Research article Special Issues

The talk debrief experience: Intervention in prehospital personnel care during the Covid-19 pandemic

  • Received: 14 March 2024 Revised: 25 April 2024 Accepted: 09 May 2024 Published: 24 June 2024
  • This study focused on the TALK Debrief Experience in the prehospital personnel (n = 1521) of a western Spanish healthcare region during the COVID-19 Pandemic. The study aimed to apply the TALK clinical debriefing intervention to out-of-hospital clinical staff during pandemics; identify their emotions, thoughts, coping strategies, and solution proposals; determine their demands for improving well-being and coping ability; and disseminate valuable knowledge for addressing trauma in similar situations. The study employed a qualitative methodology within a participatory action research (PAR) framework, conducting group discussions (n = 375) and employing the TALK clinical debriefing method as the guiding framework for the sessions. The discussion group meetings were facilitated by psychologists (n = 67) who had received training in this intervention technique. Various emotions were identified during the sessions, including fear of contagion, lack of control and security, work-related stress, and ethical dilemmas. Proposed solutions and coping strategies addressed increased security measures, promotion of social distancing, stress and anxiety management, and clarity in procedures and provision of protective equipment. The study also highlighted additional demands such as the need for clear information, psychological support, and changes in work practices like reducing strenuous shifts. In conclusion, despite study limitations, such as the lack of long-term follow-up, it emphasized the importance of comprehensively addressing well-being and working conditions during health crises.

    Citation: Olga Malas, Xavier Perez-Cuit, Jordi García-Sicard, Andrés Cuartero, Gemma Cuartero. The talk debrief experience: Intervention in prehospital personnel care during the Covid-19 pandemic[J]. AIMS Public Health, 2024, 11(3): 819-834. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2024041

    Related Papers:

  • This study focused on the TALK Debrief Experience in the prehospital personnel (n = 1521) of a western Spanish healthcare region during the COVID-19 Pandemic. The study aimed to apply the TALK clinical debriefing intervention to out-of-hospital clinical staff during pandemics; identify their emotions, thoughts, coping strategies, and solution proposals; determine their demands for improving well-being and coping ability; and disseminate valuable knowledge for addressing trauma in similar situations. The study employed a qualitative methodology within a participatory action research (PAR) framework, conducting group discussions (n = 375) and employing the TALK clinical debriefing method as the guiding framework for the sessions. The discussion group meetings were facilitated by psychologists (n = 67) who had received training in this intervention technique. Various emotions were identified during the sessions, including fear of contagion, lack of control and security, work-related stress, and ethical dilemmas. Proposed solutions and coping strategies addressed increased security measures, promotion of social distancing, stress and anxiety management, and clarity in procedures and provision of protective equipment. The study also highlighted additional demands such as the need for clear information, psychological support, and changes in work practices like reducing strenuous shifts. In conclusion, despite study limitations, such as the lack of long-term follow-up, it emphasized the importance of comprehensively addressing well-being and working conditions during health crises.



    加载中

    Acknowledgments



    This study is not funded by any agency and is being conducted by the authors independently.

    Conflict of interest



    The authors declare no conflict of interest.

    [1] Scott Z, O'Curry S, Mastroyannopoulou K (2021) The impact and experience of debriefing for clinical staff following traumatic events in clinical settings: A systematic review. J Traumatic Stress 35: 278-287. https://doi.org/10.1002/jts.22736
    [2] Nocera M, Merritt C (2017) Pediatric critical event debriefing in emergency medicine training: An opportunity for educational improvement. AEM Educ Train 1: 208-214. https://doi.org/10.1002/aet2.10031
    [3] Rose S, Cheng A (2019) Charge nurse facilitated clinical debriefing in the emergency department. Can J Emerg Med 20: 781-785. https://doi.org/10.1017/cem.2018.369
    [4] Mitchell JT (1983) When disaster strikes: The critical incident stress debriefing process. JEMS 8: 36-39.
    [5] Toews AJ, Martin DE, Chernomas WM (2021) Clinical debriefing: A concept analysis. J Clin Nurs 30: 1491-1501. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.15636
    [6] Bisson JI (2003) Single-session early psychological interventions following traumatic events. Clin Psychol Rev 23: 481-499. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-7358(03)00034-5
    [7] Rose S, Bisson J, Wessely S (2003) A systematic review of single-session psychological interventions (“debriefing”) following trauma. Psychother Psychosom 72: 176-184. https://doi.org/10.1159/000070781
    [8] Bisson J, Jenkins P, Alexander J, et al. (1997) Randomized controlled trial of psychological debriefing for victims of acute burn trauma. Br J Psychiatry 171: 78-81. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.171.1.78
    [9] Hobbs M, Mayou R, Harrison B, et al. (1996) A randomized controlled trial of psychological debriefing for victims of road traffic accidents. BMJ 313: 1438-1439. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.313.7070.1438
    [10] Richins MT, Gauntlett L, Tehrani N, et al. (2020) Early post-trauma interventions in organizations: A scoping review. Front Psychol 11: 1176. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01176
    [11] Diaz-Navarro C, Leon-Castelao E, Hadfield A, et al. (2021) Clinical debriefing: TALK© to learn and improve together in healthcare environments. Trends Anaesth Crit Care 40: 4-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tacc.2021.07.004
    [12] Rock LK, Rudolph JW, Fey MK, et al. (2020) “Circle Up”: Workflow adaptation and psychological support via briefing, debriefing, and peer support. Nejm Catalyst Innovations in Care Delivery 1. https://catalyst.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/CAT.20.0240
    [13] Trejo FE, Igel CM, Chuang M, et al. (2019) Checklists, huddles, and debriefs: Critical tools to improve team performance in obstetrics. Clin Obstet Gynecol 62: 518-527. https://doi.org/10.1097/GRF.0000000000000464
    [14] Harder N, Lemoine J, Harwood R (2020) Psychological outcomes of debriefing healthcare providers who experience expected and unexpected patient death in clinical or simulation experiences: A scoping review. J Clin Enfermeras 29: 330-346. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.15085
    [15] Sjöberg F, Shönning E, Salzmann-Erikson M (2015) Nurses' experiences of performing cardiopulmonary resuscitation in intensive care units: A qualitative study. J Crit Nurs 24: 2522-2528.
    [16] Ike ID, Durand-Hill M, Elmusharaf E, et al. (2021) NHS staff mental health status in the active phase of the COVID-19 era: A staff survey in a large London hospital. General Psychiatry 34: e100368. https://doi.org/10.1136/gpsych-2020-100368
    [17] O'Dowd A (2021) NHS staff's stress levels rose last year as covid pandemic took its toll. BMJ 372: N703. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n703
    [18] Sawyer T, Loren D, Halamek LP (2016) Post-event debriefings during neonatal care: Why are we not doing them, and how can we start?. J Perinatol 36: 415-419. https://doi.org/10.1038/jp.2016.42
    [19] Berg GM, Hervey AM, Basham-Saif A, et al. (2014) Acceptability and implementation of debriefings after trauma resuscitation. J Trauma Nurs 21: 201-208. https://doi.org/10.1097/JTN.0000000000000066
    [20] Sandhu N, Eppich W, Mikrogianakis A, et al. (2014) Postresuscitation debriefing in the pediatric emergency department: A national needs assessment. Can J Emerg Med 16: 383-392. https://doi.org/10.2310/8000.2013.131136
    [21] Sweberg T, Sen AI, Mullan PC, et al. (2018) Description of hot debriefings after in-hospital cardiac arrests in an international pediatric quality improvement collaborative. Resuscitation 128: 181-187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2018.05.015
    [22] Billings J, Zhan Yuen, Wong N, et al. (2023) Post-incident psychosocial interventions after a traumatic incident in the workplace: A systematic review of current research evidence and clinical guidance. Eur J Psychotraumatol 14: 2281751. https://doi.org/10.1080/20008066.2023.2281751
    [23] Burns CM, Buchanan MJ (2020) Factors that influence the decision to seek help in a police population. Int J Environ Res Public Health 17: 1-26. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17186891
    [24] Bardin L (1991) Content análisis. Madrid: Akal Ediciones 32-39.
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2024 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(727) PDF downloads(50) Cited by(0)

Article outline

Figures and Tables

Tables(3)

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog