions in this database are derived from five main sources: Genomic context predictions, High-throughput lab experiments, (Conserved) Co-expression, Automated textmining, Previous knowledge in databases. Accordingly, they can widely evaluate the associations of proteins. The mouse PPI information involves 20648 mouse proteins and 5, 109, 107 interactions. Each interaction is assigned eight scores, where the first seven scores measure the association of proteins from some aspect of proteins and they are integrated in the last score. For each of first seven scores, a PPI network was constructed, where proteins were defined as nodes and two nodes were connected by an edge when their corresponding proteins can constitute a PPI with such score larger than zero. In addition, this score was assigned to the edge as its weight. Accordingly, seven PPI networks were built, which can be used to extract informative features of mouse proteins.

    The network embedding algorithm, Mashup [30], was executed on above constructed seven PPI networks. To our knowledge, it is the only network embedding algorithm that can process multiple networks. This method contains two stages to extract features for each node. In the first stage, each node in each network is assigned a raw feature vector on the basis of random walk with restart algorithm [36,37]. In this way, several raw feature vectors are produced for the same node. It is necessary to combine them into one vector. At the same time, the dimensionality reduction is also inevitable because of the high dimension of raw feature vectors, which is equal to the node number in the network. All these are done in the second stage. It supposes a uniform vector for each node and a context vector for any node in any network. Based on them, it produces an approximate vector for any node in any network. The optimal components in above two types of vectors were determined by solving an optimized problem such that the produced approximate vectors based on them should be approximate to raw feature vectors as much as possible. For details, please refer to reference [30].

    This study adopted the Mashup program downloaded from http://cb.csail.mit.edu/cb/mashup/. Likewise, it was executed with the default parameters. For the dimension of feature vectors, we tried various values between 100 and 300. For convenience, features produced by Mashup were called network embedding features.

    Accordingly, each mouse protein can be represented by three forms: (1) domain embedding features; (2) network embedding features; (3) domain and network embedding features.

    As mentioned in Section 2.1, several mouse proteins belonged to two or more functional types. A natural way to assign types to given proteins is to design a multi-label classifier. Generally, there are two schemes to construct multi-label classifiers: problem transformation and algorithm adaption [38]. The former one transforms the original multi-label classification problem into some single-label classification problems. The later one generalizes the single-label classification algorithm so that it can process samples with more than one labels. Here, we adopted a widely used problem transformation method, called RAKEL [15], to construct the multi-label classifier.

    RAKEL is a generalized method of label powerset (LP) algorithm. Given a dataset with h labels, say l1,l2,,lh, randomly construct m label subsets, each of which consists of k labels. For each of these label subsets, new labels are defined as the members in its power set. These new labels are assigned to samples based on their original labels. After such operation, each sample is assigned only one new label. Samples with their new labels constitute a new dataset. A classifier is set up by training some single-label classification algorithm on such new dataset. Accordingly, m classifiers can be set up, which are integrated in RAKEL. For a query sample x, each classifier gives a binary prediction result (0 or 1) for each label li. RAKEL calculates the average vote rate for each label li. When the average vote rate is greater than a given threshold (Generally, it is set to 0.5), li is assigned to x. For an easy description, classifiers built by RAKEL were termed RAKEL classifiers in this study. To quickly implement RAKEL, the tool "RAKEL" in Meka (http://waikato.github.io/meka/) [39] was directly employed. The main parameters of RAKEL, m and k, were tuned in this study.

    As mentioned in Section 2.2, all labels can be divided into t partitions, say L1,L2,,Lt. For each partition, a new dataset is constructed by restricting labels of each sample into this partition. For instance, if one sample is assigned three labels, say l1,l2,l3 and l1,l3 belongs to one partition, this sample is assigned l1,l3 as its labels in the new dataset. Accordingly, a RAKEL classifier is built on the new constructed dataset. The final classifier integrates these RAKEL classifiers by collecting their results. In detail, for a query sample, each RAKEL classifier yields its prediction (i.e., a label subset). The final prediction is the union of label subsets yielded by all RAKEL classifiers.

    When building the RAKEL classifiers, a single-label classification algorithm is needed. In this study, two powerful classification algorithms were employed: SVM [16] and RF [17].

    SVM is a popular classification algorithm based on statistical learning theory [31,34,40,41,42,43,44,45,46]. Its principle is to use a kernel function to map samples from the original space to a higher-dimensional feature space so that samples are linearly separable in the new space. So far, several types of SVM have been designed to process different problems. Here, one type of SVM was adopted. The sequential minimal optimization (SMO) algorithm [47] was employed to optimize the training procedures of this type of SVM. A polynomial kernel or an RBF kernel was set as its kernel.

    RF is another powerful classification algorithm, which has been widely applied to tackle various biological problems [48,49,50,51,52,53,54]. In fact, it is an ensemble algorithm, integrating several decision trees. To set up each decision tree, it randomly selects samples from the given dataset, with replacement, and features to extend the tree at each node. For a query sample, all decision trees provide their predictions. These predictions are integrated in RF by majority voting. It is widely accepted that decision tree is a relative weak classifier. However, RF is much more powerful [55].

    The above SVM and RF algorithms are all implemented by corresponding tools in Meka [39]. These tools were directly employed in this study.

    All multi-label classifiers constructed in this study were assessed by ten-fold cross-validation [56]. Such method first divides the original dataset, denoted by D, into 10 mutually exclusive subsets with similar size, i.e., D=D1D2D10,DiDj=(ij,1i,j10). Each subset, say Di, is picked up as test dataset and remaining nine subsets constitute the training dataset. The classifier built on the training dataset is applied to the test dataset. Thus, each sample is exactly tested once.

    For the results of ten-fold cross-validation, we can compute some measurements to assess the quality of results. In this study, we employed three widely used measurements in multi-label classification: accuracy, exact matching and hamming loss. To list their formulas, some notations are necessary. Given a dataset with n samples and m labels, suppose that Li and Li are the sets of true labels and predicted labels, respectively, of the ith sample. Above three measurements can be computed by

    {Accuracy=1nni=1(LiLiLiLi)Exact           match=1nni=1(Li,Li)Hamming           loss=1nni=1(LiLiLiLim) (4)

    where is defined as below:

    (Li,Li)={1if Li is identifical to Li0otherwise (5)

    Evidently, the high accuracy and exact match indicate the good performance of the classifier, whereas it is on the contrary for hamming loss.

    When comparing the performance of different classifiers, different results may be concluded according to different measurements. The ranges of accuracy, exact match and hamming loss are all between 0 and 1. Accuracy and exact match have the same trend to represent the performance of classifiers, that is, higher value represents higher performance; whereas hamming loss suggest the contrary trend, that is, lower value suggests higher performance. Thus, we refined hamming loss as 1-hamming loss to make it having the same trend as accuracy and exact match. In this case, accuracy, exact match and 1-hamming loss can multiply together to define a new measurement, called integrated score in this study, formulated by

    Integrated score=AccuracyExact match(1hamming loss) (6)

    The higher the integrated score, the higher the performance of the classifier. This measurement has also used in some previous studies [45,57].

    In this study, we proposed a multi-label classifier to identify mouse protein functions, incorporating the procedure of analyzing the associations of functional types. Two types of features (domain and network embedding features) were adopted to encode proteins. RAKEL was employed to construct classifiers. The entire procedures are illustrated in Figure 2. In this section, the detailed evaluation results would be given and some comparisons were conducted.

    Figure 2.  Entire procedures for constructing and evaluating the multi-label classifier. Mouse proteins and their functional annotations (types) are retrieved from MfunGD. The types are analyzed by Louvain method, generating some label partitions. Proteins are represented by two feature types, where one is derived from functional domains via Word2vec and the other is derived from protein-protein interaction networks via Mashup. For each label partition, a classifier is built by RAKEL with support vector machine (SVM) or random forest (RF) as base classifier based on each type of features or both of them. The final multi-label classifier integrates above classifiers and it is assessed by ten-fold cross-validation.

    For the protein features derived from its functional domain information, we adopted RAKEL with a certain base classifier to construct multi-label classifiers. Three base classifiers were tried in this study: (1) SVM with polynomial kernel, (2) SVM with RBF kernel, (3) RF. For two types of SVM, the regularization parameter C was set to 0.5, 1 and 2, the exponent of polynomial kernel was set to its default value (one) and the parameter γ of RBF kernel was also set to its default value (0.01). As for RF, its main parameter, number of decision trees, was tuned, including various values between 10 and 300. The main parameter m for RAKEL was set to its default value 10, the other parameter k of RAKEL was wet to 2, 3, 4, 5. The grid search was adopted to set up all RAKEL classifiers, which were assessed by ten-fold cross-validation, and extract the optimum parameters for each base classifier. The best performance, measured by integrated score, for each base classifier is provided in Table 1, in which the best parameters for each base classifier are also provided. The integrated scores for three base classifiers were 0.1026, 0.0611 and 0.1574. Evidently, the RAKEL classifier with RF provided the best performance. Its accuracy, exact match and hamming loss were 0.6025, 0.2806 and 0.0687, respectively, which were all best compared with those of RAKEL classifiers with other two base classifiers. At a glance, these three RAKEL classifiers were not good enough. However, they were better than classifiers without label partition, which would be elaborated in Section 3.4.

    Table 1.  Performance of RAKEL classifiers with different base classifiers on domain embedding features.
    Base classifier Parameter Accuracy Exact match Hamming loss Integrated score
    Support vector machine
    (Polynomial kernel)
    m = 10, k = 5, C = 2, exponent = 1 0.5329 0.2087 0.0777 0.1026
    Support vector machine
    (RBF kernel)
    m = 10, k = 5, C = 2, γ = 0.01 0.4643 0.1441 0.0872 0.0611
    Random forest m = 10, k = 3, number of decision trees = 250 0.6025 0.2806 0.0687 0.1574

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    In addition, to fully evaluate the best RAKEL classifier with a certain base classifier, it was further assessed by ten-fold cross-validation for ten times. The performance under ten-fold cross-validation for ten times is shown in Figure 3, from which we can see that all four measurements yielded by each RAKEL classifier varied in a small range, indicating the classifiers with label partition were quite stable no matter how samples were divided.

    Figure 3.  Box plot to show the performance of three RAKEL classifiers using domain embedding features. (A) Accuracy; (B) Exact match; (C) Hamming loss; (D) Integrated score.

    For the network embedding features derived from seven protein networks, a similar procedure was conducted. The same parameters were tried for three base classifiers and RAKEL. Furthermore, the dimension of features was also tuned, including 100, 150, 200, 250 and 300. The grid search was also used to build all RAKEL classifiers, which were further assessed by ten-fold cross-validation. The best RAKEL classifier with a certain base classifier was found and its performance is listed in Table 2. The optimum parameters for each base classifier are also provided in this table. The integrated scores for three base classifiers were 0.1308, 0.0714 and 0.1269, respectively. Clearly, the RAKEL classifier with SVM (polynomial kernel) generated the best performance, where the accuracy, exact match and hamming loss were 0.5853, 0.2407 and 0.0713. These measurements were best among those yielded by three RAKEL classifiers listed in Table 2. Compared with the performance of RAKEL classifiers based on domain embedding features, the superiority of RAKEL classifiers with network embedding features depended on the base classifier. The SVM base classifier gave better performance, whereas RF base classifier yielded lower performance.

    Table 2.  Performance of RAKEL classifiers with different base classifiers on network embedding features.
    Base classifier Parameter Accuracy Exact match Hamming loss Integrated score
    Support vector machine
    (Polynomial kernel)
    m = 10, k = 5, C = 2, exponent = 1, feature dimension = 300 0.5853 0.2407 0.0713 0.1308
    Support vector machine
    (RBF kernel)
    m = 10, k = 3, C = 2, γ = 0.01, feature dimension=300 0.5020 0.1551 0.0824 0.0714
    Random forest m = 10, k = 5, number of decision trees = 250, feature dimension = 150 0.5727 0.2385 0.0714 0.1269

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    Likewise, for the best RAKEL classifiers with different base classifiers, they were further evaluated by additional ten-fold cross-validation for ten times. A box plot was shown in Figure 4 for each measurement. It is easy to see that each measurement of each classifier was changed in a small range, suggesting the stability of three RAKEL classifiers. This result was almost same as those based on the domain embedding features.

    Figure 4.  Box plot to show the performance of three RAKEL classifiers using network embedding features. (A) Accuracy; (B) Exact match; (C) Hamming loss; (D) Integrated score.

    Two types of features were adopted in this study to represent mouse proteins. They indicated essential properties of proteins from different aspects. The combination of these two types of features can be helpful to construct more efficient classifiers. Thus, we constructed RAKEL classifiers using both domain and network embedding features. To save time, we only tried the parameters listed in Tables 1 and 2. The best performance of RAKEL classifiers with different base classifiers are provided in Table 3. The integrated scores for three base classifiers were 0.1619, 0.1096 and 0.1731, respectively. Each of them was higher than the RAKEL classifiers with the same base classifier and domain or network embedding features. Furthermore, it can be observed from Tables 1-3 that given the same base classifier, the classifier with domain and network embedding features always generated higher accuracy, exact match and lower hamming loss than that with only domain or network embedding features. Therefore, the domain and network embedding features can complement each other so that their combination can improve the performance of classifiers.

    Table 3.  Performance of RAKEL classifiers with different base classifiers on domain and network embedding features.
    Base classifier Parameter Accuracy Exact match Hamming loss Integrated score
    Support vector machine
    (Polynomial kernel)
    m = 10, k = 5, C = 2, exponent = 1, network embedding feature dimension = 300 0.6242 0.2777 0.0660 0.1619
    Support vector machine
    (RBF kernel)
    m = 10, k = 5, C = 2, γ = 0.01, network embedding feature dimension = 300 0.5439 0.2177 0.0743 0.1096
    Random forest m = 10, k = 5, number of decision trees = 250, network embedding feature dimension = 150 0.6235 0.2963 0.0633 0.1731

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    In this study, the label partition was employed to construct multi-label classifiers for identifying functions of mouse proteins. To elaborate the merits of label partition, we also built RAKEL classifiers that did not adopt the label partition. All parameters for three base classifiers and RAKEL were tried for each feature type. All such classifiers were also assessed by ten-fold cross-validation.

    For the classifiers with each base classifier and domain embedding features, we plotted a violin to show their performance on each measurement under different parameters, as shown in Figure 5. For an easy comparison, those yielded by classifiers that employed the label partition were also provided in this figure. It can be observed that the accuracy, exact match and integrated score yielded by classifiers with label partition were all higher than those obtained by classifiers without label partition. As for the hamming loss, it was on the contrary. All these indicated that the employment of label partition can improve the performance of classifiers. For the other feature type, network embedding features, same tests were conducted. The violins of four measurements are illustrated in Figure 6. The same conclusion can be concluded, that is, the classifiers with label partition were generally superior to those without label partition.

    Figure 5.  Violin plot to compare RAKEL classifiers using domain embedding features with or without label partition. Red violins are for RAKEL classifiers with label partition and green violins are for RAKEL classifiers without label partition. (A) Accuracy; (B) Exact match; (C) Hamming loss; (D) Integrated score.
    Figure 6.  Violin plot to compare RAKEL classifiers using network embedding features with or without label partition. Red violins are for RAKEL classifiers with label partition and green violins are for RAKEL classifiers without label partition. (A) Accuracy; (B) Exact match; (C) Hamming loss; (D) Integrated score.

    For the classifiers using both domain and network embedding features, we tested them with parameters listed in Table 3 when the label space partition procedure was not used. The results of ten-fold cross-validation are listed in Table 4. Evidently, classifiers without label partition were much inferior to those with label partition, suggesting the effectiveness of the label partition.

    Table 4.  Performance of RAKEL classifiers using domain and network embedding features but without label partition.
    Base classifier Parameter Accuracy Exact match Hamming loss Integrated score
    Support vector machine
    (Polynomial kernel)
    m = 10, k = 5, C = 2, exponent = 1, network embedding feature dimension = 300 0.5059 0.1507 0.0781 0.0703
    Support vector machine
    (RBF kernel)
    m = 10, k = 5, C = 2, γ = 0.01, network embedding feature dimension=300 0.4485 0.1112 0.0848 0.0456
    Random forest m = 10, k = 5, number of decision trees = 250, network embedding feature dimension = 150 0.5069 0.1608 0.0762 0.0753

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    The classifiers proposed in this study adopted the label partition yielded by Louvain method. To confirm such obtained partition was really helpful to improve the performance of classifiers, we employed the random label partition, which randomly divided class labels into some partitions. To give a far comparison, the distribution of partition sizes in random partition was same as that in the partition yielded by Louvain method. On each random partition, the best RAKEL classifier with each base classifier and each feature type was built and assessed by ten-fold cross-validation. Such procedures executed ten times for different random partitions. The performance (integrated score) of each RAKEL classifier on two feature types is shown in Figures 7 and 8, respectively. For easy comparisons, the performance of RAKEL classifiers with partition yielded by Louvain method under ten-fold cross-validation for ten times was also listed in these two figures. It can be observed that when the base classifier was SVM (polynomial kernel) or RF, the RAKEL classifiers with partition yielded by Louvain method always generated better performance. As for the base classifier, SVM (RBF kernel), its superiority was not very obvious. It provided relatively better performance using domain embedding features. However, for network embedding features, classifiers with partition yielded by Louvain method were not always better than those with random partition. As a whole, classifiers with partition yielded by Louvain method were superior to those with random partition. The reasonable partition of class labels can further improve the performance of classifiers.

    Figure 7.  Violin plot to compare RAKEL classifiers using domain embedding features with partition yielded by Louvain method and random partition. Red violins indicate integrated scores yielded by classifiers with partition yielded by Louvain method, black violins represent integrated scores yielded by classifiers with random partition. (A) SVM (polynomial kernel) is the base classifier; (B) SVM (RBF kernel) is the base classifier; (C) RF is the base classifier.
    Figure 8.  Violin plot to compare RAKEL classifiers using network embedding features with partition yielded by Louvain method and random partition. Red violins indicate integrated scores yielded by classifiers with partition yielded by Louvain method, black violins represent integrated scores yielded by classifiers with random partition. (A) SVM (polynomial kernel) is the base classifier; (B) SVM (RBF kernel) is the base classifier; (C) RF is the base classifier.

    For the classifiers with both domain and network embedding features, we also compared them with those using random partition. The performance of classifier with each base classifier and random partition is listed in Table 5. Compared with results listed in Table 3, classifiers with partition yielded by Louvain method always produced higher accuracy, exact match and integrated score. As for hamming loss, classifiers with random partition yielded lower values when SVM was the base classifier. However, this cannot change the fact that classifiers with partition yielded by Louvain method were superior to the classifiers with random partition.

    Table 5.  Performance of RAKEL classifiers using domain and network embedding features but with random label partition.
    Base classifier Parameter Accuracy Exact match Hamming loss Integrated score
    Support vector machine
    (Polynomial kernel)
    m = 10, k = 5, C = 2, exponent = 1, network embedding feature dimension = 300 0.6177 0.2705 0.0654 0.1562
    Support vector machine
    (RBF kernel)
    m = 10, k = 5, C = 2, γ = 0.01, network embedding feature dimension=300 0.5427 0.2138 0.0737 0.1075
    Random forest m = 10, k = 5, number of decision trees = 250, network embedding feature dimension = 150 0.6195 0.2952 0.0635 0.1713

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    In references [9,10], two hybrid classifiers were proposed to identify functions of mouse proteins. They contained one network-based classifier, which was constructed based on PPI information reported in STRING. For a query protein, this classifier assigned a score to each of 24 functional types. Then, 24 types were sorted by the decreasing order of corresponding scores. Evidently, this classifier cannot determine which types were the predicted types. To compare with our classifiers, we employed a threshold for such score so that this classifier can determine the predicted types. Various thresholds were tried for this classifier, which was assessed by ten-fold cross-validation for ten times. The highest integrated score was only 0.0160, which was much lower than those listed in Tables 1-3. The accuracy was 0.2532, exact match was 0.0706 and hamming loss was 0.1059. Clearly, such performance was much lower than that of any above-mentioned classifier. This result indicated that the classifiers proposed in this study were superior to this previous classifier.

    As mentioned above, the usage of label partition improved the performance of multi-label classifiers. The final classifier should use the label partition on the whole dataset. This section gave analyses on 24 functional types (labels).

    First, we constructed a protein subset for each label, which consisted of all proteins having this label. For any two labels, their associations were evaluated by the Tanimoto coefficient of their corresponding protein subsets. A heat map was plotted to show Tanimoto coefficients for any two functional types, as illustrated in Figure 9. It can be observed that class 14 (TRANSPOSABLE ELEMENTS, VIRAL AND PLASMID PROTEINS) has weak associations with almost all other classes. On the contrary, class 7 (PROTEIN WITH BINDING FUNCTION OR COFACTOR REQUIREMENT (structural or catalytic)) and class 21 (SUBCELLULAR LOCALIZATION) were highly related to other classes. By using the Louvain method, 24 functional types were divided into three partitions, which are listed in Table 6. There were 14 functional types in Partition 1, whereas other two partitions all contained five functional types. Not surprisingly, class 7 and class 21 were classified into the same partition. Given a protein representation, a multi-label classifier can be built on each partition. Classifiers on all three partitions were integrated in the final multi-label classifier.

    Figure 9.  Heat map to show the associations of functional types. The corresponding functional types of class index 1-24 can be found in Figure 1.
    Table 6.  Three communities obtained by using Louvain method.
    Index Functional type
    Partition 1 PROTEIN WITH BINDING FUNCTION OR COFACTOR REQUIREMENT
    (structural or catalytic)
    REGULATION OF METABOLISM AND PROTEIN FUNCTION
    CELLULAR COMMUNICATION/SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION MECHANISM
    SUBCELLULAR LOCALIZATION
    CELLULAR TRANSPORT, TRANSPORT FACILITIES AND TRANSPORT
    ROUTES
    TRANSCRIPTION
    ENERGY
    METABOLISM
    CELL CYCLE AND DNA PROCESSING
    PROTEIN FATE (folding, modification, destination)
    BIOGENESIS OF CELLULAR COMPONENTS
    SYSTEMIC INTERACTION WITH THE ENVIRONMENT
    PROTEIN SYNTHESIS
    CELL RESCUE, DEFENSE AND VIRULENCE
    Partition 2 INTERACTION WITH THE ENVIRONMENT
    CELL TYPE LOCALIZATION
    TISSUE LOCALIZATION
    ORGAN LOCALIZATION
    TRANSPOSABLE ELEMENTS, VIRAL AND PLASMID PROTEINS
    Partition 3 CELL FATE
    DEVELOPMENT (Systemic)
    TISSUE DIFFERENTIATION
    ORGAN DIFFERENTIATION
    CELL TYPE DIFFERENTIATION

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    By employing the association information of functional types, the performance of the multi-label classifiers for identification of mouse protein functions was improved. However, there still exist rooms for improvement. First, protein features are key factors that can influence the performance of classifiers. Some novel and efficient protein features, such as motif embedding features [58], can be adopted to further improve the classifiers. Second, only one community detection algorithm, Louvain method, was employed to cluster functional types in this study. It was not clear whether this algorithm was optimum to deal with this problem. Some novel community detection algorithms may deeply investigate the associations between functional types, thereby producing a more optimum label partition. Finally, we adopted traditional machine learning algorithms (RAKEL, SVM, RF) to construct classifiers. They can be replaced with more powerful algorithms, such as deep learning algorithms, so that more efficient classifiers can be built. In future, we will continue our study in these aspects.

    This study proposed a novel multi-label classifier for identification of functions of mouse proteins. Such classifier considered the associations of functional types (labels) and divided labels into some partitions. By employing the label partition, the performance of classifiers was improved. This classifier can be easily extended to other organisms. It is hopeful that this classifier can be helpful to identify novel functions of mouse proteins. All codes and data are available at https://github.com/LiXuuuu/Mouse-Protein.

    The authors declare no conflict of interest.

    [1] Roscoe HE (1868) XXXVI.—Researches on vanadium. J Chem Soc 21: 322–350. doi: 10.1039/JS8682100322
    [2] Ditte A (1885) Recherches sur le vanadium, propriétés de l'acide vanadique. C R Acad Sci Paris 101: 698–702.
    [3] Hugues JM, Finger LW (1983) The crystal chemistry of shcherbinaite, naturally occurring V2O5. Am Mineral 68: 1220–1222.
    [4] Ketelaar JAA (1936) Crystal structure and shape of colloidal particles of vanadium pentoxide. Nature 137: 316.
    [5] Byström A, Wilhelmi KA, Brotzen O (1950) Vanadium pentoxide—a compound with five-coordinated vanadium atoms. Acta Chem Scand 4: 1119–1130. doi: 10.3891/acta.chem.scand.04-1119
    [6] Bachmann HG, Ahmed FR, Barnes WH (1961) The crystal structure of vanadium pentoxide. Z Krist -Cryst Mater 115: 110–131.
    [7] Enjalbert R, Galy J (1986) A refinement of the structure of V2O5. Acta Crystallogr C 42: 1467–1469. doi: 10.1107/S0108270186091825
    [8] Ramana CV, Hussain OM, Srinivasulu-Naidu B, et al. (1997) Spectroscopic characterization of electron-beam evaporated V2O5 thin films. Thin Solid Films 305: 219–226. doi: 10.1016/S0040-6090(97)00141-7
    [9] Julien C, Guesdon JP, Gorenstein A, et al. (1995) The influence of the substrate material on the growth of V2O5 flash-evaporated films. Appl Surf Sci 90: 389–391.
    [10] Balog P, Orosel D, Cancarevic Z, et al. (2007) V2O5 phase diagram revisited at high pressures and high temperatures. J Alloy Compd 429: 87–98. doi: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2006.04.042
    [11] Parija A, Prendergast D, Banerjee S (2017) Evaluation of multivalent cation insertion in single- and double-layered polymorphs of V2O5. ACS Appl Mater Inter 9: 23756–23765. doi: 10.1021/acsami.7b05556
    [12] Bates JB, Dudney NJ, Lubben DC, et al. (1995) Thin-film rechargeable lithium batteries. J Power Sources 54: 58–62. doi: 10.1016/0378-7753(94)02040-A
    [13] Julien C, Gorenstein A (1995) Materials design and optimization for thin-film microbatteries. Ionics 1: 193–210. doi: 10.1007/BF02426018
    [14] Julien C (1996) Technology of microbatteries and its applications, In: Radhakrishna S, Trends in Materials Science, New Delhi: Narosa Publ. House, 24–43.
    [15] Julien C (2000) Lithium microbatteries, In: Julien C, Stoynov Z, Materials for lithium-ion batteries, Amsterdam: Kluwer Acad Publ., 381–400.
    [16] Lampert CM (1998) Smart switchable glazing for solar energy and daylight control. Sol Energ Mat Sol C 52: 207–221. doi: 10.1016/S0927-0248(97)00279-1
    [17] Prakash NG, Dhananjaya M, Reddy BP, et al. (2016) Molybdenum doped V2O5 thin films electrodes for supercapacitors. Mater Today Proc 3: 4076–4081. doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2016.11.076
    [18] Vernardou D, Sapountzis A, Spanakis E, et al. (2013) Electrochemical activity of electrodeposited V2O5 coatings. J Electrochem Soc 160: D6–D9. doi: 10.1149/2.043304jes
    [19] Lin YS, Tsai CW (2008) Reactive sputtering deposition of V2O5−z on flexible PET/ITO substrates for electrochromic devices. Surf Coat Tech 202: 5641–5645. doi: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2008.06.037
    [20] Ma X, Lu S, Wan F, et al. (2016) Synthesis and electrochromic characterization of graphene/V2O5/MoO3 nanocomposite films. ECS J Solid State Sc 5: P572–P577. doi: 10.1149/2.0031610jss
    [21] Vernardou D, Loudoudakis D, Spanakis E, et al. (2014) Electrochemical properties of vanadium oxide coatings grown by hydrothermal synthesis on FTO substrates. New J Chem 38: 1959–1964. doi: 10.1039/C3NJ00931A
    [22] Mjejri I, Manceriu LM, Gaudon M, et al. (2016) Nano-vanadium pentoxide films for electrochromic displays. Solid State Ionics 292: 8–14. doi: 10.1016/j.ssi.2016.04.023
    [23] Beke S (2011) A review of the growth of V2O5 films from 1885 to 2010. Thin Solid Films 519: 1761–1771. doi: 10.1016/j.tsf.2010.11.001
    [24] Rao MC, Rao RK (2014) Thermal evaporated V2O5 thin films: thermodynamic properties. Int J Chem Tech Res 6: 3931–3934.
    [25] Chakraborty S, Sakata H, Yokoyama E, et al. (2007) Laser induced forward transfer technique for maskless patterning of amorphous V2O5 thin films. Appl Surf Sci 254: 638–643. doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2007.06.066
    [26] Kumar RTR, Karunagaran B, Venkatachalam S, et al. (2003) Influence of deposition temperature on the growth of vacuum evaporated V2O5 thin films. Mater Lett 57: 3820–3825. doi: 10.1016/S0167-577X(03)00185-X
    [27] Dhananjaya M, Prakash NG, Sandhya GL, et al. (2017) Microstructure and supercapacitor properties of V2O5 thin film prepared by thermal evaporation method. Mech Mater Sci Eng.
    [28] Santos R, Loureiro J, Nogueira A, et al. (2013) Thermoelectric properties of V2O5 thin films deposited by thermal evaporation. Appl Surf Sci 282: 590–594. doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2013.06.016
    [29] Julien C, Khelfa A, Benramdane N, et al. (1994) Lithium insertion in indium selenide films: application to microbatteries. Mater Sci Eng B-Adv 23: 105–115. doi: 10.1016/0921-5107(94)90342-5
    [30] Julien C, Guesdon JP, Gorenstein A, et al. (1995) The growth of V2O5 flash-evaporated films. J Mater Sci Lett 14: 934–936. doi: 10.1007/BF02427469
    [31] Murawski L, Gledel C, Sanchez C, et al. (1987) Electrical conductivity of V2O5 and LixV2O5 amorphous thin films. J Non-Cryst Solids 89: 98–106. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3093(87)80324-1
    [32] Ramana CV, Hussain OM, Naidu BS, et al. (1998) Physical investigations on electron-beam evaporated vanadium pentoxide films. Mater Sci Eng B-Adv 52: 32–39. doi: 10.1016/S0921-5107(97)00273-0
    [33] Vernardou D (2017) Using an atmospheric pressure chemical vapor deposition process for the development of V2O5 as an electrochromic material. Coatings 7: 24. doi: 10.3390/coatings7020024
    [34] Mantoux A, Groult H, Balnois E, et al. (2004) Vanadium oxide films synthesized by CVD and used as positive electrodes in secondary lithium batteries. J Electrochem Soc 151: A368–A373. doi: 10.1149/1.1641037
    [35] Groult H, Le Van K, Mantoux A, et al. (2007) Study of the Li+ insertion into V2O5 films deposited by CVD onto various substrates. J Power Sources 174: 312–320. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2007.09.045
    [36] Barreca D, Armelao L, Caccavale F, et al. (2000) Highly oriented V2O5 nanocrystalline thin films by plasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposition. Chem Mater 12: 98–103. doi: 10.1021/cm991095a
    [37] Watanabe H, Itoh K, Matsumoto O (2001) Properties of V2O5 thin films deposited by means of plasma MOCVD. Thin Solid Films 386: 281–285. doi: 10.1016/S0040-6090(00)01674-6
    [38] Barreca D, Battiston GA, Caccavalec F, et al. (1999) A PE-MOCVD route to V2O5 nanostructured thin films. J Phys IV France 9: 529–536.
    [39] Crociani L, Carta G, Natali M, et al. (2011) MOCVD of vanadium oxide films with a novel vanadium(III) precursor. Chem Vapor Depos 17: 6–8. doi: 10.1002/cvde.201004291
    [40] Sahana MB, Shivashankar SA (2004) Metalorganic chemical vapor deposition of highly oriented thin film composites of V2O5 and V6O13: suppression of the metal-semiconductor transition in V6O13. J Mater Res 19: 2859–2870. doi: 10.1557/JMR.2004.0394
    [41] Robbins J, Seman M (2005) Electrochromic devices deposited on low-temperature plastics by plasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposition. United States: USDOE Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE), Report No.: FG36-04GO14328.
    [42] Nandakumar NK, Seebauer EG (2011) Low temperature chemical vapor deposition of nanocrystalline V2O5 thin films. Thin Solid Films 519: 3663–3668. doi: 10.1016/j.tsf.2011.02.002
    [43] Koike S, Fujieda T, Sakai T, et al. (1999) Characterization of sputtered vanadium oxide films for lithium batteries. J Power Sources 81–82: 581–584.
    [44] Batista C, Teixeira V, Carneiro J (2008) Structural and morphological characterization of magnetron sputtered nanocrystalline vanadium oxide films for thermochromic smart surfaces. J Nano Res 2: 21–30. doi: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/JNanoR.2.21
    [45] Quinzeni I, Ferrari S, Quartarone E, et al. (2011) Structural, morphological and electrochemical properties of nanocrystalline V2O5 thin films deposited by means of radiofrequency magnetron sputtering. J Power Sources 196: 10228–10233. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2011.08.073
    [46] Giannetta HMR, Calaza C, Lamas DG, et al. (2015) Electrical transport properties of V2O5 thin films obtained by thermal annealing of layers grown by RF magnetron sputtering at room temperature. Thin Solid Films 589: 730–734. doi: 10.1016/j.tsf.2015.06.048
    [47] Poelman H, Tomaszewski H, Poelman D, et al. (2002) V2O5 thin films deposited by means of dc magnetron sputtering from ceramic V2O3 targets. Surf Interface Anal 34: 724–727. doi: 10.1002/sia.1397
    [48] Su Q, Lan W, Wang YY, et al. (2009) Structural characterization of β-V2O5 films prepared by dc reactive magnetron sputtering. Appl Surf Sci 255: 4177–4179. doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2008.11.002
    [49] Fateh N, Fontalvo GA, Mitterer C (2007) Structural and mechanical properties of dc and pulsed dc reactive magnetron sputtered V2O5 films. J Phys D Appl Phys 40: 7716–7719. doi: 10.1088/0022-3727/40/24/019
    [50] Gallasch T, Stockhoff T, Baither D, et al. (2011) Ion beam sputter deposition of V2O5 thin films. J Power Sources 196: 428–435. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2010.06.099
    [51] Silversmit G, Poelman H, DeGryse R (2004) Influence of magnetron deposition parameters on the stoichiometry of sputtered V2O5 films. Surf Interface Anal 36: 1163–1166. doi: 10.1002/sia.1866
    [52] De Castro MSB, Ferreira CL, de Avillez RR (2013) Vanadium oxide thin films produced by magnetron sputtering from a V2O5 target at room temperature. Infrared Phys Techn 60: 103–107. doi: 10.1016/j.infrared.2013.03.001
    [53] Raj PD, Gupta S, Sridharan M (2015) Nanostructured V2O5 thin films deposited at low sputtering power. Mat Sci Semicon Proc 39: 426–432. doi: 10.1016/j.mssp.2015.04.054
    [54] Fateh N, Fontalvo GA, Cha L, et al. (2008) Synthesis-structure relations for reactive magnetron sputtered V2O5 films. Surf Coat Tech 202: 1551–1555. doi: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2007.07.010
    [55] Lourenço A, Gorenstein A, Passerini S, et al. (1998) Radio-frequency reactively sputtered VOx thin films deposited at different oxygen flows. J Electrochem Soc 145: 706–711. doi: 10.1149/1.1838327
    [56] Benmoussa M, Ibnouelghazi E, Bennouna A, et al. (1995) Structural, electrical and optical properties of sputtered vanadium pentoxide thin films. Thin Solid Films 265: 22–28. doi: 10.1016/0040-6090(95)06617-9
    [57] Benmoussa M, Outzourhit A, Bennouna A, et al. (2002) Electrochromism in sputtered V2O5 thin films: structural and optical studies. Thin Solid Films 405: 11–16. doi: 10.1016/S0040-6090(01)01734-5
    [58] Yoon YS, Kim JS, Choi SH (2004) Structural and electrochemical properties of vanadium oxide thin films grown by d.c. and r.f. reactive sputtering at room temperature. Thin Solid Films 460: 41–47.
    [59] Ottaviano L, Pennisi A, Simone F, et al. (2004) RF sputtered electrochromic V2O5 films. Opt Mater 27: 307–313. doi: 10.1016/j.optmat.2004.04.001
    [60] Lin YS, Tsai CW, Chen PW (2008) Electrochromic properties of V2O5−z thin films sputtered onto flexible PE/ITO substrates. Solid State Ionics 179: 290–297. doi: 10.1016/j.ssi.2008.01.054
    [61] Kang M, Chu M, Kim SW, et al. (2013) Optical and electrical properties of V2O5 nanorod films grown using an electron beam. Thin Solid Films 547: 198–201. doi: 10.1016/j.tsf.2013.03.060
    [62] Zhang JG, McGraw JM, Turner J, et al. (1997) Charging capacity and cycling stability of VOx films prepared by pulsed laser deposition. J Electrochem Soc 144: 1630–1634. doi: 10.1149/1.1837652
    [63] Julien C, Haro-Poniatowski E, Camacho-Lopez MA, et al. (1999) Growth of V2O5 thin films by pulsed laser deposition and their applications in lithium microbatteries. Mater Sci Eng B-Adv 65: 170–176. doi: 10.1016/S0921-5107(99)00187-7
    [64] Ramana CV, Smith RJ, Hussain OM, et al. (2004) On the growth mechanism of pulsed-laser deposited vanadium oxide thin films. Mater Sci Eng B-Adv 111: 218–225. doi: 10.1016/j.mseb.2004.04.017
    [65] Iida Y, Kaneko Y, Kanno Y (2008) Fabrication of pulsed-laser deposited V2O5 thin films for electrochromic devices. J Mater Process Tech 197: 261–267. doi: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.06.032
    [66] Iida Y, Kanno Y (2009) Doping effect of M (M = Nb, Ce, Nd, Dy, Sm, Ag, and/or Na) on the growth of pulsed-laser deposited V2O5 thin films. J Mater Process Tech 209: 2421–2427. doi: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2008.05.033
    [67] McGraw JM, Perkins JD, Hasoon F, et al. (2000) Pulsed laser deposition of oriented V2O5 thin films. J Mater Res 15: 2249–2265. doi: 10.1557/JMR.2000.0323
    [68] Ashrafi MA, Ranjbar M, Kalhori H, et al. (2017) Pulsed laser deposition of Mo–V–O thin films for chromogenic applications. Thin Solid Films 621: 220–228. doi: 10.1016/j.tsf.2016.11.041
    [69] Madhuri KV, Rao KS, Naidu BS, et al. (2002) Characterization of laser ablated V2O5 thin films. J Mater Sci-Mater El 13: 426–432.
    [70] Huotari J, Bjorklund R, Lappalainen J, et al. (2015) Pulsed laser deposited nanostructured vanadium oxide thin films characterized as ammonia sensors. Sensor Actuat B-Chem 217: 22–29. doi: 10.1016/j.snb.2015.02.089
    [71] Ramana CV, Smith RJ, Hussain OM, et al. (2005) Surface analysis of pulsed laser-deposited V2O5 thin films and their lithium intercalated products studied by Raman spectroscopy. Surf Interface Anal 37: 406–411. doi: 10.1002/sia.2018
    [72] Ramana CV, Smith RJ, Hussain OM (2003) Grain size effects on the optical characteristics of pulsed-laser deposited vanadium oxide thin films. Phys Status Solidi A 199: R4–R6. doi: 10.1002/pssa.200309009
    [73] Beke S, Giorgio S, Korosi L, et al. (2008) Structural and optical properties of pulsed laser deposited V2O5 thin films. Thin Solid Films 516: 4659–4664. doi: 10.1016/j.tsf.2007.08.113
    [74] Fang GJ, Liu ZL, Wang YQ, et al. (2000) Orientated growth of V2O5 electrochromic thin films on transparent conductive glass by pulsed excimer laser ablation technique. J Phys D Appl Phys 33: 3018–3021. doi: 10.1088/0022-3727/33/23/302
    [75] Ramana CV, Hussain OM, Pinto R, et al. (2003) Microstructural features of pulsed-laser deposited V2O5 thin films. Appl Surf Sci 207: 135–138. doi: 10.1016/S0169-4332(02)01411-3
    [76] Ramana CV, Smith RJ, Hussain OM, et al. (2004) Growth and surface characterization of V2O5 thin films made by pulsed laser deposition. J Vac Sci Technol A 22: 2453–2458. doi: 10.1116/1.1809123
    [77] Ramana CV, Hussain OM, Naidu BS, et al. (1997) Influence of substrate temperature on the composition and structural properties of electron beam evaporated V2O5 thin films. Vacuum 48: 431–434. doi: 10.1016/S0042-207X(96)00304-1
    [78] Ramana CV, Hussain OM (1997) Optical absorption behaviour of vanadium pentoxide thin films. Adv Funct Mater 7: 225–231.
    [79] Ramana CV, Hussain OM, Naidu BS, et al. (1998) Physical investigations on electron-beam evaporated vanadium pentoxide films. Mater Sci Eng B-Adv 52: 32–39. doi: 10.1016/S0921-5107(97)00273-0
    [80] Ramana CV, Hussain OM, Naidu BS (1997) Growth and structure of electron beam evaporated V2O5 thin films. Mater Chem Phys 50: 195–199. doi: 10.1016/S0254-0584(97)01914-7
    [81] Ramana CV, Hussain OM, Uthanna S, et al. (1998) Influence of oxygen partial pressure on the optical properties of electron beam evaporated vanadium pentoxide thin films. Opt Mater 10: 101–107. doi: 10.1016/S0925-3467(97)00168-7
    [82] Kumar A, Singh P, Kulkarni N, et al. (2008) Structural and optical studies of nanocrystalline V2O5 thin films. Thin Solid Films 516: 912–918. doi: 10.1016/j.tsf.2007.04.165
    [83] Rosaiah P, Sandhya GL, Suresh S, et al. (2016) Effect of substrate temperature on micro-structural, optical and electrical properties of V2O5 thin films. Adv Mater Proc 1: 215–219. doi: 10.5185/amp.2016/219
    [84] Thiagarajan S, Thaiyan M, Ganesan R (2015) Physical property exploration of highly oriented V2O5 thin films prepared by electron beam evaporation. New J Chem 39: 9471–9479. doi: 10.1039/C5NJ01582K
    [85] Ali HM, Abdel-Kakeem AM (2010) Structural and optical properties of electron-beam evaporated Al2O3-doped V2O5 thin films for various applications. Phys Status Solidi A 207: 132–138. doi: 10.1002/pssa.200925121
    [86] Bouzidi A, Benramdane N, Nakrela A, et al. (2002) First synthesis of vanadium oxide thin films by spray pyrolysis technique. Mater Sci Eng B-Adv 95: 141–147. doi: 10.1016/S0921-5107(02)00224-6
    [87] Boudaoud L, Benramdane N, Desfeux R, et al. (2006) Structural and optical properties of MoO3 and V2O5 thin films prepared by spray pyrolysis. Catal Today 113: 230–234. doi: 10.1016/j.cattod.2005.11.072
    [88] Varadaraajana V, Satishkumara BC, Nandab J, et al. (2011) Direct synthesis of nanostructured V2O5 films using solution plasma spray approach for lithium battery applications. J Power Sources 196: 10704–10711. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2011.09.016
    [89] Irani R, Rozati SM, Beke S (2013) Structural and optical properties of nanostructural V2O5 thin films deposited by spray pyrolysis technique: effect of the substrate temperature. Mater Chem Phys 139: 489–493. doi: 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2013.01.046
    [90] Wei Y, Li M, Zheng J, et al. (2013) Structural characterization and electrical and optical properties of V2O5 films prepared via ultrasonic spraying. Thin Solid Films 534: 446–451. doi: 10.1016/j.tsf.2013.01.093
    [91] Abd-Alghafour NM, Ahmed NM, Hassan Z, et al. (2016) Influence of solution deposition rate on properties of V2O5 thin films deposited by spray pyrolysis technique. AIP Conf Proc 1756: 090010. doi: 10.1063/1.4958791
    [92] Vijayakumar Y, Kumar-Mani G, Ramana-Reddy MV, et al. (2015) Nanostructured flower like V2O5 thin films and its room temperature sensing characteristics. Ceram Int 41: 2221–2227. doi: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2014.10.023
    [93] Nazemiyan M, Jalili S (2013) Record low temperature Mo doped V2O5 thermochromic thin films for optoelectronic applications. AIP Adv 3: 112103. doi: 10.1063/1.4829663
    [94] Akl AA (2006) Effect of solution molarity on the characteristics of vanadium pentoxide thin films. Appl Surf Sci 252: 8745–8750. doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2005.12.076
    [95] Wang J, Curtis CJ, Schulz DL, et al. (2004) Influences of treatment temperature and water content on capacity and rechargeability of V2O5 xerogel films. J Electrochem Soc 151: A1–A7. doi: 10.1149/1.1627342
    [96] Najdoski M, Koleva V, Samet A (2014) Effect of deposition conditions on the electrochromic properties of nanostructured thin films of ammonium intercalated vanadium pentoxide xerogel. J Phys Chem C 118: 9636–9646. doi: 10.1021/jp4127122
    [97] Chen Y, Xie K, Liu Z (1998) XPS studies of V2O5 thin film at different temperatures and oxygen partial pressures. Appl Surf Sci 126: 347–351. doi: 10.1016/S0169-4332(97)00791-5
    [98] Wang Y, Shang H, Chou T, et al. (2005) Effects of thermal annealing on the Li+ intercalation properties of V2O5·nH2O xerogel films. J Phys Chem B 109: 11361–11366.
    [99] Cazzanelli E, Mariotto G, Passerini S, et al. (1996) Raman spectroscopic investigations of Li-intercalated V2O5 xerogel. J Non-Cryst Solids 208: 89–98. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3093(96)00507-8
    [100] Gokdemir FP, Ozdemir O, Kutlu K (2014) Comparison of structural and electrochemical properties of V2O5 thin films prepared by organic/inorganic precursors. Electrochim Acta 121: 240–244. doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2013.12.164
    [101] Raj DV, Ponpandian N, Mangalaraj M, et al. (2013) Effect of annealing and electrochemical properties of sol-gel dip coated nanocrystalline V2O5 thin films. Mat Sci Semicon Proc 16: 256–262. doi: 10.1016/j.mssp.2012.11.001
    [102] Wang Y, Cao G (2006) Li+-intercalation electrochemical/electrochromic properties of vanadium pentoxide films by sol electrophoretic deposition. Electrochim Acta 51: 4865–4872. doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2006.01.026
    [103] Kim KH, Roh DK, Song IK, et al. (2010) Enhanced performance as a lithium ion battery cathode of electrodeposited V2O5 thin films by e-beam irradiation. J Solid State Electr 14: 1801–1805. doi: 10.1007/s10008-010-1114-9
    [104] Liu Y, Clark M, Zhang Q, et al. (2011) V2O5 nano-electrodes with high power and energy densities for thin film Li-ion batteries. Adv Energy Mater 1: 194–202. doi: 10.1002/aenm.201000037
    [105] Groult H, Balnois E, Mantoux A, et al. (2006) Two-dimensional recrystallisation processes of nanometric vanadium oxide thin films grown by atomic layer chemical vapor deposition (ALCVD) evidenced by AFM. Appl Surf Sci 252: 5917–5925. doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2005.08.014
    [106] Lantelme F, Mantoux A, Groult H, et al. (2002) Analysis of a phase transition process controlled by diffusion, application to lithium insertion into V2O5. Electrochim Acta 47: 3927–3938. doi: 10.1016/S0013-4686(02)00364-X
    [107] Keränen J, Auroux A, Ek S, et al. (2002) Preparation, characterization and activity testing of vanadia catalysts deposited onto silica and alumina supports by atomic layer deposition. Appl Catal A-Gen 228: 213–225. doi: 10.1016/S0926-860X(01)00975-9
    [108] Le Van K, Groult H, Mantoux A, et al. (2006) Amorphous vanadium oxide films synthesized by ALCVD for lithium rechargeable batteries. J Power Sources 160: 592–601. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2006.01.049
    [109] Musschoot J, Deduytsche D, Poelman H, et al. (2009) Comparison of thermal and plasma-enhanced ALD/CVD of vanadium pentoxide. J Electrochem Soc 156: P122–P126. doi: 10.1149/1.3133169
    [110] Badot J, Ribes S, Yousfi E, et al. (2000) Atomic layer epitaxy of vanadium oxide thin films and electrochemical behavior in presence of lithium ions. Electrochem Solid St 3: 485–488.
    [111] Chen X, Pomerantseva E, Banerjee P, et al. (2012) Ozone-based atomic layer deposition of crystalline V2O5 films for high performance electrochemical energy storage. Chem Mater 24: 1255–1261. doi: 10.1021/cm202901z
    [112] Badot JC, Mantoux A, Baffier N, et al. (2004) Electrical properties of V2O5 thin films obtained by atomic layer deposition (ALD). J Mater Chem 14: 3411–3415. doi: 10.1039/b410324f
    [113] Ostreng E, Gandrud KB, Hu Y, et al. (2014) High power nano-structured V2O5 thin film cathodes by atomic layer deposition. J Mater Chem A 2: 15044–15051. doi: 10.1039/C4TA00694A
    [114] Chen X, Pomerantseva E, Gregorczyk K, et al. (2013) Cathodic ALD V2O5 thin films for high-rate electrochemical energy storage. RSC Adv 3: 4294–4302. doi: 10.1039/c3ra23031g
    [115] Blanquart T, Niinisto J, Gavagnin M, et al. (2013) Atomic layer deposition and characterization of vanadium oxide thin films. RSC Adv 3: 1179–1185. doi: 10.1039/C2RA22820C
    [116] Daubert JS, Lewis NP, Gotsch HN, et al. (2015) Effect of meso- and micro-porosity in carbon electrodes on atomic layer deposition of pseudocapacitive V2O5 for high performance supercapacitors. Chem Mater 27: 6524–6534. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemmater.5b01602
    [117] Santos L, Swiatowska J, Lair V, et al. (2017) Mechanisms of enhanced lithium intercalation into thin film V2O5 in ionic liquids investigated by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy and time-of-flight secondary ion mass spectroscopy. J Power Sources 364: 61–71. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.08.003
    [118] Wang X, Guo Z, Gao Y, et al. (2017) Atomic layer deposition of vanadium oxide thin films from tetrakis(dimethylamino)vanadium precursor. J Mater Res 32: 37–44. doi: 10.1557/jmr.2016.303
    [119] Sreedhara MB, Ghatak J, Bharath B, et al. (2017) Atomic layer deposition of ultrathin crystalline epitaxial films of V2O5. ACS Appl Mater Inter 9: 3178–3185.
    [120] Chain EE (1991) Optical properties of vanadium dioxide and vanadium pentoxide thin films. Appl Optics 30: 2782–2787. doi: 10.1364/AO.30.002782
    [121] Cezar AB, Graff IL, Varalda J, et al. (2014) Oxygen-vacancy-induced room-temperature magnetization in lamellar V2O5 thin films. J Appl Phys 116: 163904. doi: 10.1063/1.4899249
    [122] Ranea VA, Dammig-Quina PL (2016) The structure of the bulk and the (001) surface of V2O5. A DFT + U study. Mater Res Express 3: 085005. doi: 10.1088/2053-1591/3/8/085005
    [123] Chakrabarti A, Hermann K, Druzinic R, et al. (1999) Geometric and electronic structure of vanadium pentoxide: a density functional bulk and surface study. Phys Rev B 59: 10583–10590. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.59.10583
    [124] Eyert V, Hck KH (1998) Electronic structure of V2O5: role of octahedral deformations. Phys Rev B 57: 12727–12737. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.57.12727
    [125] Audière JP, Madi A, Grenet JC (1982) Electrical and thermal properties of highly quenched amorphous V2O5 thin films. J Mater Sci 17: 2973–2978. doi: 10.1007/BF00644678
    [126] Kumagai N, Kitamoto H, Baba M, et al. (1998) Intercalation of lithium in rf-sputtered vanadium oxide film as an electrode material for lithium-ion batteries. J Appl Electrochem 28: 41–48.
    [127] Benmoussa M, Outzourhit A, Jourdani R, et al. (2003) Structural, optical and electrochromic properties of sol-gel V2O5 thin films. Active Passive Electron Comp 26: 245–256. doi: 10.1080/0882751031000116223
    [128] Losurdo M, Barreca D, Bruno G, et al. (2001) Spectroscopic ellipsometry investigation of V2O5 nanocrystalline thin films. Thin Solid Films 384: 58–64. doi: 10.1016/S0040-6090(00)01820-4
    [129] Vernardou D, Paterakis P, Drosos H, et al. (2011) A study of the electrochemical performance of vanadium oxide thin films grown by atmospheric pressure chemical vapour deposition. Sol Energ Mat Sol C 95: 2842–2847. doi: 10.1016/j.solmat.2011.05.046
    [130] Guimond S, Sturm JM, Göbke D, et al. (2008) Well-ordered V2O5(001) thin films on Au(111): growth and thermal stability. J Phys Chem C 112: 11835–11846. doi: 10.1021/jp8011156
    [131] Szörényi T, Bali K, Hevesi I (1980) Structural characterization of amorphous vanadium pentoxide thin films prepared by chemical vapour deposition. J Non-Cryst Solids 35–36: 1245–1248.
    [132] Özer N (1997) Electrochemical properties of sol-gel deposited vanadium pentoxide films. Thin Solid Films 305: 80–87. doi: 10.1016/S0040-6090(97)00086-2
    [133] Kumar RTR, Karunagaran B, Kumar VS, et al. (2003) Structural properties of V2O5 thin films prepared by vacuum evaporation. Mat Sci Semicon Proc 6: 543–546. doi: 10.1016/j.mssp.2003.08.017
    [134] Gilles E, Boesman E (1966) EPR studies of V2O5 single crystals. I. Defect centres in pure, non-stoichiometric vanadium pentoxide. Phys Stat Solidi B 14: 337–347.
    [135] Pozarnsky G, Wright L, McCormijk A (1994) Effects of aging time on V2O5 sol-gel coatings. J Sol-Gel Sci Techn 3: 57–62. doi: 10.1007/BF00490149
    [136] Senapati S, Panda S (2016) Effect of aging of V2O5 sol on properties of nanoscale films. Thin Solid Films 599: 42–48. doi: 10.1016/j.tsf.2015.12.045
    [137] Anaissi FJ, Demets GJF, Alvarez EB, et al. (2001) Long-term aging of vanadium(V) oxide xerogel precursor solutions: structural and electrochemical implications. Electrochim Acta 47: 441–450. doi: 10.1016/S0013-4686(01)00737-X
    [138] Hirashima H, Gengyo M, Kojima C, et al. (1995) Effects of aging and drying on structure of V2O5 gels. J Non-Cryst Solids 186: 54–58. doi: 10.1016/0022-3093(95)00033-X
    [139] Talledo A, Granqvist CG (1995) Electrochromic vanadium-pentoxide-based films: structural, electrochemical and optical properties. J Appl Phys 77: 4655–4666. doi: 10.1063/1.359433
    [140] Luksich J, Aita CH (1991) Annealing response of disordered sputter deposited vanadium pentoxide (V2O5). J Vac Sci Technol A 9: 542–546. doi: 10.1116/1.577405
    [141] Song GY, Oh C, Sinha S, et al. (2017) Facile phase control of multivalent vanadium oxide tin films (V2O5 and VO2) by atomic layer deposition and postdeposition annealing. ACS Appl Mater Inter 9: 23909–23917. doi: 10.1021/acsami.7b03398
    [142] Luo Z, Wu Z, Xu X, et al. (2010) Impact of substrate temperature on the microstructure, electrical and optical properties of sputtered nanoparticle V2O5 thin films. Vacuum 85: 145–150. doi: 10.1016/j.vacuum.2010.05.001
    [143] El Sound AMA, Mansour B, Soliman LI (1994) Optical and electrical properties of V2O5 thin films. Thin Solid Films 247: 140–143. doi: 10.1016/0040-6090(94)90487-1
    [144] Akl AA (2010) Thermal annealing effect on the crystallization and optical dispersion of sprayed V2O5 thin films. J Phys Chem Solids 71: 223–229. doi: 10.1016/j.jpcs.2009.11.009
    [145] Maki K, Fukuda T, Momose H, et al. (2012) Structural and optical properties of reactive-sputtered films of V2O5: measurement of optical bandgap and roughness correction. J Fac Sci Tech Seikei Univ 49: 41–44.
    [146] Atuchin VV, Ayupov BM, Kochubey VA, et al. (2008) Optical properties of textured V2O5/Si thin films deposited by reactive magnetron sputtering. Opt Mater 30: 1145–1148. doi: 10.1016/j.optmat.2007.05.040
    [147] Wu QH, Thissen A, Jaegermann W, et al. (2004) Photoelectron spectroscopy study of oxygen vacancy on vanadium oxides surface. Appl Surf Sci 236: 473–478. doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2004.05.112
    [148] Wu QH, Thißen A, Jaegerman W (2005) Photoelectron spectroscopic study of Li intercalation into V2O5 thin films. Surf Sci 578: 203–212. doi: 10.1016/j.susc.2005.01.042
    [149] Benayad A, Martinez H, Gies A, et al. (2006) Vanadium pentoxide thin films used as positive electrode in lithium microbatteries: an XPS study during cycling. J Phys Chem Solids 67: 1320–1324. doi: 10.1016/j.jpcs.2006.01.089
    [150] Swiatowska-Mrowiecka J, Martin F, Maurice V, et al. (2008) The distribution of lithium intercalated in V2O5 thin films studied by XPS and ToF-SIMS. Electrochim Acta 53: 4257–4266. doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2007.12.083
    [151] Salvi AM, Guascito MR, DeBonis A, et al. (2003) Lithium intercalation on amorphous V2O5 thin film, obtained by r.f. deposition, using in situ sample transfer for XPS analysis. Surf Interface Anal 35: 897–905.
    [152] Ibris N, Salvi AM, Liberatore M, et al. (2005) XPS study of the Li intercalation process in sol-gel-produced V2O5 thin film: influence of substrate and film synthesis modification. Surf Interface Anal 37: 1092–1104. doi: 10.1002/sia.2084
    [153] Alamarguy D, Castle JE, Ibris N, et al. (2006) Characterization of sol-gel crystalline V2O5 thin films after Li intercalation cycling. Surf Interface Anal 38: 801–804. doi: 10.1002/sia.2138
    [154] Fleutot B, Martinez H, Pecquenard B, et al. (2008) Surface film morphology (AFM) and chemical features (XPS) of cycled V2O5 thin films in lithium microbatteries. J Power Sources 180: 836–844. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2008.02.080
    [155] Alamarguy D, Castle JE, Liberatore M, et al. (2006) Distribution of intercalated lithium in V2O5 thin films determined by SIMS depth profiling. Surf Interface Anal 38: 847–850. doi: 10.1002/sia.2139
    [156] Julien CM, Massot M (2003) Lattice vibrations of materials for lithium rechargeable batteries III. Lithium manganese oxides. Mater Sci Eng B-Adv 100: 69–78.
    [157] Julien CM, Massot M (2003) Lattice vibrations of materials for lithium rechargeable batteries I. Lithium manganese oxides. Mater Sci Eng B-Adv 97: 217–230.
    [158] Abello L, Husson E, Repelin Y, et al. (1983) Vibrational spectra and valence force field of crystalline V2O5. Spectrochim Acta A 39: 641–651. doi: 10.1016/0584-8539(83)80040-3
    [159] Baddour-Hadjean R, Pereira-Ramos JP, Navone C, et al. (2008) Raman microspectrometry study of electrochemical lithium intercalation into sputtered crystalline V2O5 thin films. Chem Mater 20: 1916–1923. doi: 10.1021/cm702979k
    [160] Surca A, Orel B, Drazic G, et al. (1999) Ex situ and in situ infrared spectroelectrochemical investigations of V2O5 crystalline films. J Electrochem Soc 146: 232–242. doi: 10.1149/1.1391592
    [161] Fang GJ, Liu ZL, Wang Y, et al. (2001) Synthesis and structural, electrochromic characterization of pulsed laser deposited vanadium oxide thin films. J Vac Sci Technol A 19: 887–892. doi: 10.1116/1.1359533
    [162] Su Q, Liu Q, Ma ML, et al. (2008) Raman spectroscopic characterization of the microstructure of V2O5 films. J Solid State Electr 12: 919–923. doi: 10.1007/s10008-008-0515-5
    [163] Lee SH, Cheong HM, Seong MJ, et al. (2002) Microstructure study of amorphous vanadium oxide thin films using Raman spectroscopy. J Appl Phys 92: 1893–1897. doi: 10.1063/1.1495074
    [164] Lee SH, Cheong HM, Seong MJ, et al. (2003) Raman spectroscopic studies of amorphous vanadium oxide thin films. Solid State Ionics 165: 111–116. doi: 10.1016/j.ssi.2003.08.022
    [165] Zhang Y, Liu YW, Cheng YS, et al. (2005) Electrochemical impedance spectra of V2O5 xerogel films with intercalation of lithium ion. J Cent South Univ T 12: 309–314. doi: 10.1007/s11771-005-0151-5
    [166] Julien C, Khelfa A, Guesdon JP, et al. (1996) Electrical properties of flash-evaporated V2O5 films. Ionics 2: 380–385. doi: 10.1007/BF02375816
    [167] Sanchez C, Livage J, Audiere JP, et al. (1984) Influence of the quenching rate on the properties of amorphous V2O5 thin films. J Non-Cryst Solids 65: 285–300. doi: 10.1016/0022-3093(84)90053-X
    [168] Mott NF (1968) Conduction in glasses containing transition metal ions. J Non-Crystal Solids 1: 1–17.
    [169] Akl AA (2007) Crystallization and electrical properties of V2O5 thin films prepared by RF sputtering. Appl Surf Sci 253: 7094–7099. doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2007.02.054
    [170] Wang HQ, Li N, Guldal NS, et al. (2012) Nanocrystal V2O5 thin film as hole-extraction layer in normal architecture organic solar cells. Org Electron 13: 3014–3021. doi: 10.1016/j.orgel.2012.08.007
    [171] Schneider K, Lubecka M, Czapla A (2016) V2O5 thin film for gas sensor applications. Sensor Actuat B-Chem 236: 970–977. doi: 10.1016/j.snb.2016.04.059
    [172] Park HK, Smyrl WH, Ward MD (1995) V2O5 xerogel films as intercalation hosts for lithium. J Electrochem Soc 142: 1068–1073. doi: 10.1149/1.2044133
    [173] Jourdani R, Jadoual L, Ait El Fqih M, et al. (2018) Effects of lithium insertion and deinsertion into V2O5 thin films: optical, structural and absorption properties. Surf Interface Anal 50: 52–58. doi: 10.1002/sia.6331
    [174] Julien C, Ivanov I, Gorenstein A (1995) Vibrational modifications on lithium intercalation in V2O5 films. Mater Sci Eng B-Adv 33: 168–172. doi: 10.1016/0921-5107(95)80032-8
    [175] Jung H, Gerasopoulos K, Talin AA, et al. (2017) A platform for in situ Raman and stress characterizations of V2O5 cathode using MEMS device. Electrochim Acta 242: 227–239. doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2017.04.160
    [176] Surca A, Orel B (1999) IR spectroscopy of crystalline V2O5 films in different stages of lithiation. Electrochim Acta 44: 3051–3057. doi: 10.1016/S0013-4686(99)00019-5
    [177] Meulenkam EA, van Klinken W, Schlatmann AR (1999) In-situ x-ray diffraction of Li intercalation in sol-gel V2O5 films. Solid State Ionics 126: 235–244. doi: 10.1016/S0167-2738(99)00243-X
    [178] Cazzanelli E, Mariotto, Passerini S, et al. (1994) Spectroscopic investigations of Li-intercalated V2O5 polycrystalline films. Solid State Ionics 70–71: 412–416.
    [179] Baddour-Hadjean R, Golabkan V, Pereira-Ramos JP, et al. (2002) A Raman study of the lithium insertion process in vanadium pentoxide thin films deposited by atomic layer deposition. J Raman Spectrosc 33: 631–638. doi: 10.1002/jrs.893
    [180] Baddour-Hadjean R, Navone C, Pereira-Ramos JP (2009) In situ Raman microspectrometry investigation of electrochemical lithium intercalation into sputtered crystalline V2O5 thin films. Electrochim Acta 54: 6674–6679. doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2009.06.052
    [181] Levi MD, Lu Z, Aurbach D (2001) Li-insertion into thin monolithic V2O5 films electrodes characterized by a variety of electroanalytical techniques. J Power Sources 97–98: 482–485.
    [182] Li YM, Hibino M, Tanaka Y, et al. (2001) Evaluation of Mo-doped amorphous V2O5 films as a positive electrode for lithium batteries. Solid State Ionics 143: 67–72. doi: 10.1016/S0167-2738(01)00834-7
    [183] Navone C, Baddour-Hadjean R, Pereira-Ramos JP, et al. (2005) High-performance oriented V2O5 thin films prepared by DC sputtering for rechargeable lithium microbatteries. J Electrochem Soc 152: A1790–A1796. doi: 10.1149/1.1990160
    [184] Navone C, Pereira-Ramos JP, Baddour-Hadjean R, et al. (2006) High-capacity crystalline V2O5 thick films prepared by RF sputtering as positive electrodes for rechargeable lithium microbatteries. J Electrochem Soc 153: A2287–A2293. doi: 10.1149/1.2358852
    [185] Donsanti F, Kostourou K, Decker F, et al. (2006) Alkali ion intercalation in V2O5: preparation and laboratory characterization of thin films produced by ADL. Surf Interface Anal 38: 815–818. doi: 10.1002/sia.2237
    [186] Decker F, Donsanti F, Salvi AM, et al. (2008) Li+ distribution into V2O5 films resulting from electrochemical intercalation reactions. J Brazil Chem Soc 19: 667–671.
    [187] Park YJ, Ryu KS, Kim KM, et al. (2002) Electrochemical properties of vanadium oxide thin films deposited by rf sputtering. Solid State Ionics 154: 229–235.
    [188] Liu Y, Li J, Zhang Q, et al. (2011) Porous nanostructured V2O5 film electrode with excellent Li-ion intercalation properties. Electrochem Commun 13: 1276–1279. doi: 10.1016/j.elecom.2011.08.024
    [189] Sahana MB, Sudakar C, Thapa C, et al. (2007) Electrochemical properties of V2O5 thin films deposited by spin coating. Mater Sci Eng B-Adv 143: 42–50. doi: 10.1016/j.mseb.2007.08.002
    [190] Yu D, Qiao Y, Zhou X, et al. (2014) Mica-like vanadium pentoxide-nanostructured thin film as high-performance cathode for lithium-ion batteries. J Power Sources 266: 1–6. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.04.099
    [191] Pomerantseva E, Gerasopoulos K, Chen X, et al. (2012) Electrochemical performance of the nanostructured biotemplated V2O5 cathode for lithium-ion batteries. J Power Sources 206: 282–287. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.01.127
    [192] Swiatowska-Mrowiecka J, Maurice V, Zanna S, et al. (2007) Ageing of V2O5 thin films induced by Li intercalation multi-cycling. J Power Sources 170: 160–172. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2007.04.014
    [193] Pyun SI, Bae JS (1997) Electrochemical lithium intercalation into vanadium pentoxide xerogel film electrode. J Power Sources 68: 669–673. doi: 10.1016/S0378-7753(96)02639-0
    [194] Navone C, Baddour-Hadjean R, Pereira-Ramos JP, et al. (2008) A kinetic study of electrochemical lithium insertion into oriented V2O5 thin films prepared by rf sputtering. Electrochim Acta 53: 3329–3336. doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2007.11.061
    [195] Vivier V, Farcy J, Pereira-Ramos JP (1998) Electrochemical lithium insertion in sol-gel crystalline vanadium pentoxide thin films. Electrochim Acta 44: 831–839. doi: 10.1016/S0013-4686(98)00234-5
    [196] Miyazaki H, Sakamura H, Kamei M, et al. (1999) Electrochemical evaluation of oriented vanadium oxide films deposited by reactive rf magnetron sputtering. Solid State Ionics 122: 223–229. doi: 10.1016/S0167-2738(99)00022-3
    [197] McGraw JM, Bahn CS, Parilla PA, et al. (1999) Li ion diffusion measurements in V2O5 and Li(Co1−xAlx)O2 thin-film battery cathodes. Electrochim Acta 45: 187–196. doi: 10.1016/S0013-4686(99)00203-0
    [198] Lu Z, Levi MD, Salitra G, et al. (2000) Basic electroanalytical characterization of lithium insertion into thin, well-crystallized V2O5 films. J Electroanal Chem 491: 211–221. doi: 10.1016/S0022-0728(00)00184-4
    [199] Li Y, Kunitake T, Aoki Y (2007) Synthesis and Li+ intercalation/extraction in ultrathin V2O5 layer and freestanding V2O5/Pt/PVA multilayer films. Chem Mater 19: 575–580. doi: 10.1021/cm0626233
    [200] Jung KN, Pyun SI (2006) Effect of pore structure on anomalous behavior of the lithium intercalation into porous V2O5 film electrode using fractal geometry concept. Electrochim Acta 51: 2646–2655. doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2005.08.008
    [201] Wang S, Li S, Sun Y, et al. (2011) Three-dimensional porous V2O5 cathode with ultra-high rate capability. Energ Environ Sci 4: 2854–2857. doi: 10.1039/c1ee01172c
    [202] Li SR, Ge SY, Qiao Y, et al. (2012) Three-dimensional porous Fe0.1V2O5.15 thin film as a cathode material for lithium ion batteries. Electrochim Acta 64: 81–86.
    [203] Mui SC, Jasinski J, Leppert VJ, et al. (2006) Microstructure effects on the electrochemical kinetics of vanadium pentoxide thin-film cathodes. J Electrochem Soc 153: A1372–A1377. doi: 10.1149/1.2199327
    [204] Navone C, Pereira-Ramos JP, Baddour-Hadjean R, et al. (2005) Electrochemical and structural properties of V2O5 thin films prepared by DC sputtering. J Power Sources 146: 327–330. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2005.03.024
    [205] Wei Y, Ryu CW, Kim KB (2008) Cu-doped V2O5 as a high-energy density cathode material for rechargeable lithium batteries. J Alloy Compd 459: L13–L17. doi: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2007.04.275
    [206] Park HK (2005) Manganese vanadium oxides as cathodes for lithium batteries. Solid State Ionics 176: 307–312. doi: 10.1016/j.ssi.2004.07.014
    [207] Grégoire G, Baffier N, Kahn-Harari A, et al. (1998) X-Ray powder diffraction study of a new vanadium oxide Cr0.11V2O5.16 synthesized by a sol-gel process. J Mater Chem 8: 2103–2108.
    [208] Giorgetti M, Berrettoni M, Smyrl WH (2007) Doped V2O5-based cathode materials: where does the doping metal go? An X-ray absorption spectroscopy study. Chem Mater 19: 5991–6000.
    [209] Wei Y, Zhou J, Zheng J, et al. (2015) Improved stability of electrochromic devices using Ti-doped V2O5 film. Electrochim Acta 166: 277–284. doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2015.03.087
    [210] Gies A, Pecquenard B, Benayad A, et al. (2008) Effect of silver co-sputtering on V2O5 thin films for lithium microbatteries. Thin Solid Films 516: 7271–7281. doi: 10.1016/j.tsf.2007.12.165
    [211] Avellaneda CO, Bulhoes LOS (2006) Optical and electrochemical properties of V2O5:Ta sol-gel thin films. Sol Energ Mat Sol C 90: 444–451. doi: 10.1016/j.solmat.2005.04.031
    [212] Panagopoulou M, Vernardou D, Koudouma E, et al. (2017) Tunable properties of Mg-doped V2O5 thin films for energy applications: Li-ion batteries and electrochromics. J Phys Chem C 121: 70–79. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b09018
    [213] Yu DM, Zhang ST, Liu DW, et al. (2010) Effect of manganese doping on Li-ion intercalation properties of V2O5 films. J Mater Chem 20: 10841–10846. doi: 10.1039/c0jm01252a
    [214] Ozer N, Sabuncu S, Cronin J (1999) Electrochromic properties of sol-gel deposited Ti-doped vanadium oxide film. Thin Solid Films 338: 201–206. doi: 10.1016/S0040-6090(98)00974-2
    [215] Coustier F, Passerini S, Smyrl WH (1997) Dip-coated silver-doped V2O5 xerogels as host materials for lithium intercalation. Solid State Ionics 100: 247–258. doi: 10.1016/S0167-2738(97)00354-8
    [216] Nam SC, Lim YC, Park HY, et al. (2001) The effects of Cu-doping in V2O5 thin film cathode for microbattery. Korean J Chem Eng 18: 673–678. doi: 10.1007/BF02706385
    [217] Yong W, Zhang HL, Cao HT, et al. (2016) Effect of post-annealing on structural and electrochromic properties of Mo-doped V2O5 thin films. J Sol-Gel Sci Techn 77: 604–609. doi: 10.1007/s10971-015-3889-8
    [218] Guan S, Wei Y, Zhou J, et al. (2016) A method for preparing manganese-doped V2O5 films with enhanced cycling stability. J Electrochem Soc 163: H541–H545. doi: 10.1149/2.0761607jes
    [219] Gouda GM, Nagendra CL (2013) Preparation and characterization of thin film thermistors of metal oxides of manganese and vanadium (Mn–V–O). Sensor Actuat A-Phys 190: 181–190. doi: 10.1016/j.sna.2012.11.019
    [220] Li Y, Yao J, Uchaker E, et al. (2013) Sn-doped V2O5 film with enhanced lithium-ion storage performance. J Phys Chem C 117: 23507–23514. doi: 10.1021/jp406927m
    [221] Etemadi B, Mazloom J, Ghodsi FE (2017) Phase transition and surface morphology effects on optical, electrical and lithiation/delithiation behavior of nanostructured Ce-doped V2O5 thin films. Mat Sci Semicon Proc 61: 99–106. doi: 10.1016/j.mssp.2016.12.035
    [222] Sahana MB, Sudakar C, Thapa C, et al. (2009) The effect of titanium on the lithium intercalation capacity of V2O5 thin films. Thin Solid Films 517: 6642–6651. doi: 10.1016/j.tsf.2009.04.063
    [223] Lee K, Cao GZ (2005) Enhancement of intercalation properties of V2O5 film by TiO2 addition. J Phys Chem B 109: 11880–11885. doi: 10.1021/jp044651j
    [224] Kim S, Taya M, Xu C (2009) Contrast, switching speed, and durability of V2O5–TiO2 film-based electrochromic windows. J Electrochem Soc 156: E40–E45. doi: 10.1149/1.3031978
    [225] Kim S, Taya M (2012) Electrochromic windows based on V2O5–TiO2 and poly(3,3-dimethyl-3,4-dihydro-2H-thieno[3,4-b][1,4]dioxepine) coatings. Sol Energ Mat Sol C 107: 225–229. doi: 10.1016/j.solmat.2012.06.032
    [226] Zhang YF, Hsu CY, Hu CC (2017) Deposition of tungsten-doped V2O5 thin films on non-alkali glass substrate by RF magnetron sputtering for thermal insulation. Key Eng Mater 732: 16–23. doi: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.732.16
    [227] Patil CE, Tarwal NL, Jadhav PR, et al. (2014) Electrochromic performance of the mixed V2O5–WO3 thin films synthesized by pulsed spray pyrolysis technique. Curr Appl Phys 14: 389–395. doi: 10.1016/j.cap.2013.12.014
    [228] Acharya BS, Nayak BB (2008) Microstructural studies of nanocrystalline thin films of V2O5–MoO3 using X-ray diffraction, optical absorption and laser micro Raman spectroscopy. Indian J Pure Appl Phys 46: 866–875.
    [229] Kim YS, Ahn HJ, Shim HS, et al. (2006) Electrochemical and structural properties of MoO3–V2O5 nanocomposite thin film electrodes for lithium rechargeable batteries. Solid State Ionics 177: 1323–1326. doi: 10.1016/j.ssi.2006.05.031
    [230] Ozer N, Lampert CM (1999) Electrochromic performance of sol-gel deposited WO3–V2O5 films. Thin Solid Films 349: 205–211. doi: 10.1016/S0040-6090(99)00144-3
    [231] Madhuri KV, Naidu BS, Hussain OM (2002) Optical absorption studies on (V2O5)1−x–(MoO3)x thin films. Mater Chem Phys 77: 22–26.
    [232] Demets GJF, Anaissi FJ, Toma HE (2000) Electrochemical properties of assembled polypyrrole: V2O5 xerogel films. Electrochim Acta 46: 547–554. doi: 10.1016/S0013-4686(00)00635-6
    [233] Zhang X, Sun H, Li Z, et al. (2013) Synthesis and electrochromic characterization of vanadium pentoxide/graphene nanocomposite films. J Electrochem Soc 160: H587–H590. doi: 10.1149/2.064309jes
    [234] Wu J, Gao X, Yu H, et al. (2016) A scalable free-standing V2O5/CNT film electrode for supercapacitors with a wide operation voltage (1.6 V) in an aqueous electrolyte. Adv Funct Mater 26: 6114–6120.
    [235] Chen W, Mai L, Xu Q, et al. (2003) Synthesis and Li-insertion properties of poly(ethylene-oxide)/V2O5 nanocomposite films. Solid State Phenom 90–91: 19–24.
    [236] Murphy DW, Christian PA, DiSalvo FJ, et al. (1979) Lithium incorporation by vanadium pentoxide. Inorg Chem 18: 2800–2803. doi: 10.1021/ic50200a034
    [237] Cocciantelli JM, Ménétrier M, Delmas C, et al. (1995) On the δ → γ irreversible transformation in Li//V2O5 secondary batteries. Solid State Ionics 78: 143–150. doi: 10.1016/0167-2738(95)00015-X
    [238] Zhang L, Song J, Dong Q, et al. (2009) Application of V2O5 in thin film microbatteries prepared by rf magnetron sputtering. Adv Mater Res 79–82: 931–934.
    [239] Gu G, Schmid M, Chiu PW, et al. (1998) V2O5 nanofibre sheet actuators. Nat Mater 2: 316–319.
    [240] Ponzi M, Duschatzky C, Carrascull A, et al. (1998) Obtaining benzaldehyde via promoted V2O5 catalysts. Appl Catal A-Gen 169: 373–379. doi: 10.1016/S0926-860X(98)00026-X
    [241] Livage J (1991) Vanadium pentoxide gels. Chem Mater 3: 578–593. doi: 10.1021/cm00016a006
    [242] Granqvist CG (2002) Handbook of inorganic electrochromic materials, Amsterdam: Elsevier, 295–337.
    [243] Hirashima H, Ide M, Yoshida T (1986) Memory switching of V2O5-TeO2 glasses. J Non-Cryst Solids 86: 327–335. doi: 10.1016/0022-3093(86)90021-9
    [244] Julien C (1994) Thin film technology and microbatteries, In: Pistoia G, Lithium Batteries-New Materials-Development and Perspectives, Amsterdam: Elsevier, 167–237.
    [245] Bates JB, Dudney NJ, Gruzalski GR, et al. (1993) Fabrication and characterization of amorphous lithium electrolyte thin films and rechargeable thin-film batteries. J Power Sources 43–44: 103–110.
    [246] Nakazawa H, Sano K, Baba M (2005) Fabrication by using a sputtering method and charge–discharge properties of large-sized and thin-film lithium ion rechargeable batteries. J Power Sources 146: 758–761. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2005.03.155
    [247] Lee SH, Liu P, Tracy CE, et al. (1999) All-solid-state rocking chair lithium battery on a flexible Al substrate. Electrochem Solid St 2: 425–427. doi: 10.1149/1.1390859
    [248] Dudney NJ, Neudecker BJ (1999) Soli state thin-film lithium battery systems. Curr Opin Solid State Mater Sci 4: 479–482. doi: 10.1016/S1359-0286(99)00052-2
    [249] Oukassi S, Salot R, Pereira-Ramos JP (2009) Elaboration and characterization of crystalline rf deposited V2O5 positive electrode for thin film battery. Appl Surf Sci 256: 149–155. doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2009.07.115
    [250] Navone C, Tintignac S, Pereira-Ramos JP, et al. (2011) Electrochemical behaviour of sputtered c-V2O5 and LiCoO2 thin films for solid state lithium microbatteries. Solid State Ionics 192: 343–346. doi: 10.1016/j.ssi.2010.04.023
    [251] Liu P, Zhang JG, Turner JA, et al. (1998) Fabrication of LiV2O5 thin-film electrodes for rechargeable lithium batteries. Solid State Ionics 111: 145–151. doi: 10.1016/S0167-2738(98)00184-2
    [252] Kim YT, Gopukumar S, Kim KB, et al. (2003) Performance of electrostatic spray-deposited vanadium pentoxide in lithium secondary cells. J Power Sources 117: 110–117. doi: 10.1016/S0378-7753(03)00006-5
    [253] Navone C, Baddour-Hadjean R, Pereira-Ramos JP, et al. (2009) Sputtered crystalline V2O5 thin films for all-solid-state lithium microbatteries. J Electrochem Soc 156: A763–A767. doi: 10.1149/1.3170922
    [254] Lee SH, Liu P, Tracy CE (2003) Lithium thin-film battery with a reversed structural configuration SS/Li/Lipon/Li/Cu. Electrochem Solid St 6: A275–A277. doi: 10.1149/1.1623171
    [255] Navone C, Pereira-Ramos JP, Baddour-Hadjean R, et al. (2010) Lithiated c-V2O5 thin-film as positive electrode for rocking-chair solid-state lithium microbattery. Ionics 16: 577–580. doi: 10.1007/s11581-010-0460-z
    [256] Gerbaldi C, Destro M, Nair JR, et al. (2013) High-rate V2O5-based Li-ion thin film polymer cell with outstanding long-term cyclability. Nano Energy 2: 1279–1286. doi: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2013.06.007
    [257] Zeng Y, Gao G, Wu G, et al. (2015) Nanosheet-structured vanadium pentoxide thin film as a carbon- and binder-free cathode for lithium-ion battery applications. J Solid State Electr 19: 3319–3328. doi: 10.1007/s10008-015-2941-5
    [258] Mattelaer F, Kobe G, Rampelberg G, et al. (2016) Atomic layer deposition of vanadium oxides for thin-film lithium-ion battery applications. RSC Adv 6: 114658–114665. doi: 10.1039/C6RA25742A
    [259] Mattelaer F, Geryl K, Rampelberg G, et al. (2017) Amorphous and crystalline vanadium oxides as high-energy and high-power cathodes for three-dimensional thin-film lithium ion batteries. ACS Appl Mater Inter 9: 13121–13131. doi: 10.1021/acsami.6b16473
    [260] Chae OB, Kim J, Park I, et al. (2014) Reversible lithium storage at highly populated vacant sites in an amorphous vanadium pentoxide electrode. Chem Mater 26: 5874–5881. doi: 10.1021/cm502268u
    [261] Ku JH, Ryu JH, Kim SH, et al. (2012) Reversible lithium storage with high mobility at structural defects in amorphous molybdenum dioxide electrode. Adv Funct Mater 22: 3658–3664. doi: 10.1002/adfm.201102669
    [262] Sutar MA, Pawar MS, Rendale MK, et al. (2015) Enhancing electrochemical performance of V2O5 thin film by using ultrasonic weltering. IORS J Appl Phys 7: 41–45.
    [263] Sandhya GL, Dhananjaya M, Prakash NG, et al. (2017) Structural and supercapacitive performance of V2O5 thin films prepared by dc magnetron sputtering. IOSR J Appl Chem 10: 64–69.
    [264] Wruck D, Ramamurthi S, Rubin M (1989) Sputtered electrochromic V2O5 films. Thin Solid Films 182: 79–85. doi: 10.1016/0040-6090(89)90245-9
    [265] Talledo A, Andersson AM, Granqvist CG (1990) Electrochemically lithiated V2O5 films: An optically passive ion storage for transparent electrochromic devices. J Mater Res 5: 1253–1256. doi: 10.1557/JMR.1990.1253
    [266] Guan ZS, Yao JN, Yang YA, et al. (1998) Electrochromism of annealed vacuum-evaporated V2O5 films. J Electroanal Chem 443: 175–179. doi: 10.1016/S0022-0728(97)00594-9
    [267] Kaid MA (2006) Characterization of electrochromic vanadium pentoxide thin films prepared by spray pyrolysis. Egypt J Solids 29: 273–291.
    [268] Benmoussa M, Outzourhit A, Bennouna A, et al. (2008) Li+ ions diffusion into sol-gel V2O5 thin films: electrochromic properties. Eur Phys J Appl Phys 48: 10502.
    [269] Rosaiah P, Hussain OM (2013) Electron beam evaporated nano-crystalline V2O5 thin films for electrochromic and electrochemical applications, In: Giri P, Goswami D, Perumal A, Advanced Nanomaterials and Nanotechnology. Springer Proceedings in Physics, Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 143: 485–496. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-34216-5_48
    [270] Chen LC, Ho KC (2001) Design equations for complementary electrochromic devices: application to the tungsten oxide–Prussian blue system. Electrochim Acta 46: 2151–2158. doi: 10.1016/S0013-4686(01)00368-1
    [271] Sarminio J, Talledd A, Andersson AA, et al. (1993) Stress and electrochromism induced by Li insertion in crystalline and amorphous V2O5 thin film electrodes. Electrochim Acta 12: 1637–1642.
    [272] Yoshino T, Baba N, Kouda Y (1987) Electrochromic properties of V2O5 thin films colloid-chemically deposited onto ITO glasses. Jpn J Appl Phys 26: 782–783. doi: 10.1143/JJAP.26.782
    [273] Shimizu Y, Nagase K, Miura N, et al. (1990) New preparation process of V2O5 thin film based on spin-coating from organic vanadium solution. Jpn J Appl Phys 29: L1708–L1711. doi: 10.1143/JJAP.29.L1708
    [274] Cremonesi A, Bersani D, Lottici PP, et al. (2006) Synthesis and structural characterization of mesoporous V2O5 thin films for electrochromic applications. Thin Solid Films 515: 1500–1505. doi: 10.1016/j.tsf.2006.04.029
    [275] Liberatore M, Decker F, Vuk AS, et al. (2006) Effect of the organic–inorganic template ICS-PPG on sol-gel deposited V2O5 electrochromic thin film. Sol Energ Mat Sol C 90: 434–443. doi: 10.1016/j.solmat.2005.04.035
    [276] Lin YS, Tsai CW, Chen PW (2008) Electrochromic properties of V2O5z thin films sputtered onto flexible PET/ITO substrates. Solid State Ionics 179: 290–297. doi: 10.1016/j.ssi.2008.01.054
    [277] Lu Y, Liu L, Mandler D, et al. (2013) High switching speed and coloration efficiency of titanium-doped vanadium oxide thin film electrochromic devices. J Mater Chem C 1: 7380–7386. doi: 10.1039/c3tc31508h
    [278] Kovendhan M, Joseph DP, Manimuthu P, et al. (2015) Prototype electrochromic device and dye sensitized solar cell using spray deposited undoped and 'Li' doped V2O5 thin film electrodes. Curr Appl Phys 215: 622–631.
    [279] Rizzo G, Arena A, Bonavita A, et al. (2010) Gasochromic response of nanocrystalline vanadium pentoxide films deposited from ethanol dispersions. Thin Solid Films 518: 7124–7127. doi: 10.1016/j.tsf.2010.07.010
    [280] Abbasi M, Rozati SM, Irani R, et al. (2015) Synthesis and gas sensing behavior of nanostructured V2O5 thin films prepared by spray pyrolysis. Mat Sci Semicon Proc 29: 132–138. doi: 10.1016/j.mssp.2014.01.008
    [281] Manno D, Serra A, Giulio MD, et al. (1997) Structural and electrical properties of sputtered vanadium oxide thin films for applications as gas sensing material. J Appl Phys 81: 2709–2714. doi: 10.1063/1.363973
    [282] Micocci G, Serra A, Tepore A, et al. (1997) Properties of vanadium oxide thin films for ethanol sensor. J Vac Sci Technol A 15: 34–38. doi: 10.1116/1.580471
    [283] Zhuiykov S, Wlodarski W, Li Y (2001) Nanocrystalline V2O5-TiO2 thin-films for oxygen sensing prepared by sol-gel process. Sensor Actuat B-Chem 77: 484–490. doi: 10.1016/S0925-4005(01)00739-0
    [284] Raj AD, Mangalaraj D, Ponpandian N, et al. (2010) Gas sensing properties of chemically synthesized V2O5 thin films. Adv Mater Res 123–125: 683–686.
    [285] Huotari J, Lappalainen J, Puustinen J, et al. (2013) Gas sensing properties of pulsed laser deposited vanadium oxide thin films with various crystal structures. Sensor Actuat B-Chem 187: 386–394. doi: 10.1016/j.snb.2012.12.067
    [286] Karthikeyan PS, Dhivya P, Raj PD, et al. (2016) V2O5 thin films for 2-propanol vapor sensing. Mater Today Proc 3: 1510–1516. doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2016.04.035
    [287] Toxicological review of vanadium pentoxide (V2O5), 2011. Available from: https://ofmpub.epa.gov/eims/eimscomm.getfile?p_download_id=504127.
    [288] U.S. National Libray of Medecine, 2005. Available from: https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/compound/ vanadium_pentoxide#section=GHS-Classification.
    [289] Eranna G, Joshi BC, Runthala DP, et al. (2010) Oxide materials for development of integrated gas sensors—A comprehensive review. Crit Rev Solid State 29: 111–188.
    [290] Kumar S, Qadir A, Maury F, et al. (2017) Visible thermochromism in vanadium pentaoxide coatings. ACS Appl Mater Inter 9: 21447–21456. doi: 10.1021/acsami.7b04484
  • This article has been cited by:

    1. FeiMing Huang, Lei Chen, Wei Guo, Tao Huang, Yu-dong Cai, Fan Yang, Identification of Human Cell Cycle Phase Markers Based on Single-Cell RNA-Seq Data by Using Machine Learning Methods, 2022, 2022, 2314-6141, 1, 10.1155/2022/2516653
    2. Yu-Hang Zhang, ShiJian Ding, Lei Chen, Tao Huang, Yu-Dong Cai, Andrey Cherstvy, Subcellular Localization Prediction of Human Proteins Using Multifeature Selection Methods, 2022, 2022, 2314-6141, 1, 10.1155/2022/3288527
    3. Jian Lu, Mei Meng, XianChao Zhou, Shijian Ding, KaiYan Feng, Zhenbing Zeng, Tao Huang, Yu-Dong Cai, Identification of COVID-19 severity biomarkers based on feature selection on single-cell RNA-Seq data of CD8+ T cells, 2022, 13, 1664-8021, 10.3389/fgene.2022.1053772
    4. Yu-Hang Zhang, Zhan Dong Li, Tao Zeng, Lei Chen, Tao Huang, Yu-Dong Cai, Screening gene signatures for clinical response subtypes of lung transplantation, 2022, 297, 1617-4615, 1301, 10.1007/s00438-022-01918-x
    5. Wenjing Yi, Ao Sun, Manman Liu, Xiaoqing Liu, Wei Zhang, Qi Dai, Lin Lu, Comparative Study on Feature Selection in Protein Structure and Function Prediction, 2022, 2022, 1748-6718, 1, 10.1155/2022/1650693
    6. ZhanDong Li, Deling Wang, HuiPing Liao, ShiQi Zhang, Wei Guo, Lei Chen, Lin Lu, Tao Huang, Yu-Dong Cai, Exploring the Genomic Patterns in Human and Mouse Cerebellums Via Single-Cell Sequencing and Machine Learning Method, 2022, 13, 1664-8021, 10.3389/fgene.2022.857851
    7. Zhiyang Liu, Mei Meng, ShiJian Ding, XiaoChao Zhou, KaiYan Feng, Tao Huang, Yu-Dong Cai, Identification of methylation signatures and rules for predicting the severity of SARS-CoV-2 infection with machine learning methods, 2022, 13, 1664-302X, 10.3389/fmicb.2022.1007295
    8. Feiming Huang, Lei Chen, Wei Guo, Xianchao Zhou, Kaiyan Feng, Tao Huang, Yudong Cai, Identifying COVID-19 Severity-Related SARS-CoV-2 Mutation Using a Machine Learning Method, 2022, 12, 2075-1729, 806, 10.3390/life12060806
    9. Qiao Sun, Lin Bai, Shaopin Zhu, Lu Cheng, Yang Xu, Yu-Dong Cai, Hui Chen, Jian Zhang, Ji-Fu Wei, Analysis of Lymphoma-Related Genes with Gene Ontology and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes Enrichment, 2022, 2022, 2314-6141, 1, 10.1155/2022/8503511
    10. Jiwei Song, FeiMing Huang, Lei Chen, KaiYan Feng, Fangfang Jian, Tao Huang, Yu-Dong Cai, Identification of methylation signatures associated with CAR T cell in B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia and non-hodgkin’s lymphoma, 2022, 12, 2234-943X, 10.3389/fonc.2022.976262
    11. Yaochen Xu, FeiMing Huang, Wei Guo, KaiYan Feng, Lin Zhu, Zhenbing Zeng, Tao Huang, Yu-Dong Cai, Characterization of chromatin accessibility patterns in different mouse cell types using machine learning methods at single-cell resolution, 2023, 14, 1664-8021, 10.3389/fgene.2023.1145647
    12. Xiaoqing Liu, Wenjing Yi, Baohang Xi, Qi Dai, Lin Lu, Identification of Drug-Disease Associations Using a Random Walk with Restart Method and Supervised Learning, 2022, 2022, 1748-6718, 1, 10.1155/2022/7035634
    13. Zhandong Li, Zi Mei, Shijian Ding, Lei Chen, Hao Li, Kaiyan Feng, Tao Huang, Yu-Dong Cai, Identifying Methylation Signatures and Rules for COVID-19 With Machine Learning Methods, 2022, 9, 2296-889X, 10.3389/fmolb.2022.908080
    14. ZhanDong Li, Wei Guo, ShiJian Ding, Lei Chen, KaiYan Feng, Tao Huang, Yu-Dong Cai, Identifying Key MicroRNA Signatures for Neurodegenerative Diseases With Machine Learning Methods, 2022, 13, 1664-8021, 10.3389/fgene.2022.880997
    15. Hao Li, Feiming Huang, Huiping Liao, Zhandong Li, Kaiyan Feng, Tao Huang, Yu-Dong Cai, Identification of COVID-19-Specific Immune Markers Using a Machine Learning Method, 2022, 9, 2296-889X, 10.3389/fmolb.2022.952626
    16. Jian Lu, JiaRui Li, Jingxin Ren, Shijian Ding, Zhenbing Zeng, Tao Huang, Yu-Dong Cai, Functional and embedding feature analysis for pan-cancer classification, 2022, 12, 2234-943X, 10.3389/fonc.2022.979336
    17. ZhanDong Li, FeiMing Huang, Lei Chen, Tao Huang, Yu-Dong Cai, Identifying In Vitro Cultured Human Hepatocytes Markers with Machine Learning Methods Based on Single-Cell RNA-Seq Data, 2022, 10, 2296-4185, 10.3389/fbioe.2022.916309
    18. Shiheng Lu, Hui Wang, Jian Zhang, Identification of uveitis-associated functions based on the feature selection analysis of gene ontology and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes pathway enrichment scores, 2022, 15, 1662-5099, 10.3389/fnmol.2022.1007352
    19. Xianchao Zhou, Shijian Ding, Deling Wang, Lei Chen, Kaiyan Feng, Tao Huang, Zhandong Li, Yudong Cai, Identification of Cell Markers and Their Expression Patterns in Skin Based on Single-Cell RNA-Sequencing Profiles, 2022, 12, 2075-1729, 550, 10.3390/life12040550
    20. ZhanDong Li, Wei Guo, Tao Zeng, Jie Yin, KaiYan Feng, Tao Huang, Yu-Dong Cai, Detecting Brain Structure-Specific Methylation Signatures and Rules for Alzheimer’s Disease, 2022, 16, 1662-453X, 10.3389/fnins.2022.895181
    21. Zhandong Li, Xiaoyong Pan, Yu-Dong Cai, Identification of Type 2 Diabetes Biomarkers From Mixed Single-Cell Sequencing Data With Feature Selection Methods, 2022, 10, 2296-4185, 10.3389/fbioe.2022.890901
    22. Xiaohong Li, Xianchao Zhou, Shijian Ding, Lei Chen, Kaiyan Feng, Hao Li, Tao Huang, Yu-Dong Cai, Identification of Transcriptome Biomarkers for Severe COVID-19 with Machine Learning Methods, 2022, 12, 2218-273X, 1735, 10.3390/biom12121735
    23. Man Li, Xinyi Zhou, Siyao Qin, Ziyan Bin, Yanhui Wang, Improved RAkEL’s Fault Diagnosis Method for High-Speed Train Traction Transformer, 2023, 23, 1424-8220, 8067, 10.3390/s23198067
    24. Hao Wang, Lei Chen, PMPTCE-HNEA: Predicting Metabolic Pathway Types of Chemicals and Enzymes with a Heterogeneous Network Embedding Algorithm, 2023, 18, 15748936, 748, 10.2174/1574893618666230224121633
    25. Lei Chen, Linyang Li, Prediction of Drug Pathway-based Disease Classes using Multiple Properties of Drugs, 2024, 19, 15748936, 859, 10.2174/0115748936284973240105115444
    26. Jing-Xin Ren, Qian Gao, Xiao-Chao Zhou, Lei Chen, Wei Guo, Kai-Yan Feng, Lin Lu, Tao Huang, Yu-Dong Cai, Identification of Gene Markers Associated with COVID-19 Severity and Recovery in Different Immune Cell Subtypes, 2023, 12, 2079-7737, 947, 10.3390/biology12070947
    27. Lei Chen, Ruyun Qu, Xintong Liu, Improved multi-label classifiers for predicting protein subcellular localization, 2023, 21, 1551-0018, 214, 10.3934/mbe.2024010
    28. Kailun Sun, Cornelis A. M. van Gestel, Hao Qiu, Two-Dimensional Layered Nano-MoS2 Induces Earthworm Immune Cell Apoptosis by Regulating Lysosomal Maintenance and Function: Toward Unbiased Screening and Validation of Suspicious Pathways, 2024, 58, 0013-936X, 19948, 10.1021/acs.est.4c04512
    29. Lei Chen, Huiping Liao, Guohua Huang, Shijian Ding, Wei Guo, Tao Huang, Yudong Cai, Identification of DNA Methylation Signature and Rules for SARS-CoV-2 Associated with Age, 2022, 27, 2768-6701, 10.31083/j.fbl2707204
    30. Yuanyuan Luo, Yihan Wang, Lin Liu, Feiming Huang, Shiheng Lu, Yan Yan, Identifying pathological myopia associated genes with GenePlexus in protein-protein interaction network, 2025, 16, 1664-8021, 10.3389/fgene.2025.1533567
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2018 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(10224) PDF downloads(2538) Cited by(45)

Figures and Tables

Figures(20)  /  Tables(2)

Other Articles By Authors

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog