Research article Special Issues

An active learning Gaussian modeling based multi-objective evolutionary algorithm using population guided weight vector evolution strategy


  • Received: 24 June 2023 Revised: 19 October 2023 Accepted: 24 October 2023 Published: 31 October 2023
  • The inverse model based multi-objective evolutionary algorithm (IM-MOEA) generates offspring by establishing probabilistic models and sampling by the model, which is a new computing schema to replace crossover in MOEAs. In this paper, an active learning Gaussian modeling based multi-objective evolutionary algorithm using population guided weight vector evolution strategy (ALGM-MOEA) is proposed. To properly cope with multi-objective problems with different shapes of Pareto front (PF), a novel population guided weight vector evolution strategy is proposed to dynamically adjust search directions according to the distribution of generated PF. Moreover, in order to enhance the search efficiency and prediction accuracy, an active learning based training sample selection method is designed to build Gaussian process based inverse models, which chooses individuals with the maximum amount of information to effectively enhance the prediction accuracy of the inverse model. The experimental results demonstrate the competitiveness of the proposed ALGM-MOEA on benchmark problems with various shapes of Pareto front.

    Citation: Xiaofang Guo, Yuping Wang, Haonan Zhang. An active learning Gaussian modeling based multi-objective evolutionary algorithm using population guided weight vector evolution strategy[J]. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2023, 20(11): 19839-19857. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2023878

    Related Papers:

  • The inverse model based multi-objective evolutionary algorithm (IM-MOEA) generates offspring by establishing probabilistic models and sampling by the model, which is a new computing schema to replace crossover in MOEAs. In this paper, an active learning Gaussian modeling based multi-objective evolutionary algorithm using population guided weight vector evolution strategy (ALGM-MOEA) is proposed. To properly cope with multi-objective problems with different shapes of Pareto front (PF), a novel population guided weight vector evolution strategy is proposed to dynamically adjust search directions according to the distribution of generated PF. Moreover, in order to enhance the search efficiency and prediction accuracy, an active learning based training sample selection method is designed to build Gaussian process based inverse models, which chooses individuals with the maximum amount of information to effectively enhance the prediction accuracy of the inverse model. The experimental results demonstrate the competitiveness of the proposed ALGM-MOEA on benchmark problems with various shapes of Pareto front.



    加载中


    [1] Y. Xue, Y. Tang, X. Xu, J. Liang, F. Neri, Multi-objective feature selection with missing data in classification, IEEE Trans. Emerging Top. Comput. Intell., 6 (2021), 355–364. https://doi.org/10.1109/TETCI.2021.3074147 doi: 10.1109/TETCI.2021.3074147
    [2] Y. Xue, B. Xue, M. Zhang, Self-adaptive particle swarm optimization for large-scale feature selection in classification, ACM Trans. Knowl. Discovery Data, 13 (2019), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1145/3340848 doi: 10.1145/3340848
    [3] Y. Xue, X. Cai, F. Neri, A multi-objective evolutionary algorithm with interval based initialization and self-adaptive crossover operator for large-scale feature selection in classification, Appl. Soft Comput., 127 (2022), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2022.109420 doi: 10.1016/j.asoc.2022.109420
    [4] Y. Hu, Y. Zhang, D. Gong, Multiobjective particle swarm optimization for feature selection with fuzzy cost, IEEE Trans. Cybern., 51 (2020), 874–888. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCYB.2020.3015756 doi: 10.1109/TCYB.2020.3015756
    [5] W. Liu, A. Li, C. Liu, Multi-objective optimization control for tunnel boring machine performance improvement under uncertainty, Autom. Constr., 139 (2022), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2022.104310 doi: 10.1016/j.autcon.2022.104310
    [6] S. Luo, X. Guo, Multi-objective optimization of multi-microgrid power dispatch under uncertainties using interval optimization, J. Ind. Manage. Optim., 19 (2023), 823–851. https://doi.org/10.3934/jimo.2021208 doi: 10.3934/jimo.2021208
    [7] R. Tanabe, H. Ishibuchi, A framework to handle multimodal multi-objective optimization in decomposition-based evolutionary algorithms, IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput., 24 (2020), 720–734. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEVC.2019.2949841 doi: 10.1109/TEVC.2019.2949841
    [8] M. Q. Li, X. Yao, What weights work for you? Adapting weights for any Pareto front shape in decomposition-based evolutionary multi-objective optimization, Evol. Comput., 28 (2020), 227–253. https://doi.org/10.1162/EVCO_A_00269 doi: 10.1162/EVCO_A_00269
    [9] T. Zhang, F. Li, X. Zhao, W. Qi, T. Liu, A convolutional neural network-based surrogate model for multi-objective optimization evolutionary algorithm based on decomposition, Swarm Evol. Comput., 72 (2022), 101081. https://10.1016/j.swevo.2022.101081 doi: 10.1016/j.swevo.2022.101081
    [10] J. Shen, P. Wang, H. Dong, J. Li, W. Wang, A multistage evolutionary algorithm for many-objective optimization, Inf. Sci., 589 (2022), 531–549. http://10.1016/j.ins.2021.12.096 doi: 10.1016/j.ins.2021.12.096
    [11] Y. Liu, Y. Hu, N. Zhu, K. Li, M. Li, A decomposition-based multi-objective evolutionary algorithm with weights updated adaptively, Inf. Sci., 572 (2021), 343–377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2021.03.067 doi: 10.1016/j.ins.2021.03.067
    [12] P. Serafini, Simulated annealing for multi objective optimization problems, Multiple Criteria Decision Making, (1994), 283–292. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-2666-6_29 doi: 10.1007/978-1-4612-2666-6_29
    [13] Y. Jin, T. Okabe, B. Sendhoff, Dynamic weighted aggregation of evolutionary multi-objective optimization: why does it work and how?, in Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference, (2001), 1042–1049.
    [14] F. Q. Gu, H. L. Liu, A novel weight design in multi-objective evolutionary algorithm, in 2010 International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Security, (2010), 137–141. https://doi.org/10.1109/CIS.2010.37
    [15] F. Gu, Y. M. Cheung, Self-organizing map-based weight design for decomposition-based many-objective evolutionary algorithm, IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput., 22 (2017), 211–225. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEVC.2017.2695579 doi: 10.1109/TEVC.2017.2695579
    [16] R. Wang, R. C. Purshouse, P. J. Fleming, Preference-inspired co-evolutionary algorithms using weight vectors, Eur. J. Oper. Res., 243 (2015), 423–441. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2014.05.019 doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2014.05.019
    [17] X. Yi, Y. Zhou, M. Li, Z. Chen, A vector angle-based evolutionary algorithm for unconstrained many-objective optimization, IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput., 21 (2017), 131–152. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEVC.2016.2587808 doi: 10.1109/TEVC.2016.2587808
    [18] H. Ge, M. Zhao, L. Sun, Z. Wang, G. Tan, Q. Zhang, et al., A many-objective evolutionary algorithm with two interacting processes: Cascade clustering and reference point incremental learning, IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput., 23 (2019), 572–586. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEVC.2018.2874465 doi: 10.1109/TEVC.2018.2874465
    [19] T. Liu, X. Li, L. Tan, S. Song, An incremental-learning model-based multi-objective estimation of distribution algorithm, Inf. Sci., 569 (2021), 430–449. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2021.04.011 doi: 10.1016/j.ins.2021.04.011
    [20] M. Wu, K. Li, S. Kwong, Q. Zhang, J. Zhang, Learning to decompose: a paradigm for decomposition-based multiobjective optimization, IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput., 23 (2019), 376–390. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEVC.2018.2865931 doi: 10.1109/TEVC.2018.2865931
    [21] T. Liu, X. Li, L. Tan, S. Song, A novel adaptive greedy strategy based on Gaussian mixture clustering for multiobjective optimization, Swarm Evol. Comput., 61 (2021), 1–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.swevo.2020.100815 doi: 10.1016/j.swevo.2020.100815
    [22] M. Laumanns, J. Ocenasek, Bayesian optimization algorithms for multi-objective optimization, in Proceedings of the 7th International Conference Parallel Problem Solving from Nature, (2002), 298–307. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45712-7_29
    [23] H. Karshenas, R. Santana, C. Bielza, P. Larranaga, Multiobjective estimation of distribution algorithm based on joint modeling of objectives and variables, IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput., 18 (2014), 519–542. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEVC.2013.2281524 doi: 10.1109/TEVC.2013.2281524
    [24] Q. Zhang, A. Zhou, Y. Jin, RM-MEDA: A regularity model-based multiobjective estimation of distribution algorithm, IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput., 12 (2008), 41–63. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEVC.2007.894202 doi: 10.1109/TEVC.2007.894202
    [25] R. Cheng, Y. Jin, K. Narukawa, B. Sendhoff, A multiobjective evolutionary algorithm using Gaussian process-based inverse modeling, IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput., 19 (2015), 838–856. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEVC.2015.2395073 doi: 10.1109/TEVC.2015.2395073
    [26] L. R. Farias, A. F. Araújo, IM-MOEA/D: an inverse modeling multi-objective evolutionary algorithm based on decomposition, in 2021 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC), IEEE, (2021), 462–467.
    [27] J. Shen, H. Dong, P. Wang, J. Li, W. Wang, An inverse model-guided two-stage evolutionary algorithm for multi-objective optimization, Expert Syst. Appl., 225 (2023), 120198. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2023.120198 doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2023.120198
    [28] Z. Zhang, S. Liu, W. Gao, J. Xu, S. Zhu, An enhanced multi-objective evolutionary optimization algorithm with inverse model, Inf. Sci., 530 (2020), 128–147. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2020.03.111 doi: 10.1016/j.ins.2020.03.111
    [29] X. Guo, A multi-objective decomposition based evolutionary algorithm using adaptive search, in 17th International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Security, 2021.
    [30] R. Cheng, Y. Jin, M. Olhofer, B. Sendhoff, A reference vector guided evolutionary algorithm for many-objective optimization, IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput., 20 (2016), 773–791. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEVC.2016.2519378 doi: 10.1109/TEVC.2016.2519378
    [31] Q. Zhang, H. Li, MOEA/D: A multi-objective evolutionary algorithm based on decomposition, IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput., 11 (2007), 712–731. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICALT.2005.160 doi: 10.1109/ICALT.2005.160
    [32] M. Elarbi, S. Bechikh, A. Gupta, L. B. Said, Y. S. Ong, A new decomposition-based NSGA-Ⅱ for many-objective optimization, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern.: Syst., 48 (2018), 1191–1210. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMC.2017.2654301 doi: 10.1109/TSMC.2017.2654301
    [33] J. Yuan, H. Liu, F. Gu, Q. Zhang, Z. He, Investigating the properties of indicators and an evolutionary many-objective algorithm based on a promising region, IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput., 25 (2020), 75–86. http://doi.org/10.1109/TEVC.2020.2999100 doi: 10.1109/TEVC.2020.2999100
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2023 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(863) PDF downloads(46) Cited by(0)

Article outline

Figures and Tables

Figures(6)  /  Tables(6)

Other Articles By Authors

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog