Review

Cholera toxin phage: structural and functional diversity between Vibrio cholerae biotypes

  • Received: 05 March 2020 Accepted: 24 May 2020 Published: 28 May 2020
  • Cholera is a severe form of watery diarrhea caused by Vibrio cholerae toxigenic strains. Typically, the toxigenic variants of V. cholerae harbor a bacteriophage, cholera toxin phage, integrated in their genome. The ctxAB genes from the phage genome encode the cholera toxin, which is responsible for the major clinical symptoms of the disease. Although ctxAB genes are crucial to V. cholerae strains for cholera manifestation, the genetic structure of cholera toxin phage, DNA sequence of its genes, spatial organization in the host genome and its satellite phage content are not homogenous between V. cholerae biotypes—classical and El Tor. Differences in cholera toxin phage and its genes play a significant role in the identification of V. cholerae biotypes and in the understanding of their pathogenic and epidemic potentials. Here, we present an account of the variations of cholera toxin phage and its genes in V. cholerae biotypes as well as their usefulness in the identification of classical and El Tor strains.

    Citation: Ashrafus Safa, Jinath Sultana Jime, Farishta Shahel. Cholera toxin phage: structural and functional diversity between Vibrio cholerae biotypes[J]. AIMS Microbiology, 2020, 6(2): 144-151. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2020009

    Related Papers:

    [1] Oluwafolajimi Adesanya, Tolulope Oduselu, Oluwawapelumi Akin-Ajani, Olubusuyi M. Adewumi, Olusegun G. Ademowo . An exegesis of bacteriophage therapy: An emerging player in the fight against anti-microbial resistance. AIMS Microbiology, 2020, 6(3): 204-230. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2020014
    [2] Abdullahi Yusuf Muhammad, Malik Amonov, Chandrika Murugaiah, Atif Amin Baig, Marina Yusoff . Intestinal colonization against Vibrio cholerae: host and microbial resistance mechanisms. AIMS Microbiology, 2023, 9(2): 346-374. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2023019
    [3] Md. Aoulad Hosen, Fozol Korim Ovi, Harunur Rashid, MD. Hasibul Hasan, Md. Abdul Khalek, Mahmudul Hasan, Farhana Easmin, Nazmi Ara Rumi, Mohammad Shariful Islam . Characterization of Vibrio spp. in environmental water samples collected from flood prone areas of Bangladesh and their antibiotic resistance profile. AIMS Microbiology, 2021, 7(4): 471-480. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2021028
    [4] Mohammed M. M. Abdelrahem, Mohamed E. Abouelela, Nageh F. Abo-Dahab, Abdallah M. A. Hassane . Aspergillus-Penicillium co-culture: An investigation of bioagents for controlling Fusarium proliferatum-induced basal rot in onion. AIMS Microbiology, 2024, 10(4): 1024-1051. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2024044
    [5] Bahram Nikmanesh, Kazem Ahmadikia, Muhammad Ibrahim Getso, Sanaz Aghaei Gharehbolagh, Shima Aboutalebian, Hossein Mirhendi, Shahram Mahmoudi . Candida africana and Candida dubliniensis as causes of pediatric candiduria: A study using HWP1 gene size polymorphism. AIMS Microbiology, 2020, 6(3): 272-279. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2020017
    [6] Souliphone Sivixay, Gaowa Bai, Takeshi Tsuruta, Naoki Nishino . Cecum microbiota in rats fed soy, milk, meat, fish, and egg proteins with prebiotic oligosaccharides. AIMS Microbiology, 2021, 7(1): 1-12. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2021001
    [7] Maria Parapouli, Anastasios Vasileiadis, Amalia-Sofia Afendra, Efstathios Hatziloukas . Saccharomyces cerevisiae and its industrial applications. AIMS Microbiology, 2020, 6(1): 1-31. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2020001
    [8] Philip Serwer . Restoring logic and data to phage-cures for infectious disease. AIMS Microbiology, 2017, 3(4): 706-712. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2017.4.706
    [9] Helene Nalini Chinivasagam, Wiyada Estella, Damien Finn, David G. Mayer, Hugh Rodrigues, Ibrahim Diallo . Broiler farming practices using new or re-used bedding, inclusive of free-range, have no impact on Campylobacter levels, species diversity, Campylobacter community profiles and Campylobacter bacteriophages. AIMS Microbiology, 2024, 10(1): 12-40. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2024002
    [10] Ogueri Nwaiwu, Chiugo Claret Aduba . An in silico analysis of acquired antimicrobial resistance genes in Aeromonas plasmids. AIMS Microbiology, 2020, 6(1): 75-91. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2020005
  • Cholera is a severe form of watery diarrhea caused by Vibrio cholerae toxigenic strains. Typically, the toxigenic variants of V. cholerae harbor a bacteriophage, cholera toxin phage, integrated in their genome. The ctxAB genes from the phage genome encode the cholera toxin, which is responsible for the major clinical symptoms of the disease. Although ctxAB genes are crucial to V. cholerae strains for cholera manifestation, the genetic structure of cholera toxin phage, DNA sequence of its genes, spatial organization in the host genome and its satellite phage content are not homogenous between V. cholerae biotypes—classical and El Tor. Differences in cholera toxin phage and its genes play a significant role in the identification of V. cholerae biotypes and in the understanding of their pathogenic and epidemic potentials. Here, we present an account of the variations of cholera toxin phage and its genes in V. cholerae biotypes as well as their usefulness in the identification of classical and El Tor strains.


    Vibrio cholerae is an ancient human pathogen that causes a severe form of diarrhea known as cholera. Humans are the only medically relevant living host of V. cholerae, and its transmission is mainly mediated by the consumption of V. cholerae-contaminated water and/or food. Endemic cholera in underdeveloped and developing countries frequently gives rise to explosive outbreaks that sometimes result in pandemics. During the course of recorded human history, V. cholerae has caused seven pandemics [1],[2].

    Cholera is characterized by copious watery stools that resembles rice water and by vomiting. A filamentous bacteriophage, known as ‘Cholera Toxin Phage’ (CTXφ), integrates into the genome of V. cholerae strains and enables them to produce Cholera toxin (CT)—the key virulence factor responsible for the clinical manifestations of cholera. The CT, encoded by ctxA and ctxB genes, is an A-B type toxin comprising A and B subunits. CtxA (or CTA) comprises of two polypeptide chains, CtxA1 and CtxA2, of which A1 provides CT-mediated toxigenicity, while A2 possibly affords a linker function and appends A1 to CtxB. The CtxB (or CTB) subunit is a homopentamer and is responsible for CT binding to the ganglioside GM1 of intestinal epithelium [3]. After binding to GM1, CT is endocytosed by the cell. For cell intoxication to occur, the entry of CTA1 to the cell cytosol is the key step because CTA1 catalyzes the ADP ribosylation of the adenylate cyclase (AC) [3]. ADP-ribosylation resulted in enhanced AC activity and an increased intracellular cAMP concentration, which in turn produce an imbalance in electrolyte movement in the epithelial cell and develop cholera.

    Based on variations in the somatic O-antigen structure, until now >209 serogroups of V. cholerae have been identified. Of these, 95% or more of V. cholerae strains belonging to serogroup O1 and O139 are toxigenic i.e., they harbor CTXφ and have the ability to produce CT. Based on the biochemical and phenotypic differences among V. cholerae strains from serogroup O1, two clearly distinct biotypes (a nominate form or subspecies), ‘classical’ and ‘El Tor’, have been described. The typical responses of classical strains to conventional biochemical and phenotypic tests show a negative Voges-Proskauer (VP) reaction (acetoin production), no chicken cell (erythrocyte) agglutination (CCA), sensitivity to Polymyxin B and phage IV, and resistance to phage 5, while El Tor strains are positive for VP reaction and CCA, resistant to Polymyxin B and phage IV, but sensitive to phage 5 [1]. Notably, the sixth and presumably the fifth pandemics were caused by classical biotype. By contrast, the ongoing seventh pandemic that started in 1961 was caused by El Tor biotype of V. cholerae O1. In addition to the phenotypic differences, structure of CTXφ and its genes in classical and El Tor strains vary significantly and these differences have long been used to differentiate V. cholerae biotypes. For example, based on the differences in ctxB DNA sequences, ‘ctxB genotyping’ scheme was developed to differentiate V. cholerae biotypes [4]. Additionally, CTXφs are also known to differ in their arrangement, their choice of host chromosome type (small and/or large) for integration, and their copy number in each chromosome of the strains of the two biotypes. In this review, we summarize our knowledge of the structural and functional diversity of CTXφ and its genes in the genome of classical and El Tor strains and their applications in differentiating these two biotypes.

    CTXφ is an atypical filamentous phage that carries some of the most critical virulence genes of V. cholerae toxigenic strains [5],[6]. Toxin co-regulated pilus (TCP) is a type IV pilus that acts as the receptor for CTXφ virions and is an essential human intestinal colonization factor for V. cholerae strains [1]. Once the CTXφ is inside the host cell, it can either lysogenize V. cholerae strains by integrating into the host chromosome at the attRS attachment site or replicate episomally inside the host [7]. Integration of the phage chromosome into the host genome is mediated by phage-encoded proteins (see below) in conjunction with the V. cholerae-encoded xerC and xerD gene products [8]. The primary function of XerC and XerD recombinases is to convert chromosome dimers into monomers by catalyzing recombination between sequences, known as dif sites, near the chromosomal termini [9]. Since CTXφ is maintained as an integrated prophage, production of virions requires production of extrachromosomal phage DNA. Unlike other filamentous phages, extrachromosomal CTXφ is not simply formed by prophage excision rather it is generated by a replicative process that depends upon the presence of tandemly arranged CTXφ and RS1φ (see below) within the chromosome. The advantage of this replicative process is that CTXφ can be transmitted to a new host and simultaneously retained within the genome of its old host. CTXφ virions are then secreted by their hosts using type IV secretion system [9] and infect new strains.

    The single-stranded DNA phage genome is ∼7.0 kb long and consists of two regions: RS2 and the core domain (Figure 1A). Four of the five genes in the core domain, namely cep, gIIICTX, ace and zot, are associated with phage morphogenesis and accessory toxigenicity [10][12], whereas the function of the ctxAB genes in the phage morphogenesis is yet unknown. The 2.4-kb RS2 region comprises three genes: rstA, rstB and rstR, which encode replication, integration and regulatory functions, respectively, in the phage [7] (Figure 1A).

    Figure 1.  Typical genetic organization of the CTXφ in selected strains of V. cholerae biotypes. (A): CTXφ in the genome of 569B strain of classical biotype. (B): CTXφ in the genome of N16961 strain of El Tor biotype. The numbers in parentheses within the ctxB gene represent the amino acid substitution positions (where H, T, Y and I represent Histidine, Threonine, Tyrosine and Isoleucine, respectively). The RS1φ flanking the integrated CTXφ in El Tor are bracketed. Slash sign indicates alternate combination.

    Structurally the core region of the CTXφ is identical in both classical and El Tor strains. Although a satellite phage, named RS1 (described in section 4), may or may not situated along either side of the CTX prophage in El Tor strains (Figure 1B) but CTXφ in classical strains were never known to flank by RS1φ. Sequence composition of rstR gene of the RS2 region of CTXφ were found to be highly divergent among various V. cholerae O1 strains. DNA sequence heterogeneity of the rstR gene laid the basis for the diverse CTXφ phage types in different V. cholerae strains including the two biotypes. For example, CTXφ in classical strains that harbor the classical-specific rstR allele (rstRclassical) is designated as classical CTXφ (CTXφclassical), whereas the CTXφ in El Tor strains with the El Tor-specific rstREl Tor allele is designated as El Tor CTXφ (CTXφEl Tor) [13]. Two other CTXφ types, which are related to the rstRcalcutta and rstREnvironmental alleles, have been reported in V. cholerae O139 and environmental strains of diverse serotypes [13][16]. Interestingly, V. cholerae strains infrequently harbor multiple copies of different rstR genes, which indicate the presence of multiple copies of CTXφ or RS1 satellite (described in section 3) phages in the host genome [15],[17]. Apart from rstR gene, sequence composition of the ctxB gene varies significantly between V. cholerae biotypes (described in section 5).

    Functional studies have revealed that repression of the rstA gene by the rstR allele is biotype-specific, which indicated that sequence diversity in the rstR gene provides the molecular basis for heteroimmunity, by which V. cholerae strains are immune to secondary infection by an identical CTXφ type [18]. The rstR-mediated biotype-specific heteroimmunity has been shown to protect El Tor strains harboring CTXφEl Tor from further infection by the same strain, but not from infection with CTXφclassical [18]. Heteroimmunity cannot be demonstrated in classical strains, since they do not produce virions, whereas El Tor strains are capable of generating both replicative and infectious phage particles, which is another factor used in discriminating classical and El Tor variants. However, exogenous replicative forms of CTXφclassical have been rarely observed in classical strains that were presumed to be defective in phage replication [19],[20].

    The spatial organization of CTXφ in the V. cholerae genome varies between the biotypes, with one or more copies of CTXφ integrating into a susceptible V. cholerae strain. It is known that El Tor strains normally harbor one or more CTXφ copies exclusively in the large chromosome; if two copies are present then they are arranged in tandem. In classical strains, one or both chromosomes can harbor CTXφ, which are usually dispersed [21],[22]. The molecular basis for CTXφ virion production in V. cholerae strains has been shown to rely on both the total CTXφ content and their spatial arrangement in the V. cholerae genome. In El Tor strains, the presence of multiple CTXφ copies in tandem (CTXφ-CTXφ) or a single CTXφ copy linked to RS1Ø (CTXφ-RS1φ) (Figure 1B) in V. cholerae genome was found to activate CTXφ replication to generate infectious virions. However, this pattern of CTXφ organization has never been reported in classical strains and therefore, classical strains were claimed to possess dysfunctional CTXφ with the inability to produce infectious virions [19]. Notably, a group of El Tor strains isolated just before the O139 outbreak in India in 1992 [23] and another group of El Tor-like strains from Mozambique were reported to harbor tandem arrays of CTXφclassical exclusively in the small chromosome [20],[24], and yet these strains do not produce infectious CTXφ virions [20].

    RS1 element is in fact the genome of a satellite phage (phages that do not encode their own structural components but rely on the bacterial host and another helper prophage for replication survival) that utilizes CTXφ morphogenesis genes to produce RS1φ particles [25]. However, CTXφ-independent mechanism of RS1φ has been reported in a nontoxigenic environmental V. cholerae strain [26]. CTXφ prophages in V. cholerae strains are usually flanked on either side by the RS1φ (Figure 1B). RS1 is very similar to the RS2 gene cluster, except that it contains an additional gene, rstC. RstC is an antirepressor that controls CTXφ lysogeny, production of CTXφ particles, and expression of cholera toxin [27]. RS1φ is biotype-specific and it is present in most, if not all, El Tor biotype strains examined to date [28] whereas no strains of classical biotype are known to harbor RS1φ. In El Tor strains, RS1 influences the phage virion production in two ways: one is creating an array of repeat sequences by flanking the CTXφ genome (see section 3) and another is upregulating CTXφ production by using RstC to inactivate the RstR that downregulate the CTXφ production [27].

    Heterogeneity in ctxB gene sequence and variation in the immunological properties of CTB (encoded by ctxB) have long been utilized to differentiate V. cholerae variants. Based on epitope analysis of CTB, two immunologically related but not identical epitypes have been described. Epitype CT1 is elaborated by classical biotype strains and the US Gulf Coast El Tor strains, while CT2 is produced by the El Tor biotype and O139 strains [29]. Aside from epitope mapping, Olsvik et al. [4] in 1996, based on point mutations in ctxB, identified three ctxB genotypes by using automated DNA sequencing. These ctxB genotypes are known as genotype 1 (ctxB1), genotype 2 (ctxB2) and genotype 3 (ctxB3). In all these genotypes, three point mutations at positons 115 (C or T), 138 (T or G) and 203 (C or T) in ctxB gene [6] resulted in the deduced amino acid substitutions at positions 39 (histidine or tyrosine), 46 (phenylalanine or leucine) and 68 (threonine or isoleucine) in CTB subunit (Figure 2). Based on the ctxB genotyping method, the classical biotype and US Gulf Coast El Tor indigenous strains have been classified as genotype 1, the Australian indigenous V. cholerae El Tor strains as genotype 2, and the current seventh pandemic El Tor strains and the Latin American epidemic strains as genotype 3 [4]. Thus, in effect, V. cholerae classical strains of epitype 1/genotype 1 produce classical CT (CTclassical), while the El Tor biotype strains of epitype 2/genotype 3 produce El Tor CT (CTEl Tor). However, current investigation has revealed that additional ctxB alleles exist among V. cholerae strains and until now, nine ctxB genotypes have been recognized [28]. Notably, differences in the functional aspects of these ctxB alleles are yet to be revealed.

    Figure 2.  Alignment of deduced amino acid sequences of CtxB subunit found in V. cholerae biotypes. H, F, T, Y, L and I at positions, 39, 46 and 68 stand for amino acids Histidine, Phenylalanine, Threonine, Tyrosine, Leucine and Isoleucine, respectively.

    The evolution of pathogenic variants seems to be a natural phenomenon that occurs in microbes and other forms of life in response to an ever-changing environment, and V. cholerae is no exception. The significance of CTXφ and its genes in the evolution of pathogenic form of V. cholerae is immense and indisputable. Therefore, continuous monitoring of the changes in the CTX prophage genome among V. cholerae variants including classical and El Tor strains could be one of the most effective ways to track the emergence of new CTXφ variants, therefor the V. cholerae strains. Furthermore, early detection of the emerging variants would facilitate formulating better control measures including vaccine development.


    Abbreviation CTXφ: Cholera Toxin Phage; CT: Cholera toxin; : Classical-specific ; : El Tor-specific ; CTXφ: Classical CTXφ; CTXφ: El Tor CTXφ; CT: Classical CT; CT: El Tor CT; RS1φ: Repeat Sequence Phage 1;
    Acknowledgments



    The authors would like to thank Dr. GB Nair and Dr. Richard YC Kong for their valuable assistance on the manuscript preparation.

    Conflict of interest



    The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.

    [1] Kaper JB, Morris JG, Levine MM (1995) Cholera. Clin Microbiol Rev 8: 48-86. doi: 10.1128/CMR.8.1.48
    [2] Albert M, Ansaruzzaman M, Bardhan P, et al. (1993) Large epidemic of cholera-like disease in Bangladesh caused by Vibrio cholerae 0139 synonym Bengal. The Lancet 342: 387-390. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(93)91906-3
    [3] Sánchez J, Holmgren J (2008) Cholera toxin structure, gene regulation and pathophysiological and immunological aspects. Cell Mol Life Sci 65: 1347-1360. doi: 10.1007/s00018-008-7496-5
    [4] Olsvik Ø, Wahlberg J, Petterson B, et al. (1993) Use of automated sequencing of polymerase chain reaction-generated amplicons to identify three types of cholera toxin subunit B in Vibrio cholerae O1 strains. J Clin Microbiol 31: 22-25. doi: 10.1128/JCM.31.1.22-25.1993
    [5] Mekalanos JJ (1985) Cholera toxin: genetic analysis, regulation and role in pathogenesis. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol 118: 97-118.
    [6] Waldor MK, Mekalanos JJ (1996) Lysogenic conversion by a filamentous bacteriophage encoding cholera toxin. Science 272: 1910-1914. doi: 10.1126/science.272.5270.1910
    [7] Waldor MK, Rubin EJ, Pearson GDN, et al. (1997) Regulation, replication, and integration functions of the Vibrio cholerae CTXφ are encoded by regions RS2. Mol Microbiol 24: 917-926. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.1997.3911758.x
    [8] Huber KE, Waldor MK (2002) Filamentous phage integration requires the host recombinases XerC and XerD. Nature 417: 656-659. doi: 10.1038/nature00782
    [9] Davis BM, Waldor MK (2003) Filamentous phages linked to virulence of Vibrio choleraeCurr Opin Microbiol 6: 35-42. doi: 10.1016/S1369-5274(02)00005-X
    [10] Trucksis M, Galen JE, Michalski J, et al. (1993) Accessory cholera enterotoxin (Ace), the third toxin of a Vibrio cholerae virulence cassette. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 90: 5267-5271. doi: 10.1073/pnas.90.11.5267
    [11] Faruque SM, Albert MJ, Mekalanos JJ, et al. (1998) Epidemiology, genetics, and ecology of toxigenic Vibrio choleraeMicrobiol Mol Biol Rev 62: 1301-1314. doi: 10.1128/MMBR.62.4.1301-1314.1998
    [12] Heilpern AJ, Waldor MK (2003) pIIICTX, a predicted CTXφ minor coat protein, can expand the host range of coliphage fd to include Vibrio choleraeJ Bacteriol 185: 1037-1044. doi: 10.1128/JB.185.3.1037-1044.2003
    [13] Kimsey HH, Nair GB, Ghosh A, et al. (1998) Diverse CTXφ and evolution of new pathogenic Vibrio choleraeLancet 352: 457-458. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)79193-5
    [14] Davis BM, Kimsey HH, Kimsey WC, et al. (1999) The Vibrio cholerae O139 Calcutta bacteriophage CTXφ is infectious and encodes a novel repressor. J Bacteriol 181: 6779-6787. doi: 10.1128/JB.181.21.6779-6787.1999
    [15] Mukhopadhyay AK, Chakaraborty S, Takeda Y, et al. (2001) Characterization of VPI pathogenicity island and CTXφ prophage in environmental strains of Vibrio choleraeJ Bacteriol 183: 4737-474. doi: 10.1128/JB.183.16.4737-4746.2001
    [16] Bhattacharya T, Chatterjee S, Maiti D, et al. (2006) Molecular analysis of the rstR and orfU genes of the CTX prophages integrated in the small chromosomes of environmental Vibrio cholerae non-O1, non-O139 strains. Environ Microbiol 8: 526-534. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2005.00932.x
    [17] Nusrin S, Khan GY, Bhuiyan NA, et al. (2004) Diverse CTX phages among toxigenic Vibrio cholerae O1 and O139 strains isolated between 1994 and 2002 in an area where cholera is endemic in Bangladesh. J Clin Microbiol 42: 5854-5856. doi: 10.1128/JCM.42.12.5854-5856.2004
    [18] Kimsey H, Waldor MK (1998) CTXφ immunity: application in the development of cholera vaccines. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95: 7035-7039. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.12.7035
    [19] Davis MB, Moyer KE, Boyd EF, et al. (2000) CTX prophages in classical biotype Vibrio cholerae: functional phage genes but dysfunctional phage genomes. J Bacteriol 182: 6992-6998. doi: 10.1128/JB.182.24.6992-6998.2000
    [20] Faruque SM, Tam VC, Chowdhury N, et al. (2007) Genomic analysis of the Mozambique strain of Vibrio cholerae O1 reveals the origin of El Tor strains carrying classical CTX prophage. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104: 5151-5156. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0700365104
    [21] Mekalanos JJ (1983) Duplication and amplification of toxin genes in Vibrio choleraeCell 35: 253-263. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(83)90228-3
    [22] Trucksis M, Michalsky J, Deng YK, et al. (1998) The Vibrio cholerae genome contains two unique circular chromosomes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95: 14464-14469. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.24.14464
    [23] Nandi S, Maiti D, Saha A, et al. (2003) Genesis of variants of Vibrio cholerae O1 biotype El Tor: role of the CTXφ array and its position in the genome. Microbiology 149: 89-97. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.25599-0
    [24] Lee JH, Han KH, Choi SY, et al. (2006) Multilocus sequence typing (MLST) analysis of Vibrio cholerae O1 El Tor isolates from Mozambique that harbour the classical CTX prophage. J Med Microbiol 55: 165-170. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.46287-0
    [25] Faruque SM, Asadulghani, Kamruzzaman M, et al. (2002) RS1 element of Vibrio cholerae can propagate horizontally as a filamentous phage exploiting the morphogenesis genes of CTXphi. Infect Immun 70: 163-170. doi: 10.1128/IAI.70.1.163-170.2002
    [26] Faruque SM, Kamruzzaman M, Asadulghan, et al. (2003) CTXφ-independent production of the RS1 satellite phage by Vibrio cholerae. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100: 1280-1285. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0237385100
    [27] Davis BM, Kimsey HH, Kane AV, et al. (2002) A satellite phage-encoded antirepressor induces repressor aggregation and cholera toxin gene transfer. EMBO J 21: 4240-4249. doi: 10.1093/emboj/cdf427
    [28] Safa A, Nair GB, Kong RYC (2010) Evolution of new variants of Vibrio cholerae O1. Trends Microbiol 18: 46-54. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2009.10.003
    [29] Finkelstein RA, Burks F, Zupan A, et al. (1987) Epitopes of the cholera family of enterotoxins. Rev Infect Dis 9: 544-561. doi: 10.1093/clinids/9.3.544
  • This article has been cited by:

    1. Lekshmi Narendrakumar, Vishnu S. Jaikumar, Sivakumar K. Chandrika, Sabu Thomas, Epidemiological and pathogenic characteristics of Haitian variant V. cholerae circulating in India over a decade (2000–2018), 2020, 149, 08824010, 104538, 10.1016/j.micpath.2020.104538
    2. Roberto C. Molina-Quiroz, Andrew Camilli, Cecilia A. Silva-Valenzuela, 2023, Chapter 8, 978-3-031-22996-1, 149, 10.1007/978-3-031-22997-8_8
    3. Roberto C Molina-Quiroz, Cecilia A Silva-Valenzuela, Interactions of Vibrio phages and their hosts in aquatic environments, 2023, 74, 13695274, 102308, 10.1016/j.mib.2023.102308
    4. Michael J. Iadarola, Matthew R. Sapio, Robert M. Caudle, David J. FitzGerald, Andrew J. Mannes, 2023, Chapter 18, 978-3-031-39557-4, 425, 10.1007/978-3-031-39558-1_18
    5. Narjes Noori Goodarzi, Farzad Badmasti, Fatemeh Haririzadeh Jouriani, Sepideh Fereshteh, High-throughput genomic and proteomic interpretation of gene duplication in Vibrio cholera genomes: An in silico study, 2023, 39, 23529148, 101262, 10.1016/j.imu.2023.101262
    6. Anusree Sajeevan, Thandavarayan Ramamurthy, Adline Princy Solomon, Vibrio cholerae virulence and its suppression through the quorum-sensing system , 2024, 1040-841X, 1, 10.1080/1040841X.2024.2320823
    7. Elham Ghafouri, Mahmood Fadaie, Zohre Amirkhani, Mahsa Esmaeilifallah, Ilnaz Rahimmanesh, Nafiseh Hosseini, Hossein Hejazi, Hossein Khanahmad, Evaluation of humoral and cellular immune responses against Vibrio cholerae using oral immunization by multi-epitope-phage-based vaccine, 2024, 134, 15675769, 112160, 10.1016/j.intimp.2024.112160
    8. Ibrahim S I Al-Adham, Nisrein Jaber, Ahmed S A Ali Agha, Mayyas Al-Remawi, Faisal Al-Akayleh, Najah Al-Muhtaseb, Phillip J Collier, Sporadic regional re-emergent cholera: a 19th century problem in the 21st century, 2024, 135, 1365-2672, 10.1093/jambio/lxae055
    9. Marta A. Lages, Ana do Vale, Manuel L. Lemos, Miguel Balado, Sarah E. F. D'Orazio, Remodulation of bacterial transcriptome after acquisition of foreign DNA: the case of irp -HPI high-pathogenicity island in Vibrio anguillarum , 2024, 9, 2379-5042, 10.1128/msphere.00596-23
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2020 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(5618) PDF downloads(421) Cited by(9)

Figures and Tables

Figures(2)

Other Articles By Authors

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog