This paper aims to fill a gap between textbooks and papers on data collection methods. Many undergraduate study programs include modules on data collection methods. They provide students with systematic insight into data collection methods. However, a few years later, when students want to apply this training in their research, they may have forgotten unapplied parts! Because researchers might not devote themselves to adequate re-study of data collection textbooks, they sometimes choose a data collection method without a systematic view of other methods and the wider framework of data collection. Researchers might devote their available time to selective study about applying their chosen data collection method, but a loss of overall methodological insight might have negative implications for the research. The present paper aims to help with this problem. It provides a researcher companion of data collection and validation methods in a systematic textbook style but within a concise paper with essential details and examples. The paper can be used by researchers of different disciplines as a standalone methodological guide or a legend for informed searching of more detail in relevant references.
Citation: Abbas Ziafati Bafarasat, Eduardo Oliveira, Anna Growe. A researcher companion of data collection and validation methods[J]. Urban Resilience and Sustainability, 2023, 1(2): 91-106. doi: 10.3934/urs.2023007
This paper aims to fill a gap between textbooks and papers on data collection methods. Many undergraduate study programs include modules on data collection methods. They provide students with systematic insight into data collection methods. However, a few years later, when students want to apply this training in their research, they may have forgotten unapplied parts! Because researchers might not devote themselves to adequate re-study of data collection textbooks, they sometimes choose a data collection method without a systematic view of other methods and the wider framework of data collection. Researchers might devote their available time to selective study about applying their chosen data collection method, but a loss of overall methodological insight might have negative implications for the research. The present paper aims to help with this problem. It provides a researcher companion of data collection and validation methods in a systematic textbook style but within a concise paper with essential details and examples. The paper can be used by researchers of different disciplines as a standalone methodological guide or a legend for informed searching of more detail in relevant references.
[1] | Malhotra NK, Birks DF (2007) Marketing Research: An Applied Approach. Harlow: Pearson Education. |
[2] | Menard S (2004) Polytomous Variable, in The Sage Encyclopedia of Social Science Research Methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications. |
[3] | Levy PS, Lemeshow S (2008) Sampling of Populations: Methods and Applications. Hoboken: John Wiley and Sons. |
[4] | Fink A (2003) How to Sample in Surveys. Second edition. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications. |
[5] | United Nations (1982) National Household Survey Capability Programme: Non-sampling Errors, in Household Surveys: Sources, Assessment and Control. New York: United Nations. |
[6] | Daniel J (2012) Sampling Essentials: Practical Guidelines for Making Sampling Choices. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications. |
[7] | Taherdoost H (2016) Sampling methods in research methodology; how to choose a sampling technique for research. Int j res manag 5:18–27. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3205035 doi: 10.2139/ssrn.3205035 |
[8] | Gill J, Johnson P, Clark M (2010) Research Methods for Managers. London: Sage Publications. |
[9] | Australian Bureau of Statistics (2019) Samples and censuses. |
[10] | Dattalo P (2008) Determining Sample Size: Balancing Power, Precision, and Practicality. New York: Oxford University Press. |
[11] | WHO (World Health Organization) (2005) The WHO STEPS Surveillance Manual. |
[12] | Puszczak K, Fronczyk A, Urbański M, Pashova S (2013) Analysis of Sampling Frames. Task force on quality of BCS data, OECD. |
[13] | Australian Bureau of Statistics (2019) Sample design. |
[14] | Da Costa NM, Hepp K, Martin KA (2009) A systematic random sampling scheme optimized to detect the proportion of rare synapses in the neuropil. J Neurosci Meth 180: 77–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneumeth.2009.03.001 doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2009.03.001 |
[15] | Sampath S (2001) Sampling Theory and Methods. Chennai: CRC Press. |
[16] | Thompson SK (1990) Adaptive cluster sampling. J Am Stat Assoc 85: 1050–1059. |
[17] | Chauvet G (2015) Coupling methods for multistage sampling. Ann Statist 43: 2484–2506. https://doi.org/10.1214/15-AOS1348 doi: 10.1214/15-AOS1348 |
[18] | Yates F (1960) Sampling Methods for Censuses and Surveys, 2 Eds. London: Charles Griffin Co. Ltd. |
[19] | Henderson RH, Sundaresan T (1982) Cluster sampling to assess immunization coverage: a review of experience with a simplified sampling method. Bull World Health Organ 60: 253–260. |
[20] | Fox N, Hunn A, Mathers N (2009) Sampling and sample size calculation. National Institute for Health Research. |
[21] | Bartlett JE, Kotrlik JW, Higgins CC (2001) Organizational research: Determining appropriate sample size in survey research. Inf technol learn perform j 19: 43–50. |
[22] | Israel GD (2003) Determining sample size. University of Florida. |
[23] | United Nations (2010) Handbook on Population and Housing Census Editing, New York: United Nations. https://doi.org/10.18356/1157f3b5-en |
[24] | Statistics Canada (2016) Population coverage error. |
[25] | National Research Council (2007) Research and Plans for Coverage Measurement in the 2010 Census: Interim Assessment. Washington: The National Academies Press. |