Citation: Edward N Trifonov. Columnar structure of SV40 minichromosome[J]. AIMS Biophysics, 2015, 2(3): 274-283. doi: 10.3934/biophy.2015.3.274
[1] | Yuri M. Moshkin . Chromatin—a global buffer for eukaryotic gene control. AIMS Biophysics, 2015, 2(4): 531-554. doi: 10.3934/biophy.2015.4.531 |
[2] | Michael-Christian Mörl, Tilo Zülske, Robert Schöpflin, Gero Wedemann . Data formats for modelling the spatial structure of chromatin based on experimental positions of nucleosomes. AIMS Biophysics, 2019, 6(3): 83-98. doi: 10.3934/biophy.2019.3.83 |
[3] | Davood Norouzi, Ataur Katebi, Feng Cui, Victor B. Zhurkin . Topological diversity of chromatin fibers: Interplay between nucleosome repeat length, DNA linking number and the level of transcription. AIMS Biophysics, 2015, 2(4): 613-629. doi: 10.3934/biophy.2015.4.613 |
[4] | Raghvendra P Singh, Guillaume Brysbaert, Marc F Lensink, Fabrizio Cleri, Ralf Blossey . Kinetic proofreading of chromatin remodeling: from gene activation to gene repression and back. AIMS Biophysics, 2015, 2(4): 398-411. doi: 10.3934/biophy.2015.4.398 |
[5] | Audrey Lejart, Gilles Salbert, Sébastien Huet . Cytosine hydroxymethylation by TET enzymes: From the control of gene expression to the regulation of DNA repair mechanisms, and back. AIMS Biophysics, 2018, 5(3): 182-193. doi: 10.3934/biophy.2018.3.182 |
[6] | Missag Hagop Parseghian . What is the role of histone H1 heterogeneity? A functional model emerges from a 50 year mystery. AIMS Biophysics, 2015, 2(4): 724-772. doi: 10.3934/biophy.2015.4.724 |
[7] | Tomohiro Yanao, Sosuke Sano, Kenichi Yoshikawa . Chiral selection in wrapping, crossover, and braiding of DNA mediated by asymmetric bend-writhe elasticity. AIMS Biophysics, 2015, 2(4): 666-694. doi: 10.3934/biophy.2015.4.666 |
[8] | Gydo C.P.van Zundert, Alexandre M.J.J. Bonvin . Fast and sensitive rigid-body fitting into cryo-EM density maps with PowerFit. AIMS Biophysics, 2015, 2(2): 73-87. doi: 10.3934/biophy.2015.2.73 |
[9] | Roman Marks . Bubble mediated polymerization of RNA and DNA. AIMS Biophysics, 2022, 9(2): 96-107. doi: 10.3934/biophy.2022009 |
[10] | Hisao Moriya . The expression level and cytotoxicity of green fluorescent protein are modulated by an additional N-terminal sequence. AIMS Biophysics, 2020, 7(2): 121-132. doi: 10.3934/biophy.2020010 |
SV40 minichromosome is classical object for chromatin structure studies that, in particular, provided convincing EM pictures of the nucleosomes organized in the beads-on-string manner [1,2]. The efforts towards determination of the expected unique positions of the nucleosomes along the 5243 bases long genome of the virus gave inconclusive results, both by computational mapping [3], and by cloning of the micrococcal nuclease (MNase) digest nucleosome DNA size fragments [4]. It was found that 22 of 41 cloned and mapped fragments overlap with other fragments sharing from ~25 to ~125 bases. “Nucleosomes do not occupy unique positions in SV40 minichromosomes” [4]. It appears, thus, that the nucleosomes of SV40 are sliding, so that each individual pattern of the beads is different, and no specific nucleosome repeat length, as in eukaryotes in general, is observed.
There is an alternative view at the chromatin structure-organization of the “nucleosomes” in tight oligonucleosomes [5], also called columnar structures [6,7,8,9], or meganucleosomes [10]. In this case, the nucleosomes excised by MNase from the columns in the process of their disintegration would slide like in SV40 minichromosome, occupying many nearly equivalent alternative positions shifted by 10-11 bases. Such separation (i.e., overlapping) has been first observed by Ponder & Crawford [11].
What we call columnar structures, as referred above, is manifested in the extended ~10 base ladder of nuclease digestion of chromatin [5,10,12], well beyond the nucleosome DNA size. The columns are also seen directly by various versions of electron microscopy of the minimally perturbed samples. They appear as smooth 10 nm fibers [13,14,15]. Nucleosomes in the fibers seem to be “closely packed forming a continuous 100 Å filament” [13]. The existence of the columns is suggested by observation of long, far exceeding nucleosome size 10-11 base periodic sequence regions in various chromatins [7,8,9]. Finally, the nucleosome repeat lengths of various eukaryotic organisms, derived by MNase digestion of the chromatins, display discrete values, with increments of ~10 base-pairs [16,17]. The lengths, actually, closely follow 10.4xn series (Trifonov, in press).
The nucleosomes can be mapped on genome sequences by matching to standard periodic consensus pattern (RRRRRYYYYY)n [18,19,20]. In case of the columns the mapping reveals RR/YY oscillations significantly beyond the nucleosome DNA size [9]. Apart from the RR/YY oscillation the pattern contains also the periodic YR dinucleotides which appear to make significant contribution, especially due to TA periodicity [21,22]. There is no mapping algorithm available which would take into account the corresponding (unknown) weights of the RR/YY and YR components. One can apply, however, for the nucleosome (column) mapping purposes two separate algorithms based on the above (RRRRRYYYYY)n consensus (which includes YR as a part of the signal) and on the YR-periodic tracks [23]. The prominent strong nucleosome forming sequence, clone 601 [21], is good example of both components present [22].
In this study we used both algorithms, combining the data in one map, with conclusion that the SV40 minichromosome consists of several connected columnar structures, rather than of solitary beads of the nucleosomes.
The 5243 base sequence of the SV-40 genome is taken from NCBI Genbank.
The construction of the YR tracks follows the rule suggested by the crystal structure of the 601 clone nucleosome [24]: The sequence bound by histone octamers consists of 10-mers or 11-mers starting with YR dinucleotides, occasionally separated by ordinary sequence 10-11mers (up to three 10-11 base period separations). Such succession of YR 10-11-mers makes a YR track.
The nucleosome mapping by the (RRRRRYYYYY)n probe is described in [20] and can be implemented via server http://strn-nuc.haifa.ac.il:8080/mapping/home.jsf
As it follows from crystal data on the 601 clone nucleosomes [24], the YR?YR stacks of the nucleosome DNA are located in positions “minor groove in”. They interact with arginines of the histones and, thus, serve as “anchors” uniquely determining the inner side of the bound nucleosome DNA. The special role the YR dinucleotides should play in the nucleosome positioning has been advocated by Zhurkin and his colleagues since 1979 [25,26,27,28].
The YR elements of the clone 601form a “track” of CG, 5TA and 3TG separated from one another by integer number of bases corresponding to one to three periods of nucleosome DNA of average value 10.4 bases (10, 11, 21 and 30 bases). Such YR track, if found in DNA sequence, would correspond to region bound to histone octamers. The periodically arranged YR elements would keep DNA in specific rotational setting and provide stability to the nucleosomes and columns, in addition to the contribution of the alternating RRRRRYYYYY pattern.
In Figure 1 the map of the SV40 chromatin DNA periodicity is shown derived by the application of the (RRRRRYYYYY)n mapping to the sequence. The regions with 10-11 base oscillations correspond to either nucleosomes or to their tight oligomers, columns. The largest RR/YY periodic region spans ~540 bases (sequence coordinates 4800-5243 and further to ~100, over the circular genome sequence start). Numerous peaks of the map indicate the locations of the pseudodyads, central points of the calculated nucleosome positions, separated one from another by 10-11 bases. These are positions “minor groove out” [9]. Respectively, the minima indicate positions “minor groove in” where the YR elements would be preferentially located. The sections of the map where the RR/YY periodicity is not obvious, however, still show the periodic distribution of YR dinucleotides following one another at one- to three-period distances, as in the clone 601. Altogether, the periodically distributed RR/YY and YR elements make long regions, which would correspond to the columnar chromatin structures.
In Figure 2 the full map of the YR-tracks identified in the SV40 genome is shown. The tracks are of various sizes, from 31 bases (track 17) to 725 bases (track 9). The tracks longer than tight dinucleosome DNA size, ~250 bases [5], occupy together about half of the SV40 genome (2564 bases). The longest track 9 would correspond to the tight oligonucleosomes involving 5 to 6 units ~125 bases each [5], stacked together in one column.
The construction of the tracks from the sequence positions of YR elements and their match to positions of minima in the RR/YY nucleosome map allowed for the gaps between the YR 10-11-mers of the size two or three periods (20-22 and 30-33 bases) as in the 601 clone nucleosome. The larger gaps between the tracks would mean the discontinuity in the columnar organization. Remarkably, however, there seems to be no discontinuity, since the sizes of the observed gaps are all combinations of the 10-mers and 11-mers (see Table 1). That is, although the 10-11-mers of the gaps are not decorated by the YR elements at their starts, length-wise they can be accommodated to the column, thus, fusing the YR tracks in a single long structure - a continuous genome size column.
Gap size(bases) | Number of cases |
40 (4 × 10) | 7 |
41 (3 × 10 + 11) | 1 |
42 (2 × 10 + 2 × 11) | 2 |
43 (10 + 3 × 11) | 2 |
44 (4 × 11) | 2 |
54 (10 + 4 × 11) | 1 |
55 (5 × 11) | 3 |
60 (6 × 10) | 3 |
66 (6 × 11) | 2 |
Perhaps it is not a mere coincidence that the starting 8 bases of the Figure 2 and ending 3 bases together make 11 bases, which means that the whole genome consists of 10-mers and 11-mers, as the continuous columnar structure would suggest. It is quite possible that the long smooth 10 nm filaments observed by electron microscopy in vitrified samples of SV40 chromatin [14], indeed, correspond to the columns as suggested by periodic distribution of the YR elements in the nucleotide sequence (this work). Moreover, as EM of vitrified samples of metaphase arrested eukaryotic cells suggests, chromosomes seem to be “formed by the compact association of 11 nm filaments, or portions thereof? [29]. In other words, it may well be that the columnar organization of chromatin is common feature of eukaryotic chromosomes in general, not just of the SV40 minichromosomes.
The overlapping nucleosome positions in [4] are all confined to the long YR track regions (Figure 2), though few are located in approximate nucleosome size tracks: track 1 which actually contains 2 overlapping MNase nucleosomes (at positions 221 and 247), track 7 (nucleosome at 1768), track 12 (3762), track 14 (4374 and 4392) and track 16 (4876). The frequent overlapping of the nucleosomes defined by ~145 base fragments resulting from MNase digest suggests that the “nucleosomes” may center at any peak of the RR/YY map with as many alternative positions as number of the peaks. In this sense they may slide, in discrete steps, all along the DNA sequence of the column, making series of overlapping “nucleosomes”. The longest YR track 9 harbors at least three pairs of such sliding nucleosomes (2198, 2274; 2495, 2588; and 2734, 2752). The authors of [4] conclude: “nucleosomes do not occupy unique positions in SV40 minichromosomes”.
Since practically all sequence territory of the SV40 minichromosome is covered by the periodic YR-tracks (and RR/YY oscillations) it is not surprising that practically all nucleosomes experimentally identified in [4] are located within the periodic regions. The experimental accuracy (± ~5 bases) does not allow to observe all the alternative positions of the nucleosome centers which should be separated by 10-11 bases. More accurate mapping does show the alternatives [11] for the nucleosomes which cover the unique BamHI restriction site. The site is, indeed, located within the periodic YR track 11. The corresponding RR/YY map shows about 10 alternative center positions for the nucleosomes covering the site (coordinates 2450-2600). In view of the above the term “nucleosome”, actually, describes any one of the particles, products of MNase digestion of the columnar structure, centered at one of ~400 sequence locations (according to the peaks of the nucleosome map).
The RR/YY nucleosome map of the SV40 ninichromosome and the periodic distribution of YR dinucleotides along the SV40 genome, similar to the distribution of these elements in the strongest known 601 clone nucleosome, suggests that the SV40 chromatin consists of long (perhaps, even full-length) continuous columnar structures, rather than of individual beads-on-string nucleosomes.
All authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.
[1] |
Griffith JD (1975) Chromatin structure: deduced from a minichromosome. Science 187: 1202-1203. doi: 10.1126/science.187.4182.1202
![]() |
[2] |
Bellard M, Oudet P, Germond JE, et al. (1976) Subunit structure of simian-virus-40 minichromosome. Eur J Biochem 70: 543-553. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1976.tb11046.x
![]() |
[3] |
Mengeritsky G, Trifonov EN (1984) Nucleotide sequence-directed mapping of the nucleosomes of SV40 chromatin. Cell Bioph 6: 1-9. doi: 10.1007/BF02788576
![]() |
[4] |
Ambrose C, Lowman H, Rajadhyaksha A, et al. (1990) Location of nucleosomes in simian virus 40 chromatin. J Mol Biol 214: 875-884. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(90)90342-J
![]() |
[5] | Tatchell K, van Holde KE (1978) Compact oligomers and nucleosome phasing. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 75: 3583-3587. |
[6] |
Fajkus J, Trifonov EN (2001) Columnar packing of telomeric nucleosomes. Biochem Biophys Res Comm 280: 961-963. doi: 10.1006/bbrc.2000.4208
![]() |
[7] | Salih B, Trifonov EN (2015) Strong nucleosomes of A. thaliana concentrate in centromere regions. J Biomol Str Dyn 33: 10-13. |
[8] |
Salih B, Trifonov EN (2015). Strong nucleosomes reside in meiotic centromeres of C. elegans. J Biomol Str Dyn 33: 365-373. doi: 10.1080/07391102.2013.879263
![]() |
[9] |
Nibhani R, Trifonov EN (2015) Reading sequence-directed computational nucleosome maps. J Biomol Str Dyn 33:1558-1566. doi: 10.1080/07391102.2014.958877
![]() |
[10] |
Gu SG, Goszczynski B, McGhee JD, et al. (2013) Unusual DNA packaging characteristics in endoreduplicated Caenorhabditis elegans oocytes defined by in vivo accessibility to an endogenous nuclease activity. Epigenet Chromatin 6: 37. doi: 10.1186/1756-8935-6-37
![]() |
[11] |
Ponder BAJ, Crawford LV (1977) Arrangement of nucleosomes in nucleoprotein complexes from polyoma-virus and SV40. Cell 11: 35-49. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(77)90315-4
![]() |
[12] | Zhang T, Talbert PB, Zhang W, et al. (2013) The CentO satellite confers translational and rotational phasing on cenH3 nucleosomes in rice centromeres. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 110: E4875-4883. |
[13] | Rattner JB, Hamkalo BA (1978) Higher-order structure in metaphase chromosomes Chromosoma 69: 373-379. |
[14] | Dubochet J, Adrian M, Schultz P, et al. (1986) Cryo-electron microscopy of vitrified SV40 minichromosomes: the liquid drop model. EMBO J 5: 519-528. |
[15] |
Wanner G, Formanek H (2000) A new chromosome model. J Struct Biol 132: 147-161. doi: 10.1006/jsbi.2000.4310
![]() |
[16] |
Karpov VL, Bavykin SG, Preobrazhenskaya OV, et al. (1982) Alignment of nucleosomes along DNA and organization of spacer DNA in drosophila chromatin. Nucl Acids Res 10: 4321-4337. doi: 10.1093/nar/10.14.4321
![]() |
[17] | Widom J (1992) A relationship between the helical twist of DNA and the ordered positioning of nucleosomes in all eukaryotic cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 89:1095-1099. |
[18] |
Rapoport AE, Frenkel ZM, Trifonov EN (2011) Nucleosome positioning pattern derived from oligonucleotide compositions of genomic sequences. J Biomol Str Dyn 28: 567-574. doi: 10.1080/07391102.2011.10531243
![]() |
[19] |
Frenkel ZM, Bettecken T, Trifonov EN (2011) Nucleosome DNA sequence structure of isochores. BMC Genomics 12: 203. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-12-203
![]() |
[20] |
Tripathi V, Salih B, Trifonov EN (2015) Universal full-length nucleosome mapping sequence probe. J Biomol Str Dyn 33: 666-673. doi: 10.1080/07391102.2014.891262
![]() |
[21] |
Lowary PT, Widom J (1998) New DNA sequence rules for high affinity binding to histone octamer and sequence directed nucleosome positioning. J Mol Biol 276: 19-42. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1997.1494
![]() |
[22] |
Trifonov EN, Nibhani R (2015) Review fifteen years of search for strong nucleosomes. Biopolymers, 103: 432-437. doi: 10.1002/bip.22604
![]() |
[23] | Nibhani R, Trifonov EN, TA-periodic (“601”-like) centromeric nucleosomes of A.thaliana. J Biomol Str Dyn [in press]. |
[24] |
Vasudevan D, Chua EYD, Davey CA (2010) Crystal structures of nucleosome core particles containing the ‘601’ strong positioning sequence. J Mol Biol 403: 1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2010.08.039
![]() |
[25] | Zhurkin VB (1982) Periodicity in DNA primary structure and specific alignment of nucleosomes. Stud Biophys 87: 151-152. |
[26] |
Zhurkin VB (1983) Specific alignment of nucleosomes on DNA correlates with periodic distribution of purine pyrimidine and pyrimidine purine dimers. FEBS Lett 158: 293-297. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(83)80598-5
![]() |
[27] |
Zhurkin VB, Lysov YP, Ivanov VI (1979) Anisotropic flexibility of DNA and the nucleosomal structure. Nucl Acids Res 6: 1081-1096. doi: 10.1093/nar/6.3.1081
![]() |
[28] |
Wang D, Ulyanov NB, Zhurkin VB (2010) Sequence-dependent kink-and-slide deformations of nucleosomal DNA facilitated by histone arginines bound in the minor groove. J Biomol Str Dyn 27: 843-859. doi: 10.1080/07391102.2010.10508586
![]() |
[29] | McDowall AW, Smith JM, Dubochet J (1986) Cryo-electron microscopy of vitrified chromosomes in situ. EMBO J 5: 1395-1402. |
[30] | Trifonov EN Nucleosome repeat lengths and columnar chromatin structure. J Biomol Str Dyn [in press]. |
1. | Edward N. Trifonov, Transcription factors operate TATA switches via rotational remodeling of local columnar chromatin structure, 2016, 0739-1102, 1, 10.1080/07391102.2015.1134348 | |
2. | Edward N. Trifonov, Nucleosome repeat lengths and columnar chromatin structure, 2016, 34, 0739-1102, 1156, 10.1080/07391102.2015.1075158 | |
3. | Vladimir B. Teif, Andrey G. Cherstvy, Chromatin and epigenetics: current biophysical views, 2016, 3, 2377-9098, 88, 10.3934/biophy.2016.1.88 |
Gap size(bases) | Number of cases |
40 (4 × 10) | 7 |
41 (3 × 10 + 11) | 1 |
42 (2 × 10 + 2 × 11) | 2 |
43 (10 + 3 × 11) | 2 |
44 (4 × 11) | 2 |
54 (10 + 4 × 11) | 1 |
55 (5 × 11) | 3 |
60 (6 × 10) | 3 |
66 (6 × 11) | 2 |