Appraising the decision-making process concerning COVID-19 policy in postsecondary education in Canada: A critical scoping review protocol

Claudia Chaufan; Laurie Manwell; Benjamin Gabbay; Camila Heredia; Charlotte Daniels; Claudia Chaufan; Laurie Manwell; Benjamin Gabbay; Camila Heredia; Charlotte Daniels

doi:10.3934/publichealth.2023059

AIMS Public Health

2023, Volume 10, Issue 4: 918-933. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2023059

Previous Article Next Article

Protocol

Appraising the decision-making process concerning COVID-19 policy in postsecondary education in Canada: A critical scoping review protocol

1.
School of Health Policy and Management, York University, 4700 Keele St, Toronto, ON, M3J 1P3, Canada
2.
Wilfrid Laurier University, Canada
3.
Toronto Metropolitan University, Canada
4.
School of Health Policy and Management, York University, Canada

Received: 11 September 2023 Revised: 16 October 2023 Accepted: 18 October 2023 Published: 13 November 2023

Background
Responses to COVID-19 in Canadian postsecondary education have overhauled usual norms and practices, with policies of unclear rationale implemented under the pressure of a reported public health emergency.

Objective
To critically appraise the decision-making process informing COVID-19 policy in the postsecondary education sector.

Methods
Our scoping review will draw from macro and micro theories of public policy, specifically the critical tradition exemplified by Carol Bacchi's approach “What is the problem represented to be” and will be guided by Arksey and O'Malley's framework for scoping reviews and the team-based approach of Levan and colleagues. Data will include diverse and publicly available documents to capture multiple stakeholders' perspectives on the phenomenon of interest and will be retrieved from university newsletters and legal websites using combinations of search terms adapted to specific data types. Two reviewers will independently screen, chart, analyze and synthesize the data. Disagreements will be resolved through full team discussion.

Discussion
Despite the unprecedented nature of the mass medical mandates implemented in the postsecondary sector and their dramatic impact on millions of lives—students, faculty, staff and their families, friends and communities—the decision-making process leading to them has not been documented or appraised. By identifying, summarizing and appraising the evidence, our review should inform practices that can contribute to effective and equitable public health policies in postsecondary institutions moving forward.
- COVID-19,
- critical policy analysis,
- decision-making,
- governance,
- academia,
- postsecondary education,
- medical mandates
Citation: Claudia Chaufan, Laurie Manwell, Benjamin Gabbay, Camila Heredia, Charlotte Daniels. Appraising the decision-making process concerning COVID-19 policy in postsecondary education in Canada: A critical scoping review protocol[J]. AIMS Public Health, 2023, 10(4): 918-933. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2023059

Related Papers:

Abstract

Background

Responses to COVID-19 in Canadian postsecondary education have overhauled usual norms and practices, with policies of unclear rationale implemented under the pressure of a reported public health emergency.

Objective

To critically appraise the decision-making process informing COVID-19 policy in the postsecondary education sector.

Methods

Our scoping review will draw from macro and micro theories of public policy, specifically the critical tradition exemplified by Carol Bacchi's approach “What is the problem represented to be” and will be guided by Arksey and O'Malley's framework for scoping reviews and the team-based approach of Levan and colleagues. Data will include diverse and publicly available documents to capture multiple stakeholders' perspectives on the phenomenon of interest and will be retrieved from university newsletters and legal websites using combinations of search terms adapted to specific data types. Two reviewers will independently screen, chart, analyze and synthesize the data. Disagreements will be resolved through full team discussion.

Discussion

Despite the unprecedented nature of the mass medical mandates implemented in the postsecondary sector and their dramatic impact on millions of lives—students, faculty, staff and their families, friends and communities—the decision-making process leading to them has not been documented or appraised. By identifying, summarizing and appraising the evidence, our review should inform practices that can contribute to effective and equitable public health policies in postsecondary institutions moving forward.

Acknowledgments

This work has been partially funded by a New Frontiers in Research Fund (NFRF) 2022 Special Call, NFRF–2022–00305.

Conflicts of interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

[1]	Algonquin College.FAQ–mandatory vaccination policy. Coronavirus Information (2021) . Available from: https://www.algonquincollege.com/coronavirus/faq-mandatory-vaccination-policy/.
[2]	McMaster University.Vaccination policy-COVID-19 requirements for employees and students. Policies, Procedures and Guidelines (2021) . Available from: https://secretariat.mcmaster.ca/app/uploads/Vaccination-Policy-COVID-19-Requirements-for-Employees-and-Students.pdf (retrieved September 6, 2021, and unfortunately it is no longer functional).
[3]	University of Alberta.New measures for fall return to campus. News (2021) . Available from: https://www.ualberta.ca/news/2021/08/new-measures-for-fall-return-to-campus.html
[4]	University of Toronto.U of T to require vaccination for high-risk activities, self-declaration of vaccination status. U of T News (2021) . Available from: https://www.ualberta.ca/news/2021/08/new-measures-for-fall-return-to-campus.html
[5]	York UniversityNon-Compliance with COVID-19 vaccination mandate (Oct. 29, 2021) \| better together (2021). Available from: https://www.yorku.ca/bettertogether/2021/10/29/non-compliance-with-covid-19-vaccination-mandate-oct-29-2021/.
[6]	Wilfred Laurier UniversityLaurier inspiring lives, mask requirements lifting Feb. 16 \| Wilfrid Laurier University, 2023 (2023). Available from: https://www.wlu.ca/news/spotlights/2023/feb/mask-requirements-lifting-feb-16.html.
[7]	Wong J Back to campus: Students face starkly different COVID-19 protocols at Canada's colleges, universities \| CBC News (2022). Available from: https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/universities-colleges-campus-return-policies-1.6560643.
[8]	Jabakhanji S, Knope J Ontario to drop most mask mandates on March 21, remaining pandemic rules to lift by end of April \| CBC News (2022). Available from: https://www.who.int/news/item/05-05-2023-statement-on-the-fifteenth-meeting-of-the-international-health-regulations-(2005)-emergency-committee-regarding-the-coronavirus-disease-(covid-19)-pandemic.
[9]	StaffOntario lifts vaccine mandates in schools, hospitals and long-term care homes \| CBC News (2022). Available from: https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/toronto/ontario-covid19-march-14-2022-1.6384087.
[10]	WHOStatement on the fifteenth meeting of the IHR (2005) Emergency Committee on the COVID-19 pandemic, World Health Organization (2023). Available from: https://www.who.int/news/item/05-05-2023-statement-on-the-fifteenth-meeting-of-the-international-health-regulations-(2005)-emergency-committee-regarding-the-coronavirus-disease-(covid-19)-pandemic.
[11]	Walker J (2023) Over 100 colleges still have COVID vaccine requirements ahead of 2023 school year, report says. ABC News . Available from: https://abcnews4.com/news/nation-world/over-100-colleges-still-have-covid-vaccine-requirements-ahead-of-2023-school-year-report-says-johns-hopkins-harvard-rutgers-coronavirus-pandemic-vax-health-sickness.
[12]	Walt G Health policy: An introduction to process and power (1994). Available from: https://repository.library.georgetown.edu/handle/10822/870131.
[13]	Alwan NA, Burgess RA, Ashworth S, et al. (2020) Scientific consensus on the COVID-19 pandemic: we need to act now. The Lancet 396: e71-e72. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32153-X
[14]	Camargo CQ, Simon FM (2022) Mis-and disinformation studies are too big to fail: Six suggestions for the field's future. Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Rev 3: 1-9. https://doi.org/10.37016/mr-2020-106
[15]	Chaufan C, Hemsing, Natalie, Heredia C, et al. (2023) What do experts mean by “misinformation” in the COVID-19 era? A critical scoping review protocol. Int J Scholarly Res Multidiscip Stud 3. https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/3s8pb
[16]	WHOCOVID-19 vaccines, 2023 (2023). Available from: https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019/covid-19-vaccines
[17]	World Medical Association.Declaration of Helsinki. New England J Med (1964) 271: 473-474. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM196408272710913
[18]	Subramanian SV, Kumar A (2021) Increases in COVID-19 are unrelated to levels of vaccination across 68 countries and 2947 counties in the United States. Eur J Epidemiol 36: 1237-1240. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-021-00808-7
[19]	Doshi P (2020) Will covid-19 vaccines save lives? Current trials aren't designed to tell us. BMJ 371: m4037. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.m4037
[20]	Braunstein GD, Schwartz L, Hymel P, et al. (2021) False positive results with SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR tests and how to evaluate a RT-PCR-positive test for the possibility of a false positive result. J Occup Environ Med 63: e159-e162. https://doi.org/10.1097/JOM.0000000000002138
[21]	Cao S, Gan Y, Wang C, et al. (2020) Post-lockdown SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid screening in nearly ten million residents of Wuhan, China. Nat Commun 11: 5917. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-19802-w
[22]	COVID-19 Forecasting Team.Variation in the COVID-19 infection–fatality ratio by age, time, and geography during the pre-vaccine era: a systematic analysis. The Lancet (2022) 399: 1469-1488. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(21)02867-1
[23]	Pezzullo AM, Axfors C, Contopoulos-Ioannidis DG, et al. (2023) Age-stratified infection fatality rate of COVID-19 in the non-elderly population. Environ Res 216: 114655. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2022.114655
[24]	CDCCenters for disease control and prevention, underlying medical conditions associated with higher risk for severe COVID-19: Information for healthcare professionals, 2022 (2022). Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/hcp/clinical-care/underlyingconditions.html
[25]	Wise J (2021) Covid-19: Highest death rates seen in countries with most overweight populations. BMJ 372: n623. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n623
[26]	CBC News.Ontario removes more than 400 deaths from official COVID-19 count \| CBC News. CBC (2022) . Available from: https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/toronto/covid19-ontario-march-11-1.6381330.
[27]	Ludvigsson JF, Engerström L, Nordenhäll C, et al. (2021) Open schools, Covid-19, and child and teacher morbidity in Sweden. N Engl J Med 384: 669-671. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMc2026670
[28]	Public Health Agency of CanadaGovernment of Canada, COVID-19 daily epidemiology update: Outbreaks, 2022 (2022). Available from: https://health-infobase.canada.ca/covid-19/outbreaks.html
[29]	Kriebel D, Tickner J, Epstein P, et al. (2001) The precautionary principle in environmental science. Environ Health Perspect 109: 871-876. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.01109871
[30]	Kerr L, Cadegiani FA, Baldi F, et al. (2022) Ivermectin prophylaxis used for COVID-19: A citywide, prospective, observational study of 223,128 subjects using propensity score matching. Cureus 14: e21272. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.c61
[31]	Kory P, Meduri GU, Varon J, et al. (2021) Review of the emerging evidence demonstrating the efficacy of ivermectin in the prophylaxis and treatment of COVID-19. Am J Therapeut 28: e299-e318. https://doi.org/10.1097/MJT.0000000000001377
[32]	McCullough PA, Kelly RJ, Ruocco G, et al. (2021) Pathophysiological basis and rationale for early outpatient treatment of SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) infection. Am J Med 134: 16-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2020.07.003
[33]	Risch HA (2020) Early outpatient treatment of symptomatic, high-risk COVID-19 patients that should be ramped up immediately as key to the pandemic crisis. Am J Epidemiol 189: 1218-1226. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwaa093
[34]	CDC NewsroomCDC, Statement from CDC Director Rochelle P. Walensky, MD, MPH on Today's MMWR, 2021 (2021). Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/media/releases/2021/s0730-mmwr-covid-19.html
[35]	Shrestha NK, Burke PC, Nowacki AS, et al. (2022) Effectiveness of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Bivalent vaccine. medRxiv 19. https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.12.17.22283625
[36]	Bardosh K, Figueiredo A de, Gur-Arie R, et al. (2022) The unintended consequences of COVID-19 vaccine policy: Why mandates, passports and restrictions may cause more harm than good. BMJ Global Health 7: e008684. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2022-008684
[37]	Buchan SA, Seo CY, Johnson C, et al. (2022) Epidemiology of myocarditis and pericarditis following mRNA vaccination by vaccine product, schedule, and interdose interval among adolescents and adults in Ontario, Canada. JAMA Network Open 5: e2218505. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.18505
[38]	Fraiman J, Erviti J, Jones M, et al. (2022) Serious adverse events of special interest following mRNA COVID-19 vaccination in randomized trials in adults. Vaccine 40: 5798-5805. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2022.08.036
[39]	Karlstad Ø, Hovi P, Husby A, et al. (2022) SARS-CoV-2 vaccination and myocarditis in a Nordic cohort study of 23 million residents. JAMA Cardiology 7: 600-612. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamacardio.2022.0583
[40]	Li M, Yuan J, Lv G, et al. (2021) Myocarditis and pericarditis following COVID-19 vaccination: inequalities in age and vaccine types. J Pers Med 11: 1106. https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm11111106
[41]	Mansanguan S, Charunwatthana P, Piyaphanee W, et al. (2022) Cardiovascular manifestation of the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine in adolescents. Trop Med Infect Dis 7: 1-13. https://doi.org/10.3390/tropicalmed7080196
[42]	Canadian Union of Public EmployeesCanadian Union of Public Employees, the corporatization of post-secondary education, 2019 (2019). Available from: https://cupe.ca/corporatization-post-secondary-education
[43]	Giroux HA (2009) Democracy's nemesis: The rise of the Corporate University. Cultural Stud Crit Methodol 9: 669-695. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532708609341169
[44]	Statistics Canada SCTrends in private and public funding in Canadian colleges, 2019/2020, Statistics Canada (2022). Available from: https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/pub/13-605-x/2022001/article/00002-eng.html
[45]	Doyle J Public sector governance—A guide to the principles of good practice and How are we doing? The public reporting of performance measures in British Columbia, British Columbia, Office of the Auditor General of British Columbia (2008). Available from: https://www.bcauditor.com/sites/default/files/publications/2008/report13/report/public-sector-governance-guide-principles-good-practice.pdf
[46]	Enders J (2004) Higher education, internationalisation, and the nation-state: Recent developments and challenges to governance theory. Higher Educ 47: 361-382. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:HIGH.0000016461.98676.30
[47]	Buchbinder H, Rajagopal P (1996) Canadian universities: The impact of free trade and globalization. Higher Educ 31: 283-299. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00128433
[48]	Axelrod P, Desai-trilokekar R, Shanahan T, et al. (2011) People, processes, and policy-making in Canadian post-secondary education, 1990–2000. Higher Educ Policy 24: 143-166. https://doi.org/10.1057/hep.2010.29
[49]	Brubacher LJ, Lovato CY, Sri V, et al. The use of evidence to guide decision-making during the COVID-19 pandemic: Divergent perspectives from a qualitative case study in British Columbia, Canada, In Review (2023). https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-2564918/v1
[50]	Hartney MT, Finger LK (2022) Politics, markets, and pandemics: Public education's response to COVID-19. Perspect Polit 20: 457-473. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592721000955
[51]	Felson J, Adamczyk A (2021) Online or in person? Examining college decisions to reopen during the COVID-19 pandemic in fall 2020. Socius 7: 237802312098820. https://doi.org/10.1177/2378023120988203
[52]	Johnson AF, Roberto KJ, Rauhaus BM (2021) Policies, politics and pandemics: Course delivery method for US higher educational institutions amid COVID-19. TG 15: 291-303. https://doi.org/10.1108/TG-07-2020-0158
[53]	Bacchi C (2016) Questioning how “problems” are constituted in policies. SAGE Open 6: 2158244016653986. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244016653986
[54]	Mingers J (2000) What is it to be Critical?: Teaching a Critical Approach to Management Undergraduates. Manag Learn 31: 219-237. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350507600312005
[55]	Saunders MNK, Rojon C (2011) On the attributes of a critical literature review. Coaching-Int J Theor 4: 156-162. https://doi.org/10.1080/17521882.2011.596485
[56]	King WM, Hughto JMW, Operario D (2020) Transgender stigma: A critical scoping review of definitions, domains, and measures used in empirical research. Soc Sci Med 250: 112867. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.112867
[57]	Webster F, Bremner S, Oosenbrug E, et al. (2017) From opiophobia to overprescribing: A critical scoping review of medical education training for chronic pain. Pain Med 18: 1467-1475. https://doi.org/10.1093/pm/pnw352
[58]	Bacchi C (2012) Why study problematizations? Making politics visible. Open J Political Sci 2: 8. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojps.2012.21001
[59]	Bowen GA (2009) Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qual Res J 9: 27-40. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027
[60]	Munn Z, Stern C, Aromataris E, et al. (2018) What kind of systematic review should I conduct? A proposed typology and guidance for systematic reviewers in the medical and health sciences. BMC Med Res Methodol 18: 5. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-017-0468-4
[61]	Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, et al. (2021) The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
[62]	Bacchi C (2012) Introducing the ‘what's the problem represented to be?’ Approach. Engaging with Carol Bacchi: Strategic Interventions and Exchanges . Adelaide: University of Adelaide Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/UPO9780987171856.003
[63]	Shea BJ, Hamel C, Wells GA, et al. (2009) AMSTAR is a reliable and valid measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews. J Clin Epidemiol 62: 1013-1020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.10.009
[64]	Braun V, Clarke V (2006) Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol 3: 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
[65]	Thomas J, Harden A (2008) Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol 8: 45. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-8-45
[66]	Pluye P, Hong QN (2014) Combining the power of stories and the power of numbers: Mixed methods research and mixed studies reviews. Annu Rev Public Health 35: 29-45. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-032013-182440
[67]	Popay J, Roberts H, Sowden A, et al. (2006) Guidance on the conduct of narrative synthesis in systematic reviews. Product ESRC Methods Programme 1: b92.
[68]	Arksey H, O'Malley L (2005) Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework. Int J Soc Res Method 8: 19-32. https://doi.org/10.1080/1364557032000119616
[69]	Gómez RL, Suárez AM (2021) Extending impact beyond the community: Protocol for a scoping review of evidence of the impact of communities of practice on teaching and learning in higher education. Int J Educ Res 2: 100048. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2021.100048

Reader Comments

Your name:*

Email:*
© 2023 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)