
This article studies a (2+1)–dimensional first extended Calogero-Bogoyavlenskii-Schiff equation, which was recently introduced in the literature. We derive Lie symmetries of this equation and then use them to perform symmetry reductions. Using translation symmetries, a fourth-order ordinary differential equation is obtained which is then solved with the aid of Kudryashov and (G′/G)−expansion techniques to construct closed-form solutions. Besides, we depict the solutions with the appropriate graphical representations. Moreover, conserved vectors of this equation are computed by engaging the multiplier approach as well as Noether's theorem.
Citation: Chaudry Masood Khalique, Kentse Maefo. A study on the (2+1)–dimensional first extended Calogero-Bogoyavlenskii- Schiff equation[J]. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2021, 18(5): 5816-5835. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2021293
[1] | Sixing Tao . Lie symmetry analysis, particular solutions and conservation laws of a (2+1)-dimensional KdV4 equation. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2023, 20(7): 11978-11997. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2023532 |
[2] | Weidong Zhao, Mobeen Munir, Ghulam Murtaza, Muhammad Athar . Lie symmetries of Benjamin-Ono equation. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2021, 18(6): 9496-9510. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2021466 |
[3] | Ivan Tsyfra, Wojciech Rzeszut . On reducing and finding solutions of nonlinear evolutionary equations via generalized symmetry of ordinary differential equations. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2022, 19(7): 6962-6984. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2022328 |
[4] | Raghu Raghavan . Growth and form, Lie algebras and special functions. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2021, 18(4): 3598-3645. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2021181 |
[5] | Francesca Marcellini . The Riemann problem for a Two-Phase model for road traffic with fixed or moving constraints. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2020, 17(2): 1218-1232. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2020062 |
[6] | Salvador Chulián, Álvaro Martinez-Rubio, María Luz Gandarias, María Rosa . Lie point symmetries for generalised Fisher's equations describing tumour dynamics. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2021, 18(4): 3291-3312. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2021164 |
[7] | Hong-Yang Guan, Jian-Guo Liu . Propagation of lump-type waves in nonlinear shallow water wave. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2023, 20(11): 19553-19564. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2023866 |
[8] | Abdulaziz Alsenafi, M. Ferdows . Effects of thermal slip and chemical reaction on free convective nanofluid from a horizontal plate embedded in a porous media. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2021, 18(4): 4817-4833. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2021245 |
[9] | J. Leonel Rocha, Sandra M. Aleixo . An extension of Gompertzian growth dynamics: Weibull and Fréchet models. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2013, 10(2): 379-398. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2013.10.379 |
[10] | Martha Garlick, James Powell, David Eyre, Thomas Robbins . Mathematically modeling PCR: An asymptotic approximation with potential for optimization. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2010, 7(2): 363-384. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2010.7.363 |
This article studies a (2+1)–dimensional first extended Calogero-Bogoyavlenskii-Schiff equation, which was recently introduced in the literature. We derive Lie symmetries of this equation and then use them to perform symmetry reductions. Using translation symmetries, a fourth-order ordinary differential equation is obtained which is then solved with the aid of Kudryashov and (G′/G)−expansion techniques to construct closed-form solutions. Besides, we depict the solutions with the appropriate graphical representations. Moreover, conserved vectors of this equation are computed by engaging the multiplier approach as well as Noether's theorem.
Non-linear differential equations continue to play a vital role in today's world as they are used as mathematical models that describe natural phenomena, for example in astronomy, fluids, plasmas, solid-state materials, meteorology and climate, operations research, system theory and control, continuum mechanics, and oceanography, just to mention a few. Some of these models include the pair transition coupled non-linear Schrödinger equations that are used to illustrate the spreading of the optical waves in isotropic medium [1]; Boussinesq equation that arises in the vibrations of a non-linear string [2]; Boiti-Leon-Manna-Pempinelli equation that models incompressible fluid [3]; and Hirota-Satsuma equation that models the unidirectional propagation of shallow water waves [4]. Lie symmetry analysis was carried out in [5,6,7,8] on some non-linear partial differential equations (NPDEs) and Boussinesq type equations were studied in [9,10,11]. Painlevé integrability was studied for the three dimensional Date-Jimbo-Kashiwara-Miwa equations with constant and time-dependent coefficients and for Sakovich equation in [12,13], respectively. Conservation laws and exact solutions were obtained in [14,15,16] for double dispersion equations in (1+1) and (2+1) dimensions, an extended Korteweg–de Vries equation and the (3+1)-dimensional negative-order KdV equation, respectively. New exact solutions to the nonlinear Schrödinger equation with variable coefficients were derived in [17], whereas symmetry reductions were performed in [] for the (3+1)-dimensional modified Zakharov-Kuznetsov equation. Bounded and unbounded travelling wave solutions of the (3+1)-dimensional Jimbo-Miwa equation were obtained in [19] and exact solutions for the short pulse equation were constructed in [20].
Due to the fact that a lot of phenomena of real world are represented by NPDEs, it is paramount that we are able to solve them and find their closed-form solutions for a better understanding of such equations. There is no standard theory that can be utilized to find such solutions. Nevertheless, over the years, researchers have developed several methods which can lead us to special solutions of NPDEs. These include the power series method [20], the inverse scattering transform method [21], bifurcation method [22], the simplest equation technique [23], the extended simplest equation technique [24], Kudryashov's technique [25], Hirota's method [26], Bäcklund transformation [27], Darboux transformation [28], the homogeneous balance technique [29], (G′/G)−expansion technique [30], Lie symmetry method [31,32,33] and so on.
In the middle years of the nineteenth century, Sophus Lie invented the theory of continuous groups together with its applications to differential equations (DEs). This investigation resulted in one of the significant branches of the twentieth-century mathematics, which is called theory of Lie groups as well as Lie algebras. Lie introduced what is called the Lie symmetries and used them to solve ordinary differential equations (ODEs). Moreover, utilizing Lie symmetries, systems of DEs can be reduced to simpler form. In fact, Lie's method is the most effective and powerful technique for obtaining closed-form solutions to NPDEs [31,32,33].
Conservation laws are beneficial in the investigation of DEs [33,34]. Conservation laws are physical laws that state that certain physical properties remain unchanged in the course of time within an isolated system. For example, in physics such laws govern momentum, energy, angular momentum, and electric charge. With the help of conservation laws one can recognize whether or not a given partial differential equation (PDE) is completely integrable. The validity of numerical solution methods can be checked by the aid of conservation laws [35]. Moreover, conservation laws can be used in constructing exact solutions of PDEs [36,37]. For systems that have Lagrangian formulation, Noether theorem gives an elegant way to construct conservation laws [38,39,40]. However, the multiplier method [32] and the theorem due to Ibragimov [41,42,43] can be utilized to derive conservation laws for any system of equations whether or not the system has a Lagrangian formulation.
Two NPDEs that model real-life situations, that is to say, the (2+1)–dimensional Calogero-Bogoyavlenskii-Schiff (CBS) equations that read [44]
uxxxy+2uyuxx+4uxuxy+uxt=0 | (1.1) |
and
uxxxt+2utuxx+4uxutx+uxy=0 | (1.2) |
describe the interplay of long propagating wave in the x-axis with the Riemann propagating wave along y-axis. Bogoyavlenskii in [45] derived (1.1) using Lax formulation and went further to utilize some form of Lax representations which made it possible for the introduction of equation (1.2). Besides, the researcher established an indication that equation (1.1) possesses soliton as well as N-soliton solutions which are smooth in one coordinate. In [44], Wazwaz invoked Hirota's bilinear approach and derived solutions of (1.1) and later travelling wave solutions were obtained in [46]. In [47], the authors derived Bäcklund transformation alongside Lax pair of a form of CBS equation (1.1) via the singular manifold method. Moreover, some travelling wave solutions to (1.1) were derived in [48] using tanh function technique and (G′/G)−expansion technique.
However, a generalized version of (1.1), namely
uxxxy+buyuxx+auxuxy+uxt=0 | (1.3) |
has been studied by many researchers. For instance, in [49], (G′/G)−expansion method was invoked and travelling wave solutions of (1.3) were constructed. Furthermore, in [50], the Hirota's bilinear technique and homoclinic test method were employed to secure breather-type as well as certain analytic soliton solutions. Using tanh-coth approach, the authors of [51] found some closed-form solution of (1.3). The sine-cosine and complex techniques were used in [52,53] to derive, respectively, the analytic and meromorphic exact solutions of (1.3).
Recently, by including uxy to CBS equation (1.1), the author of [54] introduced the equation that reads
uxy+4uxuxy+2uxxuy+uxxxy+utx=0. | (1.4) |
Here t is an independent variable representing time, x and y are independent variables that represent spatial coordinates and u(t,x,y) denotes the elongation of the wave at any point (t,x,y). We call it (2+1)–dimensional first extended CBS (eCBS) equation. This new integrable eCBS equation (1.4) appears in propagation of waves and provide a variety of multiple real and complex soliton solutions. Painlevé analysis has been employed to justify the integrability and furthermore, multiple soliton solutions were derived in [54].
Here we investigate eCBS equation (1.4). In Section 2, we present solutions of eCBS (1.4) using different methods and Section 3 deals with the conservation laws of the equation, obtained by two approaches. Thereafter, we bestow concluding remarks.
This section firstly determines the Lie point symmetries of eCBS equation (1.4) which are then utilized to reduce the equation and subsequently enables us to find its exact solutions.
The eCBS equation (1.4) will admit the infinitesimal group generator
S=τ(t,x,y,u)∂∂t+ξ(t,x,y,u)∂∂x+ϕ(t,x,y,u)∂∂y+η(t,x,y,u)∂∂u | (2.1) |
on condition that
S[4](uxy+4uxuxy+2uxxuy+uxxxy+utx)|(1.4)=0, | (2.2) |
where S[4] is fourth extension of (2.1) defined by [32]
S[4]=τ∂∂t+ξ∂∂x+ϕ∂∂y+η∂∂u+ζx∂∂ux+ζy∂∂uy+ζtx∂∂utx+ζxx∂∂uxx+ζxy∂∂uxy+ζxxxy∂∂uxxxy. | (2.3) |
Thus, from equation (2.2), we obtain
{ζx(4uxy)+ζy(2uxx)+ζtx(1)+ζxx(2uy)+ζxy(4ux)+ζxxxy(1)}|(1.4)=0 | (2.4) |
and when expanding and separating on appropriate derivatives of u, we get fourteen linear homogeneous PDEs:
τx=0,τy=0,τu=0,ξy=0,ξu=0,ϕx=0,ϕu=0,ξxx=0,ϕtt=0,ηxx=0,ηu+ξx=0,2ηy−ξt=0,4ηx+2ξx−ϕt=0,ϕy+2ξx−τt=0. |
The solution of above PDEs yields the symmetries of the eCBS equation (1.4) given as
S1=∂∂t,S2=2f(t)∂∂x+yf′(t)∂∂u,S3=∂∂y,S4=g(t)∂∂u,S5=4t∂∂y+x∂∂u,S6=2x∂∂x−4y∂∂y−(2u+x)∂∂u,S7=4t∂∂t+2x∂∂x−(2u+x)∂∂u,S8=−4t2∂∂t−2tx∂∂x−4ty∂∂y+(2tu+tx−xy)∂∂u. |
One-parameter groups and transformed solutions
Using the Lie equations [33], the corresponding one-parameter groups are
Ga1:(ˉt,ˉx,ˉy,ˉu)⟶(t+a,x,y,u),Ga2:(ˉt,ˉx,ˉy,ˉu)⟶(t,x+2af(t),y,u+ayf′(t)),Ga3:(ˉt,ˉx,ˉy,ˉu)⟶(t,x,y+a,u),Ga4:(ˉt,ˉx,ˉy,ˉu)⟶(t,x,y,u+ag(t)),Ga5:(ˉt,ˉx,ˉy,ˉu)⟶(t,x,y+4at,u+ax),Ga6:(ˉt,ˉx,ˉy,ˉu)⟶(t,xe2a,ye−4a,ue−2a−x2sinh(2a)),Ga7:(ˉt,ˉx,ˉy,ˉu)⟶(te4a,xe2a,y,ue−2a−x2sinh(2a)),Ga8:(ˉt,ˉx,ˉy,ˉu)⟶(t1+4at,x√1+4at,y1+4at,u√1+4at+ax(t−y)√1+4at). |
Consequently, if u=ψ(t,x,y) is a solution of eCBS equation (1.4), then so are
u1=ψ(t−a,x,y),u2=ayf′(t)+ψ(t,x−2af(t),y),u3=ψ(t,x,y−a),u4=ag(t)+ψ(t,x,y),u5=ax+ψ(t,x,y−4at),u6=e−2aψ(t,xe−2a,ye4a)−12xe−2asinh(2a),u7=e−2aψ(te−4a,xe−2a,y)−12xe−2asinh(2a),u8=ax(t−y)1−4at+1√1−4atψ(t1−4at,x√1−4at,y1−4at). |
We now perform symmetry reductions of the eCBS equation (1.4) by utilizing its three translation symmetries. Consider the combination S=S1+aS2+bS3, with f(t)=1/2 and constants a and b. The symmetry S provides three invariants, namely
p=x−at,q=y−bt,F=u | (2.5) |
and using them reduces (1.4) to
(1−b)Fpq+4FpFpq−aFpp+2FqFpp+Fpppq=0. | (2.6) |
Clearly Γ1=∂/∂p and Γ2=∂/∂q are Lie point symmetries of equation (2.6) as p and q do not appear explicitly in the equation. Utilizing the symmetry Γ=Γ1+dΓ2, d being an arbitrary constant, we can reduce equation (2.6). The symmetry Γ provides us with two invariants
r=q−dp,F=G, | (2.7) |
which reduces equation (2.6) to 4th-order nonlinear ordinary differential equation (NODE)
(d−bd+ad2)G″(r)−6d2G′(r)G″(r)+d3G⁗(r)=0. | (2.8) |
We rewrite equation (2.8) in the form
AG″(r)−6d2G′(r)G″(r)+d3G⁗(r)=0, | (2.9) |
where A=d−bd+ad2. Integrating equation (2.9) twice, we get
12AG′2−d2G′3+d32G″2+K1G′+K2=0, | (2.10) |
where K1 and K2 are arbitrary constants. Let G′=Φ, then equation (2.10) becomes
Φ′2=2dΦ3−Ad3Φ2−2K1d3Φ−2K2d3. | (2.11) |
If the algebraic equation
Φ3−A2d2Φ2−K1d2Φ−K2d2=0 |
has the roots r1>r2>r3, then (2.11) can be written as
Φ′2=2d(Φ−r1)(Φ−r2)(Φ−r3) | (2.12) |
Φ(r)=r2+(r1−r2)cn2(√r1−r32dr|N),N2=r1−r2r1−r3 | (2.13) |
with cn denoting the cosine elliptic function. Since Φ=G′ we integrate equation (2.13) and going back to the variables t, x and y the eCBS equation (1.4) acquires a periodic solution
u(t,x,y)=√2d(r1−r2)2(r1−r3)M8{EllipticE[sn((r1−r3)2dr,N),N]}+{r2−(r1−r2)1−N4N4}r+C3, | (2.14) |
where r=(ad−b)t−dx+y, C3 a constant and
EllipticE[q,w]=∫w0√1−w2m21−m2dm |
is the incomplete elliptic integral [57]. We present the wave profile of the periodic solution (2.14), for the parametric values a=−4, b=0.2, d=0.6, r1=100, r2=50.05, r3=−60, C3=100 in Figure 1.
When the roots satisfy r1>r2=r3, the solution of the eCBS equation (1.4) becomes
u(t,x,y)=r2r+√2dtanh(√r1−r22dr)+C, | (2.15) |
where r=(ad−b)t−dx+y and C is a constant of integration.
When r1=2k2 (k a constant) and r2=r3=0, the solution of the eCBS equation (1.4) becomes
u(t,x,y)=2√dktanh(k√dr)+C0, | (2.16) |
where r=(ad−b)t−dx+y and C0 is an integration constant. We represent the wave profile of (2.16) in Figure 2 with 3D and 2D plots taking the parametric values a=0.1, b=0.1, d=1.5, k=1, C0=10 with t=10.
We invoke Kudryashov's method [25] to construct a closed-form solution of eCBS equation (1.4). This method is an effective technique for finding closed-form solutions of NPDEs. The first step is to reduce the nonlinear eCBS equation (1.4) to NODE, which we have already done using the Lie symmetries in the previous section. Thus, we work with the NODE (2.8). We assume a solution of (2.8) is structured as
G(r)=N∑n=0AnHn(r), | (2.17) |
where H(r) satisfies the first-order NODE
H′(r)=H2(r)−H(r). | (2.18) |
We observe that the solution of (2.18) is
H(r)=11+exp(r). | (2.19) |
The balancing procedure [25] for (2.8) yields N=1. Thus, from (2.17), we have
G(r)=A0+A1H(r). | (2.20) |
Now substituting (2.20) into (2.8) and using (2.18), we obtain, with the aid of Mathematica
2aA1d2H(r)3−3aA1d2H(r)2+aA1d2H(r)−2A1bdH(r)3+3A1bdH(r)2−A1bdH(r)+24A1d3H(r)5−60A1d3H(r)4+50A1d3H(r)3−15A1d3H(r)2+A1d3H(r)−12A21d2H(r)5+30A21d2H(r)4−24A21d2H(r)3+6A21d2H(r)2+2A1dH(r)3−3A1dH(r)2+A1dH(r)=0. | (2.21) |
Now separating on powers of H(r), we acquire the following algebraic equations for the coefficients A0 and A1:
H(r)5:2A1d2−A21d=0,H(r)4:A21d−2A1d2=0,H(r)3:aA1d−A1b+25A1d2−12A21d+A1=0,H(r)2:A1b−aA1d−5A1d2+2A21d−A1=0,H(r):aA1d−A1b+A1d2+A1=0, | (2.22) |
whose solution is
A0=A0,A1=2d,a=b−d2−1d. | (2.23) |
Consequently, the solution of eCBS equation (1.4) associated with (2.23) is
u(t,x,y)=A0−(a±√a2+4b−41+exp((ad−b)t−dx+y)), | (2.24) |
where A0 represents arbitrary constant. The wave profile solution (2.24) for different values of parameters b=0, d=0.05, A0=0 with t=0 is shown in Figure 3.
Here we invoke the (G′/G)−expansion method [30] to acquire closed-form solutions of eCBS equation (1.4). Assume solution of the form
G(r)=M∑j=0Aj(H′(r)H(r))j, | (2.25) |
where H(r) satisfies
H″(r)+λH′(r)+μH(r)=0 | (2.26) |
with λ, μ constants. The value of M is determined by the use of balancing procedure [30]. Here A0,⋯,AM, are undetermined parameters which will be found.
For (2.8), the balancing procedure yields M=1 and hence (2.25) becomes
G(r)=A0+A1(H′(r)H(r)). | (2.27) |
Substitution of the expression for G(r) from (2.27) into (2.8) and using (2.26) provides an algebraic equation, which when separated on powers of H′(r)/H(r) gives five algebraic equations:
aA1d2λμ−A1bdλμ+A1d3λ3μ+8A1d3λμ2+6A21d2λμ2+A1dλμ=0,aA1d2λ2+2aA1d2μ−A1bdλ2−2A1bdμ+A1d3λ4+22A1d3λ2μ+16A1d3μ2+12A21d2λ2μ+12A21d2μ2+A1dλ2+2A1dμ=0,aA1d2λ−A1bdλ+5A1d3λ3+20A1d3λμ+2A21d2λ3+12A21d2λμ+A1dλ=0,aA1d2−A1bd+25A1d3λ2+20A1d3μ+12A21d2λ2+12A21d2μ+A1d=0,10A1d3λ+5A21d2λ+4A1d3+2A21d2=0. |
Solving with Mathematica, gives
A0=A0,A1=−2d,a=b−d2λ2+4d2μ−1d. |
Accordingly, we have the following three kinds of solutions to eCBS equation (1.4):
When λ2−4μ>0, we gain hyperbolic function solution
u(t,x,y)=A0+A1(−λ2+Δ1C1sinh(Δ1r)+C2cosh(Δ1r)C1cosh(Δ1r)+C2sinh(Δ1r)), | (2.28) |
where r=(ad−b)t−dx+y, Δ1=12√λ2−4μ together with C1 and C2 arbitrary constants. The wave profile of the solution (2.28) for parametric values a=1, b=0.1, d=1, λ=−0.01, μ=0.05, A0=1, C1=1, C2=4 with t=1 is shown in Figure 4.
When λ2−4μ<0, we achieve trigonometric function solution
u(t,x,y)=A0+A1(−λ2+Δ2−C1sin(Δ2r)+C2cos(Δ2r)C1cos(Δ2r)+C2sin(Δ2r)), | (2.29) |
where r=(ad−b)t−dx+y, Δ2=12√4μ−λ2 and C1, C2 arbitrary constants. The wave profile of the solution (2.29) for parametric values a=0.1, b=0.01, d=1, λ=0.01, μ=0.05, A0=1, C1=3, C2=5 with t=1 is shown in Figure 5.
When λ2−4μ=0, we gain rational function solution
u(t,x,y)=A0+A1(−λ2+C2C1+C2r), | (2.30) |
where r=(ad−b)t−dx+y and C1, C2 arbitrary constants. The wave profile of the solution (2.30) for parametric values a=0.01, b=0.01, d=1, λ=0.01, μ=0.05, A0=1, C1=3, C2=0 with t=0.4 is shown in Figure 6.
Remark. It should be noted that Kudryashov's method (also called exponential rational function method) and the (G′/G)−expansion method are particular cases of an earlier Riccati expansion technique [58,59,60,61].
We now invoke multiplier method and Noether's theorem to derive conservation laws of eCBS equation (1.4).
In this subsection, we determine conserved quantities of eCBS equation (1.4) by invoking multiplier method [32,42]. We attempt to find first-order multipliers Q, that is
Q=Q(t,x,y,u,ut,ux,uy). |
The multipliers are determined from
δδu{Q(uxy+4uxuxy+2uxxuy+uxxxy+utx)}=0, | (3.1) |
where
δδu=∂∂u−Dx∂∂ux−Dy∂∂uy+DtDx∂∂utx+D2x∂∂uxx+DxDy∂∂uxy+D3xDy∂∂uxxxy |
is the Euler operator with Dt, Dx, Dy being the total derivative operators [33].
Expanding (3.1) and separating on appropriate derivatives of u, we obtain twenty five PDEs:
Qxx=0,Qxu=0,Qxut=0,Qxuy=0,Qyy=0,Qyu=0,Qyut=0,Qyux=0,Quu=0,Quut=0,Quux=0,Quuy=0,Qutut=0,Qutux=0,Qutuy=0,Quxux=0,Quxuy=0,Quyuy=0,Qtu+2Qxy=0,Qtut−4Qu=0,Qxux−Qu=0,Qyuy−2Qu=0,Qtux−4uyQu+2Qy=0,Qtx+(2ux+1)Qxy=0,Qtuy−4uxQu−2Qu+4Qx=0. |
Solving the above PDEs, we obtain
Q=yf′(t)−2uxf(t)+g(t)−4C1t2ut+{C1(−4yuy−2xux−2u−x)+C2(4ut+2uy)−4C3uy}t+C1xy+C2(xux+2yuy+u)+C3x+C4ut+C5ux+C6uy, |
with C1,…,C6 as constants whereas f, g are functions of t. Conserved quantities of equation (1.4) are now derived using the divergence expression
DtTt+DxTx+DyTy=Q(uxy+4uxuxy+2uxxuy+uxxxy+utx), | (3.2) |
with Tt conserved density and Tx, Ty spatial fluxes. As a result we get the following low-order conserved vectors (Tt,Tx,Ty) corresponding to the eight multipliers:
Case 1. For Q1=−4t2ut−2txux−4tyuy−2tu−tx+xy,
we have the corresponding conserved vector as
Tt1=−163t2uuxuxy−83t2uuyuxx−2t2uutx−2t2uuxxxy−2t2uuxy−2t2utux−txu2x−2tyuxuy−tuux−txux+xyux,Tx1=−4txuxuxy+xuux+yuuy+xyuy+tuxy+3xyuxuy+2t2uutt−2t2utuxxy−2t2utuy+2t2utxuxy−2t2uyutxx43tu2uxy+2tyu2xy−2tyu2y+5tuut−tuuxxy+2tuxuxy−3tuyuxx−txuxxy−txuy+xyuxxy+u2−83t2uutuxy+83t2uuyutx−8t2utuxuy−4txuyu2x−8tyuxu2y+2tyuuty−43tuuxuy−txuuxxxy−2txuuxy−txuxuxxy−4txuxuy+txuxxuxy−txuyuxxx−4tyuyuxxy+xyuuxy−yuxy+xu,Ty1=83t2uutuxx+163t2uuxutx+2t2uutxxx+2t2uutx+4txuuxuxx+43tu2uxx+2txuuxx+txuuxxxx−2tyuutx+163tuu2x+4tuux+4tuuxxx+tu−xyuuxx−2yuux−yu; |
Case 2. For Q2=4tut+xux+2tuy+2yuy+u, we have the conserved vector given by
Tt2=163tuuxuxy+83tuuyuxx+2tuutx+2tuuxxxy+2tuuxy+2tutux+tuxuy+yuxuy+12xu2x+12uux,Tx2=−uxuxy+yu2y+4yuxu2y+4tuxu2y+2tutuy+2tuyutxx+2tuyuxxy−2tuutt−tuuty+2tutuxxy−2tutxuxy+2xuyu2x−yuuty+23uuxuy−12xuxxuxy+12xuyuxxx+2yuyuxxy+tu2y−12uuy−tu2xy+2xuuxuxy+12xuuxxxy+12xuuxy+12xuxuxxy+32uyuxx+23u2uxy−yu2xy−83tuuyutx+8tutuxuy+83tuutuxy+12xuxuy−52uut+12uuxxy,Ty2=−83tuutuxx−2xuuxuxx−23u2uxx−12xuuxx−83uu2x−163tuuxutx−uux−2tuutxxx−tuutx−12xuuxxxx+yuutx−2uuxxx; |
Case 3. For Q3=x−4tuy, we have the conserved vector
Tt3=xux−2tuxuy,Tx3=−8tuxu2y+2tuuty+xuuxy+3xuxuy−4tuyuxxy+2tu2xy−2tu2y+uuy+xuxxy+xuy−uxy,Ty3=−2tuutx−xuuxx−2uux−u; |
Case 4. For Q4=ut, we have the conserved vector
Tt4=43uuxuxy+23uuyuxx+12uutx+12uuxxxy+12uuxy+12utux,Tx4=23uutuxy+2utuxuy+12utuxxy+12utuy−23uuyutx+12uyutxx−12uutt−12utxuxy,Ty4=−23uutuxx−43uuxutx−12uutx−12uutxxx; |
Case 5. For Q5=ux, we have the corresponding conserved vector as
Tt5=12u2x,Tx5=2u2xuy+12(4uuxy+uxxy+uy)ux+12(u−uxx)uxy+12uuxxxy+12uyuxxx,Ty5=−12u(4uxuxx+uxx+uxxxx); |
Case 6. For Q6=uy, we have the conserved vector given by
Tt6=12uxuy,Tx6=2uxu2y+uyuxxy+12u2y−12uuty−12u2xy,Ty6=12uutx; |
Case 7. For Q7=f′(t)y−2f(t)ux, we have the conserved vector
Tt7=f′(t)yux−f(t)u2x,Tx7=−f″(t)yu+f′(t){(3yuy+u)ux+y(uuxy+uxxy+uy)}−f(t){4u2xuy+(4uuxy+uxxy+uy)ux+u(uxxxy+uxy)+uyuxxx−uxyuxx},Ty7=u{4f(t)uxuxx−f′(t)yuxx+f(t)uxx+f(t)uxxxx}; |
Case 8. For Q8=g(t), we have the conserved vector
Tt8=g(t)ux,Tx8=−g′(t)u+g(t)(3uxuy+uy+uuxy+uxxy),Ty8=−g(t)uuxx. |
We now utilize the classical Noether's theorem [38] to construct conservation laws for the eCBS equation (1.4).
A 2nd-order Lagrangian of equation (1.4) is
L=12uxxuxy−12utux−12uxuy−u2xuy. | (3.3) |
Thus, the Noether symmetries
N=τ(t,x,y,u)∂∂t+ξ(t,x,y,u)∂∂x+ϕ(t,x,y,u)∂∂y+η(t,x,y,u)∂∂u |
of eCBS equation (1.4) are constructed by employing the Lagrangian (3.3) on the determining equation
N[2]L+L{Dt(τ)+Dx(ξ)+Dy(ϕ)}−Dt(Bt)−Dx(Bx)−Dy(By)=0, | (3.4) |
with N[2] being the second extension of N and Bt,Bx,By are gauge functions. Expanding (3.4) and solving the resultant PDEs, we obtain the following Noether symmetries and the corresponding gauge functions:
N1=∂∂t,Bt=0,Bx=0,By=0,N2=∂∂y,Bt=0,Bx=0,By=0,N3=f(t)∂∂u,Bt=0,Bx=−12uf′(t),By=0,N4=4t∂∂y+x∂∂u,Bt=−12u,Bx=0,By=−12u,N5=2g(t)∂∂x+yg′(t)∂∂u,Bt=0,Bx=−12uyg″(t)−12ug′(t),By=0,N6=8t∂∂t+2x∂∂x+4y∂∂y−(x+2u)∂∂u,Bt=12u,Bx=0,By=12u. |
Now using the above Noether symmetries and invoking [38,39]
Ck=Łξk+(ηα−uαxjξj)(∂Ł∂uαxk−k∑l=1Dxl(∂Ł∂uαxlxk))+n∑l=k(ζαl−uαxlxjξj)∂Ł∂uαxkxl |
the corresponding conserved vectors are, respectively, given by
Ct1=12uxxuxy−uyu2x−12uxuy,Cx1=2utuxuy+34utuxxy−14uxxuty−12utxuxy+12utuy+12u2t,Cy1=utux2+12utux+14utuxxx−14uxxutx;Ct2=12uxuy,Cx2=12utuy+2uxuy2+34uyuxxy−12u2xy−14uxxuyy+12u2y,Cy2=−12utux+14uxxuxy+14uxxxuy;Ct3=−12f(t)ux,Cx3=−2f(t)uxuy−34f(t)uxxy−12f(t)uy−12f(t)ut,Cy3=−f(t)ux2−12f(t)ux−14f(t)uxxx;Ct4=2tuxuy−12xux,Cx4=8tuxuy2+3tuyuxxy−2tuxy2−tuxxuyy−12xut+2tuy2+2tutuy−12xuy−2xuxuy+12uxy−34xuxxy,Cy4=tuxxuxy+tuxxxuy−2tutux−xu2x−12xux+14uxx−14xuxxx;Ct5=g(t)ux2−12yg′(t)ux,Cx5=2g(t)ux2uy+32g(t)uxuxxy−12g(t)uxxuxy−12yg′(t)ut−2yg′(t)uxuy−34yg′(t)uxxy+14g′(t)uxx−12yg′(t)uy,Cy5=2g(t)ux3+g(t)ux2+12g(t)uxxxux−12g(t)uxx2−yg′(t)ux2−12yg′(t)ux−14yg′(t)uxxx;Ct6=xux2−8tuyux2+12xux+uux−4tuyux+2yuyux+4tuxyuxx,Cx6=2yuy2+8yuxuy2+2xux2uy+12xuy+uuy+2xuxuy+4uuxuy−32uxxuy+3yuxxyuy+4tutuy+2yutuy+16tuxutuy−2yuxy2+4tut2−2uxuxy−12uxy−yuyyuxx−12xuxyuxx+34xuxxy+32uuxxy+uut+32xuxuxxy+12xut+6tuxxyut−2tuxxuty−4tuxyutx,Cy6=2xux3+2xux2+2uux2+8tutux2+12xux+uux−uxxux+12xuxxxux+4tutux−2yutux−12xuxx2+yuxyuxx−14uxx+14xuxxx+12uuxxx+yuyuxxx+2tuxxxut−2tuxxutx. |
In this paper, we investigated the eCBS equation (1.4). We determined the Lie point symmetries of this equation, which were then used to construct group of transformations. Thereafter, symmetry reductions were performed and eCBS equation (1.4) was reduced to the NODE (2.8). This NODE was solved by direct integration and the solution was obtained in terms of incomplete elliptic integral, which represents periodic solution. Moreover, Kudrayshov's along with (G′/G)−expansion methods were employed to obtain solutions of the NODE. These solutions were presented graphically and we also included the parametric values of the parameters involved in the solutions. Finally, we used the multiplier method and Noether's theorem to derive the conservation laws of (1.4). The multiplier method yielded eight multipliers which gave eight local conservation laws for eCBS equation (1.4) whereas Noether's theorem gave six local conservation laws. The conservation laws obtained contain the conservation of energy and momentum. It is worth mentioning here, that Noether's theorem has a limitation when it is applied to some differential equations. The limitation is that differential equations should come from a variational problem. On the other hand, the multipliers approach can be applied to any differential equation irrespective of it being variational or not.
The authors would like to thank OD Adeyemo for fruitful discussions and the authorities of North-West University, Mafikeng campus for their continued support. Also, the authors thank the reviewers for their positive suggestions, which helped to improve the paper enormously.
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.
[1] |
W. Q. Peng, S. F. Tian, T. T. Zhang, Initial value problem for the pair transition coupled nonlinear Schrödinger equations via the Riemann-Hilbert method, Compl. Anal. Operator Theory, 14 (2020), 38. doi: 10.1007/s11785-020-00997-1
![]() |
[2] |
S. F. Tian, Lie symmetry analysis, conservation laws and solitary wave solutions to a fourth-order nonlinear generalized Boussinesq water wave equation, Appl. Math. Lett., 100 (2020), 106056. doi: 10.1016/j.aml.2019.106056
![]() |
[3] |
C. J. Cui, X.Y. Tang, Y. J. Cui, New variable separation solutions and wave interactions for the (3+1)-dimensional Boiti-Leon-Manna-Pempinelli equation, Appl. Math. Lett., 102 (2020), 106109. doi: 10.1016/j.aml.2019.106109
![]() |
[4] |
R. Hirota, J. Satsuma, N-Soliton solutions of model equations for shallow water waves, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn., 40 (1976), 611–612. doi: 10.1143/JPSJ.40.611
![]() |
[5] |
N. Benoudina, Y. Zhang, C. M. Khalique, Lie symmetry analysis, optimal system, new solitary wave solutions and conservation laws of the Pavlov equation, Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simulat., 94 (2021), 105560. doi: 10.1016/j.cnsns.2020.105560
![]() |
[6] | J. J. Mao, S. F. Tian, T. T. Zhang, X. J. Yan, Lie symmetry analysis, conservation laws and analytical solutions for chiral nonlinear Schrödinger equation in (2+1)-dimensions, Nonlinear Anal-Model, 25 (2020), 358–377. |
[7] |
M. Rosa, S. Chulián, M. L. Gandarias, R. Traciná, Application of Lie point symmetries to the resolution of an interface problem in a generalized Fisher equation, Physica D, 405 (2020), 132411. doi: 10.1016/j.physd.2020.132411
![]() |
[8] |
S. Chulián, M. Rosa, M. L. Gandarias, Symmetries and solutions for a Fisher equation with a proliferation term involving tumor development, Math. Meth. Appl. Sci., 43 (2020), 2076–2084. doi: 10.1002/mma.6105
![]() |
[9] |
T. A. Sulaiman, A. Yusuf, F. Tchier, M. Inc, F. M. O. Tawfiq, F. Bousbahi, Lie-Bäcklund symmetries, analytical solutions and conservation laws to the more general (2+1)-dimensional Boussinesq equation, Results Phys., 22 (2021), 103850. doi: 10.1016/j.rinp.2021.103850
![]() |
[10] |
P. Cui, Bilinear form and exact solutions for a new extended (2+1)-dimensional Boussinesq equation, Results Phys., 22 (2021), 103919. doi: 10.1016/j.rinp.2021.103919
![]() |
[11] |
X. Y. Gao, Y. J. Guo, W. R. Shan, Water-wave symbolic computation for the Earth, Enceladus and Titan: The higher-order Boussinesq-Burgers system, auto and non-auto-Bäcklund transformations, Appl. Math. Lett., 104 (2020), 106170. doi: 10.1016/j.aml.2019.106170
![]() |
[12] |
A. M. Wazwaz, New (3+1)-dimensional Date-Jimbo-Kashiwara-Miwa equations with constant and time-dependent coefficients: Painlevé integrability, Phys. Lett. A, 384 (2020), 126787. doi: 10.1016/j.physleta.2020.126787
![]() |
[13] | A. M. Wazwaz, A new (3+1)-dimensional Painlevé-integrable Sakovich equation: multiple soliton solutions, Int. J. Numer. Methods Heat Fluid Flow, (2021), In Press, doi.org/10.1108/HFF-11-2020-0687. |
[14] |
M. L. Gandarias, M. R. Duran, C. M. Khalique, Conservation laws and travelling wave solutions for double dispersion equations in (1+1) and (2+1) dimensions, Symmetry, 12 (2020), 950; doi:10.3390/sym12060950. doi: 10.3390/sym12060950
![]() |
[15] |
Y. Yildirim, E. Yasar, An extended Korteweg–de Vries equation: multi-soliton solutions and conservation laws, Nonlinear Dyn., 90 (2017), 1571–1579. doi: 10.1007/s11071-017-3749-x
![]() |
[16] | T. Motsepa, C. M. Khalique, Closed-form solutions and conserved vectors of the (3+1)-dimensional negative-order KdV equation, Adv. Math. Models Appl., 5 (2020), 7–18. |
[17] |
Q. Guo, J. Liu, New exact solutions to the nonlinear Schrödinger equation with variable coefficients, Results Phys., 16 (2020), 102857. doi: 10.1016/j.rinp.2019.102857
![]() |
[18] | Y. Liu, Q. Teng, W. Tai, J. Zhou, Z. Wang, Symmetry reductions of the (3+1)-dimensional modified Zakharov-Kuznetsov equation, Adv. Differ. Equ., (2019), 77. |
[19] |
Y. Zhou, F. Fan, Q. Liu, Bounded and unbounded traveling wave solutions of the (3+1)-dimensional Jimbo-Miwa equation, Results Phys., 12 (2019), 1149–1157. doi: 10.1016/j.rinp.2018.12.065
![]() |
[20] |
H. Liu, J. Li, Lie symmetry analysis and exact solutions for the short pulse equation, Nonlinear Anal. Theor., 71 (2009), 2126–2133. doi: 10.1016/j.na.2009.01.075
![]() |
[21] | M. J. Ablowitz, P. A. Clarkson, Solitons, Nonlinear Evolution Equations and Inverse Scattering, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1991. |
[22] | L. Zhang, C. M. Khalique, Classification and bifurcation of a class of second-order ODEs and its application to nonlinear PDEs, Discrete Cont. Dyn-S, 11 (2018), 777–790. |
[23] |
N. A. Kudryashov, Simplest equation method to look for exact solutions of nonlinear differential equations, Chaos Solitons Fract., 24 (2005), 1217–1231. doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2004.09.109
![]() |
[24] | N. A. Kudryashov, N. B. Loguinova, Extended simplest equation method for nonlinear differential equations, Appl. Math. Comput., 205 (2008), 396–402. |
[25] |
N. A. Kudryashov, One method for finding exact solutions of nonlinear differential equations, Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simulat., 17 (2012), 2248–2253. doi: 10.1016/j.cnsns.2011.10.016
![]() |
[26] | R. Hirota, The Direct Method in Soliton Theory, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2004. |
[27] | C. H. Gu, Soliton Theory and Its Application, Zhejiang Science and Technology Press, Zhejiang, 1990. |
[28] | V. B. Matveev, M. A. Salle, Darboux Transformations and Solitons, Springer, New York, 1991. |
[29] |
M. Wang, Y. Zhou, Z. Li, Application of a homogeneous balance method to exact solutions of nonlinear equations in mathematical physics, Phys. Lett. A, 216 (1996), 67–75. doi: 10.1016/0375-9601(96)00283-6
![]() |
[30] | M. Wang, X. Li, J. Zhang, The (G′/G)− expansion method and travelling wave solutions for linear evolution equations in mathematical physics, Phys. Lett. A, 24 (2005), 1257–1268. |
[31] | L. V. Ovsiannikov, Group Analysis of Differential Equations, Academic Press, New York, 1982. |
[32] | P. J. Olver, Applications of Lie Groups to Differential Equations, 2nd edition, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1993. |
[33] | N. H. Ibragimov, Elementary Lie Group Analysis and Ordinary Differential Equations, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, NY, 1999. |
[34] | G. W. Bluman, A. F. Cheviakov, S. C. Anco, Applications of Symmetry Methods to Partial Differential Equations, Springer, New York, 2010. |
[35] | R. J. Leveque, Numerical Methods for Conservation Laws, 2nd edition, Birkhäuser-Verlag, Basel, 1992. |
[36] | R. Naz, F. M. Mahomed, D. P. Mason, Comparison of different approaches to conservation laws for some partial differential equations in fluid mechanics, Appl. Math. Comput., 205 (2008), 212–230. |
[37] |
A. Sjöberg, On double reductions from symmetries and conservation laws, Nonlinear Anal. Real World Appl., 10 (2009), 3472–3477. doi: 10.1016/j.nonrwa.2008.09.029
![]() |
[38] | E. Noether, Invariante variationsprobleme, Nachr. v. d. Ges. d. Wiss. zu Göttingen, Math.-phys. Klasse, 2 (1918), 235–257. |
[39] |
W. Sarlet, Comment on 'Conservation laws of higher order nonlinear PDEs and the variational conservation laws in the class with mixed derivatives', J. Phys. A: Math. Theor., 43 (2010), 458001. doi: 10.1088/1751-8113/43/45/458001
![]() |
[40] |
T. Motsepa, M. Abudiab, C. M. Khalique, A Study of an extended generalized (2+1)-dimensional Jaulent-Miodek equation, Int. J. Nonlin. Sci. Num., 19 (2018), 391–395. doi: 10.1515/ijnsns-2017-0147
![]() |
[41] | N. H. Ibragimov, A new conservation theorem, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 333 (2007), 311–328. |
[42] |
C. M. Khalique, S. A. Abdallah, Coupled Burgers equations governing polydispersive sedimentation; a Lie symmetry approach, Results Phys., 16 (2020), 102967. doi: 10.1016/j.rinp.2020.102967
![]() |
[43] |
M. S. Bruzón, M. L. Gandarias, Traveling wave solutions of the K(m, n) equation with generalized evolution, Math. Meth. Appl. Sci., 41 (2018), 5851–5857. doi: 10.1002/mma.1339
![]() |
[44] | A. M. Wazwaz, Multiple-soliton solutions for the Calogero-Bogoyavlenskii-Schiff, Jimbo-Miwa and YTSF equations, Appl. Math. Comput., 203 (2008), 592–597. |
[45] | O. I. Bogoyavlenskii, Overturning solitons in new two-dimensional integrable equations, Math. USSR Izv., 34 (1990) 245–259. |
[46] | A. M. Wazwaz, New solutions of distinct physical structures to high-dimensional nonlinear evolution equations, Appl. Math. Comput., 196 (2008), 363–370. |
[47] |
S. Salem, M. Kassem, S. M. Mabrouk, Similarity solution of (2+1)-dimensional Calogero-Bogoyavlenskii-Schiff equation Lax pair, Am. J. Appl. Math., 7 (2019), 137–144. doi: 10.11648/j.ajam.20190705.11
![]() |
[48] |
M. Shakeel, S. T. Mohyud-Din, Improved (G′/G)−expansion and extended tanh methods for (2+1)-dimensional Calogero-Bogoyavlenskii-Schiff equation, Alex. Eng. J., 54 (2015), 27–33. doi: 10.1016/j.aej.2014.11.003
![]() |
[49] | M. Najafi, M. Najafi, S. Arbabi, New application of (G′/G)−expansion method for generalized (2+1)-dimensional nonlinear evolution equations, J. Eng. Math., (2013), 2013. |
[50] | M. T. Darvishi, M. Najafi, M. Najafi, New application of EHTA for the generalized (2+1)-dimensional nonlinear evolution equations, Int. J. Math. Comput. Sci., 6 (2010), 132–138. |
[51] | M. Najafi, M. Najafi, S. Arbabi, New exact solutions for the generalized (2+ 1)-dimensional nonlinear evolution equations by tanh-coth method, Int. J. Mod. Theor. Phys., 2 (2013), 79–85. |
[52] | M. Najafi, S. Arbabi, M. Najafi, New application of sine-cosine method for the generalized (2+1)-dimensional nonlinear evolution equations, Int. J. Adv. Math. Sci., 1 (2013), 45–49. |
[53] |
N. Aminakbari, Y. Gu, W. Yuan, Meromorphic exact solutions of the (2+1)-dimensional generalized Calogero-Bogoyavlenskii-Schiff equation, Open Math. J., 18 (2020), 1342–1351. doi: 10.1515/math-2020-0099
![]() |
[54] |
A. M. Wazwaz, A variety of completely integrable Calogero-Bogoyavlenskii-Schiff equations with time-dependent coefficients, Int. J. Numer. Method H., 31 (2021), 174–185. doi: 10.1108/HFF-01-2020-0015
![]() |
[55] | J. Billingham, A. C. King, Wave Motion, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2000. |
[56] | N. A. Kudryashov, Analytical theory of nonlinear differential equations, Institute of Computer Investigations, Moskow-Igevsk, 2004. |
[57] | M. Abramowitz, I. Stegun, Handbook of Mathematical Functions, New York, Dover, 1972. |
[58] | E. J. Parkes, Observations on the basic (G′/G)−expansion method for finding solutions to nonlinear evolution equations, Appl. Math. Comput., 217 (2010), 1759–1763. |
[59] | N. A. Kudryashov, A note on the (G′/G)−expansion method, Appl. Math. Comput., 217 (2010), 1755–1758. |
[60] |
J. Calatayud, M. Jornet, Short comment on the construction of soliton solutions, Optik, 228 (2021), 166192. doi: 10.1016/j.ijleo.2020.166192
![]() |
[61] |
Z. S. Lü, H. Q. Zhang, Soliton-like and period form solutions for high dimensional nonlinear evolution equations, Chaos Solitons Fractals, 17 (2003), 669–673. doi: 10.1016/S0960-0779(02)00481-2
![]() |
1. | S. M. Mabrouk, E. Y. Abu El Seoud, Abdul-Majid Wazwaz, The nonlocal potential transformation method for solitary wave packets of a shock-breaking dynamics system, 2022, 1745-5030, 1, 10.1080/17455030.2022.2084576 | |
2. | Chaudry Masood Khalique, Karabo Plaatjie, Symmetry Methods and Conservation Laws for the Nonlinear Generalized 2D Equal-Width Partial Differential Equation of Engineering, 2021, 10, 2227-7390, 24, 10.3390/math10010024 | |
3. | Chaudry Masood Khalique, Oke Davies Adeyemo, Kentse Maefo, Symmetry solutions and conservation laws of a new generalized 2D Bogoyavlensky-Konopelchenko equation of plasma physics, 2022, 7, 2473-6988, 9767, 10.3934/math.2022544 | |
4. | Maasoomah Sadaf, Saima Arshed, Ghazala Akram, Muhammad Zubair Raza, Hadi Rezazadeh, Mohammad Ali Hosseinzadeh, Solitary wave dynamics of the extended (2+1)-dimensional Calogero–Bogoyavlenskii–Schiff equation, 2024, 56, 1572-817X, 10.1007/s11082-024-06415-6 | |
5. | Chaudry Masood Khalique, 2023, On the Solutions of a Fifth Order Nonlinear Partial Differential Equation of Fluids, 979-8-3503-2759-5, 719, 10.1109/CSCE60160.2023.00122 | |
6. | Abdul-Majid Wazwaz, Study on a (3+1)-dimensional B-type Kadomtsev–Petviashvili equation in nonlinear physics: Multiple soliton solutions, lump solutions, and breather wave solutions, 2024, 189, 09600779, 115668, 10.1016/j.chaos.2024.115668 | |
7. | Sixing Tao, Lie symmetry analysis, particular solutions and conservation laws of a (2+1)-dimensional KdV4 equation, 2023, 20, 1551-0018, 11978, 10.3934/mbe.2023532 | |
8. | KANG-LE WANG, NEW PROMISING AND CHALLENGES OF THE FRACTIONAL CALOGERO–BOGOYAVLENSKII–SCHIFF EQUATION, 2023, 31, 0218-348X, 10.1142/S0218348X23501104 | |
9. | Ghazala Akram, Maasoomah Sadaf, Saima Arshed, Rimsha Latif, Mustafa Inc, Ahmed S. M. Alzaidi, Exact traveling wave solutions of (2+1)-dimensional extended Calogero–Bogoyavlenskii–Schiff equation using extended trial equation method and modified auxiliary equation method, 2024, 56, 0306-8919, 10.1007/s11082-023-05900-8 | |
10. | Saima Arshed, Ghazala Akram, Maasoomah Sadaf, Rimsha Latif, Hijaz Ahmad, Investigation of (2+1)-dimensional extended Calogero–Bogoyavlenskii–Schiff equation by generalized Kudryashov method and two variable $$\big(\frac{G'}{G},\frac{1}{G}\big)$$-expansion method, 2024, 56, 1572-817X, 10.1007/s11082-024-06361-3 | |
11. | Abdul-Majid Wazwaz, Weaam Alhejaili, Samir A El-Tantawy, Integrability and multiple kinks, lumps, and breathers solutions to an extended (3+1)-dimensional Calogero-Bogoyavlenskii-Schiff fluid model, 2024, 99, 0031-8949, 095228, 10.1088/1402-4896/ad6a9f | |
12. | Ghauss ur Rahman, J. F. Gómez-Aguilar, Energy balance approach to an optical solitons of (2+1)-dimensional fourth-order Korteweg–de Vries equation with two contemporary integration norms using a new mapping method, 2024, 0924-090X, 10.1007/s11071-024-10659-y |