Equitable access to electricity is a critical challenge confronting urban communities. We investigated this problem empirically and explored the feasibility of leveraging novel distributed energy systems as a potential solution in three steps. First, using historical data, the associations between citizens' socioeconomic attributes and their access to electricity were statistically analyzed to empirically evaluate whether the existing grid systems serve all citizens fairly. Second, a systematic scoping review was conducted to synthesize and analyze the existing knowledge on the design and development of distributed systems to promote equitable access to electricity. Third, a series of semi-structured interviews was conducted to collect subject-matter experts' insights on potential opportunities and challenges for large-scale implementation of distributed energy systems as a solution to the problem of inequitable access to electricity. Finally, using the outcomes of the statistical analysis, systematic scoping review, and interviews, a set of potential research directions are outlined. We set the groundwork for future research and investigations focused on designing novel solutions to overcome the problem of inequitable access to electricity in urban areas. The outcomes of this study will help decision-makers identify potential opportunities and challenges for implementing distributed solutions to create more equitable electricity infrastructure systems.
Citation: Niousha Talebpour, Mohammad Ilbeigi, George Korfiatis, Martin Powell. Distributed energy systems: A potential solution for equitable electricity access[J]. Urban Resilience and Sustainability, 2024, 2(3): 289-306. doi: 10.3934/urs.2024015
Equitable access to electricity is a critical challenge confronting urban communities. We investigated this problem empirically and explored the feasibility of leveraging novel distributed energy systems as a potential solution in three steps. First, using historical data, the associations between citizens' socioeconomic attributes and their access to electricity were statistically analyzed to empirically evaluate whether the existing grid systems serve all citizens fairly. Second, a systematic scoping review was conducted to synthesize and analyze the existing knowledge on the design and development of distributed systems to promote equitable access to electricity. Third, a series of semi-structured interviews was conducted to collect subject-matter experts' insights on potential opportunities and challenges for large-scale implementation of distributed energy systems as a solution to the problem of inequitable access to electricity. Finally, using the outcomes of the statistical analysis, systematic scoping review, and interviews, a set of potential research directions are outlined. We set the groundwork for future research and investigations focused on designing novel solutions to overcome the problem of inequitable access to electricity in urban areas. The outcomes of this study will help decision-makers identify potential opportunities and challenges for implementing distributed solutions to create more equitable electricity infrastructure systems.
| [1] | United Way of the National Capital Area (2021) Equity vs. equality: What's the difference—Examples and definitions. Available from: https://unitedwaynca.org/blog/equity-vs-equality/. |
| [2] |
Tien I (2022) Recommendations for investing in infrastructure at the intersection of resilience, sustainability, and equity. J Infrastruct Syst 28: 02522001. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000684 doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000684
|
| [3] |
Thacker S, Adshead D, Fay M, et al. (2019) Infrastructure for sustainable development. Nat Sustain 2: 324–331. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-019-0256-8 doi: 10.1038/s41893-019-0256-8
|
| [4] | Chow D (2022) Heat kills more in U. S. each year than any other extreme weather event. NBC News. Available from: https://www.nbcnews.com/health/health-news/heat-waves-deadliest-weather-event-united-states-rcna41129. |
| [5] |
Ilbeigi M, Jagupilla SCK (2020) An empirical analysis of association between socioeconomic factors and communities' exposure to natural hazards. Sustainability 12: 6342. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12166342 doi: 10.3390/su12166342
|
| [6] |
Meng F, Ma Q, Liu Z, et al. (2023) Multiple dynamic pricing for demand response with adaptive clustering-based customer segmentation in smart grids. Appl Energy 333: 120626. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.120626 doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.120626
|
| [7] |
Zhang H, Li R, Cai X, et al. (2022) Do electricity flows hamper regional economic–environmental equity? Appl Energy 326: 120001. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.120001 doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.120001
|
| [8] | National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (2023) The Role of Net Metering in the Evolving Electricity System, Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/26704 |
| [9] |
Chakravarty D, Roy J (2021) Solar microgrids in rural India: A case study of household benefits. Ecol Econ Soc–INSEE J 4: 65–93. https://doi.org/10.37773/ees.v4i2.140 doi: 10.37773/ees.v4i2.140
|
| [10] |
Dharmasena S, Olowu TO, Sarwat AI (2022) Algorithmic formulation for network resilience enhancement by optimal DER hosting and placement. IEEE Access 10: 23477–23488. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3154056 doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3154056
|
| [11] | United States Census Bureau (2023) American community survey 5-year data (2009–2022). Available from: https://www.census.gov/data/developers/data-sets/acs-5year.html. |
| [12] | Eckstrom S, Murphy G, Ye E, et al. (2022) Outing power outages: Real-time and predictive socio-demographic analytics for New York City, in 2022 IEEE Power & Energy Society General Meeting (PESGM), IEEE, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1109/PESGM48719.2022.9917220 |
| [13] |
Kavanaugh MS, Stamatopoulos V, Cohen D, et al. (2016) Unacknowledged caregivers: A scoping review of research on caregiving youth in the United States. Adolesc Res Rev 1: 29–49. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40894-015-0015-7 doi: 10.1007/s40894-015-0015-7
|
| [14] |
Munn Z, Peters MD, Stern C, et al. (2018) Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach. BMC Med Res Methodol 18: 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0611-x doi: 10.1186/s12874-018-0611-x
|
| [15] |
Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, et al. (2018) PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and explanation. Ann Intern Med 169: 467–473. https://doi.org/10.7326/M18-0850 doi: 10.7326/M18-0850
|
| [16] |
Gusenbauer M, Haddaway NR (2020) Which academic search systems are suitable for systematic reviews or meta-analyses? Evaluating retrieval qualities of Google Scholar, PubMed, and 26 other resources. Res Synth Methods 11: 181–217. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1378 doi: 10.1002/jrsm.1378
|
| [17] |
Cantoni R, Svenningsen LS, Sanfo S (2021) Unattainable proximity: Solar power and peri-urbanity in central Burkina Faso. Energy Policy 150: 112127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2020.112127 doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2020.112127
|
| [18] | Correa S, Bashir N, Tran A, et al. (2020) Extend: A framework for increasing energy access by interconnecting solar home systems, in Proceedings of the 3rd ACM SIGCAS Conference on Computing and Sustainable Societies, New York: Association for Computing Machinery, 265–273. https://doi.org/10.1145/3378393.3402288 |
| [19] |
Guedes W, Oliveira C, Soares T, et al. (2023) Collective asset sharing mechanisms for PV and BESS in renewable energy communities. IEEE Trans Smart Grid 15. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSG.2023.3288533 doi: 10.1109/TSG.2023.3288533
|
| [20] |
Darghouth NR, O'Shaughnessy E, Forrester S, et al. (2022) Characterizing local rooftop solar adoption inequity in the US. Environ Res Lett 17: 034028. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ac4fdc doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/ac4fdc
|
| [21] | Tarekegne B, Powell D, Oikonomou K, et al. (2022) Analysis of energy justice and equity impacts from replacing peaker plants with energy storage, in 2022 IEEE Electrical Energy Storage Application and Technologies Conference (EESAT), IEEE, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1109/EESAT55007.2022.9998034 |
| [22] |
Subedi MN, Bharadwaj B, Rafiq S (2023) Who benefits from the decentralised energy system (DES)? Evidence from Nepal's micro-hydropower (MHP). Energy Econ 120: 106592. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2023.106592 doi: 10.1016/j.eneco.2023.106592
|
| [23] | Marcelo JA, Rupolo D, Mantovani JR (2021) A new approach to determine a distribution network usage fee for distributed generators, in 2021 IEEE PES Innovative Smart Grid Technologies Europe (ISGT Europe), IEEE, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISGTEurope52324.2021.9640015 |
| [24] | Abbas SA, Ismail M, Ismail T, et al. (2018) Feeder wise net metering service planning using load power demand profile and raw customer billing data, in TENCON 2018-2018 IEEE Region 10 Conference, IEEE, 1966–1970. https://doi.org/10.1109/TENCON.2018.8650058 |
| [25] |
Bakht MP, Mohd MNH, Ayob SM, et al. (2023) A community-scale hybrid renewable energy system for sustainable power supply during load shedding. Indones J Electr Eng Comput Sci 31: 33–43. http://doi.org/10.11591/ijeecs.v31.i1.pp33-43 doi: 10.11591/ijeecs.v31.i1.pp33-43
|
| [26] | Tarekegne B, Kerby J, Bharati AK, et al. (2022) Assessing the energy equity benefits of energy storage solutions, in 2022 IEEE Electrical Energy Storage Application and Technologies Conference (EESAT), IEEE, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1109/EESAT55007.2022.9998019 |
Figures(1) / Tables(2)
Niousha Talebpour, Mohammad Ilbeigi, George Korfiatis, Martin Powell. Distributed energy systems: A potential solution for equitable electricity access[J]. Urban Resilience and Sustainability, 2024, 2(3): 289-306. doi: 10.3934/urs.2024015
DownLoad: