Number | Sample code | Sponge scientific name |
1 | PF01 | Penares nux (de Laubenfels, 1954) |
2 | PF02 | Cacospongia sp. |
3 | PF03 | Ircinia mutans (Wilson, 1925) |
4 | PF04 | Gelliodes petrosioides Dendy, 1905 |
5 | PF05 | Cacospongia sp. |
Marine sponges are well-known for their production of bioactive compounds, many of which are synthesized by their associated symbiotic microorganisms. Among these, Actinomycetes are of particular interest due to their ability to produce secondary metabolites with antimicrobial and antitumor activities. We aimed to investigate the bacterial microbiome of tropical marine sponges, with an emphasis on the diversity and distribution of Actinomycetes, employing both culture-dependent and culture-independent approaches. Five sponge samples (PF01–PF05) were collected from Sichang Island, Chonburi Province, Thailand. The bacterial communities were analyzed using 16S rRNA gene sequencing and bioinformatics tools, revealing a significant microbial diversity dominated by Cyanobacteria, Actinomycetota, and Chloroflexi. Notably, PF01 (Penares nux) exhibited the highest microbial diversity, while PF05 (Cacospongia sp.) had the lowest. Actinomycetes, particularly the genus Micromonospora, were successfully isolated from all samples, with PF03 (Ircinia mutans) yielding the highest number of strains. Culture-independent analysis identified a greater proportion of unculturable Actinomycetes compared to those isolated through traditional methods, underscoring the limitations of culture-dependent techniques. This study enhances our understanding of sponge-associated microbial diversity and highlights the potential for isolating Actinomycetes from these sponges for novel drug discovery and other bioprospective applications.
Citation: Trinset Weeraphan, Chollabuppha Chou, Naphatson Chanthathamrongsiri, Thanchanok Sirirak, Sumaitt Putchakarn, Supakarn Chamni, Wongsakorn Phongsopitanun. Microbiome profiling and Actinomycetes isolation from tropical marine sponges[J]. AIMS Microbiology, 2025, 11(1): 182-205. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2025010
[1] | Tuangrat Tunvongvinis, Weeyawat Jaitrong, Yudthana Samung, Somboon Tanasupawat, Wongsakorn Phongsopitanun . Diversity and antimicrobial activity of the tropical ant-derived actinomycetes isolated from Thailand. AIMS Microbiology, 2024, 10(1): 68-82. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2024005 |
[2] | George L. Mendz, Nadeem O. Kaakoush, Julie A. Quinlivan . New techniques to characterise the vaginal microbiome in pregnancy. AIMS Microbiology, 2016, 2(1): 55-68. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2016.1.55 |
[3] | Jasmine S. Ritschard, Lea Amato, Yadhu Kumar, Britta Müller, Leo Meile, Markus Schuppler . The role of the surface smear microbiome in the development of defective smear on surface-ripened red-smear cheese. AIMS Microbiology, 2018, 4(4): 622-641. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2018.4.622 |
[4] | Dawn B. Goldsmith, Zoe A. Pratte, Christina A. Kellogg, Sara E. Snader, Koty H. Sharp . Stability of temperate coral Astrangia poculata microbiome is reflected across different sequencing methodologies. AIMS Microbiology, 2019, 5(1): 62-76. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2019.1.62 |
[5] | Neetu Sharma, Sonu Bhatia, Abhinashi Singh Sodhi, Navneet Batra . Oral microbiome and health. AIMS Microbiology, 2018, 4(1): 42-66. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2018.1.42 |
[6] | Nikolina-Alexandra Xaxiri, Eleni Nikouli, Panagiotis Berillis, Konstantinos Ar. Kormas . Bacterial biofilm development during experimental degradation of Melicertus kerathurus exoskeleton in seawater. AIMS Microbiology, 2018, 4(3): 397-412. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2018.3.397 |
[7] | Mohammad Shamim Ahasan, Thomas B. Waltzek, Leigh Owens, Ellen Ariel . Characterisation and comparison of the mucosa-associated bacterial communities across the gastrointestinal tract of stranded green turtles, Chelonia mydas. AIMS Microbiology, 2020, 6(4): 361-378. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2020022 |
[8] | Mohamed H. El-Sayed, Doaa A. Elsayed, Abd El-Rahman F. Gomaa . Nocardiopsis synnemataformans NBRM9, an extremophilic actinomycete producing extremozyme cellulase, using lignocellulosic agro-wastes and its biotechnological applications. AIMS Microbiology, 2024, 10(1): 187-219. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2024010 |
[9] | Denisse Galarza–Verkovitch, Onur Turak, Jutta Wiese, Tanja Rahn, Ute Hentschel, Erik Borchert . Bioprospecting for polyesterase activity relevant for PET degradation in marine Enterobacterales isolates. AIMS Microbiology, 2023, 9(3): 518-539. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2023027 |
[10] | Paola Brun . The profiles of dysbiotic microbial communities. AIMS Microbiology, 2019, 5(1): 87-101. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2019.1.87 |
Marine sponges are well-known for their production of bioactive compounds, many of which are synthesized by their associated symbiotic microorganisms. Among these, Actinomycetes are of particular interest due to their ability to produce secondary metabolites with antimicrobial and antitumor activities. We aimed to investigate the bacterial microbiome of tropical marine sponges, with an emphasis on the diversity and distribution of Actinomycetes, employing both culture-dependent and culture-independent approaches. Five sponge samples (PF01–PF05) were collected from Sichang Island, Chonburi Province, Thailand. The bacterial communities were analyzed using 16S rRNA gene sequencing and bioinformatics tools, revealing a significant microbial diversity dominated by Cyanobacteria, Actinomycetota, and Chloroflexi. Notably, PF01 (Penares nux) exhibited the highest microbial diversity, while PF05 (Cacospongia sp.) had the lowest. Actinomycetes, particularly the genus Micromonospora, were successfully isolated from all samples, with PF03 (Ircinia mutans) yielding the highest number of strains. Culture-independent analysis identified a greater proportion of unculturable Actinomycetes compared to those isolated through traditional methods, underscoring the limitations of culture-dependent techniques. This study enhances our understanding of sponge-associated microbial diversity and highlights the potential for isolating Actinomycetes from these sponges for novel drug discovery and other bioprospective applications.
Marine sponges have received much attention in recent years due to their bioactive compounds, which offer promising prospects for the development of novel medications and healthcare innovations. Classified scientifically under the phylum Porifera, sponges constitute a diverse group with approximately 8,500 known species [1]. The phylum Porifera is divided into four classes based on skeletal composition: Calcerea, Demospongiae, Hexactinellida, and Sclerospongiae [2]. These multicellular aquatic animals inhabit primarily the ocean, exhibiting remarkable diversity in colors, shapes, and sizes. The unique characteristics of sponges are attributed to their bodies, which are filled with channels and pores that enable water to circulate through them, facilitating essential processes for nutrient absorption and providing a favorable environment for symbiotic relationships with microorganisms such as archaea, bacteria, cyanobacteria, and microalgae [3],[4]. Numerous secondary metabolites with potential biological activities have been identified in these symbiotic microorganisms within sponges [5],[6], such as bioactive peptides and polyketides [7], and antimicrobial compounds, such as avarol, aeroplysinin-1, preclathridine, spongiacidine B, and pyrrole alkaloids [8]. According to Dinarvand and Spain [9], marine extracts from the sponges were investigated to identify novel compounds with antimicrobial properties. The antibacterial screening of these extracts revealed that multiple compounds exhibited potent in vitro antibacterial activity, particularly against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA).
Several studies indicate that these secondary metabolites are biosynthesized by the symbionts [10]–[12]. According to Skariyachan et al. [13], metabolites extracted from sponge-associated bacteria display inhibitory effects on pathogenic bacteria such as MRSA, Proteus mirabilis, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Salmonella typhi. Sofyani et al. [14] reported that potential secondary metabolites with antimicrobial and antifungal properties are produced by sponge-associated bacteria. The synthesis of antimicrobial metabolites by these bacteria implies their potential role in protecting sponges against pathogens. One of the key symbiotic microorganisms identified in marine sponges for the biosynthesis of secondary metabolites is Actinomycetes [15]. The sponge-associated Actinomycetes are not only abundant and varied but also generate structurally novel secondary metabolites, including mainly polyketides [16], alkaloids [17], fatty acids, peptides, and terpenoids [18]. These compounds exhibit various biological activities, such as antibacterial, antitumor, and antiparasitic activities [19].
Actinomycetes are a group of Gram-positive to Gram-variable filamentous bacteria with high guanine + cytosine contents. Similar to fungi, they produce thread-like filaments identical to hyphae and form spore; however, their hyphae are generally smaller than fungal hyphae. They are exceptionally diverse, consisting of both benign and pathogenic bacteria [20]. Some species, such as Mycobacterium tuberculosis and Nocardia spp., can survive in harsh hospital environments and cause infectious diseases in humans [21], while others are tremendously high-impact sources of valuable bioactive compounds [22]. Species from the genus Streptomyces, for instance, produce a variety of secondary metabolites with high structural diversity [23], including streptomycin [24], clindamycin, chloramphenicol [25], fosfomycin, and ribostamycin [26].
Actinomycetes remain a valuable resource for the discovery of novel natural products, including antibiotics, due to their remarkable production of bioactive compounds and secondary metabolites [27],[28]. Unique environments, such as the marine environment, have provided access to strains capable of producing diverse antimicrobial compounds with varied chemical structures, including polyketides, nitrogen-containing compounds, sterols, and terpenoids [29]. Furthermore, a large number of antitumor compounds have been discovered [30]. Nevertheless, the increase in antimicrobial resistance has become a challenge in the development of new potential antibiotics [31]. Consequently, many researchers in recent years have shifted their focus to rare Actinomycetes or non-Streptomyces due to their ability to produce novel and effective antimicrobial compounds [32]. Many successful antibiotics, including macrolides [33], teicoplanin, and vancomycin [34], have been produced by rare Actinomycetes. The number of antibiotics produced by rare Actinomycetes has increased by 25–30% of known antibiotics in the last two decades [35]. Accordingly, rare Actinomycetes have become promising resources for the discovery of not only new antimicrobial compounds but also other bioactive metabolites with diverse properties.
Actinomycetes are present in various ecological habitats, including soils [36], freshwater [37], marine sediments [38], and marine sponges [39]. While microbiologists have traditionally concentrated on terrestrial environments due to the predominant presence of Actinomycetes in soils [40], recent investigations have revealed the potential of the marine environment as a distinct and promising source for rare Actinomycetes [41],[42]. The marine environment, especially marine sponges, provides a unique condition for rare Actinomycetes with distinct metabolic and genetic characteristics [43]. This diversity is driven by the extreme conditions prevalent in marine ecosystems, such as high salinity, pressure, and low temperatures [15]. Marine sponges are acknowledged as one of the most abundant sources of bioactive natural products, contributing to almost 30% of all-natural products identified from marine sources [44]. According to Sun et al. [45], marine-derived Actinomycetes were isolated from marine sponges and have been reported as a new source of aromatic polyketides. Many researchers have reported the isolation of rare Actinomycetes from marine sponges [46]. According to Olsen et al. [47], a novel Actinomycetes, Tsukamurella spongiae, was isolated from a deep-water marine sponge obtained from the coast of Curaçao in the Netherlands Antilles. In addition to sponges, marine Actinomycetes have been reported in symbiotic associations with corals and macroalgae. For instance, Actinomycetes associated with corals have been shown to produce compounds with unique antifungal and cytotoxic activities [48], while those associated with macroalgae have yielded metabolites with biotechnological potential, such as anti-inflammatory and antimicrobial agents [49]. These associations suggest that marine Actinomycetes adapted to challenging environments may be a rich source of novel biological resources [50]. Therefore, investigating marine Actinomycetes isolated from sponges, corals, and macroalgae may lead to the discovery of novel compounds with diverse bioactivities.
To study the communities of marine sponge-associated Actinomycetes, both culture-dependent and culture-independent methods were involved. These two methods can comprehensively evaluate the diversity and distribution of bacterial communities [51]. The conventional (culture-dependent) methods are laboratory procedures used to isolate and cultivate microorganisms. For centuries, the study of microorganisms relied heavily on the conventional and long-adopted culture-dependent method for investigating bacterial communities in different environments [52]. While these methods have historically facilitated the development of microbiology, their limitations are widely recognized and serious. [52]. Only a small portion of microorganisms from an environmental sample can be successfully cultured in the laboratory due to the selectivity of the nutrient media and culture conditions, resulting in the enormous bioprospecting potential of the uncultured diversity being overlooked [53].
In recent decades, culture-independent methods have been developed since the application of molecular methods [54]. Culture-independent methods do not rely on cultivation; instead, they target nucleic acids to investigate microorganisms in a particular ecosystem [55]. The application of molecular techniques in culture-independent methods makes them more accurate and appropriate for identifying microorganisms [56]. Next-generation sequencing (NGS), or large-scale massively parallel sequencing, has been developed [57]. NGS, such as Illumina sequencing, can sequence millions of DNA fragments simultaneously, offering comprehensive details on genome structure, genome variations, gene activity, and changes in gene behavior [58]. With its high-throughput capacity and cost-effectiveness, NGS has been applied and opened new opportunities for understanding microbial diversity [59].
In this study, we focused on sponge samples collected from Sichang Island in the Gulf of Thailand, a region with diverse marine ecosystems and unique environmental gradients influenced by industrial and conservation activities. Despite its ecological significance, the Gulf of Thailand remains underexplored for microbial diversity and natural product discovery, offering an opportunity to uncover novel Actinomycetes and bioactive metabolites. Consequently, we aim to isolate Actinomycetes from marine sponges in this region and investigate their biodiversity using culture-dependent and culture-independent methods. Metagenomic sequencing through 16S ribosomal RNA, such as Illumina MiSeq sequencing, was performed to evaluate the diversity of Actinomycetes and compare it to culture-dependent methods. Integrating these two methodologies enables a more thorough understanding of Actinomycetes communities in marine sponges.
Five sponge samples, each weighing approximately 20–30 g (wet weight), were collected by scuba diving at depths of 3–5 meters near Sichang Island in the Gulf of Thailand. The collection was conducted with the assistance of the Aquatic Resources Research Institute, Chulalongkorn University, and under authorization from the Department of Fisheries, Ministry of Agriculture and Cooperatives, Thailand (Permit No. 0510.2/8234, dated October 28, 2019). Briefly, sponge samples were collected and immediately stored in an ice box to maintain a low temperature during transportation. Upon reaching land, the samples were transferred to −20 °C for storage until further processing. The sponges were not washed to retain their natural microbiome composition. Sponge samples were identified based on morphological and ecological features such as growth form, color, depth, and substrate. Details of collected sponges are provided in Table 1, Figures S1 and S2.
Number | Sample code | Sponge scientific name |
1 | PF01 | Penares nux (de Laubenfels, 1954) |
2 | PF02 | Cacospongia sp. |
3 | PF03 | Ircinia mutans (Wilson, 1925) |
4 | PF04 | Gelliodes petrosioides Dendy, 1905 |
5 | PF05 | Cacospongia sp. |
For metagenomic analysis, a small fragment was taken from each individual sponge sample for DNA extraction. DNA extraction from sponges was conducted utilizing the DNeasy PowerSoil Pro DNA Kit (Qiagen, USA). For library preparation, the amplification of V3-V4 region on the 16S rRNA gene was achieved using 2X sparQ HiFi PCR master Mix (QuantaBio, USA) in conjunction with 341F (5′-TCGTCGGCAGCGTCAGATGTGTATAAGAGACAGCCTACGGGNGGCWGCAG-3′) and 805R primers (5′-GTCTCGTGGGCTCGGAGATGTGTATAAGAGACAGGACTACHVGGGTATCTAATCC-3′), whereby the underlined sequences represent overhanging adaptors subsequently trimmed off. Thermocycling reactions proceeded as follows: Initial denaturation at 98 °C for 2 min followed by 30 cycles of denaturation at 98 °C for 20 s, annealing at 60 °C for 30 s, extension at 72 °C for 1 min, and a final extension step at 72 °C for 1 min. After PCR, the products were purified utilizing sparQ Puremag Beads (QuantaBio, USA) and then indexed using Nextera XT index primer (5 µL per 50 µL PCR reaction) through 8–10 cycles of PCR under identical conditions as mentioned earlier. The resulting PCR products were pooled and diluted to achieve a loading concentration of 4 pM. Cluster generation of DNA fragments and paired-end sequencing were performed at the Omics Sciences and Bioinformatics Center, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand, utilizing the Illumina MiSeq platform. The paired-end sequence data generated in this study were deposited in the NCBI Bioproject database under the accession number PRJNA1223106 and are publicly available for verification and further analysis.
Bacterial microbiome informatics analysis was conducted using QIIME 2 version 2020.8, as described by Bolyen Rideout Dillon et al. [60]. Initially, raw sequence data underwent demultiplexing and quality filtering employing the q2-demux plugin, followed by denoising via DADA2 utilizing the q2-dada2 plugin [61]. Phylogenetic tree construction was facilitated by the SEPP q2-plugin, which placed short sequences into sepp-refs-gg-13-8.qza as a reference for phylogenetic tree generation [62]. Subsequently, alpha-diversity analysis, assessing diversity within samples, was performed utilizing Faith's Phylogenetic Diversity [63] and the Shannon metric [64] based on available operational taxonomic units (OTUs). Beta-diversity analysis, encompassing weighted and unweighted UniFrac distance metrics [65],[66] Jaccard distance, Bray-Curtis dissimilarity, and Principal Coordinate Analysis (PCoA), was conducted using q2-diversity. Taxonomy assignment to amplicon sequence variants (ASVs) was accomplished through the q2-feature-classifier using the classify-sklearn Naïve Bayes method against the Silva 13_8 99% OTUs reference sequences [67]. Taxonomic classification in this study was conducted using the Silva database, which references the phylum as Actinobacteriota. However, as this phylum has been reclassified as Actinomycetota [68], we have adopted the updated nomenclature in this manuscript while acknowledging that some databases and analysis tools may still use the former term. Visualization of OTUs data of Actinomycetes was performed by CCmetagen via Krona chart [69]. The diversity of Actinomycetes was analyzed using classified OTU data derived from 16S metagenomic sequencing. To quantify the diversity within the class Actinomycetes across various samples, the Shannon diversity index (H′) and Simpson's diversity index (D) were employed [70].
The Shannon diversity index was calculated from this formula
The Simpson's diversity index was calculated from this formula
Where H′ = the Shannon index value
D = the Simpson's diversity index
Pi = the proportion of the population represented by the i-th species (or OTUs in this context)
S = the total number of species (or total number of OTUs)
One gram of sponge samples was aseptically ground and suspended in natural seawater collected directly from the sampling site. Serial dilutions (100 to 10−3) were prepared using the same natural seawater as the diluent. A volume of 0.1 mL of the suspension was spread onto M2 (6 mL glycerol, 1 g arginine, 1 g K2HPO4, 0.5 g MgSO4, 15 g agar, 1 L seawater, pH 7.0) [71] and starch casein nitrate (SCN) medium (10 g soluble starch, 2 g K2HPO4, 2 g KNO3, 0.3 g sodium caseinate, 0.05 g MgSO4.7H2O, 0.02 g CaCO3, 0.01 g FeSO4.7H2O, 15 g agar, 1 L sea water, pH 7.0) [72], which contained 25 mg/L nalixidic acid, 50 mg/L cycloheximide, and 1 mg/L terbinafine. The agar plates were incubated at room temperature (approximately 25–28 °C) in dark conditions for a duration of 14 days. Following the incubation period, Actinomycetes colonies were observed to have grown, and they were purified using the streak plate technique. The purified colonies were then stored on International Streptomyces Project-2 (ISP2) agar medium (4 g yeast extract, 10 g malt extract, 4 g glucose, and 20 g agar per liter of seawater) for further study and analysis. For long-term storage, the isolates were maintained as glycerol stocks (20% glycerol) at -80 °C.
The isolates of Actinomycetes were cultured in ISP2 broth on a rotary shaker (200 rpm) at 30 °C for seven days. Subsequently, genomic DNA was extracted using the PureLink™ Genomic DNA Mini Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA). Amplification of the 16S rRNA gene was conducted through the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) technique employing primers 20F (5′-GAGTTTGATCCTGGCTCAG-3′) and 1500R (5′-GTTACCTTGTTACGACTT-3′) as described by Suriyachadkun et al. (2009). The PCR protocol included an initial denaturation at 94 °C for three minutes followed by 30 cycles of 94 °C for one minute, 50 °C for two minutes, and 72 °C for two minutes, culminating in a final extension at 72 °C for seven minutes. After amplification, the PCR products were purified using the GenepHlow™ PCR Cleanup Kit (Geneaid, Taiwan), thereby preparing the amplicons for subsequent sequencing. Sequencing was performed using universal primers by Macrogen, Korea, a service that ensures high fidelity in sequence data production. The resultant 16S rRNA gene sequences were aligned using the BioEdit Sequence Alignment Editor software [73]. Comparative analysis was then conducted utilizing EzBioCloud [74]. The DNA sequence data of isolated Actinomycetes in this study were deposited in the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) database (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/). The assigned accession numbers are provided in the supplementary information (Table S1).
To investigate bacterial communities in marine sponges, 16S metagenomic sequencing was employed in five sponge samples (PF01 to PF05). OTUs were clustered and assigned. Overall, 132,805 OTUs were observed and classified as 284 unique OTUs data. The top five phyla found across samples were Cyanobacteria 41,903 OTUs (31.55%), Actinobacteriota (Actinomycetota from recent reclassification) 19,515 OTUs (14.69%), Chloroflexi 16,389 OTUs (12.34%), Proteobacteria 11,429 OTUs (8.61%), and Acidobacteriota 11,071 OTUs (8.34%). On the family level, the unidentified family within Synechococcales (Cyanobacteria) accounted for the largest proportion of OTUs across all samples, with a total of 39,267 OTUs. Additionally, Microtrichaceae (Actinomycetota, 11,796 OTUs), Rhodothermaceae (Bacteroidota, 8,389 OTUs), and an unidentified family within Thermoanaerobaculales (Acidobacteriota, 8,170 OTUs) also contributed significantly to the bacterial diversity (Table S2).
Sample-specific trends emerged from the data. PF01 exhibited the highest levels of Chloroflexi, while PF04 had the greatest abundance of Cyanobacteria. Actinomycetota was more prevalent in PF05 compared to the other samples. An inverse relationship between the abundance of Cyanobacteria and Chloroflexi was observed across the sponge samples. For instance, Cyanobacteria were highly abundant in PF04, while Chloroflexi were less prevalent. Conversely, PF01, which had the highest levels of Chloroflexi, exhibited lower Cyanobacteria abundance (Figure 1).
Comprehensive microbial community profiling across five sponge samples (PF01 to PF05) revealed diverse taxonomic landscapes, with significant variations in both richness and phylogenetic breadth. Alpha diversity assessments, including rarefaction analyses and diversity indices, indicated that PF01 harbored the most diverse microbiota. The Shannon diversity index demonstrated high species richness and a favorable balance between species abundance and evenness, supported by a steep initial slope in the rarefaction curve that plateaued at increased sequencing depths, signaling a saturation of diversity. Faith's Phylogenetic Diversity further confirmed that PF01 contained a wide range of phylogenetic lineages, indicating the presence of both common and rare taxa with extensive evolutionary histories.
In contrast, PF05 exhibited the lowest alpha diversity metrics, with a rarefaction curve that rapidly plateaued. This indicated a limited range of species, corroborated by consistently lower values in both the Shannon index and observed OTUs, suggesting a community structure that is less rich and less even. Samples PF02, PF03, and PF04 displayed intermediate and comparable levels of microbial diversity, with their rarefaction curves and diversity metrics showing similar patterns (Figure 2).
Beta diversity analyses, using weighted and unweighted UniFrac, Bray-Curtis, and Jaccard in Principal Coordinate Analysis (PCoA), provided insights into the microbial community structure and composition across samples. Weighted UniFrac and Bray-Curtis metrics, which account for the relative abundance of taxa, identified PF01 as having a unique microbial composition. PF02, PF03, and PF05 showed varying degrees of similarity in their microbial community structures, whereas PF04 exhibited unique microbial taxa not found in other samples, as highlighted by unweighted UniFrac and Jaccard analyses (Figure 3).
The analysis of OTU data for the class Actinomycetes across the five sponge samples (PF01, PF02, PF03, PF04, and PF05) provided detailed insights into their abundance and diversity. In terms of total abundance, PF04 contained the highest number of Actinomycetes OTUs (434), followed by PF03 (303 OTUs), PF05 (125 OTUs), PF02 (99 OTUs), and PF01 (53 OTUs) (Table S2).
Diversity indices, including the Shannon and Simpson indices, were calculated to assess the community structure across the samples. The Shannon diversity index was highest in PF01 (0.96), reflecting a highly diverse and evenly distributed Actinomycetes community, including genera such as Bifidobacterium and Micromonospora. In contrast, PF02 showed the lowest Shannon value (0.33), indicating a less diverse community dominated by a few species, primarily unculturable Actinomycetes. Intermediate values were observed in PF03 (Shannon: 0.91, Simpson: 0.50), PF04 (Shannon: 0.70, Simpson: 0.41), and PF05 (Shannon: 0.58, Simpson: 0.39), reflecting varying levels of diversity and species dominance across these samples. The Simpson index, which emphasizes species dominance within a community, supported these findings. PF01 had the lowest Simpson value (0.58), indicating less species dominance, while PF02 had the highest value (0.18), suggesting strong dominance by one or a few species (Figure 4).
In this study, Actinomycetes were successfully isolated from sponge samples PF01–PF05, representing a diverse range of species. Two media, M2 and starch casein nitrate (SCN), were employed to isolate Actinomycetes, resulting in the recovery of 48 strains. PF03 yielded the highest number of isolates (19 strains), followed by PF02 (15 strains), PF05 (6 strains), PF04 (5 strains), and PF01 (3 strains) (Table S1).
Most isolated strains belonged to the genus Micromonospora (45 strains), while the remaining three strains were identified as Streptomyces. Micromonospora was dominant in all sponge samples based on culture-dependent methods. However, the microbiome data detected Micromonospora only in PF01. This discrepancy suggests that Micromonospora strains present in other sponge samples may be at low abundance, potentially escaping detection via sequencing methods [75],[76]. Additionally, SCN medium may have favored the growth of Micromonospora over other taxa, as previous studies have demonstrated its efficacy in yielding high colony-forming units from environmental samples [77],[78]. Among the isolated Micromonospora strains, the most frequently identified species were Micromonospora fluminis (11 isolates), Micromonospora maritima (6 isolates), and Micromonospora schwarzwaldensis (5 isolates).
The isolation of Actinomycetes yielded only Streptomyces and Micromonospora species, which reflects a subset of the diversity detected in the NGS data. The cross-validation performed using CCmetagen analysis revealed that more than 80% of Actinomycetes identified from the sponge samples were classified as unculturable (Figure 5), highlighting the complementary nature of culture-based and sequencing approaches. This suggested that the culture-based methods capture only a fraction of the total Actinomycetes diversity present in sponge-associated microbiomes.
In this study, several marine sponge species were collected and identified from Sichang Island, Chonburi Province. The distribution pattern of these sponges was reported along the Gulf of Thailand (Chonburi and Rayong Province). Penares nux (PF01) and Cacospongia sp. (PF02 and PF05) were observed in both industrial and conservation areas, specifically in the Sichang and Mun Islands, indicating their resilience to varying environmental conditions. This reflects their ecological flexibility and ability to thrive in diverse marine environments. The widespread presence of these sponges suggests their potential as a bioindicator, particularly for ecosystems exposed to anthropogenic stressors. Furthermore, Ircinia mutans (PF03) was primarily found in industrial areas, particularly in regions characterized by high sedimentation, such as reef slopes and soft-bottom habitats. Its abundance in these areas suggests that I. mutans could be an indicator species for assessing sedimentation levels in marine ecosystems. Gelliodes petrosioides (PF04) was also recorded in both industrial and conservation zones, with a notable presence in coral reef habitats. The distribution of this species across environmental gradients points to its adaptability and ecological significance in nutrient cycling within coral reef ecosystems [79]. In this study, we focused on microbial diversity in sponge-associated communities, but whether sponge adaptability to varying environments influences microbiome diversity remains unclear. Future studies integrating microbiome analysis with environmental and ecological data could explore this relationship.
The findings from sponge distribution align with this research objective for exploring the bacterial microbiome associated with marine sponges. The diverse sponge species identified across locations, including industrial and conservation zones, provide important context for the microbiome profiles observed in each sponge. The dominance of Cyanobacteria, particularly the unidentified family within Synechococcales, suggests that these bacteria play a significant role in the sponge microbiome. Cyanobacteria are well-known for forming symbiotic relationships with sponges, offering mutual benefits. The sponges provide a protected habitat and access to nutrients, while Cyanobacteria contribute to sponge nutrition through photosynthesis and nitrogen fixation. Nitrogen fixation is particularly important in nutrient-poor marine ecosystems, where it supports not only sponges but also other organisms like corals [80]. Along with the Gulf of Thailand, PF01 was found in both industrial and conservation areas [79] and exhibited the highest microbial diversity in this study, with Cyanobacteria being dominant. This could be linked to the varied environmental conditions of its habitat, where the sponge is exposed to both nutrient-rich and anthropogenically influenced waters.
The inverse relationship between Cyanobacteria and Chloroflexi abundance suggests potential ecological interactions or competition between these two phyla. Chloroflexi, which are photoheterotrophs relying on organic compounds for carbon, may be limited in environments where Cyanobacteria dominate, as Cyanobacteria perform oxygenic photosynthesis, potentially monopolizing light in shallow water environments. This competition may restrict Chloroflexi's access to light-dependent energy sources, limiting their growth [81]. Additionally, sponges may exert selective pressures to favor their symbionts, using chemical defenses to mitigate competition from other microbes, including Chloroflexi [82].
Actinomycetota, particularly members of the class Acidimicrobiia, play crucial roles in degrading complex organic compounds, including aromatic compounds and pollutants like polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) [83],[84]. The variable abundance of Actinomycetota across the samples likely reflects differences in the ecological roles they perform, particularly in organic matter degradation and nutrient cycling. The high abundance of Actinomycetota in PF05 and PF01 could indicate active involvement in nutrient cycling, supporting the metabolic needs of the sponge by transforming recalcitrant organic molecules into usable forms. The lower abundance of Actinomycetota in PF04 may reflect a reduced reliance on these microbial functions, potentially due to differences in nutrient availability or microbial competition.
Proteobacteria and Acidobacteriota were consistent contributors across all samples. The Gammaproteobacteria class, particularly Steroidobacterales, is known for its ability to degrade steroids via the aerobic 9,10-seco steroid degradation pathway. The presence of steroid-degrading bacteria in sponges may suggest a symbiotic relationship where these bacteria assist in breaking down steroids, preventing harmful accumulation within the sponge [85]. However, the lower abundance of Proteobacteria in PF05 may indicate competition with other bacterial groups like Cyanobacteria, which dominate in this sample.
Thermoanaerobaculia (Acidobacteriota) displayed variable abundance across samples, with PF02 and PF05 showing higher levels than other samples. The prevalence of Thermoanaerobaculia in PF02 suggests that these bacteria might play a role in the sponge microbiome under low-oxygen or high-temperature conditions, as this class is known for thriving in such environments [86]. Their ability to adapt to thermal stress could be crucial for the sponge's resilience in changing marine environments [87]. Additionally, Vicinamibacteria, though recently discovered and poorly understood, were found distributed across all samples, indicating their potential involvement in sponge holobionts, although their specific roles require further investigation [88].
Beta diversity analyses revealed unique microbial compositions across the samples, with PF01 showing a particularly distinct microbial community. This uniqueness may be influenced by environmental conditions or specific traits of the host sponge. For instance, PF01 has been associated with the production of bioactive compounds like trisoxazole macrolides, known for their antimicrobial and antifouling properties [89]. The uneven distribution of these compounds within the sponge, such as the concentration of kabiramides in certain structures like the capitums, may lead to spatial variations in microbial communities, as different bacterial species respond to the presence of these bioactive molecules. Additionally, the fatty acid profile of Penares species, particularly chloro-derivatives, may further influence microbial associations by interacting with microbial metabolites [90]. PF04 also exhibited a unique microbial community, suggesting niche specialization or geographical isolation that contributes to the presence of distinct microbial taxa. The similarity between PF03 and PF05 in beta diversity metrics suggests that these sponges experience similar environmental conditions or host-specific traits, which may influence the selection of comparable microbial taxa. These shared microbial interactions could play crucial roles in ecological resilience, enabling these sponge-associated communities to adapt to environmental stressors.
The observed patterns of Actinomycetes abundance and diversity highlight the differing ecological conditions and microbial interactions across the sponge samples. The high Shannon index in PF01 suggests a stable environment with minimal competition, promoting an evenly distributed and diverse Actinomycetes community. This sample included a variety of taxa, such as Bifidobacterium and Micromonospora, indicating that these genera might thrive in environments that support balanced microbial interactions. Such conditions are conducive to the formation of complex symbiotic relationships within the sponge microbiome, potentially contributing to its health and function.
Conversely, the low Shannon index in PF02 suggests a microbial community under environmental stress or constrained by limited ecological niches, which favors a few dominant species. The high Simpson index in PF02 further indicates that one or a few species are predominant, reducing overall diversity. These conditions might result from factors such as nutrient limitations, competitive exclusion, or other environmental stressors that limit the proliferation of a diverse microbial community. PF03, PF04, and PF05 displayed intermediate levels of Actinomycetes diversity, with PF03 showing a richer Actinomycetes community, including uncultured marine Propionibacteriaceae. This suggests that PF03 may be experiencing different ecological interactions compared to PF04 and PF05, where the presence of similar taxa in different proportions points to varying environmental pressures or nutrient availability. The balance of species dominance in these samples, as reflected by the Simpson index, suggests that microbial interactions are more dynamic in these environments, enabling a more even distribution of species.
The isolation of Actinomycetes in this study showed that Micromonospora was the dominant genus under the conditions employed, which may point to its competitive advantage within the sponge microbiome. However, it is important to note that different sampling approaches, storage conditions, or the use of diverse isolation media could potentially result in the isolation of a broader range of Actinomycetes. Studies have shown that Micromonospora strains can be isolated from various marine environments, including deep-sea sponges, where they produce bioactive compounds with notable antibiotic properties [91],[92]. The ability of Micromonospora to produce inhibitory metabolites likely contributes to its dominance, enabling these strains to compete effectively for space and resources within the sponge environment. Moreover, the discrepancy between NGS data and culturing results suggests that Micromonospora strains, while present in low abundance in some samples, can be selectively cultured under specific laboratory conditions. The use of SCN medium likely favored the growth of Micromonospora, supporting previous findings that certain media can enhance the isolation of Actinomycetes from environmental samples [77]. This highlights the limitations of both culture-based methods, which capture only a portion of microbial diversity, and sequencing approaches, which may overlook low-abundance taxa. Additionally, a limitation of this study is the use of only M2 and SCN media for Actinomycetes isolation. While effective, these media may not support the growth of all Actinomycetes present in the samples, potentially restricting the diversity of strains isolated. Future studies could incorporate additional media formulations to capture a broader range of Actinomycetes and provide a more comprehensive representation of the Actinomycetes community.
In addition, this discrepancy highlights the limitations of the universal primers (341F/805R) used in this study for 16S rRNA sequencing, as they may not sufficiently capture the diversity of certain taxa like Actinomycetes. While these primers are effective for broad-spectrum bacterial profiling, they can underrepresent low-abundance taxa or those with mismatched primer binding sites. Actinomycetes-specific primers, such as those suggested by previous studies (e.g., ACT1360R/ACT283F, F243/R513), could provide improved resolution of Actinomycetes diversity. Future studies incorporating such primers could further elucidate the contributions of this important bacterial group to sponge microbiomes. Additionally, the storage of samples at -20 °C before processing, while ideal for preserving microbial DNA for microbiome-based studies and preventing contamination during transport and storage, may negatively impact the survival of non-spore-forming Actinomycetes. This could result in an underestimation of their diversity in culture-dependent methods.
The diversity of isolated Micromonospora species, including M. fluminis, M. maritima, and M. schwarzwaldensis, reflects their adaptability to various environmental conditions. For example, M. maritima has been reported to thrive in stressful environments, such as mangrove soils, which are characterized by high salinity and osmotic pressure, suggesting that these species possess enzymes and metabolites that enable them to break down complex compounds and contribute to nutrient cycling within their habitats [93]. The pharmaceutical potential of Micromonospora is particularly noteworthy, as they are known for producing a wide range of bioactive secondary metabolites. These include antimicrobial compounds effective against multidrug-resistant pathogens, positioning Micromonospora as a valuable resource for drug discovery [94]. Beyond pharmaceuticals, Micromonospora have significant biotechnological applications, particularly in industries requiring robust enzymes for processes such as food processing, textiles, and pharmaceuticals. The enzymatic capabilities of M. maritima, which thrives in harsh environments like mangrove soils, suggest its enzymes can be effective biocatalysts for degrading tough substrates in industrial applications [95].
The Actinomycetes detected and isolated in this study, particularly Micromonospora and Streptomyces, are consistent with previous reports of sponge-associated Actinomycetes. For example, Micromonospora species have been isolated from tropical marine sponges in the South China Sea and Indian Ocean, where they have been recognized for producing bioactive secondary metabolites [96],[97]. However, to our knowledge, these bacteria have not been reported from the specific sponge species sampled in this study (Penares nux, Cacospongia sp., Ircinia mutans, and Gelliodes petrosioides) in the Gulf of Thailand. This suggests that our study adds new insights into the microbiome composition of these sponges in a tropical marine environment. However, the association of specific Actinomycetes with particular sponge species cannot be conclusively determined at this stage. Further studies are needed to confirm these findings through repeated sampling across geographic locations and during seasons to account for potential temporal and spatial variability. Additionally, environmental factors such as water temperature, salinity, and nutrient availability may play a significant role in shaping the microbiome composition of these sponges, further highlighting the need for broader studies to fully understand the dynamics of sponge-associated Actinomycetes in tropical marine environments.
In other marine environments, such as temperate and polar regions, different genera, including Streptomyces and Salinispora, are more commonly isolated from sponges [98], [99]. The dominance of Micromonospora in this study, particularly as observed in culture-based methods, may reflect the tropical environmental conditions around Sichang Island, such as higher temperatures and salinity, which are known to influence microbial community composition. This finding contrasts with studies conducted in temperate zones, where other genera often dominate the Actinomycetes communities [100]. Our results align with expectations based on previous studies of tropical marine sponges, where Micromonospora and Streptomyces have been commonly reported. However, the discrepancy between the cultured strains and the sequencing data highlights methodological limitations, particularly the potential underrepresentation of certain Actinomycetes due to primer bias or culture conditions. This emphasizes the need for more comprehensive approaches, including the use of diverse isolation media and Actinomycetes-specific primers, to fully capture the diversity of sponge-associated Actinomycetes. Despite these challenges, the findings underscore the importance of exploring under-sampled environments like the Gulf of Thailand, which may harbor novel Actinomycetes with unique bioactive potential.
This study highlights the bacterial diversity within tropical marine sponges. The combination of culture-dependent and independent methods reveal distinct microbial communities, with Micromonospora being prominent among the isolated Actinomycetes. The findings underscore the biotechnological potential of marine sponges as sources of novel microorganisms, though many remain unculturable, suggesting that further metagenomic research is needed to fully explore their potential. These results offer promising insights for bioprospecting efforts in drug discovery and biotechnology.
The authors declare they have not used Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools in the creation of this article.
[1] |
Van Soest RW, Boury-Esnault N, Vacelet J, et al. (2012) Global diversity of sponges (Porifera). PLoS One 7: e35105. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0035105 ![]() |
[2] |
Lavrov DV, Diaz MC, Maldonado M, et al. (2023) Phylomitogenomics bolsters the high-level classification of Demospongiae (phylum Porifera). PLoS One 18: e0287281. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0287281 ![]() |
[3] |
Jahn MT, Lachnit T, Markert SM, et al. (2021) Lifestyle of sponge symbiont phages by host prediction and correlative microscopy. ISME J 15: 2001-2011. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41396-021-00900-6 ![]() |
[4] |
Thacker RW, Freeman CJ (2012) Sponge-microbe symbioses: recent advances and new directions. Adv Mar Biol 62: 57-111. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-394283-8.00002-3 ![]() |
[5] |
Laport MS, Santos OC, Muricy G (2009) Marine sponges: potential sources of new antimicrobial drugs. Curr Pharm Biotechnol 10: 86-105. https://doi.org/10.2174/138920109787048625 ![]() |
[6] |
Varijakzhan D, Loh JY, Yap WS, et al. (2021) Bioactive compounds from marine sponges: Fundamentals and applications. Mar Drugs 19. https://doi.org/10.3390/md19050246 ![]() |
[7] |
Wakimoto T (2023) Biosynthesis of bioactive natural products derived from Theonellidae family marine sponges. Chem Pharm Bull (Tokyo) 71: 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1248/cpb.c22-00715 ![]() |
[8] |
Di Cesare Mannelli L, Palma Esposito F, Sangiovanni E, et al. (2021) Pharmacological activities of extracts and compounds isolated from mediterranean sponge sources. Pharmaceuticals (Basel) 14. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph14121329 ![]() |
[9] | Dinarvand M, Spain M (2021) Identification of bioactive compounds from marine natural products and exploration of structure-activity relationships (SAR). Antibiotics (Basel) 10. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics10030337 |
[10] |
Bibi F, Faheem M, Azhar EI, et al. (2017) Bacteria from marine sponges: A source of new drugs. Curr Drug Metab 18: 11-15. https://doi.org/10.2174/1389200217666161013090610 ![]() |
[11] |
Taylor MW, Radax R, Steger D, et al. (2007) Sponge-associated microorganisms: evolution, ecology, and biotechnological potential. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 71: 295-347. https://doi.org/10.1128/MMBR.00040-06 ![]() |
[12] |
Brinkmann CM, Marker A, Kurtböke Dİ (2017) An overview on marine sponge-symbiotic bacteria as unexhausted sources for natural product discovery. Diversity 9: 40. https://doi.org/10.3390/d9040040 ![]() |
[13] |
Skariyachan S, A GR, Patil MR, et al. (2014) Antimicrobial potential of metabolites extracted from bacterial symbionts associated with marine sponges in coastal area of Gulf of Mannar Biosphere, India. Lett Appl Microbiol 58: 231-241. https://doi.org/10.1111/lam.12178 ![]() |
[14] |
Bibi F, Yasir M, Al-Sofyani A, et al. (2020) Antimicrobial activity of bacteria from marine sponge Suberea mollis and bioactive metabolites of Vibrio sp. EA348. Saudi J Biol Sci 27: 1139-1147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sjbs.2020.02.002 ![]() |
[15] |
Jagannathan SV, Manemann EM, Rowe SE, et al. (2021) Marine actinomycetes, new sources of biotechnological products. Mar Drugs 19. https://doi.org/10.3390/md19070365 ![]() |
[16] |
Lu S, Wang J, Sheng R, et al. (2020) Novel bioactive polyketides isolated from marine actinomycetes: An update review from 2013 to 2019. Chem Biodivers 17: e2000562. https://doi.org/10.1002/cbdv.202000562 ![]() |
[17] |
De Rop AS, Rombaut J, Willems T, et al. (2021) Novel alkaloids from marine Actinobacteria: discovery and characterization. Mar Drugs 20. https://doi.org/10.3390/md20010006 ![]() |
[18] | Chen J, Xu L, Zhou Y, et al. (2021) Natural products from Actinomycetes associated with marine organisms. Mar Drugs 19. https://doi.org/10.3390/md19110629 |
[19] |
Yang C, Qian R, Xu Y, et al. (2019) Marine Actinomycetes-derived natural products. Curr Top Med Chem 19: 2868-2918. https://doi.org/10.2174/1568026619666191114102359 ![]() |
[20] | Gajdács M, Urbán E (2020) The pathogenic role of Actinomyces spp. and related organisms in genitourinary infections: Discoveries in the new, modern diagnostic era. Antibiotics (Basel) 9. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics9080524 |
[21] |
Siavashifar M, Rezaei F, Motallebirad T, et al. (2021) Species diversity and molecular analysis of opportunistic Mycobacterium, Nocardia and Rhodococcus isolated from the hospital environment in a developing country, a potential resources for nosocomial infection. Genes Environ 43: 2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41021-021-00173-7 ![]() |
[22] | De Simeis D, Serra S (2021) Actinomycetes: A never-ending source of bioactive compounds-an overview on antibiotics production. Antibiotics (Basel) 10. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics10050483 |
[23] |
Alam K, Mazumder A, Sikdar S, et al. (2022) Streptomyces: The biofactory of secondary metabolites. Front Microbiol 13: 968053. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2022.968053 ![]() |
[24] | Waters M, Tadi P (2024) Streptomycin. StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing Copyright © 2024, StatPearls Publishing LLC. |
[25] |
Quinn GA, Banat AM, Abdelhameed AM, et al. (2020) Streptomyces from traditional medicine: sources of new innovations in antibiotic discovery. J Med Microbiol 69: 1040-1048. https://doi.org/10.1099/jmm.0.001232 ![]() |
[26] |
Procópio RE, Silva IR, Martins MK, et al. (2012) Antibiotics produced by Streptomyces. Braz J Infect Dis 16: 466-471. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjid.2012.08.014 ![]() |
[27] |
Ngamcharungchit C, Chaimusik N, Panbangred W, et al. (2023) Bioactive metabolites from terrestrial and marine Actinomycetes. Molecules 28. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28155915 ![]() |
[28] |
Selim MSM, Abdelhamid SA, Mohamed SS (2021) Secondary metabolites and biodiversity of actinomycetes. J Genet Eng Biotechnol 19: 72. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43141-021-00156-9 ![]() |
[29] |
Wang C, Lu Y, Cao S (2020) Antimicrobial compounds from marine actinomycetes. Arch Pharm Res 43: 677-704. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12272-020-01251-0 ![]() |
[30] |
Olano C, Méndez C, Salas JA (2009) Antitumor compounds from marine actinomycetes. Mar Drugs 7: 210-248. https://doi.org/10.3390/md7020210 ![]() |
[31] |
Ogawara H (2016) Self-resistance in Streptomyces, with special reference to β-lactam antibiotics. Molecules 21. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules21050605 ![]() |
[32] |
Supong K, Sripreechasak P, Phongsopitanun W, et al. (2019) Antimicrobial substances from the rare actinomycete Nonomuraea rhodomycinica NR4-ASC07(T). Nat Prod Res 33: 2285-2291. https://doi.org/10.1080/14786419.2018.1440223 ![]() |
[33] |
Al-Fadhli AA, Threadgill MD, Mohammed F, et al. (2022) Macrolides from rare actinomycetes: Structures and bioactivities. Int J Antimicrob Agents 59: 106523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2022.106523 ![]() |
[34] |
Parra J, Beaton A, Seipke RF, et al. (2023) Antibiotics from rare actinomycetes, beyond the genus Streptomyces. Curr Opin Microbiol 76: 102385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mib.2023.102385 ![]() |
[35] |
Tiwari K, Gupta RK (2012) Rare actinomycetes: a potential storehouse for novel antibiotics. Crit Rev Biotechnol 32: 108-132. https://doi.org/10.3109/07388551.2011.562482 ![]() |
[36] | Sapkota A, Thapa A, Budhathoki A, et al. (2020) Isolation, characterization, and screening of antimicrobial-producing actinomycetes from soil samples. Int J Microbiol 2020: 2716584. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/2716584 |
[37] |
Gebreyohannes G, Moges F, Sahile S, et al. (2013) Isolation and characterization of potential antibiotic producing actinomycetes from water and sediments of Lake Tana, Ethiopia. Asian Pac J Trop Biomed 3: 426-435. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2221-1691(13)60092-1 ![]() |
[38] | Mondal H, Thomas J (2022) Isolation and characterization of a novel Actinomycete isolated from marine sediments and its antibacterial activity against fish pathogens. Antibiotics (Basel) 11. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics11111546 |
[39] |
Fahmy NM, Abdel-Tawab AM (2021) Isolation and characterization of marine sponge-associated Streptomyces sp. NMF6 strain producing secondary metabolite(s) possessing antimicrobial, antioxidant, anticancer, and antiviral activities. J Genet Eng Biotechnol 19: 102. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43141-021-00203-5 ![]() |
[40] | Kumar V, Bisht GS, Gusain O (2013) Terrestrial actinomycetes from diverse locations of Uttarakhnad, India: Isolation and screening for their antibacterial activity. Iran J Microbiol 5: 299-308. |
[41] |
Subramani R, Sipkema D (2019) Marine rare Actinomycetes: A Promising source of structurally diverse and unique novel natural products. Mar Drugs 17. https://doi.org/10.3390/md17050249 ![]() |
[42] |
Dhakal D, Pokhrel AR, Shrestha B, et al. (2017) Marine rare Actinobacteria: Isolation, characterization, and strategies for harnessing bioactive compounds. Front Microbiol 8: 1106. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2017.01106 ![]() |
[43] |
Subramani R, Aalbersberg W (2013) Culturable rare Actinomycetes: diversity, isolation and marine natural product discovery. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 97: 9291-9321. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-013-5229-7 ![]() |
[44] |
Mehbub MF, Lei J, Franco C, et al. (2014) Marine sponge derived natural products between 2001 and 2010: trends and opportunities for discovery of bioactives. Mar Drugs 12: 4539-4577. https://doi.org/10.3390/md12084539 ![]() |
[45] | Sun W, Zhang F, He L, et al. (2015) Actinomycetes from the South China Sea sponges: isolation, diversity, and potential for aromatic polyketides discovery. Front Microbiol 6: 1048. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2015.01048 |
[46] |
Tiwari K, Gupta RK (2013) Diversity and isolation of rare actinomycetes: an overview. Crit Rev Microbiol 39: 256-294. https://doi.org/10.3109/1040841X.2012.709819 ![]() |
[47] |
Olson JB, Harmody DK, Bej AK, et al. (2007) Tsukamurella spongiae sp. nov., a novel actinomycete isolated from a deep-water marine sponge. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 57: 1478-1481. https://doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.64837-0 ![]() |
[48] |
Siro G, Pipite A, Christi K, et al. (2022) Marine Actinomycetes associated with stony corals: a potential hotspot for specialized metabolites. Microorganisms 10: 1349. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10071349 ![]() |
[49] |
Girão M, Rego A, Fonseca AC, et al. (2024) Actinomycetota from macroalgae as rich source for natural products discovery revealed through Culture-Dependent and -Independent approaches. Microb Biotechnol 17. https://doi.org/10.1111/1751-7915.70058 ![]() |
[50] |
Schorn MA, Alanjary MM, Aguinaldo K, et al. (2016) Sequencing rare marine actinomycete genomes reveals high density of unique natural product biosynthetic gene clusters. Microbiology (Reading) 162: 2075-2086. https://doi.org/10.1099/mic.0.000386 ![]() |
[51] |
Xi L, Ruan J, Huang Y (2012) Diversity and biosynthetic potential of culturable actinomycetes associated with marine sponges in the China Seas. Int J Mol Sci 13: 5917-5932. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms13055917 ![]() |
[52] |
Al-Awadhi H, Dashti N, Khanafer M, et al. (2013) Bias problems in culture-independent analysis of environmental bacterial communities: a representative study on hydrocarbonoclastic bacteria. SpringerPlus 2: 369. https://doi.org/10.1186/2193-1801-2-369 ![]() |
[53] |
Vester JK, Glaring MA, Stougaard P (2015) Improved cultivation and metagenomics as new tools for bioprospecting in cold environments. Extremophiles 19: 17-29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00792-014-0704-3 ![]() |
[54] |
Su C, Lei L, Duan Y, et al. (2012) Culture-independent methods for studying environmental microorganisms: methods, application, and perspective. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 93: 993-1003. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-011-3800-7 ![]() |
[55] |
Cocolin L, Alessandria V, Dolci P, et al. (2013) Culture independent methods to assess the diversity and dynamics of microbiota during food fermentation. Int J Food Microbiol 167: 29-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2013.05.008 ![]() |
[56] |
Maheshwari P, Sankar PM (2023) Chapter 42-Culture-independent and culture-dependent approaches in symbiont analysis: in proteobacteria. Microbial Symbionts.Academic Press 743-763. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-99334-0.00018-9 ![]() |
[57] | McCombie WR, McPherson JD, Mardis ER (2019) Next-Generation sequencing technologies. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med 9. https://doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a036798 |
[58] |
Satam H, Joshi K, Mangrolia U, et al. (2023) Next-Generation sequencing technology: Current trends and advancements. Biology 12: 997. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology12070997 ![]() |
[59] |
Rhoads A, Au KF (2015) PacBio sequencing and its applications. Genomics Proteomics Bioinf 13: 278-289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gpb.2015.08.002 ![]() |
[60] |
Bolyen E, Rideout JR, Dillon MR, et al. (2019) Reproducible, interactive, scalable and extensible microbiome data science using QIIME 2. Nat Biotechnol 37: 852-857. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-019-0209-9 ![]() |
[61] |
Callahan BJ, McMurdie PJ, Rosen MJ, et al. (2016) DADA2: High-resolution sample inference from Illumina amplicon data. Nat Methods 13: 581-583. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.3869 ![]() |
[62] |
Janssen S, McDonald D, Gonzalez A, et al. (2018) Phylogenetic placement of exact amplicon sequences improves associations with clinical information. mSystems 3: 10.1128/msystems.00021-00018. https://doi.org/10.1128/mSystems.00021-18 ![]() |
[63] |
Faith DP (1992) Conservation evaluation and phylogenetic diversity. Biol Conserv 61: 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/0006-3207(92)91201-3 ![]() |
[64] |
Shannon CE (1948) A mathematical theory of communication. Bell Syst Tech J 27: 379-423. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1538-7305.1948.tb01338.x ![]() |
[65] |
Lozupone C, Knight R (2005) UniFrac: a new phylogenetic method for comparing microbial communities. Appl Environ Microbiol 71: 8228-8235. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.71.12.8228-8235.2005 ![]() |
[66] |
Lozupone CA, Hamady M, Kelley ST, et al. (2007) Quantitative and qualitative beta diversity measures lead to different insights into factors that structure microbial communities. Appl Environ Microbiol 73: 1576-1585. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.01996-06 ![]() |
[67] | Bokulich Nicholas A, Dillon Matthew R, Zhang Y, et al. (2018) q2-longitudinal: Longitudinal and paired-sample analyses of microbiome data. mSystems 3: 10.1128/msystems.00219-00218. https://doi.org/10.1128/msystems.00219-18 |
[68] | Oren A, Garrity GM (2021) Valid publication of the names of forty-two phyla of prokaryotes. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 71. https://doi.org/10.1099/ijsem.0.005056 |
[69] |
Marcelino VR, Clausen P, Buchmann JP, et al. (2020) CCMetagen: comprehensive and accurate identification of eukaryotes and prokaryotes in metagenomic data. Genome Biol 21: 103. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-020-02014-2 ![]() |
[70] | Davari N, Jouri M, Ariapour A, et al. (2011) Comparison of measurement indices of diversity, richness, dominance, and evenness in rangeland ecosystem (Case Study: Jvaherdeh-Ramesar). J Rangeland Sci 2: 389-398. |
[71] |
Zhang H, Zhang W, Jin Y, et al. (2008) A comparative study on the phylogenetic diversity of culturable actinobacteria isolated from five marine sponge species. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 93: 241-248. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10482-007-9196-9 ![]() |
[72] |
Weeraphan T, Somphong A, Poengsungnoen V, et al. (2023) Bacterial microbiome in tropical lichens and the effect of the isolation method on culturable lichen-derived actinobacteria. Sci Rep 13: 5483. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-32759-2 ![]() |
[73] | Hall TA (1999) BIOEDIT: A user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for windows 95/98/nt. Nucleic Acids Symposium Series 41: 95-98. |
[74] |
Chalita M, Kim YO, Park S, et al. (2024) EzBioCloud: a genome-driven database and platform for microbiome identification and discovery. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 74. https://doi.org/10.1099/ijsem.0.006421 ![]() |
[75] |
McArdle AJ, Kaforou M (2020) Sensitivity of shotgun metagenomics to host DNA: abundance estimates depend on bioinformatic tools and contamination is the main issue. Access Microbiol 2: acmi000104. https://doi.org/10.1099/acmi.0.000104 ![]() |
[76] |
Odendaal ML, Groot JA, Hasrat R, et al. (2022) Higher off-target amplicon detection rate in MiSeq v3 compared to v2 reagent kits in the context of 16S-rRNA-sequencing. Sci Rep 12: 16489. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-20573-1 ![]() |
[77] | Mohseni M, Norouzi H, Hamedi J, et al. (2013) Screening of antibacterial producing actinomycetes from sediments of the caspian sea. Int J Mol Cell Med 2: 64-71. |
[78] |
Zhao H, Kassama Y, Young M, et al. (2004) Differentiation of Micromonospora isolates from a coastal sediment in Wales on the basis of Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, 16S rRNA sequence analysis, and the amplified fragment length polymorphism technique. Appl Environ Microbiol 70: 6619-6627. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.70.11.6619-6627.2004 ![]() |
[79] | Putchakarn S, Munhapon A, Taleb S, et al. (2015) Marine sponges in the industrial and conservation areas of Chon Buri and Rayong provinces. Burapha University International Conference 2015 . |
[80] |
Andreeva NA, Melnikov VV, Snarskaya DD (2020) The role of Cyanobacteria in marine ecosystems. Russ J Marine Biol 46: 154-165. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063074020030025 ![]() |
[81] |
Pita L, Rix L, Slaby BM, et al. (2018) The sponge holobiont in a changing ocean: from microbes to ecosystems. Microbiome 6: 46. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40168-018-0428-1 ![]() |
[82] |
Kuo J, Yang YT, Lu MC, et al. (2019) Antimicrobial activity and diversity of bacteria associated with Taiwanese marine sponge Theonella swinhoei. Annals Microbiol 69: 253-265. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13213-018-1414-3 ![]() |
[83] |
Mawang CI, Azman AS, Fuad AM, et al. (2021) Actinobacteria: An eco-friendly and promising technology for the bioaugmentation of contaminants. Biotechnol Rep (Amst) 32: e00679. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.btre.2021.e00679 ![]() |
[84] |
Nguyen VH, Wemheuer B, Song W, et al. (2023) Identification, classification, and functional characterization of novel sponge-associated acidimicrobiial species. Syst Appl Microbiol 46: 126426. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.syapm.2023.126426 ![]() |
[85] |
Holert J, Cardenas E, Bergstrand Lee H, et al. (2018) Metagenomes reveal global distribution of bacterial steroid catabolism in natural, engineered, and host environments. mBio 9: 10.1128/mbio.02345-02317. https://doi.org/10.1128/mBio.02345-17 ![]() |
[86] |
Lee YJ, Wagner ID, Brice ME, et al. (2005) Thermosediminibacter oceani gen. nov., sp. nov. and Thermosediminibacter litoriperuensis sp. nov., new anaerobic thermophilic bacteria isolated from Peru Margin. Extremophiles 9: 375-383. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00792-005-0453-4 ![]() |
[87] |
Simister R, Taylor MW, Tsai P, et al. (2012) Thermal stress responses in the bacterial biosphere of the Great Barrier Reef sponge, Rhopaloeides odorabile. Environ Microbiol 14: 3232-3246. https://doi.org/10.1111/1462-2920.12010 ![]() |
[88] |
Hardoim CCP, Lôbo-Hajdu G, Custódio MR, et al. (2021) Prokaryotic, fungal, and unicellular eukaryotic core communities across three sympatric marine sponges from the Southwestern Atlantic Coast are dominated largely by deterministic assemblage processes. Front Microbiol 12: 674004. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2021.674004 ![]() |
[89] |
Olatunji OO, Petchoubon A, Thawai C, et al. (2020) Allocation of trisoxazole macrolides in the sponge Penares cf. nux and the impact on epiphytic bacterial cohabitants. Nat Prod Res 34: 710-713. https://doi.org/10.1080/14786419.2018.1493589 ![]() |
[90] |
Santalova EA, Kolesnikova SA (2024) 9-Chloro-5,9-dienoic and other fatty acids from marine sponge Penares sp. Russ J Bioorg Chem 50: 418-431. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1068162024020249 ![]() |
[91] | Back CR, Stennett HL, Williams SE, et al. (2021) A new micromonospora strain with antibiotic activity isolated from the microbiome of a Mid-Atlantic Deep-Sea Sponge. Mar Drugs 19. https://doi.org/10.3390/md19020105 |
[92] | Esteves AI, Cullen A, Thomas T (2017) Competitive interactions between sponge-associated bacteria. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 93. https://doi.org/10.1093/femsec/fix008 |
[93] |
Songsumanus A, Tanasupawat S, Igarashi Y, et al. (2013) Micromonospora maritima sp. nov., isolated from mangrove soil. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 63: 554-559. https://doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.039180-0 ![]() |
[94] |
Yan S, Zeng M, Wang H, et al. (2022) Micromonospora: A Prolific source of bioactive secondary metabolites with therapeutic potential. J Med Chem 65: 8735-8771. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jmedchem.2c00626 ![]() |
[95] | Waleed MA, Mousa AA (2016) Enzymes and phytohormones from Micromonospora. Actinobacteria. Rijeka: IntechOpen. Ch. 12 |
[96] |
Li L, Zhu H, Xu Q, et al. (2019) Micromonospora craniellae sp. nov., isolated from a marine sponge, and reclassification of Jishengella endophytica as Micromonospora endophytica comb. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 69: 715-720. https://doi.org/10.1099/ijsem.0.003209 ![]() |
[97] | Jose PA, Jha B (2017) Intertidal marine sediment harbours Actinobacteria with promising bioactive and biosynthetic potential. Sci Rep 7. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-09672-6 |
[98] |
Hassane CS, Fouillaud M, Goff GL, et al. (2020) Microorganisms associated with the marine sponge Scopalina hapalia: A reservoir of bioactive molecules to slow down the aging process. Microorganisms 8: 1262. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms8091262 ![]() |
[99] |
Jensen PR, Mafnas C (2006) Biogeography of the marine actinomycete. Salinispora Environ Microbiol 8: 1881-1888. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1462-2920.2006.01093.x ![]() |
[100] |
Miksch S, Meiners M, Meyerdierks A, et al. (2021) Bacterial communities in temperate and polar coastal sands are seasonally stable. ISME Commun 1. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43705-021-00028-w ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Number | Sample code | Sponge scientific name |
1 | PF01 | Penares nux (de Laubenfels, 1954) |
2 | PF02 | Cacospongia sp. |
3 | PF03 | Ircinia mutans (Wilson, 1925) |
4 | PF04 | Gelliodes petrosioides Dendy, 1905 |
5 | PF05 | Cacospongia sp. |