
A Gram positive rod shaped bacterium designated as isolate H1 with Fluoride resistance up to 4 g/L sodium fluoride (NaF) in LB (Luria-Bertani) agar was isolated from a ground water sample of Narketpally area, Nalgonda district, Telangana, India. The colonies of isolate H1 were off white in color. Growth patterns of isolate H1 were observed at two different concentrations, 100 and 250 ppm, of NaF and also without NaF in the medium. In cases where NaF was present in the media, the lag phases of the growth curves were extended when compared to the absence of NaF. Optimum pH required for the organism's growth was 8. Isolate H1 required a temperature of 37 °C with 150 rpm and 2% NaCl for its optimal growth in the medium without NaF. Meanwhile, isolate H1 could thrive in a diverse pH range, i.e., pH 5–10, and at an NaCl concentration of up to 11% in the medium with NaF. Based on morphological, biochemical and molecular characterization, isolate H1 was identified as belonging to the genus Bacillus. It showed 98.47% 16S rDNA gene sequence similarity with Bacillus australimaris NH71_1T. Isolate H1 showed high fluoride removals of 22.5% and 38.2% with 100 and 250 mg/L of NaF in the LB broth when incubated at pH 8 and a temperature of 37 °C with 150 rpm for 3 day. Hence, this organism could be a promising isolate to apply for defluoridation of ground water in fluoride contaminthe ated areas.
Citation: M Thirumala, E Sai Krishna, P Sindhu Priya, S Vishnuvardhan Reddy. Characterization of a novel Fluoride resistant bacterial isolate and its capability of Fluoride bioremediation[J]. AIMS Microbiology, 2022, 8(4): 470-483. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2022031
[1] | Oluwafolajimi Adesanya, Tolulope Oduselu, Oluwawapelumi Akin-Ajani, Olubusuyi M. Adewumi, Olusegun G. Ademowo . An exegesis of bacteriophage therapy: An emerging player in the fight against anti-microbial resistance. AIMS Microbiology, 2020, 6(3): 204-230. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2020014 |
[2] | Rania Abozahra, Amal Gaballah, Sarah M. Abdelhamid . Prevalence of the colistin resistance gene MCR-1 in colistin-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae in Egypt. AIMS Microbiology, 2023, 9(2): 177-194. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2023011 |
[3] | Ana M. Castañeda-Meléndrez, José A. Magaña-Lizárraga, Marcela Martínez-Valenzuela, Aldo F. Clemente-Soto, Patricia C. García-Cervantes, Francisco Delgado-Vargas, Rodolfo Bernal-Reynaga . Genomic characterization of a multidrug-resistant uropathogenic Escherichia coli and evaluation of Echeveria plant extracts as antibacterials. AIMS Microbiology, 2024, 10(1): 41-61. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2024003 |
[4] | EHWARIEME Daniel Ayobola, WHILIKI Onoriadjeren Oscar, EJUKONEMU Francis Ejovwokoghene . Plasmid-mediated quinolone resistance genes transfer among enteric bacteria isolated from human and animal sources. AIMS Microbiology, 2021, 7(2): 200-215. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2021013 |
[5] | Tuangrat Tunvongvinis, Weeyawat Jaitrong, Yudthana Samung, Somboon Tanasupawat, Wongsakorn Phongsopitanun . Diversity and antimicrobial activity of the tropical ant-derived actinomycetes isolated from Thailand. AIMS Microbiology, 2024, 10(1): 68-82. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2024005 |
[6] | Vakhtang V. Dzhavakhiya, Elena V. Glagoleva, Veronika V. Savelyeva, Natalia V. Statsyuk, Maksim I. Kartashov, Tatiana M. Voinova, Alla V. Sergeeva . New bacitracin-resistant nisin-producing strain of Lactococcus lactis and its physiological characterization. AIMS Microbiology, 2018, 4(4): 608-621. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2018.4.608 |
[7] | Sunil Kumar, Razique Anwer, Arezki Azzi . Molecular typing methods & resistance mechanisms of MDR Klebsiella pneumoniae. AIMS Microbiology, 2023, 9(1): 112-130. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2023008 |
[8] | Rochelle Keet, Diane Rip . Listeria monocytogenes isolates from Western Cape, South Africa exhibit resistance to multiple antibiotics and contradicts certain global resistance patterns. AIMS Microbiology, 2021, 7(1): 40-58. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2021004 |
[9] | Smita H. Panda, Jyothsna Khanna Goli, Sushrirekha Das, NakulanandaMohanty . Production, optimization and probiotic characterization of potential lactic acid bacteria producing siderophores. AIMS Microbiology, 2017, 3(1): 88-107. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2017.1.88 |
[10] | Farhana Haque, Ishrat Jabeen, Chaman Ara Keya, Sabbir R. Shuvo . Whole-genome sequencing and comparative analysis of heavy metals tolerant Bacillus anthracis FHq strain isolated from tannery effluents in Bangladesh. AIMS Microbiology, 2022, 8(2): 226-238. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2022018 |
A Gram positive rod shaped bacterium designated as isolate H1 with Fluoride resistance up to 4 g/L sodium fluoride (NaF) in LB (Luria-Bertani) agar was isolated from a ground water sample of Narketpally area, Nalgonda district, Telangana, India. The colonies of isolate H1 were off white in color. Growth patterns of isolate H1 were observed at two different concentrations, 100 and 250 ppm, of NaF and also without NaF in the medium. In cases where NaF was present in the media, the lag phases of the growth curves were extended when compared to the absence of NaF. Optimum pH required for the organism's growth was 8. Isolate H1 required a temperature of 37 °C with 150 rpm and 2% NaCl for its optimal growth in the medium without NaF. Meanwhile, isolate H1 could thrive in a diverse pH range, i.e., pH 5–10, and at an NaCl concentration of up to 11% in the medium with NaF. Based on morphological, biochemical and molecular characterization, isolate H1 was identified as belonging to the genus Bacillus. It showed 98.47% 16S rDNA gene sequence similarity with Bacillus australimaris NH71_1T. Isolate H1 showed high fluoride removals of 22.5% and 38.2% with 100 and 250 mg/L of NaF in the LB broth when incubated at pH 8 and a temperature of 37 °C with 150 rpm for 3 day. Hence, this organism could be a promising isolate to apply for defluoridation of ground water in fluoride contaminthe ated areas.
Fluorine amounts to around 0.3 g/kg of the total earth's crust, existing in the forms of fluoride in fluorspar, fluorapatite and cryolite minerals [1]. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), the permissible limit for fluoride in drinking water is 1.5 mg/L [2]. Fluoride has an important role as an anti-caries agent. It not only protects dental hard tissue but also inhibits bacterial growth and metabolism with acidogenicity, acidurance and adherence to the tooth surface. To prevent the destructive effects of fluoride, oral bacteria are capable of developing resistance to fluoride with changes in their genomes [3]. Different fluoride-resistant organisms are able to grow in an environment with fluoride concentration in the range of 400–1,000 ppm (21.1–52.6 mM).
Bacteria could gain different abilities to withstand environmental changes like certain levels of fluoride [4], and they have a major role in bioaccumulation, biosorption and biotransformation [5]. When the fluoride ion is present inside the bacterial cells, it can directly or indirectly inhibit some of the metabolic enzymes, namely, Enolase, Urease and F-ATPase, which can cause decreases in bacterial growth and metabolism [6]–[10]. Three of the fluoride resistant bacteria (200 mM) isolated from ground waters in selected villages at Dindigul district, Tamilnadu, India, were resistant to antibiotics such as Amoxicillin, Ampicillin, Chloramphenicol, Kanamycin and Streptomycin [11].
Removal of toxic compounds from the environment can be accomplished by some microorganisms [12],[13], nanoparticles [14] and some agricultural wastes [15]. Different fluoride resistant organisms could remove different percentages of fluoride from media [16]–[21].
To understand the mechanism of fluoride resistance in fluoride-resistant Streptococcus mutans strain (C180-2FR), whole-genome shotgun (WGS) sequencing was done [22]. Effects of pH on expression of NaF resistance in Streptococcus mutans was observed, in which at lower pH values mutants showed resistance to fluoride than the parent strain [23]. In fluoride resistant strain c180-2FR, two glycolytic enzymes were undergone mutations they were pyruvate kinase and enolase. Mutations were also observed in promoter mutp, with which upregulated expression of downstream fluoride antiporters was observed [24]. The decreased enolase activity was not always associated with decreased S. mutans growth in the presence of NaF [25].
Fluoride contamination in ground water is a major issue in some areas of Nalgonda district. Intake of water with high fluoride content leads to health issues like dental and skeletal fluorosis. To avoid such health problems, defluoridation should be done to the ground water before consumption. Wild strains with the capacity of bioremediation of fluoride exist in nature, which can be helpful to mankind in this regard. In this report, a high fluoride resistant isolate H1 was isolated from ground water sample of Narketpally area, Nalgonda district, Telangana, India, and was characterized and checked for its bioremediation activity.
Ground water samples were collected from various hand and bore pumps at various seasonal intervals from in and around Narketpally area (17°19′N 79° 20′E), Nalgonda district, Telangana, India.
High fluoride containing ground water samples of Narketpally area, Nalgonda district, Telangana, India, were used for serial dilution and then plated onto Luria–Bertani (LB) agar medium consisting of (g/L-1) Casein Enzyme Hydrolysate (Tryptone) (10), Yeast Extract (5), NaCl (5) and Agar (15), with final pH 7.0 ± 0.2. Plates were then incubated at 37 °C for 24 h. Bacterial isolates were randomly chosen and purified. After purification of bacterial isolates on LB agar, they were further plated onto the media with various NaF concentrations (i.e., 500, 1000, 1500, 2000, 2500, 3000, 3500, 4000 and 4500 mg/L) in a stepwise manner following initial growth in broth at 150 rpm, and then the organisms were plated onto the agar. Plates were incubated at 37 °C for 24 h. Exposing isolates to high concentrations of fluoride suddenly may cause the inhibition of growth, so the organisms were grown initially with low concentrations then transferred to high concentrations of NaF, which may help the isolates to adapt to those environments [26].
High fluoride resistant organism H1 was characterized morphologically, physiologically and biochemically.
Under morphological characteristics: Colony morphology and Gram's test were performed. Effects of temperature and pH on the optimal growth of Fluoride resistant organism H1 were tested in LB broth. Growth of the fluoride resistant organism H1 was checked in LB broth at different temperatures (such as 4 °C, 25 °C, 37 °C and 45 °C) in an incubator for 48 h. Growth of the fluoride resistant organism H1 was also checked in LB broth at different pH values, ranging from 5 to 10 in an incubator for 48 h at 37 °C with NaF and without NaF in the media separately. Effect of NaCl on the growth of the H1 organism was examined using different concentrations of NaCl (2% to 12%) in the LB broth.
Spectrophotometer 104 (Systronics) was employed to measure the growth of the fluoride resistant organism H1 both in presence (4 g/L NaF) and absence of NaF. Growth of isolate H1 was measured in terms of Optical density (OD) at 600 nm from 24 h to 126 h. Then, the OD values were plotted against time to determine the growth curve of the isolate H1. Along with the growth pattern of isolate H1, a change in the pH of the medium was also recorded for around 5 days. Biochemical tests like the Methyl Red test, Voges-Proskauer test and Oxidase, Catalase and Nitrate Reduction tests were performed. Himedia Hicarbo kit was employed to study carbohydrate utilization of high fluoride resistant isolate H1.
This test was conducted to analyze the capability of the isolate for its performance of mixed acid fermentation as modified by MacFaddin [27]. In brief, 100 µL of H1 inoculum was inoculated in a Methyl Red Voges-Proskauer (MRVP) broth containing tube and incubated at 37 °C for 24 h. After incubation, five drops of methyl red were added to the tube, and the result was recorded. A color change to red indicates the presence of mixed acid fermentation.
This test was performed to analyze the capacity of the organism, whether it produces the 2, 3 butanediol as a fermentation product from Glucose. As 2, 3 butanediol cannot be easily detected, acetoin, the intermediate in this pathway, can be targeted in this test. Isolate H1 inoculum was inoculated in the MRVP broth containing tube and incubated at 37 °C for 24 h. After incubation, five drops of Barritt's A reagent followed by five drops of Barritt's B reagent were added. Then the tube was kept in slant position for half an hour. A color change to red indicates a positive test [27]
This test was carried out using the Evans and Kloos method [28]. In this method, a sterile loop was used to collect a 24 h-old colony of H1 isolate from LB agar medium. It was placed on a clean slide, and smear was prepared. Then, a single drop of 3% H2O2 was added to the smear. Formation of bubbles indicates the presence of catalase.
Fresh colony of H1 isolate using sterile loop was rubbed onto a moistened strip, which has Oxidase reagent (1% N,N,N,N,-tetramethyl p-phenylenediamine dihydrochloride) impregnated on it. This chemical replaces O2 as a recipient for the electrons from the enzyme cytochrome oxidase. The additional electrons change the oxidase reagent from colorless to purple. No change in color indicates a negative test.
This test was performed to determine the capacity of the organism, whether it reduces nitrate to nitrite, utilizing the nitrate reductase enzyme. For this test, Nitrate broth was prepared with potassium nitrate and other nutrients, and then H1 organism was inoculated into it. Uninoculated nitrate broth was used as a control. Both uninoculated and inoculated tubes were incubated at 37 °C for 24 h. After incubation, one drop of each of reagent A (0.8 g of sulfanilic acid in 100 mL of 30% acetic acid) and reagent B (500 mg of N, N-dimethyl-1-naphthylamine in 100 mL of 30% acetic acid) was added. After addition of a pinch of powdered zinc, results were recorded. A change in color to red after the addition of both A and B reagents, followed by its disappearance on addition of zinc, indicates the positive test result. Appearance of no color after adding both reagents followed by a change in color to red, on addition of zinc, indicates a negative result.
Carbon substrate utilization tests employing Hicarbo kit and antibiotic sensitivity tests (with twelve different antibiotic strips on LB medium) were performed on fluoride resistant isolate H1.
Fluoride resistant isolate H1 was identified using 16s rDNA gene amplification, sequencing [29] and construction of phylogenetic tree. DNA was extracted by using the heat treatment technique. Then, Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was performed in thermocycler to amplify the 16s DNA gene by using forward and reverse primers [30] 27F (5′-AGAGTTCCTGCTGCAG-3′) and 1492R (5′-GGTTACCTTGACTTTT-3′), respectively [31]. The PCR program applied here was as follows: initial denaturation at 95 °C for 5 min, then denaturation at 95 °C for 1 min, followed by annealing of primers at 55 °C for 1 min and extension at 72 °C for 2 min. PCR was performed for 30 cycles, and final extension was carried out at 72 °C for 15 min. Amplicons were maintained at 4 °C. A 1.5 kb size PCR product was initially analyzed using Agarose gel electrophoresis, and then it was purified and sequenced. To identify isolate H1, EZBiocloud public data and analytics portal were used (https://www.ezbiocloud.net/apps). The 16s rDNA gene sequence of high Fluoride resistant isolate H1 was submitted to the NCBI Gene bank, and its accession number was sought. Mega 11 software was used for its phylogenetic analysis.
To determine the fluoride removal activity of the high fluoride resistant isolate H1, it was inoculated and incubated at a temperature of 37 °C with 150 rpm and pH 8 in 250 mL LB broth with 100 and 250 mg/L fluoride concentrations (NaF), separately. Remaining Fluoride content in the media was determined every day till 8 days. For this, a 20 mL culture sample was taken out aseptically every day, from which 5 mL was used to take optical density readings at 600 nm to analyze the growth of the H1 organism, and 15 mL of Sample was used to find out the bioremediation activity of the isolate H1 for a period of 8 days. To analyze the bioremediation activity, the 15 mL sample was centrifuged at 4500 rpm for 15 min. Then, supernatant was used for analyzing remaining fluoride concentration with a fluoride ion selective electrode [17], where TISAB III (Total ionic strength adjustment buffer III solution) reagent was mixed with supernatant sample in 1:1 ratio. These tests were performed in triplicate. Taking the OD values and fluoride removal test results on same days helps to establish a link between growth phase and its capability of Fluoride removal.
The ground water samples of Narketpally area, Nalgonda district, Telangana, India, were inoculated on LB agar with different concentrations of fluoride to purify high fluoride resistant organisms. Two such isolates, H1 and H2, were purified and could resist the fluoride concentrations of 4.8 and 4.4 g/L, respectively, in broth. Meanwhile, isolates H1 and H2 could resist the fluoride concentration on agar plates was 4 and 2.8 g/L, respectively. In this report, a study on H1 isolate is only mentioned.
Isolate H1 colonies were off white in color, cells were rod shaped, and they showed a Gram positive test. When grown at different temperatures (like 4 °C, 25 °C, 37 °C and 45 °C) in an incubator for 48 h, the fluoride resistant organism H1 showed 37 °C as its optimum temperature required for its proper growth. Isolate H1 was tested for optimum pH required for its growth in the presence and absence of NaF (4 g/L) in the medium for 48 h. The optimum pH showed for the growth of the organism H1 was 7 without the presence of NaF in the medium (Figure 1). However, the optimum pH showed for the growth of isolate H1 in the presence of NaF (4 g/L, i.e., the organism's NaF resistance limit in the agar) was 8 (Figure 2). When H1 organism was grown with different concentrations of NaCl, 2% showed as the optimum NaCl concentration for its proper growth.
The growth curve of the organism H1 was determined by taking OD values in a spectrophotometer at 600 nm at regular intervals from 24 h to 102 h. Isolate H1 was showing exponential phase at 72 h both in the absence of NaF and presence (4 g/L NaF) in the medium. The growth of isolate H1 was faster in the media without NaF when compared to with NaF. In both the absence and presence of NaF (4 g/L) in LB broth with isolate H1, a rise in the medium's pH was seen as the incubation time increased. Initial pH of 7.5 adjusted in the medium was gradually increased to 8.2 after 96 h of incubation at 37 °C. Medium's pH was increasing slowly when NaF was present in the medium than without NaF. After that, no further considerable change in pH was observed (Figures 3 and 4).
Isolate H1 was showing negative results for Methyl Red and Voges-Proskauer tests, butOxidase, Catalase and Nitrate reduction tests were positive. Different carbohydrate utilization tests were performed. Isolate H1 could efficiently utilize Fructose, Dextrose, Galactose, Mannitol, Adonitol and Arabitol as carbon substrates. Whereas, Lactose, Sucrose, L-Arabinose, Glycerol, Dulcitol, Sorbitol, Xylitol, D-Arabinose, Malonate and Sorbose did not support the growth of isolate H1. Hydrolytic activity of ONPG was absent, and Esculin hydrolysis was positive by this isolate. Citrate could be utilized by the isolate H1 but not α-Methyl-D-Glucoside. Other substrates which feebly support the growth of the isolate H1 are also mentioned in Table 1.
S. No | Carbohydrate utilization | Result |
1 | Lactose | - |
2 | Xylose | + |
3 | Maltose | + |
4 | Fructose | +++ |
5 | Dextrose | +++ |
6 | Galactose | +++ |
7 | Raffinose | + |
8 | Trehalose | +++ |
9 | Melibiose | + |
10 | Sucrose | - |
11 | L-Arabinose | - |
12 | Mannose | ++ |
13 | Inulin | ++ |
14 | Sodium gluconate | ++ |
15 | Glycerol | - |
16 | Salicin | ++ |
17 | Dulcitol | - |
18 | Inositol | ++ |
19 | Sorbitol | - |
20 | Mannitol | +++ |
21 | Adonitol | +++ |
22 | Arabitol | +++ |
23 | Erythritol | ++ |
24 | α-Methyl-D-glucoside | - |
25 | Rhamnose | ++ |
26 | Cellobiose | ++ |
27 | Melizitose | - |
28 | α-Methyl-D-Mannoside | - |
29 | Xylitol | - |
30 | ONPG | - |
31 | Esculin | + |
32 | D-Arabinose | - |
33 | Citrate | + |
34 | Malonate | - |
35 | Sorbose | - |
Note: + = positive result; ++/+++ = signs given based on the increased intensity of color formed for positive test; - = Negative result
Out of twelve antibiotics tested for sensitivity, isolate H1 showed resistance to five antibiotics: Chloramphenicol (30 mcg), Erythromycin (15 mcg), Penicillin (10 mcg), Nalidixic acid (10 mcg) and Ampicillin (10 mcg). Meanwhile, isolate H1 was inhibited by Tetracycline (30 mcg), Amikacin (30 mcg), Kanamycin (30 mcg), Vancomycin (30 mcg), Gentamycin (10 mcg), Streptomycin (10 mcg) and Ciprofloxacin (5 mcg) (Table 2).
S.No. | Antibiotic | Result |
1 | Amp10 | R |
2 | TE30 | S |
3 | AK30 | S |
4 | NA30 | R |
5 | P10 | R |
6 | E15 | R |
7 | K30 | S |
8 | VA30 | S |
9 | GEN10 | S |
10 | S10 | S |
11 | CIP5 | S |
12 | C30 | R |
Note: R = Resistant; S = Sensitive; Amp10 = Ampicillin; TE30 = Tetracycline; AK30 = Amikacin; NA30 = Nalidixic acid; P10 = Pencillin-G; E15 = Erythromycin; K30 = Kanamycin; VA30 =Vankomycin; GEN10 = Gentamicin; S10 = Streptomycin; CIP5 = Ciprofloxacin; C30 = Chloramphenicol.
The 16s rDNA gene sequence of the isolate H1 was uploaded onto the 16S and genome sequence database EzBiocloud. This fluoride resistant isolate H1 was identified as belonging to the genus Bacillus. It was showing 98.47% 16S rDNA gene sequence similarity with Bacillus australimaris NH71_1T. The 16S rDNA gene sequence of high fluoride resistant isolate H1 was submitted to the NCBI Gene bank, and the accession number sought was OM920814. The Neighbor-Joining tree was constructed as part of Phylogenetic analysis employing Mega 11 software (Figure 5).
Defluoridation by Fluoride resistant organism H1 was efficient when Fluoride concentration was 250 mg/L in the medium than 100 mg/L. The Fluoride resistant isolate H1 could remove 38.2% of Fluoride from the LB broth (with initial 250 mg/L NaF) after 72 hours of incubation. However, when the removal of the Fluoride concentration was lower, i.e., 22.5% only with 100 mg/L NaF (Figure 6), there was no considerable change in Fluoride concentration, which must be due to bacterial cell count reduction.
Fluorine is an important 13th most prevalent element of the earth's crust [1]. Microorganisms that are omnipresent have great potential to resist various environmental changes. Similarly, the microbes have the ability to withstand certain levels of Fluoride [4], which they accomplish by different methods, viz., bioaccumulation, biosorption and biotransformation [5]. Usually, the ionic form of Fluoride inside the microbial cells inhibits directly or indirectly various metabolic enzymes, thus negatively affecting their growth and metabolism [6]–[10].
Microorganisms which have the capacity to remove Fluoride from the water exist in nature. Five Fluoride resistant organisms were isolated, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa could achieve the removal of 22.1% of Fluoride [16]. Strain RH5 achieved 25.7% Fluoride removal from the media with pH 7 and temperature 30 °C after 8 day of incubation [17]. Two Fluoride tolerant bacterial strains, Bacillus sp. KT201599 and KT201600, were isolated from the mid-gut of third instar larvae of Drosophila melanogaster, which could survive at 2000–2500 µg/mL sodium Fluoride (NaF) concentrations and have the capability to remove Fluoride from the media by 16.66 and 24.71%, respectively [18]. Meanwhile, Fluoride resistant isolate H1 with high Fluoride resistance of 4 g/L in LB broth, purified in this study, showed 38.2% Fluoride removal activity from the media with NaF concentration of 250 mg·L−1 after incubation of 72 h at temperature 37 °C and initial pH 7.
In another study, Fluoride absorption efficiency of two highly Fluoride ion tolerant bacterial strains, Bacillus cereus FT1 and Bacillus marisflavi FT2, isolated from soil samples collected from Fluoride endemic areas of Birbhum district (Rampurhat block II) of West Bengal, India, were not affected at lower Fluoride concentrations (10–100 ppm). However, at higher Fluoride concentration (730 ppm), the absorption efficiency was significantly increased compared to the control strain (B. licheniformis ONF2). The concentrations of Fluoride in the culture media of B. cereus FT1 and B. marisflavi FT2 were reduced from 730 ppm to 570 ppm and 730 ppm to 580 ppm, respectively, after 72 h of incubation [19].
Interestingly, a Fluoride-tolerant halophilic Bacillus flexus NM25 isolated from Fluoride-affected soil in Birbhum District, West Bengal, India, was reducing Fluoride concentration up to 67.45%, and it could tolerate 1,500 ppm of Fluoride in brain-heart infusion agar medium [20]. Meanwhile, Acinetobacter sp. isolate could eliminate 57% of Fluoride at 35 °C after 10 h of incubation with 40 mg/100 mL biosorbent and 7.5 pH [21].
Hence, it is of great importance to isolate, purify and characterize wild microorganisms with Fluoride resistance capability and bioremediation activity, so new insights into the metabolism of Fluoride resistance bacteria could be possible, along with their exploitation for human welfare.
In the present study, isolate H1 with high Fluoride resistance of 4 g/L in LB broth was purified from high Fluoride containing ground water samples of Narketpally area, Nalgonda district, Telangana, India. It showed 38.2% defluoridation activity after 72 h of incubation in the medium with 250 mg/L NaF at 37 °C with initial pH 7. Though the isolate H1 showed promising results of Fluoride bioremediation, a further study needs to be conducted in this regard to exploit the capability of this organism for biological removal of Fluoride from the contaminated ground water samples.
[1] |
Ghosh A, Mukherjee K, Ghosh SK, et al. (2013) Sources and toxicity of fluoride in the environment. Res Chem Intermed 39: 2881-2915. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11164-012-0841-1.2 ![]() |
[2] | (2006) WHOGuidelines for drinking-water quality. Recommendations incorporating the first and second addenda. Geneva: WHO 375-377. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/97892415476113. |
[3] |
Ying L, Jingmei Y, Bernd WB, et al. (2018) Genetic loci associated with fluoride resistance in Streptococcus mutans. Front Microbiol 9: 3093. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2018.03093 ![]() |
[4] |
Maltz M, Emilson CG (1982) Susceptibility of oral bacteria to various fluoride salts. J Dent Res 61: 786-790. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345820610062701 ![]() |
[5] |
Juwarkar AA, Yadav SK (2010) Bioaccumulation and biotransformation of heavy metals. Bioremediation Technology. Amsterdam: Springer 266-284. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-90-481-3678-0_9 ![]() |
[6] |
Curran TM, Buckley DH, Marquis RE (1994) Quasi-irreversible inhibition of enolase of Streptococcus mutans by fluoride. FEMS Microbiol Lett 119: 283-288. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6968.1994.tb06902.x ![]() |
[7] |
Guha CN, Clark AG, Sissons CH (1997) Inhibition of purified enolases from oral bacteria by fluoride. Oral Microbiol Immunol 12: 91-97. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1399-302X.1997.tb00623.x ![]() |
[8] |
Burne RA, Marquis RE (2000) Alkali production by oral bacteria and protection against dental caries. FEMS Microbiol Lett 193: 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6968.2000.tb09393.x ![]() |
[9] |
van Loveren C, Hoogenkamp MA, Deng DM, et al. (2008) Effects of different kinds of fluorides on enolase and ATPase activity of a fluoride-sensitive and fluoride-resistant Streptococcus mutans strain. Caries Res 42: 429-434. https://doi.org/10.1159/000159606 ![]() |
[10] |
Pandit S, Kim HJ, Song KY, et al. (2013) Relationship between fluoride concentration and activity against virulence factors and viability of a cariogenic biofilm: in vitro study. Caries Res 47: 539-547. https://doi.org/10.1159/000348519 ![]() |
[11] | Sree KK, Raja CE, Ramesh U (2018) Isolation and characterization of fluoride resistant bacteria from groundwaters in Dindigul, Tamilnadu, India. Environ Res Technol 1: 69-74. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/460255 |
[12] |
Shalaby MG, Al-Hossainy AF, Abo-Zeid AM, et al. (2022) Geotrichum candidum mediated [Cu8O7+P2O5] nanocomposite biofabrication, characterization, physicochemical properties and its in-vitro biocompatibility evaluation. J Inorg Organomet Polym 32: 2398-2415. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10904-022-02252-w ![]() |
[13] |
Hou HY, Li SY, Meng ZC, et al. (2021) Removal of Cu ions in wastewater through a combined foam separation cell adsorption approach. Chem Eng Tech 45: 585-594. https://doi.org/10.1002/ceat.202100482 ![]() |
[14] | Darwesha OM, Shalaby MG, Abo-Zeid AM, et al. (2021) Nano-bioremediation of municipal wastewater using myco-synthesized iron nanoparticles. Egypt J Chem 64: 2499-2507. |
[15] | Darwesh OM, Abd El-Latief AH, Abuarab ME, et al. (2021) Enhancing the efficiency of some agricultural wastes as low-cost absorbents to remove textile dyes from their contaminated solutions. Biomass Conv Bioref . https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-020-01142-w |
[16] |
Chouhan S, Tuteja U, Flora SJS (2012) Isolation, identification and characterization of fluoride resistant bacteria: possible role in bioremediation. Appl Biochem Microbiol 48: 43-50. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0003683812010036 ![]() |
[17] |
Mukherjee S, Yadav V, Mondal M, et al. (2017) Characterization of a fluoride-resistant bacterium Acinetobacter sp. RH5 towards assessment of its water defluoridation capability. Appl Water Sci 7: 1923-1930. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-015-0370-3 ![]() |
[18] |
Dutta M, Pan B, Ghosh K, et al. (2020) Isolation of Fluoride tolerant Bacillus spp (KT201599, KT201600) from the midgut of Drosophila melanogaster: Their probable role in fluoride removal. Proc Zool Soc 73: 175-183. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12595-018-0282-y ![]() |
[19] | Goutam B, Archya S, Tathagato R, et al. (2016) Isolation and characterization of fluoride resistant bacterial strains from fluoride endemic areas of west bengal, India: Assessment of their fluoride absorption efficiency. Res Report Fluoride 49: 429-440. |
[20] |
Pal KC, Mondal NK, Chatterjee S, et al. (2014) Characterization of fluoride-tolerant halophilic Bacillus flexus NM25 (HQ875778) isolated from fluoride-affected soil in Birbhum district, West Bengal, India. Environ Monit Assess 186: 699-709. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-013-3408-8 ![]() |
[21] |
Shiva SA, Dasaiah S, Pavan KP (2020) A study on bioremediation of fluoride-contaminated water via a novel bacterium Acinetobacter sp. (GU566361) isolated from potable water. Results Chem 2: 100070. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rechem.2020.100070 ![]() |
[22] |
Ying L, Bernd WB, Jiyao Li, et al. (2017) Fluoride resistance in Streptococcus mutans: a mini review. J Oral Microbiol 9: 1344509. https://doi.org/10.1080/20002297.2017.1344509 ![]() |
[23] |
Brussock SM, Kral TA (1987) Effects of pH on expression of sodium fluoride resistance in Streptococcus mutans. J Dent Res 66: 1594-1596. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345870660101701 ![]() |
[24] |
Liao Y, Chen J, Brandt BW, et al. (2015) Identification and functional analysis of genome mutations in a fluoride-resistant Streptococcus mutans strain. Plos One 10: e0122630. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0122630 ![]() |
[25] |
Mitsuhata C, Puteri MM, Ohara Y, et al. (2014) Possible involvement of enolase in fluoride resistance in Streptococcus mutans. Pediatr Dental J 24: 12-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pdj.2013.10.002 ![]() |
[26] |
Zhang C, Zhang W, Xu J (2013) Isolation and Identification of methanethiol-utilizing bacterium CZo5 and its application in biotrickling filter of biogas. Bioresour Technol 150: 338-343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2013.10.024 ![]() |
[27] | MacFaddin JF (1980) Biochemical tests for identification of medical bacteria. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. |
[28] |
Evans JB, Kloos EW (1972) Use of shake cultures in a semisolid thioglycolate medium for differentiating staphylococci from micrococci. Appl Microbiol 23: 326-331. https://doi.org/10.1128/am.23.2.326-331.1972 ![]() |
[29] |
Johnson JS, Spakowicz DJ, Hong B (2019) Evaluation of 16S rRNA gene sequencing for species and strain-level microbiome analysis. Nat Commun 10: 5029. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-13036-1 ![]() |
[30] |
Peker N, Garcia-Croes S, Dijkhuizen B, et al. (2019) A comparison of three different bioinformatics analyses of the 16S–23S rRNA encoding region for bacterial identification. Front Microbiol 10: 620. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2019.00620 ![]() |
[31] |
Chen YL, Lee CC, Lin YL, et al. (2015) Obtaining long 16S rDNA sequences using multiple primers and its application on dioxin-containing samples. BMC Bioinform 16: S13. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-16-S18-S13 ![]() |
1. | Victor V. Ngaiza, Emmanuely Z. Nungula, Luciana R. Chappa, Riziki Mwadalu, Kesia A. Nyambele, Tanmoy Shankar, Shivani Ranjan, Sumit Sow, Shihab Uddin, Harun I. Gitari, 2025, Chapter 7, 978-3-031-77246-7, 163, 10.1007/978-3-031-77247-4_7 | |
2. | Luciana R. Chappa, Emmanuely Z. Nungula, Vedasto V. Ngaiza, Yamikani H. Makwinja, Riziki Mwadalu, Sagar Maitra, Jamal Nasar, Rogério P. Soratto, Kesia A. Nyambele, Harun I. Gitari, 2025, Chapter 10, 978-3-031-77246-7, 255, 10.1007/978-3-031-77247-4_10 | |
3. | Kovvali Sri Krishna Chaitanya, Jinka Rajeswari, D.V.V. Satyanarayana Raju, Viswanadham Allada, Fluoride Resistant Bacillus paralicheniformis (MSO5) Isolated from Halophytic Zone of Coringa Mangrove Wildlife Sanctuary, 2025, 19, 09737510, 582, 10.22207/JPAM.19.1.48 |
S. No | Carbohydrate utilization | Result |
1 | Lactose | - |
2 | Xylose | + |
3 | Maltose | + |
4 | Fructose | +++ |
5 | Dextrose | +++ |
6 | Galactose | +++ |
7 | Raffinose | + |
8 | Trehalose | +++ |
9 | Melibiose | + |
10 | Sucrose | - |
11 | L-Arabinose | - |
12 | Mannose | ++ |
13 | Inulin | ++ |
14 | Sodium gluconate | ++ |
15 | Glycerol | - |
16 | Salicin | ++ |
17 | Dulcitol | - |
18 | Inositol | ++ |
19 | Sorbitol | - |
20 | Mannitol | +++ |
21 | Adonitol | +++ |
22 | Arabitol | +++ |
23 | Erythritol | ++ |
24 | α-Methyl-D-glucoside | - |
25 | Rhamnose | ++ |
26 | Cellobiose | ++ |
27 | Melizitose | - |
28 | α-Methyl-D-Mannoside | - |
29 | Xylitol | - |
30 | ONPG | - |
31 | Esculin | + |
32 | D-Arabinose | - |
33 | Citrate | + |
34 | Malonate | - |
35 | Sorbose | - |
Note: + = positive result; ++/+++ = signs given based on the increased intensity of color formed for positive test; - = Negative result
S.No. | Antibiotic | Result |
1 | Amp10 | R |
2 | TE30 | S |
3 | AK30 | S |
4 | NA30 | R |
5 | P10 | R |
6 | E15 | R |
7 | K30 | S |
8 | VA30 | S |
9 | GEN10 | S |
10 | S10 | S |
11 | CIP5 | S |
12 | C30 | R |
Note: R = Resistant; S = Sensitive; Amp10 = Ampicillin; TE30 = Tetracycline; AK30 = Amikacin; NA30 = Nalidixic acid; P10 = Pencillin-G; E15 = Erythromycin; K30 = Kanamycin; VA30 =Vankomycin; GEN10 = Gentamicin; S10 = Streptomycin; CIP5 = Ciprofloxacin; C30 = Chloramphenicol.
S. No | Carbohydrate utilization | Result |
1 | Lactose | - |
2 | Xylose | + |
3 | Maltose | + |
4 | Fructose | +++ |
5 | Dextrose | +++ |
6 | Galactose | +++ |
7 | Raffinose | + |
8 | Trehalose | +++ |
9 | Melibiose | + |
10 | Sucrose | - |
11 | L-Arabinose | - |
12 | Mannose | ++ |
13 | Inulin | ++ |
14 | Sodium gluconate | ++ |
15 | Glycerol | - |
16 | Salicin | ++ |
17 | Dulcitol | - |
18 | Inositol | ++ |
19 | Sorbitol | - |
20 | Mannitol | +++ |
21 | Adonitol | +++ |
22 | Arabitol | +++ |
23 | Erythritol | ++ |
24 | α-Methyl-D-glucoside | - |
25 | Rhamnose | ++ |
26 | Cellobiose | ++ |
27 | Melizitose | - |
28 | α-Methyl-D-Mannoside | - |
29 | Xylitol | - |
30 | ONPG | - |
31 | Esculin | + |
32 | D-Arabinose | - |
33 | Citrate | + |
34 | Malonate | - |
35 | Sorbose | - |
S.No. | Antibiotic | Result |
1 | Amp10 | R |
2 | TE30 | S |
3 | AK30 | S |
4 | NA30 | R |
5 | P10 | R |
6 | E15 | R |
7 | K30 | S |
8 | VA30 | S |
9 | GEN10 | S |
10 | S10 | S |
11 | CIP5 | S |
12 | C30 | R |