Loading [MathJax]/jax/output/SVG/jax.js
Review

Type I CRISPR-Cas-mediated microbial gene editing and regulation

  • There are six major types of CRISPR-Cas systems that provide adaptive immunity in bacteria and archaea against invasive genetic elements. The discovery of CRISPR-Cas systems has revolutionized the field of genetics in many organisms. In the past few years, exploitations of the most abundant class 1 type I CRISPR-Cas systems have revealed their great potential and distinct advantages to achieve gene editing and regulation in diverse microorganisms in spite of their complicated structures. The widespread and diversified type I CRISPR-Cas systems are becoming increasingly attractive for the development of new biotechnological tools, especially in genetically recalcitrant microbial strains. In this review article, we comprehensively summarize recent advancements in microbial gene editing and regulation by utilizing type I CRISPR-Cas systems. Importantly, to expand the microbial host range of type I CRISPR-Cas-based applications, these structurally complicated systems have been improved as transferable gene-editing tools with efficient delivery methods for stable expression of CRISPR-Cas elements, as well as convenient gene-regulation tools with the prevention of DNA cleavage by obviating deletion or mutation of the Cas3 nuclease. We envision that type I CRISPR-Cas systems will largely expand the biotechnological toolbox for microbes with medical, environmental and industrial importance.

    Citation: Zeling Xu, Shuzhen Chen, Weiyan Wu, Yongqi Wen, Huiluo Cao. Type I CRISPR-Cas-mediated microbial gene editing and regulation[J]. AIMS Microbiology, 2023, 9(4): 780-800. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2023040

    Related Papers:

    [1] Jingya Wang, Ye Zhu . L2L control for memristive NNs with non-necessarily differentiable time-varying delay. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2023, 20(7): 13182-13199. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2023588
    [2] Kseniia Kravchuk, Alexander Vidybida . Non-Markovian spiking statistics of a neuron with delayed feedback in presence of refractoriness. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2014, 11(1): 81-104. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2014.11.81
    [3] Tianqi Yu, Lei Liu, Yan-Jun Liu . Observer-based adaptive fuzzy output feedback control for functional constraint systems with dead-zone input. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2023, 20(2): 2628-2650. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2023123
    [4] Gonzalo Robledo . Feedback stabilization for a chemostat with delayed output. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2009, 6(3): 629-647. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2009.6.629
    [5] Linni Li, Jin-E Zhang . Input-to-state stability of stochastic nonlinear system with delayed impulses. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2024, 21(2): 2233-2253. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2024098
    [6] Xiaoxiao Dong, Huan Qiao, Quanmin Zhu, Yufeng Yao . Event-triggered tracking control for switched nonlinear systems. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2023, 20(8): 14046-14060. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2023627
    [7] Tong Guo, Jing Han, Cancan Zhou, Jianping Zhou . Multi-leader-follower group consensus of stochastic time-delay multi-agent systems subject to Markov switching topology. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2022, 19(8): 7504-7520. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2022353
    [8] Dong Xu, Xinling Li, Weipeng Tai, Jianping Zhou . Event-triggered stabilization for networked control systems under random occurring deception attacks. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2023, 20(1): 859-878. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2023039
    [9] Yue Song, Yi Zhang, Song Yang, Na Li . Investigation on stability and controller design for singular bio-economic systems with stochastic fluctuations. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2021, 18(3): 2991-3005. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2021150
    [10] Xiaofeng Chen . Double-integrator consensus for a switching network without dwell time. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2023, 20(7): 11627-11643. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2023516
  • There are six major types of CRISPR-Cas systems that provide adaptive immunity in bacteria and archaea against invasive genetic elements. The discovery of CRISPR-Cas systems has revolutionized the field of genetics in many organisms. In the past few years, exploitations of the most abundant class 1 type I CRISPR-Cas systems have revealed their great potential and distinct advantages to achieve gene editing and regulation in diverse microorganisms in spite of their complicated structures. The widespread and diversified type I CRISPR-Cas systems are becoming increasingly attractive for the development of new biotechnological tools, especially in genetically recalcitrant microbial strains. In this review article, we comprehensively summarize recent advancements in microbial gene editing and regulation by utilizing type I CRISPR-Cas systems. Importantly, to expand the microbial host range of type I CRISPR-Cas-based applications, these structurally complicated systems have been improved as transferable gene-editing tools with efficient delivery methods for stable expression of CRISPR-Cas elements, as well as convenient gene-regulation tools with the prevention of DNA cleavage by obviating deletion or mutation of the Cas3 nuclease. We envision that type I CRISPR-Cas systems will largely expand the biotechnological toolbox for microbes with medical, environmental and industrial importance.



    In many industrial applications, due to the ubiquity of stochastic noise and nonlinear [1,2], real systems are often modelled by stochastic differential equations, which attracts researchers to pay more and more attention to the control of stochastic systems. Using the state-feedback, a closed-loop pole can be arbitrarily configured to improve the performance of the control systems. Therefore, some scholars research the problem of state-feedback stabilization for stochastic systems, e.g., reference [3] focuses on the cooperative control problem of multiple nonlinear systems perturbed by second-order moment processes in a directed topology. Reference [4] considers the case where the diffusion term and the drift term are unknown parameters for stochastic systems with strict feedback. Reference [5] studies stochastic higher-order systems with state constraints and [6] discusses output constrained stochastic systems with low-order and high-order nonlinear and stochastic inverse dynamics. However, it is often difficult to obtain all the state variables of the system directly, it is unsuitable for direct measurement or the measurement equipment is limited in economy and practicality, so the physical implementation of state-feedback is difficult. One of the solutions to this difficulty is to reconstruct the state of the system. At this time, scholars use an observer to investigate the output-feedback stabilization, e.g., reference [7] investigates the prescribed-time stability problem of stochastic nonlinear strict-feedback systems. Reference [8] focuses on stochastic strict feedback systems with sensor uncertainties. In addition, based on output-feedback, for nonlinear multiagent systems, a distributed output-feedback tracking controller is proposed in [9].

    It should be noted that all of the above results [7,8,9], Markovian switching is not considered in the design of output-feedback controller. However, as demonstrated by [10], switching system is a complex hybrid system, which consists of a series of subsystems and switching rules that coordinate the order of each subsystem. In real life, due to the aging of internal components, high temperature, sudden disturbance of external environment, operator error and other inevitable factors, the structure of many systems changes suddenly. Such systems can be reasonably modelled as differential equation with Markovian switching, see [11,12]. Recently, references [13] and [14] discuss the adaptive tracking problem and output tracking problem with Markovian switching respectively. Besides, as shown in [15], the power of the system changes because of factors such as the aging of the springs inside the boiler-turbine unit. Therefore, the research on the stability of stochastic nonlinear systems with time-varying powers has important practical significance. Reference [16] investigates the optimality and stability of high-order stochastic systems with time-varying powers. However, these results do not address the output-feedback stabilization for higher-order stochastic systems with both Markovian switching and time-varying powers.

    Based on these discussions, we aim to resolve the output-feedback stabilization for higher-order stochastic nonlinear systems with both Markovian switching and time-varying powers. The main contributions and characteristics of this paper are two-fold:

    1) The system model we take into account is more applicable than the existing results [7,8,9] and [12,13,14]. Different from the previous results [7,8,9], the stochastic system with Markovian switching is studied in this paper. Unlike previous studies in [12,13,14], we investigate the power is time-varying. The simultaneous existence of the Markov process and time-varying order makes the controller design process more complicated and difficult. More advanced stochastic analysis techniques are needed.

    2) We propose a new observer. The existence of Markovian switching and nondifferentiable time-varying power makes the observer constructed in [7,8,9] invalid. We use the time-varying power's bounds to construct a new observer, which can effectively observe the unmeasurable state and can deal with the nonlinear growth rate, while the existing observer can only deal with constant growth rate.

    The rest of this paper is listed as follows. The problem is formulated in Section 2. In Section 3, an output-feedback controller is designed. Section 4 is the stability analysis. A simulation is given in Section 5. The conclusions are collected in Section 6.

    Notations: R2 denotes the 2-dimensional space and the set of nonnegative real numbers is represented by R+. X denotes the matrix or vector, its transpose is represented by XT. |X| denotes the Euclidean norm of a vector X. When X is square, Tr{X} denotes its trace. The set of all functions with continuous ith partial derivatives is represented by Ci. Let C2,1(R2×R+×S;R+) represent all nonnegative functions V on R2×R+×S which are C2 in x and C1 in t.

    This paper studies the output-feedback stabilization for stochastic nonlinear systems with both Markovian switching and time-varying powers described by:

    dζ1=[ζ2]m(t)dt,dζ2=[u]m(t)dt+fTγ(t)(ˉζ2)dω,y=ζ1, (2.1)

    where ζ=ˉζ2=(ζ1,ζ2)TR2, yR and uR are the system state, control output and the input, respectively. The state ζ2 is unmeasurable. The function m(t):R+R+ is continuous and bounded, which satisfies 1m_m(t)ˉm with m_ and ˉm being constants. The powers sign function []α is defined as []α:=sign()||α with α(0,+). The functions fγ(t) is assumed to be smooth, and for all t0, the locally Lipschitz continuous in x uniformly. fγ(t)(t,0)=0. ω is an rdimensional standard Wiener process, which is defined on the complete probability space (Ω,F,Ft,P) with the filtration Ft satisfying the general conditions. γ(t) is a homogeneous Markov process on the probability space taking values in a space S={1,2,...,N}, which the generator Γ=(λij)N×N given by

    Pij(t)=P{γ(t+s)=i|γ(s)=j}={λijt+o(t)ifij,1+λijt+o(t)ifi=j, (2.2)

    where λij>0 is the transition rate from i to j if ij while λii=ΣNj=1,ijλij for any s,t0. Suppose the Markov process γ(t) is irrelevant to the ω(t).

    To implement the controller design, we need the following assumption.

    Assumption 2.1. There exists a non-negative smooth function ˜f(ζ1) such that

    |fγ(t)(ˉζ2)|(|ζ1|m(t)+12+|ζ2|m(t)+12)˜f(ζ1). (2.3)

    Remark 2.1. As we know, the existing results for stochastic systems with time-varying powers (e.g., [16]), neither the state-feedback control nor the output-feedback control, has considered Markovian switching. However, the structure of many physical systems in the actual system often mutates, which makes it necessary to study systems with both Markovain switching and time-varying powers. Therefore, compared with [16], the model we consider is more practical and more general.

    Remark 2.2. In Assumption 2.1, we can see that the power m(t) is time-varying and the growth rate ˜f(ζ1) is a nonlinear function. When m(t)=1 and ˜f(ζ1) is a constant, Assumption 2.1 is a linear growth condition. However, we consider that ˜f(ζ1) is a nonlinear function, which includes the constant case as a special case. The growth condition of Assumption 2.1 is broader than the linear growth condition. The time-varying power m(t) makes the design in [7,8,9] for time-invariant power invalid. In addition, the nonlinear growth rate ˜f(ζ1) makes the design in [7,8,9,17,18] for constant growth rate fail. A new design scheme should be proposed.

    In this section, we develop an output-feedback controller design for system (2.1). The process is divided into two steps:

    Firstly, we assume that all states are measurable and develop a state-feedback controller using backstepping technique.

    Secondly, we construct a reduced-order observer with a dynamic gain, and design an output-feedback controller.

    In this part, under Assumption 2.1, our objective is to develop a state-feedback controller design for the system (2.1).

    Step 1. Introducing the coordinate transformation ξ1=ζ1 and choosing V1=14ξ41, by using the infinitesimal generator defined in section 1.8 of [11], we have

    LV1ξ31[ζ2]m(t)+IIV1ξ31([ζ2]m(t)[ζ2]m(t))+ξ31[ζ2]m(t)+IIV1. (3.1)

    If we choose ζ2 as

    ζ2=c1/m_1ξ1:=α1ξ1, (3.2)

    we get

    ξ31[ζ2]m(t)=αm(t)1ξm(t)+31c1|ξ1|m(t)+3, (3.3)

    where α1=c1/m_11 is a constant with c11 being a design parameter.

    Substituting (3.3) into (3.1) yields

    LV1c1|ξ1|m(t)+3+ξ31([ζ2]m(t)[ζ2]m(t))+IIV1. (3.4)

    Step 2. Introducing the coordinate transformation ξ2=ζ2ζ2, and using Itô's differentiation rule, we get

    dξ2=([u]m(t)ζ2ζ1[ζ2]m(t))dt+fTγ(t)(ˉζ2)dω. (3.5)

    Choose V2=V1+14ξ42. From (3.4) and (3.5), we obtain

    LV2c1|ξ1|m(t)+3+ξ31([ζ2]m(t)[ζ2]m(t))+ξ32[u]m(t)ξ32ζ2ζ1[ζ2]m(t)+32ξ22|fTγ(t)(ˉζ2)|2+IIV2. (3.6)

    By (3.2) and using Lemma 1 in [19], we have

    ξ31([ζ2]m(t)[ζ2]m(t))ˉm(2ˉm2+2)(|ξ1|3|ξ2|m(t)+αˉm11|ξ1|m(t)+2|ξ2|). (3.7)

    By using Lemma 2.1 in [20], we get

    ˉm(2+2ˉm2)|ξ1|3|ξ2|m(t)16|ξ1|3+m(t)+β211|ξ2|3+m(t),ˉm(2+2ˉm2)αˉm11|ξ1|m(t)+2|ξ2|16|ξ1|3+m(t)+β212|ξ2|3+m(t), (3.8)

    where

    β211=ˉmm_+3(ˉm(2+2ˉm2))3+ˉmm_(3+m_18)3ˉm,β212=1m_+3(ˉm(2+2ˉm2)αˉm11)ˉm+3(m_+36(ˉm+2))(ˉm+2). (3.9)

    Substituting (3.8) into (3.7) yields

    ξ31([ζ2]m(t)[ζ2]m(t))13|ξ1|3+m(t)+β21|ξ2|3+m(t), (3.10)

    where β21=β211+β212 is a positive constant.

    By (3.2) and using Lemma 5 in [21], we get

    |ζ2|m(t)=|ξ2+ζ2|m(t)(|ξ2|+|α1ξ1|)m(t)2ˉm1(|ξ2|m(t)+|α1ξ1|m(t))2ˉm1αˉm1(|ξ2|m(t)+|ξ1|m(t)), (3.11)

    which means that

    |ζ1|m(t)+|ζ2|m(t)φ1(|ξ2|m(t)+|ξ1|m(t)), (3.12)

    where φ1=2ˉm1αˉm1+10 is a constant.

    By (3.11) and using Lemma 1 in [19], we have

    ξ32ζ2ζ1[ζ2]m(t)|ξ32||ζ2ζ1|2ˉm1αˉm1(|ξ2|m(t)+|ξ1|m(t))2ˉm1αˉm1|ζ2ζ1|(|ξ2|m(t)+3+|ξ32||ξ1|m(t)). (3.13)

    By using Lemma 2.1 in [20], we get

    2ˉm1αˉm1|ζ2ζ1||ξ32||ξ1|m(t)13|ξ1|3+m(t)+β221(ζ1)|ξ2|3+m(t), (3.14)

    where

    β221(ζ1)=3m_+3(2ˉm1αˉm1|ζ2ζ1|)ˉm+33(m_+33ˉm)ˉm3. (3.15)

    Substituting (3.14) into (3.13) yields

    ξ32ζ2ζ1[ζ2]m(t)13|ξ1|3+m(t)+β22(ζ1)|ξ2|3+m(t), (3.16)

    where β22(ζ1)=2ˉm1αˉm1|ζ2ζ1|+β221(ζ1) is a smooth function irrelevant to m(t).

    By (3.12), using Assumption 2.1 and Lemma 1 in [19], we get

    32ξ22|fTγ(t)(ˉζ2)|23˜f2(ζ1)|ξ2|2(|ζ1|m(t)+1+|ζ2|m(t)+1)3˜f2(ζ1)φ2(|ξ2|m(t)+3+|ξ2|2|ξ1|m(t)+1), (3.17)

    where φ2=2ˉmαˉm+11+10 is a constant.

    From Lemma 2.1 in [20], we obtain

    3˜f2(ζ1)φ2|ξ2|2|ξ1|m(t)+113|ξ1|m(t)+3+β231(ζ1)|ξ2|m(t)+3, (3.18)

    where

    β231(ζ1)=2m_+3(3˜f2(ζ1)φ2)ˉm+32(m_+33(ˉm+1))ˉm+12. (3.19)

    Substituting (3.18) into (3.17) yields

    32ξ22|fTγ(t)(ˉζ2)|213|ξ1|m(t)+3+β23(ζ1)|ξ2|m(t)+3, (3.20)

    where β23(ζ1)=3˜f2(ζ1)φ2+β231(ζ1)0 is a smooth function irrelevant to m(t).

    By using (3.6), (3.10), (3.16) and (3.20), we obtain

    LV2(c11)|ξ1|m(t)+3+ξ32([u]m(t)[x3]m(t))+ξ32[x3]m(t)+β2(ζ1)|ξ2|m(t)+3+IIV2, (3.21)

    where β2(ζ1)=β21(ζ1)+β22(ζ1)+β23(ζ1) is a smooth function irrelevant to m(t).

    Constructing the virtual controller as

    x3=(c2+β2(ζ1))1m_:=α2(ζ1)ξ2, (3.22)

    we have

    ξ32[x3]m(t)=αm(t)2(ζ1)ξm(t)+32(c2+β2(ζ1))ξm(t)+32, (3.23)

    where c2>0 is a constant and α2(ζ1)0 is a smooth function irrelevant to m(t).

    Substituting (3.23) into (3.21) yields

    LV2(c11)|ξ1|m(t)+3c2|ξ2|m(t)+3+ξ32([u]m(t)[x3]m(t))+IIV2. (3.24)

    In this part, we first design a reduced-order observer with a dynamic gain, then we design an output-feedback controller.

    Since ζ2 are unmeasurable, we construct the following observer

    dη=([u]m(t)L(ζ1)ζ1[η+L(ζ1)]m(t))dt, (3.25)

    where L(ζ1) is a smooth function, and L(ζ1)ζ1>0 is irrelevant to m(t).

    Defining e=ζ2L(ζ1)η and by the construction of the observer, we have

    de=L(ζ1)ζ1([η+L(ζ1)]m(t)[ζ2]m(t))dt+fTγ(t)(ˉζ2)dω. (3.26)

    Choose U=14e4. From (3.26), we get

    LU=e3L(ζ1)ζ1([η+L(ζ1)]m(t)[ζ2]m(t))+32e2|fTγ(t)(ˉζ2)|2+IIU. (3.27)

    By definition of e and lemma 2.2 in [22], we have

    e3L(ζ1)ζ1([η+L(ζ1)]m(t)[ζ2]m(t))12ˉm1L(ζ1)ζ1em(t)+3. (3.28)

    From (3.12), (3.17) and Assumption 2.1, we get

    32e2|fTγ(t)(ˉζ2)|23˜f2(ζ1)|e|2(|ζ1|m(t)+1+|ζ2|m(t)+1)3˜f2(ζ1)φ2(|e|2|ξ2|m(t)+1+|e|2|ξ1|m(t)+1). (3.29)

    By using Lemma 2.1 in [20], we have

    3˜f2(ζ1)φ2|e|2|ξ1|1+m(t)|ξ1|3+m(t)+β31(ζ1)|e|3+m(t),3˜f2(ζ1)φ2|e|2|ξ2|1+m(t)12|ξ2|3+m(t)+β32(ζ1)|e|3+m(t), (3.30)

    where

    β31(ζ1)=2m_+3(3˜f2(ζ1)φ2)ˉm+32(m_+3ˉm+1)ˉm+12,β32(ζ1)=2m_+3(3˜f2(ζ1)φ2)ˉm+32(3+m_2(1+ˉm))1+ˉm2. (3.31)

    Substituting (3.30) into (3.29) yields

    32e2|fTγ(t)(ˉζ2)|2|ξ1|m(t)+3+12|ξ2|m(t)+3+β3(ζ1)|e|m(t)+3, (3.32)

    where β3(ζ1)=β31(ζ1)+β32(ζ1)0 is a smooth function irrelevant to m(t).

    Substituting (3.28), (3.32) into (3.27) yields

    LU|ξ1|m(t)+3+12|ξ2|m(t)+3(12ˉm1L(ζ1)ζ1β3(ζ1))|e|m(t)+3+IIU. (3.33)

    Since ζ2 is unmeasurable, replace ζ2 in virtual controller x3 with η+L(ζ1), and we can get the controller as follows

    u=α2(ζ1)(η+L(ζ1)+α1ζ1). (3.34)

    By (3.22), (3.24) and (3.34), we obtain

    LV2(c11)|ξ1|m(t)+3c2|ξ2|m(t)+3+ξ32αˉm2(ζ1)([ξ2]m(t)[ξ2e]m(t))+IIV2. (3.35)

    By using Lemma 1 in [19], we have

    ξ32αˉm2(ζ1)([ξ2]m(t)[ξ2e]m(t))αˉm2(ζ1)ˉm(2ˉm2+2)(|ξ2|3|e|m(t)+|e||ξ2|m(t)+2). (3.36)

    By using Lemma 2.1 in [20], we get

    αˉm2(ζ1)ˉm(2ˉm2+2)|ξ2|3|e|m(t)14|ξ2|3+m(t)+β41(ζ1)|e|3+m(t),αˉm2(ζ1)ˉm(2ˉm2+2)|e||ξ2|2+m(t)14|ξ2|3+m(t)+β42(ζ1)|e|3+m(t), (3.37)

    where

    β41(ζ1)=ˉmm_+3(αˉm2(ζ1)ˉm(2ˉm2+2))ˉm+3m_(m_+312)3ˉm,β42(ζ1)=1m_+3(αˉm2(ζ1)ˉm(2ˉm2+2))ˉm+3(m_+34(ˉm+2))(ˉm+2). (3.38)

    Substituting (3.37) into (3.36) yields

    ξ32αˉm2(ζ1)([ξ2]m(t)[ξ2e]m(t))12|ξ2|3+m(t)+β4(ζ1)|e|3+m(t), (3.39)

    where β4(ζ1)=β41(ζ1)+β42(ζ1)0 is a smooth function irrelevant to m(t).

    By using (3.39) and (3.35), we have

    LV2(c11)|ξ1|m(t)+3(c212)|ξ2|m(t)+3+β4(ζ1)|e|m(t)+3+IIV2. (3.40)

    Choosing V(ξ1,ξ2,e)=V2(ξ1,ξ2)+U(e), by (3.33) and (3.40), we obtain

    LV(c12)|ξ1|m(t)+3(c21)|ξ2|m(t)+3(12ˉm1L(ζ1)ζ1β3(ζ1)β4(ζ1))|e|m(t)+3+IIV. (3.41)

    Let

    L(ζ1)=12ˉm1(c3ζ1+ζ10(β3(s)+β4(s))ds), (3.42)

    and the controller as

    u=α2(ζ1)(η+12ˉm1(c3ζ1+ζ10(β3(s)+β4(s))ds)+α1ζ1), (3.43)

    where c3>0 is a design parameter.

    By using (3.41) and (3.42), we can obtain

    LV(c12)|ξ1|m(t)+3(c21)|ξ2|m(t)+3c3|e|m(t)+3+IIV. (3.44)

    Remark 3.1. If m(t) is time-invariant and the growth rate is a constant rather than a smooth function, such as those in [7,8,9], from (3.32) and (3.39), β3 and β4 are constants irrelevant to ζ1. Then, the dynamic gain L(ζ) is a linear function of ζ1. We can design L(ζ1)=cζ1 by choosing the right parameter c to make LV in (3.41) negative definite. However, in this paper, the growth rate ˜f(ζ1) is a nonnegative smooth function and the m(t) is time-varying and non-differentiable, which makes the deducing of the dynamic gain much more difficult. To solve this problem, we introduce two constants m_ and ˉm, which are reasonably used in the design process, see (3.7) and (3.11). In this way, the dynamic gain (3.42) can be designed irrelevant to m(t), which is crucial to assure the effectiveness of the observer and controller. This is one of the main innovations of this paper.

    In this section, for the closed-loop system (2.1), (3.25) and (3.43), we first give a lemma, which is useful to prove the system has a unique solution. Then, we present the main results of the stability analysis.

    Lemma 4.1. For ζR, the function g(ζ)=[ζ]m(t) satisfies the locally Lipschitz condition.

    Proof. If ζ=0, we can get

    h+(0)=limζ0+h(ζ)h(0)ζ=0,h(0)=limζ0h(ζ)h(0)ζ=0. (4.1)

    Then, we have

    dhdζ|ζ=0=h+(0)=h(0)=0, (4.2)

    thus, h(ζ) is differentiable function in ζ=0 and so meets the locally Lipschitz condition in ζ=0.

    As ζ>0, we get

    h(ζ)=[ζ]m(t)=ζm(t). (4.3)

    For m(t)1, h(ζ) is differentiable function in ζ>0, so meets the locally Lipschitz condition in ζ>0. Similarly, as ζ<0, the conclusion is valid.

    Therefore, the conclusion holds for ζR.

    Next, we give the stability results.

    Theorem 4.1. Under Assumption 2.1, for the system (2.1), using the observer (3.25) and controller (3.43) with

    ci>3i,i=1,2,3, (4.4)

    we can get

    1) For each ζ(t0)=ζ0R2 and γ(t0)=i0S, the closed-loop system has an almost surely unique solution on [0,+);

    2) For any ζ0R2 and i0S, the closed-loop system is almost surely regulated to the equilibrium at the origin.

    Proof. By (2.1), (3.25), (3.43) and using Lemma 4.1, we can conclude that the closed-loop system satisfies the locally Lipschitz condition. By (3.2), (3.22), (3.25) and (3.42), we can get that ξ1,ξ2,η are bounded, which implies that ζ1 is bounded, which means that

    VR=inftt0,|ζ|>RV(ζ(t))R. (4.5)

    Through the verification of the controller development process, we choose appropriate design parameters ci to satisfy (4.4), and we can get IIV=0. For each l>0, the first exit time is defined as

    σl=inf{t:tt0,|ζ(t)|l}. (4.6)

    When tt0, choose tl=min{σl,t}. We can obtain that bounded |ζ(t)| on interval [t0,tl] a.s., which means that V(ζ) is bounded in the interval [t0,tl] a.s. By using (3.44), we can get that LV is bounded in the interval [t0,tl] a.s. By using Lemma 1.9 in [11], (3.44) and (4.4), we can obtain

    EV(ζ(tl))EV(ζ(t0)). (4.7)

    By (4.5), (4.7) and using Lemma 1 in [23], we can obtain conclusion (1).

    From (3.44), (4.5), by using Theorem 2.1 in [24], we can prove conclusion (2).

    In this section, a simulation example is given to show the availability of the control method.

    Study the stabilization for system with two modes. The Markov process γ(t) belongs to the space S={1,2} with generator Γ=(λij)2×2 given by λ11=2,λ12=2,λ21=1 and λ22=1. We have π1=13,π2=23. When γ(t)=1, the systems can be written as

    dζ1=[ζ2]32+12sintdt,dζ2=[u]32+12sintdt+ζ1sinζ2dω,y=ζ1, (5.1)

    where m(t)=32+12sint,m_=1,ˉm=2. When γ(t)=2, the systems are described by

    dζ1=[ζ2]2+sintdt,dζ2=[u]2+sintdt+12ζ21sinζ2dω,y=ζ1, (5.2)

    where m(t)=2+sint,m_=1,ˉm=3. Clearly, system (5.1) and (5.2) satisfy Assumption 2.1.

    According to the above design process, when γ(t)=1, the observer is constructed as

    dη=([u]32+12sintL(ζ1)ζ1[η+L(ζ1)]32+12sint)dt, (5.3)

    and the control is

    u=(c2+4ζ21)(η+L(ζ1)+c1ζ1), (5.4)

    where L(ζ1)=12(c3ζ1+6ζ21).

    When γ(t)=2, the observer is constructed as

    dη=([u]2+sintL(ζ1)ζ1[η+L(ζ1)]2+sint)dt, (5.5)

    and the control is

    u=(c2+4ζ1+12ζ21)(η+L(ζ1)+c1ζ1), (5.6)

    where L(ζ1)=14(c3ζ1+20ζ1+4ζ21).

    For simulation, we select c1=6,c2=6,c3=5, and the initial conditions as ζ1(0)=1,ζ2(0)=2,η(0)=5. We can obtain Figure 1, which illustrates that the signals of the closed-loop system (ζ1,ζ2,u,η,e) converge to zero. Specifically, the states and controller of the closed-loop system converge to zero. The observation error also converges to zero, which means that our constructed observer and controller are efficient. Figure 2 illustrates the jump of Markov process γ(t) in 1 and 2.

    Figure 1.  The responses of closed-loop systems (5.1)--(5.6).
    Figure 2.  The runs of the Markov process γ(t).

    Remark 5.1. It can be observed from the example that there are time-varying powers and Markovian switching in systems (5.1) and (5.2). For the output-feedback control of the system (5.1) and (5.2), the method in [7,8,9] fails since they can only deal with time-invariant powers without Markovian switching. To solve the difficulties caused by time-varying powers, we introduce constants 1, 2, and 1, 3 so that the design of the observer and controller is irrelevant to the power. This is one of the characteristics of our controller and observer design scheme (5.3)–(5.6).

    We investigate the output-feedback stabilization for stochastic nonlinear systems with both Markovian switching and time-varying powers in this paper. Compared with existing work, the system model considered in this paper is more general because it studies the time-varying power and Markovian switching, simultaneously. To achieve stabilization, we first design a state observer with a dynamic gain and an output-feedback controller, then use advanced stochastic analysis techniques to prove that the closed-loop system has an almost surely unique solution and the states are regulated to the origin almost surely. Even though there is no Markovian switching, the results in this paper are also new in the sense that we consider nonlinear growth rate, which is much more general than constant growth rate cases in [7,8,9].

    There are many related problems to be considered, such as how to extend the result to impulsive systems [25,26,27] and systems with arbitrary order.

    This work is funded by Shandong Province Higher Educational Excellent Youth Innovation team, China (No. 2019KJN017), and Shandong Provincial Natural Science Foundation for Distinguished Young Scholars, China (No. ZR2019JQ22).

    The authors declare there is no conflict of interest.


    Acknowledgments



    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 32100020 and 32370188), the Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation (No. 2022A1515010194 and 2023A1515012775) and the Guangzhou Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation (No. 202201010613)

    Conflict of interest



    The authors declare no conflict of interest.

    Author contributions



    Z. X. conceptualized the review topic, and S. C., W. W. and Y. W. performed the literature search. S. C. drafted the manuscript, and Z. X. and H. C. revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

    [1] Chandrasegaran S, Carroll D (2016) Origins of programmable nucleases for genome engineering. J Mol Biol 428: 963-989. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmb.2015.10.014
    [2] Fagerlund RD, Staals RHJ, Fineran PC (2015) The Cpf1 CRISPR-Cas protein expands genome-editing tools. Genome Biol 16: 251. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-015-0824-9
    [3] Sternberg SH, Doudna JA (2015) Expanding the biologist's toolkit with CRISPR-Cas9. Mol Cell 58: 568-574. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2015.02.032
    [4] Barrangou R, Doudna JA (2016) Applications of CRISPR technologies in research and beyond. Nat Biotechnol 34: 933-941. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.3659
    [5] Zheng Y, Li J, Wang B, et al. (2020) Endogenous type I CRISPR-Cas: From foreign DNA defense to prokaryotic engineering. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 8: 62. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2020.00062
    [6] Marraffini LA, Sontheimer EJ (2008) CRISPR interference limits horizontal gene transfer in Staphylococci by targeting DNA. Science 322: 1843-1845. https://doi:10.1126/science.1165771
    [7] Barrangou R, Fremaux C, Deveau H, et al. (2007) CRISPR provides acquired resistance against viruses in prokaryotes. Science 315: 1709-1712. https://doi:10.1126/science.1138140
    [8] Nussenzweig PM, Marraffini LA (2020) Molecular mechanisms of CRISPR-Cas immunity in bacteria. Annu Rev Genet 54: 93-120. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-genet-022120-112523
    [9] Amitai G, Sorek R (2016) CRISPR-Cas adaptation: insights into the mechanism of action. Nat Rev Microbiol 14: 67-76. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro.2015.14
    [10] Carte J, Wang R, Li H, et al. (2008) Cas6 is an endoribonuclease that generates guide RNAs for invader defense in prokaryotes. Genes Dev 22: 3489-3496. https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.1742908
    [11] Deltcheva E, Chylinski K, Sharma CM, et al. (2011) CRISPR RNA maturation by trans-encoded small RNA and host factor RNase III. Nature 471: 602-607. https://doi:10.1038/nature09886
    [12] Jore MM, Lundgren M, van Duijn E, et al. (2011) Structural basis for CRISPR RNA-guided DNA recognition by Cascade. Nat Struct Mol Bio 18: 529-536. https://doi.org/10.1038/nsmb.2019
    [13] Leenay RT, Beisel CL (2017) Deciphering, communicating, and engineering the CRISPR PAM. J Mol Biol 429: 177-191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmb.2016.11.024
    [14] van der Oost J, Jore MM, Westra ER, et al. (2009) CRISPR-based adaptive and heritable immunity in prokaryotes. Trends Biochem Sci 34: 401-407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibs.2009.05.002
    [15] Gasiunas G, Barrangou R, Horvath P, et al. (2012) Cas9-crRNA ribonucleoprotein complex mediates specific DNA cleavage for adaptive immunity in bacteria. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 109: E2579-E2586. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1208507109
    [16] Westra ER, van Erp PBG, Künne T, et al. (2012) CRISPR immunity relies on the consecutive binding and degradation of negatively supercoiled invader dna by Cascade and Cas3. Mol Cell 46: 595-605. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2012.03.018
    [17] Makarova KS, Wolf YI, Iranzo J, et al. (2020) Evolutionary classification of CRISPR-Cas systems: a burst of class 2 and derived variants. Nat Rev Microbiol 18: 67-83. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41579-019-0299-x
    [18] Makarova KS, Aravind L, Wolf YI, et al. (2011) Unification of Cas protein families and a simple scenario for the origin and evolution of CRISPR-Cas systems. Biol Direct 6: 38. https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-6150-6-38
    [19] Makarova KS, Wolf YI, Alkhnbashi OS, et al. (2015) An updated evolutionary classification of CRISPR-Cas systems. Nat Rev Microbiol 13: 722-736. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro3569
    [20] Makarova KS, Wolf YI, Koonin EV (2018) Classification and nomenclature of CRISPR-Cas systems: Where from here?. CRISPR J 1: 325-336. https://doi.org/10.1089/crispr.2018.0033
    [21] Koonin EV, Makarova KS, Zhang F (2017) Diversity, classification and evolution of CRISPR-Cas systems. Curr Opin Microbiol 37: 67-78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mib.2017.05.008
    [22] Liu Z, Dong H, Cui Y, et al. (2020) Application of different types of CRISPR/Cas-based systems in bacteria. Microb Cell Factories 19: 172. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12934-020-01431-z
    [23] Wang Y, Huang C, Zhao W (2022) Recent advances of the biological and biomedical applications of CRISPR/Cas systems. Mol Biol Rep 49: 7087-7100. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11033-022-07519-6
    [24] Mustafa MI, Makhawi AM (2021) SHERLOCK and DETECTR: CRISPR-Cas Systems as potential rapid diagnostic tools for emerging infectious diseases. J Clin Microbiol 59: e00745-00720. https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.00745-20
    [25] Hidalgo-Cantabrana C, Barrangou R (2020) Characterization and applications of Type I CRISPR-Cas systems. Biochem Soc Trans 48: 15-23. https://doi.org/10.1042/BST20190119
    [26] Huo Y, Nam KH, Ding F, et al. (2014) Structures of CRISPR Cas3 offer mechanistic insights into Cascade-activated DNA unwinding and degradation. Nat Struct Mol Biol 21: 771-777. https://doi.org/10.1038/nsmb.2875
    [27] Brouns SJJ, Jore MM, Lundgren M, et al. (2008) Small CRISPR RNAs guide antiviral defense in prokaryotes. Science 321: 960-964. https://doi:10.1126/science.1159689
    [28] Sinkunas T, Gasiunas G, Fremaux C, et al. (2011) Cas3 is a single-stranded DNA nuclease and ATP-dependent helicase in the CRISPR/Cas immune system. EMBO J 30: 1335-1342. https://doi.org/10.1038/emboj.2011.41
    [29] Bhatia S, Pooja, Yadav SK (2023) CRISPR-Cas for genome editing: Classification, mechanism, designing and applications. Int J Biol Macromol 238: 124054. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2023.124054
    [30] Li H (2015) Structural principles of CRISPR RNA processing. Structure 23: 13-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.str.2014.09.006
    [31] Wang R, Preamplume G, Terns MP, et al. (2011) Interaction of the Cas6 Riboendonuclease with CRISPR RNAs: recognition and cleavage. Structure 19: 257-264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.str.2010.11.014
    [32] Xiao Y, Luo M, Dolan AE, et al. (2018) Structure basis for RNA-guided DNA degradation by Cascade and Cas3. Science 361: eaat0839. https://doi:10.1126/science.aat0839
    [33] Xiao Y, Luo M, Hayes RP, et al. (2017) Structure basis for directional r-loop formation and substrate handover mechanisms in type I CRISPR-Cas system. Cell 170: 48-60.e11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2017.06.012
    [34] Semenova E, Jore MM, Datsenko KA, et al. (2011) Interference by clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeat (CRISPR) RNA is governed by a seed sequence. Proc Natl Acad Sci U.S.A 108: 10098-10103. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1104144108
    [35] Almendros C, Nobrega FL, McKenzie RE, et al. (2019) Cas4-Cas1 fusions drive efficient PAM selection and control CRISPR adaptation. Nucleic Acids Res 47: 5223-5230. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkz217
    [36] Shangguan Q, Graham S, Sundaramoorthy R, et al. (2022) Structure and mechanism of the type I-G CRISPR effector. Nucleic Acids Res 50: 11214-11228. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkac925
    [37] Peters JE, Makarova KS, Shmakov S, et al. (2017) Recruitment of CRISPR-Cas systems by Tn7-like transposons. Proc Natl Acad Sci U.S.A 114: E7358-E7366. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1709035114
    [38] Faure G, Shmakov SA, Yan WX, et al. (2019) CRISPR-Cas in mobile genetic elements: counter-defence and beyond. Nat Rev Microbiol 17: 513-525. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41579-019-0204-7
    [39] Hsieh SC, Peters JE (2023) Discovery and characterization of novel type I-D CRISPR-guided transposons identified among diverse Tn7-like elements in cyanobacteria. Nucleic Acids Res 51: 765-782. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkac1216
    [40] Li Y, Peng N (2019) Endogenous CRISPR-Cas system-based genome editing and antimicrobials: review and prospects. Front Microbiol 10: 2471. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2019.02471
    [41] Cameron P, Coons MM, Klompe SE, et al. (2019) Harnessing type I CRISPR-Cas systems for genome engineering in human cells. Nat Biotechnol 37: 1471-1477. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-019-0310-0
    [42] Osakabe K, Wada N, Miyaji T, et al. (2020) Genome editing in plants using CRISPR type I-D nuclease. Commun Biol 3: 648. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-020-01366-6
    [43] Tan R, Krueger RK, Gramelspacher MJ, et al. (2022) Cas11 enables genome engineering in human cells with compact CRISPR-Cas3 systems. Mol Cell 82: 852-867. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2021.12.032
    [44] Yoshimi K, Mashimo T (2022) Genome editing technology and applications with the type I CRISPR system. Gene and Genome Editing 3-4: 100013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ggedit.2022.100013
    [45] Osakabe K, Wada N, Murakami E, et al. (2021) Genome editing in mammalian cells using the CRISPR type I-D nuclease. Nucleic Acids Res 49: 6347-6363. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkab348
    [46] Xu Z, Li Y, Li M, et al. (2021) Harnessing the type I CRISPR-Cas systems for genome editing in prokaryotes. Environ Microbiol 23: 542-558. https://doi.org/10.1111/1462-2920.15116
    [47] Hidalgo-Cantabrana C, Goh YJ, Barrangou, R (2019) Characterization and repurposing of type I and Type II CRISPR-Cas systems in bacteria. J Mol Biol 431: 21-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmb.2018.09.013
    [48] Hidalgo-Cantabrana C, Crawley AB, Sanchez B, et al. (2017) Characterization and exploitation of CRISPR Loci in Bifidobacterium longum. Front Microbiol 8: 1851. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2017.01851
    [49] Hidalgo-Cantabrana C, Goh YJ, Pan M, et al. (2019) Genome editing using the endogenous type I CRISPR-Cas system in Lactobacillus crispatus. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 116: 15774-15783. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1905421116
    [50] Xu Z, Li Y, Yan A (2020) Repurposing the native type I-F CRISPR-Cas system in Pseudomonas aeruginosa for genome editing. STAR Protocols 1: 100039. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xpro.2020.100039
    [51] Li Y, Pan S, Zhang Y, et al. (2016) Harnessing type I and type III CRISPR-Cas systems for genome editing. Nucleic Acids Res 44: e34. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkv1044
    [52] Atmadjaja AN, Holby V, Harding AJ, et al. (2019) CRISPR-Cas, a highly effective tool for genome editing in Clostridium saccharoperbutylacetonicum N1-4(HMT). FEMS Microbiol Lett 366: fnz059. https://doi.org/10.1093/femsle/fnz059
    [53] Baker PL, Orf GS, Kevershan K, et al. (2019) Using the endogenous CRISPR-Cas system of Heliobacterium modesticaldum to delete the photochemical reaction center core subunit gene. Appl Environ Microbiol 85: e01644-01619. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.01644-19
    [54] Papoutsakis ET (2008) Engineering solventogenic clostridia. Curr Opin Biotechnol 19: 420-429. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copbio.2008.08.003
    [55] McAllister KN, Sorg JA (2019) CRISPR Genome editing systems in the genus Clostridium: a timely advancement. J Bacteriol 201: e00219-00219. https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.00219-19
    [56] Pyne ME, Bruder MR, Moo-Young M, et al. (2016) Harnessing heterologous and endogenous CRISPR-Cas machineries for efficient markerless genome editing in Clostridium. Sci Rep 6: 25666. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep25666
    [57] Johnson DT, Taconi KA (2007) The glycerin glut: Options for the value-added conversion of crude glycerol resulting from biodiesel production. Environmental Progress 26: 338-348. https://doi.org/10.1002/ep.10225
    [58] Tian L, Conway PM, Cervenka ND, et al. (2019) Metabolic engineering of Clostridium thermocellum for n-butanol production from cellulose. Biotechnol Biofuels 12: 186. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13068-019-1524-6
    [59] Oka K, Osaki T, Hanawa T, et al. (2018) Establishment of an endogenous Clostridium difficile rat infection model and evaluation of the effects of Clostridium butyricum MIYAIRI 588 probiotic strain. Front Microbiol 9: 1264. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2018.01264
    [60] Hagihara M, Yamashita R, Matsumoto A, et al. (2019) The impact of probiotic Clostridium butyricum MIYAIRI 588 on murine gut metabolic alterations. J Infect Chemother 25: 571-577. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiac.2019.02.008
    [61] Walker JE, Lanahan AA, Zheng T, et al. (2020) Development of both type I-B and type II CRISPR/Cas genome editing systems in the cellulolytic bacterium Clostridium thermocellum. Metab Eng Commun 10: e00116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mec.2019.e00116
    [62] Zhou X, Wang X, Luo H, et al. (2021) Exploiting heterologous and endogenous CRISPR-Cas systems for genome editing in the probiotic Clostridium butyricum. Biotechnol Bioeng 118: 2448-2459. https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.27753
    [63] Zhang J, Zong W, Hong W, et al. (2018) Exploiting endogenous CRISPR-Cas system for multiplex genome editing in Clostridium tyrobutyricum and engineer the strain for high-level butanol production. Metab Eng 47: 49-59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymben.2018.03.007
    [64] Maikova A, Kreis V, Boutserin A, et al. (2019) Using an endogenous CRISPR-Cas System for genome editing in the human pathogen Clostridium difficile. Appl Environ Microbiol 85: e01416-01419. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.01416-19
    [65] Dai K, Fu H, Guo X, et al. (2022) Exploiting the Type I-B CRISPR genome editing system in Thermoanaerobacterium aotearoense SCUT27 and engineering the strain for enhanced ethanol production. Appl Environ Microbiol 88: e00751-00722. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.00751-22
    [66] Du K, Gong L, Li M, et al. (2022) Reprogramming the endogenous type I CRISPR-Cas system for simultaneous gene regulation and editing in Haloarcula hispanica. mLife 1: 40-50. https://doi.org/10.1002/mlf2.12010
    [67] Cheng F, Gong L, Zhao D, et al. (2017) Harnessing the native type I-B CRISPR-Cas for genome editing in a polyploid archaeon. J Genet Genomics 44: 541-548. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jgg.2017.09.010
    [68] Joshi JB, Arul L, Ramalingam J, et al. (2020) Advances in the Xoo-rice pathosystem interaction and its exploitation in disease management. J Biosci 45: 112. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12038–020-00085-8
    [69] Liu Q, Wang S, Long J, et al. (2021) Functional identification of the Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae Type I-C CRISPR-Cas system and its potential in gene editing application. Front Microbiol 12: 686715. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2021.686715
    [70] Jiang D, Zhang D, Li S, et al. (2022) Highly efficient genome editing in Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae through repurposing the endogenous type I-C CRISPR-Cas system. Mol Plant Pathol 23: 583-594. https://doi.org/10.1111/mpp.13178
    [71] Makarova KS, Wolf YI, Koonin EV (2013) The basic building blocks and evolution of CRISPR-Cas systems. Biochem Soc Trans 41: 1392-1400. https://doi.org/10.1042/BST20130038
    [72] McBride TM, Cameron SC, Fineran PC, et al. (2023) The biology and type I/III hybrid nature of type I-D CRISPR-Cas systems. Biochem J 480: 471-488. https://doi.org/10.1042/BCJ20220073
    [73] Manav MC, Van LB, Lin J, et al. (2020) Structural basis for inhibition of an archaeal CRISPR-Cas type I-D large subunit by an anti-CRISPR protein. Nat Commun 11: 5993. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-19847-x
    [74] Bost J, Recalde A, Waßmer B, et al. (2023) Application of the endogenous CRISPR-Cas type I-D system for genetic engineering in the thermoacidophilic archaeon Sulfolobus acidocaldarius. Front Microbiol 14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2023.1254891
    [75] Wei S, Morrison M, Yu Z (2013) Bacterial census of poultry intestinal microbiome. Poult Sci 92: 671-683. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2012-02822
    [76] Ravel J, Gajer P, Abdo Z, et al. (2011) Vaginal microbiome of reproductive-age women. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 108: 4680-4687. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1002611107
    [77] Vercoe RB, Chang JT, Dy RL, et al. (2013) Cytotoxic chromosomal targeting by CRISPR/Cas systems can reshape bacterial genomes and expel or remodel pathogenicity islands. PLoS Genet 9: e1003454. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1003454
    [78] Hampton HG, McNeil MB, Paterson TJ, et al. (2016) CRISPR-Cas gene-editing reveals RsmA and RsmC act through FlhDC to repress the SdhE flavinylation factor and control motility and prodigiosin production in Serratia. Microbiology 162: 1047-1058. https://doi.org/10.1099/mic.0.000283
    [79] Xu Z, Li M, Li Y, et al. (2019) Native CRISPR-Cas-Mediated genome editing enables dissecting and sensitizing clinical multidrug-resistant P. aeruginosa. Cell Rep 29: 1707-1717.e1703. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2019.10.006
    [80] Zheng Y, Han J, Wang B, et al. (2019) Characterization and repurposing of the endogenous Type I-F CRISPR-Cas system of Zymomonas mobilis for genome engineering. Nucleic Acids Res 47: 11461-11475. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkz940
    [81] Hao Y, Wang Q, Li J, et al. (2022) Double nicking by RNA-directed Cascade-nCas3 for high-efficiency large-scale genome engineering. Open Biol 12: 210241. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsob.210241
    [82] Pan M, Morovic W, Hidalgo-Cantabrana C, et al. (2022) Genomic and epigenetic landscapes drive CRISPR-based genome editing in Bifidobacterium. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 119: e2205068119. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2205068119
    [83] Marino ND, Zhang JY, Borges AL, et al. (2018) Discovery of widespread type I and type V CRISPR-Cas inhibitors. Science 362: 240-242. https://doi: 10.1126/science.aau5174
    [84] Csörgő B, León LM, Chau-Ly IJ, et al. (2020) A compact Cascade-Cas3 system for targeted genome engineering. Nat Methods 17: 1183-1190. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41592-020-00980-w
    [85] Xu Z, Li Y, Cao H, et al. (2021) A transferrable and integrative type I-F Cascade for heterologous genome editing and transcription modulation. Nucleic Acids Res 49: e94. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkab521
    [86] Klompe SE, Vo PLH, Halpin-Healy TS, et al. (2019) Transposon-encoded CRISPR–Cas systems direct RNA-guided DNA integration. Nature 571: 219-225. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1323-z
    [87] Halpin-Healy TS, Klompe SE, Sternberg SH, et al. (2020) Structural basis of DNA targeting by a transposon-encoded CRISPR-Cas system. Nature 577: 271-274. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1849-0
    [88] Vo PLH, Ronda C, Klompe SE, et al. (2021) CRISPR RNA-guided integrases for high-efficiency, multiplexed bacterial genome engineering. Nat Biotechnol 39: 480-489. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-020-00745-y
    [89] Roberts A, Nethery MA, Barrangou R (2022) Functional characterization of diverse type I-F CRISPR-associated transposons. Nucleic Acids Res 50: 11670-11681. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkac985
    [90] Rubin BE, Diamond S, Cress BF, et al. (2022) Species- and site-specific genome editing in complex bacterial communities. Nat Microbiol 7: 34-47. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41564-021-01014-7
    [91] Shangguan Q, White MF (2023) Repurposing the atypical type I-G CRISPR system for bacterial genome engineering. Microbiology 169. https://doi.org/10.1099/mic.0.001373
    [92] Qi LS, Larson MH, Gilbert LA, et al. (2013) Repurposing CRISPR as an rna-guided platform for sequence-specific control of gene expression. Cell 152: 1173-1183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2013.02.022
    [93] Bikard D, Jiang W, Samai P, et al. (2013) Programmable repression and activation of bacterial gene expression using an engineered CRISPR-Cas system. Nucleic Acids Res 41: 7429-7437. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkt520
    [94] Wang J, Teng Y, Zhang R, et al. (2021) Engineering a PAM-flexible SpdCas9 variant as a universal gene repressor. Nat Commun 12: 6916. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-27290-9
    [95] Luo ML, Mullis AS, Leenay RT, et al. (2015) Repurposing endogenous type I CRISPR-Cas systems for programmable gene repression. Nucleic Acids Res 43: 674-681. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gku971
    [96] Rath D, Amlinger L, Hoekzema M, et al. (2015) Efficient programmable gene silencing by Cascade. Nucleic Acids Res 43: 237-246. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gku1257
    [97] Chang Y, Su T, Qi Q, et al. (2016) Easy regulation of metabolic flux in Escherichia coli using an endogenous type I-E CRISPR-Cas system. Microb Cell Factories 15: 195. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12934-016-0594-4
    [98] Tarasava K, Liu R, Garst A, et al. (2018) Combinatorial pathway engineering using type I-E CRISPR interference. Biotechnol Bioeng 115: 1878-1883. https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.26589
    [99] Qin Z, Yang Y, Yu S, et al. (2021) Repurposing the endogenous type I-E CRISPR/Cas system for gene repression in Gluconobacter oxydans WSH-003. ACS Synth Biol 10: 84-93. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acssynbio.0c00456
    [100] Stachler AE, Schwarz TS, Schreiber S, et al. (2020) CRISPRi as an efficient tool for gene repression in archaea. Methods 172: 76-85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymeth.2019.05.023
    [101] Maier LK, Stachler AE, Saunders SJ, et al. (2015) An active immune defense with a minimal crispr (clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats) RNA and without the Cas6 protein. J Biol Chem 290: 4192-4201. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M114.617506
    [102] Stachler AE, Marchfelder A (2016) Gene repression in haloarchaea using the CRISPR (clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats)-Cas I-B system. J Biol Chem 291: 15226-15242. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M116.724062
    [103] Chen Y, Cheng M, Song H, et al. (2022) Type I-F CRISPR-PAIR platform for multi-mode regulation to boost extracellular electron transfer in Shewanella oneidensis. iScience 25. https://doi:10.1016/j.isci.2022.104491
    [104] Marino ND, Pinilla-Redondo R, Csörgő B, et al. (2020) Anti-CRISPR protein applications: natural brakes for CRISPR-Cas technologies. Nat Methods 17: 471-479. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41592-020-0771-6
    [105] Davidson AR, Lu WT, Stanley SY, et al. (2020) Anti-CRISPRs: Protein inhibitors of CRISPR-Cas systems. Annu Rev Biochem 89: 309-332. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-biochem-011420-111224
    [106] Pawluk A, Shah M, Mejdani M, et al. (2017) Disabling a Type I-E CRISPR-Cas nuclease with a bacteriophage-encoded anti-crispr protein. mBio 8: 01751-01717. https://doi.org/10.1128/mbio.01751-18
    [107] Ren J, Wang H, Yang L, et al. (2022) Structural and mechanistic insights into the inhibition of type I-F CRISPR-Cas system by anti-CRISPR protein AcrIF23. J Biol Chem 298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbc.2022.102124
    [108] Rollins MF, Chowdhury S, Carter J, et al. (2019) Structure reveals a mechanism of crispr-rna-guided nuclease recruitment and anti-crispr viral mimicry. Mol Cell 74: 132-142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2019.02.001
    [109] Chen S, Cao H, Xu Z, et al. (2023) A type I-F CRISPRi system unveils the novel role of CzcR in modulating multidrug resistance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Microbiol Spectr 11: e0112323. https://doi.org/10.1128/spectrum.01123-23
    [110] Li M, Gong L, Cheng F, et al. (2021) Toxin-antitoxin RNA pairs safeguard CRISPR-Cas systems. Science 372: eabe5601. https://doi:10.1126/science.abe5601
    [111] Cooper LA, Stringer AM, Wade JT (2018) Determining the specificity of cascade binding, interference, and primed adaptation in vivo in the Escherichia coli type I-E CRISPR-Cas system. mBio 9: 02100-02117. https://doi.org/10.1128/mbio.02100-18
  • This article has been cited by:

    1. Xinling Li, Xueli Qin, Zhiwei Wan, Weipeng Tai, Chaos synchronization of stochastic time-delay Lur'e systems: An asynchronous and adaptive event-triggered control approach, 2023, 31, 2688-1594, 5589, 10.3934/era.2023284
    2. Jingya Wang, Ye Zhu, L2L control for memristive NNs with non-necessarily differentiable time-varying delay, 2023, 20, 1551-0018, 13182, 10.3934/mbe.2023588
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2023 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(2483) PDF downloads(150) Cited by(4)

Figures and Tables

Figures(4)

Other Articles By Authors

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog