Research article

Baby-skin care habits from different socio-economic groups and its impact on the development of atopic dermatitis

  • Received: 06 November 2017 Accepted: 04 January 2018 Published: 08 January 2018
  • Skin care practices of children vary among communities and are based on experience, tradition and culture. It was aimed to determine the baby-skin care approaches of mothers from three different socio-economic groups and its effect on the development of atopic dermatitis. The study comprised mothers with children under 2 years of age from three different socioeconomic groups in Istanbul in the first half of 2014. A questionnaire with 38 items related to demographic variables, feeding habits, and baby-skin care were distributed to the mothers and asked to fill at sight. The study comprised of 207 children with 69 from lower socio-economic group, 92 children from group middle socio-economic and 46 children from higher socio-economic group. Mean age was 8.48, 8.74, and 10.98 months, respectively. Atopic dermatitis was reported in 19% of the children from higher socio-economic and 9% of the children in other two groups each. The proportion of using no care products after bath was found to be lower in children with atopic dermatitis from all three groups. The proportion of using wet wipes for diaper care was significantly lower in children with atopic dermatitis in comparison to children without atopic dermatitis. Atopic dermatitis was more common among children from higher socioeconomic group and skin care after bath seems to be an important factor in the development of atopic dermatitis.

    Citation: Fatma Akpinar, Ayla Balci, Gulcan Ozomay, Ayca Sozen, Esra Kotan, Gulendam Kocak, Feyzullah Cetinkaya. Baby-skin care habits from different socio-economic groups and its impact on the development of atopic dermatitis[J]. AIMS Allergy and Immunology, 2018, 2(1): 1-9. doi: 10.3934/Allergy.2018.1.1

    Related Papers:

    [1] Ross M. Tanis, Piper A. Wedman-Robida, Alena P. Chumanevich, John W. Fuseler, Carole A. Oskeritzian . The mast cell/S1P axis is not linked to pre-lesional male skin remodeling in a mouse model of eczema. AIMS Allergy and Immunology, 2021, 5(3): 160-174. doi: 10.3934/Allergy.2021012
    [2] Masahiro Seike . Histamine suppresses T helper 17 responses mediated by transforming growth factor-β1 in murine chronic allergic contact dermatitis. AIMS Allergy and Immunology, 2018, 2(4): 180-189. doi: 10.3934/Allergy.2018.4.180
    [3] Florentina-Silvia Delli, Elena Sotiriou, Efstratios Vakirlis, Demetrios Ioannides . Bullous pemphigoid autoantibodies. AIMS Allergy and Immunology, 2021, 5(4): 259-263. doi: 10.3934/Allergy.2021019
    [4] Kazunobu Baba, Akina Oomori, Tadaaki Miyazaki . Preventive effect of Enterococcus faecalis and β-glucan on the onset and exacerbation of symptoms of atopic dermatitis in mice. AIMS Allergy and Immunology, 2023, 7(3): 183-194. doi: 10.3934/Allergy.2023013
    [5] Moufag Mohammed Saeed Tayeb . Role of IgG food test in patients with allergic diseases. AIMS Allergy and Immunology, 2023, 7(2): 154-163. doi: 10.3934/Allergy.2023010
    [6] Mohamed El Yaqoubi, Mouad Lahyaoui, Yousra Seqqat, Taoufiq Saffaj, Bouchaib Ihssane, Nabil Saffaj, Rachid Mamouni, Fouad Ouazzani Chahdi, Fahad M Alshabrmi, Alaa Abdulaziz Alnahari, Saad M. Howladar, Ammar AL-Farga, Youssef Kandri Rodi . Pyridopyrazine derivatives as highly selective histamine H4 receptor antagonist for the treatment of atopic dermatitis: QSAR modeling and molecular docking studies. AIMS Allergy and Immunology, 2024, 8(4): 303-323. doi: 10.3934/Allergy.2024019
    [7] Lucie Mondoulet, Sophie Wavrin, Vincent Dioszeghy, Véronique Dhelft, Emilie Puteaux, Mélanie Ligouis, Camille Plaquet, Christophe Dupont, Pierre-Henri Benhamou . No impact of filaggrin deficiency on the efficacy of epicutaneous immunotherapy in a murine model. AIMS Allergy and Immunology, 2017, 1(1): 1-14. doi: 10.3934/Allergy.2017.1.1
    [8] Gianna Moscato, Gianni Pala . Occupational allergy to food-derived allergens. AIMS Allergy and Immunology, 2017, 1(1): 21-30. doi: 10.3934/Allergy.2017.1.21
    [9] Anna Fusco, Logan Pucci, Kevin Pierre, Adam Wolberg, Coulter Small, John Cerillo, Mohammad Reza Hosseini Siyanaki, Brandon Lucke-Wold . Contrast allergies for neurological imaging: When to proceed. AIMS Allergy and Immunology, 2022, 6(4): 216-227. doi: 10.3934/Allergy.2022016
    [10] McKenna S. Vininski, Sunanda Rajput, Nicholas J. Hobbs, Joseph J. Dolence . Understanding sex differences in the allergic immune response to food. AIMS Allergy and Immunology, 2022, 6(3): 90-105. doi: 10.3934/Allergy.2022009
  • Skin care practices of children vary among communities and are based on experience, tradition and culture. It was aimed to determine the baby-skin care approaches of mothers from three different socio-economic groups and its effect on the development of atopic dermatitis. The study comprised mothers with children under 2 years of age from three different socioeconomic groups in Istanbul in the first half of 2014. A questionnaire with 38 items related to demographic variables, feeding habits, and baby-skin care were distributed to the mothers and asked to fill at sight. The study comprised of 207 children with 69 from lower socio-economic group, 92 children from group middle socio-economic and 46 children from higher socio-economic group. Mean age was 8.48, 8.74, and 10.98 months, respectively. Atopic dermatitis was reported in 19% of the children from higher socio-economic and 9% of the children in other two groups each. The proportion of using no care products after bath was found to be lower in children with atopic dermatitis from all three groups. The proportion of using wet wipes for diaper care was significantly lower in children with atopic dermatitis in comparison to children without atopic dermatitis. Atopic dermatitis was more common among children from higher socioeconomic group and skin care after bath seems to be an important factor in the development of atopic dermatitis.


    1. Introduction

    Barrier function of the skin begins to develop in the prenatal period and undergoes substantial development within the first year of life [1]. Epidermal barrier has immunological and antioxidant functions as well as tasks including defense against infections, protection from ultraviolet rays, and modulation of water balance of the skin. Many of these functions occur in the stratum corneum. The disruption of the structural and functional integrity of the stratum corneum leads to xerotic and eczematous skin changes in atopic dermatitis [2]. In addition, environmental factors such as skin care and cleaning routines also create skin barrier damage and result in development of atopic dermatitis [3]. Infant skin is more prone to the development of irritant or allergic contact dermatitis than adult skin [4]. For this reason, age-appropriate skin care is very important. Skin care practices of children vary among communities and are based on experience, tradition and culture.

    In this study, we aimed to detect the skin care habits of children in different socioeconomic groups, and to investigate the effects of these habits in development of diaper dermatitis and atopic dermatitis.


    2. Materials and methods


    2.1. Methods

    This cross-sectional study was conducted in three hospitals where children from three different socio-economic groups admit in Istanbul between January–June 2014. The hospitals were Sisli Pediatric Education and Research Hospital (Group Ⅰ, lower socio-economic group), Maltepe University Hospital (Group Ⅱ, middle socio-economic group), and Istanbul Acibadem International Hospital (Group Ⅲ, higher socio-economic group).

    Mothers of children under 2 years of age were recruited from the pediatric outpatient departments of these hospitals. A questionnaire with 38 items related to demographic variables, feeding habits, and baby-skin care were distributed to the mothers and asked to fill at sight (Table 1).

    Table 1. Some important questions that took place in the questionnaire.
    Questions in the questionnaire
    1. Do you breastfeed your child currently?
    2. How long have you been breastfeeding (months)?
    3. How long have you been breastfeeding with addional food (months)?
    4. If you don't breastfeed nowadays, what is the main food for your child?
    5. From whom have you got the information to care your baby?
    6. How often do you bath your child?
    7. Which products do you use for your child's bath?
    8. Which products do you use for your child's skin after bath?
    9. Which products do you use for cleaning the diaper area of your child?
    10. When has your child experienced the first diaper dermatitis?
    11. When has your child experienced the last diaper dermatitis?
    12. How often does he/she have diaper dermatitis?
    13. Have you changed your diaper care habits for this child according to your older children?
    14. If you have changed your diaper care habits, why?
    15. Which products do you use to prevent the development of diaper dermatitis?
    16. Which products do you use for the treatment of diaper dermatitis?
    17. What are the sources of your information for the care of diaper dermatitis?
    18. What type of detergents do you use to wash the clothes of the child?
    19. Has your child ever had pruritic skin dryness especially in the cheeks and extansor sides of the extremities?
    20. Is there any allergic disease in your family?
    21. Has your child ever been diagnosed as asthma or atopic dermatitis by a medical doctor?
    22. Has your child ever taken vitamin D? Does he/she take currently?
     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    The study protocol was approved by the ethical committee of Maltepe University Faculty of Medicine.


    2.2. Statistical analysis

    Definitive statistics were expressed as mean ± standard deviation for continuously measured variables, and as case number and (%) for nominal variables. Fisher's exact mid-P method was used to compare the effects of the categorical variables on the development of atopic dermatitis, and t-test was used for continuous variables. P ≤ 0.05 was considered significant for both cases. Statistical analyses were performed using Matlab R2012a.


    3. Results

    A total of 207 children, 69 from group Ⅰ, 92 from group Ⅱ, and 46 from group Ⅲ were included into the study. Male/female ratio was similar in all three groups, and mean age was 8.48, 8.74, and 10.98 months, respectively (Table 2).

    Table 2. Some important demographic and clinical characteristics of the groups.
    Group Ⅰ (n = 69) Group Ⅱ (n = 92) Group Ⅲ (n = 46)
    Mean age (months) 8.74 10.98 8.48
    Female, n (%) 28 (41) 39 (42) 25 (54)
    Male, n (%) 41 (59) 53 (58) 21 (46)
    Group Ⅰ vs Ⅱ Group Ⅰ vs Ⅲ Group Ⅱ vs Ⅲ
    OR 0.93 0.57 0.62
    Fisher's exact p-mid 0.41 0.08 0.09
    Type of delivery, n (%)
    Spontaneous delivery 35 (50.7) 10 (10.9) 12 (26.1)
    Caesarean section 34 (49.3) 82 (89.1) 34 (73.9)
    Group Ⅰ vs Ⅱ Group Ⅰ vs Ⅲ Group Ⅱ vs Ⅲ
    OR 8.44 2.91 0.34
    Fisher's exact p-mid 0.0001 0.0045 0.0141
    Mean gestational age (weeks) 38.8 38.4 38.4
    Mean birthweight (gr) 3146.8 3261.5 3121.9
    Mean height at birth (cm) 49.5 49.7 49.6
    Mean head circumference at birth (cm) 34.8 35.1 34.4
    Proportion of breastfeeding, n (%)
    Yes 67 (97.1) 91 (98.9) 45 (97.8)
    No 2 (2.9) 1 (1.1) 1 (2.2)
    Vitamin D intake, n (%)
    Yes 66 (95.7) 92 (100) 43 (93.5)
    No 3 (4.3) 0 (0) 3 (6.5)
    Physician diagnosed atopic dermatitis, n (%) 6 (9) 9 (9) 9 (19)
    Group Ⅰ vs Ⅱ Group Ⅰ vs Ⅲ Group Ⅱ vs Ⅲ
    OR 0.88 0.39 0.45
    Fisher's exact p-mid 0.41 0.05 0.06
    Diaper dermatitis, n (%) 49 (71) 44 (48) 30 (65)
    Group Ⅰ vs Ⅱ Group Ⅰ vs Ⅲ Group Ⅱ vs Ⅲ
    OR 2.67 1.30 0.48
    Fisher's exact p-mid 0.0017 0.25 0.03
    Age of mother (yr), n (%)
    ≤20 3 (4.3) 0 (0) 0 (0)
    21–30 37 (53.6) 36 (43.9) 21 (45.7)
    31–40 26 (37.7) 49 (59.8) 24 (52.2)
    41–50 3 (4.3) 7 (8.5) 1 (2.2)
    Educational status of the mother, n (%)
    Illiterate 11 (15.9) 0 (0) 0 (0)
    Primary school 26 (37.7) 7 (8.5) 3 (6.5)
    Secondary school 14 (20.3) 9 (11) 0 (0)
    High school 14 (20.3) 17 (20.7) 12 (26.1)
    University 4 (5.8) 59 (72) 31 (67.4)
    Age of father (yr), n (%)
    21–30 31 (44.9) 15 (18.3) 3 (6.5)
    31–40 27 (39.1) 60 (73.2) 37 (80.4)
    41–50 11 (15.9) 14 (17.1) 5 (10.9)
    ≥51 0 (0) 3 (3.7) 1 (2.2)
    Educational status of the father, n (%)
    Illiterate 3 (4.3) 0 (0) 0 (0)
    Primary school 31 (44.9) 6 (7.3) 3 (6.5)
    Secondary school 10 (14.5) 7 (8.5) 2 (4.3)
    High school 22 (31.9) 21 (25.6) 10 (21.7)
    University 3 (4.3) 58 (70.7) 31 (67.4)
    Allergic disease in the family, n (%)
    Yes 24 (34.8) 42 (45.7) 25 (54.3)
    No 45 (65.2) 50 (54.3) 21 (45.7)
    Group Ⅰ vs Ⅱ Group Ⅰ vs Ⅲ Group Ⅱ vs Ⅲ
    OR 0.63 0.44 0.70
    Fisher's exact p-mid 0.08 0.02 0.17
     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    Atopic dermatitis was detected in 19% of children in group Ⅲ, and 9% of children in groups Ⅰ and Ⅱ (p > 0.05) (Table 2). Atopic dermatitis was higher in females in group Ⅲ (24%), while it was higher in males from other groups (13% and 10%, respectively, p = 0.05). Family history of allergic disease was found to be higher in children with atopic dermatitis compared to those without atopic dermatitis (p < 0.05).

    There was no statistically significant difference between children with and without atopic dermatitis in terms of gestational age, type of delivery, birth weight, age of mother, education level of mother, age of father, education level of father in all 3 groups (p > 0.05) (Table 3).

    Table 3. Some important demographic and clinical risk factors on the development of atopic dermatitis.
    Atopic Cases Non-atopic Cases
    Gestational age Mean StdDev Mean StdDev p (t-test)
    38.8, 1.28 38.59, 2 0.326
    Type of delivery, n OR Fisher's exact p-mid
    Spontaneous delivery 8 49 1.37, 0.256
    Caesarean section 16 134
    Birth weight Mean StdDev Mean StdDev p (t-test)
    3238.3,314.82 3186.7,538.97 0.323
    Age of mother (Years) OR Fisher's exact p-mid
    ≤30 10 87 0.79, 0.299
    > 30 14 96
    Education level of mother, n OR Fisher's exact p-mid
    University 8 86 0.56, 0.107
    High school and others 16 97
    Age of father (Years) OR Fisher's exact p-mid
    ≤30 5 44 0.83, 0.379
    > 30 19 139
    Education level of father, n OR Fisher's exact p-mid
    University 13 79 1.55, 0.159
    High school and others 11 104
    StdDev: Standart Deviation
     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    Mean age for diaper dermatitis was 3.68 months in group Ⅲ, 2.89 months in group Ⅱ, and 2.63 months in group Ⅰ. The proportion of children who had "less or none" diaper dermatitis was significantly lower in group Ⅲ (61%) compared to group Ⅱ (91%, p < 0.05) and group Ⅰ (72%, p = 0.05).

    Frequency of using wet wipes for diaper care was not statistically different among groups, but was statistically lower in atopic children (38%) compared to non-atopic children (56%) (OR = 0.48, p = 0.05) (Table 4). Using soap with water was found to be more frequent in group Ⅲ (30%) than in group Ⅱ (1%) and group Ⅰ (8%). Using dexpanthenol as a preventive product for diaper rash was significantly higher in children with atopic dermatitis (24%) compared to those without atopic dermatitis (8%) (OR = 3.73, p = 0.012). The proportion of not using any preventive product for diaper rash was lower in children with atopic dermatitis (7%) compared to those without atopic dermatitis (16%) (OR = 0.48, p = 0.178), and this proportion was higher in group Ⅰ (29%) than that of group Ⅱ (5%) and group Ⅲ (4%). Using of dexpanthenol for diaper rash was significantly more frequent in children with atopic dermatitis (40%) compared to those without atopic dermatitis (25%) (OR = 2.13, p = 0.05). A mixture of steroid and antifungal agents in group Ⅲ (26%), Hamamelis virginiana distillate in group Ⅱ (27%) and powder in group Ⅰ (21%) were detected to be used more frequently.

    Table 4. Risk and protective factors of atopic dermatitis.
    Atopic Cases N% Non-atopic Cases N% OR (95% CI) Fisher's exact p-mid
    Wet wipes for diaper care (line number deleted)
    Yes 9 (38%) 102 (56%) 0.48, 0.05
    No 15 (62%) 81 (44%)
    Using dexpanthenol preventive
    Yes 6 (24%) 15 (8%) 3.73, 0.012
    No 18 (76%) 168 (92%)
    No using preventive products
    Yes 2 (7%) 29 (16%) 0.48, 0.178
    No 22 (93%) 154 (84%)
    Use dexpanthenol for diaper rash
    Yes 10 (40%) 46 (25%) 2.13, 0.05
    No 14 (60%) 137 (75%)
    Using soap powder as washing product
    Yes 13 (54%) 64 (35%) 2.20, 0.05
    No 11 (46%) 119 (65%)
     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    There was not any difference between the groups in terms of bath products. The percent of not using any care products after bath was found to be lower in children with atopic dermatitis (8%). The frequency of using olive oil after bath was not found statistically different between children with and without atopic dermatitis, was found similar in group Ⅲ and group Ⅰ (11% and 15%, respectively).

    Soap powder as washing product was detected to be used more frequently in children with atopic dermatitis (54%) compared to those without atopic dermatitis (35%) (OR = 2.20, p = 0.05) (Table 4).

    The mothers from groups Ⅱ and Ⅲ learned baby care mostly from pediatricians (29% and 35%, respectively), and group Ⅰ learned from the grandmothers (28%). All three groups learned diaper care products mostly from the pediatricians (33%).

    It was found that all children in this study had used vitamin D except six children without atopic dermatitis.


    4. Discussion

    Atopic dermatitis is a chronic, inflammatory skin disease resulting from the interaction between the skin barrier and genetic, environmental, pharmacological and immunological factors [5]. It has been shown that about 20% of newborns develop atopic dermatitis within the first 6 months of life [6]. In a study of 373 infants, development of atopic dermatitis was reported within the first 2 years of life [7]. The development of atopic dermatitis is a result of the interaction between genetic and environmental factors, with the indication of family history in several studies [8,9]. In our study, a family history of allergic disease made a statistically significant difference.

    Skin dryness is a common feature of atopic dermatitis and results from disruption of normal skin barrier. Proteases provide normal desquamation in low pH values and their function increases in high pH values of stratum corneum. In addition, lipid regulating enzymes decrease. Water loss through skin and decrease in surface lipids results in disruption of structure of stratum corneum [8]. Considering that the frequency of hospital admissions because of atopic dermatitis increased from year to year, protective and preventive recommendations in addition to treatment also become important [8,9,10]. Guidelines recommend using emollients after bathing of the babies who carry the risk of atopic dermatitis [6]. Consistent with this knowledge, our study showed that the proportion of not using any care products after bathing was significantly lower in children with atopic dermatitis.

    In this study, the least incidence of the children without diaper dermatitis in group Ⅲ might be due to less incidence of atopic dermatitis in this hospital and an increased risk of the development of irritant contact dermatitis. Additionally, the proportion of not using any rash prevention products was found to be lower in group Ⅲ and in children with atopic dermatitis.

    Olive oil has been shown to cause erythema in skin by disrupting the integrity of the stratum corneum [11]. Despite coming from very different socio-economic environments, Group Ⅰ and Group Ⅲ reported that they were using olive oil to moisturize the skin of their children at similar rates, but their children had different incidences of atopic dermatitis. These results suggest that olive oil is traditionally known by all segments of society in our country and trusted because it is natural, and the development of atopic dermatitis is mainly determined by genetic factors.

    Although cleaning the diaper area with water and cotton, towel or cloth is the gold standard, disposable wet wipes has become a practical alternative in recent years. Even wet wipes with acidic pH containing emollient cleanser and not containing alcohol and detergent were reported to protect skin barrier better than water and cloth [12]. Using soap with water was found more frequent in the group Ⅲ. This may be associated with the hard water. Some studies had found that water hardness is a risk factor for atopic dermatitis in children [13,14,15]. Although baby powder is not recommended because of the risk of inhalation and irritant contact dermatitis [16], some of the mothers in our study reported that they had used it regularly. Barrier paste is recommended to be used in every diaper exchange to treat and prevent diaper dermatitis. It protects the skin from the moisture and the irritants by forming a lipid layer on the skin. It contains mainly zinc oxide, petrolatum or both [17]. In spite of this fact, we found that dexpanthenol had been used most commonly by the mothers to prevent and treat diaper dermatitis in our study. Dexpanthenol increases water content of stratum corneum and decreases inflammation [18].

    This study has some limitations: Firstly, we have no control of potential confounders. Secondly, the study has small power to detect significant differences of risk factors. The third limitation is that the participation rate is not indicated.

    Differences between the groups in terms of sources of information for babysitting lead to the different approaches in babysitting and suggest that environmental factors may be important as well as genetic factors in the development of atopic dermatitis.


    5. Conclusion

    Frequency of atopic dermatitis was found to be higher among children of families coming from higher socioeconomic group. In addition, skin care after bath seems important in the development of atopic dermatitis.


    Conflict of interest

    All authors declare no conflicts of interest in this paper.


    [1] Nikolovski J, Stamatas G, Kollias N, et al. (2007) Infant skin barrier maturation in the first year of life. J Am Acad Dermatol 56: AB153. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2006.06.007
    [2] Levin J, Friedlander SF, Del Rosso JQ (2013) Atopic dermatitis and the stratum corneum: part 2: other structural and functional characteristics of the stratum corneum barrier in atopic skin. J Clin Aesthet Dermatol 6: 49–54.
    [3] Cork MJC, Murphy R, Carr J, et al. (2002) The rising prevalence of atopic eczema and environmental trauma to the skin. Dermatol Pract 10: 22–26.
    [4] Callard RE, Harper JI (2007) The skin barrier, atopic dermatitis and allergy: a role for Langerhans cells? Trends Immunol 28: 294–298. doi: 10.1016/j.it.2007.05.003
    [5] Leung DY, Bieber T (2003) Atopic dermatitis. Lancet 361: 151–160. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)12193-9
    [6] Blume-Peytavi U, Cork MJ, Faergemann J, et al. (2009) Bathing and cleansing in newborns from day 1 to first year of life: recommendations from a European round table meeting. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 23: 751–759. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-3083.2009.03140.x
    [7] Carlsten C, Dimich-Ward H, Ferguson A, et al. (2013) Atopic dermatitis in a high-risk cohort: natural history, associated allergic outcomes, and riskfactors. Ann Allergy Asthma Im 110: 24–28. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2012.10.005
    [8] Kvenshagen BK, Carlsen KH, Mowinckel P, et al. (2014) Can early skin care normalise dry skin and possibly prevent atopic eczema? A pilot study in young infants. Allergol Immunopath 42: 539–543.
    [9] Bergmann RL, Edenharter G, Bergmann KE, et al. (1998) Atopic dermatitis in early infancy predicts allergic airway disease at 5 years. Clin Exp Allergy 28: 965–970. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2222.1998.00371.x
    [10] Horii KA, Simon SD, Liu DY, et al. (2007) Atopic dermatitis in children in the United States, 1997-2004: visit trends, patient and provider characteristics, and prescribing patterns. Pediatrics 120: 527–534. doi: 10.1542/peds.2007-0378
    [11] Danby SG, AIEnezi T, Sultan A, et al. (2013) Effect of olive and sunflower seed oil on the adult skin barrier: implications for neonatal skin care. Pediatr Dermatol 30: 42–50. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1470.2012.01865.x
    [12] Visscher M, Odio M, Taylor T, et al. (2009) Skin care in the NICU patient: effects of wipes versus cloth and water on stratum corneum integrity. Neonatology 96: 226–234. doi: 10.1159/000215593
    [13] Arnedopena A, Bellidoblasco J, Puigbarbera J, et al. (2007) Domestic water hardness and prevalence of atopic eczema in Castellon (Spain) school children. Salud Publica Mex 49: 295–301. doi: 10.1590/S0036-36342007000400009
    [14] Perkin MR, Craven J, Logan K, et al. (2016) Association between domestic water hardness, chlorine, and atopic dermatitis risk in early life: A population-based cross-sectional study. J Allergy Clin Immun 138: 509–516. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2016.03.031
    [15] Engebretsen KA, Bager P, Wohlfahrt J, et al. (2017) Prevalence of atopic dermatitis in infants by domestic water hardness and season of birth: Cohort study. J Allergy Clin Immun 139: 1568–1574.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2016.11.021
    [16] Fernandes JD, Machado MC, Oliveira ZN (2011) Children and newborn skin care and prevention. An Bras Dermatol 86: 102–110. doi: 10.1590/S0365-05962011000100014
    [17] Stamatas GN, Tierney NK (2014) Diaper dermatitis: etiology, manifestations, prevention, and management. Pediatr Dermatol 31: 1–7.
    [18] Udompataikul M, Limpa-o-vart D (2012) Comparative trial of 5% dexpanthenol in water-in-oil formulation with 1% hydrocortisone ointment in the treatment of childhood atopic dermatitis: a pilot study. J Drugs Dermatol 11: 366–374.
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2018 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(4637) PDF downloads(926) Cited by(0)

Article outline

Figures and Tables

Tables(4)

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog