Statistic of natural images is a growing field of research both in vision and image processing. On the vision research side, fine statistical details about object distribution in real-world scenes help understanding the human visual system behavior. On the image processing side, by using the information gathered from statistics of natural scenes, we can obtain reliable priors and insights that can be used in many models. In has been rigorously proven in
[16] that, if second order stationarity and commutativity of spatiochromatic covariance matrices hold true for natural scenes, then the codification of spatial and chromatic information by the human visual system can be separated through a tensor product. Spatial features are coded via local and oriented Fourier basis elements, while color features are coded via a triad given by an achromatic channel followed by two color opponent channels. In this paper, we will show that, while stationarity is guaranteed, commutativity is not. However, we shall see that commutativity of spatiochromatic covariance matrices can be approached if the database of images used to model visual scenes is modified accordingly to a suitable transformation that describes the response of retinal photoreceptors to light absorption: the Michaelis-Menten formula. A thorough investigation of the effects of a parameter of this formula will be performed and its influence on commutativity of covariance matrices will be detailed.
Citation: Yiye Jiang, Jérémie Bigot, Edoardo Provenzi. Commutativity of spatiochromatic covariance matrices in natural image statistics[J]. Mathematics in Engineering, 2020, 2(2): 313-339. doi: 10.3934/mine.2020016
Abstract
Statistic of natural images is a growing field of research both in vision and image processing. On the vision research side, fine statistical details about object distribution in real-world scenes help understanding the human visual system behavior. On the image processing side, by using the information gathered from statistics of natural scenes, we can obtain reliable priors and insights that can be used in many models. In has been rigorously proven in
[16] that, if second order stationarity and commutativity of spatiochromatic covariance matrices hold true for natural scenes, then the codification of spatial and chromatic information by the human visual system can be separated through a tensor product. Spatial features are coded via local and oriented Fourier basis elements, while color features are coded via a triad given by an achromatic channel followed by two color opponent channels. In this paper, we will show that, while stationarity is guaranteed, commutativity is not. However, we shall see that commutativity of spatiochromatic covariance matrices can be approached if the database of images used to model visual scenes is modified accordingly to a suitable transformation that describes the response of retinal photoreceptors to light absorption: the Michaelis-Menten formula. A thorough investigation of the effects of a parameter of this formula will be performed and its influence on commutativity of covariance matrices will be detailed.
References
[1]
|
Attneave F (1954) Some informational aspects of visual perception. Physchol Rev 61: 183-193.
|
[2]
|
Barlow HB (1961) Possible principles underlying the transformations of sensory messages. Sens Commun 1: 217-234.
|
[3]
|
Berman A, Plemmons RJ (1987) Nonnegative Matrices in the Mathematical Sciences, SIAM.
|
[4]
|
Buchsbaum G, Gottschalk A (1983) Trichromacy, opponent colours coding and optimum colour information transmission in the retina. P Roy Soc Lond B Bio 220: 89-113.
|
[5]
|
Field DJ (1987) Relations between the statistics of natural images and the response properties of cortical cells. J Opt Soc Am 4: 2379-2394. doi: 10.1364/JOSAA.4.002379
|
[6]
|
Frazier MW (2001) Introduction to Wavelets through Linear Algebra, Springer.
|
[7]
|
Gonzales RC, Woods RE (2002) Digital Image Processing, Prentice Hall.
|
[8]
|
Gray RM (2006) Toeplitz and circulant matrices: A review. Found Trends Commun Inform Theory 2: 155-239.
|
[9]
|
Johnson CR, Horn RA (1985) Matrix Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
|
[10]
|
Johnson GM, Song X, Montag ED, et al. (2010) Derivation of a color space for image color difference measurement. Color Res Appl 35: 387-400. doi: 10.1002/col.20561
|
[11]
|
MacKay DM (1956) Towards an information-flow model of human behaviour. Brit J Psy 47: 30-43. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8295.1956.tb00559.x
|
[12]
|
Ohta Y, Kanade T, Sakai T (1980) Color information for region segmentation. Comput Graph Image Process 13: 222-241. doi: 10.1016/0146-664X(80)90047-7
|
[13]
|
Olshausen B, Field DJ (1997) Sparse coding with an overcomplete basis set: A strategy employed by v1?. Vision Res 37: 607-609.
|
[14]
|
Párraga C, Troscianko T, Tolhurst D (2002) Spatiochromatic properties of natural images and human vision. Curr Bio 6: 483-487.
|
[15]
|
Pratt WK (2007) Digital Image Processing, J. Wiley & Sons.
|
[16]
|
Provenzi E, Delon J, Gousseau Y, et al. (2016) On the second order spatiochromatic structure of natural images. Vision Res 120: 22-38. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2015.02.025
|
[17]
|
Rao CR (1973) Linear Statistical Inference and Its Applications, John Wiley and Sons.
|
[18]
|
Ruderman DL (1996) Origin of scaling in natural images. Vision Res 37: 3385-3398.
|
[19]
|
Ruderman DL, Cronin TW, Chiao C (1998) Statistics of cone responses to natural images: Implications for visual coding. J Opt Soc Am A 15: 2036-2045. doi: 10.1364/JOSAA.15.002036
|
[20]
|
Shapley R, Enroth-Cugell C (1984) Visual adaptation and retinal gain controls. Prog Retin Res 3: 263-346. doi: 10.1016/0278-4327(84)90011-7
|