Review

Recent advances in self-assembling redox nanoparticles as a radiation protective agent

  • Received: 01 November 2022 Revised: 30 January 2023 Accepted: 01 February 2023 Published: 13 February 2023
  • The search for potent radiation-protective drugs for clinical use continues. Studies have, so far, focused on targeting the neutralization of radiation-generated reactive oxygen species (ROS) to protect the cells against the deleterious effects of exposure to ionizing radiation. However, the development of efficacious radioprotective drugs, which are mostly low molecular weight (LMW) compounds, is mainly limited due to their inherent toxicity and rapid excretion from the body. Thus, researchers reformulated these LMW compounds into nano-based formulations. This review discusses recent advances in the use of self-assembling redox nanoparticles as a new group of radioprotective agents. The copolymer micelle (herein referred to as redox nanoparticles; RNP) contains an active part, amino-TEMPO, that effectively scavenges radiation-induced ROS in the body, as demonstrated in vivo. With the use of nanoparticle-based technologies, optimized formulations of these LMW ROS-neutralizers lead to the significant reduction of its toxicity, high bioavailability and longer blood circulation, which consequently resulted in its notable enhanced efficacy (for example, increased survival rate, reduced radiation-induced syndromes and organ damage) against the damaging effects of ionizing radiation. Consistent with the available data on the use of RNP and other nano-based radioprotective agents, it can be concluded that the inherent ROS-targeting activity of a drug intended for radiation protection is as vital as its bioavailability in the specific tissues and organs, where the short-lived ROS are produced during radiation exposure. In this review article, we summarized the current status of the development of radioprotective agents, including our self-assembling radioprotective agents.

    Citation: Chitho P. Feliciano, Sandrine Cammas-Marion, Yukio Nagasaki. Recent advances in self-assembling redox nanoparticles as a radiation protective agent[J]. AIMS Molecular Science, 2023, 10(1): 52-69. doi: 10.3934/molsci.2023005

    Related Papers:

  • The search for potent radiation-protective drugs for clinical use continues. Studies have, so far, focused on targeting the neutralization of radiation-generated reactive oxygen species (ROS) to protect the cells against the deleterious effects of exposure to ionizing radiation. However, the development of efficacious radioprotective drugs, which are mostly low molecular weight (LMW) compounds, is mainly limited due to their inherent toxicity and rapid excretion from the body. Thus, researchers reformulated these LMW compounds into nano-based formulations. This review discusses recent advances in the use of self-assembling redox nanoparticles as a new group of radioprotective agents. The copolymer micelle (herein referred to as redox nanoparticles; RNP) contains an active part, amino-TEMPO, that effectively scavenges radiation-induced ROS in the body, as demonstrated in vivo. With the use of nanoparticle-based technologies, optimized formulations of these LMW ROS-neutralizers lead to the significant reduction of its toxicity, high bioavailability and longer blood circulation, which consequently resulted in its notable enhanced efficacy (for example, increased survival rate, reduced radiation-induced syndromes and organ damage) against the damaging effects of ionizing radiation. Consistent with the available data on the use of RNP and other nano-based radioprotective agents, it can be concluded that the inherent ROS-targeting activity of a drug intended for radiation protection is as vital as its bioavailability in the specific tissues and organs, where the short-lived ROS are produced during radiation exposure. In this review article, we summarized the current status of the development of radioprotective agents, including our self-assembling radioprotective agents.



    加载中

    Acknowledgments



    Author Contributions: writing—original draft preparation, writing—review, and editing, C.P. Feliciano; writing-review and editing, S. Cammas-Marion; writing—review and editing, Y. Nagasaki.

    Conflicts of Interest



    We declare no conflicts of interest.

    [1] Land C (2019) Ionizing radiation. Encyclopedia Britannica, 2022 . Available from: https://www.britannica.com/science/ionizing-radiation.
    [2] Desouky O, Ding N, Zhou G (2015) Targeted and non-targeted effects of ionizing radiation. J Radiat Res Appl Sci 8: 247-254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrras.2015.03.003
    [3] Commoner B, Townsend J, Pake GE (1954) Free radicals in biological materials. Nature 174: 689-691. https://doi.org/10.1038/174689a0
    [4] Reisz JA, Bansal N, Qian J, et al. (2014) Effects of ionizing radiation on biological molecules – mechanisms of damage and emerging methods of detection. Antioxid Redox Signal 21: 260-292. https://doi.org/10.1089/ars.2013.5489
    [5] Yamamori T, Yasui H, Yamazumi M, et al. (2012) Ionizing radiation induces mitochondrial reactive oxygen species production accompanied by upregulation of mitochondrial electron transport chain function and mitochondrial content under control of the cell cycle checkpoint. Free Radic Biol Med 53: 260-270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2012.04.033
    [6] Sancar A, Lindsey-Boltz LA, Unsal-Kacmaz K, et al. (2004) Molecular mechanisms of mammalian DNA repair and the DNA damage checkpoints. Annu Rev Biochem 73: 39-85. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.biochem.73.011303.073723
    [7] Salehi F, Behboudi H, Kavoosi G, et al. (2018) Oxidative DNA damage induced by ROS-modulating agents with the ability to target DNA: a comparison of the biological characteristics of citrus pectin and apple pectin. Sci Rep 8: 13902. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-32308-2
    [8] Shokolenko I, Venediktova N, Bochkareva A, et al. (2009) Oxidative stress induces degradation of mitochondrial DNA. Nucleic Acids Res 37: 2539-2548. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkp100
    [9] Cadet J, Delatour T, Douki T, et al. (1999) Hydroxyl radicals and DNA base damage. Mutat Res 424: 9-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0027-5107(99)00004-4
    [10] Jordan BF, Sonveaux P (2012) Targeting tumor perfusion and oxygenation to improve the outcome of anticancer therapy. Front Pharmacol 3: 1-15. http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2012.00094
    [11] Krishna MC, DeGraff W, Hankovszky OH, et al. (1998) Studies of Structure-Activity relationship of nitroxide free radicals and their precursors as modifiers against oxidative damage. J Med Chem 41: 3477-3492. https://doi.org/10.1021/jm9802160
    [12] Vong LB, Kobayashi M, Nagasaki Y (2016) Evaluation of the toxicity and antioxidant activity of redox nanoparticles in Zebrafish (Danio rerio) embryos. Mol Pharm 13: 3091-3097. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.6b00225
    [13] Rades D, Fehlauer F, Bajrovic A, et al. (2004) Serious adverse effects of amifostine during radiotherapy in head and neck cancer patients. Radiother Oncol 70: 261e264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2003.10.005
    [14] Landauer MR, Davis HD, Kumar KS, et al. (1992) Behavioral toxicity of selected radioprotectors. Adv Space Res 12: 273e283. https://doi.org/10.1016/0273-1177(92)90117-G
    [15] Spencer CM, Goa KL (1995) Amifostine. Drugs 50: 1001-1031. https://doi.org/10.2165/00003495-199550060-00008
    [16] Kligerman MM, Turrisi AT, Urtasum RC, et al. Final report on phase I trial of WR-2721 before protracted radiation therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 14: 1119-1122. https://doi.org/10.1016/0360-3016(88)90387-2
    [17] Zhou Y, Hua S, Yu J, et al. (2015) A strategy for effective radioprotection by chitosan-based long-circulating nanocarriers. J Mater Chem B 3: 2931. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5TB00063G
    [18] Xie J, Wang C, Zhao F, et al. (2018) Application of Multifunctional Nanomaterials in Radioprotection of Healthy Tissues. Adv Healthcare Mater 7: 1800421. https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.201800421
    [19] Yoshitomi T, Suzuki R, Mamiya T, et al. (2009) pH-Sensitive radical-containing nanoparticle (RNP) for the L-Band EPR imaging of low pH circumstance. Bioconj Chem 20: 1792-1798. https://doi.org/10.1021/bc900214f
    [20] Xie J, Wang N, Dong X, et al. (2019) Graphdiyne nanoparticles with high free radical scavenging activity for radiation protection. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 11: 2579-2590. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.8b00949
    [21] Xie J, Wang C, Wang N, et al. (2020) Graphdiyne nanoradioprotector with efficient free radical scavenging ability for mitigating radiation-induced gastrointestinal tract damage. Biomaterials 244: 119940. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2020.119940
    [22] Xie H, Li Z, Sun Z, Shao J, et al. (2016) Metabolizable Ultrathin Bi2Se3 Nanosheets in Imaging-Guided Photothermal Therapy. Small 12: 4136-4145. https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.201601050
    [23] Li J, Jiang F, Yang B, et al. (2013) Topological insulator bismuth selenide as a theranostic platform for simultaneous cancer imaging and therapy. Sci Rep 3: 1998. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep01998
    [24] Zhang X, Chen J, Min Y, et al. (2014) Metabolizable Bi2Se3 Nanoplates: Biodistribution, Toxicity, and Uses for Cancer Radiation Therapy and Imaging. Adv Funct Mat 24: 1718-1729. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201302312
    [25] Du J, Gu Z, Yan L, et al. (2017) Poly(Vinylpyrollidone)- and Selenocysteine-Modified Bi2Se3 Nanoparticles Enhance Radiotherapy Efficacy in Tumors and Promote Radioprotection in Normal Tissues. Adv Mater 29: 1701268. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201701268
    [26] Zhang X, Jing Y, Song S, et al. (2017) Catalytic topological insulator Bi2Se3 nanoparticles for in vivo protection against ionizing radiation. Nanomed: Nanotechnol Biol Med 13: 1597-1605. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nano.2017.02.018
    [27] Baker CH (2013) Harnessing cerium oxide nanoparticles to protect normal tissue from radiation damage. Transl Cancer Res 2: 343-358.
    [28] Kadivar F, Haddadi G, Mosleh-Shirazi MA, et al. (2020) Protection effect of cerium oxide nanoparticles against radiation-induced acute lung injuries in rats. Rep Pract Oncol Radiother 25: 206-211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rpor.2019.12.023
    [29] Goushbolagh NA, Farhood B, Astani A, et al. (2018) Quantitative cytotoxicity, cellular uptake and radioprotection effect of cerium oxide nanoparticles in MRC-5 normal cells and MCF-7 cancerous cells. BioNanoScience 8: 769-777. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12668-018-0538-z
    [30] Hahn SM, Wilson L, Krishna CM, et al. (1992) Identification of Nitroxide Radioprotectors. Radiat Res 132: 87-93. https://doi.org/10.2307/3578338
    [31] Zabbarova I, Kanai A (2008) Targeted Delivery of Radioprotective Agents to Mitochondria. Mol Interv 8: 294-302. https://doi.org/10.1124/mi.8.6.7
    [32] Li J, Zhang J, Chen Y, et al. (2017) TEMPO-Conjugated Gold Nanoparticles for Reactive Oxygen Species Scavenging and Regulation of Stem Cell Differentiation. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 9: 35683-35692. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.7b12486
    [33] Wang L, Wang Z, Cao Y, et al. (2020) Strategy for highly efficient radioprotection by a selenium-containing polymeric drug with low toxicity and long circulation. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 12: 44534-44540. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.0c14000
    [34] Ren X, Huo M, Wang M, et al. (2019) Highly catalytic niobium carbide (MXene) promotes hematopoietic recovery after radiation by free radical scavenging. ACS Nano 13: 6438-6454. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.8b09327
    [35] Nosrati H, Danafar H, Rezaeejam H, et al. (2020) Evaluation radioprotective effect of curcumin conjugated albumin nanoparticles. Bioorg Chem 100: 103891. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioorg.2020.103891
    [36] Rageh MM, El-Gebaly RH (2018) Melanin nanoparticles: Antioxidant activities and effects on γ-ray-induced DNA damage in the mouse. Mutat Res Gen Tox En 828: 15-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mrgentox.2018.01.009
    [37] Wu S, Parasuraman V, Hsieh-Chih-Tai, et al. (2020) Radioprotective effect of self-assembled low molecular weight Fucoidan-Chitosan nanoparticles. Int J Pharm 579: 119161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2020.119161
    [38] Lin X, Wang X, Tian H (2020) Oral delivery of WR-1065 by ROS-responsive PEG-PCL nanoparticles for radioprotection. Colloids Surf A Physiochem 599: 124886. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2020.124886
    [39] Feliciano CP, Tsuboi K, Suzuki K, et al. (2017) Long-term bioavailability of redox nanoparticles effectively reduces organ dysfunctions and death in whole-body irradiated mice. Biomaterials 129: 68-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2017.03.011
    [40] Feliciano CP, Nagasaki Y (2019) Antioxidant nanomedicine protects against ionizing radiation-induced life-shortening in C57BL/6J mice. ACS Biomater Sci Eng 5: 5631-5636. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsbiomaterials.8b01259
    [41] Yoshitomi T, Ozaki Y, Thangavel S, et al. (2013) Redox nanoparticle therapeutics to cancer increase in therapeutic effect of doxorubicin, suppressing its adverse effect. J Control Release 172: 137-143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2013.08.011
    [42] Feliciano CP, Nagasaki Y (2017) Oral nanotherapeutics: Redox nanoparticles attenuate ultraviolet B radiation-induced skin inflammatory disorders in Kud:Hr- hairless mice. Biomaterials 142: 162-170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2017.07.015
    [43] Vong LB, Yoshitomi T, Matsui H, et al. (2015) Development of an oral nanotherapeutics using redox nanoparticles for treatment of colitis-associated colon cancer. Biomaterials 55: 54-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.03.037
    [44] Chonpathompikunlert P, Yoshitomi T, Vong LB, et al. (2015) Recovery of cognitive dysfunction via orally administered redox-polymer nanotherapeutics in SAMP8 mice. PLOS ONE 10: e0126013. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0126013
    [45] Yoshitomi T, Hirayama A, Nagasaki Y (2011) The ROS scavenging and renal protective effects of pH-responsive nitroxide radical-containing nanoparticles. Biomaterials 32: 8021-8028. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.07.014
    [46] Liebmann J, DeLuca AM, Epstein A, et al. (1994) Protection from lethal irradiation by the combination of stem cell factor and Tempol. Radiat Res 137: 400-404. https://doi.org/10.2307/3578716
    [47] Hahn SM, Tochner Z, Krishna CM, et al. (1992) Tempol, a stable free radical, is a novel murine radiation protector. Cancer Res 52: 1750-1753.
    [48] Kim A, Yonemoto C, Feliciano CP, et al. (2021) Antioxidant nanomedicine significantly enhances the survival benefit of radiation cancer therapy by mitigating oxidative stress-induced side effects. Small 17: 2008210. https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.202008210
    [49] Citrin D, Cotrim AP, Hyodo F, et al. (2010) Radioprotectors and Mitigators of Radiation-Induced Normal Tissue Injury. The Oncologist 15: 360-371. https://doi.org/10.1634/theoncologist.2009-S104
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2023 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(1072) PDF downloads(99) Cited by(0)

Article outline

Figures and Tables

Figures(9)  /  Tables(2)

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog