Review Special Issues

Volatile organic compound emissions in free-range chicken production: Impacts on environment, welfare and sustainability

  • The increasing demand for free-range poultry products has led to a surge in their availability in the market, prompting a potential decline in premium prices associated with these products. This shift places considerable pressure on upstream costs in chicken production. A comprehensive under-standing of its impact on the environment is essential to ensure the success of commercial and industrial free-range chicken production. However, there exists a significant knowledge gap concerning the emission and concentrations of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) from organic-free range chicken, and their environmental implications have yet to be understood. We aim to address this critical knowledge gap by elucidating the role of VOC emissions in chicken production and assessing their impact on human and animal health, as well as environmental challenges. Understanding the implications of VOC emissions is essential for promoting sustainable and responsible free-range chicken farming practices. By identifying the sources of VOC emissions and their impacts, stakeholders can implement appropriate measures to optimize air quality and enhance the well-being of chickens and workers. Ultimately, this review highlights the role of VOCs in animal production, providing valuable insights for improving the efficiency, environmental sustainability and welfare aspects of free-range chicken farming.

    Citation: Kiattisak Huanhong, Sureerat Thomya, Patipon Teerakitchotikan, Chompunut Lumsangkul, Tibet Tangpao, Shashanka K Prasad, Kollur Shiva Prasad, Sarana Rose Sommano. Volatile organic compound emissions in free-range chicken production: Impacts on environment, welfare and sustainability[J]. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2023, 8(4): 1071-1091. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2023058

    Related Papers:

    [1] Dyoni M. de Oliveira, Victor Hugo Salvador, Thatiane R. Mota, Aline Finger-Teixeira, Rodrigo F. de Almeida, Douglas A. A. Paixão, Amanda P. De Souza, Marcos S. Buckeridge, Rogério Marchiosi, Osvaldo Ferrarese-Filho, Fabio M. Squina, Wanderley D. dos Santos . Feruloyl esterase from Aspergillus clavatus improves xylan hydrolysis of sugarcane bagasse. AIMS Bioengineering, 2017, 4(1): 1-11. doi: 10.3934/bioeng.2017.1.1
    [2] Mayra A. Mendez-Encinas, Dora E. Valencia-Rivera, Elizabeth Carvajal-Millan, Humberto Astiazaran-Garcia, Agustín Rascón-Chu, Francisco Brown-Bojorquez . Electrosprayed highly cross-linked arabinoxylan particles: effect of partly fermentation on the inhibition of Caco-2 cells proliferation. AIMS Bioengineering, 2021, 8(1): 52-70. doi: 10.3934/bioeng.2021006
    [3] Nina Alchujyan, Elena Aghajanova, Nina Movsesyan, Arthur Melkonyan, Artashes Guevorkian, Armen Andreasyan, Margarita Hovhannisyan . Sex-specific alterations in creatine metabolism in cellular compartments of peripheral blood leukocytes in type 1 diabetes. AIMS Bioengineering, 2024, 11(4): 600-616. doi: 10.3934/bioeng.2024028
    [4] Daniel N. Riahi, Saulo Orizaga . Modeling and computation for unsteady blood flow and solute concentration in a constricted porous artery. AIMS Bioengineering, 2023, 10(1): 67-88. doi: 10.3934/bioeng.2023007
    [5] Nhuan P. Nghiem, Clyde W. Ellis, Jr., Justin Montanti . The effects of ethanol on hydrolysis of cellulose and pretreated barley straw by some commercial cellulolytic enzyme products. AIMS Bioengineering, 2016, 3(4): 441-453. doi: 10.3934/bioeng.2016.4.441
    [6] Guang Long, Bo Lin, Lu Wang, Lingyan Wu, Tieying Yin, Donghong Yu, Guixue Wang . Sappan Lignum Extract Inhibits Restenosis in the Injured Artery through the Deactivation of Nuclear Factor-κB. AIMS Bioengineering, 2014, 1(1): 25-39. doi: 10.3934/bioeng.2014.1.25
    [7] Chiara Schiraldi, Alberto D'Avino, Alessandro Ruggiero, Katia Della Corte, Mario De Rosa . Saccharomyces pastorianus as cell factory to improve production of fructose 1,6-diphosphate using novel fermentation strategies. AIMS Bioengineering, 2015, 2(3): 206-221. doi: 10.3934/bioeng.2015.3.206
    [8] Simge Çelebi, Mert Burkay Çöteli . Red and white blood cell classification using Artificial Neural Networks. AIMS Bioengineering, 2018, 5(3): 179-191. doi: 10.3934/bioeng.2018.3.179
    [9] Vasudeva Reddy Tatiparthi, Madhava Rao, Santosh Kumar, Hindumathi . Detection and analysis of coagulation effect in vein using MEMS laminar flow for the early heart stroke diagnosis. AIMS Bioengineering, 2023, 10(1): 1-12. doi: 10.3934/bioeng.2023001
    [10] David K. Y. Lim, Peer M. Schenk . Microalgae selection and improvement as oil crops: GM vs non-GM strain engineering. AIMS Bioengineering, 2017, 4(1): 151-161. doi: 10.3934/bioeng.2017.1.151
  • The increasing demand for free-range poultry products has led to a surge in their availability in the market, prompting a potential decline in premium prices associated with these products. This shift places considerable pressure on upstream costs in chicken production. A comprehensive under-standing of its impact on the environment is essential to ensure the success of commercial and industrial free-range chicken production. However, there exists a significant knowledge gap concerning the emission and concentrations of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) from organic-free range chicken, and their environmental implications have yet to be understood. We aim to address this critical knowledge gap by elucidating the role of VOC emissions in chicken production and assessing their impact on human and animal health, as well as environmental challenges. Understanding the implications of VOC emissions is essential for promoting sustainable and responsible free-range chicken farming practices. By identifying the sources of VOC emissions and their impacts, stakeholders can implement appropriate measures to optimize air quality and enhance the well-being of chickens and workers. Ultimately, this review highlights the role of VOCs in animal production, providing valuable insights for improving the efficiency, environmental sustainability and welfare aspects of free-range chicken farming.



    Arabinoxylan (AX) are non-starch polysaccharides in the cell walls of the most commonly consumed cereal grains, constituting a significant portion of dietary fiber [1]. AX are essential components in diets due to their potential beneficial effects on human health as prebiotics stimulating specific intestinal microbes and fermentation patterns, improving colon function [2]. Many of the biological activities of AX are correlated with their structural features [3]. Structurally, AX are composed of a linear backbone of (1→4) linked β-D-xylopyranosyl residues, which are substituted at C(O)−2 or C(O)−3 positions with L-arabinofuranosyl residues [4]. Around 50–60% of xylose residues are no replaced with arabinose units and present different substitution patterns, but variations in a structure depend on the extraction source of AX [5]. These arabinose units can be esterified with ferulic acid (FA) on (O)−5 position, forming di- or tri-FA structures. The esterification grade also varies in function of cereal source and the extraction methodology employed [3]. The FA units in AX chains can be crosslinking using chemical or enzymatic free radicals generating agents. Commonly, the laccase enzyme is used for FA oxidation and form additional di- or tri-FA structures [6]. The crosslinking of AX results in the formation of highly viscous solutions and gels (AX-Gel), presenting unique physicochemical properties and playing exciting roles in the food industry and human health [7].

    Generally, AX and AX-Gel consumption in humans is associated with beneficial postprandial effects such as lowering glucose and lipids levels to avoid disease development. The consumption of AX is related to anti-obesogenic impact, reduction of heart disease, and the attenuation of type 2 diabetes by improving carbohydrates, lipids, and amino acid metabolism [1],[8][10]. The AX gels fabricated with covalent crosslinking can absorb large amounts of water, are stable at temperatures or pH changes, and have a neutral taste and odor, which are essential characteristics for food applications [11],[12]. Besides, the AX crosslinking can promote a selective fermentation of these polysaccharides in the colon, limiting the growth of bacteria considered non-beneficial (Bacteroides) and favoring the growth of Bifidobacteria, a probiotic [13]. Furthermore, the AX gels are considered hypothetical protectors of the gut microbiota against consuming a high-fat diet when they were part of the Wistar rats' diet formulation [9].

    A few human evaluations have reported minor effects or no changes in postprandial glucose after AX-rich diet ingestion [14],[15]. The principal hypothesis for attenuation of metabolic responses caused by AX intakes is the increase of alimentary bolus viscosity in the gastrointestinal tract. It has been suggested that the high viscosity that AX and AX-Gel present in aqueous media would reduce the absorption rate of nutrients resulting in a subsequent lowering of blood glucose and lipids levels [16]. Some other studies point out that the AX structure may reduce the intestinal α-glucosidase activity avoiding the production of monomeric sugars units as glucose or fructose from dietary digestible carbohydrates [17].

    In animals, contrasting results about the postprandial effects of AX and AX-Gel consumption are also presented. In some studies, postprandial glucose levels present a considerable reduction by the AX or AX-Gel intake, while in others, glucose levels remain similar to control [18]. In addition, sometimes, the consumption of AX-rich diets has been considered anti-nutritive due to changes in nutrients digestion and absorption rate associated with the viscose nature of AX [19],[20]. Despite the contradictory results by consuming AX or AX-Gel, dietary fiber is important as part of the diet. It does not always impart negative or anti-nutritive effects. For that reason, this work aimed to evaluate the impact of AX and AX-Gel on blood serum lipids and glucose levels of Wistar rats. A standard diet supplemented with 5% (w/w) lyophilized AX or AX-Gel was administered in a single meal, and, after that, blood samples were collected. The serum lipid profile, including total cholesterol, triglycerides, high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol and glucose levels, were determined from blood samples.

    Maize bran AX was isolated following the methodology of Carvajal-Millan et al. [21]. The obtained AX contains 0.025 µg/mg AX of FA and arabinose to xylose (A/X) ratio of 0.8. Table 1 presents the composition of the AX obtained. Laccase enzyme (benzenediol: oxygen oxidoreductase, E.C.1.10.3.2) from Trametes versicolor and all other used chemicals were provided by Sigma Aldrich Co. (St. Louis, Missouri).

    Table 1.  Composition of maize bran arabinoxylans.
    Component Value
    Arabinose 25.9 ± 0.138
    Xylose 32.3 ± 0.210
    Galactose 12.2 ± 0.203
    Glucose 9.3 ± 0.071
    Protein 3.4 ± 0.190
    Ash 1.1 ± 0.001
    Ferulic acid 0.025 ± 0.001
    A/X ratio 0.8

    *Note: Carbohydrates, and ash and protein are expressed in g/100 g of AX dry matter. Ferulic acid is expressed in µg/mg of AX dry matter. Values are the mean ± standard deviation.

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) analysis of dry maize bran AX and AX-Gel was carried out on a Nicolet FT-IR spectrophotometer (Nicolet Instrument Corp., Madison, WI, USA), using KBr pellets (2 mg sample/200 mg KBr). A blank pellet was used as background. FT-IR spectra were acquired in absorbance mode in the mid-infrared region (400–4000 cm−1) at 4 cm−1 of resolution and 32 scans [22]. The obtained spectra were analyzed with the OMNIC 9.3.32 software (Thermo Fisher Inc). The characteristic bands of AX were detected according to previously reported FT-IR spectra [23].

    The AX-gel was prepared following the methodology of Berlanga-Reyes et al. [24] and Martínez-López et al. [25] with some modifications. Maize bran AX were dispersed in 0.1 M sodium acetate buffer at pH 5.5 to obtain a 4% (w/v) solution. The solution was maintained at constant stirring and room temperature for 24 h. Laccase was dispersed in 0.1 M sodium acetate buffer at pH 5.5 (0.4 U/µL) and incorporated as a crosslinking agent into the AX solution to prepare the AX-Gel (1.675 nkat per mg AX). The mixture was stirring for a few minutes. Then, the gel was allowed to set at 25 °C overnight. Both AX solution and AX-Gel were frozen at −20 °C and freeze-dried at −40 °C/0.125 mbar (Labconco lyophilizer, Kansas, USA) for two days.

    The mechanical spectrum of AX-Gel was studied using a strain-controlled rheometer (Discovery HR-2 rheometer, TA Instruments, New Castle, DE, USA) in oscillatory mode. The storage (G′) and loss (G″) moduli and tan δ (G′/G″) were monitored to evaluate the gel hardness by a frequency sweep from 0.01 to 10 Hz at 5% strain and 25 °C. Measurements were made at the end of the network formation in the linearity range of viscoelastic behavior. The rheological test was carried out in duplicate, and the results were reported as the means [26].

    The microstructure and surface morphology of the freeze-dried AX and AX-Gel were evaluated by field emission scanning electron microscopy (JEOL JSM-7401F, Peabody, MA, USA) without coating at low voltage (1.8 kV). The SEM images were obtained a 2000× magnification in secondary and backscattered electrons image mode [22]. ImageJ software was used to evaluate the external morphology of AX powder and AX-gel.

    Twelve male Wistar rats were housed individually in metabolic cages in an environment-controlled room (temperature: 23 ± 2 °C; relativity humidity: 60 ± 5%) with a 12 h day/night cycle. During a week, the organisms were acclimatized, and they were fed a standard pellet diet with free access to water. The weight of the animals on the study day was between 300–320 g. Animal handling and all experiments were approved by the animal ethical committee of the Research Center for Food and Development (CIAD, AC), following the procedures and specifications of the Official Mexican Standard Norm (NOM-062-ZOO-1999).

    The animals were fasted for 15 h with free access to water and randomly divided into three groups (4 per treatment). The rats were weighed, and their tail tip was washed with ethanol. A drop of blood was taken from the end of the tail vein, and the blood glucose concentration was determined with the Accu-Check Performa glucometer (Roche, Mannheim, Germany). This first measure was considered as the baseline blood glucose level. After that, the rats were divided into three groups. Two groups were fed with 20 g of a standard pellet diet containing 5% (w/w) of lyophilized AX or AX-Gel. The control group was fed with 20 g of only standard pellet diet. The rodent consumed the whole meal after 4 h of presentation. Blood glucose concentrations were determined by collecting a new drop of blood from the tail vein at 2 and 10 h after food presentation. The next day, all groups were fed with 20 g of standard pellet diet.

    The concentration of total cholesterol, triglyceride, HDL-cholesterol, and LDL-cholesterol were determined on blood serum after 10 h of food consumption. A sample of blood (approximately 500 µL) from the tail vein of each rat was taken. The samples were allowed to stand for 2 h to let that coagulation process take place. The serum lipid profile was determined using a clinical chemistry autoanalyzer based on dry chemistry micro-slide technology (VITRO® 350 chemistry system, Johnson & Johnson, USA).

    The blood glucose, total cholesterol, triglyceride, HDL-cholesterol, and LDL-cholesterol values were performed in triplicate the data are reported as the means ± standard deviation.

    FT-IR spectra of AX extracted from maize bran and the AX-Gel are presented in Figure 1. Both samples showed almost identical IR spectra, indicating similar molecular identity, and they presented the typical AX spectrum. The spectrum displays the characteristic absorbance bands for polysaccharides in the region of 1200–800 cm−1, especially the signal at 1028 cm−1 is related to the C-OH bending of xylans [27],[28]. Two little dissimulated shoulders at 1069 cm−1 and 904 cm−1 are detected, indicating the antisymmetric C-O-C stretching mode of the glycosidic links and the arabinose substitutions C-3 of xylose units [23],[28]. The band at 1639 cm−1 has been associated with the carbonyl stretching vibration of FA at a low degree of esterification [27]. At 2923 cm−1, the signal for the group CH2 was observed, and a wide band at 3320 cm−1 was presented for the OH group.

    Figure 1.  FT-IR spectrum of maize bran arabinoxylan.

    The mechanical spectrum of the AX-Gel after 12 h of gelation showed that G′ was higher than G″ and independent of frequency (Figure 2). The values of G′ were linear, ranging from 170 to 200 Pa, while G″ values were lower and changed depending on the frequency. The values of G′ and G″ were considered to calculate tan δ (G′/G″). The tan δ values increased from 0.007 to 0.1 when frequency increased.

    Figure 2.  Mechanical spectra of AX-Gel at 25 °C.

    The scanning electron micrographs of AX and AX-Gel are presented in Figure 3. The AX powder (Figure 3a) displayed a segmented and granular structure with an irregular and rough morphology which simulate small porous in the surface. In the case of the AX-Gel (Figure 3b), they had a continuous surface characterized by an irregular three-dimensional arrangement. They presented continuous aggregates of nodular structures that create the porosity of the networks.

    Figure 3.  SEM micrographs of AX powder (a) and freeze-dried AX-Gel (b).

    The rat's blood glucose levels registered before and after food consumption are shown in Figure 4. The mean of fasting blood glucose in each group, considered basal level or time 0, was 125 ± 1, 132 ± 10, and 129 ± 9 mg/dL for control, AX-Gel, and AX group, respectively. After 2 and 10 h of food consumption, the blood glucose levels were measured. In general, the glucose values were from 130 to 150 mg/dL, and in a few cases, they exceeded the 160 mg/dL, especially in the AX-Gel group. Although postprandial blood glucose values trended to increase in both AX-Gel and AX groups, they do not show significant differences compared with the control group.

    Figure 4.  Blood glucose levels in rats before (0 h) and after consumption of food containing AX or AX-Gel at 5% (w/w) (2 and 10 h).

    The serum lipid profile levels were also assessed after 10 h of food consumption. The total cholesterol mean values (Figure 5a) were similar for the AX and the control group, while the mean value increased significantly (p ≤ 0.05) for the AX-Gel group. In triglyceride levels (Figure 5b), the mean of the AX, AX-Gel, and control group were not significantly different. The HDL-cholesterol levels (Figure 5c) were similar between the three groups presenting values around 50 mg/dL. The LDL-cholesterol level (Figure 5d) for AX and AX-Gel groups was significantly higher (p ≤ 0.05) with 14 and 7 mg/dL, respectively, compared with the control group (1.6 mg/dL).

    Figure 5.  Lipid profile in rats after more than 10 h of food consumption. The different letter indicates significative differences (p ≤ 0.05).

    The maize bran AX presented an integral structure corroborated with the FT-IR spectrum, in which all typical signals of AX polysaccharides were detected. Besides, the A/X value (0.8) is similar to that reported for other AX obtained from maize bran and indicates that they have a highly branched structure [29],[30]. However, the FA content (0.025 µg/mg) was lower than the value reported in the literature for other maize bran AX (7.8 µg/mg) [31]. Differences in FA content have been associated with the length of the alkaline process. The increase of AX alkaline extraction time decreases the FA content, impacting the gelling capacity of the AX directly because less crosslinking points are formed, leading probably to a low viscosity solution [32],[33].

    The viscoelastic properties of AX-Gel were similar to those shown by other authors for crosslinked solutions of AX at different concentrations using laccase [23],[25],[34],[35]. Typical behavior of solid-like material was proved in the AX-Gel through the mechanical spectra, with G′ > G″, a linear and independent G′ value, and the G″ value-dependent of frequency [30],[34]. In previous studies, high G′ values in AX gels have been attributed to the content of covalent crosslinking combined with physical entanglements between their chains [7],[25]. The frequency-independent behavior of G′ displayed in AX-Gel reflects the stability between crosslinking points in the network, which has been seen in many AX gels [25],[31]. According to Mendez-Encinas et al. [36], the behavior of AX gels is related to the structural and conformational characteristic of AX, especially the FA content, which is the molecule for covalent crosslinking. Furthermore, the small values obtained for tan δ describe the nature of the network, and in this case, it proves an elastic character of AX-Gel [22],[37]. tan δ values lower than 0.1 are associated with an elastic system, while tan δ values higher than 0.1 suggest a more liquid-like character in the network [38].

    The differences between the surface morphology of AX and AX-Gel have also been shown by previous works that point out how several factors as the branching degree of the xylan backbone, the content of FA, and the crosslinking of the AX chains generate specific morphologies. Martinez-Lopez et al. [25] observed similar surfaces with nodular clusters in AX microparticles crosslinked from a 4% AX solution. They have associated this heterogeneous structure with the content and distribution of ferulic acid due to other studies have reported that the crosslinking of gels via phenolic groups present nodular clusters, which determine the pore size in the network.

    In the present research, the consumption of a standard diet supplemented with 5% of AX or AX-Gel by Wistar rats did not significantly change the levels of postprandial glucose after 2 and 10 h in relation to control. Contrasting results have been reported in Wistar rats fed with a diet containing 4% of crosslinking AX which significantly reduced the postprandial glucose levels [39]. According to those authors, the crosslinking of AX dramatically increases its viscosity in solution, which may delay the bowel transit and absorption rate, causing the blunt of glucose values. The absence of changes in glucose levels observed in the present work, after the ingestion of 5% of the AX-Gel by the Wistar rats, could be associated with the low G′ values (170-200 Pa) in these gels. AX gels exhibit viscoelastic properties and more compact microstructure than non-crosslinked AX [40]. However, the formation of covalent crosslinking points to set the gel mainly depends on the content of FA in the AX chain [4]. Probably, the low FA content in the structure of the AX used (0.025 µg/mg) generates few crosslinking points impacting directly on gel characteristics such as viscoelasticity. [40]. The small tan δ values (0.007–0.100) support the elastic character of AX-Gel. Although, the tan δ registered in the present study is higher than that reported for highly crosslinked AX gels (0.001) [31], which can be attributed to the lower FA content in the sample in relation to that study (7.18 µg/mg AX). Thus, several structural characteristics of AX and AX gels, including the FA content, would modify their physiological functions. In a previous report [39], supplementation of food with 4% of non-cross-linked AX did not blunt the postprandial blood glucose response in Wistar rats, which agrees with the results found in the present study. Those authors attribute the similar effect of AX and control to the low viscosity of AX in relation to AX-Gel. Comparable results have also been reported in pigs where no diet-induced differences were found in postprandial glucose levels, even when the food contained 10% or 17% of native AX as dietary fiber [41],[42]. For humans, AX consumption has been shown to reduce postprandial glucose even if only 3.2% of AX has been incorporated as dietary fiber in food [43],[44].

    Regarding the lipid profile behavior, the total cholesterol and LDL-cholesterol values were higher in AX-Gel in relation to control and AX treatments, but the values were low than those reported by previous studies in rats [45],[46]. At the same time, triglycerides and HDL-cholesterol remain close to the control for both treatments. These results are different from those presented in other studies where the lipid profile has been evaluated after 4 or 5 weeks of AX consumption. One study with rats showed that the ingestion of the dietary fiber from diverse plants, which included AX, reduced the total cholesterol, triglycerides, and LDL-cholesterol and increased the production of HDL-cholesterol [47]. Those authors proposed the increase in bowel transit rate as a mechanism of action, causing an alteration in lipid absorption as cholesterol and fatty acids, which may bind to fiber preventing the formation of micelles. Chen et al. [48] also presented decreased total cholesterol, triglycerides, and LDL-cholesterol after ingesting a high-fat diet supplemented with 6% AX. The contrasting results of this study suggest that the AX-Gel diet does not bind the cholesterol coming from a standard diet, probably due to the short time of treatments consumption. Similar results to those of our study were found in pigs fed with the AX diet, where the serum triglycerides resulted in higher concentrations compared with the control diet. Another study in pigs showed that an 8% AX-rich diet, consumed during 4 weeks, does not significantly affect LDL, HDL, or total cholesterol but decreases triglyceride levels [49]. In humans with metabolic syndrome or type 2 diabetes, the consumption of the AX diet does not improve the lipids profile [50],[51].

    In the case of LDL-cholesterol levels, they were low in all groups, in relation to those shown by previous studies in rats [45],[46]. However, the AX-Gel group presented a higher LDL-cholesterol value and a higher total cholesterol level in relation to control and AX treatments. The biological role of LDL is to transport the cholesterol from the liver to tissues, where it is incorporated into the cellular membranes [46],[52]. The increased serum levels of LDL-cholesterol in the AX-Gel group are probably related to the augmented total cholesterol in the same group, indicating its transport from the liver to extra-hepatic tissues.

    The supplementation of maize bran AX and AX-Gel at 5% in food for Wistar rats does not interfere with the absorption of nutrients. The levels of postprandial glucose, triglycerides, and HDL cholesterol were close to control treatment. Only total cholesterol and LDL-cholesterol showed an increase in AX-Gel treatment, but the values were within normal ranges that have been reported for healthy organisms. The variation in postprandial responses after the consumption of AX and AX-Gel rich diets suggests that further studies are necessary to clarify the underlying mechanisms and the effect of polysaccharide structural variation and the characteristics of the gel formed.



    [1] Jiang Y, Yao Y, Liu H, et al. (2023) Volatile organic compounds conversion pathways and odor gas emission characteristics in chicken manure composting process. Front Ecol Evol 11: 1192132. https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2023.1192132 doi: 10.3389/fevo.2023.1192132
    [2] Aneja VP, Schlesinger WH, Erisman JW (2009) Effects of agriculture upon the air quality and climate: research, policy, and regulations. Environ Sci Technol 43: 4234–4240. https://doi.org/10.1021/es8024403 doi: 10.1021/es8024403
    [3] Casey KD, Bicudo JR, Schmidt DR, et al. (2006) Air quality and emissions from livestock and poultry production/waste management systems. ASABE: Washington, DC, USA. https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.20246
    [4] KA A, Benson O (2014) Poultry wastes management strategies and environmental implications on human health in Ogun state of Nigeria. Adv Econ Bus 2: 164–171. https://doi.org/10.13189/aeb.2014.020402 doi: 10.13189/aeb.2014.020402
    [5] Cao T, Zheng Y, Zhang Y, et al. (2022) Pilot study on gaseous pollution removal efficiency of acid scrubbing in a broiler house. Agric Ecosyst Environ 335: 108021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2022.108021 doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2022.108021
    [6] Kalus K, Konkol D, Korczyński M, et al. (2020) Effect of biochar diet supplementation on chicken broilers performance, NH3 and odor emissions and meat consumer acceptance. Animals 10: 1539. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10091539 doi: 10.3390/ani10091539
    [7] Cai L, Koziel JA, Liang Y, et al. (2007) Evaluation of zeolite for control of odorants emissions from simulated poultry manure storage. J Environ Qual 36: 184–193. https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2006.0052 doi: 10.2134/jeq2006.0052
    [8] Hobbs P, Webb J, Mottram T, et al. (2004) Emissions of volatile organic compounds originating from UK livestock agriculture. J Sci Food Agric 84: 1414–1420. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.1810 doi: 10.1002/jsfa.1810
    [9] Van der Heyden C, Demeyer P, Volcke EI (2015) Mitigating emissions from pig and poultry housing facilities through air scrubbers and biofilters: State-of-the-art and perspectives. Biosyst Eng 134: 74–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2015.04.002 doi: 10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2015.04.002
    [10] Yao Q (2017) Assessing the effectiveness of vegetative environmental buffers in mitigating poultry-emitted air pollutants. University of Maryland, College Park ProQuest Dissertations Publishing 2017: 10617007.
    [11] Konkol D, Popiela E, Skrzypczak D, et al. (2022) Recent innovations in various methods of harmful gases conversion and its mechanism in poultry farms. Environ Res 214: 113825. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2022.113825 doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2022.113825
    [12] Garner CE, Smith S, Elviss NC, et al. (2008) Identification of Campylobacter infection in chickens from volatile faecal emissions. Biomarkers 13: 413–421. https://doi.org/10.1080/13547500801966443 doi: 10.1080/13547500801966443
    [13] Jaturasitha S, Leangwunta V, Leotaragul A, et al. (2002) A comparative study of Thai native chicken and broiler on productive performance, carcass and meat quality. Proc Deutscher Tropentag 146:1–10.
    [14] Nahm K (2007) Feed formulations to reduce N excretion and ammonia emission from poultry manure. Bioresour Technol 98: 2282–2300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2006.07.039 doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2006.07.039
    [15] Jaturasitha S, Chaiwang N, Kreuzer M (2016) Thai native chicken meat: An option to meet the demands for specific meat quality by certain groups of consumers; a review. Anim Prod Sci 57: 1582–1587. https://doi.org/10.1071/AN15646 doi: 10.1071/AN15646
    [16] Dal Bosco A, Mattioli S, Cartoni Mancinelli A, et al. (2021) Extensive rearing systems in poultry production: The right chicken for the right farming system. A review of twenty years of scientific research in Perugia University, Italy. Animals 11: 1281. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11051281 doi: 10.3390/ani11051281
    [17] Wongrak K, Daş G, Moors E, et al. (2014) Establishment of gastro-intestinal helminth infections in free-range chickens: a longitudinal on farm study. Berl Münch Tierarztl Wochenschr 127: 305–313.
    [18] Castellini C, Berri C, Le Bihan-Duval E, et al. (2008) Qualitative attributes and consumer perception of organic and free-range poultry meat. Worlds Poult Sci J 64: 500–512. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043933908000172 doi: 10.1017/S0043933908000172
    [19] Singh M, Cowieson A (2013) Range use and pasture consumption in free-range poultry production. Anim Prod Sci 53: 1202–1208. https://doi.org/10.1071/AN13199 doi: 10.1071/AN13199
    [20] Turan N, Akdemir A, Ergun O (2007) Emission of volatile organic compounds during composting of poultry litter. Water Air Soil Pollut 184: 177–182. https://doi.org./10.1007/s11270-007-9406-0 doi: 10.1007/s11270-007-9406-0
    [21] Abdullah A, Shukor S, Kamis M, et al. (2017) Calibration of an electronic nose for poultry farm. AIP Conf Proc 1808: No.1. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4975235 doi: 10.1063/1.4975235
    [22] Rosentrater KA (2004) Laboratory analysis of an electrostatic dust collection system. Agric Eng Int: CIGR J 2: 3–17.
    [23] Mackie RI, Stroot PG, Varel VH (1998) Biochemical identification and biological origin of key odor components in livestock waste. J Anim Sci 76: 1331–1342. https://doi.org/10.2527/1998.7651331x doi: 10.2527/1998.7651331x
    [24] Gutarowska B, Matusiak K, Borowski S, et al. (2014) Removal of odorous compounds from poultry manure by microorganisms on perlite–bentonite carrier. J Environ Manage 141: 70–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.03.017 doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.03.017
    [25] Wuebbles DJ, Hayhoe K (2002) Atmospheric methane and global change. Earth-Sci Rev 57: 177–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0012-8252(01)00062-9 doi: 10.1016/S0012-8252(01)00062-9
    [26] Saunois M (2020) Supplement of the global methane budget 2000–2017. Earth Syst Sci Data 12: 1561–1623. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-12-1561-2020 doi: 10.5194/essd-12-1561-2020
    [27] IPCC (2013) Climate change 2013: The physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, UK and USA, 659–740.
    [28] Abouelenien F, Kitamura Y, Nishio N, et al. (2009) Dry anaerobic ammonia–methane production from chicken manure. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 82: 757–764. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-009-1881-3 doi: 10.1007/s00253-009-1881-3
    [29] Thangarajan R, Bolan NS, Tian G, et al. (2013) Role of organic amendment application on greenhouse gas emission from soil. Sci Total Environ 465: 72–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.01.031 doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.01.031
    [30] Manogaran MD, Shamsuddin R, Yusoff MHM, et al. (2022) A review on treatment processes of chicken manure. Cleaner Circ Bioeconomy 2: 100013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clcb.2022.100013 doi: 10.1016/j.clcb.2022.100013
    [31] Ilea RC (2009) Intensive livestock farming: Global trends, increased environmental concerns, and ethical solutions. J Agric Environ Ethics 22: 153–167. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-008-9136-3 doi: 10.1007/s10806-008-9136-3
    [32] Gac A, Béline F, Bioteau T, et al. (2007) A French inventory of gaseous emissions (CH4, N2O, NH3) from livestock manure management using a mass-flow approach. Livest Sci 112: 252–260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2007.09.006 doi: 10.1016/j.livsci.2007.09.006
    [33] Carballa M, Regueiro L, Lema JM (2015) Microbial management of anaerobic digestion: Exploiting the microbiome-functionality nexus. Curr Opin Biotechnol 33: 103–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copbio.2015.01.008 doi: 10.1016/j.copbio.2015.01.008
    [34] Li Y, Wang C, Xu X, et al. (2022) Bioaugmentation with a propionate-degrading methanogenic culture to improve methane production from chicken manure. Bioresour Technol 346: 126607. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2021.126607 doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2021.126607
    [35] Wadud S (2011) Understanding the microbial ecology of chicken litter in the context of odour production (Ph.D. thesis). University of New South Wales (UNSW) Sydney, Australia. https://doi.org/10.26190/unsworks/15136
    [36] Robertson A, Hoxey R, Demmers T, et al. (2002) Commercial-scale studies of the effect of broiler-protein intake on aerial pollutant emissions. Biosyst Eng 82: 217–225. https://doi.org/10.1006/bioe.2002.0073 doi: 10.1006/bioe.2002.0073
    [37] Jiang J, Sands J (2000) Odour and ammonia emission from broiler farms. A report for the Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation, RIRDC Publication No 00/2, Kingston, ACT, Australia.
    [38] Cross DE (2004) Phytochemical and enzyme supplementation of broiler chicken diets and the effects on intestinal microflora, nutrient utilisation and performance (Ph.D. thesis). University of Glasgow.
    [39] Lee KW, Everts H, Beynen A (2004) Essential oils in broiler nutrition. Int J Poult Sci 3: 738–752.
    [40] Senesi N, Loffredo E (1999) The chemistry of soil organic matter. Soil Phys Chem 2: 239–370.
    [41] Lichtfouse E (2000) Compound‐specific isotope analysis. Application to archaelogy, biomedical sciences, biosynthesis, environment, extraterrestrial chemistry, food science, forensic science, humic substances, microbiology, organic geochemistry, soil science and sport. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom 14: 1337–1344. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0231(20000815)14:15<1337::AID-RCM9>3.0.CO;2-B doi: 10.1002/1097-0231(20000815)14:15<1337::AID-RCM9>3.0.CO;2-B
    [42] Chai F, Li P, Li L, et al. (2022) Dispersion, olfactory effect, and health risks of VOCs and odors in a rural domestic waste transfer station. Environ Res 209: 112879. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2022.112879 doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2022.112879
    [43] Skóra J, Matusiak K, Wojewódzki P, et al. (2016) Evaluation of microbiological and chemical contaminants in poultry farms. Int J Environ Res Public Health 13: 192. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph13020192 doi: 10.3390/ijerph13020192
    [44] Izat A, Tidwell N, Thomas R, et al. (1990) Effects of a buffered propionic acid in diets on the performance of broiler chickens and on microflora of the intestine and carcass. Poult Sci 69: 818–826. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0690818 doi: 10.3382/ps.0690818
    [45] Khan M, Mobin M, Abbas Z, et al. (2018) Fertilizers and their contaminants in soils, surface and groundwater. Encycl Anthropocene 5: 225–240. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-809665-9.09888-8 doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-809665-9.09888-8
    [46] Pyatt F (2003) Potential effects on human health of an ammonia rich atmospheric environment in an archaeologically important cave in southeast Asia. Occup Environ Med 60: 986–988. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/oem.60.12.986 doi: 10.1136/oem.60.12.986
    [47] Oenema O, Oudendag D, Velthof GL (2007) Nutrient losses from manure management in the European Union. Livest Sci 112: 261–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2007.09.007 doi: 10.1016/j.livsci.2007.09.007
    [48] Jiang J, Stevenson DS, Uwizeye A, et al. (2021) A climate-dependent global model of ammonia emissions from chicken farming. Biogeosciences 18: 135–158. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-18-135-2021 doi: 10.5194/bg-18-135-2021
    [49] Naseem S, King AJ (2018) Ammonia production in poultry houses can affect health of humans, birds, and the environment—techniques for its reduction during poultry production. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25: 15269–15293. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-2018-y doi: 10.1007/s11356-018-2018-y
    [50] Al-Kerwi MSM, Mardenli O, Jasim MRM, et al. (2022) Effects of harmful gases emitted from poultry houses on productive and health performance. IOP Conf Ser: Earth Environ Sci 1060: 012082. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1060/1/012082 doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/1060/1/012082
    [51] Bist RB, Subedi S, Chai L, et al. (2023) Ammonia emissions, impacts, and mitigation strategies for poultry production: A critical review. J Environ Manage 328: 116919. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116919 doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116919
    [52] Gržinić G, Piotrowicz-Cieślak A, Klimkowicz-Pawlas A, et al. (2023) Intensive poultry farming: A review of the impact on the environment and human health. Sci Total Environ 858: 160014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.160014 doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.160014
    [53] Sazakli E, Leotsinidis M (2021) Odor nuisance and health risk assessment of VOC emissions from a rendering plant. Air Qual Atmos Health 14: 301–312. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11869-020-00935-2 doi: 10.1007/s11869-020-00935-2
    [54] Luo K, Pang Y, Yang Q, et al. (2019) A critical review of volatile fatty acids produced from waste activated sludge: Enhanced strategies and its applications. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26: 13984–13998. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-04798-8 doi: 10.1007/s11356-019-04798-8
    [55] Feng S, Ngo HH, Guo W, et al. (2022) Volatile fatty acids production from waste streams by anaerobic digestion: A critical review of the roles and application of enzymes. Bioresour Technol 359: 127420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2022.127420 doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2022.127420
    [56] Dunlop MW (2011) Dust and odour emissions from meat chicken sheds. Australian Poultry CRC: Final Report, Project No: 04-45.
    [57] Saksrithai K, King A (2018) Controlling hydrogen sulfide emissions during poultry productions. J Anim Res Nutr 3: 2. https://doi.org/10.21767/2572-5459.100040 doi: 10.21767/2572-5459.100040
    [58] Nowak A, Matusiak K, Borowski S, et al. (2016) Cytotoxicity of odorous compounds from poultry manure. Int J Environ Res 13: 1046. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph13111046 doi: 10.3390/ijerph13111046
    [59] Calvo‐Flores FG, Dobado JA (2010) Lignin as renewable raw material. ChemSusChem 3: 1227–1235. https://doi.org/10.1002/cssc.201000157 doi: 10.1002/cssc.201000157
    [60] Tanaka N, Moriyama K, Ohtsu M, et al. (2019) Emissions of volatile organic compounds from a dairy cattle shed in Japan. Asian J Atmos 13: 171–185. https://doi.org/10.5572/ajae.2019.13.3.171 doi: 10.5572/ajae.2019.13.3.171
    [61] Nowak A, Bakuła T, Matusiak K, et al. (2017) Odorous compounds from poultry manure induce DNA damage, nuclear changes, and decrease cell membrane integrity in chicken liver hepatocellular carcinoma cells. Int J Environ Res 14: 933. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph14080933 doi: 10.3390/ijerph14080933
    [62] Spencer T (2013) Pastured poultry nutrition and forages. ATTRA (attra ncat org), 1–20.
    [63] Coetzee A (2018) What makes free range chicken "free": A case study of the free range chicken sector in the Western Cape (Ph.D. thesis). Stellenbosch: Stellenbosch University.
    [64] Campbell D, De Haas E, Lee C (2019) A review of environmental enrichment for laying hens during rearing in relation to their behavioral and physiological development. Poult Sci 98: 9–28. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pey319 doi: 10.3382/ps/pey319
    [65] Van Krimpen M, Leenstra F, Maurer V, et al. (2016) How to fulfill EU requirements to feed organic laying hens 100% organic ingredients. J Appl Poult Res 25: 129–138. https://doi.org/10.3382/japr/pfv048 doi: 10.3382/japr/pfv048
    [66] Kollenda E, Baldock D, Hiller N, et al. (2020) Transitioning towards cage-free farming in the EU: Assessment of environmental and socio-economic impacts of increased animal welfare standards. Policy report by the Institute for European Environmental Policy, Brussels & London, 1–65.
    [67] da Silva DCF, de Arruda AMV, Gonçalves AA (2017) Quality characteristics of broiler chicken meat from free-range and industrial poultry system for the consumers. J Food Sci Technol 54: 1818–1826. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-017-2612-x doi: 10.1007/s13197-017-2612-x
    [68] Miao Z, Glatz P, Ru Y (2005) Free-range poultry production—A review. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci 18: 113–132. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2005.113 doi: 10.5713/ajas.2005.113
    [69] Fanatico A (2007) Specialty poultry production: Impact of alternative genotype, production system, and nutrition on performance, meat quality and sensory attributes of meat chickens for free range and organic markets (Ph.D. thesis). University of Arkansas, Fayetteville.
    [70] Poole TE (2007) Introduction to Developing a Free-Range Poultry Enterprise. University of Maryland, 1–24.
    [71] Mickelson T (2016) Free-Range Farming. Lerner Publications.
    [72] Harper GC, Makatouni A (2002) Consumer perception of organic food production and farm animal welfare. Br Food J 104: 287–299. https://doi.org/10.1108/00070700210425723 doi: 10.1108/00070700210425723
    [73] Crandall P, Seideman S, Ricke S, et al. (2009) Organic poultry: Consumer perceptions, opportunities, and regulatory issues. J Appl Poult Res 18: 795–802. https://doi.org/10.3382/japr.2009-00025 doi: 10.3382/japr.2009-00025
    [74] Miele M (2011) The taste of happiness: Free-range chicken. Environ Plan A 43: 2076–2090. https://doi.org/10.1068/a43257 doi: 10.1068/a43257
    [75] Rodriguez-Aurrekoetxea A, Estevez I (2016) Use of space and its impact on the welfare of laying hens in a commercial free-range system. Poult Sci 95: 2503–2513. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pew238 doi: 10.3382/ps/pew238
    [76] Van Horne P, Achterbosch T (2008) Animal welfare in poultry production systems: impact of EU standards on world trade. Worlds Poult Sci J 64: 40–52. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043933907001705 doi: 10.1017/S0043933907001705
    [77] Karreman HJ, Fulwider W (2021) Animal well-being on organic farms. Improving animal welfare: A practical approach, 3Ed., 268–283.
    [78] Martínez-Pérez M, Sarmiento-Franco L, Santos-Ricalde R, et al. (2017) Poultry meat production in free-range systems: Perspectives for tropical areas. Worlds Poult Sci J 73: 309–320. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043933917000034 doi: 10.1017/S0043933917000034
    [79] Sánchez-Casanova R, Sarmiento-Franco L, Phillips C, et al. (2020) Do free-range systems have potential to improve broiler welfare in the tropics? Worlds Poult Sci J 76: 34–48. https://doi.org/10.1080/00439339.2020.1707389 doi: 10.1080/00439339.2020.1707389
    [80] Young RJ (2013) Environmental enrichment for captive animals: John Wiley & Sons.
    [81] Taylor PS, Schrobback P, Verdon M, et al. (2023) An effective environmental enrichment framework for the continual improvement of production animal welfare. Anim Welf 32: e14. https://doi.org/10.1017/awf.2023.5 doi: 10.1017/awf.2023.5
    [82] Rocchi L, Paolotti L, Rosati A, et al. (2019) Assessing the sustainability of different poultry production systems: A multicriteria approach. J Clean Prod 211: 103–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.013 doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.013
    [83] Loreto F, Barta C, Brilli F, et al. (2006) On the induction of volatile organic compound emissions by plants as consequence of wounding or fluctuations of light and temperature. Plant Cell Environ 29: 1820–1828. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3040.2006.01561.x doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2006.01561.x
    [84] Rutter SM (2006) Diet preference for grass and legumes in free-ranging domestic sheep and cattle: Current theory and future application. Appl Anim Behav Sci 97: 17–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2005.11.016 doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2005.11.016
    [85] Walker A, Gordon S (2003) Intake of nutrients from pasture by poultry Proc Nutr Soc 62: 253–256. https://doi.org/10.1079/PNS2002198 doi: 10.1079/PNS2002198
    [86] Lipiec A, Gruszecki T, Warda M, et al. (2015) Nutritional well-being of sheep under free-range grazing system on natural dry grasslands. Med Weter 71: 41–45.
    [87] Kirstine W, Galbally I, Ye Y, et al. (1998) Emissions of volatile organic compounds (primarily oxygenated species) from pasture. J Geophys Res Atmos 103: 10605–10619. https://doi.org/10.1029/97JD03753 doi: 10.1029/97JD03753
    [88] Kirstine W, Galbally I, Hooper M. (2002) Air pollution and the smell of cut grass. In: Conference proceedings: 16th International Clean Air & Environment Conference, Christchurch, New Zealand, Clean Air Society of Australia and New Zealand, 433–438.
    [89] Fall R, Karl T, Hansel A, et al. (1999) Volatile organic compounds emitted after leaf wounding: On-line analysis by proton-transfer-reaction mass spectrometry. J Geophys Res Atmos 104: 15963–15974. https://doi.org/10.1029/1999JD900144 doi: 10.1029/1999JD900144
    [90] Moran L, Aldezabal A, Aldai N, et al. (2019) Terpenoid traceability of commercial sheep cheeses produced in mountain and valley farms: From pasture to mature cheeses. Food Res Int 126: 108669. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2019.108669 doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2019.108669
    [91] Abd-ElGawad AM, El Gendy AE-NG, Assaeed AM, et al. (2021) Phytotoxic effects of plant essential oils: A systematic review and structure-activity relationship based on chemometric analyses. Plants 10: 36. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10010036 doi: 10.3390/plants10010036
    [92] Kilcawley KN, Faulkner H, Clarke HJ, et al. (2018) Factors influencing the flavour of bovine milk and cheese from grass based versus non-grass based milk production systems. Foods 7: 37. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods7030037 doi: 10.3390/foods7030037
    [93] Srikamwang C, Onsa NE, Sunanta P, et al. (2023) Role of microbial volatile organic compounds in promoting plant growth and disease resistance in horticultural production. Plant Signal Behav 2023: 2227440. https://doi.org/10.1080/15592324.2023.2227440 doi: 10.1080/15592324.2023.2227440
    [94] Guimarães GS, Rondina ABL, Santos MS, et al. (2022) Pointing out opportunities to increase grassland pastures productivity via microbial inoculants: Attending the society's demands for meat production with sustainability. Agronomy 12: 1748. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12081748 doi: 10.3390/agronomy12081748
    [95] Richardson AE, Simpson RJ (2011) Soil microorganisms mediating phosphorus availability update on microbial phosphorus. Plant Physiol 156: 989–996. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.111.175448 doi: 10.1104/pp.111.175448
    [96] Sahur A (2015) The interaction between Endophytic actinomycetes and Rhizobium in Leguminous plants. J Trop Crop Sci 2: 29–34. https://doi.org/10.29244/jtcs.2.3.29-34 doi: 10.29244/jtcs.2.3.29-34
    [97] Bentley R, Chasteen TG (2004) Environmental VOSCs––formation and degradation of dimethyl sulfide, methanethiol and related materials. Chemosphere 55: 291–317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2003.12.017 doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2003.12.017
    [98] Smet E, Lens P, Langenhove HV (1998) Treatment of waste gases contaminated with odorous sulfur compounds. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol 28: 89–117. https://doi.org/10.1080/10643389891254179 doi: 10.1080/10643389891254179
    [99] Wang D, Rosen C, Kinkel L, et al. (2009) Production of methyl sulfide and dimethyl disulfide from soil-incorporated plant material and implications for controlling soilborne pathogens. Plant Soil 324: 185–197. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-009-9943-y doi: 10.1007/s11104-009-9943-y
    [100] Smith A (1976) Ethylene in soil biology. Annu Rev Phytopathol 14: 53–73.
    [101] Adams WA, Akhtar N (1994) The possible consequences for herbage growth of waterlogging compacted pasture soils. Plant Soil 162: 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01416085 doi: 10.1007/BF01416085
    [102] Shibata M, Terada F (2010) Factors affecting methane production and mitigation in ruminants. Animal Anim Sci J 81: 2–10. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-0929.2009.00687.x doi: 10.1111/j.1740-0929.2009.00687.x
    [103] Moss A (1994) Methane production by ruminants-Literature review of Ⅰ. Dietary manipulation to reduce methane production and Ⅱ. Laboratory procedures for estimating methane potential of diets. Nutr Abstr Rev (Series B) 64: 786–806.
    [104] Taylor R, Omed H, Edwards-Jones G (2014) The greenhouse emissions footprint of free-range eggs. Poult Sci 93: 231–237. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2013-03489 doi: 10.3382/ps.2013-03489
    [105] Gutiérrez-del-Río I, Fernández J, Lombó F (2018) Plant nutraceuticals as antimicrobial agents in food preservation: Terpenoids, polyphenols and thiols. Int J Antimicrob Agents 52: 309–315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2018.04.024 doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2018.04.024
    [106] Insam H, Seewald MS (2010) Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in soils. Biol Fertil Soils 46: 199–213. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-010-0442-3 doi: 10.1007/s00374-010-0442-3
    [107] Kusstatscher P, Cernava T, Berg G (2020) Using bacteria-derived volatile organic compounds (VOCs) for industrial processes. Bacterial Volatile Compounds as Mediators of Airborne Interactions, 305–316. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-7293-7_13 doi: 10.1007/978-981-15-7293-7_13
    [108] Seedorf J (2018) Controlling the internal concentrations of gases and odor within and emissions from animal buildings. Air Quality and Livestock Farming, CRC Press, 227–264.
    [109] Preis S, Klauson D, Gregor A (2013) Potential of electric discharge plasma methods in abatement of volatile organic compounds originating from the food industry. J Environ Manage 114: 125–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.10.042 doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.10.042
    [110] Wu S, Wang Q, Fang M, et al. (2023) Hydrothermal carbonization of food waste for sustainable biofuel production: Advancements, challenges, and future prospects. Sci Total Environ 897: 165327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.165327 doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.165327
    [111] Rios C, Panini R, Menezes LA, et al. (2021) Effects of the substitution of fishmeal with mealworm meal on enzymes, haemolymph and intestinal microbiota of the Pacific white shrimp. J Insects Food Feed 7: 1023–1033.
    [112] Hamid A, Ahmad A, Khan N (2018) Respiratory and other health risks among poultry-farm workers and evaluation of management practices in poultry farms. Braz J Poult Sci 20: 111–118. https://doi.org/10.1590/1806-9061-2017-0513 doi: 10.1590/1806-9061-2017-0513
    [113] Yao Q, Torrents A, Li H, et al. (2018) Using a vegetative environmental buffer to reduce the concentrations of volatile organic compounds in poultry-house atmospheric emissions. J Agric Food Chem 66: 8231–8236. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jafc.8b00088 doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.8b00088
    [114] McGahan E, Gould N, Dunlop MW (2021) Best practice litter management manual for Australian meat chicken farms: Covering fresh, in-shed, reuse and spent litter management. AgriFutures Australia Project No. PRJ-011589.
    [115] Edwards LE, Hemsworth PH (2021) The impact of management, husbandry and stockperson decisions on the welfare of laying hens in Australia. Anim Prod Sci 61: 944–967. https://doi.org/10.1071/AN19664 doi: 10.1071/AN19664
    [116] Koerkamp PG (1994) Review on emissions of ammonia from housing systems for laying hens in relation to sources, processes, building design and manure handling. J Agric Eng Res 59: 73–87. https://doi.org/10.1006/jaer.1994.1065 doi: 10.1006/jaer.1994.1065
    [117] Fangueiro D, Alvarenga P, Fragoso R (2021) Horticulture and orchards as new markets for manure valorisation with less environmental impacts. Sustainability 13: 1436. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13031436 doi: 10.3390/su13031436
    [118] Feilberg A, Sommer SG (2013) Ammonia and malodorous gases: sources and abatement technologies. In: Sommer SG, Christensen ML, Schmidt T, et al. (Eds.), Animal Manure Recycling: Treatment and Management, 153–175. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118676677.ch9
  • This article has been cited by:

    1. Vesta Navikaitė-Šnipaitienė, Dovilė Liudvinavičiūtė, Ramunė Rutkaitė, Vaida Kitrytė-Syrpa, Michail Syrpas, Antioxidant Capacity and Thermal Stability of Arthrospira platensis Extract Encapsulated in Starch Sodium Octenyl Succinate with Freeze-, Spray-, and Nanospray-Drying, 2025, 30, 1420-3049, 1303, 10.3390/molecules30061303
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2023 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(2139) PDF downloads(151) Cited by(1)

Figures and Tables

Figures(3)  /  Tables(1)

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog